DOCSLIB.ORG

Lecture Notes Particle Physics II Quantum Chromo Dynamics 1. SU(2)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Lecture Notes Particle Physics II Quantum Chromo Dynamics 1. SU(2) Lecture notes Particle Physics II Quantum Chromo Dynamics 1. SU(2) and SU(3) Symmetry Michiel Botje Nikhef, Science Park, Amsterdam December 7, 2012 Symmetry in (particle) physics If the Lagrangian of the World would be fully known we could • derive the equations of motion from it, and the symmetries of Nature and the conservation laws would automatically follow. For instance the Maxwell Lagrangian yields, via the Maxwell equa- • tions, all the symmetries and conservation laws of electrodynamics. In subatomic physics the Lagrangians are not so obvious, and sym- • metry considerations provide essential clues to construct them. It can be shown that an invariance of the Lagrangian under a • symmetry operation leads to a conserved quantity (Noether's the- orem). Thus, if a symmetry is found, the hunt is open for the related conservation law, and if a conservation law is found, the hunt is open for the related symmetry. For instance we know that electric charge is conserved in all reactions of elementary particles, but what symmetry is responsible for this charge conservation?11 As will become clear later, it turns out that continuous symme- • tries lead to additive conserved quantum numbers (e.g. rotation invariance angular momentum conservation) while discrete sym- ! metries lead to multiplicative conserved quantum numbers (e.g. reflection symmetry parity conservation). ! We will now use some elementary non-relativistic quantum me- • chanics to establish the relation between symmetries and constants of motion. 11The answer will be given in the next lecture. 1{3 When is an observable conserved? The expectation value of a quantum mechanical operator F is • F F with Hermitian conjugate F ∗ F y h i ≡ h j j i h i ≡ h j j i The expectation value of an observable should be a real number • so that F = F ∗. It immediately follows that the quantum h i h i mechanical operator of an observable should be Hermitian F = F y if F is observable h i Because energy is an observable it follows that the Hamiltonian • energy operator H is Hermitian. Thus we have for the Schr¨odinger equation and its Hermitian conjugate @ @ i j i = H i h j = H @t j i − @t h j This immediately leads to • @ F h i = i HF FH = 0 HF FH = 0 @t h j − j i , − Thus F is a constant of motion when F commutes with H • h i [F; H] = FH HF = 0 − A theorem of quantum mechanics states that two operators can be • simultaneously diagonalised if (and only if) they commute. Thus, if F is a constant of motion, the eigentates of H can be h i chosen such that they are also eigenstates of F H = E j i j i F = f j i j i 1{4 How do we find a conserved observable? Obviously when the Hamiltonian (or Lagrangian) is known, we • can search for commuting Hermitian operators whose expectation values are then constants of motion. However, when H is not fully known, it turns out that it is sufficient to establish (or postulate) the invariance of H under a symmetry operation. To see this, consider a transformation operator U that trans- • forms one wave function into another 0 = U j i j i Wave functions are always normalized so that we must have • 0 0 = U yU = 1 h j i h j j i It follows that the transformation operator must be unitary • U yU = UU y = I We say that U is a symmetry operator when 0 obeys the • j i same Schr¨odingerequation as . Then (U time independent) j i @U @ 1 i j i = HU i j i = U − HU = H @t j i ! @t j i Iwant j i and thus 1 U − HU = H or [H; U] = 0 Thus a symmetry operator U commutes with the Hamiltonian, • just as our conserved operator F on page 1{4. But U is unitary, and not necessarily Hermitian so that we cannot per se identify U with an observable constant of motion. 