Biology and Classification of DWARF MISTLETOES (Arceuthobium)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
"Santalales (Including Mistletoes)"
Santalales (Including Introductory article Mistletoes) Article Contents . Introduction Daniel L Nickrent, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois, USA . Taxonomy and Phylogenetics . Morphology, Life Cycle and Ecology . Biogeography of Mistletoes . Importance of Mistletoes Online posting date: 15th March 2011 Mistletoes are flowering plants in the sandalwood order that produce some of their own sugars via photosynthesis (Santalales) that parasitise tree branches. They evolved to holoparasites that do not photosynthesise. Holopar- five separate times in the order and are today represented asites are thus totally dependent on their host plant for by 88 genera and nearly 1600 species. Loranthaceae nutrients. Up until recently, all members of Santalales were considered hemiparasites. Molecular phylogenetic ana- (c. 1000 species) and Viscaceae (550 species) have the lyses have shown that the holoparasite family Balano- highest species diversity. In South America Misodendrum phoraceae is part of this order (Nickrent et al., 2005; (a parasite of Nothofagus) is the first to have evolved Barkman et al., 2007), however, its relationship to other the mistletoe habit ca. 80 million years ago. The family families is yet to be determined. See also: Nutrient Amphorogynaceae is of interest because some of its Acquisition, Assimilation and Utilization; Parasitism: the members are transitional between root and stem para- Variety of Parasites sites. Many mistletoes have developed mutualistic rela- The sandalwood order is of interest from the standpoint tionships with birds that act as both pollinators and seed of the evolution of parasitism because three early diverging dispersers. Although some mistletoes are serious patho- families (comprising 12 genera and 58 species) are auto- gens of forest and commercial trees (e.g. -
Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description
Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description Prepared by: Michael A. Kost, Dennis A. Albert, Joshua G. Cohen, Bradford S. Slaughter, Rebecca K. Schillo, Christopher R. Weber, and Kim A. Chapman Michigan Natural Features Inventory P.O. Box 13036 Lansing, MI 48901-3036 For: Michigan Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Division and Forest, Mineral and Fire Management Division September 30, 2007 Report Number 2007-21 Version 1.2 Last Updated: July 9, 2010 Suggested Citation: Kost, M.A., D.A. Albert, J.G. Cohen, B.S. Slaughter, R.K. Schillo, C.R. Weber, and K.A. Chapman. 2007. Natural Communities of Michigan: Classification and Description. Michigan Natural Features Inventory, Report Number 2007-21, Lansing, MI. 314 pp. Copyright 2007 Michigan State University Board of Trustees. Michigan State University Extension programs and materials are open to all without regard to race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, marital status or family status. Cover photos: Top left, Dry Sand Prairie at Indian Lake, Newaygo County (M. Kost); top right, Limestone Bedrock Lakeshore, Summer Island, Delta County (J. Cohen); lower left, Muskeg, Luce County (J. Cohen); and lower right, Mesic Northern Forest as a matrix natural community, Porcupine Mountains Wilderness State Park, Ontonagon County (M. Kost). Acknowledgements We thank the Michigan Department of Natural Resources Wildlife Division and Forest, Mineral, and Fire Management Division for funding this effort to classify and describe the natural communities of Michigan. This work relied heavily on data collected by many present and former Michigan Natural Features Inventory (MNFI) field scientists and collaborators, including members of the Michigan Natural Areas Council. -
Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Chiricahua National Monument
