Educational Considerations

Volume 13 Number 2 Article 13

4-1-1986

Educational Considerations, vol. 13(2) Full Issue

Charles E. Litz Kansas State University

Gerald D. Bailey Kansas State University

Follow this and additional works at: https://newprairiepress.org/edconsiderations

Part of the Higher Education Commons

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 4.0 License.

Recommended Citation Litz, Charles E. and Bailey, Gerald D. (1986) "Educational Considerations, vol. 13(2) Full Issue," Educational Considerations: Vol. 13: No. 2. https://doi.org/10.4148/0146-9282.1691

This Full Issue is brought to you for free and open access by New Prairie Press. It has been accepted for inclusion in Educational Considerations by an authorized administrator of New Prairie Press. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Litz and Bailey: Educational Considerations, vol. 13(2) Full Issue

IS No. 01 -9282

e ucotiono consi erot ions

published ot konsos stote university college of education

Published by New Prairie Press, 2017 1 Educational Considerations, Vol. 13, No. 2 [1986], Art. 13

Introduction

Contrasted with other fields in American education, rural adult education is still an em· erging d iscipline. Tracing its roots back nearly a century to the development of land-grant universities and the introduction of the Cooperative Extension Service, the field of rural adult education has become increasingly diverse. Rural schools, community development corpo· rations, colleges and universities, grassroots organ izations, rural libraries - these and many other organizations provide educational service to rural areas. While they differ in mission, in style, and perhaps in approach, they share an immense concern and respect for rural areas. With the support of the Fund fo r the Improvement of Postsecondary Education (FIPSE), the Action Agenda Project has spent the past three years exploring this field - asking what, within the discipline o f ad ult education, is special about rural and what, within the discipline of rural education, is special about adults. In many respects we·ve come away with more questions th an we've answered. Examined from the perspective of ru ral empowerment, edu· cation takes on meaning that ex pands far beyond classrooms and degrees. Distinctions be· tween education and information, secondary and postsecondary, formal and informal, credit and non-credit fade when we confront the issue of how the educational resources of a nation can be extended In support of rural people. It is in this spirit of concern for the development of human resources in rural areas th at the articles in this issue have been collected . Our hope is that they enable you to see ru ral education from a broader perspective and that you come away with a better understanding of the Issues and concerns that face those who wish to serve rural areas. If you would like more information on the project or would like to join us in our efforts, please write.

Jacqueline 0. Spears Sue C. Maes Gwen Bailey

Action Agenda Project Kansas State University 1221 Thurston Manhattan, Kansas 66502

https://newprairiepress.org/edconsiderations/vol13/iss2/13 DOI: 10.4148/0146-9282.1691 2 Litz and Bailey: Educational Considerations, vol. 13(2) Full Issue

educotionol (fa._:::·::::--~ EDP:R:S:ee considerotions

Vol. XIII, Number 2, Spring 1986

EDITORIAL BOARD OF REVIEW Table of Contents-Spring 1986 Wiii iam Sparkman Texas Teoh University, Lubbock "Rural Adults and Postsecondary Education" ...... 2 James C. Carper by Jacqueline D. Spears, Sue c. Maes and College of Education Gwen Bailey, Kansas State Universi!y Mississippi State University, Starksville Eddy J. van Meter "The Rural Adult: A Portrait ot Characteristics, College of Educatioo Needs and Styles" ...... • . . . . • ...... • . • . . . . 6 Unover&•IY of Kentucky, Lexington by Roger S. McCannon, University of Susan J, Seollay, Vi<:e President, E·A·O·A Minnesota·M orris Lexington, Kentucky " Rural Education from a Native American Phillip Caner Perspective" .••...... •...... •••..... 10 College ot Education Kansas State University, Mant>allan by Jacques Seronde, Seventh Generation Fund "School·Based Enterprises: Rural Education EDITORS Through Action Learning" ...... • ...... 12 Charles E. Litz, Professor by Paul F. Delargy, University of Georgia College of Education " Creating a Rural Mandate: Impacting Kansas State University, Manhallan Institutional and State Policies" ...... •.. .. •.... • . • ..•.... 15 Gerald D. Balley, Professor by Wiiiiam H. Gray, Washington State University College of Education Kall$3s Stale University, Mannallan " The Community Education Model: Learning Opportunities tor Rural Adults" ...... 20 PRODUCTION by Ramsey, Franklin County Community Education David L. Adams, Associate Professor "Adults and Higher Education: Bridging the College of Arts and Sciences Culture Gap" ...... • • ...... 24 Kansas State University, Manhallan by Maurice Olivier, School for Lifelong Learning, Connie E. Nelson, Production Coordina1or Du rham, New Hampshire Student Publications, Inc. Kansas State University, Manllallan " The Rural Free University and the Cooperative Extension Service" ...... •••...... • ...... 29 BOOK REVIEW EDITOR by Jim Ki llacky, University of Mai ne·Orono Susan Oay Harmison "Rural Isolation: The Need for Information'' ...... •.. •...... 32 Kansas State University, M.anhauan by S. L. Ward, Kansas State University " The Partnership for Rural Improvement: An Approach to lnter-·lnstltutlonal Outreach" .. .•...... 3S by Robert H. McDaniel and Ralph A. Loomis, Washington State University

