For More Tools and Resources Check out Campaign Trail Yard Signs
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Nonprofit Security Grant Program Threat Incident Report
Nonprofit Security Grant Program Threat Incident Report: January 2019 to Present November 15, 2020 (Updated 02/22/2021) Prepared By: Rob Goldberg, Senior Director, Legislative Affairs [email protected] The following is a compilation of recent threat incidents, at home or abroad, targeting Jews and Jewish institutions (and other faith-based organization) that have been reported in the public record. When completing the Threat section of the IJ (Part III. Risk): ▪ First Choice: Describe specific terror (or violent homegrown extremist) incidents, threats, hate crimes, and/or related vandalism, trespass, intimidation, or destruction of property that have targeted its property, membership, or personnel. This may also include a specific event or circumstance that impacted an affiliate or member of the organization’s system or network. ▪ Second Choice: Report on known incidents/threats that have occurred in the community and/or State where the organization is located. ▪ Third Choice: Reference the public record regarding incidents/threats against similar or like institutions at home or abroad. Since there is limited working space in the IJ, the sub-applicant should be selective in choosing appropriate examples to incorporate into the response: events that are most recent, geographically proximate, and closely related to their type or circumstance of their organization or are of such magnitude or breadth that they create a significant existential threat to the Jewish community at large. I. Overview of Recent Federal Risk Assessments of National Significance Summary The following assessments underscore the persistent threat of lethal violence and hate crimes against the Jewish community and other faith- and community-based institutions in the United States. -
German Hegemony and the Socialist International's Place in Interwar
02_EHQ 31/1 articles 30/11/00 1:53 pm Page 101 William Lee Blackwood German Hegemony and the Socialist International’s Place in Interwar European Diplomacy When the guns fell silent on the western front in November 1918, socialism was about to become a governing force throughout Europe. Just six months later, a Czech socialist could marvel at the convocation of an international socialist conference on post- war reconstruction in a Swiss spa, where, across the lake, stood buildings occupied by now-exiled members of the deposed Habsburg ruling class. In May 1923, as Europe’s socialist parties met in Hamburg, Germany, finally to put an end to the war-induced fracturing within their ranks by launching a new organization, the Labour and Socialist International (LSI), the German Communist Party’s main daily published a pull-out flier for posting on factory walls. Bearing the sarcastic title the International of Ministers, it presented to workers a list of forty-one socialists and the national offices held by them in Germany, Austria, Czechoslovakia, Belgium, Poland, France, Sweden, and Denmark. Commenting on the activities of the LSI, in Paris a Russian Menshevik émigré turned prominent left-wing pundit scoffed at the new International’s executive body, which he sarcastically dubbed ‘the International Socialist Cabinet’, since ‘all of its members were ministers, ex-ministers, or prospec- tive ministers of State’.1 Whether one accepted or rejected its new status, socialism’s virtually overnight transformation from an outsider to a consummate insider at the end of Europe’s first total war provided the most striking measure of the quantum leap into what can aptly be described as Europe’s ‘social democratic moment’.2 Moreover, unlike the period after Europe’s second total war, when many of socialism’s basic postulates became permanently embedded in the post-1945 social-welfare-state con- European History Quarterly Copyright © 2001 SAGE Publications, London, Thousand Oaks, CA and New Delhi, Vol. -
Free Speech Yearbook: 1972. INSTITUTION Speech Communication Association,New York, N.Y
DOCUMENT RESUME ED 071 122 CS 500 097 ADTHOR Tedford, Thomas L., Ed. TITLE Free Speech Yearbook: 1972. INSTITUTION Speech Communication Association,New York, N.Y. PUB DATE 73 NOTE 142p. AVAILABLE FROMSpeech Communication Association,Statler Hilton Hotel, New York, N.Y. 10001 ($2.50) ERRS PRICE MF-$0.65 HC-$6.58 DESCRIPTORS Bibliographies; Censorship; *CivilLiberties; Court Doctrine; *Freedom of Speech; GreekCivilization; *Social Attitudes; Student Opinion;Supreme Court Litigation ABSTRACT This book is a collection ofessays on free speech. issues and attitudes, compiled bythe Commission on Freedom of Speech of the Speech CommunicationAssociation. Four articles focuson freedom of speech in classroomsituations as follows:a philosophic view of teaching free speech, effectsof a course on free speechon student attitudes, historicalessentials of teaching free speech,and two opposing views on teacher attitudeson free speech in the communications classroom. Subjects ofother essays are: the judicial process in relation to freedom of speech;freedom of speech in ancient Athens; a case in which theAmerican Civil Liberties Union sought limitations on freedom ofspeech; the opposing philosophiesof Thomas Hobbes and John Stuart Mill;the rhetoric of intimidationin Indiana during.World War I; andSupreme Court decisions relating to the First Amendment during its1971-1972 term. The book ends withan extensive bibliography of articles,books, and court decisions relating to freedom of speechand published between July 1971and June 1972. (RN) rJ;freeperil ljearbook:1972 ,c.! a publication of The Commissionon Freedom of Speech of the Speech CommunicationAssociation U S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH. EDUCATION & WELFARE OFFICE OF EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRO. DUCED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM THE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIG. -
