Reach, Implications, Consequences

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Reach, Implications, Consequences MAPPING THE BELT AND ROAD INITIATIVE REACH, IMPLICATIONS, CONSEQUENCES EDITORS Harsh V Pant and Premesha Saha Introduction © 2021 Observer Research Foundation. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without permission in writing from ORF. Attribution: Harsh V Pant and Premesha Saha (Editors), Mapping the Belt and Road Initiative: Reach, Implications, Consequences, February 2021, Observer Research Foundation. Observer Research Foundation 20 Rouse Avenue, Institutional Area New Delhi 110002 India [email protected] www.orfonline.org ORF provides non-partisan, independent analyses and inputs on matters of security, strategy, economy, 2 development, energy and global governance to diverse decision makers (governments, business communities, academia and civil society). ORF’s mandate is to conduct in-depth research, provide inclusive platforms, and invest in tomorrow’s thought leaders today. Editing and Production: Vinia Datinguinoo Mukherjee Design and layout: Rahil Miya Shaikh ISBN: 978-93-90494-37-8 Contents Introduction INTRODUCTION 5 Harsh V Pant and Premesha Saha SECTION 1 PIVOTAL GEOGRAPHIES: PROJECTS, PROGRESS, AND THE CHALLENGES SOUTH ASIA CPEC: Building a Path For 9 Pakistan’s Financial Ruin Kriti M Shah BRI & Afghanistan: Systemic Challenges Impede 13 Integration Shubhangi Pandey Bangladesh: Riding the BRI Tide 20 Joyeeta Bhattacharjee The BRI Quandary in Nepal and Sri Lanka 24 Sohini Nayak SOUTHEAST ASIA AND OCEANIA 3 Myanmar and Thailand: A Cautious Approach to the BRI 31 K. Yhome Southeast Asia: A Key Link to BRI’s Maritime Road 38 Premesha Saha Polemic Intersections: The BRI in Australia, New Zealand, 45 and the Pacific Island Countries Pratnashree Basu MIDDLE EAST Walking the Geopolitical Trapeze Wire 51 Kabir Taneja AFRICA Counting the Risks and Rewards of the BRI 56 Abhishek Mishra CENTRAL ASIA China Revives its Ancient Silk Route 63 Ayjaz Wani LATIN AMERICA The ‘Bright Spark’ for BRI? 70 Anant Singh Mann and Dipayan Pal Contents Introduction SECTION 2 GLOBAL POWERS AND THEIR RESPONSES TO THE BRI Trump’s Response to the BRI: Jettisoning 78 the ‘America First’ Approach Kashish Parpiani Russia’s Guarded Optimism 85 Nivedita Kapoor Japan’s Response: From Abe to Suga 91 Vindu Mai Chotani The EU’s View on the BRI 97 Sabrina Korreck SECTION 3 OTHER IMPLICATIONS AND ONGOING DEBATES China Challenges Western-led Global 103 Economic Governance Aarshi Tirkey The BRI: A White-Elephant in the Making? 110 Ritika Passi 4 Unlocking the Security Dynamics of BRI 116 Kartik Bommakanti and Angad Singh MSR: The Waters Under China’s Belt 120 Gayathri Iyer The ‘Indo-Pacific’ Counter-Narrative 125 Anasua Basu Ray Chaudhury Behind the Curtains of the Health Silk Road 131 Sohini Bose ABOUT THE AUTHORS 137 INTRODUCTION Harsh V Pant and Premesha Saha hina’s Belt and Road Initiative At the time of publishing this report, (BRI), launched in 2013 by more than 60 countries—home to nothing President Xi Jinping during less than two-thirds of the world’s official visits to Kazakhstan population—have signed on to BRI projects, Cand Indonesia, is among the world’s most or else have indicated an interest. Morgan ambitious infrastructure projects ever Stanley has predicted that China’s overall conceived. It is a union of development and expenses over the entire duration of investment initiatives that would stretch the BRI could reach $1.2–1.3 trillion by from East Asia to Europe, and in the process 2027. Two years after Xi announced the significantly expand China’s economic and initiative, three coordinating government political influence in these massive regions. agencies (the National Development and The plan, initially named ‘One Belt, One Reform Commission, the Ministry of Road’, is two-pronged: the overland Silk Road Foreign Affairs, and the Ministry of Economic Belt, and the Maritime Silk Road. Commerce) issued in 2015 the first official On land, Beijing aims to connect the country’s blueprint on what was then still called underdeveloped hinterland to Europe through OBOR, the ‘Vision and Actions on Jointly Central Asia; the maritime component will Building Silk Road Economic Belt and build ports and railways to connect