In Cooperation with the University of Arizona, School of Natural Resources Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Chiricahua National Monument Open-File Report 2008-1023 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey National Park Service This page left intentionally blank. In cooperation with the University of Arizona, School of Natural Resources Vascular Plant and Vertebrate Inventory of Chiricahua National Monument By Brian F. Powell, Cecilia A. Schmidt, William L. Halvorson, and Pamela Anning Open-File Report 2008-1023 U.S. Geological Survey Southwest Biological Science Center Sonoran Desert Research Station University of Arizona U.S. Department of the Interior School of Natural Resources U.S. Geological Survey 125 Biological Sciences East National Park Service Tucson, Arizona 85721 U.S. Department of the Interior DIRK KEMPTHORNE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Mark Myers, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2008 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS-the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web:http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Suggested Citation Powell, B.F., Schmidt, C.A., Halvorson, W.L., and Anning, Pamela, 2008, Vascular plant and vertebrate inventory of Chiricahua National Monument: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008-1023, 104 p. [http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2008/1023/]. Cover photo: Chiricahua National Monument. Photograph by National Park Service. Note: This report supersedes Schmidt et al. (2005). Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. -
Lodgepole Pine Dwarf Mistletoe in Taylor Park, Colorado Report for the Taylor Park Environmental Assessment
Lodgepole Pine Dwarf Mistletoe in Taylor Park, Colorado Report for the Taylor Park Environmental Assessment Jim Worrall, Ph.D. Gunnison Service Center Forest Health Protection Rocky Mountain Region USDA Forest Service 1. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................................... 2 2. DESCRIPTION, DISTRIBUTION, HOSTS ..................................................................................... 2 3. LIFE CYCLE....................................................................................................................................... 3 4. SCOPE OF TREATMENTS RELATIVE TO INFESTED AREA ................................................. 4 5. IMPACTS ON TREES AND FORESTS ........................................................................................... 4 5.1 TREE GROWTH AND LONGEVITY .................................................................................................... 4 5.2 EFFECTS OF DWARF MISTLETOE ON FOREST DYNAMICS ............................................................... 6 5.3 RATE OF SPREAD AND INTENSIFICATION ........................................................................................ 6 6. IMPACTS OF DWARF MISTLETOES ON ANIMALS ................................................................ 6 6.1 DIVERSITY AND ABUNDANCE OF VERTEBRATES ............................................................................ 7 6.2 EFFECT OF MISTLETOE-CAUSED SNAGS ON VERTEBRATES ............................................................12 -
Dwarf Mistletoes: Biology, Pathology, and Systematics
This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. CHAPTER 10 Anatomy of the Dwarf Mistletoe Shoot System Carol A. Wilson and Clyde L. Calvin * In this chapter, we present an overview of the Morphology of Shoots structure of the Arceuthobium shoot system. Anatomical examination reveals that dwarf mistletoes Arceuthobium does not produce shoots immedi are indeed well adapted to a parasitic habit. An exten ately after germination. The endophytic system first sive endophytic system (see chapter 11) interacts develops within the host branch. Oftentimes, the only physiologically with the host to obtain needed evidence of infection is swelling of the tissues near the resources (water, minerals, and photosynthates); and infection site (Scharpf 1967). After 1 to 3 years, the first the shoots provide regulatory and reproductive func shoots are produced (table 2.1). All shoots arise from tions. Beyond specialization of their morphology (Le., the endophytic system and thus are root-borne shoots their leaves are reduced to scales), the dwarf mistle (Groff and Kaplan 1988). In emerging shoots, the toes also show peculiarities of their structure that leaves of adjacent nodes overlap and conceal the stem. reflect their phylogenetic relationships with other As the internodes elongate, stem segments become mistletoes and illustrate a high degree of specialization visible; but the shoot apex remains tightly enclosed by for the parasitic habit. From Arceuthobium globosum, newly developing leaf primordia (fig. 10.lA). Two the largest described species with shoots 70 cm tall oppositely arranged leaves, joined at their bases, occur and 5 cm in diameter, toA. -
