Integrative Modelling and Managing New Landscapes and Environments in De-Glaciating Mountain Ranges: an Emerging Trans-Disciplinary Research Field

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Integrative Modelling and Managing New Landscapes and Environments in De-Glaciating Mountain Ranges: an Emerging Trans-Disciplinary Research Field Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2017 Integrative modelling and managing new landscapes and environments in de-glaciating mountain ranges: an emerging trans-disciplinary research field Haeberli, Wilfried DOI: https://doi.org/10.15406/freij.2017.01.00005 Posted at the Zurich Open Repository and Archive, University of Zurich ZORA URL: https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-143930 Journal Article Published Version The following work is licensed under a Creative Commons: Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International (CC BY-NC 4.0) License. Originally published at: Haeberli, Wilfried (2017). Integrative modelling and managing new landscapes and environments in de-glaciating mountain ranges: an emerging trans-disciplinary research field. Forestry Research and Engineering: International Journal, 1(1):00005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15406/freij.2017.01.00005 Forestry Research and Engineering: International Journal Integrative Modelling and Managing New Landscapes and Environments in De-Glaciating Mountain Ranges: An Emerging Trans-Disciplinary Research Field Keywords: Short Communication Landscape transformation;Climate change; geomorphic Glacier vanishing; surface Permafrostprocesses; degradation; Forest expansion; New lakes, Slope stability; Volume 1 Issue 1 - 2017 IntroductionAdaptation strategies; Risk reduction Geography Department, University of Zurich, Switzerland Emerging landscapes – emerging research fields *Corresponding author: Changes in the global climate system may lead to corresponding 202-33-83; Email: Wilfried Haeberli, Geography Department, University of Zurich, Switzerland Tel: +41-79- Received: | Published: changes in natural landscapes. Examples are large-scale shifts August 24, 2017 September 18, 2017 forof boreal adaptation forests to climateinto tundra change zones, impacts desertification in such cases in have semi-arid to deal withregions, future and landscapesde-glaciations and in environments, cold mountainous which areas. will Strategiesdiffer not only from the past but also from present situations. Corresponding that many mountain ranges will essentially lose their glaciers planning of management options must be scenario-based. This within decades even under moderate scenarios of global warming involves modelling of new landscapes and environments – an [5,6]. Glacial landscapes are thereby transforming for centuries if not millennia to come into periglacial landscapes composed importantThe most emerging dramatic research landscape field. changes are currently occurring in high-latitude and high-altitude cold regions in which glaciers underof rocks different and debris, time numerous scales. Glaciers new lakes, disappear expanding within forests decades, and are rapidly disappearing. In densely populated mountainous strongly intensified geomorphic surface processes, each evolving areas, increases in natural hazards and changes in water resources, energy supply, and tourism may result [1]. The following permafrost in cold mountain peaks degrades over decades to centuries, vegetation and especially forests take decades to centuries as well to cover freshly exposed terrain, and formation illustrates first experiences and perspectives concerning icy high- of mature soils can last centuries to millennia [7-10]. Adjustment mountains. The example of the Aletsch glacier, the largest