DOCSLIB.ORG

Expedition, 1908-1910 Sarfert

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Expedition, 1908-1910 Sarfert FEDERATED STATES OF MICRONESIA KOSRAE HISTORIC PRESERVATION OFFICE Translation of Thilenius, ed., Results of the South Seas - Expedition, 1908-1910 Sarfert: Kusae, 1 Half-Volume. by Carmen C.H. Petrosian-Husa Anthropological Report 2008/1a Kosrae Historic Preservation Office Kosrae Island 2008 © Kosrae Historic Preservation Office © 2008, Federated States of Micronesia, Kosrae Historic Preservation Office. All rights reserved. The contents of this study are copyright in all countries subscribing to the Berne Convention. No parts of this report may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording or by any information storage and retrieval system, without the written permission of the Historic Preservation Office, except where permitted by law. The research and this publication have been financed entirely with Federal funds from the Historic Preservation Fund grant program in partnership with the National Park Service, Department of the Interior, United States of America. However, the contents and opinions expressed do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the National Park Service, the Department of the Interior, or the Government of the United States of America, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation by the National Park Service, the Department of the Interior, Government of the United States of America, or the Government of the Republic of the Marshall Islands. This program received Federal financial assistance for identification and protection of historic properties. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, and the Age Discrimination Act of 1975, as amended, the U.S. Department of Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, disability, or age in its federally assisted programs. If you believe you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or if you desire further information, please write to: Office of Equal Opportunity, National Park Service, 1849 C Street, N.W., Washington, DC 20240. For bibliographic purposes this report may be quoted as: Petrosian-Husa, Carmen C.H. 2008, Translation of: Thilenius, ed., Results of the South Seas - Expedition, 1908-1910, Sarfert: Kusae, 1 half-volume. Report 2008/1a. Kosrae Island, Federated States of Micronesia: Kosrae Historic Preservation Office. LIBRARY CODE KEYWORDS Anthropology – Federated States of Micronesia – Kosrae Island History – Federated States of Micronesia – Kosrae Island German time – Federated States of Micronesia – Kosrae Island Culture – Federated States of Micronesia – Kosrae Island Federated States of Micronesia – Anthropology – Kosrae Island Federated States of Micronesia – Culture– Kosrae Island Federated States of Micronesia – History– Kosrae Island Federated States of Micronesia – German time– Kosrae Island HAMBURGISCHE WISSENSCHAFTLICHE STIFTUNG RESULTS OF THE SOUTH SEAS- EXPEDITION 1908-1910 PUBLISHED BY PROF. DR. G. THILENIUS DIRECTOR OF THE HAMBURG MUSEUM OF ETHNOGRAPHY II. ETHNOGRAPHY: MICRONESIA VOLUME 4 DR. SARFERT: KUSAE 1. HALF-VOLUME HAMBURG L. FRIEDRICHSEN & CO. 1919 KUSAE BY DR. E. SARFERT CHIEF OF THE OCEANIC DEPARTMENT ON THE MUSEUM OF ETHNOGRAPHY IN LEIPZIG 1. HALF VOLUME __________________ GENERAL PART AND MATERIAL CULTURE WITH 159 ILLUSTRATIONS IN THE TEXT, 1 COLOR PLATE AND 44 BLACK PLATES AND 3 MAPS __________________ HAMBURG L. FRIEDRICHSEN & CO. 1919 Preface Apart from some third party’s contributions, this work was already finished at the end of 1913 although the printing was put on hold during World War I and due to my participation in it. It was only possible to continue in the year 1919.1 The lonesome island, which is the subject of this work, is the smallest and most economically insignificant among the high islands of the Carolines. But, its wild natural beauty competes with the smoother charm of the Palau Islands. It obviously belongs among the most beautiful islands of the great ocean, as honoring its name »Gem of the Pacific« indicates, which it received at the time of its highest popularity with the white people. After Germany lost its hegemonic status in the world war and was entirely robbed of its important colonial possessions, the question remains if it is still justified from the German side to dedicate a detailed treatment to such a small and economically unimportant area. Unfortunately Germany no longer has a directly related