King Island Wildfire Management Plan February 2009 King Island Wildfire Management Plan–- February 2009 ii Forward

The 2007 Sea Elephant fires on King Island saw the destruction of the majority of the Lavinia State Reserve and considerable damage to private property. The King Island community along with the agencies involved in the fire suppression and community recovery phases of the incident saw the need for the development of a Wildfire Management Plan for King Island.

The Plan has been developed on King Island with the community to ensure a degree of ownership in the planning of any future fire fighting events. The much appreciated co-operation of the Parks and Wildlife Service, Forestry Tasmania, the Tasmanian Fire Service, King Island Council, King Island NRM Group Inc, SES, local service organizations and the King Island community has enabled the formulation of this plan. The Committee acknowledges the administrative support provided by the King Island Council in the development of this Plan.

Without everyone working together co-operatively it would have been impossible to have a plan that is of value and functional for King Island. The development of working relationships is a significant outcome that has been achieved through completing The Plan.

The King Island Wildfire Management Plan has had two main aims. Firstly to provide a fire management plan which gives direction to local and ‘imported’ fire control agencies and secondly to draw up an agenda of proposed fire control/access trails Island wide.

It gives me great pleasure on behalf of the King Island Fire Management Area Committee to present the way forward for the future of wildfire management for King Island in this plan.

Rod McGarvie

Chairman: King Island Fire Management Area Committee

King Island Wildfire Management Plan–- February 2009 iii King Island Fire Management Area Committee Name Position Organisation Rod McGarvie Group Officer Tasmania Fire Service – King Island (chairperson) Brigades

David Robertson Brigade Chief Tasmania Fire Service – North King (resigned November 2007) Island Brigade

Boyd Hoare Brigade Chief Tasmania Fire Service – North King (commenced November Island Brigade 2007)

Greg Duckett Brigade Chief Tasmania Fire Service – Grassy Brigade

Jan Van Ruiswyk Brigade Chief Tasmania Fire Service – Naracoopa Brigade Victor Cook Brigade Chief Tasmania Fire Service – Currie Brigade

Chris Irvine Fire Management Officer Parks and Wildlife Service

Rob Deverell District Officer Tasmania Fire Service

Scott White Safety and Environment Officer Forestry Tasmania

Andrew Wardlaw General Manager King Island Council

Debbi Delaney King Island Fire Recovery King Island Natural Resource Project Officer Management Group Inc. Clr Vernon Philbey Representative King Island Council

Clr John Brewster Representative King Island Council

King Island Wildfire Management Plan–- February 2009 iv

Table of Contents Risk Evaluation Criteria ...... 1 Terms used in this Document ...... 2 1. Context of the King Island Wildfire Management Plan ...... 3 Scope ...... 6 2. Treatment Strategies and Implementation Timeframes ...... 9 Register of Treatment Strategies and Implementation Timeframes ...... 9 Summary of King Island Firetrails and Identified Water Points ...... 28 Island Wide Treatment Options ...... 29 Trigger Points ...... 33 3. Appendices ...... 34 3a. Risk Identification and Analysis ...... 34 Risk Statements ...... 34 Qualitative Measures Of Consequence ...... 36 Qualitative Measures Of Likelihood ...... 37 Qualitative Risk Analysis Matrix – Level Of Risk ...... 37 Risk Analysis and Existing Controls ...... 38 3b. Identification and Evaluation of Treatment Options ...... 48 Criteria For Evaluating Risk Treatment Options ...... 48 Identification and Evaluation of Treatment Options ...... 49 References ...... 63

King Island Wildfire Management Plan–- February 2009 v Risk Evaluation Criteria

All risks identified associated with Wildfires on King Island have been evaluated against the following criteria:

Criteria No. 1 Any loss of life resulting from fire or associated activities is unacceptable Criteria No. 2 Any serious or preventable injuries resulting from fire or associated activities is unacceptable Criteria No. 3 Any fire that will affect people’s health and well-being is unacceptable. Criteria No. 4 Any damage caused by fire that could reasonably be prevented by adopting appropriate fire safety measures is unacceptable. Criteria No. 5 Any damage to the natural and cultural environment caused by fire or associated activities that could reasonably be prevented is unacceptable. Criteria No. 6 Any development or activity that fails to manage its fire risk is unacceptable.

King Island Wildfire Management Plan–- February 2009 1 Terms used in this Document

“Bushfire Plan” or “King Island Community DPIW: Department of Primary “Individual Bushfire Plan” is Recovery Team” is a group Industry and Water a written plan prepared and that provides recovery co- implemented by individual ordination assistance upon the GIS: Geographic Information households, which sets out request of the Municipal System preparation and response Emergency Management KIC: King Island Council strategies to wildfire for the Coordinator or SES Regional household. Manager. KIFMAC: King Island Fire Management Area Committee “Fire Service Regulations” is a set of rules for the TFS: Tasmania Fire Service management of wildfires and “King Island Emergency Management Committee” is PWS: Parks and Wildlife personnel undertaking fire Service – Tasmania suppression activities. the group responsible for planning, organisation, IMT: Incident Management “A Firebreak” is not designed coordination and Team to stop the spread of a fire but implementation of the King is designed to be used as a fire Island Emergency Management TFGA: Tasmania Farmers and control line during fire Plan. Graziers Association suppression operations by providing fire-fighters with an “King Island Emergency area of low fuels that reduces a Management Plan.” is a plan fire's intensity to a level that prepared for the King Island enables direct attack on the fire municipal area to detail by crews or enables an indirect emergency management attack by back burning. A measures within the Firebreak is usually constructed municipality. in conjunction with a Firetrail that provides access but a “TFS Structural Survival Firetrail may not always be Assessment” is an appraisal of constructed in conjunction with a properties’ wildfire a Firebreak. preparedness undertaken by the “Firetrail” can be considered TFS. The aim of the to be a track created primarily assessment is to work with to provide access for fire property owners to improve fighting vehicles and awareness of fire readiness and equipment for fire management how this can be achieved. and suppression operations. A “Sector Commander” is the Firetrail may not necessarily be responsible officer for used as a control line. managing fire control activities “Incident Controller” is the within a particular sector or responsible officer for zone of a wildfire. managing an emergency “Tactical Response Guide” incident (fire). are guides yet to be developed for high to extreme risk “King Island Fire Response Guidelines” is a set of locations / scenarios, which guidelines for incident include priorities for protection management on King Island and recommended response yet to be developed and strategies. integrated into fire “The Plan” is the King Island management protocols for Wildfire Management Plan Incident Controllers and their staff.

King Island Wildfire Management Plan–- February 2009 2 1. Context of the King Island Wildfire Management Plan

King Island lies at the western entrance to Bass Strait, midway between Victoria and mainland Tasmania at 144° longitude and 40° latitude. This places the Island in the path of the “Roaring Forties”, a strong prevailing westerly wind that reaches over 100km per hour. Historically the climate has been a mild maritime one with average daily temperatures ranging from 12.9° in July to 20.6° in February. Traditionally average rainfall ranges from 34.9 mm in January to 124.9mm in July. The Island is generally quite flat, with the high point being 168m above sea level at Gentle Annie in the South East of the Island.

As per much of the world, climate variability and drought are becoming much more common occurrences. Since 1981, King Island has experienced all but five years below the long-term mean annual rainfall (DPIW 2007). Prior to fires in February 2007, King Island has had a ‘serious’ rainfall deficiency for the previous 12, 24 and 36 months, while the annual rainfall for 2006 was one of the lowest on record (DPIW 2007).

A lightning strike in 2001 saw approximately 6,000 ha of the Lavinia State Reserve burnt. This was an unusual occurrence in that since European settlement, the vast majority of fires have been man-made; naturally occurring fires have been all but non-existent.

On 18 February 2007 a fire was ignited on King Island, which subsequently burnt approximately 12,500 ha from the Sea Elephant estuary, through to Pennys Lagoon in the north of the Island. It is estimated that up to 70% of the island’s native vegetation was burnt during the fire, including small areas of internationally recognised RAMSAR wetlands and orange bellied parrot feeding grounds within Lavinia State Reserve and significant tracts of remnant vegetation and pasture on private property.

When fire occurs within a small community, such as King Island, its impacts are felt across the entire width and breadth in various ways. Many people are involved or affected by the fire both directly and indirectly. It is fair to say that King Islanders’ feel a great deal of ownership of not only fire management on the Island, but also of public assets that have been burnt such as Pennys Lagoon and the Lavinia State Reserve. Both during and following the 2007 fire for example, much was being expressed within the community, - disappointment that “Pennys” was burnt, - concerns for people who’s land was burnt, - varying perceptions of the actual management of the fire and, - the need for a Whole of Island Fire Plan, regardless of ownership of the land.

This is just to name a few concerns.

To capture these concerns and identify key lessons for the future, informal one-on-one interviews were conducted with: • Landholders affected by the fire. • Earthmoving contractors that were involved in the fire fighting effort. • Businesses on the Island that provided services such as catering during the fire.

Each person was asked: • What happened? What was their involvement in the fire? • What frustrated them or did not work so well? • What did work well? • Thoughts on key lessons to be taken away from the fire. • What should be done differently in the event of another fire? • Did they have any general comments or ideas on how to manage fires into the future on King Island?

King Island Wildfire Management Plan–- February 2009 3

Key themes clearly emerged from the interviews, which were then documented and presented to the KIFMAC for review.

Considered to have worked well during the 2007 fire included: • Provision of food and water to crews, with some exceptions. • The level of resourcing that came to the Island, both in terms of people and equipment such as the helicopter and tankers etc. • Exposure to fire / emergency management process, such as the use of an IMT and Sector Commanders. • Locals turning up to help properties in the line of the fire. • Provision of a mechanic for earthmoving contractors.

A number of recommendations were developed to address identified issues raised from the interviews as outlined in Table 1 below.

Table 1: Recommendations to Address Community Concerns Issues Raised Explanation KIFMAC Recommendations Not working Crews were not rostered 1. Where feasible within the limited nights to work nights until late resources split shift(s) as appropriate in the fire. This was a across the day so that hot spots are frustration in managing attended early in the morning and late back burns and hot spots. evening. IMT Shift Everyone within the IMT 2. Staggering of shift changes for IMT, so changes changed at once, this lost that the entire IMT is not changing at time, experience and once. knowledge. Local knowledge Whilst locals were used 3. Up-skilling of volunteers on King Island to support fire to fulfil some of the IMT and sector management and as crew commander roles. members, it was felt that 4. Recommendation to TFS and PWS local knowledge was not supervisors that community consultation utilised as well as it and involvement be paramount to any could have been. IMT or crews on King Island. 5. Guidelines for incident management on King Island to be developed and integrated into fire management protocols for Incident Controllers and their staff. 6. The inclusion of a public relations person to put accurate information out into the community. This includes facilitating public meetings, briefings to landholders in the affected area and generally communicating why certain decisions are being made.

King Island Wildfire Management Plan–- February 2009 4 Issues Raised Explanation KIFMAC Recommendations Communication There were opportunities 7. The community recovery team, where for improved practicable should be located within the communication in some same building as the IMT, to ensure instances. consistency across teams and facilitate involvement of the local community. 8. Depending on fire size, two people travel around on a regular basis to farms in the immediate vicinity of the fire. One person would be from fire management to provide accurate information on the fire and review what assistance crews may provide. The other person would be from the community recovery team to provide support for welfare related issues. 9. Encourage property owners within the fire path to provide IMT with up to date farm plans, incorporating useable water holes and on farm assets. 10. Ensure earth-moving contractors have one point of contact. 11. Ensure one point of contact for caterers, so that caterers not called multiple times for the one order. Resources not Off-Island support could 12. The establishment of trigger points for brought in early have been brought in supporting fires with resources external enough earlier to prevent the fire to the Island. (See Section 4 for a copy of reaching the size and Trigger Points). intensity that it achieved. Fire breaks and Minimal fire trails to 13. Fire trails to be reviewed by KIFMAC back burning work off. and the King Island community in the development of treatment options for priority risks, within The Plan. Recognition of Perception that locally 14. Identify King Island Community Values local assets / important values were and map for inclusion in The Plan as community not highly prioritised. priority assets for protection. (See Figure values 1)

To implement Recommendation 14, community meetings were held at Reekara, Grassy, Naracoopa and Currie. At these meetings, those present identified community values for King Island and undertook some preliminary identification and analysis of fire risks. Figure 1 illustrates each of the King Island Community Values. Each of the four Tasmania Fire Service Brigades were also involved in identifying existing controls and treatment options for each risk statement.

