DOCSLIB.ORG

Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

Wednesday Volume 534 2 November 2011 No. 218 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Wednesday 2 November 2011 £5·00 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2011 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Parliamentary Click-Use Licence, available online through The National Archives website at www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/information-management/our-services/parliamentary-licence-information.htm Enquiries to The National Archives, Kew, Richmond, Surrey TW9 4DU; e-mail: [email protected] 905 2 NOVEMBER 2011 906 Mr Hurd: Community Service Volunteers is a great House of Commons organisation and it had a spectacularly successful day. The answer lies in trying to reduce some of the barriers, Wednesday 2 November 2011 such as the red tape that I mentioned, that stop people getting involved. It is also important to try to inspire The House met at half-past Eleven o’clock people to step up and get more involved. That is why we believe that programmes such as Community Organisers and Community First, which are about bringing PRAYERS communities together to identify what they want to change and inspiring them to work together to make [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] that change happen, can be a very powerful intervention. BUSINESS BEFORE QUESTIONS Mr Mark Williams (Ceredigion) (LD): The Minister will be aware that this is national trustees week. Will he LONDON LOCAL AUTHORITIES BILL [LORDS] address two particular concerns of that campaign? The (BY ORDER) first is that the number of young people being attracted Consideration of Bill, as amended, opposed and deferred to become trustees is very small indeed, and the other is until Tuesday 8 November (Standing Order No. 20). the fact that more than half of charities have at least one vacancy on their board of trustees. Mr Hurd: The hon. Gentleman raises an extremely Oral Answers to Questions important point. We all know the value and importance of the work of trustees and the ability of a really good set of trustees to transform the capability of a charity CABINET OFFICE or voluntary organisation. It is important that the Government will announce some steps to promote wider The Minister for the Cabinet Office was asked— awareness of the opportunity to take part in being a trustee. Community Projects Voluntary Sector 1. Stephen Metcalfe (South Basildon and East Thurrock) (Con): What steps he is taking to encourage individuals 2. Tony Lloyd (Manchester Central) (Lab): What and organisations to engage in projects that benefit recent steps he has taken to support the voluntary their local community. [77750] sector. [77751] The Parliamentary Secretary, Cabinet Office (Mr Nick 3. Mr Russell Brown (Dumfries and Galloway) (Lab): Hurd): Encouraging more social action is a key strand What steps he plans to take to support the voluntary of the big society vision, so we are looking at ways to sector. [77752] cut some of the red tape that gets in the way and are busy delivering programmes such as Community Organisers, The Parliamentary Secretary, Cabinet Office (Mr Nick Community First, the national citizen service and the Hurd): I refer the hon. Members for Manchester Central social action fund. (Tony Lloyd) and for Dumfries and Galloway (Mr Brown) to the open letter to the voluntary sector, which was Stephen Metcalfe: I thank my hon. Friend for his sent to all MPs and published on the Cabinet Office answer. Will he expand on how these initiatives will website; it sets out our strategy for encouraging more impact on the residents of South Basildon and East social action and supporting civil society. Thurrock and on what they could hope to see from such great ideas in the future? Tony Lloyd: The Greater Manchester centre for voluntary organisation estimates that a quarter of those employed Mr Hurd: I thank my hon. Friend for his positive by voluntary organisations are losing their jobs in this reaction. I am aware that at least three wards, I think, in two-year period. Can the Minister honestly tell the his constituency are eligible for the Community First voluntary sector through the House that with that level grant programme. This is a fund designed to put money of cutbacks there really is a role for that sector? Volunteers into the hands of neighbourhood groups to help them need a structure in which to work. implement their own plans. It is focused on wards that blend high levels of deprivation with low levels of social Mr Hurd: I understand the hon. Gentleman’s point. capital, and I very much hope that he will engage We all have to recognise that there is less money around personally in supporting constituents in those wards to so some difficult choices have to be made. I simply refer maximise those particular opportunities. him to the statement made by his own leader to the BBC on Valentine’s day this year to the effect that he Mrs Madeleine Moon (Bridgend) (Lab): I declare an could not have protected the voluntary