interest in such an effort thus, the general scientific interest has to justify the size of this monograph. This treatment may at least testify, together with our other vast colonial literature, how unselfishly Germany worked on the scientific exploration of its colonies. After the »Peiho«, the steamship of the »Hamburg South Seas-Expedition«, had criss crossed through the Carolines, it anchored in the beautiful landscape of Lölö-Harbor with all members aboard on February 5th, 1910. It was anticipated the expedition would stay 14 days, at the most. Nothing of interest to the ethnographers was expected of Kusae in 1890 after 30 years had elapsed since after FINSCH’s stay. This was not unwelcome as the second expedition year was nearing its end. Time and the steamship were to be used according to schedule for eastern Micronesia and to allow at least one long sojourn in the Marshall Islands, even thought the region with the most original culture, the central Caroline islands was long behind the exhibition. Thus, a limited result was expected 1 Compare remark p. 257. VI PREFACE. on Kusae. It could only be a poor harvest, with the most important part being a closer examination of the often mentioned but badly known »Ruins of Lölö«. Therefore, the projected sojourn was considered sufficient because, quite fortunately, all expedition members were present and a division of labor was possible. Professor KRÄMER divided the general survey of the culture between himself and me, and all other members had special assignments; Professor [Elisabeth] KRÄMER was supposed to deal with all questions related to women and especially with the old loom weaving technique, while Dr. HAMBRUCH, supported by Mr. HELLWIG, the tireless manager and collector of the expedition, was supposed to carefully survey and measure the ruins. But it turned out differently. The poorer the initial survey of the traditional culture seemed, the more exciting were the small success stories, which were soon noticed. They gave hope that a longer stay might be rewarding. The decision for my longer stay on Kusae resulted from this impression, and after the survey of the ruins was finished by Dr. HAMBRUCH and his assistants Mr. HELLWIG and finally also Mr. LORENZEN, the first officer of the »Peiho«, it was decided I should stay on Kusae, waiting for the return of the »Peiho« from its trip through the Marshall Islands (from February 22, to March 15, 1910). During this time the sources of local tradition were further discovered and when the ship finally returned, the decision was made that the »Peiho« continued its trip home to Hong Kong without me. I stayed on Kusae until May 9, 1910, when the »Germania« offered me a chance to leave this much treasured island going to the Bismarck Archipelago. Thus, my entire stay was 3 months and 3 days, while the rest of the expedition remained 16 days on the island. These circumstances explain why, there is a contribution of each of E. KRÄMER and A. KRÄMER and P. HAMBRUCH, and some small appendixes by E. KRÄMER in this work, and especially in the presentation of the material culture. This is, without any doubt, not an advantage, also variations concerning the language can thus be explained, but this disadvantage is surpassed by the benefit of thorough treatment of the researched material by each participant. Whenever material of the different members of the expedition was used, besides of their special contributions––these are mostly notes of A. KRÄMER––this is indicated every time by his name. The culture we found on Kusae made extending the stay, beyond the initial schedule, a kind of a risk, carried more by hope than by sure success. Work was in no way the heart warming and successful PREFACE. VII enterprise as it would have been in an untouched, or more or less untouched, culture. There was not even a culture, which had been dissolved by European influence and was about to decay, which doubtless offers the best working conditions for any ethnographer, as the natives no longer care about their innermost possession in a secretive way. At its best, work was mostly of a folkloristic kind especially considering the fact that it was completed in the last minutes before 12 o’clock, when little if anything at all, could be done for the scientific survey. Because only a part of the material culture, most of all objects of daily life, was still part of present day life. The youngest generation did not know at all their own past and their own culture and