glacier [11,12].of surface This processes results insuch growing as erosion/sedimentation and long lasting disequilibria, or rock in the European Alps as the focus of the corresponding UNESCO especiallydeformation/stabilization concerning the stability also take of centuries over-steepened to (many) and millennia now de- Natural World Heritage Centre Jungfrau-Aletsch, is used as an example. slope stability) of de-glaciating landscapes have been modelled with degrading permafrost [10]. So far, primarily physical aspects (topography, ice, lakes and buttressed lateral valley slopes and slowly destabilizing icy peaks Three-dimensional model approaches combined with high- resolution digital terrain information can be used to calculate becomingand considered ice-free in awill future-oriented play an increasingly way. Over important time, however, role. Correspondingbiological aspects needs and willespecially therefore forest grow expansion for contributions into areas from forestry research and engineering to this emerging trans- surfacerealistic glacier-bedtopographies topographies of periglacial for stilllandscapes existing butemerging unmeasured from continuedglaciers [13]. glacier Such retreat glacier-bed and vanishing. topographies From representthis information, future disciplinaryDeglaciating field mountains of climate change – options adaptation. and risks potential sites of future lake formation in overdeepend parts of original glacier beds can be determined [14,15]. Such new With few exceptions (Karakoram, Pamir), glaciers are forlakes the can down-valley be interesting population for hydropower and infrastructure, production, freshwaterespecially retreating worldwide at rates that exceed those of historical de- supply or tourism. However, they also increase hazards and risks lateglaciations 20th [2,3]. Due to the delayed dynamic response, the extent wouldof most have glaciers to lose still about reflects an additional climatic 50%conditions of their of surface about area the formedin connection in their with immediate the increasing neighbourhood probability [10,16]. of large Careful rock/ century. The glaciers of the European Alps, for instance, ice avalanches from destabilizing icy peaks into lakes newly Both simple and sophisticated models have provided evidence therefore needed and must be based on model calculations with alone to adjust to present-day (2017) climatic conditions [4]. and integrative consideration of changing options and risks is Submit Manuscript | http://medcraveonline.com Forest Res Eng Int J 2017, 1(1): 00005 Integrative Modelling and Managing New Landscapes and Environments in De- Copyright: 2/4 Glaciating Mountain Ranges: An Emerging Trans-Disciplinary Research Field ©2017 Haeberli respect to the evolution of future landscapes/environments and trans-disciplinary evaluation of the technical and societal aspects involved [1]. slope movements into lakes cannot be quantitatively assessed but is certainly increasing with every new lake forming at the The example of the UNESCO Natural World Heritage downfoot of to over the steepenedmain valley slopes is also and increasing. icy peaks. The With correspondingly this increase, Centre Jungfrau-Aletsch the probability of large impact waves causing devastating floods inenhanced the main hazard valley withzone itstogether important with infrastructure the exposure therefore and Aletsch glacier (Figure 1) is a valley glacier stretching vulnerability of the town of Brig/Naters (> 20,000 inhabitants) from spectacular icy and perennially frozen peaks such as the Aletschhorn (4193 m a.s.l.) and the Jungfrau (4158 m a.s.l.) to markedly raises the regional risk level. the protected forested areas of the Aletschwald. With a length of still over 20 km, it is