STRATEGIES FOR ENHANCING THE QUALITY AND SHELF LIFE OF MANGO (Mangifera indica L.) FRUIT GROWN UNDER THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS OF DERA ISMAIL KHAN
BY
FARZANA BIBI
DEPARTMENT OF HORTICULTURE
FACULTY OF AGRICULTURE, GOMAL UNIVERSITY
DERA ISMAIL KHAN, PAKISTAN
2012
STRATEGIES FOR ENHANCING THE QUALITY AND SHELF LIFE OF MANGO (Mangifera indica L.) FRUIT GROWN UNDER THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS OF DERA ISMAIL KHAN
A dissertation submitted to Gomal University, Dera Ismail Khan, in partial fulfillment of the requirement for the degree of
Doctor of Philosophy
In
Horticulture
By
FARZANA BIBI
Department of Horticulture
Faculty of Agriculture, Gomal University
Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan
2012
IN THE NAME OF ALLAH
THE MOST GRACIOUS THE MOST MERCIFUL
DEDICATED TO MY DEAREST PARENTS
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
All praises and glory be to ALLAH, the most Merciful and Beneficent who bestowed
upon me the health, power of communication and opportunity to complete this study.
Countless salutation on the Holy Prophet MUHAMMAD (Peace Be Upon Him) is the
last Prophet of ALLAH.
I am thankful to my supervisors, Prof. Dr. Muhammad Saleem Jilani, Chairman,
Department of Horticulture, for his guidance and Dr. Musa Kaleem Baloch (Tamgh-e-
Imtiaz, Izaz-e-Fazilat), Professor of chemistry and Dean of Sciences for his continuous
support, guidance, suggestions, constructive comments and technical expertise both in the
laboratory as well as in the field throughout the period of my study and research. I
sincerely respect him for his devotion to work, simplicity, his care, co-operation and
encouragement during the study period.
I express my thanks to Dr. Muhammad Iqbal and Dr. Jalal-u-Din Baloch, Department of
Horticulture; Dr. Qudratullah Khan Department of Soil and Environmental Science and
Prof. Dr. Ahmad Khan Baloch, Department of Food and Science Technology, Ex–Dean
Faculty of Agriculture for his support and guidance. I also thanks to Naqibullah,
Muhammad Farooq and Hakeem-ud-din Laboratory Assistant for his co-operation.
I am thankful to my parents whose support, prayers, encouragement, love and affection had been always a source of aspiration.
FARZANA BIBI
ix
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter Title Page Number
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ix
TABLE OF CONTENTS x
LIST OF TABLES xii
LIST OF FIGURES xviii
ABSTRACT xxii
1 INTRODUCTION 1
2 REVIEW OF LITERATURE 9
3 MATERIALS AND METHODS 60
3.1 Chemicals 60
3.2 General Procedure 60
3.2.1 Sampling 60
3.2.2 Cutting and Peeling of the Fruit 60
3.2.3 Measurement of Ripened Stage 61
3.2.4 Analysis of Fruit 61
3.2.4.1 Organoleptic Evaluation 61
3.2.4.2 Measurements of Moisture Contents 62
3.2.4.3 Measurements of Total Soluble Solids 62 (TSS)
x
3.2.4.4 Measurements of Total Solids (TS) 63
3.2.4.5 Measurements of pH 63
3.2.4.6 Measurements of Acidity 63
3.2.4.7 Measurements of Ascorbic Acid 64 (Vitamin-C)
3.2.4.8 Measurements of Total Sugar 64
3.2.4.9 Measurements of Total Carotenoids 65
3.2.4.10 Measurements of Ethylene Production 65
3.2.4.11 Measurements of Weight Loss 66
3.2.4.12 Measurements of Waste Percent 66
3.2.5 Statistical Analysis 67
3.3 Investigating the Impact of Various Parameters over 67 the Quality and Shelf life
3.3.1 Comparing ripening of On Tree fruits with 67 those under the Controlled Atmosphere
3.3.2 Exposure of Fruit to Sun Light on Tree 67
3.3.3 Harvesting at Different Day Timings and 67 Coating with Calcium Chloride
3.3.4 Harvesting Stages and Storage Conditions 68
3.3.5 Field Heat Removal of the Fruits 68
3.3.6 Pedicle (Stalk) Length of the Fruit 70
3.3.7 Coating the Fruit with Various Materials 70
xi
4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION 72
4.1 Comparison of on Tree and Controlled Atmosphere 72 Ripening
4.2 Impact of sunlight- exposure to fruits on tree 78
4.3 Harvesting at Different Day Times and Coating with 87 Calcium Chloride
4.4 Impact of Harvesting Stages and Storage Conditions 98
4.5 Field Heat Removal of the Fruit 116
4.6 Pedicle (Stalk) Length of the Fruit 128
4.7 Impact of Coating the Fruit with Various Materials 134
5 CONCLUSION 156 RECOMMENDATIONS 160 REFERENCES 161
xii
LIST OF TABLES
Table Title Page #
1 Detail about the treatments and the heat removed from the fruit during 69
the treatment.
2 Average values of physical and chemical characteristics of mango 74
determined after 5 days of storage (the time period when the mango
fruit stored at 40○C was ripened), irrespective of the variety.
3 Average values of organoleptic parameters measured at ripened stage 75
of mango fruit.
4 Average values of chemical characteristics measured at ripened stage 76
of mango fruit.
5 Average values of color, aroma and flavor measured at harvest time 81
for Langra and Samar Bahisht Chaunsa mango.
6 Average values of total sugar, total carotenoids and ascorbic acid 82
measured at harvest time for Langra and Samar Bahisht Chaunsa
mango.
7 Average values of color, aroma and flavor measured at ripened stage 83
for Langra and Samar Bahisht Chaunsa mango stored at 30○C
temperature
8 Average values of chemical constituents measured at ripened stage for 84
xiii
Langra and Samar Bahisht Chaunsa mango, stored at 30○C
temperature.
9 Average values of organoleptic parameters measured at harvest time 89
for Langra and Samar Bahisht Chaunsa mango fruit
10 Average values of chemical constituents of Langra and Samar Bahisht 90
Chaunsa mango fruit measured at harvest time.
11 Average values of organoleptic parameters measured at ripened stage 91
for Langra mango fruit stored at different temperatures
12 Average values of organoleptic parameters measured at ripened stage 92
for Samar Bahisht Chaunsa mango fruit stored at different
temperatures
13 Average values of chemical constituents measured at ripened stage for 93
Langra mango fruit stored at different temperatures
14 Average values of chemical constituents measured at ripened stage for 94
Samar Bahisht Chaunsa mango fruit stored at different temperatures
15 Average values of organoleptic parameters measured at harvest time 104
for Langra and Samar Bahisht Chaunsa mango fruit, harvested at
different days after the fruit setting
16 Average values of organoleptic parameters measured at ripened stage 105
for Langra and Samar Bahisht Chaunsa mango fruit stored at different
xiv
temperatures
17 Average values of chemical constituents of Langra and Samar Bahisht 106
Chaunsa mango fruit measured at harvest time
18 Average values of chemical constituents measured at ripened stage for 107
Langra and Samar Bahisht Chaunsa mango fruit, stored at different
temperatures
19 Parameters determined after 8 days (The time required by the control 120
fruit to ripen up) of harvest time
20 Average values of organoleptic parameters measured at ripened stage 121
for Langra mango fruit stored at different temperatures.
21 Average values of organoleptic parameters measured at ripened stage 122
for Samar Bahisht Chaunsa mango fruit stored at different
temperatures.
22 Effect of heat removed over the chemical characteristics of Langra 123
variety; stored at different temperatures.
23 Effect of heat removed over the chemical characteristics of Samar 124
Bahisht Chaunsa variety; stored at different temperatures.
24 Average values of organoleptic parameters measured at ripened stage 130
for Langra and Samar Bahisht Chaunsa mango fruit stored at 30C
25 Average values of chemical constituents measured at ripened stage for 131
xv
Langra and Samar Bahisht Chaunsa mango fruit stored at 30C
26 Average values of organoleptic parameters measured at harvest time 138
for Langra and Samar Bahisht Chaunsa mango fruit
27 Average values of chemical constituents of Langra and Samar Bahisht 138
Chaunsa mango fruit, measured at harvest time
28 Average values of organoleptic parameters of the Langra mango fruit 139
determined at the ripened time of the control, irrespective of ripened
stage of the fruit
29 Average values of organoleptic parameters measured at ripened stage 141
for Langra mango fruit stored at different temperatures
30 Average values of organoleptic parameters measured at ripened stage 142
for Samar Bahisht Chaunsa mango fruit, stored at different
temperatures
31 Average values of chemical constituents measured at ripened stage for 143
Langra mango fruit, stored at different temperatures
32 Average values of chemical constituents measured at ripened stage for 144
Samar Bahisht Chaunsa mango fruit, stored at different temperatures
33 Average values of organoleptic parameters measured at ripened stage 150
for Langra mango fruit stored at different temperatures
34 Average values of organoleptic parameters measured at ripened stage 151
xvi
for Samar Bahisht Chaunsa mango fruit stored at different
temperatures
35 Average values of chemical constituents measured at ripened stage for 152
Langra mango fruit, stored at different temperatures
36 Average values of chemical constituents measured at ripened stage for 153
Samar Bahisht Chaunsa mango fruit, stored at different temperatures
xvii
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Title Page #
1 Time required by the fruit to reach at the ripened stage as a function 77
of treatment and storage temperature
2 Waste percent of the fruit during the ripening process 77
3 Fruit exposure to sunlight on tree 80
4 Time required by the fruit to reach at the ripened stage as a function 85
of treatment and at 30C storage temperature
5 Weight loss percent of mango fruit measured at the ripened stage as a 86
function of treatment and at 30C storage temperature
6 The waste percent of the fruit during the ripening process stored at 86
30C.
7 Time required by the Langra fruit to reach at the ripened stage as 95
affected by storage temperature and treatments
8 Time required by the Samar Bahisht Chaunsa fruit to reach at the 95
ripened stage as affected by storage temperature and treatments.
9 Weight loss percent of Langra mango fruit measured at the ripened 96
time
10 Weight loss percent of Samar Bahisht Chaunsa mango fruit measured 96
xviii
at the ripened time
11 Waste percent of the Langra fruit during the ripening process 97
12 Waste percent of the Samar Bahisht Chaunsa fruit during the ripening 97
process
13 Figure 13 Correlation of (a) Total carotenoids (TC (%)), Total sugar 108-
(TS (%)), (b) Total soluble solids (TSS (%)) and (c) Acidity (%) with 109
the skin color of both the varieties, irrespective of sample and storage
temperature
14 Figure 14 Correlation of (a) Total carotenoids and (b) Acidity with 110
sugar for both the varieties, irrespective of sample and temperature.
La stands for Langra, Ch for Samar Bahisht Chaunsa and TC stands
for total carotenoids
15 Time required by the fruit to reach at the ripened stage as a function 111
of storage temperatures
16 Weight loss percent measured at the ripened stage for both the 112
varieties stored at various temperatures
17 Weight loss percent as a function of exposure parameters (calculated 112
as per Equation (5)) for all the varieties and storage temperature
18 Waste percent of the fruit during the ripening process 113
19 Ripening rate (= change in sugar contents / days) of different samples 114
xix
of Samar Bahisht Chaunsa variety as a function of storage
temperature
20 Activation energy of Langra and Samar Bahisht Chaunsa varieties 115
21 Sugar %, total carotenoids µg/g (TC), total soluble solids % (TSS) 125
and acidity % contents of the fruit as a function of heat removed from
the fruit. The fruit was stored at 30oC. L and C stand for Langra and
Samar Bahisht Chaunsa, respectively
22 Time required by the fruit to reach at the ripened stage as a function 126
of treatment and storage temperature
23 The waste percent of the fruit during the ripening process 127
24 Time required by the fruit to reach at the ripened stage as a function 132
of treatment and at 30C storage temperature
25 Weight loss percent of mango fruit measured at the ripened stage as a 133
function of treatment and at 30C storage temperature
26 The waste percent of the fruit during the ripening process stored at 133
30C
27 Weight loss percent of mango fruit measured at the ripening time of 140
the control (T0)
28 Time required by the fruit to reach at the ripened stage as affected by 145
xx
storage temperature and treatments
29 Days at which ethylene production was maxima by the fruit stored at 146
30C
30 Waste percent of the fruit during the ripening process 146
31 Time required by the fruit to reach at the ripened stage as affected by 154
storage temperature and treatments
32 Weight loss percent of mango fruit measured at the ripening time of 155
the control (T0)
33 Waste percent of the fruit during the ripening process 155
xxi
ABSTRACT
The mango fruit not only has wonderful taste, flavor and nutritional values but also has
anticancer and anti-viral activities. It is therefore, very popular and is recognized as king
of the fruits. Mango fruit is also one of the cash crops of Pakistan that stands at 5th position among the main mango producing countries. However, its pre and postharvest wastage is quiet high due to short shelf life and vulnerable to various microorganism.
Therefore, the objective of this work was to prolong the shelf life and to improve the quality of the fruit by applying various strategies. For the purpose two commercial varieties of mango namely, Langra and Samar Bahisht Chaunsa were selected for the study.
The impact of controlled atmosphere ripening was explored by harvesting the fruit at hard green stage and stored at 20, 30 and 40C till ripening. The results obtained for various quality parameters (QP) as well as shelf life of the fruit were compared with the fruit ripened at the tree (under normal conditions). It was observed that the tree ripened fruit was better in quality than the fruit ripened at different storage temperature after harvesting. The fruit took longer time for its ripening at the tree compared to storage at
30 and 40C, irrespective of the variety. The shelf life was longest for the mangoes stored at 20C compared to others, including tree ripened fruit. However, the waste percent was highest at tree ripened fruit as compared to stored fruit, irrespective of temperature and variety. These parameters were significantly different in most of the cases under the limit
P < 0.05.
xxii
The results obtained for various quality parameters of the fruit harvested at hard green
stage of maturity from different (orientation) side of the tree East, West, North and South
showed that the quality was best and waste percent was lowest for the fruit harvested
from south (sun exposure time for the fruit was maximum) orientation of tree; the shelf
life was longer and weight loss percent was lower for North direction compared to others,
irrespective of the variety and storage temperature. The values of QP for the fruit
harvested from South were significantly different from other treatments in most of the
cases under the limit P < 0.05.
The fruit was harvested three (6.30 am, 1.30 pm and 8.30 pm) times a day and was stored at 20, 30 and 40C till ripening. It was concluded that the quality of the ripened fruit was
highest for 8.30 pm harvest time and stored at 40C. The fruit harvested at 6.30 am and
stored at 20C had lowest quality and weight loss but longest shelf life, whereas the fruit
harvested at 1.30 pm and stored at 40C had shortest shelf life and highest weight loss, irrespective of the variety. On the other hand, the waste percent was highest for fruit harvested at 1.30 pm and 20C storage temperature and lowest for 6.30 am harvest time and stored at 30C, irrespective of the variety. However, the quality and the shelf life were improved by coating the fruit with calcium chloride, respective of harvest time plus storage temperature and irrespective of the variety.
The impact of harvest stages and storage conditions over the postharvest quality and shelf life of mango fruit was explored by measuring the QP for the fruit harvested at 80 (early stage), 95 (mid stage) and 110 (late stage) days after the fruit setting and stored at three different storage temperature showed a significant impact over the quality characteristics.
xxiii
The waste percentage, weight loss, pH, total soluble solids, carotenoids and total sugar
were increased with the storage time/ ripening process, irrespective of maturity stages;
while the percentage of acidity and vitamin-C was decreased with storage time. The total
sugar contents were highest in later stage whereas, vitamin C and acidity were highest in
fruit harvested at early stage whereas; the waste percentage was lowest for mid stage
harvest. The weight loss was higher and shelf life was longer for early stage harvest. The
ripening rate increased and the shelf life decreased with rise in storage temperature. The
total soluble solids, sugar contents and carotenoids had positive correlation with the skin
color, irrespective of stage, variety and temperature.
The contribution of cooling of the fruit towards the enhancement of quality and
prolonging the shelf life was explored by harvesting the fruit at hard green stage of
maturity and maintaining at 15○C (by keeping in cold water and/ or in cold air) for
different time periods. The fruit was then stored at 20, 30 and 40oC till ripening. The
quality parameters obtained were correlated with pre-storage cooling treatment. It was
concluded that the impact of heat removed of the fruit was significantly different in most
of the cases under the limit of P 0.05. It was also observed that the removal of heat
from the fruit enhanced the quality, prolongs shelf life and minimize wastage,
irrespective of the variety and storage temperatures.
The quality of mango fruit was investigated as related with pedicle (stalk) lengths of the
fruit. The fruit was harvested at hard green stage of maturity with 0.5, 2.5, 4.5 and 6.5cm
pedicle (stalk) lengths and stored at 30○C till ripening. The result showed that the fruit
harvested with 4.5cm stalk length was better among the investigated treatment for quality
and shelf life. The weight loss and waste percent during ripening process of mango fruit
xxiv
was higher for 0.5cm stalks and lower for 4.5cm stalk, irrespective of the variety and storage temperature.
The impact of coating over the quality and shelf life of mango (Langra and Samar
Bahisht Chaunsa) fruit was investigated in detail. For this purpose, several coating materials like starch, olive oil, beeswax, sodium benzoate, coconut oil, natural ghee
(clarified butter) and potassium metabisulphite were evaluated. The fruit was harvested at hard green stage of maturity, coated and stored at various temperatures with control till ripening. The data showed that the coating had significant impact over the quality and shelf life of the fruit in most of the cases under the limit of P 0.05. Shelf life was longest with minimum weight loss and waste percent in natural ghee (clarified butter) and beeswax. Quality was higher in case of natural ghee and starch based coating than others, irrespective of the variety and storage temperature. Overall the shelf life was longest and waste percent was lowest in Samar Bahisht Chaunsa as compared to Langra mango variety, irrespective of the treatment.
xxv
1 INTRODUCTION
The climate of Pakistan varies (hot summers and cool or cold winters) throughout the country. Pakistan receives precipitation in the upper parts from the western disturbance in
March to April; however, most of the country is lashed by the South West monsoon in the month of June to September. The highest temperature of the country has been recorded 50°C and mean as 38°C during June/July. The cold winter temperature of upper part of the country can drop up to –10°C and minimum mean temperature as 4°C in the month of January. Dera Ismail Khan is the southern district of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province of Pakistan. It is situated on 31°N latitude, 70°E longitude and an altitude of
171m. The climate of this area is hot and moist in summer and cold and dry in winter.
The annual precipitation is 250-300mm and it normally occurs in monsoon season during the months of July-August. The soil of this area is silty-clay type and the pH is 8.2 to 8.5.
Soil content of nitrogen and phosphorous of soil is 0.04% and 6ppm, respectively. Dera
Ismail khan is famous for the production of several nutritious fruits like mango, dates, citrus, jaman, guava etc. However, most of these fruit are spoiled due to the overlapping of monsoon and ripening season of the fruit.
Mango (Mangifera indica L.) belongs to dicotyledonous family of Anacardiaceae and is known as “King of fruits” (Nunes et al., 2007). The mango is one of the most important tropical and subtropical fruit of the world and is popular both in the fresh and the processed form. The important commercial varieties of mango grown in Pakistan are
Langra, Samar Bahisht Chaunsa, Anwar Rataul, Dusehri, Sindhri, Malda, Gulab Khas,
Alphanso, Sawarnarica, Beganpali, Fazli, Kalan, Sensation, Neelum, Zafran, Khasa,
1
Saroli and Fajri (Amin and Hanif, 2002). Mango is a nutritious fruit having an excellent
flavor, attractive fragrance, delicious taste that has made it one of the best fruits (Pal,
1998). Mango fruit has anticancer and anti-viral activities, and reduced risk of cardiac
diseases (Sivakumar et al., 2011; Talcott and Talcott, 2010). Mango provides 64-86
calories of energy per 100g of ripe fruit and can balance the diet up to large extent. It is
commercially grown in more than 80 countries of the world and Pakistan stands at 5th position, with the production of 938 kilotons, sharing 7.6 % in the world market (Sauco,
2002). In Pakistan, mango is grown on an area of 94 thousand hectare and is considered to be the second major fruit crop in Pakistan. An increase in the demand of fresh mango fruit is being observed world over which has increased the prospect for the producing countries (Anwar et al., 2008; Amin et al., 2008). However, like all other fresh commodities, its market potential is linked with the fruit quality and market access
(Anwar and Malik, 2007).
Mango being a climacteric and highly perishable fruit possesses a very short shelf life. It generally reaches to respiration peak of ripening process within three to four days after harvesting at ambient temperature and two to three weeks in cold storage 13C but certainly depends upon variety, storage and transportation conditions (Narayana et al.,
1996; Carrillo-Lopez et al., 2000). It is therefore generally harvested at mature green stage, and ripens up during the marketing, storage period and consumption process. In addition to these market constraints, the high variability of pre-harvest and post-harvest factors affects its quality. The enlisted are some of the major factors which play the role in heterogeneity in size, quality, wastage and shelf life of the fruit. However, the scientists are up to now concentrating over the maturity at the harvest stage and apparent
2
quality of the fruit so that it must attract the consumers and/ or on postharvest
management (Jacobi et al., 1995; Hoa et al., 2002; Lalel et al., 2003; Nunes et al., 2007).
The mango ripening is a complicated phenomena and control through genetically
programmed event and involvement of various chemicals/enzymes like glycosidases,
beta-D-galactosidase, glycanases, protein kinase and ethylene. The ripening process
becomes very sensitive to temperature, exposure to sun light, energy available in the
system, humidity and harvesting days, etc (Ali et al., 1995; Frylinck and Dubery, 1998;
Zheng et al., 2007). The ripening of the fruit may change in structural polysaccharides causing softening, increase in respiration and/ or ethylene production, degradation of chlorophyll, developing pigments by carotenoids biosynthesis, change in carbohydrates or starch into sugars, lipids, phenolic and volatile compounds and organic acids (Herianus
et al., 2003). Therefore, small variations in pre-harvest environment, harvesting
techniques, storage and transportation condition may greatly affect the shelf life and/or
quality of the fruit.
During the flowering and fruiting period of mango in Pakistan a monsoon rain and
humidity that caused fungal diseases resulting in flower and fruit drop. A lower humidity
and high temperature photosynthetic efficiency reduced with more respiration that
reduced crop load. Due to dry conditions, excessive fruit drop may take place resulting
low yield. The storm winds damaged mangoes through dropping of fruit, breakage of
major limbs or uprooting the whole tree. Pest and diseases reduce the quality and shelf
life of mango fruit up to large extent (Ishaq et al., 2004; Bally, 2006; Lechaudel and Joas,
2007). Infection caused by microorganisms is a serious issue of post-harvest losses in
mango fruit. Disease caused by virus, fungi, bacteria, algae and lichens, physiological
3 disorders, nutrition deficiencies, parasites, injuries occurs due to environment, diseases of post harvest due to pre-harvest treatment transit, storage (Mahmood and Gill, 2002; Ishaq et al., 2004; Iqbal et al., 2004). These factors, amongst others and combined with the high perishability of fresh produce, contributed higher (20-30%) spoilage and unnecessary losses (Tahir et al., 2002) up to about 320.7 thousand tons annually of worth
Rs. 3.0 billion only in Pakistan (Haq, 2002). Wastage of mango fruit due to anthracnose and stem end rot limits the storage potential of mango fruit up to large extent (Narayana et al., 1996).
In Pakistan and other developing countries, most of the orchards are handled by untrained peoples. They neither know the proper harvesting techniques of fruit nor the impact of these over the shelf life and quality of the fruit. This lack of knowledge causes tremendous losses in terms of physical damage, bruising, sap burn injury and later spoilage of mango fruit. One of the impacts of ill harvesting technique is the detachment of pedicel at the harvest time. The fruit ducts containing sap are normally at high pressure and the sap can come out and get deposited at the fruit surface as soon as the pedicel abscission zone is broken at harvest (Joel, 1980; Loveys et al., 1992; Campbell, 1992;
Lim and Kuppelweiser, 1993; Bosquez et al., 2000). The sap damages the market value and deteriorates the quality of the fruit through the following processes (Bagshaw, 1988;
Campbell, 1992):
1. Deteriorates the appearance of the fruit by blackening the skin.
2. The latex flow causes the mangoes to lose water and hence reduce the mass of the
fruit with higher rate.
3. The exposed fruit is highly sensitive to impact and undergoes very rapid spoilage.
4
4. The sap being sticky it attracts the soil particles as well as micro-organisms
results a decrease in shelf life.
5. It browns and hardens, staining the fruit surface and provoking skin necrosis.
To overcome the sap burn or latex problem various techniques have been adopted like, mechanical de-sapping, applying various chemicals (sodium carboximethyl cellulose, sodium lauryl sulphate and calcium hydroxide) and dabbing with vegetable oil, waxes and powder (Landrigan et al., 1991; Baker, 1991; Ledger, 1991; Meurant, 1991).
On the other hand, the non-recognition of correlation between selection of best ripening condition/ maturity stage and quality/ shelf life is playing a considerable role in deteriorating the quality of the fruit in a country like Pakistan. Similarly, the non- availability of proper storage conditions contributes toward the wastage as well as reduces the market value of the fruit (Mizrach et al., 1997; Lurie, 1998; Hoa et al., 2002;
Saranwong et al., 2004; Shafique et al., 2006; Subedi et al., 2007).
The exposure of fruit to light has a significant impact over its quality as it influences the carotenoids which results the synthesis of yellow pigments of skin, and sugar production.
On the other hand if the fruit is not sufficiently exposed to sunlight it retains a greener skin color inside the canopy and hence affects the quality of fruit (Farquhar et al., 1980;
Simmons et al., 1998; Lechaudel and Joas, 2007; Saengnil et al., 2011).
The shelf life is considered to be one of the important parameters for the quality of fruit which is very sensitive to temperature and other post harvest conditions (Simmons et al.,
1998). One of the major roles of the storage temperature is to control the rate of biochemical reactions and hence monitors the ripening process or the shelf life (Narain et al., 1998; Marsh et al., 1999; Austin et al., 1999; Baloch et al., 2011a). Mango fruit
5 requires meticulous temperature, moisture and ventilation condition. The importance of temperature management in maintaining the quality of fresh fruits and vegetable is well documented (Kader, 1992). The improper ventilation may results an increase in carbon dioxide level and insufficient supply of atmospheric oxygen may cause fermentation and rotting of the fruit. If the humidity is low the weight loss in the fruit may take place due to release of water vapors. On the other hand, the high humidity may result an attack of post-harvest disease and same is the impact of storage temperature.
It is also a common practice to harvest the fruit at early stage of maturity and get them ripened through an accelerated ripening process. For the purpose, the use of calcium carbide (CaC2) is very popular in spite of the fact that it is dangerous for health and can cause explosion and carryover toxic materials like arsenic and phosphorus to consumers, thus making the healthy fruit poisonous (Subramanian, 2004; Mariappan, 2004). Further to it, high quantity of calcium carbide is needed to ripen immature fruit, which make the fruit tasteless and poison (Medlicott et al., 1986; Cua and Lizada, 1990; Padmini and
Prabha, 1997; Singh and Janes, 2001).
One of the common techniques used to protect the fruit from micro-organisms is the coating of fruit. For the purpose a thin film of material is applied uniformly over the surface of the fruit and can be consumed along with the product (Guilbert, 1986). In addition, they reduced the weight loss and delayed ripening (Baldwin, 1994; Cuq et al.,
1995). The material used can be edible, natural or synthetic (Ketsa and Prabhasavat 1992;
McCollum et al., 1992; Baldwin, 1994, 1998; Cuq et al., 1995; Sumnu and Bayindirli
1995; Diaz-Sobac et al., 1996; 1997; Kittur et al., 2001; Dang et al., 2008). As a consequence number of coatings has been employed and discussed by the scientists and
6 still efforts are going on to find the best one. Therefore, the chitosan, carnauba wax, aloevera gel, semperfresh, shellac, zein, polysaccharide-based coatings materials have been used by different scientists and their efficiency and problem associated with them have been highlighted (Carrillo-Lopez et al., 2000; Hoa et al., 2002; Srinivasa et al.,
2004; Feygenberg et al., 2005; Zhu et al., 2008; Abbasi et al., 2009; Abbasi et al., 2011).
Though the scientists are working hard to identify the proper harvest time, techniques and instrumentation required for proper harvesting and storage conditions to minimize the wastage but the outcome is not very promising that needs systematic efforts (Anwar and
Malik, 2007; Maqbool and Malik, 2008; Abbasi et al., 2009; Lechaudel et al., 2010). In addition, Langra and Samar Bahisht Chaunsa mango are of high quality but a little has been reported over these cultivars (Anwar and Malik, 2007; Akhtar et al., 2010; Jha et al., 2010). Further, the designing of non-destructive technology for the evaluation of quality of the fruit that has recently became very popular requires precise information about the relationship between organoleptic and chemical characteristics of the fruits. The organoleptic characteristics are also very important for the marketing of the fruit (Al-Haq and Sugiyama, 2004a; Butz et al., 2005; Jha et al., 2005, 2007; 2010; Jha, 2006; Santulli and Jeronimidis, 2006; Lebrun et al., 2008).
This study was aimed to find out ways and means to prolong the shelf life of mango fruits while keeping the quality up to the required level and to figure out the impact of various parameters over it. For the purpose detail investigation has been performed to identify the optimum harvest stage/ time, suitable coatings, including some of the novel coatings, optimum pre- and storage conditions and or management strategies to minimize the post-
7 harvest losses so as to save and recover maximum worth out of the valuable food resources of the country.
OBJECTIVES
The objective of this project was to devise methodology for the prolongation of shelf life, improving organoleptic and physico-chemical qualities and reduce the wastage of mango fruit. For the purpose experiments were designed to explore the impact of sun light exposure, harvesting times of the day, harvesting (maturity) stage, field heat removal, pedicel (stalk) length, coating by various materials and storage temperature over the quality and shelf life of the fruit.
8
2 REVIEW OF LITERATURE
Mango fruit being nutritious, delicious is very popular all over the world, however, it is a
climacteric in nature and has short shelf life. A lot of work is going on to improve its
quality and reduce its wastage by prolonging its shelf life. In this section most of the
recent and relevant literature has been cited and discussed.
Harvest Stages
Medlicott et al. (1990) investigated the effects of harvest maturity of mango fruit
on different storage temperature management and the storage influence on the
development of quality during ripening. The mango fruit potential for storage depended
on storage temperature, harvest maturity and the harvest time in the season. At 12○C the
softening, development of peel and pulp color, pH and soluble solids concentration in
‘Amelie’, ‘Keitt’ and ‘Tommy Atkins’, mangos progressively occurred for up to twenty
one days during storage. During 12○C storage level of ripening changes, immature fruit
illustrated better storage capability than fruit harvested at more highly developed stages
of physiological maturity. At ripening temperature of 25○C the immature fruit appeared
ineffective to develop full ripeness quality. During storage at 12○C the half-mature and mature fruit had undergone partial ripening and during season the amount of which improved by progressive harvests. The changes in the ripening of the fruits during twenty one days of storage were of a lesser amount at 8 and 10○C compared to that at 12○C.
Ripening inhibition by chilling injury was indicated at every harvest stored at 8○C and the effect was also apparent in those fruits which were harvested in early season and were
9
stored at 10○C. Fruit harvested from mid and late season stored superior at 10 to that at
12○C with no obvious signs of chilling injury. The flavor of mango fruits ripened after
low temperature storage was less acceptable than of those ripened directly after harvest.
They concluded that the potential of storage was maximized by controlling the storage
temperature and harvest maturity for progressive harvests during the season.
Muda et al. (1995) investigated the softening of mango fruit by ripening analysis interrelated changes in the composition of cell walls of the fruit. There is on the whole an obvious loss of galactosyl and deoxyhexosyl deposits with ripening, the final representing deprivation of the wall pectin factor. The galactose loss showed to be controlled to the chelator soluble portion of the wall of pectin, even as deoxyhexose failure appeared to be further consistently disseminated amongst the pectin. The chelator soluble pectin fraction is increasingly de-polymerized and becomes more poly disperse with ripening. These changes are alike to those taking place in other fruits and are associated to the activity of hydrolases wall with ripening.