also had no understanding for it. For the before last generation, the fully mature generation, the same was true, except that they may have heard many things and in their youth may have learned some special skills, such as knot weaving, without ever practicing it. Under these circumstances the few oldest members of the population were the only main sources possible. They alone still had experience with their own culture, from their youth. Flawless and diligent interpreters were needed to counter these circumstances. After searching the half-blood-negro Kefas (plate II,1) and the real Kusaean Kelafa-Kön (plate II,3) were hired, both highly intellectual men in honorable age, the first of them already with a graying beard. Of the two, the Negro half-blood, who actually was a complete Kusaean, could be considered the quintessential representative of Kusaean intelligence. Mature and financially secure, without any snobbishness or churchly ambition, he was the only Kusaean with complete command of the English language.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Articles Migration for the Second Time
    ffi- ct1 E o r+ |+ c = I - s) 2 gq F Fl c) U| CD (D I |a - o O v, - o :a rt I c) o O- o J $iFgiFFgEst = 3 ,B.3FH.F=E*gs (D .+ !l CD 0f $E;rtf;F$Fs = o o s, - - I g3rF*gggiss - J CD r+ *cE$;'gE$5 hs F$HEF F3s F E 0r { o o !, $FEggggg$FE= - ig"$;e*Erq gE iEi $alcUil Ha ;E€ 3SFg*g $E .8I" :EF" 5;H !g *il9g;T 'dF$FEH ?f r $; flFg EF TE =6 ig FE EF gggggigggg Frz =r B6 5fi e69,8, I birdlife.org http://w w w .birdlife.org/community/2011/05/keeping-islands-rat-free-for-pacific-birds-and-people-%e2%80%93-w ith-elenoa-seniloli/ Keeping islands rat-free for pacific birds and people – with Elenoa Seniloli Elenoa Seniloli is a Conservation Officer in the BirdLife International Fiji Programme. “Lying in my tent at night, I could hear rat-traps snapping shut all around me”, said Elenoa Seniloli – Conservation Officer BirdLife International Fiji Programme. Many Pacific islands are alive with rats which are thriving on seabird eggs and chicks, driving many species towards extinction. BirdLife in the Pacific is undertaking a ground-breaking programme with local communities to rid the islands of these invasive predators for the benefit of birds, biodiversity and people. The Pacific region spreads over more than 38 million square kilometres of ocean – an area three times larger than mainland China or the United States of America. Less than 2% of this vast region is dry land; land holding a rather sobering biodiversity record.
    [Show full text]
  • Zorotypidae of Fiji (Zoraptera)
    NUMBER 91, 42 pages 15 March 2006 BISHOP MUSEUM OCCASIONAL PAPERS FIJI ARTHROPODS VII NEAL L. EVENHUIS AND DANIEL J. BICKEL, EDITORS 7 BISHOP MUSEUM PRESS HONOLULU Bishop Museum Press has been publishing scholarly books on the natu- RESEARCH ral and cultural history of Hawai‘i and the Pacific since 1892. The Bernice P. Bishop Museum Bulletin series (ISSN 0005-9439) was begun PUBLICATIONS OF in 1922 as a series of monographs presenting the results of research in many scientific fields throughout the Pacific. In 1987, the Bulletin series BISHOP MUSEUM was superceded by the Museum’s five current monographic series, issued irregularly: Bishop Museum Bulletins in Anthropology (ISSN 0893-3111) Bishop Museum Bulletins in Botany (ISSN 0893-3138) Bishop Museum Bulletins in Entomology (ISSN 0893-3146) Bishop Museum Bulletins in Zoology (ISSN 0893-312X) Bishop Museum Bulletins in Cultural and Environmental Studies (ISSN 1548-9620) Bishop Museum Press also publishes Bishop Museum Occasional Papers (ISSN 0893-1348), a series of short papers describing original research in the natural and cultural sciences. To subscribe to any of the above series, or to purchase individual publi- cations, please write to: Bishop Museum Press, 1525 Bernice Street, Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817-2704, USA. Phone: (808) 848-4135. Email: [email protected]. Institutional libraries interested in exchang- ing publications may also contact the Bishop Museum Press for more information. BISHOP MUSEUM The State Museum of Natural and Cultural History ISSN 0893-1348 1525 Bernice Street Copyright © 2007 by Bishop Museum Honolulu, Hawai‘i 96817-2704, USA FIJI ARTHROPODS Editors’ Preface We are pleased to present the seventh issue of Fiji Arthropods, a series offering rapid pub- lication and devoted to studies of terrestrial arthropods of the Fiji Group and nearby Pacific archipelagos.
