DOCSLIB.ORG

The Circadian Clock of the Carpenter Ant Camponotus Floridanus Die

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Circadian Clock of the Carpenter Ant Camponotus Floridanus Die The circadian clock of the carpenter ant Camponotus floridanus Die circadiane Uhr der Rossameise Camponotus floridanus Doctoral thesis for a doctoral degree at the Graduate School of Life Sciences, Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg, Section Integrative Biology submitted by Janina Kay from Ochsenfurt Würzburg, 13.12.2017 Submitted on: …………………………………………………………..…….. Office stamp Members of the Promotionskomitee: Chairperson: Prof. Dr. Jörg Schultz Primary Supervisor: Prof. Dr. Charlotte Förster Supervisor (Second): Prof. Dr. Flavio Roces Supervisor (Third): Prof. Dr. Monika Stengl Date of Public Defence: …………………………………………….………… Date of Receipt of Certificates: ………………………………………………. CONTENT: Summary: ................................................................................................................................................. 1 Zusammenfassung: .................................................................................................................................. 2 1. Introduction.......................................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 The endogenous clock .................................................................................................................... 5 1.2 Rhythmic Behavior ......................................................................................................................... 7 1.2.1 Rhythmic behavior in selected ants ........................................................................................ 7 1.2.2 Rhythmic behavior in C. floridanus ....................................................................................... 10 1.3 The molecular basis of the circadian clock ................................................................................... 11 1.3.1 The transcriptional-translational feedback-loop .................................................................. 11 1.3.2 Components of the feedback loop in selected insects ......................................................... 11 1.3.2.1 The molecular feedback loop of Drosophila melanogaster ........................................... 11 1.3.2.2 The molecular feedback loop of hymenopteran species ............................................... 15 1.4 The anatomy of the circadian clock ............................................................................................. 17 1.4.1 The anatomy of the central clock in Drosophila melanogaster ............................................ 17 1.4.2 The anatomy of the central clock in Apis mellifera ............................................................... 18 1.4.3 The PDF-network ................................................................................................................... 20 1.4.3.1 The Pigment-Dispersing Factor ...................................................................................... 20 1.4.3.2 The PDF-network in Drosophila melanogaster .............................................................. 21 1.4.3.3 The PDF-network in Leucophea maderae ...................................................................... 22 1.4.3.4 The PDF-network in Apis mellifera ................................................................................. 24 1.5 Study Aims .................................................................................................................................... 27 2. Material and Methods........................................................................................................................ 28 2.1 Experiments: ................................................................................................................................ 28 2.1.1 Locomotor behavior in response to light at different temperatures.................................... 29 2.1.2 The PDF-network in minor and major workers of Camponotus floridanus .......................... 29 2.1.3 The localization and cycling of the Period protein in C. floridanus ....................................... 30 2.2 Animal rearing: ............................................................................................................................. 30 2.3 Monitoring of Locomotor Behavior: ............................................................................................ 30 2.3.1 Pre-entrainment in sub-colonies ........................................................................................... 31 2.3.2 Entrainment in TriKinetics LAM (LD-phase) .......................................................................... 31 2.3.3 Feeding .................................................................................................................................. 31 2.3.4 Monitoring Protocols ............................................................................................................ 32 2.3.5 Activity Recording ................................................................................................................. 33 2.3.6 Data analysis .......................................................................................................................... 33 2.3.6.1 Actograms ...................................................................................................................... 33 2.3.6.2 Average Day ................................................................................................................... 34 2.3.6.3 Period length .................................................................................................................. 35 2.3.6.4 Additional data analysis ................................................................................................. 35 2.4 Pre-processing of brain-samples .................................................................................................. 36 2.4.1 Collection of animals ............................................................................................................. 36 2.4.1.1 Collection from monitors ............................................................................................... 36 2.4.1.2 Collection from colonies................................................................................................. 36 2.4.2 Preparation of brains: ........................................................................................................... 36 2.4.3 Fixation .................................................................................................................................. 