DOCSLIB.ORG

Delinquent Tax Report Page 1 of 139 Lancaster County 4/1/2021 10:20:30 Claim Years Range: 1997 - 2020 Selected Criteria: Municipality

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Delinquent Tax Report Page 1 of 139 Lancaster County 4/1/2021 10:20:30 Claim Years Range: 1997 - 2020 Selected Criteria: Municipality Delinquent Tax Report Page 1 of 139 Lancaster County 4/1/2021 10:20:30 Claim Years Range: 1997 - 2020 Selected Criteria: Municipality Parcel No Owner Site Address Total Due Years 380-56271-3-0008 1,779.96 2012,2013,2014,2015,2016,*** 520-31203-3-0013 204.90 2018,2019,2020 150-15014-0-0000 105 N RIVER ST LP 105 N RIVER ST 39,996.32 2020 150-35174-0-0000 105 N RIVER ST LP 30 E JACOB ST 1,189.25 2020 400-21406-0-0000 113 WEST FERDINAND STREET PROPERTY113 WLP FERDINAND ST 208.03 2020 390-96857-0-0000 1143 MANHEIM PIKE REAL ESTATE LLC 1143 MANHEIM PIKE 20,811.93 2020 400-83672-0-0000 123 EAST HIGH STREET PROPERTY LP 123 E HIGH ST 321.22 2020 490-02538-0-0000 13 HERSHEY REAL ESTATE LP 13 HERSHEY AVE 7,895.93 2020 400-63469-0-0000 135 SOUTH CHARLOTTE STREET PROPERTY135 S CHARLOTTELP ST 234.11 2020 250-47847-0-0000 145-147 HIGH ST APTS LP 145 W HIGH ST 30.69 2020 500-90256-0-0000 149 DOE RUN ROAD LP 149 DOE RUN RD 506.71 2020 390-13578-1-0101 150 FARMINGTON LLC 150 FARMINGTON LN UNIT 101 2,642.93 2020 390-13578-1-0102 150 FARMINGTON LLC 150 FARMINGTON LN UNIT 102 879.18 2020 390-13578-1-0103 150 FARMINGTON LLC 150 FARMINGTON LN UNIT 103 1,268.49 2020 390-13578-1-0104 150 FARMINGTON LLC 150 FARMINGTON LN UNIT 104 164.14 2020 390-13578-1-0105 150 FARMINGTON LLC 150 FARMINGTON LN UNIT 105 288.11 2020 390-13578-1-0106 150 FARMINGTON LLC 150 FARMINGTON LN UNIT 106 1,088.93 2020 390-13578-1-0107 150 FARMINGTON LLC 150 FARMINGTON LN UNIT 107 345.31 2020 390-13578-1-0108 150 FARMINGTON LLC 150 FARMINGTON LN UNIT 108 113.27 2020 390-13578-1-0109 150 FARMINGTON LLC 150 FARMINGTON LN UNIT 109 246.80 2020 400-55698-0-0000 150 SOUTH CHARLOTTE STREET PROPERTY150 S CHARLOTTELP ST 285.44 2020 390-78275-0-0000 1513 OREGON PIKE PROPERTY LP 1513 OREGON PIKE 1,919.96 2020 290-34929-0-0000 1728 LANDIS HOUSE INC 2600 VALLEY VIEW DR 6,057.18 2020 400-42673-0-0000 199 WEST STIEGEL HOLDINGS LIMITED199 LIABILITY W STIEGEL CO ST 8,925.48 2020 310-65645-0-0000 202 GREENFIELD LP 202 GREENFIELD RD 13,413.84 2019,2020 400-04649-0-0000 214 216 WEST HIGH STREET PROPERTY214 LP W HIGH ST 281.20 2020 337-98382-0-0000 218 SOUTH ANN TRUST 218 S ANN ST 8,274.32 2019,2020 331-20292-0-0000 221 NORTH PRINCE STREET LLC 227 N PRINCE ST UNIT 202 41,292.79 2019,2020 331-24633-0-0000 221 NORTH PRINCE STREET LLC 221 N PRINCE ST UNIT 221 49,910.93 2019,2020 331-88990-0-0000 221 WEST KING STREET LLC 222 W GRANT ST 26,036.81 2019,2020 320-26792-0-0000 222 MILLWOOD INC 222 MILLWOOD RD 7,500.08 2020 Copyright (C) 1997-2021 DEVNET Incorporated ACKERM Delinquent Tax Report Page 2 of 139 Lancaster County 