DOCSLIB.ORG

Stratigraphy and Paleontology of the Mississippian System In

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Stratigraphy and Paleontology of the Mississippian System In MEMOIR 8 Stratigraphy and Paleontology . of the Mississippian System in Southwestern New Mexico and Adjacent Southeastern Arizona By AUGUSTUS K. ARMSTRONG 1 9 6 2 STATE BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING AND TECHNOLOGY CAMPUS STATION SOCORRO, NEW MEXICO NEW MEXICO INSTITUTE OF MINING & TECHNOLOGY E. J. Workman, President STATE BUREAU OF MINES AND MINERAL RESOURCES Alvin J. Thompson, Director THE REGENTS MEMBERS EX OFFICIO The Honorable Edwin L. Mechem ........................................................ Governor of New Mexico Tom Wiley ..................................................................................Superintendent of Public Instruction APPOINTED MEMBERS William G. Abbott ............................................................................................................... Hobbs Holm 0. Bursum, Jr. ......................................................................................................... Socorro Thomas M. Cramer ......................................................................................................... Carlsbad Frank C. DiLuzio ..................................................................................................... Albuquerque Eva M. Larrazolo (Mrs. Paul F.) ............................................................................. Albuquerque Published June 22, 1962 For Sale by the New Mexico Bureau of Mines & Mineral Resources Campus Station, Socorro, N. Mex.- Price $2.50 Contents Page ABSTRACT................................................................................................................... INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................... Previous work .......................................................................................................................................... 3 Acknowledgments ................................................................................................................................... 3 Terminology of limestone lithologies ..................................................................................................... 3 Glossary of lithologic terms ................................................................................................................ 3 STRATIGRAPHY ........................................................................................................................................ 5 Escabrosa group ...................................................................................................................................... 5 Keating formation ............................................................................................................................... 5 Lithology ........................................................................................................................................ 5 Fauna of member A ......................................................................................................................... 8 Fauna of member B ...................................................................................................................... 10 Hachita formation ............................................................................................................................. 10 Lithology ...................................................................................................................................... I o Fauna ............................................................................................................................................ 12 PALEOGEOGRAPHY AND REGIONAL CORRELATIONS ................................................................. 14 Penasco dome ..................................................................................................................................... 14 Upper Devonian ..................................................................................................................................... 14 Kinderhook formation ............................................................................................................................ 14 Osage ...................................................................................................................................................... I 5 Emergence of crinoids to dominance in Osage time ......................................................................... 21 Meramec ................................................................................................................................................ 24 Chester ................................................................................................................................................... 24 Mississippian bioherms ......................................................................................................................... 27 SYSTEMATIC PALEONTOLOGY .......................................................................................................... 28 Protozoa ................................................................................................................................................. 28 Endothyra .......................................................................................................................................... 28 Endothyra symmetrica ..................................................................................................................... 28 Endothyra sp. indet. ......................................................................................................................... 28 Paraendothyra ...................................................................................................................................... 29 Paraendothyra sp. indet. ................................................................................................................... 3o Paramillerella ....................................................................................................................................... 3o Paramillerella tortula ....................................................................................................................... 3o Paramillerella? sp. ............................................................................................................................ 3o Coelenterata .............................................................................................................................................. 