DOCSLIB.ORG

Social Dominance Orientation Among Women Is Associated with the Endorsement of Benevolent Sexism

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Social Dominance Orientation Among Women Is Associated with the Endorsement of Benevolent Sexism Radke Helena (Orcid ID: 0000-0003-2811-0976) Running Head: SOCIAL DOMINANCE ORIENTATION AND SEXISM Negotiating the hierarchy: Social dominance orientation among women is associated with the endorsement of benevolent sexism Helena R. M. Radke1, Matthew J. Hornsey2, Chris G. Sibley3, and Fiona Kate Barlow2 1 Institute for Psychology, University of Osnabrück 2 School of Psychology, University of Queensland 3 School of Psychology, University of Auckland Word Count: 6916 KEYWORDS: Gender, Political Psychology, Prejudice/Stereotyping, Sexism, Social Dominance Orientation, Status Authors’ Note: Please direct all correspondence to Helena R. M. Radke, Institute for Psychology, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany, 49074, E-Mail: Helena.Radke@uos.de This is the author manuscript accepted for publication and has undergone full peer review but has not been through the copyediting, typesetting, pagination and proofreading process, which may lead to differences between this version and the Version of Record. Please cite this article as doi: 10.1111/ajpy.12176 This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. Figure_1 (1).tiff This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. Radke Helena (Orcid ID: 0000-0003-2811-0976) Running Head: SOCIAL DOMINANCE ORIENTATION AND SEXISM Negotiating the hierarchy: Social dominance orientation among women is associated with the endorsement of benevolent sexism Word Count: 6916 This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. SOCIAL DOMINANCE ORIENTATION AND SEXISM 2 Abstract Objective: We examine how women high in social dominance orientation reconcile supporting a social system that seemingly disadvantages them. We propose that women high in social dominance orientation are more likely to adopt a benevolently sexist worldview. Method: This paper contains data from two survey studies. Study 1 used data from the New Zealand Attitudes and Values Survey (N = 10,485) which is a study of social attitudes, personality, and health outcomes among New Zealanders. Measures of Social Dominance Orientation, as well as Hostile and Benevolent Sexism were included in Study 1. Study 2 consisted of data from a smaller sample of American females (N = 269). In addition to the variables described above, we also measured the extent to which participants perceived the gender hierarchy to be legitimate and their perceived personal need for protection from men. Control variables included hostile sexism and demographic variables (participants’ age, race, and socio-economic status). Results: Results revealed that social dominance orientation was a stronger predictor of benevolent sexism among women compared to men. Serial mediation analysis was then conducted in Study 2. Study 2 confirmed the hypothesised mechanism: Higher social dominance orientation was associated with perceptions that women’s low status is legitimate which, in turn, was associated with higher perceived personal need for protection from men. This was then associated with the endorsement of a benevolently sexist worldview. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that social dominance orientation might help to explain why some women endorse benevolent sexism. KEYWORDS: Gender, Political Psychology, Prejudice/Stereotyping, Sexism, Social Dominance Orientation, Status This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. SOCIAL DOMINANCE ORIENTATION AND SEXISM 3 Key Points What is already known about this topic; • Social dominance orientation (SDO) is a “general attitudinal orientation toward intergroup relations, reflecting whether one generally prefers such relations to be equal, versus hierarchical” (Pratto, Sidanius, Stallworth, & Malle, 1994, p. 742). • SDO is often studied among advantaged group members but not disadvantaged group members • Some studies have found a link between SDO and sexism among men and women What this topic adds; • We contribute to the limited literature investigating SDO among disadvantaged group members • We find that SDO is a stronger predictor of benevolent sexism among women compared to men • We identify a novel process through which SDO is associated with benevolent sexism for women This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. SOCIAL DOMINANCE ORIENTATION AND SEXISM 4 Negotiating the hierarchy: Social dominance orientation among