Pinal County Community Wildfire Protection Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pinal County Community Wildfire Protection Plan Pinal County Community Wildfire Protection Plan Dudleyville ▪ Kearny ▪ Oracle ▪ Santa Cruz ▪ Maricopa Colony Top of the World ▪ Florence ▪ Coolidge ▪ Queen Valley Arizona City ▪ Avra Valley ▪ Thunderbird Farms ▪ Picacho Apache Junction ▪ Queen Creek ▪ Eloy ▪ Superior San Manuel ▪ Casa Grande ▪ Mammoth ▪ Maricopa Stanfi eld ▪ Oracle Junction/Saddlebrook ▪ Chuichu Pinal County Board of Supervisors Oracle Fire District City of Casa Grande Queen Valley Fire District City of Apache Junction San Manual Fire District Town of Florence Stanfi eld Fire District Town of Kearny Thunderbird Fire District City of Maricopa Casa Grande Fire Department Town of Superior Coolidge Fire Department Apache Junction Fire District Florence Fire Department Arizona City Fire District Kearny Fire Department Avra Valley Fire District Maricopa Fire Department Dudleyville Fire District Superior Fire Department Eloy Fire District Ak-Chin Indian Community Golder Ranch Fire District Tohono O’odham Nation Grande Buttes Fire District Gila River Indian Communities Mammoth Fire District FEBRUARY 2009 Pinal County Community Wildfire Protection Plan February 2009 Prepared by: Logan Simpson Design Inc. 33 North Stone Avenue Suite 1460 Tucson, AZ 85701 (520) 884-5500 www.logansimpsondesign.com Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Acronyms and Abbreviations ..................................................................................................................... iv Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................... v I. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 1 A. Background .......................................................................................................................................... 2 B. WUI and Delineation Process .............................................................................................................. 5 C. Desired Future Condition and Wildfire Mitigation in the WUI ............................................................... 8 D. Goals for the Pinal County CWPP ..................................................................................................... 11 E. Planning Process ............................................................................................................................... 11 II. Pinal County CWPP Community Assessment and Analysis ............................................................ 13 A. Fire Regime and Condition Class ...................................................................................................... 19 B. Fuel Hazards ...................................................................................................................................... 22 C. Conditions of Ignition and Past Fire Occurrence ............................................................................... 39 D. Community Values at Risk ................................................................................................................. 41 E. Summary of Community Assessment and Cumulative Risk Analysis ................................................ 46 III. Community Mitigation Plan ................................................................................................................. 63 A. Fuel Reduction Priorities .................................................................................................................... 63 B. Prevention and Loss Mitigation .......................................................................................................... 77 1. Pinal County CWPP Administration and Implementation ............................................................ 78 2. Improved Protection Capability and Reduction in Structural Ignitability ....................................... 78 3. Promote Community Involvement and Improved Public Education, Information, and Outreach ........................................................................................................... 79 4. Encourage Use of Woody Material from WUI Fuel Mitigation Programs ..................................... 80 IV. Pinal County CWPP Priorities: Action Recommendations and Implementation ........................... 81 A. Administrative Oversight ................................................................................................................... 81 B. Priorities for Mitigation of Hazardous Wildland Fuels ........................................................................ 83 C. Identified Action Items for Protection Capability and Reduced Structural Ignitability ........................ 83 D. Priorities for Promoting Community Involvement through Education, Information, and Outreach .... 85 V. Monitoring Plan .................................................................................................................................... 88 A. Administrative Oversight, Monitoring, and Pinal County CWPP Reporting ....................................... 88 B. Effectiveness Monitoring ................................................................................................................... 89 VI. Declaration of Agreement and Concurrence..................................................................................... 91 VII. References ........................................................................................................................................... 95 VIII. Glossary of Fire Management Terms ................................................................................................ 