DOCSLIB.ORG

False Hopes: Communism and Fascism

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
False Hopes: Communism and Fascism False Hopes: Communism and Fascism Jes´usFern´andez-Villaverde1 September 26, 2021 1University of Pennsylvania Two alternatives to liberal democracy • The end of the WWI witnessed the appearance of two alternatives to liberal democracy (market economies+representative governments): 1. Communism: Russia (Soviet Union), later China. 2. Fascism: Italy, later Germany. • Both alternatives: 1. Saw liberal democracies as inherently flawed and incompatible with \true" human nature. 2. Proposed a radical departure from the current economic system. 3. Justified the use of violent means to achieve a radical reorganization of society. • For the first time in history, ideological fights were focused on principles of economic organization and not on power, income, or religion. 1 Communism: A basic bibliography • Best general overview: Richard Service, Comrades!: A History of World Communism. • Marx: David McLellan, Karl Marx: A Biography; Samuel Hollander, The Economics of Karl Marx: Analysis and Application. • Lenin, Stalin, Trostky: Richard Service, Lenin, Stalin, Trostky, Stephen Kotkin, Stalin (volumes I and II). • Economy: Janos Kornai, The Socialist System: The Political Economy of Communism. • Soviet Union economic history: Robert Allen, Farm to Factory and Chris Miller, The Struggle to Save the Soviet Economy: Mikhail Gorbachev and the Collapse of the USSR. 2 Communism • Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels had surprisingly little to say about how to organize a socialist economy. • They were much more concerned with an analysis of capitalist societies, the \exploitation" of labor, and how the current system would collapse because of its inherent contradictions. • In their view, at capitalism end, production would have been concentrated on a few large manufacturing corporations. • Therefore, taking control of them and using their productivity powers would be an easy task, closer to engineering than to economics. • Distributional issues would need to be worked out in some detail during the transition to communism, but this was not foreseen to be a challenging issue. 3 Revolution in Russia • However, on the way, something odd happens. • The revolution instead of happening in the leading industrial country, Great Britain, or in the country with the strongest social democrat movement, Germany, actually occurs in a backward, peripheral country: Russia. • Indeed, it was not really a revolution in the \romantic sense": on October 25 (November 7, Gregorian Calendar) 1917, Bolsheviks in Petrograd took over the offices of the Kerensky Provisional Government. • This was a coup d'etat that started a civil war. • Lenin's theory of party and revolution. 1. He thinks his \capital" will be Berlin, not Moscow. 2. German is the official language of Comintern (Third International). 4 Revolution in Russia • The \real" revolution was in February (February 23-March 3 / March 8-16, Gregorian Calendar), which brings the end of the monarchy • In the November election for a Russian Constituent Assembly, the Bolsheviks only get 24% of the vote. • Communists were able to win the civil war (1917-1923) despite long odds. • Key role of Leon Trotsky. • Victory is not total: Finland, Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania, and Poland establish independent republics. 5 6 War communism • Original Lenin's plan, firmly based on Germany's economic mobilization during WWI. • Main features: 1. Collective property of all industry. 2. Centralized control of the economy (Gosplan). 3. Military discipline. 4. State monopoly on foreign trade. 5. Requisition of food from peasants. 6. Role of money minimized. • By 1921, it is clear that the economy cannot work in this way (production only around half of the level of 1913). 7 8 New Economic Policy • In March 1921, a New Economic Policy (NEP) is introduced. • Main features: 1. Monetary reform (5*107 old rubles for 1 new ruble). 2. Peasants could sell their surpluses to private traders. 3. Artisans and small industry liberalized. 4. Small trade liberalized. • Main proponent, Nicolai Bukharin. • Fast growth from 1921 to 1926, when the economy is back to 1913 levels. 9 Stalin takes power • At Lenin's death, Stalin takes total control of the party and the Soviet Union. • Why? General Secretary. • Trotsky, who was a much deeper intellectual (although also a murderous one), never really understood the logic of a totalitarian system. • Inherent dynamics of revolutions. • Paranoid psychopaths have a clear comparative advantage at becoming dictators. • In addition, Stalin had a prodigious memory and worked harder than anyone else. 10 11 A diagnosis Rosa Luxemburg, The Russian Revolution, 1918 \When all this is eliminated, what really remains? In place of the representative bodies created by general, popular elections, Lenin and Trotsky have laid down the soviets as the only true representation of political life in the land as a whole, life in the soviets must also become more and more crippled. Without general elections, without unrestricted freedom of press and assembly, without a free struggle