DOCSLIB.ORG

1 Ecological Structure and Function of Bioretention Cells Dissertation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
1 Ecological Structure and Function of Bioretention Cells Dissertation Ecological Structure and Function of Bioretention Cells Dissertation Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of The Ohio State University By David M. Wituszynski Graduate Program in Food, Agricultural & Biological Engineering The Ohio State University 2020 Dissertation Committee Dr. Jay Martin, Advisor Dr. Mary Gardiner Dr. Stephen Matthews Dr. Ryan Winston 1 Copyrighted by David M. Wituszynski 2020 2 Abstract There is an urgent need to increase the habitat value of cities, both for human health and for conservation. Constructed Green Infrastructure (GI), which uses vegetated areas to solve engineering problems such as stormwater mitigation, is an attractive option for habitat creation, and ecological engineers, with their stated goal to design for both human and natural benefit, should be key players in its design and implementation. However, ecological engineers are hampered by the lack of a suitable reference by which to evaluate the ecological goals of the GI which they design. They are further hampered by the lack of information about the ecology of many common GI practices. Bioretention cells (BRCs) are the most common form of green infrastructure used for stormwater management. Much work has been done to evaluate the hydrological and pollutant-removal capabilities of BRCs, but there has been comparatively little investigation of the ecological properties of these systems. This is a critical gap in knowledge, as ecological design of BRCs could not only increase their functioning as stormwater infrastructure but could also contribute ecological value to urban areas. Investigation of the habitat value of BRCs could lead to design techniques that subsidize and/or prioritize habitat creation in tandem with stormwater management, allowing ecological engineers to capitalize on the current popularity of this practice to improve urban habitat for both humans and non-humans. ii I address this gap in knowledge with a multi-taxon survey of biodiversity in BRCs installed as part of a large-scale retrofit of GI in Columbus, OH. I developed and validated a protocol to survey birds with automated acoustic monitoring – a first in an urban area – and determined that BRCs affected bird community composition during spring migration but not during the summer breeding period. BRCs did not generally harbor more species than lawns, but nearby remnant ravines appeared to increase species richness at both BRC and lawn sites. I also sampled ground-active arthropods with pitfall traps and identified carabid beetles to species. Carabid communities in BRCs were different from those in nearby lawns and ravines, indicating the ability of BRCs to host biologically unique assemblages in this urban area. These findings suggest that BRCs have the potential to significantly contribute habitat value to urban areas. I integrated the above findings, along with sampled vegetation volume and diversity, into a comprehensive measure of ecosystem health following the Vigor- Organization-Resilience model. BRCs scored higher than either lawns or ravines in this system, across a variety of metrics, reinforcing their potential ecological value. This technique, which is based on standard wildlife sampling strategies, has great potential in allowing ecological engineers to quantify their success is meeting their ecological design goals, alongside their societal ones. Much work remains to be done in calibrating the technique across a diversity of ecosystems, both constructed and natural, and in investigating other aspects of the ecology of BRCs. However, this study suggests that BRCs have potential to elevate the ecology of urban areas, and encourages ecological engineers to more closely consider the ecological aspects of their designs. iii Dedication To the Lunch Bunch For suffusing these many years in graduate school with friendship, meaning, and joy and for making real to me the doctrine of Adoption iv Acknowledgments So many people have contributed to my journey through graduate school, and I’m sure I won’t be able to mention all of them. Thanks first to the folks in the Food, Agricultural, and Biological Engineering department at OSU – not least our graduate coordinator Candy McBride, who kept me on track and kept me honest. The graduate students in our department have provided a supportive and welcoming environment since the day I first interviewed. Special thanks to the Martin lab for journeying