-independent prosodic features Jacqueline Vaissière

To cite this version:

Jacqueline Vaissière. Language-independent prosodic features. : Models and Measurements, Springer Verlag, pp.53-65, 1983. ￿halshs-00703571￿

HAL Id: halshs-00703571 https://halshs.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00703571 Submitted on 3 Jun 2012

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. MlrrE9 Descriptionacoustique

7 PRINCIPES DE COMPARAISON PROSODIQUEENTRE LES LANGUES

7.I LANGUAGE.INDEPENDANT PROSODICFEATURES (ARTICLE)

5.1 lntroduction

Tbe purposeof thiscontribulion is to investigatethe similaritiesin form and function of prosodyamong diverselanguages All speakers.regardless of their specificlanguage. are equippedwith the sameproduclion and percep- tion apparatus,and consequentlyhave the samecapabilities and mustface the samephvsiological constrâints. Such similarities should be reflectedin the acousticproductioD of any speaker.The first specificarm of thisconlribu- tion is to reviewa numberof strikingacoustic similarities in the suprasegmen- tal aspectsof neutralsentences in differentlanguages. together wilh possible phvsiologicalexplanations for them. Sincethe globalfunction of (i.e. communicatron)is languageinde- pendent.the type of informationconveyed bv the speechsignal should not varv greatlyamong . The secondpurpose here is thus lo compare rhe linguisticfunctions assigned in severallanguages to similarsuprasegmen' tal phenonena,such as lengthening.fundamental freguencv rises and falls. and intensitypeaks. Ahhough the uscof suprascgmentalvanatron for paralinguisticfunctions (suchas the expressionof emotion)is alsoof prime importancein everyday conversation.the scopeof thiscontrihution is restrictedto the strictlyInguis- tic functions of prosodr,.

5.2 Language-Independenl Similarilies

5.2.1 Pauses

Acoustic analysisof speechproduction shows that speakersinsen a large number of pauseswhile talking. Studieshave indicatedthat the ratio of aniculatedsequences

LANGUAGE-INDEPENDANT PROSODICFEATI,]RES (ARTCLE) tt2 4u\ 7i-

54 5. Language-lndependent Prosodic Features

The first language-independent primary function assigned to panses is that of grouping. Speakerstend to draw breath at the end of large conceptual units sncb as sentences and clauses. Pauses between sentences tend to be longer than pauses within sentences (Goldman-Eisler [1972) for English; Grosjean and Deschamps [1973] and Duel [1982] for French). The use of pausesas a major boundary Marker between and within sentencesseems to be similar across those languagesfor which there are available data. Black et al. [1966] found no significant differences in the use or location of pausesby speakersof English, Hindi, Japaneseand Spanish. However, the length of pausesand their distribution per number of may differ slightly from one language to another: Grosjean and Deschamps [1975] found that native speakersof French tend to pause less olten but for a longer time than native speakersof English. There also exists another type of pause" generally not located at grammat- ical junctures, the so-caIled hesitation pause. The duration and frequency of both types of pauses seem to depend on a larger number of factors" such as speech rate, speech mode, age and experienœ of the speaker, emotional state, and the pursuit of stylistic effects. At fast speech rates, pauseswithin sentenœs tend to be suppressed [Gros jean and Collins" 1979); pauses are more frequent in descriptions than in interviews [Gros jean and Deschamps, 1973];in political ,pause distribution tends to be more in agreement with grammatical structure than it is in interviews [Duel" 1982]. German and English adolescents make more ungrammatical pauses than adults while [O'Connelland Kowal, 1972]. Advanced students make longer and more judicious pauses in reading than inexperienced students [Oemmer et al., 1979).ln the sixth repetition of a spontaneousdescription, subjectsmade only half as many pauses as in the first repetition [Goldman-Eisler, 1968], and made fewer and shorter pauses when reading unusual stories as com- pared to ordinary ones [O'Connell et al., 1969]. Variations in semantic con- text can produce changes in the number of unfilled pausesin a situation in which syntactic and other variations are minimized, for bath German and English speakers [O'Connell and Kowal, 1972]. Pausesalso depend on the emotional state of the speaker [Fairbanks and Hoaglin, 1941], and are olten used before with low transition probability [Cowan and Blocb, 1948; Maclay and Osgood, 1959]. AIl such factors seem to be largely independent of lan~ge. Speechis produced by modulating the airflow from the . As a conse- quenœ, it is necessaryfor aIl speakers to insert a œrtain number of respira- tory pauseswhile speaking. Respiratory pauses, which represent ont y a part of aIl pauses,cao be considered physiological necessities.The constraints due to the production apparatus explain the basic similarities in pausing between languages. The probability of occurrenœ of a pause during continuous speechseems to depend on the amount of residual air in the lungs [Fujisaki and Sudo, 1971]. It bas been shown by Grosjean and Deschamps[1975) that breathing during speechexerts an influence at similar time intervals indepen- 75

5.2 Language-Independent Similarities 5S dently of the language spoken (here English and French). The most striking similarity between languagesis that breathing (respiratory pausing) occurs at grammatical junctures. At fast rates, the physioJogicalneed to breathe is the sole determinant of pausing [Gros jean and Collins, 1979). Fodor et al. [1974] have suggested that breathing is dependent on : speakers will only breathe when allowed to do so, as it were, by the constituent structure of the utteranœ.

5.2.2FundamentaJ Frequency Features

Figure 5.1 summarizesthe general properties of F0 curves in simple sentences pronounced in a single breath-group (that is, without pauses), as observed in a number of languages.We will review in turn the declination tendency of the Fo curve, the resetting of the baseline, the contraI of Fo range, and Fo rising versos Fo falling movements. '.

1

POStp8UNI Iengt'-,;,.gprèp lengthening -T- t- ~ IREATH-GROUP

Fil. 5.1. General propenjes of Fo contours observed in unmarked .entences in a number of languages. The common tendencies are the foUowing: (i) a tendency for Fo values to fluctuate between two abstract 1ines:the plaiN" and the bas~l;II~.which delimit the speakers Ffi range: (ü) a tendency for the Fo rallge to diminish as a function of rime; (üi) a tendency to start sentenceswith a large .fellU/lCe-iIailiDJPise in Fo, klCated on one of the fust syUables,or spread over the fust few syUables;(iv) a tendency to repeat a successionof Fo rises (R) and lowerings (L): a pair of opposing movements indicat~ a prosodic (sec text); (v) a tendency for the mG.tima1valw of Fo to be located on the first prosodic ward of the .entence; (vi) a tendency to lengthen the duration of the last syUable at the end of the breath-group (prepausallellgthening), and of the fint pboneme at the beginnin, of the sentence (postpausaJleIIgrhening)

a) Tbe Declination Tendency

ln relatively long stretchesof continuousspeech, there is a global tendency for the Fo curve to declinewith time, despitesuccessive local risesand falls 7;:6:

56 5. Language-Independent Prosodic Features

/ a) ENGlISH , "1 _1 :~ Ii .t\ ~:.. \ V' 18r~_jlri' ~ " -j .~ . :-3 ..."" -, \ """'\ .L~~=::= = -..i oie\ ~-~- ~ l. ~'1 4 -,_\

l b) SPANISH } -, ln~ ria \ ..~""" ti - ":\J { .. "..~~-~ L~l~ v~ _.~-~-- on.- 1. ~- - - - - a-- - - -1'--n- 7- c) FRENCH ] 'Y-A_- ~-""-1":- :~;j ~-~ 1 M ~ w --~~J-"'I~ ---

1 J. - . 0 la - 3 la 10 - -

fil. 5.2.-c. Fooontours for the SaIneclause translated into three languagesand pronounced by native speakers:(a) "It bas oontributed a significant amount to the technical progress of the past twenty years,.. ."; (b) "Ha oontribuido a la mayoria de los progressos tecnicos en los uItimos veinte anos,. . ."; (c) "u a contribué à la majorité des progrès technologiquesdes vingt dernières années,. . .".The pausesand the rise-fall pairs in Focombine to divide the three clausesinto four prosodic words (numbered 1 to 4)

(for Dutch, Cohen and 't Hart [1967]; for English. Maeda [1976]; for Italian, Magno-Caldognetto et al. [1978]; for Japanese, Fujisaki et al. [1979]; for toRe languages,Hombert [1974». Figure 5.2, wmch shows the Focontours of the same utterance translated into three different languagesand spoken by a native speaker of each language, illustrates this tendency. Several physiological explanations have been proposed. The Fo declina- tion could be mainly due to the decline in transglottal pressure (proposed by lieberman [1967] and partially refuted by Hixon et al. [1971], to a trachea pull [Maeda, 1976, p. 220ft.], or to a laziness principle (the rise supposedly being barder to produœ than the falls [Ohala and Ewan, 1973». The differ- ent explanations primarily invoke the production apparatus and are compat- ible with one another. The declination tendency bas also been proposed to be a by-product of the perceptual system [Pierrehumbert, 1979]. The rate of declination bas been found to vary with a number of factors, but no cross- linguistic differences have yet been proved. Declination is a general tendency easily detected from a visual inspection of relatively long stretches of Fo curve, but calculation of the exact rate of declination is a difficult task. For some speakers, the tendency seems to be adequately described by a constant rate of declination ("the declination line"), while for others, there is a tendency for Fo to decreasemore rapidly in the first part of the sentence, and then to decrease less rapidly or even star fIat (exponential declination). The slope of declination is DOt entÎrely phy-

~ n

5.2 Language-lndependent Similarities 57

siologically detennined, but is partially controlled by the speaker. It has been shown that the speaker olten adjusts the rate of declination with the length of the sentenœ, at least in isolated sentenœs: the shorter the sentenœ, the more rapid the declination. When the sentenœs are part of a text, the corre- lation between rate of declination and length of utteranœ is less obvious; in spontaneous speech, many sentenœs do Dot even display such a tendency. Furthermore, the declination tendency has been shown to be olten sup- pressed in interrogative sentenœs (both in spontaneous speech and in read sentenœs). It may be suggestedthat the rate of declination contributes (together with other features) to the perœptjon of a sentenœ spoken in the declarative mode as an acoustic whole; its presenœ versus its absenœ contributes to the contrast between declarative and interrogative sentenœs (for French, Con- tini and Boé [1975]; for Danish, Thorsen [1980a]; for Russian, Svetozarova [1975]; for a language, Ho [1977]; for a number of other languages, Lieberman [1967)). We may conclude that as for pauses, the natural tendency for Fo to decline has been integrated into the linguistic code, in the form of controlling or entirely suppressingthe Fo decline. However, its foIe is probably of minor importanœ in spontaneous speech, even though it may contribute to natur- alness.

b) Resetting or the Baseline

A direct consequenceof this tendency for Fa to decline is that Fa values tend to be lower near the end of breath-groups than at the beginning. After a pause, they are generally reset. We may suppose that resetting of Fa values after a respiratory pause is a natural physiological tendency, although the relation between resetting and breathing is DOt entirely clear. Together with the declination tendency and pauses, the resetting of Fa may contribute to characterizing sentencesand clausesas acoustic entjties. It bas been shown (by Maeda [1976] for English; by Carlson and Granstrôm [1973] for Swedish; and by Fujisaki et al. [1979] for Japanese) that resetting of the baseline can be simulated between two phrases, even in the absenceof a pause. The resetting is used as a boundaf)' marker, and the degree of resetting indicates the importance of the boundary. A stepping down of the baseline at major syntactic boundaries bas been reported in a few languages[e.g. Ford, 1975]. To decide on the general useof baseline resetting, either upward or doWDward, acoustic data for a larger number of languages, particularly tone languages, must be compared and described within a common framework. The physiological basis of the relations among pause, breathing, declina- tion and resetting is difficult to establish, since speakers may pause without breathing, or reset the baseline without pausing; moreover, as noted above. 78

58 5. Language-Independent Prosodic Features declination has also been seen as a by-product of the perceptual system. Despite these difficulties, the considerable cross-linguistic similarities suggest a physiological explanation. c) Normal Frequency Range and the Control of Range

The range of Fa variation generally narrows as a function oftime (the range is often widened at the very end of the breath-group with the realization of an optional continuation rise). ln general, the local Fa maxima and minima decreasefrom the beginning to the end in simple declarative sentenœs; the local maximal values tend to decrease more rapidly than the local minimal values (Fig. 5.1). This diminution of Farange seemsto be a natural physiological tendency, sinœ it bas been attested in simple sentencesin a large number of languages. Most of the physiological explanations for such a phenomenon relate to the production apparatus. It has been shown in singing that an upward pitch change takes longer than a dowoward pitch change, suggesting that it is easier to lower pitch than to raise it [Ohala and Ewan, 1973]. (Note that a differenœ in difficuJty between the two opposite bas also been observed in deaf people [Salles, 1980].) As a consequence of this tendency, the increasein amplitude of sucœssiveFa rises does Dot entirely compensate for the decreasein falls, resulting in a narrowing of the Fa range. A percep- tuai explanation is sometimes advanced: it bas been argued that the speaker tends ta keep the same number of octaves above the baseline. The largest rise (and consequently the highest ,Fa value) is generally located in one of the first three or four syllables of the utterance (that is, within the fust lexical word). This seemsto be common to the languagesthat have been studied so fac. However, speakers are able to counteract this supposednatural tendency to a certain extent, creating a local widening or narrowing of the expected range. Sncb a strategy bas been attested in several languagesfor marking boundaries or emphasis in complex sentenœs. Another observation is that speakers have a tendency to be at a low fundamental frequency, generaUy the lowest in the sentenœ, when they œasevoicing. The final fall is often accompanied by a lower intensity and by a lengthening of the final elements, which all help to indicate to the listener that the utterance is ending. This tendency is sometimes interpreted as an (early) relaxation [Lindblom, 1968]. Again, however, speakers May counteract this tendency in order to convey linguistic information. The termi- nal contour of the last is the MOstimportant feature in distinguishing simple declarative statements from yes/no questions in a number of languages (for Danish, Thorsen [1980b]; for Italian, Magno-Caldognetto et al. [1978]; for French, Contini and Boé [1975]; for Japanese, Nishinuma [1979]; for Romanian, Dascàlu [1979]). When used for marking interrogation, a rising terminal contour is often accompanied by a suppression of the declination C79-

5.2 Language-IndependentSimiI~ties " tendency. It bas been noted, however, that this effect is language specific: in some languagesinterrogatives cao be characterized by a falling intonation, and in others a rising contour may be typical for declaratives. Even in yes/no questions, where the interrogative mode is indicated by the syntax, and in wh-questions, a rising contour is optional. The terminal contour inside a declarative sentenœ is also olten used to contrast between terminal juncture (at the end of the sentenœ) and oon- terminal juncture (before a non-final pause). (See Delattre [1963] for a com- parative study of German, French, Spanish and English; Svetozarova [1975] for Russian and Nishinuma [1979] for Japanese.) We have ooticed that in non-terminal juncture, in contrast to yes/no questions, the declination ten- dency is maÎntained. The presenœ versus absenœ of the declination ten- _dencymay contribute to the perœptual differentiation between interrogation rise and continuation rise in a number of languages. Cross-linguistic perœp- tual experiments are needed to test this hypothesis.

d) Rising Versus Falling Fu Movements

Perhapsbecause a Fa rise is mainly realized by tensing the vocaJ folds, and a Fa fall by relaxing the tension, an upward change of Fa between two succes- sive seems to be associated with the notion of beginning and a down- ward movement with the notion of end. This tendency seems to be reflected particularly by the manDer in which lexical entities are acoustically combined in spoken sentenœs to form a single acoustic entity. Such an acoustic entity is related to the notions of "stress group" as defioed by Thorsen [1980a] for Danish, the "hat-pattern" in Dutch [Collier and 't Hart, 1975] and in English [Maeda, 1974], the "rhythmic unit" [Lehiste, 1975] or the "prosodic word" in French [Vaissière, 1974, 1975]. and the "syntagma" in Russian [Kozhevnikov and Chistovich, 1965; Svetozarova, 1975]. The number of prosodic words for one sentenœ is Dot fixed; i.e. it is not entirely determined by grammatical structure. It depends on several factors, such as rate of speech and a speak- er's individual choiœ. However, in carefully spoken sentenœs, where the speaker tends to stress every meaningful word (,,'enerally the lexical words as °Pposed to the function words), the number of prosodic words (comprising essentially a sucœssive rise and fall) tends to be equal to the number of lexical words, or one fewer (the faU on the nextto last lexical word may be suppressed so that a larger fall, the sentenœ-final faU, is superimposed upon the last word (for French, Vaissière (1975]; for Russian, Svetozarova[1975]). Sncb an observation is more easily made with sentenœs composed of mul- tisyUabic words, or sentenœs where one or more grammatical words occur between the monosyUabic words, that is, where it is possible to establish perœptual contrast between sucœssive stressed and unstressed syUables. This characteristic appears to be language independent. 80

fi) 5. Language-independentProsodic Features

Many languagesseem to use suprasegmentalvariation to achieve acoustic grouping of semantically related words such as a noun and an adjective which preœdes or foUows it. (See the above references and, for Chinese, Zee and Maddieson [1979]). This is done firstly by reducing the number of Fo move- ments that would be attached to the words if they were spoken separately: the regrouped words tend to receive the Fo pattern of a single word. Sec- ondly, grouping requires that there be no more than one lise and no more than one faU in the phrasai group; if bath accur, the rise has to preœde the faU. Figure 5.2 illustra tes some regroupings comprising a Fo rise in the first lexical ward and a Fo faU in the last ward: "to the technical progress", "of the past twenty years" (English), "des progrès technologiques" (French), "en los ultimos veinte anos" (Spanish).

