DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Setting

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Setting CHAPTER 3: ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 3.1 INTRODUCTION This chapter provides a description of the existing environment potentially affected by the construction, operation, maintenance, and decommissioning of the Barren Ridge Renewable Transmission Project (BRRTP). As described in Chapter 2, five Project Alternatives—including the Proposed Action, three additional action Alternatives, and the No Action Alternative (Proposed Action and Alternatives)—are analyzed in detail in this Draft EIS/EIR. The Proposed Action and action Alternatives would consist of the following components: (1) Expansion of the existing Barren Ridge Switching Station. (2) Construction of a new electrical switching station in Haskell Canyon. (3) Construction of a new double-circuit 230 kilovolt (kV) transmission line from the Barren Ridge Switching Station to a new switching station located within Haskell Canyon. The length of the new transmission line would vary for each action Alternative and would range from 61 to 83 miles. (4) Upgrade of 76 miles of the existing Barren Ridge – Rinaldi (BR-RIN) 230 kV transmission line with larger capacity conductors between the Barren Ridge Switching Station and Rinaldi Substation. (5) Addition of 12 miles of a new 230 kV circuit on the existing double-circuit structures from Haskell Canyon to the Castaic Power Plant. The action Alternatives would cross a variety of public and private land within the jurisdictions of multiple federal, State and local agencies or political subdivisions. Potential impacts from the Proposed Action or an Alternative are addressed in Chapter 4 of this Draft EIS/EIR. 3.1.1 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING OVERVIEW For the purpose of this Draft EIS/EIR, and pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines (Section 15125(a)), the environmental setting used to determine the potential impacts associated with the Proposed Action and Alternatives is based on the environmental conditions that existed in the Project area beginning at the time the Notice of Preparation was distributed and the Notice of Intent was published. The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires that an EIS shall succinctly describe the environment of the area(s) to be affected or created by the alternatives under consideration (40 CFR 1502.15). The ―Environmental Setting‖ section in each resource discussion describes existing conditions in the Project area at the time this Draft EIS/EIR analysis was conducted. Except where indicated differently, the environmental setting reflects conditions in the Project area under the CEQA baseline identified above. The identification of impacts for the Alternatives is based on changes between existing conditions described in the ―Environmental Setting‖ section and future conditions that could occur with the implementation of each Alternative. The environmental setting that may be affected by the Proposed Action and Alternatives is described in terms of two environments: ANA 032-008 (PER-02) LADWP (AUGUST 2011) SB 115245/118927 3-1 BARREN RIDGE RENEWABLE TRANSMISSION PROJECT DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT/ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT CHAPTER 3: ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING Human Environment—those physical, social, and economic factors potentially affecting the quality of living conditions, employment, and health of those inhabiting, working in, or visiting the Project area: Air quality Noise Land use Agriculture Recreation Public services and utilities Hazardous waste and materials Traffic and transportation Visual resources Cultural resources Wildfire and fuels Electrical Effects Socioeconomics Natural Environment—those resources related to all living and non-living things occurring naturally in the Project area: Biological resources (vegetation, wildlife, riparian, and threatened, endangered, and other special-status species) Earth Resources (geology, seismicity, soils, mineralogy, and paleontology) Water resources (hydrology and wetlands) Resources within these two basic environments that may be affected by the Proposed Action or Alternatives were inventoried to describe and establish an environmental baseline against which to measure and evaluate the potential incremental impacts that may be caused by the BRRTP. Methods of inventory varied among the various resources; therefore, the inventory areas and methods are summarized in each resource section. The areas covered by each resource investigation along each of the Alternative routes are described as study corridors. The study corridors identified during the siting and routing evaluation should not be confused with agency planning or designated utility corridors, used by the USFS, BLM, and other federal land management agencies to consolidate utility rights-of-way. In some cases, however, the agency utility corridors and the study corridors do correspond. Detailed inventory results for each resource are contained in the BRRTP Technical Reports in Volumes III (Human Environment) and IV (Natural Environment). The Technical Reports also include detailed text, maps (see Volume