the largest glacier in the European Alps and the focus of the UNESCO Natural World Heritage Centre disappearJungfrau-Aletsch. within Eventhe 21 thisst large ice body with thicknesses up isto severaltransforming hundred into meters a new is likelylandscape to disintegrate in long-term and evolution,to largely century [17]. This glacier landscape developmentrequiring a new of soils interpretation and vegetation and – especiallyidentity for forest the re-growth UNESCO Natural World Heritage Centre. Modelling and visualizing the supportingand expansion such – efforts. as interconnected with geomorphic processes and lake environments [18-23] has an important potential of Figure 2 : Dam with largely empty reservoir Gibidum (April 2017; Foto W. Haeberli) and Aletsch region without the glaciers but with modelled bed overdeepenings (blue) where future lakes could possiblyLong-term form (modelplanning calculation and search and graph: for A. integrativeLinsabauer) solutions with interests concerning landscape protection, hydropower productionare needed. andConcepts fresh forwater combining supply couldrisk reduction develop alongstrategies the 3 following lines. An artificial lake reservoir with a volume of about 9 million m exists in the narrow gorge between the lower ice margin and the town of Brig (Figure 2). Enlargement of the reservoir volume could help making optimal use for hydropower duringproduction these of coming the excess few decades,water supplied reduction by inthe size melting of the glacier wouldduring thenthe coming cause additionaldecades. After runoff a “peakto decrease flow” toin bethe expected second Figure 1: could start forming within the area of destabilizing icy mountains Aletsch glacier region, Swiss Alps, with modelled permafrost Google Earth. part of the century. This is also the time when dangerous lakes occurrence indicated in colour. Source: [29], map implementation in in the upper catchment. The enhanced reservoir volume could The bed of the glacier contains a number of pronounced disaster prevention. Corresponding model calculations of then be used as a retention capacity for flood protection and secondoverdeepenings, half of the which 21st century may turn would into lakes be quite once large, the ice surrounded sets them hazardous process chains [26,27] and careful engineering design byfree over (Figure steepened,
Recommended publications
  • 4000 M Peaks of the Alps Normal and Classic Routes
    rock&ice 3 4000 m Peaks of the Alps Normal and classic routes idea Montagna editoria e alpinismo Rock&Ice l 4000m Peaks of the Alps l Contents CONTENTS FIVE • • 51a Normal Route to Punta Giordani 257 WEISSHORN AND MATTERHORN ALPS 175 • 52a Normal Route to the Vincent Pyramid 259 • Preface 5 12 Aiguille Blanche de Peuterey 101 35 Dent d’Hérens 180 • 52b Punta Giordani-Vincent Pyramid 261 • Introduction 6 • 12 North Face Right 102 • 35a Normal Route 181 Traverse • Geogrpahic location 14 13 Gran Pilier d’Angle 108 • 35b Tiefmatten Ridge (West Ridge) 183 53 Schwarzhorn/Corno Nero 265 • Technical notes 16 • 13 South Face and Peuterey Ridge 109 36 Matterhorn 185 54 Ludwigshöhe 265 14 Mont Blanc de Courmayeur 114 • 36a Hörnli Ridge (Hörnligrat) 186 55 Parrotspitze 265 ONE • MASSIF DES ÉCRINS 23 • 14 Eccles Couloir and Peuterey Ridge 115 • 36b Lion Ridge 192 • 53-55 Traverse of the Three Peaks 266 1 Barre des Écrins 26 15-19 Aiguilles du Diable 117 37 Dent Blanche 198 56 Signalkuppe 269 • 1a Normal Route 27 15 L’Isolée 117 • 37 Normal Route via the Wandflue Ridge 199 57 Zumsteinspitze 269 • 1b Coolidge Couloir 30 16 Pointe Carmen 117 38 Bishorn 202 • 56-57 Normal Route to the Signalkuppe 270 2 Dôme de Neige des Écrins 32 17 Pointe Médiane 117 • 38 Normal Route 203 and the Zumsteinspitze • 2 Normal Route 32 18 Pointe Chaubert 117 39 Weisshorn 206 58 Dufourspitze 274 19 Corne du Diable 117 • 39 Normal Route 207 59 Nordend 274 TWO • GRAN PARADISO MASSIF 35 • 15-19 Aiguilles du Diable Traverse 118 40 Ober Gabelhorn 212 • 58a Normal Route to the Dufourspitze