hauan. Kansat;(lG!lOe. Co1rtsoonoer.ce fegaroing mM· providt>¢<>f>!l)U o l permission 10Q1.1otecopyl'fOhte· PUBLICATION INFORMATION usc1i,01s musl t:e acoom O't'lnttO l>y a self·&:kffe.ssea te11a1. OufOPO&ed artlcle.s or 1.:WIOwtl E<1t1c1t1onel Cotishklralion' i:; publlah•d 11 tl'IO Col· sl~mpcd 0""'Ctopo. No 1Qm11now11on I& o lfered for Gf\'e tM 1lghl lo m&ktJ 1000 o r Educanon, Kans.as St311> Univo1Glty, £ch1<:1· CCPlOO ;).ll ii;I<;~ or Ol"'Uf tn<:itu11ol 6ul}m1ttOO gflilmm,Hcal cOtr•Ctlons an(t minor ~hanqes In U11c1e Uonal Con-1ldo1111ona and Ka.1.sas State uni vt1&lly do t9X;.s to lmpfOVt d a rlty. Address qc~.$tion~ r~lng "°' acctpt 1•SPOO.$lbility for the view.a ellPr•tMft.. In kfft)lng ••ii,. the p~iOnM tel•· '"7 Y&ty it\ IHOlh hOrft • "'1111'~ to 2f;tJO WOtO$. All &vb$oCtipck)ft to £d11ca1ional COll$idt>,.1'ons • $A 00 UUOl'at conc•pt (ha( :'$SOOOt.ti• fl'M &.cptM.stOt'I CM f!Mlleflat, inCIOOiftg quo1Gd ift!onNlion ~loo•~~ pe. ~ whn llfnote COClitS $ 1.50 ~h. Con..oon­ Pll)n)tt leami"O ill'IS •"ICOltaige 81'.flnlOtU ot tt\IU1. ts w toe typed dOl.lt11eo•r n= ,00tl'WIMI$ $110t9k:I be ~ abOu1 &4.lb$C,_,MOM&h0akf be a::fcli0$$ld to the eionuo..tot1 are inritod to $tbnf1 oonictu9'0fl• jlf'l(f li$'9d '11 thee:ndot lft.e ,.#'NICf'"l. HaaelingS*'Onot &.is~s M~ do Th• 6dlO(, EduC•liOMI Con.W· 01Mton1 eo11eeMeO wilh v.'IW)'lnO PQinis ot Wtw lfl and lObe~inOO. Tf'M<llhOf•tcompttt&flamt,.SOOteSS •r•ttoM.. COleQO Of EduoMktn. Kans.as State 1..Wvor­ \'JlbOut tducatlon. at16 \01~ numbot .sll· 1ion:t. )'lff'I'/ (altOn;i.loffices are 1oeatel) l'lt lhoCoOtl)I OI td• nliUod, Pttotographa, e11a.w!ng1, CltlOOf\S &na otnef ii· \IOfliOn., IJ1utm(lr11 He .orepared10 Prlnlt

Published by New Prairie Press, 2017 3 Educational Considerations, Vol. 13, No. 2 [1986], Art. 13

are to be served, what unit to consider in evaluating need and what criteria to use in judging ed ucational quality. Is­ Rural Adults sues related to whOse interests are 10 be served and what unit is to be considered are related. Issues of educational quality remain a concern for adu lt education in general. and Post· Historically, rural adult education addressed the needs of agrarian communities. In addition to increasing the agri­ cultural output ot the nation, cooperative extension net­ works sought 10 strengthen and preserve rural communi· secondary ties. Tl1e "rural turnaround" that resulted from the urlJan outmigration in the 1970s has led many to predict that dis· 1inc11ons between rural and urban may fade by the turn of Education the century (Treadway, 1984). Educational providers remain \ divided between concerns for preserving rural communities and lifestyles and desires to facilitate what they see lo be by Jacqueline D. Spears, Sue C. Maes the inevitable urbanization of rural Ille. Related to this Is an and Gwen Bailey ambiguity regarding the unit of analysis. Traditional institu­ tions typically survey the needs of individuals in designing Approxima1e1y one-fourth of those involved in adult educational services. Some grassroots and community or­ learning live In rural areas. With the support of the Fund for ganizations analyze the community as a whole, arguing that the Improvement of Postsecondary Education (FlPSE), the the welfare of the Individual depends on the health of lhe Action Agenda Project has spent the past three years ex· community. Historically, land·grant colleges and coopera· ploring the educational resources that serve this popula­ tlve extension networks were designed to add ress a na· tion. What we wish to share is a synthesis of current writing tlonal need for increased agricultural production. Educa­ In the field, some exploratory research conducted on pro­ tional providers remain divided on tile un it of analysis - grams, and tho insights shared by some 200 participants at individual, community or nation - which best serves lhe regional conferences on ru ral adult education held lhrough­ needs of rural areas. out the country this past year. Finally, issues of quality loom ever large. Adult educa­ Before examining the state ot the art in rural adult edu­ tion in general faces concerns with Quality assessment of cation, we need to make a few Introductory remarks about both credit and non-credit courses. Of late, attention has the diverse disciplines from which rural adult education has been focused on assuring quality In credit courses (Cross evolved and the tensions this diversity has spawned. As a and Mccartan, 1984). Questions of quality assumo yet an· distinct discipline, rural adult education draws together other dimension when viewed through the lens offered by practitioners from both higher education and public school grassroots organizations. Tax dollars flow through creden· education, from both service and academic traditions, from tialed institutions and student aid is tied to degree-seeking both formal Institutions and informal grassroots organiza­ goals. Yet frills, like cake decorating, can tum into success­ tions, from bolh professional and occupational education, ful business ventures, illiteracy can sometimes be con­ from both rural improvement and economic development Quered more easily away from the classroom, and an experi­ concerns. In the face of such diversity, it seems hardly sur­ enced small business owner can provide more valuable prising that multiple viewpoints emerge. information than a fully accredited business administration In a sense each provider sees rural America th rough a course. Issues of credit and degrees pale in comparison different tens. Seen through the lens offered by cooperative with lhe pressing needs for rural empowerment. extension and community development corporations, rural adults need the knowledge required to create an economic base and provide basic services required to sustain a com· Educational Providers and Programs munity. Seen through the lens oftered by colleges and uni­ Educational practice in rural adult education can be de­ versities, rural adulls otfer a new market to help compen· scribed as diverse - diverse in provider, con I en I and sate tor declining enrollmen ts. Seen through the lens method of delivery. In a survey of model programs In rural offered by the public schools, rural adults are a generation adult postsecondary education, Karen Hone (1985) de­ of Americans shortchanged - a generation whose lack of scribed continuing education programs, community col­ basic skills lnhlbll their own and their children's develop­ lege programs, fOb training programs. professional develop­ ment. Seen through the lens otfered by grassroots organiza­ ment programs, community education programs, adult \ tions, rural adulls articulate Interests and needs that remain basic education programs, rural focused curricula and com­ unmet or misunderstood by traditional educational organi­ munity development programs. Sponsoring agencies in­ zations. Seen through the lens o ffered by supporters o f the clude four-year colleges and universities, governmental lifelong learning movement, rural adults are a segment of agencies, nonprofit associations and organ izations, private the population lsolate