V), and data tables identifying the locations of environmental resource features mile by mile and values for each Project component of the action Alternatives, including the assumed centerline of the new 230 kV transmission line. The Regulatory Framework for the Project area, including applicable federal, State, and local laws, ordinances, regulations, and standards, is included in Appendix D of this Draft EIS/EIR. ANA 032-008 (PER-02) LADWP (AUGUST 2011) SB 115245/118927 3-2 BARREN RIDGE RENEWABLE TRANSMISSION PROJECT DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT/ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT CHAPTER 3: ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 3.2 HUMAN ENVIRONMENT 3.2.1 AIR QUALITY Introduction The purpose of the air quality analysis is to evaluate the potential for impacts associated with construction and operation of the Proposed Action, along with each of the proposed transmission line Alternative corridors and proposed new switching station, on the ambient air quality. The air quality analysis shall 1) present the regulatory framework; 2) provide an overview of the technical methodology used in collecting baseline conditions and evaluating impacts; 3) examine the affected environment with respect to air quality; 4) describe the potential impact on air quality from construction and operation of the Proposed Action and Alternatives; 5) evaluate the level of potential impacts on air quality from construction and operation of the Proposed Action and Alternatives; and 6) present specifically recommended mitigation measures, if needed, to reduce potential impacts. Recent regulatory action on both the federal and State level addresses emissions of greenhouse gases and potential global climate change impacts. Under State CEQA guidelines, global climate change is addressed as a cumulative impact. The information and analysis that is presented in this section have been derived from the Barren Ridge Renewable Transmission Project Air Quality Technical Report, contained in Volume III of this Draft EIS/EIR. This report is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. While this section presents a summary of the findings of the Air Quality Technical Report, please refer to that report for more detailed information on the Proposed Action and Alternatives’ effects on air quality and climate change. Overview of Methodology and Analysis Area The BRRTP would fall within portions of two different air basins. These are the Mojave Desert Air Basin (MDAB) and the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB). The MDAB includes the desert portions of Kern, Los Angeles, and San Bernardino Counties and the Palo Verde Valley portion of Riverside County. The SCAB includes the non-desert portions of Los Angeles, San Bernardino and Riverside County, and Orange County. These air basins are further broken down into planning areas by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) based upon various emission problems, political boundaries or watershed boundaries. The EPA is responsible for enforcing the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA) of 1970 and its 1977 and 1990 Amendments. Under the CAA, the EPA established the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS), which identify the emission thresholds for criteria pollutants (see Table 3.2.1-3). Criteria pollutants regulated under these standards include ozone (O3), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), carbon monoxide (CO), respirable particulate matter (PM10), fine particulate matter (PM2.5), and sulfur dioxide (SO2). O3 is not a directly emitted pollutant, but is formed through reactions in the atmosphere between ozone ―precursors‖ (oxides of nitrogen [NOX] and reactive organic gases [ROG]) catalyzed by the effects of sunlight. The EPA classifies areas as ―attainment,‖ ―nonattainment,‖ or ―unclassified‖ depending on whether ambient air quality data collected in the area indicate that the area shows compliance with the NAAQS (attainment), ANA 032-008 (PER-02) LADWP (AUGUST 2011) SB 115245/118927 3-3 BARREN RIDGE RENEWABLE TRANSMISSION PROJECT DRAFT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT/ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT CHAPTER 3: ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING shows noncompliance with the NAAQS (nonattainment), or whether there are insufficient data to make a determination of the area’s classification relative to the NAAQS (unclassified). The EPA has transferred a number of responsibilities to the states and in most cases, regional air quality management districts. The BRRTP area falls within three different regional air districts. The Antelope Valley Portion of Los Angeles County is in the Antelope Valley
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Oreodonts of the Tick Canyon Formation , Southern California