4/1/2021 10:20:30 Claim Years Range: 1997 - 2020 Selected Criteria: Municipality Parcel No Owner Site Address Total Due Years 260-97700-0-0000 29 CLOISTER AVENUE LP 29 CLOISTER AVE 7,790.79 2020 110-94713-0-0000 2ND WIND REAL ESTATE GROUP LLC 535 S NINTH ST 9,193.23 2020 260-34940-0-0000 300 WEST CHESTNUT STREET LP 300 W CHESTNUT ST 51,476.19 2020 420-09246-0-0000 324 ANA REAL ESTATE HOLDINGS LLC 324 W MARKET ST 11,522.90 2020 410-32593-0-0000 3634 COLUMBIA AVENUE LLC 3634 COLUMBIA AVE 946.60 2020 337-32991-0-0000 3RD ROCK PROPERTIES LLC 357 S ANN ST 256.88 2020 270-02572-0-0000 471 NORTH READING ROAD LLC 475 N READING RD 10,675.86 2020 270-70173-0-0000 471 NORTH READING ROAD LLC 471 N READING RD 15,710.66 2020 270-89021-0-0000 471 NORTH READING ROAD LLC 494 CHURCH RD 3,413.70 2020 110-30219-0-0000 4880 EAST PROSPECT LLC 142 LOCUST ST 7,212.98 2019,2020 790-43650-0-0000 504 LAMPETER ROAD PROPERTY LP 504 LAMPETER RD 3,573.00 2020 270-98112-0-0000 515 N READING ROAD LLC 515 N READING RD 10,743.89 2020 338-86528-0-0000 552 554 WEST KING STREET LLC 554 W KING ST 6,408.30 2020 338-18897-0-0000 559 MANOR STREET LLC 559 MANOR ST 3,145.15 2020 410-40015-5-0001 5G INVESTMENT TRUST LLC 2565 RIVER RD 1,384.06 2020 339-80338-0-0000 603 NORTH PRINCE LLC 603 N PRINCE ST 11,311.53 2019,2020 338-18321-0-0000 623 LAKE STREET LLC 623 LAKE ST 1,152.80 2020 335-98188-0-0000 647 WEST LLC 647 W CHESTNUT ST 6,394.32 2020 290-26539-0-0000 690 MARKET STREET LLC 2209 WOOD ST 6,067.12 2019,2020 320-01581-0-0000 690 MARKET STREET LLC 313 CLOVER AVE 8,642.31 2019,2020 450-17700-0-0000 690 MARKET STREET LLC 711 CLAY ALY 10,113.12 2019,2020 110-23004-0-0000 789 MAIN STREET LLC 132 LOCUST ST 19,814.78 2019,2020 110-28404-0-0000 789 MAIN STREET LLC 138 LOCUST ST 2,208.92 2019,2020 110-29936-0-0000 789 MAIN STREET LLC 45 BANK AVE 2,717.98 2019,2020 300-57984-0-0000 937 MARY STREET TRUST 937 MARY ST 5,062.44 2020 310-67300-0-0000 ABADIR ESSAM E 275 EDGEMERE DR 870.25 2020 440-40182-0-0000 ABBATO ROBERT F 416 MANOR VIEW DR 3,334.95 2020 560-29684-0-0000 ABBS JOHN J & GWENDOLYN F LINCOLN HWY 5,540.94 2019,2020 110-47374-0-0000 ABDELMESSEH AMIR 909 SPRUCE ST 2,346.04 2020 420-66685-0-0000 ABDELMESSEH AMIR 133 1/2 W WALNUT ST 3,605.27 2020 560-43356-3-0173 ABEL HAROLD D 755 WILLOW LN 1,677.63 2018,2019,2020 Copyright (C) 1997-2021 DEVNET Incorporated ACKERM Delinquent Tax Report Page 3 of 139 Lancaster County 4/1/2021 10:20:30 Claim Years Range: 1997 - 2020 Selected Criteria: Municipality Parcel No Owner Site Address Total Due Years 390-24682-0-0000 ABRAHAM RICHARD & 518 ASHTON PL 3,953.49 2020 339-60307-0-0000 ACKER EARL E III & 1117 W CLAY ST 1,840.05 2020 336-30571-0-0000 ACOSTA EDGAR J 622 E MADISON ST 1,552.71 2020 337-55905-0-0000 ACOSTA VELEZ IVAN 804 HIGHLAND AVE 275.56 2020 090-15352-0-0000 ADAIR KENNETH L 525 S RIDGE RD 5,717.97 2019,2020 540-27596-0-0000 ADAME MARY M 3059 BACK RUN RD 1,494.90 2020 