Ecological Forest Management

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Ecological Forest Management ECOLOGICAL FOREST MANAGEMENT Northwest Natural Resources Group Rolf Gersonde, 6/11/2016 [email protected] Ecological Forestry in 60 Seconds – The Element of Ecological Forestry • Using site Adapted Species • Based on Natural Processes • Improve Soil Productivity • Enhance Habitat and Biodiversity • Improve Natural Capital • Economic and Ecological Resilience 2 Ecological Forestry in 90 Minutes – Outline of the Presentation • Forest Stand Dynamics • Forest Ecology • Silviculture and Multi-aged Management • Group Selection Example • Single Tree Selection Example • Tools for Assessment and Management • Operations 3 Forest Stand Dynamics Stand Development Stages following a major disturbance • S 0 70 150 Age 250 500 750 Stand Initiation Franklin and Van Pelt 2004 Stem Exclusion Understory Re-Initiation Diversification –Vertical - Horizontal 4 Seedling/Sapling – Stand Initiation Early Seral Vegetation 5 Canopy Closure in Young Forests 6 Competitive Exclusion Phase – Crown Differentiation and Self-thinning 7 Crown Differentiation – The development of crown classes during early stand development D – Dominant C – Co-dominant I – Intermediate O – Overtopped 8 Biomass Production – Trees versus Stands Stand Volume Growth Volume Tree Stand Density 9 Tree Diameter Growth – The effect of stand density on diameter growth 665 TPA 75 TPA 333 TPA 110 TPA 166 TPA 10 Tree Vigor and Stability - Live crown ratio and height to diameter ratio as indicators 11 Tree Height Growth – Height growth changes with age a differs between species 12 Understory Establishment – following overstory disturbance and gap creation 13 Competition versus Agent Based Motality 14 Natural Regeneration - Understory Establishment Stage • Seed Source • Species, Seed Year, Predation • Environment • Temp, Water, Light • Seed bed • Soil, Competition, Mycorrhiza 15 Understory Light and Canopy Gap – Progressively more light in gap and shading of the gap edge 35 90 80 30 70 60 50 40 25 30 20 20 20 20 20 15 10 30 30 Canopy Height (m) Height Canopy 50 40 40 60 5 40 40 10 40 30 20 60 50 70 90 110 North - South Distance (m) 16 Identify Shade Tolerance by Branch Morphology – Shade and Light Adapted Conifers Grand fir Grand Douglas - fir Western hemlock Western Western white pine Western 17 Shade Tolerance – Ranking of Western Tree Species (Daniel et al. 1979) Western hemlock Pacific yew Very tolerant Pacific silver fir Vine maple Western redcedar Tolerant Grand fir Sitka spruce Big-leaf maple Intermediate Douglas-fir Western white pine Ponderosa pine Intolerant Lodgepole pine Red alder Cottonwoods Very intolerant Larch 18 Understory Growth – Morphological Plasticity Pacific silver fir •Sun and shade foliage Noble fir •Terminal vs. lateral growth •Apical dominance 19 Western hemlock Soil Nutrients Site and Tree Species Soil Water Soil 20 Tree species and Ecological Amplitude Soil Nutrients Poor Rich Very Poor Medium Very Rich Douglas-fir Very Dry Dry Max Productivity Crop Reliability Slightly Dry Silvicultural Fresh Feasibility Soil Water Soil Moist Very Moist Modified from: Klinka, Worrall, Skoda and Varga (2000): The Distribution and Synopsis of Ecological and Silvical Wet Characteristics of Tree Species of British Columbia www.for.gov.bc.ca/hfp/silviculture/compendium 21 Understory Species as Indicators of Site Conditions Modified from: 22 www.for.gov.bc.ca/hfp/silviculture/compendium Red Alder Redcedar P Silver Fir Sitka SpruceHemlock B CottonwoodGrant Fir Yew BL Maple WW Pine B Cherry Douglas-fir Ponderosa PWhite Oak Madrone VERY DRY Dry Slightly Dry FRESH Moist Tree Species and Soil Moisture Very Moist WET Maximum Sustainable Productivity Crop Reliability (Silvicultural Feasibility) Modified from: www.for.gov.bc.ca/hfp/silviculture/compendium 23 Soil Moisture and Topographic Position Ridge Dry Thin soil Upper Slope Fresh Thin