37 2.4.4 Embedding and Vibrating Blade Microtome Sectioning ....................................................... 37 2.5 Immunohistochemistry ................................................................................................................ 37 2.5.1 Immunofluorescent labelling ................................................................................................ 38 2.5.2 PDH staining in wholemounts ............................................................................................... 39 2.5.3 PDH staining on sections ....................................................................................................... 40 2.5.4 PER/PDH double-labelling ..................................................................................................... 42 2.6 Confocal Laser-Scanning Microscopy: .......................................................................................... 44 2.7 Data Processing ............................................................................................................................ 46 2.7.1 Image processing in FiJi ......................................................................................................... 46 2.7.2 Identification of PER cell clusters .......................................................................................... 46 2.7.3 Quantification of PER staining intensity ................................................................................ 46 2.7.4 Reconstruction of the PDF network: ..................................................................................... 47 2.7.4.1 Neuropil Reconstruction ................................................................................................ 47 2.7.4.2 PDH cell body reconstruction ......................................................................................... 48 2.7.4.3 PDH network reconstruction .......................................................................................... 48 2.7.4.4 Generation of the 3D-model .......................................................................................... 49 2.8 Statistics ....................................................................................................................................... 50 2.9 Materials ...................................................................................................................................... 50 3. Results: ............................................................................................................................................... 54 3.1 The endogenous Locomotor Behavior of C. floridanus: ............................................................... 54 3.1.1 C. floridanus is able to entrain to different light phases ....................................................... 54 3.1.2 C. floridanus has an endogenous period that is temperature compensated ....................... 61 3.2 Minor and major ants of C. floridanus have
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Resasco Etal 2014 Plosone.Pdf (1.045Mb)
    Using Historical and Experimental Data to Reveal Warming Effects on Ant Assemblages The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Resasco, Julian, Shannon L. Pelini, Katharine L. Stuble, Nathan J. Sanders, Robert R. Dunn, Sarah E. Diamond, Aaron M. Ellison, Nicholas J. Gotelli, and Douglas J. Levey. 2014. “Using Historical and Experimental Data to Reveal Warming Effects on Ant Assemblages.” Edited by Martin Heil. PLoS ONE 9 (2) (February 4): e88029. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0088029. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/ journal.pone.0088029. Published Version doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0088029 Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:11857773 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Using Historical and Experimental Data to Reveal Warming Effects on Ant Assemblages Julian Resasco1*†, Shannon L. Pelini2, Katharine L. Stuble 3‡, Nathan J. Sanders3§, Robert R. Dunn4, Sarah E. Diamond4¶, Aaron M. Ellison5, Nicholas J. Gotelli6, Douglas J. Levey7 1Department of Biology, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA 2Department of Biological Sciences, Bowling Green State University, Bowling Green, OH 43403, USA 3Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA 4Department of Biological Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA 5Harvard University, Harvard Forest, Petersham, MA 01366 USA 6Department of Biology, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405 USA 7National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA 22230, USA † Current address: Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO 80309, USA ‡ Current address: Oklahoma Biological Survey, 111 E.
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology and Field Biology of Two Dominant Camponotus Ants
    JOURNAL OF NATURAL HISTORY, 2018 VOL. 52, NOS. 3–4, 237–252 https://doi.org/10.1080/00222933.2017.1420833 Ecology and field biology of two dominant Camponotus ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in the Brazilian savannah Mariane U.V. Ronquea, Vincent Fourcassiéb and Paulo S. Oliveira c aPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ecologia, Instituto de Biologia, C.P. 6109, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brazil; bCentre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale, UMR CNRS Nº5169, Centre de Biologie Intégrative, Université de Toulouse, CNRS, UPS, Toulouse, France; cDepartamento de Biologia Animal, C.P. 6109, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brazil Camponotus renggeri and C. rufipes are very abundant in Brazilian ARTICLE HISTORY cerrado savannah, where they feed extensively on liquid rewards Received 23 March 2017 and commonly associate with plants bearing extrafloral nectaries Accepted 5 December 2017 and honeydew-producing insects. Here, we provide a qualitative Online 22 January 2018 and quantitative field account on the natural history and ecology of KEYWORDS these two ant species. The study was carried out in a cerrado Activity schedule; ants; reserve in south-eastern Brazil across a rainy/hot season (summer) cerrado vegetation; nesting and a dry/cold season (winter). The ants were found in two vegeta- habits; home range tion physiognomies: all nests of C. rufipes were located in the cerrado sensu stricto (scrub of shrubs and trees, 3–8 m tall), whereas C. renggeri occurred mostly in the cerradão (forest with more or less merging canopy, 10–12 m tall). Both species nested in fallen or erect dead trunks, as well as underground.
