DOCSLIB.ORG

King Island Wildfire Management Plan February 2009 King Island Wildfire Management Plan–- February 2009 Ii Forward

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
King Island Wildfire Management Plan February 2009 King Island Wildfire Management Plan–- February 2009 Ii Forward King Island Wildfire Management Plan February 2009 King Island Wildfire Management Plan–- February 2009 ii Forward The 2007 Sea Elephant fires on King Island saw the destruction of the majority of the Lavinia State Reserve and considerable damage to private property. The King Island community along with the agencies involved in the fire suppression and community recovery phases of the incident saw the need for the development of a Wildfire Management Plan for King Island. The Plan has been developed on King Island with the community to ensure a degree of ownership in the planning of any future fire fighting events. The much appreciated co-operation of the Parks and Wildlife Service, Forestry Tasmania, the Tasmanian Fire Service, King Island Council, King Island NRM Group Inc, SES, local service organizations and the King Island community has enabled the formulation of this plan. The Committee acknowledges the administrative support provided by the King Island Council in the development of this Plan. Without everyone working together co-operatively it would have been impossible to have a plan that is of value and functional for King Island. The development of working relationships is a significant outcome that has been achieved through completing The Plan. The King Island Wildfire Management Plan has had two main aims. Firstly to provide a fire management plan which gives direction to local and ‘imported’ fire control agencies and secondly to draw up an agenda of proposed fire control/access trails Island wide. It gives me great pleasure on behalf of the King Island Fire Management Area Committee to present the way forward for the future of wildfire management for King Island in this plan. Rod McGarvie Chairman: King Island Fire Management Area Committee King Island Wildfire Management Plan–- February 2009 iii King Island Fire Management Area Committee Name Position Organisation Rod McGarvie Group Officer Tasmania Fire Service – King Island (chairperson) Brigades David Robertson Brigade Chief Tasmania Fire Service – North King (resigned November 2007) Island Brigade Boyd Hoare Brigade Chief Tasmania Fire Service – North King (commenced November Island Brigade 2007) Greg Duckett Brigade Chief Tasmania Fire Service – Grassy Brigade Jan Van Ruiswyk Brigade Chief Tasmania Fire Service – Naracoopa Brigade Victor Cook Brigade Chief Tasmania Fire Service – Currie Brigade Chris Irvine Fire Management Officer Parks and Wildlife Service Rob Deverell District Officer Tasmania Fire Service Scott White Safety and Environment Officer Forestry Tasmania Andrew Wardlaw General Manager King Island Council Debbi Delaney King Island Fire Recovery King Island Natural Resource Project Officer Management Group Inc. Clr Vernon Philbey Representative King Island Council Clr John Brewster Representative King Island Council King Island Wildfire Management Plan–- February 2009 iv Table of Contents Risk Evaluation Criteria ............................................................................................................ 1 Terms used in this Document .................................................................................................... 2 1. Context of the King Island Wildfire Management Plan ........................................................ 3 Scope ..................................................................................................................................... 6 2. Treatment Strategies and Implementation Timeframes ......................................................... 9 Register of Treatment Strategies and Implementation Timeframes ...................................... 9 Summary of King Island Firetrails and Identified Water Points ......................................... 28 Island Wide Treatment Options ........................................................................................... 29 Trigger Points ...................................................................................................................... 33 3. Appendices .......................................................................................................................... 34 3a. Risk Identification and Analysis ........................................................................................ 34 Risk Statements ................................................................................................................... 34 Qualitative Measures Of Consequence ................................................................................ 36 Qualitative Measures Of Likelihood ................................................................................... 37 Qualitative Risk Analysis Matrix – Level Of Risk .............................................................. 37 Risk Analysis and Existing Controls ................................................................................... 38 3b. Identification and Evaluation of Treatment Options ......................................................... 48 Criteria For Evaluating Risk Treatment Options ................................................................. 48 Identification and Evaluation of Treatment Options ........................................................... 49 References ............................................................................................................................... 