DOCSLIB.ORG

Download (PDF)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Download (PDF) Davip Garrick: His GARDEN at Hamptonandthe ‘cuit ofSHAKESPEARE after appearing at an exhibition at the Royal taste of the progression of the monarchs who Academy, were ready to be introduced to the formed the succession of Privy Gardens at two northernplinths in the overgrownparterre Hampton Court. of the Privy Garden. They were made by As always there are many unanswered Robert Jackson in marble and were also known questions. What were, and what becameof, as Flora and Adonis. (figs. 2r & 22) In 1933, as the two marblefigures ofApollo and Adonis of we have heard, the bronze statues of Venus de Charles I’s Privy Garden? What was Nost’s Medici and Cleopatra were re-introduced into lost figure of Victory? Whatis the exact prove- the Privy Garden around 300 years after they nance of William III’s garden statues? We had madetheir first appearance here. In fact, could be edging towards some tenuousresolu- with two bronze figures and two marble fig- tion of that question. But were the marble ures, one ofwhom was Adonis, standing in the figures imported by Balle what William III four quarters of the garden, the statuary envisaged for his personal garden? Hehesitat- recalled what had been there in the mid seven- ed to give his approval; had he lived, wouldhe, teenth century. In 1946, the National Art like Queen Anne, have wanted them sent back Collections Fund purchased the figure of to their owner? Unless an amazing new piece Abundance by Derwent Woodfor display in of archival evidenceis found, that is something the Privy Garden andit wasplaced to the west weshall never know.. of the fountain. However, the three figures of Spring, Summer and Abundance are now fea- kK KK KOK tures of the Rose Garden at Hampton Court, and following the restoration in 1995, all the I would like to thank Juliet West at English Heritage elements of the Privy Garden now correspond for so generously sharing with me her ownresearch with those of William III’s garden of1702. into statuary at Hampton Court manyyears ago and One would imagine that statuary, com- fuelling my own enthusiasm for this subject. bining as it does the difficult attributes of being mostly angular and generally cumber- some, considerably weighty and at the same Davip Garrick: His GarDEN at HAMPTON time immenselyfragile, and then - to be prop- and the ‘cut of SHAKESPEARE’ erly seen - requiring to be lifted onto plinths, By Susannah Fleming would tend once in positionto stay put. But, as we have seen from the foregoing, this is not ‘What needs my Shakespearfor his necessarily the case. Statuary in the 1700 peri- honourd Bones, od was shipped from Whitehall by barge along The labour ofan age in piled Stones... vt the Thames to Hampton Court where a crane was in use at the wharf. The 1829 move to he beautiful ‘Shakespeare Temple’ Windsor in ordnance wagons with so little on the riverside at Hampton was mishap is either a miracle, or more likely, evi- built for David Garrick (1717-79) in dence that a great deal of thought, planning 1755. For those visitors who came to and care went into the removal, for which we pay homage at this monument, and evenfor now have only list of the statuary removed. those who merely passed by on the river, the a Even today, with modern equipment, moving message wasclear: this marked the spot where statuary is never an easy or straightforward the most celebrated actor/manager England procedure. In all events, the continual move- ever produced chose to commemorate the ‘god ment of statuary in the Privy Garden at of his idolatry’... William Shakespeare.’ As Hampton Courtis, I think, a recognition of might be expected, the arrangement of the importance given to such ornamentation Garrick’s garden, with its Temple of in the gardensetting, notonly in termsofclas- Shakespeare positioned near the bank of the sical iconography but in sequential fashionsin Thamesand the Villa in the background, sug- gardening, andalso of the value of statuary in gested a sort of permanent theatrical stage set. its own right as a reflection of the status and 1. John Milton’s sonnet, 1632, 2nd Shakespeare Folio. 2. David Piper, O Sweet Mr Shakespeare I'll have his Picture (London: 34. Carlo Milanois at present working on this subject. National Portrait Gallery, 1964), p. 30. 