Observations on an Irruption Event of the Moth Achaea Catocaloides (Lepidoptera: Erebidae) at Kakamega Forest, Kenya

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Observations on an Irruption Event of the Moth Achaea Catocaloides (Lepidoptera: Erebidae) at Kakamega Forest, Kenya Journal of East African Natural History 103(1): 31–38 (2014) OBSERVATIONS ON AN IRRUPTION EVENT OF THE MOTH ACHAEA CATOCALOIDES (LEPIDOPTERA: EREBIDAE) AT KAKAMEGA FOREST, KENYA Dino J. Martins Turkana Basin Institute, Stony Brook University N507 Social & Behavioural Sciences, Stony Brook NY 11794, USA Insect Committee of Nature Kenya National Museums of Kenya, Museum Hill, Nairobi P O Box 44486, Nairobi GPO 00100 Kenya [email protected] Scott E. Miller National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution Washington, DC 20013-7012, USA [email protected] Marina Cords Department of Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Biology, Columbia University 1200 Amsterdam Avenue, New York 10027, USA [email protected] Margaret T. Hirschauer, C. Barret Goodale Kakamega Monkey Project PO Box 2579, Kakamega, Kakamega, Kenya [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT The moth Achaea catocaloides Guenee (Lepidoptera: Erebidae, formerly Noctuidae) experiences periodic population irruptions in tropical Africa. Large numbers of adult moths were observed in the Kakamega Forest, Western Kenya in March 2012. Estimated densities of adult moths flying in surveyed forest areas were 6.8 individuals per square metre. Roosting moth density was estimated at 12.7 individuals per 50 cm long branch on two common forest tree species: Croton megalocarpus and Bridelia micrantha. Based on scaled-up data from transect counts we conservatively estimate that this irruption contained 800 million – 1.5 billion moths. The Achaea moths were common throughout the indigenous forest and were being preyed on by birds and monkeys. These population irruptions occur periodically in African forests, but the underlying causes and factors driving them remain undetermined. DNA barcodes of Achaea catocaloides, Achaea catella and Achaea lienardi are provided to facilitate identification of future irruption events. Keywords: irruption, caterpillar outbreak, defoliation by insects, DNA Barcoding, croton 32 D.J. Martins, S.E. Miller, M. Cords, M.T. Hirschauer & C.B. Goodale INTRODUCTION Drastic changes in abundance and population dynamics of tropical Lepidoptera are an interesting phenomenon of seasonal wet-dry environments such as those typical of Eastern Africa (Larsen, 1991). Short generation times and opportunistic behaviour can help insects increase rapidly in numbers and produce observed ‘outbreaks’ when they swarm or migrate locally (Holland et al., 2006). The moth genus Achaea Hubner (Lepidoptera: Erebidae) is well-known for periodic irruptions in tropical Africa, and reports of this phenomenon come from several countries in East and West Africa. Achaea catocaloides Guenee is the species most commonly recorded in this phenomenon. An early record of an A. catocaloides irruption was made by Pitman (1931), at Entebbe in Uganda. This moth was also observed as part of a fruit piercing feeding guild in Sierra Leone (Hargreaves, 1936). This phenomenon was also reported as an annual invasion of Accra, Ghana (Leston, 1979). A ‘moth plague’ was observed in Ghana in 1969, 1972 and 1973 that involved A. catocaloides and the related species A. liernardi (Boisduval) (Grubb, 1980). Achaea catocaloides has also been reported undergoing population explosions in Nigeria, including feeding on cultivated crops (maize Zea mays L. and cassava Manihot esculenta L.) (Eluwa, 1977). A study of defoliation in cocoa (Theobroma cacao L.) plantations in Cameroon found that ants were able to limit the effects of this moth (Dejean et al., 1991). Achaea catocaloides was documented defoliating a rainforest tree (Paraberlinea bifoliolata Pellegr.) in Gabon where large number of caterpillars were observed feeding on the trees