DOCSLIB.ORG

Arxiv:2006.01920V1 [Math.CO] 2 Jun 2020 Describing the Ehrhart Theory, Tropical Geometry, and Grobner¨ Theory Necessary for Our Methods in Section 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Arxiv:2006.01920V1 [Math.CO] 2 Jun 2020 Describing the Ehrhart Theory, Tropical Geometry, and Grobner¨ Theory Necessary for Our Methods in Section 2 MULTIVARIATE VOLUME, EHRHART, AND h∗-POLYNOMIALS OF POLYTROPES MARIE-CHARLOTTE BRANDENBURG, SOPHIA ELIA, LEON ZHANG ∗ ABSTRACT. The univariate Ehrhart and h -polynomials of lattice polytopes have been widely stud- ied. We describe methods from toric geometry for computing multivariate versions of volume, Ehrhart and h∗-polynomials of lattice polytropes, which are both tropically and classically convex. These algorithms are applied to all polytropes of dimensions 2, 3 and 4, yielding a large class of integer polynomials. We give a complete combinatorial description of the coefficients of volume polynomials of 3-dimensional polytropes in terms of regular central subdivisions of the fundamental polytope. Finally, we provide a partial characterization of the analogous coefficients in dimension 4. 1. INTRODUCTION Tropical polytopes are analogues of ordinary polytopes arising naturally both in tropical geometry and in a range of algorithmic applications to other fields, including optimization [JS19], phyloge- netics [YZZ19], mechanism design [CT18], and building theory [JSY07]. Several recent articles have focused on the question of how to define and compute the volume of a tropical polytopes. One approach is simply to consider their discrete volume, which is relevant to a number of appli- cations: for instance, the irreducible components of a Mustafin variety correspond to lattice points of a certain computable tropical polytope [Car+11; Zha20]. Polytropes, which are both tropically and classically convex [JK08], form a fundamental class of tropical polytopes. They also appear in the literature as alcoved polytopes of type A. Polytropes are closely related to the notion of Kleene stars and the problem of finding shortest paths in weighted graphs [Tra17; JS19]. Both the volume and the nonnegativity of the h-vector of poly- tropes have been studied in the language of affine Coxeter arrangements [LP07]. A certain family of polytropes called Lipschitz polytopes corresponding to finite metric spaces has also been heavily investigated (e.g. [Ver15; C¸el+20]). In this article we examine the multivariate Ehrhart theory of polytropes, and describe methods for computing the multivariate volume, Ehrhart, and h∗-polynomials for all polytropes. We begin by arXiv:2006.01920v1 [math.CO] 2 Jun 2020 describing the Ehrhart theory, tropical geometry, and Grobner¨ theory necessary for our methods in Section 2. In Section 3 we describe methods for computing multivariate Ehrhart polynomials and volume polynomials of polytropes. In Section 4 we apply these methods to compute the volume, Ehrhart, and h∗-polynomials for all polytropes of dimension at most 4, and we study the combinatorics deriving from the coefficients of the volume polynomials. In recent work, Loho and Schymura [LS19] developed a notion of volume for tropical polytopes driven by a tropical version of dilation, which yields an Ehrhart theory for a new class of tropical lattices. This notion of volume is intrinsically tropical and exhibits many natural properties of a volume measure, such as being monotonic and rotation-invariant. However, their notion dis- cards the classical lattice Zd in favor of tropical lattices and thus is less relevant for applications involving ordinary lattices. 1 De la Puente and Claver´ıa proved the Mahler conjecture for centrally symmetric 3-dimensional polytropes by computing their volume polynomials in [PC18]. Their approach to volume polyno- mials differs from ours, relying instead on a description of 3-dimensional polytropes as perturbed 3-dimensional boxes. By contrast, our approach works in arbitrary dimension; it produces six dif- ferent volume polynomials in 12 variables to cover all combinatorial types of polytropes, whereas de la Puente and Claver´ıa use a single volume polynomial in 21 variables. Acknowledgements. The authors thank Christian Haase, Michael Joswig, Benjamin Schroter,¨ Rainer Sinn, and Bernd Sturmfels for many helpful conversations. They also thank Michael Joswig, Lars Kastner, and Benjamin Schroter¨ for providing a dataset for 4-dimensional polytropes, and the Max Planck Institute for Mathematics in the Sciences for its hospitality while working on this project. Leon Zhang was partially supported by an NSF Graduate Research Fellowship. Sophia Elia was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) Graduiertenkolleg “Facets of Complexity”. 