DOCSLIB.ORG

Modeling the Initiation and Spread of Crown Fires

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

University of Montana ScholarWorks at University of Montana Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers Graduate School 1999 Modeling the initiation and spread of crown fires Miguel Gomes da Cruz The University of Montana Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd Let us know how access to this document benefits ou.y Recommended Citation Gomes da Cruz, Miguel, "Modeling the initiation and spread of crown fires" (1999). Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers. 2996. https://scholarworks.umt.edu/etd/2996 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at ScholarWorks at University of Montana. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Student Theses, Dissertations, & Professional Papers by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks at University of Montana. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Maureen and Mike MANSFIELD LIBRARY Tlie University of JVEONTANA Permission is granted by the author to reproduce this material in its entirety, provided that this material is used for scholarly purposes and is property cited in published works and reports. ** Please check "Yes" or "No" and provide signature ** Yes, I grant permission K No, I do not grant permission Author's Signature Date /jcui/'S z ^ ^ Any copying for commercial purposes or financial gain may be undertaken only with the author's explicit consent. MODELING THE INITIATION AND SPREAD OF CROWN FIRES By Miguel Gomes da Cruz B.S. Forestry, Coimbra Polytechnic Institute, Portugal, 1994 Presented in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA 1999 Approved by: airman, Board of£xaminers Dean, Graduate School i< Date UMI Number: EP36459 All rights reserved INFORMATION TO ALL USERS The quality of this reproduction is dependent upon the quality of the copy submitted. In the unlikely event that the author did not send a complete manuscript and there are missing pages, these will be noted. Also, if material had to be removed, a note will indicate the deletion. UMI OtsMTtation Publishing UMI EP36459 Published by ProQuest LLC (2012). Copyright in the Dissertation held by the Author. Microform Edition © ProQuest LLC. All rights reserved. This work is protected against unauthorized copying under Title 17, United States Code uest* ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway P.O. Box 1346 Ann Arbor, Ml 48106- 1346 Gomes da Cruz, Miguel, M.Sc., September 1999 Forestry Modeling the Initiation and Spread of Cro;wn^Fir;^ Director; Ronald H. Wakimoto fj~- / The unknowns in fire phenomenology lead to a simplified empirical approach to build models designed to forecast crown fire initiation and spread. This information is needed to support decision making in a large array of fire management problems.The present study is based on a large fire behavior database from experimental fires in North American fiiel complexes. These fires cover a wide spectrum of fire environment and behavior conditions. Three types of models were develop in this study: A crown fire initiation model, a crovm fire spread model, and models to predict canopy bulk density. Crown fire initiation was modeled through a logistic approach using as independent variables wind speed, fuel strata gap, a surface fuel consumption class and dead fine fuel moisture content. Spread rates for active and passive crown fires were modeled through multiple non-linear regression analysis following physical reasoning. Independent variables used in the crown fire spread models were wind speed, canopy bulk density and dead fine fuel moisture content. Models to predict canopy bulk density in some common fuel complexes in the U.S. were developed by linking foliar biomass equations with stand data from the Forest Inventory and Analysis. Canopy bulk density was modeled as a function of species, stand density and stand basal area. The crown fire initiation rAodel correctly predicted 85 % of the cases in the dataset used for its construction. The active crown fire spread model yield a of 0.61. Comparison of predictions from both fire behavior models against an independent dataset from wildfire crown fire runs revealed good model performance. The crown fire initiation model correctly predicted all the wildfires as crovm fires. The active crown fire spread model yielded a mean absolute percent error of 34 % when compared against the independent dataset. The wide variation in fuel complex structure and fire behavior in datasets used to build the crown fire initiation and spread models gives confidence that the models might work well in fuel complexes different from the original ones, given an adequate description of the physical characteristics of the fuel complex. Keywords: Fire behavior modeling; Crown fire initiation; Crown fire spread; Canopy bulk density; Model