DOCSLIB.ORG

Method Statement for Bailiwick Business Tunnels

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Method Statement for Bailiwick Business Tunnels Method Statement for Bailiwick Business Tunnels The States of Guernsey recognises that there may be a need for business trips to occur and these may be resumed under controlled circumstances if they are carried out responsibly in terms of health and the appropriate precautionary measures are followed. Business trips must comply with industry-specific safety precautions. This method statement focuses on safety measures to reduce the risk of catching and/or spreading the virus that causes COVID-19 and to support effective contact tracing. A person who undertakes One Day Business Travel is called a Business Traveller in this document. Hazard Identification Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is an infectious disease caused by a newly discovered coronavirus. • The COVID-19 virus spreads primarily through droplets of saliva or discharge from the nose when an infected person coughs or sneezes • The virus can survive for up to 72 hours out of the body on contaminated surfaces. • People can pick up the virus by breathing in the droplets or by touching contaminated surfaces and then touching their eyes, mouth and face. General guidance • Ensure that Business Travellers are advised, in advance, not to travel/stay at home, if they are displaying symptoms or feeling unwell, have been diagnosed with COVID-19 or cared for someone with COVID-19 within the last 14 days. • Ask all individuals attending the meeting to wash or sanitise their hands frequently – after coughing or sneezing, before preparing drinks, after toilet use and during exposure to high traffic public areas, such as airports. • There should be strict attention to respiratory etiquette with a cover the mouth with a tissue, sleeve or elbow when coughing or sneezing message and a promotion of the “Catch It, Kill It, Bin It”. • Used tissues should be put straight in the bin and hands washed or sanitised afterwards. • Ensure that information on the use of face-coverings is available. Face coverings/surgical masks should be made available for those requesting to wear them. These should be 1 changed if become moist, damaged or every 4 hours, disposed of immediately in a bin and hands washed or sanitised afterwards. Information for Businesses • The Business Traveller must conduct his or her business only at a meeting in – o a designated meeting room at the airport hangars only, o a meeting room in an office building or other business building, or o where the business is a property viewing, at the property, and for the avoidance of doubt, for these purposes "other business building" excludes a dwelling and any building to which there is public access, such as a restaurant, café or pub. • The Business Traveller must not enter any place other than the airport and the building where the meeting is held (if somewhere different). Travel between airport and meeting rooms on Fixed Base Operator’s Premises Meetings taking place at the airport hangars – for Business Travellers arriving via private or chartered service only: • The relevant Fixed Base Operator will organise a dedicated vehicle and walkway to transfer individuals from the chartered aircraft to the meeting room and back to the aircraft after the meeting. • There must be no physical contact at any time (including but not limited to handshakes) between the Business Traveller and the driver, and the Business Traveller must not let the driver carry or otherwise touch any bag or other possession. • The Business Traveller must sit on the back seat of the vehicle. • The Business Traveller must keep his or her face covering on for the duration of the journey. • The Business Traveller must ensure that he or she is the only passenger in the vehicle. • The Business Traveller must ensure that the windows of the vehicle remain open for the duration of the journey. • The Business Traveller must ensure that the name of the driver is recorded, and that this record is maintained for 14 days (to expedite contact tracing). 2 Vehicles used for transporting the Business Traveller should be cleaned after each use, with particular focus on frequently touched surfaces, such as handles and seat belts, advice can be found here. Travel to and from the meeting (where the meeting is not at the airport) • The Business Traveller must travel to the meeting and back to the airport in a private car or taxi, and not by public transport. • There must be no physical contact at any time (including but not limited to handshakes) between the Business Traveller and the driver, and the Business Traveller must not let the driver carry or otherwise touch any bag or other possession. • The Business Traveller must sit on the back seat of the vehicle. • The Business Traveller must keep his or her face covering on for the duration of the journey. • The Business Traveller must ensure that he or she is the only passenger in the vehicle. • The Business Traveller must ensure that the windows