First Record of the White-Winged Crossbill in California

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

First Record of the White-Winged Crossbill in California Thefollowing article is thefifth in a serieson Californiararities edited by Morlan and Roberson.It is based on materialssubmitted to the California Bird RecordsCommittee (CBRC). The descriptionand circumstanceswere drawnfrom the accountsof the observerand havebeen reviewed by him. Robersonprepared the distributionalsummary; Morlan prepared the iden- tificationsummary. In this way we hope much importantinformation ac- cumulatedin CBRC files will become widely available. White-wingedCrossbills Sketch by Tim Manolis FIRST RECORD OF THE WHITE-WINGED CROSSBILL IN CALIFORNIA PHIL GORDON, 4634 Mira Lorna, CastroValley, California92546 JOSEPH MORLAN, 417 Talbot Ave., Albany, California94706 DON ROBERSON, 282 Grove Acre Ave., Pacific Grove, California 93950 In the afternoonof 1 September1978, Phil Gordon and his son Geoffrey were fishingnear their camp at MosquitoLake in the Salmon-TrinityAlps WildernessArea, Trinity County, California.This area is at an elevationof 6600 feet (2010 m), about 7 miles west of the Scott Mountain summit on countyhighway 3. The 20-acrelake is in a smallglacial cirque basin below a crestthat dividesSiskiyou and Trinitycounties. It is surroundedby scattered PonderosaPinus ponderosa and WesternWhite P. monticolapines, Red Fir Abies magnifica, Incense Cedar Libocedrusdecurrens, and Mountain HemlockTsuga mertensiana. A canary-liketwittering drew the Gordons'at- tentionto a flockof finchesperched quietly, seemingly feeding in the top of a fir. The birdsthen flew one by one to anotherfir 70 to 80 feet away. The Gordons watched the flock of 12 birds several times that afternoon. The birds movedrestlessly from branchto branch,sometimes at distancesof several hundredyards, but oncethey cameas closeas 75 to 80 feet. Althoughthe birdsstayed mostly in the topsof the firs,they descendedto within15 feetof the groundon one occasion.Viewing conditionswere poor and backlitat first, but later the birdsallowed a fairly closestudy for 4 or 5 minutes. The birdsseemed to be crossbills,but the tighttwitter or trillof three or four phrasesat differentpitches was unlikethe callsof Red CrossbillsLoxia cur- WesternBirds 20: 81-87, 1989 81 WHITE-WINGED CROSSBILL IN CALIFORNIA virostrathat Gordon knew from the Sierra Nevada. With better views, two white wingbarsbecame conspicuous, and Pine SiskinsCarduelis pinus and Pine GrosbeaksPinicola enucleator became considerations.However, the three red birds in the flock ruled out siskins,and the small size and slender long bill eliminated the Pine Grosbeak. Gordon identified them as White- winged CrossbillsLoxia leucoptera. When Gordon and his son returned home from the camping trip three days later, they wrote descriptionson the CBRC's report form. Gordon wrote short, succinctnotes, which he has expanded into sentencesas follows: These were smallfinches the sizeof a sparrowor of a House Finch Carpodacus mexicanusbut seemedchunklet than a House Finch. The tail was shortwith a deep notch. Three birdswere reddish on the head, neck, throat, breastand sides;the other nine were overallgreenish gray. The lowerbelly and sidesof the birds,especially the greenishones, were streaked with dark. The darkishwings of bothforms showed two brightwhite wingbars, which were unmistakableon all of the birds. The lightingand position(perched on uppersurface of branches)made observation of the "crossedbill" difficult.One male had a thin, down-curvedupper mandiblepro- jectingbeyond the lower mandible,but I did not see it cross.Otherwise the bill was small and conical. The exact bill color was not noted but seemed to be medium dark. GeoffreyGordon's notes were briefer: Maleswere brightred with blackwings. Females were