the fast- 21st Century Maritime Silk Road’. growing Southeast Asian region to China’s southern provinces. Introduction Figure 1: China’s New Silk Road Source: NBC News2 The infrastructure development plan aims Barack Obama’s ‘pivot to Asia’; and to the to create a vast network of railways, energy growing salience of the Indo-Pacific maritime 6 pipelines, highways, and some 50 special geography as well. In recent years, the Indo- economic zones—all of which would expand Pacific has become central to the security and the international use of Chinese currency, foreign policies of countries like the US, Japan, the Renminbi and, thus declared Xi, “break Australia, India, the UK, France, Germany, the bottleneck in Asian connectivity.” Viewed and the countries of ASEAN. China is working from the geopolitical lens, Beijing’s aim, to strengthen global economic links to its through the BRI, is to strengthen its economic western regions, which historically have been leadership while gaining political leverage neglected. Promoting economic development over its neighbours and asserting its presence in the western province of Xinjiang, where on the global stage. In other words, China’s separatist violence has been escalating, is BRI stands on the pillars of both geopolitical a priority. So is securing long-term energy and economic motivations. It runs parallel to supplies from Central Asia and the Middle China’s growing assertiveness in its bilateral East. relations, as seen in its increasingly hawkish actions in its immediate region and beyond. At China has captured the world’s attention the same time, trade relations with the United by demonstrating the urgency of boosting States have faced setbacks, thereby pressuring infrastructure development and transnational the Chinese government to find new markets connectivity as the next stage of economic for its commodities. globalisation. Other global powers have been forced to respond to China with their own The BRI, however, is not only an initiative; it infrastructure and connectivity plans; the is a response: for one, to former US President demand is high, and China is the first power Introduction to try to fill it. As it does so, Beijing appears to finance institution, the US International be falling into similar patterns of conflict. Development Finance Corporation (USIDFC) to compete with the AIIB. And Indeed, the challenges are growing. The story the US and Australia have joined Japan in of Sri Lanka, for example, being saddled by announcing plans through the Blue Dot the burden of unsustainable debt to China is Network for an alternative to BRI. well-documented. In 2018, former Malaysian President Mahathir Mohamad suspended This monograph offers definitive analyses work on certain BRI ventures in his country of multiple aspects of the BRI, authored by over concerns of mounting debts to China. For research scholars of the Strategic Studies similar reasons, the government of Myanmar Programme of ORF. The first section, ‘Pivotal has significantly scaled down the Kyaukpyu Geographies’, outlines the progress so far port project. In Pakistan, too, the voices of projects under the BRI in the regions of against the conditionalities tied to Chinese South Asia, Southeast Asia, Oceania, Africa, activities and loans have grown louder. West Asia, Central Asia and Latin America, India, for its part, had taken an early stance and the challenges they face. The second against the BRI and refused to participate section, ‘Global Powers and their Responses in the inaugural Belt and Road Forum in to the BRI’, analyses the responses of countries 2017. It had long emphasised that connectivity and regions like the United States, Japan, projects should respect the participating European Union and Russia. The chapters country’s sovereignty and territorial integrity, in the last section offer various lenses to view 7 not create unsustainable debt burden, the BRI against: legal, defence and security, involve transparent accounting, and create and financial viability. Evolving debates on benefits for the local economy. the Maritime Silk Road are discussed in this section as well, along with the Health Silk It is clear that China’s ambitions to recreate Road, and the emergence of the Indo-Pacific its ancient Silk