63 King Island Wildfire Management Plan–- February 2009 v Risk Evaluation Criteria All risks identified associated with Wildfires on King Island have been evaluated against the following criteria: Criteria No. 1 Any loss of life resulting from fire or associated activities is unacceptable Criteria No. 2 Any serious or preventable injuries resulting from fire or associated activities is unacceptable Criteria No. 3 Any fire that will affect people’s health and well-being is unacceptable. Criteria No. 4 Any damage caused by fire that could reasonably be prevented by adopting appropriate fire safety measures is unacceptable. Criteria No. 5 Any damage to the natural and cultural environment caused by fire or associated activities that could reasonably be prevented is unacceptable. Criteria No. 6 Any development or activity that fails to manage its fire risk is unacceptable. King Island Wildfire Management Plan–- February 2009 1 Terms used in this Document “Bushfire Plan” or “King Island Community DPIW: Department of Primary “Individual Bushfire Plan” is Recovery Team” is a group Industry and Water a written plan prepared and that provides recovery co- implemented by individual ordination assistance upon the GIS: Geographic Information households, which sets out request of the Municipal System preparation and response Emergency Management KIC: King Island Council strategies to wildfire for the Coordinator or SES Regional household. Manager. KIFMAC: King Island Fire Management Area Committee “Fire Service Regulations” is a set of rules for the TFS: Tasmania Fire Service management of wildfires and “King Island Emergency Management Committee” is PWS: Parks and Wildlife personnel undertaking fire Service – Tasmania suppression activities. the group responsible for planning, organisation, IMT: Incident Management “A Firebreak” is not designed coordination and Team to stop the spread of a fire but implementation of the King is designed to be used as a fire Island Emergency Management TFGA: Tasmania Farmers and control line during fire Plan. Graziers Association suppression operations by providing fire-fighters with an “King Island Emergency area of low fuels that reduces a Management Plan.” is a plan fire's intensity to a level that prepared for the King Island enables direct attack on the fire municipal area to detail by crews or enables an indirect emergency management attack by back burning. A measures within the Firebreak is usually constructed municipality. in conjunction with a Firetrail that provides access but a “TFS Structural Survival Firetrail may not always be Assessment” is an appraisal of constructed in conjunction with a properties’ wildfire a Firebreak. preparedness undertaken by the “Firetrail” can be considered TFS. The aim of the to be a track created primarily assessment is to work with to provide access for fire property owners to improve fighting vehicles and awareness of fire readiness and equipment for fire management how this can be achieved. and suppression operations. A “Sector Commander” is the Firetrail may not necessarily be responsible officer for used as a control line. managing fire control activities “Incident Controller” is the within a particular sector or responsible officer for zone of a wildfire. managing an emergency “Tactical Response Guide” incident (fire). are guides yet to be developed for high to extreme risk “King Island Fire Response Guidelines” is a set of locations / scenarios, which guidelines for incident include priorities for protection management on King Island and recommended response yet to be developed and strategies. integrated into fire “The Plan” is the King Island management protocols for Wildfire Management Plan Incident Controllers and their staff. King Island Wildfire Management Plan–- February 2009 2 1. Context of the King Island Wildfire Management Plan King Island lies at the western entrance to Bass Strait, midway between Victoria and mainland Tasmania at 144° longitude and 40° latitude. This places the Island in the path of the “Roaring Forties”, a strong prevailing westerly wind that reaches over 100km per hour. Historically the climate has been a mild maritime one
Load more

Recommended publications
  • National Report on the Implementation of the Ramsar Convention on Wetlands
    NATIONAL REPORT ON THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE RAMSAR CONVENTION ON WETLANDS National Reports to be submitted to the 12th Meeting of the Conference of the Contracting Parties, Uruguay, 2015 Please submit the completed National Report in Microsoft Word format (.doc, 97-2003), as an electronic file (not a printed copy) and preferably by e-mail, to Alexia Dufour, Regional Affairs Officer, Ramsar Secretariat ([email protected]) by 1 September 2014. National Report Format for Ramsar COP12, page 2 The structure of the COP12 National Report Format The COP12 National Report Format (NRF) is in four sections: Section 1 provides the institutional information about the Administrative Authority and National Focal Points for the national implementation of the Convention. Section 2 is a ‘free-text’ section in which the Party is invited to provide a summary of various aspects of national implementation progress and recommendations for the future. Section 3 provides the 66 implementation indicator questions, grouped under each Convention implementation strategy in the Strategic Plan 2009-2015, and with an optional ‘free-text’ section under each indicator question in which the Contracting Party may, if it wishes, add further information on national implementation of that activity. Section 4 is an optional annex to allow any Contracting Party that so wishes to provide additional information regarding any or all of its Wetlands of International Importance (Ramsar Sites). General guidance for completing and submitting the COP12 National Report Format IMPORTANT – PLEASE READ THIS GUIDANCE SECTION BEFORE STARTING TO COMPLETE THE NATIONAL REPORT FORMAT 1. All Sections of the COP12 NRF should be completed in one of the Convention’s official languages (English, French, Spanish).