alongside me, and particularly to Abigail Tamkin for unwavering friendship and support. Thanks to Noel Aloysous and Mike Brooker for much, and continual, help with R code. I was fortunate to be given space in Mary Gardiner’s lab when it was time for me to learn how to identify carabid beetles: thanks to all the lab members for welcoming me, and especially to Katie Turo, my first friend in the lab and my source of 11-th hour insect sampling advice. Kayla Perry generously shared her knowledge of pitfall trapping and Carabid identification, many times, and also invited me to a Carabid identification seminar she taught, which finally gave me confidence in that work. Much of this work was funded by a grant from the City of Columbus Division of Sewerage and Drainage. I’d like to express my appreciation for their being willing to fund a project that went beyond their reporting requirements, and for their even-handed v support throughout. Particular thanks to Mathew Repasky, our main contact at the city, for his patience with me as I labored over the results, and to Kari Hiatt, who provided me with valuable information about the vegetation in the bioretention cells. 23 different households in the Clintonville neighborhood graciously allowed me to set up microphones and/or insect traps in their front yards, and have endured regular visits from myself and a large group of undergraduate workers over the past three years. My thanks for their willingness to contribute to this project, and for their good humor. This work was facilitated by many, many undergraduate helpers – without them I would not have been able to collect the large amount of data that goes into a project of this kind. A few of them stand out: Joey Smith and Kate Boening went on to become graduate students in our department, and eventually took over the stormwater sampling part of the project, which allowed me to focus more effectively on the work presented in this dissertation. Gautam Apte was my go-to person for bird identification help: we spent many hours reviewing the recordings together and arguing over which birds might be making the stranger sounds. And Jack Hudak sorted all of the insects we caught, pinned all the carabids, conducted the 2019 vegetation sampling almost single-handedly, and in general held the insect project together. I am grateful for his many contributions. Two organizations have contributed greatly to my development as a scholar. One is the Au Sable Institute’s Graduate Fellows program, which I was able to join in the early part of 2014. My first interaction with them – a visit with Wendell Berry – helped convince me I should stay in Columbus after obtaining my Masters degree; they therefore bear no small responsibility for my decision to pursue this doctorate. The Au Sable vi fellows have been responsible for a great deal of my own intellectual formation, and I owe them a deep debt of gratitude, especially to the Ohio State fellows: Abby, Claire, Ashley, Doug, Joshua, Lindsey, Katie, Julie L., Julie S., John, Leanna, Elizabeth, Kathleen, and Jaden; along with Greg Hitzhusen, our faculty sponsor, and Gabe Karns, who often graced our meetings. My gratitude also to Rolf Bouma, the coordinator of the Fellows Program, for many constructive conversations at retreats, and to Fred Van Dyke, the former director of the Au Sable Institute, for always making me feel welcome. The other is the Christian Graduate Student Alliance, which has consistently challenged me to more honest faith and scholarship. Thanks are especially due to Austin Knuppe and to Rob Vandenberg for much discussion and encouragement. I was never actually part of the Society for Ecological Restoration at OSU, but I’ve benefitted from friendships with many of its members. Thank you for taking me on bird walks and winter hikes that all turned into tree identification sessions, and for encouraging my love of the natural world, even when I was very frustrated with my slow pace of identification. Thanks particularly to Don Radcliffe for taking me birding; to Lewis Lolya for helping me set the gain on my microphones; to Ryan McCarthy for answering all my plant questions, and many more besides; and to Julie Slater for giving me so many great time-management tools, and for offering her porch to help keep me sane during the pandemic. The ideas in Chapter 3 were originally developed in a seminar on ecosystem health facilitated by Jay Martin in 2014. Thanks go to Abigail Tamkin, Jeremy Shechter, Ryan McCarthy, and Alex Fotis for their friendship and insightful discussion. vii Many thanks are due to my committee, who have shepherded me through quite