    [Show full text]
  • (SPREP) Compile and Review Invasive Alien Species Infor
    Report for the Secretariat of the Pacific Regional Environment Programme (SPREP) Compile and Review Invasive Alien Species Information for the Federated States of Micronesia and its constituent states Chuuk, Kosrae, Pohnpei and Yap March 2015 Shyama Pagad Biodiversity Data Management Ltd. Programme Officer, IUCN SSC Invasive Species Specialist Group 1 Table of Contents Glossary and Definitions ....................................................................................................................... 3 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................... 4 Key Information Sources ....................................................................................................................... 6 SECTION 1 .............................................................................................................................................. 8 Alien and Invasive Species in FSM and constituent States of Chuuk, Kosrae, Pohnpei and Yap ...... 8 Results of information review .............................................................................................................. 8 SECTION 2 ............................................................................................................................................ 10 Pathways of introduction and spread of invasive alien species ....................................................... 10 SECTION 3 ...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Co-Extinct and Critically Co-Endangered Species of Parasitic Lice, and Conservation-Induced Extinction: Should Lice Be Reintroduced to Their Hosts?
    Short Communication Co-extinct and critically co-endangered species of parasitic lice, and conservation-induced extinction: should lice be reintroduced to their hosts? L AJOS R ÓZSA and Z OLTÁN V AS Abstract The co-extinction of parasitic taxa and their host These problems highlight the need to develop reliable species is considered a common phenomenon in the current taxonomical knowledge about threatened and extinct global extinction crisis. However, information about the parasites. Although the co-extinction of host-specific conservation status of parasitic taxa is scarce. We present a dependent taxa (mutualists and parasites) and their hosts global list of co-extinct and critically co-endangered is known to be a feature of the ongoing wave of global parasitic lice (Phthiraptera), based on published data on extinctions (Stork & Lyal, 1993; Koh et al., 2004; Dunn et al., their host-specificity and their hosts’ conservation status 2009), the magnitude of this threat is difficult to assess. according to the IUCN Red List. We list six co-extinct Published lists of threatened animal parasites only cover and 40 (possibly 41) critically co-endangered species. ixodid ticks (Durden & Keirans, 1996; Mihalca et al., 2011), Additionally, we recognize 2–4 species that went extinct oestrid flies (Colwell et al., 2009), helminths of Brazilian as a result of conservation efforts to save their hosts. vertebrates (Muñiz-Pereira et al., 2009) and New Zealand Conservationists should consider preserving host-specific mites and lice (Buckley et al., 2012). Our aim here is to lice as part of their efforts to save species. provide a critical overview of the conservation status of parasitic lice.
    [Show full text]
  • The Journ Al of the Polynesian Society
    THE JOURNAL OF THE POLYNESIAN SOCIETY VOLUME 126 No.3 SEPTEMBER 2017 INSTRUMENTS IN MOTION: FLUTES, HARMONICAS AND THE INTERPLAY OF SOUND AND SILENCE IN COLONIAL MICRONESIA BRIAN DIETTRICH Victoria University of Wellington The few native musical instruments are now obsolete or nearly so and are replaced by the guitar, harmonica, and ukulele (Fischer and Fischer 1957: 203) Music enters the history of empire as silence (Bohlman 2016: 174) While I was residing in the islands of Chuuk in the Federated States of Micronesia, friends told me a story about a musical instrument no longer seen or heard in the islands but not completely without a presence. I first listened to this tale in 2001 and again in subsequent years. In accounts of the story—said to date from the German colonial administration (1899–1914)—the identity of the instrument was not always clear, but most believed it to be the aangún, a nose flute made of bamboo or mangrove root but not regularly constructed or played since the mid-20th century. The word aangún can be translated as ‘soft-sounder’, a term that designates its delicate tone, but the name also calls to mind its quiet place in histories of Chuuk. The story about the instrument relates how a group of men from one village planned to ambush those from another as part of traditional warfare practices. Although the warring party disguised their plans, one knowledgeable man who knew how to play the instrument sounded a coded warning to his village after he learned about the intentions of the visitors.