Firing Lines April/May 2014 Fighting for Your Second Amendment Rights Since 1965
SCOPE, inc. Volume XXIII, Issue III Firing Lines April/May 2014 Fighting for your Second Amendment Rights since 1965 INSIDE THIS ISSUE: SCOPE is growing SCOPE Chapter and BoD Information 2 ————————————————————————— Operation P.A.C. 3 to Meet the Challenges ————————————————————————— SAFE Axt charges 3 ————————————————————————— You don’t get fat 4 ————————————————————————— By Stephen Aldstadt full fledged chapter status, and we have NY Senator Maziarz 5 ————————————————————————— added new committees in Steuben and Project Appleseed 6 SCOPE's mission to protect and ————————–————————————————- Schuyler Counties. We expect by the time of Check your address label 7 preserve the right to keep and bear arms here this printing we will have graduated the ————————————————————————— SCOPE voter app 7 in New York is vital to preserving all of our Chautauqua County committee to a full ————————————————————————— civil rights. Once the Second Amendment is Rat Tat Tat Cartoon 7 fledged chapter and we will have an operat- ————————–————————————————- gone the rest will surely follow. With the ing committee in Chemung County. SCOPE member clubs 8 ————————–————————————————- passage of the NY SAFE Act, New York's We have a larger job than we have Legal defense fund 9 ————————–————————————————- ranking in the Freedom Index went from ever been burdened with before. We will SCOPE member clubs 8 ————————————————————————— dead last to dead last and not even close. need to continue our growth in membership Legal defense fund 9 It is imperative that we work to push ————————————————————————— to meet the challenge. We will need to under- DEC meeting 10 back this law. It will not be easy. It will not take a massive voter registration drive to ———————————————————————--—- Cartoon 12 happen quickly. -
Successful Citizens' Initiatives
Successful Citizens’ Initiatives A Guide to Winning Local Land-Use Ballot Measure Campaigns 2002 Edition 631 Howard St., Ste. 510, San Francisco, CA 94105 www.greenbelt.org Table of Contents Executive Summary………………………………………………………………4 Introduction ..................................................................................................... 7 Getting Started Deciding to Pursue a Ballot Strategy ....................................................... 7 First Steps................................................................................................. 9 Establishing Timelines ............................................................................. 9 Community Outreach & Building the Leadership Group ...................... 11 Steering Committee................................................................... 11 Coalition.................................................................................... 12 Campaign Structure................................................................................ 12 Campaign Manager ................................................................... 12 Treasurer ................................................................................... 12 Fundraising Chair...................................................................... 13 Outreach Coordinator................................................................ 13 Spokesperson............................................................................. 13 Other Roles............................................................................... -
Model Sign Ordinance a Comprehensive, Content-Neutral Approach to Local Sign Control
Prepared by the Montgomery County Planning Commission A comprehensive, content-neutral approach to local sign control NewModel town Sign mixed Ordinance use district Montgomery County Commissioners Josh Shapiro, Chair Leslie S. Richards, Vice Chair Bruce L. Castor, Jr. MMontgomeryontgomery County Planning Commission Board Marc D. Jonas, Esq., Chair Dulcie F. Flaharty, Vice Chair Robert E. Blue, Jr. Jill Blumhardt Scott Exley Roy Rodriguez, Jr. Charles J. Tornetta Pastor John West Rachel Yoka Jody L. Holton, AICP, Executive Director Model Sign Ordinance A comprehensive, content-neutral approach to local sign control Prepared by the Montgomery County Planning Commission 2014 introduction ii model sign ordinance Table of Contents Introduction ........................................................................................................................................ vii Hot Topics in Signage Reference Guide ................................................................................ix Part 1: Purpose of Signs ............................................................................................................. 1 Part 2: Community Impact of Signs Safety Issues .......................................................................................................................... 9 Public Welfare and Aesthetics Issues .................................................................................. 10 Environmental Issues .......................................................................................................... -
