List of All Present Ministers of India
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Shri Narendra Modi Prime Minister and Also In-Charge Of
LIST OF COUNCIL OF MINISTERS WITH UPDATED PORTFOLIOS (as on 14.08.2020) Shri Narendra Modi Prime Minister and also in-charge of: Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions; Department of Atomic Energy; Department of Space; and All important policy issues; and All other portfolios not allocated to any Minister. CABINET MINISTERS 1. Shri Raj Nath Singh Minister of Defence 2. Shri Amit Shah Minister of Home Affairs 3. Shri Nitin Jairam Gadkari Minister of Road Transport and Highways; and Minister of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises 4. Shri D.V. Sadananda Gowda Minister of Chemicals and Fertilizers 5. Smt. Nirmala Sitharaman Minister of Finance; and Minister of Corporate Affairs 6. Shri Ramvilas Paswan Minister of Consumer Affairs, Food and Public Distribution 7. Shri Narendra Singh Tomar Minister of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare; Minister of Rural Development; and Minister of Panchayati Raj 8. Shri Ravi Shankar Prasad Minister of Law and Justice; Minister of Communications; and Minister of Electronics and Information Technology 9. Smt. Harsimrat Kaur Badal Minister of Food Processing Industries 10. Shri Thaawar Chand Gehlot Minister of Social Justice and Empowerment 11. Dr. Subrahmanyam Jaishankar Minister of External Affairs 12. Shri Ramesh Pokhriyal ‘Nishank’ Minister of Education 13. Shri Arjun Munda Minister of Tribal Affairs 14. Smt. Smriti Zubin Irani Minister of Women and Child Development; and Minister of Textiles 15. Dr. Harsh Vardhan Minister of Health and Family Welfare; Minister of Science and Technology; and Minister of Earth Sciences Page 1 of 4 16. Shri Prakash Javadekar Minister of Environment, Forest and Climate Change; Minister of Information and Broadcasting; and Minister of Heavy Industries and Public Enterprises 17. -
Government of Pakistan Ministry of Federal Education & Professional
Government of Pakistan Ministry of Federal Education & Professional Training ********* INTRODUCTION: • In the wake of 18th Amendment to the Constitution the concurrent list stands abolished. Subjects of Education and Health etc. no longer remain in the purview of the Federal Government. Therefore, the Ministries of Education, Health and fifteen other ministries were devolved from 5th April, 2011 to 30th June, 2011. • Entry-16 of Part 1 of Federal Legislative list reads as follows: “Federal Agencies and Institutes for the following purposes that is to say, for research, for professional and technical training, or for the promotion of special studies” will be organized by the Federal Government. • Therefore, the Federal Agencies and Institutes imparting professional and technical training and research have been retained by the Federal Government. • To cater for the educational, professional and technical training requirements of the country after devolution, the Government has taken a very timely decision by creating a dedicated Ministry for the purpose. • The Ministry of Professional & Technical Training was notified on 29th July, 2011. Later on, the Ministry has been re-named as Ministry of Education, Trainings and Standards in Higher Education. Finally, on the recommendations of CCI the Ministry has now been renamed as Ministry Federal Education & Professional Training. Presently following departments/organizations are working under administrative control of the Ministry of Federal Education & Professional Training:- S.No. Name of Departments/Organizations 1. Higher Education Commission (HEC) 2. National Vocational & Technical Education Commission (NAVTEC) 3. National Commission for Human Development (NCHD) 4. Federal Board of Intermediate and Secondary Education (FBISE) 5. National Education Foundation (NEF) 6. -
Resisting Chinese Linguistic Imperialism