evaluation. ii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis was made possible by the assistance of many people. I am immeasurably indebted to Marty Alexander by his original ideas, guidance and support given throughout this study. I would like extending my sincere thanks to my advisor Ron Wakimoto for his support, guidance and patience. Thanks also to my other committee members, namely Richard Lane for providing assistance on the statistical portion of the analysis, and Don Potts and Bobbie Bartlette for their support. I want to also thank Kelsey Milner and Hans Zuring for their advise and assistance in the analysis of the canopy bulk density data. Thanks also to Brian Stocks for making available to me some of the unpublished data used in this study. Thanks also to the Canadian Forest Service for inviting me to participate in the 1999 Phase III of the International Crown Fire Modeling Experiment, Fort Providence, NWT. I would like to recognize Domingos Xavier Viegas from the University of Coimbra, Portugal for his encouragement for me to seek an advanced educational degree, and the financial support given by ADAI - University of Coimbra. Financial support is also acknowledged from Funda9ao Luso-Americana para d Desenvolvimento, and Blackfoot Forest Protective Association. Thanks to all my friends who made my stay in Missoula so enjoyable. My sincere and heartfelt thanks to Isabel for her never-ending patience and constant support throughout the period of this study. A todos o meu muito obrigado. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS Abstract ii Acknowledgements iii Table of Contents iv List of Tables vii List of Figures ix Introduction 1 CHAPTER I - REVIEW OF THE STATE-OF-KNOWLEDGE AND MODEL EVALUATION 3 1.1. Objectives 3 1.2. Prediction of crown fire initiation 3 1.3. Prediction of crown fire spread 8 1.4. Model evaluation 18 1.4.1. Conceptual validity 19 1.4.2. Operational validation 21 1.4.2.1. Data validation 23 1.4.2.2. Sensitivity analysis 27 1.4.2.3. Crown fire models comparison 29 1.4.2.4. Predictive validation 32 1.4.2.5. Statistical validation 35 1.5. Conclusions 37 CHAPTER II - LOGISTIC CROWN FIRE INITIATION MODELING 39 2.1. Objectives 39 2.2. Review of pertinent variables influencing crown fire initiation 39 2.3. Methods 46 2.3.1. Database construction 46 2.4. Results 49 2.4.1. Variables analysis 49 2.4.2. Model building 54 2.4.2.1. Methods 54 iv 2.4.2.2. Model results 56 2.4.3. Model evaluation 60 2.5. Conclusions 67 CHAPTER III - CROWN FIRE SPREAD MODELING 69 3.1. Objectives 69 3.2. Review of pertinent variables influencing crown fire spread 69 3.3.Methods 77 3.3.1. Database construction 77 3.4. Results 79 3.4.1. Variables analysis 79 3.5. Model building 87 3.5.1. Modeling active crown fire spread rates 87 3.5.1.1. Modeling results 89 3.5.1.2. Model behavior 91 3.5.1.3. Model evaluation 94 3.5.2. Modeling passive crown fire spread rates 100 3.5.2.1. Modeling results 10^3 3.5.2.2. Model Behavior 104 3.6. Conclusions 106 CHAPTER IV - ASSESSING CANOPY FUEL BULK DENSITIES FOR SOME WESTERN US COMMON CONIFER FUEL COMPLEXES 107 4.1. Introduction 107 4.2. Objectives 108 4.3. Methods 108 4.3.1. Fuel complex selection 108 4.3.2. The Forest Inventory and Analysis data 109 4.3.3. Selection of foliage load equations 110 4.3.4. Procedure for calculating canopy bulk density at plot level Ill 4.4. Results 111 4.4.1. Canopy bulk density variability 112 4.4.2. Canopy bulk density modeling 114 4.5. Conclusions 120 V CHAPTER V - CONCLUDING REMARKS 122 Bibliographic references 129 Appendix 145 vi LIST OF TABLES Table 1. L Reference values used in sensitivity analysis 23 1.2. Forest stand structure for the various experimental fires 25 1.3. Relative sensitivity (RS) of rate of spread output of several crown fires spread models to fine dead fuel moisture content, 10 m windspeed and live fuel moisture content. Reference situation is Kenshoe Lake #5 28 1.4. Relative sensitivity (RS) of rate of spread output of several crown fire spread models to fine dead fuel moisture content, 10 m windspeed and live fuel moisture content. Reference situation is Lily Lake wildfire 29 1.5. Validation parameters for the Rothermel crown fire model 37 2.1. Fuel complexes and fire type distribution in the database used for building the crown fire initiation model 47 2.2. Correlation matrix for significant fire environment and behavior variables in the dataset 49 2.3. Coding scheme of the SFC category design variables 56 2.4. Estimated parameters and statistics for the probabilistic crown initiation model 56 2.5. Estimated parameters and statistics for the probabilistic crown fire initiation model 57 2.6. Classification table for logistic model fire type prediction 58 2.7. Values of input variables used for the evaluation of model behavior 63 3.1.
Recommended publications
  • California Fire Siege 2007 an Overview Cover Photos from Top Clockwise: the Santiago Fire Threatens a Development on October 23, 2007