5.2.3 DurationalFeatures and Intensity Phenomena a) Final Lengthening

There is a tendency to lengthen the final elements in an utterance, particu- tarly the last , before a pause (see illustrations of prepausallengthening for French, English, German and Spanish [Dela~tre, 1966]; for Italian [Mar- œl, 1971]; for Russian [Zlatoustova, 1954]; for Swedish [Lindblom. 1968]). However, there seem to be languages in which there is tittle (if any) final lengthening, e.g. Finnish [Lehiste, 1965], Estonian [Lehiste, 1965] and Japanese[Han. 1961]. It bas been suggestedthat slowing down at the end is a natural tendency characterizing aIl motor sequences or planning units: similar patterns have been found irl music, in birdsongs, in insect chirps and of course in speech [Cooper, 1976]. The lengthening of final elements in words, phrases and sentencesin speech is an intriguing phenomenon. It seemsthat lengthening, like Fo faIl, is associated mainly with the notion of termination. Lindblom [1968] refers to Chman's [1967] model of word and sentence intonation, in which there is a "general relaxation of speech gestures toward the end of the utterances". Making the assumption that the same amount of physiological energy is expended for each syllable (excluding stress varia- tions), Lindblom concludes that the increased duration of final syllables com- pensatesfor the lower intensity per unit of time. However, OlIer and Smith [1977], who approached the issue from a developmental perspective by studying the linguistic production of infants, concluded that final-syllable lengthening constitutes a leamed behavior, since infant speech does Dot dis- play such a tendency. Lengthening a final element without a pause helps to mark the end of a word or phrase (for English, Delattre [1966] and OlIer [1973]; for French, Delattre [1966]; for German, Zingle [1974]; for Russian, Zlatoustova [1954]; for Spanish, Delattre [1966]; for Swedish, Lindblom [1968]). It bas been 81

5.2 Language-Independent Similarities 61

observed that phrase-final lengthening bas a larger range than word-final lengthening. CoOper [1976] bas noted a related tendency in music. Variations in relative Jengthening of different elements, if perœived, contribute to the recovery of syntactic structure by the listener: the greater the lengthening, the more important the syntactic break (see the experiment by O'Malley et al. [1973] on the recovery of the syntactic structure of algebraic expressions). ln addition to Jengthening of the very last syllable in a word or phrase, there may be three other kinds of lengthening phenomena: first, Jengthening of the Jaststressed syllable in a phrase, even if it is followed by one or more unstressedsyllabJes; second, lengthening of the entire Jast word in a phrase [Umeda and Quinn, 1981]; and third, lengthening of the last sentenœ in a read paragraph [Lehiste, 1975]. The buJk of final-syllable lengthening (which may be used as a right bound~' marker) SUffiS to be carried mainly by the vowels [OlIer, 1973]. By contrast, word-initial lengthening bas generally been attested as a left boundary marker, a function associated with rising Fo (for English, Lehiste [19ro]; for Italian, Nespor [1977]; for Swedish, Carlson and Gran- strôm [1973)).

b) Other Lengthening Phenomena

While Jengtheningof the final eJementseems to have essentiaJJya demarca- tive fonction, Jengtheningin a non-final context is JargeJyused for emphasis marking. The lengthening of a single syUabJeis commonJy used to mark emphasis and contrastive stress (Coker and Umeda, 1973]; deceJerationin speaking rate is a strategy that may be used by some speakersto emphasizea word, an entire sentence or a clause [KJoker, 1975].

5.2.4 Intensit) and the Syllahle

Prosodic phenomena such as tone, stress and accent are customarily consid- ered qualifies of a syllable. The syllable is the minimal unit for Fo, duration and intensity contrasts. Even the mora, which may be more adequate than the syllable for describing the suprasegmental system of languages like Ancient Greek [Garde, 1968], is defined relative to the syllable. Despite language-specificrules for grouping into syllables, there is a uni- versaI tendency to bTing the structure of the syllable as close aspossible to the ideal described by de Saussure[1916] and Jespersen [1933}. A common definition of the syllable is that it corresponds to a peak of intensity. Intensity bas a demarcative function at different levels. First, the presenœ versus absenœ of intensity over a period of time signaIspauses and divjdes speech from non-speech sequenœs. Second, during articulated se- quenœs, the gross variations in intensity and the location of local peaks and 82

62 5. Language-Independent Prosodic Features

valleys chunk the continuum into syllable-like segments.The peaks generally correspond to syllable nuclei (vowels) and the valleys to . The linguistic function of the relative intensity of syllables in continuous speechis Dot easy to determine. As mentioned by Sorin [1981], intensity has been lesswell studied in the past than the two other prosodic parameters, Fo and duration. There is very little information on the specific contribution of intensity to perception. Intensity seems to share some of the functions of bath Fo variation and durational variation. The interrelation between inten- sity and fundamental frequency bas a physiological basis. Intensity and fun- damental frequency are reguiated by the same mechanisms (increase in pul- monary effort and in subglottal pressure, tension of the vocal folds, etc.), and, as may be expected, higher fundamental frequency is generally corre- lated with an increase in intensity (see an illustration of this tendency in Fig. 5.2). Similarly, the Fo decrease at the end of sentencesis matched by an intensity decrease. Higher intensity of a syllable is also olten correlated with longer duration. An increase in global articulatory effort to produce percep- tuai prominenœ via intensity may also require additional time, and conse~ quently may result in a lengtheoing of the underlying . For example, emphasisis olten marked by bath an increase in intensity and a lengthening of the underlying segments. Generally speaking, higher Fo, higher intensity and longer duration natur- ally tend to characterize the same segmentsin a sentence. Such a tendeDcyis particularly obvious in emphasis and prominenœ marking. However, differ- ent languageshave counteracted this Datural tendeDcy to a greater or fesser degree in establishing their specific suprasegmentalcode. We will see in the next section that a particular relationship between intensity, Fo and duration may in fact be a characteristic of a language.

5.3 Prosodic DitTerencesAmong Languages

The broad similarities among languages should not mask the considerable variations indicated by cross-linguistic comparison of prosodic systems [Ladd, 1981]. There seem to be three basic princip les which guide the com- parison and description of such differences.

5.3.1 Differences in Timing

ln Engiish [Maeda, 1974], ltalian [Magno-Caldognetto et al., 1978] and Dutch [Cohen and't Hart, 1967], pitch movements (either upward ordown- ward) are mainly limited to the so-called stressedsyllables (with an optional continuation rise on the last unstressedsyllable). Together with higher ioten- 8B

5.3 ProsodicDiffcrcnœ5 Among Languages 63 sity and longer duration, they help to assignprominence to stressedsyllables relative to the surrounding syllables. The position of the stressedsyllable in a word is largely predictable trom the phonological and morpbological struc- ture of the word. ln Frencb, Fo movements occur in relation to word bound- aries: a rise is superimposed on the beginning of the word, and the word-final syllable carnes a large variety of accentuaI contrasts (large rise, rise, level, fall, large fall). ln the former tbree languages, Fo, duration and intensity variations are mainly "timed" wjth the stressed syllables, while in French, they are bound to the first and last syllable of the word. Moreover, the exact position of rises and falls in so-calIed stresslanguages varies from one language to anotber. The movements are DOtalways simul- taneous witb the stressedsyllable. ln Danisb, for example, a stressedsyllable in neutral speechis relatively low, and is followed by a higb-falling taïl on the followjng unstressedsyllable, a pattern whicb is DOtcommon in EngIish. The stressed syllable(s) may be associated in Danish with two different accents, whicb are mainly distinguished by the presenceor absenceof a kind of glonal stop (called stod), ratber tban by a Fo movement [Gârding, 1977). The direction of the pitcb change, either rising or falling, is determined by language-specificfactors. We bave noted that in French, the imponanœ of the juncture followjng the word determines the "accentual pattern" (rising, fa1ling or level) of the word-final syllable. The Fo pattern superimposedon a word in that language is mainly determined by the sentenœ context. ln Swedish, by contrast, one syllable in the word may receive primary stress(the position of whicb is predictable trom the phonological and morpbological structure of the word), and one syllable with primary stress may carry one of two typical accents [Gârding, 1977). Syntactic struCture aIso seemsto play a role in Swedisb in determining the aCtual Fo pattern realized upon a ward embedded in a sentenœ, but to a lesser degree than in French. ln atone language [Pike, 1945], where there is a lexica1ly significant tone on eacb syUable,the syntactic structure may be expected to play an even smaller mie in determining the fundamental frequency contour tban in Swedisb. As a consequence, ward boundaries, morphological and phonological ward structure. and juncture phenomena may aIl contribute to the determi- nation of Fo contour in sucb languages. The relative importance of eacb factor is language specific. Differences in the timing of the same movements are also one way of explaining dialectal varieties in a given language. The best demonstration is probably given by the work of Bruce and Gârding on Swedish [Bruce and Gârding. 1978; Gârding. 1975a): Fo peaks may occur more or lessearly in the stressed syllable, or even in the post-stressed syllable, depending on the dialect spoken (see also Fujisaki and Sugito [1976) for Japanese). A different timing rule bas also been attested for speakers of the same community. It has been shawn, for example, that native speakersof French may stan a continuation rise at the onset of the syllable, or later, in the vowel [Vaissière, 1975). 84

64 5. Language-Independent Prosodic Features

5.3.2 DifferentOrders of Priorities

As the notion of differing orders of priorities is relatively new, we shall illustrate it thrOUgh examples. a) Due to the physical constraints imposed by the vocal apparatus pro- ducing Fo curves, and to the limitation of the Fo range, it is necessaryfor upward and dowoward Fo movements to be produced altemately, so that a large fall is preceded by a rise, and vice versa. ln English and in French, a rise may serve different purposes: it may indicate a non-terminal juncture (con- tinuation rise) in bath languages, and/or be used to mark a stressedsyUable (in English) or the beginning of a word (in French). ln a language like English, a lowering of Fo occurs on the last stressedsyllable in a phrase. If the last stressedsyllable is the final syllable of that phrase, and if this phrase is followed by a non-final pause, either a fall may occur on that syllable to mark the last stressedsyllable of the phrase, or a rise may occur to mark that the phrase is non-terminal: data clearly show that priority is given to the fall (stress marking), and that the fall is followed by an optional continuation rise. ln French, the continuation rise has higher priority than the fall. which is a usual tUe for a right word boundary inside the phrase. As a consequenceof this, the fall is overridden by the continuation rise. b) Both English and French tend to spow lengthening of word-final syl- lables. ln English. the acoustic correlates of word boundaries are only traœs: marking of word boundaries competes with lexical stress marking, and prior- ity is given to the latter. For example, the longest syUable in the word is generally the stressed syllable, despite a lengthening of the word-final syl- lable. ln French. the marking of word boundaries is DOtin competition with stressmarking: the lengthening of final syllables is "reinforœd". The differ- entes between these two originally related languages may be considered a historically different choiœ of which feature to assign priority: stress or boundary. Slight differences in priority may also explain dialectal differences. ln French, for example, bath right and left word boundaries tan be perœptuaUy marked. At a normal rate of conversation, however, it is DOtpossible to put prominenœ on two successive syllables: the prominence assigned to one syUableis achieved at the expenseof the syllables immediately preceding and following. ln dissyUabic words, native speakers of Southem French give more perœptual prominence to the word ending, while Parisian speakers tend to give almost equal weight to the two syllables. Some speakers,particu- larly politicians and radio announœrs, tend more frequently to "stress" the word beginnings. ln words of more than two syllables, it is possible to con- trast the two extreme syllables relative to the intermediate syllable(s): the dialectal and individual differences are smaller. ~5

5.3 Prosodic Differences Among Languages 6S

S.3.3 Different Relationships Between F 0, Duration and Intensity

As was noted in the fust part of this contribution, intrinsic fundamental frequency, duration and intensity of individual sounds reflect the nature of the speechmechanism in general, and the same intrinsic tendencies seem to exist across languages [Chen, 1970; House and Fairbanks, 1953; Delattre, 1962]; ceteris paribus, for example, higher vowels tend to be uttered with a higher fundamentaI frequency. Extrinsic variations, which are not due to segment identity, but rather to lexical stress position, accent pattern, or syntactic boundary position, show correlations between the three parameters which may be more or less intima te. ln English, the syllables which bear pitch movements (the stressedsyllables) are also usuaUy more intense and longer. ln French, the last syllable, which cames a variety of Fo contours, is also the longest syllable in the word; it is Dot clear whether it is more intense, particu- larly in level or falling Fo contours. ln that language speakers tend to give a more equal intensity to sequencesof sounds than do speakersof English. The three suprasegmentaIparameters seem to be less systematically correlated in French than in English. ln bath languages, a longer duration characterizes the syIlables carrying pitch movements. But again, such a correlation between Fochange and duration may Dot hold equaUy for aUother languages. It has been shown that in Japanese, accent placement bas a smaller effect upon segment duration than it does in English [Hirose et al.. 1978; Mitsuya and Sugito, 1978]. It is difficult to evaluate the mutual influence of suprasegmental and segmentai aspects of one language. Rising fundamental frequency with a suprasegmental origin, for example, is mainJy achieved by a tensing of the vocal folds. But the tense consonants, tao, are uttered with more tense vocal folds than the lu consonants. An upward change of pitch seems to be favored by the presence of a tense consonant, in comparison with other enVÎrooments, e.g. lu consonants or vowels. ln French, the Fo maximum alter the word-initial rise is located on the word-initial syllable if the word begins with a voiceless consonant; but it may be delayed to the second syllable if the word-initial phoneme is a vowel or voiced consonant; i.e. the position of the tuming point in the Fo curve is determined by a combination of suprasegmentaland segmentaI features. ln English, a Fo rise (stress-mark- ing rise) results in aspiration of tense consonants beginning the syllable on which it is realized. Both phenomena, rising fundamental frequency and aspiration, correspond to a tensing of the vocal cords, and they are generally concomitant in this language. ln French, by contrast, a Fo rise in the onset of a word may or may not be acoompanied by aspiration, depending on whether or Dot the speaker wants to put emphasis on that word. Suprasegmentalaspects of each syllable affect the segmentaI characteris- tics of the nucleus. Delattre's comparative study of vowel reduction phenomena in French, English, German and Spanish [Delattre, 1963] illus- trates important cross-linguistic differences. 86

66 5. Language-Independeot Prosodie Futures

It is possible that the specific interrelations betWeen the three supraseg- mental features (Fo, dotation and intensity), and the relation between seg- mentai and suprasegmentalaspects, rather than each feature taken individu- ally, are the most salient characteristics differentiating between languages, dialects, and individual ways of speaking. If this is true, most of the existing descriptions of prosodic systems (including our own work on French) are incomplete, sinœ they describe only one parameter at a tilDe. Compensatory effects between the three parameters bave occasionally been notiœd. We have leamed from our experiments on automatic speech recognition that with somespeakers, the longer duration of final syllables is a reliable cue for automatic segmentation of speech into prosodic word-like units, wbile witb' other speakers, Fo variations are more efficiently used.

