DOCSLIB.ORG

Monterey Bay Sanctuary Scenic Trail Monterey Bay Sanctuary Scenic Trail Vision Steering Committee for Santa Cruz Brochure County 2004

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Monterey Bay Sanctuary Scenic Trail Monterey Bay Sanctuary Scenic Trail Vision Steering Committee for Santa Cruz Brochure County 2004 MONTEREY BAY SANCTUARY SCENIC TRAIL MASTER PLAN July 2007 Prepared for: Transportation Agency for Monterey County alta Prepared by: Alta Planning + Design PLANNING + DESIGN ACKNOWLEDGMENTS LEAD PROJECT CONTRIBUTORS The following agencies and individuals were the primary contributors to the Monterey Bay Sanctuary Scenic Trail Master Plan. Numerous other individuals contributed through their participation in the Master Plan process, including members of the Technical Advisory Committee, other Transportation Agency for Monterey County staff, Sanctuary Scenic Trail Steering Committee, Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee, and members of the public. PROJECT SPONSOR Transportation Agency for Monterey County Bill Reichmuth, Former Director Debbie Hale, Executive Director Lisa Rheinheimer, Senior Transportation Planner TECHNICAL ADVISORY COMMITTEE Office of Sam Farr Congressman Sam Farr Alec Arago Association of Monterey Bay Area Governments Nick Papadakis, Executive Director John Akeman Santa Cruz County Regional Transportation Commission Pat Dellin, Former Executive Director George Dondero, Executive Director Tegan Speiser, Senior Transportation Planner LEAD CONSULTANT Alta Planning + Design George Hudson, Principal-in-Charge Michael Jones, Project Manager Nora De Cuir, Project Planner Jordan Secter, Project Designer SUBCONSULTANTS Bellinger Foster Steinmetz Mike Bellinger, Project Manager Creegan + D’Angelo Stan Kulakow, Project Manager Monterey Bay Sanctuary Scenic Trail Master Plan i FINAL Denise Duffy & Associates Josh Harwayne, Project Manager Matt Johnson, GIS Specialist ii Monterey Bay Scenic Sanctuary Trail Master Plan FINAL This page intentionally left blank. Monterey Bay Sanctuary Scenic Trail Master Plan iii FINAL TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................1-1 2. Goals, Policies, and Objectives ......................................................................................2-1 3. Existing Conditions.......................................................................................................3-1 4. Opportunities and Constraints Analysis .......................................................................4-1 5. Needs Analysis ..............................................................................................................5-1 6. Evaluation of Recommended System ............................................................................6-1 7. Implementation and Design...........................................................................................7-1 APPENDICES Appendix 1: Moss Landing Feasibility Study Appendix 2: Trail and Bikeway Types Appendix 3: Trail Crossings Appendix 4: Salinas River Crossing Options Appendix 5: Environmental Permitting Requirements Appendix 6: Trails and Agricultural Uses LIST OF FIGURES Figure 3-1 Existing Conditions......................................................................................3-3 Figure 4-1 Pacific Grove to Sand City...........................................................................4-2 Figure 4-2 Sand City to Marina .....................................................................................4-4 Figure 4-3 Marina to Salinas River ................................................................................4-4 Figure 4-4 Salinas River to Moss Landing......................................................................4-5 Figure 4-5 Moss Landing to Pajaro River ......................................................................4-6 Figure 4-6 Pajaro River to Northern Terminus.............................................................4-7 Figure 6-1 Monterey Bay Sanctuary Trail System.........................................................6-2 Figure 6-2 Segment 1: Pacific Grove..............................................................................6-6 Figure 6-3 Segment 2: Monterey....................................................................................6-9 Figure 6-4 Segment 3: Seaside ......................................................................................6-10 Figure 6-5 Segment 4A, 4B: