ABSTRACT GILLESPIE, JAMIE GUSTAVA. Framing Strikes
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
ABSTRACT GILLESPIE, JAMIE GUSTAVA. Framing Strikes: A Media Analysis of Two Teacher Strikes. (Under the direction of Lance Fusarelli, PhD). With the presence of print media, broadcast media, digital media, and social media in our everyday lives, we are able to follow news events across the country and around the world as closely as we would like. Media portrayals of teachers, their unions, and school district officials are how most people learn about what is happening in schools. Public opinion on school issues is generally based on how they are presented in news media, making it important for teachers and school officials to understand how these issues are being framed in the news. In times of conflict within school districts, teachers and district leaders should make efforts to understand how public opinion is being shaped by issue framing in order to ensure their viewpoints are represented. In this study, I examined the media framing of teachers strikes in Chicago in 2012 and in Seattle in 2015 by analyzing depictions of the people, issues, and events involved in the months before, during, and after the strikes in local media outlets. My findings indicate that the overwhelmingly negative coverage of teachers and their union in Chicago may have impacted the less successful negotiations outcomes, while the mostly positive coverage of teachers and their union in Seattle may have played a role in the more successful negotiated agreement between teachers and the school district. ÓCopyright 2021 by Jamie Gustava Gillespie All Rights Reserved Framing Strikes: A Media Analysis of Two Teacher Strikes by Jamie Gillespie A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty of North Carolina State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Educational Research and Policy Analysis Raleigh, North Carolina 2021 APPROVED BY: ______________________________ ______________________________ Dr. Karen Keene Dr. Duane Akroyd ______________________________ ______________________________ Dr. Lance Fusarelli Dr. Peter Hessling Chair of Advisory Committee DEDICATION For Andrew, Hannah, and May – my inspiration. ii BIOGRAPHY Jamie Gustava Gillespie has a Bachelor of Arts in Teaching French from the University of Illinois and a Master of Education in Curriculum and Instruction from National Louis University. She is a lifelong advocate for public schools and had a 30-year career in public schools in Maryland, Illinois, Wisconsin, and North Carolina as a teacher, program coordinator, principal, and district-level administrator. She also served as a school transformation coach for the North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. Currently, she is a Research Associate at The Friday Institute for Educational Innovation at North Carolina State University where she conducts research and program evaluations for school districts, educational agencies, private businesses, and educational research institutions. Jamie is a native of Chicago and a resident of North Carolina since 2009. She lives in Raleigh with her husband, their younger daughter, a dog, and a cat. iii TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES………………………………………………………………………..……..ix LIST OF FIGURES…………………………………………………………………………...…x CHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION……………………..…………………………………....1 Background of the Study………………………………………………………………….3 Definition of Terms……………………………………………………………………….6 Media……………………………………………………………………………………...6 Purpose of the Study………………………………………………………………………7 Significance of the Study………………………………………………………………….8 Overview of Methods……………………………………………………………………..9 Organization of the Study…………………………………………………………..……10 CHAPTER TWO: REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE…………………….……………….11 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………....…11 Framing and Agenda Setting…………………………………………………………….11 Framing………………………………………………………………………….11 Agenda Setting…………………………………………………………………...13 Second-Level Agenda Setting……………………………………………………………15 Media Bias……………………………………………………………………….17 Portrayals of Educators…………………………………………………………………..19 Portrayals of Teachers’ Unions………………………………………………….19 iv Portrayals of Teachers…………………………………………………………...20 Portrayals of Other Educators…………………………………………………...21 Critical Discourse Analysis………………………………………………………………23 General Principles………………………….……………………………….…...23 CDA Frameworks………………………………………….………………….....25 Critiques of Critical Discourse Analysis………………………………………...26 Critical Discourse Analysis in Education Policy……….............................……..27 Conclusion……………………………………………………………………………….30 CHAPTER THREE: METHODOLOGY OF THE STUDY…………………….