Download Download

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Download Download Journal ofCoastal Research 1168-1169 Royal PalmBeach, Florida Summer 1998 .tttlllll". ~ DISCUSSION - Discussion of: Johnson, M. E. and Libbey, L. K., 1997. Global Review of Upper Pleistocene (Substage 5e) Rocky Shores: Tectonic Segregation, Substrate Variation and Biological DiversityJournal of Coastal Research, 13(2), 297-307. Stephen K. Donovan Department of Geography and Geology University of th e West Indies Mona, Kingston 7, J amaica The rece nt review of rocky shorelines of th e Pleistocene to be tectonically active, thi s is due to their positi ons adjacent substage 5e by J OHNSON and LIBBEY (1997 ) is a welcome to the North Ca ribbean Plate Bound ary. Simil arly, Gra nd contribution to a field that is somewhat under studied. How­ Cayman is a subae rially exposed summit of the Cayma n ever , although I warmly appla ud the initiative of the authors Ridge, whi ch form s the northern ma rgin of the Cayma n in compiling and interpreting this fascinating database, I do Tren ch (JONES, 1994 ). The Cayma n Islands have been th e query whether the desire to det ermine a consistent tectonic site of limestone deposition since the Oligocene. classification of such shore lines has not led to the true range In conclu sion, J OHNSON and LIBBEY (1997) have classified of settings becoming partially ma sked by "shoehorn ing". Thi s four Antillean islands, from ea ch of which Pleistocene sub­ is particularly noticeable to a Caribbean work er like myself, stage 5e rocky shorelines have been re porte d, as occur ring who sees substage 5e rocky shorelines in Barbad os, Grand within an "island arc" tectonic setting. In fact , of these, only Cayman, Haiti and Jamaica (JOHNSON and LIBBEY, 1997 ) all Barbados can be regarded as bein g assoc iate d with the acti ve being classified together under th e broad tectonic setting of Lesser Antilles island arc. The other three examples lie in "island arcs". tectonically active regions adjacent to th e Northern Carib­ What is an island arc? I choose the following definition bean Plate boundary. In consequence, it is suggeste d th at "is­ from a recent publication, although most physical geology land arc" is an inad equ ate and erroneous description for textbooks and dictionaries will say much the sam e th ing; "A these occurrences. Rather, they represent occur re nces adja­ group of islands usually with a curving archlike pattern, gen­ cent to an acti ve plate margin, that betw een th e North Amer­ erally convex towards th e open ocean, having a deep trench ican and Caribbea n Plates. Thus, they are closer in tectonic or trough on the convex side and usually enclosing a deep setting to the "active contine ntal margin" setting of J OHNSON basin on th e concave side" (PARKE R, 1997 , p.186). and LIBBEY (1997 ), which might constructively be re-n am ed Thus armed with a working definition of an island arc, we as the "active plate margin s" setting to include such exam­ are in a position to assess the claims of the various Antillean ples. islands mentioned above . The only volcanically active island arc in the region is in the Lesser Antilles (WADGE, 1994 ), ACKNOWLEDGMENTS such as is demonstrated by the ongoing eruptions in Mont­ serrat (WILLIAM S, 1997 ). Although none of the listed islands This comment was written during the peri od of National falls precisely within the arc sensu stricto, Barbados is the Geogr aphic Society grant #5722-96, which is gratefully ac­ closest geogr aphically. It represents the exposed apex of an kn owledged. accre tiona ry prism, the Barbados Ridge (SPEED, 1994), and is entirely sedimentary in origin , but is nevertheless part of the broad island arc environment. However , thi s is not true LITERATURE CITED of the other three islands. Both