DOCSLIB.ORG

Equity Method and Joint Ventures Topic Applies to All Entities

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Equity Method and Joint Ventures Topic Applies to All Entities A Roadmap to Accounting for Equity Method Investments and Joint Ventures 2019 The FASB Accounting Standards Codification® material is copyrighted by the Financial Accounting Foundation, 401 Merritt 7, PO Box 5116, Norwalk, CT 06856-5116, and is reproduced with permission. This publication contains general information only and Deloitte is not, by means of this publication, rendering accounting, business, financial, investment, legal, tax, or other professional advice or services. This publication is not a substitute for such professional advice or services, nor should it be used as a basis for any decision or action that may affect your business. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your business, you should consult a qualified professional advisor. Deloitte shall not be responsible for any loss sustained by any person who relies on this publication. As used in this document, “Deloitte” means Deloitte & Touche LLP, Deloitte Consulting LLP, Deloitte Tax LLP, and Deloitte Financial Advisory Services LLP, which are separate subsidiaries of Deloitte LLP. Please see www.deloitte.com/us/about for a detailed description of our legal structure. Certain services may not be available to attest clients under the rules and regulations of public accounting. Copyright © 2019 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. Other Publications in Deloitte’s Roadmap Series Business Combinations Business Combinations — SEC Reporting Considerations Carve-Out Transactions Consolidation — Identifying a Controlling Financial Interest Contracts on an Entity’s Own Equity Convertible Debt Disposals of Long-Lived Assets and Discontinued Operations Distinguishing Liabilities From Equity Earnings per Share Environmental Obligations and Asset Retirement Obligations Equity Method Investees — SEC Reporting Considerations Foreign Currency Transactions and Translations Income Taxes Initial Public Offerings Leases Noncontrolling Interests Non-GAAP Financial Measures Revenue Recognition SEC Comment Letter Considerations, Including Industry Insights Segment Reporting Share-Based Payment Awards Statement of Cash Flows Complimentary printed copies of Deloitte Roadmaps can be ordered (or preordered) from Deloitte’s Roadmap Store. iii Acknowledgments This Roadmap reflects the thoughts and contributions of the consolidation team in Deloitte’s National Office as well as the input from the many auditors and advisers in the Deloitte network who, over the past several years, have helped develop the comprehensive views and interpretations in this publication. Rob Moynihan, John Wilde, and Andy Winters led the overall preparation of the 2019 update to this Roadmap, under the guidance of Brandon Coleman. They wish to extend their deepest appreciation to Elena Cilenti, Michael Scheper, and Bailey Walsh for their hard work in updating this publication. Special thanks also go to Teri Asarito, Lynne Campbell, Amy Davidson, Geri Driscoll, David Frangione, Peter McLaughlin, Jeanine Pagliaro, and Yvonne Rudek for their editorial and desktop publishing contributions to this update. iv Contents Preface xi Contacts xii Chapter 1 — Overview 1 Chapter 2 — Scope and Scope Exceptions 5 2.1 Overview 5 2.2 Investments in Partnerships, Unincorporated Joint Ventures, and LLCs 6 2.2.1 Limited Liability Companies 6 2.2.1.1 LLC That Does Maintain Specific Ownership Accounts 7 2.2.1.2 LLC That Does Not Maintain Specific Ownership Accounts 8 2.2.2 Limited Partnership Interests in Partnerships and Similar Entities 8 2.2.3 General Partnership Interests in Partnerships 8 2.2.4 Corporate Joint Ventures 9 2.3 Scope Exceptions 9 2.3.1 Investments Accounted for in Accordance With ASC 815-10 9 2.3.2 Investments in Common Stock Held by a Nonbusiness Entity 10 2.3.2.1 Investments Held by Real Estate Investment Trusts 10 2.3.3 Investments in Common Stock Within the Scope of ASC 810 10 2.3.4 Investments Held by Investment Companies Within the Scope of ASC 946 11 2.3.4.1 Investor Is an Investment Company 11 2.3.4.2 Investor Is Not an Investment Company 11 2.3.5 Investments in Certain Securitization Entities 11 2.4 Applicability of Equity Method to Other