Ueda et al. (2000) examined the physico-chemical properties changes in ‘Irwin’ mango fruit during maturation. They harvested the fruit about at ten (sample 1), thirteen
(sample 2), sixteen (sample 3) and nineteen (sample 4) weeks after flowering. The size and weight of the fruit, respiratory rate, total soluble solids, and Hunter L and a value of fruit surface increased during maturation of fruit. These raises were notable in sample 4.
Though, the firmness of flesh reduced slowly as the fruit matured and citric acid reduced slowly in sample, 4 whereas the latter was almost constant. The free sugars, sucrose and
10
fructose increased during maturation, and the latter considerably rose in sample 4.
Therefore, fructose, which was the main free sugar in sample 1, was changed by sucrose in sample 4. Furthermore, alcohol insoluble solid, pectin and starch increased and reached a highest in sample 3 but they reduced to a lowest in sample 4. Amylase activities improved generally in row with maturation of fruit, reaching a highest in sample 4. It may be moderately reasonable to regard as that there are resemblances in the pattern of change in respiratory rate, flesh firmness, sugar content and organic acid during fruit maturation with no in view of differences of cultivar, cultivation or conditions environment.
Hossain et al. (2001) studied the physico-chemical composition of three varieties of mango. The best fruit weight was lowest (221.33 gram) in Amarpali but the variety of
Bishawanath had the maximum fresh weight (256.0 gram) and keeping quality (8.75 days). The maximum keeping quality was in Amarpali (12.5 days) mango fruit. The TSS
(23.50 percent), total sugar (26.85 percent) and pH of pulp (6.0) were highest in
Amarpali, but Bishawanath indicated highest Vitamin C (14.20 mg/100g) and acidity
(titrable) (0.87 %). Amarpali fruit was better in respect of all characters as compared to other varieties.
Mannan et al. (2003) evaluated the physico-chemical characteristics of various mango (Sharmai Fazli, Amarpali, Neelambori, Madrazi Tota and Indian Lota) varieties grown in Khulna region. The mango fruit was in three ripening stages viz. green, ripe and over ripe stage. The weight of various mango varieties was 189, 455, 180, 170 and 592g,
11
for Amarpali, Sharmai Fazli, Neelambori, Indian Lota and Madrazi Tota, respectively.
The highest percentage of edible portion (78.53 percent), juice content (56.50-72.77
percent) and maximum total soluble solids (18.66 percent) were noted in madrazi Tota.
They also concluded that the taste was very sweet in ripped Madrazi Tota than other varieties of mango fruit. The titratable acidity (0.04091percent) content was highest in
Indian Lota and smallest in Neelambori.
Lalel et al. (2003) was harvested 'Kensington Pride' mango at four maturity stages including hard mature green, sprung mature green, half-ripe and ripe allowing further to ripen it at 21′1°C. The ethylene production and rate of respiration were recorded throughout the stages of ripening. Also the quality, fatty acids and production of compounds of volatile aroma of fruit (ripe) were evaluated. The typical ethylene production and respiration was found only in the fruit harvested at the hard green stage of maturity through fruit ripening. Also it was recorded that the ripe fruit at the hard mature green stage harvested showed greater acids content, while reduced total sugars and reducing sugars contents. The fruit also exhibited a lower Hunter green-red value (a* =
6.30) and a higher hue angle value (h° = 76.20). Harvesting at Fruit maturity did not significantly influence the fruit firmness, total soluble solids, non-reducing sugars and total carotenoids of the ripe fruit. Total fatty acids, caproic, lauric, myristic, palmitic and palmitoleic acid were higher in the pulp of ripe fruit harvested at the sprung green stage.
While the pulp of fruit harvested at the half ripe stage had greater Caprilic, capric, stearic, oleic, linoleic and linolenic acids. Calculating the ratio of saturated fatty acids to unsaturated fatty acids; it was found that the saturated fatty acids were lower in the ripe
12
fruit harvested at the hard mature green and stage of sprung green. The aroma volatiles,
monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes and aromatic were found higher in the pulp of ripe fruit
harvested on the stage of sprung green. The fruit harvested at the entirely ripe phase
showed higher concentrations of esters, alkanes and norisoprenoids. The mango should
be harvested on the stage of sprung green to attain quality and greater aroma volatile
production of the ripe fruit.
Abu-Goukh and Mohamed (2004) studied the harvesting techniques for mango;
fruits were break off the tree with a pole operational with an elongated cloth sheath held
open by a circle. The pedicel was detached, the fruit fall into the bag and slid easily down
to be received by the picker. The better technique greatly enhanced fruit quality, reduced post-harvest losses and prolonged the shelf life.
Santos et al. (2004) studied the effect various maturity stages of Rosa cultivar mango with calcium chloride. Fruits were harvested at the mature-green (green- yellowish) and pre-climacteric (yellow-greenish) maturity stages. Calcium chloride was applied by 15-cm deep fruit immersion during two hours in solutions contain 0.0
(control); 4.0; and 8.0 percent. The mango fruit was stored at 10 ± 1°C and 85 percent relative humidity during twenty days, followed by five day storage at room temperature
(24 ± 2°C). Fruit skin color, weight loss, firmness (scores one to seven), internal and external appearances (scores one to six), total soluble solids and total titratable acidity were evaluated. Calcium chloride was particularly more useful when applied to pre- climacteric fruits. The fruits treated with 4.0 percent calcium chloride demonstrated fruits
13
presented skin black spot, soaked areas, and decay particularly pre-climacteric mangoes.
As compared to controls, 8.0 percent calcium chloride treatment provided a five-day
enhance in shelf life of mature-green ‘Rosa’ mango stored at 10 ± 1°C. The calcium
chloride 8.0 percent showed lowest weight losses when transferred to room temperature,
while maintaining total soluble solids, titratable acidity, fruit firmness, and best external
and internal appearances, even though, no significant delay on skin color progress was
noticed.
Chuadhry (2006) used the Alumina in the chromato-graphic analysis of mango
carotenoids and it’s also effects the four various pigments in the fruit. As mango fruit
ripen the individual pigments and the content of total carotenoid increased quickly to a highest and after that decrease subsequently. These changes were hastened at above normal temperatures (36°C, 40°C), but the values greatest were considerably unaffected.
During fruit ripening time, the content of total carotenoid was enhanced by the ultra-
violet light exposure. They also have observed during ripening the pigments increased,
particularly β-carotene.
Jha (2006) measured the maturity of mango fruit and studied the changes in sphericity, size, surface color, firmness and total soluble solids contents during growth and storage at ambient temperature. The fruit size increased slowly during growth and remained the sphericity in 0.67–0.70 range. Due to shrinkage the sphericity and size
decreased during storage. The fruit firmness remained about constant over the growth
period and it reduced after reached the maturity, while fruit yellowness improved during
14 growth and storage. Mango fruit maturity of could be expected by measuring color, firmness and size.
Shafique et al. (2006) investigated the physiological and biochemical characteristics of ten mango varieties at three various maturity stages viz. immature, mature and ripe to get the standard one. They determined the whole weight of the mangoes, weight of peel and stone, pulp content, pH, total soluble solid (TSS), acidity, vitamin C and sugar content at three maturity stages. They noted at ripe stages that all the varieties had superior content of sugar than immature and mature stages. The pleasant taste and attractive flavor were also developed in ripe stages and varied from one another due to varietal detailed. The quality aroma with the ripening is due to carbonyl and ester types components.
Uddin et al. (2006) investigated the bio-chemical characteristics of twenty two mango germplasms namely, Farooquebhog, Rad, Neelumbori, Chausa, Neelumboti,
Mallika, Tommy Atkin, Shindhu, Hybrid-10, Gopalbhog, Mixed special, Langra, Surmai
Fazli, Amrapali, Khirsapat, Keitt, BARI mango-1, Palmar, Kent, Sindhu and Kalibhog
All the germplasms were analysed chemically and among the germplasms well significant differences were recorded. The titratable acidity was highest in Mixed special, whereas moisture content was maximum in Farooquebhog. The TSS and pH of Pahlam germ plasms was top in the list but the reducing sugar and non-reducing sugar of
Amrapali and Rad was also top. They noted the total sugar and sugar/acidity ratio was
15 highest in Amrapali and Rad. The content of vitamin C was the best for Shindhu among the studied germplasms.
Peter et al. (2007) investigated the best off vine mango fruit ripening method for both consumption and processing. The physic-chemical parameters were measured of
Dodo (mature green) mango fruit before and through a three-day and six-day period of ripening by ethylene (fruit generated) pit ripening, smoked pit ripening, untreated pit ripening and room temperature ripening as a control technique. The postharvest ripening changes in the quality attributes of ripe mango fruit were interrelated among treatments and compared with the same changes in other varieties of mango. The changes such as the sugars formation, increased carotene and decreased acidity reflected the most important chemical changes in ripened stage.
Weor (2007) investigated the effects of different harvesting methods on Peter mango fruits storability under various environments in Gboko, Benue State. They used 5 harvesting methods and three storage environments set in a randomized complete block design and replicated 3 times. Data were noted on texture softening and color development at three days interval, for eighteen days. They noted that the Peter mangoes harvested using pole and collection bag, grass and handpicked methods performed superior (P < 0.05) as compared to other methods used. The fruits stored in hut performed superior (P < 0.01) as compared to the rest of the storage environments after eighteen days period of storage. It was demonstrated that these harvesting methods and hut storage environment increase Peter mango storability by this means sustaining it’s provide for
16 more than fifteen days after harvest. Therefore he recommended these methods of harvesting and hut storage of Peter mango.
Zaied et al. (2007) evaluated the eight local mango varieties; Alphonso, Hendi
Meloky, Mabrouka, Langra, Khad El Gamel, Dabsha, El- Kobbaneia and El-Madam.
They collected the mango fruit from private farm in Sharakia Governorate. They noted that the Langra mango was biggest pursued next to El-Kobbaneia & Dabsha, but Khade
El-Gamel and El-Madam created the smallest one. The lowest fiber percentage was clear in Alphonso fruit and the highest one was in Langra fruit. The mango juice percentage was highest in fruit of Langra, whereas the smallest in Hendi Meloky fruit. The total soluble solids (TSS) percent was highest in fruit of langra followed by Alphonso and the minimum one was in Mabrouka. The titratable acidity was of maximum value in Dabsha fruit, but the minimum one was noticed in Langra, Alphonso and El-Madam fruits. The content of total sugar was highest in Hendi Meloky, but El-Madam, Dabsha and
Mabrouka created the minimum one. They also concluded that the Dabsha fruit had the minimum vitamin C and the smallest one was obvious in Mabrouka fruit.
Amin et al. (2008) studied the sap burn injury and regarded it as the most threatening to external fruit quality of mango. When the pedicel of a mango fruit is broken, the sap exudes and spread over the fruit peel and causes a serious injury to the skin of mango. They estimated the suitable time of harvesting as well as de-sapping for control of sap burn injury in mango fruits. Australian industry product “Mango Wash” and Lime [Ca (OH) 2] at different times of the day including: 7 a.m. (morning), 12 p.m.
17
(noon) and 5 p.m. (evening) were assessed. Lime @ 0.5% and Mango Wash (@ 0.4% was used. Results showed that no sap injury (0 score) was recorded in the fruits harvested and de-sapped during morning, while maximum sap injury was found at noon in both the treatments (0.5 score for lime, 0.75 score for Mango Wash). Both the treatments (lime and Mango Wash) showed significantly reduced sap injury as compared with control for all the three times of treatment application. All of the physicochemical characteristics were non-significantly affected except fruit peel color and non-reducing sugar contents.
The color of fruit peel was slightly suppressed by the use of Mango Wash. Lime was found to impart attractive appearance to the fruits; however the skin color was non- significantly improved as compared to control. Also the qualitative characteristics were non-significantly influenced by the time of fruit harvest. However, significantly greater
TSS was found in the fruit harvested at noon as compared to other times of the day. It can be concluded that lime may be successfully used as an alternate instead of highly expensive mango wash for de-sapping of mango fruits.
Lebrun et al. (2008) evaluated the mango cultivar for soluble solids, acids and volatile properties at different maturity stages. The ‘Kent’ ‘Keitt’ and ‘Cogshall’ cultivars of mango were harvested at various maturities (sixty one–115 d earlier period of flowering & for Cogshall cultivar 80–307 average gram fresh weight) as well as on various sizes (276–894 and 364–1563 average grams weight fresh for ‘Kent’ and ‘Keitt’,
). Directly after harvest (green) or after one week of ripening at room temperature (ripe), fruit were homogenized and estimated by electronic nose or by gas chromatography for aroma and other volatiles as well as for acids and soluble solids. Volatile facts from the
18
various harvest maturities and stages of ripening were distinguished by using statistics
multivariate. The electronic nose or by gas chromatography were able, in the majority
cases, to detach fruit from different harvest maturities, especially for mangoes of
‘Cogshall’, at the green and ripe stages as well as differentiate green from ripe fruit and
fruit from the various varieties in a stage of maturity. The acids and soluble solids values
showed that later harvest maturities resulted in fruit sweeter and various profile of
volatile from earlier harvested fruit. The volatiles of mango fruit may be valuable as
maturity indicators to conclude best harvest maturity for fruit of mango that outcome in
full quality upon ripening.
Okeniyi et al. (2008) studied the naturally ripened and acetylene induced ripened
fruits of mango and banana analysis, and also examined the kinetic studies on the total
acidity reduce rate. The contents of vitamin C in naturally ripened mango and banana
fruits were 24.53 and 24.40mg/100g, irrespectively whereas induced ripened mango were
25.50mg/100g and in banana fruits 25.09mg/100g. The total sugar content in induced
ripened mango and banana fruits were 22.06 and 21.06 percent, whereas mango and
banana fruits ripened by naturally were 21.06 and 20.63 percent. The contents of ascorbic
acid (vitamin C) and total sugar percentage were superior as compared to fruits ripened
naturally. The kinetic studies of acidity reduce rate gave a first sort rate constant (K) for
-2 -1 -2 -1 mango and banana fruit juice as 1.5x10 h and 1.2+10 h , whereas the t½ sorted 57.75-
46.20 and 69.30-57.75 h for the induced ripened mango and banana fruits. There was a quick reduce in acidity of the induced ripened fruits against the fruit ripened naturally.
19
Akhtar et al. (2009) evaluated the sensorial and physico-chemical properties of four important mango (Mangifera indica L.) varieties (Chaunsa, Dusahri, Langra and
Ratol) grown in three main regions of Pakistan; Multan, Rahim Yar Khan and Mir Pur
Khas. Langra variety showed lower total soluble solids and pH, higher acidity among tested varieties. For these quality attributes non significant (P < 0.05) difference was observed for the place of production. Among these collected varieties the characteristics of color for Langra variety was higher from all three areas. This variety was inferior for other organoleptic properties (taste, flavor and on the whole acceptability). In addition, no relationship could be established for a particular variety to all three areas. In the same way, no parallel could be drawn between a single region and all four varieties for organoleptic properties except the Ratol variety which was exposed to be greatly acceptable for taste, flavor and normally acceptability in all three locations of its production.
Sakhale et al. (2009) assessed the shelf life of commercial mango (Kesar, cultivar) fruit; were harvested at specific physiological maturity stage. The fruits were washed suitably and treated with 50, 100 and 150ppm gibberellic acid in mixture with eight percent CaCl2 and fungicide. For post harvest storage life evaluation the various treated fruits were freely packed in CFB boxes and stored at ambient temperature. The total sugars and total soluble solids stated rising trend where as ascorbic acid; titratable acidity and physiological weight loss were established linearly reducing with the ripening. The fruits treated with gibberellic acid (100ppm) and eight percent calcium chloride was noted better in respect quality attributes of pre-ripening. The treated fruit
20
delayed the physical and chemical changes practicable for demonstration quality features
of ripening and considerably in retarding the ripening process. They reported the Kesar
mango greatly prolonged the storage life. They observed the changes on physical,
chemical and organoleptic quality factors were used as ripening and monitoring indices
of shelf life.
Saengnil et al. (2011) studied the red color development in the exocarp of
Mahajanaka mango fruit by sunlight exposure, which only occurred on the sunlight exposed side of the fruit. The anthocyanin accumulation was simultaneous with the enhanced in phenylalanine ammonia-lyase action in the mature stage of the mango. The endogenous sugar contents, activity of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase and the development of anthocyanin were higher on the exposed side of the fruit as compared to unexposed side. They concluded that sunlight increases the red color on the exocarp of mango by inducing phenylalanine ammonia-lyase action.
Pre-Storage Treatments
Loveys et al. (1992) studied that the skin of mango fruit damage through exuded
of sap from the broken or cut pedicel decreased the acceptance of consumer and shelf life
of the storage fruit. The Kensington mango fruit are mainly vulnerable to sap burn
damage. The sap of fruit separated into two parts by centrifugation. Damage skin was
caused mostly through the top non aqueous part. The main factor of this part was
terpinolene which provided symptom identical from sap burn damage when applied to the fruit surface. The indistinguishable kind of injury could be stimulated by the terpinolene
21
synthetic application when applied with no added water and diluted in hexane or as an
aqueous mixture. The components of non-volatile sap separated by cleansing were not
harmful to the skin of mango. The sap exuded from the leaf petioles of mango also
enclosed terpinolene, but its application was a lesser amount of than one percent of the
application in pedicel sap and this sap has no harmful effect on the fruit skin. Irwin
cultivar of Florida is a lesser amount responsible to sap burn damage & in sap the major
terpene was recognized as 3-carene. When applied to skin of Kensington mango, 3- carene caused notably less injured than terpinolene. They concluded that the main cause
of sap burn in mango is entrance of the sap volatile components for instance terpinolene
for the period of lenticels, resultant in injured of browning and tissue of following
enzymes.
McCollum et al. (1992) studied the effects of individual shrink film wrapping on
mango fruit shelf life and quality. Mango fruit were wrapped with shrink film in Rd 106
film (W.R.Grace and Co., Duncane, S.C) and other left non wrapped. The wrapped and
non wrapped fruit was held at 21○C frequently and used to measure the in package application of oxygen, CO2 & ethylene as well as CO2 and ethylene evolution from fruit
subsequent removal of the wrap in one set. The fruit was stored at 12○C for one or two weeks after which they were shifted to 21○C for ripening and then quality was estimated
in second set. The concentration of CO2 within the warp series from about five to eight
percent and concentration of oxygen was about twelve percent at 21○C. The taking away
of the film, respiration of the fruit were same to non wrapped controls; though, ethylene
evolution increased with increased period of wrapping. The increased ethylene was most
22 dissimilar between wrapped and non wrapped fruit. The wrapped fruit had more decomposed and inferior fruit quality when compared with non wrapped fruit. They concluded from this study individual shrink film wrapping of mango fruit does not showed to be useful.
Yuniarti and Suhardi (1992) minimized the postharvest losses during transportation by applying different methods for retarding ripening process in mangoes
(cv. Arumanis). For this purpose mango fruit was harvested at optimal maturity and treated with (1) 2, 4, 6 percent solution of CaCl2; (2) 4, 5, 6 or 7 percent wax emulsion;
(3) perforated polyethylene bags wrapping have KMnO4 as an absorbent of ethylene (2.5,
5.0, 7.5, 7.5 or 10.0 percent); (4) sealed polyethylene bags wrapping with KMnO4 as in
(3); or (4) control untreated. The mango fruits were placed perforated cartons and these cartons were transported for 36 hours. At room temperature analyzed these samples for soluble solids contents, texture, weight loss and days taken to reach the best possible ripeness or the condition of over-ripe. Emulsion of wax at six or seven percent had the maximum result in slow down the ripening process (by eleven days) and the stage of over-ripe (by nine days), and was compared by control fruits, and resulted weight loss was lowest. The soluble solids contents (14.8 percent after transportation subsequent 6% wax treatment) were also lowest by treatment of wax emulsion as compared to control.
Holmes et al. (1993) evaluated the standard harvesting technique to pick the mango fruit with elongated stem and transport them in crates made of plastic to the packing shed. The mango fruit were then de-sapped by removing the pedicel or stem and
23
the fruits were placed stem end down on a conveyor for 20- 30 minutes. This technique
still resulted in between 50 and 60 percent of the mango fruit suffering from some extent
of sap burn. The current work by officers of the Queensland Department of Primary
Industries has verified that these levels could be reduced by various techniques: (1)
packing with short stems; (2) de-stemming in a lime solution; (3) treatment with sprays
and dips detergent earlier to destemming; (4) picking the fruit without stems on a
harvesting support spraying and or dipping detergent on the mango fruit without delay.
All techniques reduced the severity and the sap burn fruit percentage. The harvesting aid
proved most useful reducing the total sap burn to 15.9 percent, and resulted in reduction
of the pickers’ number to almost half and hence a significant saving in the overall cost.
Menezes et al. (1995) studied the obvious flows of sap squirt out from the point of abscission of the fruit stalk after harvesting. The sap burn produced undesirable aesthetic on the fruit skin due to seepage of sap with considerable economic loss. They discussed the problem of economic significance, the biochemical description of the mango latex and injury of sap burn and some techniques to decrease the injury.
Prusky et al. (1999) studied the reduction of postharvest diseases occurrence source by Alternaria alternata and increasing the quality of mango fruit. For this purpose combined spray of hot water & brushing of fruit treatment for 15-20s was used. The treatment of hot water effectiveness was investigated at various temperatures (48 to
64oC), in mixture with treatment of prochloraz plus waxing of fruit. Fruits brushing by hot water considerably decreased the rot progress through Alternaria alternata. After
24
storage, the decrease of disease incidence by treatment (hot water brushing and
prochloraz (900µg ml-1)) for three weeks at 12○C and another week at 20○C was more
effective than by hot water brushing alone. The treatment of hot water brushing for 15s
enhanced the development of fruit color and more useful as compared to common
treatment of commercial dip for five minutes on 55○C. High quality for mango fruits with
a lesser amount of decay progress by the combination of hot water brushing and waxing.
Nair and Singh (2003) tested the effects of pre-storage ethereal application on
chilling injury development, ethylene production, respiration rate and quality of
Kensington Pride mango fruit. This mango (mature green) fruit was dipped in aqueous
solution including different ethereal application zero, fifty, 250 & 500 mg L-1 along with
surfactant (Tween 80) 0.01percent for five minutes. These fruits were stored for 4 weeks
at 5○C. At 22○C, the mango fruit was permitted toward ripening. Chilling injury index,
respiration rate and ethylene production was noted throughout the period of ripening from one to nine days. The rots of fruit, acidity, taste, firmness, TSS/acid ratio, total sugars, non-reducing and reducing sugar and total soluble solids were noted from fruit entirely ripe. Chilling injury was decreased significantly among every ethereal treatment. The five hundered mg/L ethereal treatment showed to be mainly useful into decreasing the chilling injury. In ethereal treated fruit the ethylene production and respiration rate was also enhanced with ripening period than fruit untreated. The quality of fruit enhanced by the treatment of ethereal with improved sugars, eating quality, TSS/acid ratio, total soluble solids and decreased the firmness of fruit and rots development. They concluded that pre-
25
storage treatment of 500 mg/L ethereal dip for 5 min decreased chilling injury as well as
enhanced quality of fruit and taste.
Anjum and Ali (2004) studied the post harvest treatment on green mature mango
cultivar SS-1 (Kala Chaunsa) fruits; were immersed for ten minutes in 2.5, 5.0 or 7.5
percent calcium sulphate (CaSO4.2H2O), calcium ammonium nitrate {Ca(NH4NO3)2} and
calcium chloride (CaCl2.2H2O) solutions. A control was also incorporated in which fruits
were dipped in fresh water for ten minutes. At ambient temperature (25 ± 3○C) the fruits
were ripened in boxes lined and enclosed with newspaper. Calcium chloride delayed the
ripening of fruit about three days as compared to control and resulted in superior aroma
of the fruits, however, it stimulate shriveling of skin. Calcium sulphate treatments
showed in better color of pulp. The increase in concentration of calcium salts resulted in
reduced the ripening but had harmful effect on quality of fruit by rising skin shrinking
and decreasing taste and flavor of the fruits. Calcium chloride at 5.0 percent delayed the
ripening for four days and resulted in better skin and pulp color but with enlarged skin
shriveling and poor taste and flavor, showing reduced eating quality.
Santos et al. (2004) studied the effect various maturity stages of Rosa cultivar mango with calcium chloride. Fruits were harvested at the mature-green (green- yellowish) and pre-climacteric (yellow-greenish) maturity stages. Calcium chloride was applied by 15-cm deep fruit immersion during two hours in solutions contain 0.0
(control); 4.0; and 8.0 percent. The mango fruit was stored at 10 ± 1°C and 85 percent relative humidity during twenty days, followed by five day storage at room temperature
26
(24 ± 2°C). Fruit skin color, weight loss, firmness (scores one to seven), internal and external appearances (scores one to six), total soluble solids and total titratable acidity were evaluated. Calcium chloride was particularly more useful when applied to pre- climacteric fruits. The fruits treated with 4.0 percent calcium chloride demonstrated fruits presented skin black spot, soaked areas, and decay particularly pre-climacteric mangoes.
As compared to controls, 8.0 percent calcium chloride treatment provided a five-day enhance in shelf life of mature-green ‘Rosa’ mango stored at 10 ± 1°C. The calcium chloride 8.0 percent showed lowest weight losses when transferred to room temperature, while maintaining total soluble solids, titratable acidity, fruit firmness, and best external and internal appearances, even though, no significant delay on skin color progress was noticed.
Kaswija et al. (2006) studied the organoleptic quality and microbial infectivity on mature green Dodo mango fruit before and during a 3- and 6-day period of ripening by smoked pit ripening, ethylene (fruit generated) pit ripening, untreated pit ripening and room temperature as control technique. The changes of post harvest ripening in the quality parameters of the ripened mango fruit were associated with treatments and compared by same changes in other verities of mango. They concluded that the organoleptic characteristics have significant differences with the employed method. The quality of microbial was significantly different among the treatments, while with aroma profiles there were significant differences of identified compounds of aromatic reflected the most important scores of sensory quality at ripening stage.
27
Malik et al. (2006) explored the advantage of postharvest polyamines application
(Spermidine, Spermine and Putrescine) on the shelf life and quality of Kensington Pride
mango fruit. Application of polyamine slow down the color development, fruit softness
and physiological weight loss was decreased through storage without a significant
reduction in ethylene production. Low concentrations of Spermine (0.01 mM), high
concentrations of Spermidine (0.5 mM) and Putrescine (1 mM) were more useful in delay
fruit softening. Through fruit ripening, Spermine (0.01 mM) showed the lowest amount
of respiration compared with the fruit control. The ripe fruit analysis stored for three or
four weeks, illustrated that polyamine application appreciably improved the firmness of
fruit, ascorbic acid, acidity, while reducing the ratio of TSS/acid and content of total
carotenoid compared with the control. The exogenous polyamines application enhanced
the shelf life of mango fruit without having harmful result on quality of fruit.
Zeng et al. (2006) for disease control treated the Matisu variety of mango fruit with 1 mmol/L salicylic acid solution for two minutes in vacuum diffusion on a low down (−80 kPa) pressure and for an extra ten minutes at pressure of air. The mango fruit was immunized by anthracnose spore suspension 1 × 104 CFU m/ L when fruit was kept
(incubated) at 13 ○C and relative humidity 85–95 percent. At the fourth day of
incubation, in treated (with salicylic acid) fruit the lesions diameter and disease incidence
were 20.9 percent and 37.5 percent lesser as compared to control fruit. By treatment of salicylic acid, the action of protection enzymes was notably increased and the action of phenylalanine ammonia-lyase & β-1, 3-glucanase was six/0.9 double higher as compared to control fruit. In treated (salicylic acid) fruit the superoxide radicals and hydrogen
28 peroxide production speed was 79.44 percent and 22.3 percent superior as compared to control fruit on the eight day. They concluded that phenylalanine ammonia-lyase, β-1, 3- glucanase and hydrogen peroxide/ superoxide radicals possibly occupied in the disease resistance enhancement in fruit of mango.
Anwar and Malik (2007) determined the effect of hot water treatment on mango
(cultivar Sindhri) fruits ripening behavior, shelf life and quality. The fruit of mango was transferred to treatment of hot water at 45°C–75 minutes and 48°C–60 minutes along with wash only (control). A fruit coating, two percent (Fresh Seal P) was also used in combination with treatment of hot water on 48°C–60 minutes. After application of water
(hot) treatment, fruits were ripened without storage at room temperature otherwise were stored on 13 ± 2°C and relative humidity 85 ± 5 percent. The stored mango fruits were removed after seven, fourteen and twenty days and were ripened at ambient temperature
(24 ± 1°C, relative humidity 68-70 percent). Hot water treatment effects on physical and biochemical properties were estimated. Fruit transferred to hot water treatment at 45°C–
75minutes and naturally ripened (without storage), indicated non-significant difference for different quality factors than wash only (control) whereas keeping the shelf life of fruits (6 days). Hot water application at 48°C–60 minutes reduced the period of ripening i.e. 3 days. Whereas, during storage non-significant differences among treatments indicated that hot water treatment does not influence the post-storage fruit quality.
Among various treatments, fruit transferred to hot water treatment at 45°C–75 minutes created superior results than treatment of water (hot) on 48°C- 60 minutes total carotenoids contents were found maximum in washed only fruits (62.78µg/g) followed
29
by treatment of hot water on 45°C–75 minutes (59.39µg/g). Fruits transferred to higher temperature during hot water treatment developed uniform color and more yellow. The results were non-significant for rests of the treatment.
Maqbool et al. (2007) accessed the international market for supply of superior quality mango there are different problems to be surmounted. Sap burn is one of the major problems in Mangoes and different management practices and experiments have been conducted to deal with this problem in Pakistan for various cultivars of Mangoes. In the current study, first experiment was explored the various cultivars of mango fruit for harvest time of a day and for sap quantity. The collected sap from Chaunsa cultivar was
11.89 times more than Sindhri cultivar and early in the morning the exudation of sap quantity was higher as compared to later throughout the day. Secondly it was noted that the effect of late de-stemming (after harvest) on sap quantity was little. But the quantity
of total sap was highest in Chaunsa cultivar and lowest in Sindhri cultivar. Spurt and ooze
were also tested in the three commercial mango cultivars and the sap burn susceptibility
after 24, 48 and 72 hrs at two various storage environment (ambient: 25 ± 1°C; 14°C and
85 percent relative humidity). The cultiuvar of Chaunsa was most vulnerable followed by
cultivar Dusehri and Sindhri. The rate of sap burn was higher in Chaunsa cultivar at
ambient (room) temperature (25 ± 1°C) as compared to cold storage (14°C, 85 percent
relative humidity (RH)). The sap burn occurrence was about same in Dusehri and Sindhri
cultivars at both the temperatures. With reference to harvest time of the day the severity
of sap burn level was investigated. They noted that with the proceeding of daytime the
severity of sap burn increased. The severities score of sap burn was lowest in harvested
30 fruits at 8:00 am (0.06) and was highest in fruits were harvested at 3:00 pm (1.08) after seven days of storage at ambient temperature and in cold storage (13 ± 1°C and 80-85 percent relative humidity). They also determined the optimal de-sapping time and decreased the sap burn injury incidence; for this purpose they placed the fruits on de- sapping trays for various time phases. The sap burn incidence was lowest in fruits which were kept on de-sapping trays for twenty minutes (0.65) followed by ten minutes (0.73) than untreated (2.54)/ fruit harvested by conventional technique after fifteen days of storage (13 ± 1°C and 80-85percent relative humidity).
Singh et al. (2007) reported the fleshy fruits go through textural changes with ripening that lead to tissue firmness loss and subsequent softening due to cell wall take to pieces carried out through various and in particular articulated enzymes. They investigated the effect of different chemical treatments on mango fruit ripening at level of physiologically and biochemically. The changes in firmness, respiration, total soluble sugar, pH and a degrading enzyme of cell wall pectatelyase action, treatment with 1- methylcyclopropene, gibberlic acid, sodium metabisulphite, ascorbic acid and silver nitrate, retarding the process of ripening whereas those of ethereal increased the process.
They observed pectatelyase activity of mango fruit was to be inhibited by certain metabolites present in enzyme of dialyzed ammonium sulphate take out and EDTA. The mango pectatelyase activity showed an entire requirement for calcium and an optimal 8.5 pH.