greenishwith no outstanding characters.Each had a white wingbarwith a smallerwingbar above that was almost reduced to a white dot. Both observersdrew rough sketchesshowing the locationof wingbarsand basic bill shape (rather long and thin); Geoffrey's sketch emphasizedthe reduced extent of the upper wingbar. This record of the White-wingedCrossbill was unanimouslyaccepted as a firstfor Californiaby the CBRC afterthree circulations (Luther et al. 1983). In early circulation,a dissenterraised the possibilityof Pine Grosbeaks,noting that thisspecies has a disproportionatelysmall bill with a downcurvedculmen and behavesmuch in the way thesebirds were described(feeding slowly at the tips of branches,then movingone by one to the next tree). Furthermore, the "brightred" or "reddish"color seemed to be lesspink than somemembers expected,and the birdswere seenmostly at substantialdistances. In the end, though,even the dissentervoted to accept,persuaded by the birds'small size (aboutthat of House Finch, but chunkier),the reduced upper wingbar,and especiallyby the streakingon the lower belly. Some membersnoted that the twitteringcalls were appropriatefor the White-winged Crossbilland pointed out that the species had occurred in numbers in British Columbia and Washington(outside of its usualhaunts) in the summer and fall of 1978 (but littleinto Oregon; see more under "Distributional Summary"). One notedthat Godfrey(1966) describedthe colorof malesas "brightscarlet or vermilionin summer, dull and pinkishin winter." Also persuasivewas Gordon'sprior ex- periencewith the Pine Grosbeak,which has never occurredin northwestern California. The Pine Grosbeak in California is a sedentaryresident in the SierraNevada. RichardA. Ericksonvisited Mosquito Lake ten dayslater but was unsuccessfulin finding any crossbills. 82 WHITE-WINGED CROSSBILL IN CALIFORNIA DISTRIBUTIONAL SUMMARY The White-winged Crossbillis a Holarctic speciesof boreal forests,par- ticularlyspruce, fir, or latch (A.O.U. 1983). In North Americait rangesfrom westernAlaska to Labradorand southin the Cascadesto Washington,in the Rockiesto Wyoming(and irregularly to northernUtah, centralColorado, and northernNew Mexico), and in the Eastto Maine (A.O.U. 1983; Figure1). It often winterswithin its breedingrange but is irruptivefollowing cone crop failures(Bock and Lepthien 1976). During suchinvasions it has occurredas far south as Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, and Florida (DeSante and Pyle 1986), where it feedson conesof other treesand the fruit of the Sweetgum Liquidarnbarstyraciflua (George 1968). In October 1971, two rode a trans- Atlanticpassenger ship from Newfoundlandto Ireland(Abramson 1974). Ir- ruptionsin the Northwestcan be impressive.Jewett et al. (1953) wrote of a "remarkableincursion" during the winterof 1908-09 throughoutthe Puget Sound area of Washington.Prior to 1940, however, the specieswas known in Oregon only from two specimenscollected 12 July 1938 on the upper Figure1. Approximatebreeding range of the White-wingedCrossbill in westernNorth America (shaded),with extralimitalrecords mentioned in the text (asterisks),and loca- tion of this record (star). 83 WHITE-WINGED CROSSBILL IN CALIFORNIA Lostine River, Wallowa County, and a 19th-century sight record in WashingtonCounty (Gabrielsonand Jewett 1940). More recentirruptions in the Casadesnorth of Californiaoccurred in 1974, 1978, 1981, and 1985. Thesetypically began during late July, and flocks oftenspread south or towardthe coastduring the fall, usuallytapering off by mid-October.The 1974 movementwas largelylimited to the mountainsof southernBritish Columbia and Washington(Crowell and Nehls1975), witha lone Oregon occurrenceat La Grande in the northeast(Rogers 1975). In 1978, the year of the Californiasighting, the species"appeared abruptly and in largenumbers" throughout