women is associated with the endorsement of benevolent sexism According to Glick and Fiske’s (1996) ambivalent sexism theory, sexism manifests in two complementary ways. Hostile sexism is an overt prejudice usually directed toward women who embody non-traditional gender roles. In contrast, those high in benevolent sexism hold seemingly “positive” views of women, but they do so as part of a broader worldview that obligates men to protect “traditional” women. Both hostile and benevolent sexism have been found to negatively impact women; for example, they are associated with discrimination in the workplace (Good & Rudman, 2010), and the promotion of sexual violence towards women (Abrams, Viki, Masser, & Bohner, 2003). It is not just men, however, who display sexism towards women. In their influential paper investigating cross-cultural differences in hostile and benevolent sexism, Glick and colleagues (2000) reported a perplexing finding – that some women (especially those from gender unequal nations) were just as likely to endorse benevolent sexism as men. Since the publication of these results, researchers have been trying to understand why some women internalise this form of prejudice towards their own group. In this paper we explore the possibility that women who adopt a benevolently sexist worldview do so because they orient towards the world in a socially dominant way. The Relationship between Social Dominance Orientation and Sexism Social dominance orientation (SDO) is a “general attitudinal orientation toward intergroup relations, reflecting whether one generally prefers such relations to be equal, versus hierarchical” (Pratto, Sidanius, Stallworth, & Malle, 1994, p. 742). As one might expect, those group members who are advantaged by the existing social system are more likely to endorse a socially dominant orientation compared to those who are disadvantaged by the social hierarchy. Men, for example, have consistently higher levels of SDO relative to women (Pratto, Sidanius, & Levin, 2006). The link between hostile sexism and SDO is theoretically intuitive and well-supported by the psychological literature. People high in SDO support hierarchies, and so one would expect them to support the (patriarchal) gender hierarchy. Given that hostile sexism is directed towards women who challenge the gender hierarchy (e.g., feminists and career women) it is not surprising that SDO is positively correlated with hostile sexism among both men and women (Christopher & Mull, 2006; Christopher & Wojda, 2008; Fraser, Osborne, & This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved. SOCIAL DOMINANCE ORIENTATION AND SEXISM 5 Sibley, 2015; Kelly, Dubbs, & Barlow, 2013; Kteily, Ho, & Sidanius, 2012; Sibley & Overall, 2011). Some studies also suggest that SDO and benevolent sexism are positively related for both women and men (Christopher & Mull, 2006; Christopher & Wojda, 2008; Fraser et al., 2015; Kteily et al., 2012), although this relationship is smaller and less reliable than the link between SDO and hostile sexism. For example, in an article examining prejudice towards women in the workplace, Christopher and Wojda (2008) found that social dominance orientation (measured using the Pratto et al., [1994] 14-item scale) and benevolent sexism (measured using the Glick & Fiske [1996] 11-item scale) were positively and significantly correlated (.27) in a sample of 349 U.S residents. In another paper, Fraser et al. (2015) investigated whether benevolent sexism moderated the relationship between social dominance orientation and support for gender-based affirmative action in a nationally representative sample of over 5,000 New Zealanders. They measured SDO using the six items from the original SDO scale (Pratto et al., 1994) and five items from the benevolent sexism scale (Glick & Fiske, 1996), and found that SDO was positively and significantly associated with benevolent sexism for both men (.11) and women (.20). These results, however, are counter to other research which has found an inconsistent relationship between SDO and benevolent sexism for men and women. In a paper investigating gender differences in intimate partner preferences, a positive and significant correlation between SDO (measured using 4 items from the Sidanius & Pratto [1999] scale) and benevolent sexism (measured using 11 items from the Glick & Fiske [1996]) was found for women (.21) but not for men (.10) in a sample of 492 New Zealand undergraduate students (Sibley & Overall, 2011). Mosso and colleagues (2013) found no relationship between SDO (measured using the SDO6 scale; Pratto et al., [2006]) and benevolent sexism (measured using the 11-item Glick & Fiske [1996] scale) among women (-.03) and men (-.12) in a sample of 544 Italian students (with ages ranging from 14 to 20 years). They did, however, find a positive and significant relationship between SDO and benevolent sexism among women (.27) and men (.18) in a sample of 297 American students (with ages again ranging from 14 to 20 years). This article was investigating the role of legitimizing ideologies (i.e., SDO, system justification) when predicting ambivalent sexism across cultures. These conflicting results suggest the need for further