soil (Colluvium) Lower Slope Moist Thicker soil Valley Wet – Deep rich soil (Alluvium) 24 Mixed-species Forests 25 Percent hardwood mixture in conifer forests affects song bird density From Ellis and Betts, 2010, Western Forester 55(2) 26 Benefits of Mixed-species Stands Hardwood plant litter with high decomposition rates improves soil development and is forage for many species 27 Mixed-Species Stands Species specific Growing space Height growth Shade tolerance Senescence Disease & Pests 28 Mixed-Species Stands Symbiosis Nutrient enrichment Resilience Mycorhiza Frankia alni bacteria 29 Root Disease Indicators Photos: www.forestryimages.org and www.fs.fed.us 30 Armillaria root disease • Widespread • Most tree species Manage for Tree Vigor Phellinus or Laminated Root Rot • Localized • Species specific Manage for Species Conversion Ecological Forestry manages for Species Diversity 31 Bark Beetle Indicators 32 Positive Feedback Cycle in Disturbance Agent Complex: Forest – Wind –Insects - Drought – Pathogens Forest Wind Pathogens Insects Drought Daniel Miller, USDA Forest Service, Bugwood.org Kenneth E. Gibson, USDA Forest Service, Bugwood.org 33 Landscape level effect of tree species diversity on disturbance propagation Disturbance Propagation Species Diversity 34 Silvicultural System – System of coordinated regeneration, tending, control, and harvest treatments Even-aged System Clear Cut Seed Tree Shelterwood Thinning Two-aged System Variable Retention Coppice with Reserves Uneven-aged system Group Selection Thinning Single Tree Selection 35 Stand Volume and Rotation in Even-aged System Stand Volume Stand Stand Age Rotation Age 36 Seed-Tree and Shelterwood Regeneration Methods 37 Continuum of Silvicultural Approaches – A- individual tree selection, B-group selection, C- mixture of individual tree and group selection 38 What is Uneven-aged Management? Even-aged “age-class” Forestry Uneven-aged Management System 39 Origins of Uneven-aged forest management: Henry Biolley (France) Alfred Möller (Germany) “Dauerwald” “Continuous Cover Forestry” 40 Ecological Basis - Small-scale disturbance regime and species composition lead to characteristic diameter distribution of natural stands Meyer 1952 Tree Count Tree Tree Diameter 41 History of Uneven-aged Management in the Pacific Northwest Kirkland and Brandstrom 1936 Leo Isaac 1956 42 Managing Multi-aged Stands 43 Managing Uneven-aged Stands Manage stand density to: 1. Sustain growth of all stand components 2. Maintain stand structure 3. Replace tree mortality and harvest through regeneration Transformation of even-aged to multi-aged stands 44 Cutting Cycle – cutting cycle length depends on cutting intensity and growth rates Cutting Cycle Length - Density Density - Growth Rate Volume Volume Removed Growing Space Growing Timber Volume Stand Stand Stand Age 45 Cutting Cycle 2. Age 60 180 TPA BA 180 1. Age 40 4. Age 80/20 200 TPA 200 TPA Volume BA 120 BA 160 Stand Stand 3. Age 60 90 TPA BA 120 Stand Age 46 Single Tree Selection – Age classes are mixed at fine scale, growth and regeneration are regulated by removal of individual trees 47 While individual trees are removed, the stand structure remains the same 48 Single Tree Selection – developing a guide curve from tree count and diameter Tree Tally by 2 inch Diameter Class Number of Trees of Number 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 Tree Diameter 49 Single Tree Selection Guide Curve: Total basal area Maximum Diameter “slope” Target Number At each cutting cycle Actual Number we thin trees in classes that exceed the guide curve. 50 Group Selection System - A Systematic Approach to Diverse Forests 51 Group Selection System – Age classes are mixed at group scale (1/2 – 2 acres), growth and regeneration are regulated by removing groups of trees AND thinning individual trees The group selection system allows for mixture of shade and intolerant species in the same stand. 