Sand City ........................................................................6-13 Figure 6-6 Segment 4A, 4B Sand City Detail...............................................................6-16 Figure 6-7 Segment 5 and 5A: Fort Ord Dunes...........................................................6-17 Figure 6-8 Segment 6: Marina State Beach...................................................................6-20 Figure 6-9 Segment 7: Marina Trail .............................................................................6-22 Figure 6-10 Segment 8: Salinas River Crossing..............................................................6-25 Figure 6-11 Segment 8A, 8B: Salinas River Crossing.....................................................6-26 Figure 6-12 Segment 9: Lapis Connection; Segment 10: Salinas National Wildlife Refuge; Segment 11: Neponset Road Access Point; Segment 12: Salinas River ............................6-29 iv Monterey Bay Scenic Sanctuary Trail Master Plan FINAL Figure 6-13 Segment 13: Monterey Dune Trail; Segment 14: Molera Road-Moss Landing6-35 Figure 6-14 Cross Section of Molera Road....................................................................6-38 Figure 6-15 Segment 15A and 15B: Moss Landing.........................................................6-42 Figure 6-16 Segment 16A, and 16B: Zmudowski State Beach........................................6-45 Figure 6-17 Segment 17A and 17B: Pajaro River Trail ..................................................6-49 Figure 7-1 Trail Cross Sections: Recreational Type A...................................................7-6 Figure 7-2 Trail Cross Sections: Unpaved Wide Trail ...................................................7-7 Figure 7-3 Trail Cross Sections: Boardwalk...................................................................7-8 Figure 7-4 Trail Cross Sections: Paved Bikeway............................................................7-9 Figure 7-5 Santa Cruz Monterey Scenic Trail Signage Types ......................................7-13 Figure 7-6 Fencing Types ............................................................................................7-17 Figure 7-7 Example of Major Trailhead Amenities .....................................................7-19 Figure 7-8 Bollard Designs...........................................................................................7-20 Figure 7-9 Path Approach Design ...............................................................................7-21 Figure 7-10 Entry Sign Examples ..................................................................................7-22 Figure 7-11 Potential Locations for Interpretive Exhibits s...........................................7-26 Figure 7-12 Santa Cruz Sanctuary Scenic Trail System .................................................7-27 Figure 7-13 Proposed Signage for Monterey Bay Sanctuary Scenic Trail .....................7-29 Figure 7-14 Sample Interpretive Information................................................................7-30 Figure 7-15 Santa Cruz Interpretive Panel ....................................................................7-31 Figure 7-16 Sample Monterey Bay Sanctuary Scenic Trail Interpretive Panel ..............7-32 LIST OF TABLES Table 1-1 Steering Committee Members......................................................................1-4 Table 2-1 Related Planning Documents .......................................................................2-9 Table 3-1 Cities and Unincorporated Places along the Sanctuary Scenic Trail ..........3-14 Table 4-1 Opportunities...............................................................................................4-9 Table 4-2 Constraints.................................................................................................4-10 Table 5-1 Mode of Journey to Work............................................................................5-7 Table 5-2 Monterey Bay Coastal Trail User Counts, 2002...........................................5-8 Table 5-3 Monterey Bay Coastal Trail User Counts, 2005...........................................5-8 Table 6-1 Evaluation Criteria Scoring Details............................................................6-41 Table 6-2 Evaluation Matrix.......................................................................................6-42 Table 6-3 Short-Term Segments .................................................................................6-43 