3o Amplexizaphrentis ............................................................................................................................... 3o Page Amplexizaphrentis hespere ........................................................................................................................ 3' Amplexizaphrentis northropi .................................................................................................................... 31 Amplexizaphrentis sonoraensis ................................................................................................................ 32 Amplexizaphrentis clinatus ....................................................................................................................... 32 Homalophyllites ............................................................................................................................................. 33 Homalophyllites circularis ......................................................................................................................... 33 Homalophyllites calceolus ......................................................................................................................... 33 Hapsiphyllum .................................................................................................................................................. 34 Hapsiphyllum nunnensis ........................................................................................................................... 35 Caninia ............................................................................................................................................................. 35 Caninia cornucopiae ................................................................................................................................... 35 Vesiculophyllum ............................................................................................................................................. 36 Vesiculophyllum sutherlandi ..................................................................................................................... 36 Vesiculophyllum cf. incrassatum .............................................................................................................. 36 Vesiculophyllum sp. A ............................................................................................................................... 37 Vesiculophyllum sp. B ................................................................................................................................ 37 Rylstonia .......................................................................................................................................................... 37 Rylstonia teres .............................................................................................................................................. 37 Lithostrotionella ............................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Paleozoic Biostratigraphy and Paleontology Along the Mogollon Rim, Arizona
    PALEOZOIC BIOSTRATIGRAPHY AND PALEONTOLOGY ALONG THE MOGOLLON RIM, ARIZONA This one-day field trip permits examination of Devonian, Pennsyl­ vanian, and Permian stratigraphy and biostratigraphy. Pennsylvanian and Permian fossil localities will also be visited. The field trip guide consists of three separate articles. These involve, in order, paleontology, stratigraphy, and a road log. The road log from Payson to Pine, on pages 34-36 of the New Mexico Geological Society Thirteenth Field Conference Guidebook (1962), might also prove useful. PALEONTOLOGY OF THE NACO FORMATION IN THE KOHL RANCH AREA, ARIZONA by Stanley S. Beus NorthernArizona University and Douglas C. Brew University of Minnesota This trip will traver-se part of the Basin and Range Province north­ east of Tempe and end up in the transition zone between the Basin and Range and Colorado Plateau provinces below the Mogollon Rim. The total distance is about 230 miles. We will examine outcrops of Devonian through Permian age, and collect Devonian, Pennsylvanian and Permian fossils. The major col­ lecting site will be in the Naco Formation near Kohl Ranch, discussed below. Possible localities are indicated in figure 1. GENERAL STRATIGRAPHY lenses. The lower unbedded portion is generally interpreted to represent a regolith formed in situ via solution of the The Naco formation of central Arizona is a predom­ Redwall Limestone, whereas the upper portion consists inantly marine sequence of interbedded limestones and predominantly of insoluble residues reworked by marine or terrigenous sedimentary rocks of Pennsylvanian age. The perhaps both nonmarine and marine agencies (Huddle and formation is separated from the underlying Mississippian Dobrovolny, 1945, 1952; Brew, 1970; McKee and Redwall Limestone by a conspicuous regional disconfor­ Gutschick, 1969).
    [Show full text]
  • University of Michigan University Library
    CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE MUSEUM OF PALEONTOLOGY THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN VOL.XIX, NO.8, pp. 105-114 (1 pl., 1 fig.) NOVEMBER25, 1964 A NEW SPIRACULATE BLASTOID, PYRAMIBLASTUS, FROM THE MISSISSIPPIAN HAMPTON FORMATION OF IOWA BY DONALD B. MACURDA, JR. MUSEUM OF PALEONTOLOGY THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN ANN ARBOR CONTRIBUTIONS FROM THE MUSEUM OF PaEONTOLOGY Director: LEWISB. KELLUM The series of contributions from the Museum of Paleontology is a medium for the publication of papers based chiefly upon the collections in the Museum. When the number of pages issued is sufficient to make a volume, a title page and a table of contents will be sent to libraries on the mailing list, and to individuals upon request. A list of the separate papers may also be obtained. Correspondence should be directed to the Museum of Paleontology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan. VOLUME XIX 1. Silicified Trilobites from the Devonian Jeffersonville Limestone at the Falls of the Ohio, by Erwin C. Stumm. Pages 1-14, with 3 plates. 2. Two Gastropods from the Lower Cretaceous (Albian) of Coahuila, Mexico, by Lewis B. Kellum and Kenneth E. Appelt. Pages 15-22, with 2 figures. 3. Corals of the Traverse Group of Michigan, Part XII, The Small-celled Species of Favosites and Emmonsia, by Erwin C. Stumm and John H. Tyler. Pages 23-36, with 7 plates. 4. Redescription of Syntypes of the Bryozoan Species Rhombotrypa quadrata (Rominger), by Roger J. Cuffey and T. G. Perry. Pages 37-45, with 2 plates. 5. Rare Crustaceans from the Upper Devonian Chagrin Shale in Northern Ohio, by Myron T.
