Open Space Vision Project Background Report
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Roots of a Legacy
The Roots of a Legacy A History of Walnut Creek, California's Open Space by Sande DeSalles This project was funded by a grant from the Borges Ranch Interpretive Foundation, 1997. , To the memory of Robert Pond, and to Ron and Mamie White, keepers of the open space. The Roots of a Legacy A History of Walnut Creek, California's Open Space by Sande DeSalles God, who hath given the World to Men in common, hath also given them reason to make use of it to the best advantage of Life, and convenience. The Earth, and all that is therein, is given to Men for the Support and Comfort of their being. And though all the Fruits it naturally produces, and Beasts it feeds, belong to Mankind in common, as they are produced by the spontaneous hand of Nature; and no body has originally a private Dominion, exclusive of the rest of Mankind, in any of them, as they are thus in their natural state: yet being given for the use of Men, there must of necessity be a means appropriate them some way or other before they can be of any use, or at all beneficial to any particular Man. John Locke, The Second Treatise on Civil Government I have lived in Walnut Creek, California, for the past thirty years, yet I am always surprised to encounter in winter the damp mist that blankets the rolling foothills and oak savannas surrounding the city. Not long ago, I drove through the fog into the Mt. Diablo foothills on an early January morning. -
National Register of Historic Places Inventory—Nomination Form 1
FHR-8-300 (11-78) United States Department off the Interior Heritage Conservation and Recreation Service National Register of Historic Places Inventory—Nomination Form See instructions in How to Complete National Register Forms Type all entries—complete applicable sections________________ 1. Name historic Old Borges Ranch and/or common Same 2. Location not for publication city, town Walnut Creek vicinity of congressional district #7 state California code 06 county Contra Costa code 013 3. Classification Category Ownership Status Present Use district X public X occupied X agriculture X museum building(s) private unoccupied commercial X park structure both work in progress X educational X private residence X site Public Acquisition Accessible entertainment religious object in process X yes: restricted X government scientific being considered yes: unrestricted industrial transportation no military other: 4. Owner of Property name County of Contra Costa street & number Public Works Director, 6th Floor Administration Building city, town Martinez vicinity of state California 5. Location of Legal Description courthouse, registry of deeds, etc. County Recorder street & number 822 Main Street city, town Martinez state California 94553 6. Representation in Existing Surveys title None known has this property been determined elegible? __ yes X no date __ federal __ state __ county local depository for survey records city, town state 7. Description Condition Check one Check one excellent X deteriorated unaltered X original site X good ruins X altered moved date _JLfalr unexposed Describe the present and original (iff known) physical appearance The Old Borges Ranch center comprises seven main buildings/structures, and sites historically and architecturally significant. Dating from the late 1890's and early 1900's, excluding the second generation house, all buildings have undergone only minor alterations. -
Appendix A: Agency Coordination, Public Involvement, and List of Receiving Parties
A Agency Coordination, Public Involvement, and List of Receiving Parties Appendix A: Agency Coordination, Public Involvement, and List of Receiving Parties Table of Contents A.1 Early Notification Announcement A-1 A.1.1 Early Notification Letter, December 4, 2012 ................................................................................ A-3 A.1.2 Legal Notice Publication, December 9, 2012 ............................................................................. A-13 A.1.3 Comments .................................................................................................................................. A-19 A.2 Project Information Meetings A-35 A.2.1 Project Meeting Notification Letters, August 27, 2013 ............................................................... A-37 A.2.2 Dates, Locations and Attendance .............................................................................................. A-57 A.2.3 Comments .................................................................................................................................. A-59 A.3 Section 106 Consultation A-65 A.3.1 Section 106 Consultation Letters, November 2013 ................................................................... A-67 A.3.2 Comments from the November 2013 Letters ........................................................................... A-107 A.3.3 Section 106 Consultation Letters, April 8, 2014 ....................................................................... A-115 A.3.4 Section 106 Concurrence Letters............................................................................................ -
Appendix A: Agency Coordination, Public Involvement, and List of Receiving Parties
Appendix A: Agency Coordination, Public Involvement, and List of Receiving Parties Appendix A: Agency Coordination, Public Involvement, and List of Receiving Parties Table of Contents A.1 Early Notification Announcement ...................................................................................... A-1 A.1.1 Early Notification Letter, December 4, 2012 .......................................................................... A-3 A.1.2 Legal Notice Publication, December 9, 2012 ....................................................................... A-13 A.1.3 Comments from the Early Notification Announcement ........................................................ A-19 A.2 Project Meetings ................................................................................................................ A-35 A.2.1 Project Meeting Notification Letters, August 27, 2013 ......................................................... A-37 A.2.2 Project Meeting Sign-In Sheets, September 2013 ............................................................... A-59 A.2.3 Comments from the Project Meeting ................................................................................... A-65 A.3 Section 106 Consultation .................................................................................................. A-71 A.3.1 Section 106 Consultation Letter, November 21, 2013 ......................................................... A-73 A.3.2 Comments from the Section 106 Consultation Letter ....................................................... -
Field Trip Curriculum for the John Muir National Historic
FIELD TRIP CURRICULUM FOR THE JOHN MUIR NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE A PROJECT Presented to the faculty of the Department of Recreation, Parks and Tourism Administration California State University, Sacramento Submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE in RECREATION ADMINISTRATION by Janice Harriet Kelley SPRING 2013 FIELD TRIP CURRICULUM FOR THE JOHN MUIR NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE A Project by Janice Kelley Approved by: _________________________________ , Committee Chair Dr. Elizabeth Erickson __________________________________, Second Reader Dr. David Rolloff ___________________________ Date ii Student: Janice Kelley I certify that this student has met the requirements for format contained in the University format manual, and that this project is suitable for shelving in the Library and credit is to be awarded for the Project. ________________________________, Department Chair _______________ Dr. Greg B.C. Shaw Date Department of Recreation, Parks and Tourism Administration iii Abstract of FIELD TRIP CURRICULUM FOR THE JOHN MUIR NATIONAL HISTORIC SITE by Janice Kelley Statement of the Problem A review of literature demonstrated the national significance of John Muir’s accomplishments to the conservation movement in the United State as well as the significance of the home site and ranch. Student field trips to the John Muir National Historic Site were conducted by focusing on a Victorian Home tour where John Muir lived and worked. The National Park Service (NPS) believed home tours overlooked key opportunities to tell the larger story of John Muir’s values and accomplishments, use the natural and cultural resources of the ranch, and demonstrate the relevance of both John Muir and the historic site to the needs of contemporary students.