Mistletoes: Pathogens, Keystone Resource, and Medicinal Wonder Abstracts
Mistletoes: Pathogens, Keystone Resource, and Medicinal Wonder Abstracts Oral Presentations Phylogenetic relationships in Phoradendron (Viscaceae) Vanessa Ashworth, Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden Keywords: Phoradendron, Systematics, Phylogenetics Phoradendron Nutt. is a genus of New World mistletoes comprising ca. 240 species distributed from the USA to Argentina and including the Antillean islands. Taxonomic treatments based on morphology have been hampered by phenotypic plasticity, size reduction of floral parts, and a shortage of taxonomically useful traits. Morphological characters used to differentiate species include the arrangement of flowers on an inflorescence segment (seriation) and the presence/absence and pattern of insertion of cataphylls on the stem. The only trait distinguishing Phoradendron from Dendrophthora Eichler, another New World mistletoe genus with a tropical distribution contained entirely within that of Phoradendron, is the number of anther locules. However, several lines of evidence suggest that neither Phoradendron nor Dendrophthora is monophyletic, although together they form the strongly supported monophyletic tribe Phoradendreae of nearly 360 species. To date, efforts to delineate supraspecific assemblages have been largely unsuccessful, and the only attempt to apply molecular sequence data dates back 16 years. Insights gleaned from that study, which used the ITS region and two partitions of the 26S nuclear rDNA, will be discussed, and new information pertinent to the systematics and biology of Phoradendron will be reviewed. The Viscaceae, why so successful? Clyde Calvin, University of California, Berkeley Carol A. Wilson, The University and Jepson Herbaria, University of California, Berkeley Keywords: Endophytic system, Epicortical roots, Epiparasite Mistletoe is the term used to describe aerial-branch parasites belonging to the order Santalales. -
Lodgepole Pine Dwarf Mistletoe Common Cause of Brooming in Lodgepole Pine
Lodgepole Pine Dwarf Mistletoe Common cause of brooming in lodgepole pine Pathogen—Lodgepole pine dwarf mistletoe (Arceuthobium americanum) is the most widely distributed, one of the most damag- ing, and one of the best studied dwarf mistletoes in North America. Aerial shoots are yellowish to olive green, 2-3 1/2 inches (5-9 cm) long (maximum 12 inches [30 cm]) and up to 1/25-1/8 inch (1-3 mm) diameter (figs. 1-2). The distribution generally follows that of its principal host, lodgepole pine, in the Rocky Mountain Region (fig. 3). Hosts—Lodgepole pine dwarf mistletoe infects primarily its namesake, but ponderosa pine is considered a secondary host of this species. However, lodgepole pine dwarf mistletoe can sustain itself and even be aggressive in pure stands of Rocky Mountain ponderosa pine in northern Colorado and southern Wyoming sometimes a mile or more away from infected lodgepole pine. This infection generally occurs in areas outside the range of ponderosa pine’s usual parasite, southwestern dwarf mistletoe. Figure 1. Flowering male lodgepole pine dwarf mistletow plant para- Figure 2. Female lodgepole pine dwarf mistletoe plant with imma- sitizing lodgepole pine. Photo: Brian Howell, USDA Forest Service. ture fruit parasitizing lodgepole pine. Note the basal cups left behind where old shoots have fallen off. Photo: Brian Howell, USDA Forest Service. Signs and Symptoms—Signs of infection are shoots and basal cups (fig. 2) found at infection sites. Symptoms include witches’ brooms, swelling of in- fected branches, and dieback. Lodgepole pine dwarf mistletoe infections grow systemically with the branches they infect, sometimes causing large witches’ brooms with elongated, loosely hanging branches. -
Researchcommons.Waikato.Ac.Nz
