Bentiu IDP Camp SOUTH SUDAN | CAMP COORDINATION and CAMP MANAGEMENT CLUSTER SITE PROFILE April 2021
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Bentiu IDP Camp SOUTH SUDAN | CAMP COORDINATION AND CAMP MANAGEMENT CLUSTER SITE PROFILE April 2021 Context Quarterly Highlights Sector overview Bentiu protection of civilian (PoC) site was established in Rubkona county of Unity state in 1. Camp management participated in an inauguration of a new elected Sector Indicator Target Achieved Implementing Agencies December 2013 where currently 101,147 internally displaced people are seeking protection CDC into the office on 29 January 2021. CCCM Land area per person 30m 2 17m2 IOM in the site. Humanitarian partners and UNMISS are working together with the community to 2. With the support of DTM, closely monitor the trend movement to Education % of enrollments in primary school(target 45,000) improve the living condition in the PoC area. understand the return dynamic. (46,000 children enrolled in ECO,primary, ALP, Secondary) 100% 85% UNICEF, MERCY CORP, INTERSOS, WORLD RELIEF 3. Monitor service provision in the PoC to flag any duplication or gaps in Food/Livelihood % of households receiving food ration 100% 96% WHH,WFP service provision. % of households receiving cash for milling 100% - WHH,WFP Health Crude mortality <2 0.99 WHO, IOM, MSF, WORLD RELIEF, IRC Site demography Site location Mortality of Under 5 years old <2 0.91 WHO, IOM, MSF, WORLD RELIEF, IRC Nutrition % of GAM prevalence under 5 years of age (by MUAC) <10% - CARE, CONCERN,WORLD RELIEF, UNICEF % of SAM prevalence under 5 years of age (by MUAC) <2% - CARE, CONCERN,WORLD RELIEF, UNICEF Total IDPs Site Coordinate Protection % of newly identified Unaccompanied or Separated 52% 0 Latitude: 9.332 2 100% 2.0% CCO, GUNO 101,147 0 Site area: 1,646,612m children registered for Family Tracing and Reunification total IDPs living Longitude: 29.918 % and # of children under 5 provided with birth 48% inside Bentiu PoC registration notification 100% of <5 60% CCO, GUNO 2 2 Shelter/NFI Average covered space per person >3.5m 1.7m Concern Age and sex disaggregated data % of IDPs covered with non-food Items 100% 4.0% Concern <5 years ≥5 years WASH Litres per person per day >15 37.5% CONCERN,IOM,MERCY CORP MEN WOMEN Person per tap 250 600 CONCERN,IOM,MERCY CORP BOYS GIRLS BOYS GIRLS Latrine coverage (person/latrine) 20 76.0% CONCERN,IOM,MERCY CORP 51% 49% 52% 48% Bathing shelter coverage (person/shower) <100 69.33 CONCERN,IOM,MERCY CORP Covid 19 Number of face mask distributed 100% 238% WHO, MSF 22,755 (23%) 73,225 (77%) Response Number of people reached with risk comms and messaging 100% 70% WHO, MSF Any other intervention WHO, MSF Population count by sector as of March 2021 Target reached Target more than 50% reached Target less than 50% reached Unknown Flow monitoring Population heat map as of March 2021 SECTOR 1 SECTOR 2 SECTOR 3 5,707 5,143 169 206 4 38% 62% 30% 70% 1 2 1 2 3 Male Female Male Female 1 2 3 15 8 Sector 1 5 6 7 12% 4 5 6 16 3 4 TIME SPENT AWAY FROM SITE AND SECTOR 3 INTENDED JOURNEY LENGTH TOP REASON 11 12 TOP REASON 17 5 6 9 10 Sector 2 7 8 9 FOR ENTRY: Family FOR EXIT: Life is now better 18% Entry Exit in destination 16 7 8 13 14 15 Sector 3 23% 3 4 FOLLOWED BY Healthcare FOLLOWED BY 9 10 1 2 12% more than 6 months Education 4% 8% 5% opportunity 8 5 6 7 SECTOR 4 9% 4-6 months 11 12 Sector 4 17% Humanitarian 7% 2% Log Base 30% 2-3 months 10 11 12 INTENDED PERIOD OF STAY NATURE OF DESTINATION 14 9 20% 10% 13 Sector 5 26% 2-4 weeks 30% 4 15% 11% 