of the vehicle remain open for the duration of the journey. • The Business Traveller must ensure that the vehicle travels directly to the meeting and back to the airport. • The Business Traveller must ensure that the name of the driver is recorded, and that this record is maintained for 14 days (to expedite contact tracing). Vehicles used for transporting the Business Traveller should be cleaned after each use, with particular focus on frequently touched surfaces, such as handles and seat belts, advice can be found here. At the meeting (including where the meeting constitutes viewing a property) • The Business Traveller should maintain at least 1 metre physical distance between individuals from within and outside the Bailiwick, including moving through meeting venues. No physical contact should take place, such as handshakes and hugs. • The Business traveller should ensure that a record of people attending the meeting, and their contact details, are kept for a period of 14 days, to expedite contact tracing, if required. • Items, such as pens, PowerPoint pointers and phones must not be shared. • The meeting should be held in a specified area of the premises and attendees kept to a minimum 3 • A separate toilet should be provided for the Business Traveller • For any refreshments offered, disposable cutlery and crockery should be used. There should be no shared food items/dishes e.g. trays of sandwiches, milk jugs/cartons or beverage supplies from which those attending help themselves. The Business Traveller should have dedicated supplies and not handle any shared equipment e.g. coffee machines, kettles etc. • Where documents are required to be circulated, physical distance must be maintained and hand sanitizer used afterwards. If possible, documents signed/reviewed during the meeting, should then be left untouched for 72 hours, or hands thoroughly washed after touching them. • Windows must remain open where possible to provide adequate ventilation or the air condition system should be compliant with the regulations issued by the Federation of European Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning Associations in Covid-19 context. • The physical area where members sit should be aired after the meeting and left untouched for 2 hours before being deep cleaned. This also includes toilets, any other facilities used and any surfaces potentially touched. Cleaning procedures should follow guidance available on https://covid19.gov.gg/guidance/business/cleaning Contingency plans • In the eventuality of someone becoming symptomatic/unwell during their flight or during the meeting, plans must be in place to deal with the situation as quickly as possible. This should include, as a minimum, access to a healthcare provider for testing and treatment as required, transport and accommodation in order to self- isolate. • Whilst in Guernsey, if a visitor develops any of the following symptoms, however mild, please phone the Coronavirus Helpline on 01481 756938 or 01481 756969. Staff will provide advice and book for testing, should this be required. • Symptoms include fever, chills, cough, muscle ache, fatigue, cough, headache – sinus pain or pain around the eyes, loss of smell or taste or shortness of breath the latest symptom list can be found here • In the event of a medical emergency involving visitors, please ensure that the emergency services are informed of the recent travel and arrival in Guernsey, so adequate infection prevention measures can be put in place. • On occasion it will not be possible for a Business Traveller to leave Guernsey on the same day he or she arrives for reasons outside the Business Traveller's control – because of technical issues with the aircraft on which he or she is travelling, for example, or because of delays caused by fog or other bad weather. 4 To minimise the risk to public health, in such circumstances a Business Traveller must travel directly to accommodation at which he or she can self-isolate in a room of his or her own and must inform [email protected]. He or she must self-isolate there until it is possible to leave Guernsey, at which point the Business Traveller must travel directly to the airport in a car, complying with the conditions and restrictions above relating to travel to and from the meeting. Further guidance about self- isolation is available Self-isolation | States of Guernsey - COVID-19 (gov.gg). A Business Traveller must, before travelling, identify suitable accommodation at which he or she may self-isolate overnight if that is necessary – for example, the address of a hotel which offers full board and room service and which he or she knows has, or is very likely to have, rooms available for the night of the date of his or her travel. 5 .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Sovereignty of the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories in the Brexit Era