    [Show full text]
  • The Southern Arizona Guest Ranch As a Symbol of the West
    The Southern Arizona guest ranch as a symbol of the West Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic) Authors Norris, Frank B. (Frank Blaine), 1950-. Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 07/10/2021 15:00:58 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/555065 THE SOUTHERN ARIZONA GUEST RANCH AS A SYMBOL OF THE WEST by Frank Blaine Norris A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF GEOGRAPHY, REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT, AND URBAN PLANNING In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS WITH A MAJOR IN GEOGRAPHY In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1 9 7 6 Copyright 1976 Frank Blaine Norris STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfill­ ment of requirements for an advanced degree at The University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowl­ edgment of source is made. Requests for permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the copyright holder. SIGNED: APPROVAL BY THESIS DIRECTOR This thesis has been approved on the date shown below: ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This thesis is the collective effort of many, and to each who played a part in its compilation, I am indebted.
    [Show full text]
  • Lexington Quadrangle Virginia
    COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES GEOLOGY OF THE LEXINGTON QUADRANGLE VIRGINIA KENNETH F. BICK REPORT OF INVESTIGATIONS I VIRGINIA DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES Jomes L. Colver Commissioner of Minerol Resources ond Stote Geologist CHARLOTTESVI LLE, VI RGI N IA 1960 COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES GEOLOGY OF THE LEXINGTON QUADRANGLE VIRGINIA KENNETH F. BICK REPORT OF INVESTIGATIONS I VIRGINIA DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES Jomes L. Colver Commissioner of Minerol Resources ond Stote Geologist CHARLOTTESVI LLE, VI RGI N IA 1960 Couuowwoer,rn op Vtncrwre DopenrupNr op Puncnesrs exo Supptv Rrculroxn 1960 DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT Richmond. Virginia MenvrN M. SurHnnr,eNn, Director BOARD Vrcron W. Stnwenr, Petersburg, Chairtnan G. Ar,vrn MessnNnunc, Hampton, Viee'Chairman A. Pr,urvrnr BmnNn, Orange C. S. Cenrnn, Bristol ANpnpw A. Fenr,pv, Danville WonrnrrvcroN FauLKNEn, Glasgow SvoNpv F. Slter,r,, Roanoke EnwrN H. Wrr,r,, Richmond Wrr,r,renr P. Wooor,nv. Norfolk CONTENTS Pece Abstract. '"*i"#:;;;;: . : ::: , : ::.:::::::::..::::::. :.::.::::::: ::,r Z Geography 8 Purpose. 4 Previous Work. Present Work and Acknowledgements. 5 Geologic Formations. 6 Introduction. 6 Precambrian System. 6 Pedlar formation 6 Precambrian and Cambrian Systems. 6 Discussion. 6 Swift Run formation 8 Catoctin greenstone. I Unieoiformation...... ......... I Hampton(Harpers)formation. .......... I Erwin (Antietam) quartzite. Cambrian System . I0 Shady (Tomstown) dolomite 10 Rome (Waynesboro) formation.... ll Elbrook formation. 12 Conococheague limestone. l3 Ordovician System. ......., 14 Chepultepeclimestone. .......... 14 Beekmantown formatron. 14 New Market limestone. 15 Lincolnshire limestone. 16 Edinburg formation. 16 Martinsburg shale... 17 SilurianSystem. ......... 18 Clinchsandstone..... .......... 18 Clinton formation.