and leaving trees by means of silken threads to pupate in the leaf litter below (Maisels, 2004). In late 2008 and early 2009, a very large irruption of Achaea catocaloides occurred in Liberia and Guinea. The 2009 event was so large that a national emergency was declared in Liberia because of crop damage and contamination of water supplies, capturing considerable attention from international news media (CABI 2009; G. Goergen, pers. comm., 2009). We describe some observations of an irruption event in the Kakamega Forest, Kenya. The Kakamega Forest is a relict tropical rainforest fragment situated in western Kenya (0°19’N 34°52’E; ~1580 m). It is the last large area remaining in Kenya of the Guinea-Congolian rainforest that was once connected to the rainforests of the Congo Basin and Central Africa. The main block of forest (23 777 ha in 2003) includes two nature reserves and a national reserve, and comprises mixed vegetation types including near-natural and secondary forest, bushland, grassland and agricultural land. Natural forest covers 50% of this area (Mitchell et al., 2009). We base our estimates of natural/indigenous forest on these data as ~11 000 ha. Annual rainfall averages 1915 mm. Rain falls seasonally, typically with two annual peaks and a pronounced dry season from December through February (Bennun & Njoroge, 1999; Mitchell et al., 2009). We do not have comprehensive records of previous irruptions at Kakamega, but we know that one occurred in 2001, with moths emerging in late May. J.M. Wathihi, District Forest Officer, reported (pers. comm. to Miller, 2001) defoliation of Bischofia javanica Blume, Cupressus lusitanica Mill., and pines (Pinus sp.) in Kakamega forest, and provided voucher specimens to National Museums of Kenya and the Smithsonian Institution. These were confirmed as Achaea catocaloides. Achaea is a diverse genus of global distribution. The African taxa were reviewed by Berio (1965), who enumerated 35 species. Until recently, Achaea was placed in the Noctuidae, subfamily Catocalinae. Based on molecular studies that led to the extensive reclassification of the former Noctuidae, Achaea is now placed in the Erebidae, subfamily Erebinae (Holloway & Miller 2003; Holloway 2011). Here we report observations of an Achaea catocaloides irruption that occurred in the Kakamega Forest in western Kenya in March and April 2012. We include estimates of adult Irruption event of Achaea catocaloides 33 A. catocaloides abundance, which have not been made previously. We also report on the predation of the adult moths by birds and mammals in the forest. MATERIALS AND METHODS Observations of the moth Achaea catocaloides were made in March and April 2012 in the Isecheno area of the Kakamega Forest. The peak of the adult moth irruption occurred from approximately 18 March to 3 April 2012. Detailed observations on abundance were made between 25 March 2012 and 1 April 2012. The presence of moths in large numbers was recorded at multiple sites in the forest during the observation period (figure 1). Figure 1. Sites (indicated by closed circles) at Kakamega Forest where abundance of A. catocaloides was quantified between 25 March–3 April. (a) location where large numbers of eggs were observed on March 1, and moths peaked on 18–22 March. (b) Moth abundance peaks here 18–22 March. (c) Moth abundance peaks here 25 March–3 April. Note our assessment of ‘peak abundance’ is based on general observations that were conducted on a daily basis by field teams spending c. 9 hrs per day in the forest. Scale bar is 1 kilometre. Image courtesy of GoogleEarth. KFS = Kenya Forest Service HQ at Isecheno. To estimate the local abundance of moths, we used two counting methods: short transects and beating of tree branches where moths were roosting. Transect estimates consisted of DJM walking slowly for 10 m and counting all moths flying across the transect area (a 1 m band) using a hand-held counter. This was repeated 5 times at each of five different sites (Rondo stream trail, junction to