    Island Studies Journal, 15(1), 2020, 151-168 The sovereignty of the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories in the Brexit era Maria Mut Bosque School of Law, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya, Spain MINECO DER 2017-86138, Ministry of Economic Affairs & Digital Transformation, Spain Institute of Commonwealth Studies, University of London, UK [email protected] (corresponding author) Abstract: This paper focuses on an analysis of the sovereignty of two territorial entities that have unique relations with the United Kingdom: the Crown Dependencies and the British Overseas Territories (BOTs). Each of these entities includes very different territories, with different legal statuses and varying forms of self-administration and constitutional linkages with the UK. However, they also share similarities and challenges that enable an analysis of these territories as a complete set. The incomplete sovereignty of the Crown Dependencies and BOTs has entailed that all these territories (except Gibraltar) have not been allowed to participate in the 2016 Brexit referendum or in the withdrawal negotiations with the EU. Moreover, it is reasonable to assume that Brexit is not an exceptional situation. In the future there will be more and more relevant international issues for these territories which will remain outside of their direct control, but will have a direct impact on them. Thus, if no adjustments are made to their statuses, these territories will have to keep trusting that the UK will be able to represent their interests at the same level as its own interests. Keywords: Brexit, British Overseas Territories (BOTs), constitutional status, Crown Dependencies, sovereignty https://doi.org/10.24043/isj.114 • Received June 2019, accepted March 2020 © 2020—Institute of Island Studies, University of Prince Edward Island, Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • 2011 Biodiversity Snapshot. Guernsey Appendices
    UK Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies: 2011 Biodiversity snapshot. Guernsey: Appendices. Author: Dr Charles David Guernsey Biological Records Centre, States of Guernsey Environment Department & La Societe Guernesiaise. More information available at: www.biologicalrecordscentre.gov.gg This section includes a series of appendices that provide additional information relating to that provided in the Guernsey chapter of the publication: UK Overseas Territories and Crown Dependencies: 2011 Biodiversity snapshot. All information relating to Guernsey is available at http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-5743 The entire publication is available for download at http://jncc.defra.gov.uk/page-5821 Commissioned by the States of Guernsey Environment Department for the Joint Nature Conservation Committee Prepared by Dr C T David Guernsey Biological Records Centre August 2010 1 Contents Appendix 1: Bailiwick of Guernsey – Location and Introduction ............................. 3 Location, Area, Number of Islands, Population 3 Topography 4 Main economic sectors 4 Constitutional Position 4 Appendix 2: Multilateral Environmental Agreements. ............................................... 5 Appendix 3: National Legislation ................................................................................ 8 Planning 8 Ancient Monuments 8 Coast and beaches 8 Land 8 Fauna 8 Flora 9 Trees 9 Import/export 9 Marine environment 9 Waste 9 Water 9 Appendix 4: National Strategies ................................................................................ 11 Appendix
    [Show full text]
  • The World's Modern Autonomy Systems
    2 The concepT of poliTical auTonomy Thomas Benedikter The World‘s Modern Autonomy Systems Concepts and Experiences of Regional Territorial Autonomy 1 The World’s Modern Autonomy Systems Institute of Minority Rights Concepts and Experiences of Regional Territorial EURAC Research Autonomy Viale Druso/Drususallee 1 I – 39100 Bolzano/Bozen Bozen/Bolzano, 2009 Email: [email protected] This study was written for the European Academy of A second version of this work is available in German Bolzano/Bozen (EURAC; www.eurac.edu), Institute for language: Minority Rights, in the frame of the project Europe- Thomas Benedikter South Asia Exchange on Supranational (Regional) Autonomien der Welt – Eine Einführung in die Policies and Instruments for the Promotion of Human Regionalautonomien der Welt mit vergleichender Rights and the Management of Minority Issues Analyse, ATHESIA, Bozen 2007 (EURASIA-Net) (FP7). ISBN 978-88-8266-479-4 www.athesiabuch.it The first edition of this publication has been released [email protected] in India in 2007 under the title „The World‘s Working Regional Autonomies“ by ANTHEM PRESS, www. This work is dedicated to my father, Alfons Benedikter anthempress.com (born in 1918), who for most of his life gave his all for C-49 Kalkaji, New Delhi 110019, India autonomy and self-determination in South Tyrol. 75-76 Blackfriars Road, London SE1 8HA, UK or PO Box 9779, London SW19 7ZG, UK 244 Madison Ave. #116, New York, NY 10016, USA Edited by Copyright © EURAC 2009 This edition is published in collaboration with the Mahanirban Calcutta Research Group GC 45, Sector 3, Salt Lake, Kolkata-700106, India.