Investments 12 2.4.1 Investments Held by Not-for-Profit Entities 12 2.4.2 Equity Method Investments Eligible for Fair Value Option 12 2.4.2.1 Availability of the Fair Value Option for Financial Instruments With a Substantive Future Services Component 13 2.4.2.2 Change From the Equity Method to Other Method of Accounting 15 2.4.3 Qualified Affordable Housing Project Investments 16 2.4.3.1 Before the Adoption of ASU 2014-01 16 2.4.3.2 After the Adoption of ASU 2014-01 17 2.4.4 Proportionate Consolidation Method 17 v Deloitte | A Roadmap to Accounting for Equity Method Investments and Joint Ventures (2019) 2.5 Investments in In-Substance Common Stock 18 2.5.1 Characteristics of In-Substance Common Stock 18 2.5.1.1 Subordination 20 2.5.1.2 Risks and Rewards of Ownership 21 2.5.1.3 Obligation to Transfer Value 24 2.5.2 Initial Determination and Reconsideration Events 25 Chapter 3 — Applying the Equity Method of Accounting 27 3.1 Overview 27 3.2 General Presumption 27 3.2.1 Corporations 30 3.2.2 Limited Liability Companies 30 3.2.3 Partnerships and Unincorporated Joint Ventures 30 3.2.4 General Partnership Interest in Partnerships 31 3.2.5 Corporate Joint Ventures 31 3.2.6 Potential Voting Rights 31 3.2.7 Direct and Indirect Interest in an Investee 32 3.2.7.1 Earnings or Losses of an Investee’s Subsidiary 34 3.3 Other Indicators of Significant Influence 34 3.3.1 Conditions Indicating Lack of Significant Influence 37 3.4 Considerations Related to Certain Investments 38 3.4.1 Investments Held by Real Estate Investment Trusts 38 3.4.2 Investment in an Entity That Invests in QAHPs 39 3.5 Reassessment of the Ability to Exercise Significant Influence 40 3.6 SEC Staff’s Views on Application of the Equity Method of Accounting 40 Chapter 4 — Initial Measurement 41 4.1 Overview 41 4.2 Initial Measurement 41 4.2.1 Commitments and Guarantees 43 4.3 Contribution of Businesses or Assets for an Investment in an Equity Method Investee 45 4.3.1A Determining Whether the Counterparty (Equity Method Investee) Is a Customer 47 4.3.1 Contribution of a Business or Nonprofit Activity 47 4.3.2 [Deleted] 47 4.3.3 Contribution of Financial Assets 47 4.3.4A Contribution of Nonfinancial Assets or In-Substance Nonfinancial Assets That Do Not Constitute a Business or Nonprofit Activity 50 4.3.4 Contributions of Real Estate or Intangibles 51 4.3.5 Transactions Addressed by Other Guidance 52 4.4 Contingent Consideration 52 4.5 Basis Differences 54 4.5.1 Bargain Purchase 56 4.5.2 Tax Effects of Basis Differences 57 4.5.3 Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income 59 vi Contents Chapter 5 — Subsequent Measurement 60 5.1 Equity Method Earnings and Losses 60 5.1.1 Impact of Preferred Dividends on an Investor’s Share of Earnings (Losses) 61 5.1.2 Disproportionate Allocation of an Investee’s Earnings or Losses in Relation to an Investor’s Ownership Interest 62 5.1.2.1 Hypothetical Liquidation at Book Value Method 64 5.1.2.2 Capital-Allocation-Based Arrangements 73 5.1.3 Differences Between Investor and Investee Accounting Policies and Principles 75 5.1.3.1 Equity Method Investee Does Not Follow U.S. GAAP 75 5.1.3.2 Investee Has Elected a Private-Company Alternative 76 5.1.3.3 Investee Applies Different Accounting Policies Under U.S. GAAP 78 5.1.3.4 Investee Adopts a New Accounting Standard on a Different Date 78 5.1.3.5 Investee Applies Investment Company Accounting 80 5.1.4 Accounting for an Investor’s Share of Earnings on a Time Lag 81 5.1.5 Adjustments to Equity Method Earnings and Losses 83 5.1.5.1 Intra-Entity Profits and Losses 83 5.1.5.2 Amortization or Accretion of Basis Differences 90 5.1.5.3 Investee Capital Transactions 92 5.1.5.4 Other Comprehensive Income 95 5.1.6 Dividends Received From an Investee 96 5.1.7 Interests Held by an Investee 99 5.1.7.1 Reciprocal Interests 99 5.1.7.2 Earnings or Losses of an Investee’s Subsidiary 101 5.1.8 Contingent Consideration 102 5.2 Equity Method Losses That Exceed the Investor’s Equity Method Investment Carrying Amount 103 5.2.1 Guarantee of an Equity Method Investee’s Third-Party Debt 107 5.2.2 Collateral of the Investee Held by the Investor When Equity Losses Exceed the Investor’s Investment 107 5.2.3 Investee Losses If the Investor Has Other Investments in the Investee 108 5.2.3.1 Percentage Used to Determine the Amount of Equity Method Losses 113 5.2.4 