DOCSLIB.ORG

RAND Review, Vol. 26, No. 2, Summer 2002

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Summer 2002 Vol. 26, No. 2 Hitting Home What We’ve Learned Since 9/11 and What We Should Do About It GLOBAL PRIORITIES OVERSEAS DEPLOYMENTS HOMELAND SECURITY STATE AND LOCAL INITIATIVES Get the Big Picture Editor-in-Chief John Godges Assistant Editor Miriam Polon RAND Review News Editor Brett Grodeck covers the Editorial Editors Jerry Sollinger big issues with Paul Steinberg Laura Zakaras an eye for Proofreader Kelly Schwartz the important Art Director Ronald Miller details. Designer Eileen Delson La Russo Production Editor Denise Constantine Circulation Christine Troncoso Web Producer Amy Clark Editorial Board Dominic Brewer, Paul Davis, Jerrold Green, Bruce Hoffman, James Hosek, James Kahan, Iao Katagiri, Kevin McCarthy, Elizabeth McGlynn, C. Richard Neu, K. Jack Riley, Mary Vaiana RAND Board of Trustees Ronald L. Olson (chairman), Ann McLaughlin Korologos (vice chairman), Carl Bildt, Harold Brown, Frank C. Carlucci, Lovida H. Coleman, Jr., Robert Curvin, Pedro José Greer, Jr., Rita E. Hauser, Karen Elliott House, Jen-Hsun Huang, Paul G. Kaminski, Bruce Karatz, Lydia H. Kennard, Philip Lader, Arthur Levitt, Lloyd N. Morrisett, Amy B. Pascal, Patricia Salas Pineda, John Edward Porter, John Reed, Donald B. Rice, James E. Rohr, Jerry I. Speyer, James A. Thomson, James Q. Wilson RAND Review is published periodically by RAND, a nonprofit institution that helps improve policy and decisionmaking through research and analysis. Opinions are those of the authors and do not reflect positions taken by RAND, its board, or its sponsors. LETTERS Send letters to: Editor, RAND Review, 1700 Main Street, P.O. Box 2138, Santa Monica, CA 90407-2138, or email [email protected]. PERMISSIONS To use material published in RAND Review, visit www.rand.org/publications/ permissions.html. COPIES For hard copies of RAND Review, call (877) 584-8642 (toll free) or (310) 451-7002 (out- side the United States); send a fax to (310) 451- 6915; or email [email protected]. REPORTS Most reports cited in these pages may be purchased. To place credit card orders, contact RAND at the phone numbers or email address listed immediately above. National Book Network (NBN) also carries selected RAND titles. Call NBN at (800) 462-6420. ABSTRACTS Selected abstracts of RAND docu- For previous editions and free online subscriptions, visit ments are available at www.rand.org/Abstracts. www.rand.org/publications/randreview. Message from the Editor Our Contribution he last time America defeated an adversary with global reach, research played an essential role. The research If research was crucial before, Tconducted here at RAND helped to unlock the political it is absolutely indispensable now. mysteries of the Soviet Politburo, to extrapolate details about the otherwise enigmatic Soviet economy, to compare the effective- ness of alternative U.S. military strategies, and to sharpen the per- formance of military operations. • The veterinary science curriculum in the United States needs America’s new war—against another adversary with global to place greater emphasis on the recognition and treatment of reach—will require an even greater analytical effort. Terrorism is animal diseases of exotic origin so that livestock and people an enemy much more inscrutable than the former Soviet Union. If can be defended against the terrorist use of biological research was crucial before, it is absolutely indispensable now. weapons. This issue of RAND Review offers a sampling of what we are • Local emergency responders need equipment that is more contributing on a wide range of fronts to help fight terrorism. In the durable and training that is more representative of extended year since Sept. 11, 2001, we have examined the dimensions of the response activities. terrorist threat—and the potential responses to it—in greater detail • Many hospitals and local public health departments should than ever before in our three decades of counterterrorism research. conduct terrorism drills more frequently and do a better job of James Thomson and Brian Jenkins set the stage for this integrating their preparedness plans with those of other local issue. Thomson describes four troubling global trends that we emergency response agencies. urgently need to understand better so that we can counteract ter- rorism better, while Jenkins offers a unique historical perspective Here are some of the questions that still cry out for answers: on the pioneering role of counterterrorism research at RAND. • What are the roots of anti-American violence? Stemming the In the 27 essays that follow, RAND authors offer specific pol- violence requires an honest examination of what drives others icy recommendations when they can. When they cannot, they out- to lash out against America. line the important questions that need to be answered before • How should victims of terrorism be compensated? Neither recommendations can be made. All of these essays represent