Exhaustees of Extended Unemployment Benefits Programs: Coping with the Aftermath of the Great Recession

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Exhaustees of Extended Unemployment Benefits Programs: Coping with the Aftermath of the Great Recession FINAL REPORT Exhaustees of Extended Unemployment Benefits Programs: Coping with the Aftermath of the Great Recession June 16, 2016 Karen Needels Walter Nicholson Joanne Lee Heinrich Hock Submitted to: U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration Office of Policy Development and Research 200 Constitution Ave NW, Suite N-5641 Washington, DC 20210 Project Officer: Richard Muller Submitted by: Mathematica Policy Research P.O. Box 2393 Princeton, NJ 08543-2393 Telephone: (609) 799-3535 Facsimile: (609) 799-0005 Reference Number: 40098.320 This page has been left blank for double-sided copying. UC EXHAUSTEES STUDY MATHEMATICA POLICY RESEARCH DISCLAIMER This report was prepared for the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL), Employment and Training Administration, Office of Policy Development and Research, by Mathematica Policy Research, under contract number DOLQ121A21886/DOLU121A21914. The views expressed are those of the authors and should not be attributed to DOL, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement of same by the U.S. Government. iii This page has been left blank for double-sided copying. UC EXHAUSTEES STUDY MATHEMATICA POLICY RESEARCH ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS We would like to thank the study’s contracting officer’s technical representative at the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL), Richard Muller, who provided guidance throughout this study. In addition, Rob Pavosevich, Ron Wilus, Mike Miller, and other staff at the Employment and Training Administration’s Office of Unemployment Insurance (OUI) provided important feedback at critical junctures. We would also like to thank the Deputy Chief Evaluation Officer, Jonathan Simonetta. In addition to providing feedback for this study, he provided guidance for a DOL-sponsored study, titled the Evaluation of the Unemployment Compensation Provisions of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (“the UCP study”), which generated much of the data used by this study. We also wish to thank the many individuals who helped ensure the availability of high- quality data for both the UCP study and this one. At OUI, the Administrator, Gay Gilbert, and the State Conformity and Compliance Team facilitated access to confidential administrative unemployment compensation (UC) data. Technical and program staff in 17 states worked extensively to provide administrative data, while legal staff help refine data-sharing agreements permitting use of the data for this study. We also owe a debt of gratitude to the UC recipients who patiently answered survey questions about their experiences. A large number of staff at Mathematica also made important contributions that facilitated the success of this study, either directly or through their efforts for the UCP study. Grace Roemer and Brandon Kyler worked tirelessly to secure administrative data from the states. A team of statisticians led by Frank Potter, and including Sheng Wang and Yuhong Zheng, designed and adapted the approach to select analysis samples and calculate analytic weights. The UCP study survey of UI recipients was skillfully directed by Patricia Nemeth, who led efforts to develop the questionnaire and design the fielding methodology. She also oversaw the implementation of the survey and day-to-day survey operations, along with Linda Mendenko, the deputy survey director, and Ryan McInerney. April Villone managed the sample release, and Alice Ng managed the survey information system. Tong Li programmed the logic of the multimode survey instrument, with the assistance of Ann Ponti. Hugo Andrade and Mike Smith supervised the telephone interviewing effort, and they developed and refined strategies for locating hard-to- reach respondents. Hong Zhang created survey operations reports and led the programming and coding of the final survey data. We are also grateful to the telephone interviewers who were involved in the data collection effort. Liz Potamites, Emma Kopa, Chris Rankin, and Joseph Mastrianni each led critical components of the effort to validate, clean, and analyze the survey and administrative data. Key staff contributing to this effort included Mike Brannan, Margaux Evans, Eric Lundquist, Adele Rizzuto, Owen Schochet, Mark Strayer, Mark Timms, and Raúl Torres. Aravind Moorthy helped to validate administrative data related to benefit collection and provided input on key study measures of