of opinion, life dies out in every public institution, becomes a mere semblance of life, in which only the bureaucracy remains as the active element. Public life gradually falls asleep, a few dozen party leaders of inexhaustible energy and boundless experience direct and rule. Among them, in reality only a dozen outstanding heads do the leading and an elite of the working class is invited from time to time to meetings where they are to applaud the speeches of the leaders, and to approve proposed resolutions unanimously { at bottom, then, a clique affair { a dictatorship, to be sure, not the dictatorship of the proletariat but only the dictatorship of a handful of politicians... Yes, we can go even further: such conditions must inevitably cause a brutalization of public life: attempted assassinations, shooting of hostages, etc." 12 Stalinism I: Socialism in one country Josef Stalin \We are fifty or a hundred years behind the advanced countries. We must make good this distance in ten years. Either we do it, or they will crush us." • Main pillars: 1. First five-year plan in 1928. 2. Collectivization. 3. Great Purge. 13 14 15 Stalinism II: Collectivization • Marx thought (wrongly) that \primitive accumulation" of capital that allowed the industrial revolution was primarily due to the enclosure movement in England in the late 18th century. • Stalin (and Trotsky, Gomulka, Mao Zedong and many others) thought that they needed to do to their farmers what Marx had told them English businessmen had done to their farmers. • First, use of price \scissors": changes in relative prices. However, peasants were less ready to exchange grain for luxuries than noblemen. • Collectivization was the party's response: by expropriating the rich peasants (Kulaks) and providing landless peasants with an epsilon more consumption than before through collective farms, the Party could extract all the agricultural surplus and use it for industrialization. • Moreover, it destroyed a potential class enemy. • Collectivization: around 12 million deaths! 16 17 Standard of Living in the Soviet Union 1077 2,200 -i 2,000 - 1,800 - 1,600 - 1,400 - 1,200 - 1,000 - 800 - 600 1928 1929 1930 1931 1932 1933 1934 1935 1936 1937 1938 1939 18 FIGURE 1 CONSUMPTION PER HEAD, 1928-1940 (consumption weights) Malafeyev's consumer price index for state and cooperative shops.45 This index is consistent with the rate of inflation implicit in Table 4 for 1928 to 1937. Figure 1 shows consumption per head from 1928 to 1939. These new consumption estimates accord with the usual view that living standards fell during the first Five-Year Plan (1928 to 1932), recovered during the second Plan (1933 to 1937)—indeed, living standards surged forward at this time —and then fell with the approach of the Second World War. 1937 has al- ways been regarded as an exceptionally prosperous year since the grain harvest was so large, and Table 6 confirms that view. Between 1928 and 1938 consumption per capita rose 22 percent in the Soviet Union (2.0 per- cent per year) and that rate is probably a fairer indicator of the pace of ad- vance than the higher growth rates realized between 1928 and 1937. Table 6 shows that the nonagricultural population always had the higher income, so the shift of employment from farm to factory raised average consumption. With the farm and nonfarm incomes at their 1928 levels, the shift of population to the nonfarm group would have raised the averaged income from 1,208 to 1,289 rubles per year in 1938. The increase equals 30 percent of the overall rise in per capita consumption. 45 Malafeyev's index {htoriya, p. 407) is not annual, so it was necessary to interpolate values for 1933-1936 and 1938-1939. 19 Stalinism III: the Great Purge • At least 750,000 executions and around 2 million died in the Gulag archipelago. • Armed forces: 3 of 5 marshals, 13 of 15 army commanders, 8 of 9 admirals, 50 of 57 army corps commanders, 154 out of 186 division commanders, 16 of 16 army commissars, and 25 of 28 army corps commissars. 1. Poor performance of the Red Army during the first year of the German invasion directly linked to this purge. 2. It also makes Germans believe they can defeat the Soviet Union. • Of the 44 German communists that belonged to the Politburo of the KPD, more were killed by Stalin than by Hitler (Hugo Eberlein, a friend of Rosa Luxemburg, perhaps the most famous). 20 21 22 The Big Push • Can we make sense of this policy? • Big push: Murphy, Schleifer, and Vishny (1989). • Multiple equilibria. • Why? • Externalities. Example: who wants to use a phone if you are the only person with one? • In Soviet Union, Preobrazhensky. 23 WWII • During WWII, the Soviet Union reaches a level of mobilization perhaps never seen before. • Thanks to this tremendous mobilization, it can out-produce Germany. • Human costs are staggering: ≈ 17:000 deaths per day for nearly four years.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 'New Era' Should Have Ended US Debate on Beijing's Ambitions
