DOCSLIB.ORG

A Quick View of Lagrangian Floer Homology 3 Such That 2 2 2 2 F (U1,...,Un)= F (0) − U1 −···− Uλ + Uλ +1 + ··· + Un

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Quick View of Lagrangian Floer Homology 3 Such That 2 2 2 2 F (U1,...,Un)= F (0) − U1 −···− Uλ + Uλ +1 + ··· + Un A Quick View of Lagrangian Floer Homology Andr´es Pedroza Abstract In this note we present a brief introduction to Lagrangian Floer homology and its relation with the solution of Arnol’d conjecture, on the minimal number of non-degenerate fixed points of a Hamiltonian diffeomorphism. We start with the basic definition of critical point on smooth manifolds, in oder to sketch some aspects of Morse theory. Introduction to the basics concepts of symplectic geometry are also included, with the idea of understanding the statement of Arnol’d Conjecture and how is related to the intersection of Lagrangian submanifolds. 1 Introduction Many elegant results in mathematics have to deal with the fixed-point-set of a function. For ex- ample: Brouwer fixed-point theorem, Lefschetz fixed-point theorem, Banach fixed-point theorem and Poincar´e-Birkhoff theorem, just to name a few. Furthermore, these results are fundamental in their own area of mathematics and have interesting consequences in diverse areas of mathematics; differential equations, topology and game theory among others. Symplectic geometry has its own fixed-point theorem, which was conjectured by V. Arnol’d [1] in 1965. The Arnol’d Conjecture was motivated by Poincar´e-Birkhoff theorem: An area-preserving diffeomorphism of the annulus which maps the boundary circles to themselves in different direction, must have at least two fixed points. The generalization of Poincar´e-Birkhoff theorem fits in symplectic geometry and not in volume- preserving geometry. The Arnol’d Conjecture establishes a lower bound on the number of fixed points a Hamiltonian diffeomorphism in terms of the topology of the manifold. The fixed points of arXiv:1701.02293v1 [math.SG] 9 Jan 2017 a Hamiltonian diffeomorphism, (in fact any diffeomorphisms) can be seen as the intersection of its graph and the diagonal. In the context of symplectic geometry, is the intersection of two Lagrangian submanifolds. In 1987, A. Floer [10] developed a homological theory that focused on the intersection of La- grangian submanifolds. In particular, under some hypotheses, he proved the Arnol’d Conjecture for a particular class of closed symplectic manifolds. This theory is called Lagrangian Floer homology. In these notes we sketch how Lagrangian Floer homology is defined. In fact we review some aspects of Morse theory from its basics; like non-degenerate critical points, the Hessian, flow lines of the gradient vector field up to Morse homology. The reason being, that Lagrangian Floer homology emulates in many aspects Morse homology. Also we cover the basics of symplectic manifolds and Hamiltonian diffeomorphisms. The last section deals with Lagrangian Floer homology and how it is used to prove the Arnol’d Conjecture. For the basic notions of differential geometry the reader can look at [41]; for the aspects of symplectic geometry [7] and [23]; and also [24] where the analytical aspect of holomorphic curves Andr´es Pedroza Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Colima, Bernal D´ıaz del Castillo No. 340, Colima, Col., Mexico 28045 e-mail: [email protected] 1 2 Andr´es Pedroza is covered. For details and proofs on the construction of Lagrangian Floer homology see [3], [32] and [33]. For an excellent introduction to Fukaya categories see a[4]; and [40] for a detail treatment of the subject. These lecture notes are based on a course given at the 7th. Mini Meeting on Differential Ge- ometry held at CIMAT in February 2015. The author wishes thank the organizers and participants for the pleasent atmospere. Finally the author was partially supported by a CONACYT grant CB- 2010/151846. 