DOCSLIB.ORG

Building Land in Coastal Louisiana: Supplemental Information

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Building Land in Coastal Louisiana: Supplemental Information BUILDING LAND IN COASTAL LOUISIANA Expert Recommendations for Operating a Successful Sediment Diversion that Balances Ecosystem and Community Needs Page 1 Supplemental Information Table of Contents HYDRODYNAMICS IN THE RIVER .......................................................................................................................... 01 Pulsed Flows ............................................................................................................................................................. 01 River Discharge ......................................................................................................................................................... 01 Maximizing Diversion Efficiency ................................................................................................................................. 02 Sediment Availability ................................................................................................................................................. 03 Other Factors ............................................................................................................................................................ 03 HYDRODYNAMICS IN THE BASIN ......................................................................................................................... 04 Channel Development .............................................................................................................................................. 04 Residence Time ......................................................................................................................................................... 05 Water Levels ............................................................................................................................................................. 05 SEDIMENT ............................................................................................................................................................... 06 Channel Development and Sediment Transport ........................................................................................................ 06 Sediment Retention .................................................................................................................................................. 06 Sediment-Water Ratio ............................................................................................................................................... 08 WATER QUALITY .................................................................................................................................................... 09 Salinity ...................................................................................................................................................................... 09 Temperature ............................................................................................................................................................. 09 Nutrients .................................................................................................................................................................. 11 Hypoxia .................................................................................................................................................................... 11 Phytoplankton and Harmful Algal Blooms ................................................................................................................. 12 Sediment .................................................................................................................................................................. 12 Disease, Pathogens, Hormones and Pharmaceuticals ................................................................................................. 12 WETLAND HEALTH ................................................................................................................................................. 13 Habitat Types ............................................................................................................................................................ 13 Vegetation ................................................................................................................................................................ 13 Sediment Input ......................................................................................................................................................... 14 Biogeochemistry ....................................................................................................................................................... 15 Timing and Duration of Flooding .............................................................................................................................. 15 FISH AND WILDLIFE POPULATIONS ...................................................................................................................... 17 Productivity and the Food Web ................................................................................................................................. 17 Wildlife Habitat ........................................................................................................................................................ 17 Fish and Shellfish Habitats ........................................................................................................................................ 18 Specific Species Information ..................................................................................................................................... 19 American Alligator .................................................................................................................................................... 19 Page 2 Table of Contents Blue Crab ................................................................................................................................................................. 20 Bottlenose Dolphin ................................................................................................................................................... 20 Eastern Oyster .......................................................................................................................................................... 21 Finfish ....................................................................................................................................................................... 22 Mammals ................................................................................................................................................................. 23 Migratory Birds ......................................................................................................................................................... 23 Rangia Clams ........................................................................................................................................................... 23 Shrimp ...................................................................................................................................................................... 24 Waterfowl and other Water Birds .............................................................................................................................. 25 SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC ISSUES .......................................................................................................................... 26 Socio-Economic Effects ............................................................................................................................................ 26 Natural Resource Dependent Communities ............................................................................................................... 27 Flood Risk to Communities ....................................................................................................................................... 28 GOVERNANCE AND LEGAL ................................................................................................................................... 30 Decision-Making Structure and Process ..................................................................................................................... 30 Active and Meaningful Participation of People Affected by Diversions ....................................................................... 30 Outreach ................................................................................................................................................................... 31 Laws and Regulations ............................................................................................................................................... 31 Transitions and Mitigation ......................................................................................................................................... 33 MONITORING, RESEARCH AND ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT ................................................................................ 35 Adaptive Management ............................................................................................................................................. 35 Monitoring and Research Plan ................................................................................................................................... 36 Hydrodynamics of the River ......................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Renaissance of Odum's Outwelling Hypothesis In
    Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 255 (2021) 107361 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science ELSEVIER journal homepage: http://www.elsevier.com/locate/ecss The renaissance of Odum’s outwelling hypothesis in ’Blue Carbon’ science Isaac R. Santos a,b,*, David J. Burdige c, Tim C. Jennerjahn d,e, Steven Bouillon f, Alex Cabral a, Oscar Serrano g,k, Thomas Wernberg h,i, Karen Filbee-Dexter h,i, Julia A. Guimond j, Joseph J. Tamborski c a Department of Marine Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden b National Marine Science Centre, Southern Cross University, Coffs Harbour, Australia c Department of Ocean and Earth Sciences, Old Dominion University, Norfolk, VA, USA d Leibniz Centre for Tropical Marine Research, Fahrenheitstrasse 6, Bremen, Germany e Faculty of Geoscience, University of Bremen, Klagenfurter Strasse, Bremen, Germany f Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium g School of Sciences and Centre for Marine Ecosystems Research, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia h School of Biological Sciences and UWA Oceans Institute, University of Western Australia, Australia i Institute of Marine Research, His, Norway j Department of Civil and Resource Engineering, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada k Centro de Estudios Avanzados de Blanes, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas, Blanes, Spain ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: The term ‘Blue Carbon’ was coined about a decade ago to highlight the important carbon sequestration capacity Coastal carbon of coastal vegetated ecosystems. The term has paved the way for the development of programs and policies that Alkalinity preserve and restore these threatened coastal ecosystems for climate change mitigation.
