THE REPUBLIC OF

OFFICE OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL

ANNUAL REPORT OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL

ON THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF STATUTORY AUTHORITIES AND STATE ENTERPRISES FOR THE YEAR ENDED 30TH JUNE 2009

VOLUME 4

STATUTORY CORPORATIONS

1

LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS AHP Allied Health Professionals AHL Amber House Limited LI Live stock Industries AC Amnesty Commission BOU CCL Cable Corporation Limited CMA Capital Markets Authority CAA Civil Aviation Authority COCTU Coordinating Office for Control of Trypanosomiasis in Uganda CDO Cotton Development Organization HTTI Crested Crane Hotel & Tourism Training Institute CAA Civil Aviation Authority DDA Dairy Development Authority PU Privatization Unit EAC East African Community ERA Electricity Regulatory Authority UICT Institute of Communication & Information Technology KCCL Kasese Cobalt Company Limited KML Kilembe Mines Limited KSW Kinyara Sugar Works LVFO Lake Victoria Fisheries Organization LDC MTAC Management Training and Advisory Centre MNS Mandela National Stadium MEMD Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development NAGRIC National Animal Genetic Resources Centre and Data Bank NWMS Nakivubo War Memorial Stadium NCC National Council for Children NCHE National Council for Higher Education NCS National Council of Sports NCDC National Curriculum Development Centre NDA NEC National Enterprises Corporation & Subsidiaries NFA National Forestry Authority NHCCL National Housing & Construction Company Limited NMS National Medical Stores NPA National Planning Authority NWSC National Water & Sewerage Corporation NWC National Women‟s Council NYC National Youth Council NHI Nile Hotel International NSSF National Social Security Fund

2

PLB Public Libraries Board PPDA Public Procurement & Disposal of Public Assets Authority REA Rural Electrification Agency UACC Corporation UBC Uganda Broadcasting Corporation BC Broadcasting Council UBOS Uganda Bureau of Statistics UCDA Uganda Coffee Development Authority UCC Uganda Communications Commission UDB Uganda Development Bank UDC Uganda Development Corporation UEB Uganda Electricity Board UEDCL Uganda Electricity Distribution Company Limited UEGCL Uganda Electricity Generation Company Limited UEGCL-TA Uganda Electricity Transmission Corporation (Twinning Arrangement) UETCL Uganda Electricity Transmission Company Limited UEPB Uganda Export Promotion Board UIC Uganda Commission UIA Uganda Investment Authority UMDPC Uganda Medical and Dental Practitioners Council UNBS Uganda National Bureau of Standards UNCST Uganda National Council of Science & Technology UNCC Uganda National Cultural Centre UNEB Uganda National Examinations Board UNMC Uganda Nurses & Midwives Council CASSOA Civil Aviation Safety and Security Oversight Agency MERECP Mount Elgon Regional Ecosystem Conservation Programme KCCL Kasese Cobalt Company Limited PSA Production Sharing Agreement PPP Public Private Partnership SCOUL Sugar Corporation of Uganda Ltd. NIC National Insurance Corporation Ltd. UTL Ltd. QCIL Quality Chemical Industries Ltd. UGCEA Uganda Ginners and Cotton Exporters Association CSDP Cotton Subsector Development Credit NHL Nsimbe Holdings Ltd. MEL Mugoya Estates Ltd. JV Joint Venture MCELU Mugoya Construction and Engineering Limited Uganda. MIC Management Investment Committee VPDL Victoria Property Development Ltd. BOD Board of Directors

3

UPPC Uganda Printing & Publishing Corporation UPHL Uganda Property Holding Limited URC Uganda Railways Corporation USL Uganda Seeds Limited UTB Uganda Tourism Board UWA Uganda Wildlife Authority

4

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER ONE ...... 9 1.1 Mandate and Legal framework ...... 9 1.1.1 The Auditor General’s Responsibilities...... 9 1.1.2 Responsibilities of Public Organisations on the financial statements ...... 10 1.1.3 Representations by management...... 10 1.2 VISION ...... 11 1. 3 STATUS OF ACCOUNTS AUDITED DURING THE YEAR ...... 11 1.4 SUMMARY OF MAJOR AUDIT FINDINGS OF THE REPORT ...... 12 1.4.1 Unremitted statutory deductions ...... 12 1.4.2 Corporate Governance ...... 13 1.4.3 Asset Management ...... 14 1.4.4 Performance Review of Public Organizations...... 15 1.5 REGIONAL AUDITS ...... 16 CHAPTER TWO ...... 18 2.1 AUDIT OPINION (CERTIFICATION OF ACCOUNTS) ...... 18 2.1.1 Unqualified Opinion ...... 19 2.1.2 Unqualified opinion with Emphasis of Matter (EOM) ...... 20 2.1.3 Qualified Opinion ...... 20 2.1.4 Disclaimer of Opinion ...... 22 2.1.5 Adverse Opinion ...... 23 2.2 ACCOUNTS WHERE EXAMINATION OF BOOKS OF ACCOUNTS HAVE BEEN CONCLUDED BUT THE ACCOUNTS HAVE NOT BEEN CERTIFIED ...... 23 2.2.1 COORDINATING OFFICE FOR THE CONTROL OF TRYPANOSOMIASIS IN ...... 24 2.2.2 LAW DEVELOPMENT CENTRE: Year ended 30th June 2006 ...... 26 2.2.3 UGANDA NATIONAL CULTURE CENTRE: Years ended 30th June ...... 26 2.2.4 UGANDA LIVESTOCK INDUSTRIES LTD ...... 27 2.2.5 NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR HIGHER EDUCATION ...... 29 2.2.6 NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR HIGHER EDUCATION: ...... 30 2.2.7 JOINT CLINICAL RESEARCH CENTRE: ...... 31 2.2.8 NAKIVUBO WAR MEMORIAL STADIUM (NWMS) ...... 34 2.3 AUDITS IN PROGRESS ...... 36 CHAPTER THREE ...... 37 3.1 UNQUALIFIED AUDIT OPINION WITH EMPHASIS OF MATTER PARAGRAPHS...... 37 3.1.1 NILE HOTEL INTERNATIONAL LIMITED (31st DECEMBER 2008) ...... 37 3.1.2 UGANDA COFFEE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (30TH SEPTEMBER 2008) ...... 37 3.1.3 NATIONAL DRUG AUTHORITY (30TH JUNE 2009) ...... 38 3.1.4 CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED (31ST DECEMBER 2008) ...... 38 3.1.5 UGANDA NATIONAL COUNCIL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (30TH JUNE 2008) ...... 38 3.1.6 UGANDA NATIONAL COUNCIL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (30TH JUNE 2009) ...... 38 3.1.7 AMBER HOUSE LIMITED (31ST DECEMBER 2008) ...... 39 3.1.8 UGANDA PRINTING AND PUBLISHING CORPORATION (30TH JUNE 2009) ...... 39 3.1.9 NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR CHILDREN (30TH JUNE 2007) ...... 40 3.2 QUALIFIED OPINIONS ...... 40 3.2.1 NATIONAL WATER AND SEWERAGE CORPORATION (30th JUNE 2009) ...... 40

5

3.2.2 UGANDA AIR CARGO CORPORATION (30TH JUNE 2008) ...... 40 3.2.3 NATIONAL CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT CENTRE (31ST DECEMBER 2004) ...... 41 3.2.4 NATIONAL CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT CENTRE (31ST DECEMBER 2005) ...... 41 3.2.5 UGANDA DEVELOPMENT BANK (31ST DECEMBER 2008) ...... 41 3.2.17 UGANDA PROPERTY HOLDINGS LIMITED (30TH JUNE 2009) ...... 50 3.2.18 UGANDA SEEDS LTD (30TH JUNE 2007) ...... 50 3.2.24 NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR CHILDREN (30TH JUNE 2005) ...... 54 3.2.25 NATIONAL CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT CENTRE ...... 55 3.3 QUALIFIED OPINIONS WITH EMPHASIS OF MATTER ...... 55 3.3.1 NATIONAL YOUTH COUNCIL (30TH JUNE 2005) ...... 55 3.3.4 UGANDA AIR CARGO CORPORATION (30THJUNE1999) ...... 57 3.3.5 UGMA ENGINEERING CORPORATION LIMITED (31ST DECEMBER 2008) ...... 57 3.3.6 CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY (30TH JUNE 2008) ...... 58 3.3.7 NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR CHILDREN (30TH JUNE 2008) ...... 59 3.3.8 NATIONAL ENTERPRISE CORPORATION (30TH JUNE 2006) ...... 59 3.3.10 CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY (30TH JUNE 2008) ...... 61 3.3.11 (30TH JUNE 2009)...... 62 3.4 DISCLAIMER OPINIONS...... 62 3.4.1 LAW DEVELOPMENT CENTRE (31ST DECEMBER 2002) ...... 62 3.4.4 THE HOTEL AND TOURISM TRAINING INSTITUTE (30TH JUNE 2005)...... 66 3.4.6 UGANDA RAILWAYS CORPORATION (31st DECEMBER 2007) ...... 68 3.5 ADVERSE OPINION ...... 70 3.5.1 POSTA UGANDA LIMITED (30TH JUNE 2007) ...... 70 CHAPTER FOUR ...... 72 4.0 ENERGY SECTOR AUDITS ...... 72 4.1 STATUTORY CORPORATIONS ...... 72 4.1.1 UGANDA ELECTRICTY TRANSMISSION COMPANY LIMITED ...... 72 4.1.2 UGANDA ELECTRICTY DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED ...... 73 4.1.3 KILEMBE MINES LTD. (30TH JUNE 2009) ...... 74 4.1.4 UGANDA ELECTRICTY GENERATION COMPANY LIMITED ...... 75 4.1.5 ELECTRICITY REGULATORY AUTHORITY (30TH June 2008) ...... 76 4.1.6 RURAL ELECTRIFICATION AGENCY (30TH JUNE 2009) ...... 77 CHAPTER FIVE ...... 78 5.0 AUDIT OF INVESTMENTS BY GOVERNMENT IN PRIVATE COMPANIES ...... 78 5.1 Section18. Audit of public monies in private organizations and bodies...... 78 5.2 The third Schedule of the Public Finance and Accountability Act 2003 Accounts ...... 78 CHAPTER SIX ...... 80 6.0 SPECIAL AUDITS AND INVESTIGATIONS ...... 80 6.1 COTTON DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION (CDO) ...... 80 6.1.1 Compliance with the Loan Agreement ...... 81 6.1.2 Utilization of the Loan Funds ...... 82 6.1.3 Impact ...... 82 6.1.4 Recovery of Loans ...... 83 6.1.5 Non Compliance with Agreements ...... 83 6.1.6 Repayments ...... 84 6.1.7 Revolving Fund ...... 84 6.1.8 Accrued Interest ...... 84

6

6.1.9 Capacity to Pay ...... 85 6.2 NATIONAL SOCIAL SECURITY FUND (NSSF) ...... 87 6.2.1 Procurement findings ...... 87 6.2.1.1 IMIS ...... 87 6.2.1.2 Motor vehicle purchase ...... 88 6.2.1.3 Legal services providers’ files ...... 89 6.2.1.4 Private investigations file ...... 89 6.2.2 Payment of salary advances, allowances and loans...... 89 6.2.2.1 Managing Director NSSF ...... 89 6.2.2.2 Deputy Managing Director NSSF ...... 89 6.2.3 Credit card usage by management ...... 90 6.2.4 Issues regarding JVs ...... 90 6.2.4.1 Nsimbe Holdings Limited (NHL) ...... 90 6.2.4.2 Victoria Property Development Limited (VPDL) ...... 91 6.2.5 Listed securities ...... 93 6.2.5.1 Procurement of stockbrokers ...... 93 6.2.5.2 British American Tobacco (Uganda) ...... 93 6.2.5.3 Bank of Baroda (Uganda) ...... 93 6.2.5.4 Development Finance Company of Uganda ...... 93 6.2.5.5 Stanbic Bank (Uganda) ...... 94 6.2.6 Investments in fixed deposit ...... 94 6.2.7 Sale of government bonds before their maturity date ...... 95 6.2.8 Purchase of land ...... 95 6.2.8.1 Temangalo ...... 95 6.2.8.2 Branch offices ...... 96 6.2.8.3 Law firm single sourced ...... 96 6.2.8.4 Investment Policy not followed ...... 96 6.2.8.5 Project ...... 96 6.2.8.6 Gayaza and forest land...... 96 6.2.8.7 Lumumba ...... 96 CHAPTER SEVEN ...... 97 7.0 STATUS OF BUSINESS OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON COMMISSIONS, STATUTORY AUTHORITIES & STATE ENTERPRISES ...... 98 7.1 Reports presented to the House ...... 98 7.2 Reports concluded but not yet presented to the House ...... 98 7.3 Reports still under consideration ...... 99 CHAPTER EIGHT ...... 100 8.0 DIVESTITURE ACCOUNTS ...... 100 8.1. Status of Divested Enterprises ...... 100 8.2 Contingent Liabilities ...... 101 8.3 DIVESTITURE AUDIT OF UGANDA ELECTRICITY BOARD (UEB) ...... 101 8.3.1 Introduction ...... 101 8.3.2 Legal Status ...... 102 8.3.3 Ownership ...... 102 8.3.4 Divestiture Process ...... 102 8.3.5 UEB Core Assets ...... 103 8.3.6 Asset valuation ...... 103

7

8.3.7 Unbundling UEB Assets and Liabilities ...... 103 8.3.8 Findings on Divestiture of Uganda Electricity Board ...... 104 8.3.5 Conclusion ...... 105 Appendix 1 ...... 106 Appendix A ...... 108 Appendix B ...... 110 Appendix C ...... 112 Appendix D ...... 114 Appendix E ...... 118 Appendix F ...... 120 Appendix G ...... 122

8

CHAPTER ONE

RESPONSIBILITY OF THE AUDITOR GENERAL AND LEGAL FRAMEWORK

This is volume 4 of the Auditor General‟s annual report to Parliament. The report presents a summary of audit reports issued for Statutory Corporations / entities audited during the period from 1st April 2009 to 31st March 2010.

1.1 Mandate and Legal framework The 1995 Constitution of the Republic of Uganda under Article 163 (3) as amplified by the National Audit Act 2008 Section 17, and other various Acts of Parliament establishing Statutory Corporations and State Enterprises require the Auditor General to examine and audit the accounts of these entities and submit annually a report to Parliament on the financial as well as value for money audits. In addition, the Auditor General is mandated to carry out special audits on any matter and report to Parliament. The National Audit Act under Section 18 also states that the Auditor General may inquire into, examine, investigate and report, as he or she considers necessary, on the expenditure of public monies disbursed, advanced, or guaranteed to a private organization or body in which government has no controlling interest.

1.1.1 The Auditor General’s Responsibilities The scope of the Auditor General‟s work when conducting financial audits is to audit and report to parliament by expressing an independent opinion as to whether or not the financial statements, in all material respects, fairly state the results of operations of the entities in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards and in the manner consistent with the respective Acts and Statutes establishing these entities as well as complying with the relevant laws and regulations applicable to financial matters. These standards require that ethical requirements are complied with and the audit is planned and performed to obtain reasonable assurance as to whether the financial statements are free from material error or misstatement.

9

The audit also includes obtaining sufficient and appropriate evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements to provide a basis for making an opinion. The audit procedures selected depend on the auditor‟s judgment, including the assessment of risks of material misstatements of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making risk assessments, the auditor considers internal controls relevant to the entity‟s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances.

An opinion will also be expressed as to whether or not any matters came to the Auditors‟ attention that causes him/her to believe that material errors and non-compliance with laws and regulations, applicable to financial matters, had occurred.

1.1.2 Responsibilities of Public Organisations on the financial statements

It is the responsibility of The Directors of the audited entities to prepare financial statements which give a true and fair view of the state of affairs and operating results of their entities in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards and the various Acts and Statutes establishing them. This responsibility also includes designing, implementing and maintaining internal controls relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, selecting and applying appropriate accounting policies and making accounting estimates that are reasonable in their circumstances. The audit of financial statements does not relieve management, or those charged with governance of their responsibility. 1.1.3 Representations by management As part of normal audit procedures, the auditor will where necessary request management of audited entities to provide written confirmations or oral representations that have been received from management during the course of the audit

After conducting audits based on the scope of the auditor‟s responsibility stated above, the auditor shall report to management in writing, any significant weaknesses based on observations on the internal control system and other areas that come to his /her notice which he / she considers necessary to be brought to management‟s attention by way of a Management letter.

10

1.2 VISION The vision of the office of the Auditor General is “To be an Effective and Efficient Supreme Audit Institution (SAI) in promoting public Accountability in the use of Resources in the enhancement of good governance”. Mission The mission of the office of the Auditor General is “To audit and report to the Public and thereby make an effective contribution in improving public accountability”. Core Values The office of the Auditor General is run on three (3) specific core values which motivate and guide staff in their endeavours to achieve the vision and mission of the office. These core values are:- Integrity Objectivity and Professional Competence

1. 3 STATUS OF ACCOUNTS AUDITED DURING THE YEAR The Office of The Auditor General is responsible for the audit of Seventy six (76) entities comprising of state enterprises, statutory authorities and commissions as listed in appendix 1. The nature of the entities is such that their accounting dates are not co- terminus (do not all end on the same date). Four different accounting dates feature in the accounts of the entities as follows:- Year ending 30th June, Year ending 30th September, Year ending 31st October and Year ending 31st December.

A total of 198 audits were conducted during the year under review. Out of these audits, 111 audit certificates were issued to 65 entities. Forty four (44) other audits were concluded but audit certificates could not be issued to these entities due to their failure to prepare financial statements. The remaining forty three (43) audits in respect of 21 entities were still under progress.

11

1.4 SUMMARY OF MAJOR AUDIT FINDINGS OF THE REPORT

1.4.1 Unremitted statutory deductions During the period under review, seven public organizations failed to remit statutory deductions amounting to Shs.3,436,170,469 to the relevant statutory authorities. Of these amounts, un remitted taxes to Uganda Revenue Authority in respect of Pay As You Earn, Value Added Tax and Withholding Tax amounted to Shs.2,278,405,227 while deductions for Employee benefits relating to National Social Security Fund amounted to Shs.1,157,765,242. Details are shown in the table below:

No Entity NSSF Taxes Amount Shs Shs Shs 1 Hotel Training and Tourism 68,960,986 71,174,387 140,135,373 Institute 2 Uganda Broadcasting 304,209,915 1,497,662,635 1,801,872,550 Corporation 3 Nakivubo War Memorial 29,376,861 163,818,328 193,195,189 Stadium 4 Mandela National Stadium 638,830,396 11,177,671 650,008,067 5 COCTU - 16,357,500 16,357,500 6 Management Training and 116,387,084 114,188,183 230,575,267 Advisory Centre 7 Uganda National Bureau of 146,612,166 146,612,166 Standards 8 Uganda Export Promotion - 257,414,357 257,414,357 Board TOTAL 1,157,765,242 2,278,405,227 3,436,170,469

Pictorially, the above information can be shown in a pie chart as follows

This is a critical situation of non compliance with the law and remedial measures should be sought to avoid penalties which may be charged by the respective statutory bodies. 12

1.4.2 Corporate Governance The framework for accountability in government specified in Section 15 and 19 of the Public Finance and Divestiture Act (Cap 98) requires Accounting officers and their Boards to be accountable for their entity‟s activities. It is mandatory for management of public entities to put in place effective internal control systems to safe guard assets and resources from mismanagement and fraud. The following commonly recurring corporate governance issues were; Public enterprises operating for long periods of over 2 years without Boards of directors. Late renewal and appointment of new Boards by the respective line Ministers responsible for the Public Enterprises and Organizations. Board members of public enterprises involved in day to day management functions instead of providing policy decisions and supervising management. Public enterprises operating without approved budget estimates. Board members remunerating themselves without approval from the line Ministers. Irregular Board meetings below or exceeding the required minimum.

During the year under review a total of Fourteen (14) Public organizations had governance issues as summarized in the table below; No Entity Governance issues 1 Uganda National Council of Science & Technology Absence of Board of Directors 2 Uganda Air Cargo Corporation (UACC) Absence of Board of Directors 3 Uganda Broad Casting Corporation(UBC) Non approval of Board remunerations 4 National Enterprise Corporation(NEC) Absence of Board of Directors 5 National Council for Children(NCC) Absence of Board of Directors 6 Uganda Export Promotion Board(UEPB) Lack of approved budgets 7 Nakivubo War Memorial Stadium(NWMS) Board indebted to stadium without settling debts 8 COCTU Irregular Board meetings 9 Mandela National Stadium (MNS) Unsigned Board minutes. 10 National Council for Higher Education(NCHE) Board of Directors involved in management functions 11 Uganda Livestock Industries Lack of approved budgets 12 National Planning Authority Absence of Board of Directors 13 Kilembe Mines Limited(KML) Absence of Board of Directors 14 Civil Aviation Authority Absence of Board of Directors

13

Recommendations Ministers responsible for these entities should ensure that appointment of new boards is timely. In order to avoid conflict of interest, in as far as the oversight function is concerned Board members should avoid performing management functions. Accounting officers of public enterprises should ensure that their budgets are approved by the Board and line Ministers.

1.4.3 Asset Management A review of public organizations revealed that many were noted to have poor or improper management of non current assets. There was apparent lack of ownership to properties as evidenced by absence of title deeds to many of the properties, absence of fixed assets registers or incomplete and outdated fixed assets registers, non revaluation of assets for a long period of time and impairment not tested periodically as required by the accounting standards. During the year under review a total of Nineteen (19) Public organizations had asset management weaknesses as shown below;

No Entity Asset management issues 1 National Water and Sewerage Lease hold land without titles Corporation (NWSC) 2 Uganda Coffee Development Authority Uninstalled Wet coffee processing machines 3 Cotton Development Organization (CDO) Absence of title to seed dressing stations 4 Uganda Electricity Generation Company Impairment of assets (Dams) Ltd (UEGCL) 5 Dairy Development Authority (DDA) Valuation of Property, plant and equipment 6 National Enterprise Corporation(NEC) Non Valuation of Property, plant and equipment 7 Law Development Centre(LDC) Outdated fixed assets register Non Valuation of Property ,plant and equipment Absence of title to properties Encroachment on LDC land 8 Uganda Nurses and Midwives No fixed assets register Council(UNMC) Non Valuation of Property ,plant and equipment Absence of title to properties 9 Hotel Training and Tourism Non Valuation of Property ,plant and equipment Institute(HTTI) Impairment of Property plant and equipment. 10 Management Training and Advisory Absence of title to properties Centre(MTAC) Non revaluation of Property plant and Equipment 11 National Council for Children (NCC) Encroachment on NCC land 12 Uganda Seeds Limited(USL) Non Valuation of land and Buildings

14

Impairment of Buildings 13 Uganda Property Holding Limited (UPHL) Non Valuation of land and buildings 14 NAGRIC Absence of title to properties Lack of livestock census register No valuation of biological assets 15 Nakivubo War Memorial Stadium(NWMS) No fixed assets register Absence of title to properties No valuation of property plant and equipment 16 Uganda Broad Casting Corporation (UBC) No values to property and assets vested to UBC Absence of title to properties 17 Uganda Livestock Industries No fixed assets register Absence of title to properties No valuation of property plant and equipment 18 National Curriculum Development No depreciation of Motor vehicles Centre(NCDC) 19 Uganda institute of Information and No values to assets vested to UICT from UCC Communication Technology

Recommendations Legal ownership of properties should be secured and land titles/deeds obtained from relevant authorities. Revaluation of assets should be conducted and impairment testing carried out at periodic intervals. Maintenance and update of fixed assets registers should be carried out. Land encroached upon should be secured.

1.4.4 Performance Review of Public Organizations Audit of financial statements of public organizations revealed that some entities have been operating profitably while others have been operating at a loss. Financial standing of these entities has been evaluated basing on the accumulated surplus or deficit as at 30th June, 2009, 31st December, 2008, 31st October 2008 and 30th September, 2008 depending on the year end of the financial years of these entities. An analysis of financial statements of fifty eight (58) entities whose accounts were certified revealed that twenty six (26) made losses while thirty two (32) made profit. This is summarized in the table below;

15

Public organization Number of loss Number of Total making profit making Regulatory Authorities 7 13 20 Government Institutions 9 6 15 State Enterprises 10 13 23 Total 26 32 58

It was further noted that eleven (11) organisations had continued accumulating losses, the following five (5) entities were singled out for making huge losses

No Entity Losses made in Financial Shs year reviewed 1 Uganda Electricity Generation Company Ltd (25,786,766,000) Dec 2008 2 Uganda Electricity Transmission Company Ltd (57,021,601,000) Dec 2008 3 Uganda Electricity Distribution Company Ltd (42,582,952,000) Dec 2008 4 National Social Security Fund(NSSF) (50,198,093,000) June 2008 5 Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) (11,291,238,000) June 2008

The earlier efforts are made, to reverse this trend the better for the economy of the country. Full details of the performance are shown in appendix A, B and C.

