DOCSLIB.ORG

The Protected Areas of Parnon, Moustos, Mainalon & Monemvasia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Protected Areas of Parnon, Moustos, Mainalon & Monemvasia Summer University “Integrated Approaches for Sustainable Development Management, Tourism and Local Products in Biosphere Reserves (BRs)” 8 - 15 July 2018, Parnon, Greece THE PROTECTED AREAS OF PARNON, MOUSTOS, MAINALON & MONEMVASIA THE ROLE OF THE MANAGEMENT BODY Boglis Argyris Forester-Environmentalist, MSc Coordinator of the Management Body Institution of «Management Bodies“ The MB of Parnon, Moustos, Mainalon & Monemvasia Key Dates: • 1999: framework of the management of Greece’s PAs by law 2742/1999. • 2002: establishment of management bodies by law 3044/2002. • 2010: establishment of the protected area of mount Parnon and Moustos wetland with the adoption of JMD 33999/2010. • 2010: The list of Greek Special Protection Areas (SPA) for Birds was published in Government Gazette 1495/Β/06.09.2010 as defined in Directive 79/409/EC "on the conservation of wild birds". Institution of «Management Bodies“ The MB of Parnon, Moustos, Mainalon & Monemvasia Key Dates: • 2011: The list of Special Areas of Conservation (SAC) was published by law 3937/2011 «Biodiversity conservation and other provisions» as defined in Directive 92/43 / EEC “for the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora”. • 2017: Revision of the national list of sites of the European Ecological Network Natura 2000. • 2018: increase of MBs spatial jurisdiction and founding of 8 more MB by Law 4519/2018 "Management of Protected Areas and other provisions“. Institution of «Management Bodies“ The MB of Parnon, Moustos, Mainalon & Monemvasia Management Body and Protected Areas MB of mount Parnon and Moustos wetland founded in 2002 and has undertaken the protection, promotion and sustainable management of its protected areas. The protected area was established in autumn 2010, in order to legally protect an area up to 1,140 sq.km as a national natural heritage. Management Body and Protected Areas According to the Joint Ministerial Decision the protected area includes the following designated areas of Law 1650/1986: A. Strict Nature Reserves: * Highly sensitive ecosystems, biotopes or habitats of rare 1.Juniperus drupacea forest or endangered species of wild at Malevi Monastery (2.Ι) flora or wildlife, land with a decisive position in the life 2.Moustos wetland (2.ΙΙ): cycle of rare or endangered species of wild fauna. Management Body and Protected Areas Management Body and Protected Areas Management Body and Protected * In these areas only scientific research Areasand no human activity of brief or of permanent nature of intervention in the natural environment are allowed. Management Body and Protected Areas B. Nature Reserves: 1.Forests of Syrian Juniper (Juniperus * These are areas of drupacea) at Prastos (3.Ι) 2.Forests of Syrian Juniper (Juniperus ecological or biological drupacea) at Aghios Vasileios- significance, where the Platanaki (3.ΙΙ) natural environment is 3.Forests of Syrian Juniper (Juniperus drupacea) at Palaiochori (3.ΙΙΙ) protected from activities or 4.Important area of flora at mount interventions that may alter Parnon peaks (3.ΙV) or distort the natural state, 5.Important area of flora at Mazia - Kontolina (3V) composition or evolution 6.Important area of flora Agios Ioannis - Oreini Meligou (3V.I) 7.Area of Dafnona Gorge and Μonasteries of Sintza and Elona (3.VII) 8.Moustos wetland (4.I) Management Body and Protected Areas Management Body and Protected Areas Management Body and Protected * A number of existing activities having no Areasnegative effects on the protected area are permitted. Biodiversity of the Protected Areas Biodiversity: is the variability among living organisms from all sources, including terrestrial, marine, and other aquatic ecosystems and the ecological complexes of which they are part; this includes diversity within species, between species, and of ecosystems. Biodiversity of the Protected Areas Biodiversity of the Protected Areas • 27 mammal species are recorded to the PAs (excluded bads) • Most important species is the otter (Lutra lutra) and the Golden Jackal (Canis aureus). Biodiversity of the Protected Areas Biodiversity of the Protected Areas • The protected area is of considerable ornithological interest with at least 249 species of permanent or seasonal basis, while some species are passing during migration or pass randomly from the area. Biodiversity of the Protected Areas • The ecological importance of all species of bats is enormous as it is a basic regulator of insect populations, both harmful and non-harmful. 