51 m THE LONDON GARDENER Or z £be Gardener's Intelligencer Volno.8 For the yeers 2002-2003 23. A View ofthe Seat 0vfthe Late David Garrick Esq. , with the Temple 9ofShakespeare a trom. Th 4¥:Lodern Universal Traveilex, 1779 4 A Courtesy THE TempLe Trust) 52 Davip Garrick: His GarDEN at Hamptonandthe ‘cuLT ofSHAKESPEARE’ This aspect may only have been apparent to least not as such. Ostensibly, the Villa at the casual observer whilst gliding gently by in Hamptonandits garden were intendedto pro- a boat, or sitting out on the bank opposite. It vide a peaceful retreat for the Garricks - well is certainly a characteristic discernible in sever- away from their hectic social life in town and al of the contemporary topographical engrav- the rigorous demands of the Londonstage. ings. (fig. 23) The stage-like quality of the Yet, when we look at the Zoffanys or some of scene would have been especially pronounced the other later topographical engravings, we during a summer's evening in 1774 when one of could easily imagine that a contemporary visi- the London journals reported that the tor to this garden must have felt a pervading Garricks had given a ‘splendid entertainment, sense of being on a stage, as if wandering into or Fete Champetre ... The companyincluded a an impromptu performancein a play already in great number of the Nobility and Gentry’, progress. Like any good stage set, the appro- whoenjoyed‘a concertand an elegant firework priate props were essential to setting the scene display. The gardens, the grotto-tunnel, and here. The focal point of the riverside lawn was, the Temple of Shakespeare were illuminated of course, the octagonal Temple with its mar- with 6000 lamps’.’ This must have had an ble statue of Shakespeare inside. The Ionic enchanting and highly theatrical effect. For orderofthe portico identified this as a Temple some of the same guests, it must also have of Wisdom.° More importantly, it proclaimed been ample compensation for the exceptional- Shakespeare to be in the ranks of the classical ly bad weather that had spoiled Garrick’s poets - an idea John Dryden hadinitiated a Shakespeare Jubilee at Statford-upon-Avon hundredyears beforeby referring to him as the five years before." ‘Homer of the British poets’.’ The Italian The atmosphere of the Hampton scene cypresses near the building would almost cer- was one ofinformality. This was immortalised tainly have conveyed the potent message of in two exquisite conversation pieces by Johann Shakespeare's immortality, and perhaps by Zoffany, painted in the summers of 1762 and extension also recall Shakespeare’s own words 1764. (figs. 24 &F 25) Each painting captures a in Twelfth Night: ‘Come away, come away, tranquil moment in the garden; one shows death; and in sad cypress let mebe laid’ (Act 2, David and Eva Maria Garrick relaxing by the Scene 4). Shakespeare Temple with the Roubiliac statue Similarly, the emblematic character of of Shakespeare visible through the open door, the weeping willows at the river’s edge and and in the other the couple are shown seated their association with the 137¢/ Psalm — ‘by the on the Temple lawn taking tea with family and streams of Babel’ etc. — would consciously friends. Two additional smaller paintings by intermingle with the memory of Desdemona’s Zoffany each show different parts of the gar- famous ‘Willow Song’ from Ofhello (Act 4, den and Villa. One of these depicts Garrick Scene 3). Perhaps an even more direct associa- writing while crouched under the shade of a tion was intended here by the careful juxtapo- large tree, whilst his gardener, Bowden,rolls sition of the cypresses with the willows — rec- the turf. In the other, Garrick’s two nieces are ognizably drawn from Dryden's assessment of at play in front of the grotto-tunnel. All four Shakespeare: ‘...he is always great when some intimate scenes once hung in the dining room great occasionis presented to him; no man can of their London house in the Adelphi.’ They say he ever had fit subject for his wit, and did a are perhaps most remarkable for having just not then raise himself as high abovetherest of exactly the right touch of the theatrical about the poets - guantum lenta solent inter viburna them. cupressi [as cypresses often do among bending Although we know that Garrick mused, osiers].”