Lirhanda Hill, base of Lirhanda Hill, River Yala trail and along the main road through the forest; figure 1). Beating involved a gentle tap of a ca. 50 cm long branch of each of 2 common tree species in the forest (Bridelia micrantha (Hochst.) Baill. and Croton megalocarpus Hutch. (identified using Beentje [1994]) and counting the number of moths that flew out. Each branch was tapped only once so as to estimate the number of moths on that branch alone and not startle moths roosting in surrounding vegetation. This procedure was repeated 20 times for each plant species. We used transect and beating data to derive estimates of the abundance of A. catocaloides in the forest as a whole. Data were analysed with Microsoft Excel Version 14.2.4. 34 D.J. Martins, S.E. Miller, M. Cords, M.T. Hirschauer & C.B. Goodale We observed predators feeding on the moths at the five counting sites while conducting transects and walking through the forest. Blue monkeys also were observed by three of us (DJM, MTH & CBG) feeding on the moths at other nearby sites (figure 1) that are part of a long-term primate monitoring project in Kakamega Forest (Cords, 2012). Specimens were collected to confirm identification and these have been deposited as vouchers in the collections of the Smithsonian Institution and the National Museums of Kenya. Identity of specimens from the 2001 Kakamega irruption was confirmed by male genitalia (USNM slides 92502 and 125566, figure 2) using Berio (1965). COI (cytochrome oxidase I) sequences were generated at the Biodiversity Institute of Ontario, University of Guelph using standard DNA barcoding protocols (Miller, 2007; Craft et al. 2010). Figure 2. Details of Achaea catocaloides. A. Representative adult specimen of A. catocaloides from West Africa. Scale bar is 10 mm. B. Main part of male genitalia from slide USNM 92502. C. Vesica from slide USNM 125566. D. Group of moths at light photographed at 7 am, 02 April 2012. E. Adult A. catocaloides at rest near a light at Kakamega Forest, Kenya. Scale bar is 10 mm. Irruption event of Achaea catocaloides 35 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION On 1 March 2012, an unusual number of thin white lepidopteran eggs was noted in the forest, attached in large numbers to one side of dead leaves on the forest floor. We assume that these eggs were laid by earlier numbers of Achaea catocaloides moths, but this was not monitored directly as the irruption event had not yet peaked and attracted our attention.
Recommended publications
  • Conservation of Biodiversity in the East African Tropical Forest Conservación De Biodiversidad En El Bosque Tropical Del Este De África
    Volume 7(2) Conservation of Biodiversity in the East African tropical Forest Conservación de Biodiversidad en el bosque tropical del este de África J.C. Onyango1, R.A.O. Nyunja1 and R.W. Bussmann2 1Department of Botany, Maseno University, Private Bag-40105, Maseno, Kenya. Email: [email protected]; [email protected]; 2Harold L. Lyon Arboretum, University of Hawaii, 3860 Manoa Road, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822-1180, U.S.A., email: [email protected] December 2004 Download at: http://www.lyonia.org/downloadPDF.php?pdfID=2.350.1 JC Onyango1 RAO Nyunja1 and RW Bussmann2 152 Conservation of Biodiversity in the East African tropical Forest Abstract Kakamega forest is one of the remnants of the equatorial guineo rainforest in the Eastern fringes of Africa. It was perhaps cut-off from the Congo region in the early volcanic era when the Great Rift Valley was formed. The forest is known for its diversity of biotic species, and it is home to some of the rare plants in the East African region. It has some of the rare species of, birds, snakes, insects and primates. However, despite the richness in biodiversity the forest has suffered a lot of anthropogenic destruction due to uncontrolled harvest of forest resources. To mitigate on this destruction an effort is currently being made to control the utilization of the forest products. This is only possible through education to the local communities on the better alternative uses of forest resources. The University Botanic Garden, Maseno’s mission on conservation for efficient utilization program is aimed at creating cultural awareness and working close to the local communities in Western Kenya in an effort to conserve the Biodiversity of the forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Insects of Western North America 4. Survey of Selected Insect Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma 2