    [Show full text]
  • Carboniferous Formations and Faunas of Central Montana
    Carboniferous Formations and Faunas of Central Montana GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 348 Carboniferous Formations and Faunas of Central Montana By W. H. EASTON GEOLOGICAL SURVEY PROFESSIONAL PAPER 348 A study of the stratigraphic and ecologic associa­ tions and significance offossils from the Big Snowy group of Mississippian and Pennsylvanian rocks UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1962 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR STEWART L. UDALL, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Thomas B. Nolan, Director The U.S. Geological Survey Library has cataloged this publication as follows : Eastern, William Heyden, 1916- Carboniferous formations and faunas of central Montana. Washington, U.S. Govt. Print. Off., 1961. iv, 126 p. illus., diagrs., tables. 29 cm. (U.S. Geological Survey. Professional paper 348) Part of illustrative matter folded in pocket. Bibliography: p. 101-108. 1. Paleontology Montana. 2. Paleontology Carboniferous. 3. Geology, Stratigraphic Carboniferous. I. Title. (Series) For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Washington 25, B.C. CONTENTS Page Page Abstract-__________________________________________ 1 Faunal analysis Continued Introduction _______________________________________ 1 Faunal relations ______________________________ 22 Purposes of the study_ __________________________ 1 Long-ranging elements...__________________ 22 Organization of present work___ __________________ 3 Elements of Mississippian affinity.._________ 22 Acknowledgments--.-------.- ___________________
    [Show full text]
  • A Quantitative Study of Benthic Faunal Patterns Within the Pennsylvanian and Early Permian
    PALAIOS, 2006, v. 21, p. 316–324 Research Report DOI: 10.2110/palo.2005.P05-82e A QUANTITATIVE STUDY OF BENTHIC FAUNAL PATTERNS WITHIN THE PENNSYLVANIAN AND EARLY PERMIAN NICOLE BONUSO* AND DAVID J. BOTTJER Department of Earth Sciences, University of Southern California, 3651 Trousdale Parkway, Los Angeles, California, 90089-0740, USA e-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT primary literature. Mudge and Yochelson’s (1962) monograph describes the stratigraphy and paleontology of the Pennsylvanian–Permian Mid- Using abundance data, this study explores quantitative patterns from continent of Kansas using over 300 fossil collections. Yancey and Stevens marine benthos, including implications for paleogeography, deposi- (1981) studied the Early Permian of Nevada and Utah extensively, re- tional environment, stratigraphic position, taxonomic groups (bra- corded abundance data from 55 localities, and identified paleocommun- chiopod or mollusc), substrate preferences, and ecological niches. ities based on the faunal comparisons and relative abundances within each Twenty-nine brachiopod- and bivalve-dominated fossil assemblages sample collected. As a result, three groups of commonly occurring com- from the Pennsylvanian and Early Permian of North and South Amer- munities emerged: (1) nearshore, mollusc-dominated; (2) open-shelf, non- ica, Thailand, and Australia were analyzed from carbonate-platform molluscan; and (3) deeper water, offshore mollusc-dominated. More re- environments; specifically, Nevada, Kansas, Oklahoma, Texas, Utah, cently, Olszewski and Patzkowsky (2001) documented the reoccurrence New Mexico, Venezuela, Kanchanaburi (Thailand), and Queensland of Pennsylvanian–Permian Midcontinent brachiopod and bivalve associ- (Australia). Samples were categorized by paleogeographic location, de- ations through time (Olszewski and Patzkowsky, 2001). Using a combi- positional environment, and age to help differentiate factors control- nation of data from Mudge and Yochelson (1962) and their own data, ling the faunal patterns.
    [Show full text]
  • Remembering the Whiptail Ruin Excavations
    Bulletin of Old Pueblo Archaeology Center Tucson, Arizona September 2009 Number 59 REMEMBERING THE WHIPTAIL RUIN EXCAVATIONS Linda M. Gregonis, Gayle H. Hartmann, and Sharon F. Urban Tucked along a bedrock pediment at the base of village was occupied from the early 1200s until about the Santa Catalina Mountains in the northeastern 1300. At least 40 rooms, a rock-walled compound, corner of the Tucson Basin are a series of perennial two Hohokam cemeteries, and a few low trash springs. These springs have provided water for mounds have been identified at the site. thousands of years, creating small oases where birds, Most of the structures were detached, adobe- mammals, and other animals could always find a walled rooms, but several adobe rooms with drink. The springs attracted humans, too. Early on, contiguous (shared) walls were also found. Features Archaic-era people hunted game at these watering at the site were broadly distributed across an area of holes and left behind spear points and other stone about 50 acres, with groups of rooms and other tools. Later, the Hohokam used the springs for both domestic features typically clustered into small hunting and farming. Today, much of the area is residential neighborhoods (see site map below). preserved within Agua Caliente Park and managed by The historian and ethnologist Adolph Bandelier, the Pima County Natural Resources, Parks and who Bandelier National Monument is named after, Recreation Department. may have been the first scholar to become aware of Whiptail Ruin, AZ BB:10:3(ASM), is one of the Whiptail Ruin. On a visit to Tucson in 1883 he toured Hohokam villages established near these springs.