the WashingtonCascades and OlympicMoun- tains in August (Harrington-Tweit et al. 1978) and continued as a "great surge"through the Casadesto Mt. Hood, Oregon, with one as far southas Bend, DeschutesCounty, in central Oregon, on 24 November (Rogers 1979). In 1981, an irruptionsent birds south during early September to Gold and Waldo lakes,Lane County, in the OregonJancentral Cascades (Hunn and Mattocks1982). In the summerof 1984, an irruptionin the Great Basin resultedin a recordfor LasVegas, Nevada, the secondfor thatstate (Kingery 1984). However, the most impressivemovements occurred in 1985, when an August-Septemberincursion brought flocks of up to 60 birdssouth in the centralCascades to highelevations in Lane, Douglas,Deschutes, and north- western Klamath counties (Summers 1986, Hunn and Mattocks 1986). Thesesites are only about100 milesnorth of the Californiaborder. Each re- centirruption has seemingly sent flocks farther south than previously (though thismight be a functionof increasedobserver coverage). The speciesshould again be looked for in northernCalifornia, especially at higherelevations duringthe late summerand fall of the next irruption. SUBSPECIES In contrastto the Red Crossbill,which exhibitsan enormousamount of geographicvariation and mayconsist of severalcryptic species (Groth 1988), the White-wingedCrossbill exhibits very little variation. Only threesubspecies havebeen described (Howell et al. 1968). L. I. leucoptera,breeding in North America,is smaller and smaller-billedthan L. I. bifasciataof Eurasia(Witherby et al. 1943). North American birds have been reported from Europe and recentlyfrom extremeeastern Siberia (Tomkovich and Sorokin1983), but Eurasianbirds have not beenreported in NorthAmerica. A third, larger-billed subspecies,L. I. megaplaga(Riley 1916), is confined to the island of Hispaniola,where nestingwas confirmedin 1971 (Kepler et al. 1975). On geographicgrounds, the Californiabirds may be presumedto havebeen L. I. leucoptera,although the describedsmall bill alsosuggests this race. IDENTIFICATION
Recommended publications
  • Red Crossbill Loxia Curvirostra Many Members of the Finch Family Migrate Irregu- Larly, As Demanded by the Irregularity of Their Food Supply
    584 Finches — Family Fringillidae Red Crossbill Loxia curvirostra Many members of the finch family migrate irregu- larly, as demanded by the irregularity of their food supply. The crossbills, with their unique specializa- tion and dependence on conifer seeds, take this irregularity to an extreme. With only small areas for- ested in conifers, San Diego County cannot support a population of the Red Crossbill, so the species is a sporadic visitor here, though it has attempted nest- ing in the county at least once. Studies of morphol- ogy, genetics, and voice suggest the Red Crossbill, with its great variation across North America in size and bill shape, may consist of multiple cryptic Photo by Anthony Mercieca species. Winter: The winters of 1966–67, 1984–85, and 1996–97 saw the biggest incursions of the Red Crossbill known the Laguna Mountains in late July 1993 (G. L. Rogers, P. in the history of San Diego County. Thus the 5-year atlas A. Ginsburg, AB 47:1152, 1993). From 1997 to 2001 the period 1997–2002 began with the winding down of an only such reports were from Middle and Cuyamaca peaks incursion in which small flocks were seen through much (M20), with one on 19 May 1998 and one or two 23–24 of the county, such as 10 at the Vineyard Golf Course, June 2001 (S. Peterson, D. Holway). Escondido (K11), 17 February 1997 (E. C. Hall). The Conservation: The crossbills breeding in the southwest- Oceanside Christmas bird count yielded the maximum of ern quadrant of the contiguous United States have bills 24 on 29 December 1996, and up to 10 occurred even at adapted to feed on the seeds of pines.