J amaica and Haiti (which cons titutes the western end of th e island of Hispaniola) orig­ J OH NSON M.E. and LIB BEY, L.K., 1997. Global review of Upper ina te d as part of an earlier island arc system (LEWIS and Pleistocene (substage fie) rocky shores: Tectonic segregation, sub­ strate variation, and biological diversity. Journal of Coastal Re­ DRAPER, 1990; MONTGOMERY et al., 1994 ), but this was a search, 13, 297-307. Cretaceous phenomenon and both islands have been volcan­ J ONES, B., 1994. The Cayman Islands. In: DONOVAN, S.K.andJACK­ ically quiescent since the Paleogene. Although both continue SON, T.A.,(eds.), Caribbean Geology: An Int roduction. Kingston: Discussion 1169 Univers ity of th e West Indi es Publisher s' Association, pp. 87- 109. SPEED, R.C., 1994. Barbados and th e Lesser Antilles Forearc. In: LEWIS, J .F. and D RA P ~;R , G., 1990. Geology and tect onic evolutio n DONOVAN , S.K. and JACKSON, T.A,(eds.), Caribbean Geology:An of the northern Caribbean margin . In: DENGO, G. and CASE, J .E., Intro duction. Kingst on: University of the West Indies Publish er s' (eds.), The Geology of North America, Volume H. The Caribbean Association, pp. 179-192. Region. Bould er : Geological Society of Ameri ca, pp. 77-140. WADGE, G., 1994 . The Lesser Antilles. In : DONOVAN, S.K., and MONTGOM ERY, H.; PESSAGNO, E.A, JR., and PINDELL, J .L., 1990 . A J ACKSON, T.A, (eds.), Caribbean Geology: An Introduction. Kings­ 195 Ma terr an e in a 165 Ma sea : Pacific origin of th e Caribbean ton: University of the West Indies Publishers' Association, pp. Plat e. GSA Today, 4(1), 3- 6. 167-177. PARKE R, S.P., (ed.), 1997. McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Earth Sciences WILLIAMS, AR., 1997. Montserrat: Under th e volca no. National Geo­ (International Edition). New York: McGraw-Hill, xii + 468 pp. graphic, 192(1), 58-75. Journal of Coastal Research, Vol. 14, No. 3, 1998.
Recommended publications
  • Kinematic Reconstruction of the Caribbean Region Since the Early Jurassic
    Earth-Science Reviews 138 (2014) 102–136 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Earth-Science Reviews journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/earscirev Kinematic reconstruction of the Caribbean region since the Early Jurassic Lydian M. Boschman a,⁎, Douwe J.J. van Hinsbergen a, Trond H. Torsvik b,c,d, Wim Spakman a,b, James L. Pindell e,f a Department of Earth Sciences, Utrecht University, Budapestlaan 4, 3584 CD Utrecht, The Netherlands b Center for Earth Evolution and Dynamics (CEED), University of Oslo, Sem Sælands vei 24, NO-0316 Oslo, Norway c Center for Geodynamics, Geological Survey of Norway (NGU), Leiv Eirikssons vei 39, 7491 Trondheim, Norway d School of Geosciences, University of the Witwatersrand, WITS 2050 Johannesburg, South Africa e Tectonic Analysis Ltd., Chestnut House, Duncton, West Sussex, GU28 OLH, England, UK f School of Earth and Ocean Sciences, Cardiff University, Park Place, Cardiff CF10 3YE, UK article info abstract Article history: The Caribbean oceanic crust was formed west of the North and South American continents, probably from Late Received 4 December 2013 Jurassic through Early Cretaceous time. Its subsequent evolution has resulted from a complex tectonic history Accepted 9 August 2014 governed by the interplay of the North American, South American and (Paleo-)Pacific plates. During its entire Available online 23 August 2014 tectonic evolution, the Caribbean plate was largely surrounded by subduction and transform boundaries, and the oceanic crust has been overlain by the Caribbean Large Igneous Province (CLIP) since ~90 Ma. The consequent Keywords: absence of passive margins and measurable marine magnetic anomalies hampers a quantitative integration into GPlates Apparent Polar Wander Path the global circuit of plate motions.