sector from interest as a trustee of Community Service Volunteers, local authority cuts. There is awareness of the challenge which had its Make a Difference day on Saturday last that we all face. I know that the sector in Manchester week, encouraging people to volunteer and make a has benefited from the transition fund and that a bid difference in their community. What steps will the has been put in to the infrastructure fund from the Government take to ensure that organisations such as organisations that support front-line organisations. Eighteen Community Service Volunteerscan reach out and encourage wards in the city of Manchester and 69 in Greater volunteers like Abbie, who is unemployed, to make a Manchester are eligible for the Community First grant difference by working in her local Marie Curie shop? programme. 907 Oral Answers2 NOVEMBER 2011 Oral Answers 908 Mr Brown: People in my constituency who are living Open Government Partnership with cancer and other long-term conditions desperately need benefits advice. It is currently provided by Macmillan 4. Mr James Clappison (Hertsmere) (Con): What Cancer Support, Citizens Advice, Welfare Rights and assessment he has made of the potential role of the the Princess Royal Trust for Carers. I attended a meeting open government partnership in promoting openness with these groups on Monday morning. Let me tell the and transparency. [77753] Minister that they are under real pressure to find the financial wherewithal to go forward. Surely now is The Minister for the Cabinet Office and Paymaster the time to make sure that these organisations have the General (Mr Francis Maude): Transparency is an idea financial support that is required to provide quality whose time has come. It makes choice possible, it encourages benefits advice. accountability, and it can change lives. The United Kingdom Government are already the world leader in Mr Hurd: I could not agree more. When I visited my transparency, and the open government partnership local advice centre on Friday, I had a real sense of the will enable those huge benefits to be promoted to many strain and stress that its staff were experiencing. We other countries around the world. have set aside a further £20 million of special funding for advice centres. There is also to be a short review to Mr Clappison: The open government partnership is investigate what the Government can do to manage an interesting and exciting concept. Can my right hon. levels of demand on those working in that vital sector, Friend tell me what are the key UK transparency and how we can make life easier for them. commitments within it? Mrs Eleanor Laing (Epping Forest) (Con): Does the Mr Maude: All the principles underlying the partnership Minister agree that voluntary groups set up by people reflect things that we have already introduced: openness who do what they do because they want to, and because about Government spending, openness about salaries, they have a lifetime of experience in the field—one openness about the internal workings of government, example is Home-Start in my constituency—often fulfil and an increase in the publication of outcome data their roles not only in a more cost-effective way, but about the way in which public services operate. We have better than others? said that commitment to and implementation of the principles of the open government partnership will Mr Hurd: Absolutely. Value is reflected in two ways, increasingly be a material factor in decisions by the in terms of cost and in terms of the effectiveness of the Department for International Development about where support that is given. In my experience, volunteer-led to place direct budget support for developing country organisations enjoy a different level of trust among the Governments. people whom they are trying to help. Mr Denis MacShane (Rotherham) (Lab): In the interests Mr Peter Bone (Wellingborough) (Con): Would the of open government, will the Minister agree to publish Minister welcome increased Government spending to all the credit card expenses of Ministers and officials enable the voluntary sector to deal with human trafficking? under the sum of £500 in all Departments, starting with If the money went through the Salvation Army, the big the Housing Minister? society could help all charities to look after victims. Mr Maude: It is good to hear the right hon. Gentleman being so enthusiastic about transparency. We have already Mr Hurd: My hon. Friend makes a good point, with published Government payment card data covering which I have a great deal of sympathy. transactions between April and August this year, and we will continue to do so. We will publish the data for Mr Gareth Thomas (Harrow West) (Lab/Co-op): The 2010 and 2011, and Departments will also have the latest survey of charity leaders by the National Council option of publishing data for the previous year, when for Voluntary Organisations shows that 30% of them the last Government were in office.
Recommended publications
  • Z675928x Margaret Hodge Mp 06/10/2011 Z9080283 Lorely