View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Research Commons@Waikato http://researchcommons.waikato.ac.nz/ Research Commons at the University of Waikato Copyright Statement: The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). The thesis may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use: Any use you make of these documents or images must be for research or private study purposes only, and you may not make them available to any other person. Authors control the copyright of their thesis. You will recognise the author’s right to be identified as the author of the thesis, and due acknowledgement will be made to the author where appropriate. You will obtain the author’s permission before publishing any material from the thesis. Identifying Host Species of Dactylanthus taylorii using DNA Barcoding A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Masters of Science in Biological Sciences at The University of Waikato by Cassarndra Marie Parker _________ The University of Waikato 2015 Acknowledgements: This thesis wouldn't have been possible without the support of many people. Firstly, my supervisors Dr Chrissen Gemmill and Dr Avi Holzapfel - your professional expertise, advice, and patience were invaluable. From pitching the idea in 2012 to reading through drafts in the final fortnight, I've been humbled to work with such dedicated and accomplished scientists. Special mention also goes to Thomas Emmitt, David Mudge, Steven Miller, the Auckland Zoo horticulture team and Kevin. -
Epiparasitism in Phoradendron Durangense and P. Falcatum (Viscaceae) Clyde L
Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany Volume 27 | Issue 1 Article 2 2009 Epiparasitism in Phoradendron durangense and P. falcatum (Viscaceae) Clyde L. Calvin Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, Claremont, California Carol A. Wilson Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, Claremont, California Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso Part of the Botany Commons Recommended Citation Calvin, Clyde L. and Wilson, Carol A. (2009) "Epiparasitism in Phoradendron durangense and P. falcatum (Viscaceae)," Aliso: A Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Botany: Vol. 27: Iss. 1, Article 2. Available at: http://scholarship.claremont.edu/aliso/vol27/iss1/2 Aliso, 27, pp. 1–12 ’ 2009, Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden EPIPARASITISM IN PHORADENDRON DURANGENSE AND P. FALCATUM (VISCACEAE) CLYDE L. CALVIN1 AND CAROL A. WILSON1,2 1Rancho Santa Ana Botanic Garden, 1500 North College Avenue, Claremont, California 91711-3157, USA 2Corresponding author ([email protected]) ABSTRACT Phoradendron, the largest mistletoe genus in the New World, extends from temperate North America to temperate South America. Most species are parasitic on terrestrial hosts, but a few occur only, or primarily, on other species of Phoradendron. We examined relationships among two obligate epiparasites, P. durangense and P. falcatum, and their parasitic hosts. Fruit and seed of both epiparasites were small compared to those of their parasitic hosts. Seed of epiparasites was established on parasitic-host stems, leaves, and inflorescences. Shoots developed from the plumular region or from buds on the holdfast or subjacent tissue. The developing endophytic system initially consisted of multiple separate strands that widened, merged, and often entirely displaced its parasitic host from the cambial cylinder. -
Fire and Dwarf Mistletoe (Arceuthobium Spp.) Relationships in the Northern Rocky Mountains
Fire and Dwarf Mistletoe (Arceuthobium spp.) Relationships in the Northern Rocky Mountains EDF. WICKER AND CHARLES D. LEAPHARTl THE geologic record indicates that fire has been a major factor in the development and succession of vegetation in terrestrial environments of temperate climatic zones. From earliest times, natural fires ignited by lightning or volcanoes often destroyed large areas of vegetation at random. The fate of such fires was de termined by the combination of interacting natural environmental factors. Apparently, primitive man was quick to realize some bene ficial aspects of fire because his use of fire became a vital character istic of his habitat. Although he undoubtedly caused changes in vegetation through his use of fire, only 20th Century man has de veloped adequate technology to prevent and suppress unwanted fires in the environment. This technology has begun to reveal the significant role of fire as an ecological factor in vegetational de velopment. Perhaps nowhere are we more cognizant of this fact than in the northern Rocky Mountains where vast areas of fire-regen erated coniferous forests exist. The pioneer and seral tree species within the many forest ccosys- 1 /The authors are Plant Pathologists, USDA Forest Service, Intermountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, Ogden, Utah 84401; stationed at the Forestry Sciences Laboratory, Mos cow, Idaho, maintained in co(')peration with the University of Idaho. 279 ED F. WICKER AND CHARLES D. LEAPHART terns of the northern Rocky Mountains definitely reflect the longtime inclusion of fire as a factor of environmental selection. Many adap tations, such as serotinous cones, fire-resistant bark, rapid growth, short life cycle, and natural pruning, are readily observed among these species. -