    Insects of Western North America 4. Survey of Selected Insect Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma 2. Dragonflies (Odonata), Stoneflies (Plecoptera) and selected Moths (Lepidoptera) Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Survey of Selected Insect Taxa of Fort Sill, Comanche County, Oklahoma 2. Dragonflies (Odonata), Stoneflies (Plecoptera) and selected Moths (Lepidoptera) by Boris C. Kondratieff, Paul A. Opler, Matthew C. Garhart, and Jason P. Schmidt C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Department of Bioagricultural Sciences and Pest Management Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 March 15, 2004 Contributions of the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity Colorado State University Cover illustration (top to bottom): Widow Skimmer (Libellula luctuosa) [photo ©Robert Behrstock], Stonefly (Perlesta species) [photo © David H. Funk, White- lined Sphinx (Hyles lineata) [photo © Matthew C. Garhart] ISBN 1084-8819 This publication and others in the series may be ordered from the C.P. Gillette Museum of Arthropod Diversity, Department of Bioagricultural Sciences, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado 80523 Copyrighted 2004 Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY……………………………………………………………………………….…1 INTRODUCTION…………………………………………..…………………………………………….…3 OBJECTIVE………………………………………………………………………………………….………5 Site Descriptions………………………………………….. METHODS AND MATERIALS…………………………………………………………………………….5 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION………………………………………………………………………..…...11 Dragonflies………………………………………………………………………………….……..11
    [Show full text]
  • Butterflies and Moths of Dorchester County, Maryland, United States
    Heliothis ononis Flax Bollworm Moth Coptotriche aenea Blackberry Leafminer Argyresthia canadensis Apyrrothrix araxes Dull Firetip Phocides pigmalion Mangrove Skipper Phocides belus Belus Skipper Phocides palemon Guava Skipper Phocides urania Urania skipper Proteides mercurius Mercurial Skipper Epargyreus zestos Zestos Skipper Epargyreus clarus Silver-spotted Skipper Epargyreus spanna Hispaniolan Silverdrop Epargyreus exadeus Broken Silverdrop Polygonus leo Hammock Skipper Polygonus savigny Manuel's Skipper Chioides albofasciatus White-striped Longtail Chioides zilpa Zilpa Longtail Chioides ixion Hispaniolan Longtail Aguna asander Gold-spotted Aguna Aguna claxon Emerald Aguna Aguna metophis Tailed Aguna Typhedanus undulatus Mottled Longtail Typhedanus ampyx Gold-tufted Skipper Polythrix octomaculata Eight-spotted Longtail Polythrix mexicanus Mexican Longtail Polythrix asine Asine Longtail Polythrix caunus (Herrich-Schäffer, 1869) Zestusa dorus Short-tailed Skipper Codatractus carlos Carlos' Mottled-Skipper Codatractus alcaeus White-crescent Longtail Codatractus yucatanus Yucatan Mottled-Skipper Codatractus arizonensis Arizona Skipper Codatractus valeriana Valeriana Skipper Urbanus proteus Long-tailed Skipper Urbanus viterboana Bluish Longtail Urbanus belli Double-striped Longtail Urbanus pronus Pronus Longtail Urbanus esmeraldus Esmeralda Longtail Urbanus evona Turquoise Longtail Urbanus dorantes Dorantes Longtail Urbanus teleus Teleus Longtail Urbanus tanna Tanna Longtail Urbanus simplicius Plain Longtail Urbanus procne Brown Longtail
    [Show full text]
  • Kakamega National Reserve Is Accessible by All Vehicles All Year Round