    Z675928x Margaret Hodge Mp 06/10/2011 Z9080283 Lorely

    Z675928X MARGARET HODGE MP 06/10/2011 Z9080283 LORELY BURT MP 08/10/2011 Z5702798 PAUL FARRELLY MP 09/10/2011 Z5651644 NORMAN LAMB 09/10/2011 Z236177X ROBERT HALFON MP 11/10/2011 Z2326282 MARCUS JONES MP 11/10/2011 Z2409343 CHARLOTTE LESLIE 12/10/2011 Z2415104 CATHERINE MCKINNELL 14/10/2011 Z2416602 STEPHEN MOSLEY 18/10/2011 Z5957328 JOAN RUDDOCK MP 18/10/2011 Z2375838 ROBIN WALKER MP 19/10/2011 Z1907445 ANNE MCINTOSH MP 20/10/2011 Z2408027 IAN LAVERY MP 21/10/2011 Z1951398 ROGER WILLIAMS 21/10/2011 Z7209413 ALISTAIR CARMICHAEL 24/10/2011 Z2423448 NIGEL MILLS MP 24/10/2011 Z2423360 BEN GUMMER MP 25/10/2011 Z2423633 MIKE WEATHERLEY MP 25/10/2011 Z5092044 GERAINT DAVIES MP 26/10/2011 Z2425526 KARL TURNER MP 27/10/2011 Z242877X DAVID MORRIS MP 28/10/2011 Z2414680 JAMES MORRIS MP 28/10/2011 Z2428399 PHILLIP LEE MP 31/10/2011 Z2429528 IAN MEARNS MP 31/10/2011 Z2329673 DR EILIDH WHITEFORD MP 31/10/2011 Z9252691 MADELEINE MOON MP 01/11/2011 Z2431014 GAVIN WILLIAMSON MP 01/11/2011 Z2414601 DAVID MOWAT MP 02/11/2011 Z2384782 CHRISTOPHER LESLIE MP 04/11/2011 Z7322798 ANDREW SLAUGHTER 05/11/2011 Z9265248 IAN AUSTIN MP 08/11/2011 Z2424608 AMBER RUDD MP 09/11/2011 Z241465X SIMON KIRBY MP 10/11/2011 Z2422243 PAUL MAYNARD MP 10/11/2011 Z2261940 TESSA MUNT MP 10/11/2011 Z5928278 VERNON RODNEY COAKER MP 11/11/2011 Z5402015 STEPHEN TIMMS MP 11/11/2011 Z1889879 BRIAN BINLEY MP 12/11/2011 Z5564713 ANDY BURNHAM MP 12/11/2011 Z4665783 EDWARD GARNIER QC MP 12/11/2011 Z907501X DANIEL KAWCZYNSKI MP 12/11/2011 Z728149X JOHN ROBERTSON MP 12/11/2011 Z5611939 CHRIS
  • FDN-274688 Disclosure

    FDN-274688 Disclosure

    FDN-274688 Disclosure MP Total Adam Afriyie 5 Adam Holloway 4 Adrian Bailey 7 Alan Campbell 3 Alan Duncan 2 Alan Haselhurst 5 Alan Johnson 5 Alan Meale 2 Alan Whitehead 1 Alasdair McDonnell 1 Albert Owen 5 Alberto Costa 7 Alec Shelbrooke 3 Alex Chalk 6 Alex Cunningham 1 Alex Salmond 2 Alison McGovern 2 Alison Thewliss 1 Alistair Burt 6 Alistair Carmichael 1 Alok Sharma 4 Alun Cairns 3 Amanda Solloway 1 Amber Rudd 10 Andrea Jenkyns 9 Andrea Leadsom 3 Andrew Bingham 6 Andrew Bridgen 1 Andrew Griffiths 4 Andrew Gwynne 2 Andrew Jones 1 Andrew Mitchell 9 Andrew Murrison 4 Andrew Percy 4 Andrew Rosindell 4 Andrew Selous 10 Andrew Smith 5 Andrew Stephenson 4 Andrew Turner 3 Andrew Tyrie 8 Andy Burnham 1 Andy McDonald 2 Andy Slaughter 8 FDN-274688 Disclosure Angela Crawley 3 Angela Eagle 3 Angela Rayner 7 Angela Smith 3 Angela Watkinson 1 Angus MacNeil 1 Ann Clwyd 3 Ann Coffey 5 Anna Soubry 1 Anna Turley 6 Anne Main 4 Anne McLaughlin 3 Anne Milton 4 Anne-Marie Morris 1 Anne-Marie Trevelyan 3 Antoinette Sandbach 1 Barry Gardiner 9 Barry Sheerman 3 Ben Bradshaw 6 Ben Gummer 3 Ben Howlett 2 Ben Wallace 8 Bernard Jenkin 45 Bill Wiggin 4 Bob Blackman 3 Bob Stewart 4 Boris Johnson 5 Brandon Lewis 1 Brendan O'Hara 5 Bridget Phillipson 2 Byron Davies 1 Callum McCaig 6 Calum Kerr 3 Carol Monaghan 6 Caroline Ansell 4 Caroline Dinenage 4 Caroline Flint 2 Caroline Johnson 4 Caroline Lucas 7 Caroline Nokes 2 Caroline Spelman 3 Carolyn Harris 3 Cat Smith 4 Catherine McKinnell 1 FDN-274688 Disclosure Catherine West 7 Charles Walker 8 Charlie Elphicke 7 Charlotte
  • Download (9MB)