98 Pinal County Community Wildfire Protection Plan February 2009 i Table of Contents APPENDIXES Appendix A. Vegetation Association Descriptions ............................................................................. 117 Appendix B. National Fire Danger Rating System Fuel Model Selection Key .................................. 123 Appendix C. Educational Resources ..................................................................................................... 127 Appendix D. Information Data Sheet and Contacts .............................................................................. 131 Appendix E. Invasive Species ................................................................................................................ 132 Appendix F. National Fire and Aviation Executive Board Appropriate Management Response ..... 147 LIST OF TABLES Table 2.1 Land management within the WUI .............................................................................................. 13 Table 2.2 Fire regime information ............................................................................................................... 19 Table 2.3 Fuel model, fire-danger ratings, and intensity levels on vegetative associations in the WUI ...... 23 Table 2.4 Fuel hazard components ............................................................................................................. 36 Table 2.5 Ignition history and wildfire occurrence ....................................................................................... 41 Table 2.6 Community values ....................................................................................................................... 44 Table 2.7 Cumulative risk levels by percentage of the WUI area ............................................................... 61 Table 3.1 Fuel modification and treatment plans ........................................................................................ 64 Table 3.2 Identified treatment management units ....................................................................................... 67 Table 3.3 Acres of wildland fuels mitigation treatment conducted by ASFD fire and fuels crew during an 8- hour on-site workday units ............................................................................................................................ 76 Table 4.1 Action recommendations for wildland fuel modification............................................................... 84 Table 4.2 Action recommendations for structural ignitability and public outreach....................................... 85 Table 4.3 Future recommendations for wildland fire protection and reduced ignitability ............................. 86 Table 4.4. Future recommendations for enhanced public education, information, and outreach ................. 87 Table 5.1 Performance measures to assess Pinal County CWPP progress. .............................................. 90 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1.1 Analysis area ............................................................................................................................... 1 Figure 1.2 Pinal County CWPP process ....................................................................................................... 7 Figure 2.1 Pinal County CWPP WUI area ................................................................................................... 14 Figure 2.2 Pinal County CWPP vegetation associations ............................................................................ 27 Figure 2.3 Pinal County CWPP flammability ............................................................................................... 29 Figure 2.4 Pinal County CWPP wildland fuel hazards during typical fire season ........................................ 37 Figure 2.5 Pinal County CWPP wildland
Recommended publications
  • Geologic Map of the Goldfield Quadrangle and the Northern Part of the Superstitton Mts
    GEOLOGIC MAP OF THE GOLDFIELD QUADRANGLE AND THE NORTHERN PART OF THE SUPERSTITTON MTS. SW QUADRANGLES, MARICOPA AND PINAL COUNTIES, ARIZONA by Steven J. Skotnicki and Charles A. Ferguson Arizona Geological Survey Open-File Report 95-9 August, 1995 Arizona Geological Survey 416 W. Congress, Suite #100, Tucson, Arizona 85701 Includes 26 page text and 1:24,000 scale geologic map (2 sheets). Jointly funded by the Arizona Geological Survey and the U.S. Geological Survey STATEMAP Program. Contract #1434-94-A-1222 This report is preliminary and has not been edited or reviewed for conformity with Arizona Geological Survey standards INTRODUCTION The Goldfield Quadrangle and Superstition Mountains are located about 40 km due east of Phoenix, Arizona, and a few miles east of Apache Junction, and include part of the Superstition Wilderness Area (Figure 1). Aerially extensive exposures of welded tuff fonn steep, rugged cliffs in the Superstition Mountains and overlie tilted felsic and mafic volcanic rocks, pre-volcanic cconglomerate, and Precambrian granite and Pinal Schist. This study was carried out concurrently with mapping in the Florence Junction Quadrangle and the southern part of the Weaver's Needle Quadrangle. Mapping in the Goldfield Quadrangle continued from January through April, 1995. The project was jointly funded by the Arizona Geological Survey and the U.S. Geological Survey under the STATEMAP Project, contract #1434-94-A- 1222. ACCESS Much of the region lies within the Tonto National Forest. Within the study area there are only a few roads which penetrate any distance into the mountains. Highway 60/89 and State Route 88 (the Apache Trail) are the best avenues and afford some of the best views of the western escarpment of the range (Figure 2).