1.5 REGIONAL AUDITS Uganda is a member of the following Regional Intergovernmental Organizations namely; Intergovernmental Standing Committee on Shipping (ISCOS) Northern Corridor Transit Transport Coordinating Authority (NCTTCA); Common Market for Eastern and (COMESA) East African Community (EAC).

The East African Audit Commission consisting of the five Auditors‟ General of is mandated to audit the East African Community. During the year, the Auditor General of Uganda chaired the audit of the East African Community and its organs, namely the East African Secretariat, Lake Victoria Basin Commission (LVBC), Lake Victoria Basin

16

Commission Partnership Fund (LVBCPF); Lake Victoria Environmental Management Project II (LVEMP II) , the Civil Aviation Safety and Security Oversight Agency (CASSOA) and Mount Elgon Regional Ecosystem Conservation Programme (MEPECP). The Auditor General conducted the audits together with Auditors General of and . The audit was completed and accounts presented to the East African Legislative Assembly where it was reported to the Committee on Accounts for scrutiny on 23rd September, 2009.

17

CHAPTER TWO

BASIS AND TYPES OF AUDIT OPINIONS ISSUED TO PUBLIC ORGANIZATIONS This chapter deals with the basis and types of audit opinions issued to public organizations during the Period 1st April 2009 to 31st March 2009.

2.1 AUDIT OPINION (CERTIFICATION OF ACCOUNTS)

During the period under review, a total of one hundred fifth six (155) audits were undertaken and of these; forty two (42) opinions issued were unqualified, eleven (11) opinions issued were unqualified with emphasis of matter (EOM) thirty (30) opinions issued were qualified, twenty (20) opinions issued were qualified with emphasis of matter (EOM), seven (7) opinions were issued with disclaimers, one (1) opinion issued was adverse, while examination of books of accounts were concluded for forty four (44) accounts but no certification was done.

Chart showing the proportion of audit opinions

18

2.1.1 Unqualified Opinion An unqualified audit opinion is issued when the Auditor is able to express an opinion and concludes that the financial statements of an audited entity give a true and fair view or are presented fairly, in all material respects, in accordance with the International Financial Reporting Standards of the various Acts and Statutes establishing the state enterprises, statutory authorities and commissions.

In the year under review Forty two (42) unqualified opinions without emphasis of matter were issued to (23) public organizations compared to thirty eight (38) reported previously showing an increase level of 10.5%, this is shown in the table below; No Entity No of Financial year audited reports certified 1 Amnesty Commission 1 30th June 2008 2 Bank of Uganda 1 30th June 2009 3 Capital Markets Authority 1 30th June 2009 4 Management Training & Advisory Centre 4 31st Dec 2004- 31st Dec 2007 5 National Housing & Construction Co. Ltd 1 31st December 2008 6 Printing & Publishing Corporation 1 30th June 2009 7 Post Bank Uganda Limited 1 31st December 2008 Public Procurement & Disposal of Public 8 Assets 1 30th June 2008 Uganda Institute of Information & 9 Communications Technology. 3 30thJune2006- 30th June 2008 10 Uganda Insurance Commission 1 30th June 2008 11 Uganda Investment Authority 1 30th June 2008 12 Uganda National Council for Higher Education 1 30th June 2006 13 Lake Victoria Fisheries Organization 1 30th June 2008 14 Uganda National Bureau of Standards 1 30th June 2008 15 Uganda National Examinations Board 4 30thJune 2005.-30thJune 2008 16 Broadcasting Council. 3 30thJune 2006-30th June 2008 th 17 Uganda Tourism Board. 1 30 June 2009 18 Uganda Communications Commission. 1 30th June 2009 19 Uganda Air Cargo Corporation. 1 30th June 2009 20 National Women‟s Council. 7 30th June 2002-30th June 2008 21 National Council for Children 3 30th June 2003,2004 and 2006 22 National Planning Authority 2 30thJune2007 to 30th June 2008 23 Uganda Bureau of Statistics 1 30th June 2009. TOTAL 42

19

2.1.2 Unqualified opinion with Emphasis of Matter (EOM)

An emphasis of matter paragraph may be included in the Auditor‟s opinion to highlight material matters and significant uncertainty which in the auditor‟s judgment do not affect the financial statements of the entity, but may be of such importance that it is fundamental to the users‟ understanding of the financial statements.

In the year under review Eleven (11) unqualified opinions with emphasis of matter were issued to ten (10) public organizations shown in the table below

No Entity No of reports Financial year certified Audited 1 Nile Hotel International Limited(NHI) 1 30th December 2008 2 Uganda Coffee Development Authority(UCDA) 1 30th September 2008 3 National Drug Authority(NDA) 1 30th June 2009 4 Cable Corporation Limited(CCL) 1 31st December 2008 5 Uganda National Council of Science & Technology 2 31st June 2008-2009 6 Uganda Electricity Distribution Company Ltd 1 30th September 200 7 Amber House Limited(AHL) 1 31st December 2008 8 Uganda Printing and Publishing Corporation 1 30th June 2009 9 National Council for Children(NCC) 1 30th June 2007 10 Rural Electrification Agency(REA) 1 30th June 2009 TOTAL 11

2.1.3 Qualified Opinion An auditor expresses a qualified opinion when:

(a) The auditor, having obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence, concludes that misstatements, individually or in aggregate, are material, but not pervasive, to the financial statements; or (b) The auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence on which to base the opinion, but the auditor concludes that the possible effects on the

20

financial statements of undetected misstatements, if any, could be material but not pervasive. In the year under review Thirty (30) qualified opinions were issued to Nineteen (19) public organizations listed below;

No Entity No of Financial year Audited reports certified 1 Dairy Development Authority 4 31st Dec 2005- 31st Dec 2008 2 Uganda Wildlife Authority 1 30th June 2009 3 Kilembe Mines Limited 1 30th June 2009 4 National Water and Sewerage 1 30th June 2009 Corporation

5 Uganda Electricity Generation Co. Ltd 1 31st December 2008

6 Uganda Air Cargo Corporation 1 30th June 2008 7 National Curriculum Development Centre. 3 31st Dec 2004-31st Dec 2006 8 Uganda Broadcasting Corporation 1 30th June 2006 9 Uganda Development Bank 1 31st December 2008 10 National Social Security Fund 2 30th June 2007-30th June 2008 11 Uganda Property Holdings Ltd 1 30th June 2008-30th June 2009 12 Management Training and Advisory 1 31st December 2008 Centre 13 Uganda Seeds Limited 5 30th June 2004-30th June 2008 14 Uganda Broadcasting Corporation 2 30th June 2007-30th June 2008 15 Uganda Electricity Transmission Co. Ltd 1 31st December 2008 16 Electricity Regulatory Authority 1 30th June 2008 17 National Council for Children 1 30th June 2005 18 Uganda Export Promotion Board 1 31st December 2006 19 Law Development Centre 1 30th June 2005 TOTAL 30

21

In addition Nineteen (20) Qualified opinions with Emphasis of matter (EOM) were issued to Nine (9) public organizations listed below; No Entity No of Financial year Audited reports certified 1 National Council for Children 1 30th June 2008 2 Uganda Export Promotion Board 2 31st Dec 2004-31st Dec 2005 3 Cotton Development Organization 1 31st October 2008 4 Uganda Air Cargo Corporation 10 30th June 1998-30thJune 2007 5 UGMA Engineering Corporation Ltd 1 30st December 2008 6 National Youth Council 1 30th June 2005 7 National Enterprise Corporation 2 30th June 2006-30th June 2007 8 Uganda Revenue Authority 1 30th June 2009 9 Civil Aviation Authority 1 30th June 2008 TOTAL 20

2.1.4 Disclaimer of Opinion The Auditor shall disclaim an opinion when the auditor is unable to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence on which to base the opinion, and the auditor concludes that the possible effects on the financial statements of undetected misstatements, if any, could be both material and pervasive. The auditor shall disclaim an opinion when, in extremely rare circumstances involving multiple uncertainties, the auditor concludes that, notwithstanding having obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence regarding each of the individual uncertainties, it is not possible to form an opinion on the financial statements due to the potential interaction of the uncertainties and their possible cumulative effect on the financial statements. During the year under review; I was not able to issue an opinion on the financial statements of five (5) public organizations listed below;

22

No Entity No of reports Financial year certified Audited 1 Law Development Centre 2 31stDec 2002-31st Dec 2003 2 Uganda Nurses & Midwives Council 2 30th June2004-30thJune 2005 3 Hotel Training and Tourism Institute 1 30th June 2005 4 Posta Uganda Limited 1 30th June 2008 5 Uganda Railways Corporation 1 30th June 2009 TOTAL 7

2.1.5 Adverse Opinion The auditor shall express an adverse opinion when the auditor, having obtained sufficient appropriate audit evidence, concludes that misstatements, individually or in the aggregate, are both material and pervasive to the financial statements.

Public Organization issued with Adverse audit opinions during the year. No Entity Type of audit opinion Financial year issued Audited 1 Posta Uganda Limited Disclaimer 30th June 2007

2.2 ACCOUNTS WHERE EXAMINATION OF BOOKS OF ACCOUNTS HAVE BEEN CONCLUDED BUT THE ACCOUNTS HAVE NOT BEEN CERTIFIED

A total of Forty four (44) audits were concluded for Thirteen (13) public organizations. However, I was unable to certify these audits because signed financial statements were not presented to my office due to the following reasons,

Some entities had no Boards to approve the financial statements. Others had their financial statements rejected by my office because of non compliance with reporting requirement and errors in the financial statements.

23

The following is a listing of these public organizations; No Entity No of Financial year under years review 1 Joint Clinical Research Centre 4 2005/2006-2008/2009 2 Nakivubo War Memorial Stadium 5 2004/2005-2008/2009 3 Livestock Industries 5 1998/1999-2000/2001 4 COCTU 4 2005/2006-2008/2009 5 Allied Health Professionals 1 2004/2005-2005/2006 6 National Council for higher Education 3 2006/2007-2008/2009 7 National Animal Genetic Resource Centre and 2 2004/2005-2006/2007 Data Bank (NAGRIC) 8 National Forestry Authority 2 2007/2008-2008/2009 9 Uganda Nurses and Midwives 4 2005/2006-2008/2009 Council 10 Uganda National Cultural Centre 7 Dec 2002-Dec2008 11 Uganda Institute of information and 1 2008/2009 Communication Technology 12 Law Development Centre 3 2005/2006-2007/2008 13 Mandela National Stadium 3 Dec 2006-Dec2008 TOTAL 44

The following are audit issues for public organizations whose audits were completed but did not submit financial statements.

2.2.1 COORDINATING OFFICE FOR THE CONTROL OF TRYPANOSOMIASIS IN UGANDA (COCTU) Outstanding issues for the year ended June 30th 2008 Late submission of accounts

Management of the Council did not prepare and submit Final Accounts to the respective authorities within 3 months after the end of the Financial Year as required by the Public Finance and Accountability Act 2003, Sec 31(b) and the Uganda Trypanosomiasis Control Statute 1992 sec 26(2). In addition, the accounts for the financial year ended June 2008 were submitted in August 2009 (i.e. 11 months later). 24

Non remittances of taxes Deductions totaling Shs.8, 514,000 in respect of PAYE from gratuity payment to staff was not remitted to URA.

Outstanding issues for the year ended June 30th 2009 Non remittances of taxes Deductions totaling Shs.7, 843,500 in respect of PAYE from salaries to employees was not remitted to URA. Procurement of goods and services We noted that procurement of some goods and services of Shs.13,250,600 was done without following the Public Procurement and Disposal of Assets Regulations, 2003. Procurement plans based on the approved budget were not made and submitted to the Procurement and Disposal Authority. Instead, procurement was done in an adhoc manner and without requisition from the user department. Besides, there were no contracts committee minutes approving the transactions.

Internal control system We noted that the internal control system of the Organization was weak in the following areas:- o Council did not operationalise the internal audit function as provided for in the Council‟s organization structure. o The entity did not have Accounting and Human Resource Manuals to guide the operations of the Council. o All payment vouchers and their supporting documents were not cancelled with “paid” stamp during the financial years under review. The possibility of duplication of payments could not be ruled out. o The assets register was not updated on regular basis to ensure that all asset acquisitions, disposals, their condition is documented. o Uganda Trypanosomiasis Control Council had only one Board meeting for the whole financial year instead of 4 as stipulated in their Statute of 1992, sec 10(1). o Expenditure totaling Shs.10,635,700 did not have supporting documents such as activity reports and receipts, rendering the expenditure doubtful

25

2.2.2 LAW DEVELOPMENT CENTRE: Year ended 30th June 2006 Lack of an approved budget

Sec 21 (Cap 132) of the centre‟s Act requires Management to submit to the Minister responsible for finance, for his/ her approval, estimates of its income and expenditure for the next ensuing year before the beginning of each financial year. Contrary to this requirement, the Centre operated without an approved budget during the year under review

Un accounted for funds A total of shs.82,660,000 which was paid to Legal Aid Clinic as students contribution for various activities, remained unaccounted for at the year end.

2.2.3 UGANDA NATIONAL CULTURE CENTRE: Years ended 30th June 2002,2003,2004,2005,2006 and 2007

Comprehensive fixed assets register The Centre does not maintain a fixed asset register. Consequently all information and explanations which was considered necessary to ascertain the completeness, existence, ownership and valuation of property, plant and equipment could not be obtained. Property, plant and equipment balances therefore may not be fairly stated.

Lack of bank reconciliation statements There were no bank reconciliation statements for the bank Accounts maintained contrary to best practice and the Financial Regulations and Accounting Manual of the centre. Besides, certificates of bank balances were not availed for audit. I could not therefore ascertain the correctness of the cash balances at the close of the year.

Revaluation of fixed assets It was noted that a number of assets have unrealistic values while others have no values attached to them at all. This is contrary to IAS 16 which requires assets of the same class to be regularly revalued to reflect their fair values.

Depreciation policy The non current assets were depreciated using the straight line method according to the accounting policies. This is however, contrary to Section 10.7 of the Centre‟s Financial Regulations and Accounting manual which requires non current assets to be 26

depreciated using the reducing balance method. This inconsistency needs to be addressed.

Bad Debts Provision Management did not make a provision for all doubtful debts as a result of the figures for debtors reflected in the financial statements are not fairly stated.

Reserves The reserves figure reflected in the Statement of Changes in Equity for the year ended 31st December 2002 of Shs.135, 855, 077 differs significantly with that reflected in the balance sheet of the same year of Shs.130,069,946 by Shs.5,785,131. This difference was not explained.

Un-receipted income The total collection from plays staged by different groups in the Centre was Shs.139,676,500 for 2004 and Shs.97,706,000 for 2005. These funds were neither receipted nor banked. It was therefore not possible to ascertain and establish the completeness of the total revenue collected and banked. Besides, utilization was not availed.

Bankings not captured in the bank statements A review of transactions on Account number 2060205 Allied Bank, to confirm the authenticity of the bankings reported in the cash books for the periods ended 31st December, 2006 and 30th June, 2007 revealed that although Shs.492,874,589 and Shs.257,391,232 respectively is reported to have been banked, only Shs.387,551,807 and Shs.257,762,151 respectively was credited on the bank statements. This created unexplained difference of Shs.105,322,782 and Shs.370,919 respectively. Bank reconciliations reconciling bank balances at the end of these periods were not availed to audit.

2.2.4 UGANDA LIVESTOCK INDUSTRIES LTD: Five years ended 31st December 1997,1998,1999,2000 and 2001. Lack of company /Ranch annual Budgets For the five year period under review, audit was not availed with approved budgets of income and expenditure.

27

Rental payments During the period under review, the company paid Shs 9,813,609 to M/S Francisco Opoka estates as rental fees for the period ended December 1999. However, audit noted that these payment lacked supporting documents including rental Agreements.

Un-supported payments During the period under review, the company paid a total of Shs. 49,600,000 to M/S Etatas Ltd to rehabilitate Kiryana and Kyempisi ranches. However audit noted that all these payments were made without any supporting documents.

Trade creditors and other payables Trade creditors and other payables were reported in the financial statements under current liabilities as shown below. 1997- 5,129,502,975 1998- 5,603,699,938 1999- 6,198,252,672 2000- 6,302,862,829 2001- 7,655,853,642 The completeness, existence and accuracy of these liabilities could not be ascertained because detailed creditors schedules confirming the valid amounts and creditors ledgers to confirm their accuracy were not availed for audit.

Property, Plant and Equipment A review of the Company‟s fixed asset values and records for the five year period established the following; i) The Company did not maintain a fixed assets register for the entire five year period under review; as a result audit could not confirm the cost, location, conditions, existence and values of assets maintained. ii) Registration log books for the Company‟s motor cycles and motor vehicles were not availed for audit, as a result audit could not confirm the ownership of these motor vehicles, including the values in the financial statements. iii) Uganda Livestock Industries Ltd does not have title deeds to Ranches at Kilak Kitgum; Lale Soroti and Land at ; in this respect audit could not confirm the Company‟s ownership to these properties. 28

iv) The Company‟s Ranch Land at Aswa, Kiryana, Kyempisi, Lale, Maruzi and Pader is not valued. Besides the other assets have never been revalued since 1997. Consequently the entire value attached to property, plant and equipment cannot be confirmed for accuracy and completeness. v) Work in progress was not reflected in the accounts in 2001 yet capital works amounting to Shs.2,730,634,545 were shown in 2000, no corresponding increase in fixed assets to this amount was reflected in the assets schedule.

2.2.5 NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR HIGHER EDUCATION: Year ended 30th June 2007

Non-compliance with PPDA and Regulation It was noted that the Council did not follow laid down procedures required by PPDA in the procurement of goods and services and the council did not have a contract committee and procurements disposal unit in place. As a result payments totaling to shs 10,281,800 for goods and services were made through cash advances.

Maintenance Expenditure A sum of Shs.6,521,700 was paid to Goshem Uganda Limited for painting an office. However, an independent verification of the work done was not carried out. It was therefore not clear whether work done was according to specification.

Irregular payment of per diem A sum of Shs.32,931,100 was paid to participants for residential workshops organized by the council in respect of per diem, out of pocket allowance and transport refund. We however, noted that the payment for these workshops was full board, meaning that participants would be catered for fully. This payment was therefore irregular.

Payment of Gratuity We noted that staff appointment letters indicate a gratuity rate of 15% while the personnel manual stipulated a rate of 25%. Therefore, the correct gratuity balance could not be confirmed in the financial statements.

29

2.2.6 NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR HIGHER EDUCATION: Outstanding issues for the year ended 30th June 2008

Irregularities in the procurement process/activities

We noted the following irregularities from the examination and review of procurement documents and activities of the Council for the period under review.

User departments did not prepare work plan for procurement based on the approved budget for Submission to the Procurement and Disposal unit to facilitate orderly execution of annually, procurement activities as prescribed in the PPDA Regulations 96(1-3). Although the nominated members of the contracts committee were approved by the Secretary to the Treasury in the Ministry of Finance, Planning, and Economic, there was no formal appointment by the Executive Secretary as required by the PPDA Regulations 2003. An extra member (an accounts assistant) to the Committee was added on the list without following proper procedures. The membership of the procurement and disposal unit did not sign the code of ethical conduct in business using PP form 211 as prescribed by the PPDA regulations.

Under Staffing The council has a provision of 39 technical staff. However, a review of the pay roll and personal files revealed that 15 of these positions had not been filled constituting about 39.5% of the approved structure. Specialized positions in procurement, transport, public relations and human resources had not yet been filled by time of this report.

Lack of internal audit function During the period under review, it was observed that the Council did not have in place an internal Audit Department as prescribed by the NCHE Accounting Manual 2005 Sec 12.0 and The public Finance and Accountability Regulations 2003, 27 and 28.

Nugatory expenditure The council engaged services of solicitors to defend the entity in the court of law in a suit that arose when individuals who were dissatisfied with the grading of their academic qualifications obtained from various academic institutions sued the council. A 30

sum of Shs 194,391,636 and Shs 45,000,000 were paid to the solicitor and individuals as legal fees and fines respectively.

It was further noted that the process through which the legal firm was procured was not transparent while management of the cases were affected by conflict of interest. While the entity won some cases, the amounts that were awarded were not vouched and disclosed in the accounts.

Outstanding issues for the year ended 30th June 2009

Understatement of non current assets in accounts

We noted that a donation of freehold land on plot no M834 measuring 1.216 hectares to the council was only disclosed in the notes to the accounts but was not valued and disclosed in the financial statements.

2.2.7 JOINT CLINICAL RESEARCH CENTRE: Outstanding issues for the two years ended 30th June 2009

Lack of procurement plans

We noted that JCRC procured goods and services from various suppliers without a Procurement Work plan for the period under review. This is contrary to Sec.60 of PPDA Act which requires user departments to prepare work plans and submit them to PDU for implementation and consolidation into a procurement plan.

Contracts Committee Sec 27 (2) of the PPDA Act (2003) requires members of the Contract‟s Committee to be nominated by the Accounting officer and approved by the Secretary to the Treasury. In absence of approval letters from the Secretary to the Treasury; audit could not confirm whether the Contract‟s Committee of the Centre was legally constituted.

Lubowa Construction Contract In 2007, JCRC undertook to construct a modern hospital at Lubowa at a contract price of Shs.6,111,600,964. The Project was to be completed on 20th March 2008. The contract price was revised to Shs.8,185,518,570 resulting into a variation of Shs.2,073,917,606 which is 34% of the original contract sum. The variations of the 31

Lubowa Constructions Contract did not get the approval of the contracts committee and PPDA contrary to regulations.

Outstanding issue for the year ended June 30th 2007 Depreciation Policy The Research Centre‟s accounting manual stipulates that depreciation of assets should be based on the straight line method and that the following rates per year shall be used: buildings 5%, computers 25%. It was however noted that all assets were depreciated at a uniform rate of 20% without regard to the rates for the different classes of assets. As a result of these, the book values of these assets are not fairly stated.

Debtors Review of the financial statements revealed that Shs.337,281,702 remained unrecovered from debtors at the close of the year as compared to shs.364,388,822 at previous year end. Poor recovery of debts from debtors increases the likelihood of some debts becoming bad and doubtful.

Salary advances We noted that received salary advances totaling shs.21,320,312 remained outstanding and un-recovered at year end. Out of this sum Shs.15,392,640 was advanced to staff for six months contrary to the research Centre‟s policy while Ushs.5,927,672 was not reflected in the final accounts.

Repair of vehicles During the audit we noted that repair of vehicles is done without requisition from the users and a verification report by the transport officer. This is a weakness which could result in irregular repair bills being paid.

Valuation of land at Mengo It was noted that JCRC acquired land on plot 616 block 12 comprising of 0.5 acres. However, this property is not recorded in the fixed asset register. Furthermore, the reported amount at Shs.550,815,730 in the financial statements is only in respect of the cost of building on which the Centre‟s head office is located excluding land.

32

Construction work at Kakira A certificate of completion in respect of construction work by M/s Associated Enterprises Construction (U) Ltd in respect of the Centre‟s Kakira branch built at a cost of Shs.188,611,205 was submitted on 14th February 2008 by the supervising engineer.

A review of the inspection reports and a physical inspection of the site revealed that the work had several defects as noted below:-

i) The floor was poorly done and in some places it has already developed cracks. ii) The roofing timber was rotting. iii) The painting on the outside wall was peeling. iv) Quality of the doors frames is not satisfactory. v) The ceiling of the conference room is sagging.

This was an indicator of poor quality work and weaknesses in supervision by the Engineers/Estates department.

Internal control structure/operation o Fixed asset register: Best practice requires that an asset register be maintained and updated frequently for proper management, custody and maintenance of fixed assets. During the audit we noted that an asset register was still not in place. o Movement of drugs: The drug stores system at JCRC requires that drugs delivered to JCRC are received in the stores while distribution is effected by first issuing out to the pharmacy before dispatch to the respective centres. The stores and pharmacy department each keep separate registers and we noted that a reconciliation of the drugs issued from stores and received/issued by the pharmacy was not carried out. o Exchange rate for forex accounts: The Centre‟s Accounting manual stipulates that conversions of currency shall be authorized by the financial controller and shall be based on the bank rate for transactions with the same bank, otherwise the best ruling rates of the day from the mass media would be used. A review of the internal audit reports of the Centre revealed that the cashier and accountant in charge of TREAT Project were dealing in foreign currency transactions and determining rates being used without seeking approval from the financial controller as required by the Centre‟s regulations. 33

2.2.8 NAKIVUBO WAR MEMORIAL STADIUM (NWMS) Outstanding issues for three years ended 31st December 2007

Lack of an assets register It was noted that management did not maintain a fixed assets register, to record asset cost /value location and condition. Most assets were not engraved. Besides different depreciation rates were used for loose tools at 61.25% in December 2004 and 50% in December 2005 respectively contrary to IAS 16.