31
Zheng et al. (2007) investigated the oxalic acid effects on ripening and occurrence of decay mango fruit at room temperature (25○C) during storage. The Zill cultivar of mango fruit was dipped in oxalic acid solution (5mM) for ten minutes at 25○C. The data demonstrated that the ripening of fruit was retarded and decay occurrence was also decreased by treatment of oxalic acid compared to the control. They concluded that reducing production of ethylene was a major provider to delaying the process of ripening by the physiological effect of oxalic acid. The treatment of oxalic acid showed potential technique for mango postharvest storage.
Amin et al. (2008) studied the sap burn injury and regarded it as the most threatening to external fruit quality of mango. When the pedicel of a mango fruit is broken, the sap exudes and spread over the fruit peel and causes a serious injury to the skin of mango. They estimated the suitable time of harvesting as well as de-sapping for control of sap burn injury in mango fruits. Australian industry product “ Mango Wash” and Lime [Ca (OH) 2] at different times of the day including: 7 a.m. (morning), 12 p.m.
(noon) and 5 p.m. (evening) were assessed. Lime @ 0.5% and Mango Wash (@ 0.4% was used. Results showed that no sap injury (0 score) was recorded in the fruits harvested and de-sapped during morning, while maximum sap injury was found at noon in both the treatments (0.5 score for lime, 0.75 score for Mango Wash). Both the treatments (lime and Mango Wash) showed significantly reduced sap injury as compared with control for all the three times of treatment application. All of the physicochemical characteristics were non-significantly affected except fruit peel color and non-reducing sugar contents.
The color of fruit peel was slightly suppressed by the use of Mango Wash. Lime was
32 found to impart attractive appearance to the fruits; however the skin color was non- significantly improved as compared to control. Also the qualitative characteristics were non-significantly influenced by the time of fruit harvest. However, significantly greater
TSS was found in the fruit harvested at noon as compared to other times of the day. It can be concluded that lime may be successfully used as an alternate instead of highly expensive Mango Wash for de-sapping of mango fruits.
Anwar et al. (2008) carried a study on two major problems related to postharvest of local mango industry. The firstly issue was the use of wooden crates which are being eliminated from the markets. Secondly, for early ripening of mango calcium carbide
2 (CaC2) is mostly used; due to health hazards caused by CaC its use is being discouraged internationally. To find out an alternative for resolving the above mentioned problems, two experiments were carried out on cv. Samar Bahisht Chaunsa commercial mango.
Fruits were packed in traditional wooden packaging with newspaper liner (WP) and corrugated cardboard packaging (CBP) for comparison. In first experiment, two
-1 chemicals CaC2(2g kg of fruit) and ethylene (C2H4) application (100 ppm, 20°C, 48 h) were compared for ripening of mangoes, followed by ripening at ambient conditions
(33±1°C & 60-65 % RH). The results showed that CBP fruit had significantly lower fresh fruit weight loss (FWL) and better storage life compared with WP fruit treated with or without CaC2. It was also found that WP fruits with CaC2 had faster ripening rate and
nd better color of peel color as compared with C2H4 treated CBP. In 2 experiment, WP or
CBP fruit were stored (13 ± 1°C & 85-90% relative humidity) for fifteen days, and allowed for natural ripening at two different temperatures (28, 33 ± 1°C). Also the
33
performance of mango with C2H4 (100 ppm, 48 h) treatment at 25°C & 30°C was
investigated in CBP fruit. Despite of ripening temperatures and methods, CBP showed
significantly decreased in FWL as compared with WP. Ethylene treatment at higher temperature (30°C) significantly improved quality compared with application at low
temperature (25°C), however, the fruit color was not developed to the desired level. It
may be concluded, CBP can be a better substituted for WP due to its demonstrated
benefits; however, more work is needed to develop a precise ripening protocol use of
ethylene at different concentrations and temperature etc.
Maqbool and Malik (2008) sap burn injury is a serious problem of mango fruit as
it reduces the attraction and downgrade fruit. Management of sap burn in commercial
cultivars Sindhri and Chaunsa of Pakistan at physiological maturity were harvested along
with 4-5 cm pedicel. After de-stemming, fruits were immediately treated with potential chemical solutions i.e. calcium hydroxide [Ca (OH) 2], Tween-80, sodium carboximethyl
cellulose (CMC), lauryl sulfate sodium (LS), detergents and vegetable oil. The fruits after
treatment with the chemicals were dried in air and packed in boxes (cardboard), and
brought in laboratory and were stored at14°C & RH 85% for seven and fourteen days in
case of cv. Sindhri and cv. Chaunsa, respectively. Fruits treated with calcium hydroxide
showed better results against sap burn injury followed by Tween-80 in both the cultivars.
In the follow-up study, the chemicals with better results in experiment 1 were testes along
with alum on cv. Chaunsa to verify the results. The fruits after application of chemicals
were subjected to different conditions for storage (25°C & RH 56% & 14°C & RH 85%).
The data on sap burn injury recorded after 24, 48 and 72 hours, showed almost similar
34
results at different temperatures. Treatment with Ca (OH) 2 gave 95% sap burn injury
control at different temperatures. The same treatment gave higher TSS levels (Ca (OH) 2
at 25°C). At the same temperature total sugars was recorded maximum in fruits treated
with simple water (30.80%), while in stored fruits, maximum total sugars (26.70%) were
noted with alum treatment. De-stemmed under Ca (OH) 2 gave a maximum of total
carotenoids in fruits at different storage temperatures. It may be concluded that Ca (OH) 2
was the better treatment in reducing sap burn injury and improving the fruit quality at
different temperatures.
Ravindra and Goswami (2008) mango fruit has short shelf life after harvesting
therefore; studied the important postharvest pre-cooling technique on mango (tropical) fruits. For pre-cooling process the cooling medium of liquid nitrogen with sufficient potential was used due to their motionlessness of the vaporized gas of nitrogen and high capacity of cooling. In comparison to pre-cooling like air cooling and hydro-cooling techniques for Amrapali mango fruit, the liquid nitrogen was used with the system of mechanical refrigeration like the cooling (medium). The performance of pre-cooling was evaluated for fruit quality like color, firmness of fruit, index of chilling injury, and the cooling coefficient and rate of cooling. They studied the effect of various pre-cooling techniques on mango fruit acidity (titratable), pH and the contents of total soluble solids of the ripened mango The results showed of this study that the system of liquid nitrogen
(20.5 kg/h the flow rate of liquid nitrogen; –85C of average gas temperature) enhanced the cooling coefficient of the air cooling method by the forty percent and had no unfavorable effect produced on the fruit quality. The control of exposure time and careful
35
plane would facilitate in understand the liquid nitrogen potential in techniques of pre- cooling for mango fruits. This would be useful (practically) in system of control atmosphere storage methods.
Rathore et al. (2010) recorded significant effect (P < 0.05) of active packaging in
Cardboard Carton (APCC) on overall quality characteristics such as loss in weight,
titratable acidity, ascorbic acid, pH and total soluble solids contents of mango (Chaunsa
white variety). It was investigated at the ambient temperature (28- 33C and 56.7-69.7%
RH) during storage. The results showed that the uncoated fruit packed in carton had
comparatively greater percent weight loss (10.96 percent) than control (9.39 percent); however, after use of APCC system same packaging had significantly decreased the percent weight loss up to 6.89%. It was also observed that mango fruit through APCC system showed TSS (16.44-20.76%), pH (3.98-4.83), had increase, while TA (0.51-
0.92%) had slower decrease, and slower increased of AA (23.06- 40.83 mg/100 g) during ripening stage with an average mean of 8.10%, 17.73%, 4.28, 0.75%, 25.47 mg/100 g respectively. The control sample (T) had higher weight loss (9.39%), TSS (20.83%),
highest pH value (4.91), lowest acidity (0.44%), highest AA (42.06 mg/100 g),
respectively at much earlier during storage. It can be concluded from the study that
innovative approach of APCC with other protective chemicals such as coating emulsions
having fungicide, ethylene absorbent and anti-ripening agent showed an effective role in
enhancing the storage life up to 25 days and also controlled the compositional changes
due to delayed ripening of the fruits with a minimum quality loss, as compared to control
sample which had a greater changes in its composition and qualitative losses during
36
storage at ambient temperature. The unappealing skin, changed color and poor taste the
control fruit was perished within two weeks of their storage.
Islas-Osuna et al. (2010) mango is a tropical fruit that ripens rapidly; therefore a
continuous effort has been made to increase its shelf life and quality by the postharvest
technologies. This technology includes the application of 1-Methylcyclopropene which
acts as ethylene receptors inhibitor. They treated the fruits with 1-Methylcyclopropene
(750mL L-1) influenced the physical and chemical characteristics, compounds (bioactive)
and activities of cell wall degrading throughout ripening period and storage. The mature-
green mangoes of Kent cultivar were compared for outer quality, Polygalacturonase
phytochemicals and Pectin Methylesterase activities of enzyms in storage by 20°C for two weeks using 1-MCP and those without1-MCP. The results showed that the concentration of ascorbic acid reduced during the ripening of fruit and losses were reduced in 1-MCP-treated mangoes. The enzymatic activities of pectin methylesterase and Polygalacturonase were decreased in the treated fruits than untreated ones. There was little change observed in the β-carotene in the treated and untreated fruits. It may be concluded that1-MCP influenced the process of ripening in Kent cultivar of mango fruit by decreasing the ascorbic acid losses, 1-MCP treatment was justified as it maintain nutritional value during its storage.
Le et al. (2010) determined the quality changes and control the occurrence of disease; treated the Taiwan native strain mango fruit with hot water (52, 55 and 58C); vapor heat (46.5C for 40 min) and treatment of hot water + vapor heat pursed cold
37
storage (1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 20C). At 55C for 3 (minutes) the hot water reduced the
spots and controlled of anthracnose disease for 6 days compared to control. The treatment of vapor heat retained firmness, peel color index and content of total soluble solid at 3C of storage time. The disease occurrence of the Colletotrichum gloeosporiodes and
Alternaria alternata were reduced by hot water and vapor heat treatment application at
3C for 3 weeks by storage. The area of Dothiorella mangiferae increased during the similar time but did not change the quality. The combined treatment of hot water plus vapor heat with continuous storage at 3C for ambient room temperature the highest quality of fruit produced.
Payasi and Sanwal (2010) reported that the final stage of development is fruit ripening, which physiologically and biochemically measures that make fruit tasty and attractive to eat. The ripening of fruit can be retarded by different methods of modified atmosphere and packaging, gamma irradiation treatment and sucrose ester coating etc.
The phytohormones, 1 methylenecyclopropene and reducing agents treatments delayed the ripening of fruit. Molecular biology tackle like plants (transgenic) with control of genes concerned in production of ethylene otherwise over appearance of genes for deprivation of ethylene, virus stimulated gene quiet as well as exploitation of transcription aspect have been efficiently used for regulating or controlling ripening of mango fruit.
Singh and Singh (2010) studied the effect of post harvest treatment on physiological and chemical properties of mango cultivar Amrapali. They used seven treatments of postharvest were specified as T1 (control), T2 (hot water treatment), T3
38
(Frutox wax treatment), T4 (hot water treatment + FWE), T5 (ALPF), T6 (hot water treatment + ALPF), T7 (FEW + ALPF), T8 (hot water treatment + FWF + ALPF). The changes in physical, biochemical and organoleptic characteristics of the fruits were encouraged and their determination was noted in Amrapali mango fruit. Physical change viz physiological weight loss percent, specific gravity, size of fruits, percentage of spoilage and ratio of pulp-peel were appreciably different over control. On fifteenth day of exploration, fruit which was treated with water (hot) + wax and enfold in ALPF showed lowest physiological weight loss.
Venkatesan and Tamilmani (2010) the study was focused on the influence of ethereal on the ripening of off–season fruits of Mangifera indica L. var. Neelum. In the experiment the experimental fruits were treated with different concentrations of ethereal
(100, 200 and 300ppm) while the untreated fruits were placed inside the laboratory naturally. They treated the fruits with different concentrations (100, 200 and 300ppm) of ethereal ripened on 13th day, 11th day and 9th day respectively after treatment of different concentrations. The color of the treated fruits changed from green greenish to yellow and the fruits were fit to be eaten. Also the color changed from green to greenish yellow to yellow. On the other hand control fruits, partial ripening led to incomplete metabolic changes, which did not change the presence of sourness in the fruits.
Consequently, they were un - fit for eating. These studies were passed out using the fruit pulp and peel tissues only. The data showed that phenols reduced in ripening, both in the untreated and treated fruits. Activity of enzymes peroxidase, polyphenoloxidase and catalase increased. Comparing the 100, 200 and 300 ppm ethrel treatments, it was found
39
that 200 ppm had the better results of ripening of off–season fruits of Mangifera indica L. var. Neelum.
Ezz and Awad (2011) studied the effect of various treatments of potassium permanganate, hot water treatment under 50C for 30 minutes and shrink film addition to control shelf life of mango cultivars Hindi Be- Besennara (early ripe) and Alphonse(mid season) under three levels of temperature including 8, 10 and 13◦C and relative humidity
of (80- 85%) for 30 days. The parameters such as decay, shelf life, weight loss, firmness,
titratable acidity, T.S.S, ascorbic acid, reducing and total sugars were studied. The data of
each parameter was collected at an interval of six days during the storage period. Results
showed that the treatment of shrink film at 8◦C was proved the most effective in keeping shelf life of the two cultivars and this also showed better performance of physical and chemical parameters in the two seasons for the two cultivars. It was found that keeping quality in low temperature and decreased with increasing temperature degree. Similarly, the hot water treatment showed the same trend with control in T.S.S., acidity, reducing and total sugars and also low content in V.C. All treatments and control had no shelf life in 24 and 30 days in 13◦C. While in the shrink film there was no decay recorded till 24 days under the different temperatures applied.
Jabbar et al. (2011) diseases and disordered causes severe losses to mango fruit
quality and sometime yielding unmarketable fruit. Also, the risk of fruit fly presence has
made it obligatory to use pre – requisite as hot water quarantine treatment (HWQT) for
marketing and access to other countries like China and Iran. To differentiate the use of
40 fungicides and hot water quarantine application on mango fruit cv. Samar Bahisht
Chaunsa, a study was carried out. The mangoes were stored for 21 days at (13±1°C,
85±5% RH). The results showed that application of Topsin-M fungicide @ 1 g L-1 as field dip for 1 min (pre-transport) followed by HWQT @ 48°C for 60 min., showed significantly suppression of postharvest diseases. The HWQT generally lead to increase the internal discoloration as compared with the control. NaOCl alone or with HWQT, caused higher internal discoloration of fruit. All physical treatments induced some degree of soft nose but combination of NaOCl with HWQT was found to accelerate the problem compared to control. The fruits treated with NaOCl @ 2.5 g 10 L-1 and Topsin-M @ 1 g
L-1 along with HWQT @ 48°C for 60 min gave greater total titratable acidity. However, color, total sugar, non-reducing sugar, total soluble solids contents and organoleptic acceptability of the fruits were found to be non-significantly influenced by the treatments.
The postharvest, pre-transport treatment of Topsin-M @ 1 g L-1 followed by HWQT
(48°C for 60 min) was effective in reducing incidence of postharvest diseases, and fulfilling market access criteria. The higher degree of soft nose development in hot water quarantine treatment fruits.
Dissa et al. (2011) carried out a study to determine the impact of ripeness on drying characteristics of mango by considering different zones on the fruit. The total soluble solids/acidity ratio, color and texture of fruit flesh for each zone was considered and the ripeness was estimated. Also for each zone of ripeness, drying curves and time- temperature curves were established both in forced and natural convection. Mass diffusivity (estimated by considering two diffusion regions), thermal diffusivity and
41 drying rates were deduced from these drying curves by considering product shrinkage.
Results showed that the time required to reduce moisture content to any given level depended on the ripeness state, being highest for unripe samples and lowest for ripe samples. At each drying moment, temperature of ripe sample was higher than that of unripe sample. Mass diffusivity, thermal diffusivity and drying rates strongly increased with ripeness state. At 60°C, unripe and ripe fruit mass diffusivities ranged respectively from 1.69 x 10-10 to 9.87 x 10-10 m²/s and 3.38 x 10-10 to 1.77 x 10-9 m²/s. Thermal diffusivities ranged from 2.12 x 10-11 to 6.44 x 10-10 m²/s and 2.74 x 10-10 to 8.05 x
10-10 m²/s respectively for unripe and ripe samples. In natural convection, drying rates reached maximal values of 0.16 kg m-2 s for unripe sample and 0.47 kg m-2 s for ripe sample whereas in forced convection they reached respectively 0.43 and 0.67 kg m-2 s.
Product shrinkage decreased with ripeness and was almost ideal for the major part of the drying process. Constants of suitable fitting models also varied considerably with fruit ripeness. This work showed that ripeness state influences strongly drying characteristics of mango fruit.
Coatings
Ketsa and Prabhasavat (1992) investigated the effect of Semperfresh skin coating on shelf life and quality of 'Nang Klangwan' fruit of mango. At ambient temperature
(32°C and RH 74.0 percent) the weight loss, firmness, yellow color development and the chemical changes related with ripening were observed in waxed and non-waxed mango fruits. The mango fruits waxed with Semperfresh 2% and 3% within 6 days caused off- odor, while Semperfresh-waxed 1% mango fruits usually ripened and were in acceptable
42
condition, although to some extent inferior. The Semperfresh- waxed 1% mango fruits
shelf life of mango fruit was 14 days, while the shelf life of non-waxed mango fruits was
10 days. The yellow color development, TSS and weight loss were low in non-waxed
mango fruits, while in waxed coated mango fruits the TA and firmness was greater.Hoa
and Ducamp. (2008) treated the Cat Hoa loc’ mango fruit with five various coatings
TFC150, TFC210, Bioxeda, Xedasol M23 and Xedabio. They stored the coated fruit at
room temperature 21–31○C & 65–75 percent relative humidity. The weight loss of mango
fruit was decreased in TFC210 and TFC150 coatings of carnauba based. The content of
ascorbic acid was not affected in this variety of mango by coating application. By storing, the coating of Xedabio decreased the process of fruit ripening and lesser changes in indicators of ripening (total and reducing sugar, pH, SSC, titrable acidity, flesh and peel color), and in normal conditions this coating enhanced the storage life of mango fruit about three days.
Castrillo and Bermudez (1992) evaluated the effect of various concentrations of two marketable wax coatings on various parameters of postharvest ripening for mango fruit. The both wax coatings reduced the fresh weight of mango fruit at higher concentrations. During ripening process the degradation of chlorophyll of the skin
(exocarp) and the increase in flesh (mesocarp) pH generally occurring was slowed down at higher concentrations with both coatings. At similar treatment concentrations the
Primafresh 31 was less useful than Primafresh C. They demonstrated that the delayed ripening process effects of fruits with wax-coated affected the loss of fresh weight,
43
degradation of chlorophyll of the exocarp and change of mesocarp pH but sugar, starch
content and mesocarp chlorophyll was not affected.
Diaz-Sobac et al. (1996) studied the effect of coatings on post harvest shelf life of
mango fruit. They prepared the coating emulsion using carboxymethylcellulose,
propileneglycol, maltodextrins and a combination of sorbit fatty acid esters by an HLB of
six. Sprayed the emulsion on fully mature un-ripened mangoes manila, which were stored
○ ○ at 15, 25 C and RH 80–85 percent. It was observed at 25 C that the production of CO2 rate increased and lost in fruits of control after twelve days of storage. The coated mango fruits kept their rate of CO2 production and weight loss take place only 8% after twenty
one days of storage. The coating was washed away and fruits were permitted to ripen
naturally after storage, which take place in 3–4 days. They concluded that hydrophobic
coating application increased the postharvest storage life of mango fruits for at least
twenty days more than uncoated fruits.
Kittur et al. (2001) investigated the property of 4 various combined coating on on
quality and the shelf-life of mango & banana at 27 ± 2°C. They compared commercial
waxol-coated and uncoated fruits with the polysaccharides based coating. These
combined coating include of chitosan and cellulose, modified starch, combined by means
of a proper element of lipid with an agent (wetting). They measured the parameters of
quality like total titratable acidity, total soluble solids and firmness. They also measured
the parameters (physiologically) like carbon dioxide change and loss of weight due to
transpiration as well as respiration. The coatings of polysaccharide exhibited the
44
decreased color improvement, greater firmness and lesser values of acidity than control &
waxol. The coating significantly reduced the carbon dioxide evolution and weight loss.
They noted that coatings chitosan-based were much better in improved the quality and
prolonged shelf-life of mango as well as banana fruits.
Carrillo-Lopez et al. (2000) studied the coating effect on post harvest shelf life &
quality of mango. They coated the Haden variety of mango fruit with semperfresh edible
coating film (three applications eight, sixteen & 24 g.L-9) and after that stored on 13○C
with relative humidity 85 percent. They evaluated the fruit every four days for up to thirty
two days for ascorbic acid content, total soluble solid, titratable acidity, pH, color of the
skin, firmness and weight loss. These coating applications affected the ripening process
of fruit. In coated fruit the total soluble solid, weight loss and pH were lowest whereas,
green color, firmness and titratable acidity were highest as compared to non coated fruit
but semperfresh had no effect on development of decay. The content of ascorbic acid
decreased in overall stored fruit, however in coated fruit this reduction was slower, and
there were non-significant differences among the various applications of semperfresh.
Hoa et al. (2002) evaluated the eight coating formulations for useful effects on the
shelf life of harvested mango (cvs. Litfa, Kent and Tommy Atkins) fruit on various stages
of maturity. They selected the 4 coatings for further study under different storage
conditions including ambient (19-22○C and relative humidity 56-40 percent) and
simulated marketable (I2○C and RH 80 percent) storage. The four coating formulations contained zein, shellac, carnauba wax, and/or derivatives of cellulose. These coatings
45
decreased the development of outer as well as inner color, respiration rate, and all but wax (carnauba) decreased the firmness loss. All coated mangoes also delayed the changes in acids. The coatings retarded the maturation (ripening) of mango fruit through an only some days than fruit without coated. Coatings of cellulose-based & shellac, though, source of ethanol elevated stage, while in organoleptic characteristics this did not guide to considerable differences in flavor from the fruit without coated. Under high relative humidity conditions, just the wax (carnauba) coating was a useful loss barrier of water.
Feygenberg et al. (2005) recently the two organic coatings for post-harvest application on fruits were developed in Israel and the USA. These two coating includes the colloidal solution based on beeswax (Bee Coat) and carnauba wax. The main differentiating characteristic between the two waxes are that beeswax coated fruits had a lusterless look, while the carnauba wax had a shiny look. Coating with the organic waxes effectively decreased the shrinkage, chlorophyll breakdown, water losses; chilling injury symptoms and decay development, thereby increase the shelf life of mango. The mango cultivar ‘Tommy Atkins’, coated with the beeswax-based organic wax, reduced the rates of weight loss, softening of fruit, development of color and acid breakdown, thus enhances shelf life. Also, ‘Tommy Atkins’ coated with beeswax at 12°C for three weeks following 10 days on 20°C, showed only a small number of the red spots which are symptoms of chilling injury. Moreover, the coated fruits did not develop anaerobic metabolites or off-flavors, and were preferred by the taste panelists.
46
Chien et al. (2007) treated the sliced mango with aqueous solutions of 0, 0.5 and 1 or 2 percent chitosan; kept in plastic trays, and over- covered with PVDC film. The fruit
(treated) were stored on 6○C and estimated the changes in the sensory characteristics of
color, taste and water loss. A coating of chitosan decreased water loss and the fall in
sensory quality, increasing the soluble solid content, ascorbic acid and titratable acidity
content. They concluded that the chitosan coating application inhibited the
microorganism’s growth, effectively extended the quality characteristics and prolonged
the shelf life of mango fruit sliced.
Zhu et al. (2008) evaluated the chitosan coating effects on decreasing decay and
retarding the ripening process of mango (Tainong cultivar) fruits and for this purpose
fruit was treated with chitosan solution (0.5, 1.0 or 2.0 percent). The fruits of mango were
stored at 15○C and RH (85–90 percent). By the treatment of chitosan coating the mango
ripening was significantly retarded. The two percent chitosan coating was the most useful
as compared to others. During storage, the chitosan coating effectively inhibited the
change of color, firmness loss, declines in ascorbic acid and titratable acidity, loss of fruit
weight and rate of respiration but the increase in total soluble solids was decreased in
fruits of mango. After sixteen days of storage, the firmness was highest (43.6 percent)
and color indicator was lowest 58.4 percent (P<0.05) in the mango fruits treated with two percent chitosan as compared to untreated fruit. Chitosan coating also significantly inhibited the progress of disease in the mango. After four and sixteen days of inoculation, the lesion diameter and incidence of disease in treated fruit (two percent chitosan) were
49.8% and 71.3 lower (P<0.05) as compared to untreated fruit. They concluded during
47
storage of fruit the chitosan coating application retarded the ripening and decreased the
decay of mango.
Dang et al. (2008) investigated the effects of various edible coatings on ripening of mango fruit and quality ripe fruit parameters including firmness, color, soluble solids contents, ascorbic acid, total acidity, fatty acids, total carotenoids and aroma volatiles.
The Kensigton Pride hard mature green mango fruits were coated with aqueous mango
Semperfresh (0.6 percent), carnauba (1:1 v/v), Aloevera gel (100 percent), Aloevera gel
(1:1, v/v) and untreated fruit served as the control. The coated fruits were dried at room temperature and packed in trays of soft-board to ripen at 21±1○C and relative humidity
55.2±11.1 percent until the soft eating stage. The fruit coated with carnauba was effective
in delaying fruit ripening, retaining firmness of fruit, and enhancing the fruit quality
characteristics including levels of aroma volatiles and fatty acids. Aloevera gel (1:1 or
100 percent) and Semperfresh slightly retarded fruit ripening but decreased fruit aroma
volatile development. Aloevera gel coating did not go beyond the commercial mango
Semperfresh and carnauba in delaying fruit ripening and enhancing aroma volatile
biosynthesis.
Regnier et al. (2008) used the essential oils coatings on mango fruit for the
control of pathogens and improved the post harvest quality. They replaced the prochloraz
with an essential oil obtained from an indigenous shrub of South African and
commercially obtainable essential oil. These coatings lower the rate of infection,
enhanced moisture maintenance was noted, whereas main organoleptic properties
48
remained unchanged, than those of the prochloraz-treated mango fruit. The terpene
elements of the essential oils are completely miscible with particular commercial
coatings, and have been showed to be useful at low applications in organic and synthetic
coatings tested. This use can be included into the pack line method with no significant
alterations.
Abbasi et al. (2009) investigated the coating (CHIirr, Mv = 5.14 × 104 irradiated
Crab and Shrimp chitosan & CHIun, Mv = 2.61 × 105un-irradiated Crab chitosan) effect
on preservation of harvested mango. They used the irradiation at 100 kGy & 200 kGy for
Crab and Shrimp chitosan and these mango fruits were stored at 15°C ± 1°C & 85
percent relative humidity for six weeks. They studied the various chitosan coatings effect
on behavior of fruit ripening, occurrence of disease attack, organoleptic and biochemical
properties during storage. The irradiated Crab chitosan (200 kGy) coating showed high
quality attributes and prolonged the mango fruit shelf-life than uncoated fruit. After four weeks of storage, the mango fruits coated with 200 kGy irradiated Crab chitosan showed six percent disease occurrence than uncoated fruit (25 percent). The eating quality of coated fruit was maintained up to four weeks of storage by 200 kGy irradiated Crab chitosan. They concluded that the quality was maintained and shelf life was prolonged in fresh produce by irradiated chitosan coatings.
Baldwin et al. (1999) investigated the effect of coatings (2 types) on outer & inner atmospheres and quality feature of mango fruit through simulated marketable storage on
10/15°C with relative humidity 90–99 percent pursued by simulated situation of
49 marketing by 20°C and RH fifty six percent. One was carnauba wax whereas other was polysaccharide based coatings as the major ingredient. Under laboratory conditions, the carnauba wax and polysaccharide based coatings showed noticeably various permeability of oxygen properties. The polysaccharide based coatings were more permeable to water vapor and less permeable to respiratory gases, such as oxygen, than wax (carnauba). In simulated commercial condition the coatings were applied to the fruit, although, the variation among the coatings in permeability to gases of respiratory greatly decreased, due to the humidity (high) in chilled storage. These coatings produced modified atmospheres, decreased rot and better outer look with imparting a delicate shine; however, just coating of polysaccharide retarded process of ripening & improved flavor volatiles applications. The coating of wax (carnauba) considerably decreased loss of water than polysaccharide based coating & uncoated mango fruit.
Li et al. (2009) observed the volatile signals for identification of rot incidence as well as evaluated the mango ripening and shelf life. Especially rapid GC, zNoseTM found on without coated surface acoustic wave sensor, was in used to observe the
Tommy Atkins mango volatiles. For the evaluation of mango quality the total soluble solids, respiration rate and color were determined. Detected the two peaks with the zNoseTM calculated occurrence of rot with 90 percent and 87 percent precision, whereas a further peak was eighty percent correct in identifying the ripeness with respect to a color indicator reference. The deterioration of deficient least squares collected with changeable significance was used for projection to choose the important peaks in
50
calculation. The rot calculation techniques might have possible uses into the industry of
mango for the identification of the rots incidence in fruit.
Abd-Alla and Haggag (2010) studied the effect of various concentrations of
chitosan solution on the mycelium expansion and spore germination of Colletotrichum
gloeosporioides (Penz.) the causal agent of anthracnose disease of mango fruits under
vitro conditions. Chitosan solution at 0.6mg/l attained significantly decreased of
Colletotrichum gloeosporioides expansion and inhibited the germination of spore, whereas, chitosan solution at 0.8mg/l showed a complete reduction and inhibition of fungal mycelium expansion and germination of spore. In the meantime, mango fruits coating with 0.2 and 0.4 percent (w/v) chitosan solution get a greatly protective effect against anthracnose disease occurrence of mango fruits, by 98.1 percent and 95.4 percent after thirty days of storage, respectively. At the same treatments were reducing the percentage of fruit deterioration tissues by 89.3 and 95.0 percent, respectively. They concluded from this study that chitosan was a substitute protected coating technique for prevent the mango fruits against anthracnose disease which causes economic losses during transportation, marketing and storage.
Durrani et al. (2011) preserved the pulp of mango fruit with adding of sodium benzoate, Potassium sorbate and Potassium metabisulphite alone and Potassium sorbate in combination with sodium benzoate and citric acid. They stored all the samples at room temperature and were evaluated in the laboratory for sensory evaluation. They illustrated that samples preserved with addition of Potassium metabisulphite, Potassium sorbate in
51
combination with Potassium metabisulphite and Potassium sorbate in addition with citric
acid retained their overall eatable quality for aroma, flavor and color throughout forty
five and sixty days of storage.
Abbasi et al. (2011) evaluated the effects of various concentrations of coatings
(beeswax, carboxy methyl cellulose and calcium chloride) and packaging with
polyethylene sheet, on improving the post harvest quality of mango fruit and its storage
performance. After harvesting the mango fruit were given hot water treatment at 50 ±
2C for three minutes as quarantine determine against attack of fungal. The mango fruits
were coated with three various concentrations of carboxy methyl cellulose and beeswax
along with calcium chloride coating and polyethylene sheet packaging. All the treatments
were applied in mixture with KMnO4 soaked with sponge cubes used as ethylene
absorbents. At refrigerated temperature the fruits were kept for eighty days and calculated
for physico-chemical and organoleptic changes at a gap of seven days. All coatings enhanced the keeping quality and reduced the fruit ripening of the produce but best results were showed by carboxy methyl cellulose at two percent level. It prolonged the
storage life up to seventy seven days with significant retention of all the parameters of
quality.
Storage Temperature
Aina (1990) estimated the physical and chemical characteristics of mature green
African mango fruit stored at tropical ambient conditions (27–30°C and RH 68–70
percent) during a seven day storage period of ripening. The results showed that change in
52
fruit color, texture and weight had taken place in addition to the other most important
chemical changes like degradation of starch, sugars formation and increase in total
carotenoids contents.
