Summary of Floods in the United States During 1967

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Summary of Floods in the United States During 1967 Summary of Floods in the United States During 1967 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 1880-C Prepared in cooperation with Federal, State, and local agencies RECEIVED WAV S W7 ' u s GeoiugKal Survey TaUahasa*. Florida Summary of Floods in the United States During 1967 By J. O. ROSTVEDT and others FLOODS OF 1967 IN THE UNITED STATES GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAFER 1880-C Prepared in cooperation with Federal, State, and local agencies UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE, WASHINGTON : 1972 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR ROGERS C. B. MORTON, Secretary GEOLOGICAL SURVEY W. A. Radlinski, Acting Director Library of Congress catalog-card No. GS 65-319 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printir^ Office Washington, D.C. 20402 - Price 75 cents (paper cover) Stock Number 2401-1139 CONTENTS Page Abstract..---.-___-___--__----_---------------------------_------- Cl Introduction,- _______________________-____-_________--__---------_- 1 Determination of flood stages and discharges._________________________ 4 Explanation of data.._________.______-_-__-_-_-_-___-__--_---_-__-- 4 Summary of floods of 1967-_______-_____-__-__-------__---___---___- 5 March 7, in southeastern Kentucky, by C. H. Hannum_______-_-_- 5 March 27-April 4, in northwestern and west-central Wisconsin, by Donald C. Hurtgen..__.___-_____________-______.___-_---_--- 7 April 13-15, in southwestern Mississippi, by B. E. Wasson__-_--_--- 10 April 13-17, in southern Louisiana, by Fred N. Lee________________ 12 April 30-May 15, in Kentucky, by C. H. Hannum_-___--__-__-__ 14 May 13, in Maury County, Tenn., by William J. Randolph.________ 18 May-July, in the Big Lost River and Big Wood River basins, Id".ho, by C. A. Thomas -_----_-_---____-_--_--------_---_ ----- 20 June 1, in southwestern Jackson, Miss., after Kenneth V. Wilson (1968) _-_----__-_---_--_---__--_-------------------___-_- 23 June 7, in the Wapsinonoc Creek basin, Iowa, after Harlan H. Schwob (1968) ___--__-___-_-___--___--___-__---__------___-_-__.- 25 June, in south-central Montana, by Melvin V. Johnson and F,. J. Omang_ ____________________________________________________ 27 June, in Nebraska, by H. D. Brice_-___.__---__----___-___-__._ 33 June 21, in northern Boise, Idaho, by C. A. Thomas. ______ ________ 41 June and July, in north-central Wyoming, by Stanley A. Druse_____ 42 June to September, in southern Nevada, by R. D. Lamke_ __._____. 48 July, in the vicinity of Oliver Springs, Tenn., by Charles R. GamHe_ _ 52 July 9-12, in northeastern Missouri, by L. D. Hauth_____________ 54 August, in east-central Alaska, from J. M. Childers, J. P. Meckel and G. S. Anderson (1971)__________________________________ 56 August 11-13, in eastern Arizona and western New Mexico, by Alberto Condes de la Torre.__________________________________ 58 August 18, near Apache Lake, Ariz., by H. W. Hjalmarson.________ 62 August, in Maryland and Delaware, from D. H. Carpenter and R. H. Simmons (1969)___-_-_________..__..__.___.__.____ 64 August 24-25, in the Washington, D.C., metropolitan area, in Virginia, from E. M. Miller and F. P. Kapinos (1968)__________________ 77 August 25-26, in northeastern Alabama, by G. H. Nelson, Jr., and J. F. McCain__________________________________--_-__--.___- 80 September 2-5, in southwestern Arizona, by L. L. Werho_-__-____-- 83 September, in Salmon River in southeastern Alaska, by C. W. Boning. 87 September 15, in the Lynn Canal area of southeastern Alaska, by C. W. Boning.-.-_-----_____-_-______________- 89 September-October, from Hurricane Beulah in southern Texas and northeastern Mexico, from R. U. Grozier and others (1967) ____ 91 September 27-29, in western New York, by F. Luman Robison____. 93 December 18-19, in northern Alabama, by J. F. McCain___________ 97 December 19-23, in central and southern Arizona, by B. N. Aldridge.- 101 References cited_______-_____-___-___-___-___--__-__-_-__--_---_--- 106 Index. _-_________-___._______-.._-_-.__-_____.. 109 ni IV CONTENTS ILLUSTRATIONS Page FIGURE 1. Map showing areas and months of flood occurrence in the conterminous United States and Alaska.