1 2 3 22% 1-7 days Intended period % of new Top departure Nature of % of perm. Top of stay entry locations destinations UNMISS destination exits Log Base 7% %14 15% 7 8 1—7 days 14% Guit, Rubkona former home Rubkona,Guit 5 6 74% Population SECTOR 5 new home, Kampala (UG), 2—4 weeks 11% Guit, Rubkona 21% March 2021 Juba 10 12 former area <1000 9 11 2—3 months 14% Juba, Rubkona 5% Koch, Guit but new home Humanitarian 80% other 1,000- 1,500 Hub Accommodation - 16 of destinations 4—6 months 17% Leer, Mayom dislacement site 13 14 15 are in Unity 1,500 - 2,000 Probably >6months 44% Leer, Panyijiar 2,000 - 2,500 2,500+ For more details and methodology, please visit DTM website:- https://dtm.iom.int/ Data Source: Flow monitoring data IOM-DTM (March 2021), Population data: IOM-DTM March 2021, Indicators: IOM-CCCM & partners, March 2021 Bentiu IDP Camp SOUTH SUDAN | CAMP COORDINATION AND CAMP MANAGEMENT CLUSTER SITE PROFILE April 2021 Bentiu IDP Camp Bentiu Service provision status Service Partner Area Issue Shelter Concern Entire camp .No funding for regular care and maintenance PoC Blocks PoC Blocks .Funds for CM is available for Bentiu until 31st July 2021. significant drop Camp Management IOM Entire camp on overall funding of IOM CCCM this year which obviously would have implications to the capacity of IOM to support IDP sites/POC. FSL WFP .Deduction of food ration from 70-50% commencing 1st April. Buffer Zone IOM Sector 2 & 3 .Jan-Mar 100% and from April-Dec 25% funded PoC Blocks Sanitation Humanitarian CWW Sector 5 .100% funding for the entire Bentiu IDP site until August 31st 2021. Log Base MC Sector 1 & 4 .Funding secured till December 2021 Buffer Zone MC Sector 1 & 4 .Funding Secured till December 2021 WASH IOM Sector 2 & 3 .Jan-Mar 100% and from April-Dec 25% funded CWW Sector 5 .100% funding for the entire Bentiu IDP site until August 31st 2021. WHO . Humanitarian Health WR Sector 2 .Funding Secured January-October 2021 Hub MSF .Activities/funding continue on the same level 0 Data source: Humanitarian service gaps in former and current PoCs as of April 2021, UNHCR & IOM. Movement Profile • Predominantly temporary travel to/from sites to visit friends/family or to attempt to return home. This indicates that many IDPs live in Bentiu IDP camp with “one foot out” however, still maintaining their presence to ensure access to services. • Between January and March 2021, at least 169 IDPs arrived on site whereas 206 exited permanently. Main reasons are: life is now better at destination, pursuit of education and livelhood opportunities. Source: IOM Displacement Site Flow Monitoring, N= 19,230 surveys conducted between January and March 2021. % of HH considering return % of HH by Timeframe of intended return Type of assistance needed for return 35 YES,RELOCATE TO A DIFFERENT 30.1% Assistance % Cl 2.2 LOCATION 30 Materials/ Money To Repair My House/ 50.1 45.5 - 54.7 25 23.7% Shelter I DON'T KNOW 10.8 20 Seeds And Tools For Farming/Cultivation 18.3 14.8 - 21.8 15 13.4% Transportation Assistance/ Cash For NO, I INTEND TO REMAIN HERE 42.2 11.3% 9.9 7.2 - 12.6 9.7% Transportation 10 7.5% YES,RETURN TO AREA OF HABITUAL 4.3% Food Assistance In Area Of Return 9.9 7 - 12.7 44.8 5 RESIDENCE 0 Livestock Assistance 4.3 2.4 - 6.3 0 10 20 30 40 50 Less than 1-3 mos 4-6 mos 7-12 mos More than I don't I prefer not Source: IOM – WFP, FNSMS+, November – December 2020 1 month 12 mos know answer Data Source: Flow monitoring data IOM-DTM (March 2021), Population data: IOM-DTM March 2021, Indicators: IOM-CCCM & partners, March 2021.