    California Fire Siege 2007 an Overview Cover Photos from Top Clockwise: the Santiago Fire Threatens a Development on October 23, 2007

    CALIFORNIA FIRE SIEGE 2007 AN OVERVIEW Cover photos from top clockwise: The Santiago Fire threatens a development on October 23, 2007. (Photo credit: Scott Vickers, istockphoto) Image of Harris Fire taken from Ikhana unmanned aircraft on October 24, 2007. (Photo credit: NASA/U.S. Forest Service) A firefighter tries in vain to cool the flames of a wind-whipped blaze. (Photo credit: Dan Elliot) The American Red Cross acted quickly to establish evacuation centers during the siege. (Photo credit: American Red Cross) Opposite Page: Painting of Harris Fire by Kate Dore, based on photo by Wes Schultz. 2 Introductory Statement In October of 2007, a series of large wildfires ignited and burned hundreds of thousands of acres in Southern California. The fires displaced nearly one million residents, destroyed thousands of homes, and sadly took the lives of 10 people. Shortly after the fire siege began, a team was commissioned by CAL FIRE, the U.S. Forest Service and OES to gather data and measure the response from the numerous fire agencies involved. This report is the result of the team’s efforts and is based upon the best available information and all known facts that have been accumulated. In addition to outlining the fire conditions leading up to the 2007 siege, this report presents statistics —including availability of firefighting resources, acreage engaged, and weather conditions—alongside the strategies that were employed by fire commanders to create a complete day-by-day account of the firefighting effort. The ability to protect the lives, property, and natural resources of the residents of California is contingent upon the strength of cooperation and coordination among federal, state and local firefighting agencies.
  • ABSTRACT This Paper Outlines the Subject Matter of Research

    ABSTRACT This Paper Outlines the Subject Matter of Research

    Invited Lecture An Overview of Research on Wildland Fire FRANK A. ALBINI Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Montana State Univers~ty P.O. Box 173800 Bozeman MT 5971 7-3800 USA ABSTRACT This paper outlines the subject matter of research on the physics and phenomenology of' wildland fire, focusing on topics that bear upon issues of fire control and fire safety. Motivations for research on fire phenomenology are identified as arising from the activities necessary to achieve fire-related objectives, including acceptable levels of fire safety. Differences in the activities, techniques, and tactical objectives for control and prevention of' fires in natural fuels and in manmade structures are noted. Sources of wildland fire research information and operational planning aids are identified, and some cautions are ventured concerning their use by nonspecialists. KEYWORDS: Wildfire, wildland fire, natural fuels INTRODUCTION In preparing an overview of research on wildland fire, it is tempting simply to survey the literature of the field, outlining areas of investigation, pointing out significant findings and tracing the development of knowledge from early investigators to the present state of the art. But to bring such a survey to this audience of distinguished scientists with research interests in fire safety poses a unique challenge. This is because, while this group's efforts are focused mainly upon fire in manmade structures, many of its studies are relevant to, and are applied in, modeling of wildland fire phenomenology. But the converse does not seem to be the case. Results of wildland fire research are seldom cited in the literature of fire safety research as it is done by this audience.
  • Naian Liu 2020 Candidate Profile: the Combustion Institute Board of Directors