    [Show full text]
  • Nutritional Ecology of the Carpenter Ant Camponotus Pennsylvanicus (De Geer): Macronutrient Preference and Particle Consumption
    Nutritional Ecology of the Carpenter Ant Camponotus pennsylvanicus (De Geer): Macronutrient Preference and Particle Consumption Colleen A. Cannon Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Entomology Richard D. Fell, Chairman Jeffrey R. Bloomquist Richard E. Keyel Charles Kugler Donald E. Mullins June 12, 1998 Blacksburg, Virginia Keywords: diet, feeding behavior, food, foraging, Formicidae Copyright 1998, Colleen A. Cannon Nutritional Ecology of the Carpenter Ant Camponotus pennsylvanicus (De Geer): Macronutrient Preference and Particle Consumption Colleen A. Cannon (ABSTRACT) The nutritional ecology of the black carpenter ant, Camponotus pennsylvanicus (De Geer) was investigated by examining macronutrient preference and particle consumption in foraging workers. The crops of foragers collected in the field were analyzed for macronutrient content at two-week intervals through the active season. Choice tests were conducted at similar intervals during the active season to determine preference within and between macronutrient groups. Isolated individuals and small social groups were fed fluorescent microspheres in the laboratory to establish the fate of particles ingested by workers of both castes. Under natural conditions, foragers chiefly collected carbohydrate and nitrogenous material. Carbohydrate predominated in the crop and consisted largely of simple sugars. A small amount of glycogen was present. Carbohydrate levels did not vary with time. Lipid levels in the crop were quite low. The level of nitrogen compounds in the crop was approximately half that of carbohydrate, and exhibited seasonal dependence. Peaks in nitrogen foraging occurred in June and September, months associated with the completion of brood rearing in Camponotus.
    [Show full text]
  • Formicine Ants Swallow Their Highly Acidic Poison for Gut Microbial Selection and Control
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.13.947432; this version posted February 17, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 Formicine ants swallow their highly acidic poison for gut microbial selection and control 2 Simon Tragust1†*, Claudia Herrmann1, Jane Häfner1, Ronja Braasch1, Christina Tilgen1, Maria 3 Hoock1, Margarita Artemis Milidakis1, Roy Gross2, Heike Feldhaar1 4 5 1 Animal Ecology I, Bayreuth Center for Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER), 6 University of Bayreuth, Universitätsstraße 30, 95447 Bayreuth, Germany 7 2 Microbiology, Biocenter, University of Würzburg, Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg 8 † Present address: General Zoology, Hoher Weg 8, Martin-Luther University, 06120 Halle 9 (Saale), Germany 10 * Correspondence to: [email protected] 11 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.02.13.947432; this version posted February 17, 2020. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 12 Abstract 13 Animals continuously encounter microorganisms that are essential for health or cause disease. 14 They are thus challenged to control harmful microbes while allowing acquisition of beneficial 15 microbes, a challenge that is likely especially important concerning microbes in food and in 16 animals such as social insects that exchange food among colony members.
    [Show full text]
  • The Functions and Evolution of Social Fluid Exchange in Ant Colonies (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Marie-Pierre Meurville & Adria C
    ISSN 1997-3500 Myrmecological News myrmecologicalnews.org Myrmecol. News 31: 1-30 doi: 10.25849/myrmecol.news_031:001 13 January 2021 Review Article Trophallaxis: the functions and evolution of social fluid exchange in ant colonies (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Marie-Pierre Meurville & Adria C. LeBoeuf Abstract Trophallaxis is a complex social fluid exchange emblematic of social insects and of ants in particular. Trophallaxis behaviors are present in approximately half of all ant genera, distributed over 11 subfamilies. Across biological life, intra- and inter-species exchanged fluids tend to occur in only the most fitness-relevant behavioral contexts, typically transmitting endogenously produced molecules adapted to exert influence on the receiver’s physiology or behavior. Despite this, many aspects of trophallaxis remain poorly understood, such as the prevalence of the different forms of trophallaxis, the components transmitted, their roles in colony physiology and how these behaviors have evolved. With this review, we define the forms of trophallaxis observed in ants and bring together current knowledge on the mechanics of trophallaxis, the contents of the fluids transmitted, the contexts in which trophallaxis occurs and the roles these behaviors play in colony life. We identify six contexts where trophallaxis occurs: nourishment, short- and long-term decision making, immune defense, social maintenance, aggression, and inoculation and maintenance of the gut microbiota. Though many ideas have been put forth on the evolution of trophallaxis, our analyses support the idea that stomodeal trophallaxis has become a fixed aspect of colony life primarily in species that drink liquid food and, further, that the adoption of this behavior was key for some lineages in establishing ecological dominance.