………….31 Introduction………………………………………………………………………………31 Selection of Case Study………………………………………………………………….31 Site Selection and Sampling……………………………………………………………..33 Data Collection and Analysis…………………………………………………………….34 Data Collection…………………………………………………………………..35 Data Analysis…………………………………………………………………….35 Reliability and Validity…………………………………………………………………..37 Limitations and Delimitations of the Study…………......……………………………….38 Researcher Bias…………………………………………………………………………..39 Summary…………………………………………………………………………………40 CHAPTER FOUR: CHICAGO ….……………………………………………………………41 FINDINGS……………………………………………………………………………………….41 v Introduction………………………………………………………………………………41 Overview of Articles……………………………………………………………………..41 Chicago Tribune………………………………………………………………………….43 Chicago Sun-Times………………………………………………………………………43 Chicago Reader…………………………………………………………………………..44 Seattle Times……………………………………………………………………………44 The Stranger………………………………………………………………………………44 Chicago Strike……………………………………………………………………………45 Chicago Sun-Times………………………………………………………………………45 Anti-strike articles…………………………………………………….………45 Pro-strike articles……………………………………………………………….64 Chicago Tribune………………………………………………………………………….70 Anti-strike articles…………………………………………………………….72 Pro-strike articles……………………………………………………………….96 Chicago Reader…………………………………………………………………………105 Summary………………………………………………………………………………..111 CHAPTER FIVE: SEATTLE…………………...……………………………………………113 FINDINGS……………………………………………………………………………………...113 Introduction…………………………………………………………………………..…113 Seattle Times…………………………………………………………….………………113 Anti-strike articles……………………………………………………..………113 Pro-strike articles…………………………………………………...………129 vi The Stranger………………………………………………………………………..…132 Anti-strike articles…………………………………………………………..…132 Pro-strike articles………………………………………………………..….132 Summary…………………………………………………………………………….….144 CHAPTER SIX: DISCUSSION……………………………………………………………...146 Introduction……………………………………………………………………………..146 Discussion………………………………………………………………………………146 Issue framing………………………………………………………………………….146 Contextual comparison………………………………………………………………...149 Results of Chicago strike………………...…………………………………149 Results of Seattle strike……………………………………………………..150 Portrayals of educators………………………………………………………….…..154 Implications for Research…………………………………………………………….155 Implications for Practice………………………………………………………………..157 Summary………………………………………………………………………………..159 REFERENCES…………………………………………………………………………….…..161 APPENDICES…………………………………………………………………………………188 APPENDIX A………………………………………………………………………………….189 INTERNET SEARCH TERMS………………………………………………………………...189 APPENDIX B……………………………………………………………………………….…190 vii DOCUMENT ANALYSIS PROTOCOL………………………………………………………190 APPENDIX C……………………………………………………………………………….…191 PHOTO ANALYSIS PROTOCOL…………...…………………………………………….….191 APPENDIX D……………………………………………………………………………….…192 PEOPLE IN STRIKES…………………………………………………………………...….…192 APPENDIX E………………………………………………………………………………….193 SAMPLE OF CRITICAL DISCOURSE ANALYSIS…………………………………...…….193 viii LIST OF TABLES Table 1. Publications and articles……………………………………………………..….………42 Table 2. Chicago Sun-Times articles……………………………………………………….…….45 Table 3. Chicago Tribune articles……………………………………………………………..….72 Table 4. Chicago Reader articles……………………………………………………………..…105 Table 5. Seattle Times articles……………………………………………………………….….113 Table 6. The Stranger articles……………………………………………………………….…..132 Table 7. Summary of items relating to the strikes in all publications……………………….…..144 Table 8. Pro- and anti-strike items, by type, during Chicago strike………………………….…..152 Table 9. Pro- and anti-strike items, by type, during Seattle strike……………………………….153 ix LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1: Relationships between media formats, frames, themes, and discourses….…………….12 Figure 2: Chicago Tribune photograph September 12, 2012a.…………………………….......…82 Figure 3: Chicago Tribune photograph September 12, 2012b……………………………………83 Figure 4: Chicago Tribune photograph September 12, 2012c……………………………………85 Figure 5: Chicago Tribune cartoon September 13, 2012..………………………..………………87 Figure 6: Chicago Tribune cartoon September 18, 2012.……………………………….……..…91 Figure 7: Chicago Tribune cartoon September 14, 2012. 7: ……………………………………102 Figure 8: The Stranger photograph September 11, 2015………………………………………..142 x CHAPTER ONE Introduction Almost since their inception, teachers’ unions have been a focus of public debate. Although there have been teacher organizations since the mid-19th century, unions for teachers did not begin to develop until after the passage of the National Labor Relations Act of 1935, also known as the Wagner Act, which granted private employees the right to organize and bargain collectively. Although the law did not explicitly give those rights to public employees, over the next 50 years most states passed various public employment relations acts that allowed public employees, including teachers, to organize and bargain collectively (Cooper, 2015). With official recognition, teachers’ unions began to negotiate and advocate on behalf