    [Show full text]
  • Wetland and Hydric Soils 6 Carl C
    Wetland and Hydric Soils 6 Carl C. Trettin, Randall K. Kolka, Anne S. Marsh, Sheel Bansal, Erik A. Lilleskov, Patrick Megonigal, Marla J. Stelk, Graeme Lockaby, David V. D’Amore, Richard A. MacKenzie, Brian Tangen, Rodney Chimner, and James Gries Introduction conterminous United States have been converted to other land uses over the past 150 years (Dahl 1990). Most of those losses Soil and the inherent biogeochemical processes in wetlands are due to draining and conversion to agriculture. States in the contrast starkly with those in upland forests and rangelands. The Midwest such as Iowa, Illinois, Missouri, Ohio, and Indiana differences stem from extended periods of anoxia, or the lack of have lost more than 85% of their original wetlands, and oxygen in the soil, that characterize wetland soils; in contrast, California has lost 96% of its wetlands. In the mid-1900s, the upland soils are nearly always oxic. As a result, wetland soil importance of wetlands in the landscape started to be under- biogeochemistry is characterized by anaerobic processes, and stood, and wetlands are now recognized for their inherent wetland vegetation exhibits specifc adaptations to grow under value that is realized through the myriad of ecosystem ser- these conditions. However, many wetlands may also have peri- vices, including storage of water to mitigate fooding, fltering ods during the year where the soils are unsaturated and aerated. water of pollutants and sediment, storing and sequestering car- This fuctuation between aerated and nonaerated soil condi- bon (C), providing critical habitat for wildlife, and recreation. tions, along with the specialized vegetation, gives rise to a wide Historically, drainage of wetlands for agricultural devel- variety of highly valued ecosystem services.
    [Show full text]
  • Carbon Outwelling from a Mangrove Forest with Adjacent Seagrass Beds and Coral Reefs (Gazi Bay, Kenya)
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 106: 291-301, 1994 Published April 7 Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. Carbon outwelling from a mangrove forest with adjacent seagrass beds and coral reefs (Gazi Bay, Kenya) M. A. Hemmingal, F. J. Slim1,J. Kazungu2,G. M. Ganssen3,J. Nieuwenhuizel, N. M. Kruyt 'Netherlands Institute of Ecology, Centre for Estuarine and Coastal Ecology. Vierstraat 28,4401 EA Yerseke. The Netherlands '~enyaMarine and Fisheries Research Institute, PO Box 81651, Mombasa, Kenya 31nstitute of Earth Sciences, Free University Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands 41nstitute for Marine and Atmospheric Research, Utrecht University, PO Box 80115,3508 TC Utrecht, The Netherlands ABSTRACT: Carbon fluxes from a mangrove creek with adjacent seagrass meadows and coral reefs (at 4 km from the creek) were investigated in Gazi Bay (Kenya).Analysis of the stable isotope signature of sediment carbon in the seagrass zone and data on the sediment carbon content indicate that outwelling of particulate organic matter (POM) from the mangrove forest occurs, but that deposition of this POM rapidly decreases away from the forest. No evidence for any input of mangrove POM in the seagrass zone was found at a distance of 3 km from the mangrove creek, near the reefs. The gradient in sedi- ment 6I3C values in the seagrass zone was paralleled by a similar gradient of 6I3Cvalues in Thalasso- dendron ciliatum, the dominant subtidal seagrass. This gradient probably reflects the availability of respiratory CO2 denved from mangrove POM as a carbon source for the seagrass. Analysis of C:N ratios of particulate material (< 1 mm) collected with sediment traps in the seagrass zone yielded values ranging from 8.5 to 11.2.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Material Processing by a Salt Marsh- Estuarine Basin in South Carolina, USA