Route—massive as they are construct as a counter-narrative to the BRI. and couched in grand rhetoric of development and connectivity—are not This monograph offers an in-depth analysis of going to remain unchallenged. China’s the BRI—perhaps the most widely contested success will depend on its ability to move narrative of this scale in contemporary beyond the bilateral framework and allow global geopolitics. It aims to generate wider a truly multilateral vision for the project to discussions on the subject, in India and evolve. Otherwise, the People’s Republic can beyond. In this era of global politics when expect to contend with stronger opposition Chinese belligerence is heightening alongside from more countries other than India. its expanding global footprint, India and the world must recognise how the BRI is aiming Japan, for instance, along with India have to reshape the global order in fundamental unveiled their own development cooperation ways. Such an understanding can serve as with third countries under the banner of an
Recommended publications
  • Information Current As of November 18, 2020
    Information Current as of November 18, 2020 Table of Contents SOURCEREE PERSPECTIVE ............................................................................................3 OVERVIEW .........................................................................................................................6 WEBSITES ...........................................................................................................................6 OWNERSHIP .......................................................................................................................6 OBJECTIVES ......................................................................................................................6 FINANCIAL INTENTIONS .................................................................................................7 THE EFFECT ON AMERICA .............................................................................................8 ECONOMIC CORRIDORS .................................................................................................9 FUNDING .......................................................................................................................... 11 APPENDIX A: PROGRAM LEADERSHIP ....................................................................... 16 APPENDIX B: ASSOCIATED ENTITIES ......................................................................... 18 APPENDIX C: PARTICIPATING NATIONS.................................................................... 21 APPENDIX D: PROJECTS ...............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chinese Investment in the Port of Piraeus, Greece: the Relevance for the EU and the Netherlands
    Chinese Investment in the Port of Piraeus, Greece: The Relevance for the EU and the Netherlands Frans-Paul van der Putten Clingendael Report Chinese Investment in the Port of Piraeus, Greece: The Relevance for the EU and the Netherlands Frans-Paul van der Putten Senior Research Fellow [email protected] Clingendael Report 14 February 2014 © Netherlands Institute of International Relations Clingendael. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without the prior written permission of the copyright holders. Clingendael Institute P.O. Box 93080 2509 AB The Hague The Netherlands Email: [email protected] Website: http://www.clingendael.nl/ Contents Summary 7 Abbreviations used in this Report 9 Introduction 10 1. Cosco and Piraeus as an Emerging Regional Hub 11 Corporate Profile and Operations 11 The Potential for Expansion 15 The Pioneering Role of Hewlett-Packard’s Distribution Activities at Piraeus 18 2. China’s Interests in the Region 21 3. EU–China Relations 24 Economic Significance for the EU 25 4. Cosco as a State-Owned Enterprise 28 Possible Political Relevance 29 5. The Relevance for Dutch Economic Interests 32 Conclusions 34 Interviews 35 Summary This report aims to provide a preliminary insight into how Cosco’s activities in Piraeus are relevant for: a) EU–China relations; and b) Dutch economic interests. Regarding EU– China relations, the report focuses on implications for trade flows and the relevance of the fact that Cosco is a state-owned company.