    [Show full text]
  • A Dangling Slab, Amplified Arc Volcanism, Mantle Flow and Seismic Anisotropy in the Kamchatka Plate Corner
    AGU Geodynamics Series Volume 30, PLATE BOUNDARY ZONES Edited by Seth Stein and Jeffrey T. Freymueller, p. 295-324 1 A Dangling Slab, Amplified Arc Volcanism, Mantle Flow and Seismic Anisotropy in the Kamchatka Plate Corner Jeffrey Park,1 Yadim Levin,1 Mark Brandon,1 Jonathan Lees,2 Valerie Peyton,3 Evgenii Gordeev ) 4 Alexei Ozerov ,4 Book chapter in press with "Plate Boundary Zones," edited by Seth Stein and Jeffrey Freymuller Abstract The Kamchatka peninsula in Russian East Asia lies at the junction of a transcurrent plate boundary, aligned with the western Aleutian Islands, and a steeply-dipping subduction zone with near-normal convergence. Seismicity patterns and P-wave tomography argue that subducting Pacific lithosphere terminates at the Aleutian junction, and that the downdip extension (>150km depth) of the slab edge is missing. Seismic observables of elastic anisotropy (SKS splitting and Love-Rayleigh scattering) are consistent \Vith asthenospheric strain that rotates from trench-parallel beneath the descending slab to trench-normal beyond its edge. Present-day arc volcanism is concentrated near the slab edge, in the Klyuchevskoy and Sheveluch eruptive centers. Loss of the downdip slab edge, whether from thermo-convective or ductile instability, and subsequent "slab-window" mantle return flow is indicated by widespread Quaternary volcanism in the Sredinny Range inland of Klyuchevskoy and Sheveluch, as well as the inferred Quaternary uplift of the central Kamchatka depression. The slab beneath Klyuchevskoy has shallower dip (35°) than the subduction zone farther south (55°) suggesting a transient lofting of the slab edge, either from asthenospheric flow or the loss of downdip load.
    [Show full text]
  • Arc Dacite Genesis Pathways: Evidence from Mafic Enclaves and Their Hosts in Aegean Lavas ⁎ G.F
    Lithos 95 (2007) 346–362 www.elsevier.com/locate/lithos Arc dacite genesis pathways: Evidence from mafic enclaves and their hosts in Aegean lavas ⁎ G.F. Zellmer a,b, , S.P. Turner c a Institute of Earth Sciences, Academia Sinica, 128 Academia Road, Section 2, Nankang, Taipei 11529, Taiwan, ROC b Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory, 61 Route 9W, Palisades, New York 10964, USA c GEMOC, Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia Received 4 January 2006; accepted 17 August 2006 Available online 25 September 2006 Abstract Mafic enclaves are commonly found in intermediate arc magmas, and their occurrence has been linked to eruption triggering by pre-eruptive magma mixing processes. New major, trace, Sr–Nd and U–Th isotope data of rocks from Nisyros in the Aegean volcanic arc are presented here. Pre-caldera samples display major and trace element trends that are consistent with fractionation of magnetite and apatite within intermediate compositions, and zircon within felsic compositions, and preclude extensive hybrid- ization between mafic and felsic magmas. In contrast, post-caldera dacites form a mixing trend towards their mafic enclaves. In terms of U-series isotopes, most samples show small 238U excesses of up to ∼10%. Mafic enclaves have significantly higher U/Th ratios than their dacitic host lavas, precluding simple models that relate the mafic and felsic magmas by fractionation or aging alone. A more complicated petrogenetic scenario is required. The post-caldera dacites are interpreted to represent material remobilized from a young igneous protolith following influx of fresh mafic magma, consistent with the U–Th data and with Sr–Nd isotope constraints that point to very limited (b10%) assimilation of old crust at Nisyros.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of the Island Arc of Japan and the Formation of Granites in the Circum-Pacific Belt
    JOURNALOF GEOMAGNETISMAND GEOELECTRICITY VOL. 23, No. 3, 4, 1971 The Evolution of the Island Arc of Japan and the Formation of Granites in the Circum-Pacific Belt Naoto KAWAI, Tadashi NAKAJIMA and Kimio HIROOKa+ Department of Material Physics, Faculty of Engineering Science, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan (Received April 27, 1971) Abstract From a palaeomagnetic study and radiometric investigation of Cretaceous intrusive rocks it was recently suggested that the Palaeozoic basin formed in the northeastern Japan was severely deformed at the end of Mesozoic era. This resulted in a narrowing and shortening of the entire length of the Japanese islands. The northeastern block moved southwestward by approximately 200km and southwestern northeastward by 150km, whereas the middle block remained relative- ly unmoved but