Volume XXIX No. 1 October 2016 Our Thanks to Edward Price, NYSRSAS Educafion Chair
Volume XXIX No. 1 October 2016 NYSRSAS PROCESS FOR ENDORSEMENT: 2016 With the election only a few weeks away, most people are focused on the presidential campaigns. Nev- ertheless, there are important contests for the US Senate and House of Representatives and New York State Sen- ate and Assembly. While the outcome of the presidential race is certainly critical, our state and national legisla- tors will be required to make decisions that impact the future for us and our children. Members of the NYSRSAS Executive Board realize that we all vote based upon a variety of factors. How- ever, there are a number of key issues involving retired people and public education that we believe should be considered in making a final decision. Therefore we decided it would be worthwhile to contact candidates for both federal and state positions to obtain their views on the following questions. We know that not all of our members vote in New York State. Since it was not feasible to contact candidates elsewhere, we encourage those who vote in other areas to consider these same issues when deciding their votes this November. Questions to candidates for President, US Senator, and US House of Representatives: Do you support the continuation of Medicare in its present form? If not, what would you change? Increase benefits. Shift costs to people with higher incomes through increased premiums and co-pays. Substitute with a voucher plan. Other. Do you support allowing the federal government to negotiate Medicare prescription drug prices? Do you support continuation of Social Security in its present form? If not, what would you change? Privatization. -
SIGN LAW 101 from the Foundations to the Frontier Copyright 2007, 2008, 2009 Randal R
SIGN LAW 101 From the Foundations to the Frontier copyright 2007, 2008, 2009 Randal R. Morrison A Special Presentation to the League of California Cities September 18, 2009, San Jose CA NEWSLETTER: SIGN REGULATION BULLETIN Quick-read summaries of recent court rulings on sign regulation free – distributed only by email; register at: www.signlaw.com Presenters: Randal R. Morrison Kenneth T. Fong Sabine & Morrison Office of the Los Angeles City Attorney 110 Juniper St. 700 City Hall East PO Box 531518 200 N. Main Street San Diego CA 92153-1518 Los Angeles CA 90012 Tel. 619.234.2864; Fax 619.342.4136 Tel.: 213.978.8064; Fax: 213.978.8214 email: [email protected] email: [email protected] Opinions expressed are those of the presenters in their individual and personal capacities and do not necessarily reflect the views of the League of California Cities, or of the presenters’ respective employers, firms or clients. PART ONE: FOUNDATIONS I. CONSTITUTIONAL FREEDOMS A. First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution (1791) Congress shall make no law respecting [1] the establishment of religion, or [2] prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or [3] abridging the freedom of speech, or [4] of the press; or [5] the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and [6] to petition the Government for redress of grievances. The First Amendment is made applicable to state and local governments, Schneider v. State, 308 U.S. 147 (1939), through the Fourteenth Amendment (1868): All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. -
The Mediator December 26 1919
On Sale at "---o-m-a-h-a-'-S-G-r-e-at::-- ' .Al1 News Stands ( and Best Five Cents EDIATOR I \Veekly NewspapeT VOL. XVI. OMAHA, NEBRASKA, DECEMBER 26, 1919. NO.5. THlNGS THAT NEVER. HAPPEN ~ GE~E CLEANING UP ODORS c""''''~''''-"I,-- ..:. BYRNES-.::...-. =",,,~,,,_~_,,, "OPEN S P" LATEST ,IN POLICE AFFAIRS 'NEWSP PER IN CITY I UNDEP.STAND~ More \,}6 uensio1].s Result l;?rom High.. .JUST ONCE ovER· t40 DILL DOLLS Indicates Movement to Curb Pyramid . ·J.~5~ -ing of Morals Squad. OR PER fuMe OR \v~ HAIR TONK ing Omaha Wage Scales. \~i0~ '(OURE. A PLAlI" SENSIBLE· lOOI<Ir{6 PITTULL~~'IDE POLICE INSPECTOR: MAN \ ~ . i BUSINESS MEN'S OFFICIAL ORGAN \ • i "Executive Session"'of Council Committee Decides to Clip Wings I Union Labul' I (>nders Expect Movement to Import Large Number of Supt. Ringer-Genel'ally Rotten Conditions Force Three i of Colored Workmen to City-New Factories May Be of Commissioners to Act-Towl Has Few Words. Established-Trade School to Be Opened. 'T'l.e namng of Andl'e"'" Pattullo as 01' to pel~;~ to beconle ,:,uperintendent :,' "Th 0 Sl" II - - " ."=~ - .. e pen lOp, a Slna news- favorable contracts for the services of poll'ce l'nspecto" fOl' tIle CI't:' ''''';11 gen- of police. In fact, were he to take on I hI' b' b th B' tl' b Th L -.' 'P paper, PU IS .en y e usmes" lelr mem ers. e increased cost of erally meet with the approval of the that position, it would blow up a lot I Men's association, recently made its living has naturally been one of the people of Omaha and especially of byof themthingstothatfattenhaveup theirbeenownworkedpocket_out i I' appearance in Omaha and its appear- results of these pjgher wages, but the . -