2. BACKGROUND In this section we give a brief overview of the background material we use for our results. Note that throughout this article, we assume P is a lattice polytope unless stated otherwise. 2.1. Ehrhart theory. In this subsection, we recall some essentials of Ehrhart theory. For more details, we refer the reader to [BR15]. A lattice polytope P ⊆ Rn is the convex hull of a finite set of points in Zn. The Ehrhart counting function of P, written ehrP(k), gives the number of lattice points in the k-th dilate of P for k 2 Z≥1: n ehrP(k) = jkP \ Z j. Ehrhart’s theorem [Ehr62] says that ehrP(k) is given by a polynomial in k of degree equal to the dimension of P. Furthermore, the constant term of this polynomial is equal to 1 and the coefficient of the leading term is equal to the Euclidean volume of P within its affine span. The interpretation of other coefficients of the Ehrhart polynomial is an active direction of research. Generating functions play a central role in Ehrhart theory. The Ehrhart series of a polytope P, written EhrP(t), is the formal power series given by: k EhrP(t) = 1 + ∑ ehrP(k)t . k≥1 For a d-dimensional lattice polytope, the Ehrhart series has the following rational expression: h∗ (t) Ehr (t) = 1 + ehr (k)tk = P , P ∑ P ( − )d+1 k≥1 1 t ∗ d ∗ i ∗ where hP(t) = ∑i hi t is a polynomial in t of degree at most d. Furthermore, each hi is a non- negative integer [Sta80]. The normalized volume of P is defined as Vol(P) = dim(P)! vol(P), where vol(P) is the Euclidean volume of P within its affine span. It is equal to the sum of the coefficients of the h∗-polynomial. The Ehrhart polynomial may be recovered from the h∗-vector through the following transforma- tion: d ∗ k + d − i ehrP(k) = ∑ hi . i=0 d 2 Polytopes also admit an inequality description as bounded intersections of finitely many closed half-spaces: P = fx 2 Rn : Ax ≤ ag for some A 2 Rm×n and a 2 Rm. The univariate Ehrhart polynomial is a function in a single variable k, which counts the number of lattice points in kP = fx 2 Rn : Ax ≤ kag, in which all facet-defining hyperplanes of P are moved uniformly. A multivariate Ehrhart polynomial is polynomial in n variables a = (a1,..., an), which allows for the independent movement of facets. 2.2. Tropical convexity. In this subsection we review some basics of tropical arithmetic and trop- ical convexity. We refer readers to [DS04] or [Jos] for a more detailed exposition. Over the min-plus tropical semiring T = R [ f¥g, we define for a, b 2 T the operations of addition a ⊕ b and multiplication a b by a ⊕ b = min(a, b), a b = a + b. We can similarly define vector addition and scalar multiplication: for any scalars a, b 2 T and for n any vectors v = (v1,..., vn), w = (w1,..., wn) 2 T , we define a v = (a + v1, a + v2,..., a + vn) a v ⊕ b w = (min(a + v1, b + w1), . , min(a + vn, b + wn)). n Let V = fv1,..., vrg ⊆ R be a finite set of points. The tropical convex hull of V is given by the set of all tropical linear combinations tconv(V) = fa1 v1 ⊕ · · · ⊕ ar vrj a1,..., ar 2 Rg. A tropically convex set in Rn is closed under tropical scalar multiplication. As a consequence, we can identify a tropically convex set P contained in Rn with its image in the tropical projective torus TPn−1 = Rn/R(1, . , 1).A tropical polytope is the tropical convex hull of a finite set V in TPn−1. A tropical lattice polytope is a tropical polytope whose spanning points are all contained in Zn. Let P = tconv(V) ⊆ TPn−1 be a tropical polytope. The (tropical) type of a point x in TPn−1 with respect to V is the collection of sets S = (S1,..., Sn), where an index i is contained in Sj if (vi)j − xj = min((vi)1 − x1,..., (vi)n − xn). i 2 S2 i 2 S2 \ S3 vi i 2 S1 i 2 S3 2 FIGURE 1. The max-tropical hyperplane Hi ⊆ TP in the chart where the third coordinate is 0, with faces labeled for type identification. n−1 Geometrically, we can view the type of x as