potential benefit availability. Priyanka Anand developed important analysis constructs using data from the survey of UI recipients. Cheryl Jiras contributed through her assistance managing the project, and Cindy Castro contributed in many ways in her role as the main secretary for the study. Sheena McConnell provided critical feedback that helped to shape the development of the main analysis results, and her comments improved the initial draft of this report. We also received excellent support from Jennifer Littel, who edited the report, as well as Stephanie Barna, who produced it. v This page has been left blank for double-sided copying. UC EXHAUSTEES STUDY MATHEMATICA POLICY RESEARCH ABSTRACT The Great Recession and the time period following it were characterized by the longest average unemployment durations seen since World War II. To extend support to unemployed workers, policymakers implemented initiatives that, in conjunction with benefits available during nonrecessionary times, offered up to 99 weeks of unemployment compensation (UC) benefits to eligible recipients in some states, representing the longest potential duration of benefits in the history of the UC system. This study examines the extent to which recipients collected all of the benefits to which they were entitled (“exhausting” their benefits) and assesses the outcomes experienced by those who exhausted their entitlements relative to (1) recipients who did not exhaust all of the benefits to which they were entitled and (2) UC nonrecipients. For the analyses, we used survey and administrative data from 10 states on UC recipients who filed claims from January 2008 through September 2009, as well as data from the Displaced Worker Supplement to the Current Population Survey. We had several important findings. Twenty-six percent of recipients in our main analysis file—recipients who collected benefits from only one claim during a three-year period—exhausted all of the UC benefits to which they were entitled. Overall, these exhaustees collected an average of 87 weeks of benefits compared to 28 weeks of benefits for nonexhaustees. Four to six years after their initial claims, and compared to nonexhaustees, exhaustees were statistically significantly less likely to be employed and more likely to be out of the labor force. They also experienced greater losses in household income and had higher rates of participation in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, Social Security retirement, and disability-related income support programs. Relative to recipients with long jobless spells, nonrecipients with long jobless spells were less likely to become reemployed in the subsequent few years following their layoff and had lower household incomes. Key words: unemployment insurance (UI) benefits, unemployment compensation (UC) benefits, EUC08, Extended Benefits (EB), exhaustees, displaced workers, Great Recession, benefit exhaustion, reemployment, labor force participation vii This page has been left blank for double-sided copying. UC EXHAUSTEES STUDY MATHEMATICA POLICY RESEARCH CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...........................................................................................................................xvii I. INTRODUCTION .............................................................................................................................. 1 A. Economic and policy context ..................................................................................................... 2 B. Data sources, research questions, and methods ...................................................................... 4 C. Prior research on UC exhaustion .............................................................................................. 7 D. Road map for the rest of the report ......................................................................................... 11 II. DATA SOURCES AND RECIPIENTS’ CHARACTERISTICS ....................................................... 13 A. Data files focused on UC recipients ........................................................................................ 13 1. The merged survey respondent data file .......................................................................... 13 2. The administrative-only data file ....................................................................................... 17 3. Comparability of the states in the study’s recipient analysis files to states nationwide ......................................................................................................................... 18 4. Comparability of UC recipients in the study’s recipient analysis files to UC recipients nationwide......................................................................................................... 22 B. The DWS data file containing UC nonrecipients and recipients.............................................. 24 III. BENEFIT COLLECTION AND EXHAUSTION RATES .................................................................. 25 A. Defining and constructing measures of UC benefit experiences ............................................ 25 1. Benefit exhaustion............................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • HR 1.39 Disciplinary Action and Termination for Cause