52 Group Selection System - Age-class mixture and management activities Regeneration PCT Activities: Group-Selection Harvest Thinned Natural Regeneration Matrix Planting Pre-comm. Thinning Commercial Thinning Understory Thinning Un-thinned Large Tree Scheduling Group Selection Treatments Area Control Method – Stand is divided into even areas, these areas are treated during the cutting cycle (e.g. 20% regenerated in one-acre group selection cuts, 40% commercial thinning, 20% pre-commercial thinning of regeneration in previous group selection cuts). Cutting Cycle 1 2 3 4 5 6 Stand Area Group Commercial Commercial Group 20% PCT PCT Selection Thin Thin Selection Commercial Group Commercial Commercial Group 20% PCT Thin Selection Thin Thin Selection Commercial Commercial Group Commercial Commercial 20% PCT Thin Thin Selection Thin Thin Commercial Commercial Group Commercial 20% PCT Thin Thin Selection Thin Commercial Commercial Group 20% PCT Thin Thin Selection 40 60 80 100 120 140 Stand Age The Silviculture Toolbox – Commercial and Ecological Forestry use the same tools. The difference is in when and how they are applied. Protect Redistribute Regenerate Select 55 Pure Hardwood Stands - Alder Hardwood Silviculture Cooperative http://www.cof.orst.edu/coops/hsc/ Planted 1200 TPA Age 9 Thinned to 230 TPA Age 12 Planted 230 TPA, Age 13 56 Naturally Regenerated Hardwood Stands Red alder, Darrington, WA, Hardwood Silviculture Cooperative, Unthinned Thinned to 250 TPA 57 Hardwood Thinning Regime • Planting 500-600 TPA • PCT to 200-250 TPA (age 12) • Pruning to retain 60% of crown • Life branch pruning only • 25-30 year harvest age • 16 foot logs, 12 inch diameter • High price of knot-free lumber • Snow and ice damage From John Belton 2004, Northwest Woodlands Photo: Hardwood Silviculture Cooperative 58 Assessing
Recommended publications
  • Shifts in Forest Composition in the Eastern United States T ⁎ Jonathan A
    Forest Ecology and Management 433 (2019) 176–183 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Forest Ecology and Management journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/foreco Shifts in forest composition in the eastern United States T ⁎ Jonathan A. Knotta, Johanna M. Despreza, Christopher M. Oswaltb, Songlin Feia, a Purdue University, Department of Forestry and Natural Resources, West Lafayette, IN 47906, United States b USDA Forest Service Southern Research Station, Knoxville, TN 37919, United States ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: Forest ecosystems in the United States (U.S.) are facing major challenges such as climate change, exotic species Forest dynamics invasions, and landscape fragmentation. It is widely believed that forest composition in the eastern U.S. is Fire tolerance transitioning from shade-intolerant, fire-tolerant species to shade-tolerant, fire-intolerant species, but most Shade tolerance evidence is anecdotal or localized. No comprehensive studies exist to quantify the shifts in forest composition Mesophication across multiple genera at a regional scale. Here, we examined the genus-level compositional changes in eastern Quercus U.S. forests to: (1) quantify the extent and magnitude of this transition, and (2) assess the influence of shade and Acer fire tolerance traits on abundance change. Genus-level data were compiled from the Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) database across 37 states in the eastern U.S. for the last three decades. We analyzed shifts in forest composition with three metrics—stem density, basal area, and importance value—for 10 of the most abundant genera (Acer, Betula, Carya, Fraxinus, Nyssa, Pinus, Populus, Prunus, Quercus, and Ulmus). In addition, we esti- mated density-weighted fire and shade tolerances for each genus using species-level published data, assessed the shifts in spatial patterns of these traits, and analyzed the associations between these traits and county-level abundance changes.