follows: a max-tropical hyperplane Ha ⊆ TP with n−1 n−1 apex at a 2 TP is the set of points y 2 TP such that the maximum of fai + yi : i 2 [n]g is attained at least twice. The max-tropical hyperplane H0 induces a complete polyhedral fan 3 n−1 F0 in TP . For each i 2 [r], let Hi be a max-tropical hyperplane with apex vi. Each of these n−1 hyperplanes determines a translate FHi of F0. Two points x, y 2 TP lie in the same face of FHi if and only if vi − x and vi − y achieve their minima in the same coordinates. For a point n−1 x 2 TP with type S = (S1,..., Sn), the set Sj records for which hyperplanes Hi the point x lies in a face such that vi − x is minimal in coordinate j. Figure 1 shows when i is contained in Sj based on the position of x in TP2. The tropical polytope P consists of all points x whose type S = (S1,..., Sn) has all Si nonempty.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Topics in Algorithmic, Enumerative and Geometric Combinatorics
    Thesis for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Topics in algorithmic, enumerative and geometric combinatorics Ragnar Freij Division of Mathematics Department of Mathematical Sciences Chalmers University of Technology and University of Gothenburg G¨oteborg, Sweden 2012 Topics in algorithmic, enumerative and geometric combinatorics Ragnar Freij ISBN 978-91-7385-668-3 c Ragnar Freij, 2012. Doktorsavhandlingar vid Chalmers Tekniska H¨ogskola Ny serie Nr 3349 ISSN 0346-718X Department of Mathematical Sciences Chalmers University of Technology and University of Gothenburg SE-412 96 GOTEBORG,¨ Sweden Phone: +46 (0)31-772 10 00 [email protected] Printed in G¨oteborg, Sweden, 2012 Topics in algorithmic, enumerative and geometric com- binatorics Ragnar Freij ABSTRACT This thesis presents five papers, studying enumerative and extremal problems on combinatorial structures. The first paper studies Forman’s discrete Morse theory in the case where a group acts on the underlying complex. We generalize the notion of a Morse matching, and obtain a theory that can be used to simplify the description of the G-homotopy type of a simplicial complex. As an application, we determine the S2 × Sn−2-homotopy type of the complex of non-connected graphs on n nodes. In the introduction, connections are drawn between the first paper and the evasiveness conjecture for monotone graph properties. In the second paper, we investigate Hansen polytopes of split graphs. By applying a partitioning technique, the number of nonempty faces is counted, and in particular we confirm Kalai’s 3d-conjecture for such polytopes. Further- more, a characterization of exactly which Hansen polytopes are also Hanner polytopes is given.
    [Show full text]
  • Optimal Area-Sensitive Bounds for Polytope Approximation
    Optimal Area-Sensitive Bounds for Polytope Approximation Sunil Arya∗ Guilherme D. da Fonseca† David M. Mount‡ Department of Computer Dept. de Informática Aplicada Department of Computer Science and Engineering Universidade Federal do Science and Institute for The Hong Kong University of Estado do Rio de Janeiro Advanced Computer Studies Science and Technology (UniRio) University of Maryland Clear Water Bay, Kowloon Rio de Janeiro, Brazil College Park, Maryland 20742 Hong Kong [email protected] [email protected] [email protected] ABSTRACT Mahler volume, it is possible to achieve the desired width- Approximating convex bodies is a fundamental question in based sampling. geometry and has applications to a wide variety of optimiza- tion problems. Given a convex body K in Rd for fixed d, Categories and Subject Descriptors the objective is to minimize the number of vertices or facets F.2.2 [Analysis of Algorithms and Problem Complex- of an approximating polytope for a given Hausdorff error ity]: Nonnumerical Algorithms and Problems—Geometrical ε. The best known uniform bound, due to Dudley (1974), problems and computations shows that O((diam(K)/ε)(d−1)/2) facets suffice. While this bound is optimal in the case of a Euclidean ball, it is far General Terms from optimal for skinny convex bodies. We show that, under the assumption that the width of the Algorithms, Theory body in any direction is at least ε, it is possible to approx- imate a convex body using O( area(K)/ε(d−1)/2) facets, Keywords where area(K) is the surface area of the body.