1{5 Hermitian, unitary, or both We have introduced quantum mechanical operators F which, when • Hermitian, correspond to observable expectation values F . Also, h i when F commutes with H then F is a constant of motion. h i We have also introduced transformation operators U which trans- • form one wave function into another. This operator is unitary be- cause normalisation must be preserved. When U commutes with the Hamiltonian, it leaves the Schr¨odingerequation invariant. Such unitary commuting operators are called symmetry operators. Our findings up to now are best summarised in a table • Operator Unitary Hermitian Commuting Observable x yes x Conserved observable x yes yes Transformation yes x x Symmetry transformation yes x yes Conserved + symmetry yes yes yes Thus to link a symmetry to a constant of motion, we can first try • to look for operators that are both unitary and Hermitian (and commute with the Hamiltonian). 1{6 Hermitian unitary transformations In our search for Hermitian unitary transformations, let us take a • unitary operator for which U 2 = I Multiplying from the right with U y and using UU y = I we find that U = U y so that the operator is both unitary and Hermitian. Examples are the charge conjugation operator C that turns parti- • cles into antiparticles (and vice versa) and the parity operator P that reflects the space coordinates (r r).12 ! − We can thus immediately say that if the Hamiltonian is invariant • under C or P , then the observables related to these operators are conserved quantities. Are these the only possible unitary Hermitian operators? The • answer is no, and an example is given by the Pauli spin matrices which are also both unitary and Hermitian 0 1 0 i 1 0 σx = ; σy = − ; σz = 1 0 i 0 0 1 − Let U1 and U2 be two discrete symmetry operators with • U1 = λ1 ;U2 = λ2 and U1U2 = λ1λ2 j i j i j i j i j i j i The (conserved) quantum numbers are obviously multiplicative. In these lectures we are not so much interested in discrete trans- • formations (like C, P , T ) but, instead, in continuous transforma- tions. These transformations are unitary (by definition), but not necessarily Hermitian. But the generator of a unitary continuous transformation is Hermitian, as we will see. 12The time reversal operator T also has T 2 = I but it is antiunitary, and not unitary. 1{7 Continuous transformations There is a large class of continuous transformations that • depend on one or more continuous parameters, say α 0 = U(α) j i j i An example is the transformation induced by a rotation of the wave function, or the coordinate system, over an angle α. Such transformations have the property that they can be written • as a succession of infinitesimal deviations from the identity iα n U(α) = lim I + F = exp(iαF ) n n !1 The factor `i' is a matter of definition but important (see below). In the above, F is called the generator of U. Exponentiation of an operator F should be interpreted as • 1 exp(iαF ) = I + iαF + (iαF )2 + 2! ··· Watch out: eAeB = eA+B is only true when A and B commute. Now if U is unitary (U yU = I) we have, to first order in α, • U yU = (I iαF y)(I + iαF ) = I + iα(F F y) = I − − so that F = F y. In other words, the generator of a unitary oper- ator is Hermitian. Now we also understand the factor `i' in the definition of a genera- • tor: without it the generator G iF of a unitary operator would ≡ not be Hermitian but anti-Hermitian: G = Gy − 1{8 Generators as conserved observables We have seen that if U is a symmetry operator, then it is unitary • and commutes with the Hamiltonian. The generator F of U is Hermitian and will also commute with H, as we will now show. First, if U(α) is a symmetry operator then the infinitesimal trans- • formation U() will also be a symmetry operator. Expanding to the first order in obtains [H; U] =: [H; I + iF ] = [H; I] +i [H; F ] = 0 [H; F ] = 0 ! 0 The generator F of a symmetry| {z } transformation is thus both Her- • mitian and commutes with H so that its expectation value is an observable constant of motion. Clearly a multiplication of continuous symmetry operators corre- • sponds to the addition of their generators in the exponent. The conserved quantum numbers, which are related to F and not to U, are therefore additive. We now have the work plan to find the relation between a contin- • uous symmetry of H and the corresponding conserved observable: 1. Define the symmetry transformation and find the generator F 2. The expectation value of F is a constant of motion Next, we will introduce some concepts of group theory which is • the mathematical framework to systematically describe and clas- sify symmetry operations. 