    [Show full text]
  • The Lower Gila Region, Arizona
    DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR HUBERT WORK, Secretary UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY GEORGE OTIS SMITH, Director Water-Supply Paper 498 THE LOWER GILA REGION, ARIZONA A GEOGBAPHIC, GEOLOGIC, AND HTDBOLOGIC BECONNAISSANCE WITH A GUIDE TO DESEET WATEEING PIACES BY CLYDE P. ROSS WASHINGTON GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1923 ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS PUBLICATION MAT BE PROCURED FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT OF DOCUMENTS GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE WASHINGTON, D. C. AT 50 CENTS PEE COPY PURCHASER AGREES NOT TO RESELL OR DISTRIBUTE THIS COPT FOR PROFIT. PUB. RES. 57, APPROVED MAT 11, 1822 CONTENTS. I Page. Preface, by O. E. Melnzer_____________ __ xr Introduction_ _ ___ __ _ 1 Location and extent of the region_____._________ _ J. Scope of the report- 1 Plan _________________________________ 1 General chapters _ __ ___ _ '. , 1 ' Route'descriptions and logs ___ __ _ 2 Chapter on watering places _ , 3 Maps_____________,_______,_______._____ 3 Acknowledgments ______________'- __________,______ 4 General features of the region___ _ ______ _ ., _ _ 4 Climate__,_______________________________ 4 History _____'_____________________________,_ 7 Industrial development___ ____ _ _ _ __ _ 12 Mining __________________________________ 12 Agriculture__-_______'.____________________ 13 Stock raising __ 15 Flora _____________________________________ 15 Fauna _________________________ ,_________ 16 Topography . _ ___ _, 17 Geology_____________ _ _ '. ___ 19 Bock formations. _ _ '. __ '_ ----,----- 20 Basal complex___________, _____ 1 L __. 20 Tertiary lavas ___________________ _____ 21 Tertiary sedimentary formations___T_____1___,r 23 Quaternary sedimentary formations _'__ _ r- 24 > Quaternary basalt ______________._________ 27 Structure _______________________ ______ 27 Geologic history _____ _____________ _ _____ 28 Early pre-Cambrian time______________________ .
    [Show full text]
  • United States Department of the Interior U.S
    United States Department of the Interior U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2321 West Royal Palm Road, Suite 103 Phoenix, Arizona 85021-4951 Telephone: (602) 242-0210 FAX: (602) 242-2513 In Reply Refer To: AESO/SE 22410-2007-F-0196 January 29, 2009 Memorandum To: Field Manager, Yuma Field Office, Bureau of Land Management, Yuma, Arizona From: Field Supervisor Subject: Biological Opinion for the Yuma Field Office Resource Management Plan Thank you for your request for formal consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) pursuant to section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973 (16 U.S.C. 1531-1544), as amended (Act). Your request for formal consultation regarding effects of the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) Yuma Field Office Resource Management Plan (RMP) was dated November 26, 2007, and received by us on November 27, 2007. At issue are impacts that may result from the RMP on the following federally-listed species: • razorback sucker (Xyrauchen texanus) and its critical habitat; • desert tortoise – Mohave Desert population (Gopherus agassizii); • Yuma clapper rail (Rallus longirostris yumanensis); and, • southwestern willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus). We concur with your effects determination of “may affect, not likely to adversely affect” for the Sonoran pronghorn (Antilocapra americanus sonoriensis). Our rationale is presented in Appendix A. The November 26, 2007, memorandum also requested concurrence regarding your determination that implementation of the proposed action may affect, but is not likely to contribute to the need to list the candidate western yellow-billed cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus). Other than the applicable conservation measures included in the proposed action (Appendix B), this species is not addressed in this biological opinion (BO).
    [Show full text]
  • Camping in the Tucson Area Note: the Public Camping Areas Listed Below Charge Entrance Fees And/Or Camping Fees
    Camping in the Tucson Area Note: The public camping areas listed below charge entrance fees and/or camping fees. Call the area you are interest- ed in for campsite availability, up to date fee information, fire closures, or any other information you need to plan your trip. For private campground information, contact either the Tucson Chamber of Commerce or the Tucson Visitors Bureau. Arizona State Parks Catalina State Park 123 drive-in campsites. Facilities include: (520) 628-5798 restrooms, showers, electricity, dump sta- Located 15 miles north of Tucson on State tion and water. * Due to budget Highway 77. constraints, some Picacho Peak State Park State Parks may be 100 drive-in campsites. Facilities include: (520) 466-3183 closed. Please check restrooms, showers, electricity and a dump website Located 40 miles north of Tucson on I-10 (exit 219). station. www.azstateparks. com Kartchner Caverns State Park (520) 586-4100 (tours/camping); 62 drive-in campsites. Facilities include: re- 586-2283 (tours/reservations) strooms, showers, electricity, dump station Located 9 miles south of I-10 (exit 302) on and water. State Highway 90. Pima County Parks Colossal Cave Mountain Park 30 drive-in campsites. Facilities include: (520) 647-7050 (camping & tours after chemical toilet and water. The main park hours); 647-7275 (tours only) gate is locked nightly, no entrance or exit Located 11 miles south of Saguaro Nation- after hours. 35’ limit on RV’s. al Park (east) on Old Spanish Trail. 150 drive-in campsites. Facilities include: Tucson Mountain Park (Gilbert Ray Campground) restrooms, electricity, dump station and (520) 883-4200 or 877-6000 water.
