Connecticut River Watch Program SUMMARY REPORT—2001-2008

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Connecticut River Watch Program SUMMARY REPORT—2001-2008 Connecticut River Watch Program EIGHTMILE RIVER RAPID BIOASSESSMENT SUMMARY REPORT—2001-2008 Connecticut River Coastal Conservation District deKoven House, 27 Washington Street Middletown, CT 06457 860‐346‐3282 www.conservect.org/ctrivercoastal TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 INTRODUCTION 2 BACKGROUND 3 PROJECT SUMMARY 4 RESULTS 7 RECOMMENDATIONS 19 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS 20 ATTACHMENTS Attachment A – RBV Organisms Attachment B – RBV Field Data Sheet Attachment C – Site Map Attachment D – Data Summary Eightmile River Rapid Biological Assessment Summary Report –2001‐2008 Jane Brawerman, Connecticut River Watch Program Director Connecticut River Coastal Conservation District deKoven House – 27 Washington Street Middletown, Connecticut 06457 860/346‐3282 November 2009 With support from and in collaboration with the Eightmile River Wild and Scenic Coordinating Committee Eightmile River Rapid Bioassessment Summary Report—2001‐2008 Page 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Benthic macroinvertebrate monitoring in the Eightmile River watershed has been conducted from 2001 to 2008 as part of a community‐based effort to document water quality and stream health in the watershed, and conserve and protect this valuable resource. Study streams have included the Eightmile River and East Branch Eightmile River (2001‐2002), and Beaver Brook, Burnhams Brook, Harris Brook, and an unnamed stream in Pleasant Valley Preserve (2003‐2008). Assessments were conducted according to the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection protocol, Rapid Bioassessment in Wadeable Streams and Rivers by Volunteer Monitors. Based on the study, streams were classified as having very good to exceptional water quality. Numerous volunteers from the community and area schools have participated in the assessment, raising awareness of local river resources and enhancing local stewardship. The information has been used to support local and regional river/watershed protection and management efforts, most notably, the effort to obtain Federal Wild and Scenic designation for the Eightmile River watershed, and to monitor changes in the Riverʹs water quality over time. INTRODUCTION In the fall of 2001, the Connecticut River Watch Program (CRWP), in cooperation with the Eightmile River Wild and Scenic Study Committee and the Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), initiated what was to become an ongoing rapid bioassessment of the Eightmile River Watershed. Beginning with an upstream‐downstream study of the Eightmile and East Branch Eightmile Rivers, the focus has evolved over the years to four tributary streams: Beaver Brook, Burnhams Brook, Pleasant Valley Preserve brook (unnamed), and Harris Brook. Teams of volunteers, including riparian landowners, town land use commissioners, teachers and students from area high schools and Three Rivers Community College, Boy Scout troops, and members of the community have assisted with the bioassessment, a survey of the benthic macroinvertebrate community following the DEP protocol: Rapid Bioassessment in Wadeable Streams and Rivers by Volunteer Monitors. The monitoring project, now being conducted with leadership from Three Rivers Community College in collaboration with the Eightmile River Wild and Scenic Coordinating Committee, is part of an ongoing community‐based effort begun in 1999 to assess the health of the Eightmile River and help ensure the protection of this valuable resource. Goals of the monitoring program include: to collect baseline information about the condition of the Eightmile River and its tributaries; to identify areas of the river in need of protection or restoration; and to raise community awareness of the River and the need to protect it. Information collected has been—and continues to be—used to identify, plan and prioritize conservation and improvement efforts. The CRWP monitoring program was also intended to support the Federal Wild and Scenic designation of the Eightmile River watershed, and complement and enhance ongoing education and conservation efforts. Eightmile River Rapid Bioassessment Summary Report—2001‐2008 Page 2 BACKGROUND The Connecticut River Watch Program Connecticut River Watch Program (CRWP) is the Connecticut River Coastal Conservation District’s citizen monitoring protection and improvement program for the Connecticut River and tributaries. Begun in 1992, CRWP initiates, supports and coordinates community‐based river monitoring, protection and improvement efforts throughout the Connecticut River Basin. Program goals are to collect scientifically credible data to use to identify and correct water quality problems; and build public awareness of local river resources and water quality issues. CRWP information has been used by municipalities to investigate potential sources of pollution, by the state for planning purposes, and by local groups in river protection and management efforts. Project areas include the Mattabesset/ Coginchaug, Eightmile, Salmon, Hockanum and Farmington River watersheds. Funding for the program has come from Connecticut DEP through US EPA grants under Section 319 of the Clean Water Act, and private donations. 