    Testimony before the U.S.-China Economic and Security Review Commission Hearing on “A ‘China Model?’ Beijing’s Promotion of Alternative Global Norms and Standards” March 13, 2020 “How Xi Jinping’s ‘New Era’ Should Have Ended U.S. Debate on Beijing’s Ambitions” Daniel Tobin Faculty Member, China Studies, National Intelligence University and Senior Associate (Non-resident), Freeman Chair in China Studies, Center for Strategic and International Studies Senator Talent, Senator Goodwin, Honorable Commissioners, thank you for inviting me to testify on China’s promotion of alternative global norms and standards. I am grateful for the opportunity to submit the following statement for the record. Since I teach at National Intelligence University (NIU) which is part of the Department of Defense (DoD), I need to begin by making clear that all statements of fact and opinion below are wholly my own and do not represent the views of NIU, DoD, any of its components, or of the U.S. government. You have asked me to discuss whether China seeks an alternative global order, what that order would look like and aim to achieve, how Beijing sees its future role as differing from the role the United States enjoys today, and also to address the parts played respectively by the Party’s ideology and by its invocation of “Chinese culture” when talking about its ambitions to lead the reform of global governance.1 I want to approach these questions by dissecting the meaning of the “new era for socialism with Chinese characteristics” Xi Jinping proclaimed at the Communist Party of China’s 19th National Congress (afterwards “19th Party Congress”) in October 2017.
    [Show full text]
  • The Birth of Communism
    Looking for a New Economic Order Tensions across Europe mounted in the 1830s and 1840s, as republican (anti-royalist) movements resisted the reigning monarchies. The monarchy in France had been restored after Napoleon Bonaparte’s final defeat at Waterloo in 1815, albeit with great divisions and debate throughout the country. Italy, Germany, and Austria were likewise ruled by monarchies, but faced growing protest. In addition to tensions about forms of government and freedoms, workers were becoming more vocal and unified in protesting conditions in factories, mines, and mills. The Birth of Communism Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels are regarded as the founders of Marxist ideology, more colloquially known as communism. Both were concerned about the ill effects of industrialism. Marx was an economist, historian, and philosopher. Engels was a German journalist and philosopher. After a two-year stay in Manchester, England, Engels wrote his first book, The Condition of the Working Class in England, which was published in 1845. It was in Manchester that Marx and Engels met for the first time. Although they did not like each other at first, they ended up forming a life- and world- changing partnership. Marx was the more public figure of the partnership, but Engels did much of the supporting work, including providing financial assistance to Marx and editing multiple volumes of their publications. In 1847, a group of Germans, working in England, formed a secret society and contacted Marx, asking him to join them as they developed a political platform. At Engels’s suggestion, the group was named the Communist League. Marx and Engels began writing the pamphlet The Communist Manifesto, composed between December 1847 and January 1848.
    [Show full text]
  • A Political Companion to Henry David Thoreau
    University of Kentucky UKnowledge Literature in English, North America English Language and Literature 6-11-2009 A Political Companion to Henry David Thoreau Jack Turner University of Washington Click here to let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Thanks to the University of Kentucky Libraries and the University Press of Kentucky, this book is freely available to current faculty, students, and staff at the University of Kentucky. Find other University of Kentucky Books at uknowledge.uky.edu/upk. For more information, please contact UKnowledge at [email protected]. Recommended Citation Turner, Jack, "A Political Companion to Henry David Thoreau" (2009). Literature in English, North America. 70. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/upk_english_language_and_literature_north_america/70 A Political Companion to Henr y David Thoreau POLITIcaL COMpaNIONS TO GREat AMERIcaN AUthORS Series Editor: Patrick J. Deneen, Georgetown University The Political Companions to Great American Authors series illuminates the complex political thought of the nation’s most celebrated writers from the founding era to the present. The goals of the series are to demonstrate how American political thought is understood and represented by great Ameri- can writers and to describe how our polity’s understanding of fundamental principles such as democracy, equality, freedom, toleration, and fraternity has been influenced by these canonical authors. The series features a broad spectrum of political theorists, philoso- phers, and literary critics and scholars whose work examines classic authors and seeks to explain their continuing influence on American political, social, intellectual, and cultural life. This series reappraises esteemed American authors and evaluates their writings as lasting works of art that continue to inform and guide the American democratic experiment.