    PALE0B10s Contributions from the University of California Museum of Paleontology, Berkeley No. I June 15, 1967 OREODONTS OF THE TICK CANYON FORMATION , SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA by David P. Whistler OREODONTS OF THE TICK CANYON FORMATION, SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA BY DAVID P. WHISTLER In 1940, Richard H. Jahns reviewed the stratigraphy of the nonmarine Mint Canyon Formation in the eastern part of the Ventura Basin and separated from it a new formation and fauna. Previous to this work, a controversy existed as to the age of the Mint Canyon Formation, for it contained vertebrates considered indicative of both the Miocene and Pliocene (Kew, 1924, Maxson, 1930, and Stirton, 1933). As a partial solut,ion to this controversy, Jahns demonstrated the presence of an erosional unconformity low in the nonmarine sequence which indicated a shift in source area. He redefined the beds below the unconformity as the Tick Canyon Formation (Jahns, 1940, pp. 163-66). Additional fossils discovered in the Tick Canyon Formation since Maxson's work, and certain of the forms described by Maxson, comprise the Tick Canyon fauna. Only two specimens described by Maxson are from the Tick Canyon Formation, UCMP 30046, the type of Miolabis californicus and UCMP 23852, a dentary fragment of a Parahippus. Neither of these permitted a definitive age determination. The additional fauna described by Jahns indicates an Arikareean mammalian age (early Miocene), and there is a noteworthy temporal hiatus between the Tick Canyon fauna and the over­ lying Mint Canyon fauna. In addition, faunas comprising three mammalian ages, late Barstovian, and earlier and late Clarendonian, are now recognized from the Mint Canyon Formation, but this is not the principal concern of this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • ASSESSMENT of COASTAL WATER RESOURCES and WATERSHED CONDITIONS at CHANNEL ISLANDS NATIONAL PARK, CALIFORNIA Dr. Diana L. Engle
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Technical Report NPS/NRWRD/NRTR-2006/354 Water Resources Division Natural Resource Program Centerent of the Interior ASSESSMENT OF COASTAL WATER RESOURCES AND WATERSHED CONDITIONS AT CHANNEL ISLANDS NATIONAL PARK, CALIFORNIA Dr. Diana L. Engle The National Park Service Water Resources Division is responsible for providing water resources management policy and guidelines, planning, technical assistance, training, and operational support to units of the National Park System. Program areas include water rights, water resources planning, marine resource management, regulatory guidance and review, hydrology, water quality, watershed management, watershed studies, and aquatic ecology. Technical Reports The National Park Service disseminates the results of biological, physical, and social research through the Natural Resources Technical Report Series. Natural resources inventories and monitoring activities, scientific literature reviews, bibliographies, and proceedings of technical workshops and conferences are also disseminated through this series. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use by the National Park Service. Copies of this report are available from the following: National Park Service (970) 225-3500 Water Resources Division 1201 Oak Ridge Drive, Suite 250 Fort Collins, CO 80525 National Park Service (303) 969-2130 Technical Information Center Denver Service Center P.O. Box 25287 Denver, CO 80225-0287 Cover photos: Top Left: Santa Cruz, Kristen Keteles Top Right: Brown Pelican, NPS photo Bottom Left: Red Abalone, NPS photo Bottom Left: Santa Rosa, Kristen Keteles Bottom Middle: Anacapa, Kristen Keteles Assessment of Coastal Water Resources and Watershed Conditions at Channel Islands National Park, California Dr. Diana L.
    [Show full text]
  • 1952 Threw Its Entire Resources Into the Bat­ Steep Slopes Above the Meyers Grade
    California Highways and Public Works Public Works Building Official lou'rnal of the Division of Highways, Twelfth and N Streets Department of Public Works, State of California Sacramento FRANK B. DURKEE GEORGE T. McCOY Director State Highway Engineer KENNETH C. ADAMS, Editor HELEN HALSTED, Associote Editor Published in the interest of highway development in Cali. fornia. Editors of newspopers and others are privileged to use matter contained herein. Cuts will be gladly loaned upon request. Address Communications to CALIFORNIA HIGHWAYS AND PUBLIC WORKS P. O. Box 1499 Sacramento, California Vol. 31 January-February Nos. 1,2 Page Typical Snow Battle Scene on U. S. 40 During Recent Record Storm. Photo by John Shaver, Photographic Section, M. R. Nickerson, ChieL Cover Epic Battle, II lustrated___________ _ _ By N. R. Bangert, Assistont Maintenance Engineer Man vs. Snow, Illustrated _ 8 By Art Hoppe, San Francisco Chronicle Sierra Crews Fight Drifts, Illustrated _ 11 By Jack Welter, San Froncisco Examiner Christm as Gift, Illustrated _ 13 By R. C. Kennedy, Secretary, California Highway Commission Ramona Freeway, III ustrated _ 17 By B. N. Frykland, Resident Engineer Santa Ana Freeway, Illustrated _ 20 By W. L. Fahey, District Engineer Ridge Route, lIIustrated____ _ _ 25 By C. P. Montgomery, District Construction Engineer U. S. 99 Job, II Iustrated _ 29 By W. M. Nett, Resident Engineer New State Highway Through Placerville, Illustrated _ 32 By Jerome F. Lipp, Right of Way Agent Bay Bridge Refi nancing 35 Street Sweepers, II lustrated__ 36 By Norman H. Heggie, Assistont Physical Testing Engineer New Index, 11,1 ustrated_______________ _ _ 40 By Richard H.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.3 Cultural Resources