22 species of bats have been recorded to the PAs (65% of Greek species) Biodiversity of the Protected Areas Biodiversity of the Protected Areas Biodiversity of the Protected Areas • At Moustos Lagoon have been recorded 12 fish species. • At the PAs have been recorded 13 reptiles species and 8 amphibians. Management Body and Protected Areas Recently, by the enactment of Law 4519/2018 (GG/A25/20.02.2018) "Management of Protected Areas and other provisions", the Management Body of Mount Parnon and Moustos wetland was renamed to Parnon, Moustou, Mainalon & Monemvasia. Its spatial jurisdiction is significantly increased, including the existing area of responsibility and fourteen (14) Natura 2000 sites. Management Body and Protected Areas 1. SAC-SPA - Lake Stymfalia (code: GR 2530002) (1,308 ha). 2. SAC- Mount Oligyrtos (code: GR 2530004) (8,630 ha). 3. SAC- Mount Mainalon (code: GR 2520001) (22,673 ha). 4. SPA- Mounts of Artemisio and Lyrkeio (code: GR 2510004) (11,477 ha). 5. SAC- Lake Taka (code: GR 2520002) (1,033 ha). 6. SAC- Akronafplia and Palamidi (code: GR 2510003) (366 ha). 7. SAC- Moustos lagoon (code: GR 2520003) (368 ha). 8. SAC- Mount Parnon summits and area of ​​Malevi Monastery (code: GR 2520006) (55,767 ha). Management Body and Protected Areas 9. SAC- Monastery of Elona and the Leonidio gorge - Cave Mana and Blue Lake (code: GR 2520005) (8,293 ha). 10. SAC- Mounts Gidovouni, Chionovouni, Gaidourovouni, Korakia, Kalogerovouni, Koulouchera and Monemvasia, Solomou's Cave, Trypa and Aghios Stephanos Tower & sea zone to Cape Kamili (code: GR 2540001) (38,869 ha). 11. SPA- East Lakonia Mts (code: GR 2540007) (37,566 ha). 12. SAC- Evrotas estuary, Vrontamas area and marine area of ​​Lakonikos Gulf (code: GR 2540003) (10,632 ha). 13. SPA - Wetlands of Evrotas (code: GR 2540006) (2,172 ha). 14. SAC - Neapolis area and Elafonisos island (code: GR 2540002) (5,493 ha). Management Body’s Action Plan The Management Body's Action Plan primarily aims to : •The protection of the habitats of flora and fauna. •The protection against any kind of interventions that degrade the ecosystem. •Provide environmental sensitization by disseminating research information about the management & biodiversity of the PA. •Managing the impacts of human activities to maintain ecosystem conservation, cultural heritage use & community values. •Carry out biodiversity monitoring & resource protection programmes. •The surveillance & guarding of the area. •Educate, inform & make the public more aware by providing information about the PAs and promote volunteering. LINE OF ACTIONS Within the management of the protected areas, four Line of Actions have been established: 1. Recording and monitoring of the biodiversity of the protected area 2. Surveillance/Guarding of the PAs by the Management Body 3. Information/Awareness Raising–Communication Strategy 4. Research and protection actions Recording and monitoring of the biodiversity of the protected area Actions related to recording and monitoring the biotic parameters, conducted by the personnel of the MB, in conjunction with collaborating external partners. Recording, monitoring and sustainable management of the Flora, Mammals, Birds, Habitat Types, Reptiles and Amphibians, Fungi, Invertebrates, Bats & Fishes of the PA of mount Parnon and Moustos wetland were carried out. Recording and monitoring of the biodiversity of the protected area Recording and monitoring of the biodiversity of the protected area • Recording of fauna with automatic cameras. • Recording of Cave fauna • Marking the area of endangered sea lilies (Pancratium maritimum). • Seed collection of Juniperus drupacea, in order to investigate the vegetative and inherent proliferation of the species by the TEI of Kavala. • Tissue collection of deceased jackals (Canis aureus) in order to conduct genetic studies of the demographic structure of the jackal population in the wetland of Moustos. Surveillance/Guarding of the PAs by the Management Body The effective Surveillance/ Guarding of the protected area is assured by the drawing out and implementation of an action plan, which defines the daily presence of staff members in the Protected Area. What Surveillance/Guarding