    [Show full text]
  • Individual Versus Collective Cognition in Social Insects
    Individual versus collective cognition in social insects Ofer Feinermanᴥ, Amos Kormanˠ ᴥ Department of Physics of Complex Systems, Weizmann Institute of Science, 7610001, Rehovot, Israel. Email: [email protected] ˠ Institut de Recherche en Informatique Fondamentale (IRIF), CNRS and University Paris Diderot, 75013, Paris, France. Email: [email protected] Abstract The concerted responses of eusocial insects to environmental stimuli are often referred to as collective cognition on the level of the colony.To achieve collective cognitiona group can draw on two different sources: individual cognitionand the connectivity between individuals.Computation in neural-networks, for example,is attributedmore tosophisticated communication schemes than to the complexity of individual neurons. The case of social insects, however, can be expected to differ. This is since individual insects are cognitively capable units that are often able to process information that is directly relevant at the level of the colony.Furthermore, involved communication patterns seem difficult to implement in a group of insects since these lack clear network structure.This review discusses links between the cognition of an individual insect and that of the colony. We provide examples for collective cognition whose sources span the full spectrum between amplification of individual insect cognition and emergent group-level processes. Introduction The individuals that make up a social insect colony are so tightly knit that they are often regarded as a single super-organism(Wilson and Hölldobler, 2009). This point of view seems to go far beyond a simple metaphor(Gillooly et al., 2010)and encompasses aspects of the colony that are analogous to cell differentiation(Emerson, 1939), metabolic rates(Hou et al., 2010; Waters et al., 2010), nutrient regulation(Behmer, 2009),thermoregulation(Jones, 2004; Starks et al., 2000), gas exchange(King et al., 2015), and more.
    [Show full text]
  • Nest Site Selection During Colony Relocation in Yucatan Peninsula Populations of the Ponerine Ants Neoponera Villosa (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)
    insects Article Nest Site Selection during Colony Relocation in Yucatan Peninsula Populations of the Ponerine Ants Neoponera villosa (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Franklin H. Rocha 1, Jean-Paul Lachaud 1,2, Yann Hénaut 1, Carmen Pozo 1 and Gabriela Pérez-Lachaud 1,* 1 El Colegio de la Frontera Sur, Conservación de la Biodiversidad, Avenida Centenario km 5.5, Chetumal 77014, Quintana Roo, Mexico; [email protected] (F.H.R.); [email protected] (J.-P.L.); [email protected] (Y.H.); [email protected] (C.P.) 2 Centre de Recherches sur la Cognition Animale (CRCA), Centre de Biologie Intégrative (CBI), Université de Toulouse; CNRS, UPS, 31062 Toulouse, France * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +52-98-3835-0440 Received: 15 January 2020; Accepted: 19 March 2020; Published: 23 March 2020 Abstract: In the Yucatan Peninsula, the ponerine ant Neoponera villosa nests almost exclusively in tank bromeliads, Aechmea bracteata. In this study, we aimed to determine the factors influencing nest site selection during nest relocation which is regularly promoted by hurricanes in this area. Using ants with and without previous experience of Ae. bracteata, we tested their preference for refuges consisting of Ae. bracteata leaves over two other bromeliads, Ae. bromeliifolia and Ananas comosus. We further evaluated bromeliad-associated traits that could influence nest site selection (form and size). Workers with and without previous contact with Ae. bracteata significantly preferred this species over others, suggesting the existence of an innate attraction to this bromeliad. However, preference was not influenced by previous contact with Ae. bracteata. Workers easily discriminated between shelters of Ae. bracteata and A.
