God Created Earth and Heaven Dr. Guillermo Gonzalez

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

God Created Earth and Heaven Dr. Guillermo Gonzalez Volume 13, Number 1 January / February 2008 — A publication of the Creation Research Society — Dr. Guillermo Gonzalez — A Case of Intolerance in Science by Jerry Bergman, Ph.D. r. Guillermo Gonzalez is an assistant Problems Begin professor of astronomy at Iowa State University (ISU). Born in Havana, In 2004, Dr. Gonzalez co-authored the D he and his family fled from Cuba to book The Privileged Planet: How Our the United States in 1967, where he earned Place in the Cosmos is Designed for Dis- a Ph.D. in astronomy with honors from the covery, which presents empirical evidence University of Washington in 1993. for the hypothesis that the universe is the CENSORED product of intelligent design (Gonzalez Several of his colleagues have conclud- and Richards, 2004). It was this book, and ed that in 2007 Gonzalez was denied tenure a film made from the book, that got him at ISU as a result of his support for intelli- into trouble. The book critiques the gent design. Tenure denial often means the “Copernican principle,” the idea that kiss of death in academia, making it very “everything we see around us is common- difficult to find an academic position else- place in the universe, that we are average where. Although the story was first broken beings in a run-of-the-mill planetary sys- publicly in the Iowa paper, Ames Tribune, tem in an average galaxy populated by on May 12, 2007, the actual decision took scores of other mediocrities” (Gingerich, place earlier in the spring (Dillon, 2007). Dr. Gonzalez had just bought a house, ... continued on p. 3 married a local woman, and wanted to start a family and continue his very promising career as an astronomer at ISU. He tends to God Created Earth and Heaven keep to himself, focusing on his highly productive research program, which would (a Creation Hymn) continue if he were allowed to stay at the by Ralph Gillmann university. His supporters have argued that this is what ISU does not want, because of Editor’s note: Please go to page 6 for the actual hymn. I asked Mr. Gillmann for this his alleged scientific heresy. introduction to provide insight into his writing of this song praising the God of creation. According to ISU’s Department of any hymns mention the Creator or creation but I could not find one with the Physics and Astronomy, the tenure process, creation story of Genesis. I’ve written poetry over the years so I decided to as outlined on page 4 of its Procedures and write such a hymn. Writing it proved to be enlightening about the nuances Promotion and Tenure Policy and Proce- M of Genesis — there is more subtlety there than first appears. dure, requires “excellence sufficient to lead to a national or international reputation ... The hymn turned out to be long, particularly by modern standards. I started with [that] would ordinarily be shown by the a stanza for each day, but so much happened on the sixth day that it required two. publication of approximately fifteen papers Then I realized that, as a Christian hymn, it needed a final stanza on the new creation, of good quality in refereed journals.” Hav- which then meant a stanza on the Fall, too. I thought I was done until I realized it ing produced 68 refereed scientific papers, should have a beginning stanza to set the stage, just as the first two verses of Genesis Dr. Gonzalez has exceeded by more than do. 350 percent his own department’s standard The meter is 87.87.77.88, which is not common, but is used with several Lutheran for “excellence” requirement for tenure. hymns. I suggest the majestic tune Der am Kreuz, which accompanies On My Heart ISU considered 66 faculty for tenure during Imprint Thine Image and is available in a Lutheran hymnal or in The Hymn Fake the past academic year, and only Gonzalez Book (chords and melody) published by Hal Leonard Corp. More common tunes and two others were denied tenure (Dillon, that are 87.87 D such as Harwell may be adapted for example by repeating the last 2007). note. ... continued on p. 6 Math Matters by Don DeYoung, Ph.D. How Did Charles Babbage Babbage suggested that God had care- Explain Miracles? fully programmed the physical Creation with built-in singularities, analogous to n=5, nglish mathematician Charles Bab- which revealed themselves as miracles in bage (1792–1871) pioneered the de- nature. velopment of mechanical calculators. Babbage also illustrated his ideas with E His difference and analytical engines graphs. The accompanying figure shows a consumed 50 years of his life. The faith of graph of an unusual function. A smooth Babbage is displayed in his contributions to curve results except for the isolated point the Bridgewater Treatises. The Earl of at x = 2. Babbage saw this singular point Bridgewater funded this series of classic as an analogy to a miracle through master programming of nature (Eves, 1969). books in the 1830s. They were dedicated to 2 2 A graph of the