    ADMINISTRATIVE DIVISION POLICY NUMBER HR Division of Human Resources HR 1.39 POLICY TITLE Disciplinary Action and Termination for Cause SCOPE OF POLICY DATE OF REVISION USC System May 28, 2020 RESPONSIBLE OFFICER ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE Vice President for Human Resources Division of Human Resources __________________________________________________________________________________ THE LANGUAGE USED IN THIS DOCUMENT DOES NOT CREATE AN EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT BETWEEN THE FACULTY, STAFF, OR ADMINISTRATIVE EMPLOYEE AND THE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA. THIS DOCUMENT DOES NOT CREATE ANY CONTRACTUAL RIGHTS OR ENTITLEMENTS. THE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA RESERVES THE RIGHT TO REVISE THE CONTENTS OF THIS DOCUMENT, IN WHOLE OR IN PART. NO PROMISES OR ASSURANCES, WHETHER WRITTEN OR ORAL, WHICH ARE CONTRARY TO OR INCONSISTENT WITH THE TERMS OF THIS PARAGRAPH CREATE ANY CONTRACT OF EMPLOYMENT. THE UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA DIVISION OF HUMAN RESOURCES HAS THE AUTHORITY TO INTERPRET THE UNIVERSITY’S HUMAN RESOURCES POLICIES. PURPOSE Outlines the university’s progressive discipline guidelines for supervisors when correcting inappropriate behavior of employees to ensure discipline is applied consistently. DEFINITIONS Bullying: Repeated, unwelcome severe and pervasive behavior that intentionally threatens, intimidates, humiliates or isolates the targeted individual(s), or undermines their reputation or job performance. Counseling or Oral Warning: A private discussion between the supervisor and employee to correct minor deficiencies in conduct or inappropriate workplace behavior. Demotion: The assignment of an employee from one established position to a different established position having a lower State salary range or, for employees in positions without a State salary range, assignment of a lower rate of pay to the employee. Termination: Disciplinary action whereby the employee is separated from employment with the University of South Carolina due to the frequency or nature of their misconduct or inappropriate workplace behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 List of Goods Produced by Child Labor Or Forced Labor
    From Unknown to Known: Asking the Right Questions to The Story Behind Our Stuff Trace Abuses in Global Supply Chains DOWNLOAD ILAB’S COMPLY CHAIN AND APPS TODAY! Explore the key elements Discover of social best practice COMPLY CHAIN compliance 8 guidance Reduce child labor and forced systems 3 labor in global supply chains! 7 4 NEW! Explore more than 50 real 6 Assess risks Learn from world examples of best practices! 5 and impacts innovative in supply chains NEW! Discover topics like company responsible recruitment and examples worker voice! NEW! Learn to improve engagement with stakeholders on issues of social compliance! ¡Disponible en español! Disponible en français! Check Browse goods countries' produced with efforts to child labor or eliminate forced labor 1,000+ pages of research in child labor the palm of your hand! NEW! Examine child labor data on 131 countries! Review Find child NEW! Check out the Mexico laws and labor data country profile for the first time! ratifications NEW! Uncover details on 25 additions and 1 removal for the List of Goods! How to Access Our Reports We’ve got you covered! Access our reports in the way that works best for you. On Your Computer All three of the U.S. Department of Labor’s (USDOL) flagship reports on international child labor and forced labor are available on the USDOL website in HTML and PDF formats at https://www.dol.gov/agencies/ilab/resources/reports/child-labor. These reports include Findings on the Worst Forms of Child Labor, as required by the Trade and Development Act of 2000; List of Goods Produced by Child Labor or Forced Labor, as required by the Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act of 2005; and List of Products Produced by Forced or Indentured Child Labor, as required by Executive Order 13126.