    [Show full text]
  • Great Australian Bight BP Oil Drilling Project
    Submission to Senate Inquiry: Great Australian Bight BP Oil Drilling Project: Potential Impacts on Matters of National Environmental Significance within Modelled Oil Spill Impact Areas (Summer and Winter 2A Model Scenarios) Prepared by Dr David Ellis (BSc Hons PhD; Ecologist, Environmental Consultant and Founder at Stepping Stones Ecological Services) March 27, 2016 Table of Contents Table of Contents ..................................................................................................... 2 Executive Summary ................................................................................................ 4 Summer Oil Spill Scenario Key Findings ................................................................. 5 Winter Oil Spill Scenario Key Findings ................................................................... 7 Threatened Species Conservation Status Summary ........................................... 8 International Migratory Bird Agreements ............................................................. 8 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 11 Methods .................................................................................................................... 12 Protected Matters Search Tool Database Search and Criteria for Oil-Spill Model Selection ............................................................................................................. 12 Criteria for Inclusion/Exclusion of Threatened, Migratory and Marine
    [Show full text]
  • CHANGES in SOUTHWESTERN TASMANIAN FIRE REGIMES SINCE the EARLY 1800S
    Papers and Proceedings o/the Royal Society o/Tasmania, Volume 132, 1998 IS CHANGES IN SOUTHWESTERN TASMANIAN FIRE REGIMES SINCE THE EARLY 1800s by Jon B. Marsden-Smedley (with five tables and one text-figure) MARSDEN-SMEDLEY, ].B., 1998 (31:xii): Changes in southwestern Tasmanian fire regimes since the early 1800s. Pap.Proc. R. Soc. Tasm. 132: 15-29. ISSN 0040-4703. School of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Tasmania, GPO Box 252-78, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia 7001. There have been major changes in the fire regime of southwestern Tasmania over the past 170 years. The fire regime has changed from an Aboriginal fire regime of frequent low-intensity fires in buttongrass moorland (mostly in spring and autumn) with only the occasional high-intensity forest fire, to the early European fire regime of frequent high-intensity fires in all vegetation types, to a regime of low to medium intensity buttongrass moorland fires and finally to the current regime of few fires. These changes in the fire regime resulted in major impacts to the region's fire-sensitive vegetation types during the early European period, while the current low fire frequency across much of southwestern Tasmania has resulted in a large proportion of the region's fire-adapted buttongrass moorland being classified as old-growth. These extensive areas of old-growth buttongrass moorland mean that the potential for another large-scale ecologically damaging wildfire is high and, to avoid this, it would be better to re-introduce a regime oflow-intensity fires into the region. Key Words: fire regimes, fire management, southwestern Tasmania, Aboriginal fire, history.
    [Show full text]
  • King Island Catchments
    DEPARTMENT of PRIMARY INDUSTRIES, WATER and ENVIRONMENT ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT GOALS for TASMANIAN SURFACE WATERS KING ISLAND September 2003 Proposed Environmental Management Goals 1 For Tasmanian Surface Waters: King Island Catchments Between late 2001 and 2003 Protected Words and expressions used in this Environmental Values (PEVS) were set final paper have, unless the contrary for King Island. A discussion paper intention appears, the same meaning as was prepared to facilitate public defined in the State Policy on Water participation in setting the PEVs. This Quality Management 1997 and the discussion paper was intended as a Environmental Management and basis for community and stakeholder Pollution Control Act 1994. Ecosystem participation in the process of refers to physical, chemical and developing environmental management biological aspects of the aquatic goals for the waterways that are environment. located within the King Island catchments. This final paper is divided into six main sections: The paper was prepared by the · The first part describes water Division of Environment Division in reforms in general. association with the Land and Water Management Branch, of the · The second part provides a brief Department of Primary Industries, the description of the King Island Tasmanian Parks and Wildlife Service catchments. Water and Environment and the King Island Council. · Part three discusses the State Policy on Water Quality Management. This paper has been modified into its current form to reflect that the process · The final Protected Environmental for the King Island catchments is now Values for the King Island complete. It is considered, however, catchments are shown in part four. that much of the information included · in the discussion paper should remain Water quantity values are discussed as a record of the PEV setting process.