UYGHUR HUMAN RIGHTS PROJECT SPECIAL REPORT Resisting Chinese Linguistic Imperialism: Abduweli Ayup and the Movement for Uyghur Mother Tongue-Based Education Rustem Shir, Research Associate Logo of the Ana Til Balilar Baghchisi (Mother Tongue Children’s Garden) May 2019 Contents Acknowledgement 4 Introduction 5 1. CCP language policy on education in East Turkestan 6 Foundations of CCP ethnic minority policy 6 Eras of minority language tolerance 9 Primary and secondary school ‘bilingual’ education policy 12 The Xinjiang Class 20 Mandarin as the language of instruction at Xinjiang University 22 Preschool and kindergarten ‘bilingual’ education policy 23 Suppression of the Movement for Uyghur Mother Tongue-Based Education 26 The Hotan Prefecture and Ghulja County Department of Education directives 28 Internment camps 29 Discussion 32 2. ABduweli Ayup and the Movement for Uyghur Mother Tongue-Based Education 36 Upal: Why couldn’t we study Kashgari? 36 Toquzaq: Oyghan! (Wake Up!) 38 Beijing: Our campus felt like a minority region 41 Doletbagh: My sad history repeating in front of me 50 Urumchi: Education for assimilation 55 Lanzhou: Are you bin Laden? 60 Ankara: Ethno-nationalism and a counterbalance 67 Urumchi: For the love of community 72 Lawrence: Disconnected 77 Kashgar: Rise of the Movement for Uyghur Mother Tongue-Based Education 81 Urumchi: Just keep silent 89 Kashgar: You’re going to be arrested 93 Doletbagh Detention Center: No choice, brother 98 Urumchi Tengritagh Detention Center: Qorqma (Don’t be afraid) 104 Urumchi Liudaowan Prison: Every color had disappeared 109 Urumchi Koktagh Prison: Do you want to defend yourself? 124 2 Urumchi/Kashgar: Release and return 127 Kashgar: Open-air prison 131 Ankara: Stateless and stranded 138 Paris: A new beginning 146 3. -
Roll No 70011650 70011897 70011933 70011999 70012266
Shari Atal Bihari Vajpayee Govt. Arts & Commerce College B.Com. Plain III Year Section-C 2020-21 Sr No. Roll No Enrolment No. Applicant Name Father`s Name 1 70011650 Dc1701396 Vikas Tawdw Santosh Tawede 2 70011897 Arti Hudi Mahesh Hudi 3 70011933 DC1701039 Payal Bherve Rakesh Bherve 4 70011999 DC1701275 Shivam Mourya Mahendra Singh 5 70012266 DC1700367 Rukmani Malviya Makhan Singh 6 70012320 DC1700891 Kushal Solanki Rajaram Solanki 7 70019760 DC1722475 Ratnesh Kohli Karan Singh 8 72850204 DC1721921 Mohmmed Asif Mohmmed Hafiz 9 80012166 Ayushi Golkar Ashok Golkar 10 80012167 DC1800222 Shivani Dahiwale Rajkumar 11 80012195 DC1800217 Sakshi Thawre Lilaram Thawre 12 80012201 DC1800226 Sumit Bhuriya Badsingh 13 80012207 DC1800209 Priyanka Nagar Rambabu Nagar 14 80012556 DC1801363 Yash Gupta Shrikant Gupta 15 80012559 DC1801050 Priyanka Dawar Pratap Singh Dawar 16 80012560 DC1800640 Anshul Gera Suresh Kumar Gera 17 80012561 DC1800586 Ajay Bairagi Balkrishna Bairagi 18 80012562 DC1801298 Surli More Surpal More 19 80012563 DC1801249 Shubham Paraste Raj Kumar Paraste 20 80012565 DC1800581 Adarsh Jain Mukesh Jain 21 80012567 DC1800927 Muskan Modak Ashok Modak 22 80012568 DC1800906 Mitesh Karveti Sadashiv Karveti 23 80012569 DC1800622 Angur Anjanava Jagdish Anjanava 24 80012570 DC1800855 Komal Garg Mukesh Garg 25 80012571 DC1800942 Neeta Anokhilal 26 80012572 DC1800837 Karan Sindhe Fattu Sindhe 27 80012573 DC1801188 Saraswati Kochale Bhagchandra Kochale 28 80012574 DC1800920 Mradul Sharma Vishal Sharma 29 80012575 DC1823111 Deepak Patidar Ashok -
Advisory Service on International Humanitarian Law
ADVISORY SERVICE ON INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW NATIONAL COMMITTEES AND SIMILAR BODIES ON INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW (25 January 2021) NATIONAL COMMITTEES AND SIMILAR BODIES ON INTERNATIONAL HUMANITARIAN LAW As of 25 January 2021 (total by region) EUROPE CENTRAL ASIA ASIA & PACIFIC THE AMERICAS AFRICA MIDDLE EAST Austria Kazakhstan Australia Argentina Algeria Bahrain Belarus Kyrgyzstan Bangladesh Bolivia Benin Egypt Belgium Tajikistan China (People’s Republic of) Brazil Botswana Iran (Islamic Republic of) Bulgaria Turkmenistan Cook Islands Canada Burkina Faso Iraq Croatia Indonesia Chile Cabo Verde Jordan Cyprus Japan Colombia Comoros Kuwait Czech Republic Kiribati Costa Rica Côte d'Ivoire Lebanon Denmark Malaysia Dominican Republic Eswatini Oman Finland Mongolia1* El Salvador Gambia Palestine France Nepal Ecuador Guinea-Bissau Qatar Georgia New Zealand Guatemala Kenya Saudi Arabia Germany Papua New Guinea Honduras Lesotho Syrian Arab Republic Greece Philippines Mexico Liberia United Arab Emirates Hungary Republic of Korea (the) Nicaragua Libya Yemen Iceland Samoa Panama Madagascar Ireland Sri Lanka Paraguay Malawi Italy (two committees) Vanuatu Peru Mauritius Lithuania Trinidad & Tobago Morocco Netherlands Uruguay Namibia Republic of North Macedonia Venezuela Niger Poland (two committees) Nigeria Republic of Moldova Senegal Romania Seychelles Slovakia Sierra Leone Slovenia South Africa Spain Sudan Sweden (two committees) Togo Switzerland Tunisia Ukraine Uganda United Kingdom Zambia Zimbabwe TOTAL: 30 TOTAL: 4 TOTAL: 17 TOTAL: -