Additional Investment After Suspension of Loss Recognition 117 5.3 Stock-Based Compensation Granted by an Investor to Employees of an Equity Method Investee 118 5.3.1 Accounting in the Financial Statements of the Contributing Investor Issuing the Awards 121 5.3.2 Accounting in the Financial Statements of the Investee Receiving the Awards 121 5.3.3 Accounting in the Financial Statements of the Noncontributing Investors 121 5.3.4 Stock-Based Compensation Granted by an Investor to Employees of an Equity Method Investee When the Investee Reimburses the Contributing Investor 129 5.4 Costs Incurred on Behalf of an Investee 129 5.4.1 Accounting for Costs Incurred on Behalf of an Investee in the Financial Statements of the Investor 129 5.4.2 Accounting for Costs Incurred on Behalf of an Investee in the Financial Statements of the Investee 131 vii Deloitte | A Roadmap to Accounting for Equity Method Investments and Joint Ventures (2019) 5.5 Decrease in Investment Value and Impairment 131 5.5.1 Identifying Impairments 132 5.5.2 Measuring Impairment 134 5.5.2.1 Consideration of Basis Differences
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Private Equity;
    MICHAEL MORTELL Senior Managing Director Digital Media; Mergers & Acquisitions; Private Equity; Restructuring; Strategy 485 Lexington Avenue, 10th Michael Mortell is a Senior Managing Director at Ankura Capital Advisors, Floor New York, NY 10017 based in New York. Mike has extensive experience advising entrepreneurs +1.212.818.1555 Main and companies on mergers, acquisitions, strategic and business planning, +1.646.291.8597 Direct restructuring, and capital raising alternatives. Over a career in investment banking and consulting, he has cultivated expertise in the digital media and [email protected] private equity industries and developed strong relationships within them. Mike has a proven record of identifying young, high-potential companies, and providing the strategical and tactical counsel that supports growth EDUCATION objectives and positions them for future success. He also has advised MBA, University or Chicago owners/shareholders of established companies on strategic growth and Booth School of Business liquidity options. In addition to his work in digital media, he has significant BS, Finance Fairfield University experience in the e-commerce, software, retail, specialty manufacturing, and business services sectors. Prior to joining Ankura, Mike was a senior advisor at GP Bullhound, a CERTIFICATIONS boutique investment bank that acquired AdMedia Partners, the M&A FINRA Series 24, 7, 79 and 63 advisory firm where he served as a managing director. He previously ran the Private Equity Financing Group of Prudential Securities and worked for Zolfo, Cooper and Company where he was a consultant to troubled companies and their creditors. Mike also co-founded and managed Grandwood Capital LLC, an investment bank and advisory firm focused on middle-market companies.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Direct Investment and Keiretsu: Rethinking U.S. and Japanese Policy
    This PDF is a selection from an out-of-print volume from the National Bureau of Economic Research Volume Title: The Effects of U.S. Trade Protection and Promotion Policies Volume Author/Editor: Robert C. Feenstra, editor Volume Publisher: University of Chicago Press Volume ISBN: 0-226-23951-9 Volume URL: http://www.nber.org/books/feen97-1 Conference Date: October 6-7, 1995 Publication Date: January 1997 Chapter Title: Foreign Direct Investment and Keiretsu: Rethinking U.S. and Japanese Policy Chapter Author: David E. Weinstein Chapter URL: http://www.nber.org/chapters/c0310 Chapter pages in book: (p. 81 - 116) 4 Foreign Direct Investment and Keiretsu: Rethinking U.S. and Japanese Policy David E. Weinstein For twenty-five years, the U.S. and Japanese governments have seen the rise of corporate groups in Japan, keiretsu, as due in part to foreign pressure to liberal- ize the Japanese market. In fact, virtually all works that discuss barriers in a historical context argue that Japanese corporations acted to insulate themselves from foreign takeovers by privately placing shares with each other (See, e.g., Encarnation 1992,76; Mason 1992; and Lawrence 1993). The story has proved to be a major boon for the opponents of a neoclassical approach to trade and investment policy. Proponents of the notion of “Japanese-style capitalism” in the Japanese government can argue that they did their part for liberalization and cannot be held responsible for private-sector outcomes. Meanwhile, pro- ponents of results-oriented policies (ROPs) can point to yet another example of how the removal of one barrier led to the formation of a second barrier.