    Naian Liu 2020 Candidate Profile: the Combustion Institute Board of Directors

    The Combustion Institute 5001 Baum Boulevard, Suite 644 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213-1851 USA Ph: (412) 687-1366 Fax: (412) 687-0340 [email protected] CombustionInstitute.org Naian Liu 2020 Candidate Profile: The Combustion Institute Board of Directors Reasons for Nomination Although fire has been a topic of interest to the Combustion Institute since its very foundation in 1958, our understanding of fire remains limited. As Hoyt C. Hottel (1903–1998) described, "A case can be made for fire being, next to life processes, the most complex of phenomena to understand". The complexity of fires comes from that there is a huge number of different fires that involve complex interactions among chemical reactions, heat transfer, and fluid mechanics, with diverse scenarios and controlling mechanisms. The discipline of fire science is less mature than other combustion topics, and more decades of fruitful research are required to gain a full understanding of this natural combustion phenomenon. My major motivation for serving the Board of Directors is to promote combustion research in the field of fire science. During the past 20 years, I have been dedicated to the theoretical and experimental studies on the combustion of extreme fire behaviors in large-scale fires. If elected to the Board of Directors, I will endeavor to promote cross-disciplinary research aiming at closer collaboration between combustion science and fire science. I commit to serve the international combustion community with the same rigor and enthusiasm that have enabled me to serve the fire community. See the next page for the candidate’s curriculum vitae. ©2020 The Combustion Institute BIOGRAPHICAL DATA of Naian Liu Naian Liu is currently a professor at the University of Science and Technology of China (USTC).
  • The 2007 Southern California Wildfires: Lessons in Complexity

    The 2007 Southern California Wildfires: Lessons in Complexity

    fire The 2007 Southern California Wildfires: Lessons in Complexity s is evidenced year after year, the na- ture of the “fire problem” in south- Jon E. Keeley, Hugh Safford, C.J. Fotheringham, A ern California differs from most of Janet Franklin, and Max Moritz the rest of the United States, both by nature and degree. Nationally, the highest losses in ϳ The 2007 wildfire season in southern California burned over 1,000,000 ac ( 400,000 ha) and property and life caused by wildfire occur in included several megafires. We use the 2007 fires as a case study to draw three major lessons about southern California, but, at the same time, wildfires and wildfire complexity in southern California. First, the great majority of large fires in expansion of housing into these fire-prone southern California occur in the autumn under the influence of Santa Ana windstorms. These fires also wildlands continues at an enormous pace cost the most to contain and cause the most damage to life and property, and the October 2007 fires (Safford 2007). Although modest areas of were no exception because thousands of homes were lost and seven people were killed. Being pushed conifer forest in the southern California by wind gusts over 100 kph, young fuels presented little barrier to their spread as the 2007 fires mountains experience the same negative ef- reburned considerable portions of the area burned in the historic 2003 fire season. Adding to the size fects of long-term fire suppression that are of these fires was the historic 2006–2007 drought that contributed to high dead fuel loads and long evident in other western forests (e.g., high distance spotting.
  • 1983 Center for Fire Research Annual Conference on Fire Research