Medlicott et al. (1990) investigated the effects of harvest maturity of mango fruit
on different storage temperature management and the storage influence on the
development of quality during ripening. The mango fruit potential for storage depended
on storage temperature, harvest maturity and the harvest time in the season. At 12○C the
softening, development of peel and pulp color, pH and soluble solids concentration in
‘Amelie’, ‘Keitt’ and ‘Tommy Atkins’, mangos progressively occurred for up to twenty
one days during storage. During 12○C storage level of ripening changes, immature fruit
illustrated better storage capability than fruit harvested at more highly developed stages
of physiological maturity. At ripening temperature of 25○C the immature fruit appeared
ineffective to develop full ripeness quality. During storage at 12○C the half-mature and mature fruit had undergone partial ripening and during season the amount of which improved by progressive harvests. The changes in the ripening of the fruits during twenty one days of storage were of a lesser amount at 8 and 10○C compared to that at 12○C.
Ripening inhibition by chilling injury was indicated at every harvest stored at 8○C and the effect was also apparent in those fruits which were harvested in early season and were stored at 10○C. Fruit harvested from mid and late season stored superior at 10 to that at
12○C with no obvious signs of chilling injury. The flavor of mango fruits ripened after
low temperature storage was less acceptable than of those ripened directly after harvest.
53
They concluded that the potential of storage was maximized by controlling the storage
temperature and harvest maturity for progressive harvests during the season.
Bender et al. (1995) investigated the effects of elevated carbon dioxide application on the ethylene trail in the fruits of mango. Tree ripe and mature green
Tommy Atkins fruit of mango were stored at 12○C for twenty one days in 10 percent, 25
percent and 45 percent carbon dioxide collective with 5 percent oxygen. After the three
weeks controlled atmosphere storage period, the fruits were shifted to air at 20○C for five
days. The mangoes stored at 10○C and twenty five percent carbon dioxide the ethylene
production rates were below noticeable levels, but improved to levels same to control
fruit after shift to air. During storage the ACC (1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylic acid)
application remained unchanged by carbon dioxide treatments while ACC oxidase
activity in mature green and tree ripe fruits reduced with rising concentrations of CO2.
During the air storage the ripening processes of fruits stored in ten percent and twenty five percent carbon dioxide atmospheres were also measured. The chroma and epidermal hue values of mango fruits in these treatments were same to control fruits after five days in air and concentration of ACC similar to the level of control fruits. Mango fruits stored under the forty five percent carbon dioxide atmosphere were severely spoiled at the end of controlled atmosphere period and did not illustrated any improvement after transfer to air.
Bustamante et al. (1997) compensated the inflation rate in market and issues of mango azucar (Mangifera indica L.) the procedure for mango storage was studied. The study included the effect of temperature (storage at 9°C, 18°C and 29°C) and treatments
54
with thiabendazol a fungicide, wax coating, thermal processing with water at 55°C and
vacuum packaging in polyethylene bags. Also, the effect of previous refrigeration after
harvesting was investigated. The results showed that increasing storage temperature increased the weight loss of the fruit. After seven days the fruit loss in weight was 20 and
30 % at 29°C. While after 17 to 22 days the same weight loss was observed at 18°C.
However, after 37 days at storage temperature of 9°C the fruit weight loss was found to be only 10 to 15%. The results also indicated that storage in polyethylene bags did not show to be effective since the respiration may have increased under such conditions and the rottening of the fruit will be earlier. However, the wax coating resulted in a significantly reduced of weight loss due to the inhibition of the transpiration. It may be concluded that the mango de azucar can be stored for 3 – 8 days at 29°C, maximum of 10
– 27 days at 18°C and to 15 – 40 days at 9°C. Previous refrigeration did not show any affect on the storage time. Application of thiabendazol (0.5% solution) also did not show any improvement under the conditions studied. Previous refrigeration showed lower dehydration of the fruit, a better presentation and a slowing of the ripening process.
Amongst the treatments under all condition of study, storage at 9°C showed the best
results of preservation.
Prusky et al. (1999) studied the reduction of postharvest diseases occurrence
source by Alternaria alternata and increasing the quality of mango fruit. For this purpose
combined spray of hot water & brushing of fruit treatment for 15-20s was used. The
treatment of hot water effectiveness was investigated at various temperatures (48 to
64oC), in mixture with treatment of prochloraz plus waxing of fruit. Fruits brushing by
55
hot water considerably decreased the rot progress through Alternaria alternata. After
storage, the decrease of disease incidence by treatment (hot water brushing and
prochloraz (900µg ml-1)) for three weeks at 12○C and another week at 20○C was more
effective than by hot water brushing alone. The treatment of hot water brushing for 15s
enhanced the development of fruit color and more useful as compared to common
treatment of commercial dip for five minutes on 55○C. High quality for mango fruits with
a lesser amount of decay progress by the combination of hot water brushing and waxing.
Bender et al. (2000) determined the effects of fruit maturity, controlled atmosphere and storage temperature on mango aroma volatiles. They stored the tree ripe
and mature green ‘Tommy Atkins’ mango fruit for twenty one days in air or in controlled
atmosphere (five percent oxygen plus 10 percent or 25 percent CO2). The mature green fruit were stored at 12○C and the tree ripe fruit at also 8 or 12○C. Homogenized tissue of
mesocarp from fruit that had ripened for two days on 20○C in air after the twenty day
storage time was used for analysis of aroma volatile. As compared to mature green fruit,
the tree ripe mango fruit created much superior levels of each volatiles aroma excluding
hexanal. Stored the tree ripe and mature green mango fruit in twenty five percent carbon
dioxide tended to have lesser terpene particularly hexanal and pcymene applications as
compared to those stored in ten percent carbon dioxide & air stored fruit of mango. The
ethanol as well as acetaldehyde intensity tended to be superior in tree ripe mango fruit
from twenty five percent CO2 as compared those from ten percent carbon dioxide/air
storage, particularly at 8○C. The inhibition of volatile production by twenty five percent
○ CO2 was superior in mature green as compared to tree ripe mango fruit, and at 8 C than
56
12○C to tree ripe fruit. Though, volatile aroma level during tree ripe mango fruit from the
twenty five percent carbon dioxide treatment were in every cases equivalent to or better
as compared to mature green fruit treatments. They concluded that suitably selected
atmospheres, which extended the shelf life of mango by delaying processes of ripening,
be able to permit tree ripe mango fruit to be stored/ transported with no sacrificing their
greater quality (aroma).
Wen et al. (2006) investigated the effect of biological postharvest characters of mango cultivars (Wacheng and Hongxiangya) in various storage conditions. They determined the total sugar, firmness, vitamin-C content, respiratory rate, peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase. The results demonstrated that 8 and 11C storage temperatures were the best, and at this condition the mango storage life was fifty days. The rate of respiration increased rapidly between the 16th - 22nd days; the values of peak at 8○C were the 28th and 25th days for Hongxiangya and Wacheng. After harvest the firmness of flesh
reduced noticeably at six days. The content of vitamin C, total sugar, peroxidase and
polyphenol oxidase increased at first and then reduced. With the increase of carotenoids
contents the green color changed to yellow. After iprodione and thiabendozole treatment
the number of fruit rots was noticeably lesser as compared to other. They concluded that
the finest temperature for Hongxiangya and Wacheng cultivars of mango was 11 and
14C. After fifty days storage the rate of rot was 6.77 & 8.33 percent by iprodine (1,000-
ppm) treatment.
Nunes et al. (2007) evaluated the quality characteristics at five various
temperatures for seven to twenty days. The palmer and Tommy Atkins mango fruity was
57
harvested at medium ripe stage for this study. The purpose of this study was to investigate the quality curves for every temperature and to note which quality feature limit the marketability of mango fruit at non chilling and chilling temperatures. The decay development, fruit softening and color changes were the limiting factors of quality for fruit of mango stored at 12, 15 & 20○C.The increased softness of fruit and chilling
injury were the limiting aspect of quality of fruit stored at 2 & 5○C. From the evaluations of quality, the curves obtained for every temperature demonstrated that attribute of quality cannot be used singly to show the quality loss of mango above the normal temperatures.
Anwar et al. (2008) carried a study on two major problems related to postharvest
of local mango industry. The firstly issue was the use of wooden crates which are being
eliminated from the markets. Secondly, for early ripening of mango calcium carbide
2 (CaC2) is mostly used; due to health hazards caused by CaC its use is being discouraged
internationally. To find out an alternative for resolving the above mentioned problems,
two experiments were carried out on cv. Samar Bahisht Chaunsa commercial mango.
Fruits were packed in traditional wooden packaging with newspaper liner (WP) and
corrugated cardboard packaging (CBP) for comparison. In first experiment, two
-1 chemicals CaC2(2g kg of fruit) and ethylene (C2H4) application (100 ppm, 20°C, 48 h)
were compared for ripening of mangoes, followed by ripening at ambient conditions
(33±1°C & 60-65 % RH). The results showed that CBP fruit had significantly lower fresh
fruit weight loss (FWL) and better storage life compared with WP fruit treated with or
without CaC2. It was also found that WP fruits with CaC2 had faster ripening rate and
58
nd better color of peel color as compared with C2H4 treated CBP. In 2 experiment, WP or
CBP fruit were stored (13 ± 1°C & 85-90% relative humidity) for fifteen days, and
allowed for natural ripening at two different temperatures (28, 33 ± 1°C). Also the
performance of mango with C2H4 (100 ppm, 48 h) treatment at 25°C & 30°C was
investigated in CBP fruit. Despite of ripening temperatures and methods, CBP showed
significantly decreased in FWL as compared with WP. Ethylene treatment at higher temperature (30°C) significantly improved quality compared with application at low
temperature (25°C), however, the fruit color was not developed to the desired level. It
may be concluded, CBP can be a better substituted for WP due to its demonstrated
benefits; however, more work is needed to develop a precise ripening protocol use of
ethylene at different concentrations and temperature etc.
Sabato et al. (2009) studied the effect of irradiation (Multipurpose Cobalt-sixty
supply obtainable to IPEN–CNEN/SP developed in home with personal skill) on various
maturity stages (stages 2 and three) of mango fruit. The immersed amount was 0.2, 0.5 &
0.75 kGy. All fruits were placed in acclimatized chamber at 12○C during fourteen days
after irradiation. After that the fruits were kept in environmental conditions at 25○C for about fourteen more days of period. They studied the Physico–chemical characteristics like texture, acidity (titrable), pH, total soluble solids (1Brix) and figure examination
(loss of weight, internal and skin color, rotting). They demonstrated that the mangoes characteristics were more dependent on temperature storage and time as compared to irradiation.
59
3 MATERIALS AND METHODS
3.1 Chemicals
Acetone, Ether, n – hexane, NaCl, Na2SO4, NaOH, 2, 6 dichlorophenol, Metaphosphoric acid, ascorbic acid, Phenolphthalein, Sodium hypochlorite, Calcium choloride, buffer of pH 4.0 and 9.0, Sodium benzoate and Potassium metbisulphite were obtained from E.
Merck, Darmstadt, Germany and used as such. Coconut oil was supplied by SAS trading,
Bangkok, Thailand. Olive oil was obtained from Aceites Borges Pont S.A Spain. Starch was obtained from the local market.
3.2 General Procedure
3.2.1 Sampling
The experiment was performed over two commercial varieties, Langra and Samar
Bahisht Chaunsa (S.B. Chaunsa) at Dera Ismail Khan during the years 2008-2010. The fruits were manually from Government Fruit Nursery Farm, Agriculture Extension
Department, Dera Ismail Khan, Pakistan. These were cleaned carefully by washing them with water to remove dust, dirt etc. Maximum efforts were made to select the fruit uniform in size, quality and free from diseases/injury. The further detail about the sampling regarding plant orientation, picking time, maturity stage etc is provided in sub- section of each experiment.
3.2.2 Cutting and Peeling of the Fruit
Scissors, peeler and knife were used for detaching, peeling and removal of pulp of the fruit respectively. All the tools used were properly washed, cleaned and dried. The pulp obtained was homogenized using clean and dried Juicer/ blender, Matsushita Elec. Ind.
60
Co. Ltd. Japan. The homogenized material was filtered through a clean Whatman filter paper. The juice and the solid materials were stored at 12○C in clean bottles for further processing.
3.2.3 Measurement of Ripened Stage
The ripened stage of the fruit was detected through the variation in firmness, color and sugar contents with the passage of time (Shorter and Joyce, 1998).
3.2.4 Analysis of Fruit
Two hundred and fifty fruits were selected from each variety for every test. Each analysis was carried out thrice and the data presented here were the average of the repeated analysis over the period of three years. The two factor experiment was laid out in
Completely Randomized Design (CRD) with three replications.
3.2.4.1 Organoleptic Evaluation
The assessment of aroma, taste and flavor of all the samples were carried out using
Hedonic scale (Larmond, 1987). A panel of twenty one experts of 20-45 years age was made on their consistency and reliability of judgment. Altogether twenty one mango fruits from each sample were selected randomly and each cut into six pieces. The material so obtained was equally divided among the experts. Panelists were asked to score the difference between samples by allotting the numbers from 0-10. The grading of the quality was made as 0-2 extremely disliked, 2-4 fair, 4-6 good, 6-8 very good and greater than 8 excellent aroma, taste and flavor.
The skin color of mango samples was measured with a colorimeter (Chroma Meter CR-
300, Minolta Co. Ltd, Osaka, Japan). Four evenly distributed places along the equator were selected and a mean value was used. The values obtained were scaled according to
61
Hedonic scale for comparison purpose (Larmond, 1987): 0-2 means green, 2-4 light green, 4-6 light yellow, 6-8 yellow and 8-10 full yellow. Measurements of firmness were taken with a Bosch penetrometer (model FT 327, Wagner Instruments, Greenwich,
Connecticut). The firmness was determined by the force (g- mm-2) necessary for a 2 mm probe to puncture the fruit peel at four different points and taking average of the values
(external firmness). The values obtained were rescaled according to Hedonic scale for comparison purpose (Larmond, 1987); 10-8 means firm, 8-6 slightly soft, 6-4 soft, 4-2 were over soft.
3.2.4.2 Measurement of Moisture Contents
The moisture contents were measured by taking about 10 g of fruit pulp in a previously dried clean dish and weighed again accurately. The dish containing the pulp was placed in an oven whose temperature was already fixed at 76°C. The dish was removed from the oven after 4 hours and cooled in desiccator to room temperature. The dish was weighed and put back in the oven for another one hour for further drying. The procedure was repeated to a constant weight (AOAC, 2000). The moisture contents were then calculated using the following formula.
(1)
3.2.4.3 Measurement of Total Soluble Solids (TSS)
Pulp from five mango fruits was obtained, mixed thoroughly and used for the measurement of total soluble solids using clean digital refractometer (Atago-Palette PR
101, Atago Co. Ltd., Itabashi-Ku, Tokyo, Japan). An equal number of drops from the
62 collected fruit juice were placed onto the refractometer prism plate, and recorded reading.
After each test the prism plate was cleaned with (distilled) water, wiped and dried with a soft tissue.
3.2.4.4 Measurement of Total Solids (TS)
Pulp from five mango fruits was obtained, mixed thoroughly and it was used for the measurement of total solids (AOAC, 2000). A thirty grams fresh sample of pulp was taken in a china dish of known weight. The weight of the sample was determined and it was kept in an oven for drying purpose. The sample was dried at 76°C up to a constant weight. The weight of the dried sample was measured and the amount of total solids calculated as follows:
(2)
3.2.4.5 Measurement of pH
The pH was determined using a Microprocessor pH meter supplied by Denver, CO, New
York, USA. The pH meter was first standardized using buffer of pH 4.0 and 9.0. The pH of the sample was then measured at 25°C, after diluting it with distilled water up to known volume (AOAC 2000).
3.2.4.6 Measurement of Acidity
The titratable acidity of the sample (in term of citric acid) was determined by volumetric titration (AOAC 2000). Briefly; the mango pulp was dispersed in water (pulp: water
Ratio) and was filtered through Whatmann filter paper. The 100 mL filtrate was titrated
63
against standardized NaOH solution, using phenolphthalein as an indicator. The
percentage of acidity was calculated using Equation (3).
(3)
3.2.4.7 Measurement of Ascorbic Acid (Vitamin-C)
Pulp from five mango fruit was obtained, mixed thoroughly and used for the measurement of ascorbic acid. The contents were determined by titrating ten gram of mixed pulp sample against the standard 2, 6 dichlorophenol dye, following the procedure outlined in (AOAC, 2000). Pulp (10 g) was blended with 3% metaphosphoric acid. The blend was first centrifuged and then filtered through Whatmann filter paper. The filtrate was then titrated against a standard dye solution and Vitamin C was determined using
Equation (4):
(4)
Here, CA, VI, CSA, VSI and DF are concentration of ascorbic acid (to be determined), volume of dichlorophenol used, and concentration of standard solution (0.1) of ascorbic
acid used for the titration purpose, volume of standard solution of dichlorophenol and
dilution factor, respectively.
3.2.4.8 Measurement of Total Sugars
The total sugars were measured by measuring the refractive index with digital
refractometer. Five standard solutions of sugar were made and the refractive index was
measured. From the results, a standard curve was obtained. After that, the refractive
64
index of the filtrate obtained from the pulp dispersion was measured and sugar contents
were determined, using the standard curve (AOAC 2000).
3.2.4.9 Measurement of Total Carotenoids
Total carotenoids of pulp were estimated following the method of Anwar et al., (2008) and expressed as µg/g of β- carotene. A known amount of mango pulp was dispersed in acetone and the slurry was filtered through Whatmann filter paper. The residue was washed with a mixture of equal volume of acetone, ether and n-hexane. The organic and aqueous phases were separated, and the organic layer was dried using anhydrous Na2SO4 to remove traces of water from the filtrate. The carotene in organic layer was determined spectroscopically. For the purpose Beer-Lambert’s law/ the following equation was used.
A = log Io/I = εCl
Here A, Io, I, ε, C and l stand for the absorbance or optical density, intensity of incident
light, intensity of transmitted light, molar absorbance coefficient or molar absorptivity
(molar extinction coefficient), concentration of solute and path length, respectively. The
λmax was determined using β-carotene and then the absorbance for four different concentrations was obtained. The data was plotted to get a standard curve and obtain a trend line equation. The absorbance of the samples was measured and the results were fitted to the equation for the estimation of concentration.
3.2.4.10 Measurement of Ethylene Production
A parallel experiment was run for each treatment in which six fruits were stored in 5 L gas-tight jars at storage temperature. The jars were kept open between the sampling (2- days) periods and sealed for 3 hours prior to gas sampling. Ethylene produced was monitored by Gas Chromatograph, Clarus 500, supplied by Perkin Elmer. Split/splitless
65
ο inlet 175 C, sample loop 0.25 mL; Column flow He 6 mL/min; column PLOT Al2O3 “M”
50 m × 0.53 mm × 0.25 m (p/n: 19095P- M25); oven 35οC (2min) with 4οC/min to
ο ο 140 C (5 min); detector FID 300 C; detector H2 35 mL/min; Air 350 mL/min; makeup gas (N2) 19 mL/min. The measurements were made in triplicate and concentration of
ethylene was calculated comparing the peak areas with the known standards (Zheng et
al., 2007; Nair and Singh, 2003).
3.2.4.11 Measurement of Weight Loss
The weight of the fruit stored at three different temperatures (20, 30 and 40C) and relative humidity (RH) of 80%, 64% and 58%, respectively under normal atmosphere, was measured just after the harvesting and during ripening/at the ripened stage using
Mettler electronic balance. . The weight loss percent was calculated using Equation (5):
(5)
3.2.4.12 Measurement of Waste Percent
The fruit was considered as waste when it was infected by the disease and/or its firmness value was less than 4 in hedonic scale. The waste percent of mango fruits was measured at three different temperatures (20, 30 and 40C) and relative the humidity (RH) of 80%,
64% and 58%. The waste percent was calculated using Equation (6):
(6)
66
3.2.5 Statistical Analysis
Each value was expressed as the mean of three independent experiments. Data were
assessed by analysis of variance (ANOVA) through Duncan’s multiple range tests using
SPSS software (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC).
3.3 Investigating the Impact of Various Parameters over the Quality and
Shelf life
3.3.1 Comparing ripening of On Tree fruits with those under the
Controlled Atmosphere
The mango fruits were harvested at hard green stage of maturity and were stored at 20, 30
and 40C using Hot Pack incubator (Philadelphia, PA), while the relative humidity (RH)
was 80%, 64% and 58%, respectively till ripening (T1). Some of the fruits having the
same maturity stage were identified and left at the tree for comparison purpose (T2) till
ripening. The fruits were analyzed at the time when the control fruit sample approached
to the ripened stage.
3.3.2 Exposure of Fruit to Sun Light on Tree
The mango fruits were harvested at hard green stage of maturity from different
(orientation) side of the tree i.e. East, West, North and South. The fruits were stored at
30○C with relative humidity (RH) of 64% till ripening, and were then analyzed for
different parameters.
3.3.3 Harvesting at Different Day Timings and Coating with Calcium
Chloride
For exploring the impact of harvest timings the fruits with hard green stage of maturity
were picked from the selected trees at different times during the day at 6.30 am (T1), 1.30
67 pm (T2), and 8.30 pm (T3) for three consecutive days. The harvested fruits were categorized according to harvesting time, irrespective of harvesting days. Some of the fruits were dipped in 1.5% calcium chloride solution for five minutes. The coated and uncoated fruits were stored using Hot Pack incubator (Philadelphia, PA) at three (20, 30 and 40C) different temperatures, while the relative humidity (RH) was kept at 80%, 64% and 58%, respectively till ripening. The samples were analyzed at the harvest as well as at ripened stage for both organoleptic and chemical parameters.
3.3.4 Harvesting Stages and Storage Conditions
The mango fruit was harvested at 80 (early stage), 95 (mid stage) and 110 (late stage) days after the setting of fruit referred as samples I, II, and III, respectively, and immediately stored using Hot Pack incubator (Philadelphia, PA) at three different temperatures (20, 30 and 40C) and relative humidity (RH) of 80%, 64% and 58% respectively till ripening. The samples were analyzed at the time of harvest as well as at ripened stage for both the organoleptic measurements and chemical constituents.
3.3.5 Field Heat Removal of the Fruits
The mango fruits were harvested at hard green stage of maturity (at 12.00- 2.00 pm time of the day) and washed carefully with chlorinated (200ppm sodium hypochlorite) water.
The fruits were then treated in three different ways by keeping the fruit in cold water and/ or cold air maintained at 15°C for different time periods (See Table 1).
68
Table 1 Detail about the treatments and the heat removed from the fruit during the treatment.
Treatment Time (min) the Time (min) the Heat removed (KJ/1000Kg)
fruit kept in fruit kept in air taking the temperature of
water at 15°C at 15°C orchard as 40oC
To (Control) 0 0 0
T1 10 60 8.68
T2 20 120 17.36
T3 - 120 3.44
The amount of energy/heat removed from the fruit during these treatments through convection process (Dissa et al., 2011) was calculated by using Equation (7) and is listed in Table 1.
(7)
Here Q, A, ΔT, s, t and k are the heat transferred/removed, heat transfer area (m2), temperature difference across the material (○C), material thickness (m) and time for which the fruit was kept in cold water and/ or in cold air and thermal conductivity of the material which is 0.58 for water and 0.024 (W/m K) for air, respectively. The fruit was stored using Hot Pack incubator (Philadelphia, PA) at 20, 30 and 40C, while the relative humidity (RH) was 80%, 64% and 58%, respectively till its ripening. The samples were analyzed at the harvest time, at the time when the control fruit sample was ripened and as well as at ripened stage for both the organoleptic and chemical constituents.
69
3.3.6 Pedicel (Stalk) Length of the Fruit
The mango fruit was harvested at hard green stage of maturity with different pedicel
(stalk) lengths 0.5 (T1), 2.5 (T2), 4.5 (T3), 6.5 (T4) cm. The length was measured with vernier caliper. The fruit was washed carefully with chlorinated (200ppm sodium hypochlorite) water. The fruit was analyzed for different parameters and stored at 30○C till it’s ripening and was then analyzed.
3.3.7 Coating the Fruit with Various Materials
The material used for coating in this respect was starch (T1), olive oil (T2), bee wax (T3), sodium benzoate (T4), coconut oil (T5), natural ghee (clarified butter) (T6), potasium metabisulphite (T7) and control without coating (T0).
The pure natural ghee (clarified butter) used for coating was obtained from the cow milk by centrifugation method. The butter was then heated up to obtain moisture free ghee that was then filtered and stored in a dry air tight container at 10°C. For coating purpose, five percent homogenous solution of potassium metabisulfite in water was used. The fruit were dipped once in this solution and retained in it for less than one minute to have uniform thin layer of the material over the surface of the fruit. However, coconut oil and ghee were first melted and then used for coating.
Beeswax was extracted from the beehives. For this purpose the bee was totally removed from the hive and the wax was melted in a double walled container in presence of nitrogen and the pure wax was poured carefully in a clean container. For further purification the same procedure was repeated again. It was then cooled and stored in air tight container for further application. Two percent homogenous solution of starch was made in warm water and allowed to cool down up to 30C. Five percent homogenous
70 solution of sodium benzoate in water was prepared by stirred vigorously. Bee wax was dissolved in ethanol to get two percent solution.
The fruits harvested at hard green stage of maturity were dipped once in the coating material and retained in it for less than one minute for uniform thin layer on it surface.
The coated and uncoated fruits were stored at 20, 30 and 40C using Hot Pack incubator
(Philadelphia, PA), while the relative humidity (RH) was kept at 80%, 64% and 58%, respectively till ripening. The samples were analyzed at the harvest before coating, at the time when the control fruit sample was ripened and at ripened stage for both the organoleptic, physical and chemical constituents.
71
4 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
4.1 Comparison of on Tree and Controlled Atmosphere Ripening
A variety of mango fruit is to be harvested within in a very short period that resulted in
glut formation in the market. This overloading on one side decreases the market value
and on the other hand enhances the wastage of the fruits. Therefore we wanted to
compare the impact on quality and shelf life of fruits undergone ripening on tree with
those ripened artificially under maneuvered conditions so as to propose a mechanism
easing market stress from the fruit overload, and hence to minimize wastage, and further
to assess as to whether storage life of the fruit can possibly be expanded without
impairing quality. For this purpose, the fruits were harvested at hard green stage of
maturity and stored at 20, 30, and 40C (T1) till their ripening. Some of the fruits having
the same maturity stage were identified and left at the tree for comparison purpose (T2).
The fruits were analyzed for color, firmness, flavor, sugar, carotenoids and ascorbic acid after 5 days of the storage, the time period when the mango fruit stored at 40○C was ripened. The results indicated that the values for all of the above parameters except ascorbic acid were highest for 40○C as compared to others (Table 2). The organoleptic parameters are very important for the marketing and judging the quality of the fruit
without disintegrating the fruit (Lebrun et al., 2008). Therefore, the data for organoleptic
characteristics were collected at the ripened stage for both the treatments. The results
showed that all the values of color, firmness, aroma, taste and flavor were highest for tree
ripened fruits compared to stored fruits, irrespective of temperature and the variety (Table
3). The high quality of fruit for T2 was attributed to the fact that the fruit remained longer
72
on tree, hence was exposed to sun, and received more nutrients and water (Simmons et
al., 1998; Farquhar et al., 1980; Hollinger, 1996). The scores of organoleptic
characteristics from T1 were highest for fruit kept at 40C and lowest for 20C,
irrespective of the variety. It was also noted that the some values increased with the rise
in temperature. The measured parameters were significantly different in most of the cases
under the limit P < 0.05.
The chemical constituents of fruit measured at the ripened stage indicated that the sugar,
carotenoids, pH, soluble solids and moisture contents were highest for 40C among T1;
over all these were highest for T2 as compared to T1, irrespective of the variety as well as storage temperature (Table 4). These parameters were significantly different in most of
the cases under the limit P < 0.05. The ascorbic acid contents were highest for the fruit
○ stored at 20 C as compared to others. The acidity was almost same in case of T2 and the fruit stored at 20C but was significantly different from the fruit stored at 30 and 40C.
The total solids contents were highest for T1 and lowest for T2, irrespective of
temperature and variety (Table 4). The reason behind T2 having lower total solids is the
variation in the production of ethylene and activity of enzymes, exposure to sunlight,
provision of required amount of water, nutrients etc at the tree to the fruit and the
difference in temperature and humidity since these are the prime parameters for the
proper development and ripening of the fruit (Simmons et al., 1998; Farquhar et al.,
1980; Hollinger, 1996).
The time required for ripening of the fruits was more in T2 as compared to 30 and 40C
(T1) as the ripening process was increased with the increase in storage temperature
73
(Narain et al., 1998). Therefore the shelf life was longest for the mangoes stored at 20C as compared to others, including T2 (Figure 1). The waste percent was highest in T2 and lowest in T1, irrespective of the variety which can be attributed to the attack of insects,
birds, animals, various diseases and other environmental conditions faced by the fruits on
the tree (Figure 2).
Table 2 Average values of physical and chemical characteristics of mango determined after 5 days of storage (the time period when the mango fruit stored at 40○C was ripened), irrespective of the variety.
Variety T* ST Color Firmness Flavor Sugar TC AA (○C) (%) (µg/g) (mg/100g) 20 2.52c† 8.29a 2.77d 8.77c 35.13d 216.02a
b a b b c c T1 30 5.08 8.23 5.23 15.11 48.91 147.83 Langra 40 7.94a 7.72b 8.21a 22.72a 64.11a 77.31d
b a c b b b T2 - 4.76 8.65 4.65 14.84 50.36 186.41
20 2.88c 8.42a 3.07h 10.51c 65.90d 145.96a
b a b b c c S.B. T1 30 5.19 8.39 5.25 16.55 75.77 112.97
Chaunsa 40 8.36a 7.79b 8.52a 25.22a 91.82a 64.47d
b a b b b b T2 - 5.21 8.81 5.34 16.85 78.78 126.03
*T, TC and AA stand for treatments, total carotenoids and ascorbic acid.
†Values having different superscript in the columns are significantly different under the
limit of P < 0.05. The comparison has been made within the variety.
74
Table 3 Average values of organoleptic parameters measured at ripened stage of mango
fruit.
Variety T* ST (○C) Color Firmness Aroma Taste Flavor
20 6.11c† 6.21c 6.01d 6.47d 6.45d
b b c c c T1 30 7.58 7.65 7.71 7.81 7.71 Langra 40 7.94b 7.72b 8.06b 8.29b 8.21b
a a a a a T2 - 8.61 8.11 9.25 9.31 9.28
20 6.43d† 6.39c 6.59d 6.95d 6.81d
c b c c c T1 30 7.91 7.72 7.95 8.04 7.95 S.B. Chaunsa 40 8.36b 7.79b 8.44b 8.58b 8.52b
a a a a a T2 - 9.31 8.21 9.45 9.51 9.48
*T stands for treatments. †Values having different superscript in the columns are significantly different under the limit of P < 0.05. The comparison has been made within
the variety.
75
Table 4 Average values of chemical characteristics measured at ripened stage of mango
fruit.
y T* ST Total TC A AA pH MC TSS Total (○C) sugar (µg/g) ( %) (mg/ (%) (%) solids
Variet (%) 100g) (%) 20 19.01d† 55.23d 0.60a 88.35a 4.81c 69.31d 20.02d 30.69a
c c b c b c c b T1 30 21.71 62.41 0.49 79.36 5.12 70.41 22.62 29.59 a r g 40 22.72b 64.11b 0.46b 77.31d 5.19b 71.31b 23.82b 28.69c Lan
a a a b a a a d T2 - 25.56 74.32 0.58 84.22 5.75 82.14 26.54 17.86
20 21.1d† 81.67d 0.46a 72.47a 5.01c 68.57d 22.13d 31.43a
c c b c b c c b T1 30 24.11 87.61 0.36 66.48 5.26 69.56 25.02 30.44
40 25.22b 91.82b 0.34b 64.47d 5.36b 70.51b 26.21b 29.49c
S.B. Chaunsa a a a b a a a d T2 - 28.49 99.54 0.42 69.35 6.16 79.26 29.14 20.74
*T, TC, A, AA, MC and TSS stand for treatments, total carotenoids, acidity, ascorbic
acid, moisture contents and total soluble solids, respectively.