2 Morse-Smale Functions Let M be a smooth manifold of dimension n and f : M → R a smooth function. A point p ∈ M is called a critical point of f if the differential d fp : TpM → R at p is the zero map. Denote by Crit( f ) the set of critical points of f . Notice that Crit( f ) can be the empty set, however if M is compact then it is not empty, since a smooth function on M has a maximum and a minimum. Let p ∈ M be a critical point of f and (x1,...,xn) a coordinate chart about p. The Hessian matrix of f at p relative to the chart (x1,...,xn), is the n × n matrix ∂ 2 f Hess( f , p)= (p) . ∂x ∂x i j A critical point p is said to be non-degenerate if the matrix Hess( f , p) is non-singular. Note that the Hessian matrix is symmetric, hence if it is non-singular its eigenvalues are real and non-zero. The index of f at a non-degenerate critical point p, which is denoted by ind( f ; p), is defined as the number of negative eigenvalues of the Hessian matrix at p. The definition of the index at a non-degenerate critical point given above depends on the coordi- nate system; however it can be shown that the is independent of the coordinate system about the the critical point.There is an alternative definition of the index of a function at a non-degenerate critical point, that does not needs a coordinate system. For a critical point p ∈ M of f define the bilinear form 2 d fp : TpM × TpM → R 2 as d fp (X,Y ) := X(Y f ), where Y is any vector field on M whose value at p is Y. Notice that since p 2 is a critical point of f , the bilinear form d fp is symmetric, e e 0 = d fp[X,Y ] = [X,Y ]p( f )= Xp(Y f ) −Yp(X f ). 2 In this context, p is called non-degeneratee e eife the bilineare symmetrice e e form d fp is non-degenerate. The index of f at p is defined as the number of negative eigenvalues of the symmetric bilinear form 2 d fp . The two definitions given of non-degenerate critical point agree. The same applies for the two definitions of the index of a non-degeneratecritical point. For further details, see [3, Ch. 1] and [29]. Definition 1. A smooth function f : M → R for which all of its critical points are non-degenerate is called a Morse function. Now we consider some examples in the case when M = R2. The origin is the only critical point of the function f (x,y)= x2 + y2. Moreover is a non-degenerate critical point and its index is zero. The origin is also the only non-degenerate critical point of the functions g(x,y)= x2 − y2 and h(x,y)= −x2 −y2. In these cases the index at the origin is 1 and 2 respectively. These three examples describe the general behavior of a function on R2 near the origin when it is a non-degenerate critical point. The precise statement on the behavior of a function near a non-degenerate critical point is given by Morse lemma. Theorem 1 (Morse Lemma). Let f : Rn → R be a smooth function such that the origin is a non- degenerate critical point of index λ. Then there exists a coordinate chart (u1,...,un) about the origin A Quick View of Lagrangian Floer Homology 3 such that 2 2 2 2 f (u1,...,un)= f (0) − u1 −···− uλ + uλ +1 + ··· + un. It goes without saying that Morse lemma also holds for smooth functions defined on arbitrary manifolds. A consequence of Morse lemma, as stated above, is that there exists a neighborhood about the origin in Rn so that it is the only critical point in such neighborhood. Corollary 1. Non-degenerate critical points of a smooth function are isolated. Note that a Morse function defined on a compact manifold has finitely many critical points. The main reason behind the study of Morse functions is to understand the topology of the mani- fold. Thus for a smooth function f : M → R and a ∈ R define the level set Ma := {x ∈ M| f (x) ≤ a}⊂ M. Notice that when a0 is the absolute minimum of f , then Ma is empty for every a < a0. And in the case when a1 is the absolute maximum of f , then Ma = M for every a1 ≤ a. Now we explain what we mean by understandingthe topology of the manifold; one aspect is that the manifold can be constructed from information from a fixed Morse function on it. Consider a compact manifold M, a smooth Morse function f : M → R and for simplicity assume that p0,..., pk are all the critical points, with λi = ind( f ; pi) and λi < λi+1 for i ∈{0,...,k−1}. Thus f achieves its minimum at p0 and ind( f ; p0)= 0; and it achieves its maximum at pk and ind( f ; pk)= n. In orderto build the manifold M from the