staff do: • keeps records of illegal activities within the PA, • maintains the recreational infrastructures of the forest, • informs the public, • provides guided tours and • offers any kind of assistance to the visitors of the PAs. Surveillance/Guarding of the PAs by the Management Body Surveillance/Guarding of the PAs by the Management Body What Surveillance/Guarding staff CANNOT do: • conduct checks or arrest offenders. In order to surpass the legal imperfection, the surveillance is in fact restricted: • to observations, • to issuing of verbal warnings and • to immediate notification of the proper authorities (e.g. Forestry Service, Fire Department, Vice-Regional Governor etc.) Information/Awareness Raising – Communication Strategy The Line of Actions includes: • informing and raising awareness among the locals, the pupils of primary and secondary
Load more

Recommended publications
  • KARYES Lakonia
    KARYES Lakonia The Caryatides Monument full of snow News Bulletin Number 20 Spring 2019 KARYATES ASSOCIATION: THE ANNUAL “PITA” DANCE THE BULLETIN’S SPECIAL FEATURES The 2019 Association’s Annual Dance was successfully organized. One more time many compartiots not only from Athens, but also from other CONTINUE cities and towns of Greece gathered together. On Sunday February 10th Karyates enjoyed a tasteful meal and danced at the “CAPETANIOS” hall. Following the positive response that our The Sparta mayor mr Evagellos first special publication of the history of Valliotis was also present and Education in Karyes had in our previous he addressed to the Karyates issue, this issue continues the series of congratulating the Association tributes to the history of our country. for its efforts. On the occasion of the Greek National After that, the president of the Independence Day on March 25th, we Association mr Michael publish a new tribute to the Repoulis welcome all the participation of Arachovitians/Karyates compatriots and present a brief in the struggle of the Greek Nation to report for the year 2018 and win its freedom from the Ottoman the new year’s action plan. slavery. The board members of the Karyates Association Mr. Valliotis, Sparta Mayor At the same time, with the help of Mr. The Vice President of the Association Ms Annita Gleka-Prekezes presented her new book “20th Century Stories, Traditions, Narratives from the Theodoros Mentis, we publish a second villages of Northern Lacedaemon” mentioning that all the revenues from its sells will contribute for the Association’s actions. special reference to the Karyes Dance Group.
    [Show full text]
  • Diplopoda) of Twelve Caves in Western Mecsek, Southwest Hungary
    Opusc. Zool. Budapest, 2013, 44(2): 99–106 Millipedes (Diplopoda) of twelve caves in Western Mecsek, Southwest Hungary D. ANGYAL & Z. KORSÓS Dorottya Angyal and Dr. Zoltán Korsós, Department of Zoology, Hungarian Natural History Museum, H-1088 Budapest, Baross u. 13., E-mails: [email protected], [email protected] Abstract. Twelve caves of Western Mecsek, Southwest Hungary were examined between September 2010 and April 2013 from the millipede (Diplopoda) faunistical point of view. Ten species were found in eight caves, which consisted eutroglophile and troglobiont elements as well. The cave with the most diverse fauna was the Törökpince Sinkhole, while the two previously also investigated caves, the Abaligeti Cave and the Mánfai-kőlyuk Cave provided less species, which could be related to their advanced touristic and industrial utilization. Keywords. Diplopoda, Mecsek Mts., caves, faunistics INTRODUCTION proved to be rather widespread in the karstic regions of the former Yugoslavia (Mršić 1998, lthough more than 220 caves are known 1994, Ćurčić & Makarov 1998), the species was A from the Mecsek Mts., our knowledge on the not yet found in other Hungarian caves. invertebrate fauna of the caves in the region is rather poor. Only two caves, the Abaligeti Cave All the six millipede species of the Mánfai- and the Mánfai-kőlyuk Cave have previously been kőlyuk Cave (Polyxenus lagurus (Linnaeus, examined in speleozoological studies which in- 1758), Glomeris hexasticha Brandt, 1833, Hap- cludeed the investigation of the diplopod fauna as loporatia sp., Polydesmus collaris C. L. Koch, well (Bokor 1924, Verhoeff 1928, Gebhardt 1847, Ommatoiulus sabulosus (Linnaeus, 1758) and Leptoiulus sp.) were found in the entrance 1933a, 1933b, 1934, 1963, 1966, Farkas 1957).