was compressed between the two blocks. As the compressional forces increased, first the Palaeozoic sediments of the central block were uplifted, and subsequently the "median line" was formed. Along the latter line, the northern half of the southern block moved eastward relative to the southern half. A strong uniaxial stress superimposed upon a hydrostatic one oc- curred associated with the relative movement. The sediments as the results recrystallized to form the three major metamorphic belts. During and after these movements, the compressed zone in the middle of the island was push- ed to the east to form a great warp in the island. Such a simple model of a bend accompanied by a tension crack as predicted by Kawai, Ito and Kume several years ago was reconsidered. The contraction of the basin was finally related to the eastward drift of Asian continent upon the Creta- ceous Pacific sea floor.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring Submarine Arc Volcanoes Steven Carey University of Rhode Island, [email protected]
    University of Rhode Island DigitalCommons@URI Graduate School of Oceanography Faculty Graduate School of Oceanography Publications 2007 Exploring Submarine Arc Volcanoes Steven Carey University of Rhode Island, [email protected] Haraldur Sigurdsson University of Rhode Island Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.uri.edu/gsofacpubs Terms of Use All rights reserved under copyright. Citation/Publisher Attribution Carey, S., and H. Sigurdsson. 2007. Exploring submarine arc volcanoes. Oceanography 20(4):80–89, https://doi.org/10.5670/ oceanog.2007.08. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5670/oceanog.2007.08 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School of Oceanography at DigitalCommons@URI. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate School of Oceanography Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@URI. For more information, please contact [email protected]. This article has This been published in or collective redistirbution of any portion of this article by photocopy machine, reposting, or other means is permitted only with the approval of The approval portionthe ofwith any permitted articleonly photocopy by is of machine, reposting, this means or collective or other redistirbution SP ec I A L Iss U E On Ocean E X P L O R ATIO N Oceanography , Volume 20, Number 4, a quarterly journal of The 20, Number 4, a quarterly , Volume O ceanography Society. Copyright 2007 by The 2007 by Copyright Society. ceanography Exploring O ceanography Society. All rights All reserved. Society. ceanography O Submarine Arc Volcanoes or Th e [email protected] Send Society. ceanography to: correspondence all B Y S T even C A R E Y an D H A R A LDUR SIGURD ss O N Three quarters of Earth’s volcanic activ- although a significant part of arc volca- tion of tsunamis (Latter, 1981).
    [Show full text]
  • Viscous Volcanos 2016 Grades 6-8 (Earth Science)
    2016 Deepwater Exploration of the Marianas Viscous Volcanoes Focus Serpentine mud volcanoes Grade Level 6-8 (Earth Science) Focus Question What are serpentine mud volcanoes and how are they different from magma volcanoes? Learning Objectives • Students will describe mud volcanoes, contrast them with magma volcanoes, and explain how these structures, the Mariana Islands, and the Mariana Trench are related to the motion of tectonic plates. Materials For each serpentine mud volcano model: q Plastic tubing, approximately 1/4” outer diameter, 1/8” inside diameter q 2-liter plastic soda bottle q Fast-setting epoxy glue q Air-cure modeling clay, approximately 500 ml q Fine sand, table salt, or finely ground coffee q Drill and drill bit to match outside diameter of plastic tubing For each sediment-derived mud volcano model: q 2-liter plastic soda bottle q Cardboard or acrylic disk, diameter slightly smaller than soda bottle diameter q Fine sand or clay q Drill and drill bits, 3/8” and 1/2” For each magma volcano model: q Modeling materials, depending upon techniques chosen (see Learning Procedure, Step 1d and Step 4. Image captions/credits on Page 2. Audio-Visual Materials q (Optional) Interactive whiteboard Teaching Time If you need assistance with this document, please contact NOAA 1 Two or three 45-minute class periods Fisheries at (808) 725-5000. www.oceanexplorer.noaa.gov Viscous Volcanos 2016 Grades 6-8 (Earth Science) Seating Arrangement Groups of two to four students Maximum Number of Students 30 Key Words Mariana Arc Serpentine Mud volcano Mariana Trench Magma volcano Tectonic plate Images from Page 1 top to bottom: This Google Earth map shows the operating area of the 2016 Deepwater Background Information Exploration of the Marianas Expedition.