1 The Eightmile River Watershed The Eightmile River is a major tributary of the Connecticut River located in the Tidelands Region of the lower Connecticut. The Eightmile flows approximately 15 miles from its headwaters in East Haddam to its confluence with the Connecticut River in Lyme. Its watershed comprises a 62 square mile area draining large portions of East Haddam, Lyme and Salem, and smaller portions of Colchester and East Lyme. Before it meets the Connecticut River, the Eightmile opens up into Hamburg Cove. This largely undeveloped watershed is home to a number of rare and endangered plants and animals. Past water quality assessments of the Eightmile River and its main tributary, the East Branch undertaken by the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP), have documented good water quality and a healthy benthic macroinvertebrate community, although the most recent 305(b) report and Impaired Waters List include the Eightmile River as not supporting recreation due to bacteria. The Eightmile River Wild and Scenic Study/Watershed Project The Eightmile River is now designated as a Wild and Scenic watershed after years of work by the local community and the Wild and Scenic Study Committee. While our Eightmile River assessment has focused most recently on supporting the designation process, the effort pre‐dated the bid for wild and scenic status, and was launched as part of the Eightmile River Watershed Project, a joint project of the University of Connecticut Cooperative Extension Program and The Nature Conservancy begun in 1995. This project was initiated to assist the watershed communities in protecting their natural resources as they develop their towns, and focused on educating municipal officials and landowners in the watershed about its natural and cultural resources through use of geographic information system (GIS) technology, and promoting use of this information to guide land use decision‐makers and watershed property owners. An advisory committee with representation from the three major watershed towns (East Haddam, Lyme and Salem) and other interests (e.g. the local land trusts), provided local input, and financial and other support for the project came from the Environmental Protection Agency, and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 1 For more information about CRWP, go to www.conservect.org/ctrivercoastal Eightmile River Rapid Bioassessment Summary Report—2001‐2008 Page 3 PROJECT SUMMARY Study Goals The Eightmile River Rapid Bioassessment was undertaken as part of an ongoing community‐based effort to document the health of the Eightmile River watershed. The overall goals of the study include: ♦ Collect baseline information about the condition of the Eightmile River and its tributaries ♦ Raise public interest in and knowledge of the Eightmile River and its watershed, both about the resources it has to offer to the community and the need to protect it ♦ Develop public awareness of water quality issues and human impacts on our rivers ♦ Build awareness among riparian landowners of the importance of maintaining streamside buffers ♦ Identify areas of concern and potential pollution problems that can be used to plan conservation and improvement efforts ♦ Form the basis for ongoing water quality monitoring activities that can be pursued in the future according to needs, level of interest, ability to commit time, and the availability of other resources Actual monitoring activities have been determined based on input from the Eightmile River Wild and Scenic Study/Coordinating Committee. In the first two years, 2001‐2002, an upstream‐downstream study of the Eightmile and East Branch Eightmile Rivers was conducted. In subsequent years, 2003‐2008, bioassessments were conducted at sites on four tributary streams: Burnhams Brook in East Haddam, Beaver Brook and the Pleasant Valley Preserve brook (unnamed) in Lyme, and Harris Brook in Salem. Study Design and Methodology The DEP’s Rapid Bioassessment in Wadeable Streams and Rivers by Volunteer Monitors (RBV) is a benthic macroinvertebrate assessment protocol designed specifically for volunteer programs. Benthic macroinvertebrates are bottom dwelling aquatic organisms that can be seen with the unaided eye, such as stonefly, mayfly and caddisfly nymphs. They are good indicators of water quality for several reasons: many are sensitive to pollution, the composition of the community is a good reflection of
Recommended publications
  • Thames River Basin Partnership Partners in Action Quarterly Report
    Thames River Basin Partnership Partners in Action Quarterly Report Summer 2018 Volume 47 The Thames River watershed includes the Five Mile, French, Moosup, Natchaug, Pachaug, Quinebaug, Shetucket, Willimantic, and Yantic Rivers and all their tributaries. We’re not just the "Thames main stem." Greetings from the Thames River Basin Partnership. Once again this quarter our partners have proven their ability to work cooperatively on projects compatible with the TRBP Workplan and in support of our common mission statement to share organizational resources and to develop a regional approach to natural resource protection. I hope you enjoy reading about these activities as much as I enjoy sharing information about them with you. For more information on any of these updates, just click on the blue website hyperlinks in this e-publication, but be sure to come back to finish reading the rest of the report. Jean Pillo, Watershed Conservation Project Manager Eastern Connecticut Conservation District And TRBP Coordinator Special Presentation If you missed the July 2018 meeting of the Thames River Basin Partnership, then you missed a presentation by Chuck Toal, Avalonia Land Conservancy’s development and programs director. Chuck gave a presentation on the 50 years of accomplishments of ALC as a regional land trust. ALC is focused on 22 towns in southeastern Connecticut. ALC, which oversees 4000 acres of preserved land, achieved accreditation in 2017. Their success has resulted from a working board of directors and the establishment of town committees to focus on smaller areas. Their current focus is to be more selective on land acquisition, particularly concentrating on building blocks of open space while also building an endowment fund land stewardship going forward.