    CAMPING For the more adventurous visitors, camping can never be wilder here. With guaranteed round the clock security, every second would be worth your money. Visitors can camp at the nearby Udo campsite. A number of campsites are located in the park. Please contact the warden or call KWS HQfor more information WHEN TO GO Kakamega National Reserve is accessible by all vehicles all year round. However to enjoy the beauty of the park visitors are advised to walk through the forest. WHAT TO TAKE WITH YOU Drinking water, picnic items and camping gear if you intend to stay overnight. Also useful are binoculars, camera, hat, and hiking boots. Visitors should be prepared for wet weather and wear footwear adequate for muddy and uneven trails. PLEASE RESPECT THE WILDLIFE CODE Respect the privacy of the wildlife, this is their habitat. Beware ofthe animals, they are wild and can be unpredictable. Don't crowd the animals or make sudden noises or movements. Don't feed the animals, it upsets their diet and leads to human dependence. Keep quiet, noise disturbs the wildlife and may antagonize your fellow visitors. Never drive off-road, this severely damages the habitat. When viewing wildlife keep to a minimum distance of 20 meters and pull to the side of the road so as to allow others to pass. KENYA WILDLIFE SERVICE PARKS AND RESERVES Leave no litter and never leave fires unattended or discard burning objects. • ABERDARE NATIONAL PARK. AMBOSELI NATIONAL PARK. ARABUKO SOKOKE NATIONAL RESERVE. Respect the cultural heritage of Kenya, nevertake pictures of the local people or • CENTRAL & SOUTHERN ISLAND NATIONAL PARK.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-Eared Bats a Symposium
    Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-eared Bats A Symposium y Edited b Susan C. Loeb, Michael J. Lacki, and Darren A. Miller U.S. Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Research Station General Technical Report SRS-145 DISCLAIMER The use of trade or firm names in this publication is for reader information and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Department of Agriculture of any product or service. Papers published in these proceedings were submitted by authors in electronic media. Some editing was done to ensure a consistent format. Authors are responsible for content and accuracy of their individual papers and the quality of illustrative materials. Cover photos: Large photo: Craig W. Stihler; small left photo: Joseph S. Johnson; small middle photo: Craig W. Stihler; small right photo: Matthew J. Clement. December 2011 Southern Research Station 200 W.T. Weaver Blvd. Asheville, NC 28804 Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-eared Bats: A Symposium Athens, Georgia March 9–10, 2010 Edited by: Susan C. Loeb U.S Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Research Station Michael J. Lacki University of Kentucky Darren A. Miller Weyerhaeuser NR Company Sponsored by: Forest Service Bat Conservation International National Council for Air and Stream Improvement (NCASI) Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources Offield Family Foundation ContEntS Preface . v Conservation and Management of Eastern Big-Eared Bats: An Introduction . 1 Susan C. Loeb, Michael J. Lacki, and Darren A. Miller Distribution and Status of Eastern Big-eared Bats (Corynorhinus Spp .) . 13 Mylea L. Bayless, Mary Kay Clark, Richard C. Stark, Barbara S.
    [Show full text]
  • Noctuoidea: Erebidae: Others
    Staude et al. / Metamorphosis 27: S165–S188 S165 ____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________ Noctuoidea: Erebidae: Others Reference/ Lepidoptera Host plant Locality rearing no. Taxon Subfamily Family Taxon Family M1148 Anoba angulilinea Anobinae Erebidae Dalbergia Fabaceae Tshukudu Game melanoxylon Reserve, Hoedspruit M998 Anoba atripuncta Anobinae Erebidae Ormocarpum Fabaceae Tshukudu Game trichocarpum Reserve, Hoedspruit Gv71 Baniana arvorum Anobinae Erebidae Elephantorrhiza Fabaceae Steenkoppies, farm, elephantina Magaliesburg 14HSS52 Baniana arvorum Anobinae Erebidae Elephantorrhiza Fabaceae