    Download (9MB)

    A University of Sussex PhD thesis Available online via Sussex Research Online: http://sro.sussex.ac.uk/ This thesis is protected by copyright which belongs to the author. This thesis cannot be reproduced or quoted extensively from without first obtaining permission in writing from the Author The content must not be changed in any way or sold commercially in any format or medium without the formal permission of the Author When referring to this work, full bibliographic details including the author, title, awarding institution and date of the thesis must be given Please visit Sussex Research Online for more information and further details 2018 Behavioural Models for Identifying Authenticity in the Twitter Feeds of UK Members of Parliament A CONTENT ANALYSIS OF UK MPS’ TWEETS BETWEEN 2011 AND 2012; A LONGITUDINAL STUDY MARK MARGARETTEN Mark Stuart Margaretten Submitted for the degree of Doctor of PhilosoPhy at the University of Sussex June 2018 1 Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS ........................................................................................................................ 1 DECLARATION .................................................................................................................................. 4 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ...................................................................................................................... 5 FIGURES ........................................................................................................................................... 6 TABLES ............................................................................................................................................
  • Unclassified Unclassified

    Unclassified Unclassified

    UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED Evidence Number Name E23 Pagoda PR E24 Paul Flynn MP E25 PCRC (Political and Constitutional Reform Committee) E26 PLMR (Political Lobbying and Media Relations Ltd) E27 Political Intelligence E28 PRCA (Public Relations Consultants Association) E29 Ranelagh International Ltd E30 Rowan Public Affairs E31 (SPA) Society of Parliamentary Agents E32 (TPA) TaxPayers’ Alliance E33 Transparency International UK E34 UKPAC E35 Unlock Democracy E36 William Dinan and David Miller UNCLASSIFIED UNCLASSIFIED E23: Pagoda PR 1. Is there any reason to think that lobbying per se is a problem; and is there any evidence that abuse of lobbying is widespread or systemic, as opposed to exceptional behaviour by a few? Not in itself, although recent evidence would indicate that some parliamentarians may be susceptible to influence on the basis of inappropriate inducements. This does, as the paper suggests, damage the reputation of lobbying and parliamentary engagement more widely. In this respect, there is a risk that efforts to encourage more lobbying/campaigning from wider sections of society – especially young people – are undermined. We need to proactively promote the positive achievements of lobbying if we are to secure the confidence and participation of the next generation, who will otherwise view Parliament with cynicism. Politicians could do more to say when they have been persuaded by well run, well evidenced and transparent lobbying campaigns. 2. How wide should the definition of lobbying be? What activities should be excluded from the definition? This is extremely difficult because the current definitions rely on determining an attempt to ‘influence’. In many cases such intent is very difficult to determine.
  • New Hybrid Connectivity Based Approaches

    New Hybrid Connectivity Based Approaches

    Appendix C: Hamiltonian Paths with Double Pheromone Ant Colony System Optimisation This appendix contains the full list of topics of the hamiltonian path identified by the algorithm presented on the PhD thesis of David M.S. Rodrigues Reading the news through their structure: new hybrid connectivity based approaches. This appendix is available in digital format at http://www.davidrodrigues.org/pdfs/phd/ and on the accompanying CD delivered with the printed copy of the thesis. As news follow a hamiltonian path the first news in the following list is connected to the last news of the list to complete the path. • Eurozone debt crisis live: Italian senate passes austerity law | Business | guardian.co.uk • Greek leaders agree to unity government as future hangs in balance | World news | guardian.co.uk • Lucas Papademos to lead Greece’s interim coalition government | World news | guardian.co.uk • The euro will survive – and Britain will join, says Michael Heseltine | World news | guardian.co.uk • Eurozone bailout fund falls short of e1 trillion target | Business | The Guardian • Euro debt crisis: Greek PM George Papandreou to resign | World news | guardian.co.uk • Chaos in Greece amid battle to form a ’government of national salvation’ | World news | The Observer • Eurozone debt crisis: EU members line up to demand ECB intervention | Business | The Guardian 1 • Italy passes austerity measures – clearing way for Berlusconi to quit | Business | guardian.co.uk • European debt crisis live: pressure mounts as finance ministers meet | Business | guardian.co.uk
  • Post–Legislative Scrutiny of the Freedom of Information Act 2000