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 72: 153-166, 1991 Published May 23 Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. Annual material processing by a salt marsh- estuarine basin in South Carolina, USA ' Department of Marine Science. Coastal Carolina College, Conway, South Carolina 29526. USA Department of Statistics. University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29298. USA Belle W. Baruch Forest Science Institute. Clemson University, Georgetown, South Carolina 29442. USA " Belle W. Baruch Institute for Marine Biology and Coastal Research, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina 29208, USA Department of Biology, University of Texas at Arlington, Arlington, Texas 76019, USA ABSTRACT: A synthesis of a comprehensive annual study of material processing in the Bly Creek marsh-estuarine basln is described. The project design provides statistical estimates of material fluxes for the water column, salt marsh, and oyster reef subsystems. Fluxes from a freshwater stream, groundwater, and rain are also presented Material processing by the Bly Creek marsh-estuarine basin is constituent- and subsystem-specific Inflows of material via rain, streamwater. and groundwater are small and relatively unin~portantcompared to tidal fluxes. The salt marsh dominates the basin in aerial extent and in terms of net material fluxes. Most constituents exhibit significant net annual import to the salt marsh. Only DON is exported from the marsh and from the basin at significant levels. The salt marsh appears to recycle most of the nitrogen and phosphorus needed for marsh grass primary production. Sufficient inorganic particulate material is imported to allow the salt marsh to maintain its elevation with respect to ongoing sea-level rise. As a result of metabolic processes, the oyster reef imports particulate materials and releases dissolved nutrients.
    [Show full text]
  • Sources of Suspended Organic Matter and Selective Feeding by Zooplankton in an Estuarine Mangrove Ecosystem As Traced by Stable Isotopes
    MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES Vol. 208: 79–92, 2000 Published December 8 Mar Ecol Prog Ser Sources of suspended organic matter and selective feeding by zooplankton in an estuarine mangrove ecosystem as traced by stable isotopes S. Bouillon1, P. Chandra Mohan2, N. Sreenivas2, F. Dehairs1,* 1Department of Analytical Chemistry, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Pleinlaan 2, 1050 Brussels, Belgium 2Department of Zoology, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam 530003, Andhra Pradesh, India ABSTRACT: Between January 1995 and August 1996, suspended matter and zooplankton were sam- pled at different locations in a mangrove ecosystem located in the Gautami Godavari estuary and adjacent Kakinada Bay (Andhra Pradesh, India). Suspended matter was sampled at 13 different sta- tions, and was found to have a highly variable carbon stable isotope composition, with δ13C values ranging overall between –30.94 and –19.18‰, and a highly variable elemental (C:N) composition. Our data suggest that the phytoplankton component has a seasonally and spatially variable δ13C sig- nature, which is surpressed by the terrestrial signal but may at times fall in the same range as the δ13C of the allochtonous matter. It is argued that the phytoplankton δ13C decreases after the onset of the monsoon rains, most likely due to the 13C-depletion of the DIC pool caused by the microbial respira- tion of the allochtonous organic matter. At each of the 4 sites selected for concurrent zooplankton sampling, the zooplankton showed a much wider range of δ13C than did the suspended matter, with overall δ13C values between –30.14 and –16.45‰. In addition, spatial differences in average δ13C were much more pronounced for zooplankton than for total suspended matter.