    [Show full text]
  • New Data on the Chewing Lice (Phthiraptera) of Passerine Birds in East of Iran
    See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/244484149 New data on the chewing lice (Phthiraptera) of passerine birds in East of Iran ARTICLE · JANUARY 2013 CITATIONS READS 2 142 4 AUTHORS: Behnoush Moodi Mansour Aliabadian Ferdowsi University Of Mashhad Ferdowsi University Of Mashhad 3 PUBLICATIONS 2 CITATIONS 110 PUBLICATIONS 393 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Ali Moshaverinia Omid Mirshamsi Ferdowsi University Of Mashhad Ferdowsi University Of Mashhad 10 PUBLICATIONS 17 CITATIONS 54 PUBLICATIONS 152 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE SEE PROFILE Available from: Omid Mirshamsi Retrieved on: 05 April 2016 Sci Parasitol 14(2):63-68, June 2013 ISSN 1582-1366 ORIGINAL RESEARCH ARTICLE New data on the chewing lice (Phthiraptera) of passerine birds in East of Iran Behnoush Moodi 1, Mansour Aliabadian 1, Ali Moshaverinia 2, Omid Mirshamsi Kakhki 1 1 – Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Biology, Iran. 2 – Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Department of Pathobiology, Iran. Correspondence: Tel. 00985118803786, Fax 00985118763852, E-mail [email protected] Abstract. Lice (Insecta, Phthiraptera) are permanent ectoparasites of birds and mammals. Despite having a rich avifauna in Iran, limited number of studies have been conducted on lice fauna of wild birds in this region. This study was carried out to identify lice species of passerine birds in East of Iran. A total of 106 passerine birds of 37 species were captured. Their bodies were examined for lice infestation. Fifty two birds (49.05%) of 106 captured birds were infested. Overall 465 lice were collected from infested birds and 11 lice species were identified as follow: Brueelia chayanh on Common Myna (Acridotheres tristis), B.
    [Show full text]
  • American Goldfinch Carduelis Tristis
    American Goldfinch Carduelis tristis Photo credit: Erin Alvey, May 2009 Photo credit: Ken Thomas, May 2007 The American Goldfinch is the state bird of New Jersey, Iowa, and Washington and is a highly recognizable and very handsome bird. They are very active foragers and welcomed guests of bird feeders that mostly eat seeds, especially thistle, and mainly eat sunflowers and nyjer at feeders. They are a common summer visitor to the Garden City Bird Sanctuary which has special "finch" feeders. Bird Statistics Description Scientific name- Carduelis (Spinus) tristis Size and Shape- A small finch with a short, Family- Fringillidae conical beak, small wings, and a notched tail. Conservation Status- Least concern Color Pattern- Males are bright yellow with Length- 4.3-5.1 in (11-13 cm) black cap. Females are golden yellow. Both have Wingspan- 7.5-8.7 in (19-22 cm) black and white striped wings and tail. Both are Weight- 0.4-0.7 oz (11-20 g) browner during winter. Behavior- Nimble and acrobatic birds that live in Egg Statistics flocks outside of the breeding season. They forage Color- Very pale blue-white with some brown actively and fly in an undulating pattern. spots near the large end Song- Varied; descending or random chirps. Nest- Tightly-woven rootlets and plant fibers Habitat- Live where weeds, brush, and thistles lined with plant down are common; including weedy fields, meadows, Clutch size- 2-7 eggs flood plains, roadsides, and orchards. Also found Number of broods- 1-2 near birdfeeders. Length- 0.6-0.7 in (1.62-1.69 cm) Range- Northeast, Central, and Northwest Width- 0.5-0.5 in (1.2-1.3 cm) America year-round.