    [Show full text]
  • EXPLANATORY TEXT for GEOLOGIC MAP of NORTH CAROLINA By
    North Carolina State Library t ( f jleigh NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT William P. Saunders, Director %*fo _ DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES Jasper L. Stuckey, State Geologist BULLETIN NUMBER 71 EXPLANATORY TEXT FOR GEOLOGIC MAP OF NORTH CAROLINA By Jasper L. Stuckey and Stephen G. Conrad RALEIGH 1958 Norffe Carolir* St** NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT William P. Saunders, Director DIVISION OF MINERAL RESOURCES Jasper L. Stuckey, State Geologist BULLETIN NUMBER 71 EXPLANATORY TEXT FOR GEOLOGIC MAP OF NORTH CAROLINA By Jasper L. Stuckey and Stephen G. Conrad RALEIGH 1958 MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT GOVERNOR LUTHER H. HODGES, Chairman Raleigh MILES J. SMITH, First Vice Chairman Salisbury WALTER J. DAMTOFT, Second Vice Chairman Canton CHARLES S. ALLEN ..__„___ Durham W. B. AUSTIN Jefferson F. J. BOLING Siler City H. C. BUCHAN, JR North Wilkesboro SCROOP W. ENLOE, JR Spruce Pine VOIT GILMORE Southern Pines R. M. HANES Winston-Salem LEO H. HARVEY Kinston CHARLES H. JENKINS - __..._...Ahoskie AMOS R. KEARNS High Point H. C. KENNETT Durham R.W.MARTIN Raleigh CECIL MORRIS Atlantic HUGH M. MORTON Wilmington W. EUGENE SIMMONS Tarboro T.MAX WATSON Spindale LETTER OF TRANSMITTAL Raleigh, North Carolina February 4, 1958 To His Excellency, HONORABLE LUTHER H. HODGES Governor of North Carolina Sir: I have the honor to submit herewith manuscript for publication as Bulletin No. 71, "Explanatory Text for Geologic Map of North Carolina". This text is an essential part of the new geologic map of North Carolina. The new geologic map and this explanatory text contain a summary of the best information pres- ently available on the geology of North Carolina.
    [Show full text]
  • Brachiopods from the Mobarak Formation, North Iran
    GeoArabia, 2011, v. 16, no. 3, p. 129-192 Gulf PetroLink, Bahrain Tournaisian (Mississippian) brachiopods from the Mobarak Formation, North Iran Maryamnaz Bahrammanesh, Lucia Angiolini, Anselmo Alessandro Antonelli, Babak Aghababalou and Maurizio Gaetani ABSTRACT Following detailed stratigraphic work on the Mississippian marlstone and bioclastic limestone of the Mobarak Formation of the Alborz Mountains in North Iran, forty-eight of the most important brachiopod taxa are here systematically described and illustrated. The ranges of the taxa are given along the Abrendan and Simeh Kuh stratigraphic sections, located north of Damgham. The examined brachiopod species date the base of the Mobarak Formation to the Tournaisian, in absence of age-diagnostic foraminifers. Change in brachiopod settling preferences indicates a shift from high energy, shallow-water settings with high nutrient supply in the lower part of the formation to quieter, soft, but not soppy substrates, with lower nutrient supply in the middle part of the Mobarak Formation. Brachiopod occurrence is instead scanty at its top. The palaeobiogeographic affinity of the Tournaisian brachiopods from North Iran indicates a closer relationship to North America, Western Europe and the Russian Platform than to cold-water Australian faunas, confirming the affinity of the other biota of the Alborz Mountains. This can be explained by the occurrence of warm surface-current gyres widely distributing brachiopod larvae across the Palaeotethys Ocean, where North Iran as other peri- Gondwanan blocks acted as staging-posts. INTRODUCTION The Mississippian Mobarak Formation of the Alborz Mountains (North Iran) has been recently revised by Brenckle et al. (2009) who focused mainly on its calcareous microfossil biota and refined its biostratigraphy, chronostratigraphy and paleogeography.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Date 30/12/2018 22:47:41
    Stratigraphy and paleontology of the Naco Formation in the southern Dripping Spring Mountains, near Winkelman, Gila County, Arizona Item Type text; Thesis-Reproduction (electronic); maps Authors Reid, Alastair Milne, 1940- Publisher The University of Arizona. Rights Copyright © is held by the author. Digital access to this material is made possible by the University Libraries, University of Arizona. Further transmission, reproduction or presentation (such as public display or performance) of protected items is prohibited except with permission of the author. Download date 30/12/2018 22:47:41 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/551821 STRATIGRAPHY AND PALEONTOLOGY OF THE NACO FORMATION IN THE SOUTHERN DRIPPING SPRING MOUNTAINS, NEARWINKELMAN, GILA COUNTY, ARIZONA by Ala stair M. Reid A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE In the Graduate College THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1966 STATEMENT BY AUTHOR This thesis has been submitted in partial fulfillment of require­ ments for an advanced degree at the University of Arizona and is deposited in the University Library to be made available to borrowers under rules of the Library. Brief quotations from this thesis are allowable without special permission, provided that accurate acknowledgment of source is made. Requests of permission for extended quotation from or reproduction of this manuscript in whole or in part may be granted by the head of the major department or the Dean of the Graduate College when in their judg­ ment the proposed use of the material is in the interests of scholarship.