1{9 Exercise 1.1: Show that (consult a quantum mechanics book if necessary) (a) [0:5] Invariance for translations in space leads to the conservation of momentum. (b) [0:5] Invariance for translations in time leads to the conservation of energy. (c) [0:5] Rotational invariance leads to the conservation of angular momentum. 1{10 Group theory It is clear that a combination of two symmetry operations|that • each leaves the system unchanged|is again a symmetry operation. And there is of course the trivial symmetry operation, namely, `do nothing'. Furthermore, we can assume that each symmetry oper- ation can be undone. We say, in fact, that symmetry operations form a group.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lecture 1 – Symmetries & Conservation
    LECTURE 1 – SYMMETRIES & CONSERVATION Contents • Symmetries & Transformations • Transformations in Quantum Mechanics • Generators • Symmetry in Quantum Mechanics • Conservations Laws in Classical Mechanics • Parity Messages • Symmetries give rise to conserved quantities . Symmetries & Conservation Laws Lecture 1, page1 Symmetry & Transformations Systems contain Symmetry if they are unchanged by a Transformation . This symmetry is often due to an absence of an absolute reference and corresponds to the concept of indistinguishability . It will turn out that symmetries are often associated with conserved quantities . Transformations may be: Active: Active • Move object • More physical Passive: • Change “description” Eg. Change Coordinate Frame • More mathematical Passive Symmetries & Conservation Laws Lecture 1, page2 We will consider two classes of Transformation: Space-time : • Translations in (x,t) } Poincaré Transformations • Rotations and Lorentz Boosts } • Parity in (x,t) (Reflections) Internal : associated with quantum numbers Translations: x → 'x = x − ∆ x t → 't = t − ∆ t Rotations (e.g. about z-axis): x → 'x = x cos θz + y sin θz & y → 'y = −x sin θz + y cos θz Lorentz (e.g. along x-axis): x → x' = γ(x − βt) & t → t' = γ(t − βx) Parity: x → x' = −x t → t' = −t For physical laws to be useful, they should exhibit a certain generality, especially under symmetry transformations. In particular, we should expect invariance of the laws to change of the status of the observer – all observers should have the same laws, even if the evaluation of measurables is different. Put differently, the laws of physics applied by different observers should lead to the same observations. It is this principle which led to the formulation of Special Relativity.
    [Show full text]
  • The Homology Theory of the Closed Geodesic Problem
    J. DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY 11 (1976) 633-644 THE HOMOLOGY THEORY OF THE CLOSED GEODESIC PROBLEM MICHELINE VIGUE-POIRRIER & DENNIS SULLIVAN The problem—does every closed Riemannian manifold of dimension greater than one have infinitely many geometrically distinct periodic geodesies—has received much attention. An affirmative answer is easy to obtain if the funda- mental group of the manifold has infinitely many conjugacy classes, (up to powers). One merely needs to look at the closed curve representations with minimal length. In this paper we consider the opposite case of a finite fundamental group and show by using algebraic calculations and the work of Gromoll-Meyer [2] that the answer is again affirmative if the real cohomology ring of the manifold or any of its covers requires at least two generators. The calculations are based on a method of the second author sketched in [6], and he wishes to acknowledge the motivation provided by conversations with Gromoll in 1967 who pointed out the surprising fact that the available tech- niques of algebraic topology loop spaces, spectral sequences, and so forth seemed inadequate to handle the "rational problem" of calculating the Betti numbers of the space of all closed curves on a manifold. He also acknowledges the help given by John Morgan in understanding what goes on here. The Gromoll-Meyer theorem which uses nongeneric Morse theory asserts the following. Let Λ(M) denote the space of all maps of the circle S1 into M (not based). Then there are infinitely many geometrically distinct periodic geodesies in any metric on M // the Betti numbers of Λ(M) are unbounded.