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Term Unemployment on a Par with Prior Recessions, but Unemployment Benefits Are
    Revised September 9, 2002 Long-Term Unemployment On a Par with Prior Recessions, But Unemployment Benefits are Not– Will Lawmakers Fix the Federal Extended Benefits Program? By National Employment Law Project In early March, Congress passed, and President Bush signed, a temporary federal extension of unemployment insurance benefits. The Temporary Extended Unemployment Compensation (TEUC) program extended benefits for up to 13 weeks for laid off workers exhausting regular unemployment insurance (UI) benefits. The TEUC program ends on December 31, 2002. After that, long-term unemployed workers will face a tight labor market without an unemployment insurance safety net. Accordingly, immediate action should be taken by Congress and the Bush Administration to extend and repair the federal unemployment program. As described below, every effort should be made by Congress to expedite UI legislation in light of the severe hardship suffered by record numbers of unemployed workers. For unemployed workers, the situation is now comparable to, if not more severe, than the recent recessions that produced far broader unemployment benefit extensions. Why Action Is Needed Before the October Congressional Recess When the federal extension was enacted in March, many observers were saying the recession was already over. Clearly, these predictions were off the mark. As with most prior recessions, Congress needs to provide laid off workers with additional extended benefits in order to tide families over until jobs return, bolster consumer confidence, and stimulate our economy (see box for specific reforms). Time is of the essence – here’s why: 1. Joblessness will remain persistently high well into 2003. According to the recent economic forecast of the Congressional Budget Office, the unemployment rate is expected to remain near 6% at least until the second half of 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • EPILEPSY in the WORKPLACE a TUC Guide CONTENTS
    EPILEPSY IN THE WORKPLACE A TUC guide CONTENTS SECTION 1 The social versus the medical model 04 SECTION 2 What is epilepsy? 06 SECTION 3 Myths and facts 08 SECTION 4 Epilepsy in the workplace 09 SECTION 5 How workplaces can create difficulties for workers with epilepsy 11 SECTION 6 Making workplaces epilepsy-friendly 16 SECTION 7 Nothing about people with epilepsy without people with epilepsy 17 SECTION 8 Epilepsy and Parliament 18 SECTION 9 Using the right language 19 SECTION 10 Crime against people with epilepsy 20 SECTION 11 A guide to the law 22 SECTION 12 Epilepsy and trade unions: what the union can do 23 SECTION 13 Resources and useful websites 24 About the author Kathy Bairstow is a UNISON member and works as the senior advice and information officer at Epilepsy Action. Her work involves providing advice and information to anyone with an interest or concern about epilepsy. This includes members of the public; employment, health and other professionals; and the media. She was a patient representative on the NICE Guideline CG20 – The Epilepsies: the diagnosis and management of the epilepsies in adults and children in primary and secondary care. Kathy had epilepsy as a child, as did two of her three children. She no longer has epilepsy, but does have several long-term health conditions. Introduction by the TUC General Secretary I am delighted that the TUC has worked with Epilepsy Action to produce this new guide for trade unionists on supporting members with epilepsy. The author is a specialist and a trade unionist so this briefing will be an authoritative aid to union reps, officers and members on dealing with the issues facing members with epilepsy in the workplace.
    [Show full text]
  • Staff Report
    Agenda Item #15.1 For Council Meeting of: October 1, 2019 CITY OF SANTA ROSA CITY COUNCIL TO: MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL FROM: RAISSA DE LA ROSA, ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT MANAGER PLANNING AND ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: ORDINANCE ADDING CHAPTER 10-45 TO THE SANTA ROSA CITY CODE TO ESTABLISH MINIMUM WAGES TO BE PAID BY EMPLOYERS AGENDA ACTION: ORDINANCE INTRODUCTION RECOMMENDATION It is recommended by the Planning and Economic Development Department that the Council introduce an ordinance adding Chapter 10-45 to the Santa Rosa City Code to establish minimum wages to be paid by employers. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY California Senate Bill 3 (Leno) was signed into law on April 4, 2016, setting the stage to raise the state minimum wage by set amounts each year to reach $15.00 per hour by January 1, 2022, for employers with 26 or more employees, and by January 1, 2023, for employers with 25 or fewer employees. After the $15.00 per hour threshold is reached, the state minimum wage will increase annually based on the Consumer Price Index up to 3.5% per year. SB 3 maintains existing exemptions in the State’s minimum wage law. Pursuant to a proposal from labor, and community organizations for Santa Rosa to expedite the State timeline, and following similar actions taken by neighboring jurisdictions, this ordinance outlines a $15.00/hour minimum wage for employers with 26 or more employees and a $14.00 minimum wage for 25 or fewer employees effective July 1, 2020. On January 1, 2021, the ordinance further outlines the minimum wage for employers with 25 or fewer employees will be $15.00 per hour and, on this same date and annually thereafter, the minimum wage for all employers regardless of size will increase based on the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers for the San Francisco-Oakland- Hayward Consolidated Metropolitan Statistical Area up to 3.5%, thereby realigning the “small” and “large” employer minimum wage.