    [Show full text]
  • Parks and Natural Resources Meeting 7:00 PM - Tuesday, September 17, 2019 Town Hall-4 South Eagleville Road- Conference Room B
    AGENDA Parks and Natural Resources Meeting 7:00 PM - Tuesday, September 17, 2019 Town Hall-4 South Eagleville Road- Conference Room B Page 1. CALL TO ORDER AND ROLL CALL 2. OPPORTUNITY FOR PUBLIC COMMENT 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES 3.1. 2019-08-20 PNRC Draft Minutes 3 - 4 4. NEW BUSINESS 4.1. Regional Economic Development Plan 5 - 18 • Monday, September 30, Coventry Senior Center/Patriot’s Park Lodge (172 Lake Street, Coventry) at 7 pm, meeting to discuss the strengths and challenges of the region Regional Economic Development Proposal and Scope of Work 4.2. Winter Programming Ideas • Recreation Rescue • Fit pass • Winter Tracking • Taste of Mansfield Event Feb 22 • Bat house making • Winter Tree Id 5. CONTINUING BUSINESS 5.1. Simpson-Wood Draft Management Plan 19 - 28 2019.04.22 Simpson Mgmt Plan_with goals TH 2019.06.26 New Goals Formatted 5.2. Moss Sanctuary Management Plan 29 - 40 2019.06.25 Moss Sanctuary Mgmt Plan no goals TH 2019.06.26 New Goals Formatted 5.3. Simpson-Wood Trails, etc. 6. COMMUNICATIONS 6.1. Minutes 41 - 49 CC21Aug19d 03Sept2019 PZC Minutes-Draft 03Sept2019 IWA Minutes Draft 7. EXECUTIVE SESSION IN ACCORDANCE WITH CGS SEC. 1-200(6)(D) 8. FUTURE MEETINGS Page 1 of 49 9. ADJOURNMENT Page 2 of 49 Parks and Natural Resources Committee Tuesday August 20, 2019 7:00 PM Mansfield Town Hall Conference Room B Minutes -- DRAFT 1. Call to order The meeting was called to order at 7:09 PM 2. Roll Call Attending: Jim Morrow (Chair), Ken Feathers (secretary), Michael Soares, Julianna Barrett (alt.) Not present but on committee roster: Quentin Kessel (Cons.
    [Show full text]
  • Spotlight on Mansfield Hollow Lake, a Different Kind of Lake
    Spotlight on Mansfield Hollow Lake, a Different Kind of Lake Mansfield Hollow Lake is an engineered impoundment of the Natchaug, Mount Hope and Fenton Rivers that resulted from the installation of a flood control project. The main function of the basin behind the dam is for flood control, although the lake is also used for many popular recreational activities. The CT DEEP Fisheries Division manages a northern pike nursery near one of the lake inlets and a boat launch for public use. The floodplain behind the dam is managed by the CT DEEP as Mansfield Hollow State Park. Swimming in the lake prohibited in the park by Connecticut State Statute section 25-43 due to its proximity to a downstream surface water drinking water intake. Landing of pontoon planes on the lake is also a prohibited activity under this legislation. Construction of the Mansfield Hollow Dam by the US Army Corp of Engineers was completed in 1952. The lake that formed behind the dam in Mansfield Hollow stretches over 450 acres through Mansfield, Windham, and Chaplin. It has a maximum depth of 16.5 feet. The flood storage area of the project, which is normally empty and is only utilized to store floodwaters, totals 1,880 acres and extends about three miles up the Natchaug River, 2.3 miles up the Mount Hope River, and 3.2 miles up the Fenton River. The project and associated lands cover 2,581 acres. Mansfield Hollow Lake can store up to 8.3 billion gallons of water for flood control purposes. This is equivalent to 6.1 inches of water covering its drainage area of 159 square miles.