    [Show full text]
  • The Maricopa County Wildlife Connectivity Assessment: Report on Stakeholder Input January 2012
    The Maricopa County Wildlife Connectivity Assessment: Report on Stakeholder Input January 2012 (Photographs: Arizona Game and Fish Department) Arizona Game and Fish Department In partnership with the Arizona Wildlife Linkages Workgroup TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ............................................................................................................................ i RECOMMENDED CITATION ........................................................................................................ ii ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................................. ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................................ iii DEFINITIONS ................................................................................................................................ iv BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................................ 1 THE MARICOPA COUNTY WILDLIFE CONNECTIVITY ASSESSMENT ................................... 8 HOW TO USE THIS REPORT AND ASSOCIATED GIS DATA ................................................... 10 METHODS ..................................................................................................................................... 12 MASTER LIST OF WILDLIFE LINKAGES AND HABITAT BLOCKSAND BARRIERS ................ 16 REFERENCE MAPS .......................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Southwestern Part of the Tonto National Forest, Gila, Maricopa, Pinal and Yavapai Counties, Arizona
    Geologic map of the southwestern part of the Tonto National Forest, Gila, Maricopa, Pinal and Yavapai Counties, Arizona Authors Richard, S.M. Citation Richard, S.M. (compiler), 2015, Geologic map of the southwestern part of the Tonto National Forest, Gila, Maricopa, Pinal and Yavapai Counties, Arizona. Arizona Geological Survey Digital Geologic Map, DGM-76 & DI-41, map scale 1:130,000. Rights Arizona Geological Survey. All rights reserved. Download date 05/10/2021 19:48:06 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10150/630066 112°10' 112°7'30" 112°5' 112°2'30" 112°0' 111°57'30" 111°55' 111°52'30" 111°50' 111°47'30" 111°45' 111°42'30" 111°40' 111°37'30" 111°35' 111°32'30" 111°30' 111°27'30" 111°25' 111°22'30" 111°20' 111°17'30" 111°15' 111°12'30" 111°10' 111°7'30" 111°5' 111°2'30" 111°0' 110°57'30" 110°55' 110°52'30" 110°50' 110°47'30" 110°45' 34°17'30" Geologic Map of the Southwestern Part of the Tonto National Forest, Gila, 34°15' @ @ @ 34°15' @ Tsy @ Tb Xagd @ Xvrg Maricopa, Pinal and Yavapai Counties, Arizona Tsy Xcfg Qy Xvrg Xct March 2010 Tb Tsy Arizona Geological Survey Tb Qls 34°12'30" Tb 5 2.5 0 5 Miles Qi 34°12'30" Qi 5 2.5 0 5 Kilometers Tb Qi Xvrg Qy Qls Tsy Tb 0 5,000 10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000 Feet Tsy 34°10' Xu Xu 1:130,000 Scale 34°10' Xct Qi Tb Tsy Tb Xct Arizona Geological Survey Tsy Tcs 416 W.
    [Show full text]
  • Camping in the Tucson Area
    Camping in the Tucson Area Note: The public camping areas listed below charge entrance fees and/or camping fees. Call the area you are interested in for campsite availability, up to date fee information, fire closures, or any other information you need to plan your trip. For private campground information, contact either the Tucson Chamber of Commerce or the Tucson Visitors Bureau. Arizona State Parks Catalina State Park 48 drive-in campsites. Facilities (520) 628-5798 include: restrooms, showers, electricity, Located 15 miles north of Tucson on dump station and water. State Highway 77. Picacho Peak State Park 100 drive-in campsites. Facilities (520) 466-3183 include: restrooms, showers, electricity Located 40 miles north of Tucson on I- and a dump station. 10 (exit 219). Kartchner Caverns State Park 62 drive-in campsites. Facilities (520) 586-2283 include: restrooms, showers, electricity, Located 9 miles south of I-10 (exit dump station and water. 302) on State Highway 90. Pima County Parks Colossal Cave Mountain Park 30 drive-in campsites. Facilities (520) 647-7275 include: chemical toilet and water. The Located 11 miles south of Saguaro main park gate is locked nightly, no National Park (east) on Old Spanish entrance or exit after hours. 35’ limit Trail. on RV’s. Tucson Mountain Park 150 drive-in campsites. Facilities (Gilbert Ray Campground) include: restrooms, electricity, dump (520) 883-4200 or 877-6000 Located 3 station and water. miles south of Saguaro National Park (west) on McCain Loop Road. United States Forest Service Coronado National Forest The number of drive-in campsites (520) 749-7730 or 760-2301 varies depending on time of year and Location: Catalina Mountains North of fire closures.