    [Show full text]
  • Storm‐Driven Particulate Organic Matter Flux Connects a Tidal
    Ecological Applications, 28(6), 2018, pp. 1420–1434 © 2018 by the Ecological Society of America Storm-driven particulate organic matter flux connects a tidal tributary floodplain wetland, mainstem river, and estuary 1 1 1,3 1 2 RONALD M. THOM, STEPHEN A. BREITHAUPT, HEIDA L. DIEFENDERFER , AMY B. BORDE, G. CURTIS ROEGNER, 1 1 GARY E. JOHNSON, AND DANA L. WOODRUFF 1Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Marine Sciences Laboratory, 1529 West Sequim Bay Road, Sequim, Washington 98382 USA 2National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Marine Fisheries Service, Point Adams Field Station, 520 Heceta Place, Hammond, Oregon 97121 USA Abstract. The transport of terrestrial plant matter into coastal waters is important to regional and global biogeochemical cycles, and methods for assessing and predicting fluxes in such dynamic environments are needed. We investigated the hypothesis that upon reconnection of a floodplain wet- land to its mainstem river, organic matter produced in the wetland would reach other parts of the ecosystem. If so, we can infer that the organic matter would ultimately become a source for the food web in the mainstem river and estuary. To accomplish this, we adapted numerical hydrodynamic and transport modeling methods to estimate the mass of particulate organic matter (POM) derived from the annually senescent aboveground parts of herbaceous marsh plants (H-POM). The Finite-Volume Community Ocean Model (FVCOM), parameterized with flow, tide, and aboveground biomass data, simulated H-POM mobilization from fluid shear stress during tidal exchange, flooding, and variable river flow; entrainment into the water column; transport via channel and overland flow; and entrap- ment when wetted surfaces dry.
    [Show full text]
  • Downloaded from CMEMS (Iberian–Biscay–Ireland Regional Sea, Available At
    water Article Integrating In Situ and Ocean Color Data to Evaluate Ecological Quality under the Water Framework Directive Ana C. Brito 1,2,* , Paloma Garrido-Amador 3 , Carla Gameiro 4 , Marta Nogueira 4 , Maria Teresa Moita 5 and Maria Teresa Cabrita 6 1 Departamento de Biologia Vegetal, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal 2 MARE-Marine and Environmental Sciences Centre, Faculdade de Ciências, Universidade de Lisboa, 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal 3 Max Plank Institute for Marine Microbiology, Celsiusstrasse 1, 28359 Bremen, Germany; [email protected] 4 IPMA-Instituto Português do Mar e da Atmosfera, 1495-006 Lisboa, Portugal; [email protected] (C.G.); [email protected] (M.N.) 5 CCMAR-Centre of Marine Sciences, Universidade do Algarve, Campus de Gambelas, 8005-139 Faro, Portugal; [email protected] 6 CEG/IGOT-Ulisboa-Centro de Estudos Geográficos/Instituto de Geografia e Ordenamento do Território, Universidade de Lisboa, 1600-276 Lisboa, Portugal; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 8 October 2020; Accepted: 27 November 2020; Published: 8 December 2020 Abstract: The Water Framework Directive (WFD) aims at evaluating the ecological status of European coastal water bodies (CWBs). This is a rather complex task and first requires the use of long-term databases to assess the effect of anthropogenic pressure on biological communities. An in situ dataset was assembled using concomitant biological, i.e., chlorophyll a (Chl a) and environmental data, covering the years from 1995 to 2014, to enable a comprehensive assessment of eutrophication in the Western Iberia Coast (WIC). Given the temporal gaps in the dataset, especially in terms of Chl a, satellite observations were used to complement it.