5.4 Conclusion

This contribution bas been based on the bypothesis tbat the suprasegmental similarities between languages are most likely due to identical contraints exercised by the production and perœptioD apparatus. Ils aim was to show bow a number of related and unrelated languageshave tended to assign the same primary functions to physiologically related phenomena: the neœssity of pausing for breatb while speaking is commonly used for grouping, the natural tendency for Fo values to decline with rime serves to cbaracterize neutral declarative sentenœs, and Fo movements corresponding to a tensing of the vocal folds (resetting of the baseline and local Fo rises) are associated with the notion of beginning, white faIls are associatedwith ending. We bave mentioned examples of bow the natural, pbysiologica1lyconditioned tenden- cies are controUed in position and amplitude, suppressed, counteracted or simulated to carry linguistic information whicb is similar in a number of languages:non-respiratory pauses serve as juncture phenomena, the length of pausesis adjusted according to the importanœ of the juncture, the rate of Fo declination is adapted to the lengtb of the sentence, the tendency to decline and to end speaking with a Fo faIl are counteracted to provide a contrast between declarative and interrogative modes, and so on. On the otber band, considerable cross-linguistic differences exist. We bave proposed tbree basic sources of these: different timing of essentially comparable phenomena, different orders of priority for the realization of comparable conflicts between prosodic pbenomena, and different relation- sbips between or different mutual effects of Fo, duration and intensity. A!f'~

References

Abercrombie, D. (1904): "~yllablt: QuanlilY and Encliliçs ill English", in ln Honour of Daniel Jones, ed. by D Abercrombit:, D. B. Fry, P. A. D. MacCarthy, N. C. Scott, J. L. M. Trim (Longmalls, London) AII.:n, G. D. (1972); Th.: localion 01'rhYlhmic ~tressbc:ills ill ElIgli~h; An .:xperimenlaJ study; 1 and Il. Lilng. ~pe.:ch 15, 72-1~) and 179-195 Bailr~, B J., Motley, M. T., MilcKay, D. G. (1975); OUlpUI editing for lexical slatus in artifi- -=.tally.:licited ~ of Ihi: tongut:. J. V.:rb. l.i:arn. Vt:rb. Behilv. 14,382-391 Ba~~I1, H. (1978): ~A NoIe on Boundari.:~ alld ~tress Rules in Dall~h ", in Nordic Pro.l'ody, ed. by E. Gàrding, G. Bruce, R. Bannert (Gleerup, Lund) pp. 65-71 Black, J. W., Tosi, O., 5ingh, ~,Takt:futil, Y. (1%6): A study of pauSt:~in oral reilding of one'~ lIalive language alld in Engli~h Lang. 5pe.:ch " 237-241 Blumstt:in, 5., Cooper, W. E. (]974); Hcmisph.:ric proces~ing of imoniltion comours. Cortex JO, ]4S-]58 Bullllg.:r, D. L, (1958): A Ihcory 01'pilch acc.:m ill El1gli~h. Word 14, ]09-]49 Bulillg.:r, D. L. (1965); "Pilch Acl:t:m alld ~elllt:nœ Rhythm", in Jourmsof Eng/ish: Accenl, , Drder (Harvitrd Univer~ily Pre.~, Cambridg.:, MA) pp. 139-180 Bolinger, D. L. (]97U); "Relaliv.: Heighl", in /nlonalion, ed. by D. Boling.:r (Penguin, Har- Illondsworth) pp. 137-153 Bollng.:r, D. L. (]972); Acct:m i~ pr.:dictabll: (if you'rt: a mind-read.:r). Languag.: 48,633-644 Bolillgt:r, D. L. (1982); Intollalion alld ils part~, Language 58, 505-533 Bolinis, A. (1982); Stre~~in modern Greek. Work. Pup. Lingui~t., Univ. Lund ZZ, 27-38 Bralil. D" Loulthard, M., John~, t-: (1~!!tJ); Discourse llllonalion and Language Teucmng (Longmans, Londoll) Brown, G" Currie, K., Yule, G. (1979); "Th\: ]monatiun of &olli~h EDgli~h", final report on SSRC PrOjt:CIHR 3WI Bruwn, G., Currit:, K., Kt:nwortlly, J. (19Ij(J); Qu~.I"lionsofl/ilunalwn (Croom Ht:lm, London) Brown, K. (19&)): "Grammatil:al Incuht:r\:nct:", iD 1emporal VarIables in Speech: Sludies in Honour of Frieda Guld"lUn-EiI'ler, .:d. by HW. Decht:rt, M. Raupach (Moutun, Tht: Hagut:) pp. 28-37 Bruct:, G. (]977); ,5w~dlsh Word Accellls ln .5enlence P~rspecli"e, Travaux d.: l'Inslilul de Lin- gui~liqu.: de Lund, ]2 (Gleerup, Lund) Bruc.:, G. (19!!1); Om prosodisk kupplillg i ~vt:n~ka. Umèa Stud. Humanitii:. 37,64-78 Brucè, G. (19M2);D,:vl:loping Ih.: Swedi~himonalioll mod\:l. Work. Pap. ulIgUÎJ;t" Univ. Lulld 22,51-114 Bruce, G., Gàrding E.{1978): "A Prosodlc Typology [ur Sw.:dl~hDialecb", ill Nordi{.' Prosudy, ed. by E. Garding, G Bruce, R. Billlnert (Glt:erup, Lund) pp. 219-228 Burdell, R. L, Fairt:~, J. D., Reynold., A C (198]): Numeri..'al Analysis. 2nd t:d (PrindJe, Wel>\:r & Schnudt, Bo~ton) Butterworth, B. (1~80): "Evldt:llci: frum Pau~e~in Spc:i:.:h", in Language Produf."lion J..Spee,'h and 1u/k, ed. by B. Butlerwurth (Acadt:mic, Lundon) pp 155-176 Buxton, H (unpubll~hed): "Rhylhm and Slrt:~~ III Spc:ech", Ph. D 111t:~~, Unjvt:r~it~ u[ Cam- bridge

~ ,88-

References

Carlson, R., Granstrôm, B. (1973): "Word Accent, Emphatic Stress, and Syntax in il Synthesis by Rules Scheme for Swedish", Speech Transmission Laboratory (Stockholm), Quarterly Progress and Status Report, 2/3-1973, pp. 31-35 Carlson, R., Erikson, Y., Granstrôm, B., Lindblom, B., Rapp, K. (1975): ~Neutral and Emph- atic Stress Pilttems in Swedish", in SpeechCommunicalion. Vol. 2: SpeechProduction und Synthesisby Rules, ed. by G. Fant (Almqvist & Wiksell, Stockholm) pp. 2œ-218 Chafe, W. L. (1970): Meaning and the Structure of Language (Chicago University Press, Chicago) Chafe, W. L. (1974): Language and consciousness.Language, 50, 111-133 Chafe, W. L. (1976): "Givenness, Contrastiveness, Definiteness, Subjects, Topics ilnd Points of view", in Subject and Topic. ed. by C. Li (Acadernic, New York) pp. 25-55 Chafe, W. L. (1979): "The Aow of Thought and the Aow of Language", in Syntax and ~'eman- tics 12: Discourse und SynUlX,ed. by T. Givon (Acildemic, New York) Chen, M. (1970): Vowellength variation as a function of the voi'-ing of the consonilnt environ- ment. Phonetica 22, 129-159 Chomsky, N. (1955): The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory (Plenum, New York) [revised 1973) Chomsky, N. (1965): Aspects of the Theory of Symax (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Chomsky, N. (1981): Lectures on Government and Binding (Foris, Dordrecht) Chomsky, N., Halle, M. (1968): The Sound Pattern of English (Harper & Row, New York) Clark, H. H., Clark, E. V. (1977): Psychowgy and Language (Harcourt Brace Jovilnovich, New York) Clark, H. H., Haviland, S. E. (1977): "Comprehension and the Given-New Contritct", in Discourse Production und Comprehension. ed. by R. O. Freedle (Ablex, Norwoud, NJ) Lli1sse, A. (1939): The Rhythm of Engüsh Prose (Blackwell, Oxford) Clements, G. N. (1975): "Tone as Speech Melody", unpublished mitnuscript, Milssilchusetts Institute of Technology Cléments, G. N. (1976): "Vowel-Harmony in Non-linear Generative Phonology: An Autoseg- mental Approach", Indiana University Linguistics Club Clemmer, E. J., O'Connell, D. C., Loui, W. (1979): Rhetorical pauses in oral reading. Lang. Speech 22, 397-405 Cohen, A., 't Hart, J. (1967): On the anatomy of intonittion. Linguil 19, 177-192 Coker, C. H., Umeda, N. (1973): Automatic synthesis from ordinary English text.1EEE Tritns. Audio Electroilcoust. AU.21, 293-297 Collier, R. (1975il): Perceptualitnd linguistic tolerilnce in intoniltion. Int. Rev. Appl. LinguJ:.t. 13, 293-3tJ8 Collier, R. (1975b): Physiological correlates of intonation patterns. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 58, 249-255 Collier, R., 't Hart, J. (1975): "The Role of Intonation in ", in Structure alld Processin SpeechPerception. ed. by A. Cohen, S. G. Nooteboom (Springer, Berlin, Heidel- berg, New York) pp. 107-121 Contini, M., BlIé, L. J. (1975): "Etude Quilntitiltive de l'Imoniltion en Frilnçilis", in Proc I$th lm. Congr. Phonetic Sciences, Leeds Cooper, W. E. (1976): "Syntilctic Comrol of Timing in Speech Production", Ph. D. Thesis, MiiSSilchusettsInstitute of Techoology Cooper, W. E., Paccia-Cooper, J. (1980): Syntax and Speech(Harvard University Press, Cam- bridge, MA) Cooper, W. E., Sorensen, J. M. (191$1): Fundamentul Frequency in Semence Production (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, Ncw York) Cowan, J M., Bloch, B. (1948): An experimentill !itudy of pause in English . Am. Speech 23, 89-99 Cruttenden, A. (1981): Falls and risc:s: Meanings and universills. J. Linguist. 17,77-91 Crystal, D. (1969): Prosodic Systemsa/Id Into/Jation in English (Cilffibridge University Press, Cilmbridge) Crystal.D (1975):Tht' EIIXlijh Tullt' ur Vuice(Edw",rd Arnold, London) 89

References 149

Currie, K. L. (198U): An InitiOiJ ~ilr~h for toni..'S. LOing. Speech 23, 329-350 Currie, K. L. (1981): furthcr experimcnts in the "search for toni~s". Lang. Spel:cb 24,1-28 Cutter, A. (1976): Phoncml:-monitoring reaction time as a function ot preceding intonation contour. Percept Psychophys. 20, 55-W Cutler. A. (1980 a): "Syllable Omission Errors and Isocbrony", in Temporal Variables in Speech: S/udjej. il. Honour of l'rleda (ioldlnun-t'isler, cd. by. H. W. Dechert, M. Raupacb (Mouton, The Hague) pp. 183-190 Cutter, A. (1980b): "Error~ of Stress and Intoniltion", in Errors in Linguislic PerfonllUnce, cd. by V. A. Fromkin (Academiç, New York) pp. 67-8U Cutter, A., Clifton, C. E. (1983): "The Use of Prosodic Information in Word Recognition", in Allen/ion and Performance X. cd. by H Bouma, D. G. Bouwhuis (Erlbaum, Hillsda1e, NJ) Cutter, A., Fodor, J. A. (1979): Semantic focus and sentence comprehension. Cognition 7, 4!}-59 Cutter, A., Foss, D. J. (1977): On thl: ro1e of sentenc~ !itress in sentence procc!ising. Lang. Speech 20, 1-10 Dabl, O. (1976): "What i!i New Informiltion'! in Reports on Texl-Linguisllcs: Approaches 10 Word Order, cd. by N. E. Enkvist, V. Kobunen (Text Linguistics Researcb Group, Abo) Dascâlu, L. (1979): On the intonation of question~ in Romanian: The rising pattern. Rev. Roum. linguist. 24, 3>-41 Deese, J. (1980): "Pau:;c:s,Pro~udy and the Demands of Production in Language", in Temporal Varil4blesin Speech:Sludie$ i'l Honour of Frieda Goldman-Eisler, cd. by H. W. Dechert, M. Raupacb (Mouton, The Hague) pp. 69-84 Delattre, P. (1962): Some factors of vowl:l duration and their cross-lingui~tic validity. J AcOU!it. Soc. Am. 34,1141-1143 De1attre, P. (1963); Comparing the prosodic feature!i in English, German, SpaJÙShand French. lot. Rev. Appl. lingui!it. l, 193-210 Delattre, P. (1966): A compiifiwn of syllabll: length conditioning among laJlguages.lot. Rev. Appl. linguist. 4, 183-198 Dell, G. S., Reich, P. A. (1981): Stage~ in !ientence production: An analy~is of data. J. Verb. learn Verb. Behav. 20,611-629 de Pijper, J. R. (1979): Close-copy ~tylll;iltion!i of Bnti!ih English intonation contours. IPO Anou. Prog. Rep. 14, 66-71 de Saussure,F. (1916): Cours de Lingul$/ique Générale (Payot, PllriS) Dogil, G. (1981): "Elementllry Accent SY!item!i", in Phonologica 1980, I:d. by W. U. Dressler, O. Pfeiffer, J Renni)Ün (Innsbrü~ker Beitrage lur Sprachwi~senschllft, Inn!ibruck) pp. 8!}-100 Donovan, A. (lm); "Perceptua1Isochrony", Conference of the Speech Group of the Institute of Acou!itics (U.K.), University of SU~!ieX,Ju1y Donovan, A., Darwin, C. J. (1979): "The Perctived Rhytbm of speech", froc. 9th lot. Cong. Phoneti~ Sciences, Copenhagen Vol. 2, pp. 268-274 Duel, D. (1982); Sile"t and non-5i!l:nI pau!ie!i ln three !ipeech styles. Lang. Speech 15, 11-28 Fairbanks, G., Hoaglin,l. W. (1941); An experimental study of thl: durational characteristics of the voil:e during the expre~!iion of emution. Speech Monogr. 8, 85-90 Faure, G., Hirst, D., Cha(couloff, M. (1980); "Rhythm in English: l!iOChronism, Pitch and Perceived Stre~s", in lne Melody of Language, ed. by l. Waugh, C. van Schooneveld (University Park Press, Baltimore) pp 71-79 Fay, D. A. (1980): "Tran~formationaJ Errors",in t'rron in Linguistic Performance, ed. by V. A. Fromkin (Academic, New York) pp. 111-122 Fodor, J. A., Bever, T. G, Giifrett, M. F. (1974); "JneP!)ychology of Language (M..-Graw-Hill, New York) Ford, K. (1975); "Downstep in KilI.uyu", unpublished manus~ript Foss, D. J. (1969): De~ision proccsses during sentencl: comprehen5ion: Effects of lexical item difficulty lInd po~ition upon deci~ion limes. J. Verb. Learn. Verb. Behav. 8, 547-562 fowler. C. (1977): Mllming Cuntrol in Speech Prudu~lion", Ph. D. Thesis, University of Con- neçticut (Obtribiat.:d hy Indiana lJnivcr.ilY Lill~Uj~til'S (lub) -