    [Show full text]
  • A Hybrid Red Crossbill-Pine Siskin (Loxia Curvirostra X Carduelis Pinus
    January1984] ShortCommunications 155 HILLS, M. 1978. On ratios--a response to Atchley, nov, Cramer-Von Mises and related statistics Gaskins and Anderson. Syst. Zool. 27: 61-62. without extensive tables. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc. 69: SAS INSTITUTE.1982. SAS user's guide: basics.Cary, 730. North Carolina, SAS Institute, Inc. ZAR, J. H. 1974. Biostatisticalanalysis. Englewood SHAPIRO,S.S., & M. B. WILK. 1965. An analysis of Cliffs, New Jersey,Prentice-Hall, Inc. variance test for normality (complete samples). Biometrika 52:591-611. Received3 March 1983,accepted 6 September1983. STEPHENS,M.A. 1974. Use of the Kolmogorov-Smir- A Hybrid Red Crossbill-Pine Siskin (Loxia curvirostra x Carduelis pin us) and Speculations on the Evolution of Loxia DAN A. TALLMAN • AND RICHARD L. ZUSI 2 'Departmentof Mathematics,Natural Sciences and Health Professions, Northern State College, Aberdeen,South Dakota 57401 USA; and 2National Museum of NaturalHistory, SmithsonianInstitution, Washington, D.C. 20560 USA On the morning of 27 December1981, a strange streaksweakest on lower throat and belly and dark- finch appeared at Tallman's feeder in a residential est and best defined on flanks and crissum. backyardin Aberdeen,Brown County, South Dakota. Upperparts dusky olive streaked or spotted with Alone and in the companyof Pine Siskins,the bird dark gray. Feathersof forehead and crown dark with consumedsunflower seeds.It fed on the ground and whitish or yellowish edges, giving spotted effect. alsocracked seeds while perchedon a sunflowerhead Longer feathers of nape, neck, and back dark gray hung from a clothesline.Tallman noted that this finch, borderedwith dusky olive laterally, giving streaked when approached,did not fly with a small siskin effect.
    [Show full text]
  • Winter Ecology Bird List Winter Ecology Field Course, CU MRS T
    Winter Ecology Bird List Winter Ecology field course, CU MRS T. Kittel Field days with Arvind Panjabi, Bird Conservancy of the Rockies (2005-2012,2014-2019) updated 2018 & Ted Floyd, American Birding Association (2013) Observed (v=visual at least, a=audio only, s=sign) cummulative 2019 3-Feb-19 2018 28-Jan-18 2017 5-Feb-17 2016 31-Jan-16 2015 8-Feb-15 2014 9-Feb-14 2013 27-Jan-13 Species (Subspecies) Group class list Allenspark Wild Basin Allenspark Wild Basin Allenspark Wild Basin Allenspark Wild Basin Allenspark Wild Basin Allenspark Wild Basin Allenspark Wild Basin Golden Eagle Hawks & Allies 1 v 1 v - 2nd yr 1 Northern Goshawk Hawks & Allies 1 Sharp-shinned Hawk Hawks & Allies Red-winged Blackbird Blackbirds & Orioles 1 Black-capped Chickadee Chickadees & Titmice 1 v v 1 1 1 1 v/a v 1 a 1 v 1 Mountain Chickadee Chickadees & Titmice 1 v/a v/a 1 v/a 1 1 1 1 v a 1 v/a v 1 v v 1v v 1 Clark's Nutcracker Corvids 1 v 1 v 1 v 1 v/a v 1 v 1 v 1 American Crow Corvids 1 v/a 1 v/a v 1 1 1 1 v v 1 v/a v 1 v 1 v 1 Common Raven Corvids 1 v/a 1 1 1 1 v 1 v/a v 1 v v 1 a v 1 Gray Jay Corvids 1 Black-billed Magpie Corvids 1 v/a 1 v/a 1 1 1 1 v 1 v v 1 v 1 Steller's Jay Corvids 1 v/a 1 v/a 1 1 1 1 v 1 v 1 v a 1 Brown Creeper Creepers 1 111a 1v v1 v1 a1 American Dipper Dippers 1 11 House Finch Finches 1 v1 v1 Cassin's Finch Finches 1 11 v 1 Evening Grosbeak Finches 1 v/a 1 v/a 1 a 1 v, mixed flock 1 Pine Grosbeak Finches 1 v/a 1 Brown-capped Rosy-Finch Finches 1 11 v, mixed flock 1 Black Rosy-Finch Finches 1 v, mixed flock 1 Gray-crowned Rosy Finch Finches
    [Show full text]
  • Phylogeography of Finches and Sparrows
    In: Animal Genetics ISBN: 978-1-60741-844-3 Editor: Leopold J. Rechi © 2009 Nova Science Publishers, Inc. Chapter 1 PHYLOGEOGRAPHY OF FINCHES AND SPARROWS Antonio Arnaiz-Villena*, Pablo Gomez-Prieto and Valentin Ruiz-del-Valle Department of Immunology, University Complutense, The Madrid Regional Blood Center, Madrid, Spain. ABSTRACT Fringillidae finches form a subfamily of songbirds (Passeriformes), which are presently distributed around the world. This subfamily includes canaries, goldfinches, greenfinches, rosefinches, and grosbeaks, among others. Molecular phylogenies obtained with mitochondrial DNA sequences show that these groups of finches are put together, but with some