    [Show full text]
  • How Interactions Between Mangrove Forests, Seagrass Meadows and Tidal Marshes Influence Carbon Storage
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Repository@Napier Current Forestry Reports https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-018-0077-4 PHYSIOLOGICAL PROCESSES (M MENCUCCINI, SECTION EDITOR) Carbon in the Coastal Seascape: How Interactions Between Mangrove Forests, Seagrass Meadows and Tidal Marshes Influence Carbon Storage M. Huxham1 & D. Whitlock2 & M. Githaiga3 & A. Dencer-Brown4 # The Author(s) 2018 Abstract Purpose of Review We use the ‘seascape’ concept to explore how interactions between mangrove forests, tidal marshes and seagrass influence the storage of carbon in these ecosystems. Mangrove forests, with the other two ‘blue carbon’ habitats, are exceptionally powerful carbon sinks. Maintaining and enhancing these sinks is an emerging priority in climate change mitigation. However, managing any one ecosystem on its own risks is ignoring important contextual drivers of carbon storage emerging from its place in the seascape. We consider how interactions between these coastal habitats directly or indirectly affect the amounts of carbon they can store. Recent Findings The export of carbon from seagrasses may occur over hundreds or thousands of kilometres, much further than reported for mangroves or tidal marshes. Seagrasses may buffer mangroves from wave impacts, assisting forest regeneration. Trophic cascades supported by contiguous blue carbon habitat may limit excessive herbivory and bioturbation in them but evidence is limited. Summary Direct transfers of carbon between blue carbon habitats are common and are likely to enhance total carbon storage, but our understanding of their contribution to carbon stocks at the seascape level is elementary. There is evidence for indirect enhancement of carbon storage at the seascape by close association of habitats, mostly through the creation and maintenance of propitious conditions by one ecosystem for another.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change Implications for Tidal Marshes and Food Web Linkages to Estuarine and Coastal Nekton
    Estuaries and Coasts https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-020-00891-1 SPECIAL ISSUE: CONCEPTS AND CONTROVERSIES IN TIDAL MARSH ECOLOGY REVISITED Climate Change Implications for Tidal Marshes and Food Web Linkages to Estuarine and Coastal Nekton Denise D. Colombano1 & Steven Y. Litvin2 & Shelby L. Ziegler3 & Scott B. Alford4 & Ronald Baker5 & Myriam A. Barbeau6 & Just Cebrián7 & Rod M. Connolly8 & Carolyn A. Currin9 & Linda A. Deegan10 & Justin S. Lesser11 & Charles W. Martin4 & Ashley E. McDonald12 & Catherine McLuckie13 & Blair H. Morrison5 & James W. Pahl14 & L. Mark Risse15 & Joseph A. M. Smith16 & Lorie W. Staver17 & R. Eugene Turner18 & Nathan J. Waltham19 Received: 2 September 2020 /Revised: 16 December 2020 /Accepted: 21 December 2020 # The Author(s) 2021 Abstract Climate change is altering naturally fluctuating environmental conditions in coastal and estuarine ecosystems across the globe. Departures from long-term averages and ranges of environmental variables are increasingly being observed as directional changes [e.g., rising sea levels, sea surface temperatures (SST)] and less predictable periodic cycles (e.g., Atlantic or Pacific decadal oscillations) and extremes (e.g., coastal flooding, marine heatwaves). Quantifying the short- and long-term impacts of climate change on tidal marsh seascape structure and function for nekton is a critical step toward fisheries conservation and management. The multiple stressor framework provides a promising approach for advancing integrative, cross-disciplinary research on tidal marshes and food web dynamics. It can be used to quantify climate change effects on and interactions between coastal oceans (e.g., SST, ocean currents, waves) and watersheds (e.g., precipitation, river flows), tidal marsh geomorphology (e.g., vegetation structure, elevation capital, sedimentation), and estuarine and coastal nekton (e.g., species distributions, life history adaptations, predator-prey dynamics).
    [Show full text]
  • Shifts in Diatom Dominance Associated with Seasonal Changes in an Estuarine-Mangrove Phytoplankton Community
    Journal of Marine Science and Engineering Article Shifts in Diatom Dominance Associated with Seasonal Changes in an Estuarine-Mangrove Phytoplankton Community Fareha Hilaluddin 1, Fatimah Md. Yusoff 2,3,* and Tatsuki Toda 4 1 Laboratory of Marine Biotechnology, Institute of Bioscience, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), Serdang, Selangor 43400, Malaysia; [email protected] 2 International Institute of Aquaculture and Aquatic Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), Port Dickson, Negeri Sembilan 71050, Malaysia 3 Department of Aquaculture, Faculty of Agriculture, Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM), Serdang, Selangor 43400, Malaysia 4 Laboratory of Restoration Ecology, Faculty of Engineering, Soka University, 1-236 Tangi-cho, Hachioji, Tokyo 192-8577, Japan; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 6 June 2020; Accepted: 13 July 2020; Published: 17 July 2020 Abstract: A study on seasonal phytoplankton abundance and composition in a mangrove estuary, Matang Mangrove Forest Reserve (MMFR), Malaysia, was carried out to determine the phytoplankton structure in this ecosystem, and to identify potential indicators of environmental changes. Phytoplankton samples were collected bimonthly from June 2010 to April 2011, to cover both dry (June to October) and wet (November to April) seasons, at four selected sampling sites along the river. Diatoms showed the highest number of species (50 species) from a total of 85 phytoplankton species from 76 genera. Diatoms contributed more than 90% of the total phytoplankton abundance during the dry season (southwest monsoon) and less than 70% during the wet season (northeast monsoon) as dinoflagellates became more abundant during the rainy season. Two diatoms were recorded as dominant species throughout the sampling period; Cyclotella sp.