__ _______ C3 2-11. Maps of flood areas: 2. March 7, in southeastern Kentucky,___________ 6 3. March 27-April 4, in northwestern and west- central Wisconsin. _-_--__-__--__--____-____ 8 4. April 13-15, in southwestern Mississippi_--_---_ 11 5. April 13-17, in southern Louisiana_-__--__-_____ 13 6. April 30-May 15, in Kentucky_________________ 16 7. May 13, in Maury County, Tenr)______________ 19 8. May-July, in the Big Lost River and Big Wood River basins, Idaho._______________________ 21 9. June 1, in southwestern Jackson, Miss_ _________ 24 10. June 7, in the Wapsinonoc Creek basin, Iowa. _ _ _ _ 26 11. June, in south-central Montana---_--__-----__ 28 12, 13. Isohyetal maps of south-central Montana: 12. June 6-7__________________________________ 29 13. June 13-15.______.__-__--__-_-__________ 30 14-16. Maps of flood areas: 14. June 6, in Horse Creek basin, Nebraska.________ 33 15. June 14, near Norfolk, Nebr________--___--____ 35 16. June 15-16, in central Nebraska.______________ 36 17. Graph of accumulated rainfall, May 25-June 15, in central Nebraska-________________________________ 36 18. Graph of daily mean discharge and accumulated runoff, March-April 1960 and June 1967, Wood River near Alda, Nebr_______________________.______________ 38 19-22. Maps of flood areas: 19. June, in the Blue River basin, Nebraska____ 39 20. June 19, in northeastern Nebraska_____________ 40 21. June 21, in northern Boise, Idaho______________ 41 22. June and July, in north-central Wyoming_______ 43 23. Discharge hydrographs (June 5-July 10) for selected stations in the Bighorn River basin, Wyoming-______ 46 24. Map of flood area, June to September, in southern Nevada-________________________________________ 48 25. Discharge hydrographs, Amargosa River near JVatty, Nev. (August 30-31), and Muddy River near Moapa, Nev. (September 7-8)___________________________ 51 26-31. Maps of flood areas: 26. July, in the vicinity of Oliver Springs, Tenn_____ 52 27. July 9-12, in northeastern Missouri. ___________ 54 28. August, in east-central Alaska.________________ 57 29. August 11-13, in eastern Arizona and western New Mexico.____________________________ 58 30. August 18, near Apache Lake, Ariz_____________ 63 31. August, in Maryland and Delaware.___________ 65 32-35. Isohyetal maps of Maryland and Delaware: 32. August 3-5_____-__________-_-_--_--_---_ 66 33. August 9-10______-______-_--____________ 67 34. August 23-25-________-_-__-__-_-__-_-------- 68 35. August 25-28_______-____________-____---_--_ 69 CONTENTS V FIGURES 6-38. Maps of flood areas: Page. 36. August 24-25, in Washington, D.C., metro­ politan area in Virginia.___________________ C78 37. August 25-26, in northeastern Alabama______-_ 81 38. September 2-5, in southwestern Arizona.______ 84 39. Graph of unit discharges for floods in southwestern Arizona and southeastern California________________ 86 40-43. Maps of flood areas: 40. September, in Salmon River in southeastern Alaska_________________________________ 88 41. September 15, in the Lynn Canal area of south­ eastern Alaska____________._______________ 90 42. September-October, from Hurricane Beulah in southern Texas and northeastern Mexico_____ 92 43. September 27-29, in western New York______ 93 44. Stage hydrograph for Van Campen Creek at Friendship, N.Y., September 27-29_________________.__________ 94 45. Map of flood area, December 18-19, in northern Alabama. 98 46. Graph of accumulated rainfall at selected ESSA Weather Bureau stations in northern Alabama, December IT- IS. _____________________________________________ 99 47. Map of flood area, December 19-23, in central and southern Arizona.________________________________ 102 48. Discharge hydrographs (December 18-21) for selected stations in central and southern Arizona._____________ 105 TABLES TABLES 1-9. Flood stages and discharges: Page 1. March 7, in southeastern Kentucky,_____________ C7 2. March 27-April 4, in northwestern and west-central Wisconsin. __________________________________ 9 3. April 13-15, in south western Mississippi.- _________ 11 4. April 13-17, in southern Louisiana._______________ 14 5. April 30-May 1, in west-central Kentucky.