Steenkoppies, farm, elephantina Magaliesburg 13HSS84 Plecoptera arctinotata Anobinae Erebidae Senegalia caffra Fabaceae Steenkoppies, farm, Magaliesburg M1020a Plecoptera flaviceps Anobinae Erebidae Dalbergia Fabaceae Casketts, farm, melanoxylon Hoedspruit M317 Bareia incidens Calpinae Erebidae Ficus lutea Moraceae Casketts, farm, (unplaced as to Hoedspruit tribe) 14HSS87 Egnasia vicaria Calpinae Erebidae Afrocanthium Rubiaceae Dlinsa Forest, (unplaced as to mundianum Eshowe tribe) 12HSS163 Exophyla multistriata Calpinae Erebidae Celtis africana Cannabaceae Golden Valley, (unplaced as to Magaliesburg tribe) M416 Exophyla multistriata Calpinae Erebidae Trema orientalis Cannabaceae Sekororo, Tzaneen (unplaced as to (Fed on Celtis tribe) africana) M743 Lacera alope Calpinae Erebidae Pterolobium Fabaceae Moholoholo Rehab (unplaced as to stellatum Centre, Hoedspruit tribe)
    [Show full text]
  • Check-List of the Butterflies of the Kakamega Forest Nature Reserve in Western Kenya (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea)
    Nachr. entomol. Ver. Apollo, N. F. 25 (4): 161–174 (2004) 161 Check-list of the butterflies of the Kakamega Forest Nature Reserve in western Kenya (Lepidoptera: Hesperioidea, Papilionoidea) Lars Kühne, Steve C. Collins and Wanja Kinuthia1 Lars Kühne, Museum für Naturkunde der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Invalidenstraße 43, D-10115 Berlin, Germany; email: [email protected] Steve C. Collins, African Butterfly Research Institute, P.O. Box 14308, Nairobi, Kenya Dr. Wanja Kinuthia, Department of Invertebrate Zoology, National Museums of Kenya, P.O. Box 40658, Nairobi, Kenya Abstract: All species of butterflies recorded from the Kaka- list it was clear that thorough investigation of scientific mega Forest N.R. in western Kenya are listed for the first collections can produce a very sound list of the occur- time. The check-list is based mainly on the collection of ring species in a relatively short time. The information A.B.R.I. (African Butterfly Research Institute, Nairobi). Furthermore records from the collection of the National density is frequently underestimated and collection data Museum of Kenya (Nairobi), the BIOTA-project and from offers a description of species diversity within a local literature were included in this list. In total 491 species or area, in particular with reference to rapid measurement 55 % of approximately 900 Kenyan species could be veri- of biodiversity (Trueman & Cranston 1997, Danks 1998, fied for the area. 31 species were not recorded before from Trojan 2000). Kenyan territory, 9 of them were described as new since the appearance of the book by Larsen (1996). The kind of list being produced here represents an information source for the total species diversity of the Checkliste der Tagfalter des Kakamega-Waldschutzge- Kakamega forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Forestry Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
    Forestry Department Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Forest Health & Biosecurity Working Papers OVERVIEW OF FOREST PESTS INDONESIA January 2007 Forest Resources Development Service Working Paper FBS/19E Forest Management Division FAO, Rome, Italy Forestry Department Overview of forest pests - Indonesia DISCLAIMER The aim of this document is to give an overview of the forest pest1 situation in Indonesia. It is not intended to be a comprehensive review. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. © FAO 2007 1 Pest: Any species, strain or biotype of plant, animal or pathogenic agent injurious to plants or plant products (FAO, 2004). ii Overview of forest pests - Indonesia TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction..................................................................................................................... 1 Forest pests...................................................................................................................... 1 Naturally regenerating forests..................................................................................... 1 Insects ..................................................................................................................... 1 Diseases..................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Summer Butterflies in Dinosaur National Monument