The repeated damage to the Island’s natural assets has disheartened and frustrated many within the local community. This has translated to a strong desire to ensure that bushfires on King Island in the future are either prevented or contained to a minimum in order to protect both the natural and productive environments of the Island. Following debriefs from the 2007 fire, there was a strong appeal from the King Island community to see the development of a “Whole of Island Fire Plan”, that addresses fire risk across the extent of the Island regardless of land tenure.

King Island Wildfire Management Plan–- February 2009 5 In response to this the KIC has provided support to the KIFMAC to lead the development of The Plan in collaboration with the King Island community.

The KIFMAC has statutory obligations under Section 20 (1) (a) of the Fire Services Act 1975. In addition members of the KIFMAC also have statutory requirements under the; • Crown Lands Act 1976 • National Parks and Reserves Management Act 2002 • Tasmanian Reserves Management Code of Practice (2003) The Plan has been developed in accordance with the Australian Standard for Risk Management AS/NZ 4360:2004 and Emergency Management Australia’s Emergency Risk Management Application Guide.

Scope The Plan applies to all lands on the Island, regardless of tenure. It is a collaborative approach to wildfire and land management between the broader King Island Community, private landowners, Tasmania Parks and Wildlife Service, Forestry Tasmania, KIC and the Tasmania Fire Service.

Additional stakeholders consulted in The Plans development include: • State Emergency Service • Tasmania Police • TFGA – King Island Branch • Department of Health and Human Services • King Island Natural Resource Management Group Inc. • Island businesses • Hydro Tasmania • Telecommunication companies

Bushfires cannot be eliminated and they will continue to have negative impacts on economic, environmental and social values. Community preparedness, including involvement in decision-making and community capacity building is a critical aspect of minimising losses.

The objective of this plan is to: • Reduce the risks posed by and the impacts of wildfires on King Island by providing the King Island Community and stakeholders with actions to prevent, prepare for, respond to and recover from wildfire events.

The guiding principles included within this objective are that: • Protection of life and property are fundamental. • Fire management for lands should consider community values, biodiversity / environmental assets and economic objectives. • All fires should be managed for suppression or containment. • All lands, regardless of land tenure, should have appropriate fire management coverage and plans. • Capacity building, including data and information provision, should be seen as assisting landowners and managers to play positive and constructive roles if or when a bushfire occurs in their local area. • King Island community members with appropriate skills, knowledge and competencies should be utilised to undertake IMT and fireground roles during wildfire suppression operations. • The level of integration between agencies and service providers should be optimised.

King Island Wildfire Management Plan–- February 2009 6 This plan identifies and analyses risks posed by wildfire hazards on King Island and specifies treatment options for identified significant risks. Treatment options focus on addressing underlying causes and providing long-term, sustainable solutions that incorporate the following four essential elements; Prevention – focusing resources on the underlying causes of fires. Preparedness – ensures that when fires occur agencies, resources, the community and individual landholders are ready to fight fires in ways that are effective and soundly based. Response – ensuring effective, appropriate fire fighting for inevitable bushfires. Recovery – helping re-establish, communities, infrastructure, buildings, biodiversity and ecosystem functionality.

The KIFMAC will meet at a minimum of twice yearly to review timelines and actions and oversee the implementation of The Plan. This will also incorporate pre-season and post- season reviews and updating of information such as contact and resource lists. In addition every 5 years The Plan will be reviewed and updated as required.

Section 2 outlines for each risk, treatment options and timeframes for implementation. For more detail on the risk assessment process used, including existing controls for each risk please refer to the Appendices.

King Island Wildfire Management Plan–- February 2009 7

King Island Wildfire Management Plan–- February 2009 8 2. Treatment Strategies and Implementation Timeframes Register of Treatment Strategies and Implementation Timeframes

ID Risk Statement Identified Treatment Options Responsibility for Implementation Treatment Timelines 001 Wildfire posses a risk to the Prevention: 1. KI Council 1. Prior to 08/09 fire Grassy Township. 1. Abatement officer at the KIC, periodically investigate abatement issues in consultation with 2. Landowners / season EXTREME RISK the TFS. managers (KI 2. Prior to 08/09 fire Preparedness: Council, KI Ports season, then 2. Fire trail 1 around the Grassy Township for defence purposes as per Figures 2 and 3. Authority) annually) 3. Widen track 2 along the powerlines to Grassy catchment to protect the power supply for the 3. KI Council and 3. Prior to 08/09 fire provision of water to Grassy as per Figures 2 and 3. Aurora season, then annual 4. Identification and mapping of fire hydrants on reticulated water supply. Grassy Brigade to 4. KI Council and maintenance check annually and faults to be reported to KIC for appropriate maintenance. Grassy TFS 4. Prior to 08/09 fire 5. Progressive upgrading of Grassy town water system to 4-6 inch mains. brigade season, then annual 6. Identify priority houses (including Ballarat and Claredon College Campus) to undertake 5. KI Council check annual TFS Structure Survival Assessment. Provide ongoing support and encouragement to 6. Grassy TFS 5. Ongoing upgrading property owners in these priority locations for the development and maintenance of Brigade 6. Prior to 08/09 individual bushfire plans. 7. Grassy TFS season 7. Develop Grassy Tactical Response Guide. Brigades/TFS 7. Prior to 08/09 season then annual Response: as applicable 8. Utilise fire trail 1as a control line where appropriate. 9. Early notification of need for recovery to the King Island Community Recovery Team. 10. Minimum two brigade response to vegetation and structural fires. 11. Use of King Island Fire Response Guidelines and Grassy Tactical Response Guide.

Recovery: 12. Existing controls (King Island Community Recovery Plan). 002 Wildfire posses a risk to Prevention: 1. Private landowners 1. 2010 rural dwellings, tourist sites and PWS 2. 2010 - Subject to and native vegetation, from Preparedness: 2. KI Council negotiation of road Attrill’s Road to Seal Rocks 1. PWS and adjoining landholder(s) enter into agreement for maintenance of the joint 3. PWS and Private ownership issues through the Red Hut Area to boundaries. landowners 3. 2010 - Subject to the Grassy Township. This 2. Widening and maintenance of Red Hut Road to be used as fire trail 3 as per Figure 2 and 3. 4. PWS in successful includes the following: 3. Creation of fire trail 4 from Red Hut Road to Sand blow beach as per Figures 2 and 3. conjunction with negotiations with a. The significant stands private landholder. landholders, of Melaleuca ericifolia KIC (South Rd) regulatory approvals

King Island Wildfire Management Plan–- February 2009 9 ID Risk Statement Identified Treatment Options Responsibility for Implementation Treatment Timelines swamp forests at 4. Widening and maintenance of South Road from Pearshape to Seal Rocks Road so that it can 5. PWS in and finance. Colliers Swamp and be used as fire trail 5 as per Figures 2 and 3. Annual maintenance of track 6 from Red Hut conjunction with 4. 2010 - Subject to within the adjacent Road along Colliers Swamp to Seal River Road as per Figures 2 and 3. private landholder successful unallocated Crown 5. Investigate and if feasible establish fire / access trail 7 from Big Lake along fern bank to 6. PWS in negotiations with Land Millers Road as per Figures 2 and 3. conjunction with landholders, b. The geomorphically 6. Widening and maintenance of Seal Rocks Road as fire trail 8 as per Figures 2 and 3. private landholder regulatory approvals significant calcified 7. Annual maintenance of track 9 from the northwest boundary of Bowling’s to Cataraquai 7. PWS in and finance. forest airstrip as illustrated in Figures 2 and 3. conjunction with 5. 2010 - Subject to c. Big Lake 8. Identify dwellings, particularly those that are occupied and mark on map(s) for response private landholder successful d. A number of gorges in activities. 8. Grassy Fire negotiations with this district 9. Annual TFS Structure Survival Assessment of properties within priority locations. Ongoing Brigade landholders, e. Eudyptula minor (Little support and encouragement to property owners in these priority locations for the 9. TFS in conjunction regulatory approvals Penguin) and Puffinus development and maintenance of individual bushfire plans. with Grassy Fire and finance. tenuirostis (Short-tailed 10. Identify potential water points near proposed defence lines. If necessary construct water Brigade 6. 2010 – Subject to Shearwater) rookeries. points. 10. Grassy Fire regulatory approvals High Risk Brigade in liaison and finance. Response: with KIC. 7. 2010 11. Use of King Island Fire Response Guidelines and Grassy Tactical Response Guide. 8. 2010 12. Control lines: 9. 2010 • Red Hut Road (fire trail 3) 10. 2010 • Red Hut Road East to Sandblow beach (fire trail 4) • South Road (fire trail 5) • Track from Red Hut Road along Colliers Swamp to Seal River Road (fire trail 6) • Seal Rocks Road (fire trail 8) • Ports Road

13. Access tracks: • Proposed track from Big Lake to Millers Road. (Fire trail 7). Subject to successful approvals to develop the Fire trail. • Seal Rocks Link Firetrail from the northwest boundary of Bowling’s to Cataraquai airstrip. (Fire trail 9). Subject to successful approvals to develop the Fire trail.

Recovery: 14. Existing controls (King Island Community Recovery Plan).

King Island Wildfire Management Plan–- February 2009 10 ID Risk Statement Identified Treatment Options Responsibility for Implementation Treatment Timelines 003a Wildfire posses a risk to the As per risk 001 As per risk 001 As per risk 001 native vegetation from Bold Head to the Grassy Township. Moderate Risk 003b Wildfire posses a risk to the Grassy River Catchment, including the town water supply for Grassy. High Risk 004 Wildfire posses a risk to the Prevention: Existing controls Existing controls Grassy Port facility, including the bulk fuel Preparedness: storages. Response: EXTREME RISK 1. Existing controls including that King Island Ports to be self-sufficient until Brigade(s) arrive. Note: Power supply is vital to ports, and Grassy township.

Recovery: 2. Existing controls (King Island Community Recovery Plan). 005 Wildfire posses a risk to Prevention: 1. Private landowners 1. Ongoing Eucalyptus brookerianna 2. PWS 2. 2010 wet forest in Kentford Prevention: 3. PWS in 3. 2010 Forest Nature Reserve, E. 1. Maintain access tracks on northern and eastern boundaries of the Nature Reserve. conjunction with 4. 2010 ovata forest and woodland 2. Gate or restrict access into conservation area off Mt Stanley Rd. Grassy Fire in Kentford Forest 3. Investigate constructing additional water holes. Brigade Conservation Area and 4. PWS and adjoining landholder(s) enter into agreement for maintenance of the joint boundary 4. PWS and other vegetation on landholders adjoining rural properties. Response: High Risk Recovery: 5. Existing controls (King Island Community Recovery Plan). 006a Wildfire posses a risk to the Prevention: 1. KIC 1. Prior 08/09 season township of Currie. 1. Firebreak around tip. 2. TFS 2. Ongoing EXTREME RISK 2. Brigade located within the township. 3. KIC 3. Ongoing 4. KIC in 4. Prior 08/09 season collaboration with 5. Annual landowner(s) 6. Prior to 09/10

King Island Wildfire Management Plan–- February 2009 11 ID Risk Statement Identified Treatment Options Responsibility for Implementation Treatment Timelines Preparedness: 5. KIC in season, subject to 3. Abatement officer at the KIC, periodically investigate abatement issues in consultation with collaboration with regulatory the TFS. landowner(s) approvals. 4. Development of access track10 to defend from at the back of housing in Lighthouse Street, 6. KIC to act as the 7. Annually from 2010 as illustrated in Figures 2 and 4. lead agency in 8. Prior to 09/10 5. Annual slashing and maintenance of Lighthouse Street access track 10 by KIC. conjunction with season 6. Development of access track 11 to defend from and provide access to water at Devils Gap, Currie Fire 9. Ongoing as illustrated in Figures 2 and 4. Brigade. 10. Prior to 08/09 7. Annual maintenance of Devils Gap access track 11 by KIC. 7. KIC season, then annual 8. Investigate the status of well at Devils Gap, as illustrated in Figures 2 and 4 and either re- 8. KIC to act as the maintenance instate or install new well for water supply. lead agency in 11. Prior to 08/09 9. Continue existing control of annual slashing of Bell Hill (track 12). conjunction with seasons, then 10. Installation of 3 new fire hydrants in Currie, 1 in Lighthouse Street and 2 in Wharf Road. Currie Fire annually. 11. Annual TFS Structure Survival Assessment of properties in Brigade. -Henry Street, 9. KIC -Huxley Street, 10. KIC in -the Main Street (including commercial properties such as Parers Hotel), collaboration with -Lighthouse Street and Currie Fire -Beach Road. Brigade Ongoing support and encouragement to property owners in these priority locations for the 11. TFS and Currie development and maintenance of individual bushfire plans. Furthermore where the property Fire Brigade is tourist accommodation, encourage managers to display bushfire plans to occupants of the accommodation.