polytomies that have apparently evolved or radiated in parallel. The time of appearance on Earth of all studied groups is suggested to start after Middle Miocene Epoch, around 10 million years ago. Greenfinches (genus Carduelis) may have originated at Eurasian desert margins coming from Rhodopechys obsoleta (dessert finch) or an extinct pale plumage ancestor; it later acquired green plumage suitable for the greenfinch ecological niche, i.e.: woods. Multicolored Eurasian goldfinch (Carduelis carduelis) has a genetic extant ancestor, the green-feathered Carduelis citrinella (citril finch); this was thought to be a canary on phonotypical bases, but it is now included within goldfinches by our molecular genetics phylograms. Speciation events between citril finch and Eurasian goldfinch are related with the Mediterranean Messinian salinity crisis (5 million years ago). Linurgus olivaceus (oriole finch) is presently thriving in Equatorial Africa and was included in a separate genus (Linurgus) by itself on phenotypical bases. Our phylograms demonstrate that it is and old canary. Proposed genus Acanthis does not exist. Twite and linnet form a separate radiation from redpolls.
    [Show full text]
  • Britain's First Two-Barred Crossbill
    Britain’s first Two-barred Crossbill Andrew H. J. Harrop, Alan G. Knox and Robert Y. McGowan, on behalf of the British Ornithologists’ Union Records Committee Introduction isations that suggest that the three forms would Until 1998, the British Ornithologists’ Union be best treated as separate species (Benkman (BOU) compiled a single List of the birds of 1992; Elmberg 1993; Cramp & Perrins 1994; Britain & Ireland. Following a request from the AOU 1998). These differences are sufficiently Irish Rare Birds Committee, the BOU has since marked to be observable in the field. The His- then maintained a List for Britain alone (BOU paniolan Crossbill, now treated as a separate 1999). This has entailed ongoing work to sepa- species by the AOU (2003), is not discussed rate the two Lists and establish, among other here; for further information see Benkman things, the first acceptable records for Britain of (1994), Smith (1997) and Boon et al. (2006). those species and subspecies whose first British As a species, Loxia leucoptera was given its and Irish record came from Ireland. A number formal scientific name by Gmelin in 1789, of these were listed in recent BOURC reports in based on specimens of the American White- Ibis and by Bradshaw (2003). winged Crossbill brought to Europe from The first Two-barred Crossbill Loxia leu- Hudson Bay and New York. Therefore, early ref- coptera for Britain & Ireland was a female of the erences to this bird in Britain were generally Old World race L. l. bifasciata (hereafter under the name ‘White-winged Crossbill’ and referred to as bifasciata), shot at Grenville, near believed to relate to birds from America (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Collation of Brisson's Genera of Birds with Those of Linnaeus
    59. 82:01 Article XXVII. COLLATION OF BRISSON'S GENERA OF BIRDS WITH THOSE OF LINNAEUS. BY J. A. ALLEN. CONTENTS. Page. Introduction ....................... 317 Brisson not greatly indebted to Linnaeus. 319 Linneus's indebtedness to Brisson .... .. ... .. 320 Brisson's methods and resources . .. 320 Brisson's genera . 322 Brisson and Linnaeus statistically compared .. .. .. 324 Brisson's 'Ornithologia' compared with the Aves of the tenth edition of Lin- naeus's 'Systema'. 325 Brisson's new genera and their Linnwan equivalents . 327 Brisson's new names for Linnaan genera . 330 Linnaean (1764 and 1766) new names for Brissonian genera . 330 Brissonian names adopted. by Linnaeus . 330 Brissonian names wrongly ascribed to other authors in Sharpe's 'Handlist of Birds'.330 The relation of six Brissonian genera to Linnlean genera . 332 Mergus Linn. and Merganser Briss. 332 Meleagris Linn. and Gallopavo Briss. 332 Alcedo Linn. and Ispida Briss... .. 332 Cotinga Briss. and Ampelis Linn. .. 333 Coracias Linn. and Galgulus Briss.. 333 Tangara Briss. and Tanagra Linn... ... 334 INTRODUCTION. In considering recently certain questions of ornithological nomenclature it became necessary to examine the works of Brisson and Linnaeus in con- siderable detail and this-examination finally led to a careful collation of Brisson's 'Ornithologia,' published in 1760, with the sixth, tenth, and twelfth editions of Linnaeus's 'Systema Naturae,' published respectively in 1748, 1758, and 1766. As every systematic ornithologist has had occasion to learn, Linnaeus's treatment of the class Aves was based on very imperfect knowledge of the suabject. As is well-known, this great systematist was primarily a botanist, secondarily a zoologist, and only incidentally a mammalogist and ornithol- ogist.