    [Show full text]
  • Edward III, Vol. 3, P. 96
    96 CALENDAR OF PATENT ROLLS. 1335. Membrane 24—con,f. April 20. The like to the good men of Northampton for their bridge over the Nene, Clipstone in to be taken by V^illiam de Lodelowe, Walter de Burgh, and William de Sherwood. Jburgh"T"k , of Norhaaipton* . O ' By p.s. April 12. Licence for Nicholas Bonde to crenellate a chamber to be built in his Clipstone. dwelling-house of Herkestede, co. Suffolk. By p.s. Respite from knighthood for three years from Ascension Day for Robert de Weyland? notwithstanding the late proclamation made in every county of the realm that all who have held 40/* yearly of land and rent for three years and are not yet knights should take the order by that feast at the latest. ByK. April 4. Protection with clause nolumus, for one year, for Benedict de Nor- Nottingham, mantoii. April 17. Presentation of Hugh de Ifboraco to the church of Drayton Passelcwc, Clipstoue. in the diocese of Lincoln. April 18. Grant to William le Engleis, king's yeoman, in enlargement of his lato CJipstonc. appointment by letters patent to the custody of the peel-house of He^hevcd } for life at a rent of 5 marks, that he shall hold the custody free of rent. 'ft By p.s. Grant to Thomas dc Whitchurclie, king's yeoman, in enlargement of his late appointment by letters patent to the office of porter and macebearer of the town of Kaernurvan, and by other letters patent to the bailiwick of the office of rhaglaw (ray lot ie) of Arvon and Uighcurveye, co.
    [Show full text]
  • Validated Maintenance Organisation Approvals | Bailiwick of Guernsey STATUS AS on 1 SEPTEMBER 2021
    Validated Maintenance Organisation Approvals | Bailiwick of Guernsey STATUS AS ON 1 SEPTEMBER 2021 Approval no. Name of Maintenance Organisation Country 2-REG.145.1.UK Aircraft Servicing Guernsey Limited United Kingdom 2-REG.145.2 RGV Aviation Limited United Kingdom 2-REG.145.3 Turkish Technic Turkey 2-REG.145.4 Rheinland Air Services GmbH Germany 2-REG.145.6 AMAC Aerospace Switzerland AG Switzerland 2-REG.145.7 ATS Aero Limited United Kingdom 2-REG.145.8 Fokker Services Netherlands 2-REG.145.9 Castle Air United Kingdom 2-REG.145.12 Inflite United Kingdom 2-REG.145.15 Jet Aviation Switzerland 2-REG.145.18 Airlines Maintenance Company France 2-REG.145.20 BCT Aviation Maintenance Ltd. United Kingdom 2-REG-145.25 OGMA – Industria Aeronáutica de Portugal S.A Portugal 2-REG.145.26 Air Works India Engineering Pvt. Ltd. T/A Air Works Commercial MRO India 2-REG.145.27 Gulfstream Aerospace Ltd. United Kingdom 2-REG.145.28 Caerdav Limited United Kingdom 2-REG.145.32 GMR Aero Technic Ltd EASA 2-REG.145.32.I M/s GMR Air Cargo and Aerospace Engineering Ltd. India 2-REG.145.33 Boeing Shanghai Aviation Services China 2-REG.145.35 SIA Engineering (Philippines) Philipines 2-REG.145.37 Cessna Zurich Citation Service Center GmbH Switzerland 2-REG.145.41 Storm Aviation Ltd. United Kingdom 2-REG.145.42 Tarmac Aerosave S.A.S France 2-REG.145.48 Signature Technicair United Kingdom 2-REG.145.50 AerSale Inc United States 2-REG.145.51 KLM Engineering & Maintenance Netherlands 2-REG.145.52 Contact Air Technik GmbH Germany 2-REG.145.54 Croatia Airlines d.d Croatia 2-REG.145.58 Apple Aviation United Kingdom 2-REG.145.59 ST Engineering Aerospace Services Company Pte.