~ 90-

156 References

Fowler, C. (1979): "Perceptual centers" in speech production and perception. Percept. Psycho- phYl. 15, 375-388 Frazier, L., Fodor, J. D. (1978): The sausagemachine: A new two-stage parsing model. Cogni- tion 6, 291-325 Fromk.in, V. A. (1972): Tone features and loue roles. Stud. Afr. Linguist. 3, 47-76 Fromkin, V. A. (1977): "Putting the EmPHAsis on the Wrong SyILABle", in Studies in Stress and Accent, cd. by L. M. Hyman (University of Southern California, Los Angeles) pp. 15-26 Fry, D. B. (1955): Duration and intensity as physical correlates of linguistic stress. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 27, 765-769 Fujisaki, H., Sudo, H. (1971): A generative model for the prosody of conoected speech in Japanese. Anou. Rep. Eng. Res. Inst., Univ. Tokyo JO, 75-g() Fujisaki, H., Sugito, M. (1976): Temporal organisation of articulatory and phonatory controls in the realization of Japanese word accent. Annu. Bull. Res. Inst. Logopedics Pboniatrics, Univ. Tokyo 10, 176-189 Fujisaki, M., Hirose, K., Ohta, K. (1979): Acoustic features of the fundamental frequency contours of declarative sentences. Anou. BuU. Res. Inst. Logopedics Phoniatrics, Univ. Tokyo 13, 163-172 Garde, P. (1968): L'Accent (Presses Universitaires de France, Paris) Gârding, E. (1962): Olikheter meUan svensk och engelsk intonation i pâstaendesat~r. Mod. Spràk 56, 269-280 Garding, E. (1975a): "Toward a Prosodic Typology for Swedish Dialects", in The Nordic Language.!'and Modern Linguistics, Vol. 2, ed. by K.-H. Dahlstedt (Almqvist & WikseU, Stockholm) pp. 4(i)-474 Gàrding, E. (1975b): The influence of tempo on rhythmic and tonal patterns in three Swedish dialects. Work. Pap. Linguist., Univ. Lund 12,71-83 Gàrding, E. (1977): ~The Importance of Turning Points for the Pitch Patterns of Swedish Accents", in Studies in Stress and Accent, cd. by L. M. Hyman (University ot Southçrn California, Los Angeles) pp. 27-35 Gârding, E. (1979): Sentenl:f: intonation in Swedish. Phonetica 36, 207-215 Gârding, E. (191!O):Moderator's summary, Symp. 7: "The relation between sentence prosody and word prosody", froc. 9tb Int. Congr. Pbonetic Sciences, Copenhagen, Vol. 3, pp. 283-287 Gàrding, E. (1981): Contrastive prosody: A model and its application. Stud. Linguist. 35, 146-165 Gârding, E. (1982): Prosodic expressionsand pragmatic categories. Work. Pap. Linguist., Univ. Lund 22, 117-136 Gârding, E., Lindblad, P. (1973): Constancy and variation in Swedish word accent patterns. Wurk. Pap. Linguist., Univ. Lund 7, 36-110 Gârding, E., Botinis, A., Touati, P. (1982): A comparativt: study uf Swedish, Greek and French intonation. Wurk. Pap. Linguist., Univ. Lund 22,137-152 Garrett, M. F. (1975): KThe Analysis of Sentence Production", in Psych%gy of Learning and Motivation, Vol. 9, ed. by G. Bower (Academic, New York) pp. 133-177 Gay, T. (1978): Physiological and acoustic corrt:lates of perceptual stress. Lang. Speech 21, 347-353 Guffman, E. (1981): "Radio Talk", in For"LI" of Talk (BlackweU, Oxford), pp. 197-327 Goldman-Eisler, F. (1968): Psycho/inguistics: ExperimenlS in SponcaneousSpeech (Acadt:mic, London) Goldman-Eisler, F. (1972): Pauses, claust:s, sentences. Lang. Speech 15, 103-113 Goldsmith, J. (1976): "Autosegmental Phonolugy", Ph. D. Thesis, MassachusettsI~titute ot Technology (Distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club) Grosjean, F., CoUins, M. (1979): Breathing, pausmg and reading. Pbonetica 36, 98-114 GrosJean, F., Deschamps, A. (1973): Analyse des variables temporeUes du Français spontane. Il. Comparaison du Français oral dans la description avec l'Anglais (description) et avec le Français (interview radiophoniquç) Phon~tica 28, 191-226 91

References 151

Grosjean, f., Descbamps, A. (1975): Analyse contrastive des variables temporelles de l'Anglais et du frllnçais: Vite~ de parole et vilriables composantes, phénomène d'besitation. Pbone- tica 31, 144-413 Grundstrom, A., Léon, P. (1973): Interrogation et Intonation, Studia Pboneticil, 8 (Didier, Pari~) Hadding-Kocb, K. (1961): Acoustico-Phonetic Studie.l' in the Intonation of Southern Swedish (Gleerup, Lund) HaUe, M., Vergnaud, J. R. (1982): "foundations of Generative Pbonology", Pbonology Semi- Dar organised by GLOW, Paris HaltidilY, M. A. K. (1963): The loues of Englisb. Arch. Linguist. 15, 1-28 HallidilY, M. A. K. (1967 a): Notes on transitivity and theme in English, Part 2. J. Linguist. 3, 199-244 Halliday, M. A. K. (1967b): Intonation and Grammar in British English (Mouton, The Hague) Halliday, M. A. K. (1970): A Course in !}'poken English: 1ntonation (Oxford Univer~ity Pre~, Oxford) Han, M. S. (1961): "Jllpanese Pbonology: An Anillysi~ Based upon Sound Spectrograms", Ph. D. 111esis,University of Texas at Austin Haugen, E., J()()S,M. (1952): Tone and mtonation in East Norwegian. Acta Philol. Scand 22, 41-64; also in D. L. Bolinger (ed.): Intonation (Penguin, Harmondsworth) pp. 414-436 Haviland, S. E., Clark, H. H. (1974): What's new'! Acquiring new information as a process in comprehension. J. Vc:rb. Ll:arn. Verb. Bl:hav. 13,512-520 Hayes, B. (1979): "ExtrametricBlity", in PBpers on Syllabll: Structurl:, Ml:tricill Structure and Harmony Processe~,MIT Working Pilpers on Linguistics, Vol. l, ed. by K. Silfir HaYl:s, B. (19H1): "A Metrical'll1eory of Strt:ss Rult:s", Ph. D. Thesis, MaSSéichust:tt~Institutl: of Technology (Distributed by Indiana Univc:rsity Linguistics Club) Heger, S. (1981): Sprog og Lyd - Elementaer Dansk Fonetlk (Akademisk, Copenhagen) Hill, D. R., Jassem, W, Wittl:n, 1. H. (1978): "A Statistical Approllch to the Problem of lsochrony in Spoken British English", Man-Macbine Sy~tems Laboratory Report 711127/6, University of Calgary Hill, D. R., Witten, 1. H., Jassem, W. (197H): "Some Results from a Preliminary Study of Britisb Engli~h Spt:i:ch Rhythms", Man-Machine Sy~temsLaboratory Report 78/2615,Uni- versity of Calgary Hirose, K., Fujisaki, H., Sugito, M. (197H): Word accc:ntin Japaneseand Engiish: A compara- tive study of acoustlc characteristics in disyllabic words. Armu. Bull. Res. Inst. Logopedics Phonlatrics, Univ. Tokyo 12, 141-14~ Hirst, D. J. (1977): Intonative J-èature.l':A S.yntactlcApproach to Engli.lh Intonation (Mouton, 'fbe Hague) Hirst, D. J. (1979): Pitch fl:aturl:sfor tout: intonation. Trav. Inst. Phon. Aix 6, 177-191 Hirst, D. J. (19Hl a): Un modèlt: de production dl: l'intonation. Trav. Inst. PhonoAix 7,297-311 Hirst, D. J. (1981 b): "Prosodit: I:t Structures de Donllées en Phonologie", in Représentations Formelles en Pholwlogie, ed. by F. DeU, D. J. Hirst, J.-R. Vergnaud (Hermann, Paris) Hlrst, D. J. (1981c): "Phonological Implications of a Production Model of Intonation", in PhonologiCQ1980, ed. by W. U. Drt:s~er, O. Pfeiffer, J. Rennison (Inn~brücker Beitrage ZUTSprachwissen~haft, Innsbruck) pp 195-2tJ2 Hirst, D. J. (in press): "Phonological and Acoustic Parameters of Engli~h Intonation", in 1nto- nalion in Discourse, ed. by C. Johns-Lewis (Cr()()m Helm, London) Hlxon, T. J., Klatt, D. H., Mc:ad, J (1971): Influence of forced transg10ttal pressure change on VOll:~fundaml:ntal frequc:ncy. J. Acoust Soc. Am. 49, 105 Ho, A. T. (1977): Intonation variation in a Mandarin sentence of tbree exprt:ssions: Interroga- . tive, exclamatory and declarative. Phonetica 34, 446-457 Hombert, J. M. (1974): Univc:r~al~of downdrift: Their basis and significanct: for a theory of loue. Stud. Afr. Lingul~t. S, 1b~11S3 Hooper, J. B. (1972): The syUable m phonological theory. Language 48, 525-540 House, A. S., Fairbanks, (J. (1953): The influenœ of con~nant environment upon the ~con- darv acousticill characteri~ti.:s of vuwl:l~ J Acuusi Soc Am 25 IIJ5-113 9~~

152 RcfcrcJx:eS

Isatenko, A., Schadlich, H.-J. (1970): A Model of Sùmdard German /ntonaliun (Mouton, The Hague) Jespersen,O. (1933): Lehrbuch der Phoneûk (Teubner, Leipzig) Jones, D. (1~): An OUiline of English , 9th cd. (Heffers, Cambridge) Kahn, D. (1976): "Syllable-Based Generalisations in Phonology", Ph. D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Tecbnology (Distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club) Kingdon, R. (1958): The Groundwurk uf English /ntonalion (Longmans, London) Kiparsky, P. (1979): Metrical structure assignment is cyclic. Linguist. Inq. 10,421-441 Klatt, D. H. (1979): "Synthesis by Rule of Segmentai Durations in English Sentences", in Fronûers of Speech Communication Research, cd. by B. Lindblom, S. Ohman (Academic, London) Klein, W. (1980): Der Stand der Forschung zur deutschen Salzintonation. Linguist. Ber. 68, 3-33 Kloker, D. (1975): Vowel and sonorant lengthening as cues to phonological phrase boundiiries. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 57, 533 Kozhevnikov, V. A., Chistovich, L. A. (1965): Speech:Articulation and Perception (U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Washington, DC) JPRS, JO, 543 Ladd, D. R. (1980): The ~'truclure ul /ntonlliiona/ Meaning: Evidence from English (Indiana University Press, Bloomington) Ladd, D. R. (1981): .'On Intonational Universals", in The (.'ognitive Representalionof Speech, cd. by T. Myers, J. Laver, J. Anderson (North-Holliind, Amsterdam) pp. 389-397 Ladd, D. R. (in press): Phonological features of intonational peaks. Language Langendoen, D. T. (1975): Finite stiite parsing of phrase structure languagesand the status of readjustment fuies in the grammar. Linguist. Inq. 6, 533-554 Laver, J. D. M. (1973): "The Detection and Correction of Slips of the Tonguc", in Speech Erron' as Linguislic Evidence, ed. by V. A. Fromkin (Mouton, The Hiigue) pp. 132-143 Lehiste, 1. (1~): An acoustic-phonelic study of internaI open junclure. Phonetica S, Suppl. 1-54 Lehiste, 1. (1965): The funclion of quantity in Finnish and Eslonian. Language 41, 447-456 Lehiste, 1. (1970): Suprasegmenta/s(Mrr Press, Cambridge, MA) Lehiste, 1. (1972): The timing of utterances and linguislic boundaries. J. Aooust. Soc. Am. 51, 2O1S-2024 Lehiste, 1. (1973): Phonetic disamblgualion of syntactic ambiguilY. Glossa 7, 107-122 Lehiste, 1. (1975): "The Phonelic Structure of Paragriiphs", in Structure and Processin Speech Perception, ed. by A. Cohen, S G. Nooteboom (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York) pp. 195-203 Lebiste, 1. (1977): lsochrony reconsidered. J. Phono 5,253-263 Levell, W. J. M. (1983): Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition Liberman, M. Y. (1975): "On the Intonalional System of English" , Ph. D. Thesis, MassachusettsInstitute of Technology (Dislributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club) Liberman, M. Y., Prince, A. (1977): On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguisl. Inq. 8, 249-336 Liberman, M. Y., Sag, 1. (1974): "Prosodic Form and Discourse Function", Papers from the Tenth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society pp. 416-426 Liberman, M. Y., Streeler, L. (1978): The use of nonsense-syllable mimicry in the sludy of prosodic phenomena. J. Aooust. Soc. Arn. 63, 231-233 Lieberman, P. (1963): $ome effects ofsemantic and grammaticii1context on the production and perception of speech. Lang. Speech 6, 172-187 Lieberman, P. (1967): /ntonalion, Perception Ulld Language (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Lindblom, B. (1968): "Temporal Organisation of Syllable Production", Speech Transmi~~ion Laboralory (Stockholm) Ouartt:rly Progress and Status Report, 2-1968, pp. 1-5 Maclay, H., Osgood, C. E. (1959): He~itation phenomena in ~pontaneous speech. Word 15, 1~ Maeda, S. (1974): "A Characts:rization of Fundamenlal Frequency Contours of Speech", Research Labor..tory of Elt:clronic~ (MIT), Qu..rterly Progrt:~~ Repl1rt, 114, pp. 193--211 ~~