    [Show full text]
  • Abstract Adaptive Sampling for Geometric
    ABSTRACT Title of dissertation: ADAPTIVE SAMPLING FOR GEOMETRIC APPROXIMATION Ahmed Abdelkader Abdelrazek, Doctor of Philosophy, 2020 Dissertation directed by: Professor David M. Mount Computer Science Geometric approximation of multi-dimensional data sets is an essential algorith- mic component for applications in machine learning, computer graphics, and scientific computing. This dissertation promotes an algorithmic sampling methodology for a number of fundamental approximation problems in computational geometry. For each problem, the proposed sampling technique is carefully adapted to the geometry of the input data and the functions to be approximated. In particular, we study proximity queries in spaces of constant dimension and mesh generation in 3D. We start with polytope membership queries, where query points are tested for inclusion in a convex polytope. Trading-off accuracy for efficiency, we tolerate one-sided errors for points within an "-expansion of the polytope. We propose a sampling strategy for the placement of covering ellipsoids sensitive to the local shape of the polytope. The key insight is to realize the samples as Delone sets in the intrinsic Hilbert metric. Using this intrinsic formulation, we considerably simplify state-of-the-art techniques yielding an intuitive and optimal data structure. Next, we study nearest-neighbor queries which retrieve the most similar data point to a given query point. To accommodate more general measures of similarity, we consider non-Euclidean distances including convex distance functions and Bregman divergences. Again, we tolerate multiplicative errors retrieving any point no farther than (1 + ") times the distance to the nearest neighbor. We propose a sampling strategy sensitive to the local distribution of points and the gradient of the distance functions.
    [Show full text]
  • Approximate Polytope Membership Queries | SIAM Journal on Computing
    SIAM J. COMPUT. c 2018 Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics Vol. 47, No. 1, pp. 1{51 ∗ APPROXIMATE POLYTOPE MEMBERSHIP QUERIES SUNIL ARYAy , GUILHERME D. DA FONSECAz , AND DAVID M. MOUNTx Abstract. In the polytope membership problem, a convex polytope K in d is given, and R d the objective is to preprocess K into a data structure so that, given any query point q 2 R , it is possible to determine efficiently whether q 2 K. We consider this problem in an approximate setting. Given an approximation parameter ", the query can be answered either way if the distance from q to K's boundary is at most " times K's diameter. We assume that the dimension d is fixed, and K is presented as the intersection of n halfspaces. Previous solutions to approximate polytope membership were based on straightforward applications of classic polytope approximation techniques by Dudley [Approx. Theory, 10 (1974), pp. 227{236] and Bentley, Faust, and Preparata [Commun. ACM, 25 (1982), pp. 64{68]. The former is optimal in the worst case with respect to space, and the latter is optimal with respect to query time. We present four main results. First, we show how to combine the two above techniques to obtain a simple space-time trade-off. Second, we present an algorithm that dramatically improves this trade-off. In particular, for any constant α ≥ 4, this data structure achieves query time roughly O(1="(d−1)/α) and space roughly O (1="(d−1)(1−Ω(log α)/α)). We do not know whether this space bound is tight, but our third result showsp that there is a convex body such (d−1)(1−O( α)/α that our algorithm achieves a space of at least Ω(1=" ).
    [Show full text]
  • Ten Problems in Geometry
    Ten Problems in Geometry Moritz W. Schmitt G¨unter M. Ziegler∗ Institut f¨urMathematik Institut f¨urMathematik Freie Universit¨atBerlin Freie Universit¨atBerlin Arnimallee 2 Arnimallee 2 14195 Berlin, Germany 14195 Berlin, Germany [email protected] [email protected] May 1, 2011 Abstract We describe ten problems that wait to be solved. Introduction Geometry is a field of knowledge, but it is at the same time an active field of research | our understanding of space, about shapes, about geometric structures develops in a lively dialog, where problems arise, new questions are asked every day. Some of the problems are settled nearly immediately, some of them need years of careful study by many authors, still others remain as challenges for decades. Contents 1 Unfolding polytopes 2 2 Almost disjoint triangles 4 3 Representing polytopes with small coordinates 6 4 Polyhedra that tile space 8 5 Fatness 10 6 The Hirsch conjecture 12 7 Unimodality for cyclic polytopes 14 8 Decompositions of the cube 16 9 A problem concerning the ball and the cube 19 10 The 3d conjecture 21 ∗Partially supported by DFG, Research Training Group \Methods for Discrete Structures" 1 1 Unfolding polytopes In 1525 Albrecht D¨urer'sfamous geometry masterpiece \Underweysung der Messung mit dem Zirckel und Richtscheyt"1 was published in Nuremberg. Its fourth part contains many drawings of nets of 3-dimensional polytopes. Implicitly it contains the following conjecture: Every 3-dimensional convex polytope can be cut open along a spanning tree of its graph and then unfolded into the plane without creating overlaps.