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Development of Ambivalent Sexism in Childhood: Effect on Future Career Aspirations
    IUL School of Social Sciences Department of Social and Organizational Psychology Development of Ambivalent Sexism in Childhood: Effect on Future Career Aspirations Stefanie Richters Dissertation submitted as partial requirement for the conferral of Erasmus Mundus European Master in the Psychology of Global Mobility, Inclusion and Diversity in Society Supervisor: Ricardo Borges Rodrigues, PhD, Invited Assistant Professor ISCTE – University Institute of Lisbon Co-supervisor: Thomas Schubert, PhD, Professor University of Oslo June 2019 Running head: DEVELOPMENT OF AMBIVALENT SEXISM IN CHILDHOOD IUL School of Social Sciences Department of SoCial and Organizational PsyChology Development of Ambivalent Sexism in Childhood: EffeCt on Future Career Aspirations Stefanie RiChters Dissertation submitted as partial requirement for the conferral of Erasmus Mundus European Master in the Psychology of Global Mobility, Inclusion and Diversity in Society Supervisor: RiCardo Borges Rodrigues, PhD, Invited Assistant Professor ISCTE – University Institute of Lisbon Co-supervisor: Thomas SChubert, PhD, Professor University of Oslo June 2019 DEVELOPMENT OF AMBIVALENT SEXISM IN CHILDHOOD Acknowledgements I would like to thank my supervisor RiCardo Rodrigues and my co-supervisor Thomas SChubert for everything I have learnt from you, for your help and support and for the interesting disCussions. Thank you so much for your encouragement, for believing in me and in the projeCt and for all your efforts without whiCh I could not have realized it. Thank you, Margarida and Carolina – it was great to work with you two and you have helped me a lot. Thanks for your support and your important input. Margarida – thanks for your persistence in teaChing me Portuguese. Moreover, I would like to thank Felix, Slobodan, Sarmad and Leonor for all the disCussions that have inspired me and made me look at things differently.
    [Show full text]
  • Considering the Effect of Sexism on Psychological Intimate Partner
    The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context (2019) 11(2) 61-69 The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context https://journals.copmadrid.org/ejpalc Considering the Effect of Sexism on Psychological Intimate Partner Violence: A Study with Imprisoned Men Joel Juarros-Basterretxeaa, Nickola Overallb, Juan Herreroa, and Francisco J. Rodríguez-Díaza, c aUniversity of Oviedo, Spain; bThe University of Auckland, New Zealand; cAndrés Bello University, Chile ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Article history: Psychological intimate partner violence (IPV) is the most prevalent form of IPV and is often thought to precede physical Received 20 September 2018 IPV. However, psychological IPV often occurs independently of other forms of IPV, and it can often emerge during routine Accepted 12 March 2019 relationship interactions. Using data from imprisoned male offenders we investigate the effect of hostile and benevolent Available online 4 April 2019 sexist attitudes on psychological IPV and the hypothesized mediating role of positive attitudes toward IPV and this effect when accounting for broader risk factors at the levels of community (social disorder), family-of-origin (conflictive climate in family of origin), and personality (antisocial personality traits) variables. The sample involved 196 male inmates of the Keywords: Penitentiary Center of Villabona (Asturias, Spain). Structural equation models result showed significant total, direct and Intimate partner violence Psychological aggression indirect effect of hostile sexism on psychological IPV, but not of benevolent sexism. When individual, family-of-origin, Ecological framework and community variables were considered, however, hostile sexism showed only an indirect effect on psychological IPV Sexist attitudes via positive attitudes toward abuse.