    [Show full text]
  • Environment Plan Artisan-1 Exploration Well Drilling
    Plan CDN/ID S4810AH717904 Environment Plan Artisan-1 Exploration Well Drilling Revision Date Reason for issue Reviewer/s Consolidator Approver 0 21/06/2019 Issued to NOPSEMA for public consultation GLE GLE GLE 0a 08/08/2019 Issued to NOPSEMA for assessment PW GLE MP Review due Review frequency Annually from date of 1 year/s THE THREE WHATS acceptance What can go wrong? For internal use and distribution only. Subject to employee could cause it to go wrong? confidentiality obligations. Once printed, this is an uncontrolled What document unless issued and stamped Controlled Copy or issued What can I do to prevent it? under a transmittal. Environment Plan CDN/ID S4810AH717904 Table of contents 1 Overview of the Activity 12 1.1 Environment Plan Summary 12 2 Introduction 14 2.1 Background 15 2.2 Titleholder and liaison person details 15 3 Applicable Requirements 17 3.1 EPBC Act Requirements 17 3.2 Commonwealth guidance material 30 3.3 Industry codes of practice and guideline material 30 4 Description of the Activity 32 4.1 Activity location 32 4.2 Operational area 32 4.3 Activity timing 32 4.4 Field characteristics 32 4.5 Activities that have the potential to impact the environment 33 4.5.1 Well design and drilling methodology 33 4.5.2 MODU details and layout 37 4.5.3 Routine support operations 39 5 Description of the Environment 41 5.1 Regulatory context 41 5.2 Regional environmental setting 41 5.3 Summary of environmental receptors within the EMBA 42 6 Environmental Impact and Risk Assessment Methodology 52 6.1 Overview 52 6.1.1 Definitions
    [Show full text]
  • NW Key Estuaries Internal Report
    Key estuaries of the Cradle Coast region Establishing key estuaries and coastal waters for monitoring in the Cradle Coast NRM region Christine Crawford and Camille White Marine Research Laboratories – Tasmanian Aquaculture & Fisheries Institute, Nubeena Crescent, Taroona, Tasmania, 7053. Project description This is an NRM funded project being run through Tasmanian Aquaculture and Fisheries Institute (University of Tasmania) in Hobart for a duration of approximately 12 months. This project is an extension of past and current work on environmental condition of estuaries conducted by the Estuarine Ecology group at TAFI. It builds on a similar project “Establishment of an Integrated Water Quality Monitoring Framework for Georges Bay”. We hope to implement a similar process with estuaries and coastal waters in the Cradle Coast region, aiming to involve as many stakeholders as possible including councils, community groups, industries, state government and research institutes. TAFI Internal Report Page i Key estuaries of the Cradle Coast region Table of contents INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................1 PHYSICAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL BACKGROUND OF THE CRADLE COAST REGION.........................................................................................................3 IMPORTANCE OF ESTUARIES AND COASTAL WATERS IN THE CRADLE COAST REGION.......................................................................................9 WATER QUALITY OBJECTIVES AND ECOSYSTEM VALUES
    [Show full text]
  • Alphabetical Table Of
    TASMANIAN ACTS AND STATUTORY RULES TASMANIAN ACTS N – R AND STATUTORY RULES Nation Building and Jobs Plan Facilitation (Tasmania) Act 2009, No. 5 of 2009 (commenced 27 April 2009) Last consolidation: 31 December 2012 (includes changes under the Legislation Publication Act 1996 in force as at 31 December 2012) Amendments commenced in 2009 – 2016: Nation Building and Jobs Plan Facilitation (Tasmania) Act 2009, No. 5 of 2009 (commenced 31 December 2012) – the Act, except Pt. 1 (ss. 1-4) and s. 18 expired 31 December 2012 unless earlier by notice made by the Treasurer National Broadband Network (Tasmania) Act 2010, No. 48 of 2010 (commenced 21 December 2010) Last consolidation: 16 August 2017 (up to and including amendment by the Aboriginal Relics (Consequential Amendments) Act 2017 and changes under the Legislation Publication Act 1996 in force as at 16 August 2017) Amendments commenced in 2017: Building (Consequential Amendments) Act 2016, No. 12 of 2016 (commenced 1 January 2017) – amended s. 28(c) Aboriginal Relics (Consequential Amendments) Act 2017, No. 17 of 2017 (commenced 16 August 2017) – amended s. 28 National Energy Retail Law (Tasmania) Act 2012, No. 11 of 2012 (commenced 1 July 2012, see S.R. 2012, No. 49) Last consolidation: 1 June 2013 (up to and including amendment by the Electricity Reform (Implementation) Act 2013 and changes under the Legislation Publication Act 1996 in force as at 1 June 2013) Amendments commenced in 2012 – 2016: Electricity Reform (Implementation) Act 2013, No. 5 of 2013 (commenced 1 June 2013) – amended ss. 15 and 18; inserted 17A Regulations: National Energy Retail Law (Tasmania) Regulations 2012 (2012/51 amended by 2013/27) National Energy Retail Law (Tasmania) s.