    [Show full text]
  • Focm 2017 Foundations of Computational Mathematics Barcelona, July 10Th-19Th, 2017 Organized in Partnership With
    FoCM 2017 Foundations of Computational Mathematics Barcelona, July 10th-19th, 2017 http://www.ub.edu/focm2017 Organized in partnership with Workshops Approximation Theory Computational Algebraic Geometry Computational Dynamics Computational Harmonic Analysis and Compressive Sensing Computational Mathematical Biology with emphasis on the Genome Computational Number Theory Computational Geometry and Topology Continuous Optimization Foundations of Numerical PDEs Geometric Integration and Computational Mechanics Graph Theory and Combinatorics Information-Based Complexity Learning Theory Plenary Speakers Mathematical Foundations of Data Assimilation and Inverse Problems Multiresolution and Adaptivity in Numerical PDEs Numerical Linear Algebra Karim Adiprasito Random Matrices Jean-David Benamou Real-Number Complexity Alexei Borodin Special Functions and Orthogonal Polynomials Mireille Bousquet-Mélou Stochastic Computation Symbolic Analysis Mark Braverman Claudio Canuto Martin Hairer Pierre Lairez Monique Laurent Melvin Leok Lek-Heng Lim Gábor Lugosi Bruno Salvy Sylvia Serfaty Steve Smale Andrew Stuart Joel Tropp Sponsors Shmuel Weinberger 2 FoCM 2017 Foundations of Computational Mathematics Barcelona, July 10th{19th, 2017 Books of abstracts 4 FoCM 2017 Contents Presentation . .7 Governance of FoCM . .9 Local Organizing Committee . .9 Administrative and logistic support . .9 Technical support . 10 Volunteers . 10 Workshops Committee . 10 Plenary Speakers Committee . 10 Smale Prize Committee . 11 Funding Committee . 11 Plenary talks . 13 Workshops . 21 A1 { Approximation Theory Organizers: Albert Cohen { Ron Devore { Peter Binev . 21 A2 { Computational Algebraic Geometry Organizers: Marta Casanellas { Agnes Szanto { Thorsten Theobald . 36 A3 { Computational Number Theory Organizers: Christophe Ritzenhaler { Enric Nart { Tanja Lange . 50 A4 { Computational Geometry and Topology Organizers: Joel Hass { Herbert Edelsbrunner { Gunnar Carlsson . 56 A5 { Geometric Integration and Computational Mechanics Organizers: Fernando Casas { Elena Celledoni { David Martin de Diego .
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:Math/0610904V3 [Math.MG] 2 Jul 2008
    From the Mahler conjecture to Gauss linking integrals Greg Kuperberg∗ Department of Mathematics, University of California, Davis, CA 95616 Dedicated to my father, on no particular occasion We establish a version of the bottleneck conjecture, which in turn implies a partial solution to the Mahler conjecture on the product v(K) = (Vol K)(Vol K ) of the volume of a symmetric convex body K Rn and its ◦ ∈ polar body K◦. The Mahler conjecture asserts that the Mahler volume v(K) is minimized (non-uniquely) when K is an n-cube. The bottleneck conjecture (in its least general form) asserts that the volume of a certain domain π nγ K♦ K K◦ is minimized when K is an ellipsoid. It implies the Mahler conjecture up to a factor of 4 n, ⊆ × 4 where γn is a monotonic factor that begins at π and converges to √2. This strengthens a result of Bourgain and Milman, who showed that there is a constant c such that the Mahler conjecture is true up to a factor of cn. The proof uses a version of the Gauss linking integral to obtain a constant lower bound on Vol K♦, with equality when K is an ellipsoid. It applies to a more general conjecture concerning the join of any two necks of the pseudospheres of an indefinite inner product space. Because the calculations are similar, we will also n 1 n 1 analyze traditional Gauss linking integrals in the sphere S − and in hyperbolic space H − . 1. INTRODUCTION Theorem 1.3 (Bourgain, Milman). There is a constant c > 0 such that for any n and any centrally-symmetric convex body n K of dimension n, If K R is a centrally symmetric convex body, let K◦ de- note its⊂ dual or polar body.