function y =(x-2) (x-3). The Babbage’s technical ideas for miracles are illustrating the “power, wisdom, and good- single isolated point (x = 2) on the graph was interesting, but they are also deficient. Mir- ness of God as manifested in the works of used by Charles Babbage to illustrate the oc- acles are clearly supernatural and not ex- Creation.” currence of miracles. plainable by natural laws. Miracles are exceptions to the known laws of science Babbage suggested several mathemati- and math and not subject to detailed analysis. cal explanations for how God performed example sequence where n = 0, 1, 2, …, miracles. Babbage wrote formulas for cer- with an infinite value for n = 5: Reference tain arithmetic sequences which change 2 Eves, Howard W. 1969. In Mathematical Circles. uniformly except for specific numbers n = 0,-0.25,-1.3,-4.5,-16,¥,36,24.5,K n - 5 Prindle, Weber, and Schmidt, Inc., Boston. which become infinitely large. Consider an Contents Take advantage Dr. Guillermo Gonzalez: A Case of Intolerance............1 of the members’ God Created Earth and Heaven (a Creation Hymn)......1 Math Matters: discount at the CRS How Did Charles Babbage Explain Miracles?.............2 Letters: online bookstore Pre-Flood/Flood Boundary: Not in the Grand Canyon!7 A Reply to M. J. Hunter..................................................8 Speaking of Science www.CRSbooks.com Hidden Messages Found in DNA..............................................9 A Step Closer to Gecko Adhesive.............................................9 Of All the Nerve: Functional Intron Discovered.......................9 The Evolutionary Inference.....................................................10 Life Influences Dating Method................................................10 Mouse Grows Long Finger, Takes Off Like a Bat..................11 Blind Cave Fish Can See Again..............................................11 All by Design: Chemical Signaling in the Honeybee..12 Creation Matters ISSN 1094-6632 Volume 13, Number 1 January / February 2008 Copyright © 2008 Creation Research Society Membership Matters All rights reserved. by Glen Wolfrom, Ph.D. General Editor: Glen W. Wolfrom For membership / subscription information, advertising rates, rom time to time we receive letters is long overdue. and information for authors: May God richly bless and use F which are an encouragement to us. Glen W. Wolfrom, Editor Here is one we received a while back: your and your wife’s creation ministry. P.O. Box 8263 Sincerely, St. Joseph, MO 64508-8263 Thank you so much for Creation Mat- BL Email: [email protected] ters. You produce a unique and excep- Westfield, NJ Phone/fax: 816.279.2312 tionally interesting update on creation Creation Research Society Website: information. Also, please express my We are truly grateful that the Lord has www.creationresearch.org appreciation to all the people who provided us this opportunity to produce a Articles published in Creation Matters represent the opinions and beliefs of the authors, and do not necessarily work on this publication, and the au- publication which many people find useful. reflect the official position of the CRS. thors of the papers. My thank you note To our faithful readers, “Thank you!” 2 Creation Matters college-level astronomy book, Observation- ated from the University of Arizona with Gonzalez al Astronomy, published by Cambridge Uni- high honors, and in the same year his first ...continued from page 1 versity Press, a work that is now in its refereed paper was published in Solar Phys- 2006, pp. 13-14). Esteemed Harvard profes- second edition (Birney, Gonzalez, and Oes- ics. He received his Ph.D. in astronomy in sor Owen Gingerich (2006, p. 16) wrote that per, 2006). Publication of a major book has 1993 from the University of Washington. critics of the film based on Gonzalez’s book been considered by many universities to be In 1995 he conducted postdoctoral re- merit for promotion to a full professor raised the alarm that the showing of search on solar eclipses at the Indian Insti- (Smith, 1973). the film The Privileged Planet at the tute of Astrophysics in Bangalore, an Smithsonian Museum would some- Gonzalez’s research on stars was high- experience that motivated him to formulate how constitute an endorsement of lighted on the National Geographic Chan- what would later become the Privileged Intelligent Design. I suppose that few nel. His work has also been cited in Science, Planet hypothesis. He also did a postdoc at of the critics actually saw the film, Nature, and many other leading scientific the University of Texas. The director there, for it contains no explicit mention of journals (for example see Murray, 1998). A David Lambert, said: “He proved himself Intelligent Design. It did, however, citation search by the author’s name located very quickly” and was “one of the best contain implicit criticism of the Co- 1,638 citations in peer-reviewed science postdocs I have had” (quoted in Brumfiel, pernican principle, for the film ar- journals as of July 2007.