    [Show full text]
  • VENETIANS and OTTOMANS in the SOUTHEAST PELOPONNESE (15Th-18Th Century)
    VENETIANS AND OTTOMANS IN THE SOUTHEAST PELOPONNESE (15th-18th century) Evangelia Balta* The study gives an insight into the historical and economic geography of the Southeast Peloponnese frorm the mid- fifteenth century until the morrow of the second Ottoma ill conquest in 1715. It necessarily covers also the period of Venetialll rule, whiciL was the intermezzo between the first and second perio.ds of Ottoman rule. By utilizing the data of an Ottoman archivrul material, I try to compose, as far as possible, the picture ())f that part of the Peloponnese occupied by Mount Pamon, which begins to t he south of the District of Mantineia, extends througlhout the D:istrict of Kynouria (in the Prefecture of Arcadia), includes the east poart of the District of Lacedaimon and the entire District of Epidavros Limira . Or. Evangelia Balta, Director of Studies (Institute for N1eohellenic Resea rch/ National Hellenic Research Foundation). Venetians and Oltomans in the Southeast Peloponnese 169 (in the Prefecture of Laconia), and ends at Cape Malea. 1 The Ottoman archival material available to me for this particular area comprises certain unpublished fiscal registers of the Morea, deposited in the Ba§bakal1lIk Osmal1lI Al"§ivi in Istanbul, which I have gathered together over the last decade, in the course of collecting testimonies on the Ottoman Peloponnese. The material r have gleaned is very fragmentary in relation to what exists and I therefore wish to stress that th e information presented here for the first time does not derive from an exhaustive archival study for the area. Nonetheless, despite the fact that the material at my disposal covers the region neither spatially nor temporarily, in regard to the protracted period of Ottoman rule, J have decided to discuss it here for two reasons: I.
    [Show full text]
  • First Announcement
    FIRST ANNOUNCEMENT SUMMER UNIVERSITY “Integrated Approaches for Sustainable Development Management, Tourism and Local Products in Biosphere Reserves (BRs)” Sunday 8 July to Sunday 15 July 2018, Parnon, Greece The current call concerns the organisation of a Summer University around the themes of designation and functioning of Biosphere Reserves (BR) / within the Man and the Biosphere (MAB) programme of UNESCO. It will be held from July 8 th to July 15 th 2018 in the important and beautiful area of Parnon, Greece. It is addressed to post graduate students, young researchers and managers. Following the successful Summer Universities in Amfissa (2014), Samothraki (2016) and Sardinia (2017), the 4 th Summer University will provide capacity building around a series of topics includin g management, local development, protection and conservation. THE IDENTITY OF THE PARNON REGION The proposal for the designation of a new Biosphere Reserve in SE Peloponnese (Parnon) is based on the coexistence of very significant cultural and environmental characteristics of the area. The region has important high quality agricultural production, se aborne trade and some particular intangible heritage (language and customs) in which tourism is a fast growing activity. All the above provide ideal conditions for the development of educational prospects, particularly through Education for Sustainable Dev elopment (ESD). The region is sparsely populated : its 75 ,000 inhabitants are scattered in small towns and villages, both mountainous and coastal. The BR reference area is spread over 6 municipalities (Voria Kynouria, Notia Kynouria, Sparta, Evrota, Monemvasia, Elafonisos), including: Areas of agricultural production (farming and fishing) Areas of cultural interest e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Landscapes of the Ancient Peloponnese. a Humangeographical Approach Shipley, Graham
    Landscapes of the ancient Peloponnese. A humangeographical approach Shipley, Graham Citation Shipley, G. (2006). Landscapes of the ancient Peloponnese. A humangeographical approach. Leidschrift : Cultuur En Natuur, 21(April), 27-44. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/1887/72722 Version: Not Applicable (or Unknown) License: Leiden University Non-exclusive license Downloaded from: https://hdl.handle.net/1887/72722 Note: To cite this publication please use the final published version (if applicable). Landscapes of the ancient Peloponnese. A human- geographical approach Graham Shipley Landscape and environment are currently of compelling cultural significance, as fields of scholarly research, sites of artistic creativity and arenas of public concern. As both imaginative representations and material realities, landscape and environment matter as a medium for the expression of complex ideas and feelings, about beauty, belonging, access to resources, relations with nature, the past and the future, making sense of the world and people’s place in it.1 This paper suggests new approaches to the ancient history of the Peloponnese, Greece. It is intended as a spur to discussion rather than the consolidated result of complete work. It proposes that ancient historians could now go further than before in adopting ideas from geographical approaches, which may allow us to investigate – in greater depth than before – aspects such as the meanings and emotions attached to landscapes, the nature of regionalism, and the extent and nature of connections and interactions between regions and smaller units. This suggestion arises from the author’s current work on Macedonian power in the Peloponnese. The period this article deals with approximately runs from the defeat of the southern Greeks by Philip II of Macedonia in 338 BC to the Roman intervention in the Peloponnese during the 190s BC.