    [Show full text]
  • Isotropic Constants and Mahler Volumes
    Isotropic constants and Mahler volumes Bo’az Klartag Abstract This paper contains a number of results related to volumes of projective perturba- tions of convex bodies and the Laplace transform on convex cones. First, it is shown that a sharp version of Bourgain’s slicing conjecture implies the Mahler conjecture for convex bodies that are not necessarily centrally-symmetric. Second, we find that by slightly translating the polar of a centered convex body, we may obtain another body with a bounded isotropic constant. Third, we provide a counter-example to a conjecture by Kuperberg on the distribution of volume in a body and in its polar. 1 Introduction This paper describes interrelations between duality and distribution of volume in convex bodies. A convex body is a compact, convex subset K Rn whose interior Int(K) is non-empty. If 0 Int(K), then the polar body is defined by⊆ ∈ K◦ = y Rn ; x K, x, y 1 . { ∈ ∀ ∈ h i ≤ } The polar body K◦ is itself a convex body with the origin in its interior, and moreover (K◦)◦ = K. The Mahler volume of a convex body K Rn with the origin in its interior is defined as ⊆ ◦ s(K)= V oln(K) V oln(K ), arXiv:1710.08084v2 [math.MG] 1 Mar 2018 · where V oln is n-dimensional volume. In the class of convex bodies with barycenter at the origin, the Mahler volume is maximized for ellipsoids, as proven by Santal´o[29], see also Meyer and Pajor [20]. The Mahler conjecture suggests that for any convex body K Rn containing the origin in its interior, ⊆ (n + 1)n+1 s(K) s(∆n)= , (1) ≥ (n!)2 where ∆n Rn is any simplex whose vertices span Rn and add up to zero.
    [Show full text]
  • Mahler's Conjecture in Convex Geometry
    MAHLER'S CONJECTURE IN CONVEX GEOMETRY: A SUMMARY AND FURTHER NUMERICAL ANALYSIS A Thesis Presented to The Academic Faculty by Philipp Hupp In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science in the School of Mathematics Georgia Institute of Technology December 2010 MAHLER'S CONJECTURE IN CONVEX GEOMETRY: A SUMMARY AND FURTHER NUMERICAL ANALYSIS Approved by: Professor Evans Harrell, Advisor School of Mathematics Georgia Institute of Technology Professor Mohammad Ghomi School of Mathematics Georgia Institute of Technology Professor Michael Loss School of Mathematics Georgia Institute of Technology Date Approved: July 23, 2010 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS My deepest appreciation to my supervisor, Prof. Evans Harrell, for his encourage- ment and guidance during my studies. I feel fortunate to have him as my advisor. His original mind, his keen insight in approaching hard problems, and his vast knowledge have served as an inspiration for me throughout this thesis. I am particularly thank- ful to him for introducing me to the subjects of convex and differential geometry. He taught these subjects in an effortless manner and just that allowed me to accomplish this thesis. A special thanks goes to Prof. Mohammad Ghomi for sharing his expertise on Mahler's conjecture with me and I would like to express my gratitude to him and Prof. Michael Loss as the members of my committee. Furthermore I like to thank Michael Music who shared Prof. Harrell's working semi- nar with me. It was fun working with you Michael and all the best for your graduate studies. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . iii LIST OF TABLES .