    Post–Legislative Scrutiny of the Freedom of Information Act 2000

    House of Commons Justice Committee Post–legislative scrutiny of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 First Report of Session 2012–13 Volume II Oral and written evidence Additional written evidence is contained in Volume III, available on the Committee website at www.parliament.uk/justicecttee Ordered by the House of Commons to be printed 3 July 2012 HC 96-II [Incorporating HC 1849-i-v, Session 2010–12] Published on 26 July 2012 by authority of the House of Commons London: The Stationery Office Limited £20.50 The Justice Committee The Justice Committee is appointed by the House of Commons to examine the expenditure, administration and policy of the Ministry of Justice and its associated public bodies (including the work of staff provided for the administrative work of courts and tribunals, but excluding consideration of individual cases and appointments, and excluding the work of the Scotland and Wales Offices and of the Advocate General for Scotland); and administration and expenditure of the Attorney General's Office, the Treasury Solicitor's Department, the Crown Prosecution Service and the Serious Fraud Office (but excluding individual cases and appointments and advice given within government by Law Officers). Current membership Rt Hon Sir Alan Beith (Liberal Democrat, Berwick-upon-Tweed) (Chair) Steve Brine (Conservative, Winchester) Mr Robert Buckland (Conservative, South Swindon) Jeremy Corbyn (Labour, Islington North) Nick de Bois (Conservative, Enfield North) Christopher Evans (Labour/Co-operative, Islwyn) Ben Gummer (Conservative, Ipswich) Rt Hon Elfyn Llwyd (Plaid Cymru, Dwyfor Meirionnydd) Seema Malhotra (Labour/Co-operative, Feltham and Heston) Yasmin Qureshi (Labour, Bolton South East) Elizabeth Truss (Conservative, South West Norfolk) Karl Turner (Labour, Kingston upon Hull East) Powers The Committee is one of the departmental select committees, the powers of which are set out in House of Commons Standing Orders, principally in SO No 152.
  • Britain's Baker's Dozen of Disasters

    Britain's Baker's Dozen of Disasters

    IEA Discussion Paper No.65 BRITAIN’S BAKER’S DOZEN OF DISASTERS: The UK’s thirteen worst economic policy mistakes since 1900 Peter Clarke and Robert C. B. Miller October 2015 Institute of Economic A airs Acknowledgement We are grateful for the most helpful critical comments of an anonymous referee. With some exceptions, such as with the publication of lectures, IEA Discussion Papers are blind peer-reviewed by at least one academic or researcher who is an expert in the field. As with all IEA publications, the views expressed in IEA Discussion Papers are those of the author and not those of the Institute (which has no corporate view), its managing trustees, Academic Advisory Council or senior staff. Contents About the authors 04 Introduction 06 No. 1 1906: Trade Union immunities 09 No. 2 1908-1911: Edwardian Liberal welfare reforms 12 No. 3 1925: Mr Churchill and the return to gold 15 No. 4 1932: Abandoning free trade 18 No. 5 1945-1979: Post-World War II nationalisation 21 No. 6 1945-2015: The Town and Country Planning Act 25 No. 7 1945-1979: Britain’s experiments with economic planning 28 No. 8 1960-2015: The development aid fallacy 31 No. 9 1950-1960s: ‘Butskellism’ - Keynesian macro-economics 34 No. 10 1945-1979: High marginal tax rates post-World War II 38 No. 11 1970-1975: The great 1970s inflation 41 No. 12 1990: Entering the Exchange Rate Mechanism 44 No. 13 2000-2008: The Gordon Brown bubble 47 References 50 4 About the authors 55 Peter Clarke is a graduate of Bradford and Oxford Universities.
  • 2017/18 Annual Report Chapter 1 Table of Contents