    [Show full text]
  • Perceptions of Organizational Justice and Ambivalent Sexism: the Moderating Role of Individualism-Collectivism1
    Revista de Psicología Vol. 35 (1), 2017 (ISSN 0254-9247) Perceptions of organizational justice and ambivalent sexism: The moderating role of individualism-collectivism1 Juan Diego Vaamonde2, Alicia Omar3 Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET); Universidad Nacional de Rosario-Argentina The aim of the present study was to explore the association between perceptions of inter- personal/informational justice and ambivalent sexism among Argentinean employees, and to examine the possible role that collectivism and individualism exert on this association. Participants (128 men and 120 women) completed a battery of instruments to measure the variables of interest. Results showed that perceptions of interpersonal and informational justice were negatively associated with hostile sexism, and that, unexpectedly, perceptions of informational justice were positively associated with benevolent sexism. Vertical collectivism and vertical individualism moderated the relationships between perceptions of interpersonal justice and hostile sexism. Findings are discussed in light of their theoretical and practical implications. Suggestions for future research are provided. Keywords: Sexism, values, interpersonal justice, informational justice Percepciones de justicia organizacional y sexismo ambivalente: el rol moderador del individualismo-colectivismo El objetivo del estudio fue, por un lado, explorar las relaciones entre percepciones de jus- ticia interpersonal/informacional y sexismo ambivalente en empleados argentinos, y, por otro lado, examinar el posible rol que el individualismo y el colectivismo ejercen sobre tales relaciones. Los participantes (128 varones y 120 mujeres) completaron una batería 1 This research was partially supported by the National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET). 2 PhD in Psychology and Postdoctoral Fellow at the National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Research Institute, School of Humanities and Arts, National Uni- versity of Rosario.
    [Show full text]
  • Authoritarianism, Social Dominance, Religiosity and Ambivalent Sexism As Predictors of Rape Myth Acceptance
    International Journal of Gender and Women’s Studies June 2019, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 79-84 ISSN: 2333-6021 (Print), 2333-603X (Online) Copyright © The Author(s). All Rights Reserved. Published by American Research Institute for Policy Development DOI: 10.15640/ijgws.v7n1p10 URL: https://doi.org/10.15640/ijgws.v7n1p10 Authoritarianism, Social Dominance, Religiosity and Ambivalent Sexism as Predictors of Rape Myth Acceptance Kallia Manoussaki1 & Ann Hayne2 Abstract The study investigates rape myth acceptance (RMA) in relation to 5 attitudinal dimensions, namely strength of religious faith, religious fundamentalism, authoritarianism, social dominance and ambivalent sexism. The findings indicate significant positive relationships between all five dimensions and RMA and provide evidence that gender roles, sexism and conservatism predict victim blaming attitudes. These findings emphasise the need for prevention work and the need for inclusive education. It is hoped that a deeper understanding of rape mythology will promote a more facilitative culture for victims, an increase in progressive policies, higher report and convictions rates and enhanced support. Key words: Rape Myth Acceptance, Authoritarianism, Social Dominance, Ambivalent Sexism, Benevolent Sexism, Religiosity 1. Introduction The increase in media exposure of gender based violence worldwide as provided many opportunities for affirmative action against it. At the same time however, it has exposed and reignited entrenched social attitudes that sustain it. For example, as more accurate accounts of the prevalence and under-reporting of rape and sexual assault are highlighted, misogynistic attitudes flood social media, offering unfettered routes to views with little likelihood of repercussion. Increased awareness of specific issues pertaining to gender based violence has led to number Governmental responses in the UK, such as anti-stalking and domestic abuse legislation targeting coercive control.