Modi: Two Years On
Modi: Two Years On Hudson Institute September 2016 South Asia Program Research Report Modi: Two Years On Aparna Pande, Director, India Initiative Husain Haqqani, Director, South and Central Asia South Asia Program © 2016 Hudson Institute, Inc. All rights reserved. For more information about obtaining additional copies of this or other Hudson Institute publications, please visit Hudson’s website, www.hudson.org ABOUT HUDSON INSTITUTE Hudson Institute is a research organization promoting American leadership and global engagement for a secure, free, and prosperous future. Founded in 1961 by strategist Herman Kahn, Hudson Institute challenges conventional thinking and helps manage strategic transitions to the future through interdisciplinary studies in defense, international relations, economics, health care, technology, culture, and law. Hudson seeks to guide public policy makers and global leaders in government and business through a vigorous program of publications, conferences, policy briefings and recommendations. Visit www.hudson.org for more information. Hudson Institute 1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. Suite 400 Washington, D.C. 20004 P: 202.974.2400 [email protected] www.hudson.org Table of Contents Overview 5 Defense 13 Self-Sufficiency 14 Challenges and Opportunities 15 Education and Skill Development 18 Background 18 Modi Administration on Education 20 Prime Minister Modi’s Interventions in Skill Development 20 Challenges and Opportunities 21 India’s Energy Challenge 23 Coal 23 Petroleum 24 Natural Gas 25 Nuclear 27 Renewables 28 Challenges -
France 2014 Human Rights Report
FRANCE 2014 HUMAN RIGHTS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY France is a multi-party constitutional democracy. The president of the republic is elected by popular vote for a five-year term. Voters elected Francois Hollande to that position in 2012. The upper house (Senate) of the bicameral parliament is elected indirectly through an electoral college, while the public elects the lower house (National Assembly) directly. The 2012 presidential and National Assembly elections and the 2014 elections for the Senate were considered free and fair. Authorities generally maintained effective control over the security forces. The most significant human rights problems during the year included an increasing number of anti-Semitic incidents. Anti-Semitic incidents and violence surged during the summer in connection with public protests against Israeli actions in Gaza. Government evictions of Roma from illegal camps, as well as overcrowded and unhygienic prisons, and problems in the judicial system, including lengthy pretrial detention and protracted investigations and trials, continued. Other reported human rights problems included instances of excessive use of force by police, societal violence against women, anti-Muslim incidents, and trafficking in persons. The government took steps to prosecute and punish security forces and other officials who committed abuses. Impunity was not widespread. Note: The country includes 11 overseas administrative divisions covered in this report. Four overseas territories in French Guiana, Guadeloupe, Martinique, and La Reunion have the same political status as the 22 metropolitan regions and 101 departments on the mainland. Five divisions are overseas “collectivities”: French Polynesia, Saint-Barthelemy, Saint-Martin, Saint-Pierre and Miquelon, and Wallis and Futuna. -
The Role of Narendra Modi's Idiosyncratic Factors in India's
Peter Sean Lie, Anak Agung Banyu Perwita| The Modi Factor: The Role Of Narendra Modi’s Idiosyncratic Factors In India’s Foreign Policy Responses Towards China Pakistan Economic Corridor Article The Modi Factor: The Role Of Narendra Modi’s Idiosyncratic Factors In India’s Foreign Policy Responses Towards China Pakistan Economic Corridor Peter Sean Lie1, Anak Agung Banyu Perwita2 1 International Relations Department, President University, Indonesia 2 President Center for International Studies, Indonesia INFORMATION A B S T R A C T The development of the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), as part of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), is one SUBMISSION TRACK