    [Show full text]
  • On the Local Minimizers of the Mahler Volume
    On the local minimizers of the Mahler volume E. M. Harrell A. Henrot School of Mathematics Institut Elie´ Cartan Nancy Georgia Institute of Technology UMR 7502, Nancy Universit´e- CNRS - INRIA Atlanta, GA 30332-0160 B.P. 239 54506 Vandoeuvre les Nancy Cedex, France [email protected] [email protected] J. Lamboley CEREMADE Universit´eParis-Dauphine Place du Mar´echal de Lattre de Tassigny 75775 Paris, France November 10, 2018 Abstract We focus on the analysis of local minimizers of the Mahler volume, that is to say the local solutions to the problem ◦ d min{M(K) := |K||K | / K ⊂ R open and convex, K = −K}, ◦ d d where K := {ξ ∈ R ; ∀x ∈ K,x · ξ < 1} is the polar body of K, and | · | denotes the volume in R . According to a famous conjecture of Mahler the cube is expected to be a global minimizer for this problem. In this paper we express the Mahler volume in terms of the support functional of the convex body, which allows us to compute first and second derivatives of the obtained functional. We deduce from these computations a concavity property of the Mahler volume which seems to be new. As a consequence of this property, we retrieve a result which supports the conjecture, namely that any local minimizer has a Gauss curvature that vanishes at any point where it is defined (first proven by Reisner, Sch¨utt and Werner in 2012, see [18]). Going more deeply into the analysis in the two-dimensional case, we generalize the concavity property of the Mahler volume and also deduce a new proof that any local minimizer must be a parallelogram (proven by B¨or¨oczky, Makai, Meyer, Reisner in 2013, see [3]).
    [Show full text]
  • Basic (And Some More) Facts from Convexity
    1 Basic (and some more) facts from Convexity In this chapter we will briefly collect some basic results and concepts con- cerning convex bodies, which may be considered as the main ”continuous” component/ingredient of the Geometry of Numbers. For proofs of the results we will refer to the literature, mainly to the books [2, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 13, 14], which are also excellent sources for further information on the state of the art concerning convex bodies, polytopes and their applications. As usual we will start with setting up some basic notation; more specific ones will be introduced when needed. n Let R = x =(x1,...,xn)| : xi R be the n-dimensional Euclidean { 2 } space, equipped with the standard inner product x, y = n x y , x, y h i i=1 i i 2 Rn. P For a subset X Rn,letlinX and a↵ X be its linear and affine hull, ✓ respectively, i.e., with respect to inclusions, the smallest linear or affine subspace containing X.IfX = we set lin X = 0 , and a↵ X = .The ; { } ; dimension of a set X is the dimension of its affine hull and will be denoted by dim X.ByX +Y we mean the vectorwise addition of subsets X, Y Rn, ✓ i.e., X + Y = x + y : x X, y Y . { 2 2 } The multiplication λX of a set X Rn with λ R is also declared vec- ✓ 2 torwise, i.e., λX = λ x : x X .Wewrite X =( 1) X, X Y = { 2 } − − − X +( 1) Y and x + Y instead of x + Y .
    [Show full text]
  • On Nazarov's Complex Analytic Approach to the Mahler Conjecture and the Bourgain-Milman Inequality
    On Nazarov’s Complex Analytic Approach to the Mahler Conjecture and the Bourgain-Milman Inequality Zbigniew Błocki Abstract We survey the several complex variables approach to the Mahler conjecture from convex analysis due to Nazarov. We also show, although only numer- ically, that his proof of the Bourgain-Milman inequality using estimates for the Bergman kernel for tube domains cannot be improved to obtain the Mahler con- jecture which would be the optimal version of this inequality. Keywords Mahler conjecture · Bergman kernel · Pluricomplex Green function 1 Introduction Let K be a convex symmetric body in Rn. This means that K =−K , K is convex, bounded, closed and has non-empty interior. The dual (or polar) body of K is given by K ={y ∈ Rn : x · y ≤ 1 for all x ∈ K }, where x · y = x1 y1 +···+xn yn. The Mahler volume of K is defined by M(K ) = λn(K )λn(K ), n where λn denotes the Lebesgue measure in R . It is easy to see that it is independent of linear transformations and thus also on the inner product in Rn. The Mahler volume n is therefore an invariant of the Banach space (R , qK ), where qK is the Minkowski functional of K : −1 qK (x) = inf{t > 0: t x ∈ K }=sup{x · y : y ∈ K }. Z. Błocki (B) Uniwersytet Jagiello´nski, Instytut Matematyki, Łojasiewicza 6,30-348 Kraków, Poland e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] © Springer Japan 2015 89 F. Bracci et al. (eds.), Complex Analysis and Geometry, Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics 144, DOI 10.1007/978-4-431-55744-9_6 90 Z.
    [Show full text]