    [Show full text]
  • Silviculture and Forest Management
    Working with your forest to meet your needs: Silviculture and Forest Management Susan L. Stout US Forest Service, Northern Research Station Warren, PA Silvi • Silviculture is certainly about trees, and specifically about trees in forests …culture • The totality of socially transmitted behavior patterns, arts, beliefs, institutions, and all other products of human work and thought • www.thefreedictionary.com/culture …culture • the quality in a person or society that arises from a concern for what is regarded as excellent in arts, letters, manners, scholarly pursuits, etc dictionary.reference.com/ browse/culture Silviculture • “Silviculture is the art & science of controlling the establishment, growth, composition, health, and quality of forests & woodlands to meet the diverse needs & values of landowners & society on a sustainable basis.” Society of American Foresters 1994 Knowledge needed to practice good silviculture • Site quality and characteristics • Character of surrounding landscape • Age classes found in and around this forest stand • History of the forest • Silvics of species in the stand Site quality • Sometimes measured by the height of leading trees at a certain age, figured out by taking tree cores (if the tallest trees were removed, or the stand is uneven-aged, this may not work) • Concept integrates landscape position, many soil characteristics, dry/moist conditions, and nutrients Landscape Context Age classes of your forest Uneven-aged Even-aged Age classes of your forest Uneven-aged Even-aged • Activities planned for the
    [Show full text]
  • Traditional Fire Knowledge in Two Chestnut Forest Ecosystems of the Iberian Peninsula and Its Implications
    Land Use Policy 47 (2015) 130–144 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Land Use Policy jo urnal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/landusepol Forgetting fire: Traditional fire knowledge in two chestnut forest ecosystems of the Iberian Peninsula and its implications for European fire management policy a,∗ b c a,b,c Francisco Seijo , James D.A. Millington , Robert Gray , Verónica Sanz , d e f Jorge Lozano , Francisco García-Serrano , Gabriel Sangüesa-Barreda , f Jesús Julio Camarero a Middlebury College C.V. Starr School in Spain, Madrid, Spain b Department of Geography, King’s College London, London, UK c RW Gray Consulting Ltd, Chilliwack, BC, Canada d Departamento de Ciencias Naturales, Sección de Biología Básica y Aplicada, Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja, San Cayetano Alto, C/París s/n., Loja 1101608, Ecuador e Saint Louis University, Madrid, Spain f Instituto Pirenaico de Ecologia-CSICAvda. Monta˜nana, 1005. 50059 Zaragoza, Spain a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t r a c t Article history: Human beings have used fire as an ecosystem management tool for thousands of years. In the context of Received 6 October 2014 the scientific and policy debate surrounding potential climate change adaptation and mitigation strate- Received in revised form 25 February 2015 gies, the importance of the impact of relatively recent state fire-exclusion policies on fire regimes has Accepted 14 March 2015 been debated. To provide empirical evidence to this ongoing debate we examine the impacts of state fire-exclusion policies in the chestnut forest ecosystems of two geographically neighbouring municipal- Keywords: ities in central Spain, Casillas and Rozas de Puerto Real.
    [Show full text]
  • Tree Growth and Mortality , Reproductive Patterns, and Soil Characteristics in a 27 Year-Old Maple-Basswood Forest Restoration Project
    St. Olaf College Local Ecology Research Papers Tree growth and mortality , reproductive patterns, and soil characteristics in a 27 year-old maple-basswood forest restoration project Robby Holmes 2017 © Robby Holmes, 2017 “​Tree growth and mortality, reproductive patterns, and soil characteristics in a 27 year-old maple-basswood forest restoration project​” by Robby Holmes is licensed under a ​Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License​. Holmes 1 Tree growth and mortality, reproductive patterns, and soil characteristics in a 27 year-old maple-basswood forest restoration project Robby Holmes Advisor: Dr. Kathleen Shea Biology Department, St. Olaf College Northfield MN, 55057 Fall 2017 Holmes 2 Abstract Forests have been on the decline since the rise of agriculture and urbanization in the last few centuries. The maple-basswood forest, a unique forest type found in southeastern Minnesota, is no exception. Keeping these forests healthy, or restoring them to health, is important in order to preserve high levels of biodiversity to facilitate ecosystem resilience. In this study, we measured over 2000 trees at St. Olaf College in Northfield, Minnesota, to assess their health and compare tree growth among four sections in two adjacent fields. We also gathered seedling and sapling data as well as soil data to assess the overall health and growth of the forests. The restoration project is dominated by white ash, with black walnut, maples, and oaks being the next most common. Sections one and two had the trees with the largest diameter, lead by red oak, white oak, and basswood, while sections three and four had higher levels of moisture and organic matter.