Response: 12. Use of King Island Fire Response Guidelines and Currie Tactical Response Guide. 13. Protection of priority roads/properties, in particular Henry Street properties in the event of a northerly wind. 14. Use of Charles Street to defend from if the fire is to the North of Devils Gap. 15. Defend off Wharf Road and ‘Bell Hill Track 12’. If required fall back to Lighthouse Street for property protection, including the use of new access track at the back of Lighthouse Street.

Recovery: 16. Existing controls (King Island Community Recovery Plan).

King Island Wildfire Management Plan–- February 2009 12 ID Risk Statement Identified Treatment Options Responsibility for Implementation Treatment Timelines 006b Wildfire posses a risk to As per Risk 006a As per Risk 006a As per Risk 006a properties on Charles Street in the vicinity of Devils Gap, including the waste management facility and Bell Hill. High Risk 006c Wildfire posses a risk to the Existing controls. Existing controls. Existing controls. Camp Creek Reserve, including the nearby gas storage yard. High Risk 006d Wildfire posses a risk to the Prevention: 1. KIC 1. Ongoing coastal vegetation and 2. TFS and Currie 2. Prior to 08/09 housing north from the Preparedness: Fire Brigade season, then mouth of the Ettrick River, 1. Abatement officer at the KIC, periodically investigate abatement issues in consultation 3. Currie Fire annually through British Admiral with the TFS. Brigade and KIC 3. Prior to 09/10 Beach, Kelp Industries Pty 2. Annual TFS Structure Survival Assessment of priority properties. Ongoing support and 4. Currie Fire season, then annual Ltd and to the township of encouragement to these property owners to develop and maintain individual bushfire plans. Brigade and KIC updates as required Currie. 3. GPS and map existing shacks (including A frame) and housing / development. Review and 5. KIC and Currie 4. Prior to 09/10 High Risk update annually. Place mapping in all King Island fire trucks / vehicles. Fire Brigade to season, then annual 4. GPS and map existing water points in the ‘risk area’. Review and update annually. Place oversee in updates as required mapping in all King Island fire trucks / vehicles. consultation with 5. 2010 5. Annual maintenance of track 13 on private property from South Road to Badger Box Creek private 6. 2010 to ensure that it could be used for access for all classes of fire vehicles. landholder(s). 6. Negotiate with private landowner to develop fire trail 12 utilising the minor track from 6. KIC and Currie Netherby Road through to cleared paddocks near Huxley Hill as identified in Figures 2 and4. Fire Brigade to 7. Local command pre-authorised to access and utilise resources eg excavators, helicopter etc, oversee in as deemed necessary given the High to Extreme Risk situation. Authorisation to be consultation with specified in King Island Fire Response Guidelines. private landholder(s). Response: 8. Use of King Island Fire Response Guidelines and Currie Tactical Response Guide. 9. Determine if shack(s) are currently being camped in and if so evacuate. 10. Defensive strategy would be the main approach at this point in time due to accessibility and the area of land that the vegetation covers.

King Island Wildfire Management Plan–- February 2009 13 ID Risk Statement Identified Treatment Options Responsibility for Implementation Treatment Timelines 11. The following tracks would be utilised for defence: - track 13 from South Road to Badger Box Creek - track 12 from Netherby Road through to cleared paddocks near Huxley Hill - Rifle Range Road - Netherby Road - Kelp track from Kelp Industries, around the front of the golf course through to Beach Road / Lighthouse Street. 12. Use of resources eg excavators, helicopters etc, according to the situation on hand.

Recovery: 13. Existing controls (King Island Community Recovery Plan). 007 Wildfire posses a risk to the Prevention: 1 KIC 1. Ongoing township of Naracoopa 1. Abatement officer at the KI Council periodically investigate abatement issues in consultation 2 KIC, PWS and 2. 2010 – Subject to EXTREME RISK with the TFS. Naracoopa Fire regulatory approvals Brigade to oversee and funding. Preparedness: in consultation 3. Prior to 08/09 2. Fire trails: with private season then annually - Trail 15, upgrade and maintenance of the Bicentennial Link Rd and Sea Elephant Rd, as landholder(s). 4. Ongoing identified in Figures 2 and 5. 3 TFS and 5. Prior to 09/10 - Trail 16, track along Sea Elephant River to provide access to water, as identified in Naracoopa Fire season, then annual Figures 2 and 5. Brigade updates as required - Put in a Fire Trail 17, from corner of paddock, across Sea Elephant Rd to Fraser Beach, 4 TFS 6. 2010 as identified in Figures 2 and 5. 5 Naracoopa Fire 7. 2010 - Put in Trail 20, from Pegarah Rd (Pegarah Hill) to the Esplanade, including putting in a Brigade and KIC gateway, as show in Figures 2 and 5. 6 Naracoopa Fire - Investigate putting in an access track (Trail 21), from Pegarah Rd to Millwood Rd as per Brigade and KIC Figures 2 and 5. If feasible construct track. 7 Naracoopa Fire - Investigate feasibility of using the old tip track as a fire trail. Brigade and KIC - Investigate feasibility of Cowper Point Track as a fire trail. 3. Work with priority properties and residents within the township of Naracoopa to complete annual TFS Structural Survival Assessment of properties. Ensure that this is an opportunity to work with and support householders, rather than taking an authoritative approach. 4. Training of brigade members. 5. Provision of maps, aerial photographs and plans within fire vehicles and provide Naracoopa information to other brigades on the Island. 6. Identify water access in close proximity to identified defence lines and access trails. If appropriate investigate creating additional water points.

King Island Wildfire Management Plan–- February 2009 14 ID Risk Statement Identified Treatment Options Responsibility for Implementation Treatment Timelines 7. Create access track 22 from the Old Kibuka Dam to Fraser Rd. Explore installing pipe from dam to Fraser Rd.

Response: 8. Use of King Island Fire Response Guidelines and Naracoopa Tactical Response Guide. 9. Defence lines: - Fire trial 15 - Fire trail 17 - Fire trail 20 - Sea Elephant Rd (firetrail 18) and Fraser Rd (firetrail 19) as illustrated in Figures 2 and 5. - Millwood Rd (firetrail 23), as illustrated in Figures 2 and 5 - Defence of assets only along Pegarah Rd, particularly adjoining the Pegarah State Forest.

Recovery: 10. Existing controls (King Island Community Recovery Plan). 11. Landholders undertake activities as appropriate. 008 Wildfire poses a risk to the Prevention: 1. PWS 1. 2010 – Subject to fire sensitive values in 2. TFS regulatory approvals Lavinia State Reserve, Seal Preparedness: 3. KIC and finance. Rocks State Reserve and 1. Fire trails as nominated in the King Island Reserves and Crown Land Fire Management Plan 4. PWS 2. 2009 adjoining Public Reserves (PWS 2002), as illustrate in Figures 2,3, 5 and 6. 3. 2009 and unallocated crown land 2. Permanent aerial on the tower at Counsel Hill 4. Prior to 09/10 as identified in the King 3. Establishment of communication line infrastructure, to enable phone connection within 24 season Island Reserves and Crown hours. Land Fire Management 4. PWS and adjoining landholder(s) enter into agreement for maintenance of the joint boundary Plan (DTPHA; 2002) and King Island 2007 Fires: Response: Impact on natural values 5. Use of King Island Fire Response Guidelines and Naracoopa Tactical Response Guide. (DPIW; 2007) including; 1. a-g Recovery: 2. a-c 6. Existing controls (King Island Community Recovery Plan). 3. a-e 4. a 5. a-d 6. a

King Island Wildfire Management Plan–- February 2009 15 ID Risk Statement Identified Treatment Options Responsibility for Implementation Treatment Timelines 009 Wildfire posses a risk to the As per risk 007 As per risk 007 As per risk 007 Pegarah State Forest including the landfill site and surrounding vegetation and housing. High Risk 010 Wildfire posses a risk to Existing controls. Existing controls. Existing controls. the King Island Airport. Low Risk

011 Wildfire posses a risk to the Existing controls Existing controls. Existing controls. power station and wind turbines. Moderate Risk 012 There is a risk that power Existing controls Existing controls. Existing controls. distribution lines and poles will be affected by wildfire. High Risk 013 Wildfire posses a risk to the Existing controls Existing controls. Existing controls. King Island Dairy. Low Risk 014 Wildfire posses a risk to Existing controls Existing controls. Existing controls. abattoirs on King Island. Low Risk 015 Wildfire posses a risk to the Prevention: Brigades Ongoing coastal vegetation and housing from Porky Beach Preparedness: to Bungaree Creek. Moderate Risk Response: Defend dwellings as required. Recovery: Existing controls (King Island Community Recovery Plan).

King Island Wildfire Management Plan–- February 2009 16 ID Risk Statement Identified Treatment Options Responsibility for Implementation Treatment Timelines 016 Wildfire posses a risk to the Prevention: 1. Private 1. 2010 – Subject to coastal vegetation and landholders, KIC regulatory approvals housing from Victoria Cove Preparedness: in consultation and finance to the mouth of Yellow 1. Upgrade and maintain existing track 34 from North Road west to the coast as illustrated in with North Fire 2. 2010 – Subject to Rock River including: Figures 2 and 7. Track 7 to terminate prior to coastal reserve. Brigade. regulatory approvals a) Neophema 2. Construct Fire trail 35, as illustrated by Figures 2 and 7. 2. Private and finance chrysogaster 3. Construct Fire trail 36, south of Lake Flannigan as illustrated in Figures 2 and 7. landholders, KIC 3. 2010 – Subject to (Orange-bellied 4. Annual TFS Structure Survival Assessment of priority properties. Ongoing support and in consultation regulatory approvals parrot) and its encouragement to these property owners to develop and maintain individual bushfire plans. with North Fire and finance associated habitat. Response: Brigade. 4. Prior to 08/09 b) Eudyptula minor 5. Aerial support due to the difficulty of the terrain. 3. Private seasons, then (Little Penguin) Recovery: landholders, KIC annually. and Puffinus 6. Existing controls (King Island Community Recovery Plan). in consultation tenuirostis (Short- with North Fire tailed Shearwater) Brigade. rookeries. 4. TFS and North High Risk Fire Brigade 017 Wildfire posses a risk to the Prevention: coastal vegetation, camping 1. Private 1. 2010 – Subject to sites, tourist visiting sites Preparedness: landholders, KIC regulatory and shacks from 1. Upgrade and maintain track 33, as illustrated in Figures 2 and 6 in consultation approvals and Disappointment Bay to the with North Fire finance Lavinia State Reserve, Response: Brigade. including Eudyptula minor 2. Defend to clear ground. Determine if shack(s) are currently being camped in and if so (Little Penguin) and evacuate. Puffinus tenuirostis (Short- tailed Shearwater) Recovery: rookeries. 3. Existing controls (King Island Community Recovery Plan). High Risk

King Island Wildfire Management Plan–- February 2009 17 ID Risk Statement Identified Treatment Options Responsibility for Implementation Treatment Timelines 018 Wildfire posses a risk to Gorges are of high value to King Island, but by their nature the response strategy would require Brigades Ongoing gorges on King Island, in defending to clear ground. particular Yarra Creek, Barrier Creek, Grassy River, Fraser River and Sea Elephant River. High Risk 019 Wildfire posses a risk to Island Wide Treatments, specifically the use of permit periods and community education to As per Island Wide As per Island Wide peat deposits on King discourage burning on peat. Treatment Options Treatment Options Island. High Risk 020 Wildfire posses a risk to Prevention: 1. Property owner 1. 2010 high priority vegetation, Preparedness: including tree lanes, 1. Individual property plans. Advice and support to properties to prepare plans. remnant vegetation and Response: threatened vegetation 2. Note: Vegetation high priority for protection where practicable. 3. Enabling of landholders to participate in fire suppression activities. Protocols to be specified community types on rural in King Island Fire Response Guidelines. properties. 4. Good communication with landholders during the fire, keeping them informed and High Risk supported. Recovery: 5. Existing controls (King Island Community Recovery Plan). 6. Support services and debriefing for landholders. 7. Support to landholders with land and vegetation recovery as applicable. 021 Wildfire posses a risk to Prevention: 1. Property owner 1. 2010 farm fences, stock and Preparedness: pasture. 1. Individual property plans. Advice and support to properties to prepare plans. Moderate Risk Response: 2. Note: Vegetation high priority for protection where practicable. 3. Enabling of landholders to participate in fire suppression activities. 4. Good communication with landholders during the fire, keeping them informed and supported. Recovery: 5. Existing controls (King Island Community Recovery Plan). 6. Support services and debriefing for landholders. 7. Support to landholders with land and vegetation recovery as applicable.