    [Show full text]
  • The Death of Godeffroy's Kleinschmidt, and the Perception of H
    “STORI BILONG WANPELA MAN NEM BILONG EM TOBOALILU,” THE DEATH OF GODEFFROY’S KLEINSCHMIDT, AND THE PERCEPTION OF HISTORY Heinz Schütte Paris, France Introduction This article is a footnote to a question of prime theoretical interest, namely the process of transition from one societal form to another. It poses another question that is, however, of central importance in that context: How is history made and how is it retained in the memory of those who come after? This question cannot be answered hastily, and the present essay is to be regarded only as an illustration of a very par- ticular case in New Guinea. Two levels of “history” are presented that in reality represent one event; that is, one aspect of European expansion overseas in the course of which the people whom that expansion came to dominate were deprived of their own history.’ What will be related here, then, are two versions of the same event, viewed through two mutually exclusive sets of interests that shaped their respective perspectives: that of the Europe- ans, their Pacific helpers and their allies, and that of the Utuan and Mioko peoples native to the area. Yet even within these two groups there emerge significant differences of perception and interpretation that- albeit at times overlapping-are contingent on the actors’ relative posi- tion in the drama that is acted out. The one version would maintain that it is “history,” objectively reporting what happened, the other that it is a “story” or “tradition,” known by individuals or small groups and only to be expressed orally.
    [Show full text]
  • Photographs of Aborigines of North-East Australia
    PHOTOGRAPHS OF ABORIGINES OF NORTH-EAST AUSTRALIA: A (COLLECTION OF EARLY QUEENSLAND ABORIGINAL PH'OrOGRAPHS, MADE BY AMALIE DIETRICH FOR THE MUSEUM GODEFFROY Ray Sumner The German naturalist-collector Amalie Dietrich (1821-1891) worked in Queensland from 1863 to 1872, assembling for the Museum Godeffroy of Hamburg large collections of botanical, zoological, ethnographic and anthropological specimens. Her work has remain­ ed relatively unknown in Australia, however, since the collections were shipped to Germany and most of the relevant literature is in German.1 One small but interesting part of her ethnographic collections is a set of very early photo­ graphs of Queensland Aborigines. The first reference to these photographs appeared in Feb­ ruary 1874, in the Museum Godeffroy Catalog V, where an advertisement for ‘Duplicates trom the Ethnographic Collection’ offered a complete set of 150 photographs, including ‘Copies of photographs of Aborigines of North-East Australia (Colon. Queensland)’, obtain­ able in either carte-de-visite or cabinet format. Details of the subject matter and provenance of the Museum Godeffroy photographs were not available until the subsequent publication in 1880 of the Verzeichniss der Photogra­ phien des Museum Godeffroy welche Australien und die Sudsee betreffen2 (Inventory of photographs of the Museum Godeffroy in respect of Australia and the Pacific), in which each photograph was listed and the subject matter described individually. The Australian (i.e. Queensland) group was quite small, comprising only nineteen photographs fifteen from Brisbane and four from Rockhampton (see Table 1). This rare publication is apparently a preprint, issued under separate cover, of the relevant section of the book Die ethnographisch- anthropologische Abtheilung des Museum Godeffroy in Hamburg, which appeared in the following year and gave a complete list and description of every item in these collections.3 The firm ot J.C.
    [Show full text]
  • German-Speakers in the Ethnographic Field
    Regina Ganter Griffith University Career Moves: German-speakers in the ethnographic field George Forster’s account of his voyage with James Cook elevated him to the most popular writer in Germany, and Germans became prominent among European scientific travellers. In many cases the entry into the ethnographic field proved to be a fruitful career move, opening opportunities for upward social mobility in a popular mood where Bildung opened the path to gentility and redemption. Here I trace some individual careers to examine how some of the best known German scientists built solid careers on their travelling and collecting in the empires of other European nations. This study is located within a larger research project that seeks to examine the dynamics of influence of German speakers in the British colonial field. The German colonial empire was truncated to barely more than three decades (late 1880s to World War I) but German-speakers were far from peripheral in the Australia/Pacific field. In the 19th century a string of scientific journals like Das Ausland (1829), Globus (1862), Verhandlungen der Berliner Gesellschaft für Anthroplogie (1867), Zeitschrift für Ethnologie (1868) or Internationales Archiv für Ethnographie (1888) kept a keen eye on explorations and activities in the European empires. Das Ausland was a weekly 20-page quartsheet under the scientific direction of Friedrich Ratzel, drawing on international literature to bring scientific, ethnographic and exploratory activities to the German-speaking reading public. Many of these journals accepted contributions in several languages, and the missionary journal Anthropos (1905) announced its sub-title in six languages (English, French, German, Spanish, Italian and Latin).