    [Show full text]
  • 90 Significant Accounting Policies Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash
    Significant Accounting Policies Cash and Cash Equivalents Cash and cash equivalents includes cash and due from banks, federal funds sold and resale agreements and interest-bearing deposits at other banks. Cash paid for interest for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 was $4.0 billion, $4.5 billion and $2.9 billion, respectively. Cash paid for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 was $1.2 billion, $1.5 billion and $1.5 billion, respectively. Securities Available for Sale The Company considers the nature of investments in securities in order to determine the appropriate classification and currently treat investments in debt securities as securities available for sale. These securities are stated at fair value, with the unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, reported as a component of cumulative other comprehensive income. The fair value of securities is based on quoted market prices, or if quoted market prices are not available, then the fair value is estimated using the quoted market prices for similar securities, pricing models or discounted cash flow analyses, using observable market data where available. The amortized cost of debt securities is adjusted for amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity. Such amortization or accretion is included in interest income. Realized gains and losses on sales of securities are determined using the specific identification method. The Company evaluates its unrealized loss positions for impairment in accordance with SFAS 115, as amended by FSP No. 115-1, The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and its Application to Certain Investments and EITF 99-20, Recognition of Interest Income and Impairment on Purchased Beneficial Interests and Beneficial Interests That Continue to Be Held by a Transferor in Securitized Financial Assets and FSP EITF 99-20.
    [Show full text]
  • Cree, Inc. Non-GAAP Measures of Financial Performance To
    Cree, Inc. Non-GAAP Measures of Financial Performance To supplement the Company's consolidated financial statements presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, or GAAP, Cree uses non-GAAP measures of certain components of financial performance. These non-GAAP measures include non-GAAP gross margin, non-GAAP operating income, non-GAAP non- operating income, net, non-GAAP net income, non-GAAP diluted (loss) earnings per share and free cash flow. Reconciliation to the nearest GAAP measure of all historical non-GAAP measures included in this press release can be found in the tables included with this press release. In this press release, Cree also presents its target for non- GAAP expenses, which are expenses less expenses in the various categories described below. Both our GAAP targets and non-GAAP targets do not include any estimated changes in the fair value of our Lextar investment. Non-GAAP measures presented in this press release are not in accordance with or an alternative to measures prepared in accordance with GAAP and may be different from non-GAAP measures used by other companies. In addition, these non-GAAP measures are not based on any comprehensive set of accounting rules or principles. Non-GAAP measures have limitations in that they do not reflect all of the amounts associated with Cree's results of operations as determined in accordance with GAAP. These non-GAAP measures should only be used to evaluate Cree's results of operations in conjunction with the corresponding GAAP measures. Cree believes that these non-GAAP measures, when shown in conjunction with the corresponding GAAP measures, enhance investors' and management's overall understanding of the Company's current financial performance and the Company's prospects for the future, including cash flows available to pursue opportunities to enhance shareholder value.