Table 6-4 Mid-Term Segments ...................................................................................6-43 Table 6-5 Long-Term Segments..................................................................................6-43 Table 7-1 Trail and Bikeway Types Matrix..................................................................7-5 Table 7-2 Recommended Signing and Markings ........................................................7-11 Table 7-3 Basic Crossing Prototypes ..........................................................................7-14 Table 7-4 Monterey Bay Sanctuary Scenic Trail New Crossings by Type.................7-16 Monterey Bay Sanctuary Scenic Trail Master Plan v FINAL Table 7-5 Example Trail Lightings.............................................................................7-18 Table 7-6 Monterey Bay Sanctuary Scenic Trail Unit Cost Estimates .......................7-34
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Santa Cruz County Coastal Climate Change Vulnerability Report
    Santa Cruz County Coastal Climate Change Vulnerability Report JUNE 2017 CENTRAL COAST WETLANDS GROUP MOSS LANDING MARINE LABS | 8272 MOSS LANDING RD, MOSS LANDING, CA Santa Cruz County Coastal Climate Change Vulnerability Report This page intentionally left blank Santa Cruz County Coastal Climate Change Vulnerability Report i Prepared by Central Coast Wetlands Group at Moss Landing Marine Labs Technical assistance provided by: ESA Revell Coastal The Nature Conservancy Center for Ocean Solutions Prepared for The County of Santa Cruz Funding Provided by: The California Ocean Protection Council Grant number C0300700 Santa Cruz County Coastal Climate Change Vulnerability Report ii Primary Authors: Central Coast Wetlands group Ross Clark Sarah Stoner-Duncan Jason Adelaars Sierra Tobin Kamille Hammerstrom Acknowledgements: California State Ocean Protection Council Abe Doherty Paige Berube Nick Sadrpour Santa Cruz County David Carlson City of Capitola Rich Grunow Coastal Conservation and Research Jim Oakden Science Team David Revell, Revell Coastal Bob Battalio, ESA James Gregory, ESA James Jackson, ESA GIS Layer support AMBAG Santa Cruz County Adapt Monterey Bay Kelly Leo, TNC Sarah Newkirk, TNC Eric Hartge, Center for Ocean Solution Santa Cruz County Coastal Climate Change Vulnerability Report iii Contents Contents Summary of Findings ........................................................................................................................ viii 1. Introduction ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Record Packet Copy
    STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE RESOURCES AGENCY GRAY DAVIS, GOVERNOR ' CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION 45 FREMONT, SUITE 2000 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 941 05· 2219 ICE AND TOO (415) 904· 5200 X ( 415) 904· 5400 • W12a RECORD PACKET COPY Date Filed: 6112/01 49th Day: 7/31/01 180th Day: 12/9/01 Staff: MVC-SF Staff Report: 7/19/01 Hearing Date: 8/8/01 Commission ActionJVote: Approved with conditions, 9-0 REVISED FINDINGS Application No.: E-01-008 Project Applicant: Monterey Abalone Company Project Location: Municipal Wharf #2, Monterey Harbor, Monterey County • Project Description: Construct and operate an abalone grow-out facility to cultivate up to 500,000 red abalone in Monterey Harbor, including the installation of walkways and seawater pumping system under the wharf and placement of concrete moorings on the seafloor. Substantive File Documents: Appendix B Prevailing Commissioners: Dettloff, Allgood, Hart, Lee, McCoy, Potter, Reilly, Woolley, Wan SYNOPSIS The Monterey Abalone Company ("MAC") proposes to construct and operate a facility to cultivate up to 500,000 red abalone (Haliotis rufescens) from juveniles to maturity in two types of "culture units," barrels and cages, to be suspended in the water under Municipal Wharf #2 in Monterey Harbor. Monterey Harbor is located 110 miles south of San Francisco in Monterey Bay in Monterey County, adjacent to the Monterey Bay National Marine Sanctuary (Exhibit 1, "Project Location"). The MAC has been operating its facility since 1992 without benefit of a coastal development • permit. In this application, the MAC proposes to authorize its existing operations (the culture of E-01-008 (Monterey Abalone Company) ~e2~1 • approximately 170,000 abalone per year) and to expand its operation up to 500,000 abalone at • full build out.
