Variable retention and : Tasmania’s goals and monitoring program

Sue Baker, Simon Grove, Steve Read, Tim Wardlaw Talk Outline

• Operational variable retention (VR) – FT’s program –Goals – Guidelines • Biodiversity studies in the Warra SST • Biodiversity assessments in operational VR • Landscape considerations Operational implementation of VR in Tasmania

• 11 coupes totalling 408 ha harvested and regenerated (as at June 2007) • Harvesting completed or in progress for another 13 coupes totalling 528 ha • Adaptive management through regular peer review of the conduct of VR operations Forestry Tasmania’s goals for VR

• More closely emulate natural ecological processes in managed tall, wet eucalypt

– by retaining late-successional species and structures (biological legacies) for at least a full rotation. • Maintain a forest edge influence over the majority of the felled area

• Achieve adequate productive regeneration of both eucalypts and other species

• Ensure safety of forest operations Forestry Tasmania’s guidelines for VR

1. Majority of felled area should be within one height of retained forest 2. Retained areas can be free-standing (island aggregates), OR contiguous with standing forest outside of the coupe (edge aggregates) 3. Aggregates should be: • at least one hectare in size • anchored to specific locations of ecological value • encompass the range of vegetation types present 4. Hazardous in aggregates and edges should be sufficiently buffered to ensure they do not pose a danger Guidelines for VR (cont’d)

5. Coupes should look different from clearfelled coupes - avoid large gaps and long view lines 6. Coupe layout and fuel preparation to allow safe and effective burning: • receptive seedbed over >2/3 of the felled area • coupe should meet seedling stocking standard (65% 16 m² stocking) at 3 years 7. Firebreaks and access tracks: • area should be minimised • preparation should not unduly compact , damage profiles, or otherwise compromise ecological values Operational monitoring of biodiversity: developing an approach

• Answer key questions: – how well do retained patches perform in providing viable to maintain late-successional species within coupes? – do increases in mature forest influence provided by VR help to maintain late successional processes in production forestry landscapes? • Practical and affordable to implement • Informed by experiences and findings from SST and elsewhere Warra Silvicultural Systems Trial (SST)

Aim: to compare alternative methods to clearfelling for harvesting oldgrowth wet eucalypt forest

DRN

CBS CBS CON LEGEND ARN DRN CON = Control CBS = Clearfall, burn & sow (with islands) CON ARN DRN = 10% dispersed retention ARN = Aggregated retention Warra SST - Biodiversity studies

Aim: Document responses of a range of life- forms to silvicultural treatments in wet E. obliqua forest Methods: Before - after - control - impact design Two replicates per treatment Biodiversity surveys done pre-, 1- year and 3-years post-logging Life-forms: Ground beetles Vascular plants Bryophytes Lichens Warra SST - Biodiversity studies

r tes la y s h s cu e p n s s tl s o e a t e rd y h V n ic la Be Bi Br L p

Resource demand High Low High Mod Low

Responsiveness Habit., Habit. Habit., Habit., +/- disturb. disturb. disturb. Focal taxa +/- +/--+/-+

Habitat surrogates + +/- +/- + - Warra SST - Biodiversity studies

r tes la y s h s cu e p n s s tl s o e a t e rd y h V n ic la Be Bi Br L p

Resource demand High Low High Mod Low

Responsiveness Habit., Habit. Habit., Habit., +/- disturb. disturb. disturb. Focal taxa +/- +/- -+/-+

Habitat surrogates + +/- +/- + - Warra SST - Biodiversity studies

r tes la y s h s cu e p n s s tl s o e a t e rd y h V n ic la Be Bi Br L p

Resource demand High Low High Mod Low

Responsiveness Habit., Habit. Habit., Habit., +/- disturb. disturb. disturb. Focal taxa +/- +/- - +/- +

Habitat surrogates ++/-+/- +- Warra SST - Biodiversity studies

r tes la y s h s cu e p n s s tl s o e a t e rd y h V n ic la Be Bi Br L p

Resource demand High Low High Mod Low

Responsiveness Habit., Habit. Habit., Habit., +/- disturb. disturb. disturb. Focal taxa +/- +/- - +/- +

Habitat surrogates ++/-+/-+ - Warra SST - Biodiversity studies

r tes la y s h s cu e p n s s tl s o e a t e rd y h V n ic la Be Bi Br L p

Resource demand High Low High Mod Low

Responsiveness Habit., Habit. Habit., Habit., +/- disturb. disturb. disturb. Focal taxa +/-+/--+/-+

Habitat surrogates ++/-+/-+ - Biodiversity monitoring in operational VR

Aim: To determine how retained patches perform in providing viable habitat to maintain late-successional species and processes within coupes?

Habitat: Floristics: • Hollows • Vascular plants • Vegetation structure • Rainforest health

Disturbance: Birds: • Fire damage • Windthrow Photo: Dave Watts Biodiversity monitoring in operational aggregated retention

SX018e

Ground surveys Aerial surveys • plots in 3 aggregates, 1 unlogged • all aggregates and edges inspected, coupe edge, and 4 unlogged unlogged control area inspected control areas • tally of mature trees, trees with • assess floristics, structure, hollows and trees with dead tops rainforest health and mammal • assessment and mapping of burn scats severity AR023e Aerial habitat tree assessment

• All aggregates and controls surveyed (8 coupes) • Oldgrowth trees and stags counted • Numbers with visible hollows and dead tops recorded

Arve 23e

Esperance 81b

Picton 7c

Temma 20c

Salmon River 37c

Styx 4b

Styx 18e

Styx 7a

0123456 Stags & hollows (trees / ha) Aerial burn assessment Unburnt Low burn Canopy burn 8 (edge)

• All aggregates 7 (edge) assessed (8 coupes) 6 (island) • Boundaries of unburnt, 5 (island) low burn (ground fire) 4 (island)

and canopy burnt 3 (island) Aggregate number Aggregate mapped from photos 2 (island)

1 (island)

0 20406080100 Proportion in category (% area)

6 8 5 4 Aerial assessment of the severity 7 of fire damage in Styx 7c 12 3 VR in the landscape

VR currently in landscapes with high levels of mature forest influence

What role for VR in landscapes with low levels of mature forest influence? Conclusions

• Goals and guidelines for variable retention afford high priority to biodiversity objectives • Aggregates maintain many oldgrowth species and structures at a coupe level • Practical method for assessment of biodiversity values in operational VR coupes • Potential for VR to increase mature forest influence at landscape-level? Acknowledgments

Thanks to Robyn Scott, Mark Neyland, John Hickey, Tom Spies, Petra Strich, Anneka Ferguson, Emily Ferguson, Shannon Clark, Karl Wotherspoon