    [Show full text]
  • Piraeus Port Authority S.A. Annual Financial Report
    PIRAEUS PORT AU THORITY S.A. ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 (IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE L. 3556/2007) WorldReginfo - 4aac7156-b0aa-428d-be03-ee017797d73b PIRAEUS PORT AUTHORITY S.A Annual Financial Report for the year ended December 31, 2018 (amounts in Euro unless stated otherwise) Index to the Annual Financial Report PAGE STATEMENTS OF THE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ....................................................................................................... 3 ANNUAL REPORT OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS .............................................................................................................................. 4 STATEMENT OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE ................................................................................................................................... 53 INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT ................................................................................................................................................. 61 STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 ................................................................. 67 STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION AS AT DECEMBER 31, 2018 .................................................................................................. 68 STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 ......................................................................... 69 CASH FLOW STATEMENT FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2018 ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • LABORATORY for MARITIME TRANSPORT Annual Report 2008 Contents
    NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS SCHOOL OF NAVAL ARCHITECTURE AND MARINE ENGINEERING DIVISION OF SHIP DESIGN AND MARITIME TRANSPORT LABORATORY FOR MARITIME TRANSPORT ANNUAL REPORT 2008 http://www.martrans.org June 2009 Laboratory for Maritime Transport National Technical University of Athens 9, Iroon Polytechneiou str 15773 Zografou , Greece Website: www.martrans.org NTUA - LABORATORY FOR MARITIME TRANSPORT Annual Report 2008 Contents Table of Contents 1. Introduction ........................................................................................2 1.1 About LMT .......................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 About this report .................................................................................................................. 2 2. Year 2008 Highlights ..........................................................................3 2.1 LMT wins "Piraeus International Centre Award"................................................................ 3 2.2 LMT and IMO business .......................................................................................................4 2.3 LMT at OECD Round Table................................................................................................ 5 2.4 LMT at SNAME Greek Section........................................................................................... 5 2.5 LMT at WMU SAR Workshop in Malmö........................................................................... 5 2.6
    [Show full text]
  • Geo-Economics with Chinese Characteristics: How China’S Economic Might Is Reshaping World Politics
    Regional Agenda Geo-economics with Chinese Characteristics: How China’s economic might is reshaping world politics January 2016 Geo-economics with Chinese Characteristics: How China’s economic might is reshaping world politics 1. Introduction Mark Leonard 2. China’s geo-economic power Wu Xinbo 3. China’s medium-term outlook: 2016-2020 Bert Hofman 4. The Geo-economic implications of China’s changing growth strategy Douglas Rediker, Elizabeth Economy, and Michael Levi 5. China’s infrastructure alliances Parag Khanna 6. China in Eurasia Sergei Guriev 7. China’s geo-economic power and the USA Ian Bremmer 8. China’s geo-economic role in South Asia Hina Rabbani Khar 9. China’s geo-economic role in Latin America Evan Ellis 10. China’s geo-economic policy in the Middle East Mahmood Sariolghalam 11. China’s geo-economic Power: Africa’s case Linah Mohohlo 12. China’s geo-economics in Europe Mark Leonard, Angela Stanzel & Agatha Kratz 13. China’s role in Asia-Pacific Kishore Mahbubani The World Economic Forum’s Network of Global Agenda Councils is the foremost interdisciplinary knowledge network dedicated to promoting innovative thinking on critical global issues, regions and industries, and incubating projects, campaigns and events for the public good. The Network convenes the most relevant and knowledgeable thought leaders from academia, government, business and civil society to challenge conventional thinking, develop new insights and create innovative solutions for key global challenges. In a global environment marked by short-term orientation and siloed thinking, the Network fosters interdisciplinary and long-range thinking on the prevailing challenges on the global agenda.
