Government Pension Fund – Global Annual Report 2005 1

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Government Pension Fund – Global Annual Report 2005 1 Government Pension Fund – Global0 Annual5 Report 2005 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 GOVERNMENT PENSION FUND – GLOBAL ANNUAL REPORT 2005 1 Key figures 2005. 2 Leader . 3 Introduction . 4 Report 1. Mandate . 10 2. Return in 2005 . 12 3. Fixed income management . 17 4. Equity management. 20 5. Corporate governance activities. 24 6. Risk. 29 7. Organisation . 32 8. Management costs . 35 9. Reporting of accounts. 36 Audit responsibility for the Government Pension Fund – Global . 38 Statement from the Central Bank0 Audit . .5 . 38 Documentation section Holdings of equities at 31 December 2005 . 40 Fixed income investments at 31 December 2005. 53 More information is available at Norges Bank’s website: www.norges-bank.no 2 Government Pension Fund – Global. Key fi gures 2005 Market value in NOK at 31.12.2005 In billions of NOK Total portfolio 1399 billion 1399.1 Equity portfolio 582 billion 1400 Fixed income portfolio 817 billion Transfers from the Ministry of Finance in 2005 (in NOK) 1300 220.3 billion Return in 2005 measured in international currencies 1200 Total 11.1 % Equity portfolio 22.5 % 1100 Fixed income portfolio 3.8 % 1016.4 Gross excess return in relation to the benchmark 1000 1.10 percentage point 900 845.3 800 700 613.7 609.0 600 500 386.4 400 300 222.4 171.8 200 113.4 100 47.8 0 -100 -200 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 20012002 2003 2004 2005 Transfers Return measured Effect of a change in the krone Market value at 31.12 in international exchange rate (which has no effect currencies on international purchasing power) GOVERNMENT PENSION FUND – GLOBAL ANNUAL REPORT 2005 3 More active ownership The assets of the Government Pension Fund – Global rose by NOK 383 billion in 2005. This is the largest annual growth since capital was first transferred to the Fund in 1996. The market value of the Fund at the end of 2005 was NOK 1 399 billion. The Ministry of Finance transferred NOK 220 billion to the Fund in 2005. The return on the Fund was NOK 162 billion. Of this, NOK 36 billion was a result of the depreciation of the Norwegian krone, which has no effect on the international purchasing power of the Fund. Equity prices rose sharply for the third consecutive year. The return was 22.5 per cent. Since the trough in 2002, the total return on the Fund’s equity investments has been 70 per cent. The return on fixed income investments was 3.8 per cent in 2005. The total return on the Government Pension Fund – Global was 11.1 per cent measured in international currency. This is the third best annual result so far. Since 1997, the average annual net real return on the Fund has been 4.5 per cent. The total nominal return during this period has been NOK 309 billion. The Fund’s expected return and risk are largely determined by the strategy defined by the Ministry of Finance in the form of a benchmark portfolio. Norges Bank’s asset management is measured against this benchmark. In 2005, the Bank achieved an excess return of 1.10 percentage point, equivalent to NOK 12 billion. This is a very solid performance in relation to the risk taken in active management. Nearly all external and internal managers generated very strong results. Norges Bank has achieved an excess return on its asset management every year, and the contribution has averaged 0.52 percentage point. This is equivalent to a gross return of NOK 26 billion and NOK 24 billion after deductions of additional costs related to active management. Nevertheless, Norges Bank’s active management has not increased the Fund’s overall risk. This is because the active management is spread over many different types of activities that are not correlated with the return on the benchmark portfolio. The Ministry of Finance defined new ethical guidelines for the Government Pension Fund – Global at the end of 2004. Active corporate governance is one of the measures. In 2005, Norges Bank intensified its corporate governance activities considerably. As of 2005, all voting in externally managed portfolios has been transferred to the bank. The Bank voted on more than 20 000 resolutions at more than 2 700 General Meetings. A separate corporate governance group has been established as part of equity management to monitor the Bank’s ownership interests. The group has broad expertise in the areas of ethics, finance and corporate management. The primary objective of Norges Bank’s corporate governance activities is to protect the Fund’s financial interests. For long-term investors, financial and ethical considerations often coincide. The Annual Report sheds further light on