DOCSLIB.ORG

Strong 30 Page 1 Masonfit.Com 10

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Strong 30 Page �1 Masonfit.Com 10 Getting Started Here’s what you need to know before diving in: 1. It should always be fun. Consistency will be the most important factor in attaining the results you want. The best program is the one you can stick to. If you’re having trouble staying consistent because of an exercise you hate or some other reason in this program, change it and change it early on. 2. Make a schedule for the 3 training days in this program. The odds of you completing every workout in the 30 days go WAY up when you have all 12 workouts scheduled for Monday, Wednesday, and Friday at 6:00 PM. 3. Keep it simple and don’t overthink things. The rest of the information in this guide may get a little technical or heavy on the science. Remember that this fitness stuff is not that serious and we’re exercising to enhance our lives, not add stress. 4. This program is just an outline. If you have to modify it in any way DO NOT feel like you have failed in any way. I designed it with making modifications in mind so that I could give it to anyone at any level of fitness. 5. If you’re going from the couch to this program be sure that you’re warming up properly and have the prerequisite mobility to complete every exercise. If you don’t, I would love for you to take one week to ease into things. The exercises in this program should be challenging but never painful. So if you are experiencing pain it’s likely a user error. 6. A support system is a HUGE help in any program or lifestyle change. Feel free to send this program to a friend or family member and have them complete it with you. 7. Remember, increasing your activity level doesn’t mean you get to eat more. Unless your goal is weight gain. In that case, eat more. 8. Never hesitate to email me about any questions/comments/concerns throughout this program. 9. The gym is not as judgmental of a place as you may think. Sure, it can be a little intimidating at first but relax and before long you’ll feel right at home. If you’re struggling with this, see #6. STRONG 30 PAGE !1 MASONFIT.COM 10. You won’t need any fancy supplements here. Spend that money on better food choices, workout clothes, and maybe your potential support systems gym membership fee or something like that. 11. Don’t stop at 30 days. I’ve laid out how to proceed after the first month at the very end of this so no excuses. 12. Everything from this point forward may not be as riveting as Fifty Shades of Grey, but it is almost necessary reading. Within the next 10 minutes you’ll be a well educated, ready to exercise, ass kicking machine. Factors of Muscle Growth There are three main factors for stimulating muscle growth. They are, mechanical tension (the intensity or weight you are lifting), muscle damage (breaking down your muscles during training to rebuild muscle fibers stronger for next time), and metabolic stress (buildup of metabolic waste due to anaerobic training AKA the “burn”). All three play separate roles and are independent of one another for the most part. Meaning that just because you aren’t sore after a training session doesn’t mean you aren’t building muscle. I would say the most important of the three is mechanical tension, or the weight lifted and total training volume. This is why this program will focus on progressing week in and week out. (Progressive Overload) As we progress total work volume there is no doubt we are getting stronger, building muscle, and improving body composition. Remember, total volume is king. Exercise Variation You won’t find much variation in the exercises in this program. Even if the program was extended beyond 30 days, there wouldn’t be a ton of variation. The reasoning is once again, science. Exercise and strength training is a skill. You have to master a movement to really begin to reap the benefits. Most of any strength gain when beginning a new exercise is just neural adaptation, and although some muscle growth is occurring, it is minimal compared to after an exercise is mastered by the nervous system. Learning new exercises all the time is inefficient, and you should really aim to master every exercise in the program. Focus on the muscles you are aiming to work in each exercise. The only