________ 15 6. May 7, in northeastern Kentucky._______________ 17 7. May 14-15, in central and western Kentucky______ 18 8. May 13, in Maury County, Tenn_____._-________ 20 9. May-July, in Big Lost and Big Wood Rivers basins, Idaho_._______-_______________-___--_ 22 10. Average discharge of highest 30-day period during 1967 and prior highest 30-day period of record for the Lost River b?sin_ 22 11-16. Flood stages and discharges: 11. June 1, in southwestern Jackson, Miss____________ 25 12. June 7, in the Wapsinonoc Creek basin, Iowa_ _ _____ 27 13. June, in south-central Montana__________________ 31 14. June, in Nebraska_____-_______________-________ 34 15. June 21, in northern Boise, Idaho._______________ 42 16. June and July, in north-central Wyoming-________ 44 17. Rainfall, in inches, June 5-lb and 20-24, in north- central Wyoming--___-_-_______--__--_---_-_--_-_-__- 45 VI CONTENTS Pace TABLES 18-21. Flood stages and discharges: 18. June to September, in southern Nevada______ C49 19. July, in the vicinity of Oliver Springs, Tenn____ 53 20. July 9-12, in northeastern Missouri.__________ 55 21. August 11-13, in eastern Arizona and western New Mexico______-__-_-__-__-_--_-_______ 60 22. Summary of flood damages, August 11-13, in eastern Arizona.________________________________________ 62 23-25. Flood stages and discharges: 23. August 18, near Apache Lake, Ariz__________ 64 24.
Recommended publications
  • Impacts of Global Warming on Hurricane-Related Flooding in Corpus Christi,Texas
    Impacts of Global Warming on Hurricane-related Flooding in Corpus Christi, Texas Sea-level Rise and Flood Elevation A one-foot rise in flood elevation due to both sea-level rise and hurricane intensification leads to an inundation of 5000 –15,000 feet. Global Sea-level Rise Global warming causes sea level to rise through Limitations of the Analysis two major mechanisms. First, as water warms, it expands, taking up more space. Second, as ice This analysis looked only at damages due to flooding by storm on land melts (including mountain glaciers surge and sea-level rise. It is not a comprehensive analysis of the wide array of hurricane-related damages. Other simplifying around the world as well as the polar ice assumptions were made and there were limitations due to lack of sheets), this water flows to the oceans. data. For example, no data on historical flood damage to oil The thermal expansion of the oceans and the refineries was available to the researchers. melting of mountain glaciers are well understood. Increased melting and loss of ice on In addition, the study assumes that the barrier island retains its elevation and volume as sea level rises, though under high rates of parts of the polar ice sheets has recently been sea-level rise, the relative condition of the barrier island would be observed, especially on Greenland, although how expected to weaken, posing additional risk for erosion of the island much and how fast the ice sheets will increase and for flooding in the bay, both of which would increase economic sea-level rise is not well known, and this damages.
    [Show full text]
  • Pdf Icon[PDF – 369
    U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND WELFARE PUBLIC HEALTH SERVICE Health Services and Mental Health Ministration Washington D.C. 20201 VITAL STATISTICS REPORT HeaZkJJzterview SurveyDaiiz VOL. 18, NO. 9 FROM THE SUPPLEMENT I DECEMBER5, 1869 NATIONAL CENTER FOR HEALTH STATISTICS Cigarette Smoking Status-June 1966, August 1967, and August 1968 For the past 3 years the National Center for former smokers among males than among females, Health Statistics has contracted with the U.S. Bureau the proportion of female former cigarette smokers of the Census to include a supplement to the Current is increasing at a faster rate than that of males. From Population Survey on smoking habits in the United June 1966 to August 1968 the proportion of male former States. The first data were collected as a supplement smokers increased by 12 percent and the proportion of to the Current population Survey of June 1966, the female former smokers increased by 22 percent. In second supplement was added to the questionnaire in addition the increase occurred primarily among males August 1967, and the third in August 1968. Similar in the age group 17-24 years while it was spread data were collected during the period July 1964-July throughout all age categories for females. 1966 as a part of the ongoing Health Interview Sur­ In 1966 an estimated 39.6 percent of the population a vey. (See “Current Estimates from the Health Inter- aged 17 years and over smoked cigarettes; in 1968 the view Survey, United States, 1967,” Vital and Health comparable percentage was 37.7, a drop of 5 percent.