private insurance, the tort system, private charities, nor govern- work done within the past year. ment aid alone is likely to provide a satisfactory solution. • What makes individuals and communities resilient in the face Here are some of our initial findings: of terrorism? Many local institutions could salve psychological • Global health care is vital to global security. America has an wounds. unprecedented opportunity to make a lasting difference in the world and to fight terrorism at the same time. Our work proceeds on additional fronts not covered in these • Social and economic development programs around the world pages. Research on demographic trends in Afghanistan, Pakistan, can inhibit terrorism only when they are adequately funded and Central Asia could inform U.S. military plans and international and properly implemented. development programs. Research on educational reform in the • The U.S. military needs to prepare for more frequent deploy- Middle East could yield promising strategies for diverting youth ments and more long-term deployments to far-flung regions. away from anger and frustration. It also needs to add new offensive capabilities to its arsenal. America needs research in all of these areas to help win the • It is often more effective to target the mid-level core of a ter- war against terrorism. We consider our counterterrorism research rorist organization than its top-level leaders. of the past year—and of the past 30 years—to be just a start. • Airport security at home should be rebuilt from the bottom up, with the federal government coordinating locally designed —John Godges solutions. WWW.RAND.ORG RAND REVIEW / SUMMER 2002 3 Summer 2002 Vol. 26, No. 2 6 Letter to the Editor GLOBAL PRIORITIES 6 News 20 Make World Health the New Marshall Plan • HIV trials: who’s in, who’s out By Robert E. Hunter, C. Ross Anthony, and Nicole Lurie • A Pakistani request for U.S., Chinese mediation • Russian corruption 23 The Role of Social and Economic • Diversity in California and America Development • Action against asthma By Kim Cragin and Peter Chalk • Why class size matters • Globalization winners and losers 26 Treat Europe as a Full Partner, and It Will Be Perspectives By David C. Gompert 10 Saving Grace: A Timely Warning from Easter Island 29 Beware of Cracks in the Coalition 12 Profits and Prejudice: By Jerrold D. Green Why We Regulate Some Drugs but Not Others 32 Anti-American Violence: An Agenda for Honest Thinking IN COMMEMORATION By C. Richard Neu OF SEPTEMBER 11, 2001 34 Control Biological Weapons, 14 Hitting Home: What We’ve Learned Since but Defend Biotechnology 9/11 and What We Should Do About It By John Parachini 15 We’re Here for the Duration OVERSEAS DEPLOYMENTS By James A. Thomson 36 Global Implications 18 30 Years and for the U.S. Air Force Counting By Edward R. Harshberger By Brian Michael Jenkins 38 A Future of Sustained Ground Operations On the Cover By Bruce R. Nardulli Global Priorities: Women wait to be received at a medical clinic in Kandahar, Afghanistan, on April 23. 40 Hard-Shelled, SOF-Centered: AP/WIDE WORLD PHOTOS/VICTOR R. CAIVANO The Synergy of Might and Mind Overseas Deployments: Light armored vehicles from the 15th By Gordon T. Lee Marine Expeditionary Unit head east toward Kandahar on Dec. 9, 2001. U.S. MARINE CORPS/SGT. JOSEPH R. CHENELLY 42 Four Lessons from Five Countries Homeland Security: Dairy cows amble through a pasture in Nash By Bruce Hoffman and Kim Cragin County, N.C., on July 12. AP/WIDE WORLD PHOTOS/BOB JORDAN State and Local Initiatives: SWAT team members join a Merced County Sheriff’s Department training exercise that included a mock terrorist takeover of a 737 airplane at Castle Airport in Atwater, Calif., 4 RAND REVIEW / SUMMER 2002 WWW.RAND.ORG HOMELAND SECURITY STATE AND LOCAL INITIATIVES 44 U.S. Air Force Roles Reach Beyond 64 Enlist the States in Protecting the Nation Securing the Skies By K. Jack Riley By Eric V. Larson 66 Give Emergency Workers Better Tools, 46 U.S. Army Finds Its Role at Home Training, Organization Up for Grabs By D. J. Peterson By Richard Brennan 68 Protecting Occupants of High-Rise 48 Beyond Sharing Intelligence, Buildings We Must Generate Knowledge By Rae W. Archibald, Jamison Jo Medby, Brian Rosen, By Jeffrey A. Isaacson and Kevin M. O’Connell and Jonathan Schachter 50 Protecting Critical 70 Defending Our Local Infrastructure Communities By Bruce Don and David Mussington By Tim Bonds 52 Airport Security from 72 The Rising Priority of the Bottom Up Local Public Health By Gerald Kauvar, Bernard Rostker, By Lois M. Davis and Janice C. Blanchard and Russell Shaver 74 Helping Each Other Cope 54 Bioterrorism: From Panic to Preparedness By Mark A. Schuster and Bradley D. Stein By Kenneth I. Shine 76 The Path of Greatest Resilience 56 Replace the Weak Links in the Food Chain By Terri Tanielian, Harold Pincus, Bradley Stein, By Peter Chalk and Audrey Burnam 58 Cleanse the Polluted Urban Seas By Russell W.
Recommended publications
  • The Future of US Special Operations Forces