critical points of f , one starts with the point Mf (p0) = {p0}. Then from Theorem 2 below, it follows that Ma has the same homotopy type has Mf (p0) for a ∈ ( f (p0), f (p1)). By an λ-cell we mean a space homeomorphic to the closed ball of dimension λ. Hence, Ma is homeomorphic to the n-cell for a ∈ ( f (p0), f (p1)). The next step is to analyze the next non-degenerte critical point p1 ∈ M. In this case for a ∈ λ ( f (p1), f (p2)), it follows that Ma has the same homotopytype as Mf (p0) with a 1-cell attached. That ∂ is Ma ≃ Mf (p0) ∪g eλ1 , where g : (eλ1 ) → Mf (p0) is a gluing function. This process continues at every critical point. That is for a ∈ ( f (pi), f (pi+1)) the space Ma as the same homotopytype has to Mf (pi−1) λ λ with an attached i-cell.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Morse-Conley-Floer Homology
    Morse-Conley-Floer Homology Contents 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Dynamics and Topology . 1 1.2 Classical Morse theory, the half-space approach . 4 1.3 Morse homology . 7 1.4 Conley theory . 11 1.5 Local Morse homology . 16 1.6 Morse-Conley-Floer homology . 18 1.7 Functoriality for flow maps in Morse-Conley-Floer homology . 21 1.8 A spectral sequence in Morse-Conley-Floer homology . 23 1.9 Morse-Conley-Floer homology in infinite dimensional systems . 25 1.10 The Weinstein conjecture and symplectic geometry . 29 1.11 Closed characteristics on non-compact hypersurfaces . 32 I Morse-Conley-Floer Homology 39 2 Morse-Conley-Floer homology 41 2.1 Introduction . 41 2.2 Isolating blocks and Lyapunov functions . 45 2.3 Gradient flows, Morse functions and Morse-Smale flows . 49 2.4 Morse homology . 55 2.5 Morse-Conley-Floer homology . 65 2.6 Morse decompositions and connection matrices . 68 2.7 Relative homology of blocks . 74 3 Functoriality 79 3.1 Introduction . 79 3.2 Chain maps in Morse homology on closed manifolds . 86 i CONTENTS 3.3 Homotopy induced chain homotopies . 97 3.4 Composition induced chain homotopies . 100 3.5 Isolation properties of maps . 103 3.6 Local Morse homology . 109 3.7 Morse-Conley-Floer homology . 114 3.8 Transverse maps are generic . 116 4 Duality 119 4.1 Introduction . 119 4.2 The dual complex . 120 4.3 Morse cohomology and Poincare´ duality . 120 4.4 Local Morse homology . 122 4.5 Duality in Morse-Conley-Floer homology . 122 4.6 Maps in cohomology .
    [Show full text]
  • MORSE-BOTT HOMOLOGY 1. Introduction 1.1. Overview. Let Cr(F) = {P ∈ M| Df P = 0} Denote the Set of Critical Points of a Smooth
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE AMERICAN MATHEMATICAL SOCIETY Volume 362, Number 8, August 2010, Pages 3997–4043 S 0002-9947(10)05073-7 Article electronically published on March 23, 2010 MORSE-BOTT HOMOLOGY AUGUSTIN BANYAGA AND DAVID E. HURTUBISE Abstract. We give a new proof of the Morse Homology Theorem by con- structing a chain complex associated to a Morse-Bott-Smale function that reduces to the Morse-Smale-Witten chain complex when the function is Morse- Smale and to the chain complex of smooth singular N-cube chains when the function is constant. We show that the homology of the chain complex is independent of the Morse-Bott-Smale function by using compactified moduli spaces of time dependent gradient flow lines to prove a Floer-type continuation theorem. 1. Introduction 1.1. Overview. Let Cr(f)={p ∈ M| df p =0} denote the set of critical points of a smooth function f : M → R on a smooth m-dimensional manifold M. A critical point p ∈ Cr(f) is said to be non-degenerate if and only if df is transverse to the ∗ zero section of T M at p. In local coordinates this is equivalent to the condition 2 that the m × m Hessian matrix ∂ f has rank m at p. If all the critical points ∂xi∂xj of f are non-degenerate, then f is called a Morse function. A Morse function f : M → R on a finite-dimensional compact smooth Riemann- ian manifold (M,g) is called Morse-Smale if all its stable and unstable manifolds intersect transversally. Such a function gives rise to a chain complex (C∗(f),∂∗), called the Morse-Smale-Witten chain complex.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix an Overview of Morse Theory