exception here would be if an exercise becomes too easy, and you have to scale up on an exercise. Try to see the bigger picture. Now, I’m a big believer in having fun with your training. After all, if you don’t enjoy it you’ll never stick with it. So play around with the accessory exercises at the end of workouts and activities outside of the gym. But improving your skills at the compound movements like pulling, pressing, and squatting will inevitably lead to less total time spent in the gym and greater results. Rep Ranges How high or low should you go with repetitions? Here’s a good rule of thumb. • 8-12 – primarily for muscle hypertrophy (building) – allows weight to be moderate enough to minimize injury while stimulating new muscle growth. This should be your sweet spot. • 15+ - primarily muscular endurance – though some accessory exercises like bicep curls or glute bridges may require higher rep schemes to properly stimulate hypertrophy STRONG 30 PAGE !2 MASONFIT.COM • 4-8 – a blend between strength/power training and muscle hypertrophy – as you become more advanced it is ok to lower rep schemes and experiment with heavier weights. • <4 – primarily strength/power development – a majority of the adaptation in this range will be nervous system related and less muscle hypertrophy. Lifting Tempo I’m not much of a stickler on super specific tempos, as long as you’re under control. You do the majority of muscle damage (essential for building muscle) on the eccentric portion of a lift, or the lowering of a weight. For this reason, a slow and controlled lowering of a weight should be your focus on each exercise. If it helps, count to two in your head during each eccentric phase. Your concentric phase, or the actual “lifting” portion should be as explosive as possible on each rep. Here are a few examples of the concentric and eccentric on a lift. • Squat o Eccentric – squatting down o Concentric – standing back up • Push Up o Eccentric – lowering to the floor o Concentric – pushing yourself back up • Bicep Curl o Eccentric – lowering the weight to your side o Concentric – curling the weight up Rest Periods Similar to lifting tempo, I’m a bit laissez-faire when it comes to rest periods. Depending on where you’re at in terms of cardiovascular fitness, this could range anywhere between 30 seconds to 3 minutes on exercises like squats. In general, your bigger compound movements like squats, presses, and pulls should require between 30-90 seconds rest between sets if you’re working in the 8-12 rep range. As long as you’re not on your phone for 5 minutes between sets you should be fine – catch your breath, shake ‘em out, and get back to work. On accessory exercises like curls, lateral raises, hamstring curls, etc. you may only need 30-60 seconds between sets. This could be a good opportunity to elicit more metabolic stress, which is good! Shorter rest periods as a whole are more effective at burning fat, getting stronger hormonal responses after training (better recovery), and improving cardiovascular health. So like I said, get off your phone. Scaling Exercises The exercises included in this program are relatively basic and picked primarily for their scalability and low barrier of entry. You can take the basic outline of the program and by simply tweaking the exercise difficulty, have an awesome progressive strength training program. Let’s run through a few examples. Lat Pulldown – Increase the difficulty by swapping these out for Pull Ups. STRONG 30 PAGE !3 MASONFIT.COM Goblet Squat – Increase the difficulty by going with a barbell back squat or front squat. Decrease the difficulty by going to a bodyweight squat or bench squat. Dumbbell Chest or Shoulder Press – Decrease the difficulty by moving to a machine press. Increase the difficulty by going to a barbell bench press to move more weight. Bench Dips – Increase the difficulty by moving to a traditional chest or tricep dip on parallel bars. You could also elevate your feet on a bench for more of a challenge. Sumo Dumbbell Squat – Increase the difficulty by moving to a sumo barbell deadlift or elevating your feet on two steps or bumper plates for greater range of motion. Rows – Read this. If you have any questions about exercise modification do not hesitate to ask me a question. Progressive Overload It’s not