The African Worker in South Africa
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
THE AFRICAN WORKER IN SOUTH AFRICA A Study of Trade Unionism ★ ALEX HEPPLE, M.P. TH E AFRICA BUREAU 65 DENISON HOUSE VAUXHALL BRIDGE ROAD LONDON S.W.l Price: Two Shillings ALEX HEPPLE, M.P. the author of this important pamphlet on the South African trade union movement, is the leader of the Labour Party in the South African Parliament, and is recognised as the authority on trade union affairs. In the past seven years he has established for himself a reputation as one of the half-dozen outstanding Members in the South African Parliament. Even his opponents have paid tribute to the vigour of his championship of the democratic rights of South Africans of all races: he played the leading role in opposing the recently enacted Industrial Conciliation Act. He has represented Labour interests in the Transvaal Provincial Council and in Parliament for nearly 15 years. Some years ago he gave up his position as'managing director of a flourishing industrial firm to devote himself entirely to his public duties. ERRATA P. 5 footnote line 3, for 31j-000j000 read 21s000,000 P. 25 line 15 for 720 read 72 CONTENTS INTRODUCTION......................................................................... 2 1. AFRICANS—THE WORKING CLASS MAJORITY ... 3 2. LABOUR ORGANISATION .................................................. 6 I. The Story of Trade Union Apartheid ......................... 6 II. White Opposition to African Trade Unions ............. 11 III. Barriers Against Union Organisation ... < .............. 15 (i) No Right to M e e t.................................................. 16 (ii) No Place to M e e t...................................................... 17 (iii) The Threat of Suppression .......................... 18 (iv) The Banning of L eaders .......................................... 19 (v) The Banning of Meetings.......................................... 20 3. LABOUR L A W S......................................................................... 21 I. The Industrial Conciliation A c t .................................... 21 II. The Native Labour (Settlement of Disputes) Act ... 23 III. The Wage Act ............................................................. 26 IV. The Native Labour Regulation Act .......................... 28 V. The Native Building Workers Act ......................... 29 VI. The Master and Servants L a w s .................................... 31 4. THE TRADE UNION ROAD TO DEMOCRACY ... 31 APPENDIX—Workers Employed in S.A. Industry .............. 36 1 INTRODUCTION This is a brief review of labour organisation amongst African workers in the Union of South Africa and of some of the laws and practices which hamper its progress. African trade unions suffer many handicaps. Greatest of these is official hostility. The Nationalist Government of the country, which looks like being in power for a long time to come, treats African trade unions as a threat to White civilisation; it is therefore determined to prevent African workers from organising. The official Parliamentary Opposition, the United Party, is also opposed to statutory recognition of African trade unions. In the circumstances, there is little likelihood of any South African government encouraging or approving the development of trade unionism among African workers. This is a disturbing thought in these days, when we hear so much about the virtues of “White” civilisation. Trade unionism has become an essential part of civilised society; if the doors to trade unionism are closed to African workers, the consequences will be dangerous. In opposing African trade unionism, the so-called defenders of “White” civilisation are in fact preparing for their own destruction. Rather than foster the advancement of the African people intelligently and sympathetically, new laws and regulations are conceived to fetter them to inferiority and to preserve White domination. Amongst White trade unionists also, there is considerable confusion on the question of African trade unions. Even those who favour legal recognition, hesitate to associate openly with African organisations and find it difficult to regard Africans as fellow workers. I believe the question of organising African workers to be of maJor importance. It would be a tragedy if the Africans could find no support amongst the Whites in their efforts to build their unions. I hope that the facts I have assembled here will stimulate interest in this important subject and induce more White South Africans to adopt a realistic and more enlightened attitude. 2 CHAPTER ONE AFRICANS—THE WORKING CLASS MAJORITY In South Africa, workers are not only classified according to their occupations and skills. They are also identified by their race. One speaks of European (or White) workers, Coloured workers, Indian workers and Native (or African) workers. The Whites perform most of the skilled work. They also occupy many of the semi-skilled occupations. Those who are unskilled are employed by the State-owned railways or by Government Departments and Provincial authorities. *%., The Coloured workers, who are mainly concentrated in the Cape Province, are craftsmen in the building, furniture and printing industries and operatives in such industries as clothing, footwear and canning. Most of them, however, are labourers and semi-skilled workers, for their opportunities in the higher grades of employment are limited. This also applies to the Indian workers, almost all of whom are confined to the Province of Natal. Their employment follows a similar pattern to that of , the Coloureds in the Cape. The African workers, with whom we are concerned here, have always been the labouring class, the hewers of wood and the drawers of water. t But this is changing. Africans are steadily rising above the old menial I status and taking over many occupations that were once the preserve J of the White man. During the war, thousands of Africans were brought into the nation’s factories to aid the war effort, and the demand for their labour increased t rapidly in the vast industrial expansion which followed the war. The a elevation of Africans into the field of higher skills was inevitable. The ^ increasing reluctance of Whites to do “dirty” work has compelled employers to make greater use of Africans in occupations that were once considered beyond their ability. At one time, the Whites held a superior attitude only towards what was called “Kaffirs’ work”, the rough, un pleasant labouring Jobs. In a land where Colour Bars impose the stigma of inferiority, manual labour holds no appeal. Pride of craft has had to give way to pride of skin. It is no wonder that the Whites are gradually spurning all kinds of factory work and even skilled trades. The sons of families with a long artisan tradition refuse to learn father’s trade. They prefer white-collar Jobs, particularly as such work is much better paid than apprenticeship. They are encouraged in this preference because of the increasing threat to the security of the artisan from mechanisation and mass production. This industrial progress, which 3 brings fears of insecurity to the White artisan, provides great opportunities for the African. Nearly all new industries are planned on the basis of mass production, using easily trained operatives, performing specialised tasks. For this repetitive work, Africans have proved eminently suitable. In older industries, such as engineering and building, many crafts that were once part of the skilled artisan’s trade, have been transformed by new techniques. They have been broken down into a few simple operations, performed as a manufacturing process by semi-skilled Africans. In this way, work that was once the preserve of the White man, has been taken over by Non-Whites. This has happened in spite of all legal and conventional colour bars. Even the present Government, with all its talk of segregation and all its control measures, has been unable to check the influx of African workers into industry. Official statistics show that the ratio of Black workers to White is increasing remarkably. It can be seen from the Table in the Appendix (p. 36) that between the years 1937 and 1951, while the percentage of African employees in industry rose from 44% to 53%, the percentage of Europeans dropped from 42% to 30%. The continuing demand by industry for African workers is establishing large “Black” populations in the urban or “White” areas. There are now nearly three million Africans in the main urban and peri-urban areas of the Union, and the number is steadily increasing. African labour has a special appeal to employers. It is cheap, docile, defenceless and disciplined by special laws. In the mines, where upwards of 300,000 Africans are employed, special precautions are taken to isolate them from the influences of urban life, especially trade unionism. Employers of African labour are always at an advantage, for they have the full weight of the law on their side. The Government is determined to prevent the growth of a Black proletariat. Its efforts to preserve feudal lordship of White over Non- White are constantly frustrated by economic pressures created by great industrial expansion. This conflict compels the Government to conceive new laws, impose greater restrictions and apply special measures of repression to urban Africans. Older laws, like the Pass Laws, the Master and Servant Laws, the Native Labour Regulation Act and the Natives (Urban Areas) Act were specially designed to ensure the proper behaviour of African workers towards their masters. These still operate, being often