    [Show full text]
  • Simulations of Snag Dynamics in an Industrial Douglas-Fir Forest
    Forest Ecology and Management 174 (2003) 521–539 Simulations of snag dynamics in an industrial Douglas-fir forest George F. Wilhere* Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife, Wildlife Program, 600 Capitol Way North, Olympia, WA 98501, USA Received 24 September 2001 Abstract Industrial silviculture is known to reduce snag density, but snag dynamics in industrial forests are poorly understood. I developed a simulation model that integrated a snag model and a well-known forest growth model, the forest vegetation simulator (FVS). A new snag model was developed by averaging the outputs of four independently created snag models. The four models were for Douglas-fir snags in forests west of the Cascade Crest in Oregon, Washington, and British Columbia. Forest growth and snag dynamics were simulated under a typical silvicultural regime and current occupational safety and environmental regulations. The results indicate that management practices like those simulated yield: (1) small and medium diameter snags at moderate densities (20 snags per hectare (sph)) for short periods of time (5–10 years); (2) a snag population with high temporal variation fluctuating between 4.2 and 22.5 sph; (3) mean densities of small, medium, and large snags equal to approximately 3.9, 6.2, and 0.1 sph/decade; and (4) a soft snag density of 0.1 sph/decade. Snag recruitment curves generated through simulations showed that to increase mean snag density per decade by 1 sph, the number of snags retained must be increased by about 1.4 sph. The mean density of snags per decade produced under the typical silvicultural regime was projected to be about 20% that found in unmanaged stands.
    [Show full text]
  • FOREST Condition Assessment Brochure, Pg
    Reference TIPS FOREST Condition Assessment brochure, pg. 9 With proper management, you can maintain healthy forest land. All forests can be managed for a single use, such as timber production, or for multiple uses, such as wildlife habitat, recreation, livestock grazing and/or timber production. To help you Worksheet manage your forest land, you need to decide which of these uses are important to you. You likely have a primary use planned that will guide your overall management and decision-making processes. If secondary and tertiary uses are also important to you, allow these to guide your decisions as well. This worksheet will help you ensure that the vegetation and ecosystems on your forest land function properly for the land uses you have identified. In a healthy forest, the larger overstory trees, smaller understory trees, and ground vegetation are all in good condition. The distribution of vegetation and the number of trees per acre will differ depending upon where your property is located within the state. Soil type, precipitation, temperature, tree species, and your land use objectives are also factors that affect the density and distribution of vegetation on your forest land. Instructions: Conduct a basic assessment of your forest land by answering the following questions. Suggestions to help you address specific management issues are listed directly under each section. If you identify management needs and issues that may require professional assistance, refer to the last page of this Forest Condition Assessment for a list of resources. Site Date 1. Identify the tree species on your forest land. Select all that are present: Others: □ Douglas fi r □ Western larch □ Ponderosa pine □ Bigleaf maple □ Grand fi r □ Red alder □ White fi r □ Sitka spruce □ Western hemlock □ Oregon white oak There are many references to help you identify the tree species present in Oregon.
    [Show full text]
  • Why Are Evergreen Leaves So Contrary About Shade?
    Opinion Why are evergreen leaves so contrary about shade? Christopher H. Lusk1*, Peter B. Reich2*, Rebecca A. Montgomery2, David D. Ackerly3 and Jeannine Cavender-Bares4 1 Department of Biological Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia 2 Department of Forest Resources, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108, USA 3 Department of Integrative Biology, University of California, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA 4 Department of Ecology, Evolution and Behavior, University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN 55108, USA Leaf mass per area (LMA) is one of the most widely spectrum (low photosynthetic capacity and respiration measured of all plant functional traits. In deciduous rates, low nitrogen concentrations and long leaf lifespan) forests, there is similarity between plastic and evolution- are not only found in inherently slow-growing species (e.g. ary responses of LMA to light gradients. In evergreens, many evergreen conifers such as Podocarpus and Picea) however, LMA is lower in shaded than sunlit individuals [7,9,10] but are often also expressed within species when of the same species, whereas shade-tolerant evergreens grown in environments unfavorable for rapid growth have higher LMA than light-demanders grown under the [10,11]. For example, leaf lifespan is often longer in shaded same conditions. We suggest that this pattern of ‘coun- individuals than in those grown in brighter light [12,13], ter-gradient variation’ results from some combination of just as it tends to be longer in shade-tolerant species (i) close evolutionary coordination of LMA with leaf adapted to late-successional habitats than in light- lifespan, (ii) selection for different leaf constitutions demanding species, which normally establish under open (relative investment in cell walls versus cell contents) conditions [11,14,15].