    1983 Center for Fire Research Annual Conference on Fire Research

    1983 CENTER FOR FIRE RESEARCH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON FIRE RESEARCH (Summaries of Research Grants and CFR In-House Programs) August 23-25, 1983 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Bureau of Standards National Engineering Laboratory Center for Fire Research Washington, D.C. 20234 July 1983 Preprint of the 1983 Center for Fire Research Annual Conference on Fire Research to be Held August 23-25, 1983 QC 100 .U56 #82-2612- 1983 CENTER FOR FIRE RESEARCH ANNUAL CONFERENCE ON FIRE RESEARCH (Summaries of Research Grants and CFR In-House Programs) August 23-25, 1983 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Bureau of Standards National Engineering Laboratory Center for Fire Research Washington, D.C. 20234 July 1983 Malcolm Baldrige, Secretary of Commerce Ernest Ambler, Director, National Bureau of Standards Preprint of the 1983 Center for Fire Research Annual Conference on Fire Research to be Held August 23-25, 1983 — FOREWORD The Seventh Annual Conference on Fire Research honors Professor Howard Emmons who retires from Harvard University this year. Professor Emmons has provided leadership and inspiration to many in this field as attested by the breadth and depth of the topics in the conference modeling of fire growth, flame phenomena and spread, diffusion flames and radiation, fire plumes , extinction and suppression— and the contributions of those he has taught. Howard Emmons has demonstrated the viability of scientifically based fire protection engineering practice. Of course, much remains to be done. The conference program and papers (to be published separately) provide a good indication of where we are in a numoer or crt-txcal areas of tare science.
  • Synthesis of Knowledge of Extreme Fire Behavior: Volume I for Fire Managers

    Synthesis of Knowledge of Extreme Fire Behavior: Volume I for Fire Managers

    United States Department of Agriculture Synthesis of Knowledge of Forest Service Pacific Northwest Extreme Fire Behavior: Research Station General Technical Volume I for Fire Managers Report PNW-GTR-854 November 2011 Paul A. Werth, Brian E. Potter, Craig B. Clements, Mark A. Finney, Scott L. Goodrick, Martin E. Alexander, Miguel G. Cruz, Jason A. Forthofer, and Sara S. McAllister A SUMMARY OF KNOWLEDGE FROM THE The Forest Service of the U.S. Department of Agriculture is dedicated to the principle of multiple use management of the Nation’s forest resources for sustained yields of wood, water, forage, wildlife, and recreation. Through forestry research, cooperation with the States and private forest owners, and management of the national forests and national grasslands, it strives—as directed by Congress—to provide increasingly greater service to a growing Nation. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 1400 Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD).
  • Fire Research and Safety

    Fire Research and Safety

    INST. OF A111D7 n?^t3 NBS PUBLICATIONS OF r O NBS SPECIAL PUBLICATION CO 639 Q * U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE/Nationai Bureau of Standards Fire Research and Safety 100 .U57 639 C.2 NATIONAL BUREAU OF STANDARDS The National Bureau of Standards' was established by an act of Congress on March 3, 1901. The Bureau's overall goal is to strengthen and advance the Nation's science and technology and facilitate their effective application for public benefit. To this end, the Bureau conducts research and provides: (1) a basis for the Nation's physical measurement system, (2) scientific and technological services for industry and government, (3) a technical basis for equity in trade, and (4) technical services to promote public safety. The Bureau's technical work is per- formed by the National Measurement Laboratory, the National Engineering Laboratory, and the Institute for Computer Sciences and Technology. THE NATIONAL MEASUREMENT LABORATORY provides the national system of physical and chemical and materials measurement; coordinates the system with measurement systems of other nations and furnishes essential services leading to accurate and uniform physical and chemical measurement throughout the Nation's scientific community, industry, and commerce; conducts materials research leading to improved methods of measurement, standards, and data on the properties of materials needed by industry, commerce, educational institutions, and Government; provides advisory and research services to other Government agencies; develops, produces, and distributes
  • Wildfire Impacts of Poorly-Planned Development in San Diego County