    Appendix An Overview of Morse Theory Morse theory is a beautiful subject that sits between differential geometry, topol- ogy and calculus of variations. It was first developed by Morse [Mor25] in the middle of the 1920s and further extended, among many others, by Bott, Milnor, Palais, Smale, Gromoll and Meyer. The general philosophy of the theory is that the topology of a smooth manifold is intimately related to the number and “type” of critical points that a smooth function defined on it can have. In this brief ap- pendix we would like to give an overview of the topic, from the classical point of view of Morse, but with the more recent extensions that allow the theory to deal with so-called degenerate functions on infinite-dimensional manifolds. A compre- hensive treatment of the subject can be found in the first chapter of the book of Chang [Cha93]. There is also another, more recent, approach to the theory that we are not going to touch on in this brief note. It is based on the so-called Morse complex. This approach was pioneered by Thom [Tho49] and, later, by Smale [Sma61] in his proof of the generalized Poincar´e conjecture in dimensions greater than 4 (see the beautiful book of Milnor [Mil56] for an account of that stage of the theory). The definition of Morse complex appeared in 1982 in a paper by Witten [Wit82]. See the book of Schwarz [Sch93], the one of Banyaga and Hurtubise [BH04] or the survey of Abbondandolo and Majer [AM06] for a modern treatment.
    [Show full text]
  • FLOER THEORY and ITS TOPOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS 1. Introduction in Finite Dimensions, One Way to Compute the Homology of a Compact
    FLOER THEORY AND ITS TOPOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS CIPRIAN MANOLESCU Abstract. We survey the different versions of Floer homology that can be associated to three-manifolds. We also discuss their applications, particularly to questions about surgery, homology cobordism, and four-manifolds with boundary. We then describe Floer stable homotopy types, the related Pin(2)-equivariant Seiberg-Witten Floer homology, and its application to the triangulation conjecture. 1. Introduction In finite dimensions, one way to compute the homology of a compact, smooth manifold is by Morse theory. Specifically, we start with a a smooth function f : X ! R and a Riemannian metric g on X. Under certain hypotheses (the Morse and Morse-Smale conditions), we can form a complex C∗(X; f; g) as follows: The generators of C∗(X; f; g) are the critical points of f, and the differential is given by X (1) @x = nxy · y; fyjind(x)−ind(y)=1g where nxy 2 Z is a signed count of the downward gradient flow lines of f connecting x to y. The quantity ind denotes the index of a critical point, that is, the number of negative eigenvalues of the Hessian (the matrix of second derivatives of f) at that point. The homology H∗(X; f; g) is called Morse homology, and it turns out to be isomorphic to the singular homology of X [Wit82, Flo89b, Bot88]. Floer homology is an adaptation of Morse homology to infinite dimensions. It applies to certain classes of infinite dimensional manifolds X and functions f : X ! R, where at critical points of f the Hessian has infinitely many positive and infinitely many negative eigenvalues.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1302.1025V3 [Math.SG] 22 Oct 2015
    HAMILTONIAN FLOER HOMOLOGY FOR COMPACT CONVEX SYMPLECTIC MANIFOLDS SERGEI LANZAT Abstract. We construct absolute and relative versions of Hamiltonian Floer ho- mology algebras for strongly semi-positive compact symplectic manifolds with con- vex boundary, where the ring structures are given by the appropriate versions of the pair-of-pants products. We establish the absolute and relative Piunikhin{Salamon{ Schwarz isomorphisms between these Floer homology algebras and the corresponding absolute and relative quantum homology algebras. As a result, the absolute and relative analogues of the spectral invariants on the group of compactly supported Hamiltonian diffeomorphisms are defined. 