    4.3 CULTURAL RESOURCES INTRODUCTION W & S Consultants, (W&S) conducted an archaeological survey of the project site that included an archival record search conducted at the local California Historic Resource Information System (CHRIS) repository at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) located on the campus of California State University, Fullerton. In July 2010, a field survey of the 1.2-mile proposed project site was conducted. The archaeological survey report can be found in Appendix 4.3. Mitigation measures are recommended which would reduce potential impacts to unknown archeological resources within the project site, potential impacts to paleontological resources, and the discovery of human remains during construction to less than significant. PROJECT BACKGROUND Ethnographic Setting Tataviam The upper Santa Clara Valley region, including the study area, was inhabited during the ethnographic past by an ethnolinguistic group known as the Tataviam.1 Their language represents a member of the Takic branch of the Uto-Aztecan linguistic family.2 In this sense, it was related to other Takic languages in the Los Angeles County region, such as Gabrielino/Fernandeño (Tongva) of the Los Angeles Basin proper, and Kitanemuk of the Antelope Valley. The Tataviam are thought to have inhabited the upper Santa Clara River drainage from about Piru eastwards to just beyond the Vasquez Rocks/Agua Dulce area; southwards as far as Newhall and the crests of the San Gabriel and Santa Susana Mountains; and northwards to include the middle reaches of Piru Creek, the Liebre Mountains, and the southwesternmost fringe of Antelope Valley.3 Their northern boundary most likely ran along the northern foothills of the Liebre Mountains (i.e., the edge of Antelope Valley), and then crossed to the southern slopes of the Sawmill Mountains and Sierra Pelona, extending 1 NEA, and King, Chester.
    [Show full text]
  • Barren Ridge FEIS-Volume IV Paleo Tech Rpt Final March
    March 2011 BARREN RIDGE RENEWABLE TRANSMISSION PROJECT Paleontological Resources Assessment Report PROJECT NUMBER: 115244 PROJECT CONTACT: MIKE STRAND EMAIL: [email protected] PHONE: 714-507-2710 POWER ENGINEERS, INC. PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT REPORT Paleontological Resources Assessment Report PREPARED FOR: LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF WATER AND POWER 111 NORTH HOPE STREET LOS ANGELES, CA 90012 PREPARED BY: POWER ENGINEERS, INC. 731 EAST BALL ROAD, SUITE 100 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 DEPARTMENT OF PALEOSERVICES SAN DIEGO NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM PO BOX 121390 SAN DIEGO, CA 92112 ANA 032-030 (PER-02) LADWP (MARCH 2011) SB 115244 POWER ENGINEERS, INC. PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 STUDY PERSONNEL ....................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................. 2 1.2.1 Construction of New 230 kV Double-Circuit Transmission Line ........................................ 4 1.2.2 Addition of New 230 kV Circuit ......................................................................................... 14 1.2.3 Reconductoring of Existing Transmission Line .................................................................. 14 1.2.4 Construction of New Switching Station .............................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 5. Environmental Analysis
    5. Environmental Analysis 5.1 CULTURAL RESOURCES Cultural resources include places, object, structures, and settlements that reflect group or individual religious, archaeological, architectural, or paleontological activities, or are considered important for their architectural or historical value. Such resources provide information on scientific progress, environmental adaptations, group ideology, or other human advancements. This section of the Draft Environmental Impact Report (DEIR) evaluates the potential for implementation of the San Marino High School Michael White Adobe project to impact cultural resources in the City of San Marino. The analysis in this section is based, in part, upon the following information: • Michael White Adobe Historic Resources Technical Report, Chattel Architecture, Planning, and Preservation, August 4, 2009. This study is included in Appendix D of this Draft EIR. 5.1.1 Regulatory Background National Historic Preservation Act Section 106 (Protection of Historic Properties) of the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 (NHPA) requires federal agencies to take into account the effects of their undertakings on historic properties. Section 106 Review refers to the federal review process designed to ensure that historic properties are considered during federal project planning and implementation. The Advisory Council on Historic Preservation, an independent federal agency, administers the review process, with assistance from State Historic Preservation Offices. National Register of Historic Resources (National Register) The National Register is the nation’s official list of historic and cultural resources worthy of preservation. Authorized under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, the National Register is part of a national program to coordinate and support public and private efforts to identify, evaluate, and protect the country’s historic and archaeological resources.