    Wildfire Impacts of Poorly-Planned Development in San Diego County

    November 13, 2018 Via Electronic Mail and Hand Delivery (with references) San Diego County Board of Supervisors Attn: David Hall Clerk of the Board of Supervisors 1600 Pacific Highway, Room 335 San Diego, CA 92101 [email protected] Re: Wildfire Impacts of Poorly-planned Development in San Diego County Dear Supervisors: These comments are submitted on behalf of the Center for Biological Diversity (Center) regarding the approval or pending approval of the following Projects: 1. Warner Ranch 2. Lilac Hills 3. Newland Sierra 4. Valiano 5. Harmony Grove Village South 6. Otay Ranch Village 14, 16, 19 7. Otay Ranch Village 13 8. Otay 250 Sunroad 9. Project Specific Requests (PSRs) While the Center has many concerns regarding the environmental impacts and inadequate analyses provided in the Environmental Impact Reports of the proposed Projects, the purpose of this letter is to voice our concern regarding the public safety impacts of these poorly-planned, sprawl developments in fire-prone chaparral ecosystems in San Diego County. The Center reviewed the Environmental Impact Report of each Project to determine the cumulative impacts of these developments on wildfire risk and analyze the adequacy of proposed mitigation measures. Project footprints were compared to the fire history and fire threat of the region, as identified by state agencies (the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection [Cal Fire] and the California Public Utilities Commission [CPUC]), and the total number of housing units and potential residents for all the developments were calculated. The proposed developments would be placed in natural landscapes dominated by fire- prone native chaparral and coastal sage scrub habitats that rely on wildfires to persist.
  • Laboratory Studies of Fire Whirls (Preliminary)

    Laboratory Studies of Fire Whirls (Preliminary)

    Laboratory Studies of Fire Whirls (preliminary) Alexander J. Smits, Katie A. Hartl, Stacy Guo and Frederick L. Dryer Princeton University Coupled Atmosphere‐Bushfire Modelling Workshop 16‐18 May 2012 High Reynolds number in the lab: compressed air up to 200 atm as the working fluid Princeton/ONR Hgh Reynolds number Princeton/DARPA/ONR Superpipe: Test Facility: boundary layer flow Fully-developed pipe flow 3 6 3 3 ReD = 31 x 10 to 35 x 10 Reθ = 5 x 10 to 220 x 10 Re = up to 106 Re⎮ = up to 75,000 τ Reλ = up to 2000 Fric & Roshko, 1994; Kelso & Smits, 1995 QuickTime™ and a h264 decompressor are needed to see this picture. Fire tornado Kentucky “Bourbon,” Josh Grimes Examples of Fire Whirls • Peshtigo Fire, WI – 1871 (>1000 deaths) • Hifukusho-ato, Tokyo – 1923 (~38,000 deaths) • Great Chicago Fire, USA – 1871 • Hiroshima, Dresden Hamburg • Mann Gulch Fire – 1949 (13 deaths) • Indians Fire, CA – 2008 (4 casualties) • (plume shedding, cold fronts, L-shaped fires) Laboratory experiments Rotating screen setup Tangential slit setup (Emmons and Ying, 1966) (Byram and Martin, 1962) Emmons and Ying (1967) Byram and Martin (1962) Previous work • Emmons and Ying (1966) –rotating frame qualitative • Byram and Martin (1962) –fixed frame qualitative • Saito and Cremers (1995) –fixed frame apparatus • Satoh and Yang (1996) –fixed frame qualitative • Hassan (2005) –fixed frame quantitative • Akhmetov (2007) –rotating frame quantitative • Lei (2011) –fixed frame quantitative Fire Whirl Principles Emmons and Ying (1967) Whirls occur: 1.ambient vorticity
  • The Prediction of Fire Propagation in Enclosure Fires