of the causes of worsening Sino-Indian relations in recent years. Seeing the possible worsening relations, India initiated Recieved : 05 February 2019 to invite Xi Jinping for an Informal Summit with Narendra Final Revision : 03 September 2019 Modi. With a longstanding historical relationship with China, Available Online : 30 November 2019 and his personal style diplomacy, Modi manages to fix some misconception with Xi Jinping on several issues. While KEYWORD Belt and Road Initiative, Sino-Indian Relations, trying to fix Sino-Indian relations, Narendra Modi is at the India Foreign Policy, Narendra Modi, foreign same time still firm on its opposition towards the Project. policy analysis This article aims at examining the idiosyncratic factors of Narendra Modi in India‟s foreign policy in responding KATA KUNCI toward CPEC. The authors observed that Narendra Modi‟s personality plays a big role in India‟s response towards Belt and Road Initiative, Hubungan Tiongkok China-Pakistan Economic Corridor. Modi‟s strong and India, Kebijakan Luar Negeri India, Narendra assertive personality, coupled with his Hindu-nationalist Modi, Analisis Kebijakan Luar Negeri belief, explained the Indian decision to firmly opposing the CPEC. -
Why New Delhi and Islamabad Need to Get Stakeholders on Board
India-Pakistan Relations Why New Delhi and Islamabad Need to Get Stakeholders on Board Tridivesh Singh Maini Jan 1, 2016 Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and his Pakistani counterpart, Nawaz Sharif, at a meeting in Lahore on December 25, 2015. Photo: PTI Interest in Pakistan cuts across party affiliations in the Indian Punjab. It is much the same story on the other side though the Pakistani Punjab is often hamstrung by political and military considerations. The border States in India and Pakistan have business, cultural and familial ties that must be harnessed by both governments to push the peace process, says Tridivesh Singh Maini. Prime Minister, Narendra Modi’s impromptu stopover at Lahore on December 25, 2015, on his way back from Moscow and Kabul, caught the media not just in India and Pakistan, but also outside, by surprise. (Though the halt was ostensibly to wish Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif on his birthday, the real import was hardly lost on Indo-Pak watchers) 1 . Such stopovers are a done thing in other parts of the world, especially in Europe. Yet, if Modi’s unscheduled halt was seen as dramatic and as a possible game changer, it was in no small measure due to the protracted acrimony between the neighbours, made worse by mutual hardening of stands post the Mumbai attack. In the event, the European style hobnobbing seemed to find favour with both PMs and as much is suggested by this report in The Indian Express 2 . However, such spontaneity is not totally alien in the Indo-Pak context. Former Prime Minister Manmohan Singh’s invitation to his counterpart, Yousuf Raza Gilani, for the World Cup Semi-final 2011, which faced domestic criticism was one such gesture 3 . -
The Diaspora and India's Growth Story
MARCH 2018 ISSUE NO. 232 The Diaspora and India’s Growth Story SHREYA CHALLAGALLA ABSTRACT This brief sketches the growing interest of the incumbent Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) government in the Indian diaspora. Over the last three years, the prime minister has repeatedly called attention to the role that the diaspora will play in India’s development process and in the promotion of its foreign policy goals. The brief gives an overview of the policies that the present government has rolled out and examines the benefits from, and pitfalls of an increased focus on the diaspora. INTRODUCTION If Atal Bihari Vajpayee, during his 1998-2004 Unlike the Indian National Congress which tenure, is credited for having promoted serious tends to disassociate with the diaspora and engagement with the Indian diaspora to views them as largely burdensome, the develop mutually beneficial linkages, current Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) perceives the Prime Minister Narendra Modi is getting Indian diaspora as an asset. In 1964 in Burma known for his enthusiasm in expanding those (now Myanmar), when General Ne Win earlier efforts. The prime minister’s vigour in nationalised all businesses in the country, the this arena has been evident since the day he large Indian trading community was greatly took office in May 2014, and it begins with his affected. They lost their livelihoods, were public pronouncements. In foreign trips and denied compensation, and as many as 300,000 outreach activities with India’s expatriate of them were expelled from the country.1 The communities, he persuades them to Indian Government at the time did not extend “contribute to India’s growth story”. -