° wrote, rehearsed and entertained friendshere, The River Thames itself at Hampton, there is no evidence that he performedhere,at with its ever-present swans, would inevitably 3. Helen R Smith, The Story of Garrick and his life at Hampton evoke the famous reference to Shakespeare as (London: The Temple Trust, 1998), p- 5- ‘the Swan of Avon’. And for the initiates of a Christian Deelman, The Great ShakespeareJubilee 4. See, for example: (London: Michael Joseph, 1964). 6. Douglas Chambers, The Planters ofthe English Landscape Garden 5. See ‘Inventoryofarticles belongingto the estate of David Garrick (New Haven & London:Yale, 1993), p. 55- on Mrs Garrick's death’ from: The Papers ofthe Reverend Thomas 7. Piper, op. cit. p. 14. Rackett as Executor to Mrs Garrick, Hereford City Museum and Art 8. Deelman, of. cit. p. 30. Gallery. 53 THE LONDON GARDENER or The Gardener’s Intelligencer Volno.8 For the years 2002-2003 far more famous garden at Stowe, the Thames plays, or even of the so-called ‘cult of could easily conflate with the River Styx, The Shakespeare’.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Classical Nakedness in British Sculpture and Historical Painting 1798-1840 Cora Hatshepsut Gilroy-Ware Ph.D Univ
    MARMOREALITIES: CLASSICAL NAKEDNESS IN BRITISH SCULPTURE AND HISTORICAL PAINTING 1798-1840 CORA HATSHEPSUT GILROY-WARE PH.D UNIVERSITY OF YORK HISTORY OF ART SEPTEMBER 2013 ABSTRACT Exploring the fortunes of naked Graeco-Roman corporealities in British art achieved between 1798 and 1840, this study looks at the ideal body’s evolution from a site of ideological significance to a form designed consciously to evade political meaning. While the ways in which the incorporation of antiquity into the French Revolutionary project forged a new kind of investment in the classical world have been well-documented, the drastic effects of the Revolution in terms of this particular cultural formation have remained largely unexamined in the context of British sculpture and historical painting. By 1820, a reaction against ideal forms and their ubiquitous presence during the Revolutionary and Napoleonic wartime becomes commonplace in British cultural criticism. Taking shape in a series of chronological case-studies each centring on some of the nation’s most conspicuous artists during the period, this thesis navigates the causes and effects of this backlash, beginning with a state-funded marble monument to a fallen naval captain produced in 1798-1803 by the actively radical sculptor Thomas Banks. The next four chapters focus on distinct manifestations of classical nakedness by Benjamin West, Benjamin Robert Haydon, Thomas Stothard together with Richard Westall, and Henry Howard together with John Gibson and Richard James Wyatt, mapping what I identify as
    [Show full text]
  • Eighteenth-Century Sculpture and Its Interpretation
    Eighteenth-century Sculpture and its Interpretation Malcolm Baker University of Edinburgh PhD (by Research Publications) 2003 Eighteenth-century sculpture and its interpretation Publications by Malcolm Baker submitted for Degree of Ph.D by Research Publications The following publications are submitted for the above degree: 1. Figured in Marble. The Making and Viewing of Eighteenth-century Sculpture, London and Los Angeles, 2000. (65,431 words) 2. Roubiliac and The Eighteenth-century Monument. Sculpture as Theatre, New Haven and London, 1995, 207-273, 382-387. (23,337 words) (The text submitted by the candidate forms part of a collaborative work by David Bindman and Malcolm Baker; the volume is made up of several distinct authorial contributions and the responsibility of each author for different parts is clearly stated in the publication.) 3. They are accompanied by a Critical Review (10, 956 words) (Total word length: 99, 724 words.) Appendix I: Catalogue of Roubiliac's Funerary Monuments, forming Part III of Roubiliac and the Eighteenth-century Monument, 275-359 Appendix II: A list of ten related articles. 1 and 2, along with the Critical Review, were written solely by me. The text included under Appendix I was written almost entirely by me but incorporates some material provided by David Bindman and Tessa Murdoch. The articles listed in Appendix II were written solely by me, except for one article of which I was the principal author, the co-authors being Alastair Laing and Colin Harrison. I also declare that none of the above mentioned writings have been submitted for any other degree or professional qualification.