as complicated as it may sound. Progressive overload can be as simple as increasing the weight lifted from your previous session or even increasing the repetitions performed with the same weight. Total volume is a very important factor to progressive strength training. Example 1: A goblet squat performed with a 50lb dumbbell for 3 sets of 10 reps (30 total reps) = 1500 lbs total lifted for that exercise. Example 2: A goblet squat performed with a 50lb dumbbell for 2 sets of 15 reps (30 total reps) = 1500 lbs total lifted for that exercise. Example 3: A goblet squat performed with a 100lb dumbbell for 1 sets of 15 reps (15 total reps) = 1500 lbs total lifted for that exercise.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Comparison of the Power Plate and Free Weight Exercises on Upper Body Muscular Endurance in College Age Subjects
    Comparison of the Power Plate and Free Weight Exercises on Upper Body Muscular Endurance in College Age Subjects ELISABETH BOLAND*, DAN BOLAND*, THOMAS CARROLL‡, and WILLIAM R. BARFIELD‡ Department of Health and Human Performance, College of Charleston, Charleston, SC, USA *Denotes undergraduate student author, ‡denotes professional author ABSTRACT Int J Exerc Sci 2(3): 215-222, 2009. The power plate (PP) is designed to reduce training time while providing a muscle stimulus that leads to positive changes in muscle mass. This study investigated the effect that training on the PP has compared to a free-weight (FW) program, on upper body endurance, defined as the number of push-ups completed at one time prior to failure. Following IRB approval a pre-test was used to assess push-up endurance in PP and FW cohorts. Each group exercised for six consecutive weeks, working out three times per week, on non- consecutive days performing five exercises of two sets of 8-12 repetitions. Twenty-two females and 2 males enrolled in the investigation. Eleven with a mean age of 22 years (20-24) participated in the PP cohort. Thirteen participated in the FW arm of the study with a mean age of 24.5 (20-29) years. Shapiro-Wilk found lack of data normality. Wilcoxon Rank Sum testing yielded statistically significant differences within groups. The FW comparison between pre and post test showed a p value of 0.016. The PP group pre to post test p value was 0.005. Nonparametric testing (Mann Whitney) found no statistical differences (p=0.62) between Group A (FW) and Group B (PP) on the push-up pre-test.
    [Show full text]
  • Effect of Progressive Calisthenic Push-Up Training on Muscle
    EFFECT OF PROGRESSIVE CALISTHENIC PUSH-UP TRAINING ON MUSCLE STRENGTH & THICKNESS A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the North Dakota State University of Agriculture and Applied Science By Christopher Joseph Kotarsky In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Major Department: Health, Nutrition, and Exercise Sciences March 2016 Fargo, North Dakota North Dakota State University Graduate School Title Effect of progressive calisthenic push-up training on muscle strength & thickness By Christopher Joseph Kotarsky The Supervisory Committee certifies that this disquisition complies with North Dakota State University’s regulations and meets the accepted standards for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE SUPERVISORY COMMITTEE: Kyle Hackney, Ph.D. Chair Bryan Christensen, Ph.D. Jason Miller, MS Approved: 3/24/2016 Yeong Rhee, Ph.D. Date Department Chair ABSTRACT Calisthenics, a form of resistance training, continue to increase in popularity; however, few studies have examined their effectiveness for muscle strength improvement. The purpose of this study was to compare progressive calisthenic push-up training (PUSH) to free weight bench press training (BENCH) as techniques to develop muscle strength and thickness. Twenty-three healthy, moderately trained males (mean ± SD: age 23 ± 6.8 years) were randomly assigned to PUSH (n=14) and BENCH (n=9), and trained three days per week for four weeks. Muscle thickness, seated medicine ball put, one repetition max bench press (1RM), and push-up progression (PUP) were measured pre- and post-training. Results revealed significant increases in 1RM (p<0.001) and PUP (p<0.05) for both groups post-training. The increase in PUP, however, was significantly greater for PUSH (p<0.001).