    VOLUME 37, NUMBER 1 91 Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 37(1), 1983, 91 SPECIES OF EUCALYPTUS AS FOOD PLANTS FOR LEPIDOPTERA IN EAST AFRICA Dr. 1. F. B. Common's paper, "Some factors responsible for imbalances in the Aus­ tralian fauna of Lepidoptera" (1981, J. Lepid. Soc. 34:286-294), and his remarks on the role of Eucalyptus as a lepidopterous food plant suggest that a list of the Lepidoptera feeding on the introduced Eucalyptus spp. in East Africa might be of interest. Various species of Eucalyptus are grown in many parts of East Africa, primarily as sources of firewood but also as useful agents in the reclamation of swampy land. E. citriodora is grown as a plantation crop in Zaire and elsewhere for its oil, used in the perfumery trade. The following is a list of species recorded as feeding on species of Eucalyptus: Lymantriidae-Euproctis molunduana Auriv., Dasychira georgiana Fawcett, D. basa­ lis Wlk., Argyrostagma niobe Weymer; Lasiocampidae---Lechriolepis nigrivenis Strand, Bombycopsis bipars Wlk., Nadiasa cuneata Distant, Pachypasa subfascia Wlk., P. pa­ pyri Tams, Eucraera salambo Vuillot; Saturniidae-Bunaea alcinoe Stoll, Nudaurelia conradsi Rebel, N. cytherea F., N. dione F., N. krucki Hering, N. gueinzii Karsch, Lobobunaea phaedusa Drury, Urota sinope Westwood, Athletes ethra Westwood; No­ todontidae-Desmeocraera varia Janse; Limacodidae-Latoia chapmanni Kirby; Psychidae-Eumeta rougeoti Bourgogne, Kotochalia junodi Hylaerts; Noctuidae­ Euxoa longidentifera Hampson, Spodoptera littoralis Bdv., Heliothis armigera (Hbn.), Anua mejanesi Gn., A. tirhaca Cramer, Achaea lienardi Bdv., A. catella Gn., A. faber Holland, PI usia limbirena Gn.; Geometridae-Orthonama obstipata F., Colocleom divisaria Wlk., Ascotis selenaria Schiff., A.
    [Show full text]
  • MOTHS and BUTTERFLIES LEPIDOPTERA DISTRIBUTION DATA SOURCES (LEPIDOPTERA) * Detailed Distributional Information Has Been J.D
    MOTHS AND BUTTERFLIES LEPIDOPTERA DISTRIBUTION DATA SOURCES (LEPIDOPTERA) * Detailed distributional information has been J.D. Lafontaine published for only a few groups of Lepidoptera in western Biological Resources Program, Agriculture and Agri-food Canada. Scott (1986) gives good distribution maps for Canada butterflies in North America but these are generalized shade Central Experimental Farm Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0C6 maps that give no detail within the Montane Cordillera Ecozone. A series of memoirs on the Inchworms (family and Geometridae) of Canada by McGuffin (1967, 1972, 1977, 1981, 1987) and Bolte (1990) cover about 3/4 of the Canadian J.T. Troubridge fauna and include dot maps for most species. A long term project on the “Forest Lepidoptera of Canada” resulted in a Pacific Agri-Food Research Centre (Agassiz) four volume series on Lepidoptera that feed on trees in Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada Canada and these also give dot maps for most species Box 1000, Agassiz, B.C. V0M 1A0 (McGugan, 1958; Prentice, 1962, 1963, 1965). Dot maps for three groups of Cutworm Moths (Family Noctuidae): the subfamily Plusiinae (Lafontaine and Poole, 1991), the subfamilies Cuculliinae and Psaphidinae (Poole, 1995), and ABSTRACT the tribe Noctuini (subfamily Noctuinae) (Lafontaine, 1998) have also been published. Most fascicles in The Moths of The Montane Cordillera Ecozone of British Columbia America North of Mexico series (e.g. Ferguson, 1971-72, and southwestern Alberta supports a diverse fauna with over 1978; Franclemont, 1973; Hodges, 1971, 1986; Lafontaine, 2,000 species of butterflies and moths (Order Lepidoptera) 1987; Munroe, 1972-74, 1976; Neunzig, 1986, 1990, 1997) recorded to date.