    [Show full text]
  • Elkhorn Slough Estuary
    A RICH NATURAL RESOURCE YOU CAN HELP! Elkhorn Slough Estuary WATER QUALITY REPORT CARD Located on Monterey Bay, Elkhorn Slough and surround- There are several ways we can all help improve water 2015 ing wetlands comprise a network of estuarine habitats that quality in our communities: include salt and brackish marshes, mudflats, and tidal • Limit the use of fertilizers in your garden. channels. • Maintain septic systems to avoid leakages. • Dispose of pharmaceuticals properly, and prevent Estuarine wetlands harsh soaps and other contaminants from running are rare in California, into storm drains. and provide important • Buy produce from local farmers applying habitat for many spe- sustainable management practices. cies. Elkhorn Slough • Vote for the environment by supporting candidates provides special refuge and bills favoring clean water and habitat for a large number of restoration. sea otters, which rest, • Let your elected representatives and district forage and raise pups officials know you care about water quality in in the shallow waters, Elkhorn Slough and support efforts to reduce question: How is the water in Elkhorn Slough? and nap on the salt marshes. Migratory shorebirds by the polluted run-off and to restore wetlands. thousands stop here to rest and feed on tiny creatures in • Attend meetings of the Central Coast Regional answer: It could be a lot better… the mud. Leopard sharks by the hundreds come into the Water Quality Control Board to share your estuary to give birth. concerns and support for action. Elkhorn Slough estuary hosts diverse wetland habitats, wildlife and recreational activities. Such diversity depends Thousands of people come to Elkhorn Slough each year JOIN OUR EFFORT! to a great extent on the quality of the water.
    [Show full text]
  • 140 Years of Railroading in Santa Cruz County by Rick Hamman
    140 Years of Railroading in Santa Cruz County By Rick Hamman Introduction To describe the last 140 years of area railroading in 4,000 words, or two articles, seems a reasonable task. After all, how much railroad history could there be in such a small county? In the summer of 1856 Davis & Jordon opened their horse powered railroad to haul lime from the Rancho Canada Del Rincon to their wharf in Santa Cruz. Today, the Santa Cruz, Big Trees & Pacific Railway continues to carry freight and passengers through those same Rancho lands to Santa Cruz. Between the time span of these two companies there has been no less than 37 different railroads operating at one time or another within Santa Cruz County. From these various lines has already come sufficient history to fill at least eight books and numerous historical articles. Many of these writings are available in your local library. As we begin this piece the author hopes to give the reader an overview and insight into what railroads have meant for Santa Cruz County, what they provide today, and what their relevance could be for tomorrow. Before There Were Railroads As people first moved west in search of gold, and later found reason to remain, Santa Cruz County offered many inducements. It was already well known because of its proximity to the former Alta California capital at Monterey, its Mission at Santa Cruz and its excellent weather. Further, within its boundaries were vast mineral deposits in the form of limestone and aggregates, rich alluvial farming soils and fertile orchard lands, and billions of standing board feet of uncut pine and redwood lumber to supply the construction of the San Francisco and Monterey bay areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Doggin' America's Beaches
    Doggin’ America’s Beaches A Traveler’s Guide To Dog-Friendly Beaches - (and those that aren’t) Doug Gelbert illustrations by Andrew Chesworth Cruden Bay Books There is always something for an active dog to look forward to at the beach... DOGGIN’ AMERICA’S BEACHES Copyright 2007 by Cruden Bay Books All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system without permission in writing from the Publisher. Cruden Bay Books PO Box 467 Montchanin, DE 19710 www.hikewithyourdog.com International Standard Book Number 978-0-9797074-4-5 “Dogs are our link to paradise...to sit with a dog on a hillside on a glorious afternoon is to be back in Eden, where doing nothing was not boring - it was peace.” - Milan Kundera Ahead On The Trail Your Dog On The Atlantic Ocean Beaches 7 Your Dog On The Gulf Of Mexico Beaches 6 Your Dog On The Pacific Ocean Beaches 7 Your Dog On The Great Lakes Beaches 0 Also... Tips For Taking Your Dog To The Beach 6 Doggin’ The Chesapeake Bay 4 Introduction It is hard to imagine any place a dog is happier than at a beach. Whether running around on the sand, jumping in the water or just lying in the sun, every dog deserves a day at the beach. But all too often dog owners stopping at a sandy stretch of beach are met with signs designed to make hearts - human and canine alike - droop: NO DOGS ON BEACH.