339-28721-0-0000 ADAMS DENISE E 521 LANCASTER AVE 7,324.11 2019,2020 240-08399-0-0000 ADAMS ROBERT S 259 W 28TH DIVISION HWY 3,293.63 2019,2020 550-99508-0-0000 ADAMS SHIRLEE M WHITE OAK RD 9,416.34 2018,2019,2020 240-79983-0-0000 ADAMS STEVEN T & ERICA S HOLIDAY LN 2,291.92 2019,2020 020-69267-0-0000 ADAMSON CHERYL S 122 N 7TH ST 2,462.07 2020 410-98542-3-0178 ADELMAN AMY 202 LONGWOOD CT W 1,638.78 2019,2020 440-92971-0-0000 ADHIKARI JAMUNA D 34 CHAMBERLAIN LN 3,996.73 2020 300-20196-0-0000 ADORERS OF THE BLOOD OF CHRIST 3950 COLUMBIA AVE 13,542.40 2020 338-12825-0-0000 ADROIT HOLDINGS LLC 678 UNION ST 795.66 2020 336-58404-0-0000 AGUILAR DARLA JZ 633 E CHESTNUT ST 1,488.77 2019,2020 336-35845-0-0000 AGUILAR MIGUEL ANGEL FLORES 362 ICE AVE 2,176.87 2020 337-39441-0-0000 AKHMEDOV AZIM 423 S QUEEN ST 983.81 2020 390-75421-0-0000 AL HAMILTON FAMILY LIMITED 4 MCGOVERN AVE 5,654.65 2020 130-83986-0-0000 ALBERT TARA L 129 MEADOW VIEW LN 3,341.09 2019 290-60765-3-0229 ALBIN PAUL 123 MADGE DR 43.49 2020 300-13348-0-0000 ALCANTARA JOANA B 3613 CLEAR STREAM DR 6,410.21 2020 410-26123-0-0000 ALECXIH ALICIA G 2368 FRANKLIN RD 3,256.97 2020 420-66346-0-0000 ALECXIH PETER C JR 14 E MARKET ST 11,598.93 2020 338-38205-0-0000 ALECXIH PETER C JR 521 FREMONT ST 6,789.26 2020 339-32210-0-0000 ALECXIH PETER C JR 516 N QUEEN ST 2,744.23 2020 340-70494-0-0000 ALECXIH PETER C JR 719 BEAN HILL RD 4,182.79 2020 390-05655-0-0000 ALECXIH PETER C JR 111 MITRIC LN 4,504.50 2020 390-13193-0-0000 ALECXIH PETER C JR 109 MITRIC LN 4,242.33 2020 390-19024-0-0000 ALECXIH PETER C JR 107 MITRIC LN 4,242.33 2020 390-21650-0-0000 ALECXIH PETER C JR 2680 BANTAM LN 3,891.16 2020 Copyright (C) 1997-2021 DEVNET Incorporated ACKERM Delinquent Tax Report Page 4 of 139 Lancaster County 4/1/2021 10:20:30 Claim Years Range: 1997 - 2020 Selected Criteria: Municipality Parcel No Owner Site Address Total Due Years 390-22152-0-0000 ALECXIH PETER C JR 2684 BANTAM LN 3,878.45 2020 390-24753-0-0000 ALECXIH PETER C JR 105 MITRIC LN 4,226.43 2020 390-25384-0-0000 ALECXIH PETER C JR 2676 BANTAM LN 3,965.84 2020 390-29982-0-0000 ALECXIH PETER C JR 103 MITRIC LN 4,226.43 2020 390-36110-0-0000 ALECXIH PETER C JR 101 MITRIC LN 4,270.93 2020 420-10589-0-0000 ALECXIH PETER C JR 521 W MARKET ST 2,320.59 2020 420-83012-0-0000 ALECXIH PETER JR 463 E MARKET ST 1,959.96 2020 080-96076-0-0000 ALEJO LOPEZ TANIA S 129 ROYAL HORSE WAY 7,561.80 2020 338-03032-0-0000 ALERT CLUB 763 CRYSTAL ST 1,013.33 2020 338-07017-0-0000 ALERT CLUB 762 CRYSTAL ST 3,487.69 2020 560-43356-3-0141 ALEXANDER DAMIEN IAN 839 CIRCLE DR 343.46 2020 130-32803-0-0000 ALEXANDER DONNA J 186 FALMOUTH RD 9,020.54 2018,2019,2020 335-18951-0-0000 ALEXCIH PETER C JR 116 N MARY ST 3,794.33 2020 260-14274-0-0000 ALEXOPOULOS JAMES P 20 E KING ST 21,569.96 2018,2019,2020 337-00241-0-0000 ALICEA HECTOR 432 S DUKE ST 3,732.55 2019,2020 290-60765-3-0219 ALICEA MINERVA 73 MADGE DR 346.42 