    [Show full text]
  • Managementstrategie Für Das UNESCO Weltnaturerbe Jungfrau-Aletsch-Bietschhorn
    Managementstrategie für das UNESCO Weltnaturerbe Jungfrau-Aletsch-Bietschhorn Trägerschaft UNESCO Weltnaturerbe Jungfrau-Aletsch-Bietschhorn Naters und Interlaken, 1. Dezember 2005 07_Managementstrategie_D_Titelse1 1 15.1.2008 11:11:27 Uhr Zitierung Trägerschaft UNESCO Weltnaturerbe Jungfrau-Aletsch-Bietschhorn, 2005: Managementplan für das UNESCO Weltnaturerbe Jungfrau-Aletsch-Bietschhorn; Naters und Interlaken, Schweiz: Trägerschaft UNESCO Weltnaturerbe Jungfrau-Aletsch-Bietschhorn. Autoren Wiesmann, Urs; Wallner, Astrid; Liechti, Karina; Aerni, Isabel: CDE (Centre for Development and Environment), Geographisches Institut, Universität Bern Schüpbach, Ursula; Ruppen, Beat: Managementzentrum UNESCO Weltnaturerbe Jungfrau-Aletsch-Bietschhorn, Naters und Interlaken Kartenredaktion Hiller, Rebecca und Berger, Catherine; CDE (Centre for Development and Environment), Geographisches Institut, Universität Bern in Zusammenarbeit mit der Trägerschaft UNESCO Weltnaturerbe Jungfrau-Aletsch-Bietschhorn, Naters und Interlaken Kontaktadressen Trägerschaft und Managementzentrum UNESCO Weltnaturerbe Jungfrau-Aletsch-Bietschhorn Postfach 444 CH-3904 Naters und Jungfraustrasse 38 CH-3800 Interlaken [email protected]; www.welterbe.ch © Trägerschaft UNESCO Weltnaturerbe Jungfrau-Aletsch-Bietschhorn, Naters, Schweiz Alle Rechte vorbehalten Titelfotos Trägerschaft UNESCO Weltnaturerbe Jungfrau-Aletsch-Bietschhorn (2005) Albrecht (1999); Ehrenbold (2001); Andenmatten (1995); Jungfraubahnen Kein Gebilde der Natur, das ich jemals sah, ist vergleichbar mit der
    [Show full text]
  • 13 Protection: a Means for Sustainable Development? The
    13 Protection: A Means for Sustainable Development? The Case of the Jungfrau- Aletsch-Bietschhorn World Heritage Site in Switzerland Astrid Wallner1, Stephan Rist2, Karina Liechti3, Urs Wiesmann4 Abstract The Jungfrau-Aletsch-Bietschhorn World Heritage Site (WHS) comprises main- ly natural high-mountain landscapes. The High Alps and impressive natu- ral landscapes are not the only feature making the region so attractive; its uniqueness also lies in the adjoining landscapes shaped by centuries of tra- ditional agricultural use. Given the dramatic changes in the agricultural sec- tor, the risk faced by cultural landscapes in the World Heritage Region is pos- sibly greater than that faced by the natural landscape inside the perimeter of the WHS. Inclusion on the World Heritage List was therefore an opportunity to contribute not only to the preservation of the ‘natural’ WHS: the protected part of the natural landscape is understood as the centrepiece of a strategy | downloaded: 1.10.2021 to enhance sustainable development in the entire region, including cultural landscapes. Maintaining the right balance between preservation of the WHS and promotion of sustainable regional development constitutes a key chal- lenge for management of the WHS. Local actors were heavily involved in the planning process in which the goals and objectives of the WHS were defined. This participatory process allowed examination of ongoing prob- lems and current opportunities, even though present ecological standards were a ‘non-negotiable’ feature. Therefore the basic patterns of valuation of the landscape by the different actors could not be modified. Nevertheless, the process made it possible to jointly define the present situation and thus create a basis for legitimising future action.
