Sounding the Limits of Life: Essays in the Anthropology of Biology and Beyond
© Copyright, Princeton University Press. No part of this book may be distributed, posted, or reproduced in any form by digital or mechanical means without prior written permission of the publisher. CHAPTER 1 WHAT WAS LIFE? Answers from Three Limit Biologies “What was life? No one knew.” — Thomas Mann, The Magic Mountain, 1924 WHAT IS LIFE? A GATHERING consensus in anthropology, science studies, phi- losophy of biology, and even the biological sciences themselves suggests that the theoretical object of biology, “life,” is today in transformation, if not disso- lution. Proliferating technologies of assisted reproduction, along with genomic reshufflings of biomatter in such practices as cloning, have unwound the “facts of life.”1 Biotechnology, biodiversity, bioprospecting, biosecurity, biotransfer, and other things bio- draw novel lines of property and protection around organ- isms and their elements (e.g., genes, organs), which now circulate in new ways as gifts, as commodities, and as tokens of social belonging or exclusion.2 From cultural theorists and historians of science we learn that “life itself,” consolidated as the object of the discipline of biology around 1800, has morphed, as material components of living things— cells and genes— rearrange and disperse, and ex- ist in distributed laboratory choreographies that have them frozen, amplified, and exchanged.3 Writers in philosophy, rhetoric, and cultural studies of science, meanwhile, claim that as “life” has become the target of digital simulation and bioinformatic representation, it has become virtual, mediated, and multiple.4 All these transformations unsteady any naturalistic or ultimate foundation that life forms— embodied bits of vitality like organisms and species—m ight pro- vide for forms of life— social, symbolic, and pragmatic ways of thinking and act- ing that organize human communities.5 In the language of anthropology, these changes unsettle the nature so often imagined to ground culture.
[Show full text]