    [Show full text]
  • U.S. Geological Survey Bulletin 1839-G, H
    Stratigraphic Framework of Cambrian and Ordovician Rocks in the Central Appalachian Basin from Morrow County, Ohio, to Pendleton County, West Virginia Depositional Environment of the Fincastle Conglomerate near Roanoke, Virginia U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1839-G, H i i i I ' i ' i ' X- »-v l^,:^ Stratigraphic Framework of Cambrian and Ordovician Rocks in the Central Appalachian Basin from Morrow County, Ohio, to Pendleton County, West Virginia By ROBERT T. RYDER Depositional Environment of the Fincastle Conglomerate near Roanoke, Virginia By CHRYSA M. CULLATHER Chapters G and H are issued as a single volume and are not available separately U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY BULLETIN 1839-G, H EVOLUTION OF SEDIMENTARY BASINS-APPALACHIAN BASIN U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, Jr., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY DALLAS L. PECK, Director Any use of trade, product, or firm names in this publication is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE: 1992 For sale by Book and Open-File Report Sales U.S. Geological Survey Federal Center, Box 25425 Denver, CO 80225 Library of Congress Cataloging in Publication Data (revised for vol. G-H) Evoluation of sedimentary basins Appalachian basin. (U.S. Geological Survey bulletin ; 1839 A-D, G-H) Includes bibliographies. Supt. of Docs. no.:19.3:1839-G Contents: Horses in fensters of the Pulaski thrust sheet, southwestern Virginia / by Arthur P. Schultz [etc.] Stratigraphic framework of Cam­ brian and Ordovician rocks in central Appalachian basin from Morrow County, Ohio, to Pendleton County, West Virginia / by Robert T.
    [Show full text]
  • Permian Corals from Nevada and California
    l 9(P<3 KCIfiZ A. LOWEHSTAI PERMIAN CORALS FROM NEVADA AND CALIFORNIA 1 i W. II. EASTON ! Reprinted from JOURNAL OF PALEONTOLOGY Vol. 34, No. 3, May, 1960 JOURNAL OF PALEONTOLOGY, V. 34, NO. 3, p. 570-583, 18 TEXT-FIGS., May, 1960 PERMIAN CORALS FROM NEVADA AND CALIFORNIA W. H. EASTON University of Southern California, Los Angeles 7, California ABSTRACT—Seven species of rugose corals are described from Permian (mostly Leonard Series) strata in the Basin and Range Province of Nevada and California. Caninia trojana, Lithostrotionella mokomokensis, Lithostrotionella dilatata, Diphy- phyllum connorsensis, Thysanophyllum princeps, Lonsdaleia illipahensis, and Lonsdaleia cordillerensis are named. The corals occur in thick successions of com- monly cyclical alternations of limestone and sandstone near the eastern margin of the Cordilleran geosyncline. Local distribution and biostromal development can be used in subdividing and mapping the Permian strata of east-central Nevada. INTRODUCTION along the eastern or continental side of the Cordilleran geosyncline. HICK deposits of marine strata of TPermian age crop out in the Basin and It has been the good fortune of the Range Province in California, Nevada, and writer to be able to study and to collect Utah. Although paleontologists have de- from numerous successions of Permian voted some attention to the fusulinids in strata in the Cordilleran region. This work these Permian beds, much more descriptive was begun in 1947 and has continued work is needed on all phases of paleontology. through most of the succeeding summers. The purposes of this paper are to describe During parts of five summers the writer was some species of corals from the area and to engaged in mapping with students enrolled show their stratigraphic occurrence in the in the summer field geology courses con- Permian System.
    [Show full text]