Revenue i) Gate Collections

We noted that Turn style, the stadium revenue recording machine at entrances was out of order. As a result ticket tabs could only be reconciled with tickets sold against cash collected by management to ascertain gate collections. This method is prone to errors and makes collusion possible with gate officials who can print their own tickets sell them and not declare the tabs.

ii) Concession fees in respect of Nakivubo Park Yard

The trustees of Nakivubo Stadium (NWMS) entered into an agreement with Kampala city council (KCC) under which KCC was to pay 30% of collections from users of the Market stalls at Nakivubo park yard, however, KCC did not honor this agreement upon which it was sued by the trustee of NWMS. On 26th May 1998, a consent judgment was entered into by KCC and NWMS in which KCC agreed to pay the rebate of 30% of the monthly collections but to date KCC has not remitted any funds.

It was also noted that on 20th July 2000 KCC awarded the tender to M/S equator Towing services to manage the Nakivubo Park yard at a contract fee of Shs.16,500,000 per month for two years. It was noted that payment was only made in 2005 and partially in 2006 and by time of this report a total of Shs.86,927,060 remained unremitted by KCC.

Water Consumption Facilities It was noted that the Stadium was using a water hydrant line for industrial consumption usage contrary to National Water and Sewerage Corporation which

34

requires hydrants to be used for emergency fire fighting. Consequently NWSC billed the Organization Shs.21,916,854 on the hydrant line and Shs.2,508,467 on the commercial line. A sum of shs.24,425,321 had not been paid by the time of audit.

Non-compliance with PPDA rules and regulations It was observed that management did not follow laid down procedures required by PPDA in the procurement of goods and services during the year. The contracts committee and procurement and disposal units are not in existence; as a result value for money may not have been obtained from hiring out its properties as parking space, Billboards, toilets.

Personnel files A review of personnel records revealed that files for the 16 staff were not up to date. Some files were found to be lacking in several major aspects like not having application, promotional or even appointments letters. We could therefore not ascertain whether the affected employees were transparently recruited.

Doubtful payments to clubs During the financial year 2006 management made payments out of gate collections to Football clubs, but acknowledgement receipts by the following clubs were not availed for audit see table below;

Voucher Number Amount Club 3925/3/06 299,889 Express foot ball club 3924/3/06 299,889 Kampala United 3941/03/6 360,281 FUFA 3920/02/06 369,970 Victor FC 4161/06/06 407,846 FUFA 4020/04/06 262,702 KCC Total 2,000,577

35

2.3 AUDITS IN PROGRESS Forty three (43) audits were under progress at the time of issue of this report these are listed below;

No Entity No of Financial year under years review 1 Uganda Broadcasting Corporation 1 2008/2009 2 Uganda National Examinations Board 1 2008/2009 3 Uganda National Bureau of Standards 1 2008/2009 4 Uganda Coffee Development Authority 1 2008/2009 5 Cotton Development Organization 1 2008/2009 6 Amnesty Commission 1 2008/2009 7 National Enterprise Corporation and 2 2007/2008-2008/2009 Subsidiaries 8 Electricity Regulatory Authority 1 2008/2009 9 Public Procurement and Disposal of Assets 1 2008/2009 Authority 10 National Council for Children 1 2008/2009 11 National Women‟s Council 1 2008/2009 12 Broadcasting Council 1 2008/2009 13 National Animal Genetic Resource Centre and 2 2007/2008-2008/2009 Data Bank (NAGRIC) 14 Allied Health Professionals 3 2006/2007-2008/2009 15 Uganda Livestock Industries 8 2001/2002-2008/2009 16 Public Libraries Board 9 2000/2001-2008/2009 17 Uganda Insurance Commission 1 2008/2009 18 National Planning Authority 1 2008/2009 19 Uganda Investment Authority 1 2008/2009 20 Uganda Export Promotion Board 2 Dec 2007-Dec 2008 21 National Youth Council 3 Dec 2006-Dec 2008 TOTAL 43

36

CHAPTER THREE

DETAILED PARAGRAPHS OF AUDIT OPINIONS

3.1 UNQUALIFIED AUDIT OPINION WITH EMPHASIS OF MATTER PARAGRAPHS The following is a detailed listing of the audit issues arising from the audit of the 11 public organizations certified with unqualified opinions with emphasis of matter

3.1.1 NILE HOTEL INTERNATIONAL LIMITED (31st DECEMBER 2008) Unqualified audit opinion with emphasis of matter Common Heads of Government Meeting (CHOGM) advances from Government Shs.1,898,972,476

Government advanced Shs.1,898,972,476 to a local firm on account of Nile Hotel International Limited (NHIL) which was used to carry out refurbishment works at Serena Conference Centre. Of this amount, Shs.1,021,839,175 was considered to be a loan in the financing agreement but the repayment terms were not clearly stated while Shs.877,133,301 was advanced by government but without indicating in the financing agreement whether it was a loan or an increase in government‟s share holding value in NHIL.

3.1.2 UGANDA COFFEE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (30TH SEPTEMBER 2008)

Unqualified audit opinion with emphasis of matter

Investments in Wet Coffee processing machines The Authority invested Shs.834,815,878 in Wet Coffee processing machines financed by government under the Strategic Export Program. These machines were offered to the beneficiaries at a discounted price by 50%, to Shs.417,407,939 under a Finance lease Arrangement managed by DFCU leasing. However, not all these machines have been installed. As a result, the original objective of value addition was negatively affected and repayment of the finance lease to UCDA delayed.

37

3.1.3 NATIONAL DRUG AUTHORITY (30TH JUNE 2009)

Unqualified audit opinion with emphasis of matter

Lack of Authority and commission. There was lack of a duly constituted Authority and attendant Commission. The Commission had expired prior to signing of these financial statements.

3.1.4 CABLE CORPORATION LIMITED (31ST DECEMBER 2008)

Unqualified audit opinion with emphasis of matter

Going Concern Matters The company has accumulated revenue reserves deficit of Ushs7.9 billion as at 31st December 2007 (2006: Ushs9.1 billion) and as of that date its total liabilities exceeded total assets by Ushs5.4 billion (2006: Ushs6.5 billion). These conditions together with other matters as set forth in the note to the financial statements indicate the existence of a material uncertainty which may cast significant doubt on the company‟s ability to continue as a going concern.

3.1.5 UGANDA NATIONAL COUNCIL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (30TH JUNE 2008)

Unqualified audit opinion with emphasis of matter

Absence of Board of directors During the financial year as noted in the previous year council operated without a Board of Directors, as a result policy decisions were initiated, approved and implemented by management.

3.1.6 UGANDA NATIONAL COUNCIL OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (30TH JUNE 2009)

Unqualified audit opinion with emphasis of matter

Absence of Board of directors Same as in 3.1.5 above

38

3.1.7 AMBER HOUSE LIMITED (31ST DECEMBER 2008)

Unqualified audit opinion with emphasis of matter

Trade and Other Receivables Note 7 in the Balance sheet of the financial statements indicates that there is weakness in Debt collection with the overall debtors increasing from shs 2,534,157,146 in 2007 to shs 3,093,442,135 in 2008. These conditions indicate the existence of a material uncertainty over trade receivables.

3.1.8 UGANDA PRINTING AND PUBLISHING CORPORATION (30TH JUNE 2009) Unqualified audit opinion with emphasis of matter

. Statutory Contributions The financial statements indicate (Under note (6) that PAYE, VAT and WHT payable increased from Shs.307,090,367 in 2007/08 financial year to Shs.479,409,013 in 2008/09 implying that these taxes are not paid regularly and/or on time thus exposing the Corporation to unnecessary penalties.

Unremitted NSSF Contributions also increased from Shs.112,055,340 in 2007/2008 financial year to Shs.175,159,701 in 2008/09 indicating possible liquidity problem.

. Trade debtors Note 4 of the financial statements indicates that there are weaknesses in debt collection with the overall Corporation‟s debtors increasing from Shs.427,703,964 in 2008 to Shs.865,748,794 in 2009. These conditions indicate the existence of a material uncertainty over trade debtors and the ability of the corporation to continue as a going concern. However, the financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis on the assumption that continued financial support will be made available to the corporation by Government.

39

3.1.9 NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR CHILDREN (30TH JUNE 2007) Unqualified audit opinion with emphasis of matter

Governance During the financial year, the term of the council expired and had not been renewed. As a result the Council operated without a governing council resulting in policy decisions being initiated, approved and implemented by management.

3.2 QUALIFIED OPINIONS

3.2.1 NATIONAL WATER AND SEWERAGE CORPORATION (30th JUNE 2009) Qualified Opinion . Lease hold land without Title Deeds As indicated in note 19(c) to the financial statements. The corporation has some leasehold land for which it does not have title deeds. The leasehold land prepayment is therefore not amortized to the income statement. The Corporation is in advanced stages of obtaining the relevant title deeds but this process had not been finalized by the date of this report. Consequently, adequate assurance over the ownership of those properties and completeness of leasehold amortization reported in the financial statements could not be obtained.

. Unaccounted for water Due to technical and non- technical losses in the supply system, the Corporation is not able to bill all the water produced from the pumping stations. As at 30 June 2009, the non revenue water was estimated at 35.8% (2008:33.5%). Because of this limitation, reliance could not be placed on the system for the purposes of testing the accuracy and completeness of the Corporation‟s water revenue. There were no practical procedures that could be adopted for this purpose. However, income from water supplied and billed is subjected to adequate accounting and control procedures.

3.2.2 UGANDA AIR CARGO CORPORATION (30TH JUNE 2008) Qualified Opinion Debtors Included under debtors in the financial statements is a figure of shs 4,193,864,273 which has been long outstanding; the total amount of shs 4,193,864,273 is yet to be recovered.

40

The recoverability of this amount appears doubtful and in the absence of a specific provision for bad debts, the debtors are not fairly stated.

3.2.3 NATIONAL CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT CENTRE (31ST DECEMBER 2004) Qualified Opinion . Debtors Included under debtors in the financial statements is Shs.281,751,397 (US$120,903.35) in respect of royalties which were remitted by M/s Pearson Education and M/S Macmillan Publishers of UK between September 1998 and June 2002 but was instead erroneously banked on a former Director‟s personal account No. 8670587 of Barclays Bank Queensway . In addition, Shs.54,075,000 (£25,020) was banked on the same account in the period ended 31st December 2004). The total amount of Shs.335,826,397 is yet to be recovered. The recoverability of the debt appears doubtful and in the absence of a specific provision for bad debts, the debtors balance may not be fairly stated.

. Valuation of UNESCO Coupons The Centre obtained UNESCO coupons valued at Shs.1,892,431 dating way back in 1970. However, the value of these coupons has not been discounted. Therefore the value of these coupons may not be fairly stated in the financial statements.

3.2.4 NATIONAL CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT CENTRE (31ST DECEMBER 2005) Qualified Opinion . Debtors . Valuation of UNESCO Coupons The issues above are the same as in 3.2.3.

3.2.5 UGANDA DEVELOPMENT BANK (31ST DECEMBER 2008) Qualified Opinion . Investments in Associates IAS 28 The bank holds a 28% shareholding in Kajjansi Roses Limited, stated at Ushs.762 million in the balance sheet. IAS 28, Investments in Associates requires that such an investment where the entity has significant influence be recorded using the equity method of accounting. The bank has not recognized its share in the associate‟s profit or loss for the year ended 31 December 2008. Further, the audited financial 41

statements of the associate as at 31 December 2008 were not available. Therefore, the correctness of the investments could not be determined.

. Investment property (‘IAS 40’) The bank has recognized a fair value gain on investment property of Shs.9,670 million based on an independent valuation done in 2008. Hither-to, the last fair valuation of investment property was done in 2005 and since then no fair value gains or losses had been recognized in the financial statements. IAS 40 requires the fair value of investment property to reflect market conditions at the balance sheet date and the gain or loss arising from the change in fair value of investment property recognized in profit or loss for the period in which it arises. Had the bank been carrying out annual fair value assessments as required by IAS 40, the fair value gain of Shs.9,670 million included in 2008 income statement, would have been progressively recognized in the respective accounting periods. As a result of the above, the profit for the year is overstated and the opening balance of retained earnings is understated. However the misstatement could not be qualified.

. Financial instruments, Recognized and Measurement (‘IAS 39’) IAS 39 requires that an entity shall assess at each balance sheet date whether there is any objective evidence that a financial asset or group of financial assets is impaired. If any such evidence exists, the entity shall determine the amount of the loss as the difference between the asset‟s carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows (excluding future credit losses that have not been incurred) discounted at the financial asset‟s original effective interest rate. This was done as at 31st December 2008. However as at 31st December 2007, the company‟s loan impairment was based on number of days in arrears and fixed percentages, and not estimated future cash flows as required by IAS 39. Management did not make an impairment assessment and thus the impact on the financial statements of the deviation in prior years from the requirements of IAS 39 pertaining to the above issue could not be assessed.

42

3.2.6 NATIONAL SOCIAL SECURITY FUND (30TH JUNE 2007) Unqualified audit opinion with emphasis of matter . Members Fund Included in the members‟ fund account as at 30 June 2007 is an amount of Ushs.360,592 million which has not been allocated to specific members. Management has been unable to provide an analysis of this balance or confirm the completeness and accuracy of balances credited to individual members accounts. Accordingly, it was not possible to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence that the members‟ fund account balance is not materially misstated.

. Other Payables A credit balance of Ushs.2,371 million is included in other payables as at 30 June 2007. Management was unable to provide an analysis of this amount and could also not explain the nature of the credit balance. Accordingly it was not possible to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence that other payables are not materially misstated.

3.2.7 NATIONAL SOCIAL SECURITY FUND (30TH JUNE 2008) Qualified Opinion . Members Fund Included in the members‟ fund account as at 30 June 2008 is an amount of Ushs.206,405 million which has not been allocated to specific members. Management has been unable to provide an analysis of this balance or confirm the completeness and accuracy of balances credited to individual members accounts. Accordingly, it was not possible to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence that the members‟ fund account balance is not materially misstated.

. Trade and Other receivables A debit balance of Shs.10,829 million is included in other receivables as at 30 June 2008. Management was unable to provide an analysis of this amount and could also not explain the nature of the debit balance. Accordingly it was not possible to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence that trade and other receivables are not materially misstated.

43

3.2.8 UGANDA BROADCASTING CORPORATION (30TH JUNE 2006) Qualified Opinion . Vesting amounts from merged departments Following the merger of the departments of Radio Uganda and Uganda Television to form Uganda Broadcasting Corporation, an instrument vesting Property, assets and liabilities of these departments to the Corporation was issued in May 2006. However no values were attached to this instrument. There were no alternative procedures that could be carried out to independently ascertain the value of the vested assets. In light of the above, a material uncertainty exists over the accuracy and completeness of the Corporations Property plant and equipment. . Title to Properties The Corporation has not secured title to all its Land, except for Titles to Land at Kibira road, Broadcasting house and Naguru hill included under its properties. Consequently I am unable to confirm and quantify the value of Corporation‟s properties without titles.

. Director’s Remuneration The UBC Act provides for directors remuneration and allowances to be determined by the line Minister. During the year under review, the line Minister did not approve any rates for director‟s remuneration. Consequently I am unable to confirm the validity of payments relating to directors remuneration during the year.

3.2.9 DAIRY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (31ST DECEMBER 2005) Qualified Opinion There were three difference types of reports issued for each of the years 2005, 2006 and 2007. The issues raised were however, the same as in all the reports as detailed below:

. Non Disclosure of uncollected Rent and electricity bills The Authority leased its Dairy plant at Entebbe to a local firm in 2003.However by the time of termination of the contract in 2004, the local firm had defaulted on rental dues totaling Ushs.54,000,000 and had accumulated electricity bills of Shs.16,229,284. Although management is pursuing the recovery of this debt at the time of audit, the uncollected rent income is not disclosed in the Authority‟s books of account.

44

Property, plant and equipment The Authority‟s assets were last valued in 1996 and, besides, most of the properties do not have land titles.

 IAS 16 requires that items of property, plant and equipment which are carried at revalued amounts be revalued with sufficient regularity to ensure that the carrying amount does not differ materially from that which would be determined using fair value at the balance sheet date. The Authority has not carried out any subsequent revaluation of the assets.

 IAS 16 also requires the subsequent increase in the revaluation to be carried under equity as revaluation surplus; this has not been done in the financial statements.

Due to the above limitations I am therefore unable to confirm the accuracy, completeness and valuation of property, plant and equipment shown in the balance sheet.

Government grants The authority received grants relating to assets. IAS 20 requires that asset related grants including non-monetary grants at fair value should be presented in the balance sheet either by setting up the grant as deferred income or by deducting the grant in arriving at the carrying amount of the asset. The authority has not appropriately disclosed government grants in accordance with IAS

3.2.10 DAIRY DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY (ENDED 31ST DECEMBER 2008) Qualified Opinion Non Disclosure of uncollected Rent and electricity bills Property, plant and equipment The above two issues are the same as in 3.2.9 Nugatory Expenditure The Authority paid URA a penalty of Ushs.83,445,373 as a 2% interest charge per month for delaying to remit PAYE deductions totaling 105,627,054 on time. Although management stated that this resulted from inadequate funding to the authority, this payment did not derive any extra value to the Authority and is deemed nugatory expenditure.

45

3.2.11 UGANDA WILDLIFE AUTHORITY (30TH JUNE 2009) Qualified Opinion Non Compliance with IAS 12 Income Taxes The financial statements do not comply with the requirements of IAS 12 on „Income Taxes‟ as no income tax and deferred tax have been provided for. Management has not quantified the effect of this non-compliance on the operating results of the authority.

Concessions Income There was an inadequate system of control of recording concessions income-franchise fees on which we could rely on for the purpose of the audit. We were therefore unable to verify the completeness of concessions income-franchise fees as stated in the financial statements amounting to Shs.936.4 million. There were no satisfactory alternative audit procedures that could be adopted to confirm that concessions income-franchise fees are fairly stated.

3.2.12 UGANDA PROPERTY HOLDINGS LIMITED (30TH JUNE 2008) Qualified Opinion Recoverability of receivables from an Apparel Company Included in the financial statements is an amount of Shs 4,741,740,000 relating to unpaid rent from Apparel Tri Star Ltd. It was noted that Uganda Property Holdings has not signed a tenancy agreement with Apparel Tri Star at inception in January 2003. Furthermore a new company LAP Textiles ltd took over the Assets and liabilities of Apparel Tri-Star limited. There is therefore uncertainty surrounding the recoverability of this debt.

Valuation of Property, Plant and Equipment Some of the Uganda Property Holdings properties in Uganda were last revalued in 2005 at the time of transfer. IAS 16 requires that when items of Property, Plant and Equipment are revalued, the entire class of Property, Plant and Equipment to which the Asset belongs should be Valued.

IAS 16 also states that items of Property, Plant and Equipment carried at revalued amount be revalued with sufficient regularity to ensure that the carrying amount does

46

not defer materially from that which would be determined as the fair value at the Balance sheet date. Due to the above limitations, the accuracy, completeness and valuation of Property, Plant and Equipment shown in the Balance sheet cannot be confirmed.

3.2.13 MANAGEMENT TRAINING AND ADVISORY CENTRE (31ST DECEMBER 2008) Qualified Opinion Title to Properties The Centre has not yet secured title deeds to four properties at Plots M290 and M255 Industrial Area and Plots 175 – 183 and PM 119 . Consequently, I am unable to confirm the Centre‟s ownership of these properties.

Land and Buildings The value of the Centre‟s Land and Buildings is reflected as Shs.3,114.865,634 in the financial statements against which depreciation of shs 49,397,933 has been provided. IAS 16 requires land and buildings to be dealt with separately for accounting purposes even when they were acquired together. Management has not yet been able to identify separately the cost of land and buildings. It was therefore not possible for audit to determine the actual value of the Company‟s land and buildings separately and to confirm the depreciation charged.

Revaluation of Property Plant and Equipment IAS 16 requires property plant and equipment carried at revalued amounts to be revalued with sufficient regularity to ensure that the carrying amounts do not differ materially from that which would be determined using fair values at the balance sheet date. The centre has not carried out any subsequent revaluation of the assets. Consequently the centre‟s assets may not be fairly stated.

3.2.14 UGANDA SEEDS LTD (30TH JUNE 2004)

Qualified Opinion

Attendance at the Stock take The counting of physical inventories as of June 2004 was not observed by audit. There were no other alternative procedures that could have been carried out to verify the physical existence of inventories amounting to Shs 296,788,326. In this circumstance 47

a material uncertainty exists over the existence, accuracy and completeness of inventory balances in the financial statements.

Trade receivables Indicated under note 2(g) in the financial statements are trade receivables of Shs179,704,680. These include shs160,871,000 of trade receivables which have been outstanding for over two years. The recoverability of these debts appears doubtful; and in the absence of a specific provision for bad and doubtful debts, the receivables are not fairly stated.

3.2.15 UGANDA SEEDS LTD (30TH JUNE 2005) Qualified Opinion Attendance at the Stock take The counting of physical inventories as of June 2005 was not observed by audit. There were no other alternative procedures that could have been carried out to verify the physical existence of inventories amounting to shs 218,459,171. In this circumstance a material uncertainty exists over the existence, accuracy and completeness of inventory balances in the financial statements.

Trade receivables Indicated under note 2(h) in the financial statements are trade receivables of shs164,471,000. These include shs160,871,000 of trade receivables which have been outstanding for over two years. The recoverability of these debts appears doubtful; and in the absence of a specific provision for bad and doubtful debts, the receivables are not fairly stated.

48

3.2.16 UGANDA SEEDS LTD (30TH JUNE 2006) Qualified Opinion Valuation of property plant and equipment: Land and Buildings The net book value of the company‟s property plant and equipment is indicated as shs5,048,131,665 in the financial statements, this figure includes land and buildings of shs3,065,000,000. Under IAS 16 land and buildings are separable assets and are dealt with separately for accounting purposes even if they are acquired together. The Company is therefore not able to effectively: Identify separately the cost of land and buildings. Allocate the depreciable amount of buildings. Due to the above limitations, it was therefore not possible to confirm the accuracy and valuation of the property, plant and equipment shown in the balance sheet.

Impairment of Buildings The company‟s buildings at Kisindi Farm are dilapidated and require major repairs. Due to the unavailability of cost /valuation relating to these buildings, it was not possible to determine the impairment loss of the company‟s assets as required under IAS 36 in order to reduce the carrying amount of buildings to the recoverable amount and recognize the impairment loss in the financial statements.

Concession Income Uganda Seeds Limited (USL) entered into a leasing agreement with M/s Nyakatonzi Cooperative Union Limited on 24th November 2005 for a 30 year lease of USL assets. The lessee was to pay USD$150,000 as lease fee in respect of lease and concession of the assets. In addition an annual concession fee amounting to 1% of the annual gross sales generated from use of the leased assets was to be paid to USL. It was noted that the Union has since defaulted on her obligation of remitting concession fees and to date, no amount has been paid to USL. There was an inadequate system of control of recording concessions income fees on which could be relied on for the purpose of the audit. It was therefore not possible to verify the completeness of concessions income fees as stated in the financial statements.

49

3.2.17 UGANDA PROPERTY HOLDINGS LIMITED (30TH JUNE 2009) Qualified Opinion Land and Buildings The value of the Company‟s Land and Buildings is reflected together at a net book value of Shs.64,406,292,451 in the financial statements contrary to IAS 16 which requires land and buildings are dealt with separately for accounting purposes even when they were acquired together. It was noted that management has not yet been able to identify separately the cost of land and buildings. It was therefore not possible for audit to confirm the actual value of the Company‟s land and buildings separately for purposes of determining the depreciation charged. As a result the value of land and buildings and the depreciation charged may not be fairly stated.

3.2.18 UGANDA SEEDS LTD (30TH JUNE 2007) Qualified Opinion Valuation of property plant and equipment; Land and Buildings The net book value of the company‟s property plant and equipment is indicated as shs4,782,640,867 in the financial statements, this figure includes land and buildings of shs3,065,000,000. Under IAS 16, land and buildings are separable assets and are dealt with separately for accounting purposes even if they are acquired together. The Company is therefore not able to effectively: o Identify separately the cost of land and buildings. o Allocate the depreciable amount of buildings Due to the above limitations, it was therefore not possible to confirm the accuracy and valuation of the property, plant and equipment shown in the balance sheet.

Impairment of Buildings The company‟s buildings at Kisindi Farm are dilapidated and require major repairs. Due to the unavailability of cost /valuation relating to these buildings, it was not possible to determine the impairment loss of the company‟s assets as required under IAS 36 in order to reduce the carrying amount of buildings to the recoverable amount and recognize the impairment loss in the financial statements.

Concession Income Uganda Seeds Limited (USL) entered into a leasing agreement with M/s Nyakatonzi Cooperative Union Limited on 24th November 2005 for a 30 year lease of USL assets. 50

The lessee was to pay USD$150,000 as lease fee in respect of lease and concession of the assets. In addition an annual concession fee amounting to 1% of the annual gross sales generated from use of the leased assets was to be paid to USL. It was noted that the Union has since defaulted on her obligation of remitting concession fees and to date, no amount has been paid to USL. There was an inadequate system of control of recording concessions income fees on which could be relied on for the purpose of the audit. It was therefore not possible to verify the completeness of concessions income fees as stated in the financial statements.