    [Show full text]
  • Suspended Push-Up Training Augments Size of Not Only Upper Limb but Also Abdominal Muscles
    Training & Testing Thieme Kohiruimaki Ren et al. Suspended Push-up Training Aug- ments … Int J Sports Med 2019; 00: 00–00 Suspended Push-up Training Augments Size of not only Upper Limb but also Abdominal Muscles Authors Ren Kohiruimaki1, 2, Sumiaki Maeo3, Hiroaki Kanehisa4 Affiliations ABSTraCT 1 Sports and Life Science, National Institute of Fitness and We investigated the effects of sling-based, suspended push-up Sports in Kanoya, Kanoya, Japan training on muscle size and function of upper limb and ab- 2 Metropolitan Police Department, Tokyo, Japan dominal muscles. Eight men conducted suspended push-ups 3 Research Organization of Science & Technology, to failure 3 sets/session, 3 sessions/week, for 8 weeks. The Ritsumeikan University, Kusatsu, Japan maximum number of push-ups during training gradually and 4 Faculty of Sport and Health Science, Ritsumeikan from the first to last training session ( + 92 %), suggesting im- University, Kusatsu, Japan proved muscle endurance. After the training, muscle thickness of the elbow extensors ( + 16 %) and flexors ( + 3 %), as well as Key words abdominal muscles (rectus abdominis: RA, + 27 %; external muscle thickness, isometric strength, one-repetition oblique: EO, + 14 %) significantly increased. No changes oc- maximum, training to failure, electromyography curred in maximum isometric strength of elbow extension or flexion, nor in 1-repetition maximum bench press. In a follow- accepted 20.07.2019 up experiment, electromyograms (EMGs) of RA, EO and inter- nal oblique (IO) during suspended push-ups to failure were Bibliography measured and normalized to those during maximum voluntary DOI https://doi.org/10.1055/a-0989-2482 contraction of each muscle ( % EMGmvc) in six men.
    [Show full text]
  • Periodization and Exercise Selection
    RESISTANCE TRAINING Workout Options and Program Periodization BASIC RULES FOR EXERCISE SELECTION AND ORGANIZATION: When selecting exercises for a particular muscle group, one must consider a number of factors to ensure the safety of the musculature and joints involved in the movement, to attain the temporary failure condition for the muscles involved to promote continued progress and to ensure activation of the desired muscle groups. These rules include: A. Exercises for problem muscle groups should be performed at the beginning of the workout to prevent their omission from the workout. This organization also allows the weight trainer to address these exercises with the greatest amount of energy available. This should help to maximize one’s efforts and, ultimately, one’s progress. B. Exercises for large muscle groups should always be addressed before those for small muscle groups. Ex.: pectorals, and depending upon the specific exercise selected, shoulders before triceps; latissimus dorsi and trapezius before biceps, quadriceps before gastrocnemius (calves). C. Multiple-joint exercises should always be performed before isolation exercises. Multiple-joint exercises involve the large muscle groups of the body, i.e. the pectorals, latissimus dorsi, trapezius, quadriceps (when assisted by the gluteal and/or hip flexor groups), hamstrings and the deltoids. These exercises typically have a “last name” of: press, pull, row, squat or lunge. Single-joint exercises utilize only one joint and usually involve such muscle groups as the deltoids (with no assistance from the triceps), the triceps, biceps, the quadriceps or hamstrings (when not assisted by the gluteal or hip flexor groups). These exercises typically have a “last name” of: extension, curl, flye, raise, pressdown or pulldown.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of 8 Weeks of Plyometric and Resistance Training on Agility, Speed and Explosive Power in Soccer Players
    Available online a t www.pelagiaresearchlibrary.com Pelagia Research Library European Journal of Experimental Biology, 2014, 4(1): 383-386 ISSN: 2248 –9215 CODEN (USA): EJEBAU The effect of 8 weeks of plyometric and resistance training on agility, speed and explosive power in soccer players Eskandar Taheri, Asghar Nikseresht* and Ebrahim Khoshnam Department of Physical Education, Jahrom Branch, Islamic Azad University, Jahrom, Iran _____________________________________________________________________________________________ ABSTRACT The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effect of plyometric and resistance training on agility, speed and explosive power in soccer players. 30 male soccer players who aged 18-25 voluntarily participated in the study. They were randomly assigned in plyometric (n=15) and resistance (n=15) groups. Both groups performed selected soccer-specified plyometric and resistance training for 8 weeks. Data was analyzed using paired t-test, independent t-test, and covariance statistical methods. The results showed that levels of agility, speed, and explosive power in plyometric training group (p=0.0001), and agility and explosive power in resistance training group (p=0.0001) were significantly improved in post-test compared to pre-test. Between-groups comparison showed better records in agility, speed and explosive power for plyometric compared with resistance training group after eight weeks (respectively p=0.032, p=0.0001 and p=0.002). According to the results, it can be concluded that both plyometric and resistance training exercises increase agility and explosive power and reduce sprint time in football players. Plyometric exercises also showed more favorable effects on study variables compared with resistance exercises. Therefore, these types of training methods are suggested to soccer players and coaches for improving speed and performance skill.