this interplay. The report also discusses the Bank’s further development of its corporate governance activities. In addition, the report provides a thorough review of our asset management performance as well as the organisation and operations of asset management. Svein Gjedrem Knut N. Kjær Central Bank Governor Executive Director, Norges Bank Investment Management 4 Annual Report for the Government Pension Fund - Global The Government Pension Fund was es- between the return measured in interna- market risk of the benchmark. Thus, the tablished by the Storting (Norwegian tional currency and the return measured cost of active management has been low Parliament) by the Act of 20 December in NOK is due to movements in the krone in terms of higher risk. Operational costs 2005. The Government Pension Fund exchange rate, which have no effect on have been somewhat higher than if the comprises: The Government Pension the long-term international purchasing portfolio had closely mirrored the bench- Fund – Global (previously the Govern- power of the Fund. mark. The real value added through ment Petroleum Fund, established in Since 1997, the average annual return active management is estimated at an 1990) and The Government Pension has been 6.3 per cent, measured in inter- annual average of 0.48 percentage point. Fund – Norway (The National Insurance national currency. The cumulative The information ratio is one measure Fund, established in 1967). nominal return amounts to NOK 309 of skills in investment management. The The Government Pension Fund – billion. After deductions for inflation ratio is calculated as the ratio of the Global is a continuation of the Govern- and management costs, the annual net annual excess return to the excess risk ment Petroleum Fund. In this Annual real return is 4.5 per cent. taken in relation to the benchmark Report the new name, The Government In 2005, Norges Bank’s excess return (tracking error). In other words, the in- Pension Fund – Global, is used even was 1.10 percentage point compared formation ratio shows how much excess though the report primarily concernes with the benchmark portfolio defined by return is achieved for each unit of risk. the period when the Fund’s name was the Ministry of Finance. Since 1998, Since 1998, the information ratio has av- the Government Petroleum Fund. which was the first whole year with equi- eraged 1.32. ties in the Fund’s portfolio, the average The market value of the Fund at end- Key figures annual excess return has been 0.52 per- 2005 was NOK 1 399 billion. Since In 2005, the return on the Government centage point. This amounts to NOK 1996, the Ministry of Finance has trans- Pension Fund - Global was 11.1 per cent 26.3 billion for the entire period. ferred a total of NOK 1 154 billion to the measured in international currency. The The Ministry of Finance has given Fund. Of this, NOK 220 billion was return on the equity portfolio was 22.5 Norges Bank a framework for exercising transferred in 2005. per cent and the return on the fixed active management with a view to achiev- income portfolio was 3.8 per cent. Meas- ing an excess return. Since 1998, the Return 1997 - 2005 ured in NOK, the return on the Fund in market risk of the actual portfolio has Table 1 shows the return on the Govern- 2005 was 14.3 per cent. The difference been only marginally higher than the ment Pension Fund – Global. Since Table 1: Annual nominal and real return measured in terms of the Fund’s currency basket. 1997 - 2005. Per cent 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Average 1997-2005 Nominal return - on the equity portfolio - 12.86 34.81 -5.82 -14.59 -24.37 22.83 13.00 22.49 5.89* - on the fi xed income portfolio 9.07 9.31 -0.99 8.41 5.04 9.90 5.25 6.10 3.82 6.16 - on the total portfolio 9.07 9.25 12.44 2.50 -2.47 -4.74 12.59 8.93 11.09 6.34 Price infl ation ** 1.75 0.92 1.28 2.02 1.18 1.89 1.36 2.43 2.22 1.70 Real return 7.19 8.25 11.02 0.47 -3.61 -6.51 11.08 6.35 8.68 4.56 Management costs*** 0.04 0.06 0.09 0.11 0.07 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.09 Net real return 7.15 8.19 10.93 0.36 -3.68 -6.60 10.98 6.24 8.58 4.47 * 1998-2005 ** Weighted average of consumer price inflation in the countries included in the Fund’s benchmark portfolio during the year in question. *** Costs include fees to external managers for excess return achieved. 10.0 40 Net real return on the actual portfolio Equity portfolio Fixed income portfolio 30 8.0 Net real return on the benchmark portfolio 20 6.0 10 4.0 0 -10 2.0 -20 0 -30 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Chart 1: Average annual net real return since 1997 Chart 2: Annual return on the equity and fixed income portfolios, measured in terms of the Fund’s currency basket.