    [Show full text]
  • Glacier Fluctuations During the Past 2000 Years
    Quaternary Science Reviews 149 (2016) 61e90 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Quaternary Science Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/quascirev Invited review Glacier fluctuations during the past 2000 years * Olga N. Solomina a, , Raymond S. Bradley b, Vincent Jomelli c, Aslaug Geirsdottir d, Darrell S. Kaufman e, Johannes Koch f, Nicholas P. McKay e, Mariano Masiokas g, Gifford Miller h, Atle Nesje i, j, Kurt Nicolussi k, Lewis A. Owen l, Aaron E. Putnam m, n, Heinz Wanner o, Gregory Wiles p, Bao Yang q a Institute of Geography RAS, Staromonetny-29, 119017 Staromonetny, Moscow, Russia b Department of Geosciences, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA 01003, USA c Universite Paris 1 Pantheon-Sorbonne, CNRS Laboratoire de Geographie Physique, 92195 Meudon, France d Department of Earth Sciences, University of Iceland, Askja, Sturlugata 7, 101 Reykjavík, Iceland e School of Earth Sciences and Environmental Sustainability, Northern Arizona University, Flagstaff, AZ 86011, USA f Department of Geography, Brandon University, Brandon, MB R7A 6A9, Canada g Instituto Argentino de Nivología, Glaciología y Ciencias Ambientales (IANIGLA), CCT CONICET Mendoza, CC 330 Mendoza, Argentina h INSTAAR and Geological Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, USA i Department of Earth Science, University of Bergen, Allegaten 41, N-5007 Bergen, Norway j Uni Research Climate AS at Bjerknes Centre for Climate Research, Bergen, Norway k Institute of Geography, University of Innsbruck, Innrain 52, 6020 Innsbruck, Austria l Department of Geology,
    [Show full text]
  • 19Th Century Glacier Representations and Fluctuations in the Central and Western European Alps: an Interdisciplinary Approach ⁎ ⁎ H.J
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Global and Planetary Change 60 (2008) 42–57 www.elsevier.com/locate/gloplacha 19th century glacier representations and fluctuations in the central and western European Alps: An interdisciplinary approach ⁎ ⁎ H.J. Zumbühl , D. Steiner , S.U. Nussbaumer Institute of Geography, University of Bern, Hallerstrasse 12, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland Received in revised form 22 August 2006; accepted 24 August 2006 Available online 22 February 2007 Abstract European Alpine glaciers are sensitive indicators of past climate and are thus valuable sources of climate history. Unfortunately, direct determinations of glacier changes (length variations and mass changes) did not start with increasing accuracy until just before the end of the 19th century. Therefore, historical and physical methods have to be used to reconstruct glacier variability for preceeding time periods. The Lower Grindelwald Glacier, Switzerland, and the Mer de Glace, France, are examples of well-documented Alpine glaciers with a wealth of different historical sources (e.g. drawings, paintings, prints, photographs, maps) that allow reconstruction of glacier length variations for the last 400–500 years. In this paper, we compare the length fluctuations of both glaciers for the 19th century until the present. During the 19th century a majority of Alpine glaciers – including the Lower Grindelwald Glacier and the Mer de Glace – have been affected by impressive glacier advances. The first maximum extent around 1820 has been documented by drawings from the artist Samuel Birmann, and the second maximum extent around 1855 is shown by photographs of the Bisson Brothers. These pictorial sources are among the best documents of the two glaciers for the 19th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Eisströme Im Aletschgebiet Ice Streams in the Aletsch Region
    Eisströme im Aletschgebiet Ice streams in the Aletsch region Gletscher I Glacier Wissenswertes 2 Als die Gletscher bis ins Mittelland reichten … Es ist «nur» zirka 24‘000 Jahre her: Damals, während des Höhepunktes der letzten Eiszeit, der Würmeiszeit, glichen die Schweiz und damit auch das ganze Wallis einem zu lange nicht mehr abgetauten Gefrierfach: Der Fieschergletscher, der Grosse Aletschgletscher und der Rhonegletscher bildeten zusammen einen gewaltigen Eispanzer. Verstärkt und angeschoben durch die Eis- ströme aus den Walliser Seitentälern, reichten die Glet- scherausläufer bis nach Solothurn und der südliche Teil dieser gewaltigen Eismasse stiess sogar bis nach Lyon vor. Und es war kalt während der letzten Eiszeit: Die mittlere Jahrestemperatur lag 14-15° C tiefer als heute. Das ganze Rhonetal und sämtliche Walliser Seitentäler lagen also unter einer zusammenhängenden Eismasse, so auch das gesamte Aletschgebiet. Aus diesem Eis- meer ragten nur die höchsten Bergspitzen hervor: das Finsteraarhorn, das Aletschhorn, das Eggishorn, das Bettmerhorn, das Bietschhorn und das Sparrhorn. Zwi- schen Fiesch und Brig war der Eispanzer schätzungs- weise 1700 Meter dick und über der Riederfurka lastete eine Eisdecke von 400 bis 500 Metern Mächtigkeit. 1 Valuable Information 3 In the days when the glaciers reached the Mittelland … About 24,000 years ago, during the peak of the last gla- cial period (the Würm ice age) most of Switzerland and thus all of Valais resembled a freezer, which had not been defrosted for too long: the Fiescher glacier, the Great Aletsch glacier and the Rhone glacier formed an impressive ice shield. Strengthened and pushed by the ice streams from the Valais side valleys, the glacier’s ends reached to today’s Solothurn and the southern part of this huge ice field even advanced as far as Lyon.