    [Show full text]
  • A Case Study of Blue-Collar Worker Retirement Investment Decisions Mark Eldridge Griffin Walden University
    Walden University ScholarWorks Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection 2015 A Case Study of Blue-Collar Worker Retirement Investment Decisions Mark Eldridge Griffin Walden University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/dissertations Part of the Finance and Financial Management Commons This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies Collection at ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Walden University College of Management and Technology This is to certify that the doctoral dissertation by Mark Griffin has been found to be complete and satisfactory in all respects, and that any and all revisions required by the review committee have been made. Review Committee Dr. Steven Tippins, Committee Chairperson, Management Faculty Dr. David Banner, Committee Member, Management Faculty Dr. David Bouvin, University Reviewer, Management Faculty Chief Academic Officer Eric Riedel, Ph.D. Walden University 2015 Abstract A Case Study of Blue-Collar Worker Retirement Investment Decisions by Mark Griffin MBA, TUI University, 2010 BS, Park University, 2006 Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Management Walden University May 2015 Abstract The finances of blue-collar workers were the most acutely impacted as these workers lost their jobs during the Great Recession of 2007 through 2009. The literature revealed a minimal understanding of how blue-collar workers allocated funds for their retirement, and what their investments might be when they invested.
    [Show full text]
  • Examining the Evidence
    Examining The Evidence The Impact of the Los Angeles Living Wage Ordinance on Workers and Businesses Examining the Evidence: The Impact of the Los Angeles David Fairris Living Wage Ordinance on Department of Economics, University of California Riverside Workers and Businesses David Runsten North American Integration and Development Center, University of California Los Angeles For more information, visit www.LosAngelesLivingWageStudy.org Carolina Briones Los Angeles Alliance for a New Economy or www.iir.ucla.edu/research/research.html Jessica Goodheart Los Angeles Alliance for a New Economy COVER PHOTO CREDITS Front Cover Los Angeles: © John Gettler Cafeteria Worker: © VICTOR ALEMAN / 2MUN-DOS.COM Back Cover Los Angeles: Binko Nagara Convention Center: © VICTOR ALEMAN / 2MUN-DOS.COM Examining the Evidence: The Impact of the Los Angeles Living Wage Ordinance on Workers and Businesses David Fairris Department of Economics, UC Riverside David Runsten North American Integration and Development Center, UCLA Carolina Briones Los Angeles Alliance for a New Economy Jessica Goodheart Los Angeles Alliance for a New Economy Acknowledgements A project of this size does not come into being without the talent and hard work of many people. We would especially like to thank the following contributing authors: León Fernández Bujanda, who conducted the multiple regression analyses, and Alissa Anderson-Garcia and Amy Willis, who conducted other statistical analysis and wrote drafts of many sections. We extend our gratitude to Jeff Chapman of the Economic Policy Institute, who spent countless hours reviewing our survey data and assembling comparative data from the Current Population Survey. We also thank Heather Boushey and Wei Wei of the Center for Economic and Policy Research, who analyzed comparative data from the Survey of Income and Program Participation.