    [Show full text]
  • 2018 Meeting Planner's Guide
    2018 Meeting Planner’s Guide A Unit of California State Parks Sales and Conference Services Team For sales and marketing Tim McGill Senior Sales Manager – Association Market Denise Morton 831.642.4220 [email protected] Director of Sales and Marketing Sales Manager – Small Meetings & Family Reunions Lauren Ross 831.642.4225 [email protected] Group Sales Office 831.642.4222 Senior Sales Manager – Educational & Government Market Linda Casey 831.642.4217 [email protected] 8:00am–5:00pm Monday–Friday Sales Manager – Corporate Market Ashley Soria 831.642.4228 [email protected] For catering and meeting room information Germar Kelly Conference Services Manager Raymond Jocson 831.642.4230 [email protected] Director of Conference Services Conference Services Manager Lindsay Brooks 831.642.4295 [email protected] 8:00am–5:00pm Monday–Friday Event Coordinator Natascha von Thiele 831.642.4231 [email protected] For In-house registration information Vivian Garcia, Reservations Manager Housing Bureau Agent Pat Kauffman 831.624.4218 [email protected] 8:00am–5:00pm Monday–Friday Housing Bureau Agent Karen Grimshaw 831.642.4272 [email protected] 800 Asilomar Avenue Pacific Grove, California 93950 831.372.8016 Fax 831.642.4262 www.VisitAsilomar.com Visitor’s Information What’s the weather like at Asilomar? Three ice machines are located on the Asilomar Spring and fall are clear and sunny, and the grounds (see Asilomar Grounds Map). Ice summer months bring morning fog that buckets are located in the guestrooms. encases the landscape, burning off to clear Call housekeeping extension 2276 for lost skies in the afternoons.
    [Show full text]
  • 1968 General Plan
    I I I I I I MONTEREY COUNTY GENERAL PLAN I MONTEREY COUNTY, STATE OF CALIFORNIA I I I I ADOPTED BY THE MONTEREY COUNTY PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 10, 1968 I ADOPTED BY THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF MONTEREY COUNTY OCTOBER 22, 1968 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I 0 N I I I MONTEREY COUNTY I I I I I I PREFACE I The Monterey County General Plan is an attempt to establish a county philosophy based on the values and desires of the people. This in turn becomes a valid basis for decisions by public bodies as well as private enterprise. Such a pro­ cedure is vitally needed in our rapidly changing environment. The General Plan I is a study of the ever changing pattern of Monterey County --a mirror in which to review the past, to comprehend the present, and to contemplate the future, This plan reflects years of research and study as well as many other reports such as I the continuing Facts and Figures, Recreation in Monterey County, Beach Acqui­ sition, and other plans which are shown as separate documents h~cause of the volume of material. I The size of Monterey County, its variety of climate, vegetation, and land forms make it imperative that only large land uses or broad proposals be used to portray geographically the objectives desired for the future development of the County. I Accordingly, in addition to the maps, greater emphasis in the General Plan is placed on the text which conveys in words the objectives as well as the princi­ ples and standards recommended to make them effective.