    [Show full text]
  • Modeling Glacier Thickness Distribution and Bed Topography Over Entire Mountain Ranges with Glabtop: Application of a Fast and Robust Approach
    Zurich Open Repository and Archive University of Zurich Main Library Strickhofstrasse 39 CH-8057 Zurich www.zora.uzh.ch Year: 2012 Modeling glacier thickness distribution and bed topography over entire mountain ranges with GlabTop: Application of a fast and robust approach Linsbauer, Andreas ; Paul, Frank ; Haeberli, Wilfried Abstract: The combination of glacier outlines with digital elevation models (DEMs) opens new dimen- sions for research on climate change impacts over entire mountain chains. Of particular interest is the modeling of glacier thickness distribution, where several new approaches were proposed recently. The tool applied herein, GlabTop (Glacier bed Topography) is a fast and robust approach to model thickness distribution and bed topography for large glacier samples using a Geographic Information System (GIS). The method is based on an empirical relation between average basal shear stress and elevation range of individual glaciers, calibrated with geometric information from paleoglaciers, and validated with radio echo soundings on contemporary glaciers. It represents an alternative and independent test possibility for approaches based on mass-conservation and flow. As an example for using GlabTop in entire mountain ranges, we here present the modeled ice thickness distribution and bed topography for all Swiss glaciers along with a geomorphometric analysis of glacier characteristics and the overdeepenings found in the modeled glacier bed. These overdeepenings can be seen as potential sites for future lake formation and are thus highly relevant in connection with hydropower production and natural hazards. The thickest ice of the largest glaciers rests on weakly inclined bedrock at comparably low elevations, resulting in a limited potential for a terminus retreat to higher elevations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Aletsch Arena – the Most Libera.Ng Natural Experience in The
    The Aletsch Arena – the most libera2ng natural experience in the Alps! MICE Program proposi2on - 4 days/3 nights Discover a unique natural landscape with a special, unspoilt character all of its own. The three holiday and tourist des2na2ons of Riederalp, BeLmeralp and Fiesch-Eggishorn are situated close to the 23km Great Aletsch Glacier, the largest of its kind in the Alps and undisputed highlight of the UNESCO Swiss Alps Jungfrau-Aletsch World Heritage Site. In summer, the car-free Aletsch Arena offers 317km of hiking paths, via ferrata, treetop adventure courses, mountain bike trails, paragliding flights, three viewpoints, the Pro Natura Centre and the highest nine-hole golf course in Europe. Authen2c relaxa2on or cool adventures. ! Infrastructure Hotels Others Holiday apartments Classificaon Beds Accommoda5on Numbe Classificaon Beds r 4 star **** 244 Group accommoda2ons, 5 star ***** 252 Guesthouses and Youth 3 star *** 892 4 star **** 1075 hostels 18 2 star ** 118 3 star *** 3791 No classifica2on 320 Swiss Olympic Training Base 1 2 star ** 550 How to find us aletscharena.ch/geng-here Riederalp, BeLmeralp and Fiesch-Eggishorn are the three holiday resorts at the heart of the Aletsch Arena in the canton of Valais. They can be reached safely and easily by car or train at any 2me of year. Riederalp, BeLmeralp and Fiescheralp are all car free! The final part of the journey takes place by cable car from the sta2ons in Mörel, BeLen Valley or Fiesch. Day 1 11:00 – 11:30 Arrive in the Aletsch Arena (Riederalp, BeLmeralp or Fiesch-Eggishorn) Three viewpoints (Moosfluh, BeLmerhorn or Eggishorn) Hohfluh and Moosfluh – magnificent vantage points by the Great Aletsch Glacier The Moosfluh viewpoint, a high-energy site, is situated at 2,333m above sea level, close to the Hohfluh viewpoint at an al2tude of 2,227m.