    The Future of US Special Operations Forces

    BEYOND THE RAMPARTS THE FUTURE OF U.S. SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES JIM THOMAS CHRIS DOUGHERTY BEYOND THE RAMPARTS THE FUTURE OF U.S. SPECIAL OPERATIONS FORCES BY JIM THOMAS CHRIS DOUGHERTY 2013 About the Authors Jim Thomas is Vice President and Director of Studies at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. Chris Dougherty is a Research Fellow at the Center for Strategic and Budgetary Assessments. From 1997 to 2000, he served as an airborne infantryman with the 2nd Battalion, 75th Ranger Regiment. Acknowledgments 7he authors wish to thanN the DeSartment of Defense ȯcials and sSe- cial operations professionals who shared insights and lent assistance during the course of this assessment: Steve Baker, COL Peter Benson, COL Stu Bradin, RDML Thomas Brown, MGen Mark Clark, Scott Elli- son, Lt Gen Eric Fiel, Roger Gallan, VADM Robert Harward, Richard Hŏmann, MaM Gen Michael .ingsley, Ale[ .ugaMevsky, MG Paul La- Camera, MGen ret. Paul Lefebvre, Michael Lumpkin, BG .evin Mang- um, MaM Gen O.G. Mannon, Robert Martinage, COL Chris Miller, Billy Montgomery, Gary Oles, ADM (ret.) Eric Olson, LTC Chip O'Neal, Col Jim Parrington, MAJ Phillip Porter, RADM Sean Pybus, Garry Reid, Bill Ricks, J.4. Roberts, LTJG Barry Scott, Michael Sheehan, COL .urt Sonntag, LtCol Todd Tetterton, Col Larry Torres, Michael Vickers, Brig Gen Brad Webb, and CAPT Stephen Wisotzki. All photos used in this report were taken by U.S. government employees in the course of their normal duties. The authors would also like to thank the CSBA stă for their assistance with this report, particularly Eric Lindsey, Nick Setter- berg and Abigail Stewart.
  • Commission Internationale De Juristes Mission