    [Show full text]
  • Group Recruitment in a Thermophilic Desert Ant, Ocymyrmex Robustior
    Eawag_07834 J Comp Physiol A (2013) 199:711–722 DOI 10.1007/s00359-013-0830-x ORIGINAL PAPER Group recruitment in a thermophilic desert ant, Ocymyrmex robustior Stefan Sommer • Denise Weibel • Nicole Blaser • Anna Furrer • Nadine E. Wenzler • Wolfgang Ro¨ssler • Ru¨diger Wehner Received: 19 March 2013 / Revised: 30 April 2013 / Accepted: 17 May 2013 / Published online: 8 June 2013 Ó Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013 Abstract Thermophilic desert ants—Cataglyphis, Ocy- nest. As video recordings show the leader, while continually myrmex, and Melophorus species inhabiting the arid zones keeping her gaster in a downward position, intermittently of the Palaearctic region, southern Africa and central Aus- touches the surface of the ground with the tip of the gaster tralia, respectively—are solitary foragers, which have been most likely depositing a volatile pheromone signal. These considered to lack any kind of chemical recruitment. Here recruitment events occur during the entire diurnal activity we show that besides mainly employing the solitary mode period of the Ocymyrmex foragers, that is, even at surface of food retrieval Ocymyrmex robustior regularly exhibits temperatures of more than 60 °C. They may provide group recruitment to food patches that cannot be exploited promising experimental paradigms for studying the inter- individually. Running at high speed to recruitment sites that play of orientation by chemical signals and path integration may be more than 60 m apart from the nest a leading ant, as well as other visual guidance routines. the recruiter, is followed by a loose and often quite dis- persed group of usually 2–7 recruits, which often overtake Keywords Desert ants Á Recruitment Á Ocymyrmex Á the leader, or may lose contact, fall back and return to the Path integration Á Solitary foraging S.
    [Show full text]
  • Modifications of Fine- and Coarse-Textured Soil Material Caused by the Ant Formica Subsericea
    MODIFICATIONS OF FINE- AND COARSE-TEXTURED SOIL MATERIAL CAUSED BY THE ANT FORMICA SUBSERICEA BY © 2015 Kim Ivy Drager Submitted to the graduate degree program in Geography and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science. ___________________________________ Co-chairperson Daniel R. Hirmas ___________________________________ Co-chairperson Stephen T. Hasiotis ___________________________________ William C. Johnson ___________________________________ Deborah R. Smith Date Defended: 02/27/2015 The thesis committee for Kim I. Drager certifies that this is the approved version of the following thesis: MODIFICATIONS OF FINE- AND COARSE-TEXTURED SOIL MATERIAL CAUSED BY THE ANT FORMICA SUBSERICEA ___________________________________ Co-chairperson Daniel R. Hirmas ___________________________________ Co-chairperson Stephen T. Hasiotis Date Defended: 02/27/2014 ii ABSTRACT The majority of ant-related bioturbation research has focused on physiochemical properties of the nest mound. However, ants are also known to line subsurface nest components (chambers and galleries) with coarse material, and may expand or backfill areas as colony size expands and contracts. These alterations may contribute to significant redistribution of soil material leading to alterations in soil physical and hydrological properties. The goal of this study was to examine the physical, chemical, and hydrological effects of the subterranean portion of ant nests on the soil profile. We measured soil in the field that was located near (<2 cm) and away (<1 m) from ant nests, and compared them to unaltered soil approximately 2 m away. Two- dimensional tracings of nest architecture were used to predict the nest effect on hydraulic properties of a fine-textured soil.