    [Show full text]
  • Order PASSERIFORMES: Passerine (Perching) Birds Suborder
    Text extracted from Gill B.J.; Bell, B.D.; Chambers, G.K.; Medway, D.G.; Palma, R.L.; Scofield, R.P.; Tennyson, A.J.D.; Worthy, T.H. 2010. Checklist of the birds of New Zealand, Norfolk and Macquarie Islands, and the Ross Dependency, Antarctica. 4th edition. Wellington, Te Papa Press and Ornithological Society of New Zealand. Pages 275, 279 & 319-320. Order PASSERIFORMES: Passerine (Perching) Birds See Christidis & Boles (2008) for a review of recent studies relevant to the higher-level systematics of the passerine birds. Suborder PASSERES (or POLYMYODI): Oscines (Songbirds) The arrangement of songbirds in the 1970 Checklist (Checklist Committee 1970) was based on the premise that the species endemic to the Australasian region were derived directly from Eurasian groups and belonged in Old World families (e.g. Gerygone and Petroica in Muscicapidae). The 1990 Checklist (Checklist Committee 1990) followed the Australian lead in allocating various native songbirds to their own Australasian families (e.g. Gerygone to Acanthizidae, and Petroica to Eopsaltriidae), but the sequence was still based largely on the old Peters-Mayr arrangement. Since the late 1980s, when the 1990 Checklist was finalised, evidence from molecular biology, especially DNA studies, has shown that most of the Australian and New Zealand endemic songbirds are the product of a major Australasian radiation parallel to the radiation of songbirds in Eurasia and elsewhere. Many superficial morphological and ecological similarities between Australasian and Eurasian songbirds are the result of convergent evolution. Sibley & Ahlquist (1985, 1990) and Sibley et al. (1988) recognised a division of the songbirds into two groups which were called Corvida and Passerida (Sibley & Ahlquist 1990).
    [Show full text]
  • On the Advantages of Crossed Mandibles: an Experimental Approach
    IBIS 130: 288-293 On the advantages of crossed mandibles: an experimental approach CRAIG W. BENKMAN* Department of Biological Sciences, State Uniwersity of New York at Albany, 1400 Washington Avenue, Albany, New York 12222, USA Accepted 20 November 1986 The importance of the crossed mandibles to crossbills for foraging on conifer cones was studied by removing most of the crossed portion of the mandibles of two Red Crossbills L. curuirortra. The foraging rate of these two bill-altered crossbills on the cones of three species of conifers was compared to their rates prior to bill alteration and to two controls. The mandible crossing proved essential for extracting seeds from closed cones. However, as cones open the bill crossing becomes less critical. The mandible crossing appears to be one of several adaptationsof crossbills that have extended the period during which conifer seeds can be exploited effectively. The functions of morphological structures can often be understood by detailed observations of organisms. However, a difficulty with ascribing a function to a structure by observation alone is that different observers often come to different conclusions. Experimental investigations of function are desirable but are often either difficult or trivial. For example, removing a bird’s leg would make perching or terrestrial locomotion impossible or awkward. In some cases, however, slight modification of structures may provide a means for studying a structure’s utility. One striking example of the difficulty of attributing a function to a structure by observation alone is the crossed mandibles of crossbills Loxia. There have been many opinions as to the function of the mandible crossing ranging from those suggesting no adaptive value to those suggesting a specific adaptive function.