2019,2020 560-29235-3-0045 ALICEA- PROFETO ASHLEY NICOLE 762 STONEWOOD DR 39.11 2020 410-98542-3-0066 ALLEN NATHAN 103 E OAKFIELD CT 79.57 2020 560-43356-3-0059 ALLEN PETER KIRK 788 DOGWOOD LN 82.05 2020 150-20081-0-0000 ALLEN RASHARD W 129 CHELMSFORD DR 2,839.94 2020 337-79259-0-0000 ALMAGUER GERARDO 525 S PLUM ST 2,638.98 2020 338-21543-0-0000 ALMAGUER HERMES 332 W KING ST 1,530.15 2020 290-22521-3-0150 ALMESTICA DAMARIS 2884 SCENIC DR 43.20 2020 420-26184-0-0000 ALTLAND HAROLD E 26 S LOCUST ST 871.35 2020 420-46757-0-0000 ALTLAND HAROLD E 26 S PERRY ST 7,698.25 2018,2019,2020 110-52915-0-0000 ALTLAND JACQUELINE J 548 N SECOND ST 3,374.53 2019,2020 410-59162-0-0000 ALTLAND WENDY 17 CHARLESTOWN RD 6,910.84 2019,2020 110-55930-0-0000 ALTLAND WENDY L 536 N SECOND ST 9,745.00 2018,2019,2020 290-22521-3-0131 ALVARADO MELIZA RAMOS 2843 TERRY LN 179.67 2019,2020 337-92411-0-0000 ALVARADO-VAZQUEZ ESTHER 720 S LIME ST 1,597.82 2020 337-83275-0-0000 ALVAREZ JULIO J 605 S CHRISTIAN ST 991.39 2020 Copyright (C) 1997-2021 DEVNET Incorporated ACKERM Delinquent Tax Report Page 5 of 139 Lancaster County 4/1/2021 10:20:30 Claim Years Range: 1997 - 2020 Selected
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Rice, Technology, and History: the Case of China
    RICE, TECHNOLOGY, AND HISTORY The Case of China By Francesca Bray Wet-rice farming systems have a logic of technical and economic evolution that is distinctively different from the more familiar Western pattern of agricultural development. The well-documented history of rice farming in China provides an opportunity for students to reassess some commonly held ideas about tech- nical efficiency and sustainable growth. rom 1000 to 1800 CE China was the world’s most populous state and its most powerful and productive economy. Rice farming was the mainstay of this empire. Rice could be grown successfully in only about half of the territory, in the south- F ern provinces where rainfall was abundant. There it was the staple food for all social classes, landlords and peasants, officials and artisans alike. The more arid climate in the north was not suited to rice; northern farmers grew dry-land grains like wheat, millet, and sorghum for local consumption. But the yields of these grains were relatively low, whereas southern rice farming produced sufficient surpluses to sustain government and commerce throughout China. Vast quantities of rice were brought north to provision the capital city— home to the political elite, the imperial court, and all the state ministries—and to feed the huge armies stationed along the northern frontier. People said that the north was like a lazy brother living off the generosity of his hard-working and productive southern sibling. Thou- sands of official barges carried rice from Jiangnan to the capital region along the Grand Canal, and more rice still was transported north in private ships along the coast (fig.