References 153

Mat:da, S. (1976): ..A Charactcrization uf Amt:rican English Intonation", Ph. D. Thesis, MassachusettsInstilute of Tcchnology Magno-Caldognetto, E., Ferrero, F. E., Lavagnoli, C., Vagges, K. (1978): Fo contours of statements, yes-no questions and wh-quc:stions of IWOregional varieties of Italian. J. liaI. Linguisl. .1, 57-68 Marcc:I, P. (1971); La durée des voyeUc:sde l'Italien à partir de l'analyse oscillographique. Trav. Inst. Phono Strasbourg .1, 147-157 Marcus, S. M. (1976): "Pcrceptual Centrcs", Ph. D. Thesis, University of Cambridge Mar~lt:n-Wilson, W. D., Welsh, A. (197H); Processing interactions and lexical accc:ssduring word recognition in continuous speech. Cognit. Psychol. 10, 29-63 Mar~lc:n-Wilson,W. D., Levy, E., Tylt:r, L. K. (1982): "Producing Intt:rpretable Discourse; The Eslablishment and Maintcnancc: of Referencc:", in Speech, Place and Action: Studies in Deuis and Related Topics, ed. by R. J. Jarvella, W. Klein (Wiley, Chichester) pp. 339-378 Martin, J. G. (1970); Rhythm-inducc:d judgen1entsuf word strc:~sin sentences.J. Verb. Learn. Vt:rb. Behav. 9,627-633 Marlin, J. G. (1972); Rhythmic (hierarcbical) versus serial structurt: in speech and otber bc:bavior. Psychol. Rev. 79, 487-5I.1J Martin, J. G. (1979); Rbythmic and segmt:nlal pc::rct:ptiunart: Dot indt:pc::ndt:nt.J. Acou~t. Soc. Am. 65, 1286---1297 Martin, J. G., BunneU, H. T. (19Hl): Pt:rcc:pliun of anlicipalory coarticulalion t:ffects. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 69, 559-567 Martin, J. G., Mills, C. B., Meltzt:r, R. H., Shit:lds, J. L. (I!J!!O); Anticipalory coarticulation and reaction timc: 10 phoneme targels in spunlaneou~ spc::echPhonC:lica .17, 159-168 Marlin, P. (1975): Analyse phonolugique de la phrase française. Linguistics 146,35-68 Martin, P. (1980); "Sur les Principc:~d'une Théorie Synlaxique de l'Intonaùon", in Problèmes de Prosodie, Vol. 1: Approches Théoriques, ed. by P. Léun, M. Rossi (Didier, Paris) McCarthy, J. (1979); On stress and ~yUabification. Linguisl. Inq. 10,443-465 McCarthy, J. (1982); Non-linear phonulogy: An overview. GLOW Newsl. 8,63-77 Meltzer, R. H., Martin, J. G., Mills, C. B., Imhuff, D. L., L>har, D. (1976); Reactiun Ume to temporally-displaced phonc:melargets in cOnlinuous speech. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2, 277-290 Mt:nn, L. (1976); "Paltern, C{)ntrol and Contra~t in Beginning Speech; A Case Study in Ihe Development of Word Furm and Wurd Function", Ph. D. lbesis, University of Illinois Mitsuya, F., Sugito, M. (1978): A study of Ihe accenlual effect on segmcnlal and moraic duration in Japancse. Annu. BuU Rt:s. Inst. Logupedics PhQniatrics, Univ. Tokyo 12, 97-112 Morton, J., Marcus, S. M., Frankish, C. (1976): Perccptual cc:nlrc:s(P-centrcs). P~ychol. Rev. 8.1,405-408 Nakatani, L. H., O'Connor, K. D., Aston, C. H. (1981); Prusodic aspectsof American English speech rhythm. Phonetica 38, 84-1~ Nespor, M. A. (1977); "St:gmenl and Word Duralional Corrclalt:s of Syntactic Boundaries in Italian", in Gxplorations in Language and Linguistics, c:d. by R. Rodman (Univt:rsity of Norlh Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC) Ne~por, M. A., Vogel, 1. (1!J82); "Prosodic Domains and External Sandhi Rult:s", in The Structure of Phonological Representatio'~, Part l, t:d. by H. v. d. Hulst, N. Smith (Foris, Dordreçht) pp. 225-255 Nespor, M A, Vogel, 1. (in prc:~): "Prosodic Hit:rarchy and Spet:ch Perception", in Proceed- ings u( Iht: Confercncc: on the Pcrceplion o( Languagc:, Accadt:mia della Crusca, Aorcnce, 198U Newman, S. S. (1946): On lhe stre~~~y~lem of English. Word 2, 171-187 Ni~hinuma, Y. (1979); Un modèlc:d'analyse autumaùque de la prosodie. Trav. lnsl. PhonoAix 6 Nooteboom, S. G. (1980): "Spc:aking and Unspeaking; Dctection and Correction of Phonologi- cal and Lexical Error~ in Sp°nlant:ous Speech", in Errors in Linguistic PerforrPUlnce.ed. by V. A Fromkin (AcaJclIIll.' N.:w Y.,r!.) rr K7~9) 94

154 References

O'ConneU, D. C., Kuwal, S. (1972): Cruss-linguistic pause and rate phenomena in adults and adolescents. J. Psycholinguisl. Res. l, 155-165 O'ConneU, D. C., Kowal, S., Hôrmann, H. (1969): Semanlic delerminants of pauses. Psychol. Forsch. 33, ~7 O'Connor, J. D., Arnold, G. F. (1961): Intonalion of Co//oquial English (Longmans, London) Ohman, S. E. G. (1967): "Word and Sl:ntencl: Intonation: A Quantitative Model", Speech Transnlission Laburatory (Stockholm) Quarterly Progrl:SS and Slatus Report, 2-1967, pp. 2(}"54 Ohala, J. (1975): Review of Ll:hisll: 1970. Languagl: 51, 736-740 Ohaia, J. (1978): "Prodw:tion of Tone", in Tone: A Linguistic Survey, cd. by V. A. Fromkin (Acadl:D1Îc, New York) Ohala, J., Ewan, W. (1973): Speed of pitch range. J. Acousl. Soc. Am. 53, 345 OUer, D. K. (1973): The effecl of position in utlerance on speechsegment duration in English. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 54, 1235-1247 Olier, D. K., Smilb, B. L. (1977): Effect of final-syllable position on vowl:l duraliun in infant . J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 62,944-997 O'MaUey, M. H., Klokl:r, D. R., Dara-Abrams, B. (1973): Recovl:ring parentheses from spo- ken algebraic expressions. IEEE Trans. Audio Electroacoust. AU-21, 217-220 O'Shaughnessy, D. (1976): "Modelling Fundamental Frequency and 1I~Relationship 10 Syntax, Semantics and Phonetics", Ph. D. Thesis, Massachu~~eltsInstitule of Tl:chnology Pl:llowe, J., Jones, V. (1979): Eslablishing inlonationally variable sysll:ms in a multi-dimen- sionallinguislic space. Lang. Speech 22, 97-116 PerkeU, J. S. (1980): "Phonl:tic Features and thl: Physiology of Speech Production", in Lan- guage Production.Volume 1: Speechand Talk. I:d. by B. Bulterworlh (Academic,London) pp. 337-372 Pierrehumbl:rl, J. B. (1979): The perception of fundaml:nlal frequency dl:clination J. Acoust. Suc Am. 66, 363-369 Pil:rrehumbert, J. B. (1980): "The Phonology and Phonetics of English Intunalion", Ph. D. Thesis, MassachussettsInstitute of Technology Pierrehumbert, J. B. (1981): Synlhesizing intonation. J. Acuust. Soc. Am. 70,985-995 Pike, K. L. (1945): The Intonalion of American English (University of Michigan Prl:ss, Ann Arbor) Prince, E. F. (1981): "Toward a Taxonomy of Given/New Information", in Radical Pragmatics, I:d. by P. ColI: (Academic. New York) pp. 223-255 Rapp, K. (1971): "A Study of Syllabll: Timing", SpeechTransmission Laboralory (Stockholm), Quarterly Progrl:~Sand Status Rl:port. 1-1971, pp. 14-19 Rischel, J. (19(X): Übl:r die phonematischl: and morphophonematischl: Funktion dl:r sogenann- ten Worttône im Norwl:gischen. Z. Phunet. Sprachwiss. Kommunikationstor~h 13, 177-185 Rischel, J. (1972): Compound stress in Dani~h without a cycle. Annu. Rep. Insl Phon., Univ. Copenhagen 6, 211-228 Rischel, J. (1975): "Problemer ved en generaliv bl:skrivelse af dansk tryk", Selskab tor Nordisk Filulogi, Arsberetning for 1971-73, pp. 22-32 Rischel, J. (19HO): Phrasenakzent aIs Signal des Objekts ohne "determiner" im Danischen. Kopenhagener Beitr. german. Linguist., Suppl. 1,262-279 Rischel, J. (in press): On unit accentuation - and the distinction betwel:n deep and surfacl: phonology. Folia Linguisl. 17 SétUes,J. L. (1980): "Essai d'un Enseigneml:nt dl: l'Intonation aux Jeunes Déficients Auditifs Profonds par Visualisation Graphique", Thèse, Centre dl: l'Ouïe et de la Parole, Fougèrl:~, France Sanford, A. J., Garrod, S. C. (1981): Understanding Written Language (WilI:Y, London) Schane, S. (1972): "Non-cyclic Word Stress", in Essayson the Sound Pattern of English. cd. by D. Goyval:rts, G. PuUum, pp. 249-259 Scherer, K. R. (1981): "Spel:ch and Emotional States", in The Evaluation of Speech in Psych~try and Medicine, ed. by J Darby (Grunl: and Slriitlon. New York) 95

Rcfcrcnces 1$S

Sch.:rer, U., Sch.:rer, K. R. (1980): "P:;ychological Factors in Bureaucratic Encounters: Deter- minant:; and Effects of Interaction:; Between OfficiaIs and Clients", in The Analysis of Social Skills, ed. by W. T. Singleton, P. Spurgeon, R. B. Stammers (Plenum, New York) pp. 315-328 Scott, D. R. (1982): Duration as a cue to the perception of a phrase boundary. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 71, ~1007 Selkirk, E. O. (1972): "The Phrase Phonology of English ilnd French", Ph. D. Thesis, MassachusettsInstitute of Technology Selkirk, E. O. (1978a); On the :;tiltU5 of "mut.:" e. Stud. Fr. Linguist. l, 141-150 Selkirk, E. O. (1978 b): "On Pro5OdicStructure and Ils Reliltion to Syntactic Structure", Con- ference on the Mental Representiltion of Phonology, Amherst, MA (Distributed by Indiilnil Univer:;ity Linguistlc5 Club) Selkirk, E. O. (1980): 'rh.: cole of prosodi.: categorie5 in English word stress. Linguist, Inq, Il, 563-605 Shields, J. L., MclIugh, A" Milrtin, J. G. (1974): Reaction lime tu phoneme tilrgets ilS il function of rhythmic cu.:s in cuntinuuus speech. J. Exp. Psychol. 102,250-255 Sorin, C. (1981): Functions, rult5 and treatm.:nts of intensity in speech. J. Phon, 9, 359-374 Stewart, J. M. (1971): "Niger-Congo, Kwa", in Cu"ent Trends in Linguislics, Vol. VII: Linguis- tics in Sub-SahùrUlIAjricù, cd. by"'. A. Sebeok (Mouton, The Hague) pp. 179-212 Stock, E. (19!!O): Unter.\'uchungenlU Form, Bedeutung und Funktiun der Intonation im Deut- schen (Akademie, Berlin) Stockwell, R. P. (1972): "The Rule ut Intunatiun: Recon5ideration:; and Other Considerations" , in Intonation, ed. by D. L. Bolinger (Penguin, Harmondsworth) pp. 87-1œ Stowell, T. (1979): "Stres:;-Systtm5 uf th.: Wurld Unit.:", in Papers on Syllable Structure, Metri- cal Structure and Hilrmony Proce5Ses,MIT Wurk.ing Papers on Linguistics, Vol. l, cd. by K. Safir, pp. 51-76 SvetoZilrova, N. D. (1975): "'rhe Inn.:r Structure of Intonation Contours in RU5Slétn",in Auto- nullic Analysis and Perception of Speech, ed. by G. Fant, M. A. A. Tatham (Academic, London) Takefuta, y, (1975): "M.:thod of Acoustic Analysis of Intonatiun", in MeùSurementProcedurt's in Speech, Hear;ng and Languuge, .:11. by S. Singh (University Park Pre5s, Baltimure) pp. 368-378 Terken, J. M. B. (198011):"l'he Reliltiun Betwe.:n Infurmation Structure IInd Accentuation: Som.: Exploriltory Investigations", InStitute toc Perception Res.:llrch Report 381, pp. 1-40 Terken, J. M. 8. (198üb): "The Distribution of Pitch Accent in De5criptive Lêtnguage as Il Functlon uf Informalionill Variabl.:s", IPO Ann. Prog. Rep. IS, pp. 48-53 't Hilrt, J. (1979): Expluréttions in automatic stylization of Facurves. IPO Annu. Prog. Rep. 14, 61-65 't Hart, J., Cohen, A (1973): Intonation by fuie: A perœptuill qUl:5t. J. Phono l, 3()1)-327 't Hart, J., Collier, R. (1975): Integrating different levels of intonation analysis. J. Phono 3, 235-255 't Hart, J.,Collier, R (197/j): A course in Dutch Intonation. IPO Annu. Prog. Rep. 13,31-35 't Hétrt, J., Collier, R. (1979): "On the Interaction of Accentuation and Intonation in Dutch", Proc. 9tb Int. Congr. Phonetic Scien.:es,Copenhagen, Vol. 2, pp. 395-402 Tbompson, H. S. (1980): !itress and SùJ;e,u:ein English: Theory and Praclice, (Xerox CofJX>ra- lion, Palo Alto) Thorsc:n, N. (1978): An acuustical analysis of Détnish intonéttion. J. Phono 6, 151-175 Thorsen, N. (1979): Interpreting raw tundamental frequ':lIcy trétcing5of Dilnish. Phonetica 36, 57-58 Thorsen, N. (l980ét): Neutral str':55, emphéttic stre55, étnd sentence intonation in Advanced StilndétId Copc:obétgenDétnish. Annu. Rep. lost. Phon., Umv. (~penhagen 14, 121-205 Thorsen, N. (1980b): A :;tudy uf the percepùon of s.:nteoce intonation - Evadeocefrom Danish. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. '7,1014-1030 Thorsen, N. (1980c): Intonation contuurs étndstreS5 group pattern5 in declarative s.:ntencesof varying length an ASC Dani!'b Annu R.:p Illsa l'Iaotl, Umv C':lpcllhagell 14, 1-29 %

156 References

Thorsen, N. (in press): Standard Danish sentence intonation - Phonetic data and their repre- sentation. Folia Linguist. 17 Touati, P. (unpublished): "Etudes Contrastives de la Prosodie du Français et du Suédois" Trager, G. L., Smith, H. L. (1951): An OU/line of English Structure (Battenburg, Norman, OK) Umeda, N., Quinn, A. M. S. (1981): Word duration as an acoustic measure of boundury perception. J. Phono 9, 19-28 Vaissière, J. (1971): "Contribution à1a Synthèse par Règles du Français", Thèse de Troisième cycle, Grenoble, France Vaissière, J. (1974): "On French Prosody", Research Laboratory of Electronics (MIT), Quar- terly Progress Report 114, pp. 212-223 Vaissière, J. (1975): "Further Note on French Prosody", Research Laboratory of Electroni~ (MIT), Quarterly Progress Report 115, pp. 251-262 Vaissière, J. (1980): La structuration acoustique de la phrase française. Ann. Scu. Norm. Sup. Pisa, Ser. III, 10, 529-SOO Van Lancker, D., Fromkin, V. A. (1973): Hemispheric specialization for pitcb and "tone": Evidence from Thai. J. Phono l, 1O1-1~ Venneman, T. (1972): On the theory of syllabic phonology. Linguist. Ber. 18, 1-18 Venneman, T. (1978): Universal ~yllabic phonology. Theor. Linguist. S, 175-215 Venneman, T. (1979): ..An Outline of Universal Phonology", unpublished manUScript, Univer- sity of Munich Vergllilud, J .-R., HiIlle, M. (1978): "Metrical Pbonology: A Fragment of a Draft" , unpubli~hed manUScript, Massachusettslnstitute of Tecbnology (revised 1979) von Essen, O. (1956): Hochdeutsche SatZmelodie Z. Phonet. Sprachwiss. Komnlunikations- forsch. 9, 75-85 Wang, W. S-Y (1967): Phonological features of toRe. Int. J. Am. Linguist. 33,93-105 Welmers, W. E. (1959): Tonemics, morpbotonemics and tonal . Gen. Linguist. 4, 1-9 Weniger, D. (1978): "Zur Prosodie bei Aphasie", in Brennpunkte der Patholinguistik, ed. by G. Peuser (Fink, Munich) pp. 305-325 Wheeler, D. (1981): "Aspects of a Categorial Theory of Phonology", Ph. D. Thesis, University of Massachusetts Williams, C. E., Stevens, K. N. (1972): Emotions and speech: Some acoustical correlates. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 52, 1238--1250 Yule, G. (1980): Intonation and givenness in spoken discourse. Stud. Lang. 4,271-286 Yule, G. (1981 a): "Aspects of the Information Structure of Spoken Discouse", Ph. D. Thesis, University of Edinburgh YuJe, G. (1981b): New, current and displaced entity reference. Lingua 55,41-52 Zee, E., Maddieson, 1. (1979): Tones and tone sandhi in Shanghai: Phonetic evidence and phonological analysis. UCLA Work. Par. Phono 45, 93-129 Zingie, H. (1974): Quelques remarques sur le groupe accentue! en allemand Trav. Inst. Phon., Strasbourg 6, 89-117 Zlatoustova, L. V. (1954): Duration of vowe! and consonant sounds ln the Russian language. Scientific Notes, Kazan State University 114, 99 (in Russian) Zurif, E. B., Mendelsohn, M. (1972): Hemispberic specializalion for the perception of ~peech souods: The influence of intonation and structure. Percept. Psychophys. Il,329-332 87