The Politics of Water Fluoridation from a Problem Definition Perspective
1 THE POLITICS OF WATER FLUORIDATION FROM A PROBLEM DEFINITION PERSPECTIVE A dissertation presented by Robyn Olson to The Department of Political Science In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the field of Public and International Affairs Northeastern University Boston, MA November, 2008 2 Abstract The Politics of Water Fluoridation from a Problem Definition Perspective Community water fluoridation has been controversial since it was first proposed more than 60 years ago. Proponents of fluoridation state that it is a safe and cost- effective method of solving a public health problem while opponents question its safety and effectiveness and whether it is a legitimate function of government. Most decisions regarding water fluoridation reside at the local level. In MA, the current law allows the local board of health to order water fluoridation. The law stipulates that within 90 days of public notice opponents can submit a petition with the signatures of 10% of the registered voters in the community, in which case a referendum would be held. Very often a referendum is held and more than half of the time and with little predictability the order is overturned. Several explanations have been offered including demographic determinism, the structure of the city government and alienation however none of these are fully explanatory. This paper examines fluoridation decisions from a problem definition perspective which purports that the way problems are defined and framed in public discourse has an impact on decision outcomes. To examine the extent that problem definition principles contribute to fluoridation decisions comparative case studies were utilized. -
Joe Bean Novel
1 Mark Nichols Joe Bean 2 3 Mark Nichols Joe Bean 4 PROLOGUE Joe Bean walks on stage. He is watched by 1000 eyes. He does not know he is being watched. To him, all the world is not a stage. To him, the walk from here to there appears to be just another walk through the market where he almost always has lunch. It is important you know this. Not that he has lunch in the market, but that he does not know you are watching him. Shhh, it’s a secret. * * * We, the audience, see that what appears to be a yoga studio is actually a set piece and that it sits rickety on a darkened stage. A young actress eyes the Yoga teacher in front and holds her Virabhadrasana, Warrior Pose. The man onstage is very calm. Handsome. Older. And more-than-likely married. She assumes that hunk of gold bling on his finger must be a wedding ring. The actress follows the trickle of sweat dripping down his back as Joe Bean begins to chant and stretch himself out like some sort of yogi/clown, Llama, lamma, pizza rama, Vishnu wish you peaceful manna Yin, Yang, Paddywack Hari Hama This little piggy went to market, Mamma Nam Yo ho, Renge Kio yo, Shivananda, Hopscotch Vegananda, 5 Mark Nichols The yoga class laughs and Joe winks. The audience remains silent. We’re waiting for something else. The young woman feels her heart beating through spandex bra and studies herself in the big mirror. The carefree double- horned-curled-over-ponytail satyr thing she’d been doing with her hair lately was good. -
Hearing Unit Cover and Text
Public Hearing before ASSEMBLY JUDICIARY COMMITTEE Assembly Concurrent Resolution 205 LOCATION: Committee Room 11 DATE: December 13, 2018 State House Annex 11:00 a.m. Trenton, New Jersey MEMBERS OF COMMITTEE PRESENT: Assemblywoman Annette Quijano, Chair Assemblywoman Carol A. Murphy, Vice Chair Assemblyman Louis D. Greenwald Assemblyman Gordon M. Johnson Assemblyman William W. Spearman Assemblyman Michael Patrick Carroll Assemblywoman Nancy F. Muñoz ALSO PRESENT: Miriam Bavati Sarita Welsh Brian Quigley Matthew Gould Office of Legislative Services Assembly Majority Assembly Republican Committee Aides Committee Aide Committee Aide Hearing Recorded and Transcribed by The Office of Legislative Services, Public Information Office, Hearing Unit, State House Annex, PO 068, Trenton, New Jersey TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Assemblyman Jon M. Bramnick District 21 7 Katherine R. Abbott Representing League of Women Voters of New Jersey 13 Mary Alosio President League of Women Voters-Mountain Lakes 14 Nhu-Uyen “Winn” Khuong Executive Director and Co-Founder Action Together New Jersey 14 Nancy Hedinger President League of Women Voters of New Jersey 28 Jill Rhodes Private Citizen 29 Sandra Matsen Volunteer Legislative Agent League of Women Voters of New Jersey 32 Susan M. Blubaugh Private Citizen 38 Marco Palladino Private Citizen 39 Cindy Matute-Brown Member Steering Committee Essex Rising 40 Patrick Murray Director Monmouth University Polling Institute Monmouth University 42 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Page Dave Pringle Representing Clean Water Action 45 Ronald K. Chen, Esq. Professor Center for Law and Justice Rutgers School of Law Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey-Newark, and Member Board of Trustees American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of New Jersey 45 Barry Brendel Chairman Our Revolution New Jersey 46 Chané Jones, Esq.