    [Show full text]
  • Timber Users, Timber Savers: Homestake Mining Company and the First Regulated Timber Harvest
    Copyright © 1992 by the South Dakota State Historical Society. All Rights Reserved. Timber Users, Timber Savers: Homestake Mining Company and the First Regulated Timber Harvest RICHMOND L CLOW The Progressive Fra (1900-1916) has emerged as a period crucial to the success of the late nineteenth century conservation crusade. During this optimistic era of social reform, with its faith in tech- nology and efficiency, demands for a halt to the destruction and waste of the nation's natural resources became established federal policy. Many studies have examined the varied themes of the con- servation movement, from the aesthetic importance of the environ- ment to the fear that the depletion of resources, such as timber, threatened the very existence of American society.' These studies have most often defined the users of resources as the despoilers of the environment. Such an approach, however, ignores the role of industry in conservation. 1. Samuel P. Hays, Conser\'ation and the Cospel of Efficiency: The Progressive Con- servation Movement, 1890-1920 (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1959), pp. 1-3. Donald ]. Pisani, in "Forests and Conservation, 1865-1890,"/ouma/oMmencan History 75 (Sept. 1985): 340-59, asserts that a conservation "ethic" existed for several decades before Progressive reformers popularized the cause. While scientists led the later movement, its leaders in the post-Civil War years were as often "moralists and philosophers" who anticipated modern conservationists in their understanding of the interrelatedness of natural resources. For more on the late nineteenth cen- tury fears of timber famine that helped lo spur the conservation movement, see David A.
    [Show full text]
  • Harvest Ceremony
    ATLANTIC OCEAN PA\\' fl.. Xf I I' I \ f 0 H I PI \ \. I \I ION •,, .._ "', Ll ; ~· • 4 .. O\\'\\1S s-'' f1r~~' ~, -~J.!!!I • .. .I . _f' .~h\ ,. \ l.J rth..i'i., \ inc-v •.u d .. .. .... Harvest Ceremony BEYOND THE THANK~GIVING MYTH - a study guide ­ Harvest Ceremony BEYOND THE THANKSGIVING MYTH Summary: Native American people who first encountered the “pilgrims” at what is now Plymouth, Massachusetts play a major role in the imagination of American people today. Contemporary celebrations of the Thanksgiving holiday focus on the idea that the “first Thanksgiving” was a friendly gathering of two disparate groups—or even neighbors—who shared a meal and lived harmoniously. In actuality, the assembly of these people had much more to do with political alliances, diplomacy, and an effort at rarely achieved, temporary peaceful coexistence. Although Native American people have always given thanks for the world around them, the Thanksgiving celebrated today is more a combination of Puritan religious practices and the European festival called Harvest Home, which then grew to encompass Native foods. The First People families, but a woman could inherit the position if there was no male heir. A sachem could be usurped by In 1620, the area from Narragansett Bay someone belonging to a sachem family who was able in eastern Rhode Island to the Atlantic Ocean in to garner the allegiance of enough people. An unjust or southeastern Massachusetts, including Cape Cod, unwise sachem could find himself with no one to lead, Martha’s Vineyard and Nantucket, was the home as sachems had no authority to force the people to do of the Wampanoag.
    [Show full text]
  • Leading Harvest Awarded Walton Family Foundation Grant to Scale
    Contact Kathleen Barada [email protected] Leading Harvest Awarded Walton Family Foundation Grant to Scale Sustainable Agriculture on Family Farms Funding supports pilot program in the Upper Mississippi River Watershed to remove barriers, accelerate sustainability certification, and generate market opportunity for producers Arlington, Va. (Thursday, October 29, 2020) – Leading Harvest, a leader in sustainable agriculture, today announced it has been awarded a Walton Family Foundation grant to support its work with farmers in the Upper Mississippi River Watershed. Leading Harvest will engage growers to adopt certifiable land management practices aimed at improving environmental, economic and social outcomes, including the quality of waterways flowing into the Mississippi River and mitigating environmental damage in the Gulf of Mexico. The grant, which will help fund a pilot program providing education and training to crop farmers in the Upper Mississippi River Watershed, advances Leading Harvest’s efforts nationwide to grow its industry-leading Farmland Management Standard. The Standard is the first scalable, industry-wide solution to the urgent issues facing our communities – from climate change and biodiversity, to the resilience of our croplands and communities. The Standard also includes indicators for water use and water quality, including fertilizer application and runoff protection. “We thank the Walton Family Foundation for recognizing Leading Harvest’s innovative efforts to promote sustainable agriculture through our Farmland Management Standard,” said Kenny Fahey, executive director of Leading Harvest. “This grant will enable us to work directly with producers in the Mississippi River Watershed to both recognize as well as enhance their efforts in sustainable agriculture and increase their market position by certifying their environmental and social management systems.” The pilot program will audit and certify sustainability activities, both those existing currently as well as facilitated through training initiatives, on family farms.