    [Show full text]
  • GEOLOGY of the TICK CANYON AREA May 23, 1952
    GEOLOGY OF THE TICK CANYON AREA J. Richard Woodcock California Institute of ·rechnology May 23, 1952 Table of Cantents. Abstract •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 1 Introdttction . • . • . • . • • . • • . • . • . • • • . • . • • • . • . • • • • • • • • . • • • • • . • • • • • • • L. Aknowledgm.ents • • •• • • • ••••••••••• • •• e ••••••••••••••• • •••••••• • ••••••• • • 5 General Geography••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 6 Statigraphy and Lithology ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 8 Basement Complex •••••••••••••·••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••· 9 Vasq.uez FO:rmation • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • • 9 General (Vasquez Formation) ...................................... 19 Tick Canyon Formation .............•.....•..••.•..•............•.. 19 Mint Canyon Formation ............................................ 20 Whonoz Formation ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 20 General (Tick Canyon and Mint Canyon Formations) ................. 21 Structure ............................................................. 22 Geomorphology••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••·•••••••••••••••••••••• 2L Drainage • . • • • • • • • • • • . • • • . • • • • • • . • • • . • • • • • • . • • . • • . • • . • • • • • • • • • • • 2 h Relief ........................................................... 24 Geologic History •••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• 26 Illustrations: Figure: 1. Index l~p •••••••••••••••·•••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••
    [Show full text]
  • 16. Watershed Assets Assessment Report
    16. Watershed Assets Assessment Report Jingfen Sheng John P. Wilson Acknowledgements: Financial support for this work was provided by the San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy and the County of Los Angeles, as part of the “Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California” Project. The authors thank Jennifer Wolch for her comments and edits on this report. The authors would also like to thank Frank Simpson for his input on this report. Prepared for: San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy 900 South Fremont Avenue, Alhambra, California 91802-1460 Photography: Cover, left to right: Arroyo Simi within the city of Moorpark (Jaime Sayre/Jingfen Sheng); eastern Calleguas Creek Watershed tributaries, classifi ed by Strahler stream order (Jingfen Sheng); Morris Dam (Jaime Sayre/Jingfen Sheng). All in-text photos are credited to Jaime Sayre/ Jingfen Sheng, with the exceptions of Photo 4.6 (http://www.you-are- here.com/location/la_river.html) and Photo 4.7 (digital-library.csun.edu/ cdm4/browse.php?...). Preferred Citation: Sheng, J. and Wilson, J.P. 2008. The Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California. 16. Watershed Assets Assessment Report. University of Southern California GIS Research Laboratory and Center for Sustainable Cities, Los Angeles, California. This report was printed on recycled paper. The mission of the Green Visions Plan for 21st Century Southern California is to offer a guide to habitat conservation, watershed health and recreational open space for the Los Angeles metropolitan region. The Plan will also provide decision support tools to nurture a living green matrix for southern California.
    [Show full text]
  • Sespe Creek Comprehensive Wild and Scenic River Management Plan, Los Padres National Forest
    Comprehensive River United States Department of Management Plan Agriculture Forest Service Sespe Creek Pacific Southwest Region R5-MB-038 Los Padres National Forest November 2003 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Description of River Setting and Resource Values .................................................................................... 4 Regional River Setting ............................................................................................................................ 4 Free-flowing values and impacts ............................................................................................................. 4 Outstandingly
    [Show full text]
  • Ventura County Plant Species of Local Concern
    Checklist of Ventura County Rare Plants (Twenty-second Edition) CNPS, Rare Plant Program David L. Magney Checklist of Ventura County Rare Plants1 By David L. Magney California Native Plant Society, Rare Plant Program, Locally Rare Project Updated 4 January 2017 Ventura County is located in southern California, USA, along the east edge of the Pacific Ocean. The coastal portion occurs along the south and southwestern quarter of the County. Ventura County is bounded by Santa Barbara County on the west, Kern County on the north, Los Angeles County on the east, and the Pacific Ocean generally on the south (Figure 1, General Location Map of Ventura County). Ventura County extends north to 34.9014ºN latitude at the northwest corner of the County. The County extends westward at Rincon Creek to 119.47991ºW longitude, and eastward to 118.63233ºW longitude at the west end of the San Fernando Valley just north of Chatsworth Reservoir. The mainland portion of the County reaches southward to 34.04567ºN latitude between Solromar and Sequit Point west of Malibu. When including Anacapa and San Nicolas Islands, the southernmost extent of the County occurs at 33.21ºN latitude and the westernmost extent at 119.58ºW longitude, on the south side and west sides of San Nicolas Island, respectively. Ventura County occupies 480,996 hectares [ha] (1,188,562 acres [ac]) or 4,810 square kilometers [sq. km] (1,857 sq. miles [mi]), which includes Anacapa and San Nicolas Islands. The mainland portion of the county is 474,852 ha (1,173,380 ac), or 4,748 sq.