    [Show full text]
  • Upper Natchaug River Healthy Watershed Implementation Plan
    Upper Natchaug River Healthy Watershed Implementation Plan Jean Pillo, Watershed Conservation Project Manager Eastern Connecticut Conservation District Project 15-03 is funded in part by a US EPA Clean Water Act § 319 NPS grant through the CT DEEP What do we mean by upper Natchaug? • The Natchaug Watershed is ~175 square miles. • ECCD documented pollution sources completed a watershed based plan for the lower 10 square miles Natchaug watershed in 2014. • Previously, EPA Clean Water Act funds were only available to clean up pollution from non- point sources. • Upper Natchaug Healthy Watershed Implementation Plan may allow federal funds to be used for pollution prevention in the future. Natchaug CAP Re-CAP Holly Drinkuth The Nature Conservancy Why the Upper Natchaug was selected for the first Healthy Watershed Plan in CT Eric Thomas, Watershed Manager CT Department of Energy and Environmental Protection What are we trying to accomplish • In partnership with CT DEEP, ECCD will identify (map) where the streams, lakes and ponds are not polluted and share this information with the municipalities. • ECCD will identify and recommend cost-effective methods to protect those high quality waters and watershed services they provide to the local communities. • With guidance from the Stakeholders, ECCD will develop and conduct a community outreach campaign to build an increased awareness regarding the natural ecosystem services and long-term benefits of healthy watersheds for resilient communities. • The final Natchaug River Healthy Watershed Implementation Plan will enhance the capacity (Towns, heath districts, COGs and others) to support the healthy watershed planning process (including reduced drinking water treatment and infrastructure costs).
    [Show full text]
  • Connecticut Watersheds
    Percent Impervious Surface Summaries for Watersheds CONNECTICUT WATERSHEDS Name Number Acres 1985 %IS 1990 %IS 1995 %IS 2002 %IS ABBEY BROOK 4204 4,927.62 2.32 2.64 2.76 3.02 ALLYN BROOK 4605 3,506.46 2.99 3.30 3.50 3.96 ANDRUS BROOK 6003 1,373.02 1.03 1.04 1.05 1.09 ANGUILLA BROOK 2101 7,891.33 3.13 3.50 3.78 4.29 ASH CREEK 7106 9,813.00 34.15 35.49 36.34 37.47 ASHAWAY RIVER 1003 3,283.88 3.89 4.17 4.41 4.96 ASPETUCK RIVER 7202 14,754.18 2.97 3.17 3.31 3.61 BALL POND BROOK 6402 4,850.50 3.98 4.67 4.87 5.10 BANTAM RIVER 6705 25,732.28 2.22 2.40 2.46 2.55 BARTLETT BROOK 3902 5,956.12 1.31 1.41 1.45 1.49 BASS BROOK 4401 6,659.35 19.10 20.97 21.72 22.77 BEACON HILL BROOK 6918 6,537.60 4.24 5.18 5.46 6.14 BEAVER BROOK 3802 5,008.24 1.13 1.22 1.24 1.27 BEAVER BROOK 3804 7,252.67 2.18 2.38 2.52 2.67 BEAVER BROOK 4803 5,343.77 0.88 0.93 0.94 0.95 BEAVER POND BROOK 6913 3,572.59 16.11 19.23 20.76 21.79 BELCHER BROOK 4601 5,305.22 6.74 8.05 8.39 9.36 BIGELOW BROOK 3203 18,734.99 1.40 1.46 1.51 1.54 BILLINGS BROOK 3605 3,790.12 1.33 1.48 1.51 1.56 BLACK HALL RIVER 4021 3,532.28 3.47 3.82 4.04 4.26 BLACKBERRY RIVER 6100 17,341.03 2.51 2.73 2.83 3.00 BLACKLEDGE RIVER 4707 16,680.11 2.82 3.02 3.16 3.34 BLACKWELL BROOK 3711 18,011.26 1.53 1.65 1.70 1.77 BLADENS RIVER 6919 6,874.43 4.70 5.57 5.79 6.32 BOG HOLLOW BROOK 6014 4,189.36 0.46 0.49 0.50 0.51 BOGGS POND BROOK 6602 4,184.91 7.22 7.78 8.41 8.89 BOOTH HILL BROOK 7104 3,257.81 8.54 9.36 10.02 10.55 BRANCH BROOK 6910 14,494.87 2.05 2.34 2.39 2.48 BRANFORD RIVER 5111 15,586.31 8.03 8.94 9.33 9.74
    [Show full text]
  • Windham Airport (IJD)