    [Show full text]
  • Jerusalem and the Riparian Simile Shaul E
    Political Geography 21 (2002) 745–764 www.politicalgeography.com Jerusalem and the riparian simile Shaul E. Cohen a,∗, David A. Frank b a Department of Geography, The University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97303, USA b Robert D. Clark Honors College, The University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, USA Abstract Many see the city of Jerusalem as an intractable religious political issue, beyond the pale of negotiation and problem solving. This view reflects a set of problematic assumptions, includ- ing beliefs that Jerusalem produces a contest between maximalist claims that only power can resolve. In this article, we conduct a conceptual exercise designed to rethink Jerusalem as an issue of political geography open to needs-based bargaining. Drawing from evidence in the Transboundary Freshwater Dispute Database, we suggest that riparian negotiations offer an analogue that might be used to restructure the discourse used in the negotiations about Jerusa- lem. We propose the use of a riparian simile in which negotiators begin with the assumption that “the conflict over Jerusalem is like international water disputes.” Riparian negotiations encourage movement from sovereign rights to functional needs, the use of time as a flexible variable, a focus on beneficial uses, and the creation of language recognizing local contin- gencies. 2002 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. Keywords: Analogic thinking; Conflict; Jerusalem; Metaphor; Riparian simile; Territory And there are days here when everything is sails and more sails, even though there’s no sea in Jerusalem, not even a river. Everything is sails: the flags, the prayer shawls, the black coats, the monks’ robes, the kaftans and kaffiyehs, young women’s dresses and headdresses, Torah mantles and prayer rugs, feelings that swell in the wind and hopes that set them sailing in other directions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Formation of Kyrgyz Foreign Policy 1991-2004
    THE FORMATION OF KYRGYZ FOREIGN POLICY 1991-2004 A Thesis Presented to the Faculty Of The FletCher SChool of Law and DiplomaCy, Tufts University By THOMAS J. C. WOOD In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy May 2005 Professor Andrew Hess (Chair) Professor John Curtis Perry Professor Sung-Yoon Lee ii Thomas J.C. Wood [email protected] Education 2005: Ph.D. Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University Dissertation Formation of Kyrgyz Foreign Policy 1992-2004 Supervisor, Professor Andrew Hess. 1993: M.A.L.D. Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy, Tufts University 1989: B.A. in History and Politics, University of Exeter, England. Experience 08/2014-present: Associate Professor, Political Science, University of South Carolina Aiken, Aiken, SC. 09/2008-07/2014: Assistant Professor, Political Science, University of South Carolina Aiken, Aiken, SC. 09/2006-05/2008: Visiting Assistant Professor, Political Science, Trinity College, Hartford, CT. 02/2005 – 04/2006: Program Officer, Kyrgyzstan, International Foundation for Election Systems (IFES) Washington DC 11/2000 – 06/2004: Director of Faculty Recruitment and University Relations, Civic Education Project, Washington DC. 01/1998-11/2000: Chair of Department, Program in International Relations, American University – Central Asia, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan. 08/1997-11/2000: Civic Education Project Visiting Faculty Fellow, American University- Central Asia, Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan. Languages Languages: Turkish (advanced), Kyrgyz (intermediate), Russian (basic), French (intermediate). iii ABSTRACT The Evolution of Kyrgyz Foreign PoliCy This empirical study, based on extensive field research, interviews with key actors, and use of Kyrgyz and Russian sources, examines the formation of a distinct foreign policy in a small Central Asian state, Kyrgyzstan, following her independence from the Soviet Union in 1991.
    [Show full text]
  • Dependent Territories (Status Updated 8 January 2016)
    Table 5: Dependent territories (Status updated 8 January 2016) Dependent territory Category Plan / Draft Submitted for Dep. Progress summary Next steps/needs Timeline enactment American Samoa 1 US Anguilla 1 GB Aruba 2 NL CITES legislation enacted Agreement between NL and Secretariat on revised legislative analysis, including possible Category 1 status Bailiwick of Guernsey 3 Yes Yes GB Comprehensive enabling and Guernsey’s CITES Ordinance pending implementing legislation drafted and enactment. Guernsey’s Scientific currently passing through Guernsey’s Authority will be appointed prior to its legislative process and will be enacted enactment. Ordinance, Once it has in the first quarter of 2016. been adopted and its SA appointed it will qualify for inclusion in Category 1. Bailiwick of Jersey 1 GB Bermuda 2 Timetable No GB Commitment to prepare draft legislation; Preparation of draft legislation submitted CITES workshop for OTs and CDs held on 7/01/16 earlier this year; draft text should soon be submitted to the Secretariat for comments British Indian Ocean Territory 1 GB British Virgin Islands 2 Timetable Yes GB Amended draft Trade in Endangered Comments from the Secretariat under submitted Species Act submitted to the Secretariat preparation. It was not possible to meet on 7/01/16 for comments on 1 Dec 2015, the deadline of the 17th December. requesting comments by the 17th. Cayman Islands (CIG) 2 Yes Yes GB The Cayman Islands Government (CIG) Submission of enacted legislation. CIG considers that its legislation, as will be happy to make any further amended, meets the 4 basic amendments to its CITES legislation, requirements of the Convention.