a lot of learning: Stephen Matthews has given me much advice about bird sampling, and always in a very encouraging way. Mary Gardiner opened her lab to me and taught me about insect trapping, even knowing how much I would have to stretch to learn it all. Ryan Winston mentored me through a great deal of this work, particularly as it related to stormwater and to green infrastructure; I know your combination of determination, enthusiasm, and grace has had a big impact on the way I approach my work. Two people are not on my committee for purely technical reasons. Angelika Nelson was the curator of the Borror Laboratory of Bioacoustics at the Ohio State University and a member of my committee until she returned to Germany in 2018.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Checklist of the Coleoptera of New Brunswick, Canada
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 573: 387–512 (2016)Checklist of the Coleoptera of New Brunswick, Canada 387 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.573.8022 CHECKLIST http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Checklist of the Coleoptera of New Brunswick, Canada Reginald P. Webster1 1 24 Mill Stream Drive, Charters Settlement, NB, Canada E3C 1X1 Corresponding author: Reginald P. Webster ([email protected]) Academic editor: P. Bouchard | Received 3 February 2016 | Accepted 29 February 2016 | Published 24 March 2016 http://zoobank.org/34473062-17C2-4122-8109-3F4D47BB5699 Citation: Webster RP (2016) Checklist of the Coleoptera of New Brunswick, Canada. In: Webster RP, Bouchard P, Klimaszewski J (Eds) The Coleoptera of New Brunswick and Canada: providing baseline biodiversity and natural history data. ZooKeys 573: 387–512. doi: 10.3897/zookeys.573.8022 Abstract All 3,062 species of Coleoptera from 92 families known to occur in New Brunswick, Canada, are re- corded, along with their author(s) and year of publication using the most recent classification framework. Adventive and Holarctic species are indicated. There are 366 adventive species in the province, 12.0% of the total fauna. Keywords Checklist, Coleoptera, New Brunswick, Canada Introduction The first checklist of the beetles of Canada by Bousquet (1991) listed 1,365 species from the province of New Brunswick, Canada. Since that publication, many species have been added to the faunal list of the province, primarily from increased collection efforts and
    [Show full text]
  • Ground Beetle Assemblages on Illinois Algific Slopes: a Rare Habitat Threatened by Climate Change
    Ground Beetle assemblages on Illinois algific slopes: a rare habitat threatened by climate change by: Steven J. Taylor, Ph.D. Alan D. Yanahan Illinois Natural History Survey Department of Entomology University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 320 Morrill Hall 1816 South Oak Street University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Champaign, IL 61820 505 S. Goodwin Ave [email protected] Urbana, IL 61801 report submitted to: Illinois Department of Natural Resources Office of Resource Conservation, Federal Aid / Special Funds Section One Natural Resources Way Springfield, Illinois 62702-1271 Fund Title: 375 IDNR 12-016W I INHS Technical Report 2013 (01) 5 January 2013 Prairie Research Institute, University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign William Shilts, Executive Director Illinois Natural History Survey Brian D. Anderson, Director 1816 South Oak Street Champaign, IL 61820 217-333-6830 Ground Beetle assemblages on Illinois algific slopes: a rare habitat threatened by climate change Steven J. Taylor & Alan D. Yanahan University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign During the Pleistocene, glacial advances left a small gap in the northwestern corner of Illinois, southwestern Wisconsin, and northeastern Iowa, which were never covered by the advancing Pleistocene glaciers (Taylor et al. 2009, p. 8, fig. 2.2). This is the Driftless Area – and it is one of Illinois’ most unique natural regions, comprising little more than 1% of the state. Illinois’ Driftless Area harbors more than 30 threatened or endangered plant species, and several unique habitat types. Among these habitats are talus, or scree, slopes, some of which retain ice throughout the year. The talus slopes that retain ice through the summer, and thus form a habitat which rarely exceeds 50 °F, even when the surrounding air temperature is in the 90’s °F, are known as “algific slopes.” While there are numerous examples of algific slopes in Iowa and Wisconsin, this habitat is very rare in Illinois (fewer than ten truly algific sites are known in the state).