    [Show full text]
  • Capitalism, Lakouism, and Libertarian Communism
    Capitalism, Lakouism, and Libertarian Communism Capitalism, Lakouism, and Libertarian Communism By Paul C. Mocombe Capitalism, Lakouism, and Libertarian Communism By Paul C. Mocombe This book first published 2020 Cambridge Scholars Publishing Lady Stephenson Library, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE6 2PA, UK British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library Copyright © 2020 by Paul C. Mocombe All rights for this book reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the copyright owner. ISBN (10): 1-5275-4343-9 ISBN (13): 978-1-5275-4343-0 This work, as with everything I pen, is done in the name of the ancestors, lwa yo, Erzulie, my grandparents (Saul and Eugenia Mocombe), sons (Isaiah and Daniel), and my wife (Tiara S. Mocombe) TABLE OF CONTENTS List of Figures............................................................................................. ix List of Tables .............................................................................................. xi Introduction ................................................................................................. 1 Chapter I .................................................................................................... 33 The Constitution of Haitian Identities Chapter II ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • How Should the United States Confront Soviet Communist Expansionism? DWIGHT D
    Advise the President: DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER How Should the United States Confront Soviet Communist Expansionism? DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER Advise the President: DWIGHT D. EISENHOWER Place: The Oval Office, the White House Time: May 1953 The President is in the early months of his first term and he recognizes Soviet military aggression and the How Should the subsequent spread of Communism as the greatest threat to the security of the nation. However, the current costs United States of fighting Communism are skyrocketing, presenting a Confront Soviet significant threat to the nation’s economic well-being. President Eisenhower is concerned that the costs are not Communist sustainable over the long term but he believes that the spread of Communism must be stopped. Expansionism? On May 8, 1953, President Dwight D. Eisenhower has called a meeting in the Solarium of the White House with Secretary of State John Foster Dulles and Treasury Secretary George M. Humphrey. The President believes that the best way to craft a national policy in a democracy is to bring people together to assess the options. In this meeting the President makes a proposal based on his personal decision-making process—one that is grounded in exhaustive fact gathering, an open airing of the full range of viewpoints, and his faith in the clarifying qualities of energetic debate. Why not, he suggests, bring together teams of “bright young fellows,” charged with the mission to fully vet all viable policy alternatives? He envisions a culminating presentation in which each team will vigorously advocate for a particular option before the National Security Council.
    [Show full text]
  • The Strongmen Strike Back Robert Kagan
    POLICY BRIEF The strongmen strike back Robert Kagan Authoritarianism has returned as an ideological and strategic force. And it returns at just the moment when the liberal world is suffering a major crisis of confidence. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION Today, authoritarianism has emerged as the Of all the geopolitical transformations confronting greatest challenge facing the liberal democratic the liberal democratic world these days, the one world—a profound ideological, as well as strategic, for which we are least prepared is the ideological challenge. Or, more accurately, it has reemerged, and strategic resurgence of authoritarianism. We for authoritarianism has always posed the most are not used to thinking of authoritarianism as a potent and enduring challenge to liberalism, since distinct worldview that offers a real alternative the birth of the liberal idea itself. Authoritarianism to liberalism. Communism was an ideology—and has now returned as a geopolitical force, with strong some thought fascism was, as well—that offered a nations such as China and Russia championing comprehensive understanding of human nature, anti-liberalism as an alternative to a teetering politics, economics and governance to shape the liberal hegemony. It has returned as an ideological behavior and thought of all members of a society in force, offering the age-old critique of liberalism, every aspect of their lives. and just at the moment when the liberal world is suffering its greatest crisis of confidence since We believed that “traditional” autocratic the 1930s. It has returned armed with new and governments were devoid of grand theories about hitherto unimaginable tools of social control and society and, for the most part, left their people disruption that are shoring up authoritarian rule at alone.