Recommended publications
  • Science & Religion Guide
    When people sit down to discuss intelligent design everyone seems to have a different definition for it. Is it political? Religious? Scientific? Is it about God or isn’t it? Depending on where you sit at the table, it’s about SCIENCE all of these things. & Intelligent design as a theoretical concept provides a lens for seeing patterns and meaning in the world in which we live. Intelligent design as a scientific con- struct attempts to use science to show these patterns to be the work of a supernatural and intelligent de- signer — for all intents and purposes, God. RELIGION However, scientists, philosophers and theorists who use the phrase “intelligent design” don’t use the “G”word — at least, not when they’re describing sci- ence. Intelligent design proponents’ staunch posi- tion on intelligent design-as-science is often in direct conflict with mainstream scientists’ insistence that ID is religion masquerading as science. Taking intelligent design out of the acrimonious de- bate, Science & Theology News takes a look at ID’s con- cepts and presents counterpoints from scientists and theologians alike — without mudslinging or repetitive rhetoric. GUIDE An exclusive, ongoing series The characters in this story know each other well. And even though privately (and sometimes publicly) to equip you with the tools these players might call each other scientifically igno- to better understand the rant biblical literalists or atheistic materialistic secular- minded elitists — everyone in the game knows that important issues at the crux there’s something to hear if the shouting would stop. of science-and-religion. In this turf war, Science & Theology News provides a THIS ISSUE: INTELLIGENT DESIGN piece of Switzerland to let everyone come to the table, even if they’ll still return to different countries and cultures after dinner.
    [Show full text]
  • The Privileged Planet: How Our Place in the Cosmos Is Designed for Discovery Pdf
    FREE THE PRIVILEGED PLANET: HOW OUR PLACE IN THE COSMOS IS DESIGNED FOR DISCOVERY PDF Guillermo Gonzalez,Jay Wesley Richards | 464 pages | 11 Mar 2004 | Regnery Publishing Inc | 9780895260659 | English | Washington DC, United States The Privileged Planet | Discovery Institute A movement known as "intelligent design" has emerged in recent years to counter evolution theories that hold that the design of the universe is random. Critics have dubbed this the "new creationism," since many in the movement correlates the intelligent designer with the Judeo-Christian God. Gonzalez and Richards now take the defense of intelligent design one step further. By assessing the elements that compose our planet, they argue, we can tell that it was designed for multicellular organic life. The presence of carbon, oxygen and water in the right proportions makes it possible for organic life to exist; and this combination of minerals and chemical elements exists only on Earth. Moreover, they argue, we can measure the ways that Earth became habitable. Thus, tree rings, stomata The Privileged Planet: How Our Place in the Cosmos Is Designed for Discovery leaves, skeletons in deep ocean sediments and pollen in lake sediments help us to measure how life on Earth developed by design. In addition, the authors contend, the universe itself is designed for discovery "Mankind is unusually well-positioned to decipher the cosmos. Were we merely lucky in this regard? View Full Version of PW. Richards, Author. Buy this book. Show other formats. Discover what to read next. PW Picks: Books of the Week. The Big Indie Books of Fall Black-Owned Bookstores to Support Now.