2 Educational Considerations https://newprairiepress.org/edconsiderations/vol13/iss2/13 DOI: 10.4148/0146-9282.1691 4 Litz and Bailey: Educational Considerations, vol. 13(2) Full Issue

panded their programs to encompass a broader mission. In ness enterprises initiated by schools. The enterprises serve Iowa, the CES offers a series of programs and services di· a dual function - offering a practocal envlronmenl in which reeled at the economic development of communities. Idaho to teach skills and prOYiding the local community with a has involved their CES in offering a computer literacy needed service. course in rural communllies. Kentucky's CES has estab· While the models serving rural areas are diverse in con­ lished the SOS Learning Network, a system of community tent, organization and purpose. Hone (1985) attempted to learning and development programs in 16 communities. identity some characteristics common to those models Thousands ot Kentuckians have become SOS teachers/ that have been most successful. Three of those characteris­ learners, spreading nonformal learning throughout the tics Include: (1) response to a specific societal need, (2) re· state. With a stall In excess of 18,000 operating In 3150 sponse to the adult learner's expectations, and (3) extensive counties In the (Killacky, 1984), CES provides cooperation with other agencies. states with a valuable resource for serving rural adults. Successful programs seem to lllerally grow out of the Colleges and universities have developed a variety o f community. The link between purpose and product is tight, strateg ies to react\ rural areas. Having been formed with a responding to a specific need ernoraced by the community mandate for community service, community colleges o ften as a whole. Community members take an active role in shap­ act as primary educational providers in rural areas. Some of· ing the programs developed and controlling the outside re· fer mobile programs in Industrial arts, career education, sources called upon. This close connection between need dental hygiene - circulating equipment throughout the re· and educational product ls. In part. whal has led to the diver­ gions they serve. Others coordinate a series of regional cen· sity o f educa!ional providers In rural areas. Community ters, offering rural areas access to low cos! postsecondary based organizations are o ften successful because their ori­ educa!ion. Continuing education programs al colleges and gins lie deep in the communities they serve. More tradi­ universities ofter a variety of outreach services. Some offer tional educational providers can at so beef lective. once they technical services to the businesses and industries In theor join hands with the community as wllllng partners in theed­ areas. Others extend a variety of formal and nonformal pro· ucational process. The programs most successlul are the grams to area residents. Some take advantage of technol· programs •owned" by the rural community. ogy 10 deliver educational services to remote sites. Among Successful programs respect adult autonomy and cul­ the more comprehensive models based on technology Is tural dilferences. At the very least, the program recognizes that offered by the University of Alaska. Serving 250 com· and respects the values and lifestyles of rural people. In ru­ munitiesof which only 30 are accessible by road, the Univer­ ral communities where many cultures coexist, successful sity of Alaska provides programs broadcast through the programs respect the differences that exist among cul· LEAN Alaska lns lructional Network, lhe Au dio· tures. Programs that address the learner's expectations, Conferencing Network and Teletext systems. that accommodate adult lifestyles Md responsibilities, and Community based organizations are yet another cate­ I hat share control over content and method with l he learn­ gory of educational providers serving rural areas. These pro· ers are also more likely to be successful. They embrace the grams are more difficult to locate, primarily because they belief tnat adults inherently have the capacity to learn and operate on shoestring budgets and a long I ist of volunteers. solve their own problems - they need only the proper re­ But their Impact in rural communities is substantial. Taking sources. advantage or resources from within the community, these programs are successful in linking community resources Policy Concerns and in acting as a catalyst for other community develop­ Ultimately. policy issues are tied to outcomes in financ­ ment activities. In many communities, these locally onltl· ing and funding. Financing and lunding are major barriers to ated organizations offer the swiftest means of getting Infor­ those wanting to serve rural areas. Rural adult education mation and help to rural adults. More than other educational can be addressed either through rural pohcy or adult educa· providers wor1<1ng in rural areas, community based organi­ lion policy. A review of both fields raises a number of issues zations reflect rural community needs to gain some control of concern to rural adult educators. over their llvos and their futures. The Lifelong Learning Act passed as pari of the 1976 Given the importance that economic development Higher Education Amendmenls len t credibility and visibil­ plays In the very survival of rural com mu nit ies, we could not ity to adult education Imperatives, but appropriated very lit· complete our Quick survey of rural adult ed ucation without tie money (Cross and Mccarl an, 1984). Press releases re­ hightlghtlng some of the more innovative models. Nowhere garding input solicited tor later hearings on reauthorization Is the integrallon ol education and communitydeveloprnenl of the Higher Education Act gave 1estlmony 10 the consider­ more obvious than In attempts 10 foster economic develop· able input provided by adult ed ucation advocates. but o ffer men1 in rural areas. Traditional educational providers, like little encouragement that these sugges tions will actually cotleges and universities, have been successful in offering be implemented (Palmer, 1985). The Commission on Higher courses in en trepreneurship or technical assistance to Education an(! the Adult Learner (1984) has outlined spe· small buslneses. Sut in some regions o f the United States. clfic suggestions aimed at increasing federal support of the barriers of economic development have been so long· adult education programs and reducing financial barriers to standing and persistent that more integrated models heve adult learners. Similarly the National University Continuing been developed. Community development corporations Education Association has oflered revisions designed to like the Mountain Association for Community Economic strengthen aid oflered to postsecondary Institutions which Development (MACED) take on the rote of change agent, in· take on the task of serving a.dult learners. corporating the analysis and training funct ions provided by However, In all these deliberations little distinction is educaltonal instotutlons with the seed monies necessary to made between urban and rural learners. Concern for the introduce incremental change into the local economy. problems of rural adult learners are addressed primarily School·baseel enterprises offer another innovative model th rough proposals to support the development of Innovative for promoting 111e economic development o f rural communl· delivery mechanisms. To the ex tent that these proposals re­ ties. These programs foster economic growth through busi· move barriers and offer support equally to rural and urban Spring 1986 3