    [Show full text]
  • Henry Moore Institute Online Papers and Proceedings
    Ed Allington and Ben Dhaliwal Reproduction in Sculpture: Dilution or Increase? 10 December 1994 Source: Henry Moore Institute Online Papers and Proceedings www.henry-moore.org/hmi This article has been downloaded from the Henry Moore Institute’s collection of Online Papers and Proceedings, an online publishing facility bringing you the most recent developments in sculpture studies from both inside and outside the Institute. Here you'll find proceedings from many of the Institute's international conferences as well as the latest research from both up-and-coming and established scholars. Copyright remains with the author. Any reproduction must be authorised by the author. Contact: [email protected] The Henry Moore Institute is a world-recognised centre for the study of sculpture in the heart of Leeds. An award-winning exhibitions venue, research centre, library and sculpture archive, the Institute hosts a year-round programme of exhibitions, conferences and lectures, as well as developing research and publications, to expand the understanding and scholarship of historical and contemporary sculpture. The Institute is a part of The Henry Moore Foundation, which was set up by Moore in 1977 to encourage appreciation of the visual arts, especially sculpture. To subscribe our newsletter email: [email protected] www.twitter.com/HMILeeds 1 Ed Allington and Ben Dhaliwal Reproduction in Sculpture: Dilution or Increase? Ed Allington INTRODUCTION TinTin is reeling backward, a dynamic spiral beneath his feet, Hergé’s sign indicating movement. Snowy is beside him mimicking the ‘take’ and emphasising it. In one hand TinTin holds a suitcase, under his arm a parcel which contains an Arumbaya fetish, perhaps the very one he has just travelled through South America to find.
    [Show full text]
  • Katharine Esdaile Papers: Finding Aid
    http://oac.cdlib.org/findaid/ark:/13030/c8x63sn4 No online items Katharine Esdaile Papers: Finding Aid Finding aid prepared by John Houlton, Marilyn Olsen, Catherine Wehrey, and Diann Benti. The Huntington Library, Art Collections, and Botanical Gardens Manuscripts Department 1151 Oxford Road San Marino, California 91108 Phone: (626) 405-2191 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.huntington.org © November 2016 The Huntington Library. All rights reserved. Katharine Esdaile Papers: Finding mssEsdaile 1 Aid Overview of the Collection Title: Katharine Esdaile Papers Dates (inclusive): 1845-1961 Bulk dates: 1900-1950 Collection Number: mssEsdaile Collector: Esdaile, Katharine Ada, 1881-1950 Extent: 101 boxes Repository: The Huntington Library, Art Collections, and Botanical Gardens. Manuscripts Department 1151 Oxford Road San Marino, California 91108 Phone: (626) 405-2203 Email: [email protected] URL: http://www.huntington.org Abstract: This collection contains the papers of English art historian Katharine Ada Esdaile (1881-1950). Much of the collection relates to her research of British monumental sculpture. Notably the collection includes more than 600 chiefly pre-World War II visitor booklets and pamphlets produced locally by British churches and approximately 3500 photographs taken or collected by Esdaile of sculpture, often funerary monuments in English churches. Language: English. Access Open to qualified researchers by prior application through the Reader Services Department. For more information, contact Reader Services. Publication Rights The Huntington Library does not require that researchers request permission to quote from or publish images of this material, nor does it charge fees for such activities. The responsibility for identifying the copyright holder, if there is one, and obtaining necessary permissions rests with the researcher.