    [Show full text]
  • Muscle Damage Indicators After Land and Aquatic Plyometric Training Programmes
    ORIGINAL SCIENTIFIC PAPER Muscle Damage Indicators after Land and Aquatic Plyometric Training Programmes Vlatka Wertheimer1, Ljubomir Antekolovic1, Branka R. Matkovic1 Affiliations: 1University of Zagreb, Faculty of Kinesiology, Zagreb, Croatia Correspondence: Lj. Antekolović, University of Zagreb, Faculty of Kinesiology, Horvaćanski zavoj 15, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Plyometric training is an important part of athletic conditioning with many significant benefits, including improved motor abilities and performance, but it can also increase the serum indices of muscle damage, collagen breakdown, muscle swelling, and soreness. Due to the physical characteristics of water, plyometric training in water presents less eccentric contraction, facilitates faster transition from the eccentric to concentric phase of a jump and offers greater resistance during concentric contraction with acute lower indices of muscle damage. To advance our understanding of the long-term effects of an eight-week plyometric training programme on land and in water on muscle damage indicators (lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), creatine kinase (CK) and serum urea (SU)), two experimental groups of physically active men (a group on land (EG1) and a group in water (EG2)) were tested before and after the first and the last plyometric training to monitor muscle damage indicators and adaptations. The results showed changes in CK activity after both plyometric trainings for EG1 and only after the first training for EG2. Moreover, after the eight-week programme, significant difference was observed in CK activity in comparison with EG2. There were no observed changes in LDH activity while SU showed greater changes for the group on land. The plyometric training programme in water resulted in smaller levels of muscle damage indicators.
    [Show full text]
  • Muscle Hypertrophy and Muscle Strength: Dependent Or Independent Variables? a Provocative Review Carlo Reggiani (1,2), Stefano Schiaffino (3)
    Muscle hypertrophy and muscle strength Eur J Transl Myol 2020; 30 (3): 9311. doi: 10.4081/ejtm.2020.9311 Muscle hypertrophy and muscle strength: dependent or independent variables? A provocative review Carlo Reggiani (1,2), Stefano Schiaffino (3) (1) Department of Biomedical Sciences of the University of Padova, Padova, Italy; (2) Science and Research Centre Koper, Institute for Kinesiology Research, Koper, Slovenia; (3) VIMM - Venetian Institute of Molecular Medicine, Padova, Italy This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (CC BY-NC 4.0) which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited. Abstract The question whether the muscle hypertrophy induced by resistance training, hormone administration or genetic manipulation is accompanied by a proportional increase in muscle strength is still open. This review summarizes and analyses data obtained in human and rodent muscles in studies that have monitored in parallel changes in muscle size and changes in muscle force, measured in isometric contractions in vivo, in isolated muscles ex vivo (in rodents) and in single muscle fibers. Although a general positive relation exists among the two variables, a number of studies show a clear dissociation with increase of muscle size with no change or even decrease in strength and, vice versa, increase in strength without increase in size. The possible mechanisms of such dissociation, which involves neural motor control and/or cellular and molecular adaptations of muscle fibers, are briefly discussed. Key Words: skeletal muscle, hypertrophy, resistance training, contractile force. Eur J Transl Myol 2020; 30 (3): 9311.