    [Show full text]
  • Ours to Save: the Distribution, Status & Conservation Needs of Canada's Endemic Species
    Ours to Save The distribution, status & conservation needs of Canada’s endemic species June 4, 2020 Version 1.0 Ours to Save: The distribution, status & conservation needs of Canada’s endemic species Additional information and updates to the report can be found at the project website: natureconservancy.ca/ourstosave Suggested citation: Enns, Amie, Dan Kraus and Andrea Hebb. 2020. Ours to save: the distribution, status and conservation needs of Canada’s endemic species. NatureServe Canada and Nature Conservancy of Canada. Report prepared by Amie Enns (NatureServe Canada) and Dan Kraus (Nature Conservancy of Canada). Mapping and analysis by Andrea Hebb (Nature Conservancy of Canada). Cover photo credits (l-r): Wood Bison, canadianosprey, iNaturalist; Yukon Draba, Sean Blaney, iNaturalist; Salt Marsh Copper, Colin Jones, iNaturalist About NatureServe Canada A registered Canadian charity, NatureServe Canada and its network of Canadian Conservation Data Centres (CDCs) work together and with other government and non-government organizations to develop, manage, and distribute authoritative knowledge regarding Canada’s plants, animals, and ecosystems. NatureServe Canada and the Canadian CDCs are members of the international NatureServe Network, spanning over 80 CDCs in the Americas. NatureServe Canada is the Canadian affiliate of NatureServe, based in Arlington, Virginia, which provides scientific and technical support to the international network. About the Nature Conservancy of Canada The Nature Conservancy of Canada (NCC) works to protect our country’s most precious natural places. Proudly Canadian, we empower people to safeguard the lands and waters that sustain life. Since 1962, NCC and its partners have helped to protect 14 million hectares (35 million acres), coast to coast to coast.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife in Your Young Forest.Pdf
    WILDLIFE IN YOUR Young Forest 1 More Wildlife in Your Woods CREATE YOUNG FOREST AND ENJOY THE WILDLIFE IT ATTRACTS WHEN TO EXPECT DIFFERENT ANIMALS his guide presents some of the wildlife you may used to describe this dense, food-rich habitat are thickets, T see using your young forest as it grows following a shrublands, and early successional habitat. timber harvest or other management practice. As development has covered many acres, and as young The following lists focus on areas inhabited by the woodlands have matured to become older forest, the New England cottontail (Sylvilagus transitionalis), a rare amount of young forest available to wildlife has dwindled. native rabbit that lives in parts of New York east of the Having diverse wildlife requires having diverse habitats on Hudson River, and in parts of Connecticut, Rhode Island, the land, including some young forest. Massachusetts, southern New Hampshire, and southern Maine. In this region, conservationists and landowners In nature, young forest is created by floods, wildfires, storms, are carrying out projects to create the young forest and and beavers’ dam-building and feeding. To protect lives and shrubland that New England cottontails need to survive. property, we suppress floods, fires, and beaver activities. Such projects also help many other kinds of wildlife that Fortunately, we can use habitat management practices, use the same habitat. such as timber harvests, to mimic natural disturbance events and grow young forest in places where it will do the most Young forest provides abundant food and cover for insects, good. These habitat projects boost the amount of food reptiles, amphibians, birds, and mammals.
    [Show full text]