    [Show full text]
  • 2020 Pacific Coast Winter Window Survey Results
    2020 Winter Window Survey for Snowy Plovers on U.S. Pacific Coast with 2013-2020 Results for Comparison. Note: blanks indicate no survey was conducted. REGION SITE OWNER 2017 2018 2019 2020 2020 Date Primary Observer(s) Gray's Harbor Copalis Spit State Parks 0 0 0 0 28-Jan C. Sundstrum Conner Creek State Parks 0 0 0 0 28-Jan C. Sundstrum, W. Michaelis Damon Point WDNR 0 0 0 0 30-Jan C. Sundstrum Oyhut Spit WDNR 0 0 0 0 30-Jan C. Sundstrum Ocean Shores to Ocean City 4 10 0 9 28-Jan C. Sundstrum, W. Michaelis County Total 4 10 0 9 Pacific Midway Beach Private, State Parks 22 28 58 66 27-Jan C. Sundstrum, W. Michaelis Graveyard Spit Shoalwater Indian Tribe 0 0 0 0 30-Jan C. Sundstrum, R. Ashley Leadbetter Point NWR USFWS, State Parks 34 3 15 0 11-Feb W. Ritchie South Long Beach Private 6 0 7 0 10-Feb W. Ritchie Benson Beach State Parks 0 0 0 0 20-Jan W. Ritchie County Total 62 31 80 66 Washington Total 66 41 80 75 Clatsop Fort Stevens State Park (Clatsop Spit) ACOE, OPRD 10 19 21 20-Jan T. Pyle, D. Osis DeLaura Beach OPRD No survey Camp Rilea DOD 0 0 0 No survey Sunset Beach OPRD 0 No survey Del Rio Beach OPRD 0 No survey Necanicum Spit OPRD 0 0 0 20-Jan J. Everett, S. Everett Gearhart Beach OPRD 0 No survey Columbia R-Necanicum R. OPRD No survey County Total 0 10 19 21 Tillamook Nehalem Spit OPRD 0 17 26 19-Jan D.
    [Show full text]
  • Birding Northern California by Jean Richmond
    BIRDING NORTHERN CALIFORNIA Site Guides to 72 of the Best Birding Spots by Jean Richmond Written for Mt. Diablo Audubon Society 1985 Dedicated to my husband, Rich Cover drawing by Harry Adamson Sketches by Marv Reif Graphics by dk graphics © 1985, 2008 Mt. Diablo Audubon Society All rights reserved. This book may not be reproduced in whole or in part by any means without prior permission of MDAS. P.O. Box 53 Walnut Creek, California 94596 TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction . How To Use This Guide .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. Birding Etiquette .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. Terminology. Park Information .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 5 One Last Word. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 5 Map Symbols Used. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 6 Acknowledgements .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 6 Map With Numerical Index To Guides .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 8 The Guides. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 10 Where The Birds Are. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 158 Recommended References .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 165 Index Of Birding Locations. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 166 5 6 Birding Northern California This book is a guide to many birding areas in northern California, primarily within 100 miles of the San Francisco Bay Area and easily birded on a one-day outing. Also included are several favorite spots which local birders
    [Show full text]
  • Discover California State Parks in the Monterey Area
    Crashing waves, redwoods and historic sites Discover California State Parks in the Monterey Area Some of the most beautiful sights in California can be found in Monterey area California State Parks. Rocky cliffs, crashing waves, redwood trees, and historic sites are within an easy drive of each other. "When you look at the diversity of state parks within the Monterey District area, you begin to realize that there is something for everyone - recreational activities, scenic beauty, natural and cultural history sites, and educational programs,” said Dave Schaechtele, State Parks Monterey District Public Information Officer. “There are great places to have fun with families and friends, and peaceful and inspirational settings that are sure to bring out the poet, writer, photographer, or artist in you. Some people return to their favorite state parks, year-after-year, while others venture out and discover some new and wonderful places that are then added to their 'favorites' list." State Parks in the area include: Limekiln State Park, 54 miles south of Carmel off Highway One and two miles south of the town of Lucia, features vistas of the Big Sur coast, redwoods, and the remains of historic limekilns. The Rockland Lime and Lumber Company built these rock and steel furnaces in 1887 to cook the limestone mined from the canyon walls. The 711-acre park allows visitors an opportunity to enjoy the atmosphere of Big Sur’s southern coast. The park has the only safe access to the shoreline along this section of cast. For reservations at the park’s 36 campsites, call ReserveAmerica at (800) 444- PARK (7275).