King Island Wildfire Management Plan–- February 2009 18 ID Risk Statement Identified Treatment Options Responsibility for Implementation Treatment Timelines 022 Wildfire posses a risk to Prevention: Existing controls Existing controls road and bridge infrastructure on King Preparedness: Island. Low Risk Response:

Recovery: Existing controls (King Island Community Recovery Plan). Post fire assessments and works programs as required. 023 Wildfire posses a risk to Existing controls Existing controls Existing controls the Reekara Community Complex. Low Risk 024 Wildfire posses a risk to Prevention: 1. TFS 1. Ongoing rural housing and 2. Property owners 2. Ongoing associated structures. Preparedness: 3. King Island Fire 3. Prior to 08/09 High Risk 1. Annually visit the school and undertake activities with the children with regard to preparing Brigades season, then as properties for a wildfire scenario. required 2. Individual property protection plans. 3. Brigades to familiarise themselves with properties in their area. Response:

Recovery: 4. Existing controls (King Island Community Recovery Plan). 025 Wildfire posses a risk to The communication infrastructure is of high value to King Island, but the risk is low with Existing controls Existing controls Airservices Australia NDB, existing controls in place. SGS, Regional Express Airlines and KIC communication infrastructure at the King Island Airport. Low Risk

King Island Wildfire Management Plan–- February 2009 19 ID Risk Statement Identified Treatment Options Responsibility for Implementation Treatment Timelines 026 Wildfire posses a risk to The communication infrastructure is of high value to King Island, but the risk is low with Existing controls Existing controls Telstra and the Tasmania existing controls in place. Police communication infrastructure at the ‘Old Power Station’ via Grahams Rd, Grassy. Low Risk 027 Wildfire posses a risk to The communication infrastructure is of high value to King Island, but the risk is low with Existing controls Existing controls Telstra Radio Terminal at existing controls in place. Cape Wickham. Low Risk 028 Wildfire posses a risk to Prevention: 1. TFS 1. 2009 communication 2. Erickson 2. Ongoing infrastructure used by Preparedness: Telstra and the Tasmania 1. Permanent repeater station at Counsel Hill Police at Counsel Hill. 2. Maintain cleared area of approximately 50 metres surrounding the tower. High Risk Response: 3. Note as a high value to King Island. Recovery: Existing controls (King Island Community Recovery Plan). 029 Wildfire posses a risk to The communication infrastructure is of high value to King Island, but the risk is low with Existing controls Existing controls Telstra and King Island existing controls in place. Dairy communication infrastructure at the King Island Dairy, North Road and to the to Promo Radio communication infrastructure. Low Risk 030 Wildfire posses a risk to The monitoring equipment is of high value to King Island, but the risk is low with existing Existing controls Existing controls Hydro Tasmania wind controls in place. monitoring infrastructure at Huxley Hill. Low Risk

King Island Wildfire Management Plan–- February 2009 20 ID Risk Statement Identified Treatment Options Responsibility for Implementation Treatment Timelines 031 Wildfire posses a risk to The communication infrastructure is of very high value to King Island, but the risk is low with Existing controls Existing controls communication existing controls in place. infrastructure used by Telstra, King Island Ports, State Fire Commission and television networks at Gentle Annie and to the Bureau of Meteorology infrastructure at Mount Stanley. High Risk

032 Wildfire posses a risk to The communication infrastructure is of high value to King Island, but the risk is low with Existing controls Existing controls Telstra communication existing controls in place. infrastructure at Yambacoona. Low Risk 033 Wildfire posses a risk to The communication infrastructure is of high value to King Island, but the risk is low with Existing controls Existing controls communication existing controls in place. infrastructure at Lymwood. Low Risk

034 Wildfire posses a risk to Prevention: 1. Ericksons 1. Ongoing communication infrastructure at the Preparedness: Naracoopa Hill. 1. Maintain cleared area of approximately 50 metres surrounding the tower. Low Risk Response:

Recovery: 2. Existing controls (King Island Community Recovery Plan). 035 Wildfire posses a risk to 6- As per Currie Treatments (risk nos.6a-6d) As per Currie As per Currie communication Treatments (risk Treatments (risk infrastructure sites within nos.6a-6d) nos.6a-6d) the township of Currie. High Risk

King Island Wildfire Management Plan–- February 2009 21

King Island Wildfire Management Plan–- February 2009 22

King Island Wildfire Management Plan–- February 2009 23

King Island Wildfire Management Plan–- February 2009 24 King Island Wildfire Management Plan–- February 2009 25

King Island Wildfire Management Plan–- February 2009 26 King Island Wildfire Management Plan–- February 2009 27 Summary of King Island Firetrails and Identified Water Points

NUMBER NAME TYPE APPROX. DISTANCE 1 Grassy township firetrail Firetrail Upgrade 2.9 km 2 Grassy powerlines to town water supply firetrail Firetrail Upgrade 0.25 km 3 Red Hut Road Firetrail Upgrade 4.7 km 4 Red Hut Rd to Sandblow beach firetrail New Firetrail 4.2 km 5 South Road Firetrail Upgrade 4.9 km 6 Seal River Rd and track along Colliers Swamp Firetrail Upgrade 6.9 km 7 Big Lake to Millers Rd New Firetrail 4.5 km 8 Seal Rocks Rd Firetrail Upgrade 4.1 km 9 Seal Rocks Link firetrail Firetrail Upgrade 1.7 km 10 Lighthouse St firetrail New Firetrail 0.4 km 11 Charles St (extension) firetrail New Firetrail 0.4 km 12 Bell Hill firetrail Firetrail maintenance 0.5 km 13 Badger Box Creek firetrail Firetrail Upgrade 2.4 km 14 Netherby Rd / Huxley Hill firetrail New Firetrail 0.8 km 15 Bicentennial Link and Sea Elephant Rd Firetrail Upgrade 5.4 km 16 Sea Elephant River firetrail Firetrail Upgrade 2.7 km 17 Fraser Beach firetrail New Firetrail 2.3 km 18 Sea Elephant Rd Firetrail Upgrade 4.1 km 19 Fraser Rd Firetrail Upgrade 4.1 km 20 Pegarah Rd to the Esplanade New Firetrail 2.1 km 21 Pegarah Rd to Millwood Rd New Firetrail 1.2 km 22 Kibuka Dam access firetrail New Firetrail 0.9 km 23 Millwood Rd firetrail Firetrail maintenance 1.6 km 24 Counsel Hill firetrail Firetrail Upgrade 3.8 km 25 Counsel Hill Link firetrail Firetrail Upgrade 0.9 km 26 South Lavinia Link firetrail Firetrail Upgrade 3.6 km 27 Main Lavinia (Young’s Rd) firetrail Firetrail Upgrade 9.8 km 28 West Lavinia Link firetrail Firetrail Upgrade 2.4 km 29 Nook Swamps Walking Track (9-Mile Beach Firetrail Upgrade 7 km firetrail) 30 Middle Lavinia firetrail Firetrail Upgrade 1.5 km 31 Martha Lavinia Rd Firetrail Upgrade 5.2 km 32 Lavinia Beach firetrail Firetrail Upgrade 1 km 33 Boulder Point track Firetrail Upgrade 2.8 km 34 Springs Rd Firetrail Upgrade 3.3 km 35 Phoques Bay track a Firetrail Upgrade 0.59 km 36 Phoques Bay track b Firetrail Upgrade 2.9 km 37 North Lavinia Boundary firetrail Firetrail Maintenance 38 South West Lavinia Boundary firetrail Firetrail Maintenance LOCATION TYPE Devils Gap Proposed Waterhole Naracoopa (Kibuka Dam) Existing Water point Sea Elephant River (x2) Existing Waterhole Counsel Hill Firetrail (and end of Reekara Rd) Proposed Waterhole Nook Swamp Existing Water point Main Lavinia firetrail (Young’s Rd) x3 Proposed Waterholes Lake Flannigan track Existing Water point

King Island Wildfire Management Plan–- February 2009 28 Island Wide Treatment Options Treatment Responsibility for Treatment Implementation Timeframe Prevention: 1. Review and modify permit periods for King Island separately to the rest of the State to reflect 1. TFS, in collaboration with 1. Prior to 08/09 fire conditions on King Island. King Island Brigades season 2. Education on the Island re: permit periods and what is required when you wish to burn during 2. KIC Abatement officer in these periods. Targeting those that are not using permits. collaboration with brigades 2. Ongoing and TFS District Officer. 3. TFS District Officer, in 3. Enforcement of the Fire Service Regulations and permit system. consultation with brigade 3. Ongoing chiefs 4. King Island Fire Brigades 4. Education on King Island re: burning of heaps. Encourage landholders to work with the 4. Ongoing brigades when burning off, as per permit period process. 5. Group Officer and District 5. Community awareness, education and empowerment program/s on: the identification and Officer develop plan for 5. Complete plan prior management of wildfire hazards and associated risks, including the responsibilities and Island in collaboration with to 08/09 season, obligations of individuals and landowners and occupiers. Brigades then ongoing 6. KIC 6. KIC Abatement Officer, periodically investigate abatement issues in consultation with the 6. Prior 08/09 season, TFS. then ongoing

King Island Wildfire Management Plan–- February 2009 29 Treatment Responsibility for Treatment Implementation Timeframe Preparedness: 1. KI Fire Response Guidelines. Guidelines for incident management on King Island to be 1. KIFMAC 1. Dec 08 developed and integrated into fire management protocols for Incident Controllers and their staff. The guidelines to consider the following: • The recommendation to PWS and TFS supervisors that community consultation and involvement is paramount to any IMT or crews on King Island. • The inclusion of public relations activities within the IMT to put accurate information out into the community. This includes facilitating public meetings, briefings to landholders in the affected area and generally communicating why certain decisions are being made. • Depending on the fire size and practicability the inclusion of two people to travel around on a regular basis to farms in the immediate vicinity of the fire. One to provide accurate information on the fire and review fire fighting assistance required. The second would be from the community recovery team to provide support for welfare related issues. • Where practicable the community recovery team should be located within the same building as the IMT to ensure consistency. • Earth-moving contractors have one point of contact. • Caterers have one point of contact. • Encourage property owners within the fire path to provide IMT with up to date farm plans, incorporating useable water holes and farm assets. • Where feasible within limited resources split shift(s) as appropriate across the day so that hot spots are attended early in the mornings and of an evening. • Staggering of shift changes for the IMT, so that the entire IMT does not change at once. • The inclusion of community members to fulfil some of the IMT requirements. 2. Tactical Response Guides: Guidelines for high priority locations and/or risks, which includes priorities for areas to be protected and recommended response strategies. Tactical Response Guides to be developed for: a. Grassy township 2. KIFMAC 2. Dec 08 b. Naracoopa township c. Currie township d. Seal Rocks to Red Hut to Grassy e. Lavinia State Reserve and adjoining Crown Lands 3. Identify and train community members to fulfil some of the IMT and sector commander roles.

King Island Wildfire Management Plan–- February 2009 30 Treatment Responsibility for Treatment Implementation Timeframe Training through PWS (and SES).