The Incidence of Dwarf Mistletoe in Minnesota Black Spruce Stands Detected by Operational Inventories
The Incidence of Dwarf Mistletoe in Minnesota Black Spruce Stands Detected by Operational Inventories Fred Baker, Mark Hansen, John D. Shaw, Manfred Mielke, and Dixon Shelstad We surveyed black spruce stands within 0.5 miles of US Forest Service Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) plots and compared dwarf mistletoe status with that of the FIA and Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) forest inventories. Our results differed from FIA results in 3 of 16 stands with FIA plots, with FIA most often not recording dwarf mistletoe in infested stands. The infestation status of 140 of 202 surrounding stands was the same as recorded for the nearby FIA plot. Minnesota DNR forest inventory identified dwarf mistletoe in only 26 of 112 infested stands. Using only the most recent FIA plot data, 8% of FIA plots were recorded as infested. Considering an FIA plot to be infested if it was infested at any time in its history raises the percentage of infested FIA plots to 11%. Of the stands we surveyed, 112 of 202 (55%) were infested, but spatial autocorrelation may bias our sample. For the infested stands, dwarf ABSTRACT mistletoe is projected to infest 20% of the stand area and reduce timber volume by at least 14% in the current rotation. Keywords: disease survey he eastern spruce dwarf mistletoe (Arceuthobium pusillum) ventory plots are often unreliable (See Muir and Moody 2002 and causes the most important black spruce (Picea mariana) dis- references therein), in at least one case dwarf mistletoe incidence Tease throughout the range of the species. Anderson (1949) collected by inventory crews was reasonably accurate (Drummond estimated that 3–11% of the black spruce type in the Big Falls 1978). -
Estado Del Arte De Las Plantas Parásitas En México
MMS ESTADO DEL ARTE DE PLANTAS PARÁSITAS EN MÉXICO CONSEJO NACIONAL DE CIENCIA Y TECNOLOGÍA RED TEMÁTICA DE SALUD FORESTAL COMISIÓN NACIONAL FORESTAL UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA CHAPINGO COLEGIO DE POSTGRADUADOS ESTADO DEL ARTE DE LAS PLANTAS PARÁSITAS EN MÉXICO Líder de la Línea de Investigación: Dr. Dionicio Alvarado Rosales. Postgrado en Fitosanidad-Fitopatología Colegio de Postgraduados Campus Montecillo, Edo. de México. DICIEMBRE, 2016 Ilustraciones: Mauricio Méndez S. Portada: Psittacanthus angustifolius Contenido: fruto de Cladocolea cupulata (Tomadas de: Geils et al., 2002). Página 2 ESTADO DEL ARTE DE PLANTAS PARÁSITAS EN MÉXICO CONTENIDO Pág. INTRODUCCIÓN 4 ANTECEDENTES 5 RELATORÍA DEL FORO 6 1. 1. IDENTIFICACIÓN DE ESPECIES 13 2. 2. ESPECIFICIDAD 18 3. 3. BIOLOGÍA MOLECULAR 18 4. 4. IMPACTO (PATOGÉNICO, ECONÓMICO Y SOCIAL) 19 5. 5. ESTUDIOS HISTOPATOLÓGICOS 23 6. 6. DIAGNÓSTICO E INCIDENCIA 24 7. 7. CONTRIBUCIÓN A LOS CICLOS BIOLÓGICOS 26 8. 8. ESTUDIOS EPIDEMIOLÓGICOS 28 9. 9. ESTRATEGIAS DE CONTROL Y MANEJO 29 10. NORMATIVIDAD 35 LITERATURA CITADA 41 ANEXOS 50 Página 3 MMS ESTADO DEL ARTE DE PLANTAS PARÁSITAS EN MÉXICO INTRODUCCIÓN Por cientos de años, las plantas parásitas han ocupado el interés público (religioso y mítico), y desde el siglo pasado los científicos investigan y estudian sus efectos en especies forestales de importancia económica en diversas partes del mundo. A pesar de que poseen pigmentos fotosensibles, estas plantas tienen hábitos parasitarios, por lo que dependen parcial o completamente de su hospedante para satisfacer sus demandas nutrimentales. Sus raíces modificadas (haustorios) les brindan soporte (fijación), y el vínculo que les permite extraer de su hospedante los suficientes recursos (carbohidratos, agua y sales minerales) para completar sus complejos ciclos biológicos.