1. Introduction. In [14] U. Frauenfelder and F. Schlenk defined the Floer homology for weakly exact compact convex symplectic manifolds. The authors also established the Piunikhin{ Salamon{Schwarz (PSS) isomorphism between the ring of Floer homology and the ring of Morse homology of such manifolds. This in turn led to the construction of the spectral invariants on the group of compactly supported Hamiltonian diffeomor- phisms analogous to the spectral invariants constructed by M. Schwarz in [33] and by Y.- G. Oh in [23] for closed symplectic manifolds. We extend the definitions and the constructions of U. Frauenfelder and F. Schlenk to the case of strongly semi-positive compact convex symplectic manifolds. As a result, we get absolute and relative ver- sions of Hamiltonian Floer homology algebras, where the ring structures are given by the appropriate versions of the pair-of-pants products. We establish the absolute and relative Piunikhin{Salamon{Schwarz isomorphisms between these Floer homology al- gebras and the corresponding absolute and relative quantum homology algebras.
    [Show full text]
  • Parameterized Morse Theory in Low-Dimensional and Symplectic Topology
    Parameterized Morse theory in low-dimensional and symplectic topology David Gay (University of Georgia), Michael Sullivan (University of Massachusetts-Amherst) March 23-March 28, 2014 1 Overview and highlights of workshop Morse theory uses generic functions from smooth manifolds to R (Morse functions) to study the topology of smooth manifolds, and provides, for example, the basic tool for decomposing smooth manifolds into ele- mentary building blocks called handles. Recently the study of parameterized families of Morse functions has been applied in new and exciting ways to understand a diverse range of objects in low-dimensional and sym- plectic topology, such as Morse 2–functions in dimension 4, Heegaard splittings in dimension 3, generating families in contact and symplectic geometry, and n–categories and topological field theories (TFTs) in low dimensions. Here is a brief description of these objects and the ways in which parameterized Morse theory is used in their study: A Morse 2–function is a generic smooth map from a smooth manifold to a smooth 2–dimensional man- ifold (such as R2). Locally Morse 2–functions behave like generic 1–parameter families of Morse functions, but globally they do not have a “time” direction. The singular set of a Morse 2–function is 1–dimensional and maps to a collection of immersed curves with cusps in the base, the “graphic”. Parameterized Morse theory is needed to understand how Morse 2–functions can be used to decompose and reconstruct smooth manifolds [20], especially in dimension 4 when regular fibers are surfaces, to understand uniqueness statements for such decompositions [21], and to use such decompositions to produce computable invariants.
    [Show full text]
  • Morse Functions and Morse Homology
    Morse Functions and Morse Homology Abhineet Agarwal/Sabrina Victor April 2019 1 Morse Functions Let X be a finite dimensional compact smooth manifold, and let f : X ! R be a smooth function. Definition 1.1. A critical point of f is a point p 2 X such that dfjp= 0 : TpX ! R: Also define Crit(f) to be the set of critical points of f. Figure 1: Critical Points of Torus and Sphere ∗ If p is a critical point, we also define the Hessian H(f,p): TpX ! Tp X as follows: Let r be any connection on TX and if v 2 TpX, define: H(f; p)(v) = rv(df) Recall that the connection defines the notion of parallel transport on a vector bundle. Also note that in our definition of the Hessian does not depend on our choice of connection. This is because df vanishes at p and the difference 1 between any two connections is a tensor. Next let x1; :::xn are local coordinates @ ∗ for X near p, then with respect to the bases f g and fdxig for TpX; T X @xi p 2 respectively, the Hessian is given by the matrix @ (f) . This is exactly what we @xi@xj expect from the formula for the hessian above. Remark. Note that the hessian matrix is obviously a symmetric matrix. Then it is a known fact that the hessian is a self-adjoint map from TpX to itself. Definition 1.2. A critical point is nondegenerate if the Hessian does not have zero eigenvalue. Definition 1.3.