    [Show full text]
  • Administrative Report for the Year Ending 30 June 1968 (To 15 May 1968)
    RESTRICTED INTERNATIONAL COMMISSION FOR THE NORTHWEST ATLANTIC FISHERIES II ICNAF Comm.Doc.68/8 Serial No.2059 (A.b.l7) ANNUAL MEETING - JUNE 1968 Administrative Report for the Year ending 30 June 1968 (to 15 May 1968) 1. The Commission's Officers Chairman of Commission Mr V.M.Kamentsev (USSR) Vice-Chairman of Commission Dr A.W.H.Needler (Canada) Chairman of Panel 1 Mr O. Lund (Norway) Chairman of Panel 2 Mr W.e.Tame (UK) (to September 1967) Chairman of Panel 3 Dr F. Chrzan (Poland) Chairman of Panel 4 Captain T. de Almeida (Portugal) Chairman of Panel 5 Mr T.A.Fulham (USA) Chairman of Panel A (Seals) Dr A.W.H.Needler (Canada) These officers, with one exception, were elected at the 1967 Annual Meeting to serve for a period of two years. Dr A.W.H.Needler was elected Chairman of Panel A at the 1966 Annual Meeting to serve for a period of two years. Chairman of Standing Committee on Research and Statistics Nr Sv. Aa. Horsted (Denmark) Chairman of Standing Committee on Finance and Administration Mr R. Green (USA) Chairman of Standing Committee on Regulatory Measures Mr J. Graham (UK) The Chairmen of Research and Statistics and Finance and Administration were elected at the 1967 Annual Meeting to serve for a period of one year. The Chairman of the Standing Committee on Regulatory Measures was elected at the first meeting of the Committee, 30 January 1968. 2. Panel Memberships for 1967/68 (cf. ICNAF Camm.Doc.68fl) Panel .1 l. 1. .!!. .2. ! Total Canada + + + + + 5 Denmark + + 2 France + + + + 4 Germany + + 2 Iceland + 1 Italy + + 2 Norway + + 2 Poland + + + 3 Portugal + + + + 4 Romania + 1 Spain + + + + 4 USSR + + + + + 5 UK + + + 3 USA ;.
    [Show full text]
  • Hurricane Info You Can Use- 2009
    Since 1953, Atlantic tropical storms have been named from lists originated by the National Hurricane Center. They are now maintained and updated by an international committee of the World Meteorological Organization. The original name lists featured only women's names. In 1979, men's names were introduced and they alternate with the women's names. Six lists are used in rotation. Thus, the 2005 list will be used again in 2011. For more information about the history of naming hurricanes, log onto www.nhc.noaa.gov. The only time that there is a change in the list is if a storm is so deadly or costly that the future use of its name on a different storm would be inappropriate for reasons of sensitivity. If that occurs, then at an annual meeting by the WMO committee (called primarily to discuss many other issues) the name is stricken from the list and another name is selected to replace it. 2009 Names List Ana Bill Claudette Danny Erika Fred Grace Henri Ida Joaquin Kate Larry Mindy Nicholas Odette Peter Rose Sam Teresa Victor Wanda What is the National Hurricane Center? The National Hurricane Center (NHC) maintains a continuous watch on tropical cyclones over the Atlantic, Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and the Eastern Pacific from May 15th through November 30th. The Center prepares and distributes hurricane watches and warnings for the general public and also prepares and distributes marine and military advisories for other users. During the “off-season," NHC provides training for U.S. emergency managers and representatives from many other countries that are affected by tropical cyclones.