Recommended publications
  • 1 Turning up the Heat: How Venture Capital Can Help Fuel The
    1 Turning up the Heat: How Venture Capital Can Help Fuel the Economic Transformation of the Great Lakes Region Appendices 2 Appendix A Key Venture Capital Words, Phrases and Concepts1 Venture capital refers to cash invested by professional investors in new companies with prospects for rapid growth, substantial size, and attractive profitability. The definitions of pre-seed, seed, and early stage venture investing refer to the earliest stages of professional investing, often when the company does not yet have all of the components of a fully functioning enterprise, namely: management, developed products, and sales. Pre-seed investments usually take place before a company is formed and finance the early stages of technology development and company formation. These stages are succeeded by seed and early stage investing, when some elements of company operations are in place, but where management teams, products, and markets are not fully tested against the competition. Generally speaking, all three investment phases occur pre-revenue or before meaningful revenue is earned. Investors in start-up companies include the business founders, their friends and families, angels, and professional venture capitalists. Investing in these businesses generally starts with the founders and proceeds through friends and family members who personally know the founders; investors may also include angel investors who may not have personal acquaintance with the founders, and/or professional venture capitalists who are investing in the business without any necessary prior involvement with any of the company’s other investors. Historically, angel investors were high net-worth individuals who provided investment cash without becoming involved in management of the enterprise.
    [Show full text]
  • Restructuring of the Rembrandt Group Circular to Shareholders and Notices of Annual General Meetings 30 August 2000
    Rembrandt Group Limited Rembrandt Controlling Investments Limited Technical Investment Corporation Limited Technical and Industrial Investments Limited Restructuring of the Rembrandt Group Circular to shareholders and notices of annual general meetings 30 August 2000 Attorneys Joint sponsoring brokers Deutsche Bank Securities Deutsche Bank Securities (SA) (Pty) Ltd Hofmeyr Herbstein & Gihwala Inc. (Registration number 1995/011798/07) Reporting accountants PricewaterhouseCoopers Inc. Chartered Accountants (SA) Registered Accountants and Auditors (Registration no 1998/012055/21) Indien u ’n Afrikaanse vertaling van hierdie dokument wil hê, skakel asseblief 0800 996 164 If you have any questions regarding the restructuring of the Rembrandt Group, call the Information Agents on 0800 996 164 (or + 44 20 7335 7278 if you are phoning from outside South Africa) are acting as Information Agents to answer your questions about the restructuring. Corporate information Directors of Rembrandt Group Limited (Registration number 1948/031037/06) Johann Rupert (Chairman) P J Erasmus* E de la H Hertzog (Co-Deputy Chairman) D M Falck M H Visser (Co-Deputy Chairman and Managing Director) J Malherbe P E Beyers E Molobi* W E Bührmann J A Preller G D de Jager* P G Steyn* J W Dreyer T van Wyk * non-executive Directors of Rembrandt Controlling Investments Limited (Registration number 1952/000002/06) Johann Rupert (Chairman) D M Falck E de la H Hertzog (Co-Deputy Chairman) J Malherbe M H Visser (Co-Deputy Chairman and Managing Director) E Molobi* P E Beyers J A
    [Show full text]
  • 3I Infrastructure Plc Completes the Sale of Its Stake in Cross London Trains and the Acquisition of Tampnet
