DOCSLIB.ORG

APTS Ex Parte January 10, 2020

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
APTS Ex Parte January 10, 2020 1001 G Street, N.W. Suite 500 West Washington, D.C. 20001 tel. 202.434.4100 fax 202.434.4646 Writer’s Direct Access Albert J. Catalano (202) 434-4207 [email protected] January 10, 2020 VIA ECFS Marlene H. Dortch Secretary Federal Communications Commission 445 12th Street, SW Washington, DC 20554 Re: Notice of Ex Parte Presentation, BRETSA Petition PS Docket No. 19-254 Dear Ms. Dortch: On January 9, 2020, Lonna Thompson and Kristen Walenta of America’s Public Television Stations (“APTS”) and the undersigned counsel to APTS met with David Furth, Michael Wilhelm, Roberto Mussenden, Alex Espinoza, Brian Marenco and Erika Olsen (by teleconference) of the Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau to discuss issues important to APTS and public safety in this proceeding. During the meeting, APTS representatives highlighted the benefits of digital datacasting, a one-to-many technology that allows broadcast television signals to deliver encrypted and targetable IP directly to first responders. We discussed the support of the technology by the United States Department of Homeland Security and the success of existing datacasting systems in Las Vegas, Harris County, Texas, and the State of Tennessee. Public television is also actively developing and testing consumer alerting applications for earthquake, fire and other natural disasters and is working with the national guard and other agencies to improve access to helicopter video. We presented the attached informational materials to Bureau staff. At the meeting, we emphasized the following: As part of their mission, public television stations across the country are fully committed to serving the needs of public safety. One of the hallmarks of public television is our broad coverage. This is especially relevant to public safety in rural areas where access to other networks may be limited or nonexistent. Washington, D.C. Brussels San Francisco Shanghai Paris This document was delivered electronically. www.khlaw.com KELLER AND HECKMAN LLP Marlene H. Dortch Federal Communications Commission January 10, 2020 Page 2 Digital datacasting is a one-way technology that, even standing alone, brings large benefits to public safety, including early earthquake warnings. Datacasting supports encrypted delivery of video, files, alerts and other data to specifically targeted first responders. The technology can be used to complement Land Mobile Radio as well as LTE public safety networks, including the FirstNet/AT&T (“FirstNet”) and Verizon networks. APTS and its member stations have sought for a number of years to work with FirstNet and AT&T to complement FirstNet’s services and coverage through the integration of datacasting into the FirstNet ecosystem. APTS member stations agreed in principle to commit 1 Mbps of their spectrum to support FirstNet in an industry resolution approved in February 2016. Public safety users would enjoy great benefits if datacasting was interoperable with the FirstNet network. The licensed spectrum of public television stations is already operational with billions of dollars’ worth of hardened facilities across the country, including in rural America. Datacasting also allows for communications of one-to-many without overload or congestion – which reduces the need for preemption of the public’s cell phone communications during periods of high use in emergencies. The existing backhaul infrastructure of public television, including satellite, fiber and microwave networks that bring content to stations for transmissions to their viewers would be available for public safety communications. To fully integrate digital datacasting into the FirstNet ecosystem and create a seamless two-way interoperable communications path, cooperation from FirstNet is needed. While several exploratory meetings have been held among the parties over the past four years to discuss such cooperation, to date neither FirstNet nor AT&T has been willing to open serious discussions with APTS on a way forward to integrate public television datacasting technology into the FirstNet ecosystem. APTS seeks first and foremost to work with FirstNet and AT&T in a cooperative approach to meeting the nation’s public safety needs. However, unless this cooperation is forthcoming from FirstNet and/or AT&T, the Commission may wish to engage through oversight or other action to ensure that the nation’s first responders have the full benefit of public television’s datacasting capability. This document was delivered electronically. KELLER AND HECKMAN LLP Marlene H. Dortch Federal Communications Commission January 10, 2020 Page 3 In an ideal world, the Commission would encourage the integration of datacasting and, if necessary, mandate that ATSC 3.0 broadcast chips be included in all public safety phones and devices. Such action would allow for a transparent hand-off of datacasting from public TV broadcast stations to the public safety LTE network allowing for a two-way mobile communications path. These broadcast chips have already been integrated into phones in South Korea, while the United States lags behind. The Commission should proceed with an inquiry to examine how the current interoperable arrangements that FirstNet and AT&T have established are serving public safety, particularly in rural areas. In light of the Commission’s responsibilities for oversight of the FirstNet license, this inquiry on interoperability, with a special focus on rural coverage, should proceed regardless of whether or not the Commission finds the current arrangements lawful. Even assuming that FirstNet and AT&T are correct that