    [Show full text]
  • The Beetle Fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and Distribution
    INSECTA MUNDI, Vol. 20, No. 3-4, September-December, 2006 165 The beetle fauna of Dominica, Lesser Antilles (Insecta: Coleoptera): Diversity and distribution Stewart B. Peck Department of Biology, Carleton University, 1125 Colonel By Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K1S 5B6, Canada stewart_peck@carleton. ca Abstract. The beetle fauna of the island of Dominica is summarized. It is presently known to contain 269 genera, and 361 species (in 42 families), of which 347 are named at a species level. Of these, 62 species are endemic to the island. The other naturally occurring species number 262, and another 23 species are of such wide distribution that they have probably been accidentally introduced and distributed, at least in part, by human activities. Undoubtedly, the actual numbers of species on Dominica are many times higher than now reported. This highlights the poor level of knowledge of the beetles of Dominica and the Lesser Antilles in general. Of the species known to occur elsewhere, the largest numbers are shared with neighboring Guadeloupe (201), and then with South America (126), Puerto Rico (113), Cuba (107), and Mexico-Central America (108). The Antillean island chain probably represents the main avenue of natural overwater dispersal via intermediate stepping-stone islands. The distributional patterns of the species shared with Dominica and elsewhere in the Caribbean suggest stages in a dynamic taxon cycle of species origin, range expansion, distribution contraction, and re-speciation. Introduction windward (eastern) side (with an average of 250 mm of rain annually). Rainfall is heavy and varies season- The islands of the West Indies are increasingly ally, with the dry season from mid-January to mid- recognized as a hotspot for species biodiversity June and the rainy season from mid-June to mid- (Myers et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Abundance and Diversity of Ground-Dwelling Arthropods of Pest Management Importance in Commercial Bt and Non-Bt Cotton Fields
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Faculty Publications: Department of Entomology Entomology, Department of 2007 Abundance and diversity of ground-dwelling arthropods of pest management importance in commercial Bt and non-Bt cotton fields J. B. Torres Universidade Federal Rural de Pernarnbuco, [email protected] J. R. Ruberson University of Georgia Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologyfacpub Part of the Entomology Commons Torres, J. B. and Ruberson, J. R., "Abundance and diversity of ground-dwelling arthropods of pest management importance in commercial Bt and non-Bt cotton fields" (2007). Faculty Publications: Department of Entomology. 762. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/entomologyfacpub/762 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Entomology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications: Department of Entomology by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Annals of Applied Biology ISSN 0003-4746 RESEARCH ARTICLE Abundance and diversity of ground-dwelling arthropods of pest management importance in commercial Bt and non-Bt cotton fields J.B. Torres1,2 & J.R. Ruberson2 1 Departmento de Agronomia – Entomologia, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Dois Irma˜ os, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil 2 Department of Entomology, University of Georgia, Tifton, GA, USA Keywords Abstract Carabidae; Cicindelinae; Falconia gracilis; genetically modified cotton; Labiduridae; The modified population dynamics of pests targeted by the Cry1Ac toxin in predatory heteropterans; Staphylinidae.
    [Show full text]
  • Osservazioni Sulla Dieta E Cenni Sulla Bionomia Del Genere Harpalus LATREILLE
    © Naturwiss.-med. Ver. Innsbruck; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Ber. nat.-med. Verein Innsbruck Band 78 S. 145 - 155 Innsbruck, Okt. 1991 Osservazioni sulla dieta e cenni sulla bionomia del genere Harpalus LATREILLE (Coleoptera, Carabidae) di Fulvia BERTRANDI e Tullia ZETTO BRANDMAYR *) Diet preferences and bionomy of Harpalus LATR. s.str. (Coleoptera, Carabidae) Synopsis: The majority of Carabid Beetles are predators and carnivores. Exceptions are found in some tribes, especially in the Harpalinae: the genus Ophonus seems to be exclusively spermophagous (= seed-eating). Frequently, many exceptions have been termed "phytophagous", a too general term (true spermophagy or occa- sional consumption of green parts of plant?). Although the genus Harpalus seems to have a polyphagous diet (seed- eating