    [Show full text]
  • Top of Europe
    98 THE ART OF CONTEMPORARY LUXURY • 99 TRAVEL MIND PHILOSOPHY Jungfraujoch Top of Europe Text by Desmund Teh, Sweezy Tan Photos by Qing, Courtesy of The Switzerland Tourism Board , Swiss Travel System 100 THE ART OF CONTEMPORARY LUXURY • 101 TRAVEL MIND PHILOSOPHY Building of the miraculous Jungfrau railway The construction and triumph of the Jungfrau Railway is one of the world’s most impressive rail engineering feats. Work began in 1896 and it took 16 years to complete the 9.2 km line with most of it tunnelling through the rock of the Eiger and Mönch mountains. The line was opened with a great celebration on 1 August 1912. It runs from Kleine Scheidegg through the Eiger to the highest railway station in Europe at 3,454 metres above sea level: Jungfraujoch–Top of Europe. Places to visit: • Alpine Sensation – Time travel to the early days of tourism in the Jungfrau region, learn history of the Jungfrau Railway and witness this tribute to the tunnel workers. • Ice Palace - Featuring impressive ice sculptures such as eagles, penguins and amphorae that transform the grottoes into shimmering works of art. • Glacier Plateau–Views of Jungfrau and Aletsch Glacier from the vantage platform is simply stunning! Sphinx terrace observatory offers magnificent all-round views beyond the borders. • Snow Fun Park on the Jungfraujoch (Top of Europe) – Experience the thrill of winter sports in summer: skiing and snowboarding, tobogganing and zip-line. *Did you know? Jungfraujoch has the highest-altitude post box in Switzerland, the highest-altitude chocolate shop in Europe and the highest- altitude watch shop in the world! Welcome at 3,454 metres above sea level.
    [Show full text]
  • Adobe Photoshop
    AIO lHE NEW YORK TIMES INTERNATIONAL SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 16, 2019 lHE NEW YORK TIMES INTERNATIONAL SATURDAY, FEBRUARY 16, 2019 N All As the Glaciers Melt, Switzerland Adjusts Glaciers in the Swiss By HENRY FOUNTAIN own making: Amid widespread public op­ Alps are retreating as GADMEN, SWITZERLAND - For hikers look­ position to nuclear power following the 2011 the earth warms. Tue ing for a daylong outing in central Switzer­ Fukushima accident in Japan, the Swiss land, the li'ift Glacier footbridge is a popu­ government has pledged to gradually warming has of late phase out thecountry's live reactors. Those led to an increase in lar destination. It's a short gondola ride from the village of Gadmen, followed by a reactors provide nearly all the restof Switz­ hydropower produc­ few miles' trek up a rocky path overlooking erland's power, and they are especially im­ tion. Eventua1ly the a granite gorge. portant in winter, when hydropower pro­ ice will retreat to an Those who successfully fight off a case of duction drops and energy demand in- extent that stream nerves - the slender cable-and-plank creases. flows will decline and bridge is more than 500 feet long and 300 The government's energy strategy calls power production will feet in the air - are rewarded with spectac­ for increases in wind, solar and geothermal power, which currently make up a small drop. However, the ular viewsofthe Trift Valley. But the glacier itself is hardly to be seen. Bec.ause of a share of electricity production. The Swiss va1leys le~ behind warming atmosphere, it has retreated rap­ are also counting on hydropower compa­ may be ideal sites to idly this century.