†Values having different superscript in the columns are significantly different under the
limit of P < 0.05. The comparison has been made within the variety.
76
Figure 1 Time required by the fruit to reach at the ripened stage
Figure 2 Waste percent of the fruit during the ripening process
77
4.2 Impact of sunlight- exposure to fruits on tree
It was expected that the quality of a fruit is improved by the exposure to sunlight.
Therefore, fruits were harvested at mature green stage from the different (East, West,
North and South) orientation/sides of a tree to evaluate the impact of duration of exposure
to sun over the quality and shelf life of mango. It was noted that the sun rises from North
East and sets in the North West of the trees and hence South of the tree remained exposed
to sun for longer time (Figure 3) during the summer season of Dera Ismail khan region.
The fruits were stored at 30○C with relative humidity (RH) of 64% till ripening. The
organoleptic parameters (color, aroma and flavor) and chemical constituents (sugar, carotenoids and ascorbic acid) were measured at the time of harvest and listed in Tables
5, 6. The results obtained at the harvest time showed that East and West values of various parameters were almost same whereas, these were significantly different for
North and South sides, irrespective of the variety (Tables 5, 6). The color, aroma and flavor measured at ripened stage were highest for South and lowest for North, but the results of East and West were almost the same, irrespective of the variety (Table 7). This means that longer the exposure time of the fruit to the Sun, better the quality was as
expectations. The sunlight provided UV radiations as well as heat/energy that help in
chlorophyll synthesis and accelerated most of the reactions needed by the fruit for
ripening (Saengnil et al., 2011; Cecchi et al., 2005; Farquhar et al., 1980; Lechaudel and
Joas, 2007).
Sugar and carotenoid contents measured at the ripened stage for (Langra and Samar
Bahisht Chaunsa) fruit were highest for South and lowest for Northern side of the tree;
but these parameters were almost same for East and West, irrespective of the variety
78
(Table 8). The mango fruit remained exposed to more sunlight on Southern side and
hence the sugar and carotenoids contents of the fruit were high (Saengnil et al., 2011;
Cecchi et al., 2005; Farquhar et al., 1980; Lechaudel and Joas, 2007).The ascorbic acid content were highest for North and lowest for South direction. The values of North were significantly different from other treatments, but East and South were non-significant under the limit P < 0.05.
The time required by the fruit to reach at the ripened stage located at the North of the tree was more compared to other sides. The shelf life of mango was longest for North and lowest for South and East directions, irrespective of the variety (Figure 4). The weight
loss percent of mango fruit was lowest for North compared to other directions (Figure 5).
The reason behind such trend can be the difference in the average temperature among
different sides of the tree. The waste percent of mango was lowest for South and highest
for North compared to other sides (Figure 6). This was attributed to the attacks of pests
which were high at the North side.
The results showed that the quality was best and waste percent was lowest for Southern
side; with more shelf life and lowest weight loss percent for Northern direction as
compared to remaining sides. It was also concluded that the Langra variety is more
responsive to sun exposure as compared to Samar Bahisht Chaunsa variety.
79
North
West East
South
Figure 3 Fruit exposure to sunlight on tree.
80
Table 5 Average values of color, aroma and flavor measured at harvest time for Langra and Samar Bahisht Chaunsa mango.
Variety T* Color Aroma Flavor
East 1.25b† 1.12a 1.15a
West 1.21b 1.08a 1.08a Langra
North 0.51c 0.44b 0.42b
South 1.77a 1.16a 1.22a
East 1.46b 1.12a 1.22a
West 1.41b 1.11a 1.16a S.B.Chaunsa North 0.73c 0.62c 0.56b
South 1.99a 1.19a 1.44a
*T stands for treatments. †Values having different superscripts in the columns are significantly different under the limit of P < 0.05. The comparison has been made within the variety.
81
Table 6 Average values of total sugar, total carotenoids and ascorbic acid measured at
harvest time for Langra and Samar Bahisht Chaunsa mango.
Variety T* Total sugar TC (µg/g) AA (%) (mg/100g)
East 4.49b† 26.62b 288.42b
West 4.38b 26.48b 288.74b Langra North 3.71c 24.89c 290.68a
South 5.18a 27.45a 287.65c
East 5.48b 58.55b 181.44b
West 5.37b 58.35b 181.75b S.B. Chaunsa North 4.69c 56.59c 183.82a
South 6.22a 59.22a 180.59c
*T, TC and AA stand for treatments, total carotenoids and ascorbic acid, respectively.
†Values having different superscripts in the columns are significantly different under the limit of P < 0.05. The comparison has been made within the variety.
82
Table 7 Average values of color, aroma and flavor measured at ripened stage for Langra
and Samar Bahisht Chaunsa mango stored at 30○C temperature.
Variety T* Color Aroma Flavor
East 7.96b† 7.99b 7.95b
West 7.78b 7.81b 7.84b Langra North 7.16c 7.25c 7.22c
South 8.42a 8.46a 8.53a
East 8.12b 8.01b 8.11b
West 7.99b 7.97b 8.04b S.B. Chaunsa North 7.29c 7.42c 7.52c
South 8.64a 8.53a 8.61a
*T stands for treatments. †Values having different superscript in the columns are significantly different under the limit of P < 0.05. The comparison has been made within
the variety.
83
Table 8 Average values of chemical constituents measured at ripened stage for Langra and Samar Bahisht Chaunsa mango, stored at 30○C temperature.
Variety T* Total sugar TC AA (mg/100g) (%) (µg/g)
East 22.11b† 62.89b 79.01b
West 21.89b 62.61b 79.14b Langra North 20.75c 61.22c 80.05a
South 22.84a 63.496a 78.41c
East 24.62b 87.89b 66.07b
West 24.41b 87.77b 66.28b S.B. Chaunsa North 23.49c 86.24c 67.21a
South 25.39a 88.48a 65.55c
*T, TC and AA stand for treatments, total carotenoids and ascorbic acid, respectively.
†Values having different superscript in the columns are significantly different under the limit of P < 0.05. The comparison has been made within the variety.
84
Figure 4 Time required by the fruit to reach at the ripened stage as a function of treatment and at 30C storage temperature
85
Figure 5 Weight loss percent (Wt. loss %) of mango fruit measured at the ripened stage as a function of treatment and at 30C storage temperature
Figure 6 The waste percent of the fruit during the ripening process stored at 30C
86
4.3 Harvesting at Different Day Times and Coating with Calcium Chloride
To investigate the impact of harvesting the fruits at different day timings (exposed to
sun), the mango fruits were harvested at hard green stage of maturity at 6.30 am (T1),
1.30 pm (T2), and 8.30 pm (T3) for the three consecutive days from the selected trees and
were analyzed organoleptically and chemical characteristics determined at the harvest
time (Tables 9 & 10). The fruits coated with 1.5% calcium chloride as well as those
uncoated ones were stored at 20, 30, 40C temperatures till ripening. The data were
collected for organoleptic characteristics at the ripened stage indicated that color, aroma,
taste and flavor were highest for T3 (8.30 pm) and lowest for T1 (6.30 am), irrespective of
the variety and storage temperatures (Tables 11 & 12). The most likely reason behind it is
that the mango fruits of T3 (8.30 pm) received more energy from sunlight and hence had
the high ripening rate (Saengnil et al., 2011; Amin et al., 2008; Murillo and Adimilson,
1999; Poovaiah, 1986; Singh et al., 1993; Yuen et al., 1993). The organoleptic characteristics were highest at 40C and lowest at 20C, irrespective of the variety. The statistical analysis done for color, aroma, taste and flavor parameters were significantly different in most of the cases for treatments as well as storage temperature except firmness (Tables 11 & 12).
The fruits were analyzed for chemical constituents at the ripened stage and results are listed in Tables 13 & 14. The contents of soluble solids, pH, sugar and carotenoids were highest for T3 (8.30 pm) and lowest for T1 (6.30 am), irrespective of the variety as well as
storage temperature. The reason for such trend can be that T3 (8.30 pm) mango fruit have
more exposure to sunlight and quality was increased with the increase in temperature
(Baloch et al., 2011a, 2011b; Narain et al., 1998). The ascorbic acid and total solid values
87
were highest for T1 (6.30 am) and lowest for T3 (8.30 pm), irrespective of variety and
storage temperature. The moisture contents were highest for T1 (6.30 am) and lowest for
T2 (1.30 pm) and were increased with the increase in storage temperature. It was
concluded that most of the measured parameters were significantly different under the
limit P < 0.05 for treatments as well as storage temperature (Tables 13 & 14).
The shelf life of fruit was highest for T1 (6.30 am) and lowest for T2 (1.30 pm) for both the varieties (Figures 7 & 8), as the T1 (6.30 am) fruits were less exposed to field heat as
compared to other treatments hence the shelf life of mango fruit was prolonged (Baloch
et al., 2011a). The shelf life of fruit was longest for 20C and lowest for 40C. It was also
noted that the shelf life was highest in Samar Bahisht Chaunsa as compared to Langra.
The weight loss percent was highest for T2 and lowest for T1 (6.30 am); it was highest for
40C and lowest for 20C, irrespective of the variety (Figures 9 & 10). It was also highest
in Samar Bahisht Chaunsa as compared to Langra variety. The waste percent was highest
for T2 (1.30 pm) and lowest for T1 (6.30 am), irrespective of the variety as well as storage
temperature. It was lowest for 30C and Samar Bahisht Chaunsa as compared to others
(Figures 11 & 12).
The results obtained for organoleptic and chemical constituents at the ripened stage for
coated fruit showed that coating enhanced the quality of the fruit and T3 (8.30 pm)
remained better than other treatments (Tables 11-14). The weight loss measured for
coated fruit at the ripened stage was less than the uncoated (Figures 9 & 10). This is
attributed to the fact that calcium chloride lowers the respiration and evaporation rate and
the ripening process which ultimately lead to improve the quality (Santos et al., 2004;
88
Sive and Resnizky, 1985; Corrales-Garcia and Lakshminarayana, 1991; Yuen et al.,
1993).
The shelf life of coated fruit was longest as compared to uncoated fruit, irrespective of
the variety and storage temperature (Figures 7 & 8). The calcium chloride delayed the
ripening process and senescence in fruits by lowering the respiration rate and resulting
longer shelf life in all treatments (Mootoo, 1991; Suntharalingam, 1996; Anjum and Ali,
2004; Singh et al., 1993; Sive and Resnizky, 1985; Corrales-Garcia and
Lakshminarayana, 1991; Yuniarti and Suhardi, 1992; Yuen et al., 1993; Gofure et al.,
1997; Tirmazi and Wills, 1981). The waste percent of coated fruit was lower than
uncoated fruit (Figures 11 & 12). The reason for such trend might be the coating that not
allowed the microbial attack and the fruit remains safe from the diseases.
Table 9 Average values of organoleptic parameters measured at harvest time for Langra and Samar Bahisht Chaunsa mango fruit.
Variety Treatment Color Firmness Aroma Taste Flavor
b a b b b T1 0.83 9.51 0.92 0.96 0.95
a b a a a Langra T2 0.92 9.24 1.08 1.11 1.10
a b a a a T3 0.99 9.35 1.14 1.17 1.15
b a b a a T1 0.92 9.70 0.97 1.16 1.13
a b a a a S. B. Chaunsa T2 1.13 9.48 1.14 1.25 1.22
a b a a a T3 1.16 9.50 1.18 1.29 1.26
†Values having different superscript in the columns are significantly different under the limit of P < 0.05. The comparison has been made within the variety.
89
Table 10 Average values of chemical constituents of Langra and Samar Bahisht Chaunsa mango fruit measured at harvest time.
T* Total TC* A AA pH MC TSS Total sugar (µg/g) ( %) (mg/100g) (%) (%) solids (%) (%) Variety
b† b a a b a a a T1 3.95 26.22 3.52 289.64 3.16 80.97 7.78 19.03
a a b b a b b b T2 4.24 26.89 3.39 288.95 3.24 79.65 7.29 20.15
Langra a a b b a a a a T3 4.38 27.29 3.34 288.04 3.35 80.45 7.95 19.55
b b a a b a a a T1 5.11 58.09 2.45 183.61 3.39 77.89 6.65 22.11
a a b b a b b b T2 5.29 58.72 2.32 182.89 3.48 76.36 6.17 23.64
a a b b a a a a T3 5.45 59.21 2.21 182.08 3.54 77.34 6.94 22.54 S.B. Chaunsa *TC, A, AA, MC and TSS stand for total carotenoids, acidity, ascorbic acid, moisture
contents and total soluble solids, respectively.
†Values having different superscript in the columns are significantly different under the limit of P < 0.05. The comparison has been made within the variety.
90
Table 11 Average values of organoleptic parameters measured at ripened stage for
Langra mango fruit stored at different temperatures.
Status T* ST (○C) Color Firmness Aroma Taste Flavor
20 6.01g† 6.82c 5.91g 6.11e 6.02f e a c c d T1 30 7.41 7.64 7.35 7.56 7.46 40 7.89d 7.79a 7.86c 8.02b 7.95c 20 6.31g 6.01d 6.15f 6.51d 6.47e d b c c c Uncoated T2 30 7.77 7.17 7.72 7.92 7.85 40 8.12c 7.35b 8.01b 8.39b 8.31b 20 6.67f 6.56c 6.45d 6.95d 6.91e c a c b b T3 30 8.02 7.55 7.91 8.13 8.11 40 8.45b 7.69a 8.37b 8.59a 8.52a 20 6.45f 6.93c 6.37e 6.39e 6.37f d a c c c T1 30 7.76 7.77 7.71 7.91 7.87 40 8.31b 7.92a 8.19b 8.45b 8.41b 20 6.73f 6.32d 6.76d 6.89d 6.82e c b b b b Coated T2 30 8.17 7.31 8.02 8.27 8.24 40 8.61a 7.48b 8.41b 8.69a 8.63a 20 7.19e 6.67c 6.93d 7.33c 7.29d b a b b b T3 30 8.37 7.68 8.28 8.43 8.42 40 8.96a 7.82a 8.78a 8.92a 8.89a
*T stands for treatments. T1, T2 and T3 stand for the fruit harvested at 6.30 am, 1.30 pm and 8.30 pm, respectively.
†Values having different superscript in the columns are significantly different under the limit of P < 0.05.
91
Table 12 Average values of organoleptic parameters measured at ripened stage for Samar
Bahisht Chaunsa mango fruit stored at different temperatures.
Status T* ST (○C) Color Firmness Aroma Taste Flavor 20 6.31f† 7.12b 6.41f 6.45f 6.45f c a d d d T1 30 7.79 7.75 7.65 7.81 7.64 40 8.12b 7.87a 8.11c 8.36c 8.21c 20 6.51f 6.39d 6.51f 6.99e 6.91e b b d c c Uncoated T2 30 8.01 7.39 7.99 8.13 8.02 40 8.45a 7.61a 8.41c 8.62b 8.55b 20 6.92e 6.71c 6.99e 7.11e 7.01e b a c c c T3 30 8.31 7.53 8.32 8.39 8.31 40 8.72a 7.72a 8.75b 8.84b 8.77b 20 6.73e 7.23b 6.79e 6.96e 6.93e c a d c c T1 30 8.05 7.88 7.99 8.21 8.18 40 8.52b 7.99a 8.51b 8.72b 8.68b 20 6.93e 6.49d 6.94e 7.32d 7.27d b b c c c Coated T2 30 8.38 7.41 8.36 8.43 8.38 40 8.95a 7.74a 8.82a 9.11a 9.05a 20 7.23d 6.81c 7.39d 7.45d 7.43d b a b b b T3 30 8.66 7.66 8.69 8.73 8.69 40 9.22a 7.85a 9.15a 9.37a 9.32a
*T stands for treatments. T1, T2 and T3 stand for the fruit harvested at 6.30 am, 1.30 pm
and 8.30 pm, respectively.
†Values having different superscript in the columns are significantly different under the limit of P < 0.05.
92
Table 13 Average values of chemical constituents measured at ripened stage for Langra
mango fruit stored at different temperatures.
T* ST Total TC A AA pH MC TSS Total (○C) sugar (µg/g) (%) (mg/ (%) (%) solids
Status (%) 100g) (%) 20 18.78g† 54.64j 0.63a 89.81a 4.79e 70.19d 19.49g 29.81c d f a e d c d d T1 30 21.41 61.42 0.53 80.19 5.06 71.28 22.36 28.81 40 22.49c 63.45d 0.45b 77.31g 5.17c 72.39b 23.45c 27.71e e i a b e f f a 20 19.45 55.29 0.60 88.35 4.84 68.66 20.42 31.34 d d e b f c d d b T2 30 21.99 62.71 0.48 79.46 5.14 69.61 22.62 30.39 c c c h c d c c
Uncoate 40 22.97 64.72 0.43 76.31 5.24 70.66 23.71 29.34 20 19.87e 55.91h 0.59a 87.72c 4.89e 69.31e 20.75f 30.69b c e b f c d c c T3 30 22.47 62.96 0.47 78.15 5.21 70.41 23.41 29.59 40 23.61b 64.99c 0.41c 75.34i 5.34c 71.31c 24.49b 28.69d 20 19.54e 55.44i 0.61a 89.55a 4.95d 71.09c 20.45f 28.91d c e a e c b c e T1 30 22.35 62.32 0.50 80.09 5.12 72.11 23.15 27.89 40 23.44b 64.51c 0.44b 77.15g 5.26c 73.23a 24.37b 26.77f 20 20.57e 56.18h 0.58a 88.11b 5.05d 69.48e 21.52e 30.52b
d c d b f c d c c T2 30 22.88 63.52 0.47 79.25 5.21 70.59 23.61 29.41
Coate 40 23.87b 65.63b 0.42c 76.16h 5.39b 71.62c 24.73b 28.38d 20 20.89e 57.71g 0.58a 87.39c 5.16c 70.29d 21.78e 29.71c b c b f b c b d T3 30 23.62 64.85 0.46 78.12 5.37 71.37 24.52 28.63 40 24.79a 66.82a 0.40c 75.19i 5.54a 72.34b 25.65a 27.66e
*T stands for treatments.T1, T2 and T3 stand for the fruit harvested at 6.30 am, 1.30 pm and 8.30 pm, respectively.
†Values having different superscript in the columns are significantly different under the limit of P < 0.05.
93
Table 14 Average values of chemical constituents measured at ripened stage for Samar
Bahisht Chaunsa mango fruit stored at different temperatures.
T* ST Total TC A AA pH MC TSS Total (○C ) sugar (µg/g) (%) (mg/ (%) (%) solids
Status (%) 100g) (%) 20 20.69g† 80.34k 0.52a 73.41a 4.92d 69.63d 20.59g 30.37c d g b e c c d d T1 30 23.58 86.19 0.42 67.47 5.15 70.51 24.46 29.49 40 24.56c 89.36d 0.38b 65.51g 5.25c 71.53b 25.45c 28.47e f j a c c f f a 20 21.45 81.72 0.50 71.85 5.11 67.48 22.35 32.52 d c f b g b e c b T2 30 24.51 87.69 0.41 65.99 5.32 68.10 25.46 31.90 b c c h b d b c
Uncoate 40 25.52 90.16 0.35 63.81 5.42 69.39 26.57 30.61 20 21.83f 82.78i 0.48a 71.35c 5.16c 68.55e 22.74f 31.45b c e b g b d c c T3 30 24.79 88.61 0.39 65.38 5.43 69.65 25.62 30.35 40 25.85b 90.82c 0.33c 63.32i 5.49b 70.64c 26.69b 29.36d 20 21.71f 81.36j 0.51a 73.35a 5.02c 70.55c 22.62f 29.45d c f b e b b c e T1 30 24.63 87.21 0.38 67.25 5.28 71.48 25.58 28.52 40 25.67b 90.29c 0.34b 65.18g 5.42b 72.49a 26.61b 27.51f 20 22.39e 82.30i 0.49a 71.42c 5.19c 68.45e 23.32e 31.55b
d b e b g b d b c T2 30 25.49 88.41 0.40 65.71 5.43 69.15 26.39 30.85
Coate 40 26.55a 91.36b 0.34c 63.59h 5.55a 70.35c 27.45a 29.65d 20 22.81e 83.28h 0.47a 71.09c 5.25c 69.51d 23.84e 30.49c b d b g a c b d T3 30 25.85 89.21 0.38 65.12 5.54 70.65 26.55 29.32 40 26.84a 92.32a 0.32c 63.15i 5.65a 71.61b 27.62a 28.33e
*T stands for treatments. T1, T2 and T3 stand for the fruit harvested at 6.30 am, 1.30 pm and 8.30 pm, respectively.
†Values having different superscript in the columns are significantly different under the limit of P < 0.05.
94
Figure 7 Time required by the Langra fruit to reach at the ripened stage as affected by storage temperature and treatments
Figure 8 Time required by the Samar Bahisht Chaunsa fruit to reach at the ripened stage as affected by storage temperature and treatments
95
Figure 9 Weight loss percent of Langra mango fruit measured at the ripened time
Figure 10 Weight loss percent of Samar Bahisht Chaunsa mango fruit measured at the ripened time
96
Figure 11 Waste percent of the Langra fruit during the ripening process
Figure 12 Waste percent of the Samar Bahisht Chaunsa fruit during the ripening process
97
4.4 Impact of Harvesting Stages and Storage Conditions
Mango is considered very important fruits and Pakistan stands at significant position at the exporters list. However, its high portion is wasted due to several reasons including short shelf life. In present study fruits were harvested at 80 (early stage), 95 (mid stage) and 110 (late stage) days of fruit setting, designated as samples I, II, and III, respectively; stored them at different (20, 30, 40○C) temperatures and analyzed fruit at harvest as well as at ripened stage. The results obtained for organoleptic characteristics at the harvest time were low except firmness (Table 15). All the parameters increased except firmness during the ripening process and were more at high storage temperature (Table 16) indicated that the fruit was ripened with the passage of time. The decrease in green color was the most obvious change and was attributed to an increase in carotenoids during the storage and the principal agents responsible for such variations were oxidative system, pH change and enzymes like chlorophyllases (Doreyappa-gowda and Huddar, 2001).
With the ripening of fruit, the concentration of volatile compounds increased and made the fruit more attractive, delicious and valuable (Al-Haq and Sugiyama, 2004b; Bender et al., 2000; Kays, 1991; Malundo et al., 1996). The firmness results indicated that the fruit was intact and hence had proper look even at ripened stage as observed by others for other varieties (Al-Haq and Sugiyama, 2004b; Mizrach et al., 1997; Santulli and
Jeronimidis, 2006).The results for the fruit taste illustrated that it was developed during the ripening process. As the taste is a combination of sugar and acids present in the fruit, it was expected that the sugar contents increased and the acid value decreased with the passage of time (Kays, 1991; Malundo et al., 2001).
98
The mango fruit was analyzed for chemical constituents at the harvest time and at the
ripened stage (Tables 17 & 18). The pH increased from sample I to sample III and with
the increase in storage temperature, irrespective of variety investigated (Tables 17 & 18)
and was considered to be due to conversion of acids into sugars and other products
(Absar et al., 1993; Kumar and Singh, 1993; Rathore et al., 2007; Yuniarti, 1980). The
pulp pH obtained at ripened stage for different samples was significantly different under
the limit of P < 0.05. The moisture contents were decreased with the ripening process and were minimum for lower storage temperature and vise-versa and were high for Langra as compared to Samar Bahisht Chaunsa, through out the measurements (Tables 17 & 18).
This trend was expected as in case of low storage temperature, the ripening rate can be low and the fruit requires longer time. Further, as the fruit is almost ripened up the mass transfer through diffusivity phenomenon is enhanced (Dissa et al., 2011). The results
obtained for the different samples were significantly different at P < 0.05. Total soluble
solids (TSS) of both varieties increased with ripening process and were high at maximum
storage temperature, irrespective of sample/variety (Tables 17 & 18). The increase in TSS
was due to conversion of carbohydrates into simple sugars during the storage and is
considered to be one of the important indexes of ripening process in mango and other
climacteric fruit (Doreyappa-gowda and Huddar, 2001; Kays, 1991; Kittur et al., 2001).
It was noted that the total soluble solids and skin color has a positive correlation and can be used as an indicator for the judgment of quality of the fruit (Figure 13). It was also observed that the harvesting stage of the fruit has a significant impact over the results at the level of P < 0.05. Total solids decreased with the harvest stage, ripening process
(Saranwong et al., 2004; Subedi et al., 2007) and storage temperature, irrespective of the
99
variety (Tables 17 & 18). The sugar contents of the mango varieties (Langra and Samar
Bahisht Chaunsa) recorded at the time of harvest as well as at the ripened stage (Tables
17 & 18). It was noted that the sugar contents were highest for sample III and lowest for
sample I at the harvest time, which was attributed to the sample III had more time on the
tree as compared to sample I or sample II (Table 17). The results obtained at the ripened
stage concluded that the sugar contents were minimum for sample I and low storage
temperature and maximum for sample III and high storage temperature for both the
varieties. Further to it, the contents were high for S. B. Chaunsa for a particular sample or
storage temperature. The analysis of the harvested fruit indicated that the total
carotenoids were increased with the harvest stage or storage temperature during the
ripening process, irrespective of the varieties; it was high for S.B. Chaunsa as compared
to Langra (Tables 17 & 18) (Chuadhary, 2006). The application of ANOVA to the data
concluded that the results for different samples and storage temperatures were
significantly different under the limit of P < 0.05. The skin color of the fruit showed positive correlation with the carotenoids and sugar contents, irrespective of storage temperature and harvest stage (Figure 13) (Ornelas-paz et al., 2008). The acidity was lowest for sample III at particular storage temperature (Table 18) and was decreased with rise in storage temperature for both varieties. It was more in Langra than in Samar
Bahisht Chaunsa at the harvest and at ripened stage, irrespective of storage conditions.
The decrease in acidity was attributed towards the conversion of citric acid into sugars and their further utilization in metabolic process of the fruit (Doreyappa-gowda and
Huddar, 2001; Mizrach et al., 1997; Rathore et al., 2007; Srinivasa et al., 2002). It was interesting to note that carotenoids, sugar and acidity had negative correlation, indicating
100
that with the ripening of the fruit the acidity was decreased while carotenoids and sugar
increased (Figure 14). The ascorbic acid (Vitamin-C) of Langra and Samar Bahisht
Chaunsa was recorded at the time of harvest for each harvest stage (Table 17). The results
showed that ascorbic acid at the harvest time were high for sample I as compared to
sample II or III that reduced down with the ripening of the fruit or increasing the
storage temperature, irrespective of the variety (Table 18). It was high for Langra as
compared to Samar Bahisht Chaunsa, irrespective of sample or storage temperature and
was comparable to that of Shindhu variety at the ripened stage (Absar et al., 1993).
The time required for ripening of the fruit was plotted for every sample and storage temperature. It was noted that the results obtained for different samples/ storage temperature were significantly different under the limit of P < 0.05; and sample I required more time to reach to the ripened stage as compared to others (Figure 15). The data also demonstrated that the fruit stored at low temperature required more time to reach at the ripened stage, irrespective of the sample or variety.
The weight loss was highest for sample I and lowest for sample III at the ripened stage among the three samples and it was increased with the increase in temperature or was decreased with the increase in relative humidity in both the varieties, which was according to expectations (Figure 16). To translate the above statement into mathematical expression, we have introduced an exposure parameter which can be related to storage temperature and relative humidity in the following way and ultimately to weight loss of the fruit. The simple thermodynamic states that:
(8)
(9)
101
(10)
Combining Equation (8), Equation (9) and Equation (10) results
(11)
Here temperature difference means the difference between the storage temperature and
the reference temperature at which the results for all samples can be compared; k is a
constant depending upon the material used for storage and other storage conditions. To
make the system more clear, the results can be scaled with the reference temperature just
like humidity. For the purpose the Equation (11) can be modified to:
(12)
Here S. Temperature and R. Temperature stand for storage temperature and reference temperature, respectively.
Taking the reference temperature as 15°C, we have calculated the exposure parameter and plotted the weight loss percent against it in Figure 17. The figure shows that it increases with the increase in exposure time as expected from Equation 12 and the data obtained for both the varieties and storage temperature nicely follow the Equation (12).
The waste percent in the fruit during the storage period was also calculated and depicted in Figure 18. It can be observed that the value of waste percent was lowest for sample II
102 and 30°C as storage temperature and the results are significantly different under the limit
P < 0.05.
It was concluded that the harvest days (sample number) and the storage temperature had noticeable impact over the shelf life, weight loss, waste percent and quality of the fruit.
Since every chemical or biological process needs certain amount of activation energy and this energy plays very important role not only in ripening of the fruit but also in its spoilage and same will be the case for mango fruit. Therefore, the activation energy of the ripening process was calculated in the following way. The ripening rate was plotted versus storage temperature (Figure 19) and the activation energy as per Arrhenius equation (Equation 13) has been calculated (Mut et al., 2008).
Ripening rate = Ke-Ea/RT (13)
Here K, Ea, R and T are pre-exponential factor, activation energy, gas constant and storage temperature in Kelvin scale. The activation energy so obtained was plotted for different samples in Figure 20. It was noted that the activation energy is not significantly different for sample I and II for both the varieties; however, it was different for sample III from sample I and II, under the limit P < 0.05.
103
Table 15 Average values of organoleptic parameters measured at harvest time for Langra and Samar Bahisht Chaunsa mango fruit, harvested at different days of fruit setting.
Samples Maturity Harvest Color Firmness Aroma Taste Flavor stages days Variety
I Early 80 0c 10a 0b 0b 0b
II Mid 95 0.9b 9.7b 1.06a 1.08a 1.1a
Langra III Late 110 1.5a 9.3c 1.0a 1.0a 1.0a
I Early 80 0.6c 9.8a 0.6c 0.21c 0.3c
II Mid 95 1.1b 9.5b 1.1b 1.21a 1.2b
III Late 110 1.8a 9.1c 1.5a 1.2a 2.3a S.B. Chaunsa †Values having different superscript in the columns are significantly different under the limit of P < 0.05. The comparison has been made with in the variety.
104
Table 16 Average values of organoleptic parameters measured at ripened stage for
Langra and Samar Bahisht Chaunsa mango fruit stored at different temperatures.
Variety S ST Color Firmness Aroma Taste Flavor 20 3.07h† 5.01g 3.71h 4.02h 4.01h I 30 5.03g 5.81f 5.02g 5.82g 5.71g 40 5.38f 6.18e 5.49f 6.02f 6.02f 20 6.11g 6.13e 6.01h 6.47h 6.45g Langra II 30 7.58c 7.14c 7.71d 7.81e 7.71d
40 7.94b 7.49b 8.06c 8.29c 8.21c 20 6.11e 6.89d 6.54e 7.01e 7.01e III 30 8.19b 7.51b 8.44b 8.61b 8.46b 40 8.51a 7.62a 8.63a 9.14a 8.84a 20 4.02h 5.42g 4.04h 4.74h 4.71h I 30 6.07g 6.02f 5.71g 6.01g 5.91g 40 6.43f 6.44e 6.11f 6.41f 6.39f 20 6.43j 6.38e 6.59h 6.95h 6.81h S. B. Chaunsa II 30 7.91e 7.41c 7.95d 8.04d 7.95d 40 8.36d 7.61b 8.44c 8.58c 8.52c 20 7.21e 7.01d 7.09e 7.43e 7.41e III 30 8.62b 7.62b 8.51b 8.86b 8.61b 40 9.21a 7.68a 9.02a 9.41a 9.01a S and ST stand for samples and storage temperature (○C).
†Values having different superscript in the columns are significantly different under the limit of P < 0.05. The comparison has been made within the variety.
105
Table 17 Average values of chemical constituents of Langra and Samar Bahisht Chaunsa mango fruit measured at harvest time.
S Total TC A AA pH MC TSS Total sugar (µg/g) ( %) (mg/100g) (%) (%) solids (%) (%) Variety
I 2.51c† 15.11c 3.71a 369.75a 2.01c 69.13c 4.31c 29.87a
II 4.12b 26.41b 3.41a 288.60a 3.21b 80.12a 7.66a 18.88b
Langra III 4.86a 30.18a 2.11c 240.63c 3.55a 82.12a 8.15a 17.88c
I 2.71c 22.22c 2.94a 315.77a 2.21c 68.11c 4.01c 31.89a
II 5.21a 58.02a 2.32b 182.7b 3.45a 77.32b 6.65b 23.68a S.B.