and prédation), little was known about dietary preferences of Harpalus s. str., especially of its larvae. Five species of Harpalus were bred successfully both under laboratory (20 - 25°C, LD : 15/9) and natural con- dition: in all species, growth, moults and pupation were observed, both on a protein diet (minced meat or Tenebrio larvae or grasshoppers) and on an exclusively spermophagous diet. The seed-diet seems to increase the survival rate and the propagation rhythm. The five species were shown to be polyphagous: in natural habitats they may be- have both as predators and as primary consumers. Since the larvae develope in 2-3 months, without dormancy, Harpalus is probably a spring-breeder with summer-larvae. Harpalus species aggregate in crops because of their more opportunistic feeding habits, whereas Ophonus are typical of Daucus-rich open and abandoned habitats. Introduzione: I Coleotteri Carabidi, pur essendo considerati carnivori e predatori per eccellenza, presentano un notevole numero di eccezioni per quanto riguarda la loro dieta.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Insect Species Which May Be Tallgrass Prairie Specialists
    Conservation Biology Research Grants Program Division of Ecological Services © Minnesota Department of Natural Resources List of Insect Species which May Be Tallgrass Prairie Specialists Final Report to the USFWS Cooperating Agencies July 1, 1996 Catherine Reed Entomology Department 219 Hodson Hall University of Minnesota St. Paul MN 55108 phone 612-624-3423 e-mail [email protected] This study was funded in part by a grant from the USFWS and Cooperating Agencies. Table of Contents Summary.................................................................................................. 2 Introduction...............................................................................................2 Methods.....................................................................................................3 Results.....................................................................................................4 Discussion and Evaluation................................................................................................26 Recommendations....................................................................................29 References..............................................................................................33 Summary Approximately 728 insect and allied species and subspecies were considered to be possible prairie specialists based on any of the following criteria: defined as prairie specialists by authorities; required prairie plant species or genera as their adult or larval food; were obligate predators, parasites
    [Show full text]
  • Consequences of Omnivory and Alternative Food Resources on the Strength of Trophic Cascades
    ABSTRACT Title of Dissertation: CONSEQUENCES OF OMNIVORY AND ALTERNATIVE FOOD RESOURCES ON THE STRENGTH OF TROPHIC CASCADES Steven D. Frank, Doctor of Philosophy, 2007 Directed By: Associate Professor Paula M. Shrewsbury Department of Entomology & Professor Robert F. Denno Department of Entomology Omnivorous predators that feed on prey and plant resources are recognized as an important component of food webs but their impact on herbivore populations and trophic dynamics is unpredictable. Feeding on food items from multiple trophic levels increases the reticulate nature of food webs and the labile role of omnivores in promoting trophic cascades. Using carabid beetles in a corn agroecosystem, this research explored the interactive effects of predator guild (omnivore or carnivore) and the trophic origin of alternative food resources (seeds or fly pupae) on the control of herbivores (black cutworms) and plant survival. I demonstrated that the trophic guild and feeding performance of carabids can be predicted from their mandibular morphology. Carnivorous carabids, using mandibles with sharp points and a long shearing edge, kill and consume caterpillars more efficiently than omnivores that have mandibles with wide molar areas adapted for consuming prey and seeds. Omnivore preference for seeds and pupae further reduced their consumption of cutworms, which resulted in increased plant damage, ultimately dampening trophic cascades. In open field plots the abundance of omnivorous carabids and ants increased in response to seed but not pupae whereas neither subsidy affected the abundance of carnivorous predators. Pupae subsidies reduced predation of cutworms by carnivores and omnivores, consequently reducing seedling survival. However, in seed subsidized plots omnivorous predators switched from seeds to higher quality cutworm prey.