    [Show full text]
  • Ramping up Reforestation in the United States: a Guide for Policymakers March 2021 Cover Photo: CDC Photography / American Forests
    Ramping up Reforestation in the United States: A Guide for Policymakers March 2021 Cover photo: CDC Photography / American Forests Executive Summary Ramping Up Reforestation in the United States: A Guide for Policymakers is designed to support the development of reforestation policies and programs. The guide highlights key findings on the state of America’s tree nursery infrastructure and provides a range of strategies for encouraging and enabling nurseries to scale up seedling production. The guide builds on a nationwide reforestation assessment (Fargione et al., 2021) and follow-on assessments (Ramping Up Reforestation in the United States: Regional Summaries companion guide) of seven regions in the contiguous United States (Figure 1). Nursery professionals throughout the country informed our key findings and strategies through a set of structured interviews and a survey. Across the contiguous U.S., there are over 133 million acres of reforestation opportunity on lands that have historically been forested (Cook-Patton et al., 2020). This massive reforestation opportunity equals around 68 billion trees. The majority of opportunities occur on pastureland, including those with poor soils in the Eastern U.S. Additionally, substantial reforestation opportunities in the Western U.S. are driven by large, severe wildfires. Growing awareness of this potential has led governments and organizations to ramp up reforestation to meet ambitious climate and biodiversity goals. Yet, there are many questions about the ability of nurseries to meet the resulting increase in demand for tree seedlings. These include a lack of seed, workforce constraints, and insufficient nursery infrastructure. To meet half of the total reforestation opportunity by 2040 (i.e., 66 million acres) would require America’s nurseries to produce an additional 1.8 billion seedlings each year.
    [Show full text]
  • The Institutional Causes of China's Great Famine, 1959–1961
    Review of Economic Studies (2015) 82, 1568–1611 doi:10.1093/restud/rdv016 © The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Review of Economic Studies Limited. Advance access publication 20 April 2015 The Institutional Causes of China’s Great Famine, 1959–1961 Downloaded from XIN MENG Australian National University NANCY QIAN Yale University http://restud.oxfordjournals.org/ and PIERRE YARED Columbia University First version received January 2012; final version accepted January 2015 (Eds.) This article studies the causes of China’s Great Famine, during which 16.5 to 45 million individuals at Columbia University Libraries on April 25, 2016 perished in rural areas. We document that average rural food retention during the famine was too high to generate a severe famine without rural inequality in food availability; that there was significant variance in famine mortality rates across rural regions; and that rural mortality rates were positively correlated with per capita food production, a surprising pattern that is unique to the famine years. We provide evidence that an inflexible and progressive government procurement policy (where procurement could not adjust to contemporaneous production and larger shares of expected production were procured from more productive regions) was necessary for generating this pattern and that this policy was a quantitatively important contributor to overall famine mortality. Key words: Famines, Modern chinese history, Institutions, Central planning JEL Codes: P2, O43, N45 1. INTRODUCTION
    [Show full text]
  • Onslow County Advertisement of Tax Liens on Real Property for 2020
    THE DAILY NEWS » www.jdnews.com MONDAY, MARCH 8, 2021 C7 ONSLOW COUNTY ADVERTISEMENT OF TAX LIENS ON REAL PROPERTY FOR 2020 BARNARD CRAIG E 188 DENISE DR 788.61 BROWN CALVIN KIM 236 HARRIS CREEK LOOP RD 1099.16 BARNARD CRAIG E 186 DENISE DR 82.55 BROWN CALVIN KIM 236 HARRIS CREEK LOOP RD 802.92 BARNARD MATTHEW C 1345 KELLUM LOOP RD 630.90 BROWN CALVIN KIM 135 SCOTT JENKINS RD 454.16 BARNARD MATTHEW C 1325 KELLUM LOOP RD 167.71 BROWN CALVIN KIM 0 HARRIS CREEK LOOP 120.62 Under and by virtue of the authority vested in me by Section 105-369 of the BARNES CAMP K 25 ESTHER LN 536.01 BROWN CARMEN MOORE 105 LILA LN 503.15 North Carolina General Statutes and pursuant to an order of the Board of BARNETT SANDRA KAY VAN WICKEL 336 RIDGEWOOD DR 143.46 BROWN CHAD C MORGAN & 176 E RIDGE CT 1,475.35 Commissioners of Onslow County dated February 1, 2021 I am hereby BARRKATT LLC 2300 2 NEW RIVER INLET RD 1,192.36 BROWN DAVID BRIAN 233 BELGRADE SWANSBORO RD 19.50 advertising tax liens for the year 2020 upon the real estate described below. BARROW GERALD SCOTT 0 BELGRADE SWANSBORO RD 227.78 BROWN DAVID BRIAN 235 BELBRADE SWANSBORO RD 11.75 The amount advertised will be increased by interest and costs, and the BARWICK TERESA D & CAROLYN BOYD 106 MCGOWAN RD 281.78 BROWN EVA C 213 BRIARNECK RD 766.61 omission of interest and costs from the amount advertised will not constitute BARWICK TERESA DIANE 146 LAKE HAVEN DR 571.82 BROWN EVA SMITH ESTATE 204 STRATFORD RD 962.18 BASDEN DOUGLAS R & HELEN K 1061 MERIDIAN DR 82.87 BROWN JEAN TUCK 4055 4TH ST 1,807.33 a waiver of the taxing unit’s claim for those items.