3. PWS to co-ordinate 3. Training plan 4. Regular multi-agency exercises that test all levels of the Island’s response and recovery from developed by Sept a wildfire event, including field and table top exercises. 08

4. Municipal Emergency 4. Following Management Co-ordinator completion of IMT training and development of 5. Provision of maps, aerial photographs and plans within fire vehicles and provide each brigade Tactical Response with a total Island-wide set Place TFS mapping onto KI GIS system. Build up layers over Guides time including, water points, fire trails, residences, threatened species etc. 6. Work with priority properties, as identified within individual risk treatment options to 5. KIC (lead agency) 5. Set up by Sept 08 complete annual TFS Structural Survival Assessment of properties. Ensure that this is an opportunity to work with and support householders, rather than taking an authoritative 6. TFS/ King Island Brigades approach. Keep as a layer in GIS database, with annual updates. Provide maps back to the in collaboration with KIC. 6. Set up property brigades. assessment layer 7. Routine training of brigade members. prior to 08/09 8. Individual property plans. Advice and support to properties to prepare plans. Encourage 7. TFS season. property owners to provide these to brigades for inclusion with mapping resources. 8. King Island Fire Brigades 9. Recommend to KI Council that they use the TFS Bushfire Prone guidelines, when assessing 9. KIFMAC Recommend to 7. Ongoing new building permits on King Island. KI Council 8. Ongoing 9. Prior to 08/09 Season

King Island Wildfire Management Plan–- February 2009 31 Treatment Responsibility for Treatment Implementation Timeframe Response: 1. Local command pre-authorised to access and utilise resources such as excavators and 1. KIFMAC 1. Dec 08 helicopter(s) etc, as deemed necessary in accordance with Response Guidelines. To be pre- negotiated with TFS District Officer and King Island PWS Ranger for High and Extreme risk statements. 2. Ensure the King Island Wildfire Management Plan is integrated with the King Island 2. KIFMAC in collaboration 2. Dec 08 Municipal Emergency Management Plan. with KIC 3. Incident Controller / Municipal Emergency Management Co-ordinator to ensure a register of 3. KIFMAC 3. Dec 08 people travelling through incident area is kept. Action into Response Guidelines. 4. Trigger Points as attached. 4. KIFMAC 4. Dec 08 Recovery: 1. Ensure the King Island Municipal Emergency Management Plan contains provisions for 1. KIFMAC / KIMEMP 1. Ongoing recovery from wildfire 2. Support services and debriefing for landholders, volunteers, fire fighters etc. 2. IMT / King Island 2. During and Community Recovery following a large Team fire situation 3. Support to landholders with land and vegetation recovery as applicable. 3. KIC in collaboration with 3. As required KINRMG Inc. following an event 4. Municipal Emergency 4. Post fire assessments and works programs as required. Documentation of losses. Management Committee / 4. As required IMT following an event

King Island Wildfire Management Plan–- February 2009 32 Trigger Points

Trigger for Assessment of Fire Management / Operations In the event that all King Island Fire Brigades are called out to an incident, the Group Officer will review the fire situation with Brigade Chiefs (Grassy, Naracoopa, Currie and North), King Island PWS Ranger and the King Island Municipal Emergency Management Co- ordinator against the following criteria:

• Location of fire, including - proximity to towns or other ‘Island’ assets, - terrain, and - level of identified risk of the site within KI Wildfire Management Plan. • Potential for the fire to travel, including - vegetation type surrounding fire site, together with how contiguous the vegetation is. • Weather forecasts and fuel loads. - Note: Firecomms to be contacted for relevant information, such as weather forecasts, soil dryness indicator etc. • Resources (human, vehicles and equipment) available on the Island in relation to the size (or potential size) of the incident.

In addition GIS mapping will be used to inform decision-making and if deemed necessary a review of the fire from the air will be undertaken. Lead times for accessing resources from off the Island will also be considered. The TFS Regional Officer, District Officer and/or the PWS NW Region Fire Duty Officer will be informed of the meeting.

Trigger for calling in resources and establishing a local IMT If containment of the fire is not expected within the first 12 hours and/or patrolling of the fire line will be required for multiple days, the following will take place: 1. A phone hook up will be undertaken ASAP between King Island TFS, TFS Regional Officer and/or the PWS NW Region Fire Duty Officer to determine the type and level of assistance required. Organisation of appropriate support will then be undertaken. If required Forestry Tasmania will be included in the phone link. 2. The establishment of a locally based IMT.

King Island Wildfire Management Plan – February 2009 33 3. Appendices

3a. Risk Identification and Analysis Risk Statements ID Risk Statement 001 Wildfire posses a risk to the Grassy Township. 002 Wildfire posses a risk to rural dwellings, tourist sites and native vegetation, from Attrill’s Road to Seal Rocks through the Red Hut District to the Grassy Township. This includes the following: a. The significant stands of Melaleuca ericifolia swamp forests at Colliers Swamp and within the adjacent unallocated Crown Land b. The geomorphically significant calcified forest c. Big Lake d. A number of gorges in this district e. Eudyptula minor (Little Penguin) and Puffinus tenuirostis (Short-tailed Shearwater) rookeries. 003a Wildfire posses a risk to the native vegetation from Bold Head to the Grassy Township, including Eudyptula minor (Little Penguin) and Puffinus tenuirostis (Short-tailed Shearwater) rookeries. 003b Wildfire posses a risk to the Grassy River Catchment, including the town water supply for Grassy. 004 Wildfire posses a risk to the Grassy Port facility, including the bulk fuel storages. 005 Wildfire posses a risk to Eucalyptus brookerianna wet forest in Kentford Forest Nature Reserve, E. ovata forest and woodland in Kentford Forest Conservation Area and other vegetation on adjoining rural properties. 006a Wildfire posses a risk to the township of Currie. 006b Wildfire posses a risk to properties on Charles Street in the vicinity of Devils Gap, including the waste management facility and Bell Hill. 006c Wildfire posses a risk to the Camp Creek Reserve, including the nearby gas storage yard. 006d Wildfire posses a risk to the coastal vegetation and housing north from the mouth of the Ettrick River, through British Admiral Beach, Kelp Industries Pty Ltd and to the township of Currie. 007 Wildfire posses a risk to the township of Naracoopa. 008 Wildfire poses a risk to the fire sensitive values in Lavinia State Reserve, Seal Rocks State Reserve and adjoining Public Reserves and unallocated crown land as identified in the King Island Reserves and Crown Land Fire Management Plan (DTPHA; 2002) and King Island 2007 Fires: Impact on natural values (DPIW; 2007) including; 1. Visitors to the reserves at the following sites; a. Lavinia SR – carpark and picnic area (incorporating Pennys Lagoon and Lake Martha Lavinia) b. Lavinia SR – Sea Elephant Road c. Lavinia SR – Nook Swamp 4WD track and foreshore d. Lavinia SR – Nine Mile Beach (incorporating Lavinia Beach) e. Lavinia SR – campsites f. Seal Rocks SR – Seal Rocks Road and Calcified Forest Track g. Seal Rocks SR – Minor walking tracks 2. Parks managed assets including, walking tracks, viewing platforms, picnic shelters, tables, toilets and signage at the following sites; a. Lavinia SR – carpark and picnic area (incorporating Pennys Lagoon and Lake Martha Lavinia) b. Lavinia SR – Sea Elephant Road c. Seal Rocks SR – Seal Rocks Road and Calcified Forest Track 3. The following vegetation communities a. Coastal scrub b. Eucalyptus globulus King Island forest c. E. brookeriana wet forest d. King Island sedge/heath/scrub complex e. Melaleuca ericifolia swamp forest 4. The following flora species; a. Elaeocarpus reticulates (Blueberry ash) 5. The following fauna species and their habitats; a. Acanthiza pusilla archibaldi (King Island brown thornbill) b. Acanthornis magnus greenianus (King Island scrubtit) c. Austrochloritis victoriae (Southern Hairy Snail) d. Neophema chrysogaster (Orange-bellied parrot) 6. The following geoconservation sites a. Lavinia Peatland Complex

King Island Wildfire Management Plan – February 2009 34 ID Risk Statement 009 Wildfire posses a risk to the Pegarah State Forest including the landfill site and surrounding vegetation and housing. 010 Wildfire posses a risk to the King Island Airport. 011 Wildfire posses a risk to the power station and wind turbines. 012 Wildfire posses a risk to power distribution lines and poles. 013 Wildfire posses a risk to the King Island Dairy. 014 Wildfire posses a risk to abattoirs on King Island. 015 Wildfire posses a risk to the coastal vegetation and housing from Porky Beach to Bungaree Creek. 016 Wildfire posses a risk to the coastal vegetation and housing from Victoria Cove to the mouth of Yellow Rock River including: c) Neophema chrysogaster (Orange-bellied parrot) and its associated habitat. d) Eudyptula minor (Little Penguin) and Puffinus tenuirostis (Short-tailed Shearwater) rookeries. 017 Wildfire posses a risk to the coastal vegetation, camping sites, tourist visiting sites and shacks from Disappointment Bay to the Lavinia State Reserve, including Eudyptula minor (Little Penguin) and Puffinus tenuirostis (Short-tailed Shearwater) rookeries. 018 Wildfire posses a risk to gorges on King Island, in particular Yarra Creek, Barrier Creek, Grassy River, Fraser River and Sea Elephant River. 019 Wildfire posses a risk to peat deposits on King Island. 020 Wildfire posses a risk to high priority vegetation, including tree lanes, remnant vegetation and threatened vegetation community types on rural properties. 021 Wildfire posses a risk to farm fences, stock and pasture. 022 Wildfire posses a risk to road and bridge infrastructure on King Island. 023 Wildfire posses a risk to the Reekara Community Complex. 024 Wildfire posses a risk to rural housing and associated structures. 025 Wildfire posses a risk to Airservices Australia NDB, SGS, Regional Express Airlines and KIC communication infrastructure at the King Island Airport. 026 Wildfire posses a risk to Telstra and the Tasmania Police communication infrastructure at the ‘Old Power Station’ via Grahams Rd, Grassy. 027 Wildfire posses a risk to Telstra Radio Terminal at Cape Wickham. 028 Wildfire posses a risk to communication infrastructure used by Telstra and the Tasmania Police at Counsel Hill. 029 Wildfire posses a risk to Telstra and King Island Dairy communication infrastructure at the King Island Dairy, North Road and to Promo Radio communication infrastructure. 030 Wildfire posses a risk to Hydro Tasmania’s wind monitoring infrastructure at Huxley Hill. 031 Wildfire posses a risk to communication infrastructure used by Telstra, King Island Ports, State Fire Commission and television networks at Gentle Annie and to the Bureau of Meteorology infrastructure at Mount Stanley. 032 Wildfire posses a risk to Telstra communication infrastructure at Yambacoona. 033 Wildfire posses a risk to communication infrastructure at Lymwood. 034 Wildfire posses a risk to communication infrastructure at the Naracoopa Hill. 035 Wildfire posses a risk to 6-communication infrastructure sites within the township of Currie.

King Island Wildfire Management Plan – February 2009 35 Qualitative Measures Of Consequence

Descriptor Description Insignificant No injuries or fatalities. Small number or no people displaced and only for a short duration. Little or no personal support required (support not monetary or material). Inconsequential or no damage. Little or no disruption to community. No measurable impact on environment. Little or no financial loss. Minor Small number of injuries but no fatalities. First aid treatment required. Some displacement of people (less than 24 hours). Some personal support required. Some damage. Some disruption (less than 24 hours). Small impact on environment with no lasting effects. Some financial loss. Moderate Medical treatment required but no fatalities. Some hospitalization. Localised displacement of people who return within 24 hours. Personal support satisfied through local arrangements. Localised damage that is rectified by routine arrangements. Normal community functioning with some inconvenience. Some impact on environment with no long term effect or small impact on environment with long-term effect. Significant financial loss. Major Extensive injuries, significant hospitalisation, large number displaced (more than 24 hours duration) Fatalities. External resources required for personal support. Significant damage that requires external resources. Community only partially functioning, some services available. Some impact on environment with long-term effects. Significant financial loss- some financial assistance required. Catastrophic Large number of severe injuries. Extended and large numbers requiring hospitalisation. General and widespread displacement for extended duration. Significant fatalities. Extensive personal support. Extensive damage. Community unable to function without significant support. Significant impact on environment and / or permanent damage.

King Island Wildfire Management Plan – February 2009 36 Qualitative Measures Of Likelihood

Descriptor Description Almost It is expected to occur in most circumstances and / or high level of recorded Certain incidents: and / or strong anecdotal evidence: and / or a strong likelihood the event will recur: and / or great opportunity, reason, or means to occur may occur once every year or more. Likely Will probably occur in most circumstances: and / or regular recorded incidents and strong anecdotal evidence: and / or considerable opportunity, reason or means to occur: may occur once every five years. Possible Might occur at some time: and / or few, infrequent, random recorded incidents or little anecdotal evidence: and / or very few incidents in comparable organisations, facilities or communities: and / or some opportunity, reason or means to occur, may occur once every twenty years. Unlikely Is not expected to occur: and / or no recorded incidents or anecdotal evidence: and / or no recent incidents in associated organisations, facilities or communities: and / or little opportunity, reason or means to occur, may occur once every one hundred years. Rare May occur only in exceptional circumstances: may occur once every five hundred or more years.