    [Show full text]
  • General Assembly
    UNITED NATIONS Distr. GENERAL GENERAL A/7080 ASSEMBLY 28 March 1968 ORIGINAL: ENGLISH Twenty-second session Agenda item 28 (a) NON-PROLIFERATION OF NUCLEAR WEAPONS Subject index to annex HI of the report of the Conference of the Eighteen-Nation Committee on Disarmament Note by the Secretariat On l4 March 1968, the Conference of the Eighteen-Nation Committee on Disarmament decided that the Secretariat should prepare a concise subject index to annex III of the report of the Conference (A/7072-DC/230). Annex III lists the documents and verbatim records setting forth views of the members participating in that Conference regarding a draft treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons. This subject index lists, under twelve subject headings and the corresponding treaty articles, the relevant documents and verbatim records containing proposed amendments, suggestions and statements of delegations. 68-07488 I ... A/7080 English Page 2 CONTENTSY Page 1. General (preamble) •••••••••• • 3 Basic obligations (articles I and 11) • 6 3. Safeguards (article Ill) ••••••• • • 8 4. Peaceful uses of nuclear energy (article IV) • •• 11 5. Peaceful nuclear explosions (article V) • 14 6. Other measures of disarmament (article VI) • • •• • 17 7. Treaties for nuclear-free zones (article VII) 20 8. Amendments; review (article VIII) ••. 22 9. Signature; ratification; depository Governments; entry into force; 24 definition of nuclear-weapon State (article IX) • 10. Withdrawal; duration (article X) •••••••• • 26 11. Acceptable balance of mutual responsibilities and obligations )f the nuclear and non-nuclear Powers • 28 12. Security; security assurances .. • 30 Y The draft treaty articles referred to are those of the 1968 drafts of a treaty on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons (draft of 11 March 1968, A/7072-DC/230, annex I; drafts of 18 January 1968: ibid, annex IV, documents ENDC/192/Rev.l and 193/Rev.l).
    [Show full text]
  • Southern Climate Monitor in This Issue
    Southern Climate Monitor June 2019 | Volume 9, Issue 2 In This Issue: Page 2-5: The Biggest Rain Events Ever Page 6-7: NOAA’s Hurricane Season Outlook Page 8-9: Managing the Costs of Disasters Page 10-11: Evaluating Heat Related Illnesses Page 12-13: 20 Years Later: The May 3-4, 1999 Southern Plains Tornado Outbreak Page 14-16: Are there trends in the heaviest hourly periods with rainfall? Page 17: About SCIPP Team: Barry Keim Page 18: From Our Partners The Southern Climate Monitor is available at www.srcc.lsu.edu & www.southernclimate.org Feature The Biggest Rain Events Ever John Nielson-Gammon, Texas A&M University, Texas State Climatologist While Hurricane Harvey was intensifying in available to dispose of all the water, massive the Gulf of Mexico, it was pretty obvious that flooding resulted. somebody was going to get a ton of rain. As it turns out, the highest rainfall total credibly I wondered, how does Harvey stack up against measured by a rain gauge was 60.58” in the biggest rain events ever documented in the Nederland, in the southeast corner of Texas United States? And which events were they? (Blake and Zelinsky 2018). That’s five feet of Do they normally happen in the southern rain.* United States? Or were we just lucky? As Harvey was happening, I had a hunch that To figure out the total amount of rain in a it could break some multi-day rainfall records. given area, I needed what are called rainfall So I looked the records up.
    [Show full text]
  • 45Th Anniversary of Hurricane Beulah
    NWS Corpus Christi, TX Summer 2012 Edition 45th Anniversary of Hurricane Beulah Special points of John Metz — Warning Coordination Meteorologist interest: Severe Weather Season Beulah was the 2nd storm of the 2012 most active season in 1967 hurricane season in which there 25 years! were only 6 named storms. However Beulah left its mark on Texas history as All about the wildfire on the her slow storm motion produced record Padre Island National flooding and a prolific number of torna- Seashore does. Beulah was a long track storm, developing just east of the Leeward Is the Drought Improving? Islands in the Caribbean on Sept 5, 1967, intensifying rapidly into a hurricane the Find out how to become a Hurricane Beulah – September1967 next day. Beulah passed south of volunteer at the NWS WFO Hispaniola as a Category 4 hurricane with wind speeds of 150 mph. As she churned across Corpus Christi, TX the Caribbean, she weakened to a tropical storm while skirting south of Jamaica. But by the eleventh day she made her first direct impact, on the northern tip of the Yucatan Peninsula near Cozumel, as a Category 3 storm. She reemerged in the warm waters of the Gulf of Inside this issue: Mexico, becoming a powerful Category 5 storm, with sustained winds of 160 mph. Beulah finally moved ashore in Mexico, just south of Brownsville Texas on Sept 20, 1967. Maximum wind gusts were measured at 136 mph in Brownville producing a storm surge of Hurricane Beulah 1 18-20 feet north of where the center of the storm crossed the coast.