    [Show full text]
  • Hiking Data 3-16-2019.Xlsx
    Hiking Club Database 3/16/2019 Hike Rating Hike Name Hike Location Hike Description A Agua Caliente Hill Rincons The hike has great panoramic views of Tucson, and the Rincon and Santa Catalinas. The trail starts climbing immediately from the Camino Remuda Trailhead. The trail continues up and down for approximately two miles to a water hole. From here, the trail climbs and then drops into a wash. Next is a steep climb to a ridge and a junction with old jeep FS # 4445, about three miles from the trailhead. It is another 1.5 miles to the top of Aqua Caliente Hill. The return is via the same route. Hike 8.5 miles; trailhead elevation 2930 feet; net elevation change 2430 feet; accumulated gain 3045 feet; RTD 75 miles. A Agua Caliente Hill / La Milagrosa Ridge / Rincons In this key exchange hike, one group will start at the Camino Remuda Trailhead, climb Molino Basin to the saddle, and summit Agua Caliente Hill. The group will then descend to the saddle, merge with a trail going north to Agua Caliente Canyon, connect with La Milagrosa Trail, hike northeast to the intersection with the AZT, then head northwest toward Molino Basin on Catalina Hwy. The other group will do the reverse. Hike 14.2 miles; trailhead elevations Camino Remuda/Molino Basin 2930/4480 feet; net elevation change 2430 feet, accumulated gain: hill to basin 4720 feet, basin to hill 3300 feet; RTD 97 miles. A Agua Caliente Hill and La Milagrosa Rincons The hike begins at the Camino Remuda Trailhead and follows the Agua Caliente Trail.
    [Show full text]
  • Arizona, Road Trips Are As Much About the Journey As They Are the Destination
    Travel options that enable social distancing are more popular than ever. We’ve designated 2021 as the Year of the Road Trip so those who are ready to travel can start planning. In Arizona, road trips are as much about the journey as they are the destination. No matter where you go, you’re sure to spy sprawling expanses of nature and stunning panoramic views. We’re looking forward to sharing great itineraries that cover the whole state. From small-town streets to the unique landscapes of our parks, these road trips are designed with Grand Canyon National Park socially-distanced fun in mind. For visitor guidance due to COVID19 such as mask-wearing, a list of tourism-related re- openings or closures, and a link to public health guidelines, click here: https://www.visitarizona. com/covid-19/. Some attractions are open year-round and some are open seasonally or move to seasonal hours. To ensure the places you want to see are open on your travel dates, please check their website for hours of operation. Prickly Pear Cactus ARIZONA RESOURCES We provide complete travel information about destinations in Arizona. We offer our official state traveler’s guide, maps, images, familiarization trip assistance, itinerary suggestions and planning assistance along with lists of tour guides plus connections to ARIZONA lodging properties and other information at traveltrade.visitarizona.com Horseshoe Bend ARIZONA OFFICE OF TOURISM 100 N. 7th Ave., Suite 400, Phoenix, AZ 85007 | www.visitarizona.com Jessica Mitchell, Senior Travel Industry Marketing Manager | T: 602-364-4157 | E: [email protected] TRANSPORTATION From east to west both Interstate 40 and Interstate 10 cross the state.
