Variable retention and biodiversity: Forestry Tasmania’s goals and monitoring program
Sue Baker, Simon Grove, Steve Read, Tim Wardlaw Talk Outline
• Operational variable retention (VR) – FT’s program –Goals – Guidelines • Biodiversity studies in the Warra SST • Biodiversity assessments in operational VR • Landscape considerations Operational implementation of VR in Tasmania
• 11 coupes totalling 408 ha harvested and regenerated (as at June 2007) • Harvesting completed or in progress for another 13 coupes totalling 528 ha • Adaptive management through regular peer review of the conduct of VR operations Forestry Tasmania’s goals for VR
• More closely emulate natural ecological processes in managed tall, wet eucalypt forest
– by retaining late-successional species and structures (biological legacies) for at least a full rotation. • Maintain a forest edge influence over the majority of the felled area
• Achieve adequate productive regeneration of both eucalypts and other species
• Ensure safety of forest operations Forestry Tasmania’s guidelines for VR
1. Majority of felled area should be within one tree height of retained forest 2. Retained areas can be free-standing (island aggregates), OR contiguous with standing forest outside of the coupe (edge aggregates) 3. Aggregates should be: • at least one hectare in size • anchored to specific locations of ecological value • encompass the range of vegetation types present 4. Hazardous trees in aggregates and edges should be sufficiently buffered to ensure they do not pose a danger Guidelines for VR (cont’d)
5. Coupes should look different from clearfelled coupes - avoid large gaps and long view lines 6. Coupe layout and fuel preparation to allow safe and effective burning: • receptive seedbed over >2/3 of the felled area • coupe should meet seedling stocking standard (65% 16 m² stocking) at 3 years 7. Firebreaks and access tracks: • area should be minimised • preparation should not unduly compact soils, damage soil profiles, or otherwise compromise ecological values Operational monitoring of biodiversity: developing an approach
• Answer key questions: – how well do retained patches perform in providing viable habitat to maintain late-successional species within coupes? – do increases in mature forest influence provided by VR help to maintain late successional processes in production forestry landscapes? • Practical and affordable to implement • Informed by experiences and findings from SST and elsewhere Warra Silvicultural Systems Trial (SST)
Aim: to compare alternative methods to clearfelling for harvesting oldgrowth wet eucalypt forest
DRN
CBS CBS CON LEGEND ARN DRN CON = Control CBS = Clearfall, burn & sow (with islands) CON ARN DRN = 10% dispersed retention ARN = Aggregated retention Warra SST - Biodiversity studies
Aim: Document responses of a range of life- forms to silvicultural treatments in wet E. obliqua forest Methods: Before - after - control - impact design Two replicates per treatment Biodiversity surveys done pre-logging, 1- year and 3-years post-logging Life-forms: Ground beetles Birds Vascular plants Bryophytes Lichens Warra SST - Biodiversity studies
r tes la y s h s cu e p n s s tl s o e a t e rd y h V n ic la Be Bi Br L p
Resource demand High Low High Mod Low
Responsiveness Habit., Habit. Habit., Habit., +/- disturb. disturb. disturb. Focal taxa +/- +/--+/-+
Habitat surrogates + +/- +/- + - Warra SST - Biodiversity studies
r tes la y s h s cu e p n s s tl s o e a t e rd y h V n ic la Be Bi Br L p
Resource demand High Low High Mod Low
Responsiveness Habit., Habit. Habit., Habit., +/- disturb. disturb. disturb. Focal taxa +/- +/- -+/-+
Habitat surrogates + +/- +/- + - Warra SST - Biodiversity studies
r tes la y s h s cu e p n s s tl s o e a t e rd y h V n ic la Be Bi Br L p
Resource demand High Low High Mod Low
Responsiveness Habit., Habit. Habit., Habit., +/- disturb. disturb. disturb. Focal taxa +/- +/- - +/- +
Habitat surrogates ++/-+/- +- Warra SST - Biodiversity studies
r tes la y s h s cu e p n s s tl s o e a t e rd y h V n ic la Be Bi Br L p
Resource demand High Low High Mod Low
Responsiveness Habit., Habit. Habit., Habit., +/- disturb. disturb. disturb. Focal taxa +/- +/- - +/- +
Habitat surrogates ++/-+/-+ - Warra SST - Biodiversity studies
r tes la y s h s cu e p n s s tl s o e a t e rd y h V n ic la Be Bi Br L p
Resource demand High Low High Mod Low
Responsiveness Habit., Habit. Habit., Habit., +/- disturb. disturb. disturb. Focal taxa +/-+/--+/-+
Habitat surrogates ++/-+/-+ - Biodiversity monitoring in operational VR
Aim: To determine how retained patches perform in providing viable habitat to maintain late-successional species and processes within coupes?
Habitat: Floristics: • Hollows • Vascular plants • Vegetation structure • Rainforest health
Disturbance: Birds: • Fire damage • Windthrow Photo: Dave Watts Biodiversity monitoring in operational aggregated retention
SX018e
Ground surveys Aerial surveys • plots in 3 aggregates, 1 unlogged • all aggregates and edges inspected, coupe edge, and 4 unlogged unlogged control area inspected control areas • tally of mature trees, trees with • assess floristics, structure, hollows and trees with dead tops rainforest health and mammal • assessment and mapping of burn scats severity AR023e Aerial habitat tree assessment
• All aggregates and controls surveyed (8 coupes) • Oldgrowth trees and stags counted • Numbers with visible hollows and dead tops recorded
Arve 23e
Esperance 81b
Picton 7c
Temma 20c
Salmon River 37c
Styx 4b
Styx 18e
Styx 7a
0123456 Stags & hollows (trees / ha) Aerial burn assessment Unburnt Low burn Canopy burn 8 (edge)
• All aggregates 7 (edge) assessed (8 coupes) 6 (island) • Boundaries of unburnt, 5 (island) low burn (ground fire) 4 (island)
and canopy burnt 3 (island) Aggregate number Aggregate mapped from photos 2 (island)
1 (island)
0 20406080100 Proportion in category (% area)
6 8 5 4 Aerial assessment of the severity 7 of fire damage in Styx 7c 12 3 VR in the landscape
VR currently in landscapes with high levels of mature forest influence
What role for VR in landscapes with low levels of mature forest influence? Conclusions
• Goals and guidelines for variable retention afford high priority to biodiversity objectives • Aggregates maintain many oldgrowth species and structures at a coupe level • Practical method for assessment of biodiversity values in operational VR coupes • Potential for VR to increase mature forest influence at landscape-level? Acknowledgments
Thanks to Robyn Scott, Mark Neyland, John Hickey, Tom Spies, Petra Strich, Anneka Ferguson, Emily Ferguson, Shannon Clark, Karl Wotherspoon