    [Show full text]
  • Strength Training Fundamentals in Gymnastics Conditioning
    USA Gymnastics Online: Technique: Strength Training Fundamentals in Gymnastics Con...Page 1 of 14 Conditioning Strength Training Fundamentals in Gymnastics Conditioning James J. Major Motor Behavior Laboratory Dept. of Exercise and Sports Science University of Utah Salt Lake City, Utah Often coaches must be a jack-of-all-trades, but masters of one. Gymnastics coaches are responsible for not only skill training, routine composition, safety, education, and mental health of their gymnasts, but also their conditioning. To help the coach with conditioning, there is a plethora of advice and equipment. However gymnastics coaches need fundamental information to evaluate these products and suggestions; and yes, even see through the grantsmanship of the sport scientists. Understanding basic principles, coaches can sift through the advice and choose the best conditioning for their gymnasts. To help coaches towards understanding basic principles of strength training, the U.S. Elite Coaches Association for Women's Gymnastics (USECA–W) has had translated an excellent article on strength training fundamentals (Bührle and Werner, 1984). The translation of "The Muscle Hypertrophy Training of the Body Builder" (Bührle and Werner, 1984) is available from the USECA. I want to explain how these fundamentals should be applied in gymnastics. Four basic principles that will help coaches to evaluate strength training are: z Consistent, special strength training is necessary for maximum performance in gymnastics; z Training to increase muscle size and strength is important, but maximum strength from minimum size is the most important training goal; z Rest and recuperation are important aspects of strength training, also in gymnastics; z Strength training must be integrated with the skill training in gymnastics.
    [Show full text]
  • Training Program
    TRAINING PROGRAM INTERMEDIATE 6-DAY SPLIT THE​ ​WHY ​ I am not a Personal Trainer. Just a random university student who likes to train and do sport. I have been striving to improve my physical fitness ever since I was 15 years old. I played football at that time. And improving my physical fitness would mean training for sport-specific purposes. Then I began to become interested in training to improve strength, hypertrophy, conditioning and fitness in general. I have spent innumerable hours informing myself in the last 4 or 5 years of my life. This has allowed me to design training programs for myself just because I enjoy the process of crafting a thoughtfully-organized list of exercises to be repeated over time whose progress can be tracked in order to be aware of the improvements happening. As I have no certification and official competences in the fitness field, this training program is just the result of a lot of research and experience I have accumulated over time. THE​ ​PROGRAM ​ This training program is a 6-day split designed for intermediate lifters. The split is: Legs, Pull, Push, Arms, Total Body A, Total Body B. The core focus of the plan is hypertrophy, strength, as well as some conditioning, keeping in mind that the actual focus of a training plan depends on the type of diet regimen in place in the trainee’s life (calorie deficit, calorie surplus, maintenance). Apart from the single training session, in the last page of this document there can be found the volume per muscle group and a graphic depicting the volume per muscle group.
    [Show full text]
  • Its Relation to Muscle Activation in Training Session
    Nonuniform Muscle Hypertrophy: Its Relation to Muscle Activation in Training Session TAKU WAKAHARA1,2, ATSUKI FUKUTANI3,4,5, YASUO KAWAKAMI1, and TOSHIMASA YANAI1 1Faculty of Sport Sciences, Waseda University, Tokorozawa, Saitama, JAPAN; 2Faculty of Health and Sports Science, Doshisha University, Kyotanabe, Kyoto, JAPAN; 3Graduate School of Sport Sciences, Waseda University, Saitama, JAPAN; 4Faculty of Sport and Health Science, Ritsumeikan University, Shiga, JAPAN; and 5Japan Society for the Promotion of Science, Tokyo, JAPAN ABSTRACT WAKAHARA, T., A. FUKUTANI, Y. KAWAKAMI, and T. YANAI. Nonuniform Muscle Hypertrophy: Its Relation to Muscle Activation in Training Session. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc., Vol. 45, No. 11, pp. 2158–2165, 2013. Purpose: Muscle hypertrophy in response to resistance training has been reported to occur nonuniformly along the length of the muscle. The purpose of the present study was to examine whether the regional difference in muscle hypertrophy induced by a training intervention corresponds to the regional difference in muscle activation in the training session. Methods: Twelve young men participated in a training intervention program for the elbow extensors with a multijoint resistance exercise for 12 wk (3 dIwkj1). Before and after the intervention, cross-sectional areas of the triceps brachii along its length were measured with magnetic resonance images. A series of transverse relaxation time (T2)-weighted magnetic resonance images was recorded before and immediately after the first session of training intervention. The T2 was calculated for each pixel within the triceps brachii. In the images recorded after the session, the number of pixels with a T2 greater than the threshold (mean + 1 SD of T2 before the session) was expressed as the ratio to the whole number of pixels within the muscle and used as an index of muscle activation (percent activated area).