they are not required to do more than they are currently doing to integrate other public safety networks and services, the Commission should examine whether this interoperable arrangement is satisfying the needs of public safety users, particularly in rural areas where FirstNet/AT&T coverage may be lacking. Of course, the Commission is free to conduct an inquiry on FirstNet’s service to rural public safety users in a separate proceeding. Please let APTS know if you have any questions. Respectfully submitted, Albert J. Catalano Counsel for America’s Public Television Stations This document was delivered electronically. Attachment Stories from the Street Datacasting: Improving Video Streaming and Data Sharing for Public Safety Public Safety Challenge In an emergency, first responders need access to timely and relevant data to make informed decisions. Traditionally used networks are meant for voice communication Datacasting provides the ability and do not have the capacity to transmit large amounts of data, particularly video. to deliver secure, high-quality Although voice communication is important, videos and images enhance situational awareness. data and video to emergency Traditional networks can also become overloaded or completely fail as the network services personnel. “Getting that becomes saturated by public use, leaving public safety agencies competing for the same network resources as the general public to send mission-critical information. ‘eyes-on’ look at a situation or First Responders Group (FRG) Solution specific location is a huge help to Quickly and reliably sharing information between public safety officials can be a the first responders. Having that challenge, but it shouldn’t be. Datacasting provides a solution for public safety users to quickly share secure data, including voice, text, files, images, and video to a select real-time, crucial video delivered audience. Through its use, first responders have a reliable means to stay connected, maintain situational awareness, and access information they need. reliably, lets the different teams On using traditional means of communications versus datacasting, LT. Bret Collier, know what they’re heading for, Chief of Staff for the University of Houston Police Department said, “Something always gets lost in translation. The advantage to this (using datacasting) is we and how to prepare for it.” can send video directly to the officers (and) they can look at an image and know exactly what they are looking at.” —Jack Hanagriff of Houston’s Since datacasting uses existing public television infrastructure, it also provides an Office of Public Safety and effective method to relieve traffic from traditional wireless infrastructure. Network Homeland Security congestion may cause other wireless services to fail, but datacasting’s bandwidth is expandable and will continue to provide reliable support. Additionally, public television stations can reach 97% of the U.S. population today, including rural areas and territories, allowing this technology to be accessible almost anywhere in the country. Testing the Technology FRG and its partners, Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Lab and SpectraRep, conducted several successful pilots, tests, and experiments in 2015 and 2016 in Houston, Texas; Chicago, Illinois; Washington, D.C.; and Boston, Massachusetts. The pilots demonstrated datacasting’s ability to support public safety communications in an operational environment, as well as its ability to integrate with other communications systems. Our Technology in the Hands of First Responders “This software is giving us the Since the successful testing, Houston has used the technology during the following large-scale events and emergency situation, and will continue to use it for its day-to-day operations and upcoming large-scale events: ability to quickly and easily Datacasting helped responders provide seamless security at the Republican Presidential accommodate
Load more

Recommended publications
  • IDC MUX-5012I
    Flexible multiplexer for broadcast applications Fully Compliant with ISDB-T and ISDB-Tb Description Easy to use PSI/SI rebuilding, editing and gener- International Datacasting’s MUX-5012i is an extremely There is a complete set of backlit alphanumeric full- ating feature rich ISDB-T/ISDB-Tb transport stream multiplex- travel buttons on the front panel for easy configuration, Descriptor data inserting er. Up to 12 ASI inputs can be supported. The output even in the dark. The large LCD display is illuminated, yet provides high contrast for visibility in direct sunlight. Accurate PCR adjusting may be configured as two separate multiplex groups to simplify feeding different service providers with differ- Control may be via the simple front panel interface or SFN support, supporting hierarchy ent groups of services. via the integrated web browser controlled software transmission interface. Up to twelve (12) ASI inputs Ideal for converting your transport to ISDB-T per unit TSM5012i multiplexer is a TS re-multiplexer that is de- Reliable and affordable Two (2) separate TS re-multiplexed signed for ISDB-T and ISDB-Tb Digital Terrestrial Televi- The MUX-5012i multiplexer provides an industry-leading ASI outputs per unit sion broadcast video distribution. The TSM5012i sup- set of features in a highly compact, highly affordable PID Remapping ports 2 separate multiplexers which are fully complying package. The unit is designed for demanding 24 / 7 Support input 188/204 byte TS with ISDB-T/ISDB-Tb standard. This multiplexer can environments for years of reliable operation. packet transfer the head-end SPTS and MPTS to ISDB-T stand- Support IIP packet editing and gen- ard TS as required .