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Group Theory and Standard Model
    Physics 129b Lecture 18 Caltech, 03/05/20 10 Group Theory and Standard Model Group theory played a big role in the development of the Standard model, which explains the origin of all fundamental particles we see in nature. In order to understand how that works, we need to learn about a new Lie group: SU(3). 10.1 SU(3) and more about Lie groups SU(3) is the group of special (det U = 1) unitary (UU y = I) matrices of dimension three. What are the generators of SU(3)? If we want three dimensional matrices X such that U = eiθX is unitary (eigenvalues of absolute value 1), then X need to be Hermitian (real eigenvalue). Moreover, if U has determinant 1, X has to be traceless. Therefore, the generators of SU(3) are the set of traceless Hermitian matrices of dimension 3. Let's count how many independent parameters we need to characterize this set of matrices (what is the dimension of the Lie algebra). 3 × 3 complex matrices contains 18 real parameters. If it is to be Hermitian, then the number of parameters reduces by a half to 9. If we further impose traceless-ness, then the number of parameter reduces to 8. Therefore, the generator of SU(3) forms an 8 dimensional vector space. We can choose a basis for this eight dimensional vector space as 00 1 01 00 −i 01 01 0 01 00 0 11 λ1 = @1 0 0A ; λ2 = @i 0 0A ; λ3 = @0 −1 0A ; λ4 = @0 0 0A (1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 00 0 −i1 00 0 01 00 0 0 1 01 0 0 1 1 λ5 = @0 0 0 A ; λ6 = @0 0 1A ; λ7 = @0 0 −iA ; λ8 = p @0 1 0 A (2) i 0 0 0 1 0 0 i 0 3 0 0 −2 They are called the Gell-Mann matrices.
    [Show full text]
  • Kinematic Relativity of Quantum Mechanics: Free Particle with Different Boundary Conditions
    Journal of Applied Mathematics and Physics, 2017, 5, 853-861 http://www.scirp.org/journal/jamp ISSN Online: 2327-4379 ISSN Print: 2327-4352 Kinematic Relativity of Quantum Mechanics: Free Particle with Different Boundary Conditions Gintautas P. Kamuntavičius 1, G. Kamuntavičius 2 1Department of Physics, Vytautas Magnus University, Kaunas, Lithuania 2Christ’s College, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK How to cite this paper: Kamuntavičius, Abstract G.P. and Kamuntavičius, G. (2017) Kinema- tic Relativity of Quantum Mechanics: Free An investigation of origins of the quantum mechanical momentum operator Particle with Different Boundary Condi- has shown that it corresponds to the nonrelativistic momentum of classical tions. Journal of Applied Mathematics and special relativity theory rather than the relativistic one, as has been uncondi- Physics, 5, 853-861. https://doi.org/10.4236/jamp.2017.54075 tionally believed in traditional relativistic quantum mechanics until now. Taking this correspondence into account, relativistic momentum and energy Received: March 16, 2017 operators are defined. Schrödinger equations with relativistic kinematics are Accepted: April 27, 2017 introduced and investigated for a free particle and a particle trapped in the Published: April 30, 2017 deep potential well. Copyright © 2017 by authors and Scientific Research Publishing Inc. Keywords This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution International Special Relativity, Quantum Mechanics, Relativistic Wave Equations, License (CC BY 4.0). Solutions
    [Show full text]
  • Relativistic Quantum Mechanics 1
    Relativistic Quantum Mechanics 1 The aim of this chapter is to introduce a relativistic formalism which can be used to describe particles and their interactions. The emphasis 1.1 SpecialRelativity 1 is given to those elements of the formalism which can be carried on 1.2 One-particle states 7 to Relativistic Quantum Fields (RQF), which underpins the theoretical 1.3 The Klein–Gordon equation 9 framework of high energy particle physics. We begin with a brief summary of special relativity, concentrating on 1.4 The Diracequation 14 4-vectors and spinors. One-particle states and their Lorentz transforma- 1.5 Gaugesymmetry 30 tions follow, leading to the Klein–Gordon and the Dirac equations for Chaptersummary 36 probability amplitudes; i.e. Relativistic Quantum Mechanics (RQM). Readers who want to get to RQM quickly, without studying its foun- dation in special relativity can skip the first sections and start reading from the section 1.3. Intrinsic problems of RQM are discussed and a region of applicability of RQM is defined. Free particle wave functions are constructed and particle interactions are described using their probability currents. A gauge symmetry is introduced to derive a particle interaction with a classical gauge field. 1.1 Special Relativity Einstein’s special relativity is a necessary and fundamental part of any Albert Einstein 1879 - 1955 formalism of particle physics. We begin with its brief summary. For a full account, refer to specialized books, for example (1) or (2). The- ory oriented students with good mathematical background might want to consult books on groups and their representations, for example (3), followed by introductory books on RQM/RQF, for example (4).