    [Show full text]
  • Confronting and Reducing Sexism: a Call for Research on Intervention
    UC Merced UC Merced Previously Published Works Title Confronting and Reducing Sexism: A Call for Research on Intervention Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/7fv3k41w Journal Journal of Social Issues, 70(4) ISSN 0022-4537 Authors Becker, JC Zawadzki, MJ Shields, SA Publication Date 2014-12-01 DOI 10.1111/josi.12081 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Journal of Social Issues, Vol. 70, No. 4, 2014, pp. 603--614 doi: 10.1111/josi.12081 Confronting and Reducing Sexism: A Call for Research on Intervention ∗ Julia C. Becker University of Osnabrueck Matthew J. Zawadzki University of California, Merced Stephanie A. Shields The Pennsylvania State University This article presents the current state of research on confronting and reducing sexism. We first provide a systematic overview about prior work on confronting sexism. We identify gaps in the literature by outlining situational and contextual factors that are important in confronting sexism and introduce how these are addressed in the current volume. Second, we review prior work on reducing sexism. Compared to research on reducing other forms of prejudice, research on interventions to reduce sexism is rare. We explain why mechanisms that are successful in reducing other forms of prejudice cannot simply be adapted to reducing sexism. We then outline how the articles of this issue promote research, theory, and policy on reducing sexism. In conclusion, the aim of this issue is to bring together novel theoretical approaches as well as empirically tested methods that identify key antecedents and consequences of diverse ways of confronting and reducing sexism.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Ambivalent Sexism and Gender Stereotypes Among Children and Adolescents: Effects on Behavioral Intention to Stereotypic Task Division
    IUL School of Social Sciences Department of Social and Organizational Psychology Development of Ambivalent Sexism and Gender Stereotypes among Children and Adolescents: Effects on Behavioral Intention to Stereotypic Task Division Margarida Gonçalves Cavadas Dissertation submitted as partial requirement for the conferral of Master in Social and Organizational Psychology Supervisor: Ricardo Borges Rodrigues, PhD, Invited Assistant Professor ISCTE – University Institute of Lisbon Co-supervisor: Leonor Pereira da Costa, MSc, Researcher Investigator CIS – University Institute of Lisbon September 2018 IUL School of Social Sciences Department of Social and Organizational Psychology Development of Ambivalent Sexism and Gender Stereotypes among Children and Adolescents: Effects on Behavioral Intention to Stereotypic Task Division Margarida Gonçalves Cavadas Dissertation submitted as partial requirement for the conferral of Master in Social and Organizational Psychology Supervisor: Ricardo Borges Rodrigues, PhD, Invited Assistant Professor ISCTE – University Institute of Lisbon Co-supervisor: Leonor Pereira da Costa, MSc, Researcher Investigator CIS – University Institute of Lisbon September 2018 I Acknowledgements I would like to begin to thank my supervisor, Ricardo Rodrigues, and my co- supervisor, Leonor Pereira da Costa. Thank you for walking with me during this time, for teaching me, for your patience, for your persistence, for believing in me. For your kindness and your trust. I honestly believe that I would have not made it without the two of you. A special thank you for my psychologist, who listened me, who thought me to change my perspective, to see things in a brighter light, to see me in a different, more confident, perspective. It has been a big journey and I can’t thank you enough.
    [Show full text]
  • A Validity Analysis Based on the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory Anuario De Psicología, Vol
    Anuario de Psicología ISSN: 0066-5126 anuario-psicologia@ub.edu Universitat de Barcelona España León-Ramírez, Beatriz; Ferrando, Pere J. Assessing sexism in a sample of Mexican students: A validity analysis based on the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory Anuario de Psicología, vol. 43, núm. 3, septiembre-diciembre, 2013, pp. 335-347 Universitat de Barcelona Barcelona, España Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=97030658005 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Anuario de Psicología/The UB Journal of Psychology 2013, vol. 43, nº 3, 335-347 © 2013, Facultat de Psicologia Universitat de Barcelona Assessing sexism in a sample of Mexican students: A validity analysis based on the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory Beatriz León-Ramírez Pere J. Ferrando Universitat Rovira i Virgili The first aim of this study was to assess the psychometric properties (structure, dimensionality and accuracy of measurement) of the Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (ASI: Glick and Fiske, 1996) in the Spanish version (Expósito et al., 1998) for its use in the Mexican context. Secondly, it was assessed whether the variables sex and socio-economical status were related to the sexist attitudes. Analyses were carried out based on a sample of 396 university students. Results confirmed the cross-cultural invariance and appropriate psychometric properties of the ASI in the Mexican sample. Furthermore, both sex and socio-economical status were found to be related to certain sub-dimensions of sexism.