Qualitative Risk Analysis Matrix – Level Of Risk Likelihood Consequence Insignificant Minor Moderate Major Catastrophic Almost High High Extreme Extreme Extreme Certain Likely Moderate High High Extreme Extreme Possible Low Moderate High Extreme Extreme Unlikely Low Low Moderate High Extreme Rare Low Low Moderate High High

King Island Wildfire Management Plan – February 2009 37 Risk Analysis and Existing Controls ID Risk Statement Consequence Likelihood Level of Existing Controls Risk 001 Wildfire posses a risk to the Grassy Township. Major Possible EXTREME • Fire hydrants throughout township. • Brigade in township. • Fire permit periods. • Total Fire Ban days. 002 Wildfire posses a risk to rural dwellings, tourist sites and native vegetation, from Moderate Possible High • Fire Permit periods. Attrill’s Road to Seal Rocks through the Red Hut District to the Grassy Township. • Area fire brigade. This includes the following: • Total Fire Ban days. a. The significant stands of Melaleuca ericifolia swamp forests at Colliers Swamp and within the adjacent unallocated Crown Land b. The geomorphically significant calcified forest c. Big Lake d. A number of gorges in this district e. Eudyptula minor (Little Penguin) and Puffinus tenuirostis (Short-tailed Shearwater) rookeries. 003a Wildfire posses a risk to the native vegetation from Bold Head to the Grassy 3a Minor Possible Moderate • Fire Permit periods. Township. • Area fire brigade. 003b Wildfire posses a risk to the Grassy River Catchment, including the town water supply • Total Fire Ban days. for Grassy. 3b Moderate Possible High • Fire Permit periods. • Area fire brigade. • Total Fire Ban days.

King Island Wildfire Management Plan – February 2009 38 ID Risk Statement Consequence Likelihood Level of Existing Controls Risk 004 Wildfire posses a risk to the Grassy Port facility, including the bulk fuel storages. Major Possible EXTREME • Access from Ports Road and through old mining tracks. • Grass kept low by King Island Ports. • Sprinkler system with a 40,000-litre tank maintained by King Island Ports. • King Island Ports have a poly pipe system and pumps in place to douse the area with water if required. • Fire hydrant system. • Area around navigational markers slashed. • Golf course provides a cleared area around the King Island Ports. • Fire Permit periods. • Area fire brigade. • Total Fire Ban days 005 Wildfire posses a risk to Eucalyptus brookerianna wet forest in Kentford Forest Moderate Possible High • Fire Permit periods. Nature Reserve, E. ovata forest and woodland in Kentford Forest Conservation Area • Area fire brigade. and other vegetation on adjoining rural properties. • Total Fire Ban days.

King Island Wildfire Management Plan – February 2009 39 ID Risk Statement Consequence Likelihood Level of Existing Controls Risk 006a Wildfire posses a risk to the township of Currie. 6a Major Possible EXTREME • Annual slashing of Bell Hill by KIC. • Existing fire hydrant system within the township of Currie. • Fire Permit periods. • Area fire brigade. • Total Fire Ban days. 6b Moderate Likely High • Annual slashing of 006b Wildfire posses a risk to properties on Charles Street in the vicinity of Devils Gap, Bell Hill by KIC. including the waste management facility and Bell Hill. • Existing fire hydrant system within the township of Currie. • Fire Permit periods. • Area fire brigade. • Total Fire Ban days. 6c Moderate Possible High • Good network of fire hydrants in and 006c Wildfire posses a risk to the Camp Creek Reserve, including the nearby gas storage around the Camp yard. Creek area, such as Shaw Street with 3 fire hydrants. • Good access to Camp Creek, from roads, ‘the old stock route’, through open paddocks and the school grounds. • Fire Permit periods. • Area fire brigade. • Total Fire Ban days.

King Island Wildfire Management Plan – February 2009 40 ID Risk Statement Consequence Likelihood Level of Existing Controls Risk 006d Wildfire posses a risk to the coastal vegetation and housing north from the mouth of 6d Moderate Possible High • Kelp Industries have the Ettrick River, through British Admiral Beach, Kelp Industries Pty Ltd and to the a standpipe that township of Currie. connects to 2 concrete tanks. The factory has a reticulated fire pump and 4 hydrants. • Fire Permit periods. • Area fire brigades • Total Fire Ban days. 007 Wildfire posses a risk to the township of Naracoopa Major Likely EXTREME • Fire Permit periods. • Area fire brigade. • Total Fire Ban days. 008 Wildfire poses a risk to the fire sensitive values in Lavinia State Reserve, Seal Rocks • Ranger for Parks and State Reserve and adjoining Public Reserves and unallocated crown land as identified Wildlife Service in the King Island Reserves and Crown Land Fire Management Plan (DTPHA; 2002) based on King Island and King Island 2007 Fires: Impact on natural values (DPIW; 2007) including; • Fire Permit periods. 1. Visitors to the reserves at the following sites; • Area fire brigade. a. Lavinia SR – carpark and picnic area (incorporating Pennys Lagoon • Total Fire Ban days. 1a Moderate Likely High and Lake Martha Lavinia) 1b Moderate Likely High b. Lavinia SR – Sea Elephant Road 1c Minor Possible Moderate c. Lavinia SR – Nook Swamp 4WD track and foreshore d. Lavinia SR – Nine Mile Beach (incorporating Lavinia Beach) 1d Minor Possible Moderate e. Lavinia SR – campsites 1e Moderate Likely High f. Seal Rocks SR – Seal Rocks Road and Calcified Forest Track 1f Moderate Likely High g. Seal Rocks SR – Minor walking tracks 1g Minor Possible Moderate 2. Parks managed assets including, walking tracks, viewing platforms, picnic shelters, tables, toilets and signage at the following sites; 2a Moderate Likely High a. Lavinia SR – carpark and picnic area (incorporating Pennys Lagoon and Lake Martha Lavinia) b. Lavinia SR – Sea Elephant Road 2b Moderate Likely High c. Seal Rocks SR – Seal Rocks Road and Calcified Forest Track 2c Moderate Likely High 3. The following vegetation communities 3a Minor Possible Moderate a. Coastal scrub

King Island Wildfire Management Plan – February 2009 41 ID Risk Statement Consequence Likelihood Level of Existing Controls Risk b. Eucalyptus globulus King Island forest 3b Moderate Possible High c. E. brookeriana wet forest 3c Moderate Possible High d. King Island sedge/heath/scrub complex 3d Minor Likely High e. Melaleuca ericifolia swamp forest 3e Moderate Possible High 4. The following flora species; 4a Minor Likely High a. Elaeocarpus reticulates (Blueberry ash) 5. The following fauna species and their habitats; 5a Catastrophic Possible EXTREME a. Acanthiza pusilla archibaldi (King Island brown thornbill) b. Acanthornis magnus greenianus (King Island scrubtit) 5b Catastrophic Possible EXTREME c. Austrochloritis victoriae (Southern Hairy Snail) 5c Moderate Possible High d. Neophema chrysogaster (Orange-bellied parrot) 5d Catastrophic Possible EXTREME 6. The following geoconservation sites 6a Major Possible EXTREME a. Lavinia Peatland Complex 009 Wildfire posses a risk to the Pegarah State Forest including the landfill site and Moderate Possible High • Water supply at entry surrounding vegetation and housing. from Pegarah Rd. • Fire Permit periods. • Area fire brigade. • Total Fire Ban days. 010 Wildfire posses a risk to the King Island Airport. Minor Likely Low • Surrounded by cleared agricultural land. • Hydrant system, water on hand. • Slashing of the area. • Fire Permit period • Area fire brigade • Total Fire Ban days

King Island Wildfire Management Plan – February 2009 42 ID Risk Statement Consequence Likelihood Level of Existing Controls Risk 011 Wildfire posses a risk to the power station and wind turbines. Moderate Unlikely Moderate • Area around power station maintained as low grass. • Hydrant system and pumps, with water on hand • Fire Permit periods. • Area fire brigade. • Total Fire Ban days. 012 Wildfire posses a risk to power distribution lines and poles. Moderate Likely High • Removal of vegetation from power lines. • General line maintenance. • Fire Permit periods. • Area fire brigades. • Total Fire Ban days. 013 Wildfire posses a risk to the King Island Dairy. Moderate Unlikely Moderate • Surrounded by cleared agricultural land. • Internal fire suppression system, including water supply. • Fire Permit periods. • Area fire brigade. • Total Fire Ban days. 014 Wildfire posses a risk to abattoirs on King Island. Moderate Unlikely Moderate • Surrounded by cleared agricultural land. • Fire Permit periods. • Area fire brigade. • Total Fire Ban days.

King Island Wildfire Management Plan – February 2009 43 ID Risk Statement Consequence Likelihood Level of Existing Controls Risk 015 Wildfire posses a risk to the coastal vegetation and housing from Porky Beach to Minor Possible Moderate • Fire Permit periods. Bungaree Creek. • Area fire brigade. • Total Fire Ban days. 016 Wildfire posses a risk to the coastal vegetation and housing from Victoria Cove to the Moderate Possible High • Fire Permit periods. mouth of Yellow Rock River including: • Area fire brigade. e) Neophema chrysogaster (Orange-bellied parrot) and its associated habitat. • Total Fire Ban days. f) Eudyptula minor (Little Penguin) and Puffinus tenuirostis (Short-tailed Shearwater) rookeries. 017 Wildfire posses a risk to the coastal vegetation, camping sites, tourist visiting sites and Minor Likely High • Fire Permit periods. shacks from Disappointment Bay to the Lavinia State Reserve, including Eudyptula • Area fire brigade. minor (Little Penguin) and Puffinus tenuirostis (Short-tailed Shearwater) rookeries. • Total Fire Ban days. 018 Wildfire posses a risk to gorges on King Island, in particular Yarra Creek, Barrier Major Unlikely High • Most are surrounded Creek, Grassy River, Fraser River and Sea Elephant River. by cleared agricultural land. • Fire Permit periods. • Area fire brigade. • Total Fire Ban days 019 Wildfire posses a risk to peat deposits on King Island. Moderate Likely High • Fire Permit periods. • Area fire brigade. • Total Fire Ban days. 020 Wildfire posses a risk to high priority vegetation, including tree lanes, remnant Moderate Likely High • Individual property vegetation and threatened vegetation community types on rural properties. preparation by owners. • Fire Permit period • Area fire brigade • Total Fire Ban days 021 Wildfire posses a risk to farm fences, stock and pasture. Minor Possible Moderate • Individual property preparation by owners. • Fire Permit period • Area fire brigade • Total Fire Ban days

King Island Wildfire Management Plan – February 2009 44 ID Risk Statement Consequence Likelihood Level of Existing Controls Risk 022 Wildfire posses a risk to road and bridge infrastructure on King Island. Minor Unlikely Low • Roadside slashing of main roads. • Roadside spraying • Fire Permit periods. • Area fire brigade. • Total Fire Ban days. 023 Wildfire posses a risk to the Reekara Community Complex. Minor Rare Low • Regularly slashed. • Surrounded by cleared agricultural land. • Fire station adjoining. • Good water supply. • Fire Permit periods. • Area fire brigade. • Total Fire Ban days. 024 Wildfire posses a risk to rural housing and associated structures. Moderate Possible High • Individual property preparation by owners. • Fire Permit periods. • Area fire brigade. • Total Fire Ban days. 025 Wildfire posses a risk to Airservices Australia NDB, SGS, Regional Express Minor Rare Low • Surrounded by Airlines and KIC communication infrastructure at the King Island Airport. cleared agricultural land. • Fire Permit periods. • Area fire brigade. • Total Fire Ban days. 026 Wildfire posses a risk to Telstra and the Tasmania Police communication infrastructure Minor Rare Low • Surrounded by at the ‘Old Power Station’ via Grahams Rd, Grassy. Wildfire posses a risk to Telstra cleared agricultural and the Tasmania Police communication infrastructure at the ‘Old Power Station’ via land. Grahams Rd, Grassy. • Fire Permit periods. • Area fire brigade. • Total Fire Ban days.