    DECEMBER 2017 FINAL Environmental Assessment (EA) & Environmental Impact Evaluation (EIE) for Obstruction Removal Windham Airport (IJD) Prepared for: Prepared by: FINDING OF NO SIGNIFICANT IMPACT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (EA) FOR OBSTRUCTION REMOVAL WINDHAM AIRPORT (IJD) FAA AIP NO. 3‐09‐0900‐010‐2014 CAA CONTRACT NO. 2014‐02 CHA CONTRACT NO. 29067 March 2017 Prepared for: Connecticut Airport Authority (CAA) Prepared BY: CHA Consulting, Inc. Windham Municipal Airport (IJD) Obstruction Analysis ‐Tree Removal FEDERAL FINDING After careful and thorough consideration of the facts contained herein, the undersigned finds that the proposed federal action is consistent with existing national policies and objectives as set forth in Section 101 of the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and other applicable environmental requirements and will not significantly affect the quality of the human environment or otherwise include any condition requiring consultation pursuant to Section 101 (2) (c) of the NEPA. Approved: 2/23/17 Richard Doucette Date Manager, Environmental Programs RECORD OF DECISION ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT EVALUATION (EIE) FOR OBSTRUCTION REMOVAL WINDHAM AIRPORT (IJD) FAA AIP NO. 3‐09‐0900‐010‐2014 CAA CONTRACT NO. 2014‐02 CHA CONTRACT NO. 29067 December 2017 Prepared for: Connecticut Airport Authority (CAA) Prepared BY: CHA Consulting, Inc. Notice: On November 11, 2017, the State of Connecticut, Office of Policy and Management (OPM) determined that the Connecticut Airport Authority (CAA) “shall not be construed to be a department, institution or agency of the state”, and that the Connecticut Environmental Policy Act (CEPA) is not applicable to CAA actions. See CT OPM notice included in Appendix B. As such, environmental review for the project is not subject to CEPA, and this ROD (prepared prior to November 2017) is not applicable.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecticut Fish Distribution Report2012
    Connecticut Fish Distribution Report 2012 Connecticut Department of Energy & Environmental Protection Bureau of Natural Resources Inland Fisheries Division 79 Elm Street, Hartford, CT 06106 860-424-3474 www.ct.gov/deep/fishing www.facebook.com/ctfishandwildlife The Connecticut Fish Distribution Report is published annually by the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection Daniel C. Esty, Commissioner Susan Whalen, Deputy Commissioner Bureau of Natural Resources William A. Hyatt, Chief Inland Fisheries Division Peter Aarrestad, Director 79 Elm Street Hartford, CT 06106-5127 860-424-FISH (3474) www.ct.gov/deep/fishing www.facebook.com/ctfishandwildlife Table of Contents Introduction 3 DEEP State Hatcheries 3 Connecticut’s Stocked Fish 4 Stocking Summary 2012 7 Fish Distribution Numbers 8 Catchable trout 8 Broodstock Atlantic salmon 18 Brown trout fry/fingerlings 18 Kokanee fry 18 Northern pike 19 Walleye 19 Channel catfish 19 Miscellaneous Diadromous Fish Stocking 20 (Atlantic salmon, brown trout, Shad, Alewife) Cover: Rearing tanks at the Quinebaug Valley State Trout Hatchery (top), a Seeforellen brown trout, from Kensington State Fish Hatchery being stocked (middle left-photo credit Bill Gerrish), channel catfish being unloaded and stocked (middle right-photo credit Neal Hagstrom), CT DEEP IFD trout stocking truck (lower left-photo credit Justin Wiggins), and a net of brown trout being removed from the rearing tank at the Burlington State Fish Hatchery and headed for the stocking truck (lower right-photo credit Bill Gerrish). The Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection is an Affirmative Action/Equal Opportunity Employer that is committed to complying with the requirements of the Americans with Disabilities Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Schenob Brook