    [Show full text]
  • CLASSIFICATION of CALIFORNIA ESTUARIES BASED on NATURAL CLOSURE PATTERNS: TEMPLATES for RESTORATION and MANAGEMENT Revised
    CLASSIFICATION OF CALIFORNIA ESTUARIES BASED ON NATURAL CLOSURE PATTERNS: TEMPLATES FOR RESTORATION AND MANAGEMENT Revised David K. Jacobs Eric D. Stein Travis Longcore Technical Report 619.a - August 2011 Classification of California Estuaries Based on Natural Closure Patterns: Templates for Restoration and Management David K. Jacobs1, Eric D. Stein2, and Travis Longcore3 1UCLA Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology 2Southern California Coastal Water Research Project 3University of Southern California - Spatial Sciences Institute August 2010 Revised August 2011 Technical Report 619.a ABSTRACT Determining the appropriate design template is critical to coastal wetland restoration. In seasonally wet and semi-arid regions of the world coastal wetlands tend to close off from the sea seasonally or episodically, and decisions regarding estuarine mouth closure have far reaching implications for cost, management, and ultimate success of coastal wetland restoration. In the past restoration planners relied on an incomplete understanding of the factors that influence estuarine mouth closure. Consequently, templates from other climatic/physiographic regions are often inappropriately applied. The first step to addressing this issue is to develop a classification system based on an understanding of the processes that formed the estuaries and thus define their pre-development structure. Here we propose a new classification system for California estuaries based on the geomorphic history and the dominant physical processes that govern the formation of the estuary space or volume. It is distinct from previous estuary closure models, which focused primarily on the relationship between estuary size and tidal prism in constraining closure. This classification system uses geologic origin, exposure to littoral process, watershed size and runoff characteristics as the basis of a conceptual model that predicts likely frequency and duration of closure of the estuary mouth.
    [Show full text]
  • Coastal and Ocean Engineering
    May 18, 2020 Coastal and Ocean Engineering John Fenton Institute of Hydraulic Engineering and Water Resources Management Vienna University of Technology, Karlsplatz 13/222, 1040 Vienna, Austria URL: http://johndfenton.com/ URL: mailto:[email protected] Abstract This course introduces maritime engineering, encompassing coastal and ocean engineering. It con- centrates on providing an understanding of the many processes at work when the tides, storms and waves interact with the natural and human environments. The course will be a mixture of descrip- tion and theory – it is hoped that by understanding the theory that the practicewillbemadeallthe easier. There is nothing quite so practical as a good theory. Table of Contents References ....................... 2 1. Introduction ..................... 6 1.1 Physical properties of seawater ............. 6 2. Introduction to Oceanography ............... 7 2.1 Ocean currents .................. 7 2.2 El Niño, La Niña, and the Southern Oscillation ........10 2.3 Indian Ocean Dipole ................12 2.4 Continental shelf flow ................13 3. Tides .......................15 3.1 Introduction ...................15 3.2 Tide generating forces and equilibrium theory ........15 3.3 Dynamic model of tides ...............17 3.4 Harmonic analysis and prediction of tides ..........19 4. Surface gravity waves ..................21 4.1 The equations of fluid mechanics ............21 4.2 Boundary conditions ................28 4.3 The general problem of wave motion ...........29 4.4 Linear wave theory .................30 4.5 Shoaling, refraction and breaking ............44 4.6 Diffraction ...................50 4.7 Nonlinear wave theories ...............51 1 Coastal and Ocean Engineering John Fenton 5. The calculation of forces on ocean structures ...........54 5.1 Structural element much smaller than wavelength – drag and inertia forces .....................54 5.2 Structural element comparable with wavelength – diffraction forces ..56 6.
    [Show full text]