    [Show full text]
  • Turkish-Chinese Cooperation on the Belt & Road Initiative
    EKONOMICKÉ ROZHĽADY – ECONOMIC REVIEW Ročník/Volume 50, 2/2021 161 TURKISH-CHINESE COOPERATION ON THE BELT & ROAD INITIATIVE BARBORA DRUŽBACKÁ1 Turecko-čínska spolupráca v rámci iniciatívy Jedno pásmo, jedna cesta Abstract: China’s ambition to get to the top of the largest economies is obvious. This is also the reason in 2013 China launched the largest initiative in modern history – the Belt & Road Initiative (BRI) – to revive the ancient Silk Road using state-of-the-art technology and to connect the Eurasian continent. In this context, China has cooperated with many countries, including Turkey. China and Turkey have a history of complicated relations, but it turns out that it is the cooperation on the ongoing projects of the BRI that could improve relations. This article aims to highlight Turkey’s position in the BRI, describes relations between these countries, analyses mutual trade, Chinese investment in Turkish territory and focuses on major projects under the initiative. The results showed that countries in economic interest are deepening their mutual cooperation despite cultural and ethical problems, but there is a large imbalance in market reciprocity. The paper also points out the most important BRI projects, with the opening of the Baku–Tbilisi–Kars railway being identified as the most significant project implemented. This railway opens an alternative land route so-called southern branch of the New Silk Road. Turkey is becoming an important country as a gateway to Europe. Keywords: Belt and Road Initiative, BRI, Cooperation, Investment, China, Turkey JEL Classification: F20, F50, P45 1 Ing. Barbora Družbacká, University of Economics in Bratislava, Slovak Republic; e-mail: [email protected] EKONOMICKÉ ROZHĽADY – ECONOMIC REVIEW 162 Ročník/Volume 50, 2/2021 1 Introduction In 2013, Chinese President Xi Jinping presented a vision for reviving the Silk Road in the form of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).
    [Show full text]
  • China in the Broader Black Sea Region
    CHINA IN THE BROADER BLACK SEA REGION www.globsec.org CHINA IN THE BROADER BLACK SEA REGION The broader Black Sea region is the scene of increasing tensions amid renewed great power competition and conflicting geopolitical and geo-economic interests. The rise of China and its solidifying regional footprint requires a better understanding of how this influence is capitalized at national and regional level, what type of challenges it creates for respective countries, and what choices decision-makers have at their disposal in this new complex and complicated geopolitical setting. A report coordinated by Alexandra Martin, Head of GLOBSEC Brussels Office March 2021 China in the Broader Black Sea Region PARTNERS: PARTNERS This is a joint publication of GLOBSEC, the Wilfried Martens GLOBSEC is a global think-tank based in Bratislava Centre for European Studies and the Black Sea Trust for committed to enhancing security, prosperity and Regional Cooperation. This publication receives funding sustainability in Europe and throughout the world. Its from the European Parliament. GLOBSEC, the Wilfried mission is to influence the future by generating new ideas Martens Centre for European Studies, the Black Sea Trust and solutions for a better and safer world. We believe for Regional Cooperation, and the European Parliament we can change the world by putting together the right assume no responsibility for facts or opinions expressed in stakeholders at the right time for a free exchange of this publication or any subsequent use of the information ideas. In an interconnected world, GLOBSEC stimulates contained therein. Sole responsibility lies on the authors public-private dialogue to shape agendas for the future.
    [Show full text]
  • The Belt and Road Initiative: an Inclusive and Symbiotic Approach to Shared Global Prosperity
    The Belt and Road Initiative: An Inclusive and Symbiotic Approach to Shared Global Prosperity Yvonne Zhou, Alex Xie, Feng Lu, and Kevin Zhang March 2018 Contents 1. Analysis of the BRI’s Strategic Significance and Investment Models 1 1.1 Fundamental Evolution of the BRI: from a Foreign and Economic Policy Program Focusing on Infrastructure Projects, to a China-initiated Inclusive Global Platform for Economic Cooperation 1 1.2 Achievements and Status: Extensive Coverage, Inclusiveness and Symbiotic Development 2 1.3 An Inclusive and Symbiotic Model 3 1.4 Analysis of Chinese Enterprises’ Investments in BRI Countries: Models and Experience 5 2. Challenges Faced by the BRI and Suggestions for Its Development 12 2.1 Improve the Government’s Complementary Strategic Measures 12 2.2 Conquer Uncertainties in the Investment Environment of BRI Countries 13 2.3 Upgrade Models of Corporate Operations and Management 13 2.4 Suggestions for the Government 14 2.5 Suggestions for Enterprises Expanding Globally 15 The Belt and Road Initiative: An Inclusive and Symbiotic Approach to Shared Global Prosperity 1. Analysis of the BRI’s Strategic Significance and Investment Models 1.1 Fundamental Evolution of the BRI: from a Foreign and Economic Policy Program Focusing on Infrastructure Projects, to a China-initiated Inclusive Global Platform for Economic Cooperation During his state visit to Kazakhstan in September 2013 and to Indonesia a month later, President Xi Jinping proposed jointly building a “Silk Road Economic Belt” and a “21st Century Maritime Silk Road”, now officially known as the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI). Since then, the BRI has become a key component of China’s economic and diplomatic efforts.