    [Show full text]
  • ATLAS of CLASSICAL HISTORY
    ATLAS of CLASSICAL HISTORY EDITED BY RICHARD J.A.TALBERT London and New York First published 1985 by Croom Helm Ltd Routledge is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group This edition published in the Taylor & Francis e-Library, 2003. © 1985 Richard J.A.Talbert and contributors All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reprinted or reproduced or utilized in any form or by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publishers. British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data Atlas of classical history. 1. History, Ancient—Maps I. Talbert, Richard J.A. 911.3 G3201.S2 ISBN 0-203-40535-8 Master e-book ISBN ISBN 0-203-71359-1 (Adobe eReader Format) ISBN 0-415-03463-9 (pbk) Library of Congress Cataloguing in Publication Data Also available CONTENTS Preface v Northern Greece, Macedonia and Thrace 32 Contributors vi The Eastern Aegean and the Asia Minor Equivalent Measurements vi Hinterland 33 Attica 34–5, 181 Maps: map and text page reference placed first, Classical Athens 35–6, 181 further reading reference second Roman Athens 35–6, 181 Halicarnassus 36, 181 The Mediterranean World: Physical 1 Miletus 37, 181 The Aegean in the Bronze Age 2–5, 179 Priene 37, 181 Troy 3, 179 Greek Sicily 38–9, 181 Knossos 3, 179 Syracuse 39, 181 Minoan Crete 4–5, 179 Akragas 40, 181 Mycenae 5, 179 Cyrene 40, 182 Mycenaean Greece 4–6, 179 Olympia 41, 182 Mainland Greece in the Homeric Poems 7–8, Greek Dialects c.
    [Show full text]
  • Myth – Religion in Ancient Greece
    Potsdamer Altertumswissenschaftliche Beiträge – Band 67 Franz Steiner Verlag Sonderdruck aus: Natur – Mythos – Religion im antiken Griechenland Nature – Myth – Religion in Ancient Greece Herausgegeben von Tanja Susanne Scheer Franz Steiner Verlag, Stuttgart 2019 INHALTSVERZEICHNIS Allgemeines Abkürzungsverzeichnis ................................................................. 9 I BEGRIFFE, KONZEPTE, METHODEN Tanja S. Scheer Natur – Mythos – Religion im antiken Griechenland: Eine Einleitung ............. 13 Katja Sporn Natural Features in Greek Cult Places: The Case of Athens .............................. 29 Richard Gordon The Greeks, Religion and Nature in German Neo-humanist Discourse from Romanticism to Early Industrialisation ..................................................... 49 Jennifer Larson Nature Gods, Nymphs and the Cognitive Science of Religion .......................... 71 II DIE VEREHRUNG DER ‚NATUR‘ BEI DEN GRIECHEN? Jan N. Bremmer Rivers and River Gods in Ancient Greek Religion and Culture ........................ 89 Esther Eidinow “They Blow Now One Way, Now Another” (Hes. Theog. 875): Winds in the Ancient Greek Imaginary .............................................................. 113 Renate Schlesier Sapphos aphrodisische Fauna und Flora ............................................................ 133 Julia Kindt Animals in Ancient Greek Religion: Divine Zoomorphism and the Anthropomorphic Divine Body ............................................................. 155 Dorit Engster Von Delphinen und ihren Reitern:
    [Show full text]
  • L a K O N I A
    KARYES L a k o n i a KARYATES ASSOCIATION NEWS BULETTIN Issue number 28 Spring 2021 PROGRAM "OUR ANCESTORS’ ROOTS" An initiative of the Karyates Association in view of the Karyes Laconia Memory and Culture Centre completion and operation The Karyates Association on the occasion of the creation of the Karyes Laconia Memory and Culture Center inaugurates the program "OUR ANCESTORS ROOTS". The Program’s purpose is to collect data and information on the large migration flow of our compatriots during the 20th century from their homeland, Karyes Laconia to the U.S.A., Canada, Australia, etc. Our hope is with this program to record the historical path of the Arachovites / Caryates and their families over the last 150years, so that through it the third and fourth generation descendants will be able to reconnect with the place of origin of their ancestors and come in contact with modern Greece and more specifically with the beautiful place of Karyes, Laconia, their ancestors homeland. For this purpose, the Association appeals to all compatriots, wherever they are, to reminisce about their historical family memories, to record and send us a brief history of their family. This story will start from the their first Arachovite / Caryatian ancestor who emigrated, will narrate his own course in the new place he settled and will continue unfolding the story of his descendants in the new homelands. Furthermore the description of events or incidents that highlight the social contribution of the ancestors in the new homelands, but also in Karyes will have an additional historical value. These recordings can be sent to the email address [email protected] in order to be recorded by the Association and used for the purpose of the vision of the Karyes Laconia Memory and Culture Centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Optimal Utilization of Water Resources for Local Communities in Mainland