References

Abcrcrombiè, D. (1904): ..Syllablt: QuanlilY and En~lili~~ in Engli~h", in ln Hu/luurufLJanit'1 JO/It'S,èd. by D. Abt:r~rombit:, D. ü. Fry, P. A. D Ma~Carlhy, N. C. Scolt, J. L. M. Trim (Lungman~, London) AII.:n, G. D. (1972): lnc localion of rhYlhmi~ ~Ire~~bl:al~ ill Ellglish: An experill1cnlal )Iudy; 1 and Il. L4Ing. SI>et:~h15,72-100 and 179-195 üilar), H J., MollèY, M. T., MitcKay, D. G. (1975): Oulpulèdilmg for It:xical :ilalu:; in ilrlifi. ':Iitlly èliciled slips of Iht: longut:. J. Vt:rb. Leitrn. Vèrb. Behav. 14, 3B2-391 HiI:;boll, H. (J97B): ~A NoIe on Boundarie~ itod Slre:i:i Rules in Dam~h Phonulùgy", in Nurdic Prusody, .:d. by E. (jàrding, G. Br\I~t:, R. Bannc:n (Glt:.:rup, Lund) pp. ()~71 lliack, J. W., Tosi, O., ~ingh, S., Takt:fulit, Y. (11JtJ6):A ~Iudy of pau:;t:sin oral r.:ading of on':':i native language and in English. l4Ing. SpC:t:~h9,237-241 ülumslc:in, S., Coopr:r, W. E. (1974): Ht:mi:iph..:ri~proct::;~ing lIf IIIIlIoalion l:unlllUr) LlIrlt:X 10, J48-15B Hulillgl;r, D. L. (195B): A Ihèory ùf pill:h ilCCClI1ill ElIgli:ih. Wurd 14, 1U'J-149 Rolingc:r, D. L. (1965): "Pilch ACCènl itlld S.21~228 Burdc:n, R. L., Fuires, J. D" Reynold~, A t'. (19B}): Numeri,;a/ Alla/ys;s, 2nd cd IPnndl~, W~bt:r & Schmidl, 80)lùn) Hutl~rWurlh, B, (1980): "Evldènct: frllm Pau:ic) in SP'.'I;l:h",il, Language Prudut"lio/i l' Sp~t'ch arld lulk, èd. by B. Hullc:rwûrlh (Acudl:mlc, l.ùndon) pp 155-176 Buxlûn, H (ullpubIIShI:J): .'Rhythm und Slrl.'!I:;III ~I~èl:h", Ph l) l'hl:~i..., Ullivl:r)ilV (Jf ('am- hrJ\lg~ 88

148 Refcrences Carlson, R., Granstrôm, B. (1973): "Word Accent, Emphatic Stress, and Syntax ln it SYl1thesis by Rules Scheme for Swedish", Speech Transmission l-aboratory (Slockhull1l), Quarterly Progressand StéitusReport, 2/3-1973, pp. 31-35 Carlson, R., Erikson, Y., Granstrôm, B., Lindblom, B., Rapp, K (1975): "Neutral and Emph- atic StressPatterns in Swedish", in SpeechCommunication, Vu/. 2: Speechl'ruduction und Synthesisby RuJes.ed. by G. Fant (Almqvist & WikSèIl, Stockholm) pp. 21JJ-21~ Chafe, W. L. (1970): Meuning und the Structure of Languuge (Chicago Univcr~ity Prc~s, ChiCéigO) Chafe, W. L. (1974): Language and consciousness.Language, 50, 111-133 Chafe, W, L. (1976): "Givenness, Contrastiveness,Definileness, Suhjects, Topil.:sitnd Puints of view", in Subject and Topic. cd. by C. Li (Academic, New York) pp. 25-55 Chafe, W. L. (1979): "The Flow of Thought and the Flow of Language", in Syntux IlnJ .'ie"Uln- tics 12: Discourse and Syntax, ed. by T. Givon (Academic, New York) Chen, M. (1970): Vowellength variation as a function of the voicing of the con:;Ul1itlll~lIviron- ment. Pbonetica 12, 129-159 Chomsky, N. (1955): The Logical Structure of Linguistic Theory (Plt:num, Nt:w York) (rl:vi~t:d 1973] Chomsky, N. (1965): Aspects of the Theory of Syntax (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Chomsky, N. (1981): Lectures on Governmenl and Binding (Foris, Dordrechl) Chomsky, N., Halle, M. (1968): The Sound Putlern of English (Harper & Ruw, Nt:w York) Clark., H. H., Clark, E. V. (1977): PSYChO/Dg)'und Lunguuge (Harcourt Brace Jùvanuvich, New

Clark.,York) H. H., Haviland, S. E. (1977): "Comprehension and the Given-New ("()l1tract", in Discourse Production and Comprehension. cd. by R. O. Freedle (Ablex, Nùrwùud. NJ) Classe, A. (1939): The RhYlhm of EngJish Prose (Blackwell, Oxford) Clements, G. N. (1975): "ToM as Speech MeJody". unpublished mal1uscript, Ma:;:;èI(;h~tts Institute of Technology Clements, G. N. (1976): "VoweJ-Harmony in Non-Jinear Generuti~'ePhonulub')': .4" Autuseg- menlal Approach", Indiana University Linguistics Club Clernm~r, E. J., O'Connell, D. C., Loui, W. (1979): Rhetorical pau~:; in urèll reading. Lang. Speech12, 397-405 Cohen, A., 't Hart, J. (1967): On the anatomy of intonatiùn. Lingua 19, 177-1'12 Coker, C. H., Umeda, N. (1973): Automatic synlh~!iisfrom urdinèlry Engli!ih lexl. IEEE Trans. Audio Electroacoust. AU-21, 293-297 Collier, R. (1975a): Perceptual and linguistic tolerancl: in intonation. Il1t Rt:v. Appl Lingul:;t. 13, 293-3()8 Collier, R. (1975b): PhysiologiCéilcorr~latcs of intùnaliun pèltll:rns. J. AI.:OU!it.Soc Am SH, 249-255 Collier, R., 't Hart, J. (1975): "The Role of Intonation in Speech Percl:ptiun", in Strllcture Ilnd Processin SpeechPerception. ed. by A. Cohen, S. G NuotebOl)1n(Springl:r, Berlin, Hl:idel- berg, New York.) pp. 107-121 Contini, M., Boé, L. J. (1975): "Etud~ Quantitative de l'Intonèltion en Frèlnçéli:;",in Pru.: lilh Int. Congr. Phonetic Sciences, Leeds Cooper, W. E. (1976): "Syntactic Control of Timing in Speech PrlKluction", Ph. D. lnc:;i!i, MassachusettsInstitute of Technology Cooper, W. E., Paccia-Cooper, J. (1980): Syntux and Speech(Hélrvard Univ~r~ily Pre~~,Cam- bridge, MA) Cooper, W. E., Sorensen, J. M. (1981): FwldamentuJ Frequency in Sentence Pruducuun (Springer, Berlin, Heid~lberg, N~w York) Cùwan, J. M., Bloch, B. (I~): An experimcntal study of pause in Engli~h gramnlar. Am. Speech1.3, H9-99 Cruttenden, A. (1981): Falls and ri.se~:Meanings and univer!ials. J. Linguist. 17, 77-') 1 Cry~tal, D. (1969): Prosodic SystenlSund 1ntunariun in EngJish (Cambridg~ Univer~ity Prc:~, Cambridge) Crystal. D. (1975): Tht' English T'ln" ur Vuice (Edwitrd Arnold, Londùn) 89

R~f~r~nœs 149

Curnc, K. L. (1~!StJ):Ali Illitiiti ~~iir~h for loni~~. Lang. Spce~h23, 32~35U Currl~, K. 1_.(I~~I): "'urthcr cxpcrimcnt~ in the "search for toni~~». Liing. Spccch 24, 1-2H Cutl~r, A. (1~76): Phullcme-moluturing reaction lime ii~ ii funl:tiun ot preccding intunatiun cuntour. Percept P~ychuphy~.20, 55-W Cutlt:r, A. (19~it): "Syllitble Omission Errors and lsochrony" , in 1'emporal Variablesin Speech: Siudiesin Hùnùur of rrleda Goldmun-Eisler, ed. by. H. w. Dechert, M. Ritupitch (Mouton, The Hague) pp. 183-190 Cutler, A. (l~&J b): '.Errl)r~ of Stre~~itnd Intonittion", in Errurs in Linguislic PerfùrlllUnct', ed. by V. A. Fromlin (Al:ademiç, New York) pp. 67-HU Cutler, A., Cliflon, C. E. (1983): "The Use of Prosodiç Informittion in Word Recognition", m Allenlion clnd Performance X, ed. by H. Bouma, D. G. Bouwhui~ (Erlbaum, Hill~ditle, NJ) Cutl~r, A., Fudor, J. A. (1979): Semantic fuçu~ and !il:ntence comprehension. Cognitiun 7, 49-59 Cutler, A., Foss, D. J. (1977): On the fuie uf sentence ~tr~ssin sentence proce~~ing.Liing Speech20, 1-10 Dithl, O. (1976): "What i~ New Infurmatiun? in Rt'poru' ün Texl-l_ingI4islics:Approaches 10 Ward Drder, ed. by N. E. Enkvist, V. Kohunen (Text Lingui~tic~ Reseitrch Group, Abo) Dascâlu, L. (1979): On the intonation of question~ in Rumitnian: The rising pélttern. Rev Roum. Lingui~t. 24, 35-41 Dt:ese,J. (19&»: "Pau:ies, Prosody and the Demand~ of Production in Languitge", in 1empurul Variablesin Speech:Siudies;n lIonour of Frieda Goldman-Eisler, ed. by H. w. Del:hert, M. Raupach (Mouton, The Hligue) pp. 69-84 Dela«re, P. (1962): Some factors of vowel duration and their cross-linguistic vitlidity J Acuu~l. Soc. Am. 34, 1141-1143 Dela«re, P. (1963): Comparing the prosodic feittures inEnglish, German, Spitnish lind French. fOl. Rev. Appl. Linguist. l, 193-210

Dela«re, Appl. P. Linguist.(1966): 4,A 183-198compiirison of syUable length conditioning among languiige~. Int. Re

Dell, G. S., Reich, P. A. (1981): Stage~in sentence production: An analysi~ uf spê~chc:rror ditta. J. Verb. Learn Verb. Behav. 20,011-629 de Pijper, J. R. (1979); Close-copy styllZlitions of British English intonation cuntuur~. IPQ AIlIIU. Prog. Rep. 14, 66-71 de Saussure,F. (1916): Cours de Lillguisl;que Glnlrule (Payot, Pliris) Dogil, G. (1981): "Elementliry Al:Cent Systents", in Phunologica 1980, ed. by W U. Dr~s~ler, O. Pfeiffer, J Renni~ln (Innsbrücker Beitrage zut Sprachwis~enschlifl, IlImbrul:k) pp. M9-IOO Dulluviin, A. (1977): "Pc:rl:eptuallsol:hrony", Conference of the Spee~hGruup of Ih~ Institute uf Acou~li~ (U.K." University of Sussex,July l)olluvan, A., Darwin, C. J. (1979): "'l11e Perl:eived RhythJn of speech", Proc. 9th Int Congr. Phonetic Sciences,Copenhligen Vol. 2, pp. 268-274 Ou~z, D. (1~82): S.lent itnd non-~ilent pause~in three :.pcel.:hstyles. Litng. Speech25, 11-2M Fiiirbanks, G., Hoiiglin, L. W. (1941): An experimentaI ~tudy of th~ durationitl chiirlictc:ri~ticsof the vuice during the ~xpre:iSionof emotion. Spcech Munugr. 8, !S5-9

150 References

Fowler,phys. C. 15, (1979): 375-388 "PerceptWlI centers" in ~pel:,chproduction and pl:-rcl:,ption.Percept. P~ycho-. Frazier, L., Fodor, J. D. (1978): The ~ausagemachinl:,: A néWtwo-~tagl:, par~ing mud~l. Cogni- tion 6, 291.,-325 Fromk.in,V. A. (1972):Tone featuresand tone rulés. Stud. Afr. Linguist.3, 47-76 Fromkin, V. A. (1977): "Putting the EmPHAsis on the Wrong SyILABle", in Studiesin Stress and Accent, ed. by L. M. Hyman (University of Southern California, Los Angeles) pp. 15-26 Fry, D. B. (1955): Duration and intensity as physical corrélates of linguistic stress. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 27, 765-769 Fujisaki, H., Sudo, H. (1971): A generative model for the prosody of connected speech in Japanese.Annu. Rep. Eng. Res. Inst., Univ. Tokyo JO, 75-80 Fujisaki, H., Sugito, M. (1976): Temporal organisation of articulatory and phonatory controls in the realization of Japanese ward accent. Annu. Bull. Res. Inst. Logopedics Phonilltrics, Univ. Tokyo 10, 176-189 Fujisaki, M., Hirose, K., Ohta, K. (1979): Acoustic features of the fundamental frl:,quéncy contours of declarative sentences. Annu. Bull. Res. Inst. Logopedics Phoniatrics, Umv. Tokyo 13, 163-172 Gllrde, P. (1968): L'Accent (PressesUniversitaires de France, Paris) Gârding, E. (1962): Olikheter mellan svensk och engelsk intonation i pâstàendC::idt~~r.Mod. Sprak 56, 269-280 Gàrding, E. (]975 a): "Toward a Prosodic Typology for Swedish Dialects" , in n,~ Nordic Languogesand Modern Linguistics, Vol. 2, ed. by K.-H. Dahlstedt (Almqvlsl & Wlk~lI, Stockholm) pp. 4(i)-474 Gàrding, E. (1975b): The influence of tempo on rhythmic and tonal paltern~ ilt thré~ Swc:dl~h dialects. Work. Pap. Linguist., Univ. Lund 11,71-83 Gârding, E. (1977): "The Importance of Turning Points for the Pitch Paltern~ of SweJlsh Accents", in Studies in S/ress and Accent, ed. by L. M. Hyman (Univèrsity of Soulhérn California, Los Angeles) pp. 27-35 Gàrding, E. (1979): Sentenc~ intonation În Swedish. Phonetica 36, 207-215 Gàrding, E. (1980): Moderator's summary, Symp. 7: "The relation belwc:c:n:it:ltl~nçc: pro~ody and ward prosody" , Proc. 9th lot. Congr. Phonetic Sci~nces, COpélthéig.:n, Vol. 3, pp. 283-287 Gàrding, E. (1981): Contrastive prosody: A model and its application. Slud Lingui~t. J5, 146-165 Gàrding, E. (1982): Prosodic expressionsand pragmatic cat~gories. Work. Pap Linguist., Univ. Lund 21, 117-136 Gàrding, E., Lindblad, P. (1973): CoDStancyand véirilltion in Swt:dish word ao.:o.:entpall.:rn~. Work. Pap. Linguist., Univ. Lund 7,36-]10 Garding, E., BotÎnis, A., Touati, P. (1982): A oomparativl:,study of Swl:,dish.Grc:~k. éind French intonation. Work. Pap. Linguist.. Univ. Lund 21, 137-152 Gilrrétt, M. F. (1975): "The Analysis of Sentence Production", in Psycho/ug>'ut L~ummg ufJd Motiva/ion, Vol. 9, ed. by G. Bower (Academic, New York) pp. 133--177 Gay, T. (1978): Physiological and acoustic corrl:,late~of perceptual stress. laJlg. Spé~~h21, 347-353 Goffman. E. (1981): "Rlldio Talk", in Forms of Taik (Blackwell, Oxford), pp. 11J7-327 Goldman-Eisler, F. (1968): : Experiments in SpolJtaneousSpe~t:h (Aciideillic, London) Goldman-Eisler, F. (1972): Pauses,clauses, sentences.Lang. Speech 15, 103-113 Goldsmith, J. (1976): "Autosegmental Phonology", Ph. D. Thesis, Massachu~tt:i In~titute 01 Te~hnology (Distributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club) Grosjean, F., Collins, M. (1979): Breathing, pausing and reading. Phonetica 36, 9~114 GrosJean, F., Deschamps,A. (1973): Analyse des variables temporelles du Français ~pontane. Il. Comparaison du Français oral dans la description avec l'AngléÙS(descriptIon) et avec le Français (interview radiophonique) Phonetica 18, 191-226 91.

