bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/212555; this version posted November 1, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 1 Equality between the sexes in plants for costs of reproduction; evidence from the dioecious 2 Cape genus Leucadendron (Proteaceae). 3 Jeremy J. Midgley*1, Adam G. West1, Michael D. Cramer1 4 1Dept Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, P bag Rondebosch 7701, South Africa 5
[email protected];
[email protected];
[email protected]. 6 Keywords Life history evolution, plants, sexual allocation, dioecy, Leucadendron, 7 dimorphism 8 Running title: Equality between the sexes in plants 9 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/212555; this version posted November 1, 2017. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 2 10 Abstract 11 It has been argued that sexual allocation is greater for female function than male function in 12 plants in general and specifically for the large dioecious Cape genus Leucadendron. Here, 13 we use new interpretations of published information to support the hypothesis of equality 14 between sexes in this genus. The explanations are based on the fire ecology of the Cape that 15 results in reproductive synchrony, reproductive doubling and competitive symmetry.