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding the Carbon and Greenhouse Gas Balance of Forests in Britain
    Research Report Understanding the carbon and greenhouse gas balance of forests in Britain Research Report Understanding the carbon and greenhouse gas balance of forests in Britain James Morison, Robert Matthews, Gemma Miller, Mike Perks, Tim Randle, Elena Vanguelova, Miriam White and Sirwan Yamulki Forestry Commission: Edinburgh © Crown Copyright 2012 You may re-use this information (not including logos) free of charge in any format or medium, under the terms of the Open Government Licence. To view this licence, visit: www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence or write to the Information Policy Team, The National Archives, Kew, London TW9 4DU, or e-mail: [email protected]. First published in 2012 by Forestry Commission, Silvan House, 231 Corstorphine Road, Edinburgh EH12 7AT. ISBN 978-0-85538-855-3 Morison, J., Matthews, R., Miller, G., Perks, M., Randle, T., Vanguelova, E., White, M. and Yamulki, S. (2012). Understanding the carbon and greenhouse gas balance of forests in Britain. Forestry Commission Research Report. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh. i–vi + 1–149 pp. Keywords: Forest carbon; carbon stocks; soil carbon; greenhouse gas balance; mitigation; fossil fuel substitution; forest management. FCRP018/FC-GB(STUDIO9)/0K/MAR12 Enquiries relating to this publication should be addressed to: Forestry Commission 231 Corstorphine Road Edinburgh Scotland, EH12 7AT T: 0131 334 0303 E: [email protected] The Forestry Commission will consider all requests to make the content of publications available in alternative formats. Please direct requests to the Forestry Commission Diversity Team at the above address, or by email at [email protected] or by phone on 0131 314 6575.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural Disturbance and Stand Development Principles for Ecological Forestry
    United States Department of Agriculture Natural Disturbance and Forest Service Stand Development Principles Northern Research Station for Ecological Forestry General Technical Report NRS-19 Jerry F. Franklin Robert J. Mitchell Brian J. Palik Abstract Foresters use natural disturbances and stand development processes as models for silvicultural practices in broad conceptual ways. Incorporating an understanding of natural disturbance and stand development processes more fully into silvicultural practice is the basis for an ecological forestry approach. Such an approach must include 1) understanding the importance of biological legacies created by a tree regenerating disturbance and incorporating legacy management into harvesting prescriptions; 2) recognizing the role of stand development processes, particularly individual tree mortality, in generating structural and compositional heterogeneity in stands and implementing thinning prescriptions that enhance this heterogeneity; and 3) appreciating the role of recovery periods between disturbance events in the development of stand complexity. We label these concepts, when incorporated into a comprehensive silvicultural approach, the “three-legged stool” of ecological forestry. Our goal in this report is to review the scientific basis for the three-legged stool of ecological forestry to provide a conceptual foundation for its wide implementation. Manuscript received for publication 1 May 2007 Published by: For additional copies: USDA FOREST SERVICE USDA Forest Service 11 CAMPUS BLVD SUITE 200 Publications Distribution NEWTOWN SQUARE PA 19073-3294 359 Main Road Delaware, OH 43015-8640 November 2007 Fax: (740)368-0152 Visit our homepage at: http://www.nrs.fs.fed.us/ INTRODUCTION Foresters use natural disturbances and stand development processes as models for silvicultural practices in broad conceptual ways.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Stand Delineation
    City of Dallas Landscape and Tree Manual APPENDIX G Forest Stand Delineation Steps for Assessment Tree survey Sampling methods Tree canopy cover assessment methods Forest Stand Delineation procedures 1. Old-field succession assessment 2. Tree canopy cover credit for single-family and duplex uses 3. Tree canopy cover assessment of development impact area in conjunction with Sustainable Development Incentives (Review Appendix F) 4. Tree canopy cover assessment on properties five acres or larger with institutional and community service uses or recreation uses 5. Forest analysis for baseline documentation to create a conservation easement 6. Tree canopy cover assessment where trees are removed without authorization (10.137) The forest stand delineation is a form of site assessment prescribed for its function to evaluate for tree species size, distribution, location, and age and may be used to March 14, 2019 Appendix G: Forest Stand Delineation 1 | Page City of Dallas Landscape and Tree Manual identify tree canopy coverage for the purposes of tree mitigation calculations. A forest canopy goal is typically sought instead of mandating a forest canopy requirement. Ordinance: (22) FOREST STAND DELINEATION (“FSD”) means a comprehensive assessment of the conditions of a property using multiple types of information, including, but not limited to, a tree survey, aerial imagery collected from private or public sources, natural resources assessments, topographic maps, management plans, a map of conservation areas, land use maps, etc., to provide the required data to determine tree replacement requirements and forest conservation objectives. (B) A forest stand delineation (“FSD”) used for the purpose of calculating the total square footage of forest canopy coverage of building sites and providing an ecological assessment of a property.