Rc:ferences 151

(jrU!iJl:êln,f., OI:!iÇhitmp!i,A. (1975): Analysc: contrit~tive des vêlriêlble~temporc:llc:~ de l'Anglais ..:tdu t:ritn...itÎ!i:Yitl:!i!O..: de parult: t:t vitriable~ cumpo~ante~,phénomène d'hc:~itatiun. Phone- IÎca 31,144-413 Gru"d~lrum, A., Léun, P. (1973): Interrogation etlntoMtion, Studia Phonetica, 8 (Didic:r, Pari~) Hadding-Kol:h, K (1%1): Acuustù:o-Phonetic Studies in the Intonutiun of Suuthem Swedish ~(,II:c:rup, I.und) Halll:, M., Yl:rgn&lud,J. R. (1982): "Foundations of Gc:nerêltivePhonology", Phonology Seoù- nar organi~eJ by GLOW, Pétris Halllday, M. A. K. ~1%3): The tone~ of English. Arch. Lingui~t. 15, 1-28 HilllidêlY, M. A. K. (1967..): Notes on transitivity and theme in English, Part 2. J. Linguist 3, 199-244 Halliday, M. A. K. (1967b): Intonation and Grarnmar in British l:.nglish (Mouton, The Haguc:) HêIIliday, M. A. K (1970): A Course in Spoken English: Intonation (Oxford Univer!iity Prc:!iS, Oxford) Hêln, M. S. (1%1): "Japan~sePbonology: An AnétlysisBased upon Sound Spc:ctrograms",Ph. D. lnC:!iis, Univer~ity of Texa~ at Austin Haugen, E., JoO!i,M. (1952): Tone and intonation in East Norwegian. Actil Philo1. Scand 22, 4]-64; alw in 0 L. Bulinger (ed.): Intonation (Penguin, Hêlrmondsworth) pp. 4]4-436 HavÎland, S. E., L'Iark, H. Il. (1974): What's new? Ac~uiring new information as a pruce!i~in comprehension. J. Yc:rb. uarn. Verb. Behav. 13,5]2-520 Ilayes, B. (1979): "Extramt:tricality", in Papers on Syllable Structurc:, Metrical Structure and Harmony Procc:sse~,Mil' Working Papers on Linguistics, Vol. 1, ed. by K. Sal"ir Hayc:s,B. (1981); .'A M~trll:al Theory of Str~!iSRules", Ph. D.lnesis, Ma:osal:bu~lt~I"~tllulc of Teclmolugy (Di!itributed by Indiana University Linguistics Club) Hc:ger, S. (198]): .5prog ug Lyd - Elementaer DaIL5kFonetlk (Akademisk, Copenbêlgen) Hill, D. R., Jas~m, W., Wittc:n, 1. H. (1978): "A Statisticêll Approêlch to thc Prublc:m uf Iwchrony in $poli.c:nBriti~h English", Man-Machine Systems Laboratory Rc:pon 78/27/6, Univ~r!iity üÎ Calgary Hill, D. R., Wittcn, 1. Ii., Ja:i!il:m, W. (197H): "Some Rc:sults from a Prc:liminary Siudy 01" I3riti~h Engli~" S~el:h Rhythms", Man-Machine Systc:msLaboratory Report 78/26/5, Uni- vc:r~ityof Cêligitry I{ir~, K., Fuji~aki, H., Sugito, M. (197H): Word êlccc:ntin Japaneseand English: A compêlra- tivt: stul1yof aCOU!itlc~haracteri~tics in disyllabic wllrds. Annu. Bull. Res. In!it. Lugopedics PbonÎiltril."!i,Univ. Tokyo 12, 141-14S tllr!il, D. J. (1977): Intonati~'e Joèatures:A Syntuctic Appruach to E"glish Intonation (t\10uton, .!lac:Hitgue) tfir$I, D. J. (1979): Pitch featurc:sfor tonc: intonêltion. Trav. Inst. PhonoAix 6,177-191 Hir~t, D. J. (19Hl al: Un modèle de production de l'intonation. Trav. Inst. PhonoAix 7,297-311 Hir~t, 0 J. (t9Hlb): "Prosodic: et Structurc:s de DonnéC:!ic:n Phonologie", in ReprésentutiollS Joor"lL'lIesen Phonologie. ed. by F. Dell, D. J. Hirst, J .-R. Yc:rgnaud (Hernlann, Pari$) HaroSt,D. J. (1981c): "Phonologacal Implications of a Production Model of Intonation", in Phûnulûgic{l }1}80, c:d. by W. U. Dre!iSter, O. Pfeiffer, J Rennison (Inn!ibruckc:r Bc:itrage zur Sprachwi!iJlt:n!iÇhaÎt,Innsbruck) pp. 195-20"2 t-tir~t, D. J. (in pre~~): "Phonological and Acoustic Parametc:rsof Engti!ib Intonation", in Into- nation in Di.\.t:ourse,I:d. by C. John!i-Lewi!i (Crl)()m Helm, London) Haxon,T. J., Klatt, D. tl., Mt:ad, J. (1971): tntluence ol lorcc:d transglottaf pressureclaangc: on VOIC":funJamc:ntal frc:quency. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 49, 1U5 Ho, A. T. (1977): Intonation variation in a Mandêlrin sentenceof three expressions:tntc:rroga- . tivc:, I:xctamatl)ry and declarative. Phonetica 34, 446-457 Hombert, J. M. (1974): lJnivc:r!iatsof downdrift: Their basis and significance for a thc:ory of tüne. Stud. Air. Ling"a!it. S, 169-1H3 Houp\:r, J. B. (1972): Thc: sytt..bte in phonologicaf theüry. Language 48,525-540 House, A. S., Fairbanks, G. (1953): 'Tht: intluence of I:onwnant environment upon thc: !iècon- dary acou!itil:i11chi1ritcteri~til..'S of vowel!i. J. Aooust Soc. Am 25,105-113 92

152 Re{erences

I~itèenko, A., Schadlich, H.-J. (1970): A Model of Standard German lntonuti()n (Mouton, Thè Hague) Jespersen,O. (1933): Lehrbuch der Phonetik (Teubner, Leipzig) Jones, D. (I~): An OUlline of Eng/ish PhonetÎl:S.9th cd. (Heffers, Cambridge) Kithn, D. (l97b): "Syliable-Based Generalisations in Phonology", Ph. D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (Distributed by lndianit University Linguistics Club) Kingdon, R. (1958): The Groundwork of English Intonation (Longmans, London) Kipitrsky, P. (1979): Metrical structure assignmentis cyclic. Linguist. Inq. 10,421-441 Klatt, D. H. (1979): "Synthesis by Rule of SegmentaI Durations in Engli~h Sentences", in Fronliers of SpeechCommunication Research,ed. by B. Lindblom, S. Ohman (Acitdemic, London) Klein, W. (1980): Der Stand der For~chung zur deutschen Satzintonation. Linguist. Ber. 68, 3-33 Kloker, D. (1975): Vowel and sonorant lengthening as cues to phonological phritse boundarit:~. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 57, 533 Kozhevnikov, V. A., Chistovich, L. A. (1965): Speech:Articulation und Perl.'eption(U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Washington, DC) JPRS, 30, 543 Ladd, D. R. (1980): The Structure of Intonotional Meaning: Evidence from Engll.lh (Indiana University Press, Bloomington) Ladd, D. R. (1981): "On Intonational Universals", in The Cognitive Representotionof Speech. ed. by T. Myers, J. Laver, J. Anderson (North-Holiand, Amsterdam) pp. 38~397 Ladd, D. R. (in press): Phonological features of intonational peaks. Language Litngendoen, D. T. (1975): Finite state parsing of phrase structure languagesand the status of readjustment rules in the grammar. Linguist. lnq. 6, 533-554 Laver, J. D. M. (1973): "The Detection and Correction of Slips of the ", in Speech Errors as Linguistic Evidence. cd. by V. A. Fromkin (Mouton, The Hague) pp. 132-143 Lehiste, 1. (19(i): An acoustic-phonc:ticstudy of internai open juncture. Phonetica S, Suppl. 1-54 Lebiste, 1. (1%5): The function of quantity in FinnÎsh and Estornan. Language 41, 447-456 Lehistc:, 1. (1970): Suprasegmentuls(MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Lehiste, 1. (1972): The timing of utterances and linguistic boundéiries.J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 51, 201&-2024 Lehistc:, 1. (1973): Phùnetic disambiguation of syntactic ambiguity. Glossa 7,107-122 Lehiste, 1. (1975): "The Phonetic Structure of Paragraphs", in Structure and Processin Spee('h Perception. c:d. by A. Cohc:n. S. G. Nooteboom (Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York) pp. 195-203 Lehiste, 1. (1977): lsochrony reconsidered. J. Phono5,253-263 Levelt, W. J. M. (1983): Monitoring and self-repair in speech. Cognition Liberman, M. Y. (1975): "On thc: IntonationaJ System of English", Ph. D. Thesi~, MassachusettsInstitute of Technology (Distributed by Indiana University Lingulstics ('Iub) Liberman, M. Y., Prince, A. (1977): On stress and linguistic rhythm. Linguist. Inq. 8, 249-33ô Liberman, M. Y., Sag, 1. (1974): "Prosodic Form and Discourse Function", Paper~ frum lhe Tenth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society pp. 416-426 Liberman, M. Y., Streeler, L. (1978): The use of nonsense-syllablc:mimicry in lhe ~luJy uf prosodic phenonlena. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 63, 231-233 L.iebc:rmall,P. (1%3): Some effects of semantic and grammatical contexl 011the pruJuction itnd perception of speech. Lang. Speech 6, 172-187 Liebermétn, P. (1%7): lntu/lution. Perception und Lunguage (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA) Lindblum, B. (1968): "Temporal Organisation of Syllabl~ Production", Speech Translru~:ôiun Laboratùry (Stockhulnl) Quartc:rly Progress and Status Report, 2-1968, pp. 1-5 Maclay, H., Ü-'igood, C. E. (1959): Hesitation phenomena in spontaneous spe~ch. Wurd 15, 19-44 Maeda, S. (1974): "A Churact.erÎzéttionof Fundam~ntalFr~quency C~ntuurs uf Spc:ech", R~search LIt!><)ratoryof Elèctronics (MIT), Quarterly Progress RefX)rt, 114, pp. 193-211 93

Rc:rc:rencc:~ loSJ

Macdil, S. (1'J70): " A CharactcrÎLaliùl1 uf Anl~rical1 El1glbh Intunaliun", Ph. D. Thesis, M~iiChU!iCII~ II1)ttlule ur "'.;chnulùgy Magllu-Caldognl:ttu, E, Ferrcru, F. E., Laviignuli, C., VlIggl:S, K. (197K): f... oontuurs uf slalt:ment~, yc:s-nuquc~tions and wh-qUt:)tiom of IWOregional vllrieties or Italial1, J, [laI, Linguisl, 3, 57-6M Marœl, P. (1971); La Jurée de~voyelll:s de J'[talien à partir de J'analyscoscillographiquc:. Trllv. III~I. Phun. Sirasbolug 3, 147-157 Miircu~, S. M. (1970): "Percc:plual Centre~", Ph. D. Thesis, University of Cambridgc: Mar)lcn-Wilson, W. D" Welsb, A. (1978); Processing interactions and lexical acœss during wurd reoognilion iD cunliDuouSspeech. Cognil. Psychol. 10, 29-63 Miil'~It:II-Wilson, W. D" Levy, E., Tyler, L, K. (19H2);"Producing Interpretable Discour~; The blabli~hmc:nt Itnd Maintenancc: of Rererc:nce", in Speech, Place and Action: SludÎt's in /)euis and Relaie" Topics. cd. by R. J. Jarvella, W. Klein (Wiley, Chichester) pp. 339-378 Miirlin, J. G. (197U): Rhythm-induccd judgements ùr word ~tressin sentences.J. Verb. Lcarn. Verb. Behav 9,627-633 Miirttfl, J. G. (1972): Rhythmic (hierarchical) ver~us serial structure iD speech and other behaviur. Psychùl Rev. 79,487-509 Marltll, J. G. (197'J): Rhythmic and st:gmental pc:rceptionare not independent. J. Acoust. Soc. Aut. 65, 1l&>--12~7 Martin, J. G., Bul1nell. Ii. T. (1981): Percl:ptiun of anticipatory ooarticulatiun ~ffects. J. Acousl Soc. Am. '9, 551)-567 Miirlin, J. G., Mill~, C. B., Meltzl:r, R. H., Shield~, J. L. (19HO);Anticipatory ooarticulation and rcIICtion timc: tu phon~mc tiirgc:(Sin ~pl)Otaneou~~peech. Phonetica 37, 15~ lôK p.1artin,P. (1975): ADaly)e ph,>nolugi(juede III phrase françaisc. Linguistics 146,35-68 Martin, P. (1980): "Sur I~~Pnllci~cs d'une "Ibéuri~ Syntllxique dc:J'[ntonation", in Problèmesde Prusodie, Vol. J: Approches Théuriques, ed. by P. Léon, M. Rossi (Didier, Pari~) M\.'Carthy, J. (1979): On strc~s iiud syllabificiitiul1. Linguist. [nq, 10,443-465 Ml.-Clirthy, J. (1982): Non-lincar plt'ln\Jlugy: An ùv~rview. GLOW Newsl. 8,63-77 M.:ltur, R. H., Martin, J. (J., Mills, C. B.,lmhoff, D. L., Zohar, D. (1976): Reactiun ume to temporally-dispiacedpoonc:mc: targ~t~ in rontinuous ~peech.J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. P~rcc:pl. P~rform. Z, 211-2~1 M~l1n. L. (1976): "Piiltl:rII, C"nlrol élnd Contra~t in Beginning Speech; A Case Study in the ()evc:loprnentof Wùrd f~rm iind Word Functiuo", Ph. D. Thesis, University of IlIinùi~ Mlt~UYii, F., Sugit(I, M. (197H): A study of the accentuaI c:ffect 00 segmentai iind moraic duriition in Jiipiin~~. Annu. Bull. Res. Inst. Logopedics Phooiatrics, Univ. Tokyu 12, 97-112 Murtun, J., Miircu~. SM" friinkish, C. (1976): Perceptual centres (P-centres). Psychul. R~v. 83,405-408 Nakatani, L. H., O'COI1I1"I',K. D., Aston, C. H. (1981): Prosodic aspectsof American Engli~h speech rhythm. Phullcli~]M, M-IU6 Ne~r, M. A. (1911): "~gnlC:l1t and Wurd Duriitionltl Currelates of Syntactic Bouodari~:. fi Italiiirl" , il1 t'xplurulium. ln Lllllguuge and Linguislics. cd. by R. Rodmiin (Univ~r5ity of North Ciirolirla, Chiipel Hill, N{~) Nc::.por, M. A., Vogc:I, 1. (I~K2): "Pr~ic Domiiius and External Sandbi Rul~M, in The .\'Iru..'lureut Phunulugit.'1l1R.epresentaliollS. Part l, ed. by H. v. d. Hulst, N. Smilh (Fori), Durdr~ht) pp. 225-255 N':5por, MA, Vog.:I, 1. (in prc:~); ,.Pr~sudic Ili~riircby and Spcech Perceptiun", iD Prucc:ed- ing~ tif th.: Con(~rc:nœon th~ Perœptiun of Languiige, Accademia della Crusca, Aorence, 1')8(j Nc:wln,,", S. S. (1'J40): 011 lh~ )tre~ sy~l.:m of El1glisb. Wùrd Z, 171-187 Nishinumii, Y. (1979): Un mudèlc d'aniilySc:itutumiltique de la prusudic. Trilv. lust. PhonoAix 6 Nuot~bounl, S. G. (l'J~): "Speakutg and Unspeaking; Detection and Correction of Phonologt- cal itnd Lexical Error) ill Slx)ntaneous Spe~ch", in Err()rs in Linguistic Ptrfurmallce, ed, by V. A. Fromkin (/\ci.J.:mi.. Nl:"w Y"rl. 1 PI' 1<7-'15 94