    [Show full text]
  • Coleoptera: Carabidae) Diversity
    VEGETATIVE COMMUNITIES AS INDICATORS OF GROUND BEETLE (COLEOPTERA: CARABIDAE) DIVERSITY BY ALAN D. YANAHAN THESIS Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Entomology in the Graduate College of the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 2013 Urbana, Illinois Master’s Committee: Dr. Steven J. Taylor, Chair, Director of Research Adjunct Assistant Professor Sam W. Heads Associate Professor Andrew V. Suarez ABSTRACT Formally assessing biodiversity can be a daunting if not impossible task. Subsequently, specific taxa are often chosen as indicators of patterns of diversity as a whole. Mapping the locations of indicator taxa can inform conservation planning by identifying land units for management strategies. For this approach to be successful, though, land units must be effective spatial representations of the species assemblages present on the landscape. In this study, I determined whether land units classified by vegetative communities predicted the community structure of a diverse group of invertebrates—the ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae). Specifically, that (1) land units of the same classification contained similar carabid species assemblages and that (2) differences in species structure were correlated with variation in land unit characteristics, including canopy and ground cover, vegetation structure, tree density, leaf litter depth, and soil moisture. The study site, the Braidwood Dunes and Savanna Nature Preserve in Will County, Illinois is a mosaic of differing land units. Beetles were sampled continuously via pitfall trapping across an entire active season from 2011–2012. Land unit characteristics were measured in July 2012. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordinated the land units by their carabid assemblages into five ecologically meaningful clusters: disturbed, marsh, prairie, restoration, and savanna.
    [Show full text]
  • Its Breadth of Effectiveness Against Predators J
    J. Appl. Entomol. Haemolymph defence of an invasive herbivore: its breadth of effectiveness against predators J. G. Lundgren1, S. Toepfer2,3, T. Haye2 & U. Kuhlmann2 1 USDA-ARS, North Central Agricultural Research Laboratory, Brookings, SD, USA 2 CABI Europe-Switzerland, Delemont, Switzerland 3 CABI Europe, c/o Plant Health Service, CABI Europe, Hodmezovasarhely, Hungary Keywords Abstract Tetramorium caespitum, Zea mays, biological control, Carabidae, diel cycle, Lycosidae Defensive characteristics of organisms affect the trophic linkages within food webs and influence the ability of invasive species to expand their Correspondence range. Diabrotica v. virgifera is one such invasive herbivore whose preda- Jonathan Lundgren (corresponding author), tor community is restricted by a larval haemolymph defence. The effec- NCARL, USDA-ARS, 2923 Medary Avenue, tiveness of this haemolymph defence against a range of predator Brookings, SD, USA. E-mail: functional and taxonomic guilds from the recipient biota was evaluated [email protected] in a series of experiments. Eight predator species (Carabidae, Lycosidae, Received: August 5, 2009; accepted: October Formicidae) were fed D. v. virgifera 3rd instars or equivalent-sized mag- 28, 2009. gots in the laboratory, and the mean times spent eating, cleaning their mouthparts, resting and walking following attacks on each prey were doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0418.2009.01478.x compared. Prey species were restrained in five Hungarian maize fields for 1 h periods beginning at 09:00 and 22:00 hours. The proportion of each species attacked and the number and identity of predators consum- ing each prey item were recorded. All predators spent less time eating D.
    [Show full text]
  • B a N I S T E R I A
    B A N I S T E R I A A JOURNAL DEVOTED TO THE NATURAL HISTORY OF VIRGINIA ISSN 1066-0712 Published by the Virginia Natural History Society The Virginia Natural History Society (VNHS) is a nonprofit organization dedicated to the dissemination of scientific information on all aspects of natural history in the Commonwealth of Virginia, including botany, zoology, ecology, archaeology, anthropology, paleontology, geology, geography, and climatology. The society’s periodical Banisteria is a peer-reviewed, open access, online-only journal. Submitted manuscripts are published individually immediately after acceptance. A single volume is compiled at the end of each year and published online. The Editor will consider manuscripts on any aspect of natural history in Virginia or neighboring states if the information concerns a species native to Virginia or if the topic is directly related to regional natural history (as defined above). Biographies and historical accounts of relevance to natural history in Virginia also are suitable for publication in Banisteria. Membership dues and inquiries about back issues should be directed to the Co-Treasurers, and correspondence regarding Banisteria to the Editor. For additional information regarding the VNHS, including other membership categories, annual meetings, field events, pdf copies of papers from past issues of Banisteria, and instructions for prospective authors visit http://virginianaturalhistorysociety.com/ Editorial Staff: Banisteria Editor Todd Fredericksen, Ferrum College 215 Ferrum Mountain Road Ferrum, Virginia 24088 Associate Editors Philip Coulling, Nature Camp Incorporated Clyde Kessler, Virginia Tech Nancy Moncrief, Virginia Museum of Natural History Karen Powers, Radford University Stephen Powers, Roanoke College C. L. Staines, Smithsonian Environmental Research Center Copy Editor Kal Ivanov, Virginia Museum of Natural History Copyright held by the author(s).