    [Show full text]
  • Equity Method Investees — SEC Reporting Considerations
    A Roadmap to SEC Reporting Considerations for Equity Method Investees October 2020 This publication contains general information only and Deloitte is not, by means of this publication, rendering accounting, business, financial, investment, legal, tax, or other professional advice or services. This publication is not a substitute for such professional advice or services, nor should it be used as a basis for any decision or action that may affect your business. Before making any decision or taking any action that may affect your business, you should consult a qualified professional advisor. Deloitte shall not be responsible for any loss sustained by any person who relies on this publication. The services described herein are illustrative in nature and are intended to demonstrate our experience and capabilities in these areas; however, due to independence restrictions that may apply to audit clients (including affiliates) of Deloitte & Touche LLP, we may be unable to provide certain services based on individual facts and circumstances. As used in this document, “Deloitte” means Deloitte & Touche LLP, Deloitte Consulting LLP, Deloitte Tax LLP, and Deloitte Financial Advisory Services LLP, which are separate subsidiaries of Deloitte LLP. Please see www.deloitte.com/us/about for a detailed description of our legal structure. Copyright © 2020 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. Publications in Deloitte’s Roadmap Series Business Combinations Business Combinations — SEC Reporting Considerations Carve-Out Transactions Comparing IFRS Standards
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER 16 ESTIMATING EQUITY VALUE PER SHARE in Chapter 15, We Considered How Best to Estimate the Value of the Operating Assets of the Firm
    1 CHAPTER 16 ESTIMATING EQUITY VALUE PER SHARE In Chapter 15, we considered how best to estimate the value of the operating assets of the firm. To get from that value to the firm value, you have to consider cash, marketable securities and other non-operating assets held by a firm. In particular, you have to value holdings in other firms and deal with a variety of accounting techniques used to record such holdings. To get from firm value to equity value, you have to determine what should be subtracted out from firm value – i.e, the value of the non-equity claims in the firm. Once you have valued the equity in a firm, it may appear to be a relatively simple exercise to estimate the value per share. All it seems you need to do is divide the value of the equity by the number of shares outstanding. But, in the case of some firms, even this simple exercise can become complicated by the presence of management and employee options. In this chapter, we will measure the magnitude of this option overhang on valuation and then consider ways of incorporating the effect into the value per share. The Value of Non-operating Assets Firms have a number of assets on their books that can be categorized as non- operating assets. The first and obvious one is cash and near-cash investments – investments in riskless or very low-risk investments that most companies with large cash balances make. The second is investments in equities and bonds of other firms, sometimes for investment reasons and sometimes for strategic ones.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 Consolidation Following Acquisition Consolidation Following
    Consolidation Following Acquisition Chapter 5 • The procedures used to prepare a consolidated balance sheet as of the date of acquisition were introduced in the preceding chapter, that is, Consolidation Chapter 4. Following Acquisition • More than a consolidated balance sheet, however, is needed to provide a comprehensive picture of the consolidated entity’s activities following acquisition. McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2005 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. 5-2 Consolidation Following Acquisition Consolidation Following Acquisition • The purpose of this chapter is to present the procedures used in the preparation of a • As with a single company, the set of basic consolidated balance sheet, income statement, financial statements for a consolidated entity and retained earnings statement subsequent consists of a balance sheet, an income to the date of combination. statement, a statement of changes in retained earnings, and a statement of cash flows. • The preparation of a consolidated statement of cash flows is discussed in Chapter 10. 5-3 5-4 Consolidation Following Acquisition Consolidation Following Acquisition • This chapter first deals with the important concepts of consolidated net income and consolidated retained earnings. • Finally, the remainder of the chapter deals with the specific procedures used to • Thereafter, the chapter presents a description prepare consolidated financial statements of the workpaper format used to facilitate the subsequent to the date of combination. preparation of a full set of consolidated financial statements. 5-5 5-6 1 Consolidation Following Acquisition Consolidation Following Acquisition • The discussion in the chapter focuses on procedures for consolidation when the parent company accounts for its investment in • Regardless of the method used by the parent subsidiary stock using the equity method.