    [Show full text]
  • 53. Petrologic Evolution of the Mariana Arc and Back-Arc Basin System— a Synthesis of Drilling Results in the South Philippine Sea1
    53. PETROLOGIC EVOLUTION OF THE MARIANA ARC AND BACK-ARC BASIN SYSTEM— A SYNTHESIS OF DRILLING RESULTS IN THE SOUTH PHILIPPINE SEA1 James H. Natland, Deep Sea Drilling Project, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, California and John Tarney, Department of Geology, University of Leicester, LEI 7RH, United Kingdom ABSTRACT The results of Deep Sea Drilling Project Leg 60 pertaining to the petrologic evolution of the Mariana Trough and Mariana arc are summarized in Part I. The rocks recovered at five principal sites are exceptionally diverse, including gabbros and calc-alkalic andesites derived from the West Mariana Ridge; fresh and hydrothermally altered basalts in the Mariana Trough; and interbedded boninites and arc tholeiites in the forearc region between the modern arc and the trench. Part I outlines the stratigraphy, alteration, and petrology of these rock suites and summarizes hypotheses on their origin. Part II integrates these results with those of previous DSDP legs in the region, and with island sampling, to present a composite 40-m.y. history of the Mariana arc system. Arc volcanism began in the Eocene, probably as a result of a change to the west in the motion of the Pacific plate. A north-south-trending fracture zone was transformed into a trench-subduction complex, trapping a portion of the Pacific plate in the Philippine Sea. The crust of this basin, drilled in Hole 447 (Leg 59), has the composition of typical ocean floor basalt. The earliest Eocene arc was built up dominantly of arc tholeiite and boninitic lavas, with lesser calc-alkalic lavas, based on the results of Leg 60 drilling at Sites 458 and 459 in the forearc region; Leg 59, Site 448, on the Palau-Kyushu Ridge; and exposures on the islands of Palau, Guam, and Saipan.
    [Show full text]
  • Inherited Zircons Reveal a Gondwana Continental Fragment Beneath East Java, Indonesia ⁎ H.R
    Earth and Planetary Science Letters 258 (2007) 269–282 www.elsevier.com/locate/epsl The deep crust beneath island arcs: Inherited zircons reveal a Gondwana continental fragment beneath East Java, Indonesia ⁎ H.R. Smyth a, , P.J. Hamilton b, R. Hall a, P.D. Kinny b a SE Asia Research Group, Royal Holloway University of London, Egham, Surrey TW200EX, UK b Department of Applied Geology, Curtin University of Technology, Perth 6845, Australia Received 21 November 2006; received in revised form 21 March 2007; accepted 21 March 2007 Available online 1 April 2007 Editor: R.W. Carlson Abstract Inherited zircons in Cenozoic sedimentary and igneous rocks of East Java range in age from Archean to Cenozoic. The distribution of zircons reveals two different basement types at depth. The igneous rocks of the Early Cenozoic arc, found along the southeast coast, contain only Archean to Cambrian zircons. In contrast, clastic rocks of north and west of East Java contain Cretaceous zircons, which are not found in the arc rocks to the south. The presence of Cretaceous zircons supports previous interpretations that much of East Java is underlain by arc and ophiolitic rocks, accreted to the Southeast Asian margin during Cretaceous subduction. However, such accreted material cannot account for the older zircons. The age populations of Archean to Cambrian zircons in the arc rocks are similar to Gondwana crust. We interpret the East Java Early Cenozoic arc to be underlain by a continental fragment of Gondwana origin and not Cretaceous material as previously suggested. Melts rising through the crust, feeding the Early Cenozoic arc, picked up the ancient zircons through assimilation or partial melting.