154 Rt:ft:rt:nct:~

O'Connell, D. C., Kuwal, S. (1972): Crus~-lingui~(icp~use and rate phenumena in adul(s and adole~cenl~.J. Psycholinglli~l. RI:~. l, J55-165 O'Connell, D. C., Kowal, S., llôrnlann, H. (1%9): Senlantic determinants of pauses.Psychol. Forsch. 33, 50-67 O'Connor, J D., Arnold, G. F. (1961): lt'lunacion of Col/oquial English (Longmans, London) Ohman, S. E. G. (1%7): "Wurd and Sl:ntence Intonation: A Quantitative Model", Speech Tran~mi~sion Laboralory (S(ockholnl) Quarterly Progress and Status Report, 2-1967, pp. 20-54 Ohalét, J. (1975): Review of Lehisle 1970. Language SI, 736-740 Ohala, J. (1978): "Production of Tone", in Tone: A Linguislic Survey, ed. by V. A. Fromkin (Acadc:mic, New York) Ohétla,J., Ewétn, W. (J973): Speed of pitch range. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 53,345 aller, D. K. (J913): Thc: effect uf position in utterétnceon speechsegment duration in Engl~h. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 54, 1235-J247 aller, D. K., Smith, B. L. (1977): Effect of final-syllable position on vowel duration in infant babbting. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 62, 944-997 O'Malley, M. H., Kloker, D. R., Dara-Abrams, B. (1973): Recovering paren(hesesfrom spo- ken algebréticexpr~sions. IEEE Trans. Audio Electroacoust. AU-21, 2J7-220 O'Shétughnes~y,D. (1976): "Modelling Fundamental Frequency and I(s Relation~hip (0 Syn(ax, Semétn(icsand Phone(ics", Ph. D. Thesis, MassachussettsInsti(ute of Technolugy Pellowe, J., Jonl:~, V. (1979): Es(ablishing in(ona(ionally variétble systems il1 a mulli-diml:l1- siol1étllingui~tjc~pace. Lang. Speech 22,97-116 Perkell, J. S. (19HO):"Phone(ic Features and the Physiology uf Speech Produc(ion", in Lan- guage PruJucclon. Volume 1: Speechand Ta/k, ed. by B. Butterwonh (Academic, Londol1) pp. 337-372 Pierrehumber(, J. B. (1979): The perception of fundétmental frequency declinéttion J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 66, 363-369 Pierrehumber(, J. 8. (1980): "The Phonology and Phonetics of English In(onét(ion", Ph. D. 'fhe~i~, M~~~i1chusset(sIns(ilute of Technology Pil:rrehumbert, J 8. (1981): Syn(hesizing intonation. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 70,985-995 Pike, K. L. (1945): The Imunulion of American English (University of Michigan Prl:~s, Ann Arbor) Prince, E. F. (1981): "Toward a T~xonomy of Given/New Information", in Radical Pragmalic.~, ed. by P. (~olc:(Ac~demic, New York) pp. 223-255 Rapp, K. (1971): "A Study of Syll~ble 'l'iming'', SpeechTransmission Létboratory (Sto(khlllm), Quétrterly Progressand Sta(us Rc:port, I-J971, pp. 14-19 Rischc:l,J. (1960): Über dic: phonema(i~(he and morphophonematischeFunktion dl:r ~ugl:nann- ten Wort(ône im Norwegi~hen. Z. Phonet. Sprachwiss. Kommunikéttion~tur~h 13, 177-J85 Ri~hel, J (1912): Compound s(re~sin Détnishwithuut a cycle. Annu. Rep. Inst. Phon., Univ. ÜJpenhagc:n6, 211-228 Rischel, J. (1975): "Problemer ved en generativ beskrivelse étfdansk tryk", Selskabfor Nurdisk FiJologi, Arsberc:tning for 1971-73, pp. 22-32 Rischel, J. (J9&»: Phrasenakzent al~ SignétJde~ Objekts ohne "determiner" im Dànischen. KopenhétgenerBeitr. german. Linguist., Suppl. 1, 262-279 Rischel, J. (in pre~s): On unit acœntuation - and the distinction between deep étnd surfaCe phonology. Folia Linguist. 17 Sétlles,J. L. (1980): "Esséti d'un Enseignement de J'Intonation aux Jeunes Déficient~ Auditif)' Profonds par Visualisation Grétphique", Thèsc:,Centre de l'Ouïe et de la Parole, Fougère)', France Sanford, A. J., Garrod, S. C. (1981): Understundillg Written Language (Wiley, Lundul1) Schane,S. (J972): "Non-cyclic Word StreS.\",in Essayson the Sound Pattern of Ellglish, c:d. by D. Goyvaerts, G. Pullum, pp. 249-259 Scherer, K. R. (1981): "Speech and Emotional States", in The Eva/uation of Speech in hychiulry and Medicille. ed. by J. Détrby (Grune étndStral(On, New York) 95

References .tSS

Sch~rc;r,U., S(;It~rc;r,K, k. (I~&J,: '.P~ychologicalfactur~ in Bureaucratic Encounters: Deter- millallts iind EI1~(;t~uf InI~ructlulIS 8etwec;n Offi~ial~ and Clienls", in The Ana/y.i'isof Social Ski/ls , ed. by W r, Slngl~lun, P. Spurgeun, R B. Stammer~ (Plenum, New York) pp.315-32K Scott, O. 1(. (1982): I)urutlon ilS '* cuc; to the perception of a phrase boundary. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 71, ~IIXJl S~lkirk, E. 0 (1'J72). ..ln~ Phril~~ Pbùnûlogy uf English and French", Ph. D. Thesis, Métssachu~ttsIn~titule uî l'~chnolugy Selkirk., E. O. (1~7Isa): On Ihc Stiltu~ of "mut~" e. Stud. Fr. Linguist. 1,141-150 S~lkirk, E. O. (1978b): .'011 Prosudic Structure ,*nd Its Reliitiun to Synt,*ctic Structur~", Con- fcrenc~ un tbc; Ml:lltal kc;presc;lIlatlonof Pbonology, Amherst, MA (Distributed by Indianét UniVèr~ity LllIgui~II':~ ('tub) Sc:lkir~, E. 0 (I,:)SU): l'h~ rul~ ûf prosodi.: céttegoriesin English ward stress. Linguist. Inq, Il, 5b3-6(l5 Shield~, J L., M.:llugh, A., Martill, J. ü. (1974): Reaction time to phoneme targets as ii function uf rbythmic .:uc;!tm curltlnuou~ speech. J. Exp. Psychol, 102,250-255 Socin, C. (I~KI): FUII.:tiulI:;, rult:~ alld Irealmènts of imensily in speech. J. Phono9, 359-374 Stewart, J. M. (1~71): .'Ni~~r-Cl)lIgo, Kwét", in ('urrent Trendsin Linguistics, Vol. VII: Linguis- tics in Sub-~'uhu"U/IAJrÎ('u, I:d by"'. A. Sebeok (Mouton, The Hague) pp, 179-212 Stock, E. (191SO):Untt'fsu..hU/lgt'/I lU form, Bt'deutung und f'unktion der Intonation im DeuJ- schen (Akêtd~mie, l3~rll/l) Slockwell, R. P. (1~72): "111.:Role \Jf Inlonalion; R~cunsider'*tionsand Olher Consideralions", ill IntonUiiùn, c;d. lJY1) L 8oliflger (Pt:nguifl, Harmondsworth) pp. 87-109 Stowell, T, (1979): "Slre:;:;.Sy~t\:l/I:;of Ib~ World Ullitt:", in Paperson SyUableStructure, Metri- cél.1Structure and HarffiûllY Pru(;e~s, Mn' Working Papers on Linguistics, Vol. l, ed. by K. Safir, pp. 51-76 Svelozarova, N. D. (1975,: "l'ht: Innc:r Slruclure uf Imonation Contours in Ruman", in Auto. motic Analysis und l'erceptiun uf Speech, t:d. by G. Fant, M, A. A. Tétlham (A~demic, London) Takefula, Y. (1975,: '.!'.1~llloduf Acuu:;lic Anétlysi:;of Intonation", in MeasuremenlPrucedures in !;'peech, Ileuml!; U/IJ Lunsuuge, el.!. by S. Singb (University Park Press, Baltimore) pp, 368-37~ T~rkeD, J, M. 8. (1'J&JiI): '1111:Rt:Jiiliun B~lw~~n Infurmation Structure and ACC~nlualion: SOffit:ExplulalulY Jllvt:~ligiiliuns", In~tilule for Perc.:eptionRt:sc:arch Report 3~1, pp. 1-40 Tt:rk~n, J. M. Ii. (l'JtS1Jb':'-l'h.: Di:;tribution of Pllch Accent in Descriptive Language as ii Funcllull of IlIfollUallullill Vilriable~", IPO Ann. Prog. Rep. 15, pp, 48-53 '1 Hart, J, (1~7~): E.~plulilliun:i III aUI\Jmiilic !tlylizalion of f~ curves. IPO Annu. Prug. Rep. 14, 61-65 'l Hétrl, J, Colten, A (1'J73): InI'Jniilion by rule: A perceptual qut:st, J. Phono l, 3(J')-327 't Harl, J., û)lIi~r, R (1':)75): I/llègraling diffcrenllt:vels of imonation analysis. J, Phono 3, 235-255 'lliarl, J., Culli~r, 1<' (l~lM): A cuur~e in Oulch Inlonatioll. IPO Annu. Prog. Rep. 13, 31-35 '1 Hétrl, J., Collicr, 1( (11J7~);"On thc: Interaction of Accenlualion and Inlonalion in DUlCh", PlOC.9th Inl. t'ongr Phu/lelic Sciences,t'openhagen, Vol. 2, pp, 395-402 Thum~n, H. S. (19~U):!}lress und Su/ien\'ein Eng/ish: Theory and Practice, (Xc:rox Corpora- liun, PaJoAIlu) 1norSC:/I,N. (1~78): Ali acuu~lical analy~i!i.uf Dani~h inlOnétlion. J, Phono 6, 151-175 'lnor~en, N. (1979): InI~rprc:ting raw fufldaffit:nlal fre'fu~III:Y tr,*cingsof Danish. Phonelica 36, 57-5K Thursc:n, N, (19~a); N~ulral ~trt:s:;, emphalic !ttr.:~s, and sc:nlenceimonation in Advanced StandétrdCopenhagt:/l Oalli!th. AmlU. Rep. Inst, Phon., Univ. Copenhétgen14, 121-205 Thorsc:n,N. (I~Wb): A ~Iud)' uf the pc:rcc:pliunof sc:nlc:nœimonation - Evidence frum Dani:;h. J. ACOU:;l.Soc. Am. '7, IOI4-JU30 Thursc:o,N. (19KOt:):ImOnétlion com\)ur~ and stressgroup piltterns in declarativè senlence~uf varying It:ngui in ASC r)aoi~b Anou J{.:p Insl. PIIIIII, , Univ, C\)penhagen 14, 1-29 96

156 Referenœ~

Thorsen, N. (in press): Standard Dani:;h :;entc:nceintonation - Phonetic data and their rc:prc:- sentation. Folia Linguist. 17 Touati, P. (unpubllshed): "Etude:; Contra:;tives de la Prosodie du Français et du Suédois" Trager, G. L., Smith, H. L. (1951): An Outline QI E'nglishStructure (Battenburg, Norman, OK) Umeda, N., Quinn, A. M. S. (1981): Word durution as an acoustic measure of boundary perception. J. Phono9, 19-28 Vaissière, J. (1971): "Contribution à la Synthè:;epar Règles du Français", Thèse de Troi:;ième cycle, Grenoble, France Vai:;sière, J. (1974): "On French Prosody", Research Laboratory of Electronics (MIT), Quar. terly ProgressReport 114, pp. 212-223 Vaissière, J. (1975): "Further Note on French Prosody", Research Laboratory of Electronics (MIT), Quarterly ProgressReport lIS, pp. 251-262 Vaissière, J. (1980): La structuration acoustique de la phrase française. Ann. Scu. Norm. Sup. Pisa, Ser. III, 10, 529-5~ Van Lancker, D., Fromkin, V. A. (1973): Hemispheric specialization for pitch and "tone": Evidence from Thai. J. Phon. l, 101-109 Venneman, T. (1972): On the theory of syllabic phonology. Linguist. Ber. 18, 1-lH Venneman, T. (1978): Univer:;al :;yllabic phonology. Theor. Linguist. S, 175-215 Venneman, T. (1979): "An Outline of Univc:r:;al Phonology", unpublished manuscript, Univer- sity of Munich Vergnaud, J.-R, Halle, M (1978): "Metrical Phonology: A Fragment of a Draft", unpubli~lIed manu:;cript, Massachusett:;Institute of Technology (revised 1979) von Essen, O. (1956): Hochdeut:;che Satzmelodie Z Phonet. Sprachwiss. Kommunikation:;- forsch. 9, 75-85 Wang, W. S-Y (1967): Phonological features of tone. Int. J. Am. Linguist. 33,93-105 Welmers, W. E. (1959): Tonemi(."S,morphotonemics and tonal morphemes. Gen. Linguist. 4, 1-9 Weniger, D. (197M):"Zur Prosodie bei Apha:;ie", in Brennpunkte der Patholinguislik, ed. by G. Peuser (Fink, Munich) pp 305-325 Wheeler, D. (1981): "Aspects of a Categorial Theory of Phonology", Ph. D. The~is, Univer:;ity of Ma:iSachu:;etts William~, C. E., Steven:;, K. N. (1972): Emotion:; and speech: Some acoustical correlates. J. Acou~t. Soc. Am. S2, 1238-1250 Yule, G. (1980): Intonation and givenn~~ in :;pùken discourse. Stud. Lang. 4, 271-286 Yule, G. (1981a): "A:;pects of the Infurmatlul1 Structure of Spoken Discouse", Ph. D. Thesis, Univer:;ity of Edinburgh Yule, G. (1981b): New, current and di:;placc:dentity reference. Lingua SS, 41-52 Zec:, E., Maddi~son, 1 (1979): Tunes and IODesandhi in Shanghai: Phonetic evidc:nceand phonulogical étflaly:;is.UCLA Wurk. Pap. Phun. 45, 93-129 Zingle, H. (1974): Quc:lque:;remarque:; ~ur le groupe accentuel en allemand. Trav. 1nst. Phon., Strasbourg 6,89-117 Zlatoustuva, L. V. (1954): Duratiun of vowel and consonant sounds in the Ru~~ianlanguagc:. Scientific Nute:;, Kazan State University 114, 99 (in Russian) Zurif, E. D., Mendelsohn, M. (1972): Hemispheric specialization for the perceptiun uf speech sounds: The influence of intonation and structure. Percept. Psychophys. Il,329--332