    3i Infrastructure plc completes the sale of its stake in Cross London Trains and the acquisition of Tampnet 14 MARCH 2019 3i Infrastructure plc (“3i Infrastructure”) yesterday completed the sale of its 33.3% stake in Cross London Trains (“XLT”) following the satisfaction of certain conditions. The sale, to a consortium of Dalmore and Equitix funds, was announced on 5 February 2019 with proceeds to 3i Infrastructure of £333 million. XLT was established to procure and lease the rolling stock for use on the Thameslink passenger rail franchise. 3i Infrastructure today completed the acquisition of Tampnet following the receipt of regulatory approvals in Europe and the USA. 3i Infrastructure has invested €226 million alongside Danish pension fund ATP, with each party acquiring 50%. 3i Infrastructure’s investment manager, 3i Investments plc, will manage the investment on behalf of the consortium. Tampnet is the leading offshore telecoms network operator in the North Sea and the Gulf of Mexico. The transaction was announced on 27 July 2018. -Ends- For further information, contact: Thomas Fodor Investor enquiries +44 20 7975 3469 Kathryn van der Kroft Media enquiries +44 20 7975 3021 Notes to editors: About 3i Infrastructure plc 3i Infrastructure plc is a Jersey-incorporated, closed-ended investment company, an approved UK Investment Trust (with effect from 15 October 2018), listed on the London Stock Exchange and regulated by the Jersey Financial Services Commission. It is a long- term investor in infrastructure businesses and assets. Its market focus is on economic infrastructure and greenfield projects in developed economies, principally in Europe, investing in operating businesses and projects which generate long-term yield and capital growth.
    [Show full text]
  • PIC INSURES the 3I GROUP PENSION PLAN
    PIC INSURES THE 3i GROUP PENSION PLAN London, 26 May 2017 – Pension Insurance Corporation plc (“PIC”), a specialist insurer of defined benefit pension funds, has concluded a pension insurance buy-in with the Trustees of the 3i Group Pension Plan (“the Plan”), for a premium of approximately £200 million. The buy-in covers around 40% of the Plan’s liabilities for pensions in payment. The Trustees were advised by LCP and Linklaters. 3i is a leading international investment manager focused on mid-market Private Equity and Infrastructure. Their core investment markets are northern Europe and North America. Carol Woodley, Chairman of Trustees, said: “The Plan has been de-risking for a number of years, primarily by moving our asset mix to favour index-linked gilts. We are very pleased to have been able to complete this logical next step in our long-term de-risking programme. PIC demonstrated significant expertise while helping us to manage a complex project and ultimately deliver the transaction we required.” Uzma Nazir, Head of Origination Structuring at PIC, said: “The Plan’s Trustees and the company have a well-developed de-risking strategy in place. As part of this strategy, the Trustees have been increasing the proportion of the Plan’s assets invested in bonds over time. This strategy has proved to be the right one and the Trustees have now been able to de-risk a significant proportion of the liabilities. We are delighted to have been able to help them achieve this goal.” Michelle Wright, Partner at LCP and lead adviser on the transaction, said “The buy-in is an important step in the Plan’s de-risking journey, reducing the Plan’s exposure to longevity risk and providing perfect hedging of the Plan’s complex pension increases for around 40% of the Plan’s liabilities for pensions in payment.
