Ecoregions of Idaho 117° 116° Ecoregions denote areas of general similarity in ecosystems and in the type, quality, and quantity of environmental resources; they are designed to serve as a spatial framework for the research, assessment, management, and monitoring of ecosystems and ecosystem components. By recognizing the spatial differences in the capacities 10 Columbia Plateau 49° CANADA and potentials of ecosystems, ecoregions stratify the environment by its probable response to disturbance (Bryce and others, 1999). These general purpose regions are K 49° 10f Dissected Loess Uplands oo 15h critical for structuring and implementing ecosystem management strategies across federal agencies, state agencies, and nongovernment organizations that are responsible te n for different types of resources within the same geographical areas (Omernik and others, 2000). 10h Palouse Hills 15h a
i
R 10j Nez Perce Prairie
i The approach used to compile this map is based on the premise that ecological regions can be identified through the analysis of the spatial patterns and the composition
v
e 10l Lower Snake and Clearwater Canyons r of biotic and abiotic phenomena that affect or reflect differences in ecosystem quality and integrity (Wiken, 1986; Omernik, 1987, 1995). These phenomena include geology, physiography, vegetation, climate, soils, land use, wildlife, and hydrology. 15m 11 Blue Mountains Bonners The relative importance of each characteristic varies from one ecological region to another regardless of the hierarchical level. A Roman numeral hierarchical scheme has 11d Melange Priest Ferry Lake been adopted for different levels of ecological regions. Level I is the coarsest level, dividing North America into 15 ecological regions. Level II divides the continent into 11e Wallowas/Seven Devils Mountains 15y 52 regions (Commission for Environmental Cooperation Working Group, 1997). At level III, the continental United States contains 104 ecoregions and the conterminous 11f Canyons and Dissected Highlands 15h 15 United States has 84 ecoregions (United States Environmental Protection Agency [USEPA], 2000). Level IV is a further subdivision of level III ecoregions. Explanations 11g Canyons and Dissected Uplands P of the methods used to define the USEPA’s ecoregions are given in Omernik (1995), Omernik and others (2000), Griffith and others (1994), and Gallant and others r 15q i e 11i Continental Zone Foothills 15 s (1989). t
R 11l Mesic Forest Zone
i v
e 15h 15h Libby Idaho is made up of semiarid shrub- and grass-covered plains, irrigated agricultural valleys, volcanic plateaus, forested mountains, woodland- and shrubland-covered r 11m Subalpine–Alpine Zone 15w Sandpoint hills, glaciated peaks, lava fields, and wetlands. Ecological diversity is enormous. There are 10 level III ecoregions and 71 level IV ecoregions in Idaho and many ille R. continue into ecologically similar parts of adjacent states. re 12 Snake River Plain O Pend The level III and IV ecoregion map on this poster was compiled at a scale of 1:250,000 and depicts revisions and subdivisions of earlier level III ecoregions that were 12a Treasure Valley 15u originally compiled at a smaller scale (USEPA, 2000; Omernik, 1987). This poster is part of a collaborative project primarily between USEPA Region X, USEPA 12b Lava Fields Lake National Health and Environmental Effects Research Laboratory (Corvallis, Oregon), Idaho Division of Environmental Quality (IDEQ), United States Department of 12c Camas Prairie Pend Agriculture–Forest Service (USFS), United States Department of Agriculture–Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS), United States Department of the 12d Dissected Plateaus and Teton Basin 48° Oreille Interior–Bureau of Land Management (BLM), and United States Department of the Interior–Geological Survey (USGS)–Earth Resources Observation Systems (EROS) 48° Data Center. 