    [Show full text]
  • The Face of Shakespeare S
    Is this the face of Shakespeare? David Shakespeare May 2021 Today you are going to be looking into the the faces of William Shakespeare. The problem is which if any is genuine. Our story is set in the early 18th century and at its centre is one very interesting portrait. Let me put everything into context. The Chandos Portrait William Shakespeare had rested in posthumous an anonymity during most of the Restoration period, but interest in him was growing again in the late 17th Century with improvement in printing techniques and the growth of the entertainment industry. Later as we shall see the marketing of Shakespeare took on a distinctly political edge. A series of publications of his work began to emerge and along with the printed word came illustrations. There was therefore an obvious need for images of the face of Shakespeare. And this the so called Chandos portrait was pretty well all there was to go on, a 16th century portrait of a rather dishevelled man, which was of rather dubious authenticity !1 This the frontispiece of Nicholas Rowe’s 1709 edition of his works. The first to bear illustrations.The source for the engraving is not hard to recognise. Elsewhere in the publication is this illustration of William Shakespeare from Holy Trinity church Stratford upon Avon, specially made by Gerard Van der Gucht. Well not exactly. !2 He based it on a previous engraving dating from 1656 by Wenceslaus Hollar. Hollar Van der Gucht High forehead and a similar design of tunic….yes. But the tiredness has gone, and an aged face is replaced by one of bright disposition, by staring eyes, a neat beard and curly hair.
    [Show full text]
  • The Shepherdess's Tomb
    James Stevens Curl, ‘The Tomb in the Garden: A Few Observations on “The Shepherdess’s Tomb” at Shugborough, Staffordshire’, The Georgian Group Journal, Vol. XXIV, 2016, pp. 53–64 TEXT © THE AUTHORS 2016 THE TOMB IN THE GARDEN: A FEW OBSERVatiONS ON ‘The ShePHERDESS’S TOMb’ at SHUGBOROUGH StaffORDSHIRE JAMES STEVENS CURL he presence of the Mausoleum, Tomb, tomb: the shadow of one of the shepherds cast on TCenotaph, or Memorial in the landscape the monument alludes to the Spirit, or Classical garden has been the subject of numerous studies, Manes, and the inscription was interpreted to mean far too many to be listed here. Nicolas Poussin either ‘and I was once an inhabitant of Arcady’ or (1594–1665), in the second version of his painting that, even there, in Arcadia, ‘I’ (meaning Death) on the et in Arcadia ego theme (c.1635–6), depicted was ever-present (though there have been other shepherds in an Arcadian landscape studying the explanations as well, some turgid, some reasonable, inscription on a simple, rather severe Classical and some not). Standing to the right is a female Fig. 1. Nicolas Poussin’s second version of the Et in Arcadia Ego theme, known as ‘Arcadian Shepherds’ (reproduced from James Stevens Curl, Freemasonry & the Enlightenment: Architecture, Symbols, & Influences. (London: Historical Publications Ltd., 2011) THE GEORGIAN GROUP JOURNAL VOLUME XXIV THE TOMB IN THE GARDEN : ‘ THE SHEPHERDESS ’ S TOMB ’ AT SHUGBOROUGH Fig. 2. The Choragic Monument of Lysicrates, Athens, Fig. 3. The ‘Lanthorn of Demosthenes’ at Shugborough reproduced from James Stuart & Nicholas Revett, (1764–9). (Photograph © James Stevens Curl) The Antiquities of Athens I (London: John Haberkorn, 1762), Ch.