3.2.19 UGANDA SEEDS LTD (30TH JUNE 2008) Qualified Opinion Valuation of property plant and equipment: Land and Buildings The net book value of the company‟s property plant and equipment is indicated as shs4,553,856,279 in the financial statements, this figure includes land and buildings of shs3,065,000,000. Under IAS 16, land and buildings are separable assets and are dealt with separately for accounting purposes even if they are acquired together. The Company is therefore not able to effectively:

Identify separately the cost of land and buildings. Allocate the depreciable amount of buildings

Due to the above limitations, it was therefore not possible to confirm the accuracy and valuation of the property ,plant and equipment shown in the balance sheet.

Impairment of Buildings Concession Income The above two issues are the same as in 3.2.18.

3.2.20 UGANDA BROADCASTING CORPORATION (30TH JUNE 2007) Qualified Opinion Vesting Assets from merged departments Following the merger of the departments of Radio Uganda and Uganda Television to form Uganda Broadcasting Corporation, an instrument vesting property, assets and liabilities of these departments to the Corporation was issued in May 2006. However, values in respect of these properties were not attached to the instrument and included 51

in the financial statements. In light of the above, a material uncertainty exists over the accuracy and completeness of the Corporations Property plant and equipment

Title to Properties The Corporation has not secured title to all its Land, except for Land at Kibira road, Broadcasting house and Naguru hill included under its properties. Consequently I am unable to confirm the ownership and accuracy of the value of these properties without titles.

Gratuity Included in the creditors schedule is Shs.230, 675,000 in respect to gratuity. This benefit to staff is not provided for by the Human Resource Manual of the Corporation.

3.2.21 UGANDA EXPORT PROMOTION BOARD (31ST DECEMBER 2006.) Qualified Opinion Statutory Deductions The Board did not remit Income taxes in respect of PAYE amounting to shs 324,197,838 during the year to Uganda Revenue Authority. Non Compliance with laws and regulations is an offence which may result in fines, penalties and litigation.

3.2.22 UGANDA BROADCASTING CORPORATION (30TH JUNE 2008) Qualified Opinion Vesting amounts from merged departments

Title to Properties The above two issues are the same as in 3.2.20

Gratuity Included in the creditors schedule is Shs.550,924,235 in respect to gratuity which is not provided for in the Human Resource Manual.

Non Compliance with laws and regulations The Corporation did not remit taxes in respect of PAYE of shs742,397,537 and VAT of shs 755,265,098 during the year to Uganda Revenue Authority, In addition

52

shs304,209,915 in respect of Social Security Fund contributions was not remitted to NSSF. Non compliance with laws and regulations is an offence which may result in penalties and litigation.

Trade debtors and other receivables As indicated in note 12 to the financial statements, the Corporations debtors increased from shs559,913,919 to shs 1,766,625,528 during the year. Over 75% of these debtors have been outstanding for more than 4 months. In the absence of a provision for bad and doubtful debts , I am unable to confirm that all the debtors and other receivables are fairly stated in the financial statements.

3.2.23 LAW DEVELOPMENT CENTRE (18 MONTHS ENDING 30TH JUNE 2005) Qualified Opinion Fixed Assets Register The Centre maintains a fixed assets register which has not been updated for a long time. As .a result the net book value of property, plant and equipment as indicated in the fixed assets register did not agree to that as reported in the balance sheet. Due to the above limitations, it was not possible to confirm the accuracy, existence, completeness and validity of property plant and equipment reflected in the financial statement. The Centre is therefore not able to effectively; o Allocate depreciable amounts of this property, plant and equipment over their useful life as required under IAS 16. o Facilitate the fair presentation of fixed assets in the Centre‟s financial statements.

Land and Buildings The net book value of the Centre‟s Land and Buildings is indicated as shs.474,295,995 in the financial statements. Under IAS 16, land and buildings are separable assets and are dealt with separately for accounting purposes even when they are acquired together. It was noted that management has not been able to identify separately the cost of land and buildings. It was, therefore, not possible to confirm the actual value of the Centre‟s land and buildings separately.

53

Valuation of fixed assets Although the Centre valued its land and building, the revalued amounts were not reflected in the financial statements. Motor vehicles, furniture fittings and other assets were not revalued.

o IAS16 requires that items of property, plant and equipment which are carried at revalued amount be revalued with sufficient regularity to ensure that the carrying amount does not differ materially from that which would be determined using fair value at the balance sheet date. The Centre has not carried out any subsequent revaluation of the revalued assets. This constitutes non-compliance with the revaluation requirements of IAS 16. o IAS 16 also requires the subsequent increase in revaluation to be carried under equity under Revaluation surplus, this was not done in the financial statements.

Due to the above limitations I am unable to confirm the accuracy, completeness and Valuation of the property, plant and equipment shown in the balance sheet.

Title to Properties The Centre does not have title deeds to plots 1,34,69,508,509,510,614 and 615 included under its properties. Consequently I am unable to confirm the Centre‟s ownership to these properties, and due to lack of a comprehensive fixed assets register I am further unable to quantify the value of these properties without titles.

Encroachment on Land The Centre has properties on plot 339 and 169 on blocks 9 and plot 69 Block 1 and on Block 11882 in . However, it was noted that these properties have been encroached upon with permanent structures built on them. The Centre has not taken action to remove the encroachers. Due to this limitation I am unable to confirm the value and ownership to these properties.

3.2.24 NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR CHILDREN (30TH JUNE 2005) Qualified Opinion Nugatory Expenditure The council was sued by a staff for wrongful dismissal and awarded Ushs 12,146,580 in a case in which the council did not defend.

54

It was further noted that the same officer while still serving the council was paid Ushs 4,100,000 for consultancy work, in addition to his salary.

3.2.25 NATIONAL CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT CENTRE ( 31ST DECEMBER 2006) Qualified Opinion Depreciation Policy The Centre depreciates its assets using a straight line method and applies a fixed rate of depreciation on the cost of each asset category. However, depreciation was not charged to motor vehicles as required by the centre‟s depreciation policy. In addition there was no depreciation charged to library books valued at shs 8,806,906 contrary to IAS 16 which requires depreciable amounts of an asset to be allocated on a systematic basis over its useful life. As a result, the net book value of Fixed Assets of shs 558,927,859 in the financial statements may not be fairly stated.

3.3 QUALIFIED OPINIONS WITH EMPHASIS OF MATTER

3.3.1 NATIONAL YOUTH COUNCIL (30TH JUNE 2005) Qualified with Emphasis of matter Procurement Procedures Contrary to the PPDA Act, the Council did not have a contracts committee during the period under review. Procurements were made in an adhoc manner in disregard to the provisions of the PPDA Act. Furthermore, stationary and tyres procured at a total cost of Shs.19,971,600 were not recorded in the council‟s books. Therefore, I could not confirm that the actual deliveries were made and that the amount spent on procurement of these goods was put to good use.

Unauthorized Borrowing of Funds Contrary to Section 18 of the National Youth Council Act (Cap 319), the council borrowed Shs.6,380,000 at a rate of interest of 17% per month without the approval of the Minister. In this respect I could not confirm that the loan was legally obtained and put to the proper use.

55

Internal Control As mentioned in my previous report, the internal control structure of the council remained weak. There was lack of segregation of duties as demonstrated by a single individual performing the tasks of initiating payments, preparing vouchers, drawing and paying out cash as well as writing up the prime books of entry of the council.

3.3.2 COTTON DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION (31ST OCTOBER 2008) Qualified with Emphasis of matter Titles to Seed Dressing Stations The Organization has seed dressing properties (seed stores, seed dressing halls and delinters) at Kasese, Ngetta, Nakivumbi and Kachumbala worth Ushs2.051billion for which it has not secured Land titles for over four years. The security of these investments is therefore not guaranteed.

Loan from UGCEA Attention is drawn to outstanding amounts due to Uganda Ginners and Exporters Association (UGCEA) of Shs7.8 billion stated in note 7 to the financial statements. The Organization raised a loan from Uganda Ginners & Exporters Association UGCEA in 2003 to finance cotton seed activities which were implemented under the Strategic Intervention Program (SIP) which is still outstanding. In the event that UGCEA recalls the loan, the organization may not have sufficient resources to meet the payment.

3.3.3 UGANDA AIR CARGO CORPORATION (30THJUNE1998) Qualified with Emphasis of matter Ten separate audit reports were issued for the ten years 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007. The issues therein were however the same as detailed below;

Valuation of Property Plant and Equipment The Corporation has an Aircraft, a Hercules Model L100-30 reflected at a cost of Shs.8,382,954,749 in the financial statements. There has been no revaluation to this aircraft for a long time. Consequently the carrying value of the Aircraft may differ materially from its fair value at the balance sheet date.

56

Depreciation policy on aircraft It was noted that the Aircraft was depreciated using the reducing balance method at a uniform rate of 5% contrary to IAS16 which requires depreciation of Aircrafts to be done on specific parts at different rates and not generally because of the different lifespan of these parts and components. As a result, the value of the aircraft may not be fairly stated in the financial statements

Repair of the Air Craft The Corporation‟s Aircraft Hercules C130 was impounded in Congo in 1995 and later got involved in an accident in Cairo, Egypt in the same year. The repair bill estimated at US$10.5m was financed by the Privatization Unit under the Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development. In the event the Privatization Unit recalls this loan, the Corporation may not have sufficient resources to meet the payment.

3.3.4 UGANDA AIR CARGO CORPORATION (30THJUNE1999) Qualified with Emphasis of matter

Contingent liability $10.5m (this affected the years 1999 to 2004 only) The Corporation‟s Aircraft Hercules C130 was impounded in Congo in 1995 and later got involved in an accident in Cairo, Egypt in the same year. The repair bill estimated at US$10.5m was financed by the Privatization Unit under the Ministry of Finance, Planning and Economic Development. In the event the Privatization Unit recalls this loan, the Corporation may not have sufficient resources to meet the payment.

3.3.5 UGMA ENGINEERING CORPORATION LIMITED (31ST DECEMBER 2008) Qualified with Emphasis of matter Government of Uganda Loans As disclosed in note 15 to the financial statements, the company has term loans from the Government of Uganda amounting to Ushs.24.8 billion (2007: Ushs.24.3 billion) for which no independent confirmation has been received. No formal agreements exist in respect of Ushs.18.267 billion (2007: Ushs17.982 billion). I was not able to satisfy myself as to the completeness and accuracy of the balance due to Government of Uganda. In addition, I was unable to satisfy myself with the completeness and accuracy of the interest charge for the year ended 31 December 2008 and prior years.

57

Losses The Company incurred a net loss of Ushs3.631 billion during the year ended 31 December 2008 (2007: Ushs.41,293 billion). These conditions along with other matters as set forth in the note 2 to the financial statements indicate the existence of a material uncertainty which cast significant doubt on the company‟s ability to continue as going concern.

3.3.6 CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY (30TH JUNE 2008) Qualified with Emphasis of matter Receivables At the end of the financial year, the carrying value of receivables stood at Ushs.62,494,262,000; I am unable to confirm whether the balance reflected as receivables in the financial statements is fairly stated due to incomplete reconciliation of receivables. The amount of trade receivables in the financial statements is Ushs.91, 521,818,102 before deduction of provisions for doubtful debtors. The gross amount of debtors includes government debtors of Ushs.63, 176,773,099. The amount of government debtors balances verified is only Ushs.62, 100,094,483, leaving an un reconciled difference of Ushs.1,076,678,616. Inventory As a result of incomplete reconciliation of the value of closing physical inventory to the balance of inventory in the general ledger, it was not possible to confirm whether the amount attributable to inventory in the balance sheet is fairly stated. While the closing physical inventory as at 30th June 2008 was valued at Ushs.1,206,029,518 ,the general ledger balance was stated at Ushs.1.105,927,521 and this was the value adopted in the balance sheet. Payables It was also not possible to confirm the correctness of the carrying amount of Ushs.25, 689,227, 000 stated as the balance of payables in the financial statements due to an adjustment totaling Ushs.180,504,373 in respect of debit balances.

Recoverability of Receivables As stated in note 4 to these financial statements, the carrying value of receivables as at 30th June 2008 increased from Ushs.51,435.065,000 (2006/2007) to Ushs.62,

58

494,262,000 (2007/2008) representing an increase of 21.5%. The major categories of the debt are owed by Government of Uganda. The majority of these debts have been outstanding for over 6 years and their recoverability is not certain.

3.3.7 NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR CHILDREN (30TH JUNE 2008) Qualified with Emphasis of matter Encroachment on land. The council acquired Land and a building from the at Mukabya road, Nakawa in 2004. However, this property which is not secured has been encroached upon by a Motor repair Garage. The Council has not taken any steps to evict the encroachers. Furthermore the property has not been included in the financial statements. Due to the above limitation I am unable to confirm the ownership to this property and the accuracy, completeness, valuation of property and equipment shown at shs 18,246,118 in the balance sheet.

Governance During the financial year, the term of the council expired and had not been renewed. As a result the Council operated without a governing council resulting in policy decisions being initiated, approved and implemented by management.

3.3.8 NATIONAL ENTERPRISE CORPORATION (30TH JUNE 2006)

Qualified with Emphasis of matter Two accounts were certified for the years 2006 and 2007. And they had similar issues as raised below: Valuation of property and plant at plot 38-40 Kibira road Bugolobi Although the Corporation carried out a valuation of this property in 1998, a subsequent revaluation was not carried out until 8 years later in 2005 when it was sub-leased to NEC Health World Pharmaceuticals contrary to IAS 16. IAS 16 requires that items of property, plant and equipment which are carried at revalued amounts be revalued with sufficient regularity to ensure that carrying amounts do not differ materially from that which would be determined using fair value at the Balance Sheet date. Due to the above limitation , I am unable to confirm whether the sub-lease was 59

carried at fair value and whether the figure of the leased property in the financial statements is fairly stated.

Trade and Other Debtors There are over 40 debtor accounts with account balances which have remained dormant for over five years in respect of Luwero Industries Subsidiary. The recoverability of these debts appears doubtful. In the absence of a specific provision for bad debts, these debtors are not fairly stated.

Absence of board of directors During the period under review, the National Enterprise Corporation and the subsidiaries namely; NEC Farm, NEC Construction Works and Engineering Ltd and NEC Luwero Industries operated without a Board of Directors. As a result policy decisions were initiated, approved and implemented by management.

3.3.9 UGANDA EXPORT PROMOTION BOARD (31st DECEMBER 2004.) Qualified with Emphasis of matter Two accounts were certified for the years 2004 and 2005. And they had similar issues as raised below: Non Compliance with laws and regulations The Board did not remit Income taxes in respect of PAYE amounting to shs 227,414,357 during the year to Uganda Revenue Authority. Non Compliance with laws and regulations is an offence which may result in fines, penalties and litigation.

Unapproved Budget During the year the Board did not submit estimates of Income and expenditure for approval. Absence of an approved budget contravenes section 13 of the Uganda Export Promotion Board Act (Cap 102). Therefore expenditure incurred stands unauthorized in the accounts.

Absence of Board of Directors During the period under review there was no Board of Directors in place as a result policy decisions were initiated, approved and implemented by management.

60

3.3.10 CIVIL AVIATION AUTHORITY (30TH JUNE 2008) Qualified opinion with emphasis on matter Receivables At the end of the financial year, the carrying value of receivables stood at Ushs.62,494,262,000; I am unable to confirm whether the balance reflected as receivables in the financial statements is fairly stated due to incomplete reconciliation of receivables. The amount of trade receivables in the financial statements is Ushs.91,521,818,102 before deduction of provisions for doubtful debtors. The gross amount of debtors includes government debtors of Ushs.63,176,773,099. The amount of government debtors balances verified is only Ushs.62,100,094,483, leaving an un reconciled difference of Ushs.1,076,678,616. Inventory As a result of incomplete reconciliation of the value of closing physical inventory to the balance of inventory in the general ledger; it was not possible to confirm whether the amount attributable to inventory in the balance sheet is fairly stated. While the closing physical inventory as at 30th June 2008 was valued at Ushs1,206,029,518, the general ledger balance was stated at Ushs1,105,927,521 and this was the value adopted in the balance sheet. Payables It was also not possible to confirm the correctness of the carrying amount of Ushs.25,689,227,000 stated as the balance of payables in the financial statements due to an adjustment totaling Ushs.180,504,373 in respect of debit balances. Recoverability of Receivables As stated in note 4 to these financial statements, the carrying value of receivables as at 30th June 2008 increased from Ushs.51,435,065,000 (2006/2007) to Ushs.62,494,262,000 (2007/2008) representing an increase of 21.5%. The major categories of the debt are owed by Government of Uganda. The majority of these debts have been outstanding for over 6 years and their recoverability is not certain.

61

3.3.11 UGANDA REVENUE AUTHORITY (30TH JUNE 2009) Qualified with Emphasis of matter Outstanding Reconciling Items A review of the bank reconciliation statements revealed outstanding reconciling differences representing bank credits not traceable to the collection cash books (shs.1,800,120,481) and cash book collections not traceable to the bank accounts (Shs.1,938,289,152). These differences have not yet been resolved and have an effect on the reported collections and closing cash balances. VAT Deferment According to the information obtained from the ASYCUDA++ system, customs entries with a BIF value of Shs.152,276,897,266 granted VAT deferment of Shs.27,409,841,508 (being 18% thereof) remained un-validated beyond the thirty days, with some dating as far back as July, 2007. Evidence for extension of this facility was not provided hence rendering the recoverability of the amount uncertain. Outstanding government taxes Information obtained from the ASYCUDA++ system revealed that a total of shs.3,337,763,547 remained outstanding during the year under review, shs.2,356,598,147 representing 66% relates to the prior year. Outstanding Transit Bonds Transit bonds totaling shs.1,431,804,139 at various Customs stations to which they were destined remained outstanding beyond the statutory period. Included were outstanding transit bonds that go beyond July, 2008 (a year ago), a period too long for any consignment to remain in transit. This is a potential revenue loss which requires investigation.

3.4 DISCLAIMER OPINIONS

3.4.1 LAW DEVELOPMENT CENTRE (31ST DECEMBER 2002) Disclaimer Two accounts were certified for the years 2002 and 2003. And they had similar issues as raised below:

62

Fixed Assets Register The Centre maintains a fixed assets register which has not been updated. The net book value of property, plant and equipment as indicated in the fixed assets register did not agree to that as reported in the balance sheet. The Centre is therefore not able to effectively; allocate depreciable amount of this property, plant and equipment over their useful life as required under IAS 16, and facilitate the fair presentation of fixed assets in the Centre‟s financial statements. Due to the above limitations, it was not possible to confirm the accuracy, existence, completeness and validity of property, plant and equipment reflected in the financial statements. Land and Buildings The net book value of the Centre‟s Land and Buildings is indicated as shs.28,568,443 in the financial statements, under IAS 16 land and buildings are separable assets and are dealt with separately for accounting purposes even when they are acquired together. It was noted that management has not been able to identify separately the cost of land and buildings. It was, not possible to confirm the actual value of the Centre‟s land and buildings separately. Valuation of Land, buildings and fixed assets Although the Centre valued its land and building, the revised amounts were not reflected in the financial statements, while Motor vehicles, furniture fittings and other assets were not revalued. IAS16 requires that items of property, plant and equipment which are carried at revalued amount be revalued with sufficient regularity to ensure that the carrying amount does not differ materially from that which would be determined using fair value at the balance sheet date. The Centre has not carried out any subsequent revaluation of the revalued assets. This constitutes non-compliance with the revaluation requirements of IAS 16. IAS 16 also requires the subsequent increase in revaluation to be carried under equity under Revaluation surplus; this was not done in the financial statements. Due to the above limitations I was unable to confirm the accuracy, completeness and Valuation of the property, plant and equipment shown in the balance sheet. Title to Properties The Centre does not have title to plots 1, 34, 69, 508, 509, 510, 614 and 615 included under its properties. Consequently I am unable to confirm the Centre‟s ownership of 63

these properties, and due to lack of a comprehensive fixed assets register, I am further unable to quantify the value of these properties without titles. Encroachment on Land The Centre has properties on plot 339 and 169 on blocks 9 and plot 69 Block 1 and on Block 11882 in Bukoto. However, it was noted that these properties have been encroached upon with permanent structures built on them. The Centre has not taken action to remove the encroachers. Due to this limitation, I am unable to confirm the value and ownership to these properties. Motor Vehicles For values given to motor vehicles shown in the financial statements, we were unable to obtain the documents confirming their purchase and values. Consequently we have been unable to confirm the accuracy, completeness recording and accounting for this property, plant and equipment. Revenue balances There were differences in GOU subventions from the Centre as shown in the statement of income and expenditure of (Shs.1,080,525,886) and (Shs.1,010,004,001) and that verified by audit of (Shs.946,321,335) and (Shs.966,004,001) for the years 2002 and 2003 respectively. Management attributed the differences to salaries for staff and tuition for Bar course for Government sponsored students. However, evidence to this effect was not availed. In this circumstance I was not able to confirm the accuracy and completeness of income reflected in the income statement. Cash and Bank Balances The cash and bank balances of Shs.270,433,302 and Shs.227,060,924 for the years 2002 and 2003 respectively included in the accounts could not be confirmed because bank statements and certificates of bank and cash balances were not availed for audit. There were no alternative audit procedures that could be performed to confirm the cash and bank balances.

64

3.4.2 UGANDA NURSES AND MIDWIVES COUNCIL (30TH JUNE 2004) Disclaimer Fixed Assets Register The Council does not maintain a fixed assets register indicating the break down of property, plant and equipment and details of fixed asset particulars such as, location, condition values, cost and date of purchase. The Council is therefore not able to effectively; . Allocate depreciable amounts of these property, plant and equipment over their useful life as required by IAS 16. . Facilitate fair presentation of fixed assets in the Council‟s financial statements. In the circumstances therefore; it was not possible to confirm the accuracy, existence, completeness and validity of property, plant and equipment of the Council. Title to Property The Council purchased a building in 2005 for shs.207 million which it expensed in the year of purchase. The title to this building was not availed for verification. Consequently it was not possible to confirm the ownership of this property. Non disclosure of Property, Plant and Equipment An inspection of the Council‟s assets to establish existence revealed that the Council has assets such as motor vehicles, computers, furniture and fittings. However, these Assets have not been disclosed at fair values in the financial statements contrary to IAS 16. Financial Statement Balances Management did not keep proper books of account. There are no complete ledgers and the trial balance was not prepared. As a result the accuracy of account balances in the financial statements cannot be confirmed. Cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalent amounts was reflected in the balance sheet, as Shs.419,667,041 while the corresponding notes to the accounts had a figure of Shs.382,110,997; Management was not able to explain the difference of Shs.37,556,044. Furthermore proper cash books were not maintained. There were no alternative procedures that could be conducted to ascertain the accuracy of this figure. Therefore, a material

65

uncertainty over the existence, accuracy and completeness of the Councils cash balances exists.

3.4.3 UGANDA NURSES AND MIDWIVES COUNCIL (30TH JUNE 2005) Disclaimer Fixed Assets Register. Title to Property Non disclosure of Property, Plant and Equipment Financial Statement Balances The above four issues are the same as those raised in 3.4.2 above. Cash and cash equivalents Cash and cash equivalent amounts is reflected in the balance sheet, as Shs.289,133,114 while the corresponding notes to the accounts has a figure of Shs.264,324,115. Management has not been able to explain the difference of Shs.24,808,999. Furthermore proper cash books were not maintained. There were no alternative procedures that could be conducted to ascertain the accuracy of this figure. Therefore, a material uncertainty over the existence, accuracy and completeness of the Councils cash balances exists.