    [Show full text]
  • Francis Fukuyama the National Interest Summer 1989
    The End of History? Francis Fukuyama The National Interest Summer 1989 IN WATCHING the flow of events the intellectual climate of the world's over the past decade or so, it is hard to two largest communist countries, and avoid the feeling that something very the beginnings of significant reform fundamental has happened in world movements in both. But this history. The past year has seen a flood phenomenon extends beyond high of articles commemorating the end of politics and it can be seen also in the the Cold War, and the fact that "peace" ineluctable spread of consumerist seems to be breaking out in many Western culture in such diverse regions of the world. Most of these contexts as the peasants' markets and analyses lack any larger conceptual color television sets now omnipresent framework for distinguishing between throughout China, the cooperative what is essential and what is restaurants and clothing stores opened contingent or accidental in world in the past year in Moscow, the history, and are predictably Beethoven piped into Japanese superficial. If Mr. Gorbachev were department stores, and the rock music ousted from the Kremlin or a new enjoyed alike in Prague, Rangoon, and Ayatollah proclaimed the millennium Tehran. from a desolate Middle Eastern What we may be witnessing is not capital, these same commentators just the end of the Cold War, or the would scramble to announce the passing of a particular period of rebirth of a new era of conflict. postwar history, but the end of history And yet, all of these people sense as such: that is, the end point of dimly that there is some larger process mankind's ideological evolution and at work, a process that gives coherence the universalization of Western liberal and order to the daily headlines.
    [Show full text]
  • A Letter to Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels
    A Letter to Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels Karl Marx 946 Communist Way London , United Kingdom W11 2BQ Dear Comrade Karl and Comrade Friedrich: I write to you in appreciation and admiration. I have just read your Manifesto of the Communist Party and I have found it to be an outstanding analysis of industrial society. However, times have changed. And while I found your manifesto to be an incredibly well-written, scathing critique of capitalism, a primer on communism, a new way of looking at history and an incisive sociological study, the manifesto needs to be updated and given a facelift for modern times. Nevertheless, your work today is just as pertinent as it was in 1848. The collapse of the United States’ real estate market and the ensuing global recession of 2008 have engendered renewed interests in your ideas. Communism has a seat at the table of ideas in the modern world if it can to be adapted to the modern problems of capitalism by becoming more democratic, respecting the individual, adapting to a market based economy and readdressing the problems of wealth inequality and quality of life. I have found the most startling aspect of your manifesto to be its complete disregard for democracy. Your manifesto is a vitriolic attack on the iniquities of capitalism and offers communism as the sole alternative. Yet, the modern era, with its emphasis on human rights, has obviated the totalitarian nature that your essay suggests. The horrors of starvation and genocide in the Soviet Union, Cambodia , Red China and North Korea have made people wary of anything that reeks of communism.
    [Show full text]
  • The Imaginative Tension in Henry David Thoreau's Political Thought
    THE CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OF AMERICA Arcadian Exile: The Imaginative Tension in Henry David Thoreau’s Political Thought A DISSERTATION Submitted to the Faculty of the Department of Politics School of Arts and Sciences of the Catholic University of America In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree Doctor of Philosophy © Copyright All Rights Reserved By Joshua James Bowman Washington, D.C. 2016 Arcadian Exile: The Imaginative Tension in Henry David Thoreau’s Political Thought Joshua James Bowman, Ph.D. Director: Claes G. Ryn, Ph.D. Henry David Thoreau‘s writings have achieved a unique status in the history of American literature. His ideas influenced the likes of Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr., and play a significant role in American environmentalism. Despite this influence his larger political vision is often used for purposes he knew nothing about or could not have anticipated. The purpose of this dissertation is to analyze Thoreau’s work and legacy by elucidating a key tension within Thoreau's imagination. Instead of placing Thoreau in a pre-conceived category or worldview, the focus on imagination allows a more incisive reflection on moral and spiritual questions and makes possible a deeper investigation of Thoreau’s sense of reality. Drawing primarily on the work of Claes Ryn, imagination is here conceived as a form of consciousness that is creative and constitutive of our most basic sense of reality. The imagination both shapes and is shaped by will/desire and is capable of a broad and qualitatively diverse range of intuition which varies depending on one’s orientation of will.