    2017/18 Annual Report Chapter 1 Table of Contents

    2017/18 ANNUAL REPORT CHAPTER 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS ENGAGING WITH GOVERNMENTS AND PRACTITIONERS 31 WELCOME 3 Deepening relations with governments and leading policymakers 32 Year in review 4 Leadership programmes 34 Governance of the School 5 Public engagement 35 International Advisory Board 6 The Challenges of Government Conference 36 Academic Advisory Board 7 The Kyoto Prize at Oxford 37 Visiting practitioners and academics 38 RESEARCH WITH IMPACT 8 Research programmes 9 Partnerships 39 New research 14 DEVELOPING THE SCHOOL 40 Awards and new books 16 Finance 41 Thanking our supporters 42 TEACHING TO ADDRESS POLICY CHALLENGES 17 The MPP year 18 Our faculty 43 Master of Public Policy (MPP) 20 Student success 22 MPP student recruitment 23 Alumni 25 DPhil in Public Policy 30 2 Development Forum. In Latin America, the World of the School enabling leaders to take a short WELCOME Economic Forum invited us to co-chair the regional moment away from their current roles to reflect on meeting this year. The Commission on State their practice, benefitting from new research and Fragility, Growth and Development (joint with exchanging ideas, and to build a network that will London School of Economics) published its enable them to tackle the challenges of public recommendations in April which we discussed at leadership. the Commonwealth Heads of Government We are fortunate to benefit from an ever- meeting and at the Annual Meetings of the IMF strengthening partnership with the Africa Initiative and World Bank. Our faculty member Professor for Governance (AIG), which is bringing Pepper Culpepper has just been awarded a €2.5 outstanding Nigerian and Ghanaian students to the million grant from the European Research Council MPP, and a distinguished AIG Fellow to the School for a groundbreaking project on public attitudes to each year: this year Ghana’s Chief Justice banks and mass media.
  • The Henry Jackson Society and the Degeneration of British

    The Henry Jackson Society and the Degeneration of British

    Tom Griffin Hilary Aked David Miller Sarah Marusek THE HENRY JACKSON SOCIETY AND THE DEGENERATION JUNE 2015 OF BRITISH NEOCONSERVATISM: LIBERAL INTERVENTIONISM, ISLAMOPHOBIA AND THE ‘WAR ON TERROR’ Sponsored by: ISBN 978-0-9570274-4-2 AUTHOR PROFILES David Miller is Professor of Sociology in the Department of Social and Policy Sciences at the University of Bath. He is an RCUK Global Uncertainties Leader- ship Fellow (2013-15) conducting Tom Griffin is a freelance writer and a project to examine the construc- researcher and a doctoral candidate tion, use and impact of expertise on at the University of Bath. He is a ‘terrorism’. He has written widely on contributing editor of OpenDemoc- propaganda, spin and lobbying and racy’s OurKingdom blog and writes for was co-founder of Public Interest Investigations a non profit Spinwatch. He is a former executive company of which Spinwatch and Powerbase are projects. editor and political correspondent of Recent publications include: A Century of Spin: How Public the Irish World. Relations Became the Cutting Edge of Corporate Power (Pluto Press, 2008, co-author); Neoliberal Scotland (Cam- bridge Scholars, 2010, co-editor); Critical Terrorism Studies Dr Sarah Marusek is a freelance since 11 September 2001. What has been learned? (Rout- researcher and writer. She has a PhD in ledge, 2014, co-editor). Researching the Powerful: Public social science from the Maxwell School Sociology in Action (Routledge, forthcoming, co-editor). of Syracuse University. Her doctoral research focused on Islamic activism in Lebanon and was funded by the gener- Hilary Aked is a freelance researcher ous support of the Mellon Foundation.
  • Approved Judgment