    [Show full text]
  • PBS Engineering Technology Advisory Committee ATSC 3.0 Position Paper
    PBS Engineering Technology Advisory Committee ATSC 3.0 Position Paper Introduction The PBS Engineering Technical Advisory Committee (ETAC)* has created a working group focused on the pending ATSC 3.0 broadcast transmission standard and its impact on PBS member stations. The ETAC ATSC 3.0 Working Group is made up of Public Television station technology leaders with support from PBS. The current digital broadcast technology was developed in the early 1990s by a large group of industry professionals with overall leadership from the FCC Advisory Committee on Advanced Television Service and the Advanced Television Systems Committee (ATSC).* The standard was published in 1995 and then adopted by the FCC in 1996. In July of 1996, WRAL TV in Raleigh, NC became the first North American television station to broadcast a digital service. In time, the standard we now refer to as ATSC 1.0 was introduced across the country. With the demise of analog television broadcast, it became the operating standard in 2009. ATSC 2.0 was an enhancement of ATSC 1.0, adding new technologies such as advanced video and audio coding and new features such as second screen and Conditional Access. While ATSC 2.0 did become a standard, it was not widely adopted. Many of the capabilities 2.0 enabled, however, were used and expanded on in ATSC 3.0. Technology changes rapidly and the need for an advanced broadcast standard not hampered by the backwards compatibility restraints of ATSC 1.0 is clear. Given consumers’ rapid adoption of mobile and handheld devices for video consumption, it is clear that broadcasters need to adapt to meet current consumer demands and ensure scalability for future needs.
    [Show full text]
  • Gearbox II ISDB-Tb 16 Tuners/IP 104Ch
    Gearbox II ISDB-Tb 16 Tuners/IP104ch Broadcast Quality, Multichannel, Real Time, Standard or High Definition (up to 1080p), Integrated ISDB-Tb Receiver, and MPEG-2 to H.264 or Optional H.265 Transcoder, Scaler, and Streamer. Based on Embedded Linux®, it Boots Quickly from Flash Drive and Remembers all Settings. Easy to Use GUI Allows Full Config of Each Stream and via SNMP can Report its Status to Remote Network Operations. Will Transcode and Process Multiple Streams up to CPU Limitations. Typical Dedicated Transcodes are up to 104 SD Streams, or 26 1080i/p Streams, or 40 720p60 Streams. Supports RTMP, HTTP, and Live Streaming and Works with Atlas™, Wowza®, and Adobe® Flash® Servers. Supports 50 Simultaneous HLS Users. With Optional Atlas™ Add-on, Supports 1,000 RTMP, ISDB‐Tb DASH, and/or HLS Users Natively. Features Overview Inputs: Simultaneously receives one to 16 ISDB-Tb inputs The Gearbox™ II ISDB-Tb 16 Tuners/IP 104ch is a real time IP input (H.264, MPEG-2, or VC-1): UDP, RTP, RTSP, multichannel streamer, integrated RF receiver, and transcoder designed to HTTP, HTTP Live, RTMP (pushed from Flash server) receive up to sixteen simultaneous ISDB-Tb signals and transform them into IP output protocols: UDP, RTP, RTMP (Open Flash), IP streams that are optimized for streaming. It is designed to be scalable, HTTP, with DLNA support easily adaptable, and field upgradeable to meet the needs of streaming Supports HLS (adaptive) for output to mobile devices service users who are very comfortable with embedded Linux® based appliances. It relies on an Intel® Dual 16 Core CPU for encoding.