    [Show full text]
  • Entry Requirements for the Bailiwick of Guernsey
    Entry requirements for the Bailiwick of Guernsey • The Bailiwick of Guernsey continues to have testing and self-isolation requirements for persons arriving into the islands. It is the responsibility of the person travelling to the Bailiwick of Guernsey to check the current requirements before they travel and make sure they are prepared. • The requirements for testing and self-isolation differ based on a country or regions classification. Due to its prevalence rate for cases of Covid-19, France has been classified as a category 4 country from 00:01 on 29 July – this means that all arrivals from France are required to self-isolate for at least 14 days on arrival into the Bailiwick of Guernsey. • The country and regional classifications are published at https://covid19.gov.gg/guidance/travel/countries. The list is reviewed on a regular basis and can change at short notice. • If people decline to take a test on arrival they will have to self-isolate for 21 days. • All arrivals are required to register on the Travel Tracker and enter journey details up to 2 days before arrival in the Bailiwick. • From 14 May, Covid tests for people arriving in the Bailiwick are charged at £25 per test. These can be paid for through the Travel Tracker. • You must not leave your place of self-isolation during the period that you are required to self-isolate. This is a legal requirement and failure to comply is a criminal offence. • At this time, the Bailiwick of Guernsey is not currently accepting visiting vessels from Category 3 or Category 4 regions or countries outside of the Common Travel Area (which comprises the UK, Republic of Ireland, Guernsey, Jersey and the Isle of Man).
    [Show full text]
  • Economic and Social Council
    UNITED NATIONS E Economic and Social Distr. Council GENERAL E/C.12/GBR/5/Add.1 12 February 2008 Original: ENGLISH Substantive session of 2008 IMPLEMENTATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL COVENANT ON ECONOMIC, SOCIAL AND CULTURAL RIGHTS Fifth periodic reports submitted by States parties under articles 16 and 17 of the Covenant Addendum UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND: CROWN DEPENDENCIES [7 August 2007] GE.08-40456 (E) 110308 E/C.12/GBR/5/Add.1 page 2 CONTENTS Paragraphs Page CHAPTER l. REPORT FROM THE BAILIWICK OF GUERNSEY AND ITS DEPENDENCIES ................................................. 1 - 308 3 CHAPTER 2. REPORT FROM THE BAILIWICK OF JERSEY ............... 309 - 604 55 CHAPTER 3. REPORT FROM THE ISLE OF MAN ................................. 605 - 622 119 E/C.12/GBR/5/Add.1 page 3 CHAPTER I. REPORT FROM THE BAILIWICK OF GUERNSEY AND ITS DEPENDENCIES 1. Statistics (includes the sections “land and people” and “economic, social and cultural characteristics”)1 Population • 76,315 (Isle of Man - in 2001). • 88,200 (Bailiwick of Jersey - in 2005). • 63,267 (Bailiwick of Guernsey - in 2001). Number of men per 100 women • 96 (Isle of Man - in 2001). • 95 (Bailiwick of Jersey - in 2001). • 98 (Bailiwick of Guernsey - in 2001). Ethnic groups • 51% Jersey, 35% UK, 6% Portuguese/Madeiran, 3% Irish (Bailiwick of Jersey - in 2001). • 60.8% Guernsey, 0.6% Jersey, 25.9% UK, 0.6% Irish, 1.8% Portuguese, 1.5% Other EU, 0.6% Other Europe, 2.3% Other - (Bailiwick of Guernsey - in 2001). Percentage of population under 15 • 17.8% (Isle of Man - in 2001). • 15.7% (Bailiwick of Guernsey - in 2001).