3.4.4 THE HOTEL AND TOURISM TRAINING INSTITUTE (30TH JUNE 2005). Disclaimer Land and Buildings The Value of the Institute‟s Land and Building is indicated as Shs.1,556,547,952 in the financial statements, against which depreciation of Shs.30,730,959 has been charged. Under IAS 16, Land and Building are separate assets and are dealt with separately for accounting purposes even when they are acquired together. It was noted that management has not been able to identify separately the cost of Land and Buildings. It was therefore not possible to confirm the actual value of the Institute‟s Land and Buildings separately. Valuation of Land and Buildings The Institutes acquired Land (register Vol. 496 folio 17) on 1st September 1960 comprising 5,672 acres on which the hotel is located. The Buildings on this Land were 66

revalued by the government valuer in 1996 at Shs.800,000,000 while the Land has never been valued. IAS 16 requires that items of Property, Plant and Equipment which are carried at revalued amount be revalued with sufficient regularity to ensure that the carrying amount does not differ materially from that which would be determined using fair value at the Balance Sheet date. The Institute has not carried out any subsequent revaluation of the revalued assets since 1996. This constitutes non compliance with the revaluation requirements of IAS 16. Due to this limitation I am therefore unable to confirm the accuracy, completeness and valuation of the property, Plant and Equipment shown in the balance sheet. Property Plant and Equipment (PPE) It was noted that The Institute‟s Property, plant and equipment namely, Machinery and Equipment, Motor vehicles, Crockery and Cutlery, Linen and Uniform have been fully depreciated yet these assets are still in use. IAS 16 requires the residual value and useful life of PPE to be reviewed at least at each financial year end and if expectations differ from previous estimates the change be accounted for as a change in accounting estimate in accordance with IAS 8. Management has not carried out a review of the useful life of these assets nor a valuation to ascertain their values and useful life. Due to these limitations I am therefore unable to confirm the accuracy and valuation of Property Plant and Equipment (PPE) stated in the financial statements at Ushs1,337,024,518. Government Grants IAS 20 requires that the nature and extent of the government grants received be appropriately disclosed in the financial statements. The standard also requires that asset related grants including non monetary grants at fair value should be presented in the balance sheet either by setting up the grant as deferred income or by deducting the grant in arriving at the carrying amount of the asset. The Institute received a grant of Shs.350 million at year end ear marked for construction of classroom blocks. This transaction has not been treated in accordance with IAS 20 in the financial statements. Due to this limitation, I cannot confirm the accuracy of grants disclosed in the financial statements. 67

3.4.6 UGANDA RAILWAYS CORPORATION (31st DECEMBER 2007) Disclaimer Comprehensive Fixed Assets Register The Corporation maintains fixed assets registers whose asset values are prepared in- house by the management. The registers were revised and the results incorporated in these financial statements. All asset carrying amounts were corrected except for buildings and as a result I am unable to allocate their depreciable amount over their useful lives. Asset Revaluation The Corporation‟s assets were last revalued in 1988. The revaluation model under IAS 16, property, plant and equipment requires that, items of property, plant and equipment which are carried at the revalued amount, be revalued with sufficient regularity to ensure that the carrying amount does not differ materially from that which would be determined using fair value at the balance sheet date. The Corporation has not carried out any subsequent revaluation of the revalued assets. This constitutes non-compliance with the revaluation requirements of IAS 16. Although a revaluation of some assets was carried out for purposes of the concession in April 2005, the results of the same cannot be relied upon for accounting purposes because of the valuation models adopted. Due to the above limitation, I was unable to establish as to whether the property, plant and equipment in the financial statements are stated at fair value or not. Revaluation Reserve The Directors undertook an in-house valuation of all property, plan and equipment in 1988 to take into account the currency reform of 1987. The results were incorporated in 1989 financial statements as a surplus in the capital revaluation reserve amounting to Shs.168.235 billion (2006: U.Shs.168.237 billion). This balance has been carried forward over the years while the assets in question were being depreciated. This accounting treatment contravenes the provisions of IAS 16, property, plant and equipment. Impairment of Assets The following factor suggests that some of the Corporation‟s assets may be impaired:- Included in plant and equipment are two passenger boats namely MV Barbus and MV Mvule with a value of U.Shs.1.6 billion. Due to the lack of insurance for the boats and

68

the declining marine passenger services, the Corporation suspended these services on Lake Victoria several years ago and the boats are anchored at the Port Bell Pier. Whereas MV Mvule was conceded, MV Barbus is still anchored at Port Bell with no economic benefits flowing to the Corporation from it. Due to the matter relating to the assets stated above, I was unable to determine the impairment loss of the boats as required under IAS 36, Impairment of assets. Investment in Subsidiary The Corporation holds a controlling (98%) stake in Nalukolongo Railway Workshop Limited (NRWL). The Corporation is still accounting for this investment in its books at cost. Pursuant to the concession agreement, NRWL‟s assets were revalued and taken over by the concessionaire and as such the Corporation has no right to cash flows in form of dividends from NRWL. The Corporation has neither consolidated the effect of this investment in its financial statements previously nor has it been derecognized in light of the effects of the concession. In light of the above, the investment in the joint venture has neither been accounted for in accordance with the requirements of IAS 27 Consolidated and Separate financial Statements, IAS 31 Interests in Joint Ventures, nor IAS 39 Financial Instruments; Recognition and Measurement. Valuation and Existence of Inventory The Corporation has inventory held at its Nalukolongo warehouse that was neither used in the Corporation‟s joint venture operations nor included in its books. They include parts for locomotive engines (class 72 and Class 82), which are considered obsolete, as the Corporation is no longer using them. These assets are not recognized in the financial statements of the Corporation. Long-Term Loans The Corporation recorded several long-term loans in its books. These comprise of funds borrowed or mobilized by the Government of Uganda from various multi lateral and bilateral funding agencies for onward lending to the Corporation. I was not provided with copies of the loan agreements with the exception of the Spanish Loan Agreement. Furthermore, I did not obtain confirmation from the Government of Uganda on the balances outstanding for the principal and accrued interest as at 31 December, 2007. I was therefore unable to verify:- . Whether the terms and conditions of the loans had been complied with. 69

. Whether the principal loan balance and the accrued interest was fairly stated. . Whether the long and short term portions of the loans are appropriately disclosed in the financial statements. Uganda Government Contribution As at 31st December, 2007, the Government of Uganda‟s contribution to the Corporation amounted to UShs.39.99 billion. These contributions comprise both of non-monetary/capitalization grants and revenue grant which were used for asset acquisition. These Government grants have not been accounted for in accordance with the requirements of IAS 20 Government grants which states that Government grants related to assets, including non-monetary grants at fair value, shall be presented in the balance sheet either as deferred income or by deducting the grant in arriving at the carrying amount of the asset of which the deferred grant income should be amortized over the useful life of the asset.

3.5 ADVERSE OPINION

3.5.1 POSTA UGANDA LIMITED (30TH JUNE 2007) Balances due to international creditors Included in the creditors and accruals figure of Ushs.13,317,407,000 is a balance of Ushs.1,565,910,000 described as international payables in note 7 to the financial statements. Posta Uganda Limited maintains ledgers for the international creditors combined with international debtors. The ledgers could not be agreed to the balances in the final accounts. Therefore, the existence of these creditors could neither be confirmed nor the movement of the year verified. Debit Balance under creditors Included under creditors is a debit balance for money orders amounting to Ushs.218,162,000. Normally, the balance on this account is supposed to be a credit, representing cash received from customers due to be paid out. There was no schedule available to support this balance; consequently we could not verify the existence of this balance. Prior Year Adjustment During the year, unspecified entries amounting to a net debt of Ushs.3.063 billion were posted on this account leading to a closing debit balance of Ushs. 414,714,000. 70

These entries include a debit amount of Ushs.2 billion for liquid assets which should have been applied to the Profit and Loss Account of the current year. System Generated Entries It was observed that a number of accounts had entries with a description of ‘system generated entries’. explanations for these entries which included an entry to the Prior Adjustment Account which had a material debit entry of Ushs.1.655,000,000 billion were not obtained. Inaccurate Debtors balances and completeness of Debtors’ balances The general ledger does not have a provision for control accounts and subsidiary ledgers. In addition, no reconciliation statements are prepared for debtors. There were some variations between the debtors‟ amounts included in the accounts and the confirmation received from the debtors. The completeness and accuracy of Debtor balances totaling Ushs.621,000,000 due from Other Organizations could not be confirmed. Inaccuracies in computation of Pay as You Earn (PAYE) Posta Uganda Limited does not properly operate the PAYE system. There were various amounts paid to staff for which PAYE was not deducted and remitted to the tax authority. The outstanding PAYE figure included in the financial statements is understated by at least Ushs.93,205,513. Opening balances The previous year balances were qualified by the external auditor. Management has not carried out a comprehensive exercise to reconcile the opening balances. There are material variations between some of the opening balances in the accounts and the financial statements of the previous year. The variations could not be reconciled. Emphasis of matter I further draw attention to note 17 in the financial statements which indicates that the Company incurred a net loss of Shs.1,525,407,000 during the year ended 30th June 2007 and, as of that date, the Company‟s current liabilities exceeded its current assets by Ushs.7,108,331,000. In addition, there is decreasing liquidity at the company resulting in the inability to meet current liabilities as they fall due. These matters indicate the existence of a material uncertain which may cast significant doubt about the Company‟s ability to continue as a going concern.

71

CHAPTER FOUR

4.0 ENERGY SECTOR AUDITS

During the year the directorate undertook a pilot audit under a sector wide approach. The Energy sector was identified for this pilot Audit. The audit entities and projects reviewed using this approach comprised the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development and Energy projects whose report is in volume 2, audits of Statutory Corporations and oil exploration companies. Audits of oil exploration activities were done for licenses issued to Blocks 1, 2,3A, 4B and 5. Reports on Oil exploration activities are available on request.

4.1 STATUTORY CORPORATIONS STATUTORY AUTHORITIES Type of opinion Financial year issued audited 1 Electricity Regulatory Authority Qualified with EOM 30th June 2008

2 Uganda Electricity Transmission Company Ltd Qualified 31st December 2008

3 Uganda Electricity Distribution Company Ltd Unqualified with EOM 31st December 2008

4 Uganda Electricity Generation Company Ltd Qualified with EOM 31st December 2008

5 Rural electrification Agency Unqualified with EOM 30th June 2009

6 Kilembe Mines Ltd Qualified with EOM 30th June 2009

4.1.1 UGANDA ELECTRICTY TRANSMISSION COMPANY LIMITED (31ST December 2008)

Qualified Opinion

. Depreciation of property plant and Equipment Included in Property, plant and equipment are asset additions worth Ushs.32,856,279,827 that were not depreciated during the year due to the Company‟s policy of not depreciating assets in the year of acquisition. The depreciation on these assets would have been Ushs.1,253,927,757. This is in contravention of IAS 16 Property, Plant and Equipment that requires assets to be depreciated from the date they are available for use.

72

. Valuation of Inventory Included in the financial statements is inventory valued at Ushs.6,625,646,000 whose valuation could not be independently tested due to unavailability of purchase invoices or any other supporting documents. Further, despite indications of slow moving/obsolete stock, no provision was made to reduce the realizable value of the company‟s stocks. As a result, the valuation of the company‟s inventories could not be confirmed since no alternative procedures could be performed in this regard.

. Related Party Transactions Included in the amount due to related parties is a balance of Ushs.30,987,371,102 due to UEGCL which dates as far back as 2001. This amount has been long-outstanding and its fair value could not be determined as well as its validity. The valuation and validity of this amount could not be ascertained since no alternative procedures could be performed.

4.1.2 UGANDA ELECTRICTY DISTRIBUTION COMPANY LIMITED (31ST DECEMBER 2008)

Unqualified with Emphasis of Matter

. Current liabilities in excess of current assets Note 2.1 in the financial statements indicates that the Company‟s current liabilities exceeded its current assets by Ushs.31,291 million and its total liabilities exceeded its total assets by Ushs68,489 million as at 31 December 2008 and the Company made a net loss of Ushs42,582 million for the year then ended. These conditions indicate the existence of uncertainty which may cast doubt about the Company‟s ability to continue as a going concern. However the Company is a holding entity with its services fully paid for from the tariff or by other agencies it provides services to.

The loans in the balance sheet were vested to the company form UEB by the Government while it still managed and operated the distribution and supply of electricity. The principal and interest repayments for loans are fully paid from the tariff as part of the lease payments by the concessionaire. The operations of the off-grid stations are subsidized from the tariff. Construction of rural electrification schemes is fully funded by Government of Uganda through the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Development. The Company has also got substantial liquid investments which will 73

continue to generate income in the foreseeable future. These financial statements have therefore been prepared on a going concern basis.

4.1.3 KILEMBE MINES LTD. (30TH JUNE 2009) Qualified with Emphasis of matter

. Sub-Lease Agreement between KML & Tronder Power ltd Kilembe Mines Ltd entered into a sub-lease agreement with Tronder Power Ltd to sublease 7.554 Acres of land for the period of 27 years upon payment of a premium of shs.250m on the date of signing of the Agreement, and an annual rent of shs.1,000,000. The agreement further states that if the rates are not paid as stipulated for more than 6 months, the agreement will be terminated. Contrary to this requirement, Tronder Power Limited had not paid the premium of shs.250m by the time of audit. In addition, the structures valued at shs14,000,000 formerly belonging to KML and taken over by Tronder Limited have not yet been compensated for as per agreement. These amounts have not been reflected in the financial statements of Kilembe Mines Limited. We noted further that Tronder Power Limited has already erected permanent structures on the land.

. Board of Directors’ Responsibilities For six months during the financial year, the company did not have a Board of Directors having been directed by the Minister of Energy and Mineral Development to step aside on 30th December 2008

Lack of a substantive Board deprived the entity of strategic direction. It is not clear how key decisions affecting the company were taken in the absence of the Board of Directors.

. Investment in KCCL shs.17,426,428,620 Kilembe Mines Limited acquired 25% shareholding in Kasese Cobalt Company Ltd in 2001 at shs.17,426,428,620 (ref: note 10 to the accounts). This investment has remained constant since 2001 and no dividend has ever been received by Kilembe Mines Ltd.

74

4.1.4 UGANDA ELECTRICTY GENERATION COMPANY LIMITED (31ST December 2008)

Qualified Opinion

. Government of Uganda Loans As disclosed in note 18 to the financial statements, the Company has long term loans from the Government of Uganda amounting to Shs.102.9 billion (2007: Ushs.96.3 billion) for which no independent confirmation had been received. In addition no formal agreement exists in respect of Government of Uganda-UEB refinancing loan of Shs.33.3 billion (2007: Ushs.31.8billion). Accordingly, it was not possible to establish the completeness and accuracy of the loans due to Government of Uganda.

. Related Party balance Included in note 20 in the financial statements are balances due from related parties as at 31st December 2008 amounting to Shs.31 billion and amounts payable of Shs.1.4 billion. These balances have been outstanding for long periods and there was no independent confirmation from these companies. Besides, management could not confirm their recoverability. Accordingly, it was not possible to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence that these balances are not materially misstated.

. Due to Government of Uganda An amount of Shs.32.8 billion (2007: Shs.32.5) as at 31st December 2008 is due to Government of Uganda and has been outstanding since 2001. This amount was transferred from Uganda Electricity Board (UEB) to UEGCL, who were supposed to collect UEB debtors and use the proceeds to pay the Government. There was no independent confirmation from Government regarding the existence and accuracy of this amount. Accordingly, it was not possible to confirm completeness, existence and accuracy of this balance and to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence that the amount is not materially misstated.

. Impairment of assets The installed capacity of the power complex (Nalubale and Kiira) was 380MW and during the year the average capacity generated was about 170MW. Management attributed the low level generating capacity to low water levels, which resulted to restricted amount of water released to the complex. However Management has not carried out an impairment testing for the assets as required by the company‟s

75

accounting policy No. 2(1) and International Accounting Standards No.36. Accordingly, it was not possible to obtain sufficient appropriate audit evidence that the carrying amount of the assets as at 31st December 2008 was not materially misstated.

4.1.5 ELECTRICITY REGULATORY AUTHORITY (30TH June 2008) Qualified Opinion . Property, Plant and Equipment; Land and Buildings The value of the Authority‟s Land and Building is reflected as shs1,970,000,000 in the financial statements. This value is based on a revaluation done during December 2008, two months after the preparation and submission of the financial statements. This condition did not exist within the reporting period as required by IAS 10, and therefore the revaluation does not affect these financial statements. Further more the Buildings have not depreciated. Due to inappropriate treatment to Land and Buildings in the financial statements, I cannot confirm that the value of land and buildings is fairly stated.

. General Reserves Following a revaluation carried out during December 2008, the Authority has reflected a general reserve of shs687,538,018 in the financial statements. However the revaluation was done after the reporting date and therefore the reserves do not qualify to be an adjusting event as at the balance sheet date.

. Depreciation of Books and Journals During the financial year under review the Authority depreciated it‟s Books and Journals at a rate of 20 % p.a resulting in a charge of shs1,900,194. The depreciation rate has not been approved by the Board.

. Office Equipments and Computers Management still derives economic benefits from Office Equipments and Computers which have been fully depreciated. The Authority has not carried out a revaluation of these assets in accordance with IAS 16 which requires that the residual value and useful life of an asset be reviewed at least each financial year to ensure that expectations in usage and useful life do not differ materially.

76

4.1.6 RURAL ELECTRIFICATION AGENCY (30TH JUNE 2009) Unqualified with Emphasis of matter . Conflict of interest The chair person to the Rural Electrification board is also the Accounting Officer and the Principal signatory to the of Rural Electrification Agency Accounts. This is a conflict of interest and violates the principles of a good corporate governance structure since the board chairman participates in setting the organization‟s policy which (s)he then implements.

. Rural electrification Mini grids. The board sourced and licensed two (2) local firms to run rural electrification Mini- grids at Kalangala and Ngoma. It appears, however, that the Rural electrification model and implementation framework applied did not evaluate their viability. At the time of audit the two operators had abandoned the mini-grids citing failure to make profits due to the high cost of diesel.

. Un-implemented Rural electrification schemes. The Agency has a backlog of 154 unimplemented rural electrification projects including Presidential pledge projects. There is however no prioritization criteria in respect of all these projects.

77

CHAPTER FIVE

5.0 AUDIT OF INVESTMENTS BY GOVERNMENT IN PRIVATE COMPANIES

The audit of investments by Government in private companies under the public private partnership arrangement (PPP) is governed by the following legal frameworks.

5.1 Section18. Audit of public monies in private organizations and bodies. The Auditor General may inquire into, examine, investigate and report, as he or she considers necessary, on the expenditure of public monies disbursed, advanced, or guaranteed to a private organization or body in which government has no controlling interest. In addition the Public Finance and Accountability Act 2003 also requires the Accountant General to submit to the Auditor General details of these investments as follows;

5.2 The third Schedule of the Public Finance and Accountability Act 2003 Accounts to be submitted by the Accountant General states that; The following accounts shall be submitted to the Auditor General and the Minister by the Accountant General- (i) A statement of investments held by the Government at the end of the year showing the original cost and current value; (j) A statement of the net worth of all state enterprises as at the end of the financial year;

During the year the Accountant General was required to avail a list of all beneficiaries/investments in Private companies in which Government made investments but did not have a controlling interest.

78

He submitted the list of beneficiaries listed below:

No. Entity Subscribed Share %of Capital Government Share Holding 1 30,000,000,000 49.2 2 Sugar Corporation of Uganda Ltd. 9,181,500 23.8 3 National Insurance Corporation Ltd. 807,760,000 40 4 Uganda Telecom Ltd. 22,638,001,410 31 5 Kinyara Sugar Works Ltd. 3,000,456,160 49 6 Phoenix Logistics (31/July/2008) 5,097,599,190 49 7 Quality Chemicals Industries Ltd 23/July/2008 10,000,000,000 22 8 Commonwealth Resort 10,000,000,000 25 9 J&M International Hotel 2,000,000 10 Good Africa Coffee (20/June/2008)

Financial statements of the above PPP were not submitted to the Auditor General including a statement of investments held at original cost and current value other than the shareholding position above.

Due to these limitations it was not possible for me to carry out audits in the PPP arrangement.

79

CHAPTER SIX

6.0 SPECIAL AUDITS AND INVESTIGATIONS

This chapter deals with special audits and investigations carried out during the Audit reporting period 1st April, 2009 to 31st March, 2010. Under Section 22 of the National Audit Act (NAA) 2008 the Auditor General may carry out special audits, investigations or any other audit considered necessary by him or her. Special audits and investigations are audits which do not follow normal statutory audit procedures. These are audits that may cover more than one accounting period. During the year under review, the Auditor General conducted five (5) special audits on Statutory Organisations as summarized below; Cotton Development Organization (CDO) National Social Security Fund (NSSF) African Trade Development Fund (ATDF) National Housing and Construction Company Limited (NHCCL) Quality Chemical Industries Limited (QCIL)

The special audits of African Trade Development Fund (ATDF), National Housing and Construction Company Limited (NHCCL) and Quality Chemical Industries Limited (QCIL) are still in progress.

Special audits of Cotton Development Organization (CDO) and National Social Security Fund (NSSF) were completed and the outcomes of these special audits and investigations are analyzed below;

6.1 COTTON DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION (CDO) A special audit exercise was conducted to determine review loans to Cotton Development Organization (CDO) and Uganda Ginners and Cotton Exporters Association (UGCEA) under the Cotton Development Sub sector development credit (CSDP) disbursed by Bank of Uganda. The objective of the audit was to: Ensure CDO and UGCEA have complied with provisions of the Loan Agreement relating to disbursement of funds from Bank of Uganda. Review and assess the liquidity position and financial performance of CDO and UGCEA in order to establish their ability to repay the loan. 80

Ascertain accuracy and completeness of principal amounts lent, outstanding balances, interest payable accruing from CDO and UGCEA and guaranteed by government of Uganda in respect of the disbursed loans. Ascertain actual balances and the status of the revolving account in Standard Chartered Bank relating to UGCEA under the CSDP credit. Obtain and analyze lists of beneficiaries from UGCEA and CDO. Assess the impact of the credit facility on cotton production since 1998 to date.

A summary of loans received by UGCEA and CDO from the Bank of Uganda amounting to Shs.9,865,054,080 is as follows:- Agreements date Beneficiary and Amount Ug. Shs. Equivalent 2nd April 1998 CDO $1,250,000 1,427,500,000 14th July 1998 UGCEA $3,290,050 4,267,554,080 10th June 99 UGCEA 750,000,000 13th Sept 99 UGCEA 3,300,000,000 14th December 99 UGCEA 120,000,000 TOTAL 9,865,054,080

Findings 6.1.1 Compliance with the Loan Agreement It was noted that management of both CDO and UGCEA complied in all material respects with the loan agreement provisions except for the following:

UGCEA UGCEA did not invite Bank of Uganda to witness the procurement, storage, distribution and utilization of the pesticides. After restructuring of the Loan, did not give standing instructions to the Participating bank to transfer into Bank of Uganda Seed Emergency Response Programme Account all funds recovered under advice to Bank of Uganda- Development Finance Department. CDO CDO did not enter into contract with designated ginners for the collection of the loans advanced to farmers in form of seeds.

81

Bank of Uganda BOU did not maintain true and complete records and accounts of the programme and arrange for the preparation of the accounts of the programme and the audit by an independent qualified auditor acceptable to Government annually. 6.1.2 Utilization of the Loan Funds According to the loan agreements between BOU, UGCEA & CDO, the money was meant for purchasing pesticides and spray pumps which were to be distributed to the farmers. These items were periodically purchased both locally and internationally and distributed to farmers in the cotton growing areas. It was observed that the purchases of items started in 1998 and ended in 2001, with the total value of the purchases totaling to $ 8,949,455.5. Audit was generally satisfied with the utilization of the loan except for the case of theft mentioned below.

An analysis of the records availed for audit revealed that out of the above procured items 10,032 units of pesticides and 20 units of spray pumps were stolen. Information received from management was that those pumps were stolen by the entity‟s store‟s assistants who were later dismissed and reported to Police. 6.1.3 Impact The distribution and use of the pesticides plus the spray pumps by the farmers resulted in a general increase in cotton production, farmer‟s income and foreign exchange earnings from the inception of the intervention till 2004/05 and started declining again. See the graphs 1 & 2.below Graph 1

82

Graph 2

Besides the government facilitation in form pesticides, seed dressing and spray pumps, there were other factors which also affected the production and these were:- Un-favorable weather conditions resulting in El-nino which caused rotting of cotton balls thereby affecting the quality and quantity of cotton produced. Poor soils and inadequate extension services. Drought or late rains in some parts of the country. Level of cotton prices during the year prior to the season ie if prices are poor, farmers get discouraged and if good, farmers are encouraged to grow more cotton. 6.1.4 Recovery of Loans CDO received a loan of $1,250,000 under SERP while UGCEA received a combined total amount of Shs.4.170bn and US$3,290,050 for both the pesticide programme and the SERP the following was noted on recovery of these loans.

6.1.5 Non Compliance with Agreements Both CDO and UGCEA were expected to give standing instructions to participating Banks to transfer to the Bank of Uganda SERP and PP accounts all funds recovered. We noted that only UGCEA complied and gave standing instructions to this effect. We were not provided with any evidence by CDO that standing instructions were given. Instead CDO appears to have left the responsibility to UGCEA to recover the money from ginners and to directly repay BOU. 83

CDO management response was that, it reached an understanding with UGCEA management, for the ginners to own and manage the CDO Loan of shs 1,427,500,000 and the accrued interest. This money was even reflected in the UGCEA accounts for the year end 30th June 1999 as a liability.

6.1.6 Repayments Out of this principal sum, a total of Shs.2.84 billion was remitted by UGCEA to BOU by standing order instruction and Shs.500 million by cheque, bringing the total amount remitted to Shs.3,340,609,301, leaving an outstanding balance of Shs.6,524,444,779.

6.1.7 Revolving Fund We noted that on 28th February, 2000, the outstanding loan to UGECEA under CSDP was restructured into a revolving fund to settle outstanding balances due to companies that had supplied pesticide and spray pumps to finance the seed planting activities for 2000/2001 season. The revolving fund was to be recalled after 3 years i.e 6th Feb 2003. Bank of Uganda was to have constant access to the revolving account records at all times.