    [Show full text]
  • Morse Theory for Lagrange Multipliers and Adiabatic Limits
    MORSE THEORY FOR LAGRANGE MULTIPLIERS AND ADIABATIC LIMITS STEPHEN SCHECTER AND GUANGBO XU Abstract. Given two Morse functions f; µ on a compact manifold M, we study the Morse homology for the Lagrange multiplier function on M ×R which sends (x; η) to f(x)+ηµ(x). Take a product metric on M ×R, and rescale its R-component by a factor λ2. We show that generically, for large λ, the Morse-Smale-Witten chain complex is isomorphic to the one for f and the metric restricted to µ−1(0), with grading shifted by one. On the other hand, for λ near 0, we obtain another chain complex, which is geometrically quite different but has the same singular homology as µ−1(0). Our proofs contain both the implicit function theorem on Banach manifolds and geometric singular perturbation theory. Contents 1. Introduction1 2. Morse homology and Morse-Smale-Witten complex of (F; gλ)4 3. Adiabatic limit λ ! 1 9 4. Fast-slow system associated to the λ ! 0 limit 16 5. Adiabatic limit λ ! 0 23 6. Basic Morse theory and the chain complex C0 34 Appendix A. Geometric singular perturbation theory 36 Appendix B. Choosing the center manifold 41 References 41 1. Introduction Let M be a compact manifold. Suppose f and µ are Morse functions on M, and 0 is a regular value of µ. Then we consider the Lagrange multiplier function F : M × R ! R; (x; η) 7! f(x) + ηµ(x): Date: November 10, 2012. 1991 Mathematics Subject Classification. 57R70, 37D15. Key words and phrases.
    [Show full text]
  • Morse Homology
    Morse Homology Trabajo de Tesis presentado al Departamento de Matem´aticas Presentado por: Juanita Pinz´on Caicedo Asesor: Bernardo Uribe Para optar por el t´ıtulo de Matem´atica Universidad de Los Andes Departamento de Matem´aticas Julio 2007 Contents Introduction ii 1 Preliminary Notions 1 2 Morse Functions 4 2.1 Gradient Flow Lines . 4 2.2 Stable, Unstable submanifolds . 6 2.3 Homotopy . 7 3 Morse-Smale Functions 15 4 The Morse Homology Theorem 18 5 Examples 26 5.1 Complex Projective Spaces . 26 5.2 Real Projective Spaces . 29 A Morse-Bott 36 i Introduction In the present work we study Morse-Smale functions over Riemannian manifolds and the Morse- Smale chain complexes that can be assigned to each one of them. Morse functions are real-valued functions with isolated and nondegenerate critical points, they are the starting point of Morse Theory. The main objective is to prove Morse Homology Theorem, a theorem that relates certain topological properties of a manifold to some information obtained from a real-valued function defined on it. The theorem says that the homology groups found using a triangulation of the manifold defined by the gradient flow lines of Morse-Smale functions are isomorphic to the singular homology groups. Therefore, Morse Homology Theorem allows us to calculate the homology groups of an unknown manifold by studying much simpler objects, namely, a Morse- Smale function and its critical points. Given their importance, Morse functions, critical points and gradient flow lines are the topic of section two. That section also contains a series of results which follow from a detailed observation of those functions.