    Sages Ravine Brook Schenob BrookSchenob Brook Housatonic River Valley Brook Moore Brook Connecticut River North Canaan Watchaug Brook Scantic RiverScantic River Whiting River Doolittle Lake Brook Muddy Brook Quinebaug River Blackberry River Hartland East Branch Salmon Brook Somers Union Colebrook East Branch Salmon Brook Lebanon Brook Fivemile RiverRocky Brook Blackberry RiverBlackberry River English Neighborhood Brook Sandy BrookSandy Brook Muddy Brook Freshwater Brook Ellis Brook Spruce Swamp Creek Connecticut River Furnace Brook Freshwater Brook Furnace Brook Suffield Scantic RiverScantic River Roaring Brook Bigelow Brook Salisbury Housatonic River Scantic River Gulf Stream Bigelow Brook Norfolk East Branch Farmington RiverWest Branch Salmon Brook Enfield Stafford Muddy BrookMuddy Brook Factory Brook Hollenbeck River Abbey Brook Roaring Brook Woodstock Wangum Lake Brook Still River Granby Edson BrookEdson Brook Thompson Factory Brook Still River Stony Brook Stony Brook Stony Brook Crystal Lake Brook Wangum Lake Brook Middle RiverMiddle River Sucker BrookSalmon Creek Abbey Brook Salmon Creek Mad RiverMad River East Granby French RiverFrench River Hall Meadow Brook Willimantic River Barkhamsted Connecticut River Fenton River Mill Brook Salmon Creek West Branch Salmon Brook Connecticut River Still River Salmon BrookSalmon Brook Thompson Brook Still River Canaan Brown Brook Winchester Broad BrookBroad Brook Bigelow Brook Bungee Brook Little RiverLittle River Fivemile River West Branch Farmington River Windsor Locks Willimantic River First
    [Show full text]
  • Thames River Basin Partnership Partners in Action Quarterly Report
    Thames River Basin Partnership Partners in Action Quarterly Report Spring 2017 Volume 42 The Thames River watershed includes the Five Mile, French, Moosup, Natchaug, Pachaug, Quinebaug, Shetucket, Willimantic, and Yantic Rivers and all their tributaries. We’re not just the "Thames main stem." Greetings from the Thames River Basin Partnership. Once again this quarter our partners have proven their ability to work cooperatively on projects compatible with the TRBP Workplan and in support of our common mission statement to share organizational resources and to develop a regional approach to natural resource protection. I hope you enjoy reading about these activities as much as I enjoy sharing information about them with you. For more information on any of these updates, just click on the blue website hyperlinks in this e-publication, but be sure to come back to finish reading the rest of the report. Jean Pillo, Watershed Conservation Project Manager Eastern Connecticut Conservation District And TRBP Coordinator Special Presentation If you missed the April 18, 2017 Thames River Basin Partnership meeting, then you missed a presentation by Adam Whelchel, Science Director for The Nature Conservancy. TNC recently completed a project with 10 southeastern Connecticut municipalities focused on regional community resilience. Southeastern Connecticut is a collection of communities each with its own individual identity and history. However, everyone involved with the project was reminded during this project that the fate of each community is closely tied to the social, environmental, and economic health of the whole region. Therefore, it is quite clear that the challenges facing this region are best tackled collectively with multiple towns, organizations, associations, foundations, and businesses working together.