    [Show full text]
  • Seismotectonic Modeling of the Repeating M 7-Class Disastrous Odawara Earthquake in the Izu Collision Zone, Central Japan
    Earth Planets Space, 56, 843–858, 2004 Seismotectonic modeling of the repeating M 7-class disastrous Odawara earthquake in the Izu collision zone, central Japan Katsuhiko Ishibashi Research Center for Urban Safety and Security/Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Kobe University, Kobe 657-8501, Japan (Received February 16, 2004; Revised July 15, 2004; Accepted July 21, 2004) Odawara City in central Japan, in the northernmost margin of the Philippine Sea (PHS) plate, suffered from severe earthquake disasters five times during the last 400 years with a mean repeat time of 73 years; in 1633, 1703, 1782, 1853 and 1923. In this region, non-volcanic Izu outer arc (IOA), the easternmost part of the PHS plate, has been subducted beneath Honshu (Japanese main island), and volcanic Izu inner arc (IIA) on the west of IOA has made multiple collision against Honshu. I hypothesize ‘West-Sagami-Bay Fracture’ (WSBF) beneath Odawara, a north-south striking tear fault within the PHS plate that has separated the descending IOA crust from the buoyant IIA crust, through examinations of multiple collision process and the PHS plate configuration. WSBF is considered a blind causative fault of the 1633, 1782 and 1853 M 7 Odawara earthquakes, and is inferred to have ruptured also during the 1703 and 1923 great Kanto earthquakes simultaneously with the interplate main fault. A presumable asperity on WSBF just beneath Odawara seems to control the temporal regularity of earthquake occurrence. Though WSBF has not yet been detected directly, it is considered an essential tectonic element in this region, which might be a fracture zone with a few or several kilometer thickness actually.
    [Show full text]
  • Aleutian Island Arc Magma Production Rates and Mechanisms
    https://doi.org/10.5194/se-2019-179 Preprint. Discussion started: 4 December 2019 c Author(s) 2019. CC BY 4.0 License. Aleutian island arc magma production rates and mechanisms Yongliang Bai1, Diya Zhang1, Dongdong Dong2, Shiguo Wu3, Zhenjie Wang1 1College of Ocean and Space Information, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, China 2Key Laboratory of Marine Geology and Environment, Institute of Oceanology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Qingdao 5 266071, China 3Institute of Deep-sea Science and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Sanya 572000, China Correspondence to: Yongliang Bai ([email protected]) Abstract. The variation in island arc magma production rates and their influencing mechanisms are of great significance since island arc magma is considered a main source of continental crust growth. The island arc magma directly originates from the 10 molten mantle wedge, and the mantle melting is driven by fluids or melts from the subducted slab. Slab dehydration flux mainly depends on the slab thermal structures, and subducted slab melting requires a sufficiently high temperature. For the Aleutian subduction system, the subducted Pacific Plate has diverse thermal structures due to the existing fracture zones, ridges and slab window, so it is an ideal region for arc magma production rate research. However, the previous estimations are based on seismic profiles that only provide magma production rates at specific regions of the Aleutian arc, and these results are 15 controversial. Here, we design a magma production rate estimation method based on gravity inversion constrained by deep seismic profiles. The first overview map of magma production rates along the Aleutian arc strike demonstrates that the magma production rates have the same trend as the slab dips, and the peaks correspond to the subduction of the fracture zones and ridges.