    [Show full text]
  • State and Country Data Codes As of 12/1/2014
    State and Country Data Codes as of 12/1/2014 Press CTRL+F to prompt the search field. STATE AND COUNTRY DATA CODES TABLE OF CONTENTS 1--INTRODUCTION 2--U.S. STATE CODES 2.1 LIS, MAK, OLS, POB, PLC, AND RES FIELDS 2.2 RES FIELD CODE EXCEPTIONS FOR BOAT FILE RECORDS 3--U.S. TERRITORIAL POSSESSIONS LIS, MAK, OLS, POB, PLC, AND RES FIELD CODES FOR U.S. TERRITORIAL POSSESSIONS 4--INDIAN NATIONS LIS, MAK, OLS, POB, PLC, AND RES FIELD CODES FOR INDIAN NATIONS 5--CANADIAN PROVINCES LIS, MAK, OLS, POB, PLC, AND RES FIELD CODES FOR CANADIAN PROVINCES 6--MEXICAN STATES LIS, MAK, OLS, POB, PLC, AND RES FIELD CODES FOR MEXICAN STATES 7--COUNTRIES/DEPENDENCIES/TERRITORIES 7.1 CTZ, LIS, MAK, OLS, POB, PLC, AND RES FIELD CODES FOR COUNTRIES/DEPENDENCIES/TERRITORIES 7.2 CTZ, LIS, MAK, OLS, POB, PLC, AND RES FIELD CODES FOR COUNTRIES/DEPENDENCIES/TERRITORIES, INDIAN NATIONS, MEXICAN STATES, PROVINCES, STATES, AND U.S. TERRITORIAL POSSESSIONS IN ALPHABETICAL ORDER BY CODE STATE AND COUNTRY DATA CODES SECTION 1--INTRODUCTION The appropriate code for the state, territorial possession, Indian nation, province, or country must be used in the Citizenship (CTZ), License State (LIS), Make (MAK), Operator's License State (OLS), Place of Birth (POB), Place of Crime (PLC), and Registration State (RES) Fields. SECTION 2--U.S. STATE CODES 2.1 LIS, MAK, OLS, POB, PLC, AND RES FIELDS State Code Alabama AL Alaska AK Arizona AZ Arkansas AR California CA* Colorado CO* Connecticut CT Delaware DE* District of Columbia DC Florida FL Georgia GA Hawaii HI* Idaho ID Illinois IL Indiana IN Iowa IA Kansas KS* Kentucky KY Louisiana LA Maine ME Maryland MD Massachusetts MA* Michigan MI* Minnesota MN Mississippi MS* Missouri MO Montana MT Nebraska NB Nevada NV New Hampshire NH New Jersey NJ New Mexico NM New York NY North Carolina NC North Dakota ND Ohio OH Oklahoma OK Oregon OR * This code should not be used in the Boat File RES Field.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnic Violence in the Former Soviet Union Richard H
    Florida State University Libraries Electronic Theses, Treatises and Dissertations The Graduate School 2011 Ethnic Violence in the Former Soviet Union Richard H. Hawley Jr. (Richard Howard) Follow this and additional works at the FSU Digital Library. For more information, please contact [email protected] THE FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF SOCIAL SCIENCES ETHNIC VIOLENCE IN THE FORMER SOVIET UNION By RICHARD H. HAWLEY, JR. A Dissertation submitted to the Political Science Department in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Degree Awarded: Fall Semester, 2011 Richard H. Hawley, Jr. defended this dissertation on August 26, 2011. The members of the supervisory committee were: Heemin Kim Professor Directing Dissertation Jonathan Grant University Representative Dale Smith Committee Member Charles Barrilleaux Committee Member Lee Metcalf Committee Member The Graduate School has verified and approved the above-named committee members, and certifies that the dissertation has been approved in accordance with university requirements. ii To my father, Richard H. Hawley, Sr. and To my mother, Catherine S. Hawley (in loving memory) iii AKNOWLEDGEMENTS There are many people who made this dissertation possible, and I extend my heartfelt gratitude to all of them. Above all, I thank my committee chair, Dr. Heemin Kim, for his understanding, patience, guidance, and comments. Next, I extend my appreciation to Dr. Dale Smith, a committee member and department chair, for his encouragement to me throughout all of my years as a doctoral student at the Florida State University. I am grateful for the support and feedback of my other committee members, namely Dr.
    [Show full text]