    [Show full text]
  • A Stocktake of Recovery Activities Undertaken for the Orange-Bellied Parrot (Neophema Chrysogaster)
    SUPERSEDED SUPERSEDED SUPERSEDED BirdLife Australia BirdLife Australia was founded in 1901 and works to conserve native birds and biological diversity in Australasia and Antarctica, through the study and management of birds and their habitats, and the education and involvement of the community. BirdLife Australia produces a range of publications, including Emu, a quarterly scientific journal; Australian BirdLife, a quarterly magazine for all members; Conservation Statements; BirdLife Australia Monographs; the BirdLife Australia Report series; and the Handbook of Australian, New Zealand and Antarctic Birds. It also maintains a comprehensive ornithological library and several scientific databases covering bird distribution and biology. Membership of BirdLife Australia is open to anyone interested in birds and their habitats, and concerned about the future of our avifauna. For further information about membership, subscriptions and database access, contact BirdLife Australia 60 Leicester Street, Suite 2-05 Carlton VIC 3053 Tel: (03) 9347 0757 E-mail: [email protected] © BirdLife Australia This report is copyright. Apart from any fair dealings for the purposes of private study, research, criticism, or review as permitted under the Copyright Act, no part may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise without prior written permission. Enquiries to BirdLife Australia. Recommended citation: BirdLife Australia. 2018. A stocktake of recovery activities undertaken for the Orange-bellied Parrot (Neophema chrysogaster). Unpublished report for the Department of Environment and Energy by BirdLife Australia. This report was prepared by BirdLife Australia under contract to the Department of Environment and Energy. Disclaimers: This publication may be of assistance to you and every effort has been undertaken to ensure that the information presented within is accurate.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of King Island Checklist
    Likelihood of sighting Birds of King Island Checklist *** = very likely to be seen Over 200 species have been recorded on King Island, including 6 local ** = likely endemic sub‐species and 10 Tasmanian endemic species. * = unlikely V = very unlikely Please feel free to fill in this checklist and send a copy to the King Island Natural Resource Management Group at PO Box 293, King # = introduced Island 7256. This information is a valuable resource for the island. • = Tasmanian endemic † = endemic sub‐species Following this checklist of resident species and regular visitors is a list of vagrant bird species. NB: This scale assumes you are in suitable habitat at a suitable time of the year Common Name Species Name Spotting Hints Where Sighted Emu# Dromaius novahollandiae * Farm escapees in SW of island (endemic emu is extinct) Wild Turkey# Meleagris gallopavo *** Paddocks Common Pheasant# Phasianus colchicus *** Paddocks Indian Peafowl# Pavo cristatus *** Paddocks, eg. Buttons Rd Californian Quail# Callipepla californica * Sea Elephant, Lavinia Reserve & Tin Mine Rd Blue‐billed Duck Oxyura australis V Lake Flannigan & Big Lake Cape Barren Goose Cereopsis novaehollandiae ** Yellow Rock estuary Feral Goose# Anser anser *** Yellow Rock estuary Musk Duck Biziura lobata *** Sea Elephant, Currie Harbour and Big Lake Black Swan Cygnus atratus *** Everywhere, paddocks in winter Australian Wood Duck Chenonetta jubata ** SE of the island (along the Grassy Rd in winter) Australian Shelduck Tadorna tadornoides *** Everywhere, paddocks in winter Pacific Black Duck Anas superciliosa *** Everywhere, paddocks in winter Australian Shoveler Anas rhynchotis * Lake Flannigan and Yellow Rock in winter Grey Teal Anas castanea V Sea Elephant estuary and Lake Flannigan Chestnut Teal Anas castanea *** W coast, Sea Elephant & Lake Flannigan Hoary‐headed Grebe Poliocephalus poliocephalus ** Lake Flannigan, Big Lake & Grassy Dam Little Penguin Eudyptula minor *** Grassy Harbour and Penguin Island at dusk Grassy Harbour at dusk (Oct‐Mar).