    [Show full text]
  • Class 2: Operators, Stationary States
    Class 2: Operators, stationary states Operators In quantum mechanics much use is made of the concept of operators. The operator associated with position is the position vector r. As shown earlier the momentum operator is −iℏ ∇ . The operators operate on the wave function. The kinetic energy operator, T, is related to the momentum operator in the same way that kinetic energy and momentum are related in classical physics: p⋅ p (−iℏ ∇⋅−) ( i ℏ ∇ ) −ℏ2 ∇ 2 T = = = . (2.1) 2m 2 m 2 m The potential energy operator is V(r). In many classical systems, the Hamiltonian of the system is equal to the mechanical energy of the system. In the quantum analog of such systems, the mechanical energy operator is called the Hamiltonian operator, H, and for a single particle ℏ2 HTV= + =− ∇+2 V . (2.2) 2m The Schrödinger equation is then compactly written as ∂Ψ iℏ = H Ψ , (2.3) ∂t and has the formal solution iHt Ψ()r,t = exp − Ψ () r ,0. (2.4) ℏ Note that the order of performing operations is important. For example, consider the operators p⋅ r and r⋅ p . Applying the first to a wave function, we have (pr⋅) Ψ=−∇⋅iℏ( r Ψ=−) i ℏ( ∇⋅ rr) Ψ− i ℏ( ⋅∇Ψ=−) 3 i ℏ Ψ+( rp ⋅) Ψ (2.5) We see that the operators are not the same. Because the result depends on the order of performing the operations, the operator r and p are said to not commute. In general, the expectation value of an operator Q is Q=∫ Ψ∗ (r, tQ) Ψ ( r , td) 3 r .
    [Show full text]
  • Question 1: Kinetic Energy Operator in 3D in This Exercise We Derive 2 2 ¯H ¯H 1 ∂2 Lˆ2 − ∇2 = − R +
    ExercisesQuantumDynamics,week4 May22,2014 Question 1: Kinetic energy operator in 3D In this exercise we derive 2 2 ¯h ¯h 1 ∂2 lˆ2 − ∇2 = − r + . (1) 2µ 2µ r ∂r2 2µr2 The angular momentum operator is defined by ˆl = r × pˆ, (2) where the linear momentum operator is pˆ = −i¯h∇. (3) The first step is to work out the lˆ2 operator and to show that 2 2 ˆl2 = −¯h (r × ∇) · (r × ∇)=¯h [−r2∇2 + r · ∇ + (r · ∇)2]. (4) A convenient way to work with cross products, a = b × c, (5) is to write the components using the Levi-Civita tensor ǫijk, 3 3 ai = ǫijkbjck ≡ X X ǫijkbjck, (6) j=1 k=1 where we introduced the Einstein summation convention: whenever an index appears twice one assumes there is a sum over this index. 1a. Write the cross product in components and show that ǫ1,2,3 = ǫ2,3,1 = ǫ3,1,2 =1, (7) ǫ3,2,1 = ǫ2,1,3 = ǫ1,3,2 = −1, (8) and all other component of the tensor are zero. Note: the tensor is +1 for ǫ1,2,3, it changes sign whenever two indices are permuted, and as a result it is zero whenever two indices are equal. 1b. Check this relation ǫijkǫij′k′ = δjj′ δkk′ − δjk′ δj′k. (9) (Remember the implicit summation over index i). 1c. Use Eq. (9) to derive Eq. (4). 1d. Show that ∂ r = r · ∇ (10) ∂r 1e. Show that 1 ∂2 ∂2 2 ∂ r = + (11) r ∂r2 ∂r2 r ∂r 1f. Combine the results to derive Eq.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Physics (UCSD Physics 130)
    Quantum Physics (UCSD Physics 130) April 2, 2003 2 Contents 1 Course Summary 17 1.1 Problems with Classical Physics . .... 17 1.2 ThoughtExperimentsonDiffraction . ..... 17 1.3 Probability Amplitudes . 17 1.4 WavePacketsandUncertainty . ..... 18 1.5 Operators........................................ .. 19 1.6 ExpectationValues .................................. .. 19 1.7 Commutators ...................................... 20 1.8 TheSchr¨odingerEquation .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... 20 1.9 Eigenfunctions, Eigenvalues and Vector Spaces . ......... 20 1.10 AParticleinaBox .................................... 22 1.11 Piecewise Constant Potentials in One Dimension . ...... 22 1.12 The Harmonic Oscillator in One Dimension . ... 24 1.13 Delta Function Potentials in One Dimension . .... 24 1.14 Harmonic Oscillator Solution with Operators . ...... 25 1.15 MoreFunwithOperators. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .... 26 1.16 Two Particles in 3 Dimensions . .. 27 1.17 IdenticalParticles ................................. .... 28 1.18 Some 3D Problems Separable in Cartesian Coordinates . ........ 28 1.19 AngularMomentum.................................. .. 29 1.20 Solutions to the Radial Equation for Constant Potentials . .......... 30 1.21 Hydrogen........................................ .. 30 1.22 Solution of the 3D HO Problem in Spherical Coordinates . ....... 31 1.23 Matrix Representation of Operators and States . ........... 31 1.24 A Study of ℓ =1OperatorsandEigenfunctions . 32 1.25 Spin1/2andother2StateSystems . ...... 33 1.26 Quantum