12e Upper Snake River Plain 15s 12f Semiarid Foothills The project is associated with an interagency effort to develop a common framework of ecological regions. Reaching that objective requires recognition of the 12g Eastern Snake River Basalt Plains 15w differences in the conceptual approaches and mapping methodologies applied to develop the most common ecoregion-type frameworks, including those developed by the USFS (Bailey and others, 1994), the USEPA (Omernik, 1987, 1995), and the NRCS (U.S. Department of Agriculture–Soil Conservation Service, 1981). As each of these 12h Mountain Home Uplands 15o frameworks is further refined, their differences are becoming less discernible. Regional collaborative projects such as this one in Idaho, where agreement has been 12i Magic Valley Coeur d’Alene reached among multiple resource management agencies, are a step toward attaining consensus and consistency in ecoregion frameworks for the entire nation. 12j Unwooded Alkaline Foothills Spokane 15h Coeur 13 Central Basin and Range d’Alene Lake Kellogg 115° 114° 13b Shadscale-Dominated Saline Basins Literature Cited: 15h 13c Sagebrush Basins and Slopes 15 Bailey, R.G., Avers, P.E., King, T., and McNab, W.H., eds., 1994, Ecoregions and subregions of the United States 13d Woodland- and Shrub-Covered Low (map) (supplementary table of map unit descriptions compiled and edited by McNab, W.H. and Bailey, R.G.): Mountains 15h Washington, D.C., USFS, scale 1:7,500,000. 13i Malad and Cache Valleys Saint St. Joe 15v River Bryce, S.A., Omernik, J.M., and Larsen, D.P., 1999, Ecoregions – a geographic framework to guide risk 10h Maries 41 characterization and ecosystem management: Environmental Practice, v. 1, no. 3, p. 141-155. 15 Northern Rockies
N
O 15f Grassy Potlatch Ridges
T 15p Commission for Environmental Cooperation Working Group, 1997, Ecological regions of North America – toward G 15 a common perspective: Montreal, Commission for Environmental Cooperation, 71 p. 15h High Northern Rockies
N I 15i Clearwater Mountains and Breaks H Gallant, A.L., Whittier, T.R., Larsen, D.P., Omernik, J.M., and Hughes, R.M., 1989, Regionalization as a tool for 47° S 15j Lower Clearwater Canyons
A managing environmental resources: Corvallis, Oregon, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, EPA/600/3- 47 W 15h ° 89/060, 152 p. 15m Kootenai Valley 15h 15n Weippe Prairie 15h Missoula Griffith, G.E., Omernik, J.M., Wilton, T.F., and Pierson, S.M., 1994, Ecoregions and subregions of Iowa – a framework for water quality assessment and management: Journal of the Iowa Academy of Science, v. 101, no. 15o Coeur d’Alene Metasedimentary Zone 1, p. 5-13. 15p St. Joe Schist–Gneiss Zone Moscow Omernik, J.M., 1987, Ecoregions of the conterminous United States (map supplement): Annals of the Association 15q Purcell–Cabinet–North Bitterroot 15f rk Clearwa iver 10 Dworshak Fo ter R h of American Geographers, v. 77, no. 1, p. 118-125, scale 1:7,500,000. Mountains Reservoir rt 15h No 15s Spokane Valley Outwash Plains 10h Omernik, J.M., 1995, Ecoregions – a framework for environmental management, in Davis, W.S. and Simon, T.P., 16b 17 eds., Biological assessment and criteria-tools for water resource planning and decision making: Boca Raton, 15u Inland Maritime Foothills and Valleys Clearwat 15i Florida, Lewis Publishers, p. 49-62. er River Orofino 15v Northern Idaho Hills and Low Relief 10l 15j 15n Omernik, J.M., Chapman, S.S., Lillie, R.A., and Dumke, R.T., 2000, Ecoregions of Wisconsin: Transactions of the Mountains Lewiston 15f er Wisconsin Academy of Sciences, Arts, and Letters, v. 88, p. 77-103. 15w Western Selkirk Maritime Forest 10f iv R 16b sa U.S. Department of Agriculture–Soil Conservation Service, 1981, Land resource regions and major land resource 15y Selkirk Mountains ch 16h Lo 16h 16h areas of the United States: Agriculture Handbook 296, 156 p. 10l Nezperce 16 Idaho Batholith U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2000, Level III ecoregions of the continental United States (revision of 16b Lochsa Uplands Omernik, 1987): Corvallis, Oregon, USEPA – National Health and Environmental Effects Research 16c Lochsa–Selway–Clearwater Canyons 11f 16c Laboratory, Map M-1, various scales. 10j 16e 16d Dry, Partly Wooded Mountains Selway River Wiken, E., 1986, Terrestrial ecozones of Canada: Ottawa, Environment Canada, Ecological Land Classification 16e Glaciated Bitterroot Mountains and 46° Series no. 19, 26 p. Canyons 46° 11f SCALE 1:1 350 000 16f Foothill Shrublands–Grasslands Grangeville 16g High Glacial Drift-Filled Valleys 11g 16h 15 10 5 0 30 60 mi 16h High Idaho Batholith Sn ak e 16 16i South Clearwater Forested Mountains R 11 i 16i 30 20 10 0 60 120 km v 16j Hot Dry Canyons e r 16h Albers equal area projection 16k Southern Forested Mountains Standard parallels 43° N and 48° N 17 Middle Rockies 16h 113° 112° 111° 17e Barren Mountains Ri 16i lmon ver 17h High Elevation Rockland Alpine Zone Riggins Sa 17ad 16j 17j West Yellowstone Plateau Hells Canyon NRA 11e