    [Show full text]
  • Ambivalent Sexism and Positive Illusions of Physical Attractiveness in Heterosexual Romantic Relationships
    Marquette University e-Publications@Marquette Dissertations, Theses, and Professional Dissertations (1934 -) Projects Ambivalent Sexism and Positive Illusions of Physical Attractiveness in Heterosexual Romantic Relationships Michaela Engdahl Marquette University Follow this and additional works at: https://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu Part of the Social Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Engdahl, Michaela, "Ambivalent Sexism and Positive Illusions of Physical Attractiveness in Heterosexual Romantic Relationships" (2015). Dissertations (1934 -). 514. https://epublications.marquette.edu/dissertations_mu/514 AMBIVALENT SEXISM AND POSITIVE ILLUSIONS OF PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS IN HETEROSEXUAL ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS By Michaela M. Engdahl, B.A., M.S. A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Graduate School, Marquette University, in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Milwaukee, Wisconsin May 2015 ABSTRACT AMBIVALENT SEXISM AND POSITIVE ILLUSIONS OF PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS IN HETEROSEXUAL ROMANTIC RELATIONSHIPS Michaela M. Engdahl, B.A., M.S. Marquette University, 2015 While considerable research has been devoted to the impact that the mainstream media and parents have on body image, less is known about how romantic partners’ beliefs and perceptions impact individuals’ evaluations of both their physical selves and their relationships. This study examined the influence of individually-endorsed cultural sexism on romantic partners’ tendency to hold positive illusions about their significant others’ physical appearance and the impact of sexism and positive illusions of physical attractiveness on body esteem and relationship satisfaction. Evidence of positive illusions of physical attractiveness was found, but there was no significant association between gender and positive illusion endorsement. There was no significant correlation between men’s benevolent sexism (BS) and their endorsement of positive illusions.
    [Show full text]
  • Ambivalent Sexism, Well-Being, and Stigma Consciousness 2
    AMBIVALENT SEXISM, WELL-BEING, AND STIGMA CONSCIOUSNESS 2 Abstract Although women have made great strides in society working to close the gender gap, sexism still exists that may impact women’s psychological wellness. The current research examines the relationship between sexist attitudes toward women, stigma consciousness, and psychological well-being among 235 female participants from a medium sized Southern city. Participants took part in the research by completing a cross-sectional survey about the health and well-being of women in exchange for class credit or cash. The primary hypothesis was that stigma consciousness would serve as a mediator of the relationship between sexist attitudes toward women and psychological well-being. Results indicated a positive relationship between hostile sexism and psychological well- being and a negative relationship between hostile sexism and stigma consciousness. However, the relationship between stigma consciousness and psychological well-being was not significant. Therefore, stigma consciousness did not serve as a mediator between sexism and psychological well-being. This not significant relationship is explained in accord with past research. Possible reasons for the positive relationship between holding more sexist views toward women and having greater psychological well-being are discussed. AMBIVALENT SEXISM, WELL-BEING, AND STIGMA CONSCIOUSNESS 3 Ambivalent Sexism and Psychological Well-being Among Women: Examining the Role of Stigma Consciousness The recent U.S. election season of 2012 highlighted women’s rights issues including views on abortion and equal pay. With these issues at the forefront, it is crucial that we focus on how these important women’s social subjects relate to their psychological well-being.