    [Show full text]
  • Spin in Relativistic Quantum Theory∗
    Spin in relativistic quantum theory∗ W. N. Polyzou, Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242 W. Gl¨ockle, Institut f¨urtheoretische Physik II, Ruhr-Universit¨at Bochum, D-44780 Bochum, Germany H. Wita la M. Smoluchowski Institute of Physics, Jagiellonian University, PL-30059 Krak´ow,Poland today Abstract We discuss the role of spin in Poincar´einvariant formulations of quan- tum mechanics. 1 Introduction In this paper we discuss the role of spin in relativistic few-body models. The new feature with spin in relativistic quantum mechanics is that sequences of rotationless Lorentz transformations that map rest frames to rest frames can generate rotations. To get a well-defined spin observable one needs to define it in one preferred frame and then use specific Lorentz transformations to relate the spin in the preferred frame to any other frame. Different choices of the preferred frame and the specific Lorentz transformations lead to an infinite number of possible observables that have all of the properties of a spin. This paper provides a general discussion of the relation between the spin of a system and the spin of its elementary constituents in relativistic few-body systems. In section 2 we discuss the Poincar´egroup, which is the group relating inertial frames in special relativity. Unitary representations of the Poincar´e group preserve quantum probabilities in all inertial frames, and define the rel- ativistic dynamics. In section 3 we construct a large set of abstract operators out of the Poincar´egenerators, and determine their commutation relations and ∗During the preparation of this paper Walter Gl¨ockle passed away.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantization of the Free Electromagnetic Field: Photons and Operators G
    Quantization of the Free Electromagnetic Field: Photons and Operators G. M. Wysin [email protected], http://www.phys.ksu.edu/personal/wysin Department of Physics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506-2601 August, 2011, Vi¸cosa, Brazil Summary The main ideas and equations for quantized free electromagnetic fields are developed and summarized here, based on the quantization procedure for coordinates (components of the vector potential A) and their canonically conjugate momenta (components of the electric field E). Expressions for A, E and magnetic field B are given in terms of the creation and annihilation operators for the fields. Some ideas are proposed for the inter- pretation of photons at different polarizations: linear and circular. Absorption, emission and stimulated emission are also discussed. 1 Electromagnetic Fields and Quantum Mechanics Here electromagnetic fields are considered to be quantum objects. It’s an interesting subject, and the basis for consideration of interactions of particles with EM fields (light). Quantum theory for light is especially important at low light levels, where the number of light quanta (or photons) is small, and the fields cannot be considered to be continuous (opposite of the classical limit, of course!). Here I follow the traditinal approach of quantization, which is to identify the coordinates and their conjugate momenta. Once that is done, the task is straightforward. Starting from the classical mechanics for Maxwell’s equations, the fundamental coordinates and their momenta in the QM sys- tem must have a commutator defined analogous to [x, px] = i¯h as in any simple QM system. This gives the correct scale to the quantum fluctuations in the fields and any other dervied quantities.