    Approved Judgment

    Neutral Citation Number: [2013] EWHC 1435 (QB) Case No: HQ12X002414 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL Date: 04/06/2013 Before : MR JUSTICE BEAN - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between : LIAM FOX Claimant - and - HARVEY BOULTER Defendant - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - William McCormick QC and Jonathan Barnes (instructed by PSB Law) for the Claimant Matthew Nicklin QC (instructed by DLA Piper) for the Defendant Hearing date: 15 May 2013 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Approved Judgment I direct that pursuant to CPR PD 39A para 6.1 no official shorthand note shall be taken of this Judgment and that copies of this version as handed down may be treated as authentic. ............................. MR JUSTICE BEAN MR JUSTICE BEAN Fox v Boulter Approved Judgment Mr Justice Bean : 1. The Claimant is the Member of Parliament for North Somerset. From 12th May 2010 until 14th October 2011 he was Secretary of State for Defence. 2. The Defendant is a British businessman principally resident in Dubai (but who, according to the Particulars of Claim, also maintains a residence in the UK) and is Chief Executive Officer of Porton Capital Inc, a Cayman Islands based legal entity which conducts business in the UK, Dubai and other jurisdictions. 3. In June 2011 the Defendant was the subject of widely reported allegations which he has characterised as being to the effect that he was guilty, or there were strong grounds to suspect that he was guilty, of an unlawful campaign of blackmail against the US corporation 3M Co. in an effort to extort millions of dollars in settlement of a hopeless piece of litigation.
  • Behind the Mask the Taxpayers’Alliance & the War on Public Provision

    Behind the Mask the Taxpayers’Alliance & the War on Public Provision

    Behind the Mask The TaxPayers’Alliance & the War on Public Provision October 2012 Preface Dear friend, Thomas Frank in his recent book “Pity the Billionaire” uses the phrase “a mask for privilege” to describe the US Tea Party movement. He highlights how its populism, while appearing to rail against government and vested financial interests, in reality cloaks the real agenda of its wealthy backers - to ‘free’ business from any kind of regulation and enable the ‘free’ market to ignore social consequences as it maximises profit for business owners and their shareholders. We have our own Tea Party equivalents which work assiduously on behalf of big business and the wealthy under the guise of independent think tanks. Such outfits are the first port of call for the mainstream media when comments are sought on matters of public policy, such as taxation, employment legislation, planning and regulation on business. An organisation with one of the highest public profiles on such matters is the “Taxpayers’ Alliance”(TPA). Their name and public relations may wish to conjure up an image of hardworking, conscientious citizens concerned about whether the ‘ordinary level’ taxes they pay are being effectively used by government but, objectively, the TPA are funded by and represent major interest groups that are far from being ‘ordinary level’ taxpayers. This latest NIPSA research publication exposes the reality of what this organisation actually stands for. Behind the mask of their public concern for the “ordinary guy” and their “non-partisan” self-definition, the TPA is an organisation funded by wealthy individuals and private companies, whose real objective is to promote the interests of a business elite who will benefit most from their extreme anti-public sector, right-wing/‘libertarian’ politics.
  • List of Ministers' Interests

    List of Ministers' Interests

    LIST OF MINISTERS’ INTERESTS CABINET OFFICE DECEMBER 2015 CONTENTS Introduction 1 Prime Minister 3 Attorney General’s Office 5 Department for Business, Innovation and Skills 6 Cabinet Office 8 Department for Communities and Local Government 10 Department for Culture, Media and Sport 12 Ministry of Defence 14 Department for Education 16 Department of Energy and Climate Change 18 Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs 19 Foreign and Commonwealth Office 20 Department of Health 22 Home Office 24 Department for International Development 26 Ministry of Justice 27 Northern Ireland Office 30 Office of the Advocate General for Scotland 31 Office of the Leader of the House of Commons 32 Office of the Leader of the House of Lords 33 Scotland Office 34 Department for Transport 35 HM Treasury 37 Wales Office 39 Department for Work and Pensions 40 Government Whips – Commons 42 Government Whips – Lords 46 INTRODUCTION Ministerial Code Under the terms of the Ministerial Code, Ministers must ensure that no conflict arises, or could reasonably be perceived to arise, between their Ministerial position and their private interests, financial or otherwise. On appointment to each new office, Ministers must provide their Permanent Secretary with a list in writing of all relevant interests known to them which might be thought to give rise to a conflict. Individual declarations, and a note of any action taken in respect of individual interests, are then passed to the Cabinet Office Propriety and Ethics team and the Independent Adviser on Ministers’ Interests to confirm they are content with the action taken or to provide further advice as appropriate.