r 17l Gneissic–Schistose Forested Mountains
e
v 16h i 17n Cold Valleys R er n v 16h o i 17o Partly Forested Mountains R m l n Salmon a o Dillon 17aa Dry Intermontane Sagebrush Valleys S 16h 11m m 11l k l 16h
a 17ab Dry Gneissic–Schistose–Volcanic Hills F
S 16k th 16h k 17ad Western Beaverhead Mountains
u r o 45° 11e S o 45°
F
17 e 11f 16g l 18 Wyoming Basin
d
11i d i 18c Wet Valleys
M McCall Camas C r 18d Semiarid Bear Hills r e v 16g i 11d R
L 19 Wasatch and Uinta Mountains n em o 17h h 16h m i 19d Wasatch Montane Zone l R 17e 16h a iv 11d Cascade S er 19f Semiarid Foothills Reservoir P a h 16h 16h s 17l 80 Northern Basin and Range im 16k e ro MON 80a Dissected High Lava Plateau Challis i TANA 17e 11i R 80b Semiarid Hills and Low Mountains iv 17e 17aa 17e e 17e r 80c High Elevation Forests and Shrublands Weiser 12j 12f 17j 16g 80e High Desert Wetlands 16g 17ab Dubois 80f Owyhee Uplands and Canyons Stanley 17e 12 16d 17e 17ab 80h Saltbush-Dominated Valleys 16j iver 16h o 80i Sagebrush Steppe Valleys R s F rk 12j ry 17h 12g n 17e L e 80j Semiarid Uplands te i H 44° t 17h t 44° e t 17e l 80k Partly Forested Mountains y e a L Saint P o 16h 17ab s Anthony Emmett t 12d R iv e 16k r 17h 12e Rexburg Level III ecoregion 12j Idaho Driggs City 17e Level IV ecoregion Caldwell 16h 16h 16h Ketchum W County boundary 12a Rigby Y
r O State boundary Boise e Arco M iv Nampa R I N International boundary Bi st 17h 16h 16d g Lo Idaho G N 12d O Falls 17n G Hailey E 12b R 16f
O Craters of the 16f Moon NM PRINCIPAL AUTHORS: Chad L. McGrath (NRCS), Alan J. 80f 12h 12c 12b 17 Woods (Dynamac Corporation), James M. Omernik (USEPA), Fairfield 80c Sandra A. Bryce (Dynamac Corporation), Mike Edmondson Murphy 12c 12f 12b Palisades 12g Reservoir (IDEQ), John A. Nesser (USFS), James Shelden (USFS), Rex 12f 12g 17n C. Crawford (Washington Department of Natural Resources), Blackfoot 80b Jeffrey A. Comstock (Indus Corporation), and Milton D. Mountain 17o Plocher (Dynamac Corporation). Home 12i American Falls 12e Grays 43° 80k 12a Reservoir Lake 43° COLLABORATORS AND CONTRIBUTORS: Erwin Cowley (Dry) 80j Snake River 80c (BLM), Carl Davis (USFS), Don A. Essig (IDEQ), Jerry 12j Blackfoot Freeouf (USFS), Pat Green (USFS), Glenn Griffith (NRCS), Gooding Shoshone 17o 12i Pocatello Reservoir Jimmy Kagan (Oregon Natural Heritage Program), Scott 12b 80c Lambert (Washington State University), Duane A. Lammers 80i (USFS), John Lott (USFS), Thomas R. Loveland (USGS), 80 12i American 80c Soda Terry Maret (USGS), Michael McIntyre (IDEQ), Christopher 80j Falls Springs 80a Jerome 80c Mebane (IDEQ), Neil Peterson (NRCS), Thor D. Thorson (NRCS), and Bill Ypsilantis (BLM). B Rupert r Shoshone Lake u n Falls Walcott e 80c REVIEWERS: Arthur C. Zack (USFS, Idaho Panhandle
a Twin
u Falls National Forest), Gerald J. Niehoff (USFS, Idaho Panhandle
R Burley 80i 80c
80j i 80i National Forest), and Thomas M. Rice (USFS, Rocky Mountain v
e r Research Station). 80a 80i 19f 80c Owyhe Montpelier CITING THIS POSTER: McGrath C.L., Woods A.J., Omernik, e Ri 80c ver 80h 80c J.M., Bryce, S.A., Edmondson, M., Nesser, J.A., Shelden, J., 80i 18d 80c 18c Crawford, R.C., Comstock, J.A., and Plocher, M.D., 2002, 80b 80b 13i 19d Ecoregions of Idaho (color poster with map, descriptive text, 80e 80b Malad 80c City summary tables, and photographs): Reston, Virginia, U.S. 80i 13i 80c Bear Geological Survey (map scale 1:1,350,000). 80j 80i 13c 18d 80a 13b 13d Preston Lake 42° 80j 13b 42° This project was partially supported by funds from the USEPA- NEVADA UTAH Office of Research and Development's Environmental 80 80 13 19 18 Monitoring and Assessment Program through contract 68-C6- 005 to Dynamac Corporation. 117° 116° 115° 114° 113° 112° INTERIOR—G EOLOG ICAL S U RVEY, RES TON, VIRG INIA—2002 111°