    [Show full text]
  • Biogeography and Prehistoric Exploitation of Birds from Fais Island, Yap State, Federated States of Micronesia 1
    Pacific Science (1994), vol. 48, no. 2: 116-135 © 1994 by University of Hawaii Press. All rights reserved Biogeography and Prehistoric Exploitation of Birds from Fais Island, Yap State, Federated States of Micronesia 1 DAVID W. STEADMAN 2 AND MICIDKO INTOH 3 ABSTRACT: Five archaeological sites on the remote, raised limestone island of Fais, Yap, Federated States of Micronesia, yielded nearly 200 identifiable bird bones from strata that range in age from about 400 to 1800 radiocarbon yr B.P. Represented are 14 species ofseabirds, five species ofmigratory shorebirds, four species of land birds, and the introduced chicken. This is the most species-rich prehistoric assemblage of birds from any island in Micronesia. Because the "modern" avifauna of Fais never has been studied, it is difficult to determine which of the species from archaeological contexts still occur on Fais. Neverthe­ less, based upon modern distributions of birds from other islands in Yap and adjacent island groups, the environmental condition ofFais, and what is known about the relative vulnerability of individual species, it is likely that about nine ofthe seabirds (Pterodroma sp., Bulweria bulwerii, Sula dactylatra, S. sula, Sterna sumatrana, S. lunata, S./uscata, Anous minutus, Procelsterna cerulea) and three of the land birds (Poliolimnas cinereus, Gallicolumba cf. xanthonura, Ducula oceanica) no longer live on Fais.. FAIS ISLAND LIES at9° 46' N, 140 0 31' E, about of427 in 1925 to a low of 195 in 1977, followed 80 km east of Ulithi Atoll and 210 km east of by increases to 253 in 1987 (Gorenflo and the main island ofYap in western Micronesia Levin 1991).
    [Show full text]
  • Physical Anthropology of the Pacific – Michael Pietrusewsky
    PHYSICAL (BIOLOGICAL) ANTHROPOLOGY – Physical Anthropology of the Pacific – Michael Pietrusewsky PHYSICAL ANTHROPOLOGY OF THE PACIFIC Michael Pietrusewsky Department of Anthropology, University of Hawaii at Mānoa, Honolulu, 96822 U.S.A. Keywords: Physical anthropology, skeletal biology, bioarchaeology, paleopathology, craniology, biological distance, multivariate statistics, dental studies, genetic studies, Polynesian origins, Lapita skeletons Contents 1. Introduction 2. Pacific Islands: Geology, Prehistory and Linguistics 3. First Impressions/Early Paradigms (Table 1) 4. Pacific Relationships and Polynesian Origins (Table 2) 5. Health, Disease, and Lifestyle of Early Pacific Islanders (Table 3) 6. Regional Studies in Skeletal Biology 7. Conclusions and Future Prospects Acknowledgements Glossary Bibliography Biographical Sketch Summary A brief summary of studies in physical anthropology and skeletal biology of the Pacific and Polynesia is presented. Commencing with early studies in physical anthropology in the mid-nineteenth century, which included studies of living as well as prehistoric inhabitants of the Pacific, this survey focuses mainly on two topics: What studies of skeletons from the region have revealed about 1) the initial peopling of the Pacific and the origins of the Polynesians and 2) the health and lifestyle of past Pacific Islanders and Polynesians. Despite the limited number of studies in the physical anthropology of the Pacific and issues surrounding repatriation, a significant amount of information about the past inhabitants of this region continues to emerge from work involving human skeletons. 1. Introduction This chapter summarizes previous work in physical anthropology and skeletal biology of the Pacific. Although evidence from other areas in physical anthropology (e.g., genetic and dental studies) is included, the major focus will be what studies of human skeletons and teeth reveal about the origins, health, and lifestyle of the indigenous inhabitants of the Pacific, particularly Polynesians.