    [Show full text]
  • Forced Labour May 2016
    Shaping Policy Advancing Practice Strengthening Accountability IHRB Briefing Forced Labour May 2016 What is forced labour? The term ‘forced labour’ means any situation in which persons are coerced to work through the use of violence, intimidation or threat of penalty. ILO Indicators of Forced Labour Many of the products we buy were made Why should companies address using forced labour at some stage of their forced labour in production. This might be in production of the • Physical or sexual violence (threat of their supply chains? raw materials, in the processing of component and/or actual harm) parts, or the manufacture of the final product. • Restriction on movement Customers and Long and many-tiered supply chains mean • Bonded labour consumers are undertaking checks on all stages of production Increasingly asking • Withholding of wages is very difficult. These products of forced questions about company commitments labour can therefore be found even in the • Retention of passports and identity documents to forced labour in goods sold by leading companies and well- their operations. known brands. • Threat of denunciation to the authorities Governments are adopting regulations to try to combat forced labour. These typically “Forced labour” or “modern slavery”? take the form of reporting requirements Modern slavery is a term increasingly used to that modern slavery seldom resembles this. Instead for companies to outline describe forced labour and trafficking. The use of the it involves the exploitation of vulnerabilities, is often the steps they have taken word slavery, which is loaded with connotations, has financial in nature, and is an integral part of many to prevent it occurring.
    [Show full text]
  • Rapid Response Manual 2 | P a G E
    SOUTH CAROLINA RAPID RESPONSE MANUAL Contents Rapid Response ........................................................................................................................ 3 Rapid Response as a Business Service .................................................................................. 3 Rapid Response Stages ........................................................................................................... 4 Stage 1: Discovery and Notification............................................................................. 4 Stage 2: Management Meeting ..................................................................................... 5 State Rapid Reemployment Representatives Role Local WIOA Representative’s Role TAA Representative’s Role Important Considerations for the Management Meeting When Workers Are Laid Off Without Notice Stage 3: Group Informational Sessions ....................................................................... 7 State Rapid Reemployment Representatives Role Local WIOA Representative’s Role Local DEW Representative’s Role UI Representative’s Role TAA Representative’s Role Important Considerations for the Group Informational Sessions Stage 4: Onsite Reemployment Services .................................................................. 10 State Rapid Reemployment Team’s Role Local SC Works Representative’s Role “Blue Word” Definitions ......................................................................................................... 12 Useful Terms ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Is the Four-Day Week Becoming a Standard in the United States?
    Calhoun: The NPS Institutional Archive Theses and Dissertations Thesis Collection 1972 Is the four-day week becoming a standard in the United States?. Brown, William Timothy. George Washington University http://hdl.handle.net/10945/16223 IS THE FOUR-DAY WEEK BECOMING A STANDARD IN THE UNITED STATES? William Timothy Brown IS THE FOUR-DAY WEEK BECOMING A STANDARD IN THE UNITED STATES? By William Timothy Brown Bachelor of Arts St. Francis College, Brooklyn, N. Y., 1965 A Thesis Submitted to the School of Government and Business Administration of the George Washington University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Business Administration May 1, 19 72 Thesis directed by Norma Maine Loeser, D.B.A. Assistant Professor in Business Administration T1A6640 2 LIBRARY NAVAL POSTGRADUATE SCHOOL MONTSRIY, CALIF. 93940 TABLE OF CONTENTS Chapter Page I. INTRODUCTION 1 Statement of the Research Question Scope of the Study Purpose and Utility of the Study Research Methods Utilized and Method of Analysis Organization of the Study II. THE HISTORICAL EVOLUTION OF THE STANDARD WORK WEEK IN THE UNITED STATES 9 Period Prior to 1840 Period From 1840 - 1927 Period From 1928 - 1968 Period From 1969 - 1972 III. ADVANTAGES AND DISADVANTAGES OF THE FOUR DAY WEEK 22 -Viewpoints of Company Managements and Professional Management Associations disagreement Within the Labor Movement Customer and Client Relations Viewpoints of Selected Workers Perspective of Government Society in General IV. THE FOUR DAY WEEK AS AN EVOLVING STANDARD IN THE UNITED STATES 85 Management Posture and Planning Labor and Worker Roles Impetus of Consumers, Clientele and Constituents The New Worker Attitudes Governmental Influences ii Chapter Page V.