    [Show full text]
  • 2016 Connecticut Angler’S Guide Inland & Marine Fishing
    Share the Experience—Take Someone Fishing • APRIL 9 Opening Day Trout Fishing 2016 CONNECTICUT ANGLER’S GUIDE INLAND & MARINE FISHING YOUR SOURCE For CT Fishing Information »New Marine Regulations for 2016 See page 58 Connecticut Department of Energy & Environmental Protection www.ct.gov/deep/fishing Voted CT’s #1 Party Boat Niantic, CT in 2015! Family Fishing Fun! 75’ Coast Guard licensed & inspected Fast • Clean • Comfortable 1-800-382-2824 NO RESERVATIONS REQUIRED www.BlackHawkSportFishing.com REWARD In 2016, over 175 tagged CT’s 2015 trout, worth over $15,000 Opening Day $5,000 in cash and prizes Winner have been released throughout CT’s ponds, lakes & streams. Check our website for details! Check out our website under “tagged trout” for free entry & details. www.BlackHawkSportFishing.com BlackHawk Sponsored by: Rowledge Pond Hatchery www.BlackHawkSportFishing.com www.RowledgePond.com Raymarine Fisherman’s World Fisherman’s Magazine www.Raymarine.com www.FishermansWorld.net www.TheFisherman.com 2016 CONNECTICUT ANGLER’S GUIDE INLAND REGULATIONS INLAND & MARINE FISHING Easy two-step process: 1. Check the REGULATION TABLE (page 25) for general Contents statewide regulations. General Fishing Information 2. Look up the waterbody in the LAKE AND PONDS Directory of Services Phone Numbers .............................2 (pages 32–41) or RIVERS AND STREAMS Licenses .......................................................................... 14 (pages 44–52) listings to find any special regulations. Permits ...........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ct Deep 2018 Spring Stocking Trout
    CT DEEP 2018 SPRING STOCKING TROUT YOU CAN FIND US DIRECTLY ON FACEBOOK. This page features a variety of information on fishing, hunting, and wildlife watching in Connecticut. The address is www.facebook.com/CTFishandWildlife. DEEP’s 2018 spring trout stockings were completed on May 25. Prior to Opening Day, approximately 306,000 trout were stocked into nearly 100 lakes and ponds and over 120 rivers and streams located throughout Connecticut. DEEP’s in-season stockings are now underway with nearly 240,000 additional trout scheduled to be stocked between Opening Day and the middle of May. On July 3 DEEP conducted its annual trout stocking on the Farmington River and fall stockings will begin in late August or early September if weather and flows cooperate. The following area was stocked on July 3 (updated 7/5/2018) RIVERS AND STREAMS: Just in time for the Fourth of July holiday, The Farmington River TMA (the West Branch Farmington River from the Goodwin Dam down to the upper boundary of the year-round catch-and-release area) was stocked with 1,800 Brown Trout (12 inch and up fish). The following areas were stocked the week of 5/21 - 5/25 (updated 5/25/2018) RIVERS AND STREAMS: In eastern Connecticut; Fenton River, Scantic River (Upper and lower), Natchaug River, Quinebaug River, Farm River (Lower), Jeremy River, Coginchaug River, the Salmon River & Salmon River TMA, Shetucket River and the Moosup River & the Moosup River TMA. In western Connecticut; Pequabuck River, Pequonnock River (Trumbull Basin, Open and Beardsley Park), the lower Naugatuck River (Waterbury – Beacon Falls), Weekeepeemee River, Little River (Oxford), Hop Brook, Nonewaug River and Pomperaug River.
    [Show full text]
  • Thames River Basin Partnership Partners in Action Quarterly Report
    Thames River Basin Partnership Partners in Action Quarterly Report fall 2020 Volume 56 The Thames River watershed includes the Five Mile, French, Moosup, Natchaug, Pachaug, Quinebaug, Shetucket, Willimantic, and Yantic Rivers and all their tributaries. We’re not just the "Thames main stem." Greetings from the Thames River Basin Partnership. Once again this quarter our partners have proven their ability to work cooperatively on projects compatible with the TRBP Plan of Work and in support of our common mission statement to share organizational resources and to develop a regional approach to natural resource protection. I hope you enjoy reading about these activities as much as I enjoy sharing information about them with you. For more information on any of these updates, just click on the blue website hyperlinks in this e-publication, but be sure to come back to finish reading the rest of the report. Jean Pillo, Watershed Conservation Project Manager Eastern Connecticut Conservation District And TRBP Coordinator Special Presentation If you missed the fall TRBP meeting, you missed a presentation by ECCD’s Assistant Director, Judy Rondeau. Judy gave an overview of the Eastern Connecticut Stormwater Collaborative. Modeled after the Central Massachusetts Stormwater Coalition, the Eastern Connecticut Stormwater Collaborative is a partnership of municipalities, non-profits, educational institutions and agencies working together to help the municipalities navigate the requirements of the Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) General permit. This unfunded mandate requires certain municipalities to comply with six minimum control measures of the MS4 permit. Rather than each municipality struggling through these requirements alone, the Collaborative gathers municipal representatives and agency specialists to discuss common issues, resource sharing and education and outreach strategies to meet the requirements of the MS4 permit.
    [Show full text]