    [Show full text]
  • Country Data Dossier for Reducing Risk of Extinction Summary Sheet
    Country Data Dossier for Aichi Target 12: Reducing Risk of Extinction FEDERATED STATES OF MICRONESIA – Country Data Dossier for Reducing Risk of Extinction Summary Sheet Summary Table of Threatened Species Identified by the IUCN Red List Mammals Birds Reptiles* Amphibians Fishes* Molluscs* Other Inverts* Plants* 7 10 7 0 20 4 111 4 Amphibian, Mammal, Plant*, and Reptile* Threatened Species Identified by the IUCN Red List In Federated States of Micronesia: Out of 0 amphibian species, 0 are threatened or extinct Out of 24 mammal species, 6 are threatened or extinct Out of 58 plant species, 4 are threatened or extinct Out of 19 reptile species, 7 are threatened or extinct List of Threatened Species Identified by the IUCN Red List Federated States of Micronesia has: 1 Critically Endangered (CR) reptile* species: Eretmochelys imbricata List of Bird Threatened Species Federated States of Micronesia has 2 Critically Endangered (CR) bird species: Aplonis pelzelni, Acrocephalus luscinius List of Critically Endangered Endemic Species Out of 1 Critically Endangered (CR) mammal species, Federated States of Micronesia has 1 endemic mammal species: Pteropus insularis Out of 2 Critically Endangered (CR) bird species, Federated States of Micronesia has 2 endemic bird species: Aplonis pelzelni, Acrocephalus luscinius *Reptiles, fishes, molluscs, other invertebrates and plants: please note that for these groups, there are still many species that have not yet been assessed by the IUCN Red List and therefore, their status is not known. The figures presented for these groups should be interpreted as the number of species known to be threatened within those species that have been assessed to date, and not as the overall total number of threatened species for each group.
    [Show full text]
  • PACIFIC MANUSCRIPTS BUREAU Catalogue of South Seas
    PACIFIC MANUSCRIPTS BUREAU Room 4201, Coombs Building College of Asia and the Pacific The Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200 Australia Telephone: (612) 6125 2521 Fax: (612) 6125 0198 E-mail: [email protected] Web site: http://rspas.anu.edu.au/pambu Catalogue of South Seas Photograph Collections Chronologically arranged, including provenance (photographer or collector), title of record group, location of materials and sources of information. Amended 18, 30 June, 26 Jul 2006, 7 Aug 2007, 11 Mar, 21 Apr, 21 May, 8 Jul, 7, 12 Aug 2008, 8, 20 Jan 2009, 23 Feb 2009, 19 & 26 Mar 2009, 23 Sep 2009, 19 Oct, 26, 30 Nov, 7 Dec 2009, 26 May 2010, 7 Jul 2010; 30 Mar, 15 Apr, 3, 28 May, 2 & 14 Jun 2011, 17 Jan 2012. Date Provenance Region Record Group & Location &/or Source Range Description 1848 J. W. Newland Tahiti Daguerreotypes of natives in Location unknown. Possibly in South America and the South the Historic Photograph Sea Islands, including Queen Collection at the University of Pomare and her subjects. Ref Sydney. (Willis, 1988, p.33; SMH, 14 Mar.1848. and Davies & Stanbury, 1985, p.11). 1857- Matthew New Guinea; Macarthur family albums, Original albums in the 1866, Fortescue Vanuatu; collected by Sir William possession of Mr Macarthur- 1879 Moresby Solomon Macarthur. Stanham. Microfilm copies, Islands Mitchell Library, PXA4358-1. 1858- Paul Fonbonne Vanuatu; New 334 glass negatives and some Mitchell Library, Orig. Neg. Set 1933 Caledonia, prints. 33. Noumea, Isle of Pines c.1850s- Presbyterian Vanuatu Photograph albums - Mitchell Library, ML 1890s Church of missions.
    [Show full text]