Minister Says the Scheme Will Secure Seed Funding, Inspire Innovation, Support Transformative Ideas, Facilitate Implementation, and Start Startup Revolution;
Press Information Bureau Government of India Shri Piyush Goyal launches the Startup India Seed Fund Scheme; Minister says the scheme will Secure seed funding, Inspire innovation, Support transformative ideas, Facilitate implementation, and Start startup revolution; 3,600 startups are expected to benefit from the scheme; New Delhi; 19.4.21 Minister of Railways, Commerce & Industry, Consumer Affairs and Food & Public Distribution Shri Piyush Goyal today launched the Startup India Seed Fund Scheme (SISFS). The Fund aims to provide financial assistance to startups for proof of concept, prototype development, product trials, market entry, and commercialization. The Scheme was announced by the Hon’ble Prime Minister, Shri Narendra Modi on 16th January 2021 in his Grand Plenary address of ‘Prarambh: Startup India International Summit’, marking the five-year anniversary of the Startup India initiative. Rs. 945 Crore corpus will be divided over the next 4 years for providing seed funding to eligible startups through eligible incubators across India. The scheme is expected to support an estimated 3,600 startups through 300 incubators. Speaking on the occasion, Shri Goyal said that this scheme is being launched within 3 months of its announcement, one of the fastest in the recent times. He said that times are tough, but our resolve is strong, and never before has it become more important for us to empower our startups. The Minister said that the SISFS will Secure seed funding, Inspire innovation, Support transformative ideas, Facilitate implementation, and Start startup revolution. He said that this Scheme will create a robust startup ecosystem, particularly in Tier 2 and Tier 3 towns of India, which are often deprived of adequate funding. -
Government Formation and Minister Turnover in Presidential Cabinets
Review Copy – Not for Redistribution Marcelo Camerlo - University of Lisbon - 21/04/2020 Government Formation and Minister Turnover in Presidential Cabinets Portfolio allocation in presidential systems is a central tool that presidents use to deal with changes in the political and economic environment. Yet, we still have much to learn about the process through which ministers are selected and the reasons why they are replaced in presidential systems. This book offers the most comprehensive, cross- national analysis of portfolio allocation in the Americas to date. In doing so, it contributes to the development of theories about portfolio allocation in presidential systems. Looking specifi- cally at how presidents use portfolio allocation as part of their wider political strategy, it examines eight country case studies, within a carefully developed analytical framework and cross- national comparative analysis from a common dataset. The book includes cases studies of portfolio allocation in Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, the United States, Peru and Uruguay, and covers the period between the transition to democracy in each country up until 2014. This book will be of key interest to scholars and students of political elites, executive politics, Latin Amer ican politics and more broadly comparative politics. Marcelo Camerlo is Researcher at the Institute of Social Sciences of the Uni- versity of Lisbon (ICS- UL), Portugal. Cecilia Martínez-Gallardo is Associate Professor in the Department of Polit- ical Science at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA. Review Copy – Not for Redistribution Marcelo Camerlo - University of Lisbon - 21/04/2020 Routledge Research on Social and Political Elites Edited by Keith Dowding Australian National University and Patrick Dumont University of Luxembourg Who are the elites that run the world? This series of books analyses who the elites are, how they rise and fall, the networks in which they operate and the effects they have on our lives.