    [Show full text]
  • Why ATSC 3.0 in Korea UHD? (1)
    ATSC 3.0 base Terrestrial UHD Broadcasting in S. Korea Sung-Ik Park ETRI Contents ❖ ATSC 3.0 base Terrestrial UHD Status in S. Korea ❖ Why ATSC 3.0 in S. Korea? ❖ On-going and planned services in S. Korea – Single Frequency Network (SFN) – Mobile HD – Advanced Emergency Alert (AEA) ❖ Summary ATSC 3.0 base Terrestrial UHD Status in Korea (1) Commercial Launch ATSC 3.0 base terrestrial 4K-UHD broadcasting started in Seoul metro area (May 2017), extended to major cities (Dec. 2017), and will be nationwide by 2021 New frequency bands in 700 MHz were assigned for UHD broadcasting Existing HD (ATSC 1.0) and new UHD services must be simulcasted by 2027, and then the existing HD service will be switched off ATSC 3.0 base Terrestrial UHD Status in Korea (2) Consumer Devices TV, Set-top box, and others (dongle receiver, home gateway) are available in market TV STB Others - Dongle receiver for existing device - Home gateway for WiFi re-distribution ATSC 3.0 base Terrestrial UHD Status in Korea (3) 2018 Winter Olympics (PyeongChang) Successfully demonstrated HD mobile and 4K-UHD in a single RF channel Why ATSC 3.0 in Korea UHD? (1) ATSC 1.0 Developed in 1993 Modern Digital World WiFi 802.11ac 1300 Mbps Smart Phones Computer DOS … Windows 3.1 Cell Phone Analog 2G But, Old-fashioned TV Dial-up Modem VCR - analog 19.2 kbps • First digital broadcasting standard • HD video & 5.1 digital audio • Electronic program guides & caption Revolution in 1993 Why ATSC 3.0 in Korea UHD? (2) Enhanced TV Datacasting Convergence Mobility Navigation Updates Phones Smart
    [Show full text]
  • Video Datacasting
    Datacasting: NCAA Deployment in Houston Report First Responders Group July 2016 Intentionally Blank Datacasting: NCAA Deployment in Houston Report HSHQPM-15-X-00122 August 2016 Prepared The First Responders Group Office for: for Interoperability and Compatibility Prepared Johns Hopkins University Applied by: Physics Lab Publication Notice Disclaimer The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S. government. Reference herein to any specific commercial products, processes, or services by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the U.S. government. The information and statements contained herein shall not be used for the purposes of advertising, nor to imply the endorsement or recommendation of the U.S. government. With respect to documentation contained herein, neither the U.S. government nor any of its employees make any warranty, express or implied, including but not limited to the warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. Further, neither the U.S. government nor any of its employees assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed; nor do they represent that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Contact Information Please send comments or questions to: [email protected] Intentionally Blank Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Lab Pilot After Action
    [Show full text]
  • Recommendation Itu-R Bt.1833-2*, **
    Recommendation ITU-R BT.1833-2 (08/2012) Broadcasting of multimedia and data applications for mobile reception by handheld receivers BT Series Broadcasting service (television) ii Rec. ITU-R BT.1833-2 Foreword The role of the Radiocommunication Sector is to ensure the rational, equitable, efficient and economical use of the radio-frequency spectrum by all radiocommunication services, including satellite services, and carry out studies without limit of frequency range on the basis of which Recommendations are adopted. The regulatory and policy functions of the Radiocommunication Sector are performed by World and Regional Radiocommunication Conferences and Radiocommunication Assemblies supported by Study Groups. Policy on Intellectual Property Right (IPR) ITU-R policy on IPR is described in the Common Patent Policy for ITU-T/ITU-R/ISO/IEC referenced in Annex 1 of Resolution ITU-R 1. Forms to be used for the submission of patent statements and licensing declarations by patent holders are available from http://www.itu.int/ITU-R/go/patents/en where the Guidelines for Implementation of the Common Patent Policy for ITU-T/ITU-R/ISO/IEC and the ITU-R patent information database can also be found. Series of ITU-R Recommendations (Also available online at http://www.itu.int/publ/R-REC/en) Series Title BO Satellite delivery BR Recording for production, archival and play-out; film