    [Show full text]
  • Fluxes of Zooplankton Biomass Between a Tidal Estuary and the Sea in Northeastern Brazil
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF OCEANOGRAPHIC, 55(4):239-249, 2007 FLUXES OF ZOOPLANKTON BIOMASS BETWEEN A TIDAL ESTUARY AND THE SEA IN NORTHEASTERN BRAZIL Mauro de Melo Júnior1,*; Maryse Nogueira Paranaguá2; Ralf Schwamborn3; Sigrid Neumann Leitão1 and Werner Ekau4 1Departamento de Oceanografia da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (Av. da Arquitetura, s/n, 50670-901 Recife, PE, Brasil) 2Departamento de Biologia da Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco (Av. Dom Manuel de Medeiros, s/n., 52171-900 Recife, PE, Brasil) 3Departamento de Zoologia da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco (Av. Professor Moraes Rego, 235, 50740-550 Recife, PE, Brasil) 4Center for Tropical Marine Ecology (ZMT, Bremen, Germany) *corresponding author: [email protected] A B S T R A C T The objective of this study was to quantify the zooplankton biomass transport between the Santa Cruz Channel (SCC) at Catuama north inlet and the adjacent shelf located in Itamaracá estuarine ecosystem, Pernambuco State, Northeastern Brazil. Sampling was carried out in August 2001 at spring and neap tides at three stations every 3-hour interval. Collections were made in three depths with a plankton pump coupled to a 300 µm mesh size net. Current data were obtained with an ADCP (Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler). In laboratory, samples were filtered for wet weigh determination. High biomass variation was recorded, with highest values at nocturnal flood and ebb during spring tide. The average instantaneous biomass transport was 139.48 ± 72.58 mg.m-2s-1, during spring tide and 36.63 ± 27.66 mg.m-2s-1, during neap tide. No significant difference was registered between importation and exportation flows (p > 0.05), showing that the estuary both exports and imports high biomass during the rainy season.
    [Show full text]
  • GALLEY 22 Cultural Eutrophication in the Choptank and Patuxent
    Allen Press x DTPro System GALLEY 22 ms#04-165 File #05ee Name /limn/50_605 06/17/2005 10:39AM Plate # 0-Composite pg 22 # 1 Limnol. Oceanogr., 00(0), 2005, 000±000 q 2005, by the American Society of Limnology and Oceanography, Inc. Cultural eutrophication in the Choptank and Patuxent estuaries of Chesapeake Bay T. R. Fisher Horn Point Laboratory, Center for Environmental Science, University of Maryland, Cambridge, Maryland 21613 J. D. Hagy III U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, NHEERL, Gulf Ecology Division, 1 Sabine Island Drive, Gulf Breeze, Florida 32561 W. R. Boynton Chesapeake Biological Laboratory, Center for Environmental Science, University of Maryland, Solomons, Maryland 20688-0038 M. R. Williams Horn Point Laboratory, Center for Environmental Science, University of Maryland, Cambridge, Maryland 21613 Abstract ?1 The Choptank and Patuxent tributaries of Chesapeake Bay have become eutrophic over the last 50±100 years. Systematic monitoring of nutrient inputs began in ;1970, and there have been 2±5-fold increases in nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) inputs during 1970±2004 due to sewage discharges, fertilizer applications, atmospheric depo- sition, and changes in land use. Hydrochemical modeling and land-use yield coef®cients suggest that current input rates are 4±20 times higher for N and P than under forested conditions existing 350 yr ago. Sewage is a major cause of increased nutrients in the Patuxent; agricultural inputs dominate in the Choptank. These loading increases have caused three major water-quality problems: (1) increased nutrients, phytoplankton, and turbidity; (2) decreased submerged grasses due to higher turbidity and epiphyton shading; and (3) bottom-water hypoxia due to respiration of excess organic matter.
    [Show full text]