    [Show full text]
  • Akimel O'odham
    Akimel O’odham - Pee Posh OUR COMMUNITY OUR FUTURE Governor Lieutenant Governor William Rhodes Jennifer Allison-Ray ANew Direction CONTENTS www.gric.nsn.us | FALL 2007 4 Community Profi le 13 Tribal Government + Executive Offi ce 5 History + Legislative Offi ce + Judicial Offi ce + Pre-History + Early Contact 16 Community Portfolio + 19th and 20th Centuries 9 Water Settlement 17 Tribal Enterprises 10 Tribal Culture 23 Tribal Community 27 Tribal Districts View of Sacaton Mountains from Olberg Gila River farms - District 2, Blackwater Bridge District 2 A MESSAGE FROM THE GOVERNOR We welcome you to experience the rug- ged, awe-inspiring vistas of the South- west and the rich heritage of the Akimel O’odham (Pima) and Pee-Posh (Mari- copa). Historically, the strength of our culture has been the community spirit, industriousness, and maintaining our traditions and languages. Today, we con- tinue to face the challenge of preserving these core values while also meeting the demands of a rapidly changing world. Throughout Gila River’s history, our tribe has made innumerable contribu- tions and will continue to play an inte- gral role in the decades ahead. Governor William R. Rhodes 5 COMMUNITYFACTSHEET COMMUNITY PROFILE The Gila River Indian Community is located on 372,000 acres in south-central Arizona, south of Phoenix, Tempe, and Chandler. The reservation was established by an act of Congress in 1859. The Tribal administrative offi ces and departments are located in Sacaton, and serve residents throughout the seven community districts. The Gila River casinos are both owned and managed by the Gila River Indian Com- munity.
    [Show full text]
  • Pinal County, Arizona
    Profile: Pinal County, Arizona Pinal County was formed from portions of Maricopa and Pima counties on Feb. 1, 1875, in response to the petition of residents of the upper Gila River Valley, as "Act #1" of the Eighth Territorial Legislature. Florence, established in 1866, was designated and has remained the county seat. The county encompasses 5,374 square miles, of which 4.5 are water. In both economy and geography, Pinal County has two distinct regions. The eastern portion is characterized by mountains with elevations to 6,000 feet and copper mining. The western area is primarily low desert valleys and irrigatedagriculture. The communities of Mammoth, Oracle, San Manuel, and Kearny have traditionally been active in copper mining, smelting, milling and refining. Arizona City, Eloy, Maricopa, Picacho, Red Rock and Stanfield have agriculture based-economies. Apache Junction, Arizona City, Coolidge, Eloy, and particularly Casa Grande have diversified their economic base to include manufacturing, trade and services. This expansion and diversification has been facilitated by their location in the major growth corridor between Phoenix and Tucson near the junction of I-10 and I-8, except for Apache Junction, which is to the east of burgeoning Mesa. Most of the southern ¾ of Pinal County and a small area in Apache Junction are designated as Enterprise Zones. The county is home to many interesting attractions, including the Old West Highway 60, Casa Grande Ruins National Monument, Picacho Peak State Park, Picacho Reservoir, Boyce Thompson Southwestern Arboretum, Oracle State Park and Columbia University’s Biosphere II, McFarland State Park, Lost Dutchman State Park, Skydive Arizona, the world’s largest skydiving drop-zone, and the Florence Historical District, with 120 buildings on the National Register.
    [Show full text]
  • Issues Concerning Phreatophyte Clearing, Revegetation, and Water Savings Along the Gila River, Arizona William L
    University of South Carolina Scholar Commons Faculty Publications Geography, Department of 4-1-1984 Issues Concerning Phreatophyte Clearing, Revegetation, and Water Savings Along the Gila River, Arizona William L. Graf University of South Carolina - Columbia, [email protected] Duncan T. Patten Bonnie Turner Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarcommons.sc.edu/geog_facpub Part of the Geography Commons Publication Info 1984, pages Cover-69. This Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Geography, Department of at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ISSUES CONCERNING PHREATOPHYTE CLEARING, REVEGETATION, AND WATER-SAVINGS ALONG THE GILA RIVER, ARIZONA W.... LGraf Duncan T. Patten Bonnie Turner Submitted by the Forum In partial fu1fliiment of U. S.. Army Corps of Engineer. Contract DACW09-83-M-2823 April 1984 -------- ISSUES CONCERNING PHREATOPHYTE CLEARING, REVEGETATION, AND WATER SAVINGS ALONG THE GILA RIVER, ARIZONA William L. Graf Department of Geography Duncan T. Patten Center for Environmental Studies Bonnie Turner Center for Environmental Studies Arizona State University Tempe, Arizona 85287 A report submitted in partial fulfillment of U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Contract DACW09-83-M-2623. April 1984 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY A detailed analysis of the published results of the U. S. Geological Survey Phreatophyte Project conducted in the area of interest for the Corps of Engineers Camelsback Dam study provides the following results. It appears that the figure of 18.53 inches per year for water savings from phreatophyte clearing along the Gila River in southeast Arizona should not be used for predicting potential water salvage because of large sampling errors, measurement errors, and the inherent variability of the natural processes of evapotranspiration.
    [Show full text]