    [Show full text]
  • Simple Quantum Systems in the Momentum Representation
    Simple quantum systems in the momentum rep- resentation H. N. N´u˜nez-Y´epez † Departamento de F´ısica, Universidad Aut´onoma Metropolitana-Iztapalapa, Apar- tado Postal 55-534, Iztapalapa 09340 D.F. M´exico, E. Guillaum´ın-Espa˜na, R. P. Mart´ınez-y-Romero, A. L. Salas-Brito ‡ ¶ Laboratorio de Sistemas Din´amicos, Departamento de Ciencias B´asicas, Univer- sidad Aut´onoma Metropolitana-Azcapotzalco, Apartado Postal 21-726, Coyoacan 04000 D. F. M´exico Abstract The momentum representation is seldom used in quantum mechanics courses. Some students are thence surprised by the change in viewpoint when, in doing advanced work, they have to use the momentum rather than the coordinate repre- sentation. In this work, we give an introduction to quantum mechanics in momen- tum space, where the Schr¨odinger equation becomes an integral equation. To this end we discuss standard problems, namely, the free particle, the quantum motion under a constant potential, a particle interacting with a potential step, and the motion of a particle under a harmonic potential. What is not so standard is that they are all conceived from momentum space and hence they, with the exception of the free particle, are not equivalent to the coordinate space ones with the same arXiv:physics/0001030v2 [physics.ed-ph] 18 Jan 2000 names. All the problems are solved within the momentum representation making no reference to the systems they correspond to in the coordinate representation. E-mail: [email protected] † On leave from Fac. de Ciencias, UNAM. E-mail: [email protected] ‡ E-mail: [email protected] or [email protected] ¶ 1 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Random Perturbation to the Geodesic Equation
    The Annals of Probability 2016, Vol. 44, No. 1, 544–566 DOI: 10.1214/14-AOP981 c Institute of Mathematical Statistics, 2016 RANDOM PERTURBATION TO THE GEODESIC EQUATION1 By Xue-Mei Li University of Warwick We study random “perturbation” to the geodesic equation. The geodesic equation is identified with a canonical differential equation on the orthonormal frame bundle driven by a horizontal vector field of norm 1. We prove that the projections of the solutions to the perturbed equations, converge, after suitable rescaling, to a Brownian 8 motion scaled by n(n−1) where n is the dimension of the state space. Their horizontal lifts to the orthonormal frame bundle converge also, to a scaled horizontal Brownian motion. 1. Introduction. Let M be a complete smooth Riemannian manifold of dimension n and TxM its tangent space at x M. Let OM denote the space of orthonormal frames on M and π the projection∈ that takes an orthonormal n frame u : R TxM to the point x in M. Let Tuπ denote its differential at u. For e Rn→, let H (e) be the basic horizontal vector field on OM such that ∈ u Tuπ(Hu(e)) = u(e), that is, Hu(e) is the horizontal lift of the tangent vector n u(e) through u. If ei is an orthonormal basis of R , the second-order dif- { } n ferential operator ∆H = i=1 LH(ei)LH(ei) is the Horizontal Laplacian. Let wi, 1 i n be a family of real valued independent Brownian motions. { t ≤ ≤ } P The solution (ut,t<ζ), to the following semi-elliptic stochastic differen- n i tial equation (SDE), dut = i=1 Hut (ei) dwt, is a Markov process with 1 ◦ infinitesimal generator 2 ∆H and lifetime ζ.
    [Show full text]