    [Show full text]
  • China's Expanding Overseas Coal Power Industry
    Department of War Studies strategy paper 11 paper strategy China’s Expanding Overseas Coal Power Industry: New Strategic Opportunities, Commercial Risks, Climate Challenges and Geopolitical Implications Dr Frank Umbach & Dr Ka-ho Yu 2 China’s Expanding Overseas Coal Power Industry EUCERS Advisory Board Marco Arcelli Executive Vice President, Upstream Gas, Frederick Kempe President and CEO, Atlantic Council, Enel, Rome Washington, D.C., USA Professor Dr Hüseyin Bagci Department Chair of International Ilya Kochevrin Executive Director of Gazprom Export Ltd. Relations, Middle East Technical University Inonu Bulvari, Thierry de Montbrial Founder and President of the Institute Ankara Français des Relations Internationales (IFRI), Paris Andrew Bartlett Managing Director, Bartlett Energy Advisers Chris Mottershead Vice Principal, King’s College London Volker Beckers Chairman, Spenceram Limited Dr Pierre Noël Sultan Hassanal Bolkiah Senior Fellow for Professor Dr Marc Oliver Bettzüge Chair of Energy Economics, Economic and Energy Security, IISS Asia Department of Economics and Director of the Institute of Dr Ligia Noronha Director Resources, Regulation and Global Energy Economics (EWI), University of Cologne Security, TERI, New Delhi Professor Dr Iulian Chifu Advisor to the Romanian President Janusz Reiter Center for International Relations, Warsaw for Strategic Affairs, Security and Foreign Policy and President of the Center for Conflict Prevention and Early Professor Dr Karl Rose Senior Fellow Scenarios, World Warning, Bucharest Energy Council, Vienna/Londo Dr John Chipman Director International Institute for Professor Dr Burkhard Schwenker Chairman of the Strategic Studies (IISS), London Supervisory Board, Roland Berger Strategy Consultants GmbH, Hamburg Professor Dr Dieter Helm University of Oxford Professor Dr Karl Kaiser Director of the Program on Transatlantic Relations of the Weatherhead Center for International Affairs, Harvard Kennedy School, Cambridge, USA Media Partners Impressum Design © 2016 EUCERS.
    [Show full text]
  • The Potential for Growth Through Chinese Infrastructure Investments in Central and South-Eastern Europe Along
    The views expressed in this report are those of the author only and not the EBRD. The potential for growth through Chinese infrastructure investments in Central and South-Eastern Europe along the “Balkan Silk Road” Report1 prepared by Dr Jens Bastian for the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (with funding from the Central European Initiative) Athens / London July 2017 1 The author would like to thank the Central European Initiative for generous funding of the study. He is also indebted to Daniel Berg and Peter Tabak as well as Ian Brown from the EBRD offices in Belgrade and Sarajevo, respectively for the time and expertise provided. Peter Sanfey and Anna Engstrom from the EBRD head office in London have engaged with the author in a spirit of cooperation and inspiration. Finally, he would like to thank the participants attending the presentation of the report at EBRD headquarters on July 18th, 2017, in particular Dr Mattia Romani, XinXing Li and Libor Krkoska. Executive Summary President XI Jinping’s “One Belt, One Road” or “Belt and Road” initiative, launched in 2013, is a Eurasian grand strategy that seeks to expand and secure maritime routes and road infrastructure networks for China from Asia across Africa to the Middle East and Europe. The blueprint includes a mosaic of trade deals, energy cooperation and financing agreements taking China westwards. With deep government pockets, growing technical sophistication and a comprehensive investment plan, China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) aims to establish the country’s political economy on a global scale. In various sectors, it is already achieving dominant status in terms of production, consumption and distribution.