Published by New Prairie Press, 2017 5 Educational Considerations, Vol. 13, No. 2 [1986], Art. 13

learners, they are supportive to rural adult education. To the and (2) promote inter-institutional cooperation and co11abo· extent that they continue a long tradition of volume·driven ration. In some rural areas, residents are more isolated from funding, these proposals ignore fundamental issues re· educational resources within their states tt>an from those in garding equity of access in the wake of increased costs to adjacent states, Ou t-of·state tuitions create unnecessary deliver services to rural areas. To the extent that they offer hardships. Reciprocal arrangements, like that between Min· disproporlionate support to format ed ucational instilu· nesotaand Wisconsin, remove this artificial barrier. Encour· tions. they ignore the fact that rural needs may not be ame· aging cooperation was cited as yet another way state policy nable to solution·s posed by traditional Institutions. Without could assist rural education. The range of educational pro· wanting to dilute the solidarity forged on behalf of adult viders active in rural areas reflects the diverse character of learners, it is important to remember the extent to w11ich an rural residents. not inefficiency. Most providers call for urban bias has dominated in the past. state policies that promote and reward inter·institutional The past decade has witnessed a resu rgence of inter· collaboration and cooperation among educational pro· est in rural problems. but those knowledgeable about fed· vi de rs rather than policies that eti mi nate programs under eral policy e.xpress frustration with fragmented efforts. the guise that duplication is occurring. Treadway (1984) speaks to the need tor a federal policy that distingu ishes between ru ral and urban learners, specifi· The Special Needs of Rural Adult Education cally in issues regarding equity and appropriateness. Cur· In an effort to both summarize and synthesize the infor· rent lederal criteria for allocating resources ignore the mation about rural adult ed ucation, we wou ld like to close higher costs of delivering services to rural areas and overes· by examining two questions. What, within the discipline of timate the local resources available to support such ser­ adult education, is special about rural?What, within the dis· vices. Nearly all concerned with rural development speak to cipline of rural education, is special adult? It is along this the need for a federal policy that recognizes the extent to boundary between existing disciplines - adu lt education which ad ull educ at ion must be integrated into community and ru ral education - that the special needs of rural adults development. Blakely (1983) calls for a rural policy based on fall. the development of human resources, nol natural re· In many respects, rural adu lt learners share the same sources. Isolating educational policy from rural policy is to characlerislics as urban adult learners. They prefer courses ignore the interrelationships between human resources that are directly relevant to their life situations, need ftexi· and rural development. bility ol scheduling and course location, respond best to Because of widespread differences among states and content that is learner driven. But there are substantial dif· instllulions, it is difficult to generalize about state and insti· ferences. The realities ol distance and isolation make ser­ tutional policies atfecting rural adull education. But many vices more difficult lo deliver - access is severely re· of lhe concerns in traditional education institutions can be stricted. Second, expectations are lower. . Richard Margolis lumped Into two categories: (1) the volume·driven model by (1985) speaks earnestly of 1he "incubus of ignorance and in· which educational programs are fu nded and (2) the stand· ertia" In rural America. Having seen themselves only alone model within which most adult education and ou t· through urban eyes, some rural Americans have been reach efforts must operate. robbed of their pride - feeling condemned to an Inferior Ille Most state funds are allocated to institutions and lnsti· by virt ue of their rural status. Tile urban exodus, if it co.n· tutlonal funds to programs on a per student·credit·hour ba, 1inues, will simply exacerbate the problem. Resources will sis. T11is allocation procedure Is urban biased, motivating be directed to lhe professionals, to the 1echnotoglcally Iller· Institutions 10 offe r services In urban areas where the appll· ate, to the already wel l educated. to the urban outmlgran1s. cant pool is large and the costs are relatively small. This is A third difference lies embedded in the very fabric of exacerbated by state or institvtionat policies that require rural poverty; Current efforts in Ii nking economic develop­ adult education or outreach efforts be self-supporting. Ur­ ment and postsecondary ed ucation (See for example ban adults may have up to 50 percent of theil costs covered Charner, 1984 and Charner and Rolzinski, 1985) explore ill\· by tax dollars white their rural cou nterparts foot t he entire portant new ground for education - yet they are dominated bill. In the wake of decreased federal involvement, rural pro· by urban models. Seen th rough the tens of rural needs, eco· viders are united in their concern that states assume re· nomic development models must help adults create jobs, sponsibility for assuring that educational opportunities not simply train for them. As innovative as many of the col· equal to those found in urban areas be extended to rural ar­ laborat1ve models in economic development are. they pale eas. in comparison to the more deeply integ rated models Another concern raised was that state policies must needed in rural areas. Education must chart new terri tory if recognize the need for different strategies in addressing the it is to have an impact in rural areas. educational needs of the already well·educated as con­ What, within the field of rural education. is unique trasted to those who lack basic skills. State policies that en· about adults? Certainly adults face the same problems of courage the use of technology and restrict duplication of access and equity, the same need for a rural curriculum that programs In rural areas result in programs for the well· helps them regain self-respect. Whal sets adults apart from educated - those familiar with lhe educational system and young people is the characteri stics of adult learners. Adults aggressive in locating services, Adults who are illiterate or require education thal is experience based, relevant to their who lack basic skills are moreeaslly reached through softer life, at times and places manageable within adult responsi· programs provided locally - commun lty·based efforts, bilities, and over which they have some control. Secondly, sc110ol·based programs or recreational programs. While our review of successfu l programs suggests that no single technology can be effective in extending educational ser­ provider is well suited for all rural communities or to serve vices to rural adults, states should not view it as l he "rural all educational needs of a given community. Rvral educa· solution:' tion must concern itself with these realities, involve these Perhaps the most supportive role state policy can play other providers in its deliberations, and explore collabora· in improving setVices extended to rural adults is to: (1) en· live relationships if ii intends to reach the rural adult. gage in reciprocity arrangements with neighboring states What is the agenda for rural adult educators? For all, 4 Educational Considerations https://newprairiepress.org/edconsiderations/vol13/iss2/13 DOI: 10.4148/0146-9282.1691 6 Litz and Bailey: Educational Considerations, vol. 13(2) Full Issue

the day to day work in reaching out to rural areas, in extend· MD: Commission on Higher Education and the Adult ing educational opportunities to rural adults remains para­ Learner, 1984. mount. But the problems faced by rural America deepen. Cross, K. Patricia and Mccartan, Anne-Marlo. Adult Learn· Perhaps traditional concepts of rural education need to give Ing: State Policies and Institutional Practices. ASHE· way to notions of rural empowerment. Perhaps our real con· ERIC Higher Education Research Reporl No. 1. Wash· cern for rural America must become the development o f its ington, D.C.: Association for the Sludy of Higher human resources - using whatever form education must Education, 1984. take. Hone, Karen. Serving the Rural Adult: Inventory of Model Programs in Rural Adult Postsecondary Education. References Manhattan, KS: Action Agenda Project, 1985. Blakely, Edward J. "Rural Policy: An Independent View:" in Klllacky, J. Furthering Nonformal Education in Rural Amer­ Rural Development, Poverty, and Natural Resources ica. New Mexico State University: ERI C/CRESS, 1984. Workshop Paper Serles, Part I. Washington, D.C.: Na· Margolis, Richard. "The Incubus ol Ignorance." Talk pre­ tional Center for Food and Agricultural Policy, 1983. senled at the Eastern Region Conference on Serving Charner, Ivan. "Exploring New Concepts for Postsecondary the Rural Adult, Skylop, PA, 1985. Education." Washington, D.C.: National Institute for Palmer, Stacey E. "Congress Showing More than Usual Con· Work and Learning, 1984. cern About the Needs of Non-Traditional Students." Charner, Ivan and Rolzlnski, Catherine. "Postsecondary Re­ The Chronicle of Higher Education, 30, No. 18. July 3, sponses to a Changing Economy:· Washington, D.C.: 1985. National Institute for Work and Learning, 1985. Treadway, Douglas M. Higher Education in Rural America: Commission on Higher Education and lhe Adult Learner. Serving the Adult Leamer. New York: College En­ Adult Learners: Key to the Nation's Future. Columbia, trance Examination Board, 1984.