King Island Wildfire Management Plan – February 2009 45 ID Risk Statement Consequence Likelihood Level of Existing Controls Risk 027 Wildfire posses a risk to Telstra Radio Terminal at Cape Wickham. Minor Rare Low • Surrounded by cleared agricultural land. • Fire Permit periods • Area fire brigade. • Total Fire Ban days. 028 Wildfire posses a risk to communication infrastructure used by Telstra and the Moderate Likely High • Currently cleared Tasmania Police at Counsel Hill. • Fire Permit periods. • Area fire brigade. • Total Fire Ban days. 029 Wildfire posses a risk to Telstra and King Island Dairy communication infrastructure Minor Rare Low • Surrounded by at the King Island Dairy, North Road and to the Promo Radio communication cleared agricultural infrastructure. land. • Fire Permit periods. • Area fire brigade. • Total Fire Ban days. 030 Wildfire posses a risk to Hydro Tasmania’s wind monitoring infrastructure at Huxley Minor Rare Low • Area around power Hill. station maintained as low grass. • Fire Permit periods. • Area fire brigade. • Total Fire Ban days. 031 Wildfire posses a risk to communication infrastructure used by Telstra, King Island Major Unlikely High • Surrounded by Ports, State Fire Commission and television networks at Gentle Annie and to the cleared agricultural Bureau of Meteorology infrastructure at Mount Stanley. land. • Fire Permit periods. • Area fire brigade. • Total Fire Ban days.

King Island Wildfire Management Plan – February 2009 46 ID Risk Statement Consequence Likelihood Level of Existing Controls Risk 032 Wildfire posses a risk to Telstra communication infrastructure at Yambacoona. Minor Rare Low • Surrounded by cleared agricultural land. • Fire Permit periods. • Area fire brigade. • Total Fire Ban days. 033 Wildfire posses a risk to communication infrastructure at Lymwood. Minor Rare Low • Surrounded by cleared agricultural land. • Fire Permit periods. • Area fire brigade. • Total Fire Ban days. 034 Wildfire posses a risk to communication infrastructure at the Naracoopa Hill. Minor Unlikely Low • Fire Permit periods. • Area fire brigade. • Total Fire Ban days. 035 Wildfire posses a risk to 6-communication infrastructure sites within the township of Major Unlikely High As per Risk 006 Currie.

King Island Wildfire Management Plan – February 2009 47 3b. Identification and Evaluation of Treatment Options

Criteria For Evaluating Risk Treatment Options

Criteria Questions 1. Equity Do those responsible for creating the risk pay for its reduction? Where there is no man made cause, is the cost fairly distributed? 2. Timing Will the beneficial effects of this option be quickly realised? 3. Leverage Will the application of this option lead to further risk reduction actions by others? 4. Cost Is this option the most cost effective or could the same result be achieved more cheaply by other means? 5. Administrative Can this option be easily administered or will its efficiency application be neglected because of difficulty of administration or lack of expertise? 6. Continuity of Will the effects of the application of this option be effect continuous or merely short term? 7. Compatibility How compatible is this option with others that may be adopted? 8. Jurisdictional Does this level of government have the legislated authority authority to apply this option? If not can higher levels be encouraged to do so? 9. Effect on What will be the economic impact of this option? economy 10. Effect on What will be the environmental impact of this option? environment 11. Risk Creation Will this option itself introduce new risks? 12. Risk reduction What proportion of the losses due to this risk will this potential option prevent? 13. Political Is this option likely to be endorsed by the relevant acceptability government? 14. Public and Are there likely to be adverse reactions to pressure group implementation of this option? reaction 15. Individual Does this option deny basic rights? freedom

King Island Wildfire Management Plan – February 2009 48 Identification and Evaluation of Treatment Options ID Risk Statement Identified Treatment Options Assessment Preferred Treatment(s) 001 Wildfire posses a risk to the Prevention: Grassy Township. 1. Abatement officer at the KIC, periodically investigate abatement issues in No.2: This fire All consultation with the TFS. trail will require Preparedness: approval under 2. Fire trail 1 around the Grassy Township for defence purposes as per Figures 2 and forest practice 3. act and a check 3. Widen track 2 along the powerlines to Grassy catchment to protect the power on the supply for the provision of water to Grassy as per Figures 2 and 3. vulnerability of 4. Identification and mapping of fire hydrants on reticulated water supply. Grassy the vegetation Brigade to check annually and faults to be reported to KIC for appropriate community. Will maintenance. also need to 5. Progressive upgrading of Grassy town water system to 4-6 inch mains. check against 6. Identify priority houses (including Ballarat and Claredon College Campus) to planning undertake annual TFS Structure Survival Assessment. Provide ongoing support regulations. and encouragement to property owners in these priority locations for the development and maintenance of individual bushfire plans. 7. Develop Grassy Tactical Response Guide.

Response: 8. Defend off fire trail 1. 9. Early notification of need for recovery to the King Island Community Recovery Team. 10. Minimum two brigade response to vegetation and structural fires. 11. Use of King Island Fire Response Guidelines and Grassy Tactical Response Guide.

Recovery: 12. Existing controls (King Island Community Recovery Plan).

King Island Wildfire Management Plan – February 2009 49 ID Risk Statement Identified Treatment Options Assessment Preferred Treatment(s) 002 Wildfire posses a risk to rural Prevention: dwellings, tourist sites and No2: Contingent native vegetation, from Preparedness: on negotiations Attrill’s Road to Seal Rocks 1. PWS and adjoining landholder(s) enter into agreement for maintenance of between PWS through the Red Hut District to the joint boundary. and adjoining All the Grassy Township. This 2. Widening and maintenance of Red Hut Road to be used as fire trail 3 as per landholders. includes the following: Figures 2 and 3. a. The significant stands of 3. Creation of fire trail 4 from Red Hut Road to Sand blow beach as per Figures 2 Melaleuca ericifolia and 3. s swamp forests at Colliers 4. Widening and maintenance of South Road from Pearshape to Seal Rocks Road so No 5and6: Swamp and within the that it can be used as fire trail 5 as per Figure 2 and 3. Subject to RAA adjacent unallocated 5. Annual maintenance of track 6 from Red Hut Road along Colliers Swamp to Seal and other Crown Land River Road as per Figures 2 and 3. environmental b. The geomorphically 6. Investigate and if feasible establish fire / access trail 7 from Big Lake along fern constraints. s significant calcified forest bank to Millers Road as per Figures 2 and 3. No 1 - 7 Subject c. Big Lake 7. Widening and maintenance of Seal Rocks Road as fire trail 8 as per Figures 2 and to negotiation d. A number of gorges in this 3. with private district 8. Annual maintenance of track 9 from the northwest boundary of Bowling’s to landholders. e. Eudyptula minor (Little Cataraquai airstrip as illustrated in Figures 2 and 3. Penguin) and Puffinus 9. Identify dwellings, particularly those that are occupied and mark on map(s) for tenuirostis (Short-tailed response activities. Shearwater) rookeries. 10. Annual TFS Structure Survival Assessment of properties within priority locations. Ongoing support and encouragement to property owners in these priority locations for the development and maintenance of individual bushfire plans. 11. Identify potential water points near proposed defence lines. If necessary construct water points.

Response: 12. Use of King Island Fire Response Guidelines and Grassy Tactical Response Guide. 13. Defence lines: • Red Hut Road (fire trail 3) • Red Hut Road East to Sandblow beach (fire trail 4)

King Island Wildfire Management Plan – February 2009 50 ID Risk Statement Identified Treatment Options Assessment Preferred Treatment(s) • South Road (fire trail 5) • Track from Red Hut Road along Colliers Swamp to Seal River Road (fire trail 6) • Seal Rocks Road (fire trail 8) • Ports Road 14. Access tracks: • Proposed track from Big Lake to Millers Road. (Fire trail 7) • Track from the northwest boundary of Bowling’s to Cataraquai airstrip. (Fire trail 9)

Recovery: 15. Existing controls (King Island Community Recovery Plan). 003a Wildfire posses a risk to the As per risk 001 003b native vegetation from Bold Head to the Grassy Township. Wildfire posses a risk to the Grassy River Catchment, including the town water supply for Grassy. 004 Wildfire posses a risk to the Prevention: Grassy Port facility, including All the bulk fuel storages. Preparedness: Response: 1. Existing controls including that King Island Ports to be self-sufficient until Brigade(s) arrive. Note: Power supply is vital to ports, and Grassy township.

Recovery: 2. Existing controls (King Island Community Recovery Plan).

King Island Wildfire Management Plan – February 2009 51 ID Risk Statement Identified Treatment Options Assessment Preferred Treatment(s) 005 Wildfire posses a risk to Prevention: All Eucalyptus brookerianna wet forest in Kentford Forest Prevention: Nature Reserve, E. ovata forest 1. Maintain access tracks on northern and eastern boundaries of the Nature Reserve. and woodland in Kentford 2. Gate or restrict access into conservation area off Mt Stanley Rd. Forest Conservation Area and 3. Investigate constructing additional water holes. other vegetation on adjoining rural properties. Response:

Recovery: 4. Existing controls (King Island Community Recovery Plan). 006a Wildfire posses a risk to the Prevention: township of Currie. 1. Firebreak around tip. 2. Brigade located within the township.

Preparedness: Nos 4-10: All 3. Abatement officer at the KIC, periodically investigate abatement issues in Subject to consultation with the TFS. environmental 4. Development of access track 10 to defend from at the back of housing in constraints and Lighthouse Street, as illustrated in Figure 2 and 4. negotiation with 5. Annual slashing and maintenance of Lighthouse Street access track 10 by KIC. private 6. Development of access track 11 to defend from and provide a defence line and landholders. access to water at Devils Gap, as illustrated in Figure 2 and4. 7. Annual maintenance of Devils Gap access track 11 by KIC. 8. Investigate the status of well at Devils Gap, as illustrated in Figure 2and4 and either re-instate or install new well for water supply. 9. Continue existing control of annual slashing of Bell Hill (track 12). 10. Installation of 3 new fire hydrants in Currie, 1 in Lighthouse Street and 2 in Wharf Road. 11. Annual TFS Structure Survival Assessment of properties in -Henry Street, -Huxley Street, -the Main Street (including commercial properties such as Parers Hotel),

King Island Wildfire Management Plan – February 2009 52 ID Risk Statement Identified Treatment Options Assessment Preferred Treatment(s) -Lighthouse Street and -Beach Road. Ongoing support and encouragement to property owners in these priority locations for the development and maintenance of individual bushfire plans. Furthermore where the property is tourist accommodation, encourage managers to display bushfire plans to occupants of the accommodation.

Response: 12. Use of King Island Fire Response Guidelines and Currie Tactical Response Guide. 13. Protection of priority streets/properties, in particular Henry Street properties in the event of a northerly wind. 14. Use of Charles Street to defend from if the fire is to the North of Devils Gap. 15. Defend off Wharf Road and ‘Bell Hill Track 12’. If required fall back to Lighthouse Street for property protection, including the use of access track 10 at the back of Lighthouse Street.

Recovery: 16. Existing controls (King Island Community Recovery Plan). 006b Wildfire posses a risk to As per Risk 006a As per 006a properties on Charles Street in the vicinity of Devils Gap, including the waste management facility and Bell Hill. 006c Wildfire posses a risk to the Existing controls. Existing controls. Camp Creek Reserve, including the nearby gas storage yard.

King Island Wildfire Management Plan – February 2009 53 ID Risk Statement Identified Treatment Options Assessment Preferred Treatment(s) 006d Wildfire posses a risk to the Prevention: coastal vegetation and housing north from the mouth of the Preparedness: Ettrick River, through British 1. Abatement officer at the KIC, periodically investigate abatement issues in Subject to All Admiral Beach, Kelp consultation with the TFS. environmental Industries Pty Ltd and to the 2. Annual TFS Structure Survival Assessment of priority properties. Ongoing constraints, township of Currie. support and encouragement to these property owners to develop and maintain forest practices individual bushfire plans. act and 3. GPS and map existing shacks (including A frame) and housing / development. negotiation with Review and update annually. Place mapping in all King Island fire trucks / landholders vehicles. 4. GPS and map existing water points in the ‘risk area’. Review and update annually. Place mapping in all King Island fire trucks / vehicles. 5. Annual maintenance of track 13 on private property from South Road to Badger Box Creek to ensure that it could be used for access for all classes of fire vehicles. 6. Negotiate with private landowner to develop fire trail 14 utilising the minor track from Netherby Road through to cleared paddocks near Huxley Hill as identified in Figures 2 and 4. 7. Local command pre-authorised to access and utilise resources eg excavators, helicopter etc, as deemed necessary given the High to Extreme Risk situation.

Response: 8. Use of King Island Fire Response Guidelines and Currie Tactical Response Guide. 9. Determine if shack(s) are currently being camped in and if so evacuate. 10. Defensive strategy would be the main approach at this point in time due to accessibility and the area of land that the vegetation covers. 11. The following tracks would be utilised for defence: - track 13 from South Road to Badger Box Creek - track 12 from Netherby Road through to cleared paddocks near Huxley Hill - Rifle Range Road - Netherby Road - Kelp track from Kelp Industries, around the front of the golf course through to Beach Road / Lighthouse Street.