    [Show full text]
  • Rim of the Valley Corridor Special Resource Study U.S
    National Park Service Rim of the Valley Corridor Special Resource Study U.S. Department of the Interior Rim of the Valley Corridor Special Resource Study Newsletter #4 • Spring 2015 Oat Mountain area in the Santa Susana Mountains. Photo: Steve Matsuda. See Page 2 for Draft Special Resource Study & Environmental Public Meeting Assessment Report Available for Review Schedule! Dear Friends, About the National Park Service The National Park Service preserves It is with great pleasure that the National Park Service (NPS) offers the Rim of unimpaired the natural and cultural the Valley Draft Special Resource Study and Environmental Assessment to you resources and values of the national park system for the enjoyment, for review and comment. This newsletter contains the executive summary of education, and inspiration of this and the draft study report and information about how to submit comments and future generations. The NPS cooperates with partners to extend the benefits participate in public meetings to learn more about the draft study report. of natural and cultural resource conservation and outdoor recreation The NPS initiated this special resource study in 2010 and published preliminary throughout this country and the world. management alternatives in late 2012. This study report reflects your initial involvement and input into the planning process. The study alternatives and Newsletter Contents their concepts reflect your concerns and ideas. How to Obtain a Copy of the Draft Report ......................... 2 The full draft report is posted on the study website at: http://www.nps.gov/ How to Provide Comments ............. 2 pwro/rimofthevalley, and limited printed copies are available from the National Public Meeting Schedule ................
    [Show full text]
  • To Oral History
    100 E. Main St. [email protected] Ventura, CA 93001 (805) 653-0323 x 320 QUARTERLY JOURNAL SUBJECT INDEX About the Index The index to Quarterly subjects represents journals published from 1955 to 2000. Fully capitalized access terms are from Library of Congress Subject Headings. For further information, contact the Librarian. Subject to availability, some back issues of the Quarterly may be ordered by contacting the Museum Store: 805-653-0323 x 316. A AB 218 (Assembly Bill 218), 17/3:1-29, 21 ill.; 30/4:8 AB 442 (Assembly Bill 442), 17/1:2-15 Abadie, (Señor) Domingo, 1/4:3, 8n3; 17/2:ABA Abadie, William, 17/2:ABA Abbott, Perry, 8/2:23 Abella, (Fray) Ramon, 22/2:7 Ablett, Charles E., 10/3:4; 25/1:5 Absco see RAILROADS, Stations Abplanalp, Edward "Ed," 4/2:17; 23/4:49 ill. Abraham, J., 23/4:13 Abu, 10/1:21-23, 24; 26/2:21 Adams, (rented from Juan Camarillo, 1911), 14/1:48 Adams, (Dr.), 4/3:17, 19 Adams, Alpha, 4/1:12, 13 ph. Adams, Asa, 21/3:49; 21/4:2 map Adams, (Mrs.) Asa (Siren), 21/3:49 Adams Canyon, 1/3:16, 5/3:11, 18-20; 17/2:ADA Adams, Eber, 21/3:49 Adams, (Mrs.) Eber (Freelove), 21/3:49 Adams, George F., 9/4:13, 14 Adams, J. H., 4/3:9, 11 Adams, Joachim, 26/1:13 Adams, (Mrs.) Mable Langevin, 14/1:1, 4 ph., 5 Adams, Olen, 29/3:25 Adams, W. G., 22/3:24 Adams, (Mrs.) W.
    [Show full text]