    [Show full text]
  • BMC Biology Biomed Central
    BMC Biology BioMed Central Research article Open Access Nutritional upgrading for omnivorous carpenter ants by the endosymbiont Blochmannia Heike Feldhaar*1, Josef Straka1, Markus Krischke2, Kristina Berthold1, Sascha Stoll3, Martin J Mueller2 and Roy Gross3 Address: 1Department of Behavioural Physiology and Sociobiology (Zoology II), Biocenter, University of Wuerzburg, Am Hubland, 97074 Wuerzburg, Germany, 2Department of Pharmaceutical Biology, Julius-von-Sachs-Institute for Biosciences, Biocenter, University of Wuerzburg, Julius-von-Sachs-Platz 2, 97082 Wuerzburg, Germany and 3Department of Microbiology, Biocenter, University of Wuerzburg, Am Hubland, 97074 Würzburg, Germany Email: Heike Feldhaar* - [email protected]; Josef Straka - [email protected]; Markus Krischke - [email protected]; Kristina Berthold - [email protected]; Sascha Stoll - [email protected] wuerzburg.de; Martin J Mueller - [email protected]; Roy Gross - [email protected] * Corresponding author Published: 30 October 2007 Received: 3 May 2007 Accepted: 30 October 2007 BMC Biology 2007, 5:48 doi:10.1186/1741-7007-5-48 This article is available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1741-7007/5/48 © 2007 Feldhaar et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Abstract Background: Carpenter ants (genus Camponotus) are considered to be omnivores. Nonetheless, the genome sequence of Blochmannia floridanus, the obligate intracellular endosymbiont of Camponotus floridanus, suggests a function in nutritional upgrading of host resources by the bacterium.
    [Show full text]
  • Ant Control in the Apiary1 William H
    ENY-169 Ant Control in the Apiary1 William H. Kern2 Ants are one of a beekeeper’s most common pests, both in The Honey and Nectar Stealers the apiary and in the honey house. Florida and the south- Argentine ant—Linepithema humile (formerly Iridomyrmex eastern United States have a large and diverse ant fauna, humilis) with both native and exotic species. The vast majority of ant species have no impact on our bees or us. The few pest ghost ant—Tapinoma melanocephalum (called black- species can cause serious problems. We can divide the ants headed ants in California) into two pest groups, bee and brood eaters and honey and nectar stealers. Some species can cause both problems at white-footed ant—Technomyrmex difficilis times. Pharaoh’s ant—Monomorium pharaonis The Bee and Brood Eaters The most prominent ants that people notice are the black carpenter ant—Camponotus pennsylvanicus carpenter ants. These are some of our largest ants and compact carpenter ant—Camponotus planatus are abundant in both suburban and rural locations. Many Floridians call these bull ants because of their large size. Florida carpenter ants—Camponotus floridanus and C. The eastern or Florida harvester ant, Pogonomyrmex badius, tortuganus is also called the “bull ant,” but they can deliver a wicked sting. Carpenter ants cannot sting, but they do deliver a crazy ant—Paratrechina longicornis slicing bite into which they spray formic acid. There are numerous species in Florida. These ants are omnivorous, crazy ant—Nylanderia bourbonica eating honeydew, nectar, honey, other insects, and carrion. The most widespread and common is the Florida carpenter tawny crazy ant—Nylanderia fulva ant.
    [Show full text]
  • Ants Modulate Stridulatory Signals Depending on the Behavioural Context A
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Ants modulate stridulatory signals depending on the behavioural context A. Masoni1,5*, F. Frizzi1,5, R. Nieri1,2, L. P. Casacci3,4, V. Mazzoni2, S. Turillazzi1 & G. Santini1 Insect societies require an efective communication system to coordinate members’ activities. Although eusocial species primarily use chemical communication to convey information to conspecifcs, there is increasing evidence suggesting that vibroacoustic communication plays a signifcant role in the behavioural contexts of colony life. In this study, we sought to determine whether stridulation can convey information in ant societies. We tested three main hypotheses using the Mediterranean ant Crematogaster scutellaris: (i) stridulation informs about the emitter’caste; (ii) workers can modulate stridulation based on specifc needs, such as communicating the proftability of a food resource, or (iii) behavioural contexts. We recorded the stridulations of individuals from the three castes, restrained on a substrate, and the signals emitted by foragers workers feeding on honey drops of various sizes. Signals emitted by workers and sexuates were quantitatively and qualitatively distinct as was stridulation emitted by workers on diferent honey drops. Comparing across the experimental setups, we demonstrated that signals emitted in diferent contexts (restraining vs feeding) difered in emission patterns as well as certain parameters (dominant frequency, amplitude, duration of chirp). Our fndings suggest that vibrational signaling represents a fexible communication channel paralleling the well-known chemical communication system. Efective communication is crucial for eusocial insects, because it allows the activity of thousands of interact- ing individuals to be strengthened and coordinated1,2. In complex societies, information is exchanged through chemical, tactile, visual and mechanical signals, the latter including both air-borne sounds and substrate-borne vibrations3–5.
    [Show full text]