    [Show full text]
  • By P. E. Scbmid Goddurd Space Flight Center Greedelt, Md
    NASA TECHNICAL NOTE NASA TN 0-6822 cv N SURFACE-REFRACTIVITY MEASUREMENTS AT NASA SPACECRAFT TRACKING SITES by P. E. Scbmid Goddurd Space Flight Center Greedelt, Md. 20771 NATIONAL AERONAUTICS AND SPACE ADMINISTRATION 0 WASHINGTON, D. C. SEPTEMBER 1972 TReport No. 2. Government Accession No. 3. Recipient's Catalog No. NASA IY D-u&?~ 4. Title and Subtitle 5. Report Date Surface-Refractivity Measurements at SepLernber 19 (2 NASA Spacecraft Tracking Sites 6. Performing Organization Code 7. Author(s) 8. Performing Organization Report No. P. E. Schmid G-1052 9. Performing Organization Name and Address IO. Work Unit No. Goddard Space Flight Center - 11. Contract or Grant No. Greenbelt, Maryland 2077 1 13. Type of Report and Period Covered 12. Sponsoring Agency Name and Address Technical Note National Aeronautics and Space Administration Washington, D.C. 20546 14. Sponsoring Agency Code IS. Supplementary Notes 16. Abstract High-accuracy spacecraft tracking requires tropospheric modeling which is generally scaled by either estimated or measured values of surface refractivity. This report summarizes the results of a worldwide surface-refractivity test conducted in 1968 in support of the Apollo program. The results are directly applicable to all NASA radio-tracking systems. I 17. Key Words (Selected by Author(r)) 18. Distribution Statement Troposphere Surface Refractivity Unclassified-Unlimited Meteorological Measurements Unclassified Unclassified 48 *For sale by the National Technical Information Service, Springfield, Virginia 22 151. CONTENTS Page I Abstract .................................. i I ~ INTRODUCTION .............................. 1 I CALCULATION OF SURFACE REFRACTIVITY .................. 2 I Scope of Test .............................. 2 I Mathematical Formulation of Refractivity ................... 4 SURFACE-REFRACTIVITY MEASUREMENT RESULTS .............. 5 Monthly Variations ...........................
    [Show full text]
  • Recent Changes in the United States Silver Policy, August 1967
    FEDERAL RESERVE DANK OF NEW YORK 151 Recent Changes In United States Silver Policy Following the emergence in the late fifties of an increas- of speculative purchases in May of this year, the Treasury ingly severe shortage of silver, United States silver policy discontinued sales of silver to buyers other than "legiti- has undergone a series of changes, which in effect provide mate domestic concerns" and simultaneously invoked its for the demonctization of silver. For a brief period in the statutory authority to prohibit the melting and export of late fifties, the Treasury was able to accommodate market silver coins. By early July it became clear that the amount demands by sales of "free" silver, that is, its holdings of of clad coins was adequate to meet public needs, and on silver over and above the amount legally required as "back- July 14 the Treasury halted sales of silver to domestic ing" for outstanding silver certificates. By late 1961, how- users at the fixed price of $1.29 per ounce. ever, it was clear that the Treasury could not continue to fill market demands and at thc same time meet the nation's SOURCESAND USES OF SILVER increasing coinage requirements. Accordingly, in Novem- ber of that year, the Treasury moved to conserve its free The changeoverto a silverlcss coinage system as well silver stock by temporarily suspending sales of silver to the as earlier changes in silver policy was dictated fundamen- market. At the same time, and for the same purpose, it also tally by the development of a global imbalance between began to retire silver certificates in the first of a series of industrial and other demands for silver and available sup- moves toward the removal of certificates from the cur- plies.