    Commission Internationale De Juristes Mission

    Commission internationale de juristes Mission La Commission internationale de juristes est consacree a la primaute, a la coherence et a l'application du droit international et des principes qui font progresser les droits de l'Homme. La Commission internationale de juristes (CIJ) se distingue par l'impartialite, l'objectivite et l'approche juridique faisant autorite qu'elle applique a la protec­ tion et a la promotion des droits de l'Homme par le biais du respect de la preeminence du droit. La CIJ fournit des services d'experts juridiques aux niveaux national et interna­ tional afin de garantir que le developpement du droit international reste fidele aux principes des droits de l'Homme et que les normes internationales soient mises en oeuvre au plan national. La Commission, creee a Berlin en 1952, est composee de 60 juristes eminents qui representent les divers systemes juridiques du monde. II incombe au Secretariat international, base a Geneve, de realiser les buts et objectifs de la Commission. Pour s'acquitter de cette tache, le Secretariat international beneficie d'un reseau de sections nationales autonomes et d'organisations affiliees implantees sur tous les continents. Parmi les distinctions decernees a la CIJ en hommage aux contributions qu'elle a apportees a la promotion et a la protection des droits de l'Homme figurent le premier Prix europeen des droits de l'Homme attribue par le Conseil de l'Europe, le Prix Wateler pour la paix, le Prix Erasme et le Prix des Nations Unies pour les droits de l'Homme. Commission internationale de juristes Case postale 216 - 81 A, avenue de Chatelaine CH - 1219 Chatelaine / Geneve - Suisse Tel: (+41 22) 979 38 00 Fax: (+41 22) 979 38 01 E-Mail: [email protected] Site web: www.icj.org ELEMENTS FOR A GENERAL RECOMMENDATION ON RACIAL DISCRIMINATION IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE TABLE OF CONTENTS I ntroduction.................................................................................................................................................................................................
  • Don't Shoot: Race-Based Trauma and Police Brutality Leah Metzger

    Don't Shoot: Race-Based Trauma and Police Brutality Leah Metzger

    Taylor University Pillars at Taylor University Orphans and Vulnerable Children Student Orphans and Vulnerable Children Scholarship Spring 2019 Don't Shoot: Race-Based Trauma and Police Brutality Leah Metzger Follow this and additional works at: https://pillars.taylor.edu/ovc-student Part of the Child Psychology Commons, Higher Education Commons, and the Social Welfare Commons Running head: DON’T SHOOT 1 Don’t Shoot: Race-Based Trauma and Police Brutality Leah Metzger Taylor University DON’T SHOOT 2 Introduction With the growing conversation on police brutality against black Americans, there is an increasing need to understand the consequences this has on black children. Research is now showing that children and adults can experience race-based trauma, which can have profound effects on psychological and physical well-being, and can also impact communities as a whole. The threat and experience of police brutality and discrimination can be experienced individually or vicariously, and traumatic symptoms can vary depending on the individual. Children are especially vulnerable to the psychological and physical effects of police brutality and the threat thereof because of their developmental stages. Definitions and prevalence of police brutality will be discussed, as well as race based trauma, the effects of this trauma, and the impact on communities as a whole. Police Brutality Definitions Ambiguity surrounds the discussion on police brutality, leaving it difficult for many to establish what it actually is. For the purpose of this paper, police brutality is defined as, “a civil rights violation that occurs when a police officer acts with excessive force by using an amount of force with regards to a civilian that is more than necessary” (U.S.
  • Trump Praised for Measured Speech

    Trump Praised for Measured Speech

    Friday, March 3, 2017 BUSINESS 9 US court overturns $533m Apple verdict Israel begins gas exports to Jordan In this ever-changing society, the most powerful Washington Jerusalem and enduring brands are built from the heart. US appellate court overturned a $533 million patent verdict n Israeli company has started exporting gas from an offshore They are real and sustainable. Their foundations against Apple, saying the award was based on “routine field to Jordan, marking the country’s first ever exports are stronger because they are built with the computerA activities” which cannot ofA natural gas. The exports strength of the human be patented. The decision comes to Jordan began in January, spirit, not an ad campaign. two years after a court in Texas Delek Drilling said. Jordanian The companies that are ordered Apple to pay the award firms Arab Potash and Jordan lasting are those that are to Smartflash LLC, which sued Bromine signed a deal in authentic” claiming Apple infringed on patents 2014 to import 2 billion cubic Howard Schultz, for flash memory technology used metres of gas from Israel’s Starbucks CEO in the iTunes music store. Tamar field over 15 years. Controversies in Trump praised Trump’s West Wing for measured speech Jan 20, 2017 Donald Trump is inaugurated as 45th President of the United States Jan 27 Executive order imposing 90-day ban on citizens of seven Muslim-majority countries from entering U.S. and indefinite ban on refugees triggers multiple legal challenges. Federal court issues temporary stay – decision upheld by federal appeals court on February 9 US President Donald J.
  • 1 Racial Profiling and Street-Level Crime the National Significance Of