Chaunsa III 5.75a 59.56a 1.39c 170.61c 3.61a 80.01a 7.49a 19.99c
S, TC, A, AA, MC and TSS stand for samples, total carotenoids, acidity, ascorbic acid, moisture contents and total soluble solids, respectively.
†Values having different superscript in the columns are significantly different under the limit of P < 0.05. The comparison has been made within the variety.
106
Table 18 Average values of chemical constituents measured at ripened stage for Langra and Samar Bahisht Chaunsa mango fruit, stored at different temperatures.
ST V S TSu TC A AA pH MC TSS TS (○C) 20 13.36h† 32.31i 0.86a 124.67a 3.95i 57.29i 14.82i 42.71a I 30 16.12g 40.32h 0.75b 114.68b 4.05h 58.10h 17.41h 41.90b
40 17.25f 45.32g 0.72c 109.45c 4.12g 60.11g 18.11g 40.89c 20 19.01j 55.23i 0.60b 88.35b 4.81f 69.31g 20.02j 30.69b
a
r II f e f f e e f c g 30 21.71 62.41 0.49 79.36 5.12 70.41 22.62 29.59
Lan 40 22.72d 64.11d 0.46h 77.31g 5.19d 71.31b 23.82d 28.69f 20 22.02c 63.22c 0.53g 80.54g 5.45c 71.56c 23.45c 28.44g III 30 25.01b 74.33b 0.44h 72.53h 5.61b 72.25b 26.11b 27.75h 40 26.65a 78.09a 0.41i 69.38i 5.78a 73.01a 26.75a 26.99i 20 15.11i 53.26i 0.63a 102.48a 4.10i 59.71i 16.69i 40.29a I 30 18.25h 59.79h 0.53b 93.38b 4.19h 60.42h 19.91h 39.58b 40 19.11g 62.77g 0.50c 90.76c 4.26g 61.61g 20.12g 38.39c 20 21.10g 81.67j 0.46b 72.47b 5.01f 68.57e 22.13g 31.43c II 30 24.11d 87.61h 0.36e 66.48d 5.26e 69.56c 25.02d 30.44e 40 25.22c 91.82e 0.34d 64.47f 5.36d 70.51b 26.21c 29.49f S. B. Chaunsa 20 24.22c 84.12c 0.39g 66.39g 5.84c 69.61c 25.45c 28.39g III 30 27.21b 95.72b 0.30h 58.28h 6.08b 70.21b 27.62b 29.79h 40 28.31a 99.22a 0.27i 55.28i 6.25a 71.28a 28.51a 28.99i V, S, TSu, TC, A, AA, MC TSS and TS stand for variety, samples, total sugar (%), total carotenoids (µg/g), acidity (%), ascorbic acid (mg/100g), moisture contents (%), total soluble solids (%) and total solids (%) respectively. †Values having different superscript in the columns are significantly different under the limit of P < 0.05. The comparison has been made within the variety.
107
(a)
(b)
108
(c)
Figure 13 Correlation of (a) Total carotenoids (TC (µg/g)), Total sugar (TS (%)), (b)
Total soluble solids (TSS (%)) and (c) Acidity (%) with the skin color of both the varieties, irrespective of sample and storage temperature
109
(a)
(b)
Figure 14 Correlation of (a) Total carotenoids and (b) Acidity with sugar for both the varieties, irrespective of sample and temperature. La stands for Langra, Ch for Samar Bahisht Chaunsa and TC stands for total carotenoids
110
Figure 15 Time required by the fruit to reach at the ripened stage as a function of storage temperatures
111
Figure 16 Weight loss percent measured at the ripened stage for both the varieties stored at various temperatures
Figure 17 Weight loss percent as a function of exposure parameters (calculated as per Equation (12)) for all the varieties and storage temperature
112
Figure 18 Waste percent of the fruit during the ripening process
113
Figure 19 Ripening rate (= change in sugar contents / days) of different samples of Samar
Bahisht Chaunsa variety as a function of storage temperature
114
Figure 20 Activation energy of Langra and Samar Bahisht Chaunsa varieties
115
4.5 Effect of Field Heat Removal on Fruit
The enzymatic as well as chemical reactions which may take place in the fruit are considered to be highly sensitive to the temperature of the fruit. Therefore, it is expected that if the fruit is cooled just after the harvest it may slow down the ripening process and increase the shelf life. To quantify this idea and develop a correlation between cooling and shelf life of the fruit, the fruit was harvested at hard green stage of maturity and maintaining at 15○C by keeping in cold water and/ or in cold air for various time periods
(See Table 1). The treated and untreated fruit was stored at 20, 30 and 40○C. The organoleptic properties were measured at three storage stages (1) at the harvest time (2) when the control fruit was ripened (3) when all the treated fruit was ripened. The values for firmness, color, taste, flavor and aroma at the harvest time were 9.2, 0.9, 1.08, 1.09 and 1.06 for Langra and 9.4, 1.1, 1.21, 1.20 and 1.10 for Samar Bahisht Chaunsa, respectively. The measurements made for some of the quality parameters at the time when the control fruit (stored at 30○C) was ripened concluded the value of firmness was highest for treatment T2 than others (Table 19). The sugar, carotenoids and total soluble solids were low whereas acidity was high for T2 amongst the all. During ripening of the fruit, a number of physiological and/or chemical process are involved which are very much dependent over the temperature of the system or energy available. Therefore the removal of heat or reduction in the temperature of the system slowed down the process of ripening. That is why a significant difference in the results for different quality parameters was observed in most of the cases for P < 0.05 (Table 19). The fruit analyzed at the ripened stage for various organoleptic parameters indicated that these were lowest in case of T0 and highest for T2, irrespective of the storage temperatures as well as variety
116
Tables 20 & 21. Such type of observations was due to removal of heat from the fruit,
resulting slow down the ripening process, enhanced the quality and prolonged the shelf
life. The values of organoleptic parameters were lowest for 20○C and highest for 40○C.
These parameters were significantly different in most of the cases for P < 0.05 for
different treatments, irrespective of the variety as well as storage temperature.
The values of moisture contents obtained at the harvest time were 80.12% and 77.32%
for Langra and S.B. Chaunsa variety, respectively, which were significantly reduced
during the ripening process, however, the extent of reduction was function of treatment as
well as variety as observed by others for various varieties (Tables 22 & 23) (Mollah and
Siddique, 1973; Samad and Faruque, 1976). The observations made at the ripened stage
in respect of moisture contents concluded that these were directly proportional to the heat
removed from the fruit at the harvest time (T2). The reason behind such trend was that by
cooling the system the rate of diffusion of water molecule from the body of the fruit to
the surface was reduced which resulted reduction in evaporation and the contents of the
moisture remained high up to the ripened stage (Dissa et al., 2011). The values of pH
were 3.21 and 3.45 for Langra and S.B. Chaunsa variety at the harvest time, respectively.
The results indicated at ripened stage that the measured pH was lowest in case of T0 and highest for T2 treatment, irrespective of the storage temperatures as well as fruit variety
(Tables 22 & 23). The values of pH showed that the quality of fruit was better for T2 than others (Absar et al., 1993; Kumar and Singh, 1993; Yuniart, 1980). It was noted at the harvest time the estimated total solids were 18.88% and 23.68% in Langra and S.B.
Chaunsa, respectively, which were enhanced with the process of ripening and stored at various temperatures. The contents of total soluble solids in the mango varieties (Langra
117
and Sammar Bahisht Chaunsa) were recorded at the time of harvest as 7.66 and 6.65%,
respectively. The total soluble solids obtained for various treatments at ripened stage are
demonstrated in Tables 22 & 23. The ascorbic acid (Vitamin-C) noted for mango
varieties at harvest time was 288.6 mg/100g and 182.7 mg/100g for Langra and S.B.
Chaunsa, respectively, which were reduced during the process of ripening (Tables 22 &
23). The value of ascorbic acid was lowest while the total soluble solids were highest in
T2 the expected cause for such trend was with the removal of heat from the fruit at the
harvest time, resulting slow down the ripening process (Tables 22 & 23). It was observed
that the contents of total soluble solids were highest in T2 and the fruit took longer time to
reach up the ripened stage; demonstrating the better quality than others under the stated
conditions (Dissa et al., 2011). The acidity of the Langra and Sammar Bahisht Chaunsa
mango varieties recorded at harvest time was 3.41% and 2.32%, respectively and
decreased during the ripening process (Tables 22 & 23). The values of total carotenoids
at the time of harvest were 26.41µg/g in Langra and 58.02µg/g in Sammar Bahisht
Chaunsa variety, respectively and enhanced with the ripening process. The obtained
results indicated that the carotenoids contents were enhanced during fruit ripening, as it
has been revealed for other various mango fruit varieties (Chuadhary, 2006; Ornelas-Paz
et al., 2008). The sugar percentage at the time of harvest was 4.12 for Langra fruit and
5.21 for Sammar Bahisht Chaunsa variety, respectively. At the ripened stage; the sugar content was increased, irrespective of the variety as well as storage temperature (Tables
22 & 23) (Chuadhary, 2006; Ornelas-Paz et al., 2008).
The sugar, total soluble solids and carotenoids contents obtained at the ripened stage of the fruit as a function of field heat removal illustrated that the removal of heat enhanced
118 these parameters, irrespective of the fruit variety; and the trend was found to be similar to the one obtained for color (Figure 21). The results obtained for sugar, carotenoids were plotted against the skin color of the fruit which gave a very nice (0.9) correlation. Figure
21 also illustrated that with the removal of heat from the fruit the acidity was reduced in both the varieties it may be due to utility of citric acid in a metabolic process of the fruit during the respiration; the reduction of acidity with a reasonably high rate concluded that either the quality and/or ripening rate of the fruit under the stated conditions was enhanced. It can be considered as the major reason for the negative correlation between sugar, carotenoids and acidity (Figure 21).
The measurement of ethylene production also display that the time required for the fruit to ripen up was different for various treatments (Burdon et al., 1996); and it was longest
○ ○ for T2 (Figure 22). The mango fruit shelf life was lowest for 40 C and longest on 20 C storage temperature. During ripening of the fruit, the lower percent of waste was
○ observed at 30 C storage temperature and in T2 than others, for both the varieties (Figure
23). The trend was attributed to slow ripening rate and low respiration rate (Mitra and
Baldwin, 1997; Poubol et al., 2008). The obtained results concluded that the T2 treatment provided better quality and longer shelf life, whereas, lower waste percent hence can be considered as better treatment than others. The results obtained highlighted that the impact of every treatment over the quality and shelf life was significantly different in most of the cases under the limit of P 0.05. The obtained results demonstrated that the removal of energy at the harvest stage significantly reduces the ripening process and improves the quality.
119
Table 19 Parameters determined after 8 days (The time required by the control fruit to
ripen up) of harvest time
Varieties T* Total TC (µg/g) Acidity TSS (%) Firmness sugar (%) (%) b† d f b d T0 21.71 62.41 0.49 22.62 7.65
f b e b T1 17.57f 54.41 1.27 19.41 8.29 Langra g g a f a T2 16.01 50.25 1.59 18.42 8.71
e e c d c T3 18.73 55.77 1.07 20.26 8.01
a a g a d T0 24.11 87.61 0.36 25.02 7.72
d b e c a T1 20.46 82.99 0.79 21.65 8.47
S.B.Chaunsa e c c d a T2 18.74 80.18 1.01 20.29 8.61
c b d b b T3 21.34 83.20 0.68 22.48 8.36
*T stands for treatments. †Values having different superscript in the columns are significantly different under the limit of P < 0.05.
120
Table 20 Average values of organoleptic parameters measured at ripened stage for
Langra mango fruit stored at different temperatures.
T* ST (○C ) Color Firmness Aroma Taste Flavor
20 6.11e† 6.21d 6.01e 6.47e 6.45e
c b c c c T0 30 7.58 7.65 7.71 7.81 7.71
40 7.94b 7.72b 8.06b 8.29b 8.21b
20 6.45d 6.61c 6.31d 6.95d 6.88d
b b b b b T1 30 7.96 7.95 8.28 8.44 8.43
40 8.34a 8.11a 8.56a 8.56a 8.53a
20 6.52d 6.84c 6.54d 7.01d 6.92d
a a a a a T2 30 8.25 8.14 8.45 8.57 8.52
40 8.48a 8.17a 8.65a 8.69a 8.67a
20 6.32d 6.48c 6.18e 6.71e 6.68d
c b b b b T3 30 7.75 7.81 8.01 8.32 8.24
40 8.02b 7.92b 8.49a 8.43b 8.38b
*T and ST stand for treatments and storage temperature.
†Values having different superscript in the columns are significantly different under the limit of P < 0.05.
121
Table 21 Average values of organoleptic parameters measured at ripened stage for Samar
Bahisht Chaunsa mango fruit stored at different temperatures.
T* ST (○C ) Color Firmness Aroma Taste Flavor
20 6.43d† 6.39d 6.59f 6.95d 6.81e
b b c b c T0 30 7.91 7.72 7.95 8.04 7.95
40 8.36a 7.79b 8.44a 8.58a 8.52a
20 6.79c 7.13c 6.95e 7.11c 7.01d
b a a a a T1 30 8.22 8.19 8.45 8.51 8.48
40 8.52a 8.21a 8.55a 8.66a 8.65a
20 7.09c 7.24c 7.11d 7.24c 7.17d
a a a a a T2 30 8.45 8.22 8.52 8.63 8.58
40 8.68a 8.25a 8.69a 8.78a 8.72a
20 6.58d 7.01c 6.78e 6.99d 6.91e
b a b b b T3 30 8.01 8.15 8.35 8.41 8.35
40 8.45a 8.19a 8.48a 8.59a 8.56a
*T stands for treatments. †Values having different superscript in the columns are significantly different under the limit of P < 0.05.
122
Table 22 Effect of heat removed over the chemical characteristics of Langra variety;
stored at different temperatures.
T* ST Total TC A AA pH MC TSS Total (○C ) sugar (µg/g) ( %) (mg/ (%) (%) Solids (%) 100g) (%) 20 19.01f† 55.23h 0.60a 88.35a 4.81d 69.31f 20.02f 30.69a
d f b e c e d b T0 30 21.71 62.41 0.49 79.36 5.12 70.41 22.62 29.59
40 22.72c 64.11d 0.46b 77.31g 5.19c 71.31d 23.82c 28.69c
20 20.45i 58.88j 0.57a 85.56c 5.11c 71.55d 21.46e 28.45c
c d b f b c c d T1 30 22.62 64.91 0.47 78.26 5.39 72.44 23.81 27.56
40 23.51b 66.85b 0.43b 75.22i 5.46a 73.55b 24.46b 26.88e
20 20.66e 59.16g 0.55a 83.12d 5.17c 72.21c 21.51e 27.79d
b c b g a b a e T2 30 23.45 65.11 0.46 77.02 5.48 73.11 25.14 26.89
40 24.01a 67.66a 0.41b 74.12h 5.56a 74.12a 25.51a 25.98f
20 19.61f 57.12h 0.58a 86.28b 4.96d 70.32e 20.49f 29.68b
c e b f b d c c T3 30 22.38 63.11 0.48 78.56 5.24 71.54 23.41 28.46
40 23.32b 65.25c 0.44b 76.62h 5.31b 73.22b 24.29b 26.55e
*T, TC, A, AA, MC and TSS stand for treatments, total carotenoids, acidity, ascorbic
acid, moisture contents and total soluble solids, respectively.
†Values having different superscript in the columns are significantly different under
the limit of P < 0.05.
123
Table 23 Effect of heat removed over the chemical characteristics of Samar Bahisht
Chaunsa variety; stored at different temperatures.
T* ST Total TC A AA pH MC TSS Total (○C ) sugar (µg/g) ( %) (mg/ (%) (%) solids (%) 100g) (%) 20 21.10e† 81.67h 0.46a 72.47a 5.01d 68.57e 22.13e 31.43a
c f b c c d c b T0 30 24.11 87.61 0.36 66.48 5.26 69.56 25.02 30.44
40 25.22b 91.82c 0.34b 64.47e 5.36b 70.51c 26.21b 29.49c
20 22.27d 87.11f 0.44a 67.11b 5.25c 69.45d 23.27d 30.55b
b d b d a c b c T1 30 25.04 90.48 0.34 65.22 5.48 70.41 26.15 29.59
40 25.81b 92.94b 0.30b 62.52g 5.58a 71.66b 26.85b 28.34d
20 22.67d 88.34e 0.43a 66.37c 5.36b 70.48c 23.54d 29.52c
b c b e a b a d T2 30 25.51 91.26 0.33 64.35 5.59 71.16 27.12 28.84
40 26.43a 93.77a 0.31b 61.11h 5.64a 72.34a 27.49a 27.66e
20 21.47e 86.60g 0.45a 67.62b 5.15c 69.16d 22.45e 30.64b
c e b d b c c c T3 30 24.57 88.24 0.35 65.52 5.39 70.15 25.65 29.65
40 25.52b 92.25b 0.32b 63.62f 5.50a 71.25b 26.51b 28.75d
*T, TC, A, AA, MC and TSS stand for treatments, total carotenoids, acidity, ascorbic acid, moisture contents and total soluble solids, respectively.
†Values having different superscript in the columns are significantly different under the limit of P < 0.05.
124
Figure 21 Sugar %, total carotenoids µg/g (TC), total soluble solids % (TSS) and acidity
% contents of the fruit as a function of heat removed from the fruit. The fruit was stored at 30oC. L and C stand for Langra and Samar Bahisht Chaunsa, respectively
125
Figure 22 Time required by the fruit to reach at the ripened stage as a function of treatment and storage temperatures
126
Figure 23 The waste percent of the fruit during the ripening process
127
4.6 Impact of Pedicel (Stalk) Length of the Fruit
It has been reported that if the pedicel length is very short at the time of harvest the latex
falls on the skin of fruit and spoil the mango fruit (Loveys et al., 1992; Holmes et al.,
1993; Menezes et al., 1995). To investigate the impact of latex and pedicel length, we
have harvested the fruit at hard green stage of maturity with following pedicel (stalk)
lengths 0.5 (T1), 2.5 (T2), 4.5 (T3), 6.5 (T4) cm. The organoleptic parameters of Langra
and Samar Bahisht Chaunsa mango fruit stored at 30C were measured at their ripened
stage. The results indicated that the color, aroma, taste and flavor values were highest for
T3 and lowest for T1; firmness values were also lowest for T1, but the results of T2 and T4 were not much different, irrespective of the variety (Table 24). The sap (latex) symptom was more on T1 (0.5cm stalk) as compared to others due to short pedicel lengths which
considerably reduced the consumer acceptance and fruit value (Menezes et al., 1995;
Campbell, 1992; Loveys et al., 1992). On the other hand, the results obtained for T4 were not better than T3 one of the plausible explanation is that energy, water etc of the fruit is consumed to carry out all types of biological reactions and to maintain such a long stem which resulted a decrease in quality. The values of T3 were significantly different from
other treatments, but T2 and T4 values were not significantly different among each other
under the limit P < 0.05.
The chemical constituents of Langra and Samar Bahisht Chaunsa mango fruit stored at
30C were measured at their ripened stage. The results showed that the sugar, carotenoid,
pH, soluble solids and moisture contents were highest for T3 and lowest for T1 as compared to others, irrespective of the variety (Table 25). The acidity, ascorbic acid and
128
total solids contents were highest for T1 and lowest for T3; T2 and T4 were non-
significantly different under the limit P < 0.05.
The shelf life of mango fruit was longest for T3 and lowest for T1, irrespective of the
variety (Figure 24). The latex symptom was highest for T1 due to short pedicel length and
was significantly different from others treatments, which resulted a decrease in shelf life
of the fruit (Menezes et al., 1995; Campbell, 1992; Loveys et al., 1992). The weight loss
and waste percent at the ripened stage of mango fruit was lowest for T3 and highest for T1
(Figures 25 & 26). The reason behind it can be that the sticky latex browned, hardened and stained the fruit surface and provoked the skin necrosis. The damaged areas of the skin can subsequently became a site for secondary infections and caused breakdown of the flesh, which further decreased the value and storage life of the fruit. The latex flow also caused the mangoes to lose water hence it was more de-shaped as compared to T3
(Menezes et al., 1995; Campbell, 1992; Diaz de Leon-Sanchez et al., 2005; Loveys et al.,
1992; Holmes et al., 1993). The results obtained for T4 were not better than T3 because the long stalk became dead vary soon and exposed to atmosphere which acted as host for different diseases. The result indicated that the T3 (4.5cm stalk) was best among the investigated treatment for quality and shelf life.
129
Table 24 Average values of organoleptic parameters measured at ripened stage for
Langra and Samar Bahisht Chaunsa mango fruit stored at 30C.
Variety T* Color Firmness Aroma Taste Flavor
c† b c c c T1 6.79 7.13 6.96 7.45 7.38
b a b b b T2 7.68 7.69 7.91 7.99 7.94 Langra a a a a a T3 8.16 7.81 8.51 8.47 8.41
b a b b b T4 7.49 7.51 7.49 7.83 7.78
c b c c c T1 6.95 7.31 7.45 7.58 7.55
b a b b b T2 7.98 7.78 8.04 8.09 8.04 S.B.Chaunsa a a a a a T3 8.45 7.88 8.51 8.59 8.54
b a b b b T4 7.72 7.64 7.61 7.88 7.85
*T stands for treatments. †Values having different superscript in the columns are significantly different under the limit of P < 0.05. The comparison has been made within
the variety.
130
Table 25 Average values of chemical constituents measured at ripened stage for Langra and Samar Bahisht Chaunsa mango fruit stored at 30C.
T* Total TC A AA pH MC TSS Total sugar (µg/g) ( %) (mg/100g) (%) (%) solids
Variety (%) (%)
c† c a a c c c a T1 20.58 58.21 0.57 83.01 5.11 69.41 21.82 30.59
b b a b b b b b T2 21.99 63.16 0.50 80.05 5.22 71.41 22.61 28.59
a a b c a a a c T3 22.79 65.35 0.45 76.12 5.41 72.32 23.68 27.68 Langra
b b a b b b b b T4 21.46 63.82 0.51 80.31 5.17 71.16 22.36 28.84
c c a a c c c a T1 23.01 84.19 0.47 68.47 5.21 68.10 24.12 31.90
b b a b b b b b T2 24.31 89.61 0.43 65.48 5.48 69.51 25.22 30.49
a a b c a a a c T3 25.11 92.21 0.34 60.28 5.59 70.48 26.16 29.49
S.B. Chaunsa b b a b b b b b T4 24.01 89.09 0.44 65.87 5.41 69.15 25.02 30.85
*T, TC, A, AA, MC and TSS stand for treatments, total carotenoids, acidity, ascorbic acid, moisture contents and total soluble solids, respectively.
†Values having different superscript in the columns are significantly different under the limit of P < 0.05. The comparison has been made within the variety.
131
Figure 24 Time required by the fruit to reach at the ripened stage as a function of treatment and at 30C storage temperature
132
Figure 25 Weight loss percent (Wt. loss %) of mango fruit measured at the ripened stage as a function of treatment and at 30C storage temperature
Figure 26 The waste percent of the fruit during the ripening process stored at 30C
133
4.7 Impact of Coating the Fruit with Various Materials
Mango fruit is a climacteric fruit and have short shelf life. Therefore a number of
techniques are in vogue to prolong the shelf life of the fruit. Among these, coating is
considered to be successful up to some extent. For the purpose, we used various coatings
for the investigation of their impact over the quality and shelf life of the fruit. The mango
fruit was harvested at hard green stage of maturity and the material used for coating was
starch (T1), olive oil (T2), beeswax (T3), sodium benzoate (T4), coconut oil (T5), clarified
butter (natural ghee) (T6), potasium metabisulphite (T7) and without coating (control, T0).
The results for organoleptic parameters and chemical constituents of mango (Langra and
Samar Bahisht Chaunsa) fruit obtained at the harvest time are reported in Tables 26 & 27.
The coated and uncoated fruit of both the varieties were stored at three (20, 30 and 40C) different temperatures.
Keeping in view the number of coatings and storage temperature, we have decided to first discuss the following coatings: starch (T1), olive oil (T2), beeswax (T3), sodium benzoate
(T4).
The fruit was analyzed for color, firmness, flavor and weight loss at the time when the
control fruit sample was ripened, irrespective of the ripening stage of the stored fruit
(Table 28 & Figure 27). The organoleptic parameters were increased with the ripening of
the fruit while the firmness was decreased for all treatments. The value of firmness was
highest in T3 as compared to others, irrespective of the variety. It was attributed to the
fact that the beeswax reduced the evaporation, improved the texture of fruit and hence
delayed its wrinkling and softening during the storage period (Ladaniya and Sonker 1997;
Mc. Millium 1989; Shahid 2007). This trend can be explained in the way that
134
polygalacturonase, pectinesterase and other enzymes digest the cell wall resulting softness in texture as well as skin of the fruit and is considered as ripening of the mango
fruits; this process is increased by the increase in storage temperature, hence the results
were according to expectations (Narain et al., 1998; Baloch et al., 2011a). Since the
color, flavor and taste are the outcome of the compounds that are either formed or their
contents are varied with the ripening process, it is therefore expected that these
parameters will depend upon storage temperature and/ or coatings etc (Kays 1991;
Feygenberg et al., 2005). The weight loss percent calculated for each coating and
temperature at the time when the control reached to the ripened stage is displayed in
Figure 27. The beeswax coating, T3 was most effective for reducing the weight loss as
compared to others, irrespective of the variety as well as storage temperature. The reason
for the reduction in weight loss may be the blockage of lenticels and/or stomates (Dhalla
and Hanson 1988). This idea was also supported by the reduction in respiration
(Hagenmaier and Baker 1993). The beeswax being hydrophobic reduces the water losses, alters internal CO2, O2 and ethylene level of the fruit, hence delays ripening and keeps the
fruit in good shape (Baldwin et al., 1999; Hagenmaier and Baker 1993; Hagenmaier and
Shaw 1992; Dhalla and Hanson 1988; Dang et al., 2008; Feygenberg et al., 2005; Hoa et
al., 2002; Hoa and Ducamp 2008; Menezes et al., 1996). It was noted that these
parameters were significantly different in most of the cases for different coatings and
storage temperature.
The results obtained at the ripened stage for a specific storage temperature indicated that
the color, aroma, taste and flavor values were highest in T1 (starch based coating) and
lowest in T2 as compared to others, irrespective of the variety (Table 29 & 30). The
135
reason for such was that starch being hydrophilic and antimicrobial can penetrate or
diffuse in to the fruit skin easily and reduces respiration and protects the fruits from the
attack of microorganisms (Oz and Ulukanli 2012; Garcia et al., 1998a, 1998b; Ribeiro et
al., 2007). The organoleptic parameters were highest for 40C and lowest for 20C
storage temperatures, irrespective of the variety (Table 29 & 30).The statistical analysis
concluded that the impact of coating as well as temperature was significant in most of the
cases.
The chemical constituents of the stored fruit obtained at ripened stage indicated that the
contents of sugar, carotenoids and soluble solids were increased during ripening process
and were highest for T1 and lowest for T2 as compared to others, irrespective of the
varieties and storage temperature (Tables 31 & 32). An increase in TSS is considered to
be due to hydrolytic conversion of polysaccharides into soluble sugar for climacteric
fruits during the ripening process. During the ripening process the transition of chlorophyll into carotenoids, biochemical conversions of starch into sugar, insoluble protopectin into pectin and loss of organic acid through oxidation are responsible for the increase in these parameters (Kays 1991; Martinez et al., 1997; Campestre et al., 2002).
The acidity, ascorbic acid and total solids were lowest in T1 and highest in T2, while the
pH was higher in T1 and lower for T2 as compared to other treatments, irrespective of
variety as well as storage temperature. The slowing down of ripening process by the
coating resulted in better preservation of color, aroma, and firmness while kept the
ascorbic acid contents and titratable acidity high and pH low for longer time (Baloch et
al., 2011b; Herianus et al., 2003; Ribeiro et al., 2007; Sumnu and Bayindirli 1995; Wing
et al., 1988). Further, the impact of coating over the ascorbic acid or pH was significant
136
under the limit P < 0.05. The moisture contents were highest in T1 and lowest in T2 in both the varieties and were increased with the increase in storage temperature. The impact of T3 was non-significant in both the varieties when it was compared to T0, irrespective of storage temperature and was significant in most of the cases for other treatments.
Storing the fruit at high temperature increased the fruit respiration/ ripening process resulting shortest shelf life for 40 and longest for 20C (McHugh and Krochta 1994). The time taken to reach the ripened stage was longest in T3 and shortest in T0 as compared to
other treatments (Figure 28). These observations were also supported by the ethylene
evolution during the storage period of the fruit (Figure 29). Due to the fact that these
coating materials were also antioxidant and antimicrobial hence reduced the decay
process and attack of diseases; resulted longer shelf life (Covas 2008; Kittur et al., 2001).
The waste percent was highest in T0 and lowest in T3 as compared to others (Figure 30).
This is attributed to the fact that beeswax reduces the ripening process and attack of
microorganisms over the fruit (Khan and Abourashed 2010). The fruit coated with
beeswax showed good quality, long shelf life; reduction in weight loss and waste percent
and hence can be considered as most beneficial among the employed coatings.
137
Table 26 Average values of organoleptic parameters measured at harvest time for Langra and Samar Bahisht Chaunsa mango fruit.
Variety Color Firmness Aroma Taste Flavor
Langra 0.9 9.2 1.06 1.08 1.09
S. B. Chaunsa 1.1 9.4 1.10 1.21 1.20
Table 27 Average values of chemical constituents of Langra and Samar Bahisht Chaunsa mango fruit, measured at harvest time.
Variety Total TC* A AA pH MC TSS Total sugar (µg/g) ( %) (mg/100g) (%) (%) solids (%) (%) Langra 4.12b† 26.41b 3.41a 288.60a 3.21b 80.12a 7.66a 18.88b
S.B. Chaunsa 5.21a 58.02a 2.32b 182.70b 3.45a 77.32b 6.65b 23.68a
*TC, A, AA, MC and TSS stand for total carotenoids, acidity, ascorbic acid, moisture contents and total soluble solids, respectively.
†Values having different superscripts in the columns are significantly different under the limit of P < 0.05.
138
Table 28 Average values of organoleptic parameters of the Langra mango fruit
determined at the ripened time of the control, irrespective of ripened stage of the fruit.
T* ST (C) Color Firmness Flavor 20 6.11d† 6.21f 6.45d b c b T0 30 7.58 7.65 7.71 40 7.94a 7.72c 8.21a
20 5.41e 7.12d 6.01e d b d T1 30 6.26 8.08 6.44 c b c 40 6.61 8.36 6.86 20 4.01h 6.69e 4.08h
g c g T2 30 4.47 7.71 4.52 40 4.91f 8.21b 4.89f 20 4.11h 7.81c 4.13h g b g T3 30 4.54 8.37 4.54
40 4.99f 8.68a 4.99f
20 5.63e 6.99d 6.05e c c c T4 30 6.91 7.83 7.11 b c b 40 7.45 7.98 7.58
*T and T0 stand for treatments and non-coated (control) fruit, respectively. T1, T2, T3 and
T4 stand for the fruit coated with starch, olive oil, beeswax and sodium benzoate, respectively.
†Values having different superscript in the columns are significantly different under the
limit of P < 0.05
139
Figure 27 Weight loss percent (Wt. loss %) of mango fruit measured at the ripening time of the control (T0)
140
Table 29 Average values of organoleptic parameters measured at ripened stage for
Langra mango fruit stored at different temperatures.
T* ST (C) Color Firmness Aroma Taste Flavor
20 6.11h† 6.21e 6.01f 6.47f 6.45f
d b c d d T0 30 7.58 7.65 7.71 7.81 7.71
40 7.94c 7.72b 8.06b 8.29c 8.21c
20 6.74f 6.61d 6.72e 7.18d 7.08e
b b b b b T1 30 8.23 7.67 8.44 8.51 8.46
40 8.62a 7.74b 8.76a 8.92a 8.89a
20 5.54i 5.91e 5.32h 5.69g 5.62h
f d e e f T2 30 6.71 6.82 6.61 6.87 6.81
40 7.32e 7.29c 7.22d 7.26d 7.21e
20 6.02h 7.11c 5.75g 6.32f 6.15g
e b c d e T3 30 7.35 7.75 7.69 7.53 7.44
40 7.59d 7.95a 7.95b 8.01c 7.92d
20 6.45g 6.66d 6.55e 6.81e 6.78f
c b b c c T4 30 7.89 7.66 8.05 8.21 8.15
40 8.31b 7.73b 8.44b 8.57b 8.49b
*T and T0 stand for treatments and non-coated (control) fruit, respectively. T1, T2, T3 and
T4 stand for the fruit coated with starch, olive oil, beeswax and sodium benzoate, respectively.