    [Show full text]
  • Joseph Willems's Chelsea Pieta and Eighteenth-Century Sculptural Aesthetics Matthew Martin
    Joseph Willems's Chelsea Pieta and eighteenth-century sculptural aesthetics Matthew Martin The question of the extent to which porcelain figures were considered 551 sculpture - that is, figural works bearing an independent meaning, viewed Chelsea Porcelain Factory, Londe.% (manufacturer) and engaged with as such, rather than objects which were seen as components England c. 1744-1709 subsumed into a larger decorative scheme - in mid eighteenth-century England Joseph Willeas (designer) is one of interest. In general, porcelain has acquired overwhelmingly decorative Flanders/England 5.1715-1766 Pieta c.1761 (detail) connotations in art historical discourse and this has overshadowed its place porcelain (soft-Pnete) in sculptural aesthetics. The medium falls foul of the aesthetic critiques of 55.55 28.1 622.8 on National GellerydVictoria, neoclassical theorists such as Winckelmann and Goethe, as it is seen to embody Melbourne the phenomena of material illusionism (one material being employed to imitate Purchesedtbrough TheArt another) and miniaturisation, both identified by Ludwig Giesz in his influential Foundation ofVictori.with the isolate nce of the Alcoa study Phdnomenologie des Kitsches as art historical criteria for kitsch.. The Foundation, GOVernor. 1989 failure to consider the work of the modeller of porcelain figures as an exercise in (D24989) compositional creativity is symptomatic of the more general failure to consider porcelain figures as art and their creators as artists. Being manufactured from moulds, porcelain figures have been placed in the category of reproductive, serially produced objects, and as such are assumed to provide only the most tenuous access to the independent creative processes of the artists responsible for these works.
    [Show full text]
  • Church Monuments Vols I–XXXI (1985–2016) Authors
    Church Monuments Vols I–XXXI (1985–2016) Authors Alexander, Jennifer S., Hodgkinson, R.W. and contracting in eighteenth-century English Hadcock, Sue A., The Gylbert monument in sculptors’ workshops. X: 90–108 Youlgreave church: memorial or liturgical Baldry, Tony, War memorials and monuments: furnishing? XXI: 94–111 a centenary approach. XXVIII: 109–123 Anderson, Freda, Three Westminster abbots: a Bayliss, Jon, Richard Parker ‘the problem of identity. IV: 3–15 alablasterman’. V: 39–56 Antonovics, Atis V., The tomb of Lady Richard and Gabriel Royley of Burton- Frances Waldegrave at Chewton Mendip upon-Trent, tombmakers. VI: 21–41 (Somerset): new documents on a late- A Dutch carver: Garrett Hollemans I in Victorian sculptural commission. XXIV: England. VIII: 45–56 112–117 An indenture for two alabaster effigies. Arnold, Janet, The jupon or coat-armour of the XVI: 22–29 Black Prince in Canterbury Cathedral. ‘What stronger circle can Art-magick VIII: 12–24 find?’ Thomas Skippe, the seventeenth- Askew, Portia, Early medieval Purbeck marble century Skippe monuments at North grave slabs from Southwark. XIII: 15–16 Tuddenham (Norfolk), and Thomas Heywood. XXV: 121–132 Badham, Sally, Richard Gough and the A discovery at Salisbury cathedral. XXVII: flowering of Romantic antiquarianism. II: 90–95 32–43 The monument of William, Lord Parr, at London standardisation and provincial Horton (Northamptonshire). XXVIII: 78– idiosyncrasy: the organisation and working 88 practices of brass-engraving workshops in Epiphanius Evesham: a ‘new’ discovery. pre-Reformation England. V: 3–25 XXVIII: 133–138 Medieval minor effigial monuments in West Bergé, Willem, Sculptors on the move: and South Wales: an interim survey.