    [Show full text]
  • Marriage Record Index 1922-1938 Images Can Be Accessed in the Indiana Room
    Marriage Record Index 1922-1938 Images can be accessed in the Indiana Room. Call (812)949-3527 for more information. Groom Bride Marriage Date Image Aaron, Elza Antle, Marion 8/12/1928 026-048 Abbott, Charles Ruby, Hallie June 8/19/1935 030-580 Abbott, Elmer Beach, Hazel 12/9/1922 022-243 Abbott, Leonard H. Robinson, Berta 4/30/1926 024-324 Abel, Oscar C. Ringle, Alice M. 1/11/1930 027-067 Abell, Lawrence A. Childers, Velva 4/28/1930 027-154 Abell, Steve Blakeman, Mary Elizabeth 12/12/1928 026-207 Abernathy, Pete B. Scholl, Lorena 10/15/1926 024-533 Abram, Howard Henry Abram, Elizabeth F. 3/24/1934 029-414 Absher, Roy Elgin Turner, Georgia Lillian 4/17/1926 024-311 Ackerman, Emil Becht, Martha 10/18/1927 025-380 Acton, Dewey Baker, Mary Cathrine 3/17/1923 022-340 Adam, Herman Glen Harpe, Mary Allia 4/11/1936 031-273 Adam, Herman Glenn Hinton, Esther 8/13/1927 025-282 Adams, Adelbert Pope, Thelma 7/14/1927 025-255 Adams, Ancil Logan, Jr. Eiler, Lillian Mae 4/8/1933 028-570 Adams, Cecil A. Johnson, Mary E. 12/21/1923 022-706 Adams, Crozier E. Sparks, Sarah 4/1/1936 031-250 Adams, Earl Snook, Charlotte 1/5/1935 030-250 Adams, Harry Meyer, Lillian M. 10/21/1927 025-376 Adams, Herman Glen Smith, Hazel Irene 2/28/1925 023-502 Adams, James O. Hallet, Louise M. 4/3/1931 027-476 Adams, Lloyd Kirsch, Madge 6/7/1932 028-274 Adams, Robert A.
    [Show full text]
  • Direct Seeded Fall Root Crops Are Some of the Least Labor Intensive Crops to Grow on Our Farm
    Summary: Direct seeded fall root crops are some of the least labor intensive crops to grow on our farm. Often fall root crops don’t require any cultivation or hand weeding. Later planting dates allow for all nutrient needs to be met via cover cropping. Late planting dates can also lower pest pressure, particularly if the crops are planted far away from summer crops of the same family. As we trend towards wetter or more consistent moisture in the fall, current weather patterns allow for little or no need for irrigation. Much of our fall root crop production is simply planting the crop and then harvesting it! Fall root crops are also more efficient to harvest relative to other veg crops, because root crops can be mass harvested and stored. Mass harvest allows for more efficient material handling, with the use of larger harvest containers and a more efficient organization of labor. The Use of a barrel washer and or brusher washer makes processing roots relatively quick. Planting root crops Field prep: Field cultivate (stale seed bed, summer fallow) successive times over fall root ground. Allow legume cover crop grow large before plow down helps with nutrient needs. Use of a precision seeder allows for no thinning. Even in beets! LatestPlanting Dates: Parsnips: May‐Early June (hardest root crop to grow) Carrots: last planting date mid‐late July Beets: end of July Brassicas: Rutabagas: end of July Watermelon Radish: early‐mid August Daikon, China Rose Radish, Korean Radish: mid August Hakurei Turnips: mid august to early September. Storage: winter storage of roots is often just an insulated room with a thermostat and a heat lamp.