    [Show full text]
  • Role Congruity Theory of Prejudice Toward Female Leaders
    Psychological Review Copyright 2002 by the American Psychological Association, Inc. 2002, Vol. 109, No. 3, 573–598 0033-295X/02/$5.00 DOI: 10.1037//0033-295X.109.3.573 Role Congruity Theory of Prejudice Toward Female Leaders Alice H. Eagly Steven J. Karau Northwestern University Southern Illinois University at Carbondale A role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders proposes that perceived incongruity between the female gender role and leadership roles leads to 2 forms of prejudice: (a) perceiving women less favorably than men as potential occupants of leadership roles and (b) evaluating behavior that fulfills the prescriptions of a leader role less favorably when it is enacted by a woman. One consequence is that attitudes are less positive toward female than male leaders and potential leaders. Other consequences are that it is more difficult for women to become leaders and to achieve success in leadership roles. Evidence from varied research paradigms substantiates that these consequences occur, especially in situations that heighten perceptions of incongruity between the female gender role and leadership roles. Leadership has been predominantly a male prerogative in cor- advanced degrees (U.S. Bureau of the Census, 2000). In contrast, porate, political, military, and other sectors of society. Although statistics pertaining to major leadership roles consistently show women have gained increased access to supervisory and middle inequality: Women constitute 4% of the five highest earning management positions, they remain quite
    [Show full text]
  • Gender, Perpetrator Attractiveness, and Ambivalent Sexism As Predictors of Victim Blaming, Minimization, and Subjective Fear in Stalking Incidents
    Psychology, 2020, 11, 1675-1690 https://www.scirp.org/journal/psych ISSN Online: 2152-7199 ISSN Print: 2152-7180 Gender, Perpetrator Attractiveness, and Ambivalent Sexism as Predictors of Victim Blaming, Minimization, and Subjective Fear in Stalking Incidents Niwako Yamawaki, Jane Green, Marissa James, Tatyana Brenes S., Abena Yirenya-Tawiah, Alice Nuo-Yi Wang Department of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, USA How to cite this paper: Yamawaki, N., Abstract Green, J., James, M., Brenes S., T., Yirenya- Tawiah, A., & Wang, A. N.-Y. (2020). Gender, The aim of this study was to examine how participant gender affected indi- Perpetrator Attractiveness, and Ambivalent viduals’ perceptions toward stalking and stalking victims. We also explored Sexism as Predictors of Victim Blaming, how the attractiveness of stalking perpetrators impacted perceptions of stalk- Minimization, and Subjective Fear in Stalk- ing along with the role of ambivalent sexism. A total of 120 undergraduate ing Incidents. Psychology, 11, 1675-1690. https://doi.org/10.4236/psych.2020.1111106 students in the research pool were randomly assigned to read one of two stalk- ing scenarios that either portrayed the perpetrator as attractive or non-attrac- Received: October 3, 2020 tive. Participants completed related measures of victim blame attribution, stal- Accepted: November 14, 2020 king minimization, subjective fear, and ambivalent sexism. We performed a 2 Published: November 17, 2020 × 2 MANOVA, a follow up ANOVA, and a series of multiple regression ana- Copyright © 2020 by author(s) and lyses to test the hypotheses, which were supported. The results revealed that Scientific Research Publishing Inc. men were more likely to blame the victim, minimize the stalking incident, and This work is licensed under the Creative feel less subjective fear for the victim than did women.
    [Show full text]
  • An Intersectional Approach to Racial and Gend
    Running Head: IMPLICIT AMBIVALENT RACIST SEXISM Implicit Ambivalent Racist Sexism: An Intersectional Approach to Racial and Gender Bias An Honors Thesis for the Department of Psychology Megan Warshawsky Tufts University, 2018 IMPLICIT AMBIVALENT RACIST SEXISM Acknowledgments Funding for this research project was granted by the Tufts University Undergraduate Research Fund. The author would like to extend her deepest gratitude to her mentor Chelsea Crittle; thank you for being patient, available and a great source of knowledge during this past year, this thesis would not have happened without you. Thank you to Dr. Keith Maddox, the author’s thesis advisor; you supported me in pursuing this thesis and your guidance, patience and encouragement over the course of this process have made all the difference. Thank you to Dr. Samuel Sommers, the author’s academic advisor; you have been a great support and are so generous to serve on my thesis committee. Thank you to the author’s friends and family who have been her greatest cheerleaders during this time; I appreciate it more than you know. 1 IMPLICIT AMBIVALENT RACIST SEXISM Abstract Recent publicity of sexual misconduct (e.g., O’Brien & Segall, 2017) often fails to address the impact of intersectionality on implicit sexist associations. Intersectionality theory posits specific consequences for Women of Color (Crenshaw, 1989) including varied perceptions of femininity across race (‘gendered race theory,’; Schug et al., 2017) and unique prejudices targeting Black women (‘misogynoir,’; Bailey, 2010). Such are often overlooked due to lacking social salience of oppressed groups like Black women (‘invisibility’; Books, 1998; Fryberg & Townsend, 2008). ‘Ambivalent sexism’ posits two disparate valences of sexism: perceptually negative ‘hostile sexism’ (HS) targeting non-traditional women, and positive ‘benevolent sexism’ (BS) targeting traditionally feminine women (Glick & Fiske, 1996).
    [Show full text]