    [Show full text]
  • E-Learning Most Socially Active Professionals
    The World’s Most Socially Active Oil & Energy Professionals – September 2020 Position Company Name LinkedIN URL Location Size No. Employees on LinkedIn No. Employees Shared (Last 30 Days) % Shared (Last 30 Days) 1 Rystad Energy https://www.linkedin.com/company/572589 Norway 201-500 282 87 30.85% 2 Comerc Energia https://www.linkedin.com/company/2023479 Brazil 201-500 327 89 27.22% 3 International Energy Agency (IEA) https://www.linkedin.com/company/26952 France 201-500 426 113 26.53% 4 Tecnogera Geradores https://www.linkedin.com/company/2679062 Brazil 201-500 211 52 24.64% 5 Cenit Transporte y Logística de Hidrocarburos https://www.linkedin.com/company/3021697 Colombia 201-500 376 92 24.47% 6 Moove https://www.linkedin.com/company/12603739 Brazil 501-1000 250 59 23.60% 7 Evida https://www.linkedin.com/company/15252384 Denmark 201-500 246 57 23.17% 8 Dragon Products Ltd https://www.linkedin.com/company/9067234 United States 1001-5000 350 79 22.57% 9 Kenter https://www.linkedin.com/company/10576847 Netherlands 201-500 246 54 21.95% 10 Repower Italia https://www.linkedin.com/company/945861 Italy 501-1000 444 96 21.62% 11 Trident Energy https://www.linkedin.com/company/11079195 United Kingdom 201-500 283 60 21.20% 12 Odfjell Well Services https://www.linkedin.com/company/9363412 Norway 501-1000 250 52 20.80% 13 XM Filial de ISA https://www.linkedin.com/company/2570688 Colombia 201-500 229 47 20.52% 14 Energi Fyn https://www.linkedin.com/company/1653081 Denmark 201-500 219 44 20.09% 15 Society of Petroleum Engineers International https://www.linkedin.com/company/23356 United States 201-500 1,477 294 19.91% 16 Votorantim Energia https://www.linkedin.com/company/3264372 Brazil 201-500 443 86 19.41% 17 TGT Oilfield Services https://www.linkedin.com/company/1360433 United Arab Emirates201-500 203 38 18.72% 18 Motrice Soluções em Energia https://www.linkedin.com/company/11355976 Brazil 201-500 214 40 18.69% 19 GranIHC Services S.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Speaker Bios
    Safety30 Speaker Bios Matt Abraham HSE Director, Oil & Gas UK No bio Rebecca Allison Asset Integrity Solutions Centre Manager, The Oil & Gas Technology Centre Rebecca is a highly driven and motivated Senior Manager with more than 20 years of experience in the oil and gas sector working for various service companies such as Lloyd’s Register, Aker Solutions and Stork. As manager of the Asset Integrity Solution Centre within the Oil & Gas Technology Centre, Rebecca is responsible for leading the Asset Integrity team to identify and appraise the relevance, readiness and accessibility of existing technology in the market place to meet mature basin asset integrity challenges. She is specifically charged with identifying specific technology gaps that remain in asset integrity through designing and delivering programmes to resolve these gaps. Mario Alonso Digital Solutions Product Leader - Subsea Production Systems & Service, Baker Hughes, a GE Company Mario is a digital solutions product leader at Baker Hugues, a GE Business. He is responsible for the digital solutions portfolio within Subsea Production Systems and Services, and has been focused on development of digital analytics applications for the last 13+ years. Mario has an engineering background and hold a PhD in Multi-Phase Fluid Dynamics. He is a chartered engineer and member of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Zev Arnold Executive, Accenture Zev is an executive in Accenture's Industry X.0 Practice and a real-time applications practitioner. In his career, he has helped his clients make improvements in operational performance and integrity, and helped secure their license to operate. He has specialized in real-time infrastructure and analytics, working with the Integrated Operations initiatives of several multinational oil and gas operating companies.
    [Show full text]
  • Are Institutional Investors the Answer for Long-Term Development Financing?
    Development Co-operation Report 2014 Mobilising Resources for Sustainable Development © OECD 2014 PART I Chapter 6 Are institutional investors the answer for long-term development financing? by Raffaele Della Croce, Directorate for Financial and Enterprise Affairs,1 OECD Developing countries need long-term investors to help finance activities that support sustainable growth such as infrastructure, including low-carbon infrastructure. With USD 83.2 trillion in assets in 2012 in OECD countries alone, institutional investors – pension funds, insurers and sovereign wealth funds – represent a potentially major source of long-term financing for developing countries. Despite the recent financial crisis, the prospect for future growth for institutional investors is unabated, especially in developing countries. But although interest is growing, the overall level of institutional investment in infrastructure remains modest and major barriers to investment still exist. Greater growth will depend on policy and structural reforms to create a more favourable investment climate, build private sector confidence and ensure that global savings are channelled into productive and sustainable investments. This chapter also includes an opinion piece on long-term investment by Sony Kapoor, Managing Director of Re-Define, on promoting long-term investment in developing country infrastructure. 79 I.6. ARE INSTITUTIONAL INVESTORS THE ANSWER FOR LONG-TERM DEVELOPMENT FINANCING? Long-term finance plays a pivotal role in fulfilling physical investment needs across all sectors of the economy (OECD, 2013c). It is also essential for the development of small and medium-sized enterprises, especially young, innovative, high-growth firms. Addressing the challenge of climate change and other pressures on the environment will require long-term investments in renewable energy and low-carbon technologies (G20/OECD, 2013).