    1 Racial Profiling and Street-Level Crime the National Significance Of

    Racial Profiling and Street-level Crime The national significance of the Trayvon Martin case has ignited a heated discussion about bias and racial profiling in this country. The prologue for this conversation was established in communities across the country where racial profiling by law enforcement has been commonplace for years. Notwithstanding the fact that racial profiling is unconstitutional, and despite the emphatic declaration from the federal government that the practice is “invidious,” “wrong,” “ineffective,” and “harmful to our rich and diverse democracy,” quantitative and qualitative evidence collected at the federal, state, and local levels confirms that racial profiling persists. Empirical evidence confirms the existence of racial profiling on America’s roadways and that police actions taken during traffic stops are not uniform across race and ethnicity. The U.S. Department of Labor’s Bureau of Justice Statistics reports that for the year 2005: • Black drivers (4.5 percent) were twice as likely as White drivers (2.1 percent) to be arrested during a traffic stop, while Hispanic drivers (65 percent) were more likely than White (56.2 percent) or Black (55.8 percent) drivers to receive a ticket. • In addition, Whites (9.7 percent) were more likely than Hispanics (5.9 percent) to receive a written warning, while Whites (18.6 percent) were more likely than Blacks (13.7 percent) to be verbally warned by police. • Black (9.5 percent) and Hispanic (8.8 percent) motorists stopped by police were searched at higher rates than Whites (3.6 percent). Quantitative evidence reported in several states confirms this nationwide data. • A study in Arizona shows that during 2006–2007, the state highway patrol was significantly more likely to stop African Americans and Hispanics than Whites on all the highways studied, while Native Americans and persons of Middle Eastern descent were more likely to be stopped on nearly all the highways studied.
  • Race and the Fourth Amendment.Pdf

    Race and the Fourth Amendment.Pdf

    RACIAL PROFILING AND THE FOURTH AMENDMENT Juval O. Scott Attorney Advisor Office of Defender Services Training Division Washington, D.C. I. Introduction “The erosion of Fourth Amendment liberties comes not in dramatic leaps but in small steps, in decisions that seem “fact- bound,” case specific, and almost routine at first blush. Taken together, though, these steps can have broader implications for the constitutional rights of law-abiding citizens.”1 It seems as though one can barely turn on the nightly news without learning of yet another heartbreaking tale of a person dying at the hands of law enforcement officers. The face of the deceased is disproportionality black and/or brown. Of course this phenomenon is not new—these days it is simply caught on camera and disseminated via mass and social media for all to consume. While there are differing views on how these matters should be handled and what they mean for society as a whole, there is no question that having these issues surrounding race and the Fourth Amendment discussed openly means it is time for criminal defense attorneys to dig in and fight for change in our system. Specifically, we must address racial profiling and its impact on our clients articulating how the life experience, both individual and collective, our clients endure must be factored in to the court’s Fourth Amendment analysis. 1 United States v. Tinnie, 629 F.3d 749, 754 (7th Cir. 2011)(HAMILTON, dissenting). 1 001 This session will delve into the standards set forth by the United States Supreme Court and how we can use those standards to combat seizures that run afoul of the Fourth Amendment.
  • Racial Profiling Studies in Law Enforcement: Issues and Methodology

    Racial Profiling Studies in Law Enforcement: Issues and Methodology

    INFORMATION BRIEF Minnesota House of Representatives Research Department 600 State Office Building St. Paul, MN 55155 June 2000 Jim Cleary,* Legislative Analyst 651-296-5053 Racial Profiling Studies in Law Enforcement: Issues and Methodology Many communities have undertaken racial profiling studies to examine if and how someone’s race and ethnicity plays a part in stops by law enforcement. This information brief describes the central concepts, issues, and methodological challenges involved in studying racial profiling in law enforcement. Contents Page Introduction...............................................................3 Part I: Issues Relating to Racial Profiling Studies................................5 Competing Definitions of “Racial Profiling”..................................5 Varying Viewpoints on Racial Profiling.....................................7 Critique of the “Rational Discrimination” Basis for Racial Profiling: Circular Reasoning..........................................12 Levels of Police Discretion: An Important Distinction.........................13 Broken Windows vs. Community Policing: The Context of Racial Profiling Studies...................................................14 Race Data Collection Practices Among the States............................16 Possible Behavioral Responses to Racial Profiling Studies......................19 *For legal questions about racial profiling, please contact legislative analyst Judith Zollar, 651-296-1554. This publication can be made available in alternative formats upon request.
  • BORN SUSPECT: Stop-And-Frisk Abuses & the Continued Fight to End Racial Profiling in America