†Values having different superscript in the columns are significantly different under the
limit of P < 0.05.
141
Table 30 Average values of organoleptic parameters measured at ripened stage for Samar
Bahisht Chaunsa mango fruit, stored at different temperatures.
T* ST (C) Color Firmness Aroma Taste Flavor
20 6.43f† 6.39e 6.59f 6.95e 6.81e
d b c c c T0 30 7.91 7.72 7.95 8.04 7.95
40 8.36c 7.79b 8.44b 8.58b 8.52b
20 7.11e 6.79c 7.45d 7.59d 7.52d
b b b b b T1 30 8.45 7.73 8.51 8.63 8.55
40 8.94a 7.81b 8.99a 9.14a 9.02a
20 5.89h 6.01e 5.58g 5.92g 5.82g
e c e e e T2 30 7.02 7.19 6.91 6.94 6.91
40 7.58d 7.51b 7.46d 7.49d 7.42d
20 6.21g 7.28c 6.41f 6.61f 6.54f
d b c d d T3 30 7.51 7.78 7.73 7.72 7.65
40 7.75d 7.99a 8.31b 8.11c 8.07c
20 6.71f 6.61d 7.13e 7.18e 7.12e
c b c c c T4 30 8.19 7.73 8.12 8.19 8.11
40 8.51b 7.80b 8.55b 8.66b 8.56b
*T stands for treatments. †Values having different superscript in the columns are significantly different under the limit of P < 0.05.
142
Table 31 Average values of chemical constituents measured at ripened stage for Langra mango fruit, stored at different temperatures.
T* ST Total TC A AA pH MC TSS TS (C) sugar (µg/g) ( %) (mg/ (%) (%) (%) (%) 100g) 20 19.01g† 55.23h 0.60a 88.35b 4.81e 69.31e 20.02g 30.69b
d d c e c d d c T0 30 21.71 62.42 0.49 79.37 5.12 70.41 22.62 29.59
40 22.72c 65.12c 0.46c 77.32f 5.19c 71.31c 23.82c 28.69d
20 20.85e 59.34f 0.55c 83.81d 5.01d 71.52c 21.46e 28.48d
b b d h b b b e T1 30 23.47 66.12 0.43 74.19 5.38 72.49 24.46 27.51
40 24.52a 69.10a 0.36e 69.61i 5.55a 73.47a 25.45a 26.53f
20 17.76h 51.33i 0.63a 94.26a 4.65f 68.25f 18.65h 31.75a
e g b c d e e b T2 30 20.81 58.34 0.53 85.13 4.91 69.20 21.78 30.80
40 21.92d 60.18e 0.49c 80.12e 5.11c 70.35d 22.67d 29.65c
20 19.11g 55.27h 0.60a 88.41b 4.82e 69.41e 20.12g 30.59b
d d c e c d d c T3 30 21.75 62.44 0.50 79.42 5.13 70.43 22.66 29.56
40 22.78c 65.35c 0.45c 77.44f 5.25c 71.36c 23.87c 28.64d
20 19.91f 58.11g 0.59b 85.35c 4.91d 70.79d 20.85f 29.21c
c c c g c c c d T4 30 22.58 64.16 0.46 76.15 5.25 71.76 23.51 28.24
40 23.59b 67.21b 0.41d 72.54h 5.42b 72.71b 24.49b 27.29e
*T, TC, A, AA, MC,TSS and TS stand for treatments, total carotenoids, acidity, ascorbic acid, moisture contents, total soluble solids and total solids, respectively.
†Values having different superscript in the columns are significantly different under the limit of P < 0.05.
143
Table 32 Average values of chemical constituents measured at ripened stage for Samar
Bahisht Chaunsa mango fruit, stored at different temperatures.
T* ST Total TC A AA pH MC TSS TS (C) sugar (µg/g) ( %) (mg/ (%) (%) (%) (%) 100g) 20 21.10i† 81.67g 0.46b 72.47b 5.01d 68.57e 22.13i 31.43b
e d d d c d e c T0 30 24.11 87.61 0.36 66.48 5.26 69.56 25.02 30.44
40 25.22d 91.82c 0.34d 64.47e 5.36c 70.51c 26.21d 29.49d
20 22.71g 86.34e 0.42c 66.31d 5.33c 70.82c 23.69g 29.18d
c b d g b b b e T1 30 25.79 93.29 0.34 61.47 5.52 71.81 26.71 28.19
40 26.92a 97.46a 0.27e 59.51h 5.71a 72.89a 27.75a 27.21f
20 19.36j 77.34h 0.54a 78.31a 4.83e 67.59f 20.19j 32.41a
g i c b d e h b T2 30 22.41 83.19 0.43 71.42 5.11 68.65 23.32 31.35
40 23.52f 87.36d 0.39c 69.41c 5.24c 69.79d 24.15f 30.31c
20 21.39i 81.87g 0.45b 72.67b 5.02d 68.64e 22.33i 31.36b
e d d d c d e c T3 30 24.22 87.81 0.35 66.68 5.27 69.61 25.22 30.39
40 25.39d 91.95c 0.33d 64.67e 5.37c 70.69c 26.31d 29.45d
20 22.11h 84.91f 0.44b 69.15c 5.29c 69.89d 23.01h 30.11c
d c d f b c d d T4 30 25.18 90.71 0.34 63.10 5.47 70.98 26.01 29.02
40 26.22b 94.75b 0.31d 61.31g 5.58b 71.97b 27.11b 28.05e
*T, TC, A, AA, MC,TSS and TS stand for treatments, total carotenoids, acidity, ascorbic acid, moisture contents, total soluble solids and total solids, respectively.
†Values having different superscript in the columns are significantly different under the limit of P < 0.05.
144
Figure 28 Time required by the fruit to reach at the ripened stage as affected by storage temperature and treatments
145
Figure 29 Days at which ethylene production was maxima by the fruit stored at 30C
Figure 30 Waste percent of the fruit during the ripening process
146
In the second part of this experiment, we discuss the impact of coconut oil (T5), natural ghee (T6), potasium metabisulphite (T7) coatings. As it was stated earlier that the fruit was harvested at hard green stage of maturity and coated just after harvesting. The fruit was analyzed at the ripened stage for organoleptic parameters. It can be noted that the fruit coated by different materials have different taste, color, aroma, firmness and flavor at the ripened stage (Tables 33 & 34). As a whole, the organoleptic values were highest for the fruit coated with natural ghee as compared to others. The results concluded that all the coatings had retarding effect on biochemical changes in the fruit, but with a different efficacy and in some cases less evident. Coatings applied to fruit acted as a barrier, altering permeability to gases and resulted in increased internal CO2 contents, slowing down the ripening process of the fruit (Amarante et al., 2001; Bai et al., 1988, 2003;
Baldwin et al., 1999).The other contribution of the coatings may be that they acted as antiseptic and made the fruit disease resistant. The organoleptic parameters were having low values for 20○C and high for 40○C storage temperature. This trend can be explained in the way that polygalacturonase, pectinesterase and other enzymes digest the cell wall resulting softness in texture as well as skin of the fruit and is considered as ripening of the mango fruits; this process is increased by the increase in storage temperature (Narain et al., 1998). The statistical analysis made in this respect concluded that most of the measured parameters were significantly different for coating as well as storage temperature (Tables 33 & 34).
The chemical constituents obtained at the ripened stage for both the varieties and storage temperature is listed in Tables 35 & 36. The moisture contents measured at ripened stage were increased with the increase in storage temperature, irrespective of coating.
147
However, these were minimum for T5 and maximum for T6. The reason for the high
moisture contents /reduction in weight loss may be due to the fact that the coating blocks
lenticels and/or stomata which results a reduction in respiration and gas exchange (Dhalla
and Hanson 1988; Hagenmaier and Baker 1993). Ascorbic acid and acidity was
decreased, whereas pH was increased with the passage of time and an increase in storage
temperature. It is attributed to an increase in rate of chemical and biological process with
the increase in storage temperature, leading to earlier ripening. The value of acidity is
minimum for T6 and maximum for T5 and it is other way round for pH, irrespective of
storage temperature and variety of the fruit. The slowing down process of ripening by the
coating resulted in better preservation of color, aroma, firmness, keeps the ascorbic acid
contents and titratable acidity high and pH low for longer time (Herianus et al., 2003;
Sumnu and Bayindirli 1995). Further, the impact of coating over the acidity or pH was significant under the limit P < 0.05. The total soluble solids were increased with the increase in storage temperature (Tables 35 & 36). The impact of coating in most of the cases was significant for a particular storage temperature and variety. The total soluble solids were minimum for T5 (less than non-coated) and maximum for T6, irrespective of
variety and storage temperature. The total solids were decreased with the increase in
storage temperature and were minimum for T6 and maximum for T5. The impact of T7 was non-significant in case of Samar Bahisht Chaunsa when it was compared to T0, irrespective of storage temperature and was significant for other treatments. The total carotenoids estimated in the samples showed that it is minimum for T5 and maximum for
T6 and comparable to T7. These values were increased with the increase in storage
temperature for a particular coating, irrespective of variety. The estimated sugar contents
148
were noted to increase with the increase in storage temperature and the impact of coating
was highest for T6 and lowest for T5, irrespective of the variety and the overall impact of coating was significant (Tables 35 & 36).
The time required by the fruit to reach up to ripened stage indicated was longest for the fruit coated by natural ghee as compared to others (Figure 31). These observations were also supported by the ethylene evolution during the storage period of the fruit. The weight loss percent calculated for each coating and temperature at the time when the control reached to the ripened stage is displayed in Figure 32. The weight loss percent was highest for T0 and lowest for T6; it was highest for 40C and lowest for 20C for both
the varieties. These results indicated that coconut oil and natural agree reduced the water
loss. The waste percent was highest in T0 and lowest in T6 as compared to others (Figure
33). This is due to the fact that natural ghee on one hand slowed down the ripening
process on the other hand made the fruit disease resistant. Comparing the results obtained
for various parameters concluded that natural ghee (clarified butter) was one of the best
coatings we have applied. The plausible reason for such observations are that as the
natural ghee is hydrophobic, has high molecular mass (long chain) it reduces the water
losses, alters internal CO2, O2 and ethylene levels of the fruit (Banks 1984; El Ghaouth et
al., 1991, 1992). Natural ghee being antimicrobial and antifungal it reduces the waste
caused by the attack of various diseases (Agoramoorthy et al., 2007; Akalin et al., 2006;
Joachim 2000; Schaafsma 2005; Sprong et al., 2001). As the natural ghee (clarified
butter) coating provided better flavor, aroma, taste and highest contents of sugar,
carotenoids and total soluble solids; longer shelf life and low waste percent hence can be
considered as better coatings than the all applied coatings.
149
Table 33 Average values of organoleptic parameters measured at ripened stage for
Langra mango fruit stored at different temperatures.
T* ST (○C) Color Firmness Aroma Taste Flavor
g† g h h g T0 20 6.11 6.21 6.01 6.47 6.45
30 7.58c 7.65b 7.71d 7.81e 7.71d
40 7.94b 7.72a 8.06c 8.29c 8.21c
h h j j i T5 20 5.02 6.11 5.01 5.52 5.45
30 6.79e 7.23d 6.96g 7.53f 7.51e
40 7.39d 7.49c 7.10f 7.78e 7.71d
e e f g f T6 20 6.66 7.07 7.01 ± 7.25 7.18
30 8.26b 7.71b 8.64b 8.91b 8.88b
40 8.54a 7.81a 9.01a 9.31a 9.27a
f f i i h T7 20 6.44 6.46 5.71 6.21 6.18
30 7.81c 7.66b 7.55e± 7.81e 7.61d
40 8.19b 7.71a 7.72d 8.10d 7.99c
*T and T0 stand for treatments and non-coated fruit (control), respectively. T5, T6 and T7 stand for the fruit coated with coconut oil, natural ghee (clarified butter) and potassium metabisulfite, respectively.
†Values having different superscript in the columns are significantly different under the
limit of P < 0.05.
150
Table 34 Average values of organoleptic parameters measured at ripened stage for Samar
Bahisht Chaunsa mango fruit stored at different temperatures.
T* S (○C) Color Firmness Aroma Taste Flavor
20 6.43j† 6.39f 6.59h 6.95h 6.81h
e b d d d T0 30 7.91 7.72 7.95 8.04 7.95
40 8.36d 7.79a 8.44c 8.58c 8.52c
20 5.45i 6.19g 5.59j 5.71j 5.61j
g c f f f T5 30 7.42 7.61 7.51 7.68 7.65
40 7.67f 7.71b 7.71e 7.84e 7.79e
20 7.11h 7.26d 7.31g 7.42g 7.37g
b b b b b T6 30 8.85 7.75 8.85 9.19 9.01
40 9.01a 7.84a 9.16a 9.44a 9.39a
20 6.71i 6.61e 5.95i 6.37i 6.29i
c b e d d T7 30 8.59 7.73 7.71 8.09 8.02
40 8.90a 7.81a 8.01d 8.46c 8.41c
*T stands for treatments. †Values having different superscript in the columns are significantly different under the limit of P < 0.05.
151
Table 35 Average values of chemical constituents measured at ripened stage for Langra
mango fruit, stored at different temperatures.
T* ST Total TC A AA pH MC TSS Total (○C) sugar (µg/g) ( %) (mg/100g) (%) (%) solids (%) (%) 20 19.01j† 55.23i 0.60b 88.35b 4.81f 69.31g 20.02j 30.69b
f e f f e e f c T0 30 21.71 62.41 0.49 79.36 5.12 70.41 22.62 29.59
40 22.72d 64.11d 0.46h 77.31g 5.19d 71.31b 23.82d 28.69
20 18.18k 53.34j 0.63a 92.81a 4.95g 68.81h 19.29k 31.19a
h g e d e f h c T5 30 20.71 61.12 0.51 82.19 5.11 69.61 21.66 30.39
40 21.69f 63.10e 0.48g 80.31e 5.16d 70.66d 22.72f 29.34d
20 21.16g 60.33f 0.54d 80.26e 5.21d 71.25c 22.25g 28.75e
b b j i b b b f T6 30 23.59 68.35 0.42 71.12 5.37 72.20 24.48 27.80
40 24.55a 70.19a 0.37l 65.11k 5.44a 73.35a 25.48a 26.65g
20 20.17i 58.11h 0.56c 82.72c 5.18d 70.19e 21.35i 29.81c
e c i h c c e e T7 30 22.15 66.16 0.45 73.15 5.35 71.19 23.31 28.81
40 23.11c 68.20b 0.39k 67.34j 5.39b 72.29b 24.16c 27.71f
*T, TC, A, AA, MC and TSS stand for treatments, total carotenoids, acidity, ascorbic
acid, moisture contents and total soluble solids, respectively.
†Values having different superscript in the columns are significantly different under the limit of P < 0.05.
152
Table 36 Average values of chemical constituents measured at ripened stage for Samar
Bahisht Chaunsa mango fruit, stored at different temperatures.
T* ST Total TC A AA pH MC TSS Total (○C) sugar (µg/g) ( %) (mg/ (%) (%) solids (%) 100g) (%) 20 21.10g† 81.67j 0.46b 72.47b 5.01f 68.57e 22.13g 31.43c
d h e d e c d e T0 30 24.11 87.61 0.36 66.48 5.26 69.56 25.02 30.44
40 25.22c 91.82e 0.34d 64.47f 5.36d 70.51b 26.21c 29.49f
20 20.33h 79.34k 0.52a 75.31a 5.03f 67.48g 21.19h 32.52a
e i d c e f e b T5 30 23.18 86.19 0.41 68.47 5.25 68.10 24.12 31.90
40 24.16d 89.36g 0.36e 66.51d 5.39d 69.39d 25.15d 30.61d
20 23.03e 90.28f 0.40d 63.41e 5.44c 69.63c 24.15e 30.37e
b b f h b b b f T6 30 26.11 96.21 0.31 56.28 5.62 70.51 27.16 29.49
40 27.05a 98.32a 0.28g 54.35i 5.69a 71.53a 27.62a 28.47g
20 22.10f 88.30g 0.44c 66.75c 5.26e 68.45e 23.17f 31.55b
c d e g d c c e T7 30 25.05 92.41 0.37 58.10 5.41 69.55 26.11 30.45
40 26.04b 95.10c 0.34d 56.31h 5.51c 70.54b 27.15b 29.46f
*T, TC, A, AA, MC and TSS stand for treatments, total carotenoids, acidity, ascorbic acid, moisture contents and total soluble solids, respectively.
†Values having different superscript in the columns are significantly different under the limit of P < 0.05.
153
Figure 31 Time required by the fruit to reach at the ripened stage as affected by storage temperature and treatments
154
Figure 32 Weight loss percent of mango fruit measured at the ripening time of the control
(T0)
Figure 33 Waste percent of the fruit during the ripening process
155
CONCLUSION
Pakistani mango varieties namely, Langra and Samar Bahisht Chaunsa were investigated for quality and shelf life. For the purpose, the fruit was harvested at different stages and day timings, coated with different materials, stored under various conditions and analyzed at the harvest time as well as at the ripened stage. The conclusions drawn from these experiments are narrated over here.
Comparison of on Tree and Controlled Atmosphere Ripening
The mango fruit was harvested at hard green stage of maturity and was stored at 20, 30 and 40C till ripening. However, some of the fruit having the same maturity stage were identified and left at the tree for comparison purpose till ripening. The result showed that the tree ripened fruit was best in quality as compared to fruit ripened at different storage temperature after harvesting. The time required for ripening of fruit was more in tree ripened fruit as compared to 30 and 40C, irrespective of the variety. Therefore, the shelf life was longest for the mangoes stored at 20C as compared to others, including tree ripened fruit. The waste percent was highest in tree ripened fruit as compared to stored fruit, irrespective of temperature and variety.
Exposure of Fruit to Sun Light on Tree
The mango fruit was harvested at hard green stage of maturity from different
(orientation) side of the tree east, west, north and south and analyzed for quality. The fruit was stored at 30○C till ripening. The results indicated that the quality was best and waste percent was lowest for the fruit harvested from south (sun exposure time for the fruit was maximum) orientation of tree; the shelf life was longest and weight loss percent was
156
lowest for north direction as compared to others, irrespective of the variety as well as
storage temperature.
Harvesting at Different Day Times and Coating with Calcium Chloride
The fruit was harvested at different day (6.30 am, 1.30 pm and 8.30 pm) times and was
stored at 20, 30 and 40C till ripening. It was concluded that quality was highest for 8.30
pm harvest time and lowest for 6.30 am harvest time; it was highest for 40C and lowest
for 20C, irrespective of the variety. The shelf life of mango fruit was longest for 6.30 am
harvest time and stored at 20C and shortest for 1.30 pm harvest time and stored at 40C, irrespective of the variety. It was also noted that the shelf life was longest in Samar
Bahisht Chaunsa as compared to Langra variety. The weight loss percent was highest for
1.30 pm harvest time and lowest for 6.30 am harvest time; it was highest for 40C and
lowest for 20C, irrespective of the variety. It was also highest in Samar Bahisht Chaunsa as compared to Langra variety. The waste percent was highest for 1.30 pm harvest time and stored at 20C and lowest for 6.30 am harvest time and stored at 30C, irrespective of the variety. It was also concluded that the coating of fruit with calcium chloride enhances the quality and shelf life and reduces the weight loss and waste percent, irrespective of the variety as well as storage temperature.
Harvesting Stages and Storage Conditions
The fruit harvested at different maturity stages and was stored at 20, 30 and 40C till ripening. The fruit was analyzed for quality that was increased with the maturity stage and with the increase in storage temperature. The shelf life was decreased with the maturity stage as well as storage temperature. The waste percent was lowest for mid stage or stored at 30C storage temperature and highest for early stage or stored at 20C storage
157
temperature. The ripening rate of Langra was high but the quality of S.B. Chaunsa was
better and the activation energy of ripening process was high for Langra as compared to
S. B. Chaunsa. It was also noted that the TSS, sugar, carotenoids and skin color had quite
high positive and acidity has negative correlation. The application of ANOVA to the
results obtained concluded that the effect of harvest stage and storage temperature was
quite significant.
Field Heat Removal of the Fruit
The fruit was harvested at hard green stage of maturity and was put in water and/air
having temperature of 15○C just after harvesting. The cooled fruit was stored at 20, 30 and 40○C till ripening. The fruit from which maximum heat was removed,
17.36KJ/1000Kg (by the combination of water and air treatment) was concluded to be
better treatment than others to prolong the shelf life and minimize the wastage, while
keeping the quality of the fruit high, irrespective of the variety as well as storage
temperatures. It was also concluded from these observations that the ripening rate and
quality were highly dependent upon the energy removed. The effect of storage
temperature with reference to shelf life was similar to the one stated earlier.
Pedicel (Stalk) Length of the Fruit
The mango fruit was harvested at hard green stage of maturity with different pedicel
(stalk) lengths 0.5, 2.5, 4.5, 6.5cm. The fruit was stored at 30○C till ripening. The result
indicated that the 4.5cm stalk was best among the investigated treatment for quality and
shelf life. The weight loss and waste percent during ripening process of mango fruit was
lowest for 4.5cm stalk and highest for 0.5cm stalks, irrespective of the variety and storage
temperature.
158
Coating the Fruit with Various Materials
The mango fruit was harvested at hard green stage of maturity and was coated with
various materials. The coated and uncoated fruit was stored at 20, 30 and 40○C till ripening. The results obtained highlighted that the impact of coating over the quality and shelf life was significantly different in most of the cases under the limit of P 0.05. The quality was best in case of clarified butter (natural ghee) and starch whereas the shelf life was longest in case of clarified butter (natural ghee) and beeswax coatings; waste percent was lowest in case of natural ghee and bees wax as compared to others, irrespective of variety and storage temperature.
159
RECOMMENDATIONS
For obtaining maximum/profitable shelf life while keeping the quality up to the
required level the following recommendations have been made for Langra and
S.B. Chaunsa cultivars under agro-climatic conditions of Dera Ismail Khan.
1. The fruit may be harvested after 90-100 days of fruit setting to avoid wastage of
the fruit due to diseases, bird biting, winds, rains etc.
2. It is recommended that the fruit may be harvested at early in the morning.
3. The fruit may be harvested with pedicel length of 3-4.5cm.
4. To prolong the shelf life of the fruit during the storage it may be cooled at least up
to 15 immediately after the harvest by using both cold water and cold air.
5. The fruit may be stored at about 20 to prolong the shelf life of the fruit,
however the quality and shape of the fruit will be better, if the storage temperature
is 30
6. To enhance the shelf life and keep the flavor as well as taste of the fruit according
to the required level the fruit may be coated with Natural Ghee (Clarified Butter).
160
REFERENCES
Abbasi, N.A., Z. Iqbal, M. Maqbool and A.I. Hafiz. 2009. Post harvest quality of Mango
(Mangifera indica L.) fruit as affected by chitosan coating. Pak. J. Bot. 41: 343-
357.
Abbasi, K. S., N. Anjum, S. Sammi, T. Masud and S. Ali. 2011. Effect of coatings and
packaging material on the keeping quality of mangoes (Mangifera indica L.)
stored at low temperature. P. J. Nut. 10 (2): 129-138.
Abd-Alla, M.A. and W.M. Haggag. 2010. New safe methods for controlling anthracnose
disease of mango (Mangifera indica L.) fruits caused by Colletotrichum
gloeosporioides (Penz.). J. Am. Sci. 8(8): 361-367.
Absar, N., M.R. Karim and M.A.L. Amin. 1993. A comparative study on the changes in
the physico-chemical composition of ten varieties of mango in Bangladesh at
different stages of maturity. Bangld. J. Agric. Res. 18: 201-208.
Abu-Goukh, A.A. and H.I. Mohamed. 2004. Effect of harvesting method on quality and
shelf-life of mango fruits. Trop. Sci. 44(2): 73-76.
Agoramoorthy, G., M. Chandrasekaran, V. Venkatesalu and M.J. Hsu. 2007.
Antibacterial and antifungal activities of fatty acid methyl esters of the Blind-
your-eye mangrove from india. Braz. J. Microbiol. 38: 739-742.
Aina, J.O. 1990. Physico-chemical changes in African mango (Irvingia gabonensis)
during normal storage ripening. Food Chem. 36: 205-212.
161
Akalin, S., S. Gonc and G. Unal. 2006. Functional properties of bioactive components of
milk fat in metabolism. Pak. J. Nut. 5 (3): 194-197.
Akhtar, S., S. Mahmood, S. Naz, M. Nasir and M. T. Saultan. 2009. Sensory evaluation
of mangoes (Mangifera indica L.) grown in different regions of Pakistan. Pak. J.
Bot. 41(6): 2821-2829.
Akhtar, S., S. Naz, T.M. Sultan, S. Mahmood, M. Nasir and A. Ahmad. 2010. Physico-
chemical attributes and heavy metal content of mangoes (Mangifera indica L.)
cultivated in different regions of Pakistan. Pak. J. Bot. 42: 2691-2702.
Al-Haq, M.I. and J. Sugiyama. 2004a. Measurement of firmness of Irwin mangoes by a
non-destructive acoustic tester during cold storage. Trans. ASAE. 47: 2017-2021.
AL-Haq, M.I. and J. Sugiyama. 2004b. Application of electrolyzed water in food
processing. Presented at ASAE/CSAE annual meeting, Ottawa, Canada, August
1-4, 2004 ASAE paper No.04-6178.
Ali, Z.M., S. Armugam and H. Lazan. 1995. Beta-Galactosidase and its significance in
ripening mango fruit. Phytochem. 38 (5): 1109-1114.
Amarante, C., N.H. Banks and S. Ganesh. 2001. Effects of coating concentration,
ripening stage, water status and fruit temperature on pear susceptibility to friction
discoloration. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 21: 283-290.
Amin, M., A.U. Malik, M.S. Mazhar, I. Din, M.S. Khalid and S. Ahmad. 2008. Mango
fruit desapping in relation to time of harvesting. Pak. J. Bot. 40(4): 1587-1593.
Amin, M. and M. Hanif, 2002. Cultivation of Mango in Dera Ismail Khan, pp: 1–18.
Agricultural Research Institute, Ratta Kulachi, D.I. Khan, Pakistan.
162
Anjum, M. A and H. Ali. 2004. Effect of various calcium salts on ripening of mango
Fruits. J. Res. Sci. Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan. 15 (1): 45-
52.
Anwar, R. and A.U. Malik. 2007. Hot water treatment affects ripening quality and
storage life of mango (Mangifera indica L.). Pak. J. Agric. Sci. 44: 304-311.
Anwar, R., A.U. Malik, M. Amin, A. Jabbar and B. A. Saleem. 2008. Packaging material
and ripening methods affect mango fruit quality. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 10: 35-41.
AOAC, 2000. Official Methods of Analysis. Association of Official Analytical Chemist.
EUA, Gaithersburg, Maryland.
Austin, P.T., A.J. Hall, P.W. Gandar, I.J. Warrington, T.A. Fulton and E.A. Halligan.
1999. Compartment model of the effect of early-season temperatures on potential
size and growth of ‘Delicious’ apple fruits. Ann. Bot. 83:129-143.
Bagshaw, J. 1989. Mango pests and disorders. Queensland Department of Primary
Industries, p. 44 (Bulletin, Q189007).
Bai, J., R.D. Hagenmaier and E.A. Baldwin. 2003. Coating selection for ‘delicious’ and
other apples. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 28: 381-390.
Bai, R.K., M.Y. Huang and Y.Y. Jiang. 1988. Selective permeability of chitosan–acetic
acid complex membrane and chitosan–polymer complex membrane for oxygen
and carbon dioxide. Polym. Bull. 20: 83-88.
Baker, I. 1991. Mango Quality Program, 1990. Final Report for N.T. Horticultural
Association. Mimeograph.
Baldwin, E.A. 1994. Edible coatings for fresh fruits and vegetables: past present, and
future. In: Krochta, J.M., Baldwin, E.A., Nisperos-Carriedo, M.O. (Eds.), Edible
163
Coatings and Films to Improve Food Quality. Technomic Publishing Co,
Lancaster/Basel, pp. 25-64.
Baldwin, E.A. 1998. Effect of coating on mango (Mangifera indica L.) Flavor. Proc. Fla.
State Hort. Soc. 111: 247-250.
Baldwin, E.A., J.K. Burns, W. Kazokas, J. Brecht, R.D. Hagenmaier, R.J. Bender and E.
Pesis. 1999. Effect of two edible coatings with different permeability
characteristics on mango (Mangifera indica L.) ripening during storage.
Postharvest Biol. Technol. 17: 215-226.
Bally, I.S.E. 2006. Mangifera indica (mango), ver. 3.1. In: Elevitch, C.R. (ed.). Species
Profiles for Pacific Island Agroforestry. Permanent Agriculture Resources (PAR),
Hōlualoa, Hawai‘i.
Baloch, M. K., F. Bibi and M.S. Jilani. 2011a. Quality and shelf life of mango
(Mangifera indica L.) fruit: As affected by cooling at harvest time. Sci. Hort. 130:
642-646.
Baloch, M. K., F. Bibi and M.S. Jilani. 2011b. Effect of coatings over the quality and
shelf life of mango (Mangifera indica L.) fruit. J. Food Proc. Preserv.
(DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-4549.2011.00614.x).
Banks, N.H. 1984. Some effects of TAL Pro-Long coating on ripening bananas. J. Exp.
Bot. 35: 127-137.
Bender, R.J., J.K. Brecht and S.A. sergeant. 1995. Inhibition of ethylene production in
mango fruit by elevated CO2 and recovery during subsequent air storage. Proc.
Fla. State Hort. Soc. 108: 279-285.
164
Bender, R.J., J.K. Brecht, E.A. Baldwin, T.M.M. Maludo. 2000. Aroma volatiles of
mature-green and tree-ripe ‘Tommy Atkins’ mangoes after controlled atmosphere
vs. air storage. Hort. Sci. 35: 684-686.
Bosquez, E., S.C. Figueroa, J. Dominguez, L. Perez, C. Kerbel and F. Diaz-de-Leon.
2000. Sap burn control by the application of different chemical compounds in
mexican mango fruit with exportation quality. Acta Hort. (ISHS) 509:687-696.
Burdon, J., S. Dori, R. Marinansky and E. Pesis. 1996. Acetaldehyde inhibition of
ethylene biosynthesis in mango fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 8: 153-161.
Bustamante, E., C. Gomez, J. Martinez and R.J.O.S.E.M. Rodriguez. 1997. Preservation
of mango Azucar variety (Mangifera indica L.) at different storage stages. Acta
Hort. (ISHS) 455: 747-754.
Butz, P., C. Hofmann and B. Tauscher. 2005. Recent developments in noninvasive
techniques for fresh fruit and vegetable internal quality analysis. J. Food Sci. 70:
R131-R141.
Campbell, J. 1992. A guide to mangoes in Florida. Miami, Fairchild Tropical Garden, p.
227.
Campestre, C., V. Marsilio, B. Lanza, C. Iezzi and G. Bianchi. 2002. Phenolic
compounds and organic acids change in black oxidized table olives. ISHS Acta
Hort. 586: IV International Symposium on Olive Growing. ISBN 978-90-66057-
56-2.
Carrillo-Lopez, A., F. Ramirez-Bushtamant, J.B. Valdez-Torres, R. Rojas-Villages and
E.M. Yahi. 2000. Ripening and quality changes in mango fruit as affected by
coating with an edible film. J. Food Qual. 23: 479-486.
165
Castrillo, M. and A. Bermudez. 1992. Post-harvest ripening in wax-coated Bocado
mango. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 27: 457-463.
Cecchi, F., G. De Martino, A. Bellincontro, R. Botondi and F. Mencarelli. 2005.