    [Show full text]
  • Wildlife Population and Harvest Trends in the United States a Technical Document Supporting the Forest Service 2010 RPA Assessment
    Wildlife Population and Harvest Trends in the United States A Technical Document Supporting the Forest Service 2010 RPA Assessment Curtis H. Flather, Michael S. Knowles, Martin F. Jones, and Carol Schilli Flather, Curtis H.; Knowles, Michael S.; Jones, Martin F.; Schilli, Carol. 2013. Wildlife popu- lation and harvest trends in the United States: A technical document supporting the Forest Service 2010 RPA Assessment. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-296. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 94 p. Abstract: The Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act (RPA) of 1974 requires periodic assessments of the condition and trends of the nation’s renewable natural resources. Data from many sources were used to document recent historical trends in big game, small game, migratory game birds, furbearers, nongame, and imperiled species. Big game and waterfowl have generally increased in population and harvest trends. Many small upland and webless migratory game bird species have declined notably in population or harvest. Considerable declines in fur harvest since the 2000 RPA Assessment have occurred. Among the 426 breeding bird species with sufficient data to estimate nationwide trends, 45 percent had stable abundance since the mid-1960s; however, more species declined (31 percent) than increased (24 percent). A total of 1,368 bird species were formally listed as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act—a net gain of 278 species since the 2000 RPA Assessment. Most forest bird communities are expected to support a lower variety of species. America’s wildlife resources will continue to be pressured by diverse demands for ecosystem services from humans.
    [Show full text]
  • Serhii Plokhy Mapping the Great Famine One of the Most Insightful
    Serhii Plokhy Mapping the Great Famine One of the most insightful and moving eyewitness accounts of the Holodomor, or the Great Ukrainian Famine of 1932–33, was written by Oleksandra Radchenko, a teacher in the Kharkiv region of Ukraine. In her diary, which was confiscated by Stalin’s secret police and landed the author in the Gulag for ten long years, the 36-year-old teacher recorded not only what she saw around her but also what she thought about the tragedy unfolding before her eyes. “I am so afraid of hunger; I’m afraid for the children,” wrote Radchenko, who had three young daughters, in February 1932. “May God protect us and have mercy on us. It would not be so offensive if it were due to a bad harvest, but they have taken away the grain and created an artificial famine.” That year she wrote about the starvation and suffering of her neighbors and acquaintances but recorded no deaths from hunger. It all changed in January 1933, when she encountered the first corpse of a famine victim on the road leading to her home. By the spring of 1933, she was regularly reporting mass deaths from starvation. “People are dying,” wrote Radchenko in her entry for May 16, 1933, “…they say that whole villages have died in southern Ukraine.”1 Was Radchenko’s story unique? Did people all over Ukraine indeed suffer from starvation in 1932 and then start dying en masse in 1933? Which areas of Ukraine were most affected? Was there a north-south divide, as the diary suggests, and, if so, did people suffer (and die) more in the south than in the north? Were there more deaths in the villages than in towns and cities? Were small towns affected? Did ethnicity matter? These are the core questions that Mapa, the Harvard Ukrainian Research Institute’s Digital Map of Ukraine Project is attempting to answer by developing a Geographic Information System (GIS)-based Digital Atlas of the Holodomor.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Causes of China's Agricultural Crisis and the Great Leap Famine
    ON THE CAUSES OF CHINA'S AGRICULTURAL CRISIS AND THE GREAT LEAP FAMINE Justin Yifu Lin and Dennis Tao Yang ABSTRACT: Recently researchers have conducted extensive investigations on China's Great Leap cri- sis. In this article, we critically review this literature and argue that, since the grain production collapse was not the only factor that led to the famine, the causes of these two catastrophes require separate exam- ination. At the theoretical level multidimensional factors were responsible for the crisis. However, exist- ing empirical findings mainly support the exit right hypothesis to explain the dramatic productivity fluctuations in Chinese agriculture, and support grain availability and the urban-biased food distribution system as important causes of the famine. We suggest that additional empirical research is needed to assess the relative importance of the proposed causes. I. INTRODUCTION The sharp declines in agricultural production and the widespread famine between 1959-61 are two most important aspects of China's economic crisis during the Great Leap Forward. In 1959, total grain output suddenly dropped by 15 percent and, in the following two years, food supplies reached only about 70 percent of the 1958 level. During the same period, massive starvation prevailed in China. A careful study of demographic data concludes that this crisis resulted in about 30 million excess deaths and about 33 million lost or postponed births (Ashton, Hill, Piazza, & Zeitz, 1984). This disaster is one of the worst catastrophes in human history. The crisis of the Great Leap Forward became a fertile ground for academic research immediately after the release of reliable economic and demographic information from China in the early 1980s.
    [Show full text]