Spring 1986 5

Published by New Prairie Press, 2017 7 Educational Considerations, Vol. 13, No. 2 [1986], Art. 13

Early studies of rural adu It learners sug­ Table 1. Participation In Adult Education gested that most rural adults were interested by Residential Status: 1981 only in recreational or avocational learning. Residential Status 1981 A recent study which analyzed both regional Percent Number of total and national demographic data suggests RURAL otherwise. This study provides us with a Total Population not In MSA • clearer picture of the learning needs and (Farm and Rural Nonfarm) 52,365,000 31.6 Part icipants In Adult Education 5,865,000 27.6 characteristics of rural adult learners. URBAN Total Population in MSA • 11 3,464,000 68.4 Part icipants in Adult Education 15,387.000 72.4 The Rural Adult: 'Metropolitan Statistical Area 1971) have found that adults enter learning situations with a particular focus that seems to fit their immediate needs. Cross (1 981) reports that data from 35 large-scale state and A Portrait of national surveys tend to suggest that, in general, adult learners have shown increasing interest both in occupa­ tional training and in social life and recreation education. Characteristics, However, most of these studies were focused upon urban areas. In one large national study (JOhnstone and Rivera. 1965)conducted over20 yearsago, 11 was concluded that ru­ Needs and Styles ral adults were not very much interested in continuing !heir learning. Very few recent studies have looked either at rural by Roger S. Mccannon adulls' educational needs or at their reasons for engaging In learning activities. A study ot part·lime enrollment In higher More recently there has been greater accenClon on serv· education in this country In fall 1974 (Valley, 1976) found Ing Che eaucational needs of rurat adulls. Life In our agripo· less participation in formal credit educational programs In litan count ryside has become more complex and continued ru ral states lllan In urban states. California had the highest learning 11as become necessary for both occupational and percentage of part·time credil enrollment with 53.1 percent, personal advancement. Rural adults are turning towarcs edu· and Iowa had the lowest at 17.6 percent. To estimate the size cation in Increasing numbers as a means of improving and and focus of the adull learning force in Iowa (essentially a enriching their lives. Educalional providers are attempting rural state). the Educalional Tesllng Service conducted a fO meet rural adu lts" learning needs. Despite this new Inter­ study (Hamilton, 1976) which showed that an estimated est, most of the literature of adult postsecondary education 676.800 adults in Iowa wanted additional education. The focuses upon urban programs and urban adult learners. results were compared with those of a national study con­ Less attention has been given to developing an understand· ducted in 1972 by the Commission on Nontraditional Study. Ing of rural adults' educational interests and needs. This The result of the two studies are presented in Table 2. They study undertook the challenge of developing a statistical suggest that the adults surveyed were more interested in base of Information about rural adults' educatlonal needs. personal satisfaction and were slfgh lly less oriented toward interests and parlicipation patterns. vocational advancement.

Background Table 2. Rank Order of Adults' Focus on Learning The National Center for Education Statistics (NCES) of the U.S. Department of Education reports that there ls in· Reason Iowa, 1976 Nalion, 1972 creasing participation by adults of all ages In adult educa· To be better informed 1 1 lion programs (Nat ional Center for Education Stat istics. Personal satisfaction 2 2 1982). According to the 1981 triennial supplement to the Improve income 3 4 Current Population Survey, more than 21 million adults age Prepare for different job 4 3 17 and older participated in some form of adult education. Current job requirement 5 5 Of this total. nearly 6 million, or 28 percent, were adu lts liv­ ing in rural areas (see Table 1). During the summer of 1976, the University of Minne­ In his classic slUdy, Houte{1961) determined that adult sota conducted a survey of 3,606 households in rural west­ learners had three types of orientation toward learning: ern Minnesota to assess the perceived needs for education some were goal-oriented, others were activity-oriented, and beyond high school (Copa, 1976). One conclusion drawn still others were teaming-oriented. Other authors (Cross, from the study was that adults In this rural area ol Minne­ 1981; Boshier, 1977; Knox, 1976; Knowles, 1980: Tough, sota were more interested in continuing !heir education for personal development and self·lmprovement (60 percent) Roger S. Mccannon is the director of Continuing Edu· lhan they were for reasons of vocational advancement cation and Summer Session at the University of Min· through job training (40 percent). nesota - Morris and a member of the National Steer· Between 1975 and t 982. students enrol led In evening Ing Committee of the Action Agenda Project. courses al ihe University of Minnesota-Morris. which Is lo· 6 Educational Considerations, Vol. 13, No. 2, Spring 1986 https://newprairiepress.org/edconsiderations/vol13/iss2/13 DOI: 10.4148/0146-9282.1691 8 Litz and Bailey: Educational Considerations, vol. 13(2) Full Issue