    [Show full text]
  • The Making of Portrait Busts in the Mid-Eighteenth Century: Roubiliac, Scheemakers and Trinity College, Dublin*
    MALCOLM BAKER The making of portrait busts in the mid-eighteenth century: Roubiliac, Scheemakers and Trinity College, Dublin* WHILE the workshop practices of portrait painters in eigh- teenth-century England have received some attention, little has been written about the procedures employed by portrait sculptors or about how these conditioned the use of conven- tions and the representation of individual likeness.' By exam- ining a problematic series of busts commissioned for the Library of Trinity College, Dublin, this article will outline the diverse practices involved in the production of portrait sculp- ture in mid-eighteenth-century England and suggest the implications these may have for understanding the operation of the sculpture trade as well as the transactions between sculptor and sitter.2 Among the many marble busts that now line the Long Room of the Library are fourteen ancient and modern wor- thies which form a distinct set.3 In 1743 a sum of f500 was bequeathed by Dr Claudius Gilbert, the Vice-Provost, 'for the purchase of busts of men eminent for learning to adorn 36. Viewof theLong Room, Trinity College, Dublin, byJames Malton. 1793. Engraving, 27 37.5 cm. From:J. MALTON:A and view thecity the library'. Some at least of these must have been in place by by picturesque descriptive of ofDublin, Dublin [1794]. (Victoriaand AlbertMuseum, London). March 1749, when it was reported that Roubiliac's bust of Swift, which was not acquired out of the Gilbert funds, was 'to be placed in the College Library, among the heads of Newton,
    [Show full text]
  • Return of Outdoor Memorials in London, Other Than Statues on The
    1 s? s-> 11y i^ ^Aavaain^ <rii3DNv-$oi^ ^amainihwv tfAavaai ^UIBRARYQ^ ^UIBRARYQ^ ^EUNIVE %a3AiNa-]\\v %0i\m-i^ hoiimiti^ <TiH3NV-S 1% ^0KALIF(% ^OF-CALIFOfaj, ^EU ^lOSANCflfj> <^ o ft, /^\,% ft 7 s? v^ "^sajAiNfl-]^ ^AavaaiH^ ^amih^ <TiU3NV-S fQr ^UIBRARYtf/* <\WE-UNIVER% ^lOSASCElfj> ^UIBRAF or 30^ ^OJIIVJ-JO^ <riiJONVS01^ %MAINIUWV ^EUNIVERS//, CALIF % ^0F-CALIFC%, ^slOSANCElfj^, ^OF A I o %J13 AINf]-3VVv y<?Aav!iai Kfc '/- 10S-ANGEI&> &*MEI 2 £1 <X J X i s "%I3AIN(1 3^ ^fOJIlVJ-JO^ ^OJITVJ-JO^ Kto $clOS«lfj> ^OF-CAllFOfy* ^Ei & 15 '/HHAINIHttV* ni .1 • I LIBRARY \WEUNIYf LONDON COUNTY COUNCIL. RETURN OF OUTDOOR MEMORIALS IN LONDON, OTHER THAN STATUES ON THE EXTERIOR OF BUILDINGS, MEMORIALS IN THE NATURE OF TOMBSTONES, MEMORIAL BUILD- INGS AND MEMORIAL TREES. Prepared by THE CLERK OF THE COUNCIL, under the direction of the Local Government, Records J and Museums Committee' of- die Council.* PRIMKD FOR THE LONDON COUNTY COUNCIL BY SOl'THWOOD, SMITH AND CO., LTU. And may be purchased through any Bookseller or direct from P. S. KING AND SON, 2 anti 4, Great Smith-btrkkt, Victoria-street, Westminster. SAV, Agents for tht zalt of the publications of the London County Council. I9IO. No. 1359. Price is. Od. Post Free is. 8$d >oo—25.7.10—337 „ S.S. 1776 v* 28 OCT. 1920 ^iTJCAL- — 4 * » » • •• • • < • * • • • • • « • • •- • • ... .. • • • ••••• -470 PREFACE The following is an extract from the report of the Local - Government, Records and Museums Committee, submitted /» to the Council on 5th July, 1910 : We have for some time held the opinion that the pre- paration of a return of outdoor memorials in London would form a valuable addition to literature concerning London, and would meet a great want.