    The Prediction of Fire Propagation in Enclosure Fires

    The Prediction of Fire Propagation in Enclosure Fires F. JIA, E.R. GALEA and M.K. PATEL Fire Safety Engineering Group University of Greenwich London SE 18 6PF, UK ABSTRACT In this paper we present some early work concerned with the development of a simple solid fuel combustion model incorporated within a Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) framework The model is intended for use in engineering applications of fire field modelling and represents an extension of this technique to situations involving the combustion of solid cellulosic hels A simple solid &el combustion model consisting of a thermal pyrolysis model, a six flux radiation model and an eddy- dissipation model for gaseous combustion have been developed and implemented within the CFD code CFDS-FLOW3D The model is briefly described and demonstrated through two applications involving fire spread in a compartment with a plywood lined ceiling. The two scenarios considered involve a fire in an open and closed compartment The model is shown to be able to qualitatively predict behaviours similar to flashover - in the case of the open room - and backdrafl - in the case of the initially closed room. KEYWORDS: CFD, field model, pyrolysis, solid fuel combustion, flashover, backdraft INTRODUCTION Over the past 10 years considerable effort has been expended in developing fire field models capable of predicting the development of hazardous conditions within fire enclosures[l-41. At the heart of these fire field models is the Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) code and a large proportion of these models are based on commercial CFD software such as PHOENICS[S] and FLOW3D[6].
  • Arnaud Trouvé 2018 Candidate Profile: the Combustion Institute Board of Directors

    Arnaud Trouvé 2018 Candidate Profile: the Combustion Institute Board of Directors

    The Combustion Institute 5001 Baum Boulevard, Suite 644 Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213-1851 USA Ph: (412) 687-1366 Fax: (412) 687-0340 [email protected] CombustionInstitute.org Arnaud Trouvé 2018 Candidate Profile: The Combustion Institute Board of Directors Reasons for Nomination I have been involved with The Combustion Institute (CI) through the US Eastern States Section (ESSCI) and the Joint US Sections (USSCI) since 2005 and 2011, respectively. I have served in different capacities: as member or Chair of the Executive Boards of ESSCI/USSCI; as Chair of the Program and Host Committees of ESSCI/USSCI technical meetings; as an organizer of workshops; and as a member of the Editorial Boards of the premier journals in combustion and fire science. I have always been driven by the conviction that the strength of a research community lies as much on the research accomplishments of its individual members as it does on the strength of its infrastructure. The Combustion Arnaud Trouvé Institute is the infrastructure of the combustion science community. I have worked at ESSCI/USSCI towards transforming the US Sections from associations with a limited agenda, primarily focused on organizing the next technical meeting, to associations with a more comprehensive and ambitious agenda. Areas in which I would like to now serve CI at the international level include: outreach activities (general public, students, industry); professional development (early-career development, mentorship program); infrastructure to share teaching material, research tools and data; Summer schools; academia-industry relations; governance; diversity; ethics; publications. See the next page for the candidate’s curriculum vitae. © 2018 The Combustion Institute Arnaud TROUVÉ Professor, Department of Fire Protection Engineering, University of Maryland (UMD) 3104D J.M.
  • Fire Dynamics and Forensic Analysis of Liquid Fuel Fires

    Fire Dynamics and Forensic Analysis of Liquid Fuel Fires

    The author(s) shown below used Federal funds provided by the U.S. Department of Justice and prepared the following final report: Document Title: Fire Dynamics and Forensic Analysis of Liquid Fuel Fires Author: Christopher L. Mealy, Matthew E. Benfer, Daniel T. Gottuk Document No.: 238704 Date Received: May 2012 Award Number: 2008-DN-BX-K168 This report has not been published by the U.S. Department of Justice. To provide better customer service, NCJRS has made this Federally- funded grant final report available electronically in addition to traditional paper copies. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S. Department of Justice. FIRE DYNAMICS AND FORENSIC ANALYSIS OF LIQUID FUEL FIRES Final Report Grant No. 2008-DN-BX-K168 Prepared by: Christopher L. Mealy, Matthew E. Benfer, and Daniel T. Gottuk Hughes Associates, Inc. 3610 Commerce Drive, Suite 817 Baltimore, MD 21227 Ph. 410-737-8677 FAX 410-737-8688 February 18, 2011 This document is a research report submitted to the U.S. Department of Justice. This report has not been published by the Department. Opinions or points of view expressed are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the official position or policies of the U.S.