    [Show full text]
  • A COMPANION to the AUDIOBOOK Chapter 3: Doubts About Darwinism 71
    A COMPANION TO THE AUDIOBOOK ChaPTeR 3: Doubts about Darwinism 71 my seat as far as it would go. I felt satisfied by my interview with Wells and was anxious to determine whether the most up-to-date scientific evidence supports the existence of the intelligent designer he had talked about. Still, though, some pesky questions continued to bother me. I remained troubled by the intersection of science and faith. I needed to resolve whether these two domains are destined to be at war with each other, as some people claim. Can a scientific person legitimately entertain the idea of the supernatural? How much can empirical data tell us about the divine? Should scientists merely stick to their test tubes and let the theologians ponder God? Should pastors be allowed to poke their nose into the research laboratory? Can science and faith ever really CHAPTERbe partners in pursuit3: DOUBTS of the ultimate ABOUT answers of life? DARWINISM I knew I needed to get some answers to those questions before I could go any further. I pulled the blanket up to my neck and decided to get some sleep. Tomorrow, I’d be planning another journey. foR fURTheR eVIDenCe More Resources on This Topic Denton, Michael. Evolution: A Theory in Crisis. Bethesda, Md.: Adler & Adler, 1986. Hanegraaff, Hank. The Face That Demonstrates the Farce of Evolution. Nash- ville: Word, 1998. Johnson, Phillip. Darwin on Trial. 2nd ed. Downers Grove, Ill.: InterVarsity Press, 1993. Wells, Jonathan. Icons of Evolution. Washington, D.C.: Regnery, 2000. 9780310339281_csCreator_sc_int.indd 71 9/4/13 2:14 pm 1 CHAPTER 4: WHERE SCIENCE MEETS FAITH ChaPTeR 4: Where Science Meets Faith 97 for further evidence More Resources on This Topic Dembski, William.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles Darwin
    Contents Articles Alfred Russel Wallace 1 Charles Darwin 24 Publication of Darwin's theory 49 Evolution 57 Natural selection 89 Intelligent design 103 Argument from poor design 133 Teleological argument 139 Watchmaker analogy 148 Irreducible complexity 153 Specified complexity 169 Fine-tuned Universe 176 Intelligent designer 183 Richard Dawkins 189 Gene-centered view of evolution 207 References Article Sources and Contributors 213 Image Sources, Licenses and Contributors 220 Article Licenses License 222 Alfred Russel Wallace 1 Alfred Russel Wallace Alfred Russel Wallace Born 8 January 1823Usk, Monmouthshire, Wales, United Kingdom Died 7 November 1913 (aged 90)Broadstone, Dorset, England Citizenship British Fields exploration, biology, biogeography, social reform, botany Known for his co-discovery of natural selection and his work on biogeography Notable awards Royal Society's Royal Medal (1866) and Copley Medal (1908), Order of Merit (1908) Alfred Russel Wallace, OM, FRS (8 January 1823 – 7 November 1913) was a British naturalist, explorer, geographer, anthropologist and biologist. He is best known for independently proposing a theory of evolution due to natural selection that prompted Charles Darwin to publish his own theory. Wallace did extensive fieldwork, first in the Amazon River basin and then in the Malay Archipelago, where he identified the Wallace Line that divides the Indonesian archipelago into two distinct parts, one in which animals closely related to those of Australia are common, and one in which the species are largely of Asian origin. He was considered the 19th century's leading expert on the geographical distribution of animal species and is sometimes called the "father of biogeography".[1] Wallace was one of the leading evolutionary thinkers of the 19th century and made a number of other contributions to the development of evolutionary theory besides being co-discoverer of natural selection.