    BORN SUSPECT: Stop-And-Frisk Abuses & the Continued Fight to End Racial Profiling in America

    September 2014 1 Stop-and-Frisk Abuses & the Continued Fight to End Racial Profiling in America NAACP’s groundbreaking report opens a renewed dialogue about racial profiling by law enforcement in America. This conversation includes a call to action for NAACP members to work toward ending this ineffective policing practice across the country. www.naacp.org BORN SUSPECT: Stop-and-Frisk Abuses & the Continued Fight to End Racial Profiling in America Cornell William Brooks Roslyn M. Brock President and Chief Executive Officer Chairman, National Board of Directors Barbara Bolling-Williams Criminal Justice Committee Chairman, National Board of Directors President, NAACP Indiana State Conference September 2014 First Edition BORN SUSPECT: Stop-and-Frisk Abuses & the Continued Fight to End Racial Profiling in America I BORN SUSPECT: Stop-and-Frisk Abuses & the Continued Fight to End Racial Profiling in America III BORN SUSPECT: Stop-and-Frisk Abuses & the Continued Fight to End Racial Profiling in America Mr. Gary L. Bledsoe, Esq., President, Texas NAACP State Conference; NAACP National Board Member Region VI Ms. Barbara Bolling-Williams, Esq., Chair, NAACP Criminal Justice Committee; President, NAACP Indiana State Conference; NAACP National Board Member Region VI Mr. Dedric Doolin, NAACP National Board Member Region IV 1V Minister Edward O. Dubose, NAACP National Board Member Region V Mr. Scot X. Esdaile, President, NAACP Connecticut State Conference; NAACP National Board Member Region II Mr. James Gallman Sr., NAACP National Board Member Region V Mr. John R. Grant, Jr., Retired Staff Sgt., Air Force, Purple Heart Veteran; Chair, NAACP Veterans Affairs Committee, Harrisburg, PA Region II Ms. Alice A.
  • Un-American Racial and Dangerous Profiling

    Un-American Racial and Dangerous Profiling

    racial_prof_lett_black 2/20/04 1:05 PM Page 1 aclu.org KEEP AMERICA SAFE AND FREE AND SAFE AMERICA KEEP Act now because freedom can’t protect itself! protect can’t freedom because now Act Bring together a local coalition to lobby your members of Congress for the act. act. the for Congress of members your lobby to coalition local a together Bring ◆ and vote for the End Racial Profiling Act. Act. Profiling Racial End the for vote and ell them you are concerned about racial profiling and want them to cosponsor to them want and profiling racial about concerned are you them ell T Get active at www.aclu.org/action. Call, write or fax your members of Congress. of members your fax or write Call, www.aclu.org/action. at active Get ◆ Visit www.aclu.org/racialprofiling to learn more. learn to www.aclu.org/racialprofiling Visit ◆ Here’s how you can help pass this landmark civil rights bill: rights civil landmark this pass help can you how Here’s end racial profiling, Congress must pass the End Racial Profiling Act. Act. Profiling Racial End the pass must Congress profiling, racial end To OU CAN HELP… CAN OU Y Racial Profiling: Un-American and Dangerous Admit it. When you’re driving along the highway and see a patrol car, you slow down—whether you’re speeding or not. It’s just instinct, you see the top of a police car in the rear view mirror and you’re compelled to glance down at the speedometer for that compulsory moment of "Our lives panic.
  • Why Racial Profiling Is Wrong