    [Show full text]
  • Morse-Conley-Floer Homology
    Morse-Conley-Floer Homology T.O. Rot ([email protected]) and R.C.A.M. Vandervorst ([email protected])1 Department of Mathematics, VU University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1081a, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Abstract. The gradient flow of a Morse function on a smooth closed manifold generates, under suitable transversality assumptions, the Morse- Smale-Witten complex. The associated Morse homology is an invariant for the manifold, and equals the singular homology, which yields the classical Morse relations. In this paper we define Morse-Conley-Floer homology, which is an analogous homology theory for isolated invariant sets of smooth, not necessarily gradient-like, flows. We prove invariance properties of the Morse-Conley-Floer homology, and show how it gives rise to the Morse-Conley relations. AMS Subject Class: 37B30, 37C10, 58E05 Keywords: Morse homology, Lyapunov functions, Conley index theory 1. INTRODUCTION arXiv:1305.4074v2 [math.DS] 23 Apr 2014 The aim of this paper is to define an analogue of Morse homology for isolated invariant sets of smooth, not necessarily gradient-like, flows. We first recall how the gradient flow of a Morse gives rise to Morse homology. 1.1. Morse Homology. On a smooth, closed, m-dimensional manifold M the Morse-Smale pairs (f; g), consisting of a smooth function f : M ! R 1Thomas Rot supported by NWO grant 613.001.001. 1 2 T.O. ROT AND R.C.A.M. VANDERVORST and a Riemannian metric g, are characterized by the property that all critical points of f are non-degenerate and all their stable and unstable manifolds with respect to the negative g-gradient flow intersect transversally.
    [Show full text]
  • A Gentle Introduction to Morse Theory
    A GENTLE INTRODUCTION TO MORSE THEORY ALVARO´ DEL PINO Abstract. These are the notes for the Morse theory course within the Utrecht Summer School 2018 for undergrads. Their aim is to introduce the students to the study of manifolds through the use of Morse theory. As such, we assume no background on Differential Topology, but we expect familiarity with Calculus in several variables, point-set Topology, and basic Group Theory. A first course on Algebraic Topology is probably useful to put these results in context (but not really necessary). The final result in the notes is the construction of Morse homology. We will hand-wave through some of the details, but the reader should get a reasonable idea of how the proofs work and how the theory can be applied to examples (surfaces and 3-manifolds). 1. Introduction Today we are going to look at a particular area of Differential Topology called Morse theory. Morse theory will allow us to: • Take a (smooth) manifold and decompose it into elementary pieces. • Conversely, take these elementary pieces and use them to construct manifolds. • Construct an invariant of the manifold called Morse homology. If you do not know what a manifold is, do not worry. We will start with surfaces, which you know well after G. Cavalcanti's course last week. Then we will review what a manifold is, introducing the notions we need along the way. Since our focus will be on surfaces and 3-manifolds, we will be able to draw plenty of pictures! This course is somewhat of a follow-up to Gil's course from last week.
    [Show full text]
  • 6. Morse Theory and Floer Homology
    6. Morse Theory and Floer Homology 6.1 Preliminaries: Aims of Morse Theory Let X be a complete Riemannian manifold, not necessarily of finite dimension 1 .Weshallconsiderasmoothfunctionf on X,i.e.f C∞(X, R)(actually ∈ f C3(X, R)usuallysuffices).TheessentialfeatureofthetheoryofMorse and∈ its generalizations is the relationship between the structure of the critical set of f, C(f):= x X : df (x)=0 { ∈ } (and the space of trajectories for the gradient flow of f) and the topology of X. While some such relations can already be deduced for continuous, not nec- essarily smooth functions, certain deeper structures and more complete re- sults only emerge if additional conditions are imposed onto f besides smooth- ness. Morse theory already yields very interesting results for functions on finite dimensional, compact Riemannian manifolds. However, it also applies in many infinite dimensional situations. For example, it can be used to show the existence of closed geodesics on compact Riemannian manifolds M by applying it to the energy functional on the space X of curves of Sobolev class H1,2 in M,asweshallseein 6.11 below. Let us first informally discuss§ the main features and concepts of the theory at some simple example. We consider a compact Riemannian manifold X diffeomorphic to the 2-sphere S2,andwestudysmoothfunctionsonX; more specifically let us look at two functions f1,f2 whose level set graphs are exhibited in the following figure, 1 In this textbook, we do not systematically discuss infinite dimensional Riemannian mani- folds. The essential point is that they are modeled on Hilbert instead of Euclidean spaces.
    [Show full text]