    [Show full text]
  • C2. Artists: Designers, Sculptors and Craftsmen
    C2. ARTISTS: DESIGNERS, SCULPTORS AND CRAFTSMEN Full references to sculptors are given in Rupert Gunnis, Dictionary of British Sculptors 1660–1851, 1953 (rev. edn 1968); more recent published material is included in the bibliography in M. Whinney, rev. J. Physick, Sculpture in Britain: 1530–1830, Pelican History of Art, 1988. Also see A. White’s Ph.D. thesis ‘Church Monuments in Britain 1560– 1660’, 1992. Information on stained glass can be found in Journal of the British Society of Master Glass Painters (from 1983 the Journal of Stained Glass). ADAMS, Robert (1917-84) Grieve, A. 1992 The Sculpture of Robert Adams ARMITAGE, Joseph (1880–1945) Armitage, E. 1982 Joseph Armitage, craftsman, 1880–1945, Thirties Society Journal 3, 25–30 ARMITAGE, Kenneth (1916-) Woollcombe, T. 1997 Kenneth Armitage, life and work AYRES, Arthur J.J. (1902–85) 1986 An Architectural Sculptor, Arthur J.J. Ayres (pamphlet from exhibition at the R.I.B.A. Heinz Gallery, London) BACON, John, the elder (1740–99, sculptor) Cox-Johnson, A. 1961 John Bacon, St Marylebone Publications 4 BAKEWELL, Robert (d.1755) Edwards, I. 1962 A great gatesmith reassessed, Country Life 132 (27 September), 716–7 BANKS, Thomas (1735–1805) Bryant, J. 1985 The church memorials of Thomas Banks, Church Monuments Journal 1, part 1, 49–64 BAYES, Gilbert (1872-1953) Irvine, L., & Atterbury, P. 1998 Gilbert Bayes Artists: Designers, Sculptors & Craftsmen 1 BELL, John (1812-1895) Barnes, Richard 1999 John Bell: the sculptor’s life and work BIRD, Francis (1667–1731) Rendel, R. 1976 Francis Bird, 1667–1731, sculptor, Recusant History 2, no. 4, 206 BOEHM, Joseph Edgar (1834–90) Stocker, M.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spirit & Force Of
    THE SPIRIT &FORCE OF ART Drawing in Britain 1600–1750 THE SPIRIT & FORCE OF ART: DRAWING IN BRITAIN 1600–1750 3 Clifford Street, London 20 June to 6 July 2018 London London Art Week 29 June to 6 July 2018 new york TeFAF New York Fall 27 to 31 October 2018 THE SPIRIT &FORCE OF ART Drawing in Britain 1600–1750 Lowell Libson & Jonny Yarker Ltd London 2018 Contents Index of Artists 6 Foreword Lowell Libson 7 Introduction Jonny Yarker 8 3 Clifford Street · London w1S 2LF +44 (0)20 7734 8686 ‘The spirit and force of art’: [email protected] Defining Drawing in England, 1600–1750 www.libson-yarker.com Richard Stephens 11 Lowell Libson [email protected] A Lost Art? Collecting Early British Drawings Jonny Yarker & their Critical Fate [email protected] Richard Stephens and Jonny Yarker 33 Cressida St Aubyn [email protected] CATALoGUe Published by Lowell Libson & Jonny Yarker Ltd 2018 I Towards an English School 41 Text and publication © Lowell Libson & Jonny Yarker Ltd All rights reserved II Academies 69 ISBn 978 1 9999783 1 0 Designed by Dalrymple III The Rise of the Sketch 85 Set in Mário Feliciano’s Rongel type Photography by Rodney Todd-White & Son Ltd VI From Prospect to Landscape 101 Colour reproduction by Altaimage Ltd Printed in Belgium by Albe De Coker V From Ceiling to Exhibition Room: the Progress of History Painting 127 VI Face Painting 147 VII ‘A noble, delightful and useful art’: Drawings by Antiquarians, Amateurs and Artisans 169 VIII The Age of Hogarth 181 Notes and References 199 Index of Artists Foreword References are to catalogue numbers Laguerre, Louis 47 We are delighted to publish this catalogue which represents the culmination of over ten years of gathering these rare drawings which were created before the ‘Golden Age’ Amigoni, Jacopo 58 Laroon, Marcellus 73 of British watercolours and which demonstrate the formation of an identifiable ‘British’ Baron, Bernard 74 Laroon, Marcellus, the younger 84 School.
    [Show full text]