    [Show full text]
  • Sovereign Wealth Funds As Sustainability Instruments? Disclosure of Sustainability Criteria in Worldwide Comparison
    sustainability Article Sovereign Wealth Funds as Sustainability Instruments? Disclosure of Sustainability Criteria in Worldwide Comparison Stefan Wurster * and Steffen Johannes Schlosser TUM School of Governance, Technical University Munich, 80333 Munich, Germany * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Sovereign wealth funds (SWFs) are state-owned investment vehicles intended to pursue national objectives. Their nature as long-term investors combined with their political mandate could make SWFs an instrument suited to promote sustainability. As an essential precondition, it is important for SWFs to commit to sustainability criteria as part of an overarching strategy. In the article, we present the sustainability disclosure index (SDI), an original new dataset for a selection of over 50 SWFs to investigate whether SWFs disclose sustainability criteria covering environmental, social, economic, and governance aspects into their mandate. In addition to an empirical measurement of the disclosure rate, we conduct multiple regressions to analyze what factors help to explain the variance between SWFs. We see that a majority of SWFs disclose at least some of the sustainability criteria. However, until today, only a small minority address a broad selection as a possible basis for a comprehensive sustainability strategy. While a high-state capacity and a young population in a country as well as a commitment to the international Santiago Principles are positively associated with a higher disclosure rate, we find no evidence for strong effects of the economic development level, the resource abundance, and the degree of democratization of a country or of the specific size and structure of a fund. Identifying favorable conditions for a higher commitment of SWFs could Citation: Wurster, S.; Schlosser, S.J.
    [Show full text]
  • 1199SEIU Health Care Employees Pension Fund
    1199SEIU Health Care Employees Pension Fund SUMMARY PLAN DESCRIPTION OF YOUR PENSION BENEFITS HOME | TABLE OF CONTENTS | HOME | TABLE OF CONTENTS | July 2016 Dear Pension Fund Participants and Retirees: This updated booklet contains a Summary Plan Description (“SPD”) of your Pension Plan as well as a copy of the Plan Document for the 1199SEIU Health Care Employees Pension Fund (the “Plan” or “Pension Fund”). It can help you plan and prepare for Retirement. If you have any questions about the Pension Plan and how it affects you, feel free to make an appointment with a Pension Fund Counselor. When you do, it’s important to make your appointment at least three to six months before you plan to Retire. Your Pension Fund Counselor will explain your pension benefits and options, and help you through the application process. This SPD is a non-technical explanation of your pension benefits. It is written to make it easier for you to understand your rights and responsibilities under the Plan Document and related Trust Agreement. However, it may not provide you with all of the details of the Plan’s rules and regulations, nor does it modify, change or otherwise interpret the terms of the Plan Document. Any words that have an initial capital letter are defined terms and appear in Section XII under the heading “Key Terms and Definitions.” Telephone conversations and other oral statements can easily be misunderstood. Therefore, you should rely on the information provided in the SPD and Plan Document rather than any oral explanation of the Plan’s provisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Contribution of Pension Funds to the Capital Markets of the EEC
    COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES Report on the contribution of pension funds to the capital markets of the EEC ECONOMIE AND FINANCIAL AFFAIRS SERIES - 1968 - 7 I Report on the Contribution of Pension Funds to the Capital Markets of the EEC STUDIES ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL AFFAIRS SERIES No. 1 BRUSSELS 1969 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION 7 CHAPTER I Some conceptual considerations 9 1. Current transfers 9 2. Funding (capitalization) 10 3. Effects on capital markets 11 CHAPTER II Pension funds and their assets - The present status 15 1. United Kingdom 15 2. United States 16 3. Holland 17 4. Germany 18 5. Italy 20 6. Belgium 21 7. France 22 CHAPTER III Scope for growth of