After the expiry of the revolving fund period, BOU and UGCEA did not issue fresh standing instructions to Standard Chartered Bank to resume transferring all funds recovered .This resulted in the default of the loan repayment.

By the time of this audit, the revolving account (Standard Chartered Collection Account No. 01040-108463 -01) was still operational. However, the last time money was deposited on the account was 18th May 2007 when a cheque totaling Shs22,510,000 was deposited.

6.1.8 Accrued Interest We noted from the review of BOU internal audit quarterly reports that accrued interest due from CDO/UGCEA by September 2004 amounted to Shs.2,596,091,000. By January 2005 when BOU suspended accruing interest, the total amount due had risen to Shs.3,193,377,841.

84

6.1.9 Capacity to Pay During our review of the cash flow statements and Bank statements for CDO and UGCEA for the period between June 1999 and April 2009, it was noted that the liquidity position of the two organizations kept on declining a persistent trend resulting into minimal cash balances. A further review of the bank statements for UGCEA and CDO for the period ending 30th march 2009 and 30th April 2009 respectively revealed the cash position as indicated below.

UGCEA Account no Bank Type of Account Amount Ugshs 01040108463-01 Standard Chart Bank Collection 841,047 account/revolving 01040108463-00 -do- operation 73,315 01400075426-01 Stanbic Bank operation 212,866,971 Total 213,781,333

CDO Account no Bank Type of Amount Ugshs Account 01L2540582900 Dfcu K‟la operation 881,306,463 210211076-1 BOU 1,007,922,899 02L2540582900 Dfcu K‟la Capital account 66,117,108 01400904349-01 StanbicBank Lira operation 110,112,245 01400842616-01 Masindi -do- 21,402,350 01400444110-01 Mbale -do- 220,409,178 01400369124-01 Iganga -do- 164,234,783 Total 2,564,885,624 Less Outstanding 3,425,236,542 commitments

We noted that the current liquidity position of both CDO and UGCEA is poor. The total indebtedness of CDO at the time of audit was Shs7.78billion, of which Shs.4.75 billion was

85

borrowed from the revolving fund and Shs 3.02 billion from the Government Cotton Price Subsidy given to the Ginners. The total indebtedness at the time of audit stood at Shs.7.78billion, of which Shs.4.75 billion was borrowed from the revolving fund and Shs.3.02 billion from the Government Cotton Price Subsidy given to the Ginners. Details are as shown below.

A CDO Borrowing from UGCEA Recoveries Period Amount borrowed(Shs) Amount repaid(Shs) Outstanding bal(Shs) 02/03 1,700,000,000 Nil 1,700,000,000 03/04 2,500,000,000 Nil 4,200,000,000 04/05 550,000,000 Nil 4,750,000,000

B (Borrowings from the Government Cotton Price Subsidy to Ginners) 04/05 4,007,001,170 Nil 4,007,001,170 05/06 Nil 978,855,822 3,028,145,348

CDO is 95% funded by Government and lack of Government‟s intervention raises going concern issues. The CDO‟s inability to pay the UGCEA loans has been a subject of previous audit reports.

6.1.10 Conclusion Cotton Development Organization and Uganda Ginners and Cotton Associations may not be in a position to repay the loans. Non compliance with some provisions of the agreements affected the performance of the loans. Out of the Principal total amount of Shs.9,865,054,080 in loans to UGCEA and CDO, Shs.3,340,609,301 was remitted to BOU leaving a balance of Shs.6,524,444,779. Loan advances from the revolving fund totaling Shs.4,75b to CDO remain unpaid. The balance due from UGECEA is Shs.4,967,822,620 in respect of Principal amount (Shs.1,774,444,779) and accrued interest (Shs.3,193,377,841) to February 20

86

6.2 NATIONAL SOCIAL SECURITY FUND (NSSF) This summary provides a brief synopsis of the forensic investigation of NSSF and the key findings. The full report which had earlier been submitted to Parliament forms an integral part of this report. A copy of the report is available on the website. 6.2.1 Procurement findings The Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act came into force on 21 February 2003 provides that it shall apply to all procurement using public funds. It was noted that NSSF did not adhere to various rules and regulations of the Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets Act (PPDA) Act during procurement of the following: • IMIS. • Motor vehicle lease. • Legal service procurement. • Private investigation services. 6.2.1.1 IMIS The procurement process for the support component of the NSSF IMIS project was reviewed. It was noted that the support component was divided into three phases; the first to conduct a diagnostic study, the second to rectify IMIS and the third to provide future technical support on an annual basis. . It was noted that there was no procurement requisition (PP Form 20) for phase 1 from the user department–ISD. . It was noted further that the bid notice period was 12 days instead of the minimum 22 days required by the PPDA Act and Regulations. . NSSF wrote to the PPDA Authority for a waiver of the notice period vide a letter dated 10 April that was received by the Authority the following day, which was the day the bids were opened. . NSSF did not receive a response to their letter requesting for a waiver. . The bid for phase 1 was awarded to CIAL at a bid price of USD 430,000 on 11 April 2007. . It was noted that a written response prepared by the user department-ISD to the MD- NSSF concerning CIAL‟s report on phase 1. ISD stated among others, that the CIAL report contained many inaccuracies, that the technical team was changed after the contract award, that for future work the technical staff of CIAL are largely based

87

abroad, and suggested a phased approach in fixing IMIS and that the bidding process be open. . It was noted that there was no advertisement for the second phase or any open bidding process and that the contract was awarded to CIAL at USD 4.9 million on 28 August 2007. The PPDA also detected this breach during its compliance check and stated that “it was irregular for NSSF to have contracted the same firm (CIAL) to identify problems (diagnostic study) and then award them to fix the IMIS problems since they would have a conflict of interest”. The PPDA letter further states that “The findings of the Authority under the Compliance Check report were communicated to the entity which was requested to respond but the then Accounting Officer (MD-NSSF) did not respond despite several reminders. The queries of the Authority are still outstanding and a formal response is required…” . It was also noted that the contract for phase 2 states that CIAL has completed phase 1 to the satisfaction of NSSF. However, the report by the ISD at the end of phase 1 seemed to suggest otherwise. . It was noted that on 30 November 2007, three months after the award of phase 2, the Contracts Committee approved a variation to the contract price from USD 4.9 million to USD 5,472,845. . On 18 March 2009, NSSF applied for a waiver from PPDA for USD 900,000 to contract CIAL for maintenance services for one year and additional training under phase 2. On 8 May 2009, the PPDA gave this waiver.

6.2.1.2 Motor vehicle purchase On 5 June 2007, the NSSF Transport Department raised a requisition to procure 67 vehicles under an operating lease. It was noted that the bid notice days were 28 instead of 33 working days as provided in section 145 (1) (b) of the PPDA Act. It was also noted that NSSF changed the contract from operating lease to hire purchase after the contract was awarded, and the agreement included an option for NSSF to purchase the vehicles within six months. The above change could have resulted in a breach of regulation 219(3) (b) which states that “negotiations under competitive procurement method shall not be conducted to materially alter the terms and conditions of contract stated in the solicitation documents”.

88

6.2.1.3 Legal services providers’ files Ten legal files from service providers were examined and it was noted that Sections 79 and 84 of the PPDA Act were not adhered to as none of the service providers‟ submitted proposals to the NSSF. NSSF did not adhere to sections 126 and 142 of the PPDA Regulations which requires the preparation of a shortlist of service providers. It was also noted that the suppliers did not submit all mandatory documentation as required by the PPDA Act and Regulations. 6.2.1.4 Private investigations file NSSF hired the services of a private company on 4 December 2007 to provide investigation services. The company did not send a quotation to NSSF as required by Section 84(3) of the PPDA Act. NSSF did not comply with Section 126 and 142(1) of the PPDA Regulations, since it did not prepare a short-list of available providers of investigation services. We also noted that the supplier‟s file did not contain most of the mandatory documentation as required by the PPDA Act and Regulations.

6.2.2 Payment of salary advances, allowances and loans

6.2.2.1 Managing Director NSSF The MD received housing advances exceeding the limit of his gratuity. Furthermore he was paid gratuity without recovery of housing advances. He received a total of Shs.259.2million in housing advances over 22 months. He received salary advances exceeding his monthly salary on three different occasions; 02 August 2007, 14 April 2008 and 18 September 2008. Paragraph 25.1 of the Loan Policy3 allows for only one salary advance per year. In 2007 and 2008, a total of six salary advances were authorised for the MD. In total, Shs.148.6 million of salary advances was paid to him. As at 31 January,2009, the MD‟s ledger account indicated that he owed the fund Shs 244.2 million. To recover this money from him, NSSF would have to deduct Shs.20.3 million per month for the remaining duration of his contract. This is more than his monthly salary of Shs.18million. 6.2.2.2 Deputy Managing Director NSSF In year 2007, four salary advances were authorised for the DMD. Paragraph 25.1 of the Loan Policy, only allows for one salary advance per year. As at 31 January 2009,the DMD‟s ledger account indicated that he owed the NSSF Shs.111.5 million. To recover this

89

money, the NSSF would have to deduct Shs.9.3 million per month from the DMD‟s monthly salary of Shs.16 million, for the remaining period of his contract. 6.2.2.3 Others Some members of staff received very low net salaries after deduction of advances, which did not comply with paragraph 25.9 of the staff handbook. 6.2.3 Credit card usage by management The MD-NSSF instructed to hold an NSSF investment account as lien for credit cards issued to senior management. It was noted that US$. 37,141.71 and cash advance of Kshs.29,075.50 relating to personal expenses and appearing on MD-NSSF‟s credit card statement were debited to his ledger account at NSSF. At the date of audit, he had not reimbursed NSSF for these charges.

6.2.4 Issues regarding JVs

6.2.4.1 Nsimbe Holdings Limited (NHL) Despite repeated requests for the relevant financial and supporting documentation, these were not provided to us and therefore we were unable to examine all supporting documentation relating to the activities of this JV. However, the following issues were noted. Mugoya Estates Limited (MEL) was selected as a partner in this JV. Other than Mugoya Construction and Engineering Limited Kenya (MCELK), we found no recorded applications being received from other parties. No record at NSSF of any minutes of the MIC was found, or the Board of Directors (BOD) with regard to the consideration of the applications received from other parties other than from MCELK. The first application by MCELK was made on 16 June 2003 on behalf of Mugoya Construction and Engineering Limited Uganda (MCELU). MCELU did not have an Investment Licence, which should have constituted sufficient grounds for disqualification. The second application was made on 21 January 20047 by, the Managing Director of MCELK, personally. A local law firm was appointed to act for NSSF in the underlying transactions. Also, we did not find any appointing documentation formalising the relationship between NSSF and KAA.

90

There was also a case of potential conflict of interest on the part of KAA, as they acted for, not only the sellers of the land in question, but the buyer (NSSF) and the JV Company as well. Messrs. Byokusheka were appointed to undertake valuations on the property. There was no competitive bidding. The surveyors met with the NSSF Investment Manager on 3 March 2004 and discussed the valuation of some pieces of land, including that owned by MEL and on which the project was to be developed. On the same day, the firm were appointed by the MD to undertake the valuations. Evidence of adherence to the required procurement process was not availed. On 18 June 2004 and 6 July 2004, NHL requested NSSF for funding “in order to undertake part of infrastructural development for Nsimbe Estates”. This was authorised by the BOD of NHL in a meeting on 16 June 2004. There was no provision in the Joint Venture Agreement (JVA) for funding of the project by PDL or NSSF. This should have been subjected to an entirely new investment approval/procurement process by NSSF. NSSF held 49% shareholding in NHL and half of the Board Members of NHL were NSSF representatives. As NSSF was an interested party, issues of conflict of interest arose with regard to NSSF/PDL negotiating with NHL for provision of the financing “on terms and conditions to be agreed” as stated in the letter dated 18 June 2004 fromNHL to NSSF. PDL seconded their Project and Development Manager, a local to NHL and offered to pay for their services. The BOD of NSSF belatedly approved the appointment of this firm for a period of 55 months on 20 August 2004 after management had already formalized the appointment. MBW was to receive a 15% advance payment and quarterly payments for the balance.

6.2.4.2 Victoria Property Development Limited (VPDL) Despite repeated requests for the relevant financial and supporting documentation, these were not provided to us and therefore we were unable to examine all supporting documentation relating to the activities of this JV. However, the following issues were noted. 1. The USD 1 million loan advanced by NSSF to VPDL was not authorised by the Minister or by the BOD of NSSF.

91

2. The loan was advanced to VPDL through PDL. However, there was no legal agreement between NSSF and PDL regarding the loan. It appears that the loan was given without due process and it is also unsecured. 3. The MD-NSSF sought to re-classify this loan as an advance payment to VPDL, with consequential loss to NSSF. 4. Management has not acted on the recommendations by Internal Audit for the recovery of these funds. 5. There were numerous instances of potential conflicts of interest involving NSSF staff, management and board members who served in staff, management and boards of other third party entities with which NSSF maintained business relationships. The following are examples of possible conflicts of interest: (i.) Corporation Secretary of NSSF and Company Secretary of PDL. (ii.) Director of NSSF, Chairman of PDL and Chairman of VPDL. (ii.) MD of NSSF, Deputy MD of VPDL, Ag. MD of PDL, BOD Member of VPDL and BOD Member of PDL. (iv.) CIO of NSSF, BOD Member of VPDL and BOD Member of PDL. (v.) BOD Member of NSSF and Chairman of VPDL. (vi.) BOD Member of VPDL and Investment Manager of NSSF. (vii.) BOD Member of NSSF and BOD Member of VPDL. (viii.) CS of VPDL and Investment Manager of NSSF. (ix.) In an Internal Memo dated 10 May 2004, the CFO of NSSF stated that “the CFO of NSSF should directly control the finance functions of VPDL”. (x) Appointment of a Legal Advisor for the Lubowa Project: The Company Secretary of PDL recommended to VPDL the appointment of a lawyer as the Company Secretary of VPDL. Later, this lawyer was appointed by NSSF as the Legal Advisor for the Lubowa Project and received professional fees for the same. Note that the Lubowa Project was being undertaken by VPDL, where this same lawyer was also the Company Secretary. The CS- NSSF and the lawyer were in partnership in the same law firm as at the time of our review.

92

6.2.5 Listed securities 6.2.5.1 Procurement of stockbrokers Section 84(3) of the PPDA Act requires a proposal to be received from, in this case, the stock brokers before their appointment to transact for NSSF. However, procurement documentation for the stockbrokers used by NSSF for the period under review were not provided.

6.2.5.2 British American Tobacco (Uganda) The following in respect of transactions by Crane Financial Services (CFS) on behalf of NSSF were noted: CFS Sales Contract Note No. SC/354/Aug/07 has a price of Ushs 300 per share (value Ushs 705,407,000) which is at variance with the price of Ushs 370 per share on USE trading slips (value 869,722,830). A CFS Statement of Account for the above transactions shows a deduction for CMA charges of Ushs 14,964,888. It is not clear what this relates to. The communication of sale from CFS to NSSF was two months after the sale, implying a similar delay to NSSF receiving the funds.

6.2.5.3 Bank of Baroda (Uganda) The following in respect of transactions by Crane Financial Services on behalf of NSSF were noted: CFS appears to have understated the funds owing to NSSF on Sale Contract Note No. SC/51/Mar/08 by Ushs 519,350,000 by stating a price of Ushs 2,745 per share whereas the price on the USE trading slips was Ushs 2,995 per share. The former Chief Investment Officer of NSSF raised a complaint to the USE. On 1 April 2008, CFS paid NSSF an amount of Ushs 508,963,000. However, this amount is Ushs 10,387,000 less than Ushs 519,350,000.

6.2.5.4 Development Finance Company of Uganda The following in respect of transactions by Crane Financial Services (CFS) on behalf of NSSF were noted: CFS Sale Contract Note No. SC/23/Feb/08 for the sale of 2,389,463 DFCU shares has a price of Ushs 650 per share (value Ushs 1,553,150,950 before commission and 93

statutory charges). This is at variance with USE trading slips which show prices between Ushs 700 with a total value of Ushs 1,664,204,400. CFS Sale Contract Note No. SC/38/Feb/08 for the sale of 3,825,560 DFCU shares has a price of Ushs 675 per share (value Ushs 2,582,253,000 before commission and statutory charges). This is at variance with USE trading slips which show a price of Ushs 665700 with a total value of Ushs 2,677,892,000. After a complaint was raised by the Chief Investment Officer, the USE intervened and imposed a fine on CFS of Ushs 107,264,131.

6.2.5.5 Stanbic Bank (Uganda) The following in respect of transactions by Crane Financial Services (CFS) on behalf of NSSF were noted: • On 29 October 2007, CFS stated that it had purchased 3,185,800 shares whereas USE trading slips show that it had purchased 4,477,500 shares. • On 12 November 2007, CFS stated that it had purchased 1,000,000 shares whereas USE trading slips show that it had purchased 978,000 shares. • On 11 December 2007, CFS stated that it had purchased 2,071,657 shares whereas USE trading slips show that it had purchased 2,076,657 shares. • On 14 December 2007, CFS appears to have over-stated the cost of 20,411,996 shares that it had purchased for NSSF by Ushs 7,885,000. • On 19 February 2008, CFS appears to have over-stated the purchase price of 2,410,000 Stanbic shares with a value of Ushs 12,050,000 as having been purchased at Ushs 240 whilst trading slips showed that the same were purchased at Ushs 235 per share. • On 25 February 2008, CFS stated that it had purchased 633,307 shares whereas USE trading slips show that it had purchased 624,782 shares.

6.2.6 Investments in fixed deposit A letter from NSSF to dated 3 May 2007 States that the signing mandate should be operated by two authorized signatories. It was noted that the CS-NSSF alone signed a letter dated 16 August 2007 authorizing the investment of Ushs.17 billion in foreign currency fixed deposits and the transaction was effected on 17 August 2007.

A general payment voucher for this transaction was not provided during the audit. An internal memo dated 17 August 2007 from the Acting Treasurer to the MD-NSSF 94

requesting authorization for this transaction and another one of Ushs.22.9 billion to be entered into NSSF‟s books was noted. The memo indicated that the transaction of Ushs.22.9 billion occurred on 8 August 2007. An undated journal voucher for the two amounts which was prepared and posted by the Acting Treasurer was availed.

6.2.7 Sale of government bonds before their maturity date NSSF sold several government bonds during the period September 2007 to November 2007. These bonds were sold before their maturity date. The decision to sell the bonds was made by the MD-NSSF and was not deliberated by the MIC. Most of the bonds that were sold to one of the companies were at a price below their discounted present value (computed market worth) at the time. Even though gains were realised from the sale of the bonds, these were below the market worth of the bond – a fact that could have been revealed (by the MIC) through proper analysis of the bond prices.

An evaluation of the prices of the bonds and the prices at which NSSF sold the various bonds revealed a total unfavorable variance of Ushs.5,790,785,765. A further evaluation revealed an unfavorable variance of Ushs.2,757,616,821 between the market prices prevailing at the time of sale and the price at which NSSF sold the bonds.

6.2.8 Purchase of land Generally, NSSF‟s procurement and investment in land was not in accordance with the PPDA Act. Nonetheless it was noted that PP Forms 20 that were used in the process for the purchase of land were dated after NSSF had negotiated with the vendors. Under the procurement act, a PPF 20 is used in the initial stages of the procurement process and acts as a confirmation that money for the procurement envisaged is available from the annual budget.

6.2.8.1 Temangalo In the Temangalo land purchase, the MD-NSSF informed the team that he started the procurement process by requesting for sale offers of land in Wakiso district in January 2008. It was noted that he had already started negotiations in December 2007 with one of the Vendors for the purchase of his and another Vendors land in Wakiso. Thier land had been surveyed and valued by December 2007, about a month before the alleged Request for Proposals (RFP). No documented details of offers received arising from the RFP process were availed for audit.

95

6.2.8.2 Branch offices It was noted that the board approved the development of four branches for the financial year 2007/2008 but NSSF purchased a total of eight branches. There were no valuations for two of the branches - Gulu and . On the Kabale purchase, the Investment Officer negotiated with the vendor for an agreed price of Shs.112,000,000, which was above the valuation returned by the three valuers and then submitted to the Contracts Committee for approval of the two plots in Kabale.

6.2.8.3 Law firm single sourced NSSF pre-qualified several law firms to assist in the purchase of land for the branch offices. However, the procurement process for these firms was not carried out properly. A law firm that was engaged to purchase land for the Hoima Branch Office, was single sourced contrary to the requirements of the PPDA Act.

6.2.8.4 Investment Policy not followed The NSSF Investment Policy was not followed. There were no details relating to the expected returns and the anticipated risk exposures for the land purchases made.

6.2.8.5 Arua Project NSSF paid a local firm of surveyors before a contract was signed. They then continued to pay this firm USD.5,537.24 per month when the contract period expired, though there was no written agreement on the extension of contract or approval from the CC. It was noted that the firm issued two Interim Payment Certificates No.10 and 11 without due consideration of the Valuation Certificates issued by the quantity surveyors and approved by, the project managers.

6.2.8.6 Gayaza and forest land We noted that NSSF‟s BOD had approved the purchase of land for forest development and the purchase of swampy land in Gayaza at values higher than those recommended by the valuers.

6.2.8.7 Lumumba The project at Lumumba started in the year 2000 with the appointment of as project architects. Though there was no contract between the two parties, there were Terms of 96

Reference (TOR) which set out the duties of both parties and amount of payments due. It was noted that Architects did not follow the TOR‟s and sent invoices for work that was either not completed or partially completed. In 2000, the project was initially estimated to cost USD.6,000,000, but this rose to USD.21,991,896 in 2007 and USD.75 million in 2008, after changes to the initial design by MD NSSF.

On 25 May 2008, MD-NSSF, ostensibly on instructions from the Board FIC, directed the architects to revise the approved design to increase the number of floors from four to sixteen and the number of basement parking levels from two to four. On 29 May 2008, he instructed the Project Managers, to begin excavations for the increased number of floors and parking levels. The revised design was approved by the NSSF‟s BOD in June 2008.

CHAPTER SEVEN

97

7.0 STATUS OF BUSINESS OF THE STANDING COMMITTEE ON COMMISSIONS, STATUTORY AUTHORITIES & STATE ENTERPRISES

The Parliamentary oversight Committee on Statutory Authorities and State Enterprises (COSASE) is responsible for reviewing and making recommendations on audit reports and subsequently reporting to Parliament on their resolutions.

During the period the COSASE committee considered and discussed Eighteen (18) reports as follows;

7.1 Reports presented to the House A report on the performance of National Drug Authority was presented to the House covering the financial year 1999 to 2007

7.2 Reports concluded but not yet presented to the House

. Nine (9) reports were discussed which are ready to be presented to the House these are reports on the performance of the following;

Four (4) reports on the performance of, Amber House, Uganda Communications Commission, Uganda Property Holdings and National Forestry Authority were discussed but are yet to be presented to the House as follows.

No Audit Entity Financial years covered 1 Amber House Limited Dec 2004 to Dec 2006 2 Uganda Communications commission 1999/2000 to 2006/2007 3 Uganda Property Holdings Limited 2000/2001 to 2006/2007 4 National Forestry Authority 2003/2004 to 2006/2007

Five (5) reports on the performance of; Uganda Revenue Authority, National Housing and Construction Company Limited, Amnesty Commission, Electricity Regulatory Authority, Cotton Development Organization were discussed and these are under compilation for presentation to the House. No Audit Entity Financial years covered 1 Cotton development Organization 1999/2000 to 2007/2008 2 Amnesty Commission 2000/2001 to 2007/2008 3 Electricity Regulatory Authority 2004/2005 to 2006/2007 4 National Housing and Construction Company Limited 1999/2000 to 2004/2005

98

7.3 Reports still under consideration

Eight (9) reports were under consideration during the period; these are reports on the performance of the following;

No Audit Entity Financial years under consideration. 1 Uganda Electricity Transmission Company 2005/2006 to 2007/2008 2 Uganda Coffee Development Authority 2000/2001 to 2007/2008 3 Uganda Investment Authority 2000/2001 to 2007/2008 4 Uganda National Bureau of Standards 2002/2003 to 2007/2008 5 Uganda Bureau of Statistics 2000/2001 to 2007/2008 6 Civil Aviation Authority 2004/2005 to 2007/2008 7 National Water Sewerage Corporation 2002/2003 to 2007/2008 8 Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets 2003/2004 t0 2007/2008 Authority 9 Posta Uganda 1998/1999 to 2006/2007

99

CHAPTER EIGHT

8.0 DIVESTITURE ACCOUNTS This chapter deals with privatization of public enterprises during the year ended 30th June 2009.