for television BS Broadcasting service (sound) BT Broadcasting service (television) F Fixed service M Mobile, radiodetermination, amateur and related satellite services P Radiowave propagation RA Radio astronomy RS Remote sensing systems S Fixed-satellite service SA Space applications and meteorology SF Frequency sharing and coordination between fixed-satellite and fixed service systems SM Spectrum management SNG Satellite news gathering TF Time signals and frequency standards emissions V Vocabulary and related subjects Note: This ITU-R Recommendation was approved in English under the procedure detailed in Resolution ITU-R 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Download ATSC 3.0 Implementation Guide
    ATSC 3.0 Transition and Implementation Guide INTRODUCTION This document was developed to provide broadcasters with ATSC 3.0 information that can inform investment and technical decisions required to move from ATSC 1.0 to ATSC 3.0. It also guides broadcasters who are planning for its adoption while also planning for channel changes during the FCC Spectrum Repack Program. This document, finalized September 9, 2016, will be updated periodically as insight and additional information is made available from industry testing and implementation of the new standard. This document was developed by the companies and organizations listed in the Appendix. Updates to the Guide are open to input from all companies and individuals that wish to contribute. Those interested in suggesting changes or updates to this document can do so at [email protected]. 2 ATSC 3.0 Transition and Implementation Guide EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Television service continues to evolve as content distributors – from traditional cable operators to internet-delivered services – utilize the latest technologies to reach viewers and offer a wide variety of program choices. New receiving devices are easily connected to the internet, which relies on the language of Internet Protocol (IP) to transport content. Now terrestrial broadcasters are preparing both for the adoption of an IP-ready next-generation digital TV (DTV) standard and a realignment of the U.S. TV spectrum. Viewers are already buying high-quality displays that respond to 4K Ultra HDTV signals and High Dynamic Range (HDR) capabilities. Immersive and personalized audio is also emerging, with the ability to enhance the quality and variety of audio.
    [Show full text]
  • Satellite Signal Security: Copyright Protection Korean DBS Content and Transaction Security
    Online Journal of Space Communication Volume 3 Issue 6 Satellite Security (Winter 2004) Article 4 June 2021 Overview: Satellite Signal Security: Copyright Protection Korean DBS Content and Transaction Security Don Flournoy Follow this and additional works at: https://ohioopen.library.ohio.edu/spacejournal Part of the Astrodynamics Commons, Navigation, Guidance, Control and Dynamics Commons, Space Vehicles Commons, Systems and Communications Commons, and the Systems Engineering and Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Commons Recommended Citation Flournoy, Don (2021) "Overview: Satellite Signal Security: Copyright Protection Korean DBS Content and Transaction Security," Online Journal of Space Communication: Vol. 3 : Iss. 6 , Article 4. Available at: https://ohioopen.library.ohio.edu/spacejournal/vol3/iss6/4 This Articles is brought to you for free and open access by the OHIO Open Library Journals at OHIO Open Library. It has been accepted for inclusion in Online Journal of Space Communication by an authorized editor of OHIO Open Library. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Flournoy: Satellite Signal Security SATELLITE SIGNAL SECURITY Copyright Protection Korean DBS Content and Transaction Security Don Flournoy, Professor of Telecommunications Ohio University, Athens OH, USA As a result of new developments in broadband communication, residential users, office workers and those who move from place to place have more ways to access the programming and services they want when they want them. It is clear that modern media and telecom users want increased choices in content and in services, and they want whatever options they choose to be available in a form that is fast, convenient and easy to use. Once users feel the satisfaction and power of having voice and video, audio and data packages at their fingertips, they tend to want more and more.