Influence of sunlight exposure and postharvest ethylene control on carotenoids
content of peach fruit. Acta Hort. (ISHS) 682: 329-336.
Chien, P., F. Sheu and F.Yang. 2007. Effects of edible chitosan coating on quality and
shelf life of sliced mango fruit. J. Food Eng. 78: 225-229.
Chuadhry, M.T. 2006. Carotenoids pigments of different varieties of mangoes; changes
during ripening. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1: 173-177.
Corrales-Garcia, J. and S. Lakshminarayana. 1991. “Response of two cultivars of mango
fruits immersed in a calcium solution to cold storage at different times and
temperatures”, Technical Innovations in Freezing and Refrigeration of Fruits and
Vegetables, International Institute of Refrigeration, Paris, pp. 73-77.
Covas, M.I. 2008. Bioactive effects of olive oil phenolic compounds in humans:
reduction of heart disease factors and oxidative damage. Inflammopharmacol.
16(5): 216-8.
Cua, A.U. and M.C.C. Lizada. 1990. Ethylene production in the ‘Carabao’ mango
(Mangifera indica L.) fruit during maturation and ripening. Acta Hort. 269: 169-
79.
Cuq, B., N. Gontard and S. Guilbert. 1995. Edible films and coatings as active layers. In:
Rooney, M.L. (Ed.), Active Food Packaging. Chapman & Hall- Glagow-UK, pp.
111–141.
166
Dang, K.T.H., Z. Singh and E.E. Swinny. 2008. Edible coatings influence fruit ripening,
quality and aroma biosynthesis in mango fruit. J. Agric. Food Chem. 56: 1361-
1370.
Dhalla, R. and S. W. Hanson. 1988. Effect of permeable coatings on the storage life of
fruits. II. Pro-long treatment of mangos (Mangifera indica L. cv. Julie). Int. J.
Food. Sci. Technol. 23:107-112.
Diaz de Leon-Sanchez, F., F. Rivera-Cabrera, E. Bosquez-Molina, J. Dominguez-
Soberanes, Y. Alvarez-Hoppe and L. J. Perez-Flores. 2005. Activity of the
enzyme polyphenol oxidase and susceptibility to damage from latex in ‘Haden’
and ‘Tommy Atkins’ mangoes. Revista Chap. Serie Hort. 11(1): 37-40.
Diaz-Sobac, R., A.V. Luna, C.I. Beristain, J. Delacruzand and H.S. Garcia. 1996.
Emulsion coating to extend postharvest life of mango (Mangifera indica cv.
Manila). J. Food Proc. Preserv. 20(3): 191-202.
Diaz-Sobac, R., J. Delacruz, A. V. Luna, C.I Beristain and H.S. Garcia. 1997. Evaluation
of softening and associated enzyme activities during the ripening of coated
‘Manila’ mangoes. J. Hort. Sci. 72(5): 749-753.
Dissa, A.O., H. Desmorieux, P. Degrave, J. Bathiebo and J. Koulidiati. 2011. Impact of
fruit ripeness on physiochemical properties and convective drying characteristics
of Kent mango (Mangifera indica L. cv. Kent). Int. J. Food Eng. 7(3): Article 12.
Doreyappy-gowda, I.N.D. and A.G. Huddar. 2001. Studies on ripening changes in mango
(Mangifera indica L.) fruits. J. Food Sci. Technol. Mysore. 38: 135-137.
167
Durrani, Y., A. Zeb, M. Ayub, W. Ullah and A. Muhammad. 2011. Sensory evaluation of
mango (Chanunsa) pulp preserved with addition of selected chemical
preservatives and antioxidant during storage. Sarhad J. Agric. 27(3): 471-475.
El Ghaouth, A., J. Arul, R. Ponnamapalam and M. Boulet. 1991. Chitosan coating effect
on storability and quality of fresh strawberries. J. Food Sci. 56: 1618-1620.
El Ghaouth, A., R. Ponnamapalam, F. Castaigene and J. Arul. 1992. Chitosan coating to
extend the storage life of tomatoes. J. Hort. Sci. 27: 1016-1018.
Ezz, T.M. and R. M. Awad. 2011. Effect of some post harvest treatments under different
low temperature on two cultivars. Aust. J. Basic & Appl. Sci. 5(10): 1164-1174.
Farquhar, G.D., S. Von Caemmerer and J.A. Berry. 1980. A biochemical model of
photosynthetic CO2 assimilation in leaves in C3 species. Planta. 149:78-90.
Feygenberg, O., V. Hershkovitz, R. Ben-arie, S. Jacob, E. Pesis and T. NIkitenko. 2005.
Postharvest use of organic coating for maintaining bio-organic avocado and
mango. Acta Hort. 682: 507-512.
Frylinck, L. and I.A. Dubery. 1998. Protein kinase activities in ripening mango
(Mangifera indica L) fruit tissue. I: purification and characterization of a calcium-
stimulated casein kinase-I. Biochim. Biophys. Acta. 1382(1): 65-79.
Garcia, M.A., M.N. Martino and N.E. Zaritzky. 1998a. Starch based coatings: effect on
refrigerated strawberries (Frageria x Ananassa). J. Agric. Food. Chem. 76: 411-
420.
Garcia, M.A., M.N. Martino and N.E. Zaritzky. 1998b. Plasticizer effect on starch based
coatings: applied on strawberry (Frageria x Ananassa) quality. J. Sci. Food Agric.
76: 411- 420.
168
Gofure, A., M.Z. Shafique, M. Helali, M. Ibrahim, M.M. Rahman and M.S. Alam. 1997.
Studies on extension of post-harvest storage life of mango (Mangifera indica L.).
Bangld. J. Sci. Indust. Res. 32: 148-152.
Guilbert, S. 1986. Technology and application of edible protective films. In Mathlouthi,
M. (Ed.), Food packaging and preservation, p. 371-394. London, UK: Elsevier
Appl. Sci.
Hagenmaier, R.D. and P. Shaw. 1992. Gas permeability of fruit coating waxes. J. Am.
Soc. Hort. Sci. 117: 105-109.
Hagenmaier, R.D. and R.A. Baker. 1993. Reduction in gas exchange of citrus fruit by
wax coatings. J. Agric. Food Chem. 41: 283-287.
Haq, A. 2002. Package for mango production, post harvest techniques and its export
prospects, Mango. Res. Inst. Shajabad, pp: 1-15.
Hashmi, M. S., S.B. Alam, A. Riaz and A.S. Shah. 2007. Studies on Microbial and
Sensory Quality of Mango Pulp Storage with Chemical Preservatives. Pak. J. Nut.
6 (1): 85-88.
Herianus, J.D., L.Z. Singh and S.C. Tan. 2003. Aroma volatiles production during fruit
ripening of Kensington Pride mango. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 27: 323-336.
Hoa, T.T. and M. Ducamp. 2008. Effects of different coatings on biochemical changes of
‘cat Hoa loc’ mangoes in storage. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 48: 150-152.
Hoa, T.T., M. Ducamp, M. Lebrun and E.A. Baldwin. 2002. Effect of different coating
treatments on the quality of mango fruit. J. Food Qual. 25: 471-486.
Hollinger, D.Y. 1996. Optimality and nitrogen allocation in a tree canopy. Tree Physiol.
16:627-634.
169
Holmes, R.J., S.N. Ledger and W.N.B. Macleod. 1993. Handling systems to reduce
mango sapburn. Acta Hort. 341: 528-532.
Hossain, M.M., M.A. Haque, M.A. Rahim and M.H. Rahman. 2001. Physio-
morpholigical and compositional variation in ripe fruit of three mango varieties.
Online J. Biol. Sci. 1(11): 1101-1102.
Iqbal, Z., A. Saleem and A.A. Dasti. 2004. Assessment of mango malformation in eight
districts of Punjab (Pakistan). Int. J. Agric. Biol. 6: 620-3.
Ishaq, M., M. Usman, M. Asif and I.A. Khan. 2004. Integrated pest management of
mango against mealy bug and fruit fly. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 6: 452-4.
Islas-Osuna, M.A., N.A. Stephens-Camacho, C.A. Contreras-Vergara, M. Rivera-
Dominguez and E. Sanchez-Sanchez. 2010. Novel postharvest treatment reduces
ascorbic acid losses in mango (Mangifera indica L.) var. Kent. Am. J. Agric. Biol.
Sci. 5(3): 342-349.
Jabbar, A., A.U. Malik, I. Din, R. Anwar, M. Ayub, I. A. Rajwana, M. Amin, A. S. Khan
and M. Saeed. 2011. Effect of combined application of fungicides and hot water
quarantine treatment on postharvest diseases and quality of mango fruit. Pak. J.
Bot. 43(1): 65-73.
Jacobi, K.K., L.S. Wong and J.E. Giles. 1995. Effect of fruit maturity on quality and
physiology of high humidity hot air treated ‘Kensington’ mango (Mangifera
indica L); Postharvest Biol. Technol. 78: 22-26.
Jha, S.N., K. Narsaiah, A.D. Sharma, M. Singh, S. Bansal and R. Kumar. 2010. Quality
parameters of mango and potential of non-destructive techniques for their
measurement – a review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 47: 1-14.
170
Jha, S.N., S. Chopra and A.R.P. Kingsly. 2005. Determination of sweetness of intact
Mango using visual spectral analysis. Biosystems Eng. 91: 157-161.
Jha, S.N., S. Chopra and A.R.P. Kingsly. 2007. Modeling of color values for
nondestructive evaluation of maturity of mango. Food Eng. 78: 22-26.
Jha, S.S. 2006. Non-destructive determination of firmness and yellowness of mango
during growth and storage using visual spectroscopy. Biosystems Eng. 94: 397-
402.
Joachim, M. 2000. Occurrence and biochemical characteristics of natural bioactive
substances in bovine milk lipids. Brit. J. Nut. 84, Suppl. 1, S47±S53.
Joel, D.M. 1980. Resin ducts in the mango fruit: A defense system. Agricultural Research
Institute, Ratta, D.I. Khan, Pakistan. J. Exp. Bot. 31:1707-1718
Kader, A.A. 1992. Postharvest Technology of Horticultural crops. Second edition, Univ.
Calif., Div. Agr. Nat. Resources, Publ. 3311, p. 296.
Kaswija, M., M. Peter and F. Leonard. 2006. Sensory attributes, microbial quality and
aroma profiles of off vine ripened mango (Mangifera indica L.) fruit. Afr. J.
Biotechnol. 5 (2): 201-205.
Kays, S.J. 1991. Post harvest Physiology of Perishable Plant Products. Van Nostrand
Rein Hold Book, AVI Publishing Co., pp: 149-316.
Ketsa, S. and T. Prabhasavat. 1992. Effect of skin coating on shelf life and quality of
‘Nang Klanwan’ mangoes. Acta Hort. 321: 764-770.
Khan, I. A. and E.A. Abourashed. 2010. Leung's, encyclopedia of common natural
ingredients used in food, drugs, and cosmetics 3rd edition, John Wiley.
171
Kittur, F.S., N. Saroja, Habibunnisa and R.N. Tharanathan. 2001. Polysaccharide- based
composite coating formulations for shelf-life extension of fresh banana and
mango. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 213: 306-311.
Kumar, P. and S. Singh. 1993. Effect of GA3 and ethrel on ripening and quality of mango
CV. Amarpali. Horticulture Journal 6, 19-23.
Ladaniya, M.S. and R.K. Sonkar. 1997. Effect of curing, wax application and packing on
quality of stored Nagpur mandarins. Ind. Agri. Sci. 67: 500-503.
Lalel, H.J.D., Z. Singh and S.C. Tan. 2003. Maturity stage at harvest affects fruit
ripening, quality and biosynthesis of aroma volatile compounds in ‘Kensington
Pride’ mango. J. Hort. Sci. Biotechnol. 78: 225-233.
Landrigan, M., S. Morris, I. Baker, S. Cole and W. Kuppelweiser. 1991. Postharvest
studies with mangoes. Tech. Annl. Rep. 1989-90, pp: 93–7. Horticulture Branch,
Department of Primary Industry and Fisheries, N.T. Technology, Bull No. 175.
Larmond, E. 1987. Methods for sensory evaluation of foods. Department of Agriculture,
Ottawa, Canada, Publ. No. 1637.
Le, T.N., C.C. Shiesh and H.L. Lin. 2010. Effect of vapor heat and hot water treatments
on disease incidence and quality of Taiwan native strain mango fruits. Int. J.
Agric. Biol. 12: 673–678.
Lebrun, M.A., K. Plotto, M.N. Goodner, M.N. Ducamp and E. Baldwin. 2008.
Discrimination of mango fruit maturity by volatiles using the electronic nose and
gas chromatograph. Postharvest Biol.Technol. 48: 122-131.
172
Lechaudel, M and J. Joas. 2007. An overview of pre-harvest factors influencing mango
fruit growth, quality and postharvest behavior. Braz. J. Plant Physiol. 19(4): 287-
298.
Lechaudel, M., L. Urban and J. Joas. 2010. Chlorophyll Fluorescence, a nondestructive
method to assess maturity of Mango fruits (Cv. ‘Cogshall’) without growth
conditions Bias. J. Agric. Food Chem. 58: 7532-7538.
Ledger, S.N. 1991. Effectiveness of detergents in reducing mango sap burn 1990/1991
season. postharvest report, Queensland Department of Primary Industries.
Li, Z., N. Wang, G.S. V. Raghavan and C. Vigneault. 2009. Ripeness and rot evaluation
of ‘Tommy Atkins’ mango fruit through volatiles detection. J. Food Eng. 91:
319–324.
Lim, T.K. and W. Kuppelweiser. 1993. Mango sapburn amelioration in the Northern
Territory. Acta Hort. 341: 518-527.
Loveys, B.R., S.P. Robinson, J.J. Brophy and E.K. Chacko. 1992. Mango Sapburn:
Components of fruit sap and their role in causing skin damage. Aust. J. Plant.
Physiol. 19: 449-457.
Lurie, S. 1998. Post harvest heat treatments. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 14: 257-269.
Mahmood, A. and M.A. Gill. 2002. Quick decline of mango and In Vitro response of
fungicides against the disease. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 4: 39–40.
Malik, A.U., Z. Singh and S.C. Tan. 2006. Exogenous application of polyamines
improves shelf life and fruit quality of mango. Acta Hort. 699: 291-296.
173
Malundo, T.M.M., E.A. Baldwin, G.O. Ware and R.L. Shewfelt. 1996. Volatile
composition and interaction influence flavor properties of mango (Mangifera
indica L.). Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 109: 264-268.
Malundo, T.M.M., R.L. Shewfelt, G.O. Ware and E.A. Baldwin. 2001. Sugars and acids
influence flavor properties of mango (Mangifera indica L). J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci.
126: 115-121.
Mannan, M.A., S.A.K.U. Khan, M.R. Islam, M. S. Islam and A. Siddiqa. 2003. A study
on the physico-chemical characteristics of some mango varieties in Khulna
region. Pak. J. Biol. Sci. 6(24): 2034-2039.
Maqbool, M. and A. U. Malik. 2008. Anti-Sap chemicals reduce sap burn injury and
improve fruit quality in commercial mango cultivars. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 10: 1-8.
Maqbool, M., A.U. Malik and A. Jabbar. 2007. Sap dynamics and its management in
commercial mango cultivars of Pakistan. Pak. J. Bot. 39(5): 1565-1574.
Mariappan, P. 2004. How do raw mangoes and bananas become ripe when treated with
chemicals (Answer-2)? In: The Hindu–Online edition of India’s National
th Newspaper. Dated: 29 July, 2004.
Marsh, K.B., A.C. Richardson and E.A. Macrae. 1999. Early- and mid-season
temperature effects on the growth and composition of satsuma mandarins. J. Hort.
Sci. Biotechnol. 74: 443-451.
Martinez, B.E., C.G. Guevara, J.M. Contreras, J.R. Rodriguez and U. Lavi. 1997.
Preservation of mango Azucar variety (Mangifera indica L.) at different storage
stages. Proceedings of the fifth international mango symposium (Tel Aviv, Israel,
1996) 2: 747-754.
174
McCollum, T.G., S.D. Aquino, W.R. Miller and R.E. Mcdonald. 1992. Individual shrink
film wrapping of mangoes. Proc. Fla. State Hort. Soc. 105: 103-105.
McHugh, T.H. and J.M. Krochta. 1994. Permeability properties of edible films. In Edible
Coatings and Films to improve Food Quality, (J.M. Krochta, E.A. Baldwin and
M.O. Nisperos-Carriedo, 4 s . ) pp. 139-187, Techomic Pub. Co., Lancaster, Pa.
McMillium, M. 1989. Food experimental perspectives. 1st ed. Macmillan publish. Co.
Inc. USA., 217pp.
Medlicott, A.P., J.M.M. Sigrist and O. Sy. 1990. Ripening of Mangos Following Low-
temperature Storage. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci. 115(3): 430-434.
Medlicott, A.P., S.B. Rynolds and A.K. Thompson. 1986. Effect of temperature on
ripening of mango fruit (Mangifera indica L. var. Tommy Atkins). J. Sci. Food
Agric. 37: 469-474.
Menezes, J. B., L. C. O. Lima and R. E. Alves. 1996. Postharvest ripening in water-wax
coated ‘Tommy Atkins’ mango. Proc. Interamer. Soc. Trop. Hort. 40:133-138.
Menezes, J. B., R. E. Alves and F.C. O. Freire. 1995. Mango sapburn - a postharvest
injury' R. Bras. Fisiol. Veg. 7(2):181-184.
Meurant, N. 1991. Bowen Mango Field Day. Mango Care Newsletter No. 3. Queensland
Department of Primary Industries.
Mitra, S.K. and E.A. Baldwin. 1997. Mango. In: Mitra, S.K. (Ed.), Postharvest
Physiology and Storage of Tropical and Subtropical Fruits. CAB International,
New York, NY, pp. 85-122.
175
Mizrach, A., U. Flitsanov and Y. Fuchs. 1997. An ultrasonic non destructive method for
measuring maturity of mango fruit. Transac. ASAE. 40: 1107-1111.
Mollah, S. and M.A. Siddique. 1973. Studies on some mango varieties of Bangladesh.
Bangld. Hort. 1: 16-24.
Mootoo, A. 1991. Effect of post-harvest calcium chloride dips on ripening changes in
‘Julie’ mangoes. Trop. Sci. 31: 243-248.
Muda, P., G.B. Seymour, N. Errington and G.A. Tuckera. 1995. Compositional changes
in cell wall polymers during mango fruit ripening. Carbohydrate Poly. 26: 255-
260.
Murillo, F.J. and B.C. Adimilson. 1999. Effect of calcium chloride application on mango
fruits cv. Tommy Atkins hydrothermally treated. Pesq. agropec. bras. 34 (5): 761-
769.
Mut, P., C. Bustamante, G. Martinez, K. Alleva, M. Sutka, M. Civello and G. Amodeo.
2008. A fruit-specific plasma membrane aquaporin subtype PIP1; 1 is regulated
during strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa) fruit ripening, Physiol. Plantarum. 132:
538-551.
Nair, S. and Z. Singh. 2003. Pre-storage ethereal dip reduces chilling injury, enhances
respiration rate, ethylene production and improves fruit quality of ‘Kensington’
mango. Food Agric. Environ. 1(2): 93-97.
Narain, N., P.S. Bora, R. Narian and P. Shaw. 1998. Mango. In Tropical and Subtropical
Fruits, (Eds.): P.E. Shaw, H.T. Chan and S. Nagy. pp. 1-77. Agrscience, Inc.,
Auburndale, FL.
176
Narayana, C.K., R.K. Pal and S.K. Roy. 1996. Effect of pre-storage treatments and
temperature regimes on shelf life and respiratory behaviour of ripe Beneshan
mango. J. Food Sci. Technol. Mysore. 33: 79-82.
Nunes, M.C.N., J.P. Emond, J. K. Brecht, S. Dea and E. Proulx. 2007. Quality curves for
mango fruit (cv. Tommy Atkins and Palmer) stored at chilling and non chilling
temperatures. J. Food Qual. 30: 104-120.
Okeniyi, S.O., P.A. Egwaikhide, E.E. Akporhonor and S.A. Emua. 2008. Kinetic studies
of the total acidity and comparative studies of some parameters in artificial
ripened fruits. Agric. J. 3(1): 46-49.
Ornelas-paz, J.J., E.M. Yahia and A.A. Garde. 2008. Changes in external and internal
color during postharvest ripening of ‘Manila’ and ‘Ataulfo’ mango fruit and
relationship with carotenoids content determined by liquid chromatography-APcI
± time of flight mass spectrometry. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 50: 145-152.
Oz, A. T. and Z. Ulukanli. 2012. Application of edible starch-based coating including
glycerol plus Oleum Nigella on arils from long-stored whole pomegranate fruits.
J. Food Processing Preservation. 36: 81-95.
Padmini, S. and T.N. Prabha. 1997. Biochemical changes during acetylene-induced
ripening in mangoes (var. Alphonso). Trop. Agric. (Trinidad) 74: 265-271.
Pal, R.K. 1998. Ripening and rheological properties of mango as influenced by ethrel
and calcium carbide. J. Food Sci. Tech. Mysore, 35: 358-360.
Payasi, A. and G.G. Sanwal1. 2010. Ripening of climacteric fruits and their control. J.
Food Biochem. 34: 679-710.
177
Peter, M., F. Leonard, C. Bernard, K. Joyce, G. Victor and M. Kaswija. 2007. Physical
and chemical characteristics of off vine ripened mango (Mangifera indica L.) fruit
(Dodo). Afr. J. Biotechnol. 6(21): 2477-2483.
Pooaviah, B.W. 1986. Role of calcium in prolonging storage life of fruits and vegetables.
Food Tech. 40: 86-89.
Poubol, J., S. Matsuoka, M. Oshima and H. Izumi. 2008. Quality of shelf life on fresh-cut
Nam Dok Mai mango stored in air and low O2 atmospheres. Acta Hort. 804: 477-
483.
Prusky, D., Y. Fuchs, I. Kobiler, I. Roth, A. Weksler, Y. Shalom, E. Fallik,
G. Zauberman, E. Pesis, M. Akerman, O. Ykutiely, A. Weisblum, R. Regev and
L. Artes. 1999. Effect of hot water brushing, prochloraz treatment and waxing on
the incidence of black spot decay caused by Alternaria Alternata in mango fruits.
Postharvest Biol. Technol. 15(10): 165-174.
Rathore, H. A., T. Masud, S. Sammi and S. Majeed. 2010. Innovative approach of active
packaging in cardboard carton and its effect on overall quality attributes such as
weight loss, total soluble solids, pH, acidity and ascorbic acid contents of
Chaunsa White variety of mango at ambient temperature during storage. Pak. J.
Nut. 9 (5): 452-458.
Rathore, H.A., T. Masud, S. Sammi and A.H. Soomro. 2007. Effect of storage on
physico-chemical composition and sensory properties of mango (Mangifera
indica L.) variety Dosehri. Pak. J. Nut. 6: 143-148.
Ravindra, M.R. and T.K. Goswami. 2008. Modelling the respiration rate of green mature
mango under aerobic conditions. Biosystems Eng. 99: 239-248.
178
Regnier, T., G.W. Duplooy, S. Combrinck and B.M. Botha. 2008. Fungitoxicity of Lippia
scaberrima essential oil and selected terpenoid components on two mango
postharvest spoilage pathogens. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 48: 254-258.
Ribeiro, C., A.A. Vicente, J.A. Teixeira and C. Miranda. 2007. Optimization of edible
coating composition to retard strawberry fruit senescence. Postharvest Biol.
Technol. 44: 63–70.
Sabato, S.F., J.N. Cruz, P.R. Rela and P.O. Broisler. 2009. Study of influence on
harvesting point in Brazilian Tommy Atkins mangoes Submitted to gamma
radiation. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 78571-573.
Saengnil, K., K. Lueangprasert and J. Uthaibutra. 2011. Sunlight-stimulated
phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL) activity and anthocyanin accumulation in
exocarp of ‘Mahajanaka’ mango. Maejo Int. J. Sci. Technol. 5(03): 365-373.
Sakhale, B.K., V.N. Pawar and B.M. Kapse. 2009. Studies on extension of shelf life of
Kesar mango (Mangifera indica L.). Acta Hort. 820: 643-651.
Samad, M.A. and A.H.M. Faruque. 1976. A study on the physical characteristics of some
common mango varieties of Bangladesh. Bangld. Hort. 4: 18-23.
Santos, A.F., S.M. Silva, R.M.N. Mendonça, R.E. Alves and L.P. Martins. 2004. Storage
of mango fruits cv. Rosa treated with calcium chloride after harvest at different
maturity stages. Acta Hort. 645: 663-670.
Santulli, C. and G. Jeronimidis. 2006. Development of a method for nondestructive
testing of fruits using Scanning Laser Virometry NDT.net Sep 2006, Vol. 11 No.
10 Centre for Biomimetics, University of Reading, UK.
179
Saranwong, S., J. Sornsrivichai and S. Kawano. 2004. Prediction of ripe-stage eating
quality of mango fruit from its harvest quality measured nondestructively by near
infrared spectroscopy. Postharvest Biol.Technol. 31: 137-145.
Sauco, V.G. 2002. Magazine of Chronica Horticulturae. Int. Soc. Hort. Sci., 42: 14-17.
Schaafsma, G. 2005. Protective Factors in Milk and Milk Products with Special
Emphasis on the GI Tract http://www.enzymestuff.com/discussionvirusdairy.htm
Shafique, M.Z., M. Ibrahim, M.O.H. Helali and S.K. Biswas. 2006. Studies on the
physiological and biochemical composition of different mango cultivars at
various maturity levels. Bangld. J. Sci. Ind. Res. 41:101-108.
Shahid, M.N. 2007. Effect of bee wax coating on the organoleptic changes in fruit of
sweet orange (citrus sinensis l.) cv. “blood red”. Sarhad J. Agric. 23: 411-416.
Shorter, A.J. and D.C. Joyce. 1998. Effect of partial pressure infiltration of calcium into
‘Kensington’ mango fruit. Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 38: 287–294.
Simmons, S.L., P.J. Hofman, A.W. Whiley and S.E. Hetherington.1998. Effects of pre-
harvest calcium sprays and fertilizers, leaf:fruit ratios, and water stress on mango
fruit quality. In: Coates LM, Hofman PJ, Johnson GI (eds), International
Workshop on Disease Control and Storage Life Extension in Fruit, pp.19-26.
Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, Chiang Mai.
Singh, R. K. and R .N. Singh. 2010. Effect of postharvest treatments on shelf life of
mango (Mangifera indica L.) fruits cv. Amrapali. Res. J. Agric. Sci. 1(4): 415-
418.
180
Singh, R., P. Singh, N. Pathak, V. K. Singh and U. N. Dwivedi. 2007. Modulation of
mango ripening by chemicals: physiological and biochemical aspects. Plant
Growth Regul. 53:137–145.
Singh, R.P., D.K. Tandon and S.K. Kalra. 1993. Change in post-harvest quality of
mangoes affected by pre-harvest application of calcium salts. Sci. Hort. 54: 211-
219.
Singh, Z. and J. Janes. 2001. Effect of postharvest application of ethephon on fruit
ripening, quality and shelf life of mango under modified atmosphere packaging.
Acta Hort. 553: 599-601.
Sivakumar, D., Y. Jiang and E. M. Yahia. 2011. Maintaining mango (Mangifera indica
L.) fruit quality during the export chain. Food Res. Int. 44: 1254–1263.
Sive, A. and D. Resnizky. 1985. Experiments on the CA storage of a number of mango
cultivars. Alon Hanotea, 39: 845-855.
Sprong, C. R., M. F. E. Hulstein and V. M. Roelof. 2001. Bactericidal Activities of Milk
Lipids: Antimicrob Agents. Chemother. 45(4): 1298-1301.
Srinivasa, P. C., N. S. Susheelamma, R. Ravi and R. N. Thnathanara. 2004. Quality of
mango fruits during storage: effect of synthetic and eco-friendly films. J. Sci.
Food Agric. 84: 818–824.
Srinivasa, P., C.R. Baskaran, M.N. Ramesh, K.V.H. Prashantand and R.N. Tharanthan.
2002. Storage studies of mango packed using biodegradable chitosan film. Eur.
Food Res. Technol. 215: 504-508.
181
Subedi, P.P., K.B. Walsh and G. Owens. 2007. Prediction of mango eating quality at
harvest using short-wave near infrared spectrometry. Postharvest Biol. Technol.
43: 326-334.
Subramanian, S. 2004. How do raw mangoes and bananas become ripe when treated with
chemicals (Answer-1)? In: The Hindu – Online Edition of India’s National
th Newspaper. Dated: 29 July, 2004.
Sumnu, G. and L. Bayindirli. 1995. Effects of sucrose polyester coating on fruit quality
of apricots. J. Sci. Food Agric. 67: 537-540.
Suntharalingam, S. 1996. Postharvest treatment of mangoes with calcium. Trop. Sci. 36:
14-17.
Tahir, F.M., M.A. Parvaz and C. Hameed. 2002. Losses of mango fruit after harvest and
its control. Agric. Digest. 37: 62-64.
Talcott, S., and S. Talcott (http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2010/01/100111154926.htm).
Tirmazi, S. I. H. and R. B. H. Wills. 1981. Retardation of ripening of mangoes by post-
harvest application of calcium. Trop. Agric. 58:137-141.
Uddin, M. Z., M. A. Rahim, M. A. Alam, J. C. Barman and M. A. Wadud. 2006. A study
on bio-chemical characteristics of different mango germplasms grown in the
climatic condition of Mymensingh. Int. J. Sustain. Crop Prod. 1(2): 16-19.
Ueda, M., K. Sasaki, N. Utsunomiya, K. Inaba and Y. Shimabayashi. 2000. Changes in
physical and chemical properties during maturation of mango fruit (Mangifera
indica L. ‘Irwin’) cultured in a plastic greenhouse. Food Sci. Technol. Res. 6(4):
299-305.
182
Venkatesan, T. and C. Tamilmani. 2010. Effect of ethreal on phenolic changes during
ripening of off season fruits of mango ( Mangifera indica L. var. Neelum). Curr.
Bot. 1(1): 22-28.
Wen, Q., M.A. Rongchao, Q. Dong and Y. Xin. 2006. Studies on postharvest physiology
and the storage technology of mango (Mangifera indica L.). J. Food Proc.
Preserv. 30: 670-683.
Weor, D.U. 2007. Effects of various harvesting methods and storage environments on the
storability of Peter mangof in Gboko, Benue State, Nigeria. J. Sustain. Develop.
Agric. Environ. 3: 81-88.
Wing, R.E., S. Maiti and W.M. Doane. 1988. Amylose content of starch controls the
release of encapsulated bioactive agents. J. Control. Release. 7: 33-37.
Yuen, C.M.C., S.C. Tan, D. Jovce and P. Chettri. 1993. Effect of postharvest calcium and
polymeric film on ripening and peel injury in Kensington Pride mango. ASEAN
Food J. 8: 110-113.
Yuniarti, I. 1980. Pysico-chemical changes of Arumanis mangoes during storage at
ambient temperature. Bull. Penel. Hort. Indonesia. 8: 11-17.
Yuniarti and Suhardi, 1992. Ripening retardation of Arumanis mango. ASEAN Food J. 7:
207-208.
Zaied, N.S., S.A.A. Khafagy and M.A. Saleh. 2007. Evaluation of some mango species
by fruit characters and fingerprint. Res. J. Agric. Biol. Sci. 3(4): 316-320.
Zeng, K.F., J.K. Cao and W.B. Jiang. 2006. Enhancing disease resistance in harvested
mango (Mangifera indica L. cv. “Matisu”) fruit by salicylic acid. J. Sci. Food
Agric. 86: 694-698.
183
Zheng, X., T. Shiping, J.G. Michael, Y. Hong and L. Boqiang. 2007. Effects of
exogenous oxalic acid on ripening and decay incidence in mango fruit during
storage at room temperature. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 45: 281-284.
Zhu, X., Q. Wang, J. Cao and W. Jiang. 2008. Effects of chitosan coating on postharvest
quality of mango (Mangifera indica L. cv. Tainong) fruits. J. Food Proc. Preserv.
32: 770-784.
184