    [Show full text]
  • A Shade Tolerance Index for Common Understory Species of Northeastern North America
    Ecological Indicators 7 (2007) 195–207 This article is also available online at: www.elsevier.com/locate/ecolind A shade tolerance index for common understory species of northeastern North America Lionel Humbert *, Daniel Gagnon, Daniel Kneeshaw, Christian Messier Groupe de Recherche en E´cologie Forestie`re Interuniversitaire (GREFi), De´partement des Sciences Biologiques, Universite´ du Que´bec a` Montre´al, Case Postale 8888, Succursale Centre-Ville, Montre´al, Qc., Canada H3C 3P8 Received 12 June 2005; received in revised form 29 November 2005; accepted 2 December 2005 Abstract Since Baker’s [Baker, F.S., 1949. A revised tolerance table. J. For. 47, 179–181] classic contribution, shade tolerance indices have not been much modified for North American plant species. While many common tree and shrub species are included in the shade tolerance index, much less is known about this characteristic for the abundant and rich understory vascular and nonvascular plant layers. The classification of the shade tolerance is widely used to compare relative growth and survival among plant species under closed canopies and is also fundamental to an understanding of stand development following small and large scale disturbances. Although qualitative, it is frequently used both in research and management implications. Here we provide a significant revision to Baker’s shade tolerance table to include the most common forest understory plant species found in northeastern North America forests. Our index is based on: (1) the compilation of the opinions of five experts, (2) a comparison with Ellenberg’s index from Europe as well as, (3) information from current literature. For most of the 347 plant species investigated, a consistent and robust shade tolerance index, ranging between 1 (very tolerant) and 9 (very intolerant), was found.
    [Show full text]
  • Growth and Yield in Uneven-Aged Stands
    We can perhaps think of two main categories of growth and yield estimates: (1) estimates of current growth of existing stands, with projections for short periods into the future assuming continuation of current management practices; and (2) estimates of growth and yield under long term applica­ tion of possible management regimes, intended in part at least to identify options and provide a basis for choice among alternatives. The first usually comes from inventories of existing conditions. The second, from construction of some type of predictive model, often based on quite limited data from small experimental areas, since the stand conditions concerned may not as yet exist over the forest as a whole. Here, I am talking pri­ · marily about this second type of estimate. Basic Differences Between Even-aged and Uneven-aged Stands 1. Areal arrangement by age classes: By definition, an even-aged stand is composed of one main age class over an area large enough to be mappable and recognized as a distinct unit in management. An uneven-aged stand is anything else, and consists of two to many age classes in any areal arrangement from stemwise mixture to even­ aged groups of up to several acres each. 2. Diameter distributions: The- even-aged stand has the typical bell-shaped diameter distribution, while the uneven-aged stand--considered over any substantial area--has a more or less J-shaped distribution (which may be a summation of other distributions for numerous small areas) . 3. Height growth: Even-aged stands: Dominants have a well-defined and consistent sigmoid growth pattern characteristic of the site.
    [Show full text]