    [Show full text]
  • Demystifying Equity Financing
    Chapter 6 Demystifying Equity Financing by James Macon, Principal, Barbour Alliance L3C Above images used with the permission of Ben Waterman. 31 The Equity Model Equity is a representation of ownership in an enterprise allocated to individuals or other entities in the form of ownership units (or shares). Equity can be used as a financing tool by for-profit businesses in exchange for ownership (control) and an expected return to investors. Unlike many debt financing tools, equity typically does not require collateral, but is based on the potential for creation of value through the growth of the enterprise. Equity investors may not require ongoing interest payments, however, the future return expectations are higher than debt, ranging from 8% to more than 25% per year over the life of the investment. The primary considerations for any enterprise considering equity are 1) the level of ownership and thus control the founders are willing to relinquish in their enterprise; and 2) the ability to deliver the level of return expected by the equity investors. The two primary categories of equity are “common” shares (typically for founders and employees) and “preferred” shares Words of Caution: (typically for investors). Preferred shares include special features Farmers who seek outside capital through any process or “terms” to sweeten and protect the investment. Such features should consider carefully structuring the agreement to include liquidation preference (right to redeem their allocation of maintain management control. Farmers should also proceeds from a sale of the business before common shareholders), consider carefully limiting the capacity of investors to anti-dilution protection (protecting the value of preferred equity withdraw capital before the business can withstand a units at the expense of common shareholders should the value withdrawal of capital.
    [Show full text]
  • Essay on Anti-Takeover Provisions and Corporate Spin-Offs Wei Du Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected]
    Louisiana State University LSU Digital Commons LSU Doctoral Dissertations Graduate School 2015 Essay on Anti-takeover Provisions and Corporate Spin-offs Wei Du Louisiana State University and Agricultural and Mechanical College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations Part of the Finance and Financial Management Commons Recommended Citation Du, Wei, "Essay on Anti-takeover Provisions and Corporate Spin-offs" (2015). LSU Doctoral Dissertations. 3901. https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/gradschool_dissertations/3901 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at LSU Digital Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in LSU Doctoral Dissertations by an authorized graduate school editor of LSU Digital Commons. For more information, please [email protected]. ESSAY ON ANTI-TAKEOVER PROVISIONS AND CORPORATE SPIN-OFFS A Dissertation Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Louisiana State University and Agriculture and Mechanical College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in The Interdepartmental Program in Business Administration by Wei Du B.S., Tongji University, 2008 M.S., Illinois Institute of Technology, 2010 May 2016 Acknowledgements This paper could not be written to its fullest without the help, support, guidance and efforts of a lot of people. First of all, I would like to express my deepest sense of gratitude to my research advisor and dissertation chair Dr. Gary C. Sanger, for his guidance, encouragement and support throughout the time of my dissertation research, even in the week before his surgery. I admire his wisdom deeply and regard him as my lifelong role model to follow.