pension funds 24 1. Statistics and estimates 24 2. Scope of analysis 24 3. Basic assumptions 24 4. Conceptual framework 25 5. Projections of membership 26 6. Projections of benefits 27 7. Projections of fund assets 27 8. Main conclusions and implications 32 CHAPTER IV Possible reforms to foster the security and growth of pension funds and their contribution to capital markets 37 1. On pension funds in the form of balance-sheet provisions (Germany and Italy) 37 2. On the legal form of pension funds 39 3 Page 3. On countries with a repartition system in force 39 4. On the tax position of pension funds 40 5. On the regulation of pension funds 42 APPENDICES TO CHAPTER III 45 List of tables in the text Table 1 - Trends in private non-agricultural employment 28 Table 2 - Projections of membership penetration 28 Table 3 - Covered workers by country and main type of fund
    [Show full text]
  • Producing Results
    producing results Annual Report and Accounts 2008 WorldReginfo - a0ccc23f-15ea-478f-80e6-f06799ba3abe results we’re proud of... Dana Petroleum plc is a leading British independent oil company, committed to maximising shareholder value through the creation and execution of high impact opportunities. Contents 1 Highlights 36 Directors’ report and accounts 2 Chairman and Chief 114 Proven and probable reserves Executive’s statement and resources 6 Business review 115 Exploration and production 32 Directors and officers interests as at 31 December 2008 WorldReginfo - a0ccc23f-15ea-478f-80e6-f06799ba3abe Highlights Production 39,365boepd up 29% Revenue £518.0m up 66% Pre-tax profit £191.4m up 34% Earnings per share 111.13p up 51% Cashflow from operations £345.0m up 75% WorldReginfo - a0ccc23f-15ea-478f-80e6-f06799ba3abe 1 Dana Petroleum plc Annual Report 2008 Chairman and Chief Executive’s statement Dear Shareholder It is extremely pleasing to report that excellent progress has been made across all key areas of the Company’s business during 2008. Despite the extremely difficult global economic conditions now prevailing, which have resulted in an unprecedented and rapid deterioration of the oil price over recent months, Dana delivered record profits and earnings per share for the full year. 2008 also saw the achievement of new record highs in oil and gas reserves, production, revenue and cash flow. Dana has developed a strong and balanced asset base combining healthy cash reserves, a robust production portfolio delivering strong cash flow, a range of development opportunities and an extensive and exciting exploration programme. 2008 was Tom Cross, Chief Executive the most active year of exploration in Dana’s history with 11 wells completed during the year, including notable successes in the North Sea and the Nile Delta, with a further four wells being drilled at the year end.
    [Show full text]
  • Pension Fund Investment in Infrastructure: a Resource Paper
    - Occasional Paper Series - No.3 December, 2008 Pension Fund Investment in Infrastructure: A Resource Paper By Larry W. Beeferman Pensions and Capital Stewardship Project Labor and Worklife Program Harvard Law School Contents Abstract............................................................................ 1 Introduction...................................................................... 2 Section 1: Risk, Reward, and Other Financial Considerations A. Infrastructure: defi nitions………….…………….…... 5 B. Why infrastructure investments may be attractive to pension funds.................................... 7 C. The fi nancial rewards and risks of investments in individual infrastructure facilities…………….. 8 D. Where infrastructure investments fi t in the fund portfolio…................................................. 15 E. Types of investment vehicles……………….............. 18 F. Financial performance…………………………………. 23 G. Fees and other charges………………………………. 29 Section 2: Labor Implications and Responses A. Potential impacts………..……………………………... 32 B. Contractual and legislative responses…………….. 35 C. Pension fund responses.…..……………………….... 40 Conclusions…………………………………….................. 50 Endnotes…..…………………………………….................. 56 Occasional Papers | December 2008 Pension Fund Investment in Infrastructure: A Resource Paper By Larry W. Beeferman* Abstract What is termed “infrastructure” appears to offer pension funds opportunities for investment that might yield substantial and predictable returns matching their long-term liabilities. But there
    [Show full text]