8.1. Status of Divested Enterprises A total of 132 enterprises were divested by government of which 93 were privatized, 11 were concessioned, 5 were repossessed by the former owners and 39 were struck off the register of companies/liquidated, 2 dissolved. 40 other enterprises had been listed for divestiture as at 30th June 2009. Below is a summary of method s of divestiture of these public enterprises covering the period 1992 to 30th June 2009. Method of Divestiture No of divestitures transactions 1 Auction 6 2 Concession 11 3 Debt Equity Swap 2 4 Initial Public Offering 4 5 Joint Venture 2 6 Liquidation / Struck off the Co register. 39 7 Management Buy Out 4 8 Pre-emptive rights 9 9 Repossession 5 10 Sale of Assets 22 11 Share Sale 28 Total 132

100

Pie Chart presentation of Methods of Divestiture transactions

Details of the status of divested enterprises are attached to this report under appendices D,E and F. By the time of this report, a total of 85 divestiture transactions had fetched a cumulative total of shs 432,632,462,206 with 75 of them fully paid for. There were 7 others with a total outstanding balance of shs 18.318 bn while 3 transactions of pre- emptive rights had not yet been exercised. Details of these are attached to this report under appendices G.

8.2 Contingent Liabilities Contingent liabilities from divested enterprises in respect of litigations against government dating as back as 2003 remain unresolved. These post-divesture issues require urgent (Government) intervention to prevent further build up of the burden. Appendix G provides a summary of these litigations and court cases).

8.3 DIVESTITURE AUDIT OF UGANDA ELECTRICITY BOARD (UEB)

8.3.1 Introduction The Uganda Electricity Board (UEB) was classified under Class II of the PERD Statute 1993 as an enterprise in which the State is supposed to retain the majority shareholding and

101

the Electricity Act 1999, provided for the formation of successor companies to assume all responsibilities and obligations duties, objectives and functions including property, rights and liabilities of UEB with the exception of the regulatory functions.

8.3.2 Legal Status Uganda Electricity Board (UEB) was established by the Electricity Ordinance of 1948 which was replaced by the Electricity Ordinance of 1961 and eventually re-enacted by the Electricity Act Chapter 135 of the Laws of Uganda 1964. The Board was established with the main functions relating to generation, transmission, distribution and supply of electricity, inspection and testing of electrical plant and the safe use of electricity, and for purposes incidental to and connected with matters aforesaid.

8.3.3 Ownership UEB was 100% owned by Government of Uganda with a paid up capital of Shs.92, 362,811,000 . 8.3.4 Divestiture Process All the functions of UEB were unbundled for purposes of divestiture, and vested into holding companies responsible for; Generation: forming the Uganda Electricity Generation Company (UEGCL) to own and operate the Kiira and Nalubale hydro-electric power stations to generated and sell electricity to the Transmission Company. Transmission: forming Uganda Electricity Transmission Company (UETCL) to own the electricity transmission infrastructure above 33KV and responsible for buying power in bulk from generators and selling it to distribution companies and for export. Distribution: forming Uganda Electricity Distribution Company (UEDCL) to own and operate the grid connected to supply infrastructure operating at 33KV and below; inherit the responsibility for retail of electricity, metering, billing customers of UEB including all outstanding balances. Electricity Regulatory Authority (ERA) was created to regulate the activities of the successor companies. UEB the parent Company to administer Residual matters pending liquidation on completion.

102

8.3.5 UEB Core Assets A hydropower Dam and a Power station of 180 MW (Owen Fall Power Station) and Extension Kiira Dam 200 MW 1400 Kilometers of Transmission lines 900 kilometers of distribution lines Diesel generation (1-9MW) plus Seven small thermal power stations in remote regions ( Arua, Kapchorwa, Kitgum, Maziba (Kabul), Moroto, Moyo, Nebbi, Rukungiri) Mini-hydro 1MW (Kabale) 150,000 customers Other potential assets; Hydro power sites at Budhagali, Busowoko, Kalagala, Kamdini, Karuma, Ayago North and Ayago South Nyagak Mini-hydro station (4.5MW) 8.3.6 Asset valuation UEB asset values as at 31st December 1995 as per financial statements Land and Buildings 34,994,064,433 Furniture and Fittings 278,893,099 Motor Vehicles 3,084,985,297 Transmission and Distribution 293,739,334,416 Generation 215,196,447,645 Computer and office Equipment 87,383,092 Tools and Equipment 2,049,524,279 Total 549,680,632,261

We were not availed with the evidence of any other asset valuation after 1995.

8.3.7 Unbundling UEB Assets and Liabilities Assets of UEB were unbundled as follows; . Non Core assets (Amber House, Kimaka Estate) . Amber House: Amber House valued at shs 5 billion was transferred to Ministry of Finance by signing a Transfer Share Certificate effective from 15th September 2005.

103

. Kimaka Estate: At its 301st meeting of 22nd August 2003, DRIC noted and approved the estimated revenue of shs 4.53 billion foregone in implementing the Presidential directive of transferring the estate constructed at a loan of US$8,222,185.50 to Ministry of Defence to function as a Military Academy in Jinja. . UEB Houses/Estate: The properties were valued at shs 12,733,650,000 out of which houses worth shs 10,061,950,000 were sold to the sitting tenants and who paid for them using their terminal benefits (either topping up) and others sold to the public amounted to shs 2,671,700,000. . Core Assets: On 30th March 2001, the assets were vested among the holding companies of Uganda Electricity Distribution Company Limited (UEDCL), Uganda Electricity Generation Company Limited (UEGCL) and Uganda Electricity Transmission Company Limited (UETCL). To date the liquidation of UEB is still going on and a report is awaited.

8.3.8 Findings on Divestiture of Uganda Electricity Board Two concessions were accomplished (Distribution and Generation), however, no records are available to assess the values of the “concessioned” assets in both cases and without an independent value attached to the assets, it‟s difficult to determine the basis on which the concession fee was charged by GOU.

However, PU management believes that concession fees which were a result of a bidding process had no relevance to the values of the Assets leased especially when the Concessionaire was required to invest in the power sector.

Contrary to the cabinet decision under minute 401 (CT 2001) which recommended that all real estate properties owned by Government including those to be acquired in the future be vested with Uganda Property Holdings Ltd (UPHL) for proper management, audit noted that the property was instead transferred to the Ministry of Finance.

The available records indicate that Amber House was registered under Amber House Ltd with 100% government share holding and was managed by an agent M/s Bageine and Company Ltd until March 2008 when the company employed its own Estate manager.

104

M/s Bageine agency cost government a cumulative management fee of shs124,487,041 (between 15th September 2005 when the property was transferred to Ministry of Finance and march 2008 when M/s Bageine‟s contracted was terminated). This cost would have been avoided if the Cabinet recommendation was adhered to. iii) UEDCL and UEGCL have concessioned all their main activities for 20 years, leaving the two companies with only the supervisory role of and Eskom respectively.

8.3.5 Conclusion i. Shs 124,487,041 is a nugatory expenditure. ii. The concession fees for both generation and distribution may not have been fair.

105

Appendix 1 List of seventy Six (76) public organizations audited by the Auditor General

1 Allied Health Professionals 2 Amber House Limited 3 Amnesty Commission 4 Bank of Uganda 5 Cable Corporation Ltd 6 Capital Markets Authority 7 Civil Aviation Authority 8 Coordinating Office for Control of Trypanosomiasis in Uganda 9 Cotton Development Organization 10 Crested Crane Hotel & Tourism Training Institute 11 Dairy Development Authority 12 Divestiture & Redundancy Accounts 13 East African Community 14 Institute of Communication & Information Technology 15 Kilembe Mines Ltd 16 Kinyara Sugar Works 17 Lake Victoria Fisheries Organization 18 Law Development Centre 19 Management Training & Advisory Centre 20 Nakivubo War Memorial Stadium 21 Nambole Stadium 22 National Animal Genetic Resources Centre and Data Bank 23 National Council of Sports 24 National Council for Children 25 National Council for Higher Education 26 National Curriculum Development Centre 27 National Drug Authority 28 National Enterprises Corporation & Subsidiaries 29 National Forestry Authority 30 National Housing & Construction Co. Ltd 31 National Medical Stores 32 National Planning Authority 33 National Social Security Fund 34 National Water & Sewerage Corporation 35 National Women‟s Council 36 National Youth Council 37 New Vision Printing and Publishing Corporation 38 Nile Hotel International 39 Post Bank Uganda Limited 40 Posta Uganda 41 Public Libraries Board

106

42 Public Procurement & Disposal of Public Assets 43 Rural Electrification Agency 44 Uganda Air Cargo Corporation 45 Uganda Broadcasting Corporation 46 Uganda Broadcasting Council 47 Uganda Bureau of Statistics 48 Uganda Coffee Development Authority 49 Uganda Communications Commission 50 Uganda Development Bank 51 Uganda Development Corp. 52 Uganda Electricity Board 53 Uganda Electricity Distribution Co. 54 Uganda Electricity Generation Co. 55 Uganda Electricity Regulatory Authority 56 Uganda Electricity Transmission Co. 57 Uganda Export Promotion Board 58 Uganda Insurance Commission 59 Uganda Investment Authority 60 Uganda Livestock Industries 61 Uganda Medical and Dental Practitioners Council 62 Uganda National Bureau of Standards 63 Uganda National Council for Higher Education 64 Uganda National Council of Science & Technology 65 Uganda National Council of Sports 66 Uganda National Cultural Centre 67 Uganda National Examinations Board 68 Uganda Nurses & Midwives Council 69 Uganda Printing & Publishing Corp. 70 Uganda Property Holding Limited 71 Uganda Railways Corp. 72 Uganda Seeds Company Limited 73 Uganda Tourism Board 74 Uganda Wildlife Authority 75 Uganda Women Council 76 UGMA Engineering Corporation Limited

107

Appendix A Summary of operational and financial standing of Public organizations audited during the period 1st April 2009 to 31st March 2010 No Statutory Authority/State Enterprise Surplus/Deficit Accumulated for the year Surplus/Deficit for the year A (i) Public organizations audited for financial years ended 30th June 2009 1 Bank of Uganda (BOU) 2,885,000,000 1,012,129,000,000 2 Capital Markets Authority (CMA) (738,718,000) 1,087,930,000 3 Kilembe Mines Ltd (KML) (5,842,063,772) (26,264,603,508) 4 National Drug Authority (NDA) 2,423,597,822 11,219,059,934 5 National Water and Sewerage Corporation 12,350,645,000 36,696,814,000 (NWSC) 6 National Women‟s Council (NWC) (7,986,870) (1,392,321) 7 New Vision Printing and Publishing Corporation 2,182,847,000 17,885,149 000 8 Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS) (1,462,255,236) 2,881,327,764 9 Uganda Air Cargo Corporation (UACC) 4,893,701,067 (20,631,002,268) 10 Uganda Communication Commission (UCC) 18,270,350,534 38,327,394,491 11 Uganda National Council For Science and (1,888,012,981) 1,042,700,627 Technology (UNCST) 12 Uganda Printing and Publishing Corporation 17,732,000 2,004,043,000) (UPPC) 13 Uganda Property Holdings Ltd (UPHL) 465,885,824 425,135,340 14 Uganda Tourism Board (UTB) 35,631,168 8,032,101 15 Uganda Wildlife Authority (UWA) (1,216,197,000) (10,652,253,000) 16 Uganda Revenue Authority (URA) 8,676,103,233 5,282,539,508 17 Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) (11,291,238,000) (134,031,291,000) Public organizations audited for financial A (ii) years ended 30th June 2008 18 Broadcasting Council (BC) 58,817,461 233,134,384 19 Electricity Regulatory Authority (ERA) 179,702,929 2,603,897,429 20 Lake Victoria Fisheries Organization (LVFO) (US $643,922) US $1,271,842 21 National Council For Children (NCC) (73,052,814) (58,825,601) 22 National Council For Disability (NCD) (9,105,681) 2,268,667 23 National Medical Stores (NMS) 3,019,501,000 9,224,522,000 24 National Planning Authority (NPA) 927,664,734 1,259,548,385 25 National Social Security Fund (NSSF) (50,198,093,000) 7,465,951,000 26 Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets 1,588,646,765 4,830,751,521 Authority (PPDA) 27 Uganda Broadcasting Corporation (UBC) 68,090,923 (1,051,573,209) 28 Uganda Institute of Information and 451,183,721 1,110,701,191 Communications Technology (UICT) 29 Uganda Insurance Commission (UIC) 767,404,936 1,228,009,826 30 Uganda Investment Authority (UIA) (1,239,048,054) 971,726,392 31 Uganda Medical and Dental Practitioners Counci 40,196,477 88,978,420 (UMDPC) 108

32 Uganda National Bureau of Standards (UNBS) (729,812,299) (1,169,961,881) 33 Uganda National Examination Board (UNEB) (251,480,601) (52,159,750) 34 Uganda Post Ltd (83,693,000) (5,538,764,000) 35 Uganda Seeds Ltd (USL) (225,348,303) (3,115,277,306) Public organizations audited for financial A (iii) years ended 30th June 2007 36 Crested Crane Hotel & Tourism Training Institute (146,729,523) (1,112,212,890) (HTTI) 37 National Animal Genetic Resource Centre and (12,032,000) 19,307,000 Data Bank (NAGRIC) 38 National Council of Sports (NCS) 18,424,083 327,332,858 39 National Enterprise Corporation (NEC) (2,822,712,655) (14,460,218,032) Public organizations audited for financial A (iv) years ended 30th June 2005 & 2004 40 Law Development Centre (LDC) 947,084,321 1,508,543,565 41 National Youth Council (NYC) 114,305 (60,657,825) 42 Uganda Nurses and Midwives Council (UNMC) (130,533,927) 289,133,114 43 Uganda Export Promotion Board (UEPB) (219,992,002) (360,714,658) Public organizations audited for financial B years ended 31st October 2008 44 Cotton Development Organization (CDO) 2,116,679,810 761,922,682 Public organizations audited for financial C years ended 30th September 2008 45 Uganda Coffee Development Authority (UCDA) 1,059,701,974 940,131,106 Public organizations audited for financial D years ended 31st December 2008 46 Amber House Ltd (AHL) 822,969,846 3,960,213,059 47 Cable Corporation Ltd (CCL) 388,053,000 (7,491,545,000) 48 Dairy Development Authority (DDA) 801,076,684 669,528,684 49 Management Training & Advisor Centre (MTAC) 159,524,369 (399,215,498) 50 National Housing and Construction Co Ltd 4,720,310,000 28,167,013,000 (NHCCL) 51 Nile Hotel International Ltd (NHI) 841,235,000 145,775,000 52 Post Bank Uganda Ltd 1,048,588,078 3,485,822,139 53 Uganda Development Bank Ltd (UDB) 11,583,878,000 18,054,208,000 54 Uganda Development Corporation (UDC) (122,276,000) (1,285,595,000) 55 Uganda Electricity Distribution Co Ltd (UEDCL) (42,582,952,000) (104,070,603,000) 56 Uganda Electricity Generation Co Ltd (UEGCL) (25,786,766,000) (65,582,798,000) 57 Uganda Electricity Transmission Co Ltd (UETCL) (57,021,601,000) (25,529,601,000) 58 UGMA Engineering Corporation Ltd (3,631,799,000) (47,587,726,000)

109

Appendix B Summary of operational and financial standing of Public organizations audited during the period 1st April 2009 to 31st March 2010 categorized under Regulatory Authority’s, Government institutions and State Enterprises from appendix A

No Statutory Authority/State Enterprise Surplus/Deficit Accumulated for the year Surplus/Defici t for the year A (i) Public organizations audited during the period 1st April 2009 to 31st March 2010 Government Institutions 1 National Women‟s Council (7,986,870) (1,392,321) 2 Uganda Bureau of Statistics (1,462,255,236) 2,881,327,764 3 Uganda National Council For Science and Technology (1,888,012,981) 1,042,700,627 4 Lake Victoria Fisheries Organisation (US $643,922) US.1,271,842 5 National Council For Children (73,052,814) (58,825,601) 6 National Council For Disability (9,105,681) 2,268,667 7 Uganda Institute of Information and Communications 451,183,721 1,110,701,191 Technology 8 Uganda Medical and Dental Practitioners 40,196,477 88,978,420 9 Crested Crane Hotel & Tourism Training Institute (146,729,523) (1,112,212,890) 10 National Animal Genetic Resource Centre and Data Bank (12,032,000) 19,307,000 11 National Council of Sports 18,424,083 327,332,858 12 Law Development Centre 947,084,321 1,508,543,565 13 National Youth Council 114,305 (60,657,825) 14 Uganda Nurses and Midwives Council (130,533,927) 289,133,114 15 Management Training & Advisor Centre 159,524,369 (399,215,498) Regulatory Authorities 1 Bank of Uganda 2,885,000,000 1,012,129,000,000 2 Capital Markets Authority (738,718,000) 1,087,930,000 3 National Drug Authority 2,423,597,822 11,219,059,934 4 Uganda Communication Commission 18,270,350,534 38,327,394,491 5 Uganda Tourist Board 35,631,168 8,032,101 7 Uganda Wildlife Authority (1,216,197,000) (10,652,253,000) 8 Broadcasting Council 58,817,461 233,134,384 9 Electricity Regulatory Authority 179,702,929 2,603,897,429 10 National Planning Authority 927,664,734 1,259,548,385 11 Public Procurement and Disposal of Public Assets 1,588,646,765 4,830,751,521 Authority 12 Uganda Insurance Commission 767,404,936 1,228,009,826 13 Uganda Investment Authority (1,239,048,054) 971,726,392 14 Uganda National Bureau of Standards (729,812,299) (1,169,961,881) 15 Uganda National Examination Board (251,480,601) (52,159,750) 16 Uganda Export Promotion Board (219,992,002) (360,714,658) 17 Cotton Development Organisation 2,116,679,810 761,922,682 18 Uganda Coffee Development Authority 1,059,701,974 940,131,106

110

19 Dairy Development Authority 801,076,684 669,528,684 20 Uganda Revenue Authority 8,676,103,233 5,282,539,508 21 Civil Aviation Authority (11,291,238,000) (134,031,291,000) State Enterprises 1 Amber House Ltd 822,969,846 3,960,213,059 2 Cable Corporation Ltd 388,053,000 (7,491,545,000) 3 Kilembe Mines Ltd (5,842,063,772) (26,264,603,508) 4 National Enterprise Corporation (2,822,712,655) (14,460,218,032) 5 National Housing and Construction Co Ltd 4,720,310,000 28,167,013,000 6 National Medical Stores 3,019,501,000 9,224,522,000 7 National Social Security Fund (50,198,093,000) 7,465,951,000 8 National Water and Sewerage Corporation 12,350,645,000 36,696,814,000 9 New Vision Printing and Publishing Corporation 2,182,847,000 17,885,149 000 10 Nile Hotel International Ltd 841,235,000 145,775,000 11 Post Bank Uganda Ltd 1,048,588,078 3,485,822,139 12 Uganda Air Cargo 4,893,701,067 (20,631,002,268) 13 Uganda Broadcasting Corporation 68,090,923 (1,051,573,209) 14 Uganda Development Bank Ltd 11,583,878,000 18,054,208,000 15 Uganda Development Corporation (122,276,000) (1,285,595,000) 16 Uganda Electricity Distribution Co Ltd (42,582,952,000) (104,070,603,000) 17 Uganda Electricity Generation Co Ltd (25,786,766,000) (65,582,798,000) 18 Uganda Electricity Transmission Co Ltd (57,021,601,000) (25,529,601,000) 19 Uganda Post Ltd (83,693,000) (5,538,764,000) 20 Uganda Printing and Publishing Corporation 17,732,000 (2,004,043,000) 21 Uganda Property Holdings Ltd 465,885,824 425,135,340 22 Uganda Seeds Ltd (225,348,303) (3,115,277,306) 23 UGMA Engineering Corporation Ltd (3,631,799,000) (47,587,726,000)

111

Appendix C Financial standing of public organizations with up to date financial statements submitted for audit for the years ended 30th June 2009 and 31st Dec 2008

No Statutory Authority/State Accumulated Surplus/Deficit for the past three years Enterprise Public organizations audited with financial years ended 30th June NAME OF ENTITY 2008/09 2007/08 2006/07 shs shs shs 1.Uganda Air Cargo Corporation (UACC) (20,631,002,268) (25,524,703,335) (26,241,946,520) 2.Uganda Wild Life Authority (UWA) (10,652,253,000) (9,436,056,000) (6,140,516,000) 3.New Vision Printing and Publishing 17,665,149,000 16,660,953,000 13,444,426,000 Corporation 4.Bank of Uganda (BOU) 1,012,129,000,000 241,018,000,000 100,428,000,000 5.Uganda Tourism Board (UTB) 8,032,101 (27,598,967) (31,616,203) 6.Kilembe Mines Ltd (KML) (26,264,603,508) (20,171,252,442) (19,331,260,322) 7.National Women Council (NWC) (1,392,321) 6,594,549 3,547,759 8.Uganda Bureau of Statistics (UBOS) 2,881,327,764 4,343,583,000 3,328,955,377 9.National Drug Authority(NDA) 11,219,059,934 8,795,462,112 4,662,305,779 10.Uganda Property Holdings (UPHL) 425,135,340 (40,750,484) (129,330,512) 11.National Water and Sewerage 36,696,814,000 20,574,775,000 9,419,424,000 Corporation (NWSC) 12.Uganda Communications commission 38,327,394,491 20,057,043,957 10,884,169,530 (UCC) 13.Uganda National Council for Science and Technology (UNCST) 1,042,700,627 3,851,833,549 5,224,867,770 14.Uganda Printing and Publishing Corporation (UPPC) (2,004,043,000) (2,008,978,000) (1,569,224,000 ) Public organizations audited with financial years ended 31st December

NAME OF ENTITY DEC. 2008 DEC.2007 DEC.2006 15.Dairy Development Authority(DDA) 669,528,780 (131,548,904) (107,148,000) 16.Management Training and Advisory (399,215,198) (558,739,866) (579,003,461) Centre(MTAC) 17.Amber House Ltd (AHL) 3,960,213,059 3,148,253,309 2,450,592,899 18.Nile Hotel International Ltd (NHI) 145,775,000 (695,460,000) (1,356,340,000) 19.Post Bank Ltd 3,485,822,139 2,542,195,834 1,763,683,238 20.Uganda Electricity Transmission (25,529,601,000) 31,491,984,000 30,968,410,000 Company limited (UETCL) 21.National Housing and Construction 28,167,013,000 21,366,545,000 14,842,297,000 Company Limited (NHCC) 22.Uganda Development Corporation Ltd (1,163,319,000) (1,163,319,000) (1,035,625,000) (UDC) 23.Uganda Electricity Generation (65,582,798,000) (39,796,032,000) (31,853,239,000) Company (UCDL) 24.Cable Corporation Limited (CCL) (7,491,545,000) (7,879,600,000) (9,113,602,000) 25.UGMA Engineering Corporation Ltd (47,587,726,000) (43,955,927,000) (39,659,207,000) 26.Uganda Development Bank Ltd (UDB) 18,054,208,000 6,635,207,000 6,048,148,000 27.Uganda Electricity Transmission (25,529,601,000) 31,491,984,000 30,968,410,000 Company (UETCL) 112

28.Nambole National Stadium (2,687,622,918) (2,770,496,076) (2,199,780,757) 29.Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) (134,031,291,000) (124,301,271,000) (102,668,098,000) 30.Uganda Revenue Authority (URA) 5,283,539,508 (2,856,169,106) (10,882,374,921,)

Public organizations audited with financial years ended 31st October

NAME OF ENTITY OCTOBER 2008 OCTOBER 2007 OCTOBER 2006 31 Cotton Development 761,922,682 (1,411,487,556) (991,548,245) Organization (CDO)

Public organizations audited with financial years ended 31st October NAME OF ENTITY SEPTEMBER SEPTEMBER SEPTEMBER 2008 2007 2006 32 Uganda Coffee Development Authority 1,670,741,895 (2,539,598,232) (2,539,598,232) (UCDA)

113

Appendix D DIVESTITURES AND OUTSTANDING TRANSACTIONS AS AT 30th JUNE 2009

Buyer Method of sale Balance Public Enterprise Date Price Money collected (m)

Ms Laoo Ltd Sale of Assets 1 Acholi Inn May-95 Shs 235 m 108,000,000 122 African Ceramics Muhindo Sale of Assets 2 Co. Enterprises Ltd May-96 Shs.0.270 bn 270,000,000 -

P.S.Patel Share Sale 3 African Textile Mills Mar-96 Shs.1.4 bn 100,000,000 679 Agip Petrol Share Sale 4 Agip (U) Ltd International May-96 Shs.1.675 bn 1,664,141,892 - Commonwealth Agricultural Development Oct-93 Joint Venture US$ 12.7 m Enterprises Ltd 3,835,414,534 5 Corp - Apollo Hotel MIDROC Share Sale 6 Corporation Ltd. plc Mar-01 US$ 18m 32,040,000,000 - Associated Match Shares/Preempitve Madhvani Group 7 company Ltd Jun-01 rights Sh. 46,164 46,164 - Bank of Baroda Shares/Preempitve 8 Bank of Baroda () Jun-99 rights Shs 2.5bn 2,500,000,000 - Barclays Bank of Shares/Preempitve Barclays Plc 9 Uganda Ltd Oct-98 rights Shs 5bn 5,000,000,000 - BAT Uganda BAT Investments Shares/Preemptive (PHASE 1, 20% of Ltd. rights 10 shares) Sep-99 US$ 7m 10,290,000,000 - Initial Public BAT Uganda Various 11 (PHASE 2) Jun-00 Offering - USE Ushs 4.6 bn 4,608,794,753 - Uniliver Overseas Share Sale 12 Blenders (U) Ltd Holding BVC Aug-94 US$ 531,586 38,109,750 -