cated in rural western Minnesota. have been surveyed each NCES data. What I have attempted to do is to selectively re· quarter. When asked what was the most Important reason view certain variables and cross-tabulate them, giving us a for enrolling, 55 percent said that they attended for personal ponraft o f rural adult learners' characteris tics, needs and enrichment or "just for fu n:• On ly 13 percen t said th at job styles. A lull presentation and a more detailed analysis of training or professional advancement was the most I mpor· these data is available in Mccannon (t975). tant reason tor enrolling. In a more recent study, Treadway (1984)concluded that rural people are looking for education Findings from Na1ional Data that relates more Immediately to their needs and has a prac· Tables 3, 4 and 5 summarize information on the sex, tical consequence. age, reason for participation, and subject areas of courses Collectively, these isolated studies do not allow one to taken by rural adults. Table 3 shows that 55.8 percent of the draw hard conclusions. They suggest that. at least in the survey population were women and 44.2 percent were men. past, rural adults have selected learning activities more for Further, the NCES data shows that 94.9 percent of the 3,558 reasons of personal development than lor reasons or voca­ survey respondents (or 3,378) were non-farm residents: that tional advancement. However, because mandated continu· is to say, they resided in a small communily or town or lived ing educalion requi rements have increased lor various oc­ in the open countryside, but were not engaged in farming. cupations and professions m most states, this orientation The data summwized in Tables 3, 4, and 5 allow us to draw may now be changing. With the Increasing job growth in the following conclusions: prolessional services now being round in rural areas, more Age and Sex-Near1y three.fourths of all the resPQn· individuals in many occupations will need continuing pro· dents (both female and male) were between lhe ages of fessional education. 23-50. There were slightly more older women participants than men. Nature of the Study At present, designers of rural postsecondary educa· Table 3. Age and Sex of Rural Adull Participants tlon prog rams are handicapped by a dearth of information in Adult Educa1ion: 1981 about rural adults' educational interests. characteristics, rnotivations and participation pauerns. That is not to say Male Female that research studies and local needs assessments have Age Nurnber Percent not been conducted. Rat her, we have not "taken stock" and Number Percent developed a base-line trom which to Judge Improvement In 16 - 17 37 2.4 38 1.9 our practice and upon wl1lch sound discussions and decl· 18 - 22 131 8.3 199 10.1 sions can be founded. Thi s study provides- In a profile 23 -30 445 28.3 537 27.0 form-more current Information to assist practitioners and 31 - 40 464 29.5 586 29.5 policy makers to better understand the educational needs 41 - 50 253 16.1 292 14.7 of rural adult learners. 51 - 60 168 10.7 219 11 .0 Two types of data were analyzed In this study. First. na­ 61 - 70 61 3.9 89 4.5 tional data(based upon a sample of 3,558 rural adults) were 71 - + 13 .8 26 1.3A obtained through an existing data file at the National Center N =1572 N = 1986 tor Education Statistics (NCES). Second, regional data were collected (on 812 adu Its) through a series of original surveys Table 4. Main Reason of Rural Participants in five mldwestern states. Information from these two i.n Adult Education for Taking Courses sources are merged to provide a demographic profile of the by Sex: 1981 rural adult learner.

Description of National Data and Procedure Male Female The National Center for Educalion Statistics (NCES) Reason Number Percent Number Percent sponsors a supplement to the Current Population Survey Personal or conducted by the Bureau of the Census every three years. Social 333 21 .2 744 37.6 Titled "Participation in Adult Education; this study has lmprove, M· been conducted dunng the month of May in each of the fol­ vance, Up- lowing yews: 1969, f972, 1975, 1978, 1981 and 1984. Those date Cur­ individuals surveyed were selected from census files with rent Job 808 51 .5 722 36.5 coverage in all 50 states; approximately 60,000 households Train for New were queried at the time of each survey. At the time of this Occupation 151 9.6 176 8.9 study, the most curren t information available from NCES New Job in was the 1981 data tapes. Thus, the Information presented Current Oc­ here is an analysis ol 3,558 rural adu lt learners who reported cupation 24 1.5 36 1,8 having participated in adult education during the 12·month Other Job period preceding May 1981. Information variables con· Rel atea 100 6.4 66 3.3 tained in the 1981 NCES data on those 3,558 surveyed par· Train for Vol­ ticipants included: age and sex: race and ethnic groups; unteer Work 36 2.3 27 1.4 level of education; annual family Income: geographic area General Edu· of residence: labor lorce statu s: occupation of employed cation 103 6.6 182 9.2 participants; types of courses taken; reasons for taking Naturalization 2 .1 courses: who provided the Instructi on; and, major sources Other Non of payment for courses. Job Related 14 .9 23 1.2 Space here does not llllow fora complete analysis or all

Spring 1986 7 Published by New Prairie Press, 2017 9 Educational Considerations, Vol. 13, No. 2 [1986], Art. 13