    [Show full text]
  • 354 United Nations Treaty Series 1967
    354 United Nations Treaty Series 1967 No. 3511. CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF CULTURAL PROPERTY IN THE EVENT OF ARMED CONFLICT. DONE AT THE HAGUE, ON 14 MAY 1954 * RATIFICATION Instrument deposited with the Director-General of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization on : 11 August 1967 FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY* (To take effect on 11 November 1967.) PROTOCOL FOR THE PROTECTION OF CULTURAL PROPERTY IN THE EVENT OF ARMED CONFLICT. DONE AT THE HAGUE, ON 14 MAY 1954 RATIFICATION Instrument deposited with the Director-General of the United Nations Ediicational, Scientific and Cultural Organization on : 28 July 1967 INDONESIA (To take effect on 26 October 1967.) 11 August 1967 FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY* (To take effect on 11 November 1967.) Certified statements were registered by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization on 30 August 1967. * In a communication received by the Director-General of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization on 11 August 1967, the Government of the Federal Repub lic of Germany declared that "the Convention and the Protocol shall also apply to the Land Berlin, with effect from the date on which the Convention and Protocol will enter into force for the Federal Republic of Germany". In a further communication received on 4 April 1968, the Government of the Federal Re public of Germany informed the Director-General that the following supplementary phrase should be added to the above-mentioned declaration : "...account being taken of the rights and responsibilities of the Allied Authorities, in particular the powers retained by them with regard to the maintenance of the security of Berlin, and notably,© those in the military field." 1 United Nations, Treaty Series, Vol.
    [Show full text]
  • Tornadoes Associated with Hurricane Beulah on September 19-23, 1967
    July 1970 541 UDC 661.616.3:651.616.~~784)“1967.~.18-~”“BEOLAH” TORNADOES ASSOCIATED WITH HURRICANE BEULAH ON SEPTEMBER 19-23, 1967 ROBERT ORTON ESSA State Climatologist for Texas, Austin, Tex. ABSTRACT One hundred fifteen tornadoes are known to have occurred in association with humcane Beulah. The total was far greater than the number reported with any previous North Atlantic tropical cyclone in history. The spatial distribution of the tornadoes with reference to the hurricane center was examined, and it is shown that the best relationships on location of the hurricane-tornado within the parent cyclone are obtained with respect to true azimuth and are superior to those obtained using an orientation from a heading along the tropical cyclone track. With few exceptions, the tornadoes associated with hurricane Beulah occurred outside the area of known hurricane- force winds. The period of the day, the orientation of the Texas coastline in relation to the hurricane’s path, and the length of time Beulah lingered near the coast may have contributed to the record.numberof occurrences of hurricane- tornadoes. Unauthenticated | Downloaded 09/28/21 07:58 PM UTC 542 MONTHLY WEATHER REVIEW vel. 98, No. 7 hurricane Beulah for descriptive evidence of tornado occurrence. The daily September totals of tornadoes associated with hurricane Beulah are: the 19th, 5; 20th, 67; 21st, 21; 22d, 21; and 23d, 1. Of these, 79 occurred in the morning and 35 in the after- noon; for one tornado occurrence, the period of the day was not known. The location of each tornado, the time of occurrence when known, and other pertinent data concerning these storms are on file at the ESSA State Climatologist's of6ce.
    [Show full text]
  • Rethinking the Six Day War: an Analysis of Counterfactual Explanations Limor Bordoley
    Limor Bordoley Rethinking the Six Day War: An Analysis of Counterfactual Explanations Limor Bordoley Abstract The Six Day War of June 1967 transformed the political and physical landscape of the Middle East. The war established Israel as a major regional power in the region, while the Israeli territorial acquisitions resulting from the war have permanently marred Israel’s relationship with its Arab neighbors. The May crisis that preceded the war quickly spiraled out of control, leading many to believe that the war was unavoidable. In this paper, I construct three counterfactuals that consider how May and June 1967 might have unfolded differently if a particular event or person in the May crisis had been different. Ultimately, the counterfactuals show that war could have been avoided in three different ways, demonstrating that the Six Day War was certainly avoidable. In the latter half of the paper, I construct a framework to compare the effectiveness of multiple counterfactual. Thus, the objective of this paper is twofold: first, to determine whether war was unavoidable given the political climate and set of relations present in May and June 1967 and second, to create a framework with which one can compare the relative persuasiveness of multiple counterfactuals. Introduction The Six Day War of June 1967 transformed the political and physical landscape of the Middle East. The war established Israel as a major regional power, expanding its territorial boundaries and affirming its military supremacy in the region. The Israeli territorial acquisitions resulting from the war have been a major source of contention in peace talks with the Palestinians, and has permanently marred Israel’s relationship with its Arab neighbors.
    [Show full text]