Detecom Share Sale 13 Uganda Telecom Jun-00 US$ 33.5m 50,975,088,162 -

Sameer Concession 14 Dairy Corp US$0.5 m 892,000,000 - Development Initial Public Fiance Company of Various Shs 10.1 Offering - USE 15 Uganda Jul-04 billion 18,369,374,559 - International East African Distillers & Share Sale 16 Distilleries ltd Vintners Nov-92 US$ 600,000 731,063,195 - Efforte Corp, Shares/Preemptive ENHAS Global Airlinks & Apr-98 US$ 3.75m rights 17 Sabena 1,226,193,448 - Foods & Beverages James Mbabazi Auction 18 Ltd May-96 Shs.0.670 bn 670,000,000 - Eddie & Sophie Auction 19 Fresh Foods Ltd Enterprises May-96 Shs.0.0009 bn 900,000 - Government Management and Management Buy Central Purchasing Employees Out 20 Corp. Jul-00 Shs 1.09 bn 1,091,276,000 -

Three Links Ltd Sale of Assets 21 Hilltop Hotel May-95 Shs 35 m 10,000,000 25 Reco Industries Sale of Assets 22 Hotel Margherita Ltd Aug-94 US$ 400,000 365,184,210 - International ROKO Sale of Assets 23 television sales Construction Dec-96 Shs 0.32bn 320,000,000 - Kakira Sugar East African Shares/Preemptive 24 Works Holdings Ltd. Jul-00 rights Shs 3.5 bn 3,500,000,000 - Kampala Auto Centre (Gomba Management Auction 25 Motors Ltd) Nov-95 Shs.0.110 bn 8,200,000 - 114

Kibimba Rice Co. Tilda Holdings Share Sale 26 Ltd. Sep-96 Shs 1.607 bn 1,523,515,000 - Kinyara Sugar US$33.5 Rai Holdings Share Sale 27 Works Ltd Oct-06 million 61,546,870,000 - Lake Victoria Crown Bottlers Share Sale 28 Bottling Co. Ltd (U) Ltd Feb-93 Shs 6.46 bn 3,621,000,000 - Lake Victoria Hotel Windsor Ltd Share Sale 29 (PHASE 1) Aug-95 Shs. 3.06 bn 2,962,387,928 - Lake Victoria Hotel Ltd (Phase 2) - Shares/Preemptive The Windsor Ltd. Windsor Lake rights 30 Victoria Aug-00 US$ 1.75m 2,962,387,928 - Sunset Share Sale 31 Lango Dev. Co. International Ltd. May-98 Shs 0.1bn 100,000,000 - Showa Trade Sale of Assets 32 Lira Hotel Company Ltd Jan-95 Shs 250 m 50,000,000 200 Ottoman Sale of Assets 33 Masindi Hotel Engineering Feb-00 US$ 500,000 198,500,000 - Motorcraft and Andami Works Share Sale 34 Sales Ltd. Ltd. Sep-96 Shs 0.200 bn 200,000,000 - Bugisu Cooperative Sale of Assets 35 Mt. Elgon Hotel Union May-95 Shs 650 m 650,000,000 - Kodet Sale of Assets 36 Mt. Moroto Hotel International Nov-94 Shs 40 m 40,000,000 - Mweya Safari Madhvani Group Concession 37 Lodge Aug-95 Shs.1.821 bn 1,821,112,067 - National Housing & Libyan Arab Construction Foreign Debt/Equity Swap 38 Corporation Investment Co. Jun-05 US$20.3 m 35,789,600,000 - National Insurance Corporation Ltd IGI Share sale 39 (60%) Jun-05 US$3.625m 6,307,822,446 - NEC Pharmaceuticals Haupt Groupe Joint Venture 40 Ltd. Dec-99 US$ 1.5m - - New Vision Printing IPO and Rights and Publishing Co Various Ushs 9.2 Issue 41 Ltd (20%) Sep-04 billion 2,040,000,000 -

Madhvani Group Repossession 42 Nile Breweries Apr-92 shs 500m - - Serena Tourism Nile Hotel Promotion Concession 43 International Ltd Services Jan-04 US$1.2m 2,340,000,000 - NYTIL Textile Picfare Ltd Sale of Assets 44 Industries Ltd Mar-96 Shs 7.0 bn 2,132,000,000 - PAPCO Industries Praful C. Patel Share Sale 45 Ltd. Feb-99 Shs 100m 100,000,000 - Uganda Railways Concession 46 Corp US$ 2m 3,479,200,000 - Rafiki Trading Auction 47 Republic Motors Company Dec-95 Shs.0.395 bn 148,000,000 - Swisa Industries Sale of Assets 48 Rock Hotel Ltd Nov-94 Shs 300 m 300,000,000 - Share sale/ Rwenzori Highland Finlays Groups 49 Tea Company Ltd May-02 Preemptive rights Ushs 1.45 bn - - Steel Rolling Mills Share Sale 50 SAIMMCO Ltd. Sep-99 Shs 202m 199,333,633 - Second National MTN Concession 51 Operator Mar-98 US$ 5m 6,664,000,000 - Shell Petroleum Debt/Equity Swap 52 Shell (U) Ltd Co. Ltd Dec-92 Shs 12.79 bn 12,790,000,000 - Speedbird Aviation Services Sale of Assets 53 Soroti Hotel Ltd Jan-95 Shs 150 m 150,000,000 - 115

Stanbic Bank (U) IPO Share Sale 54 Ltd. Dec-96 Ushs 6.9 Bn 35,812,000,000 - Stanbic Bank (U) SBIC Africa Share Sale 55 Ltd. Holdings Ltd. Nov-96 ushs 6939m 6,938,819,178 - Steel Corporation Muljibhai Shares/Preempitve of East Africa Ltd Madhvani & Co. rights 56 (SCEA). Ltd Jul-00 Shs 0.32bn 362,912,000 -

Total Outre Mer Share Sale 57 Total (U) Ltd Mar-96 Shs.5.7 bn 5,645,992,433 - Transocen 1998 Coin Ltd. Share Sale 58 (U) Ltd Jul-01 Shs 361m 361,000,000 - US$ 700,000 GM Company Ltd Share Sale 59 TUMPECO Aug-94 +Shs 429 m 693,350,000 - Uganda Hire Shs.0.00024 Tadeo Kisekka Auction 60 Purchase Co. Nov-95 bn 240,000 - Uganda Cement Rawals Group of Sale of Assets 61 Industry - Hima Industries Dec-94 US$ 20.5 m 17,948,945,000 - Uganda Cement Corrugated Sale of Assets 62 Industry - Sheets Ltd Oct-95 Shs.5.75 bn 5,864,857,750 - Initial Public Various 63 Uganda Clays Ltd. Oct-99 Offering - USE Shs 1.46 bn 1,182,415,300 - Uganda Westmont Asia Share sale 64 Commercial Bank ltd Oct-97 ushs 12610m 12,610,000,000 - Uganda Net Ushs 21.9 Stanbic Bank Share Sale by BoU 65 Commercial Bank Feb-02 billion 21,900,000,000 - Uganda Consolidated GoU Sale of Assets Properties (PHASE 66 1) Apr-99 US$ 9m 11,250,000,000 16,174 Management Buy Management 67 Uganda Motors Ltd Nov-95 Out Shs.0.803 bn 300,000,000 - Uganda Electricity Umeme Concession 68 Distribution Co Ltd May-05 US$1.4 m 10,765,000,000 - Uganda Electricity Eskom 69 Generation Co Ltd Enterprises Nov-02 Concession US$0.5 m 993,000,000 - Uganda Fisheries Nordic-African May-95 Share Sale US$ 1.1 m 70 Enterprises Fisheries Co. Ltd 105,600,000 994 Uganda Garment Phoenix Logistics Sale of Assets 71 Industries Ltd. Uganda Ltd. Aug-00 US$ 0.5 m 850,000,000 - Uganda Grain Calebs Milling Co.(PHASE Share Sale International 72 1) Dec-96 Shs 5.3bn 5,336,000,000 - Uganda Hardwares Management Buy Management 73 Ltd Oct-95 Out Shs.0.298 bn 18,200,000 - Uganda Pharmaceuticals Vivi Holdings Share Sale 74 Ltd. Jul-96 Shs 1.501 bn 1,524,620,000 - Uganda Industrial F.B. Lukoma Share Sale 75 Machinery Ltd. May-97 Shs 7 m 7,000,000 - Uganda Leather and Tanning IPS (U) Ltd Sale of Assets 76 Industry (ULATI) Jul-95 Shs.1.71 bn 1,594,150,000 - Uganda Libyan Arab Holding Co Preemptive Preemptive 77 Ltd Apr-08 Ushs 2 M - Uganda Livestock Industries Ltd Ziwwa Ranchers Concession 78 _Kiryana Ranch May-02 U Sh.0.800 bn 850,000,000 - Uganda Livestock Royal Ranchers Industries Ltd Lease of Assets Ltd 79 _Kyempisi Ranch May-05 Ushs 391 m 391,000,000 - Uganda Meat Uganda Meat Packers Ltd Sale of Assets Industries Ltd 80 (Kampala Plant) Aug-95 Shs.0.7 bn 588,094,172 - 81 Uganda Meat Teso Agric Nov-97 Sale of Assets Shs 0.3bn 116

Packers-Soroti Industrial Co Ltd. 185,755,445 124 Uganda Seeds Lease/concession Lease/concession 82 (Kasese) Sep-05 Shs 326 m 273,000,000 - Uganda Seeds (Masindi and Lease/concession Lease/concession 83 Kisindi) Sep-05 US$350,000 648,495,259 - Dolma Sale of Assets 84 White Rhino Hotel Associates Ltd May-95 Shs 200 m 200,000,000 - Kabale Development Sale of Assets 85 White Horse Inn Company Ltd. Aug-94 Shs 600 m 600,000,000 -

EMCO Works Ltd Auction 86 Winits (U) Ltd Oct-95 Shs. 0.274 bn 102,500,000 - Cancelled-Assets belonged to MBO 87 Printpak (U) Ltd Lonhro n/a - - Uganda American American Life Insurance Insurance Repossession 88 Company Company Nov-92 n/a - - Buganda Uganda Crane Repossession 89 Estates Ltd. Kingdom Jun-97 n/a - - Uganda Securiko Securiko (U) Ltd Repossession 90 Ltd Aug-93 n/a - - Comrade Cycles Uganda Motors Share Sale 91 (U) Ltd. Ltd. Jan-97 n/a - - Guostar Sale of Assets by Uganda Spinning Enterprises (U) Court Order 92 Mills, Lira Limited 1999 n/a - - Uganda Tea Mehta Group Repossession 93 Corporation May-94 n/a - -

Total 432,632,462,206 18,318 Total Divestiture 93 transactions Liquidations 39 Total 132

117

Appendix E PEs STRUCK OFF THE COMPANIES REGISTER /LIQUIDATED AS AT 30 JUNE 2009 Name Date of sale Nature of divestiture 1 Associated Paper Industries Ltd Apr-98 Liquidation 2 Gobbot (U) Ltd. Jul-96 Voluntary Liquidation 3 Intra africa Traders Jun-87 Liquidated 4 Ugadev Properties Ltd. Mar-98 Struck off Register Voluntary Liquidation & Struck Off Co 5 Agro-Chemicals Nov-93 Register 6 Chillington Tools Co. Ltd. Jun-98 Liquidation 7 Coffee Marketing Board Ltd Apr-03 Voluntary Liquidation 8 Domestic Appliances Nov-93 Struck Off Company Register 9 Farm Marchinery Ltd, Namalere. Jan-97 Struck off 10 International Television Sales Nov-93 Struck Off Company Register 11 Itama Mines Nov-93 Struck Off Company Register 12 Johnas Brothers Ltd Apr-03 Voluntary Liquidation 13 Lebel (EA) Ltd. Nov-93 Struck Off Company Register 14 Lint Marketing Board Jul-94 Recievership 15 Paramount Manufacturers Ltd.(residual) Oct-93 Struck Off Company Register 16 Peoples Transport Co. Ltd. Jun-94 Recievership 17 Produce Marketing Board Liquidation on going 18 R. O. Hamiliton (U) Ltd Nov-93 Struck Off Company Register 19 SINO (U) Ltd. Oct-98 Voluntary Liquidation 20 Sukulu Mines Nov-93 Struck Off Company Register The Uganda Fish Marketing Corp (1969) Voluntary Liquidation & Struck Off Co 21 Ltd TUFMAC) Nov-93 Register 22 Toro Development Corporation Jul-91 Struck off Register Tororo Industrial Chemicals and Fertlizers Voluntary Liquidation 23 (TICAF) 24 Ugadev Bank Ltd. Liquidation 25 Ugadev Holdings Ltd. Mar-98 Struck off Register 26 Ugadev Investments Ltd. Jul-91 Struck off Register Dissolved by Decree 15, 1976 (Airline 27 Uganda Air Ltd. 1976 decree) 28 Holdings Ltd. Apr-01 Liquidation Dissolved by Decree 15, 1976 (Airline 29 Uganda Aviation Services 1976 decree) 30 Uganda Bags & Hessian Mills Mar-97 Voluntary liquidation Uganda Consolidated Properties Ltd Liquidation 31 (residual) Jan-01 32 Uganda Crane industries limited 2003 Liquidation 33 Uganda General Merchandise Ltd. Jul-94 Liquidation 34 Uganda Grain Milling (PHASE 2) Jan-04 Creditor Liquidation

118

Not registered in Company Registry 35 Uganda Toni Services Dissolved by Uganda Tourist Board 36 Uganda Tourist Development Corporation 1994 Act 37 Uganda Transport Co. Ltd. Jun-94 Struck off Register 38 Uganda Wild Life Development Co. Nov-96 Struck off Register 39 Wolfram Investments Ltd. Voluntary Liquidation

119

Appendix F THE REMAINING ENTERPRISES LISTED FOR DIVESTITURE AS AT JUNE 2009 No. Parastatal Comment PERD Class GOU share % 1 Amber House Ltd Fomerly subsidiary of UEB I 100% 2 Cable Corporation Ltd. divestiture completed III 51% Dairy Corporation Ltd. Concessioned to Sameer Group III 3 100% Housing Finance Company of Uganda 4 Ltd. To be divested II 50% 5 Industrial Promotion Services Ltd Pre-emptive rights III 30% 6 Kasese Cobalt Company Ltd (KCCL) To be divested III 25% 7 Kilembe Mines Ltd. PPP / Concessioning III 99.996% Kinyara Sugar Works Ltd. Divested & remainder to be 8 divested through IPO III 49%

9 Mandela National Stadium Pending concessioning II 100%

10 Munyonyo Resort To be determined and divested 11 National Enterprise Corporation To be divested II 100% National Housing and Construction 12 Co. Ltd. Partial divestiture II 51%

13 National Insurance Corporation To be divested through IPO III 40% 14 National Medical Stores To be divested I 100% National Water & Sewerage 15 Corporation PPP / Concessioning II 100% New Vision Printing & Publishing Ltd. Partial divestiture through IPO 16 II 53% Concessioned to TPS Uganda 17 Nile Hotel International Ltd. II 100% 18 Post Bank (U) Ltd PPP / Concessioning II 100% 19 Pride Uganda Ltd. To be divested 20 Sugar Corporation of Uganda Ltd. divestiture completed III 30% Tropical Africa Bank Ltd. (Libyan Arab 21 Holding) To be divested III 51% 22 Uganda Air Cargo To be divested II 100% 23 Uganda Commercial Bank/Stanbic IPO II 10% Uganda Consolidated properties Ltd / 24 Kulubya properties To be divested 93%

25 Uganda Crane Industries Ltd To be divested 100%

26 Uganda Development Bank N/A II 100% 27 Uganda Development Corporation To be revived I 100% Uganda Electricity Distribution Co. 28 Ltd Concessioned to UMEME II 100%

29 Uganda Electricity Generation Co. Ltd Concessioned to ESKOM II 100%

30 Uganda Hotels Ltd (residual) To be wound up 100% 120

31 Uganda Libyan Arab Holdings Ltd To be divested 51% Uganda Livestock Industries Ltd. Kiryana & Kyempisis ranches 32 concessione out III 100% 33 Uganda Posts Ltd PPP / Concessioning II 100% Uganda Printing and Publishing 34 Corporation I 35 Uganda Prison Industries Ltd. PPP / Concessioning II 100% 36 Uganda Property Holdings Ltd Asset Holding comapmy I 100% 37 Uganda Railways Corporation Concessioned to RVR II 100% 38 Uganda Seed Ltd Concessioned out II 100% 39 Uganda Telecoms Ltd To be divested through IPO III 31% UGMA Engineering Company Ltd. 40 divestiture completed III 51%

Residual PrintPak Uganda Spinning Mills, Lira

121

Appendix G PENDING CLAIMS (LITIGATIONS) AGAINST GOVERNMENT AS AT JANUARY 5, 2010 Public Case/Parties/PE Particulars of Claim Enterprise 1 Nyanza Textile IGG vs. Gordon Ssentiba & Ors Compensation by the minority Industries Limited & AG HCCS No. 431 of 2006) shareholders in NYTIL for their interest in (NYTIL) the company which according to a Consent Judgment would amount to approx. US $ 9 Million. The Consent Judgment which was entered against Government was successfully challenged by IGG in the High Court and Court of Appeal and was set aside. The minority shareholders appealed to the Supreme Court 2 Uganda Electricity Bagamuhunda vs. UEB HCCS Claim for terminal benefits computed Board (UEB) and No 1044 of 2001. based upon their consolidated salary. successor Judgment was entered in favour of the Companies Plaintiffs Kalibbala Vincent & Others vs AG The Plaintiffs have sought declaration HCCS 107/2008 from court that some UEB former employees are entitled to pension arrears for the period 2006 – 2008. Edison Mavunwa & Another (on behalf of 194 Others) Vs Claim by 203 former employees of UEB UEGCL & Attorney General – now working with UEGCL for terminal High Court Civil Suit No. benefits not paid when UEB was 353/2003; unbundled.

John Walugo & 175 Ors Vs UEB, UEDCL & UETCL – High Claim of 1,500 former employees of UEB Court Civil Suit No. 967/2006; now working with UEGCL for terminal and benefits not paid when UEB was unbundled. Josephine Nakafeero & 844 Others Vs UEB, UETCL & The plaintiffs challenged the basis of the UEDCL - High Court Civil Suit payment of gratuity to them as terminal No. 760/2006; and benefits for their period of service with the successor companies. They contend Kyambadde Henry, Paul that they ought to have been paid Nyamarere & 636 Others Vs pension in terms of the UEB Standing UEDCL & UETCL – High Court Instructions Civil Suit No. 138/2008.

3 Uganda General a) UNIDRO vs AG HCCS No. 4/ Creditors of Uganda General Merchandise Merchandise 2007; supplied merchandise which was never paid and instituted the suits for recovery Uganda Transport b) George Zziwa & Others Vs of the monies due at the time of Company (1975) AG & DRIC - HCCS No. liquidation. 122

Ltd 3/2007

People‟s Transport c) Mugenyi & Co. Advocates Vs Company, AG HCCS No. 663 of 1994

Uganda d) Specioza Kalungi & 61 Grain Milling Co Others Vs AG & DRIC – HCCS Ltd No 63 of 2008

4 Uganda Transport Ayoub Ibrahim Vs. AG Claim former employees for advances Co. Ltd. HCCS No. 192/ 2003 arbitrarily deducted from their terminal benefits 5 Apollo Hotel a) Kazooya & Others Vs Apollo Claim for terminal benefits not paid after Corporation Hotel Corporation, Sheraton divestiture. Hotel Limited & AG HCCS No. 64 of 2003 Claim for “Association fees” i.e. 25% of the terminal benefits b) Clement Othieno vs. AG

c) David Lubega vs. AG HCCS No. 601/07 6 Kilembe Mines Kaija Mugenyi and 137 others Claim for under payment of terminal Limited (KML) vs. Attorney General HCCS No. benefits based on approved terms and 755 of 2003 conditions of service retrospectively. 7 East African Steel Mugalula & Others vs. MMCL Claim arose out of a suit by former Corporation & SCEAL workers against MMCL & SCEAL. MMCL HCCS No. 640/1994 was indemnified by Government 8 Uganda Railways a) NSSF vs URC & AG HCCS Claim for un-remitted workers Corporation (URC) No. 277/2008 contributory benefits under the NSSF Act Claim for declarations that URC should b) Victor Byemaro vs URC have remitted NSSF contributions for 200 HCCS No. 249/2009 URC workers Claim arising from computation of the tax liability of the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs c) Nkote Charles, Sabani allege that they were unlawfully taxed Magemeso vs. URC & URA H.C.C.SNo.107/2009 9 Kibimba Rice Co. Notice of Intention to Sue – Claim for compensation for land Ltd. Peter Muwafu, Wandera submerged after Tilda took over Basirita, Samanya Eriasa and operation of Kibimba 181 Others vs AG 10 Diary Corporation a) Morris Ogwal Vs DCL, HCCS Claims are for payment of terminal Limited (DCL) No. 614/2003 benefits and other allowances.

b) Otai Samuel Vs DCL HCCS No. 800/2003

c) Agono Charles Vs DCL, HCCS No. 814/2003

Behangana Richard Vs DCL - HCCS No. 883/2003

123

11 Other Diary a) Owor Alex vs. DCL Former Employee claiming special Corporation HCCS No. 320 of 2006 damages for salary arrears, general Limited cases b) Wekhasa Fred & 6 others damages, interests and costs of the suit. vs. DCL HCCS No. 1152 of Terminal benefits claim, damages for 1998 unlawful termination of employment Claim for unlawful termination of c) Gerald Muhumuza vs. DCL employment and general damages. HCCS No. 108 of 2004 Claim for payment of forced leave d) Otai Samuel vs. DCL salaries, compensation for earnings lost HCCS No.261 of 2003 while on forced leave and damages. Court entered judgement for UGX 8,575,299 inclusive of costs. This money was deposited in court as a condition to stay execution of the judgement pending appeal to the high court and a review of the judgement of the court. Claim for terminal benefits, salary arrears and allowances amounting to UShs e) Edward Keijuko vs. 57,834,954 with interest of 25% and DCL HCCS No. 813 of general damages plus costs. 2003 Supreme Court Appeal: Claim for recovery of milk cooling plant and lost revenue from the DCL‟s confiscation of the milk f) Ephraim Kizito vs. DCL & cooler. Attorney General HCCS No. 71 of 1977 and Civil Appeal Compensation for the loss of No. 36/2003 developments, damages for trespass, mesne profits and costs. g) Habib Kiggundu vs. DCL HCCS No. 17/ 1995 Claim for unpaid salary plus, and travel allowance on retirement, general h) Mwesigwa Samuel vs. DCL damages for mental stress and costs of HCCS No. 59 of 2002 the suit.

i) Alonga John Charles vs. DCL Claim for wrongful dismissal, general HCCS No. 48 of 2004 damages, terminal benefits, pension and Claim arising from computation of the tax j) Siraj Hassan Kajura Vs. DCL liability of the plaintiffs. The plaintiffs & URA allege that they were unlawfully taxed

12 Coffee Marketing CMBL Vs. National Union of Claim for under payment of Terminal Board Limited Clerical Commercial Benefits Claims (CMBL) Professional & Technical Employees Misc. Application No. 74 of 2006 13 African Textile Uganda Textile Garment Claim for recovery of Union Fees arising Mills, Nytil, Ug. Leather & Allied Workers Union from a check-off system of 3% Garment, & Lira Vs. AG - HCCS No. 58 of 2009 Spinning Mills) 14 Kinyara Sugar Nyeko Smith and Others vs. Claim for terminal benefits bythe former Works Ltd Kinyara Sugars Works Limited employees of National Sugar Works & AG – HCCS 009/2009 Kinyara 124

(Masindi) 15 Trans Ocean U Ltd Foods & Beverages Ltd (FBL) FBL claimed US$ 730,000 for haulage Vs. AG – HCCS No. -/2003 expense. Transocean counter-claimed for US $ 230,000 16 Uganda Posts & a) Several former UPTC Claims for pension under Ug Telecomm. employees Communications Employee Pensions Corporation Scheme (UCEPS) (UPTC) b) Bernard Mweteise, Asaph Declaration that former 825 former UPTC Ndawula & 8823 Others vs. workers are entitled to pension payments Uganda Telecom Limited, Post arising before the unbundling of UPTC Bank (U) Limited, Uganda Posts Limited, Ug Communication Commission & AG - HCCS No. 135/2003

125