    Available online at www.sciencedirect.com Available online at www.sciencedirect.com AvailableScienceDirect online at www.sciencedirect.com Procedia Manufacturing 00 (2019) 000–000 Procedia Manufacturing 00 (2019) 000–000 www.elsevier.com/locate/procedia ScienceDirect www.elsevier.com/locate/procedia Procedia Manufacturing 44 (2020) 253–260 1st International Conference on Optimization-Driven Architectural Design (OPTARCH 2019) 1st International Conference on Optimization-Driven Architectural Design (OPTARCH 2019) Optimal utilization of water resources for local communities in mainland Greece (case study of Karyes, Peloponnese) a a a a G.-Fivos Sargentisa*, Panayiotis Dimitriadisa, Romanos Ioannidisa, Theano Iliopouloua, G.-Fivos Sargentis *, Panayiotis Dimitriadisb , Romanos Ioannidis , Theanoa Iliopoulou , Evangelia Frangedakib and Demetris Koutsoyiannisa Evangelia Frangedaki and Demetris Koutsoyiannis aSchool of Civil Engineering, Laboratory of Hydrology and Water Resources Development, National Technical University of Athens, Heroon a School of Civil Engineering, Laboratory of HydrologyPolytechneiou and Water 9, 157 Resources 80 Zographou, Development, Greece National Technical University of Athens, Heroon bSchool of Architecture, NationalPolytechneiou Technical 9,Unive 157 rsity80 Zographou, of Athens, PatissionGreece 42, 106 82 Athens, Greece bSchool of Architecture, National Technical University of Athens, Patission 42, 106 82 Athens, Greece Abstract Abstract Water is the basis of our civilization and the development of society is intertwined with the exploitation of water resources in variousWater is scales, the basis from of aour well civilization dug to irrigate and the a garden, development to a larg of esociety dam providing is intertwined water withand energythe exploitation for a large of area.water However, resources for in remotevarious mountainousscales, from aareas, well intermittentdug to irrigate natural a garden, water toresources a large damand highproviding seasonal water demand and energy the above for atasks large become area.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mycenaean Settlements in the Sparta Plain and the Ancient Traditions
    THE MYCENAEAN SETTLEMENTS IN THE SPARTA PLAIN AND THE ANCIENT TRADITIONS by RICHARD HOPE SIMPSON INTRODUCTION In this note I assess the main Mycenaean settlements discovered in and around the Sparta plain and also try to interpret the ancient testimonia related to them. It is both customary and correct to present the more definite (i.e. the archaeological) evidence first and separately in such cases, before any speculative attempts to assign ancient names to particular sites. For this reason my note is divided into two parts, the first confined to the (more objective) archaeological data, and the second consisting of arguments based on these data combined with indications derived from the ancient traditions. The interpretation of the latter is by nature more subjective, involving more diverse and complex factors, especially the historical and topographical, in addition to deductions from the ancient material found at the sites. I. THE MYCENAEAN SITES AND THEIR SIZES: THE ROLE OF SURVEY Excavations in the Sparta plain have been of small scale, except for those of the British School at Ancient Sparta and at the site of the Menelaion (the final report of H.W. Catling's excavations is in preparation)!. For estimates of the sizes of most of the Mycenaean settlements in and around the plain we must therefore rely mainly on results obtained by survey. For the Menelaion and its vicinity, in addition to the preliminary excavation reports, we now have the data from the intensive Laconia Survey (LS i. 43, 51; LS ii. 289, 401-5), and for Kouphovouno the intensive site sUIvey (Cavanagh, Mee and Renard 2004).