    [Show full text]
  • Structuring Habitat to Conserve Ground Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and Reduce Summer Annual Weeds in Agroecosystems
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Jessica M. Green for the degree of Master of Science in Horticulture presented on October 22, 2010. Title: Structuring Habitat to Conserve Ground Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and Reduce Summer Annual Weeds in Agroecosystems Abstract approved: ____________________________________________________________________________ R. Edward Peachey Weed management in sustainable farming systems often requires the integration of several different pest management techniques. Cultural, biological, and chemical pest control efforts can be utilized to contribute to the common goal of reducing weeds in vegetable row crop systems. This research addresses how common disturbances such as tillage and insecticide use affect: carabid beetle assemblages; predation of weed seeds by invertebrates; and weed seed recruitment. Field experiments were conducted over three years at two different locations on the OSU Vegetable Research Farm, Linn Co., OR. We found that activity-density of carabid beetles varied seasonally and peaked in late August- September each year. Insecticide applied in year 1 affected seed loss in year 2, suggesting possible long-term effects of land management on weed seed removal. Weed recruitment was highly variable between treatment, site, and year. Conserving biological weed control agents in combination with cultural techniques such as reducing tillage and the use of cover crops, helps growers shift from expensive, density-independent control efforts to more ecological, long-term solutions for weed management in agroecosystems. © Copyright by Jessica M. Green October 22, 2010 All Rights Reserved Structuring Habitat to Conserve Ground Beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and Reduce Summer Annual Weeds in Agroecosystems by Jessica M. Green A THESIS submitted to Oregon State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science Presented October 22, 2010 Commencement June 2011 Master of Science thesis of Jessica M.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscape and Local Controls of Insect Biodiversity in Conservation Grasslands
    Land 2014, 3, 693-718; doi:10.3390/land3030693 OPEN ACCESS land ISSN 2073-445X www.mdpi.com/journal/land/ Article Landscape and Local Controls of Insect Biodiversity in Conservation Grasslands: Implications for the Conservation of Ecosystem Service Providers in Agricultural Environments Thomas O. Crist 1,2,* and Valerie E. Peters 1 1 Institute for the Environment and Sustainability, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA; E-Mail: [email protected] 2 Department of Biology, Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056, USA * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-513-529-6187; Fax: +1-513-529-5814. Received: 3 May 2014; in revised form: 23 June 2014 / Accepted: 30 June 2014 / Published: 14 July 2014 Abstract: The conservation of biodiversity in intensively managed agricultural landscapes depends on the amount and spatial arrangement of cultivated and natural lands. Conservation incentives that create semi-natural grasslands may increase the biodiversity of beneficial insects and their associated ecosystem services, such as pollination and the regulation of insect pests, but the effectiveness of these incentives for insect conservation are poorly known, especially in North America. We studied the variation in species richness, composition, and functional-group abundances of bees and predatory beetles in conservation grasslands surrounded by intensively managed agriculture in Southwest Ohio, USA. Characteristics of grassland patches and surrounding land-cover types were used to predict insect species richness, composition, and functional-group abundance using linear models and multivariate ordinations. Bee species richness was positively influenced by forb cover and beetle richness was positively related to grass cover; both taxa had greater richness in grasslands surrounded by larger amounts of semi-natural land cover.
    [Show full text]