    [Show full text]
  • Trophobiosis Between Formicidae and Hemiptera (Sternorrhyncha and Auchenorrhyncha): an Overview
    December, 2001 Neotropical Entomology 30(4) 501 FORUM Trophobiosis Between Formicidae and Hemiptera (Sternorrhyncha and Auchenorrhyncha): an Overview JACQUES H.C. DELABIE 1Lab. Mirmecologia, UPA Convênio CEPLAC/UESC, Centro de Pesquisas do Cacau, CEPLAC, C. postal 7, 45600-000, Itabuna, BA and Depto. Ciências Agrárias e Ambientais, Univ. Estadual de Santa Cruz, 45660-000, Ilhéus, BA, [email protected] Neotropical Entomology 30(4): 501-516 (2001) Trofobiose Entre Formicidae e Hemiptera (Sternorrhyncha e Auchenorrhyncha): Uma Visão Geral RESUMO – Fêz-se uma revisão sobre a relação conhecida como trofobiose e que ocorre de forma convergente entre formigas e diferentes grupos de Hemiptera Sternorrhyncha e Auchenorrhyncha (até então conhecidos como ‘Homoptera’). As principais características dos ‘Homoptera’ e dos Formicidae que favorecem as interações trofobióticas, tais como a excreção de honeydew por insetos sugadores, atendimento por formigas e necessidades fisiológicas dos dois grupos de insetos, são discutidas. Aspectos da sua evolução convergente são apresenta- dos. O sistema mais arcaico não é exatamente trofobiótico, as forrageadoras coletam o honeydew despejado ao acaso na folhagem por indivíduos ou grupos de ‘Homoptera’ não associados. As relações trofobióticas mais comuns são facultativas, no entanto, esta forma de mutualismo é extremamente diversificada e é responsável por numerosas adaptações fisiológicas, morfológicas ou comportamentais entre os ‘Homoptera’, em particular Sternorrhyncha. As trofobioses mais diferenciadas são verdadeiras simbioses onde as adaptações mais extremas são observadas do lado dos ‘Homoptera’. Ao mesmo tempo, as formigas mostram adaptações comportamentais que resultam de um longo período de coevolução. Considerando-se os inse- tos sugadores como principais pragas dos cultivos em nível mundial, as implicações das rela- ções trofobióticas são discutidas no contexto das comunidades de insetos em geral, focalizan- do os problemas que geram em Manejo Integrado de Pragas (MIP), em particular.
    [Show full text]
  • CHECKLIST of WISCONSIN MOTHS (Superfamilies Mimallonoidea, Drepanoidea, Lasiocampoidea, Bombycoidea, Geometroidea, and Noctuoidea)
    WISCONSIN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY SPECIAL PUBLICATION No. 6 JUNE 2018 CHECKLIST OF WISCONSIN MOTHS (Superfamilies Mimallonoidea, Drepanoidea, Lasiocampoidea, Bombycoidea, Geometroidea, and Noctuoidea) Leslie A. Ferge,1 George J. Balogh2 and Kyle E. Johnson3 ABSTRACT A total of 1284 species representing the thirteen families comprising the present checklist have been documented in Wisconsin, including 293 species of Geometridae, 252 species of Erebidae and 584 species of Noctuidae. Distributions are summarized using the six major natural divisions of Wisconsin; adult flight periods and statuses within the state are also reported. Examples of Wisconsin’s diverse native habitat types in each of the natural divisions have been systematically inventoried, and species associated with specialized habitats such as peatland, prairie, barrens and dunes are listed. INTRODUCTION This list is an updated version of the Wisconsin moth checklist by Ferge & Balogh (2000). A considerable amount of new information from has been accumulated in the 18 years since that initial publication. Over sixty species have been added, bringing the total to 1284 in the thirteen families comprising this checklist. These families are estimated to comprise approximately one-half of the state’s total moth fauna. Historical records of Wisconsin moths are relatively meager. Checklists including Wisconsin moths were compiled by Hoy (1883), Rauterberg (1900), Fernekes (1906) and Muttkowski (1907). Hoy's list was restricted to Racine County, the others to Milwaukee County. Records from these publications are of historical interest, but unfortunately few verifiable voucher specimens exist. Unverifiable identifications and minimal label data associated with older museum specimens limit the usefulness of this information. Covell (1970) compiled records of 222 Geometridae species, based on his examination of specimens representing at least 30 counties.
    [Show full text]