    [Show full text]
  • Laconian Bronzes from the Sanctuary of Apollo Hyperteleatas Near Phoiniki (Laconia) and from the Acropolis of Athens
    0821-07_Babesch_83_02 23-09-2008 15:38 Pagina 17 BABESCH 83 (2008), 17-45. doi: 10.2143/BAB.83.0.2033096. Laconian Bronzes from the Sanctuary of Apollo Hyperteleatas near Phoiniki (Laconia) and from the Acropolis of Athens Conrad M. Stibbe Abstract This is a presentation of largely unknown or even unpublished Laconian bronze material mainly from the Archaic period from two surprising find places on the Greek mainland. On a total of 80 finds from the sanctuary of Apollo Hyperteleatas near Phoiniki (Laconia), which are catalogued here, 62 are bronze products. Of these 38 are certainly, 6 possibly Archaic. Next to these, 15 Archaic Laconian bronzes found on the Acropolis of Athens are presented and catalogued. This small but in several respects important complex has no other links with the find place of Apollo Hyperteleatas in the far-away Laconian province than the mere fact that - as a find place of Laconian bronzes - it is equally surprising. The article aims finally at demonstrating that such eminent bronze products as the krater from Vix and the bronze hydriae from Paestum and Sala Consilina can be attributed with- out any problem to the same production centre, namely Sparta or Laconia, from where obviously all the other bronzes of similar quality and style, discussed here, originated. Two apparently very unequal sites - a relatively Consilina and many other exported archaic bronze unknown sanctuary of Apollo in the province of products, e.g. statuettes, vessels and useful imple- Laconia, and the famous acropolis of Athens - are ments originated in the 6th century BC. nevertheless taken together here for the same rea- Other important aspects, such as the signifi- son: as find places for Laconian bronzes both are cance of the many dedicatory inscriptions, the exceptional and, from an historical point of view, historical and religious implications of the bronze most interesting.
    [Show full text]
  • Observations on Routes and Bridges in Laconia from the Archaic to Byzantine Periods Author(S): Pamela Armstrong, W
    Crossing the River: Observations on Routes and Bridges in Laconia from the Archaic to Byzantine Periods Author(s): Pamela Armstrong, W. G. Cavanagh, Graham Shipley Source: The Annual of the British School at Athens, Vol. 87 (1992), pp. 293-310 Published by: British School at Athens Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/30103513 Accessed: 17/08/2010 06:16 By purchasing content from the publisher through the Service you agree to abide by the Terms and Conditions of Use, available at http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp. These Terms and Conditions of Use provide, in part, that this Service is intended to enable your noncommercial use of the content. For other uses, please contact the publisher of the journal. Publisher contact information may be obtained at http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublisher?publisherCode=bsa. Each copy of any part of the content transmitted through this Service must contain the same copyright notice that appears on the screen or printed page of such transmission. For more information regarding this Service, please contact [email protected]. British School at Athens is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Annual of the British School at Athens. http://www.jstor.org CROSSING THE RIVER: OBSERVATIONS ON ROUTES AND BRIDGES IN LACONIA FROM THE ARCHAIC TO BYZANTINE PERIODS THISpaper brings together the evidence for bridges in ancient and medieval Laconia. The immediate impetus for our discussion is our work on the publication of the BSA Laconia Survey.' Through the medium of the bridges, some issues concerning communications in Laconia over this long span of history are addressed.
    [Show full text]