    [Show full text]
  • Future of Alpine Glaciers and Beyond
    The Future of Alpine Glaciers and Beyond The Future of Alpine Glaciers and Beyond Wilfried Haeberli, Johannes Oerlemans, and Michael Zemp Subject: Future Climate Change Scenarios, Climate of the European Alps Online Publication Date: Oct 2019 DOI: 10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.769 Summary and Keywords Like many comparable mountain ranges at lower latitudes, the European Alps are in­ creasingly losing their glaciers. Following roughly 10,000 years of limited climate and glacier variability, with a slight trend of increasing glacier sizes to Holocene maximum ex­ tents of the Little Ice Age, glaciers in the Alps started to generally retreat after 1850. Long-term observations with a monitoring network of unique density document this de­ velopment. Strong acceleration of mass losses started to take place after 1980 as related to accelerating atmospheric temperature rise. Model calculations, using simple to high- complexity approaches and relating to individual glaciers as well as to large samples of glaciers, provide robust results concerning scenarios for the future: under the influence of greenhouse-gas forced global warming, glaciers in the Alps will largely disappear with­ in the 21st century. Anticipating and modeling new landscapes and land-forming process­ es in de-glaciating areas is an emerging research field based on modeled glacier-bed topographies that are likely to become future surface topographies. Such analyses pro­ vide a knowledge basis to early planning of sustainable adaptation strategies, for exam­ ple, concerning opportunities and risks related to the formation of glacial lakes in over- deepened parts of presently still ice-covered glacier beds. Keywords: Alps, glaciers, global warming, monitoring, numerical models, landscapes, lakes, hazards, adaptation to climate change Introduction There is not much left of a future for glaciers in the Alps (Figures 1 and 2).
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change Impacts on Glaciers and Runoff in Alpine Catchments
    Climate Change Impacts on Glaciers and Runoff in Alpine catchments Saeid A. Vaghefi Eawag: Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology University of Geneva, Institute for Environmental Science [email protected] Outline 1. SWATCH21 project 2. Importance of glacier retreat modeling in determination of runoff at basin scale (Why?) 3. How to quantify the glacier melt (How?) 4. The “Glacier Evolution Runoff Model” (GERM) + SWAT 5. Aletsch Glacier in Rhone river basin, Switzerland 6. Calibration protocol for discharge in mountainous catchments 7. Climate change impact on Aletsch Glacier SWATCH21 Project 2017-2020, Founded by SNF SWATCH21 Deliverables and Objectives Data collection for SWAT to model spatial distribution of water resources in Switzerland Build, calibrate and validate a hydrologic model of Switzerland with uncertainty analysis Quantify the impact of land use and climate change on water quantity, water quality, biodiversity and ecosystem services … Modeling the glaciers retreat and evolution in Swiss Alps SWATCH21 team Prof. Dr. Anthony Lehmann Prof. Dr. karim Abbaspour Prof. Dr. Daniel Farinotti PD. Dr. Christian Huggel University of Geneva Eawag ETHZ University of Zurich Marc Fasel University of Geneva Pablo Timoner University of Geneva Dr. Saeid Vaghefi Martin Lacayo University of Geneva University of Geneva Eawag Why to quantify glacier melt? Global water cycle Ice caps and mountainous glaciers: contain less than 1% of all global ice (Meier et al. 2007) cover 734,400 km2 of the Earth (Gardner et al. 2013) correspond to one-third to on-half of global sea-level rise in last decades(global) in the European Alps (ca. 2050 km2 on 3800 glaciers) produce an annual average Trenberth et al.
    [Show full text]