    [Show full text]
  • The Time-Course of Changes in Muscle Mass, Architecture and Power During 6 Weeks of Plyometric Training
    fphys-11-00946 August 2, 2020 Time: 18:15 # 1 ORIGINAL RESEARCH published: 04 August 2020 doi: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00946 The Time-Course of Changes in Muscle Mass, Architecture and Power During 6 Weeks of Plyometric Training Elena Monti1,2†, Martino V. Franchi1,2*†, Francesca Badiali2, Jonathan I. Quinlan2,3,4, Stefano Longo2,5 and Marco V. Narici1,2,6* 1 Institute of Physiology, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy, 2 MRC-ARUK Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing, University of Nottingham, Derby, United Kingdom, 3 School of Sport, Exercise and Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom, 4 NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospitals Birmingham, NHS Foundation Trust and University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom, 5 Department of Biomedical Sciences for Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy, 6 CIR-Myo Myology Centre, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy Edited by: Geoffrey A. Power, Purpose: To investigate the time-course of changes in knee-extensors muscle mass, University of Guelph, Canada architecture and function in response to plyometric training (PLT) performed on a novel Reviewed by: training device, the Tramp-Trainer. This machine consists in a trampoline connected to Matt S. Stock, University of Central Florida, an inclined sledge which allows the performance of repeated jumps while the subject is United States sitting on a chair. Jared R. Fletcher, Mount Royal University, Canada Methods: Eight healthy males (173.6 ± 4.7 cm, 69.7 ± 13.5 kg, 25.3 ± 4.6 years) *Correspondence: underwent 6 weeks of bilateral PLT on the tramp-trainer machine.
    [Show full text]
  • Attentional Focus for Maximizing Muscle Development: the Mind-Muscle Connection
    Evidence-Based Personal Training The Evidence-Based Personal Training column provides practical application of research topics specific to enhancing results for personal trainers. COLUMN EDITOR: Brad Schoenfeld, PhD, CSCS, CSPS, NSCA-CPT Attentional Focus for Maximizing Muscle Development: The Mind-Muscle Connection Brad J. Schoenfeld, PhD, CSCS, FNSCA1 and Bret Contreras, MA, CSCS2 1Department of Health Sciences, Program of Exercise Science, City University of New York, Lehman College, New York, New York; and 2Sport Performance Research Institute, AUT University, Auckland, New Zealand ABSTRACT movements during performance. Alter- outcome measures, lending strong sup- natively, an external focus directs the port for the use of an external focus ATTENTIONAL FOCUS IS A WELL- exerciser’s attention to the environment. when the goal is to boost performance. RECOGNIZED ASPECT OF MOTOR For example, in the squat an internal LEARNING AND ITS USE HAS With respect to resistance training, the focus could be to “squeeze your glutes performance-based superiority of an IMPORTANT IMPLICATIONS TO THE as you ascend” whereas an external FITNESS PROFESSIONAL. THIS external focus has been attributed to focus could be to “drive the floor away an enhanced economy of movement ARTICLE WILL DISCUSS HOW from your body.” This article will discuss ATTENTIONAL FOCUS SHOULD BE associated with greater force produc- how attentional focus should be directed tion and reduced muscular activity (5). DIRECTED TO MAXIMIZE MUSCU- to maximize muscular development. However, whereas a more economical LAR DEVELOPMENT. ATTENTIONAL FOCUS RESEARCH movement pattern facilitates better skill acquisition, it may not be optimal for A compelling body of research indi- muscle development.
    [Show full text]