    [Show full text]
  • Liberalism, Marxism and Democratic Theory Revisited: Proposal of a Joint Index of Political and Economic Democracy
    brazilianpoliticalsciencereview ARTICLE Liberalism, Marxism and Democratic Theory Revisited: Proposal of a Joint Index of Political and Economic Democracy Angelo Segrillo Department of History, University of São Paulo Liberalism and Marxism are two schools of thought which have left deep imprints in sociological, political and economic theory. They are usually perceived as opposite, rival approaches. In the field of democracy there is a seemingly in- surmountable rift around the question of political versus economic democracy. Liberals emphasize the former, Marxists the latter. Liberals say that economic democracy is too abstract and fuzzy a concept, therefore one should concentrate on the workings of an objective political democracy. Marxists insist that political democracy without economic democracy is insufficient. The article argues that both propositions are valid and not mutually exclu- sive. It proposes the creation of an operational, quantifiable index of economic democracy that can be used alongside the already existing indexes of political democracy. By using these two indexes jointly, political and economic democracy can be objectively evaluated. Thus, the requirements of both camps are met and maybe a more dialogical approach to democracy can be reached in the debate between liberals and Marxists. The joint index is used to evaluate the levels of economic and political democracy in the transition countries of Eastern Europe. Keywords: democratic theory; transition countries; economic democracy Introduction iberalism and Marxism are two schools of thought which have left deep imprints Lin political, sociological and economic theory. Both have been very fruitful in il- luminating a wide range of common issues across these fields and yet are usually perceived 8 bpsr Liberalism, Marxism and Democratic Theory Revisited: Proposal of a Joint Index of Political and Economic Democracy as opposite, rival approaches contradicting each other in general.
    [Show full text]
  • Socialism, Marxism and Communism in the Thought of Hu Han-Min
    SOCIALISM, MARXISM AND COMMUNISM IN THE THOUGHT OF HU HAN-MIN David Peter Barrett Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the University of London, School of Oriental and African Studies May 1978 ProQuest Number: 10672909 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a com plete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. uest ProQuest 10672909 Published by ProQuest LLC(2017). Copyright of the Dissertation is held by the Author. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States C ode Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 ABSTRACT In the history of republican China, Hu Han-min played an important role both in its political affairs and in its intellec­ tual life. This study concentrates on Hu’s political and social thought, with the emphasis on the period from 1919 to 1927. From the time he joined Sun Yat-sen’s nationalist movement in 1905, until his death in 1936, Hu devoted his intellectual energies to the study of the varieties of western socialism. In 1919 he wrote an important series of articles for the Shanghai periodical Chien-she on the materialist conception of history. This represented one of the first comprehensive discussions of this aspect of Marxism to be presented in China.
    [Show full text]
  • Anarchism, Individualism and Communism: William Morris's Critique of Anarcho-Communism
    Loughborough University Institutional Repository Anarchism, individualism and communism: William Morris's critique of anarcho-communism This item was submitted to Loughborough University's Institutional Repository by the/an author. Citation: KINNA, R., 2012. Anarchism, individualism and communism: William Morris's critique of anarcho-communism. IN: Prichard, A. ... et al (eds). Liber- tarian Socialism: Politics in Black and Red. Houndsmill, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.35-56. Additional Information: • This is a book chapter. It is reproduced with permission of Palgrave Macmillan. This extract is taken from the author's original manuscript and has not been edited. The definitive, published, version of record is available here: www.palgrave.com Metadata Record: https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/2134/12730 Version: Accepted for publication Publisher: Palgrave MacMillan ( c Alex Prichard, Ruth Kinna, Saku Pinta and Dave Berry) Please cite the published version. This item was submitted to Loughborough’s Institutional Repository (https://dspace.lboro.ac.uk/) by the author and is made available under the following Creative Commons Licence conditions. For the full text of this licence, please go to: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/2.5/ 3 Anarchism, Individualism and Communism: William Morris’s Critique of Anarcho- communism Ruth Kinna Introduction William Morris’s commitment to revolutionary socialism is now well established, but the nature of his politics, specifically his relationship to Marxism and anarchist thought, is still contested. Perhaps, as Mark Bevir has argued, the ideological label pinned to Morris’s socialism is of ‘little importance’ for as long as his political thought is described adequately. Nevertheless, the starting point for this essay is that thinking about the application of ideological descriptors is a useful exercise and one which sheds important light on Morris’s socialism and the process of ideological formation in the late nineteenth-century socialist movement.
    [Show full text]