    [Show full text]
  • Reserve Listing
    Reserve Summary Report NCA Reserves Number Area (ha) Total 823 2,901,596.09 CONSERVATION AREA 438 661,640.89 GAME RESERVE 12 20,389.57 HISTORIC SITE 30 16,051.47 NATIONAL PARK 19 1,515,793.29 NATURE RECREATION AREA 25 67,340.19 NATURE RESERVE 86 118,977.14 REGIONAL RESERVE 148 454,286.95 STATE RESERVE 65 47,116.57 Total General Plan Total 823 2,901,596.09 823 2,901,596.09 CONSERVATION AREA 438 661,640.89 438 661,640.89 GAME RESERVE 12 20,389.57 12 20,389.57 HISTORIC SITE 30 16,051.47 30 16,051.47 NATIONAL PARK 19 1,515,793.29 19 1,515,793.29 NATURE RECREATION A 25 67,340.19 25 67,340.19 NATURE RESERVE 86 118,977.14 86 118,977.14 REGIONAL RESERVE 148 454,286.95 148 454,286.95 STATE RESERVE 65 47,116.57 65 47,116.57 CONSERVATION AREA Earliest Previous mgmt Name Mgt_plan IUCN Area ha Location Notes Reservation Statutory Rules Reservation auth NCA Adamsfield Conservation Area Yes - WHA Statutory VI 5,376.25 Derwent Valley Historic mining area 27-Jun-1990 1990#78 subject to PWS True 25.12.96 SR 1996 Alma Tier Conservation Area No IV 287.31 Glamorgan-Spring 03-Jan-2001 Alma Tier PWS True Bay Forest Reserve Alpha Pinnacle Conservation Area GMP - Reserve Report V 275.50 Southern Midlands Dry sclerophyll forest 24-Jul-1996 subject to 25.12.96 PWS True SR 1996 #234 Anderson Islands Conservation Area No V 749.57 Flinders 06 Apr 2011 PWS True Ansons Bay Conservation Area GMP - Reserve Report VI 104.56 Break ODay Coastal 27-May-1983 yyyy#76 PWS True Ansons River Conservation Area No VI 93.77 Ansons Bay 17-Apr-2013 SR13 of 2013 PWS True Apex Point
    [Show full text]
  • Cape Wickham Golf Course Development, King Island, Tasmania
    Planning Submission Cape Wickham Golf Links Clubhouse and Villa Development Cape Wickham Road, Wickham Prepared for: King Island Council Project Management Leading Architect Codesign + Masterplan Codesign + Masterplan Development Management Richard John Nebauer Issue 01 Date 17 September 2018 Project Name Cape Wickham Golf Links Clubhouse and Villa Development Project Number 17.291 Author George Walker 6ty Pty Ltd © Planning Submission Contents 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Background to Proposal ...................................................................................... 1 1.2 Existing Operation ............................................................................................... 3 2.0 Site and Surrounds ................................................................................................... 5 2.1 The Site ............................................................................................................... 5 2.2 Topography ......................................................................................................... 7 2.3 Natural Values .................................................................................................... 7 2.4 Natural Hazards .................................................................................................. 8 2.5 European Heritage .............................................................................................. 8 2.6 Aboriginal
    [Show full text]
  • Draft King Island Biodiversity Management Plan 2010–2020
    DRAFT KING ISLAND BIODIVERSITY MANAGEMENT PLAN 2010–2020 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This Plan was prepared by Debbi Delaney under the auspices of the King Island Natural Resource Management Group Inc., with contributions from staff of the Threatened Species Section (Tasmanian Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment) and the Australian Government Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts. The Plan was based upon a draft prepared by Lauren Barrow in 2008. The preparation of the Plan was funded by the Australian Government Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts. Citation: Threatened Species Section (2010). King Island Biodiversity Management Plan. Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Hobart. © Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and the Environment This work is copyright. It may be reproduced for study, research or training purposes subject to an acknowledgement of the sources and no commercial usage or sale. Requests and enquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Section Head, Threatened Species Section, Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment, Hobart. Note: The King Island Biodiversity Management Plan (KIBMP) has been prepared under the provisions of both the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act) and the Tasmanian Threatened Species Protection Act 1995 (TSP Act). Adoption as a national Recovery Plan under the EPBC Act refers only to species listed under the EPBC Act. ISBN: Cover Photos: Left to right: Hooded Plover (Thinornis rubricollis) courtesy of Chris Tzaros (Birds Australia); Green and Golden Frog (Litoria raniformis) and leafy greenhood (Pterostylis cucullata subsp. cucullata) courtesy of Mark Wapstra.
    [Show full text]