    [Show full text]
  • Geodynamic Evolution of the Palaeozoic Gondwana Margin in Western Argentina (Famatina-System)
    Second ISAG, Oxford (UK),21-231911993 531 GEODYNAMIC EVOLUTION OF THE PALMOZOIC GONDWWA MARGIN IN WESTERN ARGENTINA (FAJVWTINA-SYSTEM) . Rolf Mannheim Jnstitut fiir Allgemeine und Angewandte Geologie Luisenstr. 37,80333 München 2, Germany Los caracteres geoquimicos de los basaltos ordovicicos del Sistema deFamatina (SF) son comparables a los de basaltos calcoalcalinos modernos de arcos de islas oceinicos. Observaciones sedimentoi6gicas prueban la existencia de una Cuenca de retroarco entre el arc0 voldnico (SF) al oeste y el craton (Sierras Pampeanas) al este en el Ordovicico (relacionado a coordenadas actuales). Durante la colision del arco con el continentese intruyeron granitoides anatécticos corticales en el SF (Orogénesis Famatiniana). Como indicadores de un estadio poscolisional aparecen leucogranitos peralcalinos (Devonico?). En el mismo ambiente geotecthico del SF se intruyeronbasaltos de subducci6n. Los caracteres geoquimicos de estos basaltos correspondena los de basaltos calcoalcalinos de un borde continental activo como delactual tipo Chile. KEY WORDS: Famatina-Systern, island arc - back arc, collision, nlagmatism INTRODUCTION The Famatina System 0's) representsa lithostrati- graphically and structurally independent unit within the NW-argentinian Sierras (fjg.1). It is characterized by Lower Middleto Ordovician volcanosedimentary scquences, which areintruded by calcalkaline granitoids of Upper Ordovician to Devonian age and by syn- to postplutonic volcanic dykes. Accordingto Aceiiolaza and Toselli (1954) andToselli etal. (1991) the xnagnlatic characteristics of the FS advocate for a destructiv plate margin. In the concept of Willner et al. (1957) and Rapela et al. (1990) the Ordovician wcstem Gondwana margin included a volcanic arc in the region of the FS and a several.hundred km largezone of intrusion situated in the back of the arc.
    [Show full text]
  • Andesite and Dacite Genesis Via Contrasting Processes: the Geology and Geochemistry of El Valle Volcano, Panama Marc J
    Contrib Mineral Petrol (1991) 106:309-324 Contributions to Mineralogy and Petrology Springer-Verlag 1991 Andesite and dacite genesis via contrasting processes: the geology and geochemistry of El Valle Volcano, Panama Marc J. Defant 1, Lee F. Clark i Robert H. Stewart t, Mark S. Drummond 2, Jelle Z. de Boer 3, Ren~ C. Maury 4, Herv~ Bellon 5, Thomas E. Jackson 1, and Juan F. Restrepo 1 1 Department of Geology,University of South Florida, Tampa, FL 33620, USA 2 Department of Geology,University of Alabama at Birmingham,Birmingham, AL 35294, USA 3 Department of Earth and EnvironmentalSciences, Wesleyan University,Middletown, CT 06457, USA 4 Laboratoire de P6trologie et UA 1278, Universit6 de Bretagne Occidentale, 29287 Brest, France 5 Laboratoire de G~ochimieet de G~ochronologieet UA 1278, Universit6 de Bretagne Occidentale, 29287 Brest, France Received November 29, 1989/Accepted July 6, 1990 Abstract. The easternmost stratovolcano along the Cen- geochemical characteristics of subducted-lithosphere tral American arc is E1 Valle volcano, Panama. Several melting is generated apparently only where relatively hot andesitic and dacitic lava flows, which range in age 5- crust is subducted, based on recent work. The young 10 Ma, are termed the old group. After a long period dacite-genesis at E1 Valle volcano is related to the sub- of quiescence (approximately 3.4 Ma), volcanic activity duction of relatively hot lithosphere. resumed approximately 1.55 Ma with the emplacement of dacitic domes and the deposition of dacitic pyroclastic flows 0.9-0.2 Ma. These are referred to as the young group. All of the samples analyzed are calc-alkaline an- desites and dacites.
    [Show full text]