King Island Wildfire Management Plan – February 2009 54 ID Risk Statement Identified Treatment Options Assessment Preferred Treatment(s) 12. Use of resources eg excavators, helicopters etc, according to the situation on hand.

Recovery: 13. Existing controls (King Island Community Recovery Plan). 007 Wildfire posses a risk to the Prevention: All township of Naracoopa 1. Abatement officer at the KIC, periodically investigate abatement issues in consultation with the TFS.

Preparedness: Fire trails 2. Fire trails: contingent upon - Trail 15, upgrade and maintenance of Link Rd and Sea Elephant Rd, as environmental identified in Figure2 and approvals (eg - Trail 16, track along Sea Elephant River to provide access to water, as RAA and Forest identified in Figures 2 and 5. Practices Act) - Put in a Fire Trail 17, from corner of paddock, across Sea Elephant Rd to and landowner Fraser Beach, as identified in Figures 2 and 5. agreement and - Put in Trail 20, from Pegarah Rd (Pegarah Hill) to the Esplanade, including negotiation. putting in a gateway, as show in Figures 2 and 5. - Investigate putting in an access track (Trail 21), from Pegarah Rd to Millwood Rd as per Figures 2 and 5. If feasible construct track.

3. Work with priority properties and residents within the township of Naracoopa to complete annual TFS Structural Survival Assessment of properties. Ensure that this is an opportunity to work with and support householders, rather than taking an authoritative approach. 4. Training of brigade members. 5. Provision of maps, aerial photographs and plans within fire vehicles and provide Naracoopa information to other brigades on the Island. 6. Identify water access in close proximity to identified defence lines and access trails. If appropriate investigate creating additional water points. 7. Create access track 22 from the old Kibuka Dam to Fraser Rd. Explore installing pipe from dam to Fraser Rd.

King Island Wildfire Management Plan – February 2009 55 ID Risk Statement Identified Treatment Options Assessment Preferred Treatment(s) Response: 8. Use of King Island Fire Response Guidelines and Naracoopa Tactical Response Guide. 9. Defence lines: - Fire trial 15 - Fire trail 17 - Fire trail 20 - Sea Elephant Rd (firetrail 18) and Fraser Rd (firetrail 19) as illustrated in Figures 2 and5. - Millwood Rd (firetrail 23), as illustrated in Figures 2 and 5. - Defence of assets only along Pegarah Rd, particularly around Pegarah State Forest. Recovery: 10. Existing controls (King Island Community Recovery Plan). 11. Landholders undertake activities as appropriate.

King Island Wildfire Management Plan – February 2009 56 ID Risk Statement Identified Treatment Options Assessment Preferred Treatment(s) 008 Wildfire poses a risk to the fire Prevention: sensitive values in Lavinia Fire trails All State Reserve, Seal Rocks Preparedness: contingent upon State Reserve and adjoining 1. Fire trails as nominated in the King Island Reserves and Crown Land Fire environmental Public Reserves and Management Plan (PWS 2002), as illustrate in Figures 2, 3, 5 and 6. approvals (eg unallocated crown land as 2. Permanent aerial on the tower at Counsel Hill. RAA and Forest identified in the King Island 3. Establishment of communication line infrastructure, to enable phone connection Practices Act) Reserves and Crown Land Fire within 24 hours. and landowner Management Plan (DTPHA; 4. PWS and adjoining landholder(s) enter into agreement for maintenance of the agreement and 2002) and King Island 2007 joint boundary. negotiation. Fires: Impact on natural values (DPIW; 2007) Response: No4: Contingent including; 14. Use of King Island Fire Response Guidelines and Naracoopa Tactical Response on negotiations 7. a-g Guide. between PWS 8. a-c and adjoining 9. a-e Recovery: landholders. 10. a 13. Existing controls (King Island Community Recovery Plan). 11. a-d 12. a 009 Wildfire posses a risk to the As per risk 007 Existing controls Existing controls Pegarah State Forest including the landfill site and surrounding vegetation and housing. 010 Wildfire posses a risk to the Existing controls. Existing controls Existing controls King Island Airport. 011 Wildfire posses a risk to the Existing controls Existing controls Existing controls power station and wind turbines. 012 There is a risk that power Existing controls Existing controls Existing controls distribution lines and poles will be affected by wildfire.

King Island Wildfire Management Plan – February 2009 57 ID Risk Statement Identified Treatment Options Assessment Preferred Treatment(s) 013 Wildfire posses a risk to the Existing controls Existing controls Existing controls King Island Dairy. 014 Wildfire posses a risk to Existing controls Existing controls Existing controls abattoirs on King Island. 015 Wildfire posses a risk to the Prevention: Existing controls Existing controls coastal vegetation and housing from Porky Beach to Bungaree Preparedness: Creek. Response: Defend dwellings as required. Recovery: Existing controls (King Island Community Recovery Plan). 016 Wildfire posses a risk to the Prevention: Subject to All coastal vegetation and housing environmental from Victoria Cove to the Preparedness: constraints and mouth of Yellow Rock River 1. Upgrade and maintain existing track W from North Road west to the coast as negotiation with including: illustrated in Figures 2 and 7. landholders g) Neophema 2. Construct Fire trail 35, as illustrated by Figures 2 and 7. chrysogaster (Orange- 3. Construct Fire trail 36, south of Lake Flannigan as illustrated in Figures 2 and 7. bellied parrot) and its 4. Annual TFS Structure Survival Assessment of priority properties. Ongoing associated habitat. support and encouragement to these property owners to develop and maintain h) Eudyptula minor individual bushfire plans. (Little Penguin) and Response: Puffinus tenuirostis 5. Aerial support due to the difficulty of the terrain. (Short-tailed Shearwater) Recovery: rookeries. 6. Existing controls (King Island Community Recovery Plan). 017 Wildfire posses a risk to the Prevention: Subject to All coastal vegetation, camping environmental sites, tourist visiting sites and Preparedness: constraints and shacks from Disappointment 1. Upgrade and maintain track 33, as illustrated in Figure2 2 and 6. negotiation with Bay to the Lavinia State landholders Reserve, including Eudyptula Response:

King Island Wildfire Management Plan – February 2009 58 ID Risk Statement Identified Treatment Options Assessment Preferred Treatment(s) minor (Little Penguin) and 2. Defend to clear ground. Determine if shack(s) are currently being camped in and Puffinus tenuirostis (Short- if so evacuate. tailed Shearwater) rookeries. Recovery: 3. Existing controls (King Island Community Recovery Plan). 018 Wildfire posses a risk to Gorges are of high value to King Island, but by their nature the response strategy Existing controls Existing controls gorges on King Island, in would require defending to clear ground. particular Yarra Creek, Barrier Creek, Grassy River, Fraser River and Sea Elephant River. 019 Wildfire posses a risk to peat Island Wide Treatments, specifically the use of permit periods and community Existing controls Existing controls deposits on King Island. education to discourage burning on peat. 020 Wildfire posses a risk to high Prevention: All priority vegetation, including tree lanes, remnant vegetation Preparedness: and threatened vegetation 1. Individual property plans. Advice and support to properties to prepare plans. community types on rural Response: properties. 2. Note: Vegetation high priority for protection where practicable. 3. Enabling of landholders to participate in fire suppression activities. 4. Good communication with landholders during the fire, keeping them informed and supported. Recovery: 5. Existing controls (King Island Community Recovery Plan). 6. Support services and debriefing for landholders. 7. Support to landholders with land and vegetation recovery as applicable.

King Island Wildfire Management Plan – February 2009 59 ID Risk Statement Identified Treatment Options Assessment Preferred Treatment(s) 021 Wildfire posses a risk to farm Prevention: All fences, stock and pasture. Preparedness: 1. Individual property plans. Advice and support to properties to prepare plans. Response: 2. Note: Vegetation high priority for protection where practicable. 3. Enabling of landholders to participate in fire suppression activities. 4. Good communication with landholders during the fire, keeping them informed and supported. Recovery: 5. Existing controls (King Island Community Recovery Plan). 6. Support services and debriefing for landholders. 7. Support to landholders with land and vegetation recovery as applicable. 022 Wildfire posses a risk to road Prevention: Existing controls Existing controls and bridge infrastructure on Preparedness: King Island. Response:

Recovery: Existing controls (King Island Community Recovery Plan). Post fire assessments and works programs as required. 023 Wildfire posses a risk to the Existing controls Existing controls Existing controls Reekara Community Complex. 024 Wildfire posses a risk to rural Prevention: housing and associated All structures. Preparedness: 1. Annually visit the school and undertake activities with the children with regard to preparing properties for a wildfire scenario. 2. Individual property protection plans. 3. Brigades to familiarise themselves with properties in their area. Response:

Recovery: Existing controls (King Island Community Recovery Plan).

King Island Wildfire Management Plan – February 2009 60 ID Risk Statement Identified Treatment Options Assessment Preferred Treatment(s) 025 Wildfire posses a risk to The communication infrastructure is of high value to King Island, but the risk is low Existing controls Existing controls Airservices Australia NDB, with existing controls in place. SGS, Regional Express Airlines and KIC communication infrastructure at the King Island Airport. 026 Wildfire posses a risk to The communication infrastructure is of high value to King Island, but the risk is low Existing controls Existing controls Telstra and the Tasmania with existing controls in place. Police communication infrastructure at the ‘Old Power Station’ via Grahams Rd, Grassy. 027 Wildfire posses a risk to The communication infrastructure is of high value to King Island, but the risk is low Existing controls Existing controls Telstra Radio Terminal at Cape with existing controls in place. Wickham. 028 Wildfire posses a risk to Prevention: communication infrastructure All used by Telstra and the Preparedness: Tasmania Police at Counsel 1. Permanent repeater station at Counsel Hill Hill. 2. Maintain cleared area of approximately 50 metres surrounding the tower. Response: 3. Note as value. Recovery: Existing controls (King Island Community Recovery Plan). 029 Wildfire posses a risk to The communication infrastructure is of high value to King Island, but the risk is low Existing controls Existing controls Telstra and King Island Dairy with existing controls in place. communication infrastructure at the King Island Dairy, North Road and to the to Promo Radio communication infrastructure.

King Island Wildfire Management Plan – February 2009 61 ID Risk Statement Identified Treatment Options Assessment Preferred Treatment(s) 030 Wildfire posses a risk to Hydro The monitoring equipment is of high value to King Island, but the risk is low with Existing controls Existing controls Tasmania’s wind monitoring existing controls in place. infrastructure at Huxley Hill. 031 Wildfire posses a risk to The communication infrastructure is of very high value to King Island, but the risk is Existing controls Existing controls communication infrastructure, low with existing controls in place. used by Telstra, King Island Ports, State Fire Commission and television networks at Gentle Annie and to the Bureau of Meteorology infrastructure at Mount Stanley. 032 Wildfire posses a risk to The communication infrastructure is of high value to King Island, but the risk is low Existing controls Existing controls Telstra communication with existing controls in place. infrastructure at Yambacoona. 033 Wildfire posses a risk to The communication infrastructure is of high value to King Island, but the risk is low Existing controls Existing controls communication infrastructure with existing controls in place. at Lymwood. 034 Wildfire posses a risk to Prevention: communication infrastructure All at the Naracoopa Hill. Preparedness: Maintain cleared area of approximately 50 metres surrounding the tower. Response:

Recovery: Existing controls (King Island Community Recovery Plan). 035 Wildfire posses a risk to 6- As per Currie Treatments (risk nos.6a-6d) As per Risk 006 As per Risk 006 communication infrastructure sites within the township of Currie.

King Island Wildfire Management Plan – February 2009 62 References

Parks and Wildlife Service (2000). Lavinia Nature Reserve Draft Management Plan 2000. Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Primary Industries, Water and Environment, Hobart.

Resource Management and Conservation Division (2007). King Island 2007 Fires: Impact on Natural Values. Unpublished report to the Tasmania Parks and Wildlife Service. Biodiversity Conservation Branch, Resource Management and Conservation Division, Department of Primary Industries and Water, Hobart.

Standards Australia (2004). Risk Management AS/NZS 4360:2004. Standards Australia, Standards New Zealand, Sydney

Standards Australia (2004). Risk Management Guidelines, Companion to AS/NZS 4360:2004. Standards Australia, Standards New Zealand, Sydney

Emergency Management Australia (2004). Emergency Risk Management – Applications Guide – Manual 5. Emergency Management Australia, Dickson, ACT

King Island Wildfire Management Plan – February 2009 63