    [Show full text]
  • American Scientific Affiliation 2003 Annual Meeting Schedule
    American Scientific Affiliation 2003 Annual Meeting Schedule Thursday, July 24 4:00 PM Check-in and registration 10:00 PM Registration closes Friday, July 25 7:00 AM Breakfast 9:00 AM Registration begins Field Trips 9:00 AM #1 - The Earth Has a History #2 - High Altitude Ecology #3 - National Center for Atmospheric Research 11:30 AM Lunch 12:30 PM #4 - National Renewable Energy Laboratory #5 - Red Rocks - Dinosaur Ridge 6:00 PM Dinner 7:30 PM Introductions and Opening Plenary Address Plenary: "A Universe of Wonder " Dr. Deborah Haarsma, Professor of Physics and Astronomy, Calvin College 9:15 PM Welcome Mixer Saturday, July 26 7:00 AM Breakfast 8:30-9:00 AM Morning Devotions and Worship 9:00 AM Spouse Field Trip #6 - Betty Ford Alpine Gardens 9:00 - 10:30 AM Plenary: "Watching Galaxies Form Near the Beginning of Time" Dr. William Keel, Professor of Physics and Astronomy, University of Alabama, and Dr. Alan Stockton, Astronomer, Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii 10:30-11:00 AM Refreshment Break 11:00 AM - 12:15 PM Parallel Session I A: Introduction to Cosmology B: Cosmology in Scripture C: Environmental Stewardship A Layperson's Introduction The Cosmology of Genesis 1 -- Christian Environmentalist, A to the Big Bang -- Perry Phillips William Monsma Political Force to be Reckoned (45 min.) A Scriptural Star Trek? -- William With -- Mike Hingle Chiasmic Cosmology and Traugott Freshwater Mollusks: A Part of Scientific Cosmologies --George Murphy Objections to Planetary Conjunction Creation in Dire Need of Care -- Hypotheses for the Identity of the David Christopher Campbell Star of the Magi -- Sherman Kanagy II A Biological Integrity Assessment of the Conewago and Codorus Watersheds -- Michael Burrell 12:15 - 1:15 PM Lunch Student and Early Career Scientist Luncheon 1:25 - 3:30 Parallel Session II A.
    [Show full text]
  • Rhetorical Contestation Involving Disputed Organizational and Ontological Categories Anish Mukundbhai Dave Iowa State University
    Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Graduate Theses and Dissertations Dissertations 2011 Rhetorical contestation involving disputed organizational and ontological categories Anish Mukundbhai Dave Iowa State University Follow this and additional works at: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd Part of the English Language and Literature Commons, and the Rhetoric and Composition Commons Recommended Citation Dave, Anish Mukundbhai, "Rhetorical contestation involving disputed organizational and ontological categories" (2011). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 12076. https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/etd/12076 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Iowa State University Capstones, Theses and Dissertations at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Rhetorical contestation involving disputed organizational and ontological categories by Anish Mukundbhai Dave A dissertation submitted to the graduate faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Major: Rhetoric and Professional Communication Program of Study Committee: David R. Russell, Major Professor Helen Ewald Lee Honeycutt Jean Goodwin Sree Nilakanta Iowa State University Ames, Iowa 2011 Copyright © Anish Mukundbhai Dave, 2011. All rights reserved. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1. INTRODUCTION 1 CHAPTER 2. CATEGORIES, AGENCY, AND POWER: A STRUCTURATION ANALYSIS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY (DHS) AND THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY (FEMA)’S RESPONSE TO HURRICANE KATRINA 35 CHAPTER 3. CHANGING RHETORICAL TOPOI FOR BOUNDARY-WORK BETWEEN EVOLUTION AND ITS OPPONENTS: FROM POPPER’S FALSIFICATION THEORY TO METHODOLOGICAL NATURALISM 84 CHAPTER 4.
    [Show full text]
  • Pastor's Bibliography
    PASTOR’S BIBLIOGRAPHY Gregory A. Miller NOVEMBER 2, 2020 BIBLE BELIEVERS FELLOWSHIP 0 | P a g e Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 2 Last Revision Date: 04/25/2020 .................................................................................................................... 2 Purpose ......................................................................................................................................................... 2 I. Reference Works ........................................................................................................................................ 3 II. Books & Publications (Including Audiobooks) .......................................................................................... 7 III. Feature Films, Audio/Video Documentaries & Studies ......................................................................... 40 IV. Debates, Interviews, Speeches, Sermons and Lectures ...................................................................... 133 V. Harvard Classics: Dr. Eliot's Five Foot Shelf of Classics ......................................................................... 149 VI. Harvard Classics: Shelf of Fiction ......................................................................................................... 159 VII. Sermons and Sermon Series ..............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]