    [Show full text]
  • Hellenic Institute of Transport
    Informal document WP.5/GE.2 (2015) No. 5 Distr.: General 28 May 2015 English only Economic Commission for Europe Inland Transport Committee Working Party on Transport Trends and Economics Group of Experts on Euro-Asian Transport Links Thirteenth session Dushanbe, 9–10 June 2015 Item 5 of the provisional agenda Information from participants on recent developments in transport infrastructure priority projects on EATL routes Information from participants on recent developments in transport infrastructure priority projects on EATL routes Submitted by the Hellenic Institute of Transport GE. Informal document WP.5/GE.2 (2015) No. 5 Contribution Paper Submitted to: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe Inland Transport Committee Working Party on Transport Trends and Economics Group of Experts on Euro-Asian Transport Links Based on: NEAR2 Project “Network of European-Asian Rail Research Capacities” SEVENTH FRAMEWORK PROGRAMME THEME 7 Transport including Aeronautics Submitted by: Dr. Maria Boile, Research Director, NEAR2 Project Coordinator Ms. Annie Kortsari, Research Associate Centre for Research and Technology Hellas Hellenic Institute of Transport Athens, May 2015 Contribution Paper to the EATL Project 2 Informal document WP.5/GE.2 (2015) No. 5 1. Introduction From the antiquity until today the Trans-Eurasian land bridge networks have contributed to the exchange of goods and ideas, and to the economic growth of Europe and Asia. Today, Asia is one of the world’s largest geo-economic hubs and Europe places particular emphasis on trade relationships with it. The New Silk Road, as the Eurasian land bridge is often called, provides a land-based option for moving freight between the Pacific ports of Russian Far East and China, countries of Central Asia like Kazakhstan and European industrial centres.
    [Show full text]
  • Silk Road 2.0: US Strategy Toward China’S Belt and Road Initiative
    Silk Road 2.0: US Strategy toward China’s Belt and Road Initiative Gal Luft Foreword by Joseph S. Nye, Jr. REVIVING THE SILK ROAD Announced by Chinese President Xi Jinping in 2013, the Silk Road in infrastructure projects including railways and power grids in central, initiative, also known as China’s Belt and Road Initiative, aims to invest west, and southern Asia, as well as Africa and Europe. Silk Road 2.0 A US Strategy toward China’s One Belt, One Road Initiative Atlantic Council Strategy Paper No. 11 © 2017 The Atlantic Council of the United States. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without permission in writing from the Atlantic Council, except in the case of brief quotations in news articles, critical articles, or reviews. Please direct inquiries to: Atlantic Council 1030 15th Street, NW, 12th Floor Washington, DC 20005 ISBN: 978-1-61977-406-3 Cover art credit: Marco Polo’s caravan, from the Catalan Atlas, ca. 1375 This report is written and published in accordance with the Atlantic Council Policy on Intellectual Independence. The authors are solely responsible for its analysis and recommendations. The Atlantic Council, its partners, and funders do not determine, nor do they necessarily endorse or advocate for, any of this report’s particular conclusions. October 2017 Atlantic Council Strategy Papers Editorial Board Executive Editors Mr. Frederick Kempe Dr. Alexander V. Mirtchev Editor-in-Chief Mr. Barry Pavel Managing Editor Dr. Mathew Burrows Table of
    [Show full text]