    Why Racial Profiling Is Wrong

    Saint Louis University Public Law Review Volume 18 Number 2 Civil Rights in the Next Millennium Article 4 (Vol. XVIII, No.2) 1999 Any Way You Slice It: Why Racial Profiling is rW ong Reginald T. Shuford American Civil Liberties Union Foundation Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.slu.edu/plr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Shuford, Reginald T. (1999) "Any Way You Slice It: Why Racial Profiling is rW ong," Saint Louis University Public Law Review: Vol. 18 : No. 2 , Article 4. Available at: https://scholarship.law.slu.edu/plr/vol18/iss2/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Saint Louis University Public Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship Commons. For more information, please contact Susie Lee. SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW ANY WAY YOU SLICE IT: WHY RACIAL PROFILING IS WRONG REGINALD T. SHUFORD* INTRODUCTION It has been said that in life but two things are certain: death and taxes.1 If you are a young African-American or Latino male, however, there is an additional certainty: At some point during your lifetime, you will be harassed by the police.2 Racially motivated police harassment, vis-a-vis racial profiling, is as American as baseball and apple pie. And it has been around, in some form or fashion, for most of America’s history.3 Racial profiling happens to consumers and pedestrians, on planes, trains, and automobiles. There is driving while black (or brown), flying while black, walking while black, shopping while black, hailing (as in a cab) while black, swimming while black (six African-American youths accused of stealing a cell phone and beeper at a public pool in Michigan) and dining while black (think Miami, where a tip was automatically added to the bill of a black patron, on the assumption that blacks are poor tippers), to name a few.
  • Police Violence Against Afro-Descendants in the United States

    Police Violence Against Afro-Descendants in the United States

    Cover Art Concept This IACHR report concludes that the United States has systematically failed to adopt preventive measures and to train its police forces to perform their duties in an appropriate fashion. This has led to the frequent use of force based on racial bias and prejudice and tends to result in unjustified killings of African Americans. This systematic failure is represented on the cover of the report by a tombstone in the bullseye of a shooting range target, which evokes the path of police violence from training through to these tragic outcomes. The target is surrounded by hands: hands in the air trying to stop the bullet, hands asking for help because of the danger that police officers represent in certain situations, and hands expressing suffering and pain over the unjustified loss of human lives. Cover design: Pigmalión / IACHR OEA/Ser.L/V/II. Doc. 156 26 November 2018 Original: English INTER-AMERICAN COMMISSION ON HUMAN RIGHTS African Americans, Police Use of Force, and Human Rights in the United States 2018 iachr.org OAS Cataloging-in-Publication Data Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. African Americans, police use of force, and human rights in the United States : Approved by the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights on November 26, 2018. p. ; cm. (OAS. Official records ; OEA/Ser.L) ISBN 978-0-8270-6823-0 1. Human rights. 2. Police misconduct--United States. 3. Race discrimination-- United States. 4. African Americans--Civil rights. 5. Racism--United States. I. Title. II. Series. OEA/Ser.L/V/II. Doc.156/18 INTER-AMERICAN
  • The GCC Crisis at One Year

    The GCC Crisis at One Year

    The GCC Crisis at One Year Stalemate Becomes New Reality Contributors Majed M. al-Ansari Abdullah Baabood Gabriel Collins David B. Des Roches Charles W. Dunne Imad K. Harb Khalil E. Jahshan Marwan Kabalan Tamara Kharroub Joe Macaron Kristian Coates Ulrichsen Editors Zeina Azzam Imad K. Harb TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction 5 Khalil E. Jahshan I: Stalemate and Mediation 11 Measures of Stalemate in the GCC Crisis 13 Imad K. Harb Kuwait’s GCC Mediation: Incentives and Reasons for Failure 23 Marwan Kabalan A Difficult Position: US Mediation in the Gulf Dispute 31 Charles W. Dunne Perspective: Can Washington Resolve the Impasse? 43 Majed M. al-Ansari II: Impacts and Implications 47 Missed Opportunities and Failed Integration in the GCC 49 Kristian Coates Ulrichsen Anti-Qatar Embargo Grinds toward Strategic Failure 59 Gabriel Collins Qatar’s Military Response to a National Emergency 73 ACW Research Team GCC Military Cooperation: A Receding Vision 81 David B. Des Roches Understanding the Humanitarian Costs of the Blockade 91 Tamara Kharroub GCC Divisions and Regional Challenges 101 Joe Macaron The International Implications of the GCC Stalemate 109 Abdullah Baabood Biographies of Contributors 119 About Arab Center Washington DC 125 INTRODUCTION Khalil E. Jahshan INTRODUCTION Khalil E. Jahshan June 5, 2018 marked the first anniversary of the crisis in the Gulf Cooperation Council, when Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates, and Bahrain severed diplo- matic relations with neighboring Qatar and imposed an air, land, and sea blockade against it. A few weeks later, they issued a long list of demands for their fellow GCC member to implement in return for defusing the crisis.