    [Show full text]
  • The Cost of Equity Capital for Reits: an Examination of Three Asset-Pricing Models
    MIT Center for Real Estate September, 2000 The Cost of Equity Capital for REITs: An Examination of Three Asset-Pricing Models David N. Connors Matthew L. Jackman Thesis, 2000 © Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 2000. This paper, in whole or in part, may not be cited, reproduced, or used in any other way without the written permission of the authors. Comments are welcome and should be directed to the attention of the authors. MIT Center for Real Estate, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Building W31-310, Cambridge, MA, 02139-4307 (617-253-4373). THE COST OF EQUITY CAPITAL FOR REITS: AN EXAMINATION OF THREE ASSET-PRICING MODELS by David Neil Connors B.S. Finance, 1991 Bentley College and Matthew Laurence Jackman B.S.B.A. Finance, 1996 University of North Carolinaat Charlotte Submitted to the Department of Urban Studies and Planning in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE IN REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENT at the MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY September 2000 © 2000 David N. Connors & Matthew L. Jackman. All Rights Reserved. The authors hereby grant to MIT permission to reproduce and to distribute publicly paper and electronic (\aopies of this thesis in whole or in part. Signature of Author: - T L- . v Department of Urban Studies and Planning August 1, 2000 Signature of Author: IN Department of Urban Studies and Planning August 1, 2000 Certified by: Blake Eagle Chairman, MIT Center for Real Estate Thesis Supervisor Certified by: / Jonathan Lewellen Professor of Finance, Sloan School of Management Thesis Supervisor
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 5 Questions Multiple Choice 1
    Chapter 5 Question Review 1 Chapter 5 Questions Multiple Choice 1. At the beginning of the year, Paradise Co. had an inventory of $200,000. During the year, the company purchased goods costing $900,000. Paradise Co reported ending inventory of $300,000 at the end of the year. Their cost of goods sold is a. $1,000,000 b. $800,000 c. $1,400,000 d. $400,000 2. Under the perpetual inventory system, in addition to making the entry to record a sale, a company would a. debit Inventory and credit Cost of Goods Sold. b. debit Cost of Goods Sold and credit Purchases. c. debit Cost of Goods sold and credit Inventory. d. make no additional entry until the end of the period. 3. Gross profit equals the difference between net sales and a. operating expenses. b. cost of goods sold. c. net income. d. cost of goods sold plus operating expenses. 4. Income from operations appears on a. both a multiple-step and a single-step income statement. b. neither a multiple-step nor a single-step income statement. c. a single-step income statement. d. a multiple-step income statement. 5. The entry for a buyer to record the return of goods under a perpetual inventory system assuming the purchase was made on account would include a a. debit to inventory b. debit to purchase returns and allowances c. credit to accounts payable d. debit to accounts payable 6. Under the perpetual system, cash freight costs incurred by the buyer for the transporting of goods is recorded in which account? a.
    [Show full text]
  • BIG CHALLENGES BIG SOLUTIONS 2121 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20433 USA IFC FINANCIALS and PROJECTS 2014
    2014 2014 IFC Financials and Projects 2014 CREATING OPPORTUNITY WHERE IT’S NEEDED MOST BIG CHALLENGES BIG SOLUTIONS 2121 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20433 USA IFC FINANCIALS AND PROJECTS 2014 202 473 3800 ifc.org Big Challenges. Solutions. 2014 2014 TABLE OF CONTENTS MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS 2 Executive Summary 2 Client Services 5 Liquid Assets 11 Funding Resources 11 Risk Management 13 Critical Accounting Policies 18 Results of Operations 20 Governance and Control 26 CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND INTERNAL CONTROL REPORTS 30 Management’s Report Regarding Effectiveness of Internal Control over External Financial Reporting 30 Auditors’ Report on Management’s Assertion on Effectiveness of Internal Control over External Financial Reporting 32 Consolidated Balance Sheets 34 Consolidated Income Statements 35 Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income 36 Consolidated Statements of Changes in Capital 37 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 39 Consolidated Statement of Capital Stock and Voting Power 41 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 42 Independent Auditors’ Report 100 PROJECT COMMITMENTS 103 INVESTMENT PORTFOLIO — CUMULATIVE GROSS COMMITMENTS BY REGION 124 NOTES AND DEFINITIONS 128 IFC Financials and Projects 2014 2 MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY and other derivative instruments. The Management’s Discussion and Analysis contains forward looking statements which may be International Finance Corporation (IFC or the Corporation) is the identified by such terms as “anticipates,” “believes,” “expects,” largest global development institution focused on the private sec- “intends,” “plans” or words of similar meaning. Such statements tor in developing countries. Established in 1956, IFC is owned by involve a number of assumptions and estimates that are based on 184 member countries, a group that collectively determines its poli- current expectations, which are subject to risks and uncertainties cies.
    [Show full text]