    [Show full text]
  • Recruitment and Promotion Rules for the Post of Peons Class Iv (Non Gazetted) in the Prosecution Department of Himachal Pradesh
    RECRUITMENT AND PROMOTION RULES FOR THE POST OF PEONS CLASS IV (NON GAZETTED) IN THE PROSECUTION DEPARTMENT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH 1. Name of the post Peon 2. Number of posts 81 (77 in Prosecution Department) (4 in Vigilance Department) 3. Classification Class IV (Non -Gazetted) 4. Scale of pay (I) For regular Peons Rs. 2520 -100 -3220 -110 -3660 -120 - 4140 with an initial start of Rs. 2620/-. (II) For contract Peons as per provisions of Rule 15-A. 5. Whether selection post or Not applicable. non-selection post 6. Age fo r direct recruitment 45 years and below. Provided that the upper age limit for direct recruits will not be applicable to the candidates already in service of the Government including those who have been appointed on ad hoc or on contract basis; Provided that if a candidate appointed on adhoc basis or contract basis had become overage on the date when he was appointed as such he shall not be eligible for any relaxation in the prescribed age limit by virtue of his adhoc or contract appointment. Provided further that upper age limit is relaxable for Scheduled Castes/Scheduled Tribe/other categories of persons to the extent permissible under the general or special order(s) of the Himachal Pradesh Government; Provided further that the employees of all the Public Sector Corporation and Autonomous Bodies who happened to be Government servants before absorption in Public Sector Corporations/Autonomous bodies at the time of initial constitution of such Corporations/Autonomous bodies shall be allowed age concession in direct recruitment as admissible to Government servants.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for an Outcome-Based Trial – Raising Productivity and Engagement
    WHITE PAPER – THE FOUR-DAY WEEK GUIDELINES FOR AN OUTCOME-BASED TRIAL – RAISING PRODUCTIVITY AND ENGAGEMENT In association with Coulthard Barnes, Perpetual Guardian, The University of Auckland, Auckland University of Technology (AUT) and MinterEllisonRuddWatts. WHITE PAPER 2019 – THE FOUR-DAY WEEK 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction from Andrew Barnes, Perpetual Guardian Founder P3. 2. The Perpetual Guardian Four-Day Week trial P5. 3. Productivity P6. a. Global comparison a. Global comparison b. Industry statistics b. Industry statistics c. Effects of congestion c. Effects of congestion 4. Flexible working arrangements (FWAs) – the data and the benefits P10. 5. Implementation of a Four-Day Week trial P13. a. Purpose and programme design a. Purpose and programme design b. Toolbox b. Toolbox c. Contracts / HR c. Contracts / HR d. Team collaboration d. Team collaboration 6. Global media headlines and market commentary P15. 7. Case studies and how-to recommendations P18. 8. Contact P41. 9. Appendices P42. a. 15 Useful Pointers: The blueprint for starting your Four-Day Week trial b. Productivity Week Policy – Opt-In Request Form c. So you’ve got extra time, now what? WHITE PAPER 2019 – THE FOUR-DAY WEEK 3 TABLE OF CONTENTS P3. 1. INTRODUCTION P5. FROM ANDREW BARNES, P6. a. Global comparison PERPETUAL GUARDIAN b. Industry statistics FOUNDER c. Effects of congestion P10. It’s not just At Perpetual Guardian we set out to test our assumptions having a day P13. about productivity through a company-wide trial, the off a week - it’s results of which have made headlines around the world.
    [Show full text]