Reason for Participation- The most imporlant reason information gathered substantiated the conclusions drawn listed by rural adulls was 10 improve, advance or updale from our analysis ol the NCES data. Additional lnlormation their currenl occupalion. If the reasons for partlcipallon on barriers and needs expressed by adulls enroll.ad in three (shown on Table 4) were collapsed into two primary reasons, of the five inslllutions (Logan College, Minnesota-Morris occupational enhancement and personal developmen1, we and Wisconsin·River Falls) Is presenled In Tables 6 and 7. can see that over 11'/o·thirds (69 percent) of the males and This data allows us 10 draw the following conclusions: just over one-half (50 percent) of the females were motivated for occupallonal reasons. Table 6. Major Obstacles to Beginning/Returning Subjects Enrolled In-Business subjects ranked first to College for Adult Learners by Sex forrural adu lts; 18.3 percent reported enrolling in business subjects. There were 12.4 percent enrolled in heallh care Male Female subjects and 9.1 percent in education subjects. This analysis provides the first national base-line of In· Obstacle Number Percenl Number Percent formation about rural adull learners. These data suggest Distance 17 11.8 109 27.8 that the predominant intent for participating in adult educa· Costs 54 37.7 192 48.9 lion programs is for occupational enhancement, with per· Time 55 38.4 176 44.8 sonal development as a strong secondary interest. Scheduling Conflict 37 25.8 96 24.4 Conflicts Table S. Rank Order of Subj ect Areas (Courses) with Job 40 27 .9 95 24.2 Enrolled in by Rural Adults: 1981 lack Confidence 14 9.7 84 21.4 Subject Area Number Percent Lack ol CJe. sired Business 650 18.3 Courses 28 t9.5 54 13.7 Heatlh Care 439 12.4 Other Com· Engineering and Computer Science 419 1 t.8 mitments 27 11 .8 20.4 Education 80 324 9. 1 Other t5 10.4 31 7.9 Philosophy or Religion 244 6.9 N 143 N =392 Physical Education or Leisure 22 1 6.2 = Ans 213 5.9 Language 152 4.3 Table 7. Adult Learners Needs by Sex Heallh Education 137 3.9 Home Econom lcs t34 3.8 Male Female Social Science t33 3.7 Personal Service 10t 2.8 Need Number Percent Number Percent Life and Physical Science 87 2.5 Financial Aid 43 30.0 158 40.3 Agrlcullure 59 t.7 More lnfor· lnter·Olsclpllnary 36 1.0 mat ion 25 17.4 81 20.6 Olher 205 5.8 Babysitting Ser.'ices 2 t.3 52 13.2 Time Off Description ol Regional Dala and Procedure lrom Work 31 21.6 102 26.0 In this seclion we are focusing entirely upon postse· Support from condary education and the experiences of adults who were Employer 15 t0.4 21 5.3 enrolled in higher education instilutions in a rural setting. Support from Since the data analyzed from NCES were collected In May Family 8 5.5 74 18.8 198 1, an effort to augmenl and verify ii with more current in· Increased formation was undertaken. These regional data were col· Self Con· lected In Seplernber 1984. Also. lhe NCES ctatadldn't tell us fidence 23 16.0 104 26.5 much about barriers adults experience, nor the needs and Other 22 15.3 49 12.5 prelerences they have for services. These "augmen1ation N =143 ill =392 studies" allowed us an opportunity lo probe a bil more into these areas. Obstacles-Distance, costs. time and self·confidence Five postsecondary education inslitu1ions in the mid· were rnore often reported by women as being lhe biggest west were selected as sites fortheseaugmentation Sludies. obstacles to be{linning or returning to college than men. Included were: Drake University (Iowa); John A. Logan Col· Men reported conlllcts with job and lack of desired courses lege (Illinois); The University ol Minneso1a-Morrls; The Uno· as obstacles at slightly higher rates than women. Compari· verslly of North Dakola; and, the Universlly ol Wisconsin· sons among studenls at lhe three institutions sugges1s River Falls. These institutions represent a variety of 1ypes of that costs and lack of desired courses are lesser obslacles postsecondary education, I.e., two· and four-year colleges, al Logan College lhan at the University of Minnesota-Morris public and private institulions, single focus ad comprehen· and lhe Universily of Wisconsin-River Falls. sive missions, and autonomous and coordinate campuses. Adult Learners' Need s-The need for financial aid, in· formation and time off from work are important factors to Findings from Regional Data both men and women students In order to help them con· Tho data collected from these instilutions allowed us tinue lheir educalion. Women ciled the need for baby· to analyze responses lrom 812 adu lt learners. Much ol the sitting services, lam ily supporl and Increased self·

8 Educational Considerations https://newprairiepress.org/edconsiderations/vol13/iss2/13 DOI: 10.4148/0146-9282.1691 10 Litz and Bailey: Educational Considerations, vol. 13(2) Full Issue

confidence at higher rates than men. From other questions urban adults and are presented in the aforementioned publ l· in our survey, we found preferences for scheduling of cation from Kansas State University). This suggests that courses to be for late afternoon and evening courses, week­ equal access to quality postsecondary education is a vi tal end courses and clustered courses. concern for adult learners wherever they live. In a country The total regional sam pie, or 8 t 2 Individuals who re· committed to equal access and with lifelong learning be· sponded to our regional surveys, were participants in adult coming an accepted concept, all people have a right to lhe education at five different types of postsecondary institu· benefits of quality learning regardless of age. race. income tions. Yet, their responses painted a similar picture to those or place of residence, even if that place of residence is a from the NCES study. Most were enrolled In courses foroc· small town surrounde