    [Show full text]
  • TV Datacast Engineer
    TV Datacast Engineer Position Details Class Code: 4839 Job Family: Broadcast/Communications Classification: Support Professional Terms of Employment: Pay Grade 56 on the Support Professional Salary Schedule FLSA STATUS: NON-EXEMPT Position open until filled Position Summary Under general supervision, installs, maintains, and repairs emergency service datacast communications systems using television broadcasting, production equipment. Assists statewide public and private organizations organize existing digital data sources into files suitable for transmission to first responders in the field. Essential Duties and Responsibilities The list of Essential Duties and Responsibilities is not exhaustive and may be supplemented. 1. Installs broadcasting equipment. 2. Assists with the research and development of technology, interconnection, and delivery systems such as satellite uplinks and fiber optic technology. 3. Repairs broadcasting and production equipment. 4. Tunes transmitters to maintain efficient operation. 5. Diagnoses cause of equipment malfunctions. 6. Installs audio and video patching systems. 7. Maintains, troubleshoots, and repairs datacasting systems which integrate television transmitters, microwave links, satellite reception and transmission systems, remote site translator systems, studio production switcher systems, video and audio routing switcher systems, synchronizing and timing equipment, studio systems, audio consoles, video monitors and receivers, audio and video patching systems, and intercom headset systems using technical
    [Show full text]
  • Datacasting: NCAA Deployment in Houston Report HSHQPM-15-X-00122 July 2016 V Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Lab Pilot After Action Report
    Datacasting: NCAA Deployment in Houston Report First Responders Group July 2016 Intentionally Blank Datacasting: NCAA Deployment in Houston Report HSHQPM-15-X-00122 July 2016 Prepared The First Responders Group Office for: for Interoperability and Compatibility Prepared Johns Hopkins University Applied by: Physics Lab Publication Notice Disclaimer The views and opinions of authors expressed herein do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S. government. Reference herein to any specific commercial products, processes, or services by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not necessarily constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the U.S. government. The information and statements contained herein shall not be used for the purposes of advertising, nor to imply the endorsement or recommendation of the U.S. government. With respect to documentation contained herein, neither the U.S. government nor any of its employees make any warranty, express or implied, including but not limited to the warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose. Further, neither the U.S. government nor any of its employees assume any legal liability or responsibility for the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information, apparatus, product, or process disclosed; nor do they represent that its use would not infringe privately owned rights. Contact Information Please send comments or questions to: [email protected] Intentionally Blank Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Lab Pilot After Action
    [Show full text]
  • Datacasting - Broadcasting Real-Time Video and Critical Data Over Existing Digital Television Spectrum
    DHS Science and Technology Directorate Datacasting - Broadcasting Real-Time Video and Critical Data over Existing Digital Television Spectrum Creating Alternative Communication Options Preventing Network Overload In an emergency, first responders need timely and relevant Datacasting is a broadcasting mechanism capable of one-to- data to make informed decisions. Land Mobile Radio many content delivery. For example, an unlimited number (LMR) networks only work for voice communication and of recipients can be targeted without running out of do not have the capacity to transmit large amounts of data. bandwidth. This not only reduces congestion on commercial Commercial cellular networks can become overloaded or cellular networks, but it complements existing systems. fail completely as they become saturated by public use. This Further, it allows public safety agencies to transmit leaves public safety agencies competing for the same encrypted video and data that is invisible to the general network resources when trying to transmit their mission- public through the digital television signal. critical information, especially video. Transmission hardware is set up at the television station The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Science and while recipients use a receiver dongle in order to receive the Technology Directorate (S&T) explored new information broadcast from the station. Datacasting’s communications options for public safety use through the software allows the owners of the video and other data to piloting of datacasting technology. Datacasting uses target individual users or groups of receivers to view the existing broadcast television signals to deliver encrypted video, files and notifications transmitted. These owners data to targeted recipients. retain control and can be selective about who can see video feeds and other information, even across various agencies S&T joined the Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics and political jurisdictions.
    [Show full text]
  • FCC Memorandum Opinion and Order 03-330 of 12/9/2003
    Federal Communications Commission FCC 03-330 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) General Motors Corporation and ) Hughes Electronics Corporation, Transferors ) MB Docket No. 03-124 ) And ) ) The News Corporation Limited, Transferee, ) ) For Authority to Transfer Control ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: December 19, 2003 Released: January 14, 2004 By the Commission: Chairman Powell, Commissioners Abernathy and Martin issuing separate statements; Commissioners Copps and Adelstein dissenting and issuing separate statements. TABLE OF CONTENTS Para. No. I. INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................................................1 II. DESCRIPTION OF THE PARTIES .....................................................................................................6 A. The News Corporation Limited................................................................................................6 B. General Motors Corporation and Hughes Electronics Corporation ........................................8 C. The Proposed Transaction ........................................................................................................9 III. STANDARD OF REVIEW AND PUBLIC INTEREST FRAMEWORK........................................15 IV. COMPLIANCE WITH COMMUNICATIONS ACT AND COMMISSION RULES AND POLICIES...................................................................................................................................18
    [Show full text]